Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Apr 30;16(4):e0250694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250694

Factors affecting utilization of mental health services from Primary Health Care (PHC) facilities of western hilly district of Nepal

Gaurav Devkota 1,*, Puspa Basnet 1, Bijay Thapa 1, Madhusudan Subedi 1
Editor: Pranil Man Singh Pradhan2
PMCID: PMC8087454  PMID: 33930894

Abstract

Aim

To explore the factors affecting mental health service utilization from Primary Health Care facilities of Arghakhanchi district, a western hilly district of Nepal.

Background

Mental health service utilization has many facilitating and hindering factors present at different socio-ecological levels. Stigma and lack of awareness in the community have been identified as the major barriers for mental health service demand and access worldwide.

Methods

A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted in Arghakhanchi district of Nepal in July-August 2019 that collected information through face-to-face In-depth and Key Informant Interviews of three categories of participants selected judgmentally. Thirty-two purposively selected participants from the three categories were interviewed using validated interview guidelines. Thematic analysis was performed using RQDA package for EZR software. Validation of translated transcripts, member checking and inter-coder percent agreement were performed to maintain rigor in the study.

Results

Mental health stigma and inadequate awareness were identified as major factors that caused barriers for mental health service utilization at community level. They also influenced different factors at other socio-ecological levels to act as barriers. Awareness in community along with accessibility and availability of comprehensive mental health services were recommended by the participants for increasing service utilization from Primary Health Care facilities.

Conclusion

Individual, family and community awareness could help reduce and/or eliminate mental health stigma. Accessibility of health facilities and availability of comprehensive mental health services in Primary Health Care facilities could help increase service utilization from those facilities.

Introduction

Inadequate mental health service utilization is a major factor among the many obstacles encountered in the control and management of mental illnesses. An estimated 300 million people are affected by depression, 60 million people by bipolar affective disorder, 23 million by schizophrenia and 50 million people by dementia worldwide [1]. National Mental Health Survey of Nepal, 2020 has identified prevalence of any mental disorder among adolescents aged 13 to 17 years as 5.2% (95% Confidence Interval: 4.2–6.4) and lifetime prevalence among adults as 10.0% (95% Confidence Interval: 8.5–11.8) and current prevalence as 4.3 (95% Confidence Interval: 3.5–5.2) [2, 3]. Mental, Neurological and Substance use (MNS) disorders is a term used by World Health Organization to incorporate mental, neurological, and substance use disorders in a single term which are often otherwise separated into treatment silos such as neurology, psychiatry, psychology, substance use, etc. in developed countries. Of all the people suffering from Mental, Neurological and Substance use (MNS) disorders, the proportion that had not received any treatment and care in past 12 month was of significant concern, being 35–50% in developed countries and 76–85% in less developed countries [4]. High treatment gap for mental illnesses has been identified from National Mental Health Survey of India (2015–2016) [5] and National Mental Health Survey of Nepal (2020) as well [3].

Stigma has been identified as a major barrier for mental health service demand worldwide [6]. Stigma can be defined as “a process involving labeling, separation, stereotype awareness, stereotype endorsement, prejudice and discrimination in a context in which social, economic or political power is exercised to the detriment of members of a social group” and can be of different types such as anticipated stigma, experienced stigma, internalized stigma, perceived stigma, stigma endorsement and treatment stigma [7]. Stigma and discrimination in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) leading to pervasive human rights violations against people with mental and psychosocial disabilities act as barriers to mental health service usage [8].

Studies in Nepal have identified lack of awareness of mental health problem as major problem, mental health stigma and certain cultural norms as major barriers for accessing mental health services [9]. In addition, lacking financial means, fear of being perceived as weak, fear of being perceived as crazy and being too unwell to ask for help have also been identified as barriers to accessing mental health care [10]. Inadequate health literacy is also pivotal determinant for hindering access and engagement with health services as well as making and enacting health decisions [11]. Lack of availability of mental health services and senior staffs such as Senior Community Medicine Assistant, insufficient trained health workers, and mistreatment within health centers of rural areas have been identified as factors that influenced demand and access of mental health services at health facility level [9]. In addition, inaccessible mental health services, limited authority for prescription of psychotropic drugs, and knowledge and skill gaps of Primary Health Care (PHC) health workers on mental health have caused barriers in integration of mental health service as routine PHC care [12].

Strategies identified to increase the demand for mental health services include channeling mental health education through trusted and respected community figures, responding to the need for openness or privacy in educational programs, and adapting to local perceptions of stigmatized treatments [9]. In addition, developing patient support group for collective organization and advocacy and a focal community resource person to aid in mental health service delivery and education; upgrading skills and knowledge of health workers through mhGAP resources (operations manual, training manual and intervention guide); and using mobile technology to deliver effective mental health services have been identified to improve mental health service utilization [12].

Non-reduction of treatment gap has implications beyond impact on national burden of diseases (Years Lived with Disability and Disability Adjusted Life Years), such as increasing indirect economic costs (owing to absenteeism and lost productivity at work) [13], impairing family function [14], and increasing the risk of teenage childbearing [15] and domestic violence [16]. Many socio-cultural and psychosocial barriers in demand for mental health care services as well as pragmatic and health system functioning barriers along with difficulties in accessing health care has widened the treatment gap of mental illnesses at PHC facilities. Therefore, in order to bridge treatment gap and shorten the treatment lag, it is essential to determine and pinpoint factors affecting mental health service utilization.

Many available works of literature on factors affecting mental health service utilization in Nepal focused on one or some of the socio-ecological levels. A qualitative formative study done to identify barriers and potential solutions for reaching people with priority mental illnesses identified barriers at community and health facility level [9], whereas another formative qualitative study exploring resources, challenges and potential barriers to develop primary care and community-based mental health services identified barriers at policy, health facility and community level [12]. Hence, this study was conducted in order to explore factors from all the socio-ecological levels that affect utilization of mental health services in Arghakhanchi district, a western hilly district of Nepal. The study was based on the socio-ecological model proposed by Urie Bronfenbrenner [17] that includes following five levels:

  1. individual level that includes characteristics that influences behavior such as knowledge, attitude and skill

  2. interpersonal level that includes social networks like partners, friends and families

  3. organizational level that includes formal and informal structures, environment and ethos

  4. community level that includes established cultural norms and values

  5. policy level that includes national and local policies.

Materials and methods

Study design

The study was a cross-sectional exploratory qualitative study grounded in socio-ecological model that used an emic perspective for data collection and analysis. The study consisted of 16 In-Depth Interviews (IDIs) and 16 Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) conducted between July-August 2019. IDIs and KIIs were conducted in order to explore the knowledge, perception, and experiences of community on factors affecting utilization of mental health services from PHC facilities. In addition, recommendations for improving mental health service utilization from the PHC facilities in the district were explored.

Operational definitions

In order to guide the selection of participants as well as to ease the conduction of the study, operational definitions were provided for the following terms before the start of information collection.

  1. Primary Health Care Facilities: Public health care facilities, under local government and below District Hospital level, providing regular health care services. Primary Health Care Centers (PHCCs), Health Posts (HPs), Urban Health Clinics (UHCs) and Community Health Units (CHUs) were the PHC facilities visited.

  2. People with mental illnesses: Patients under psychiatric medications for mental illnesses from any health facilities, whose identity were informed by Female Community Health Volunteers (FCHVs), PHC health workers or secondary health service providers.

  3. Primary caretaker: Relatives of people with mental illnesses who have been continuously taking care of the patient from onset of the disease. Spouses in case of married, parents in case of children, in-laws, and siblings were interviewed.

  4. Service providers: Health workforce who provided health services from the PHC facilities. Doctor, Nurse, Health Assistants (HA), Auxiliary Health Workers (AHW) and Auxiliary Nurse Midwife (ANM) were selected as they provided mental health services to the patients.

  5. Health Administrators: Health coordinators of the municipalities and the head of Health Office in the district were termed as health administrators.

  6. Elected Representatives: Mayors of municipalities and heads of rural municipalities who were elected for the positions after the local election held in Nepal in 2017.

Setting

The study was conducted in Arghakhanchi district, a western hilly district of Nepal. The district not being selected in National Mental Health Survey as well as researchers’ familiarity with the use of idioms and metaphors of the district influenced selection of the district as study site. Nearly 68% of the district lies in the mountainous Mahabharat Range and the rest lies in the Siwalik Hills. The district is surrounded by Palpa district in the east, Gulmi district in the north, Kapilvastu district in the south and Pyuthan district in the west. Population of Arghakhanchi district as per Census 2011 was 197,632 with 56% female, 49% under 20 years of age, life expectancy of 68.8 years, per capita income of 909 USD, 97% speaking Nepali, 51% of Brahmin-Chhetri, 28.8% poor, 73% able to read and write, and 2.6% with disability [18]. The major mental illnesses prevalent in the district are depression, psychosis, anxiety (neurosis), conversive disorder, alcoholism, epilepsy and mental retardation [19]. There were 46 Primary Health Care facilities in the district at the start of the study period [20]. Psychological counseling and referral services for people with mental illnesses were provided based on the Basic Health Service Package of Nepal, 2075 from those PHC facilities [21]. These services were provided regardless of the training and supervision the health care service providers had or did not have.

Sampling procedure and sample size

For the purpose of the study, two rural municipalities (coded RM1 and RM2) among three rural municipalities and two municipalities (coded M1 and M2) among three municipalities within the district were selected conveniently as study sites (S1 Table). Judgmental sampling [22] was done to select three categories of participants (people with mental illnesses and/or their caretakers, PHC service providers and elected representatives/health administrators). Identity of people with mental illnesses was collected with the assistance of PHC health workers, FCHVs, or secondary service providers. Accordingly, people with mental illnesses or their primary caretakers were recruited for IDIs purposively. Primary health care service providers and Health Administrators/Elected representatives were selected purposively. At the health facility level, two Health Posts and one Community Health Unit from RM1, one Health Post from RM2, one Health Post and one Urban Health Center from M1 and one PHCC from M2 were selected purposively in order to interview health care service providers. Health administrators and elected representatives of the conveniently selected rural municipalities and municipalities were interviewed. Thus, representation of both municipalities and all the level of PHC facilities were maintained.

Twelve primary caretakers and four people with mental illnesses, eight primary health care service providers and eight health administrators/elected representatives were interviewed and information saturation was maintained. Total number of interviews (32) was deemed to be sufficient for the objective of the study at the end of data collection. The study excluded eligible participants who did not provide consent, were unable to speak, were less than 18 years of age, or were seriously ill or with known severe illness.

Data collection tools and processes

Socio-demographic characteristics of participants from all the categories were collected using an open-ended proforma. Interview Guide Approach [23] was used for face-to-face interviews that was audio-recorded. Face and content validity of the Interview Guidelines was maintained through repeated discussions with qualitative research experts, faculties of School of Public Health, psychiatrists of Patan Academy of Health Sciences and mental health research experts. Written consent was obtained from selected participants prior to information collection. Anonymity was maintained by providing codes to the interviewees and confidentiality was maintained by storing the interviews in a password-protected folder in a password-protected laptop. Ideas and knowledge obtained from the informal talks between researcher and community people as well as feelings and experiences the researcher had during the stay within the study district were recorded in a notebook. It helped to enhance the analysis process, which in turn, contributed to the quality of research findings.

For interviewing the health care service providers and health administrators/elected representatives, researcher went to their respective workplace in most of the cases. In some cases, health care service providers and health administrators/elected representatives were met in places where they felt comfortable to provide interview. Majority of interviews of caretakers were conducted at their homes. Some interviews of caretakers and all interviews of patients were conducted in the private clinic that they visited for treatment/follow-up. Interviews of people with mental illnesses were conducted in the clinic with psychiatrist being available in next room to assist during the interview, if required. However, all the interviews were conducted smoothly and did not require involvement of the psychiatrist.

Ethical consideration

Approval for the study was obtained from the Institution Review Committee (IRC) of Patan Academy of Health Sciences (PAHS) [Ref: PHP1906141257.amend1]. Authorities of the selected municipalities in the district were well explained about the objectives of the study and written consent for conduction of the study was obtained. Informed consent form was designed in Nepali language and written consent was obtained from all participants prior to interview. The decision for participation in study was voluntary without any compensation for the time provided. Participants were informed about their right to withdraw from the study at any time without giving any justification. Collected audios and translated documents were maintained with high privacy by the researcher. All the interviews of the participants were provided with interview codes during the translation of the interviews.

During the conduction of interviews with the primary caretakers of people with mental illnesses at their home or in the clinic, there was a tendency of the community people to be present during the interviews. In some cases, the researcher requested community people to provide privacy, which they obeyed. For rest of the cases and in case of interviews conducted in the clinic, the researcher took verbal consent from the interviewee when it was difficult to maintain privacy until a separate room was available. When a separate room was available, the interviews were conducted in that vary room.

Some of the participants who were selected for interviews were unable to read and write. In such cases, witnesses who could read and write were asked to read the consent in front of the participants and provide their signature on the consent form. Then, participants were asked for their consent and thumbprints were taken if they provided consent for the interview.

Data analysis

The recorded interviews were directly translated into English as the researchers had same mother tongue in which the interviews were recorded. The process of direct translation provided time-efficiency. Another researcher, who was not involved in translation, performed verification of all the translated documents. The verified translated transcripts were imported to RQDA package [24] for EZR and were open coded manually after many readings and familiarization with the text. Thematic analysis with interpretivist approach [23] using socio-ecological lens was performed based on participants’ knowledge, feelings, experiences and expectations as authentic source of information. Thematic analysis was based on the six-phase framework provided by Braun and Clarke moving forward and back between those phases [25]. Different codes that had connections were collected under predetermined broad themes, i.e., different levels of socio-ecological model.

Member checking has been identified to provide confirmability and credibility to the qualitative analysis [23]. In case of this study, member checking of the results was done by providing the results to some of the interviewed participants selected conveniently, who showed agreement on the results presented. In addition, two coders independently coded the interviews with the themes fixed a priori and no codes from the principal investigator were rejected. These codes were then validated by a qualitative research expert who also calculated the inter-coder reliability which showed an average positive percent agreement of 70.59%. Positive percent agreement was performed as there were only two coders and all the codes of Coder 2 matched with the codes of Coder 1 (Table 1).

Table 1. Inter-coder positive percent agreement.

S.N. Themes Coder 2 Coder 1 Percentage Agreement
1. Individual level factors affecting mental health service utilization 7 11 63.64%
2. Interpersonal level factors affecting mental health service utilization 4 6 66.67%
3. Organizational level factors affecting mental health service utilization 4 7 57.14%
4. Community level factors affecting mental health service utilization 6 7 85.71%
5. Policy level factors affecting mental health service utilization 3 3 100%
Total 24 34 70.59%

Results

Socio-demographics of the participants who provided interviews from categories health administrators/elected representatives, health care service providers and people with mental illnesses were collected whereas socio-demographics of the people with mental illnesses were collected when interviews were conducted with their primary caretakers. Socio-demographics of the participants have been depicted in Table 2 below.

Table 2. Socio-demographics of the participants.

S.N. Socio-demographics* Frequency
1 Age  
  0–14 years 1
  15–59 years 29
  60 years and above 2
2 Sex  
  Male 17
  Female 15
3 Permanent address  
  Rural Municipality 14
  Urban Municipality 18
4 Ethnicity  
  Brahmin 18
  Chhetri 6
  Janajati 2
  Dalit 6
5 Religion  
  Hindu 31
  Christian 1
6 Marital status  
  Unmarried 3
  Married 26
  Widowed 3
7 Education status  
  None 6
  Informal 1
  Formal 25
Total 32

* Socio-demographics recorded were of patients when the interviews were conducted with their caretakers

Major findings of the study are presented in different pre-determined themes (Fig 1). The findings are followed by italicized texts which are the actual statements provided by the participants.

Fig 1. Thematic analysis (factors affecting mental health service utilization).

Fig 1

Factors affecting mental health service utilization

Individual level

Female sex, low economic status and lack of education were reported as factors hindering mental health service utilization.

Additionally, if the patient is married female, then her family, relatives along with her husband could dominate the conditions of divorce or damage of family life could also happen. (Service Provider, 35 years, Female, Chhetri, Married)

If there are small health problems then they provide medicines from within the Health Post, but if there are some bigger health problems then they prescribe medicines from medicals saying there are no medicines in the Health Post for that disease. People having money can buy those medicines but those who are poor cannot and have to die in vain. (Caretaker of 40 years old married Dalit female)

If the member is from an educated family, then they come themselves and ask about it otherwise they are not encouraged to take services. In contrast, they seek care from the “Dhami/Jhakkri” rather than coming to us. (Service Provider, 25 years, Male, Brahmin, Unmarried)

Household works also acted as barrier for mental health service utilization as caretakers had to provide time for taking care of children and/or livestock.

I may not have visited PHC facilities because I am busy in my work. Even a married couple finds it hard to rear their child properly, I am alone, I should provide time to household works hence it is hard for me to provide time to take my sister to PHCC, HP or UHC. (Caretaker of 36 years old widowed Chhetri female)

Inadequate knowledge and information among service users about availability of mental health services at PHC facilities acted as barrier. In addition, knowledge about availability of mental health specialists in different private clinics and hospitals also reduced service utilization from PHC facilities.

We did not know whether mental health services were provided by PHCC or not. (Caretaker of 45 years old married Dalit female)

Participants responded that not sharing of signs and symptoms by the patients and feeling shy to speak-up as barriers for mental health service utilization. However, people with mental illnesses who were able to identify their signs and symptoms and knew about the consequences of not treating the illness utilized mental health services.

People with mental illnesses limit themselves to house and do not share their symptoms to anyone and thus they increase severity of the disease. (Health Administrator, 50 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

Those who understand about the illness visit health facility thinking that they will be cured after treatments and some talk about symptoms of mental illness when they visit for check-up of other diseases. (Service Provider, 40 years, Female, Chhetri, Married)

Ignorance and non-acceptance of the disease by people with mental illnesses due to fear of society and hiding the disease (self-stigmatization) were also identified as barriers for mental health service utilization.

She used to refuse to go to the hospital saying she would be fine by herself. (Caretaker of 40 years old married Dalit female)

Next is ignorance from the patient self, they cannot accept themselves as having mental illness thinking what would people think of me, they will think that I am crazy, how would doctor treat me knowing my illness etc. (Health Administrator, 34 years, Female, Janajati, Married)

I do not know why we did not take him for treatment…. One thing is that he used to say he has no illness… (Caretaker of 34 years old married Brahmin male)

Unstable mental state of the patients was also identified as barriers for service utilization because in such state it was either difficult to take them to health facilities or they would change their mind anytime.

Mostly she used to reject to go to hospital for treatment. Sometimes she used to get ready to go and then suddenly used to change her decision. (Caretaker of 40 years old married Dalit female)

People preferred health facilities where they had treated similar mental illnesses previously rather than visiting PHC facilities. Negative perception regarding treatment of mental illnesses available at PHC facilities also hindered mental health service utilization.

As the symptoms were similar to that of my mother-in-law’s we knew that it was mental illness and thus did not take my daughter to public health facilities of our rural municipality. (Caretaker of 3.5 years old Dalit female child)

It is because there are not good doctors at public health facilities and the medicines are not available there. After all public is public. (Patient, 41 years, Male, Chhetri, Married)

This clinic is nearer to us, also is Health Post, but at Health Post they provide opposite medicines, they only listen and provide medicines as per their wish. (Patient, 36 years, Female, Dalit, Married)

Interpersonal level

Inability of family members and neighbors to identify mental illnesses at early stages acted as barrier for service utilization. Only after the disease is severe would they identify the disease and prefer mental health service utilization. People with more authority within house or in the neighborhood were identified as factors that would affect mental health service utilization from PHC facilities.

The only thing that affected was we could not understand early that she was mentally ill. (Caretaker of 36 years old widowed Chhetri female)

…family members think that mentally ill person has no illness, is acting in order not to do works… (Service Provider, 40 years, Female, Chhetri, Married)

My husband used to say that there is no benefit taking her to Health Post… (Caretaker of 16 years old unmarried Dalit female)

To receive any services, not only mental health related, they first wait for their family decision and do what family decide to do at first. (Service Provider, 42 years, Female, Brahmin, Married)

People had inadequate knowledge about different modalities of treatment for mental illnesses and thought medicines as the only means of treatment thereby not preferring PHC facilities. Therefore, inadequate mental health literacy in family members and neighbors was identified as one of the barriers for mental health service utilization.

…there is belief in people that medicines must be prescribed when they go for check-ups and since medicines are not provided from primary health care facilities thus it has acted as barrier. (Health Administrator, 40 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

Communicating the outcome of treatment acted as both facilitator and barrier for service utilization. When the outcome was good, communication acted as facilitator and when the outcome was bad, it acted as barrier for mental health service utilization.

My sister nowadays gives suggestions to other people about mental illness and its treatment. If she identifies any similarity as her symptoms in someone, she suggests meeting her doctor for treatment. (Caretaker of 36 years old widowed Chhetri female)

Presence or absence of trust between mental health service provider and user were also identified as factor that affected mental health service utilization.

I had done an insurance Sir, so they sent us to Dhorbas, Palpa. At Dhorbas there will be different doctor and the doctor will examine in their own way, and as the medicines she was taking were doing her good, I feared that the disease may return if the medicines are changed at Dhorbas, so I did not take her there. (Caretaker of 40 years old married Dalit female)

As I am from same local community, they (people with mental illnesses) easily share the problems they face. (Service Provider, 35 years, Female, Chhetri, Married)

Navigators like teachers, neighbors and people in the community who provide ideas on places for treatment of mental illnesses were identified both as facilitator and as barrier for mental health service utilization from PHC facilities.

Community leaders like teachers also help by providing suggestions for treatment in health facility. (Service Provider, 35 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

There was no one suggesting that the treatment and cure of mental illness could be at Health Posts, so we took her to Bhairahawa as people said that cure was possible at Bhairahawa. (Caretaker of 38 years old widowed Brahmin female)

There are some relatives working in health posts who said that they do not provide medicines for mental illnesses from health post, so I never went there for treatment. (Patient, 66 years, Female, Brahmin, Widow)

Support from family members, close acquaintances and neighbors by providing information, helping to reach health facility and access health services was identified as facilitator for mental health service utilization whereas neglect and lack of love from family and friends were identified as barriers for mental health service utilization.

Support was from my brothers, no one else provided any support. Either her father or my brother has provided support; others have not provided support. (Caretaker of 16 years old unmarried Dalit female)

Many people in this community keep their family members suffering from mental illnesses at home tying and not bringing them to health facilities for treatment. (Service Provider, 35 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

Hindrance was from my family as my in-laws were uneducated so they used to say not to take medicines, as it would make body stink and there were no one in the village to provide help. (Caretaker of 40 years old married Brahmin male)

Organizational level

Unavailability of comprehensive mental health services from the PHC facilities acted as barrier for mental health service utilization. However, counseling and suggestions by health care service providers regarding mental illnesses at health facilities or during fieldwork acted as facilitators for mental health service utilization.

Public health facilities in this municipality do not provide medicines. There are no medicines for mental illness. (Caretaker of 50 years old married Janajati female)

If the medicines were provided at Health Post, then we need not come here [private clinic]. They do not provide medicines at Health Post so we come here. They provide 2 to 4 medicines for simple diseases but not of mental illness. (Patient, 66 years, Female, Brahmin, Widow)

Field visit by the health workers, counseling about their mental health problems during their visits at the health facility also motivate them and so they keep coming to take the health services in the municipality. (Health Administrator, 47 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

Commercialization of health care services, practice of prescribing psychotropic medicines in different private health facilities and clinics, and practice of referral of people with mental illnesses from PHC facilities to urban cities acted as barriers for utilization of mental health care services from PHC facilities. The presence of commercialization of mental health services in the district and referral to urban private health centers was also acknowledged by elected representatives and health administrator of the district.

There is somewhat commercialization [of mental health services] in this rural municipality. (Elected Representative, 64 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

We have also seen many women visiting Palpa for medication of mental illness, may be due to practice of prescribing medicines for mental illness there. (Health Administrator, 50 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

Location of PHC facilities also affected mental health service utilization. Participants responded that PHC facilities being far as barrier for service utilization. In addition, enrolling in health insurance made service users travel distant places in cases of referral thereby increasing their out-of-pocket expenses, and thus leading to lower service utilization from PHC facilities.

We do not go to public health facilities as they are far from here. (Caretaker of 31 years old married Chhetri male)

…if anyone is enrolled in the insurance and is referred to other centers for treatment, only the cost for medicine is covered and not of transportation, for which we have to pay self, so it is not of help. (Caretaker of 40 years old married Dalit female)

Inadequate mental health knowledge and counseling skills in mental health service providers at PHC facilities also acted as barriers for mental health service utilization. However, supportive and sympathetic nature of service providers facilitated mental health service utilization.

But all the staffs over here are also not as capable and are not trained and aware about the problem yet, which may act as barrier. (Service Provider, 25 years, Male, Brahmin, Unmarried)

I took him to PHCC as well. Health care service providers over there provided good suggestions, also provided medicines if available, they used to support as much as possible, so it was for me to bring my husband to the condition where he is now. (Caretaker of 40 years old married Brahmin male)

People’s interest to seek mental health care services from experts and not from general health care service providers acted as barriers for mental health service utilization from PHC facilities. As some PHC facilities lacked separate rooms for diagnosing and counseling patients with mental illness, participants responded that lack of privacy while diagnosis and treatment also acted as barrier for mental health service utilization.

There are no doctors for mental illnesses here at public health facilities, so I did not take my wife there for treatment. (Caretaker of 40 years old married Dalit female)

…to open up with the health worker for them there is no any privacy… (Service Provider, 39 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

Community level

Stigma for mental illnesses was identified as the major factor that hindered mental health service utilization from PHC facilities and caused people to travel to distant places for mental health services.

In the community, people who are educated take mental illnesses like any other illnesses but people in the community who are not educated think that those with mental illness have no sense and are crazy (pagal). (Caretaker of 45 years old married Brahmin female)

They say it is communicable, it is very dangerous, do not touch the patient, do not walk with them, do not have the meal on same plate or you may get the disease. (Caretaker of 3.5 years old Dalit female child)

…in our society, the perception towards the mental health patient is different from the perception towards normal person. (Health Administrator, 47 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

…thinking that people will joke when they know about the illness within family, they do not visit primary health care facilities and if they have to, they go to distant health facilities for treatment and are under regular medicines without letting anyone in the community know about the illness. (Health Administrator, 50 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

Although mood disorders like depression was not stigmatized, psychosis was highly stigmatized, similar to diseases like TB and Leprosy.

At community, there is trend of making minor illnesses as a severe one, like for TB, leprosy and for diseases like mental illnesses and dominate ill people. (Service Provider, 32 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

There may be barriers like stigma for severe cases (psychosis) but for minor cases like depression there is no barriers, they come here. (Service Provider, 37 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

Inadequate awareness in community people regarding mental health and treatment of mental illnesses was identified as barrier for mental health service utilization from PHC facilities. Presence of discrimination in the community for people with mental illnesses and neglect from the community regarding treatment of mental illnesses acted as barriers for mental health service utilization from PHC facilities.

Educated people and those who know about the disease take this illness as any other disease that can be cured with treatment and hence suggest to go for medications rather than “Lama-Jhakkri” but those who are not educated or have no knowledge about the disease talk about “risani”, “laageko” and suggest for traditional healers. (Caretaker of 38 years old widowed Brahmin female)

In community, after suffering from the mental health problem the perception towards him changes. And people even do not want to listen to him and says that his brain is weak, why to waste time by listening to what he is saying we have to go to our work. (Health Administrator, 47 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

Beliefs in traditional healers and practices of visiting traditional healers (Dhami/Jhakri) for treatment of mental illnesses in the community acted as barrier for mental health service utilization from PHC facilities. People also responded that taking to traditional healers did not provide any improvement of people with mental illnesses.

As my sister believed a lot in traditional healers it took us a long time to visit the hospital, it took us nearly 2 years. (Caretaker of 36 years old widowed Chhetri female)

As we have customs in society to take such people to traditional healers thinking that the illness might be due to “bayu-batas”, “bhoot-pichas”, “risani-boksini” but there was no improvement seen. She got well by herself; taking to traditional healers did not help. (Caretaker of 42 years old married Dalit female)

Presence of FCHVs in the community identifying people with mental illnesses, providing mental health awareness as well as suggestions to visit PHC facilities for treatment of such illnesses were identified as facilitators for mental health service utilization from PHC facilities. In addition, presence of social workers and different organizations within the district that help create awareness regarding mental health as well as provide suggestions to visit PHC facilities for treatment or coordinate with those facilities regarding treatment of people with mental illnesses acted as facilitator for mental health service utilization from PHC facilities.

Supporting factors are our FCHVs who are present in every toles, they recommend people with mental illnesses to visit health facilities to have check-ups and treatment from service providers at health facilities…. there are many that support like Women development as well as there are many groups like health mother group, agricultural group. These groups have provided support. (Service Provider, 40 years, Female, Chhetri, Married)

Social workers here are working for providing support to people with mental illnesses. If they find such person, they take them for the treatment at the service center or clinic. (Elected Representative, 58 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

Like this there are also group of female leaders who also used to refer cases by making communication with us. (Service Provider, 42 years, Female, Brahmin, Married)

Participants identified that traditional healers have been acting both as facilitator and as barrier for mental health service utilization from PHC facilities. Some traditional healers suggested people with mental illnesses to visit health facilities in order to treat mental illnesses whereas some traditional healers asserted that they could treat mental illnesses in shorter duration than health facilities and doctors.

…patients first visit to Lama and he asks them to visit health facilities as well and they come here. (Service Provider, 35 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

I took her to a traditional healer (Buddha Lama) at Haraiya for “Jharfuk”. He told me to keep my wife there for 7 days in order to cure her, and said that doctors would take 15 days to cure her. (Caretaker of 40 years old married Dalit female)

Policy level

Lack of health facilities within municipality as well as geographic constraints in access to health facilities were identified as barriers for mental health service utilization from PHC facilities.

…the largest municipality of Nepal lies in this district; the municipality has such scattered community that it is hard for people there to utilize basic health services, even harder to get mental health services. (Health Administrator, 34 years, Female, Janajati, Married)

Nepal’s geography is still a constraint. There are many villages with lesser access of hospitals and many lack specialist doctors… (Caretaker of 45 years old married Brahmin female)

However, presence of roads and transportation facilities to different parts of the district were identified as facilitators for accessing mental health services.

In spite of being Hilly district, there is development of road transport facility. (Service Provider, 35 years, Female, Chhetri, Married)

There is availability of services to transport patients to district hospital or to nearby health posts. (Elected Representative, 64 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

Financial support for mental health treatment from municipality/ward was identified as facilitator for mental health service utilization.

If people with mental illnesses or their family members appeal for support from this rural municipality then we provide them with money for transportation and other support through a committee. (Elected Representative, 64 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

My sister said that municipality had provided some 5 to 10 thousand rupees as help after certifying some papers. (Caretaker of 45 years old married Dalit female)

However, there was also an instance when the support was not provided from the municipality/ward when asked for which may have caused barrier for mental health service utilization.

Recently I talked with ward chief regarding some help for medicines and treatment but he said it was very difficult for recommendations at this time… (Caretaker of 38 years old widowed Brahmin female)

Participants reported that mental health services were provided as per National Mental Health Policy. However, as the policy for mental health had not been implemented properly, there existed barriers in mental health service delivery, thereby reducing service utilization from PHC settings.

There is no policy as facilitators and barriers of mental health services and not in process as well. We are working based on national policy. (Health Administrator, 40 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)

As there is policy to deliver mental health services from PHC level, there is not much implementation of this policy to deliver mental health services. (Service Provider, 42 years, Female, Brahmin, Married)

Recommendations from the participants

Participants were also asked for recommendations in order to improve mental health service utilization from PHC facilities, thematic analysis of which were performed as per socio-ecological level and are depicted in Table 3.

Table 3. Recommendations for improving mental health service utilization at PHC facilities.

Levels Recommendations Narratives
Individual Awareness If people have awareness regarding disease condition, state of disease, knowledge about the proper treatment centers then we can empower them to visit health facilities for treatment. (Service Provider, 35 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)
Interpersonal Awareness For service users, if they or their family members could be assured that if they go to the health facility that their mental health problem will be solved then would they come to utilize the service. (Health Administrator, 47 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)
Organizational Trained mental health workforce, Infrastructures, Availability of medicines If doctors for mental illnesses were available at PHCC and Health Posts then it would be better for people of low economic status like us as we need not travel far for treatment and could get treatment easily. (Caretaker of 45 years old married Dalit female)
In addition, there should be availability of separate room for counseling as well as male health staff for treating male and female health staff for treating female patients with mental illnesses should be present. (Service Provider, 35 years, Male, Brahmin, Married)
Community Awareness I think that people with mental illnesses should not be tagged crazy (baulaha) or should not be neglected such that they die an unknown death or hurt any other people. (Caretaker of 36 years old widowed Chhetri female)
Policy Access to services Had there been a hospital at our municipality we would not have come here, we would spend our money within our village, and it would be a lot easier for us and would reduce our expenses on transportation. (Patient, 36 years, Female, Dalit, Married)

Discussion

This study identified predisposing factors like being female, having low economic status and lack of formal education as barriers for mental health service utilization, which shows partial similarity with the findings from a cross-sectional community survey done in Nepal [10] as the study identified that barriers to mental health care were not based on age, sex, marital status, education and caste/ethnicity but was associated with occupation. The differences present in the findings can be attributed to the fact that the previous study included only two disorders (Depressive Disorder and Alcohol Use Disorder) whereas the present study included different MNS disorders. However, a qualitative formative study done in Nepal at community and health facility level has identified that ignorance about mental health issues was highly present among people of high economic and caste status and among people with more education and resources [9]. Perception of disease (self-stigmatization) and limiting to self, perception regarding risk of disease, negative perception towards treatment of the disease, unstable mental state, and past experiences of treatment also acted as barriers for mental health service utilization, findings that are similar to the study done in Nepal [10] and elsewhere [26]. Inadequate knowledge and information regarding mental health services as well as involvement in household chores created barriers for mental health service utilization from PHC facilities. Studies have shown that low demand of mental health care are present in people based at home, particularly females and those with no proper knowledge regarding correct place to seek help for mental illnesses [9].

Major finding from the study was mental health stigma in the community that was identified as the factor that itself acted as a barrier as well as influenced other factors at different socio-ecological levels. Self-stigmatization and limiting to self at individual level, lack of support from family and friends at interpersonal level, fear of privacy maintenance at organizational level, and discrimination and neglect at community level were influenced by stigma present in the community. Literature on underutilization of mental health services in India has concluded stigma as a combination of lack of knowledge (ignorance and misinformation), negative attitudes (prejudice) and excluding or avoiding behaviors (discriminations) [27]. Studies in different parts of world have also identified stigma as a major factor limiting mental health service utilization [6]. Inadequate awareness regarding mental health was identified as another major factor that acted as barrier for mental health service utilization as well as influenced traditional practices for treatment of mental illnesses. Majority of participants in this study recommended mental health awareness raising in order to reduce stigma thereby decreasing many barriers for mental health service utilization, which was also identified in different studies done in Nepal [9, 28].

Presence of FCHVs and social organizations and social workers in the community facilitated mental health service utilization whereas traditional healers played both supportive and hindering roles. Studies have identified that community informants are capable for accurate proactive case finding of mental disorders [29], and trained FCHVs are necessary condition to increase mental health service utilization as well as mental health service demand creation [28]. Use of trusted people in the community and respected public figures has been identified to cause largest impact on mental health awareness and thereby mental health service utilization [9, 30].

Support from family and friends were identified as factors facilitating mental health service utilization whereas lack of support, care, and love from the family hindered service utilization. Similar to these findings, a study has identified that family play dual role, on one hand they help to improve detection, access and maintenance of mental health treatment and care, and on the other hand ill-treat or neglect the patients due to fear of loss of status or being discriminated [30]. In addition, due to inadequate mental health literacy in community people, decision maker and navigators, suggestions visiting traditional healers or private clinics and hospitals were provided thereby causing barrier for mental health service utilization from PHC facilities. A rapid review done on the literatures that reported barriers to health care engagements in Nepal has recognized the importance of locally identified and developed health literacy in understanding, accessing and using health information and health services in Nepal [11]. In a formative study done in Nepal for setting mental health priorities, mental health literacy was identified as major strategy to overcome negative attitudes resulting in discrimination of people with mental health problems [30]. Communication of treatment successes from patients under treatment to patients who are not under treatment acted as facilitator for service utilization. It has been identified that mental health service users empathize with individuals experiencing mental health problems and help them understand mental health problems and ways to manage them [31]. Trust among service users and service providers facilitated mental health service utilization. A qualitative formative study done in Nepal has identified that misinformation about services, not knowing the correct place to seek help and lack of trust in the quality and existence of services causes decrease in demand of mental health services from nearest PHC facilities [9].

Factors at organizational level hindering mental health service utilization were unavailability of comprehensive mental health services, lack of mental health specialists and psychotropic medicines, limited knowledge and skills of providers in mental health and provision of counseling and referral services only from the PHC facilities. Though Basic Health Service Package of Nepal 2075 has included basic mental health services to be provided from PHC facilities [21], and 16 psychotherapeutic medicines are listed in national essential medicine list of Nepal [32], participants responded lack of mental health services and psychotropic medicines at PHC facilities as factors hindering mental health service utilization. Similar findings were identified from different qualitative studies done in Nepal [12, 33]. PHC facilities being far and lack of proper infrastructure to maintain privacy also acted as barriers for mental health service utilization. Lack of accessibility and confidentiality and trust has been identified as barriers for mental health service utilization in previous studies [34]. However, sympathetic and supportive nature of the health care service providers facilitated utilization of mental health services available at PHC facilities. A study done in Nepal has identified that community people find it necessary that health workers were sensitive and maintained confidentiality in cases of mental health problems [30].

Inadequate implementation of the mental health policy at national and sub-national levels was the major factor at policy level that acted as barriers for mental health service utilization from PHC facilities. A qualitative study conducted in Nepal identified that availability of mental health policy and inclusion of mental health in other general policies and plans as a factor enabling good mental health system governance that may increase service utilization [33]. In addition, the geography and lack of health infrastructure within reach has been barriers for mental health service utilization from PHC facilities. However, some municipalities providing financial support or provision of transport have acted as facilitators for mental health service utilization. A study conducted to assess whether distance affects utilization of substance abuse and mental health services in the presence of transportation services among HIV-positive individuals did not identify distance as a barrier when the transportation services were provided [35]. Use of technology for the management of people with mental illnesses by psychiatrists without being physically present in the PHC facilities was also identified as factor that could facilitate mental health service utilization. Use of technology to provide mental health care has the potential to improve patient access to care and has been used effectively in rural areas, schools, forensic practices, and correctional facilities [36].

The study was conducted providing enough attention to its validity and reliability; however, there are strengths and limitations of the study. The study was a novel qualitative study that collected data from multiple sources to explore factors affecting mental health service utilization at PHC facilities of Arghakhanchi district. Data analysis performed was rigorous and was assisted by software. The study being a qualitative study with purposive sampling, findings cannot be generalized. However, the findings can be considered references to initiate studies and researches in similar contexts. Though the district has diversity in terms of socio-economy, culture and ethnicity, the study did not include representations from all the socio-demographics present in the district. The interviews were carried out in Nepali and directly translated to English and analyzed, which may have caused loss of original meaning of some rich and important information. Due to the nature of the study, subjectivity may not have been avoided during data analysis and interpretation, although measures (verification of translated transcripts, member checking of the results, inter-coder reliability, reflexivity and process documentation) were used to maintain rigor of the study.

Conclusion

This study identified wide range of diverse but interweaving factors that affected mental health service utilization from PHC facilities. Stigma as a combination of lack of knowledge (ignorance and misconceptions), negative attitudes (prejudice) and excluding or avoiding behaviors (discriminations) is still present in the community acting as barrier for service utilization. Awareness (individual, family, and community) was a recurring term in the recommendations of the participants in order to reduce stigma and increase mental health service utilization. Accessibility of the health facilities and availability of comprehensive mental health services in PHC facilities could help increase mental health service utilization from the PHC facilities.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Primary Health Care facilities in Arghakhanchi district.

(DOCX)

S1 Appendix. Interview guidelines.

(DOCX)

S2 Appendix. Coding and codes within theme in EZR.

(DOCX)

S3 Appendix. Thematic mapping in EZR.

(DOCX)

S1 Transcript

(DOCX)

S2 Transcript

(DOCX)

S3 Transcript

(DOCX)

S4 Transcript

(DOCX)

S5 Transcript

(DOCX)

S6 Transcript

(DOCX)

S7 Transcript

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Rabi Shakya, Dr. Pawan Sharma, faculties of School of Public Health and Mr. Nagendra Prasad Luitel for their valuable inputs in face and content validation of the interview guidelines. We would like to thank Mr. Sudarshan Paudel for translation of the interview guidelines into Nepali and Ms. Reena Koju for back-translation. We also thank Dr. Phanindra Prasad Baral and Dr. Dipendra Gautam for providing useful insights and materials on national mental health policy and plans. The assistance provided by Dr. Amit Arjyal and Mr. Kiran Acharya for the preparation of final manuscript is highly appreciated.

Abbreviations

AHW

Auxiliary Health Workers

ANM

Auxiliary Nurse Midwife

AUD

Alcohol Use Disorder

CHU

Community Health Unit

DALY

Disability Adjusted Life Years

DD

Depressive Disorder

EZR

Easy R

FCHV

Female Community Health Volunteer

HA

Health Assistant

HP

Health Post

ICR

Inter Coder Reliability

IDI

In-Depth Interview

IRC

Institutional Review Committee

KII

Key Informant Interview

LMICs

Low- and Middle-Income Countries

MNS

Mental, Neurological and Substance use

PAHS

Patan Academy of Health Sciences

PHC

Primary Health Care

PHCC

Primary Health Care Center

RQDA

R-based Qualitative Data Analysis

TB

Tuberculosis

UHC

Urban Health Clinic

YLD

Years Lost due to Disability

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly as the information were audio-recorded and some of the participants may have willingly disclosed their identity. In addition, as the manuscript is a part of the thesis conducted by corresponding author, all the information has been stored by the supervisor and Institutional Review Committee (IRC) of Patan Academy of Health Sciences (PAHS). Data are available from the Institutional Review Committee of PAHS (contact via irc-pahs@pahs.edu.np) as per the institutional rules for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. Patan Academy of Health Sciences is a public not-for-profit tertiary academic institution running School of Medicine, School of Public Health and School of Nursing. More information regarding Patan Academy of Health Sciences can be found from the following link: https://www.pahs.edu.np/ However, seven of the translated transcripts have been made available as supporting information.

Funding Statement

GD was awarded "Dr. Harka Gurung- New ERA Fellowship 2019" for the research. New ERA is a non-government, non-profit research organization in Nepal (https://www.newera.com.np/). YES - Mr. Kiran Acharya of New ERA assisted in proof-reading of final manuscript that has been acknowledged in acknowledgement section of the original manuscript.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization—WHO. Fact Sheet on Mental Disorders. [Accessed on: 20 May 2019]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-disorders.
  • 2.Risal A, Manandhar K, Linde M, Steiner TJ, Holen A. Anxiety and depression in Nepal: Prevalence, comorbidity and associations. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16(1):1–9. 10.1186/s12888-016-0810-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nepal Health Research Council. National Mental Health Survey, Nepal 2020: Factsheet (Adults). 2020. Available from: http://nhrc.gov.np/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Factsheet-Adults-1.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization—WHO. Mental Health Gap Action Programme: Scaling up care for mental, neurological, and substance use disorders. World Heal Organ. 2008;37. ISBN: 978 92 4 159620 6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences. The national mental health survey of India, 2015–16 prevalence, pattern and outcomes. 2016. Available from: http://indianmhs.nimhans.ac.in/Docs/Report2.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stigma Thornicroft G. and discrimination limit access to mental health care. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2008;17(1):14–9. 10.1017/s1121189x00002621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Clement S, Schauman O, Graham T, Maggioni F, Evans-Lacko S, Bezborodovs N, et al. What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Psychol Med. 2015;45(1):11–27. 10.1017/S0033291714000129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Drew N, Funk M, Tang S, Lamichhane J, Chávez E, Katontoka S, et al. Human rights violations of people with mental and psychosocial disabilities: An unresolved global crisis. Lancet. 2011;378(9803):1664–75. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61458-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brenman NF, Luitel NP, Mall S, Jordans MJD. Demand and access to mental health services: A qualitative formative study in Nepal. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2014;14(1):1–12. 10.1186/1472-698X-14-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Luitel NP, Jordans MJD, Kohrt BA, Rathod SD, Komproe IH. Treatment gap and barriers for mental health care: A cross-sectional community survey in Nepal. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):1–15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0183223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Budhathoki SS, Pokharel PK, Good S, Limbu S, Bhattachan M, Osborne RH. The potential of health literacy to address the health related UN sustainable development goal 3 (SDG3) in Nepal: a rapid review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–13. 10.1186/s12913-016-1943-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Angdembe M, Kohrt BA, Jordans M, Rimal D, Luitel NP. Situational analysis to inform development of primary care and community-based mental health services for severe mental disorders in Nepal. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017;11(1):1–16. 10.1186/s13033-017-0176-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kohn R, Saxena S, Levav I, Saraceno B. The treatment gap in mental health care. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(11):858–66. doi: /S0042-96862004001100011 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Keitner GI, Ryan CE, Miller IW, Kohn R, Bishop DS, Epstein NB. Role of the Family in Recovery and Major Depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152:1002–8. 10.1176/ajp.152.7.1002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kessler RC, Berglund PA, Foster CL, Saunders WB, Stang PE, Walters EE. Social Consequences of Psychiatric Disorders, II: Teenage Parenthood. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154(10):1405–11. 10.1176/ajp.154.10.1405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zlotnick C, Kohn R, Peterson J, Pearlstein T. Partner Physical Victimization in a National Sample of American Families: Relationship to Psychological Functioning, Psychosocial Factors, and Gender. J Interpers Violence. 1998;13:156–66. 10.1177/088626098013001009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bronfenbrenner U. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. Am Psychol. 1977;32(7):513–31. 10.1037/0003-066x.32.7.513 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.District Profile of Arghakhanchi. [Accessed on: 20 May 2019]. Available from: https://nepalmap.org/profiles/district-46-arghakhanchi/.
  • 19.Department of Health Services. Annual Report 2074/75 (2017/18). 2018. Available from: https://dohs.gov.np/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/DoHS-Annual-Report-FY-2074-75-date-22-Ashad-2076-for-web-1.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Number of Health Facilities in Province 5. [Accessed on: 20 May 2019]. Available from: https://www.publichealthupdate.com/number-of-health-facilities-in-province-5-nepal/.
  • 21.Ministry of Health and Population. Basic Health Service Package-2075. [Accessed on: 27 Nov 2019]. Available from: https://www.publichealthupdate.com/basic-health-service-package-2075-dohs-mohp-nepal/.
  • 22.Marshall MN. Sampling for qualitative research. Fam Pract. 1996;13(6):522–5. 10.1093/fampra/13.6.522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ulin PR, Robinson ET, Tolley EE. Qualitative Methods in Public Health. Library. 2005. 10.1249/01.mss.0000172593.20181.14 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Estrada S. Qualitative analysis using R: A free analytic tool. Qual Rep. 2017;22(4):956–68. Available from: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol22/iss4/2/. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa 32100154 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Goldman LS, Nielsen NH, Champion HC. Awareness, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Depression. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:569–80. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.03478.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shidhaye R, Kermode M. Stigma and discrimination as a barrier to mental health service utilization in India. Int Health. 2013;5(1):6–8. 10.1093/inthealth/ihs011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Breuer E, Subba P, Luitel N, Jordans M, De Silva M, Marchal B, et al. Using qualitative comparative analysis and theory of change to unravel the effects of a mental health intervention on service utilisation in Nepal. BMJ Glob Heal. 2018;3(6):1–11. 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jordans MJD, Kohrt BA, Luitel NP, Lund C, Komproe IH. Proactive community case-finding to facilitate treatment seeking for mental disorders, Nepal. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(7):531–6. 10.2471/BLT.16.189282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jordans MJD, Luitel NP, Tomlinson M, Komproe IH. Setting priorities for mental health care in Nepal: A formative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13. 10.1186/1471-244X-13-332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Campos F, Sousa A, Rodrigues V, Marques A, Queirós C, Dores A. Practical guidelines for peer support programmes for mental health problems. Rev Psiquiatr y Salud Ment (English Ed). 2016;9(2):97–110. 10.1016/j.rpsm.2014.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ministry of Health. National List of Essential Medicines Nepal (Fifth Revision) 2016. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Health, Department of Drug Administration. 2016. Available from: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s23537en/s23537en.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Upadhaya N, Jordans MJD, Pokhrel R, Gurung D, Adhikari RP, Petersen I, et al. Current situations and future directions for mental health system governance in Nepal: Findings from a qualitative study. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017;11(1):1–12. 10.1186/s13033-017-0145-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gulliver AKMGHC. Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2010;113(10). 10.1186/1471-244X-10-113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Whetten R, Whetten K, Pence BW, Reif S, Conover C, Bouis S. Does distance affect utilization of substance abuse and mental health services in the presence of transportation services? AIDS Care—Psychol Socio-Medical Asp AIDS/HIV. 2006;18(SUPPL. 1):37–41. 10.1080/09540120600839397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Deslich SA, Thistlethwaite T, Coustasse A. Telepsychiatry in correctional facilities: using technology to improve access and decrease costs of mental health care in underserved populations. Perm J. 2013;17(3):80–6. 10.7812/TPP/12-123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Heidi H Ewen

12 Jun 2020

PONE-D-20-06276

Factors affecting utilization of mental health services from Primary Health Care (PHC) facilities of western hilly district of Nepal: The roles of stigma, awareness and availability

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Devkota,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 27 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Heidi H Ewen, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please describe in your methods section how capacity to consent was determined for the participants in this study.

3. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for the opportunity to review this article focused on factors influencing mental health services utilization.

Background:

Importance of conducting research in this district not clear? Why rural vs urban area was chosen?

Explain what MNS mean and what disorders it represent. Dementia statistic was mentioned. Were people with dementia interviewed as well?

Please make sure you are consistent on wording either use mental illnesses or mental health disorders. If you are talking about mental illnesses in general term, I would suggest using it as plural term than singular.

Pg. 3 line 59, mental disorders should be mental health disorder (throughout the paper, this should be changed), but I would recommend either using mental illnesses throughout or mental health disorders throughout.

Pg. 4 Line 75: should be mental health care instead of mental care

Please provide some background information on mental health care provider in Nepal, in particular the district (region), where this study was conducted. Also, types of mental health disorders.

Pg 5, line 88, not sure what mhGAP resources means

Line 91: YLDs and DALYs, what do these terms mean?

Line 93: How is teenage childbearing related to treatment gap?

Please rewrite sentence starting at line 94 With difficulties even in….to make simple and clearer

Line 107: Please briefly describe Bronfenbrenner model.

I would refrain from using mental ill patients, please change these phrases (through out the paper) to patient with mental illness or patient with mental health disorder.

Methods:

Pg. 6 Operational definition, b. How did FCHVs identify patients with mental illnesses? Was this volunteer doing this for the research?

Pg. 7, line 143: I would recommend changing to 2.6% individuals with disability rather than disabled population.

Line 144-146: Does it mean that the district is not included in ongoing national mental health survey, is that one of the reasons to select this as a research site? Why is this district not included in national survey? This should be described as part of background and significance section. Also, please provide the statistics on MNS disorders in this district and region and how they differ from national data. This information should be in background.

Please explain if the participants with mental illnesses were already patients at the PHC. How were they identified/diagnosed?

Please make sure all the abbreviations are spelled out in their first use in the paper.

Table 1: this table can be used in supplement materials. I would rather have descriptive table in the manuscript rather than supplement. For demographic descriptive table in supplement (this should be moved to main document), I would use descriptive statistic in mean (SD), frequency (%), and/or range, rather than describing each participant. Provide descriptive statistic for each categories: mean age of participants, frequency for gender, ethnicity, religion, marital status, education, and occupation. I would provide frequency for different mental health disorders of the patients as well. It is not explained anywhere what is the mental health disorders of the participants interviewed.

Conceptual model should be part of the main paper as well, not supplement.

I had hard time figuring out thematic mapping and coding document. It would certainly help if the words and figure were clearer. However, I am not a qualitative researcher, so I would rather not comment on those two documents.

Were participants compensated for their time in anyway?

What does nearest caretaker mean? I think it could be substituted by primary caretaker? Is this person responsible for majority of the patient’s informal care? then I would substitute the nearest word to primary.

For quotes in italics, they should be indented as well.

Results:

Pg. 12, line 237, Did you mean “misunderstood mental illnesses as communicable disease”? or “treated mental illnesses as they were communicable diseases”?

If you are taking about mental illness as general term, I would write it as plural term: mental illnesses.

You should explain what “dhami/jhakri” mean for Non-Nepali readers.

Discussion:

What were the difference between the study you cited? It is mentioned that there was partial similarity, what was not similar? Again, what is MNS and what disorders it encompasses should be explained in background section.

Line 483-484: “highly present among people of high economic and caste status as well as those with more education and resources”: do you mean with both high and low economic and education resources?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 30;16(4):e0250694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250694.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


17 Oct 2020

We would like to thank the reviewer for reviewing our article titled “Factors affecting utilization of mental health services from Primary Health Care (PHC) facilities of western hilly district of Nepal: The roles of stigma, awareness and availability”. All the comments made are heartily acknowledged. Please find the responses on the comments made on your review. The marked-up copy and an unmarked version of revised paper has also been submitted for your perusal.

Background:

Comment:Importance of conducting research in this district not clear? Why rural vs urban area was chosen?

Response:The comments are well acknowledged and the necessary changes are made.

The importance of conducting the research is provided from Line 105 to 124which explains that only organizational, community and policy level factors from the socio-ecological levels had been identified in previous studies, thus this study was done to explore factors at all the levels of socio-ecological model proposed by Urie Bronfenbrenner (individual, interpersonal, organizational, community and policy level).

The rationale for conducting the research in the district are provided under “Introduction” section of the manuscript, as suggested (line 112 to 115).

The study does not compare between rural and urban areas, however participants from both the areas were selected so as to provide representation from both the areas. This is provided in detail under “Sampling procedure and sample size” topic in “Materials and Methods” section (line 165 to 179).

Comment:Explain what MNS mean and what disorders it represents. Dementia statistic was mentioned. Were people with dementia interviewed as well?

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the explanation has been provided.

MNS disorder was termed by World Health Organization in order to incorporate mental, neurological, and substance use disorders in a single term which are often otherwise separated into treatment silos such as neurology, psychiatry, psychology, substance use, etc. in developed countries.

Reference: Altevogt BM., Hanson SL., Ssali ZN, Cuff P, Rapporteurs. Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders in Sub-Saharan Africa: Reducing the treatment gap, Improving quality of care. 2001. ISBN: 9780309148801

People with dementia were not interviewed in the study. The statistics were provided as the five most common MNS disorders include dementia. People with mental illnesses who were recovering from their illnesses were only interviewed, in presence of psychiatrist in nearby room.

Comment:Please make sure you are consistent on wording either use mental illnesses or mental health disorders. If you are talking about mental illnesses in general term, I would suggest using it as plural term than singular.

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the necessary changes have been made. The term “mental illnesses” has been used throughout the paper, as suggested.

Comment:Pg. 3 line 59, mental disorders should be mental health disorder (throughout the paper, this should be changed), but I would recommend either using mental illnesses throughout or mental health disorders throughout.

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the necessary changes have been made. The term “mental illnesses” has been used throughout the paper, as suggested.

Comment:Pg. 4 Line 75: should be mental health care instead of mental care

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the necessary change has been made, as suggested.

Comment:Please provide some background information on mental health care provider in Nepal, in particular the district (region), where this study was conducted. Also, types of mental health disorders.

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the necessary information has been provided.

The type of mental illnesses within the district have been provided in the “Introduction” section, as suggested, along with the rationale for selection of the district for study.

The health care service providers have been listed in the “Service provider” sub-topic of “Operational Definition” topic in “Materials and Methods” section (Line 147 to 149).

Comment:Pg 5, line 88, not sure what mhGAP resources means

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the necessary information has been provided.

mhGAP operations manual, training manual and intervention guide endorsed by World Health Organization are the mhGAP resources that are available to help reduce the mental health treatment gap and to enhance the capacity of Member states to respond to the large burden of Mental, Neurological and Substance use disorders.

Reference: https://www.who.int/mental_health/mhgap/en/

Comment:Line 91: YLDs and DALYs, what do these terms mean?

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the necessary changes has been made.

The full forms for the abbreviations have been provided in their first use.

YLD means Years Lived with Disability and DALY means Disability Adjusted Life Years.

Comment:Line 93: How is teenage childbearing related to treatment gap?

Response:The comment is well acknowledged.

The statement was made based on a previous study.

Reference: Kohn R, Saxena S, Levav I, Saraceno B. The treatment gap in mental health care. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(11):858–66.

Comment:Please rewrite sentence starting at line 94 With difficulties even in….to make simple andclearer

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the statement has been re-written as below.

Many socio-cultural and psychosocial barriers in demand for mental health care services as well as pragmatic and health system functioning barriers along with difficulties in accessing health care has widened the treatment gap of mental illnesses at PHC facilities.

Comment:Line 107: Please briefly describe Bronfenbrenner model.

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the description is provided as below.

The five socio-ecological levels of the model in which the study is based upon (Bronfenbrenner model) are:

i. individual level that includes characteristics that influences behavior such as knowledge, attitude and skill

ii. interpersonal level that includes social networks like partners, friends and families

iii. organizational level that includes formal and informal structures, environment and ethos

iv. community level that includes established cultural norms and values

v. policy level that includes national and local policies.

Comment:I would refrain from using mental ill patients, please change these phrases (through out the paper) to patient with mental illness or patient with mental health disorder.

Response: The comment is acknowledged and the necessary changes have been made throughout the paper, as suggested.

Methods:

Comment:Pg. 6 Operational definition, b. How did FCHVs identify patients with mental illnesses? Was this volunteer doing this for the research?

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the following changes are made in the operational definition.

People with mental illnesses: Patients under psychiatric medications for mental illnesses whose identity were informed by Female Community Health Volunteers (FCHVs), PHC health workers or secondary health service providers.

Comment:Pg. 7, line 143: I would recommend changing to 2.6% individuals with disability rather than disabled population.

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the change have been made as per suggestion.

Comment:Line 144-146: Does it mean that the district is not included in ongoing national mental health survey, is that one of the reasons to select this as a research site? Why is this district not included in national survey? This should be described as part of background and significance section. Also, please provide the statistics on MNS disorders in this district and region and how they differ from national data. This information should be in background.

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the rationale for selection of the district as study site and the reason for the district not being included in the national survey has been provided in “Introduction” section as suggested.

Respected Reviewer, we would like to notify that Nepal does not have a national data on MNS disorders as well as statistics for the district, and thus the data could not be provided. The reason for the national mental health survey is itself to have a national statistic on mental health.

Reference: http://nhrc.gov.np/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Pilot-national-mental-health.pdf

Comment:Please explain if the participants with mental illnesses were already patients at the PHC. How were they identified/diagnosed?

Response: The comment is well acknowledged.

The operational definition for “People with mental illnesses” is provided in line 140-143 as

Patients under psychiatric medications for mental illnesses from any health facilities whose identity were informed by Female Community Health Volunteers (FCHVs), PHC health workers or secondary health service providers.

The operational definition is to clarify that these people were patients and under treatment at any health facilities. The information regarding people under psychiatric medications were provided by Female Community Health Volunteers (FCHVs), PHC health workers or secondary health service providers.

Comment:Please make sure all the abbreviations are spelled out in their first use in the paper.

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the necessary changes are made as per suggestion.

Comment:Table 1: this table can be used in supplement materials. I would rather have descriptive table in the manuscript rather than supplement. For demographic descriptive table in supplement (this should be moved to main document), I would use descriptive statistic in mean (SD), frequency (%), and/or range, rather than describing each participant. Provide descriptive statistic for each categories: mean age of participants, frequency for gender, ethnicity, religion, marital status, education, and occupation. I would provide frequency for different mental health disorders of the patients as well. It is not explained anywhere what is the mental health disorders of the participants interviewed.

Response: The comments are well acknowledged and the necessary changes have been made.

The descriptive statistics has not been shown in mean (SD), frequency (%) and range owing to the purposive nature of participant selection. Moreover, the socio-demographics were gathered in order to provide background characteristics of “WHO” is providing the narration rather than for any comparisons.

In addition, the interviews were mostly conducted with primary caretaker of the people with mental illnesses and thus the exact type of the mental illnesses were not collected.

Comment:Conceptual model should be part of the main paper as well, not supplement.

Response: The comments are well acknowledged and the necessary changes have been made. The result of the thematic analysis based on the theoretical model has been provided as Figure 1 in the revised paper.

Comment:I had hard time figuring out thematic mapping and coding document. It would certainly help if the words and figure were clearer. However, I am not a qualitative researcher, so I would rather not comment on those two documents.

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the changes have been made.

Respected Reviewer, the result from the thematic analysis has been provided as Figure 1 in the revised paper.

Comment:Were participants compensated for their time in anyway?

Response: The comment is well acknowledged. As the participation was completely voluntary thus no compensation was provided for the time provided by the participants.

Modification in the statement (line 212-213) has been made.

“The decision for participation in study was voluntary without any compensation for the time provided.”

Comment:What does nearest caretaker mean? I think it could be substituted by primary caretaker? Is this person responsible for majority of the patient’s informal care? then I would substitute the nearest word to primary.

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the necessary changes has been made, as suggested.

Comment:For quotes in italics, they should be indented as well.

Response: The comment is acknowledged and the necessary changes have been made throughout the paper, as suggested.

Results:

Comment:Pg. 12, line 237, Did you mean “misunderstood mental illnesses as communicable disease”? or “treated mental illnesses as they were communicable diseases”?

Response: The comment is acknowledged and the change has been made to “misunderstood mental illnesses as communicable diseases”.

Comment:If you are taking about mental illness as general term, I would write it as plural term: mental illnesses.

Response: The comment is acknowledged and the necessary changes are made throughout the paper, as suggested.

Comment:You should explain what “dhami/jhakri” mean for Non-Nepali readers.

Response: The comment is well acknowledged and the traditional/faith healers are identified as “dhami/jhakri” in line 301-302.

Discussion:

Comment:What were the difference between the study you cited? It is mentioned that there was partial similarity, what was not similar? Again, what is MNS and what disorders it encompasses should be explained in background section.

Response:The comment is well acknowledged. The factors identified in the previous study has also been listed and changes made in the sentence.

Comment:Line 483-484: “highly present among people of high economic and caste status as well as those with more education and resources”: do you mean with both high and low economic and education resources?

Response: The comment is well acknowledged. The study had identified that ignorance was high among people with high economic, caste and education status. The sentence in the revised paper has been modified as below:

However, a qualitative formative study done in Nepal at community and health facility level has identified that ignorance about mental health issues was highly present among people of high economic and caste status and among people with more education and resources.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Pranil Man Singh Pradhan

7 Jan 2021

PONE-D-20-06276R1

Factors affecting utilization of mental health services from Primary Health Care (PHC) facilities of western hilly district of Nepal: The roles of stigma, awareness and availability

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Devkota,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 21 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Pranil Man Singh Pradhan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

Reviewer #3: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: all comments have been addressed. Data is not available but authors have provided reasons for not making them available.

Reviewer #2: The authors have addressed the issues raised by the previous reviewer/s well.

Here are some of the major concerns regarding the study.

1. Title: The authors have explored various factors affecting service utilization in PHC facilities in the district rather than "the roles of stigma, awareness and availability". The roles of stigma, awareness and availability have not been explored in detail as well. So, the mention of "the roles of stigma, awareness and availability" in the title itself is not well justified.

2. How many of the primary health service providing centers in the study area had availability of mental health services? Non-availability of mental health service can be considered as a barrier to mental health service provision but definitely not a barrier to "utilization". This needs to be clarified further.

3. It is the lived experiences of those with mental illness and then their caretakers that provide more authentic information regarding individual and interpersonal factors, and even community level factors that facilitate or hinder service utilization. However, the narratives of those with mental illness and that of their caretakers have been grossly under-represented in the article. Would recommend to include more of the narratives from them.

4. Conclusion- Lines 678-683 (Community awareness can be provided through mass media, campaigns, and celebrations of days related to mental health. Mental illnesses support groups can be formed to reduce stigma at the community level and increase mental health literacy at the individual level through various programs. Inclusion of mental health education in the curriculum can also help arouse awareness and mental health literacy from an early age. These support groups and inclusion of mental health education in the curriculum can help reduce and/or eliminate stigma and increase awareness in community) have not been substantiated from the results or discussion portion of the manuscript. Better to either substantiate these claims in the conclusion or drop them out.

5. Calculation of "Inter-coder positive percent agreement"- It needs more elaboration. As per the table, all the codes from coder 2 must have matched with that of coder 1 for this gross calculation provided in the table. However, I would recommend more expert opinion in this regard.

Line 86- the inference of decreasing service utilization is not substantiated as the factors mentioned in the sentence refer to lack of service availability itself. So, this does not relate to "service utilization".

Line 97/98- "impairing family function(1), and increasing the risk of teenage childbearing(2) and domestic violence(3)"- this is cited from - 1. Keitner GI, Ryan CE, Miller IW, Kohn R, Bishop DS, Epstein NB. Role of the family in recovery and major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry 1995;152:1002-8. 2. Kessler RC, Berglund PA, Foster CL, Saunders WB, Stang PE, Walters EE. Social consequences of psychiatric disorders. II: Teenage parenthood. American Journal of Psychiatry 1997;154:1405-11. 3. Zlotnick C, Kohn R, Peterson J, Pearlstein T. Partner physical victimization in a national sample of American families: relationship to psychological functioning, psychosocial factors and gender. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 1998;13:156-65- in the article mentioned in your reference. So, while citing reference mentioned in other articles use appropriate referencing.

Line 199/200- psychiatrist being available nearby in order to manage any deviation from normal seen in the patients, if required.- Please clarify what does "manage any deviation from normal seen in the patients"

Line 244- mentally ill patients - patients with mental illness

Two of the themes(stigma, educational level) explained in the "Mental Illness and Help Seeking pathway" do not concern directly to help seeking pathways. Also, sudden mention of "help seeking pathway" does not seem relevant to factors affecting service utilization as mentioned in the title.

Line 402-404- It's obvious that one would not go to a facility where service is not available. So, this statement cannot be interpreted as a "barrier to service utilization". There would be no question of service utilization when service is not even available."Unavailability of service" is definitely a barrier to mental health service provision but not a barrier for "utilization". There would be no question of "service utilization" when the service does not even exist.

The verbatim given in lines 431-432 do not substantiate the claim of "commercialization of health services" as barrier to service utilization.

Similarly, referral from the PHCs themselves should not be interpreted as "barrier to service utilization" at PHC. (lines 428-435)

Lines 461-468- Here, issue related to stigma have been raised. But again, there are verbatim of service provider/administrator only. It would be more relevant if the issue of stigma has been raised by the service users.

Line 518-519- "whereas some traditional healers suggested not visiting health facilities" is not substantiated by the verbatim mentioned in line 522-23 "He told me to keep my523 wife there for 7 days in order to cure her, and said that doctors would take 15 days to cure her."

Lines 550-560- there's national mental health policy in Nepal (https://publichealthupdate.com/mental-health-policy-nepal/) and policy to provide mental health services from PHC services. Local bodies do not make their own mental health policies. So, the statements basically shows the lack of awareness among the participants. It's better to clarify these issues rather than just mentioning and interpreting the verbatim of participants.

Reviewer #3: This is an important area of research, thank you for the study. The paper contains rich information on barriers to use mental health service. However, I recommend following modifications:

Prevalence of Mental Disorders in Nepal may be added in the first paragraph after the global prevalence

59/60: advise to reframe the sentence “This is a stark reminder of the immense burden of the huge gap in mental health”

61: definition of treatment gap may not be needed; it has already been explained in lines 57-59

Treatment gap in nepal may also be added along with the treatment gap in India. The fact sheet on the finding of National MH survey of Nepal has been published.

82: what do you mean by senior staff?

110 – 113 aren’t these methodological issues relating to site selection?

151: it would be useful to state whether primary care centers (health posts/PHCCs etc) in the district provide mental health services as part of government’s program or NGO program. As availability is important factor for service use and also focus of this paper.

298-300: Suggest reviewing the write up. The line read as ‘educated people DO NOT have stigma at all’ which is not a consistent observation in researches published.

452: ‘Lack of psychiatrists, mental health experts or doctors in the PHC facilities acted as barriers for mental health service utilization’ I would suggest interpreting this as people interest to seek care from experts and not form general health care providers at PHCs. Otherwise, it suggests to place experts at PHCCs which is not the philosophy of primary care services.

The sections in settings (Methods) or the results did not provide information on whether the health care providers at the PHCCs are trained/supervised to provide MH service. This is relevant because without training and supervision, primary care providers generally will not be able to provide services in Nepal. Therefore, we would not be able to make inferences from statements where service users felt that PHCCs do not provide MH service. If PHCCs do not provide service for MH the problem is not in KNOWING, it is in AVAILABILITY. On the other hand, if health care providers are trained but people do not know it is different case. It would be great if authors could clarify on this.

633: suggest replacing ‘many mental health services’ to ‘basic mental health services’ … use psychotropic medications at all places

644: do you mean inadequate implementation? I am not convinced that every municipalities should have separate ‘Policy’ for mental health. What probably was meant by research participants is MH programs or even activities at municipal level.

678 – 685: These are the recommendations and do not seem to have come from the study participants as described in the results sections. I suggest to exclusively limit the conclusion on the finding from the study and not on the ‘opinion of the authors.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Madhur Basnet, MD(Psychiatry), Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 30;16(4):e0250694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250694.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


20 Feb 2021

Reviewer #1: all comments have been addressed. Data is not available but authors have provided reasons for not making them available.

Response: Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged.

Reviewer #2: The authors have addressed the issues raised by the previous reviewer/s well.

Here are some of the major concerns regarding the study.

1. Title: The authors have explored various factors affecting service utilization in PHC facilities in the district rather than "the roles of stigma, awareness and availability". The roles of stigma, awareness and availability have not been explored in detail as well. So, the mention of "the roles of stigma, awareness and availability" in the title itself is not well justified.

Response: Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The title has been refined as suggested.

2. How many of the primary health service providing centers in the study area had availability of mental health services? Non-availability of mental health service can be considered as a barrier to mental health service provision but definitely not a barrier to "utilization". This needs to be clarified further.

Response:Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The fact regarding presence of psychological counseling and referral services has been added.

3. It is the lived experiences of those with mental illness and then their caretakers that provide more authentic information regarding individual and interpersonal factors, and even community level factors that facilitate or hinder service utilization. However, the narratives of those with mental illness and that of their caretakers have been grossly under-represented in the article. Would recommend to include more of the narratives from them.

Response: Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. Narratives from people with mental illnesses or their primary caretakers has been increased throughout the result section.

4. Conclusion- Lines 678-683 (Community awareness can be provided through mass media, campaigns, and celebrations of days related to mental health. Mental illnesses support groups can be formed to reduce stigma at the community level and increase mental health literacy at the individual level through various programs. Inclusion of mental health education in the curriculum can also help arouse awareness and mental health literacy from an early age. These support groups and inclusion of mental health education in the curriculum can help reduce and/or eliminate stigma and increase awareness in community) have not been substantiated from the results or discussion portion of the manuscript. Better to either substantiate these claims in the conclusion or drop them out.

Response: Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The necessary changes as suggested have been made in the conclusion section.

5. Calculation of "Inter-coder positive percent agreement"- It needs more elaboration. As per the table, all the codes from coder 2 must have matched with that of coder 1 for this gross calculation provided in the table. However, I would recommend more expert opinion in this regard.

Response:Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. Expert opinion was provided by psychiatrist on the codes generated and the calculation of intercoder reliability. All the codes of Coder 2 did match with the codes of Coder 1. A simple percentage calculation was done then after.

Line 86- the inference of decreasing service utilization is not substantiated as the factors mentioned in the sentence refer to lack of service availability itself. So, this does not relate to "service utilization".

Response: Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The portion of the sentence “thereby decreasing service utilization” has been removed.

Line 97/98- "impairing family function(1), and increasing the risk of teenage childbearing(2) and domestic violence(3)"- this is cited from - 1. Keitner GI, Ryan CE, Miller IW, Kohn R, Bishop DS, Epstein NB. Role of the family in recovery and major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry 1995;152:1002-8. 2. Kessler RC, Berglund PA, Foster CL, Saunders WB, Stang PE, Walters EE. Social consequences of psychiatric disorders. II: Teenage parenthood. American Journal of Psychiatry 1997;154:1405-11. 3. Zlotnick C, Kohn R, Peterson J, Pearlstein T. Partner physical victimization in a national sample of American families: relationship to psychological functioning, psychosocial factors and gender. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 1998;13:156-65- in the article mentioned in your reference. So, while citing reference mentioned in other articles use appropriate referencing.

Response: Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. Different studies that had identified the factors have been added as suggested.

Line 199/200- psychiatrist being available nearby in order to manage any deviation from normal seen in the patients, if required.- Please clarify what does "manage any deviation from normal seen in the patients"

Response: Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The sentence has been modified to provide understandable meaning.

Line 244- mentally ill patients - patients with mental illness

Response: Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The change as per suggestion has been made.

Two of the themes(stigma, educational level) explained in the "Mental Illness and Help Seeking pathway" do not concern directly to help seeking pathways. Also, sudden mention of "help seeking pathway" does not seem relevant to factors affecting service utilization as mentioned in the title.

Response: Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. “Mental Illness and Help Seeking Pathway” was provided as background for the factors identified, which has been removed as suggested.

Line 402-404- It's obvious that one would not go to a facility where service is not available. So, this statement cannot be interpreted as a "barrier to service utilization". There would be no question of service utilization when service is not even available."Unavailability of service" is definitely a barrier to mental health service provision but not a barrier for "utilization". There would be no question of "service utilization" when the service does not even exist.

Response:Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The narration has been substituted with more relevant narrations.

The verbatim given in lines 431-432 do not substantiate the claim of "commercialization of health services" as barrier to service utilization.

Response: Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. Presence of commercialization was acknowledged by elected representatives and the health administrators of the district.

Similarly, referral from the PHCs themselves should not be interpreted as "barrier to service utilization" at PHC. (lines 428-435)

Response: Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. Substantial narrations have been provided.

Lines 461-468- Here, issue related to stigma have been raised. But again, there are verbatim of service provider/administrator only. It would be more relevant if the issue of stigma has been raised by the service users.

Response: Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. Verbatim from service users has been added as suggested.

Line 518-519- "whereas some traditional healers suggested not visiting health facilities" is not substantiated by the verbatim mentioned in line 522-23 "He told me to keep my523 wife there for 7 days in order to cure her, and said that doctors would take 15 days to cure her."

Response: Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The necessary changes in the statement have been made.

Lines 550-560- there's national mental health policy in Nepal (https://publichealthupdate.com/mental-health-policy-nepal/) and policy to provide mental health services from PHC services. Local bodies do not make their own mental health policies. So, the statements basically shows the lack of awareness among the participants. It's better to clarify these issues rather than just mentioning and interpreting the verbatim of participants.

Response: Respected Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. Necessary changes as per suggestions have been made.

Reviewer #3: This is an important area of research, thank you for the study. The paper contains rich information on barriers to use mental health service. However, I recommend following modifications:

Prevalence of Mental Disorders in Nepal may be added in the first paragraph after the global prevalence

Response: Respected Madam/Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. Prevalence of Mental Disorders in Nepal has been added as suggested.

59/60: advise to reframe the sentence “This is a stark reminder of the immense burden of the huge gap in mental health”

Response: Respected Madam/Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. As the paragraph tried to present the burden of treatment gap in “inverted triangle” format, the sentence has been removed.

61: definition of treatment gap may not be needed; it has already been explained in lines 57-59

Treatment gap in nepal may also be added along with the treatment gap in India. The fact sheet on the finding of National MH survey of Nepal has been published.

Response: Respected Madam/Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. Definition of treatment gap has been removed and findings from National Mental Health Survey have been added as per suggestion.

82: what do you mean by senior staff?

Response: Respected Madam/Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The term was used as such from the study cited. “Senior Community Medicine Assistant” as used in the study cited has been added.

110 – 113 aren’t these methodological issues relating to site selection?

Response: Respected Madam/Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The sentence from the lines 110-113 have been kept in the “Setting” sub-heading of “Materials and Methods” as suggested. Moreover, the major mental disorder present in the diseases have also been kept within the sub-heading as it describes the status of mental disorder in the study area/site.

151: it would be useful to state whether primary care centers (health posts/PHCCs etc) in the district provide mental health services as part of government’s program or NGO program. As availability is important factor for service use and also focus of this paper.

Response: Respected Madam/Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The availability of mental health services has been provided in the “Setting” sub-heading.

298-300: Suggest reviewing the write up. The line read as ‘educated people DO NOT have stigma at all’ which is not a consistent observation in researches published.

Response: Respected Madam/Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The portion has been removed as it was used only to provide background in to the mental health context in the study site.

452: ‘Lack of psychiatrists, mental health experts or doctors in the PHC facilities acted as barriers for mental health service utilization’ I would suggest interpreting this as people interest to seek care from experts and not form general health care providers at PHCs. Otherwise, it suggests to place experts at PHCCs which is not the philosophy of primary care services.

Response: Respected Madam/Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. Changes in the sentence as per suggestions have been made.

The sections in settings (Methods) or the results did not provide information on whether the health care providers at the PHCCs are trained/supervised to provide MH service. This is relevant because without training and supervision, primary care providers generally will not be able to provide services in Nepal. Therefore, we would not be able to make inferences from statements where service users felt that PHCCs do not provide MH service. If PHCCs do not provide service for MH the problem is not in KNOWING, it is in AVAILABILITY. On the other hand, if health care providers are trained but people do not know it is different case. It would be great if authors could clarify on this.

Response: Respected Madam/Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The availability of psychological counseling and referral services regardless of training and supervision provided has been added to the section.

633: suggest replacing ‘many mental health services’ to ‘basic mental health services’ … use psychotropic medications at all places

Response: Respected Madam/Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The suggested change has been made.

644: do you mean inadequate implementation? I am not convinced that every municipalities should have separate ‘Policy’ for mental health. What probably was meant by research participants is MH programs or even activities at municipal level.

Response: Respected Madam/Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The changes as per suggestions has been made.

678 – 685: These are the recommendations and do not seem to have come from the study participants as described in the results sections. I suggest to exclusively limit the conclusion on the finding from the study and not on the ‘opinion of the authors.

Response: Respected Madam/Sir, the comment is well acknowledged. The conclusion has been modified as per suggested.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Pranil Man Singh Pradhan

13 Apr 2021

Factors affecting utilization of mental health services from Primary Health Care (PHC) facilities of western hilly district of Nepal

PONE-D-20-06276R2

Dear Dr. Devkota,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Pranil Man Singh Pradhan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #3: Thank you for addressing the comments. The second paragraph (64-72) under introduction section may be revised to make it concise.

The rest seem ok to me.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #3: No

Acceptance letter

Pranil Man Singh Pradhan

23 Apr 2021

PONE-D-20-06276R2

Factors affecting utilization of mental health services from Primary Health Care (PHC) facilities of western hilly district of Nepal

Dear Dr. Devkota:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Pranil Man Singh Pradhan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Primary Health Care facilities in Arghakhanchi district.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Appendix. Interview guidelines.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Appendix. Coding and codes within theme in EZR.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Appendix. Thematic mapping in EZR.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Transcript

    (DOCX)

    S2 Transcript

    (DOCX)

    S3 Transcript

    (DOCX)

    S4 Transcript

    (DOCX)

    S5 Transcript

    (DOCX)

    S6 Transcript

    (DOCX)

    S7 Transcript

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Data cannot be shared publicly as the information were audio-recorded and some of the participants may have willingly disclosed their identity. In addition, as the manuscript is a part of the thesis conducted by corresponding author, all the information has been stored by the supervisor and Institutional Review Committee (IRC) of Patan Academy of Health Sciences (PAHS). Data are available from the Institutional Review Committee of PAHS (contact via irc-pahs@pahs.edu.np) as per the institutional rules for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. Patan Academy of Health Sciences is a public not-for-profit tertiary academic institution running School of Medicine, School of Public Health and School of Nursing. More information regarding Patan Academy of Health Sciences can be found from the following link: https://www.pahs.edu.np/ However, seven of the translated transcripts have been made available as supporting information.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES