Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2021 May 3;376(1827):20200023. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0023

‘She come like a sister to me’: a qualitative study of volunteer social support for disadvantaged women in the transition to motherhood in England

Jenny McLeish 1,, Maggie Redshaw 1
PMCID: PMC8090821  PMID: 33938283

Abstract

This qualitative study explores the ways in which disadvantaged women benefit from social support from a trained volunteer during pregnancy and the postnatal period, using the theoretical frameworks of stress and coping and a multi-dimensional model of social support. Forty-seven mothers took part in semi-structured interviews. The mothers, who had received social support through nine volunteer projects in England, faced many potentially stressful challenges besides having a baby (such as poverty, poor housing, histories of abuse, motherhood at a young age, living with physical or mental health difficulties, migration and insecure immigration status). Analysis was in two distinct stages: first, an inductive thematic analysis of mothers' experiences, and second, mapping of the results onto the theoretical frameworks chosen. Volunteers built relationships of trust with mothers and gave skilled emotional support, positive appraisal support, informational support and practical support according to mothers’ individual needs, thereby assisting mothers exposed to multiple stressors with problem-focused, emotion-focused and perception-focused coping. This helped to reduce social isolation, increase effective access to services and community resources, and build mothers' confidence, self-esteem and self-efficacy. Volunteer social support may have particular salience for mothers who lack structural support and need skilled functional support.

This article is part of the theme issue ‘Multidisciplinary perspectives on social support and maternal–child health’.

Keywords: volunteer, social support, stress, coping, pregnancy, postnatal

1. Background

There are significant health inequalities for disadvantaged mothers and their babies in the UK. They are both at increased risk of poor physical and mental health outcomes if the mothers are poor, migrants, from Black, Asian and minority ethnic communities, single or young [17]. These outcomes may be influenced by poorer access to maternity and child health services [8] and the effects of stressful life events or chronically stressful circumstances [9,10].

Psychosocial stress can be understood as the interaction between the existence of an objective stressor, a person's subjective cognitive appraisal of the stressor and their reaction in the light of this appraisal [11]. In this model, the experience of stress involves a mismatch, which is the perception that the demands imposed by the stressor exceed the available resources for coping. ‘Coping’ describes behaviours that protect the person from psychological harm resulting from the stressor, and may be focused on removing the stressor, on altering perception of the meaning of the stressor, or on managing the emotional consequences effectively [12]. Some coping resources are psychological, such as a sense of self-efficacy or self-esteem [12]. Another important resource that can buffer the impact of stressors through coping assistance is social support, defined as a person's perception of the availability of others to provide emotional, psychological and material resources [13]. Social support may deal directly with the stressor (problem-focused coping assistance), help to cognitively redefine the stressor as less threatening (perception-focused coping assistance) or alter the person's reactive self-perception (emotion-focused coping assistance) [12,13]. In addition, social support may improve emotional wellbeing by offering companionship, a sense of belonging and mattering to other people [14].

Mothers typically receive social support from their partners, family (especially their own mothers), friends and health professionals when they have a baby. Social support has been found to enable mothers to cope more effectively with the stress of having a baby [15,16], and it is an important protective factor against antenatal and postnatal depression and anxiety, and a key ingredient for developing parenting confidence [6,1622]. Social support is constructed as both structural, which refers to the number of relationships in a person's social network, and functional, which refers to dimensions of the support itself—emotional, appraisal (esteem), informational and practical [23]. Emotional support, which contributes to emotion-focused coping, consists of words or actions that show love, liking, empathy, respect and trust, leading the recipient to believe that they are cared for, esteemed and valued [23]. Appraisal support, which contributes to perception-focused coping, is the communication of information to enable positive self-evaluation [23]. Informational support, which contributes to problem-focused coping, is information provided to another at a time of stress [23]. Practical support, which also contributes to problem-focused coping, is the provision of tangible goods, services or aid [23]. These different dimensions of social support operate through multiple social psychological mechanisms [14]. Different people in the network may provide different dimensions of functional support and a mother may feel unsupported or even more stressed if the support offered does not match her needs [13,15,21].

People living with various forms of disadvantage are disproportionately likely to be affected by stressful events [24]. They are also less likely to have the psychological and interpersonal resources to cope, because of absent or limited social networks and lower self-esteem and self-efficacy [25,26]. Where a mother does not have sufficient social support from within her own family and social network, she may benefit emotionally from support from a trained community volunteer [2734]. There is as-yet limited research on the specific dimensions of social support during the transition to motherhood [35]. This paper aims to explore the experiences of disadvantaged mothers who received social support from a volunteer, through the lens of the theoretical framework of stress and coping and a multi-dimensional model of social support.

2. Methods

This qualitative study in two stages was informed by the theoretical perspective of phenomenological social psychology [36]. The first stage had an experiential qualitative descriptive design [36,37], which focuses on mothers' accounts and enabled their voices to be heard while acknowledging the role of both participants’ understandings and the researchers' interpretations in the production of knowledge [38]. Results of the empirical stage have already been reported [3941]. The second stage was theory-based mapping of those qualitative data, reported here.

(a). Participant recruitment

A researcher (J.M.) contacted the coordinators of nine projects providing volunteer social support to disadvantaged mothers in England. Each project trained unpaid volunteer mothers from the local community in active listening, providing information and signposting to local services. Volunteers supported women during pregnancy and until the baby was between six weeks and two years old, through one-to-one support, group support or both. The projects had a variety of target groups, including young mothers, South Asian mothers, refugee and asylum seeker mothers, mothers living with HIV, mothers with mental health difficulties, mothers with very complex needs or any disadvantaged mother in the local area. Some volunteers were peers with specific life experiences as well as motherhood, such as living with mental health difficulties or HIV. Details of the projects have been reported in an earlier paper describing the different models of volunteer support [40]. The project coordinators described the research to supported mothers using the study information leaflet and either asked permission for the researcher to contact them or arranged with those who wished to participate a time for interview.

(b). Data collection

Each mother took part in a face-to-face semi-structured interview that explored the mother's experiences of using maternity services, her involvement with the volunteer support project, its impact, and her feelings about the voluntary nature of the peer support and its ending. The duration of interviews varied (range 16–90 min, median 44 min); the shorter length of a few interviews was owing to mothers needing to attend to their young children. Professional interpreting for participants whose first language was not English was offered, but none took up the offer. All the interviews were audio-recorded and fully professionally transcribed, with each participant being given an anonymous identifier, e.g. M001.

(c). Data analysis

Interviews were initially analysed using inductive thematic analysis [42]. Transcripts were checked against the audio recording, and then reread, and codes were identified inductively and recorded using NVIVO software. Codes were refined, combined and disaggregated as data collection continued, and themes identified; initial codes and themes were reconsidered in the light of subsequent interviews. To increase the validity of the analysis, one researcher (J.M.) undertook thematic analysis of all the transcripts and the other (M.R.) analysed a subset. Codes and themes were discussed and agreed. Both researchers approached the analysis reflexively, acknowledging the potential impact of their own perspectives as White, UK-born women with children. After this inductive analysis, a second stage of analysis was carried out deductively: the themes identified were mapped onto the theoretical framework of stress and coping theory and a multi-dimensional model of social support.

3. Results

(a). Participants

A total of 47 mothers who had received volunteer support during pregnancy and after birth took part in interviews between July 2013 and September 2014. Forty-six interviews were carried out face-to-face and one interview was by telephone at the mother's request. Mothers’ socio-demographic characteristics are shown in table 1. They all faced a range of challenging issues and most faced multiple challenges. These stressors included traumatic experiences before pregnancy, such as forced migration (to seek asylum or through people trafficking), having children taken into care, the death of a child or partner, childhood sexual abuse, detention, rape and torture. Ongoing stressful experiences during pregnancy and afterwards included unemployment, poverty, homelessness, domestic abuse, children with health or behavioural problems, living with stigma (for example because of HIV), unfamiliarity with the UK healthcare and social support systems, language barriers with service providers and insecure immigration status. Other stressors related to the mother directly, such as pregnancy at a young age, poor physical or mental health, and living with HIV. Finally, for some mothers, there were stressors specifically connected to motherhood: a lack of knowledge about pregnancy, birth and parenting, and adapting to the role transition of becoming a mother.

Table 1.

Characteristics of mothers interviewed.

number of mothers (n = 47) percentage (%)
first time mother 22 47
aged under 25 10 21
single parent 21 45
long-term health condition or disability 9 19
poor mental healtha 25 53
ethnicity
 Black 18 38
 White 13 28
 Asian 3 6
 Other 8 17
born overseas 31 66
English not first language 35 74
asylum seeker/refugee 13 28

aThis refers to mothers' self-described poor mental health during pregnancy or after birth.

(b). Findings

Table 2 shows the theoretical mapping of the stressors and support activities described by mothers in the empirical stage [3941], and the social, psychological and practical mechanisms of impact identified by the authors during that stage, with illustrative quotations.

Table 2.

Stressors and support activities mapped onto the dimensions of social support and coping theory.

stressor support activity aspect of social support coping mechanism identified example quotation
social isolation regular contact structural/companionship problem-focused increase in social network ‘If she wasn't there I would feel like alone, crying every day’ (M010)
emotional emotion-focused feeling valued It's something inside yourself as well, you know that that person is there in their own time and there because they want to be, not because they have to be’ (M016)
signposting or accompanying to local parent groups informational, practical problem-focused increase in social network ‘She helped me get into the baby groups and get me out the house a bit more, which built my confidence up’ (M026)
no-one to confide in non-judgemental active listening emotional emotion-focused offloading, feeling heard When the problem is really, really much I feel depressed, I just smash everything on her and she listens to me’ (M028)
feeling accepted ‘You can be open and you can be yourself, and if you have something on your mind you know you can say it without being judged’ (M019)
chronic and uncontrollable stressors compassionate presence, moral support, shared prayer emotional emotion-focused having someone alongside ‘The emotional stress … you might say, “Oh God, I did not bargain for this” … When someone is there to encourage you I think you will feel better’ (M028)
lack of confidence, feeling powerless, feeling like a failure normalization appraisal perception-focused lateral social comparison They took my mind off a lot of what I was going through, the problems and worry, by making feel me like I was normal’ (M007)
strengths-based approach appraisal perception-focused affirmation ‘She made me feel better because [she was] speaking always good things [about] me’ (M013)
encouraging small steps towards goals or solutions appraisal perception-focused building experiences of success—increasing self-efficacy ‘She used to ask me, “What do you want to do? You can do it! …” I have always been living toward the things we wrote down to achieve it’ (M006)
non-directive information appraisal perception-focused empowerment ‘The volunteer provides a package of solutions, choice, and they told you what's pros and cons, and you make decision which is right for you. There is no push, no demand’ (M043)
lack of hope role modelling recovery or positive outcomes appraisal perception-focused inspiring hope I'd be like, “Oh wow, they're normal now, and that's going to be me”’ (M038)
negative interpretations suggesting alternative explanations appraisal perception-focused reframing They show me another way of looking at it, where sometimes I'm very narrow-minded’ (M019)
lack of knowledge about pregnancy, birth, parenting providing evidence-based information informational problem-focused empowerment, confidence ‘She told me everything … When I went for labour, when I gave birth, when I had a baby, it was like it wasn't new to me’ (M032)
poverty, hunger signposting to local services, community groups, food banks informational problem-focused meeting basic needs When I was pregnant, she make me a lasagne. Oh, I'll never forget this lasagne! … She brings me clothes for the baby before she [was] born. She showed me [the community centre], they give free baby clothes and free baby stuff’ (M010)
providing baby clothes, household goods, food practical
unfamiliar systems explaining systems, signposting informational problem-focused effective access to services You have to try to find things, how they're going to work … You always need someone who can explain for you. And who knows the law’ (M037)
‘I wouldn't want to go on my own … I was like, “Oh God, I can't do it, I can't do it.” And she's like, “Just go. I'll come with you’’’ (M020)
accompanying, advocacy practical
communicating with health professionals interpreting, advocacy practical problem-focused effective use of services ‘She came to nearly all my appointments … it's much better because sometimes I can't explain myself because my English, I can't remember all the words’ (M011)

(i). Structural support and companionship

Most of the mothers were extremely socially isolated. Sometimes, this was as a result of migration to the UK or because of homelessness and temporary accommodation: ‘I had so many difficulties here because I was so alone here’ (M036). Others had structural support in theory from partner, family or friends, but could not make use of it because confiding their difficulties would trigger negative reactions: ‘I can't tell people I can't cope. In Africa they would say, “Then why did you get pregnant?”’ (M006). The volunteers represented an increase in mothers' social networks, and their support included helping mothers to access local parenting groups where they could find ongoing structural social support.

The significance of this companionship was reflected in the dominant metaphors used by mothers to describe their volunteers, which were either social: ‘Friends forever, friends for life!’ (M001) or echoed the family relationships they were missing: ‘I have a home’ (M033); ‘She come like a sister to me’ (M012). Although some mothers moved on naturally from needing this additional structural social support, many preferred that the support relationship ended by evolving into informal social contact. Where a project had a defined endpoint and withdrew the volunteer from contact at the end, this loss of structural support could be distressing for mothers: ‘Hard … she's been like part of the family almost’ (M030). The relationship of trust built by the volunteers over time was the vehicle for effective delivery of all four functional dimensions of social support.

(ii). Emotional support and emotion-focused coping assistance

Visits from an unpaid volunteer gave vulnerable mothers the sense that they had an individual social value. All the volunteers were trained in the techniques of active listening, and their non-judgemental demeanour enabled mothers to speak freely, unburden themselves of thoughts they had been keeping to themselves, and experience unconditional acceptance. Having difficult feelings accepted and validated helped mothers to accept themselves. Where the mother was dealing with a chronic stressor that could not be solved, such as insecure immigration status, volunteers gave moral support through compassionate presence, solidarity and prayer.

(iii). Appraisal support and perception-focused coping assistance

Volunteers used multiple techniques that enabled mothers to appraise themselves and their situations more positively, including drawing on their own peer experiences of motherhood (or other challenging issues) to normalize the difficulties and emotions mothers were experiencing. In helping mothers to reframe how they saw themselves and their competence, most volunteers used an explicitly strengths-based approach that affirmed mothers' capabilities, and supported them in taking small steps in dealing with stressors. They gave non-directive information rather than advice, empowering mothers to make their own choices by emphasizing the mothers’ agency. They gently challenged mothers' self-blame and negative interpretation of interactions. Volunteers with direct peer experiences in addition to motherhood also provided role models of recovery or living successfully as a mother with the condition or in the situation, inspiring mothers with hope for their own future.

(iv). Informational support and problem-focused coping assistance

Volunteers were trained to give evidence-based information about pregnancy, birth and parenting that was not based on their own experiences but learned during training or obtained from reputable sources. They might draw on support from their project or their own knowledge to help mothers understand the UK maternity care and welfare systems, resources available in the local community (such as a parenting group, a free source of baby clothes, a food bank or a place of worship) and life in the UK (for example, bus routes, or how to use a self-service checkout).

(v). Practical support and problem-focused coping assistance

Volunteers did not just give mothers information about community resources and UK systems, but in many cases, gave them direct practical help to make use of them. This was typically in the form of accompanying an unconfident mother to the group or service, advocacy on her behalf to service providers, or informal interpreting so she could make effective use of the service. Some volunteers mobilized their own networks to provide mothers with essential items for the baby or household goods that they lacked, or took them home-cooked food.

4. Discussion

Studies of social support in the transition to motherhood often focus on support for the specific challenges associated with having a new baby, usually for more advantaged participants [16]. Although the volunteer projects in this study offered support for women during pregnancy and afterwards, having a baby was just one of a range of stressors affecting the disadvantaged mothers from a range of cultural backgrounds. Mothers described the benefits when volunteers gave support in ways that also addressed these wider contextual stressors, flexibly adapted to a mother's individual needs. Successful volunteer support for mothers has been consistently found to be based on a relationship of trust [27,28,40,4346]. Mapping the types of support given by volunteers onto the four dimensions of social support and the three types of coping assistance indicates the breadth of support that can be given by volunteers within this relationship, using a variety of techniques.

From the perspective of stress and coping theory, this study illustrated how volunteers gave multiple forms of coping assistance. They helped mothers directly with some of the problems causing them stress, for example, by helping them to navigate UK systems, make more effective use of maternity care, find community resources and access essential items for their babies and emergency food. Emotion-focused coping took the form of providing mothers with a compassionate and confidential listener to whom they could offload their worries and stress, and making them feel that they mattered and were not alone as they faced their difficulties. As predicted by Cutrona & Russell [47], this emotional support was central when the stressors themselves were uncontrollable. Some of the most skilful interactions were forms of perception-focused coping in which volunteers reframed mothers' perceptions of situations and also of themselves and their ability to cope. Many mothers described themselves in ways consistent with very low self-esteem and self-efficacy. These self-perceptions were modified over time, with mothers gradually feeling themselves worthy of attention and care. The volunteers’ presence and gentle affirmation, their non-directive information-giving emphasizing the mothers' own decision-making, support for achieving small goals, and opportunities to feel normal and hopeful about the future through social comparison, actively contributed to this process [48].

Mothers normally rely on structural social support from their existing social network, but most mothers in this study had low levels of structural support, or none at all, which is particularly common for migrant women [49]. Volunteers supplied a basic level of structural and companionship support through their visits, and helped to build up mothers’ social networks by providing groups for them to meet each other, or by connecting them to other community sources of structural support such as parent and child groups. The importance, and sometimes challenge, of managing the ending of support sensitively [27] was emphasized by mothers' frequent use of metaphors of family and home when describing their personal experience of receiving volunteer support, particularly when their real family or home had been left behind or lost.

Mothers who have structural support may be dissatisfied with the level or type of functional support they receive from their network, and support may be ineffective (e.g. wrong advice) or may be counterproductive if it does not match need (e.g. perceived as controlling or undermining), which can increase stress and contribute to poorer psychological wellbeing [6,16,50]. Some mothers in this study had some apparent structural support but did not see their partner, family or friends as safe and useful sources of functional support, particularly if they were ashamed of their situation or feelings, or were worried about the consequences of being perceived as not coping [41]. This is in line with the personal and social barriers to mobilizing postnatal social support identified by Negron et al. [51] and De Sousa Machado et al. [52], who note that there may be cultural differences in these barriers. Although the level of training varied between the projects [40], all the volunteers were trained in non-judgemental active listening, confidentiality, non-directive information-giving and a strengths-based approach to building up mothers’ confidence and self-efficacy. This meant that, unlike partners, family and friends without the benefit of training, volunteers were able to give effective social support across all the functional dimensions of social support: emotional, informational, appraisal and (in many cases) practical support as well. This echoes the findings of a study of social support from paid lay pregnancy outreach workers [53].

A key strength of this research was the inclusion of 47 participants with diverse personal circumstances, including some extremely disadvantaged backgrounds, from nine different volunteer peer support projects around England. Another strength was the separation of the deductive theoretical analysis from the initial inductive stage, so that analysis first stayed close to participants' own perspectives and words before the later application of a theoretical framework [36]. There were also some limitations. First, participants were contacted through the project coordinators—this was essential to gain the trust of vulnerable women, but meant that the researchers were not aware of how many declined to participate at that early stage. Second, one mother's interview was informally interpreted by her volunteer supporter at her request, so her comments about the support she had received had to be considered in this context (she is not quoted in this paper).

5. Conclusion

Volunteer social support during pregnancy and after birth is a promising and valued intervention that can benefit disadvantaged mothers through a number of interrelated mechanisms. Trained volunteers can give emotional, appraisal, informational and practical support according to mothers' individual needs, thereby assisting mothers exposed to multiple stressors with problem-focused, emotion-focused and perception-focused coping. Evidence from this study indicates that volunteer social support has particular salience for women who lack structural support and have complex needs that are not easily met within conventional care, for example, mothers who are recent migrants and those experiencing multiple complex disadvantages.

Acknowledgements

We are most grateful to all the women who participated in this study and the organizations that facilitated the research, including Birth Companions, Bluebell Care Trust, Chapel Street Community Fund, Island House, NCT, Positively UK and Shoreditch Trust.

Ethics

The Oxford University Medical Sciences Research Ethics Committee (reference MSD-IDREC-C1-2013- 111) approved the study. An information leaflet was provided and informed consent to participate was obtained.

Data accessibility

Women consented to data collection and for their interview responses to be used in publications with no details or other information being published that could identify them. Following the consent process, the individual qualitative interview transcripts will not be made publicly available.

Authors' contributions

This study is part of a programme of work, the research questions for which were developed by M.R. and J.M. M.R. and J.M. conceived and developed the outline for this study. J.M. undertook the data collection and J.M. and M.R. both took part in data analysis. J.M. drafted the manuscript with input from M.R. Both authors were involved in interpretation, review and revision of the draft manuscript and approval of the final version.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

This research is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme, conducted through the Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, 108/0001. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

References

  • 1.Knight M, Bunch K, Tuffnell D, Jayakody H, Shakespeare J, Kotnis R, Kenyon S, Kurinczuk J. 2018. Saving lives, improving mothers' care. Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland confidential enquiries into maternal deaths and morbidity 2014–16. Oxford, UK: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aveyard P, Cheng K, Manaseki S, Gardosi J. 2002. The risk of preterm delivery in women of different ethnic groups. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 109, 894-899. ( 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01197.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lancaster CA, Gold KJ, Flynn HA, Yoo H, Marcus SM, Davis MM. 2010. Risk factors for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: a systematic review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 202, 5-14. ( 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.09.007) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liao T. 2003. Mental health, teenage motherhood, and age at first birth among British women in the 1990s. ISER working papers number 2003–33. Colchester, UK: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Office for National Statistics. 2020. Statistical bulletin: Child and infant mortality in England and Wales: 2018. (See https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/childhoodinfantandperinatalmortalityinenglandandwales/2018#risk–factors)
  • 6.Razurel C, Kaiser B. 2015. The role of satisfaction with social support on the psychological health of primiparous mothers in the perinatal period. Women Health. 55, 167-186. ( 10.1080/03630242.2014.979969) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Manktelow BN, Smith LK, Seaton SE, Hyman-Taylor P, Kurinczuk JJ, Field DJet al. 2016. MBRRACE-UK Perinatal mortality surveillance report, UK perinatal deaths for births from January to December 2014. Leicester, UK: The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Downe S, Finlayson K, Walsh D, Lavender T, Downe S. 2009. ‘Weighing up and balancing out’: a metasynthesis of barriers to antenatal care for marginalised women in high-income countries. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 116, 518-529. ( 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02067.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dunkel Schetter C, Tanner L. 2012. Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy: implications for mothers, children, research, and practice. Curr. Opin Psychiatry. 25, 141-148. ( 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283503680) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.O'Donnell K, O'Connor TG, Glover V. 2009. Prenatal stress and neurodevelopment of the child: focus on the HPA axis and role of the placenta. Dev. Neurosci. 31, 285-292. ( 10.1159/000216539) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lazarus RS, Folkman S. 1984. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer Pub. Co. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pearlin LI, Schooler C. 1978. The structure of coping. J. Health Soc. Behav. 19, 2. ( 10.2307/2136319) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cohen S, Wills TA. 1985. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol. Bull. 98, 310-357. ( 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Thoits PA. 2011. Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. J. Health Soc. Behav. 52, 145-161. ( 10.1177/0022146510395592) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Razurel C, Kaiser B, Sellenet C, Epiney M. 2013. Relation between perceived stress, social support, and coping strategies and maternal well-being: a review of the literature. Women Health 53, 74-99. ( 10.1080/03630242.2012.732681) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ni PK, Siew Lin SK. 2011. The role of family and friends in providing social support towards enhancing the wellbeing of postpartum women: a comprehensive systematic review. JBI Libr. Syst. Rev. 9, 313-370. ( 10.11124/jbisrir-2011-94) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lee AM, Lam SK, Sze Mun Lau SM, Chong CS, Chui HW, Fong DY. 2007. Prevalence, course, and risk factors for antenatal anxiety and depression. Obstet. Gynecol. 110, 1102-1112. ( 10.1097/01.AOG.0000287065.59491.70) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Leigh B, Milgrom J. 2008. Risk factors for antenatal depression, postnatal depression and parenting stress. BMC Psychiatry. 8, 24. ( 10.1186/1471-244X-8-24) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Robertson E, Grace S, Wallington T, Stewart DE. 2004. Antenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: a synthesis of recent literature. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry. 26, 289-295. ( 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.02.006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Littleton HL, Breitkopf CR, Berenson AB. 2007. Correlates of anxiety symptoms during pregnancy and association with perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 196, 424-432. ( 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.042) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Leahy-Warren P. 2005. First-time mothers: social support and confidence in infant care. J. Adv. Nurs. 50, 479-488. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03425.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Leahy-Warren P, McCarthy G, Corcoran P. 2012. First-time mothers: social support, maternal parental self-efficacy and postnatal depression. J. Clin. Nurs. 21, 388-397. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03701.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.House JS. 1981. Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hatch SL, Dohrenwend BP. 2007. Distribution of traumatic and other stressful life events by race/ethnicity, gender, SES and age: a review of the research. Am. J. Community Psychol. 40, 313-332. ( 10.1007/s10464-007-9134-z) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Turner RJ, Avison WR. 2003. Status variations in stress exposure: implications for the interpretation of research on race, socioeconomic status, and gender. J. Health Soc. Behav. 44, 488-505. ( 10.2307/1519795) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guindon MH. 2009. Self-Esteem across the lifespan: issues and interventions. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Spiby H, Green JM, Darwin Z, Willmot H, Knox D, McLeish J, Smith M. 2015. Multisite implementation of trained volunteer doula support for disadvantaged childbearing women: a mixed-methods evaluation. Health Serv. Deliv. Res. 3, 1-332. ( 10.3310/hsdr03080) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Granville G, Sugarman W. 2012. Someone in my corner: a volunteer peer support programme for pregnancy, birth and beyond. Final Evaluation Report. Essex, UK: Parents 1st.
  • 29.Taggart AV, Short SD, Barclay L. 2000. ‘She has made me feel human again’: an evaluation of a volunteer home-based visiting project for mothers. Health Soc. Care Community 8, 1-8. ( 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2000.00227.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Frost N, Johnson L, Stein M, Wallis L. 2000. Home-start and the delivery of family support. Child Soc. 14, 328-342. ( 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2000.tb00188.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.MacPherson K, Barnes J, Nichols M, Dixon S. 2009. Volunteer support for mothers with new babies: perceptions of need and support received. Child Soc. 24, 175-187. ( 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00227.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bhavnani V, Newburn M, McMullen S. 2015. Someone on my side: NCT's birth and beyond community supporters programme. Summary of evaluation findings. London, UK: NCT. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.McAuley C, Knapp M, Beecham J, McCurry N, Sleed M. 2004. Young families under stress. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Small R, Taft AJ, Brown SJ. 2011. The power of social connection and support in improving health: lessons from social support interventions with childbearing women. BMC Public Health. 11(Suppl. 5), S4. ( 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S5-S4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Reid KM, Taylor MG. 2015. Social support, stress, and maternal postpartum depression: a comparison of supportive relationships. Soc. Sci. Res. 54, 246-262. ( 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.08.009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Landridge D. 2008. Phenomenology and critical social psychology: directions and debates in theory and research. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass. 2, 1126-1142. ( 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00114.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sandelowski M. 2000. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res. Nurs. Health 23, 334-340. () [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pidgeon N, Henwood K. 1997. Using grounded theory in psychological research (ed. Hayes N). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.McLeish J, Redshaw M. 2016. ‘We have beaten HIV a bit’: a qualitative study of experiences of peer support during pregnancy with an HIV Mentor Mother project in England. BMJ Open 6, e011499. ( 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011499) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.McLeish J, Redshaw M. 2015. Peer support during pregnancy and early parenthood: a qualitative study of models and perceptions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15, 257. ( 10.1186/s12884-015-0685-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.McLeish J, Redshaw M. 2017. Mothers' accounts of the impact on emotional wellbeing of organised peer support in pregnancy and early parenthood: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17, 28. ( 10.1186/s12884-017-1220-0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77-101. ( 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Suppiah C. 2008. A collective evaluation of community parent programmes: what works well and in what circumstances? Essex, UK: The Health Foundation, NHS South West Essex, Parents 1st. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Barlow J, Coe C. 2012. Family action perinatal support project, research findings report. London, UK: Family Action. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Akister J, O'Brien N, Cleary T. 2011. CSV volunteers in child protection (ViCP): an assessment of impact and effectiveness. Cambridge, UK: Anglia Ruskin University. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.McLeish J, Redshaw M. 2019. ‘Being the best person that they can be and the best mum’: a qualitative study of community volunteer doula support for disadvantaged mothers before and after birth in England. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 19, 21. ( 10.1186/s12884-018-2170-x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cutrona CE, Russell DW. 1990. Type of social support and specific stress: toward a theory of optimal matching. In Social support: an interactional view. Wiley series on personality processes (eds BR Sarason, IG Sarason, GR Pierce), pp. 319-366. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Festinger L. 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 7, 117-140. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Benza S, Liamputtong P. 2014. Pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood: a meta-synthesis of the lived experiences of immigrant women. Midwifery 30, 575-584. ( 10.1016/j.midw.2014.03.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Friedman HS, Taylor SE. 2012. Social support: a review. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Negron R, Martin A, Almog M, Balbierz A, Howell E. 2013. Social support during the postpartum period: mothers' views on needs, expectations, and mobilization of support. Matern. Child Health J. 17, 616-623. ( 10.1007/s10995-012-1037-4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.De Sousa Machado T, Chur-Hansen A, Due C. 2020. First-time mothers’ perceptions of social support: recommendations for best practice. Health Psychol. Open 7, 2055102919898611. ( 10.1177/2055102919898611) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gale NK, Kenyon S, MacArthur C, Jolly K, Hope L. 2018. Synthetic social support: theorizing lay health worker interventions. Soc. Sci. Med. 196, 96-105. ( 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.012) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Women consented to data collection and for their interview responses to be used in publications with no details or other information being published that could identify them. Following the consent process, the individual qualitative interview transcripts will not be made publicly available.


Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES