Copper compounds have traditionally been used as standard bactericides in agriculture in the past few decades. However, the extensive use of copper has fostered the evolution of bacterial copper resistance mechanisms. Pseudomonas syringae is a plant-pathogenic bacterium used worldwide as a model to study plant-pathogen interactions.
KEYWORDS: Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, mango host, pPT23A plasmids, copper resistance, COARS Tn7-like transposon
ABSTRACT
Copper resistance mechanisms provide an important adaptive advantage to plant-pathogenic bacteria under exposure to copper treatments. Copper resistance determinants have been described in Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae (Pss) strains isolated from mango intimately associated with 62-kb plasmids belonging to the pPT23A family (PFP). It has been previously described that the indiscriminate use of copper-based compounds promotes the selection of copper-resistant bacterial strains and constitutes a selective pressure in the evolution of copper resistance determinants. Hence, we have explored in this study the copper resistance evolution and the distribution of specific genetic determinants in two different Pss mango populations isolated from the same geographical regions, mainly from southern Spain, with an average of 20 years of difference. The total content of plasmids, in particular the 62-kb plasmids, and the number of copper-resistant Pss strains were maintained at similar levels over time. Interestingly, the phylogenetic analysis indicated the presence of a phylogenetic subgroup (PSG) in the Pss mango phylotype mostly composed of the recent Pss population analyzed in this study that was strongly associated with a hyperresistant phenotype to copper. Genome sequencing of two selected Pss strains from this PSG revealed the presence of a large Tn7-like transposon of chromosomal location, which harbored putative copper and arsenic resistance genes (COARS Tn7-like). Transformation of the copper-sensitive Pss UMAF0158 strain with some putative copper resistance genes and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR experiments brought to light the role of COARS Tn7-like transposon in the hyperresistant phenotype to copper in Pss.
IMPORTANCE Copper compounds have traditionally been used as standard bactericides in agriculture in the past few decades. However, the extensive use of copper has fostered the evolution of bacterial copper resistance mechanisms. Pseudomonas syringae is a plant-pathogenic bacterium used worldwide as a model to study plant-pathogen interactions. The adaption of P. syringae to plant surface environment is the most important step prior to an infection. In this scenario, copper resistance mechanisms could play a key role in improving its epiphytic survival. In this work, a novel Tn7-like transposon of chromosomal location was detected in P. syringae pv. syringae strains isolated from mango. This transposon conferred the highest resistance to copper sulfate described to date for this bacterial phytopathogen. Understanding in depth the copper resistance mechanisms and their evolution is an important step for the agricultural industry to improve disease management strategies.
INTRODUCTION
Pseudomonas syringae is a major bacterial phytopathogen used worldwide as a model bacterium to study plant-pathogen interactions (1). P. syringae synthesizes a vast array of virulence factors, prominent among which are the type III secretion system (T3SS) and diverse toxic compounds, such as lipodepsipeptide and antimetabolite toxins (2–4). The P. syringae species belongs to the P. syringae complex, which has been described as a taxonomic hodgepodge that includes at least nine different taxonomically related species (5–7). More than 60 pathovars of P. syringae have been reported (7), with the pathovar syringae being the most outstanding pathovar due to its broad arsenal of virulence factors and host range (4). In addition, adaptation mechanisms have emerged as being important for colonization and survival strategies on the plant surface environment and also are closely connected with bacterial virulence (4). P. syringae pv. syringae (Pss) strains isolated from mango trees have been described as the causal agent of bacterial apical necrosis (BAN) disease of mango trees (8). Pss strains isolated from mango form a single phylotype within phylogenetic group 2 of the P. syringae complex (9), mainly associated with the mango host and with the production of the antimetabolite toxin mangotoxin (6, 10).
Copper-based compounds traditionally have been used in agriculture as standard bactericides targeting plant-pathogenic bacteria (11). However, copper is a major heavy metal, and the indiscriminate use of copper-based compounds has entailed severe environmental impact affecting soil, plants, and food security (12–14). It should be pointed out that the excessive use of copper has promoted the selection of copper-resistant strains and facilitated the evolution and spread of copper resistance determinants in many different bacteria, including P. syringae (15–20). In this context, mobile genetic elements, such as plasmids, integrative conjugative elements, and transposons, play an important role in bacterial evolution due to their ability to acquire foreign DNA that can be transmitted to other bacteria via horizontal gene transfer (HGT) mechanisms (21–23). In particular, plasmid DNA is considered part of the flexible genome, and plasmids tend to encode important genes that can improve the epiphytic survival and virulence of their bacterial hosts (24–26). The pPT23A-family of plasmids (PFPs) is a family of plasmids that appear to be indigenous to P. syringae (24), with all of them sharing a conserved major replication gene, repA (27). The most common genetic determinant associated with copper resistance in P. syringae is the copABCD operon, described for the first time in P. syringae pv. tomato (28). The copABCD operon and UV radiation resistance genes (rulAB operon) are frequently carried by PFP plasmids (24). The presence of PFP plasmids has also been reported in Pss strains isolated from mango (15, 26). Hitherto, rulAB genes and two different variants of copper resistance determinants have been found in Pss strains isolated from mango, carried mainly by 62-kb PFP plasmids (15, 26, 29, 30). The two copper resistance determinants are the copABCD operon and the copABCD-cusCBA-copG gene cluster (designated a copABCD novel structure, copABCDns), which was described for the first time in a Pss strain isolated from mango (30). The detoxification mechanism of the copABCD operon involves copper binding by sequestering proteins, and the cus genes belong to the heavy-metal efflux (HME)-RND (resistance-nodulation-cell division) family. The presence of the copABCDns has been demonstrated to increase copper resistance compared with that of the copABCD operon (30). Other than these two different variants of copper resistance determinants harbored by PFP plasmids in Pss strains isolated from mango, previous data have suggested the existence of at least another copper resistance determinant variant that can even improve the resistance to copper compounds (6, 15). Based on this premise, the main aim of this work was to elucidate the copper resistance distribution and the specific genetic determinants harbored by two different Pss populations isolated from mango from different worldwide regions, but mainly from southern Spain, and separated in time by an average of 20 years.
RESULTS
Bacterial isolates identification as Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae.
Eighty-two bacterial isolates from mango, comprising Pss strains isolated mainly before the year 2000 (designated population 1, or P1) and Pss strains from 2016 to 2017 (designated population 2, or P2), were collected. The P1 population comprised 38 Pss strains isolated from mango. Seven Pss strains isolated from other hosts were included as external controls of the P1 population. The P2 population (n = 44) comprised strains recovered from mango trees with BAN symptoms isolated from the same geographical regions as the P1 population. Three Pss strains isolated from other hosts were included as external controls of the P2 population (Table 1). These 47 P2 isolates were identified as Pss through biochemical, physiological, and genetic approaches. All were fluorescent on KB medium under UV light, levan positive, cytochrome c oxidase negative, arginine dihydrolase negative, and positive for tobacco hypersensitive response. All isolates hydrolyzed gelatin and esculin and metabolized glucose, mannitol, inositol, adonitol, gluconate, propionate, l-lactate, and l-histidine but not l-tartrate. All isolates showed ice nucleation activity at −5°C. Gene syrB was detected by PCR in all isolates that also produced syringomycin. In all isolates, the presence of the mboAB genes, which also produced the antimetabolite toxin mangotoxin, was detected by PCR (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). All these tests were also repeated for the 45 P1 Pss strains to confirm their previous identifications. All the Pss strains showed the same results, with a few exceptions regarding the production of mangotoxin and the detection by PCR of mboAB genes. Pss ICMP14923, Pss UMAF2801, and Pss UMAF0167 strains (isolated from mango) and the Pss UMAF1444-5 strain (isolated from laurel) did not produce mangotoxin, but the presence of mboAB genes was detected by PCR. Pss EPSMV3, Pss UMAF6016, and Pss UMAF6582 strains were negative for PCR detection of the mboAB genes and for the production of mangotoxin.
TABLE 1.
Pseudomonas syringae strains used in this study
| P. syringae strain | Geographical origin | Host of isolation | Yr of isolation | Reference or source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. syringae pv. syringae strains | ||||
| P1 populationa | ||||
| DAR77787 | Dandaragan, Australia | Mango | 2007 | 60 |
| DAR77789 | Perth, Australia | Mango | 2007 | 60 |
| ICMP14923 | Sicily, Italy | Mango | 2002 | 10 |
| ICMP14925 | Sicily, Italy | Mango | 2002 | 61 |
| Ps10 | Bet Dagan, Israel | Mango | 1999 | 50 |
| Ps35 | Bet Dagan, Israel | Mango | 1999 | 50 |
| UMAF0005 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1990 | 29 |
| UMAF0048 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1992 | 50 |
| UMAF0049 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1992 | 15 |
| UMAF0081 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1992 | 15 |
| UMAF0100 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1990 | 50 |
| UMAF0114 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1991 | 50 |
| UMAF0115 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1991 | 50 |
| UMAF0119 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1991 | 29 |
| UMAF0158 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1993 | 15 |
| UMAF0167 | Torrox, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1994 | 50 |
| UMAF0170 | Estepona, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1993 | 15 |
| UMAF0171 | Estepona, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1993 | 50 |
| UMAF0174 | Benajarafe, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1994 | 15 |
| UMAF0176 | Benajarafe, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1994 | 50 |
| UMAF0185 | Churriana, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1997 | 16 |
| UMAF0186 | Benamocarra, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2003 | 10 |
| UMAF0209 | Benamocarra, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2006 | 51 |
| UMAF1003 | Lepe, Huelva, Spain | Mango | 1997 | 50 |
| UMAF1029 | Lepe, Huelva, Spain | Mango | 1997 | 15 |
| UMAF1051 | Lepe, Huelva, Spain | Mango | 1997 | 50 |
| UMAF1065 | La Redondela, Huelva, Spain | Mango | 1997 | 50 |
| UMAF1094 | Lepe, Huelva, Spain | Mango | 1998 | 15 |
| UMAF1110 | La Redondela, Huelva, Spain | Mango | 1998 | 15 |
| UMAF1128 | La Redondela, Huelva, Spain | Mango | 1998 | 15 |
| UMAF1559.1 | La Redondela, Huelva, Spain | Mango | 1996 | 50 |
| UMAF2007 | Almansil, Portugal | Mango | 1997 | 50 |
| UMAF2016 | Faro, Portugal | Mango | 1997 | 15 |
| UMAF2025 | Almansil, Portugal | Mango | 1998 | 15 |
| UMAF2026 | Almansil, Portugal | Mango | 1998 | 15 |
| UMAF2801 | La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain | Mango | 2000 | 61 |
| UMAF2802 | La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain | Mango | 2000 | 50 |
| UMAF3028c | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 1990 | 50 |
| P2 populationb | ||||
| PSM 22 | Sicily, Italy | Mango | 2014 | 62 |
| PSM 47 | Sicily, Italy | Mango | 2010 | 62 |
| UMAF0269 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF0271 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF0272 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF0273 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF0274 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF0275 | Benamocarra, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF0277 | Torrox, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF0278 | Torrox, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF0280 | Cajiz, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF0281 | Cajiz, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF0282 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF0283 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF0284 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF0286 | Benamocarra, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF0287 | Benamocarra, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF0288 | Benamocarra, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF0289 | Benamocarra, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF0290 | Benamocarra, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF0291c | Benajarafe, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF0292 | Benajarafe, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF0295 | Torrox, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF0296 | Torrox, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF0297 | Torrox, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF0298 | Torrox, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF0299 | Casarabonela, Málaga, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF1013 | Lepe, Huelva, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF2043 | Faro, Portugal | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF2044 | Faro, Portugal | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF2045 | Lagos, Portugal | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF2046 | Lagos, Portugal | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF2047 | Albufeira, Portugal | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF2048 | Albufeira, Portugal | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF2600 | Perth, Australia | Mango | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF2815 | La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain | Mango | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF2816 | La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain | Mango | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF2906 | Almuñecar, Granada, Spain | Mango | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF2907 | Almuñecar, Granada, Spain | Mango | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF2908 | Motril, Granada, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF2909 | Motril, Granada, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF2910 | Almuñecar, Granada, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF2911 | Almuñecar, Granada, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF5017 | Níjar, Almería, Spain | Mango | 2017 | This study |
| Controls | ||||
| P. syringae pv. aptata DSM50252 | USA | Sugar beet | 63 | |
| P. syringae pv. avellanae ISPaVe011 | Italy | Hazelnut | 1992 | 54 |
| P. syringae pv. japonica MAFF301072 | Japan | Barley | 63 | |
| P. syringae pv. phaseolicola 1448A | Ethiopia | Bean | 1985 | 64 |
| P. syringae pv. pisi 1704B | France | Pea | 1986 | 63 |
| P. syringae pv. syringae B728a | USA | Bean | 65 | |
| P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 | UK | Tomato | 1986 | 66 |
| P. syringae pv. tomato PT23 | Tomato | 53 | ||
| External controls of P1 and P2 populations | ||||
| EPSMV3 | Gerona, Spain | Pear | 1990 | 50 |
| EPS17A | Gerona, Spain | Pear | 1987 | 50 |
| UMAF1444-5 | Madrid. Spain | Laurel | 1995 | 50 |
| UMAF4002 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Tomato | 1994 | 50 |
| UMAF6016 | Torrijos, Málaga, Spain | Chestnut | 1994 | 50 |
| UMAF6024 | Málaga, Spain | Purple phlomis | 1995 | 51 |
| UMAF6032 | Algarrobo, Málaga, Spain | Melon | 2016 | This study |
| UMAF6034 | Alfarnate, Málaga, Spain | Chestnut | 2017 | This study |
| UMAF6582 | Periana, Málaga, Spain | Peach | 1994 | 50 |
| UMAF7000 | Gerona, Spain | Pear | 2017 | This study |
| P. syringae pv. syringae transformant strainsd | ||||
| UMAF0158pBBR1MCS-5 | This study | |||
| UMAF0158pBBR1cus | This study | |||
| UMAF0158pBBR1cop | This study |
P. syringae pv. syringae strains isolated from mango mainly before the year 2000.
P. syringae pv. syringae strains isolated from mango in 2016 to 2017.
Pss strains names in boldface were selected for genome sequencing.
Relevant characteristics for the Pss transformant strains were the following: UMAF0158pBBR1MCS-5, UMAF0158 transformed with the empty pBBR1MCS-5 vector; UMAF0158pBBR1cus, UMAF0158 transformed with pBBR1MCS-5cusCBA; UMAF0158pBBR1cop, UMAF0158 transformed with pBBR1MCS-5copABmbpCDF.
Plasmid profile analysis in Pss strains isolated from mango.
The plasmid content and the assessment of PFP status were studied in the P1 and P2 Pss mango populations. From the P1 population, 25 Pss strains harbored plasmids, while in the P2 population, 36 Pss strains harbored plasmids (Fig. 1A). Five different plasmid profiles were found in both Pss populations (45 kb, 62 kb, 120 kb, 45 to 62 kb, and 62 to 88 kb). The plasmid profile 45 to 120 kb was detected only in the P2 strain UMAF0292. The 62-kb plasmid profile was the most represented, being present in 17 and 24 Pss strains from P1 and P2, respectively (Fig. 1B). The 120-kb plasmid profile was the second most represented plasmid profile and was present in 2 Pss strains from P1 and in 5 Pss strains from P2 (Fig. 1B). The number of plasmids present in the P2 population with respect to the P1 population, in particular the 62-kb plasmids, was not statistically different according to a Pearson chi-squared test. Therefore, the total content of plasmids was maintained at similar levels between P1 and P2 populations. Southern blot hybridizations with repA and rulA genes were performed to determine which plasmids belonged to the PFP family (Table S1). Southern blot experiments with the repA gene probe demonstrated that the 62-kb plasmid always belonged to the PFP family when harbored alone or together with 45-kb or 88-kb plasmids. Additionally, the 45-kb plasmid also displayed repA hybridization signal when harbored alone. Moreover, the 120-kb plasmid present in Pss from P2 showed hybridization with the repA gene probe. However, this hybridization was not detected in the 120-kb plasmids present in Pss strains from P1. Interestingly, the Pss strain UMAF0292 of P2 showed repA hybridization signal in the 45-kb and 120-kb plasmids. Southern blot hybridization with the rulA gene probe exhibited results similar to those for the repA hybridization experiments, showing only a difference in the 62- to 88-kb plasmid profile, where both plasmids displayed rulA hybridization signal. However, the hybridization signal was weaker in the 88-kb plasmid. The specific plasmid profiles of each Pss strain from both populations and Southern blot analysis of repA and rulA genes are summarized in Table S1.
FIG 1.
Plasmid content and plasmid profile distribution in P. syringae pv. syringae strains isolated from mango. (A) Number of P. syringae pv. syringae strains harboring plasmids versus plasmidless strains of P1 and P2 populations. Dark blue and light blue colors represent the number of strains belonging to the P1 population that harbor plasmids versus plasmidless strains, respectively. Dark red and light red colors represent the same data describe above but for the P2 population. (B) Number of P. syringae pv. syringae strains harboring different plasmid profiles. Dark blue bars represent the number of strains from P1 that harbor different plasmid profiles, and red bars represent the same data but for the P2 population.
The distribution of 62-kb PFP copper-resistant plasmids was maintained over time.
Copper resistance genes in Pss strains isolated from mango were previously reported to be mainly encoded by 62-kb plasmids (15). The number of copper-resistant strains was determined in the P1 and P2 Pss populations. Twenty-five Pss strains from P1 (66%) and 30 Pss strains from P2 (68%) could grow on 0.8 mM copper sulfate, showing that copper resistance was maintained at similar levels between P1 and P2 populations. Moreover, the MIC values for copper sulfate showed that the copper resistance level was heterogeneous, with Pss strains showing MIC values ranging from 1.0 to 3.0 mM in P1 and from 1.0 to 2.8 mM in P2 (Table 2). Plasmid profile analysis revealed that from the 25 copper-resistant Pss strains from P1, 14 harbored at least a 62-kb plasmid. PCR with specific primers for copper resistance genes and Southern blot hybridization revealed that in 12 out of the 14 copper-resistant strains that harbored a 62-kb plasmid, the copper resistance genes were detected in the 62-kb plasmid. For P2, 18 of the 30 copper-resistant Pss strains harbored at least a 62-kb plasmid. However, the copper resistance genes were detected in 14 out of the 18 copper resistant strains that harbored a 62-kb plasmid. Thus, copper resistance associated with 62-kb plasmids showed a similar frequency between both populations (48% and approximately 47% in P1 and P2, respectively). Additionally, 12 Pss strains from P1 and 16 Pss strains from P2 displayed different levels of copper resistance, high plasmid content variability, and no detectable copper resistance genes. In this group, it was particularly noteworthy that some Pss strains (3 from P1 and 11 from P2) showed the highest MIC values for copper sulfate of ≥2.4 mM (Table 2). The presence of that hyperresistant phenotype was increased in the P2 population based on Pearson chi-squared test.
TABLE 2.
Plasmid profiles, MIC values for copper sulfate, and detection of different copper resistance determinants by PCR amplification and Southern blot hybridization in P. syringae pv. syringae strains isolated from mango
| Pss strain | Plasmid profile | MIC (mM) | PCR amplificatione |
Southern blot hybridization |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| copABCDa | copABCDnsb | copAc | cusAd | |||
| P1 population | ||||||
| DAR77787 | Plasmidless | 2.0 | − | − | − | − |
| DAR77789 | 62 | 1.6 | + | − | +62 | − |
| ICMP14923 | 62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| ICMP14925 | Plasmidless | 2.0 | − | − | NTf | NT |
| Ps10 | Plasmidless | 1.6 | − | − | − | − |
| Ps35 | 62 | 1.2 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0005 | Plasmidless | 1.0 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0048 | 62 | 1.8 | − | + | +62 | +62 |
| UMAF0049 | 62–88 | 1.8 | − | + | +62 | +62 |
| UMAF0081 | 62 | 1.8 | − | + | +62 | +62 |
| UMAF0100 | Plasmidless | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0114 | 120 | 2.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0115 | Plasmidless | 2.0 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0119 | 62–88 | 2.0 | − | + | +62 | +62 |
| UMAF0158 | 62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0167 | 120 | 2.0 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0170 | 62 | 1.2 | + | − | +62 | − |
| UMAF0171 | Plasmidless | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0174 | Plasmidless | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0176 | 62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0185 | 62 | 1.8 | − | + | +62 | +62 |
| UMAF0186 | 62 | 2.0 | − | + | +62 | +62 |
| UMAF0209 | Plasmidless | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF1003 | 45–62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF1029 | 62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF1051 | Plasmidless | 1.6 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF1065 | 62 | 3.0 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF1094 | 62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF1110 | 62 | 1.6 | + | − | +62 | − |
| UMAF1128 | 45–62 | 2.0 | + | − | +62 | − |
| UMAF1559.1 | 62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF2007 | 62 | 2 | − | + | +62 | +62 |
| UMAF2016 | 62 | 1.8 | − | + | +62 | +62 |
| UMAF2025 | Plasmidless | 2.0 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF2026 | 45 | 2.0 | + | − | +45 | − |
| UMAF2801 | Plasmidless | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF2802 | Plasmidless | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF3028 | 45 | 2.6 | − | − | − | − |
| P2 population | ||||||
| PSM 22 | Plasmidless | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| PSM 47 | 62 | 1.8 | − | + | +62 | +62 |
| UMAF0269 | Plasmidless | 2.4 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0271 | 62–88 | 2.0 | − | + | +62 | +62 |
| UMAF0272 | 62 | 1.8 | − | + | +62 | +62 |
| UMAF0273 | 62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0274 | 62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0275 | 62 | 1.2 | − | − | NT | NT |
| UMAF0277 | 62 | 1.0 | + | − | +62 | − |
| UMAF0278 | 62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0280 | 62 | 1.0 | + | − | +62 | − |
| UMAF0281 | 45–62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0282 | Plasmidless | 2.6 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0283 | 62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0284 | 45 | 2.4 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0286 | 62 | 1.2 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0287 | 62 | 1.6 | + | − | +62 | − |
| UMAF0288 | 120 | 2.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0289 | 62 | 1.6 | + | − | +62 | − |
| UMAF0290 | 62 | 1.8 | − | + | +62 | +62 |
| UMAF0291 | 45 | 2.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0292 | 45–120 | 2.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0295 | Plasmidless | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0296 | 120 | 2.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0297 | 62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0298 | 120 | 2.6 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF0299 | 120 | 2.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF1013 | 62 | 2.0 | + | − | +62 | − |
| UMAF2043 | 120 | 2.4 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF2044 | 62 | 2.4 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF2045 | 62 | 2.0 | + | − | +62 | − |
| UMAF2046 | 62 | 1.6 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF2047 | Plasmidless | 1.0 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF2048 | Plasmidless | 1.6 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF2600 | 62 | 1.6 | + | − | +62 | − |
| UMAF2815 | Plasmidless | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF2816 | Plasmidless | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF2906 | 62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF2907 | 62 | 1.6 | + | − | +62 | − |
| UMAF2908 | 62–88 | 1.8 | − | + | +62 | +62 |
| UMAF2909 | 62–88 | 1.8 | − | + | +62 | +62 |
| UMAF2910 | 62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF2911 | 62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
| UMAF5017 | 62 | ≤0.8 | − | − | − | − |
copA amplification from the typical copABCD operon obtained from Pss UMAF0170 62-kb PFP plasmid.
copA, cusA, and copG amplification from the copABCDns structure obtained from Pss UMAF0081 62-kb PFP plasmid.
Southern blot hybridization using a copA probe that binds both copA genes from different structures.
Southern blot hybridization using a cusA probe that binds the cusA gene from the copABCDns structure.
Plus signs indicate positive results of PCR amplifications.
NT, not tested.
Phylogenetic analysis reveals the presence of three different phylogenetic subgroups clearly associated with copper resistance phenotypes.
Pss strains isolated from mango form a single phylotype inside the phylogenetic group 2 of the P. syringae complex, characterized by the host of isolation and the production of mangotoxin (6, 10). The phylogenetic distribution analysis performed in this study by using partial sequences of gyrB and rpoD housekeeping genes clearly showed a main clustering comprising all the Pss strains isolated from mango from both P1 and P2 populations, including 4 Pss strains isolated from other hosts (EPS17A, UMAF7000, UMAF4002, and UMAF6032) that, interestingly, showed the ability to produce mangotoxin. Nine different phylogenetic subgroups (PSG) have been observed within the Pss mango single phylotype (Fig. 2). Interestingly, all the Pss strains belonging to the phylogenetic subgroups I, II, and VIII (PSG-I, PSG-II, and PSG-VIII) were copper resistant. In particular, PSG-II comprised 7 Pss strains from P1 and 5 Pss strains from P2. All Pss strains from this PSG harbored at least a 62-kb plasmid, which encoded the copABCDns structure (Table 2 and Fig. S2), showing similar MIC values for copper sulfate (between 1.8 and 2.0 mM). Intriguingly, the PSG-I subgroup clustered together 14 Pss strains and was composed predominantly of Pss strains from the P2 population (11 Pss strains). It is important to highlight that this group was composed of the Pss strains that showed the highest MIC values of copper sulfate, noted earlier (MIC, ≥2.4 mM copper sulfate) (Table 2). However, the genetic markers associated with this highly resistant phenotype could not be detected by PCR or by Southern blot approaches using the specific primers to detect the copABCD and copABCDns structures. Moreover, these Pss strains have shown high plasmid content variability, although the presence of a 120-kb PFP plasmid was only found in 5 Pss strains from P2 belonging to this PSG (Table 2 and Table S1). In addition, PSG-VIII was composed of 5 Pss strains belonging to both populations that harbored different copper resistance structures (Fig. S2). The remaining 24 Pss copper-resistant strains were randomly distributed among the different PSGs.
FIG 2.
Phylogenetic analysis of P. syringae pv. syringae strains isolated from mango. The neighbor-joining tree was constructed with combined partial sequences of gyrB and rpoD housekeeping genes using MEGAv7. Bootstrap values (100 repetitions) are shown on branches, and evolutionary distances are in units of nucleotide substitutions per site. Nine different phylogenetic subgroups (PSG) are present in P. syringae pv. syringae strains isolated from mango and are represented in Roman numerals. Blue color shows the strains belonging to the P1 population. Red color represents the strains belonging to the P2 population. P. syringae pv. syringae strains isolated from other hosts but included in different subgroups of the Pss single mango phylotype are underlined (PSG-II, UMAF4002 strain isolated from tomato; PSG-III, UMAF7000 strain isolated from pear; PSG-IV, UMAF6032 strain isolated from melon; PSG-VI, EPS17A strain isolated from pear). PSG-I, PSG-II, and PSG-VIII, marked with light blue boxes, are PSGs where all Pss strains were copper resistant. Pss strains (UMAF3028 and UMAF0291) that belong to PSG-I and that are marked with yellow boxes were the strains selected for genome sequencing. Pav, P. syringae pv. avellanae, Pph, P. syringae pv. phaseolicola; Ppi, P. syringae pv. pisi; Psj, P. syringae pv. japonica; Pss, P. syringae pv. syringae; Pst, P. syringae pv. tomato; Ptt, P. syringae pv. aptata.
Detection of a novel Tn7-like transposon by genome sequencing and mining.
The Pss UMAF3028 strain from P1 (isolated in 1990) and Pss UMAF0291 strain from P2 (isolated in 2017), which belonged to the PSG-I and showed the same plasmid profile (45 kb), were selected to obtain their draft genome sequences. The main features of the draft genome sequences of both strains are summarized in Table S2. Bioinformatic mining of copper resistance genes was performed against the draft genome sequences of both sequenced strains using the copABCD and copABCDns structures from the 62-kb plasmids of Pss UMAF0170 and Pss UMAF0081, respectively. By using discontiguous MegaBLAST with both copper structures, a region that could be involved in copper resistance was detected in scaffold 8.1 of both strains. In addition, the draft genome sequences of both strains were compared with the complete genome sequence of the copper-sensitive strain Pss UMAF0158 by MAUVE alignment (Fig. S3), revealing the presence of a DNA region of 51.1 kb in both strains that was not present in the copper-sensitive one. In addition, based on genome annotation, a large structure of 51,178 bp was detected in the typical attachment site for Tn7 transposons, attTn7, which was allocated in the chromosome downstream of the glmS gene of both sequenced Pss strains. The Tn7-like regions of Pss UMAF3028 and Pss UMAF0291 showed 100% identity between them.
The complete genetic structure of this transposon is represented in Fig. 3. The putative Tn7-like transposon comprised 49 open reading frames (ORFs) (Fig. 3A), which encoded several genes that could be involved in DNA repair mechanisms related to copper and arsenic resistance phenotypes (Fig. 3B and C), the typical tnsABCDE genes that form the transposition mechanism of Tn7 transposons (Fig. 3D), and a retrotransposon (Fig. 3E). Putative specific functions of the ORFs predicted in the Tn7-like transposon are summarized in Table S3. This Tn7 transposon was designated COARS Tn7-like due to its putative ability to detoxify copper and arsenic compounds. In addition, all Pss strains from mango from both populations were interrogated for the presence of the COARS Tn7-like transposon based on PCR amplification of copA and cusA genes from the Tn7 structure. Only those Pss strains from PSG-I apparently contained the COARS Tn7-like transposon (Fig. S2). A nucleotide BLAST search of this Tn7 region was performed and revealed that this Tn7-like transposon was present, with some differences, in the genome of some soil and water strains belonging to the Pseudomonas fluorescens complex and in two strains of P. syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa NZ-64 and Psa SR121). A comparative genetic map among the Tn7-like transposons present in Pss UMAF0291, Psa SR121, and P. rhodesiae BS2777 strains is represented in Fig. S4.
FIG 3.
Genetic organization of the Tn7-like transposon associated with hyperresistant phenotype to copper in P. syringae pv. syringae strain UMAF0291. (A) Complete genetic structure of the Tn7-like transposon of 51,178 bp that is composed of 49 open reading frames. Gray arrows represent hypothetical proteins; red arrows represent genes putatively involved in DNA repair mechanisms; blue arrows represent genes putatively involved in copper resistance; green arrows represent genes involved in different functions; yellow arrows represent genes putatively involved in transposition mechanisms; and purple arrows represent genes putatively related to detoxification of arsenic compounds. (B) Genetic structure related to copper resistance, composed of 23 open reading frames. (C) Genetic structure of genes related to arsenic resistance, composed of six open reading frames. (D) Genetic structure of the typical transposition machinery of Tn7 transposons encoded by tnsABCDE genes. (E) Genetic structure of a retrotransposon. Gray boxes represent the DNA fragments cloned into pBBR1MCS-5 vector.
COARS Tn7-like transposon confers hyperresistant phenotype to copper in P. syringae pv. syringae strains isolated from mango.
To decipher the role of the COARS Tn7-like transposon in the detoxification of copper sulfate, transformant strains derived from the copper-sensitive strain Pss UMAF0158 were generated, including two different regions that harbored putative genes involved in copper resistance from the COARS Tn7-like transposon of the Pss UMAF0291 strain. The transformant strain Pss UMAF0158pBBR1cus, which harbored the cusCBA operon, increased the MIC to 1.0 mM copper sulfate. The second transformant, Pss UMAF0158pBBR1cop, which harbored the genes copAB, a metal binding protein and a CDF transporter, showed a MIC of 1.2 mM copper sulfate (Fig. 4A). Thus, both transformants provided a copper-resistant phenotype to the Pss UMAF0158 sensitive strain. In addition, reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) experiments were performed on the putative copper resistance genes copA and cusA present in the COARS Tn7-like transposon from Pss UMAF0291. The expression of both genes was strongly increased at the two different concentrations of copper tested (0.8 and 1.6 mM) compared with their expression in the absence of copper sulfate (Fig. 4B). Compared with the control condition (0 mM copper sulfate), the copA gene showed an overexpression of 269- and 69-fold changes at 0.8 mM and 1.6 mM copper sulfate, respectively. Additionally, the cusA gene showed an overexpression with respect to the control condition of 7.7-fold change at 0.8 mM copper sulfate. However, its relative expression at 1.6 mM with respect to the control condition was not increased (Fig. 4B).
FIG 4.
Transformation and RT-qPCR experiments on selected putative copper resistance genes. (A) MICs of copper sulfate in MGY medium supplemented with different concentrations of copper sulfate (0.8 mM, 1.0 mM, 1.2 mM, and 1.6 mM). The transformants of the copper-sensitive P. syringae pv. syringae UMAF0158 (Pss UMAF0158) strain that harbor the cusCBA (Cus) genes and copAB, a metal binding protein and a CDF transporter (Cop) gene, were tested. The Pss UMAF0158 copper-sensitive strain and Pss UMAF0291 copper-resistant strain that harbors the Tn7-like transposon are included as negative and positive controls, respectively. (B) RT-qPCR experiments were performed on the Pss UMAF0291 copper resistance strain on two putative copper resistance genes. One of each is present in each construction describe above (cusA and copA). The results are shown as the fold change in expression of cusA and copA genes at 0.8 and 1.6 mM copper sulfate compared with the control condition (absence of copper).
DISCUSSION
Copper-based compounds have been widely used since the middle of the 18th century in agriculture as standard bactericides to control plant diseases (11). Pss is a phytopathogenic bacterium distinguished from other pathovars of the P. syringae complex due to its ability to infect a large variety of woody and herbaceous plants (31). Pss has been identified as the causal agent of BAN disease in mango trees (8). The copper-based spray compound Bordeaux mixture (BM) has been used as the conventional treatment to control BAN disease caused by Pss (32, 33). Nevertheless, the continuous use of copper by growers has served as a selection pressure mechanism that has sharply increased the number of copper-resistant bacterial phytopathogens, including P. syringae, and improved the evolution of copper resistance determinants, which are mainly allocated in plasmids (15, 18, 19, 30, 34). Therefore, in this study, two different Pss populations isolated from mango from the same worldwide region (mainly from southern Spain) and that were isolated with an average of 20 years of difference were assessed to better understand the evolution of copper resistance and their specific detoxification mechanisms through time in a particular host and environment.
Plasmids that are part of what is known as a flexible genome are one of the main drivers of bacterial evolution (21, 24). The PFP family of plasmids is widely distributed among pathovars of P. syringae and related species of the P. syringae complex (24, 26, 35). The presence of 62-kb plasmids belonging to the PFP family has been described in Pss strains isolated from mango (15, 26). To characterize the plasmids harbored in both Pss populations analyzed in this study, the presence of the repA gene was assessed (24, 26, 35). Our results confirmed previous data that suggested nearly all 62-kb plasmids present in Pss from mango belonged to the PFP family (10, 15). Furthermore, the presence of plasmids that do not belong to the PFP family (non-PFP) has been widely described in P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi, a related phytopathogenic bacterium, displaying an important contribution to virulence and fitness (36).
PFP plasmids do not encode basic survival functions of their bacterial hosts but contribute to their virulence and ecological fitness (15, 24, 25, 37–40). Some of the most relevant accessory determinants carried by PFPs are copper resistance and UV radiation resistance genes (39, 41, 42).The rulAB genes have been found to be tightly associated with the 62-kb PFP plasmids in Pss from mango, improving their tolerance to UV radiation (29). Interestingly, the rulA gene was also detected in the 88-kb non-PFP plasmid, which suggests the Pss strains with the 62- to 88-kb plasmid profile has a significant advantage in surviving on the mango plant surface.
The total content of plasmids was found at similar levels over time. Our findings also highlighted that the 62-kb PFP plasmid profile was also maintained at similar levels between both Pss populations. Copper resistance determinants are also important accessory genes carried by PFP plasmids that confer an important ecological fitness advantage (24, 26, 37) and have been described in Pss strains isolated from mango mainly carried by 62-kb PFP plasmids (15). Two different copper resistance determinants have been reported in 62-kb PFP plasmids, the typical copABCD operon and the novel gene cluster copABCDns, both being structures relevant to the survival of Pss under exposure to copper treatments (15, 26, 30). In previous works, copper resistance was found at similar levels in Pss from mango but mostly associated with 62-kb plasmids (10, 15). Likewise, our results have shown that copper resistance was maintained over time, showing similar levels between P1 and P2 populations. These results could point out that some mechanisms of selection pressure, among which copper could be one of the most relevant, act by maintaining the plasmid content over time, mostly 62-kb PFP copper-resistant plasmids, which display an important role in the epiphytic lifestyle of Pss (15, 26). Moreover, there were some Pss strains (12 from P1 and 16 from P2) that displayed a copper-resistant phenotype and showed no homology with any of the copper resistance determinants described previously. This fact suggests that novel copper resistance determinants are present in Pss mango populations. Curiously, among these Pss copper-resistant strains, there was an increase over time of a hyperresistant phenotype to copper, with MIC values of ≥2.4 mM (3 Pss strains from P1 and 11 Pss strains from P2).
The phylogenetic analysis performed in this study revealed that within this single mango phylotype (10), at least nine different PSGs were detected. It is noteworthy that three of them showed a strong correlation with the copper-resistant phenotype, PSG-I, PSG-II, and PSG-VIII. Outstandingly, all Pss strains that showed the highest MIC values for copper sulfate were phylogenetically clustered within the PSG-I. As far as we know, this particular phylogenetic copper phenotype association has not been clearly observed in any other bacteria, with the exception of the nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecium (43).
By genome sequencing and mining, a Tn7-like transposon that encoded putative genes involved in copper and arsenic resistance was found. Copper and arsenic resistance modules have been previously reported clustering and associated with mobile genetic elements (26). Genes involved in antibiotic resistance and pathogenesis and others involved in adaptive mechanisms have been frequently found in Tn7 transposons (44). In addition, Tn7-like transposons have been found in a wide range of bacteria belonging to the Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria phyla (44). These types of transposons carry the tnsABCDE genes, which form the transposition machinery. In our case, the transposon designated COARS Tn7-like was found to be located at the attTn7 site located downstream of the glmS gene on the chromosome and carried the tnsABCDE genes, similar to what has been observed previously (45, 46). Similar genetic structures of the COARS Tn7-like transposon have been observed in the genomes of some Pseudomonas species belonging to the P. fluorescens complex and in Psa (19). It is worth highlighting that this Tn7 transposon in Psa is inserted at a different location in the chromosome, as it is an integrative conjugative element (ICE), and that the MIC for copper sulfate (1.2 mM) was lower than that with the COARS Tn7-like transposon (≥2.4 mM). The ICE location could provide an advantage to be horizontally transferred, spreading the structure to other bacteria. However, the COARS Tn7-like transposon at the typical attTn7 site could offer a higher copper resistance. Different approaches to demonstrate the transfer of COARS Tn7-like or to prove the involvement in copper resistance of some of its genes by insertional or deletion mutagenesis failed. Thus, to link genomic information with functionality, some genes putatively relevant for copper resistance were cloned and expressed in a Pss copper-sensitive strain, proving the role of these genes in copper resistance. RT-qPCR experiments also supported these findings. The differences in the relative expression of the different genes tested suggested that a dynamic response against different concentrations of copper exists in the COARS Tn7-like transposon. Hence, the role of the COARS-Tn7-like transposon in copper resistance in Pss strains isolated from mango was demonstrated. These results suggest that a novel copper resistance determinant that provides higher resistance could have been selected instead of other copper resistance determinants in Pss mango populations over time, probably favored by continuous copper exposure.
Overall, in this study it has become evident that copper resistance and plasmid content, in particular the 62-kb PFP copper-resistant plasmids, were maintained at similar levels over time in spite of continuous applications of copper. Interestingly, a new copper resistance determinant, with a much more complex structure based on the Tn7-like transposon of chromosomal location that provides higher copper detoxification, has been selected and increased over time. Finally, understanding in depth the evolution of copper resistance in plant-pathogenic bacteria could shed light on the design of more efficient control programs through the rational application of copper.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
Eighty-two Pss strains isolated from mango from different worldwide regions, but mainly from southern Spain, and separated in time by an average of 20 years were used in this study. This Pss collection was composed of two populations, designated P1 and P2. The P1 population (n = 38) comprised Pss strains randomly selected from our research group collection and were mainly isolated before the year 2000. In addition, seven Pss strains isolated from other hosts, including pear (n = 2; EPSMV3 and EPS17A), laurel (UMAF1444 and UMAF1445), tomato (UMAF4002), chestnut (UMAF6016), purple phlomis (UMAF6024), and peach (UMAF6582), were included as external controls of the P1 population. The P2 population (n = 44) comprised Pss strains isolated during the years 2016 and 2017. Three Pss strains isolated from other hosts, including melon (Pss UMAF6032), chestnut (Pss UMAF6034), and pear (Pss UMAF7000), also were included as external controls of the P2 population. In addition, eight strains of P. syringae belonging to seven different pathovars, such as pv. aptata (n = 1), pv. avellanae (n = 1), pv. japonica (n = 1), pv. phaseolicola (n = 1), pv. pisi (n = 1), pv. syringae (n = 1), and pv. tomato (n = 2), were used as control strains in the different experimental approaches performed in this study. All strains were cultured routinely in King’s B (KB) agar and lysogeny broth (LB) media and incubated at 25°C for 24 h. All strains used in this work are summarized in Table 1.
Bacterial isolation and identification.
To generate the P2 population, bacterial isolation during the years 2016 and 2017 was performed according to the following procedure. Small pieces of symptomatic mango tissues were collected from the field, preferentially from apical buds but also from petioles and leaves, from the same or the nearest mango growing areas as those of the isolates belonging to the P1 population. The samples were processed by two approaches: (i) small portions of samples were surface disinfected by immersion in a sterile aqueous solution of sodium hypochlorite (10%), 96% ethanol (10%), and sterile distilled water (80%) for 2 min, two wash steps of 2 min in sterile distilled water, and then plated on KB agar medium plates supplemented with cycloheximide (100 µg/ml) to prevent fungal growth, and (ii) small portions of samples were placed in sterile plastic bags, and 10 ml of sterile phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.2) per gram of fresh weight was added. The samples were homogenized in a laboratory blender (Colworth Stomacher-400; Seward Ltd.) for 3 min, and the resultant suspension was used for 10-fold serial dilutions in sterile phosphate buffer. One hundred-microliter aliquots of each 10-fold serial dilution were plated onto KB agar medium amended with cycloheximide (100 µg/ml) to prevent fungal growth. Regardless of the approach, KB agar plates were incubated at 25°C for 2 to 5 days. Fluorescent colonies under UV light (265 nm) were selected and identified using different biochemical and physiological tests (8). These tests included Gram staining, glucose metabolism, LOPAT tests, with the exception of potato soft rot (levan production, cytochrome c oxidase reaction, arginine dihydrolase, and tobacco hypersensitivity response), hydrolysis of esculin and gelatin, and utilization of different carbon sources (glucose, mannitol, sorbitol, gluconate, propionate, l-histidine, l-lactate, l-tartrate, inositol, and adonitol). All media were incubated at 25°C for 3 to 5 days. Ice nucleation activity (INA) of bacterial isolates was detected following a tube test described previously (47). Furthermore, the bacterial isolates were interrogated for the presence by PCR amplification of the main gene, syrB, involved in the biosynthesis of syringomicin, a lipodepsipeptide toxin mainly associated with the pathovar syringae. The primer sequences and amplicon sizes are listed in Table 3 (48). The production of syringomicin was analyzed by using the growth inhibition test on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium using Geotrichum candidum F-260 as the indicator strain (49). All tests described above were carried out at least in duplicate. All tests were also carried out in the Pss strains belonging to the P1 population to confirm all of them were identified correctly as Pss.
TABLE 3.
Primers used in this study for PCR, RT-qPCR, and Southern blot experiments
| Primer name | Primer sequence 5′–3′ | Amplicon size (bp) | Reference or source |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCR amplification | |||
| Syringomicin | |||
| syrB1 | CTTTCCGTGGTCTTGATGAGG | 752 | 48 |
| syrB2 | TCGATTTTGCCGTGATGAGTC | ||
| Mangotoxin | |||
| mbo24-For | CAAGGACGAGAAGGATCTGC | 692 | 51 |
| mbo24-Rev | CGACATTCAAACGACTCAGG | ||
| copABCD | |||
| copAF | ATGAAGATGAACCCCACGGA | 435 | This study |
| copAR | GTCCATACCACCCATGCCCA | ||
| copABCDns | |||
| copAnsF | ATGAAGATGAACCCCACTGA | 717 | This study |
| copAnsR | GGCCTGCATGTCAACCAACG | ||
| cusAnsF | GGATTCCATCCGAGCATCAG | 492 | This study |
| cusAnsR | TGTCGATGCGGTTGCGAATG | ||
| copGnsF | CTGGTCATTGCCTGCCCTTG | 500 | This study |
| copGnsR | GCGCCTAGCTCGATCAACC | ||
| Phylogeny | |||
| rpoDfor2 | ACCGATCCCGTTCGTATGTA | 907 | 54 |
| rpoDrev2 | TGGTGTACTTCTTGGCGATG | ||
| gyrBfor2 | GTCATCATGACCGTGCTCCA | 996 | 54 |
| gyrBrev2 | CCCTTCCACCAGGTACAGTT | ||
| COARS Tn7-like | |||
| copATn7F | AGATCCTAGTCGCGTCATGG | 390 | This study |
| copATn7R | ACGGCGATGCGGAATTCGTC | ||
| cusATn7F | TCGCGTTGGTCTGCGGAATC | 394 | This study |
| cusATn7R | AACGCCAATGGACCGAATAG | ||
| Copper transformantsa | |||
| cus-xhoIF | CCCTCGAGGGCCGCTCGTACAAACCTCTTC | 6,086 | This study |
| cus-xbaIR | GCTCTAGAGCACGGGCTGTGCAGCTCAAAC | This study | |
| cop-apaIF | GCGGGCCCGCTCGCTTGCCGTAAGAGTTTG | 5,597 | This study |
| CDF-speIR | GGACTAGTCCCGAAGACCACGCTCGTGAAC | This study | |
| RT-qPCR experiments | |||
| copATn7RTF | AGCGTACTCACTGGCAATGA | 199 | This study |
| copATn7RTR | GAATGATCCCGTGCCAATGG | This study | |
| cusATn7RTF | CAACCACCATGCTCTCAGTG | 194 | This study |
| cusATn7RTR | AGTGGCATCAGGTCCTAAGG | This study | |
| qRT-PCR158_gyrB_F | TGCTGACCTTCTTCTTCCGT | 198 | 59 |
| qRT-PCR158_gyrB_R | AGATACCTGGAGCCGATTCG | ||
| Southern blot experiments | |||
| Copper resistance | |||
| copA-probeF | CCACAGCCACTCCGGATTTC | 332 | This study |
| copA-probeR | CATTGAGCAGGTACGTGTAG | ||
| cusA-probeF | GGATTCCATCCGAGCATCAG | 192 | This study |
| cusA-probeR | ACAGCAAATCGCCTTCATCC | ||
| Plasmid replication | |||
| repA-probeF | TGGTGTCCTGGCTGGTGTTC | 203 | This study |
| repA-probeR | GGCAAACGCGGCATAGATCG | ||
| Ultraviolet resistance | |||
| rulA-probeF | CCAAGATCGATGGCGACAGC | 200 | This study |
| rulA-probeR | GATATGCCGAGGCGGATAGG |
Sequences in boldface represent restriction enzyme cutting sites.
Mangotoxin production assay and detection of the mangotoxin biosynthetic operon (mbo) by PCR.
The detection of the mbo operon and the production of mangotoxin were used in this work as markers to identify Pss strains belonging to the Pss single mango phylotype. Mangotoxin production was detected by an indicator technique based on the growth inhibition of Escherichia coli (50). Briefly, a double layer agar plate with Pseudomonas minimal medium (PMS) was prepared and solidified with the indicator strain E. coli CECT831. To evaluate mangotoxin activity, 100 μl of a 6 mM solution of N-acetyl-ornithine or l-ornithine was added to the double layer of E. coli. The bacterial strains to be tested then were stab-inoculated and the plates were incubated at 22°C for 24 h, with an additional incubation step of 24 h at 37°C. Mangotoxin production was detected due to the presence of growth inhibition halos. The presence of the mbo operon was assessed by PCR using specific primers that amplified an overlapping fragment of the mboA and mboB genes (Table 3) (51). Both approaches were performed at least in duplicate.
Plasmid profile.
Plasmid DNA from the 82 P. syringae pv. syringae strains isolated from mango included in this study was isolated according to an alkaline lysis method (52) and separated by electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose gels. Plasmid size was estimated by comparison with the P. syringae pv. tomato PT23 (Pst PT23) control strain, which harbors four plasmids: pPT23A (100 kb), pPT23B (83 kb), pPT23C (65 kb), and pPT23D (36 kb) (53). Several P1 strains, previously described to harbor different plasmid profiles, were also used as controls (Pss UMAF0158 [62 kb], Pss UMAF0049 [62 kb, 88 kb], Pss UMAF1128 [45 kb, 62 kb], and Pss UMAF3028 [45 kb]). Plasmid profile analyses were performed in triplicate.
Analysis of the MIC of copper sulfate.
Copper resistance was determined by using mannitol-glutamate-yeast extract agar medium (MGY). The Pss strains that could grow on all surfaces streaked on MGY supplemented with 0.8 mM copper sulfate after 72 h at 25°C were considered copper resistant. For Pss copper-resistant strains, the MICs of copper sulfate were determined. The copper sulfate concentrations tested were 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0, 2.4, 2.8, 3.0, and 3.2 mM. Pss strains growing on MGY supplemented with the different concentrations of copper sulfate after 72 h at 25°C were considered resistant to that concentration. MIC experiments were repeated in triplicate.
PCR detection of copper resistance genes.
Two different copper resistance determinants have been described in Pss strains isolated from mango: the typical copABCD operon and copABCDns (26, 30). To differentiate the copper resistance determinants, PCR analyses were performed using specific primers that amplified fragments of the copA gene sequences of PssUMAF0170 and PssUMAF0081 62-kb plasmids, which harbored copABCD (copAF and copAR) and copABCDns (copAnsF and copAnsR) structures, respectively. Specific primers were also designed on the sequences of cusA (cusAnsF and cusAnsR) and copG (copGnsF and copGnsR) genes of the copABCDns structure. The primer sequences and the amplicon sizes are summarized in Table 3.
Southern blot analysis.
The genomic locations of repA, rulA, copA, and cusA genes were assessed by Southern blot hybridization using plasmid DNA extractions that were separated by electrophoresis in 0.8% agarose gels. Due to the nucleotide sequence variability of the copA gene of the different structures, a unique primer set to amplify different copA gene variants was designed based on a highly conserved sequence of 4 different copA genes present in plasmids of different P. syringae strains (Pss UMAF0081, Pss UMAF0170, Pss 7B44, and Pst PT23). The DNA probes obtained from the purified PCR amplicons were labeled with digoxigenin (DIG) using a DIG-high prime labeling kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) by following the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasmid DNA extraction gel was transferred to nylon membranes and cross-linked in a UV chamber. For membrane hybridization, a DIG Easy Hyb kit was used (Roche), and immunological detection was performed with an anti-DIG antibody conjugated to alkaline phosphatase. The DIG-labeled nucleic acids were detected by chemiluminescence using a Molecular Imager ChemiDoc system (Bio-Rad, United Kingdom). Prehybridization and hybridization were performed at low stringency (50°C) for copA and cusA and a high stringency (60°C) for repA and rulA genes. The primer sequences and the amplicon sizes to obtain DNA probes for the different genes are summarized in Table 3. Pst PT23, Pss UMAF0081 (copABCDns structure in a 62-kb plasmid), PssUMAF0170 (copABCD in a 62-kb plasmid), and Pss UMAF0158 (copper-sensitive strain that harbors a 62-kb plasmid) were included in all gels as controls. These experiments were repeated at least in duplicate.
Phylogenetic analysis.
Partial sequences of rpoD and gyrB housekeeping genes were used to analyze the phylogenetic distribution of the Pss strains that belong to the mango single phylotype compared with other P. syringae strains that belong to different pathovars. Some of the partial sequences from the Pss strains belonging to the P1 population and control strains were available at the NCBI database, and the rest of the partial sequences from the Pss were obtained in this study. The partial sequences of the housekeeping genes rpoD and gyrB were obtained by PCR using specific primers listed in Table 3 (54). PCR products were purified and sent for sequencing to STABvida (Portugal). The partial sequences of rpoD (807 bp) and gyrB (890 bp) were concatenated for each strain and treated as a single sequence for multiple alignments using MUSCLE (EMBL-EBI). Phylogenetic trees were generated using MEGAv7 (55) with neighbor-joining, Jukes-Cantor Model, maximum likelihood, and complete deletion to eliminate positions containing gaps. Confidence levels of the branching points were determined using 1,000 bootstrap replicates.
Genome sequencing.
Pss strain UMAF3028 (isolated in 1990) and Pss strain UMAF0291 (isolated in 2017) were selected to obtain their draft genome sequences. Overnight shaking of cultures growing in LB broth tubes at 25°C of both Pss strains was used to perform total DNA isolation using the DNeasy UltraClean microbial kit (Qiagen). DNA libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit for small genomes (Illumina, Inc., USA). The draft genome sequencing project was performed by the Supercomputing and Bioinnovation Center of the University of Málaga using the sequencing platform NextSeq550 with paired-end reads with a read length of 150 bp. The raw reads were preprocessed using SeqTrimNext software (56), and the assembly of high-quality filtered reads was performed using A5 software with default parameters (57). Genome sequence annotation and gene identification were carried out with the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) using default parameters.
Bioinformatic mining for copper resistance genes.
Nucleotide sequence searches to detect putative copper resistance genes were performed using nucleotide BLAST by following two approaches, highly similar sequences (MegaBLAST) and more dissimilar sequences (discontiguous MegaBLAST) against copABDC and copABCDns gene clusters from Pss UMAF0170 and Pss UMAF0081, respectively. PGPA annotations then were used to analyze the regions that showed some similarities to identify putative copper resistance genes. Furthermore, the complete genome sequence of the Pss UMAF0158 copper-sensitive strain (58) was aligned against the draft genome sequences of Pss UMAF3028 and Pss UMAF0291 using MAUVE software with progressiveMAUVE alignment for efficient multiple genome alignment to detect gene gain, loss, and rearrangement. Specific primers were designed to PCR amplify partial sequences of putative copper resistance genes copA (copATn7F and copATn7R) and cusA (cusATn7F and cusATn7R) from the COARS Tn7-like transposon. Primer sequences and amplicon sizes are listed in Table 3.
Transformant strains and screening for copper resistance.
To determine the functionality of some genes related to copper resistance in the COARS Tn7-like transposon, transformation experiments were performed. Specific primers with restriction sites for double digestion and directional ligation into the pBBR1MCS-5 vector were designed on the sequence of the COARS-Tn7-like transposon of the Pss UMAF0291 strain. A fragment containing cusCBA genes (6,086 bp) was amplified by PCR with the primers cus-xhoIF and cus-xbaIR, which harbored restriction sites for XhoI and XbaI, respectively. A second fragment containing copAB, a metal binding protein and a CDF transporter (5,597 bp), was also amplified by PCR with the primers cop-apaIF and CDF-speIR, which harbored restriction sites for ApaI and SpeI, respectively. Primer sequences are included in Table 3. PCR amplifications were performed using Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) by following the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR products were purified, double digested, cloned into pBBR1MCS-5, which harbors a gentamicin resistance gene, and transformed into electrocompetent cells of the copper-sensitive strain Pss UMAF0158. For copper resistance screening, cultures of Pss UMAF0158 transformant strains were grown overnight in LB agar medium supplemented with 15 μg/ml gentamicin (Gm) and directly streaked onto MGY agar plates supplemented with different concentrations of copper sulfate (0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, and 1.6 mM). Pss UMAF0158 was used as the negative control, and Pss UMAF0291 was used as the positive control.
RNA isolation and RT-qPCR on putative copper resistance genes.
The Pss UMAF0291 strain was grown overnight in LB broth shaking cultures at 25°C. The culture was washed two times in sterile 0.85% NaCl, and 100-ml flasks with 20 ml of MGY broth without copper sulfate (0 mM) and supplemented with 0.8 mM and 1.6 mM copper sulfate were inoculated at an optical density at 600 nm of 0.1 (approximately 107 CFU/ml). Flasks were incubated for 6 h at 25°C, and 5 ml of each flask was collected and centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 3 min. Total RNA was extracted using an RNA isolation kit (NucleoSpin RNA, minikit for RNA purification; Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Germany). The total RNA concentration was determined with a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA), and RNA integrity was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The absence of genomic DNA contamination was tested by PCR amplification of RNA samples using specific primers that amplify the syrB gene (Table 3). DNA-free total RNA then was converted to cDNA using Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA) and random primers according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RT-qPCR assays were conducted in a CFX96 Touch qPCR system (Bio-Rad, USA) using SyBrGreen supermix (Bio-Rad, USA). Two independent RNA extractions for each condition and three technical replicates per extraction were assessed. Specific primers were designed using the Primer3 website (http://primer3.ut.ee/) on cusA and copA gene sequences from the COARS Tn7-like transposon. The housekeeping gene gyrB was used as the reference gene (59). Primer sequences and amplicon sizes are summarized in Table 3. The relative transcript abundance was calculated using the ΔΔCT (cycle threshold) method. The expression of cusA and copA at 0 mM copper sulfate was used for the normalization of RT-qPCR at 0.8 and 1.6 mM copper sulfate.
Statistical analysis.
The Pearson chi-squared test was used to evaluate the difference in plasmid content between P1 and P2 populations and, in particular, the presence of 62-kb plasmids. In addition, this statistical test was used to evaluate the number of copper hyperresistant strains and the presence of the COARS Tn7-like transposon between both populations. A significance level of 0.05 was applied in all cases.
Data availability.
GenBank accession numbers of the different Pseudomonas syringae plasmids (Pss UMAF0081, Pss UMAF0170, Pss 7B44, and Pst PT23) harboring different copA genes were KY362368, KY362372, KY362373, and MSDS00000000, respectively. GenBank accession numbers of the partial nucleotide sequences of rpoD and gyrB genes for each bacterial strain are listed in Table S4 in the supplemental material. The partial nucleotide sequences of the gyrB gene obtained in this study have been deposited at GenBank under the accession numbers MW001941 to MW002005. The partial nucleotide sequences of the rpoD gene obtained in this study have been deposited at GenBank under the accession numbers MW002006 to MW002070. The draft genome sequences obtained in this work have been deposited at GenBank under accession numbers JACTWA000000000 and JACTWB000000000 for Pss UMAF0291 and Pss UMAF3028, respectively.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by grants from CICE-Junta de Andalucía, Proyecto de Excelencia (P12-AGR-1473) from Junta de Andalucía, Proyecto Spanish Plan Nacional I+D+I (AGL2017-83368-C2-1-R) and cofinanced by Proyecto FEDER UMA18-FEDERJA-046. Jose A. Gutiérrez-Barranquero was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Plan Propio de Investigación y Transferencia of the University of Malaga “Ayuda de Incorporación de Doctores.”
We thank Irene Linares for her technical support during the development of this work. We also thank the Supercomputing and Bioinnovation Center of the University of Málaga for its technical support.
J.A.G.-B. and A.V. designed the study, F.A. and Z.H.-P. performed the experiments, and F.M.C. and J.A.G.-B. analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
REFERENCES
- 1.Baltrus DA, McCann HC, Guttman DS. 2017. Evolution, genomics and epidemiology of Pseudomonas syringae. Mol Plant Pathol 18:152–168. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Arrebola E, Cazorla FM, Perez-García A, de Vicente A. 2011. Chemical and metabolic aspects of antimetabolite toxins produced by Pseudomonas syringae pathovars. Toxins (Basel) 3:1089–1110. doi: 10.3390/toxins3091089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ichinose Y, Taguchi F, Mukaihara T. 2013. Pathogenicity and virulence factors of Pseudomonas syringae. J Gen Plant Pathol 79:285–296. doi: 10.1007/s10327-013-0452-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Xin XF, Kvitko B, He SY. 2018. Pseudomonas syringae: what it takes to be a pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol 16:316–328. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2018.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gardan L, Shafik H, Belouin S, Broch R, Grimont F, Grimont PA. 1999. DNA relatedness among the pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae and description of Pseudomonas tremae sp. nov. and Pseudomonas cannabina sp. nov. (ex Sutic and Dowson 1959). Int J Syst Bacteriol 49:469–478. doi: 10.1099/00207713-49-2-469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gutiérrez-Barranquero JA, Cazorla FM, de Vicente A. 2019. Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae associated with mango trees, a particular pathogen within the “hodgepodge” of the Pseudomonas syringae complex. Front Plant Sci 10:570. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Young JM. 2010. Taxonomy of Pseudomonas syringae. J Plant Pathol 92:S5–S14. doi: 10.4454/jpp.v92i1sup.2501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cazorla FM, Torés JA, Olalla L, Pérez-García A, Farré JM, De Vicente A. 1998. Bacterial apical necrosis of mango in southern Spain: a disease caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. Phytopathology 88:614–620. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.7.614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Berge O, Monteil CL, Bartoli C, Chandeysson C, Guilbaud C, Sands DC, Morris CE. 2014. A user’s guide to a database of the diversity of Pseudomonas syringae and its application to classifying strains in this phylogenetic complex. PLoS One 9:e105547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gutiérrez-Barranquero JA, Carrión VJ, Murillo J, Arrebola E, Arnold DL, Cazorla FM, De Vicente A. 2013. A Pseudomonas syringae diversity survey reveals a differentiated phylotype of the pathovar syringae associated with the mango host and mangotoxin production. Phytopathology 103:1115–1129. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-13-0093-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lamichhane JR, Osdaghi E, Behlau F, Köhl J, Jones JB, Aubertot JN. 2018. Thirteen decades of antimicrobial copper compounds applied in agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 38:28. doi: 10.1007/s13593-018-0503-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Iannotta N, Belfiore T, Brandmayr P, Noce ME, Scalercio S. 2007. Evaluation of the impact on entomocoenosis of active agents allowed in organic olive farming against Bactrocera oleae (Gmelin, 1790). J Environ Sci Health B 42:783–788. doi: 10.1080/03601230701551020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kabata-Pendias A. 2010. Trace elements in soils and plants, 4th ed. CRC Press, New York, NY. doi: 10.1201/b10158. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Xiong ZT, Wang H. 2005. Copper toxicity and bioaccumulation in Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis Rupr.). Environ Toxicol 20:188–194. doi: 10.1002/tox.20094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cazorla FM, Arrebola E, Sesma A, Pérez-García A, Codina JC, Murillo J, de Vicente A. 2002. Copper resistance in Pseudomonas syringae strains isolated from mango is encoded mainly by plasmids. Phytopathology 92:909–916. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.8.909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vanneste JL, McLaren GE, Yu J, Conzish DA, Boyd R. 2005. Copper and streptomycin resistance in bacterial strains isolated from stone fruit orchards in New Zealand. NZPP 58:101–105. doi: 10.30843/nzpp.2005.58.4262. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Behlau F, Canteros BI, Minsavage GV, Jones JB, Graham JH. 2011. Molecular characterization of copper resistance genes from Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri and Xanthomonas alfalfae subsp. citrumelonis. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:4089–4096. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03043-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Staehlin BM, Gibbons JG, Rokas A, O'Halloran TV, Slot JC. 2016. Evolution of a heavy metal homeostasis/resistance island reflects increasing copper stress in enterobacteria. Genome Biol Evol 8:811–826. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evw031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Colombi E, Straub C, Künzel S, Templeton MD, McCann HC, Rainey PB. 2017. Evolution of copper resistance in the kiwifruit pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae through acquisition of integrative conjugative elements and plasmids. Environ Microbiol 19:819–832. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Richard D, Ravigné V, Rieux A, Facon B, Boyer C, Boyer K, Grygiel P, Javegny S, Terville M, Canteros BI, Robène I, Vernière C, Chabirand A, Pruvost O, Lefeuvre P. 2017. Adaptation of genetically monomorphic bacteria: evolution of copper resistance through multiple horizontal gene transfers of complex and versatile mobile genetic elements. Mol Ecol 26:2131–2149. doi: 10.1111/mec.14007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Norman A, Hansen LH, Sørensen SJ. 2009. Conjugative plasmids: vessels of the communal gene pool. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:2275–2289. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Johnson CM, Grossman AD. 2015. Integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs): what they do and how they work. Annu Rev Genet 49:577–601. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-055018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Babakhani S, Oloomi M. 2018. Transposons: the agents of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. J Basic Microbiol 58:905–917. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201800204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sundin GW. 2007. Genomic insights into the contribution of phytopathogenic bacterial plasmids to the evolutionary history of their hosts. Annu Rev Phytopathol 45:129–151. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bardaji L, Pérez-Martínez I, Rodríguez-Moreno L, Rodríguez-Palenzuela P, Sundin GW, Ramos C, Murillo J. 2011. Sequence and role in virulence of the three plasmids complement of the model tumor-inducing bacterium Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi NCPPB 3335. PLoS One 6:e25705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gutiérrez-Barranquero JA, Cazorla FM, de Vicente A, Sundin GW. 2017. Complete sequence and comparative genomic analysis of eight native Pseudomonas syringae plasmids belonging to the pPT23A family. BMC Genomics 18:1–17. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3763-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sesma A, Sundin GW, Murillo J. 2000. Phylogeny of the replication regions of pPT23A-like plasmids from Pseudomonas syringae. Microbiology 146:2375–2384. doi: 10.1099/00221287-146-10-2375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mellano MA, Cooksey DA. 1988. Nucleotide sequence and organization of copper resistance genes from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. J Bacteriol 170:2879–2883. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.6.2879-2883.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cazorla FM, Codina JC, Abad C, Arrebola E, Torés JA, Murillo J, Pérez-García A, de Vicente A. 2008. 62-kb plasmids harboring rulAB homologues confer UV-tolerance and epiphytic fitness to Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae mango isolates. Microb Ecol 56:283–291. doi: 10.1007/s00248-007-9346-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gutiérrez-Barranquero JA, de Vicente A, Carrión VJ, Sundin GW, Cazorla FM. 2013. Recruitment and rearrangement of three different genetic determinants into a conjugative plasmid increase copper resistance in Pseudomonas syringae. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:1028–1033. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02644-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kennelly MM, Cazorla FM, de Vicente A, Ramos C, Sundin GW. 2007. Pseudomonas syringae diseases of fruit trees: progress toward understanding and control. Plant Dis 91:4–17. doi: 10.1094/PD-91-0004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cazorla FM, Arrebola E, Olea F, Velasco L, Hermoso JM, Pérez-García A, Torés JA, Farré JM, de Vicente A. 2006. Field evaluation of treatments for the control of the bacterial apical necrosis of mango (Mangifera indica) caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. Eur J Plant Pathol 116:279–288. doi: 10.1007/s10658-006-9059-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gutiérrez-Barranquero JA, Arrebola E, Bonilla N, Sarmiento D, Cazorla FM, de Vicente A. 2012. Environmentally friendly treatment alternatives to Bordeaux mixture for controlling bacterial apical necrosis (BAN) of mango. Plant Pathol 61:665–676. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02559.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Behlau F, Hong JC, Jones JB, Graham JH. 2013. Evidence for acquisition of copper resistance genes from different sources in citrus-associated xanthomonads. Phytopathology 103:409–418. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-06-12-0134-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ma Z, Smith JJ, Zhao Y, Jackson RW, Arnold DL, Murillo J, Sundin GW. 2007. Phylogenetic analysis of the pPT23A plasmid family of Pseudomonas syringae. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:1287–1295. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01923-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pérez-Martínez I, Zhao Y, Murillo J, Sundin GW, Ramos C. 2008. Global genomic analysis of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi plasmids. J Bacteriol 190:625–635. doi: 10.1128/JB.01067-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sundin GW, Bender CL. 1996. Molecular analysis of closely related copper- and streptomycin-resistance plasmids in Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. Plasmid 35:98–107. doi: 10.1006/plas.1996.0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jackson RW, Athanassopoulos E, Tsiamis G, Mansfield JW, Sesma A, Arnold DL, Gibbon MJ, Murillo J, Taylor JD, Vivian A. 1999. Identification of a pathogenicity island, which contains genes for virulence and avirulence, on a large native plasmid in the bean pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pathovar phaseolicola. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:10875–10880. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sundin GW, Murillo J. 1999. Functional analysis of the Pseudomonas syringae rulAB determinant in tolerance to ultraviolet B (290–320 nm) radiation and distribution of rulAB among P syringae pathovars. Environ Microbiol 1:75–87. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.1999.00008.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vivian A, Murillo J, Jackson RW. 2001. The roles of plasmids in phytopathogenic bacteria: mobile arsenals? Microbiology (Reading) 147:763–780. doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-4-763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sundin GW, Kidambi SP, Ullrich M, Bender CL. 1996. Resistance to ultraviolet light in Pseudomonas syringae: sequence and functional analysis of the plasmid-encoded rulAB genes. Gene 177:77–81. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(96)00273-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sundin GW, Jacobs JL, Murillo J. 2000. Sequence diversity of rulA among natural isolates of Pseudomonas syringae and effect on function of rulAB-mediated UV radiation tolerance. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5167–5173. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.12.5167-5173.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Arredondo-Alonso S, Top J, McNally A, Puranen S, Pesonen M, Pensar J, Marttinen P, Braat JC, Rogers MRC, van Schaik W, Kaski S, Willems RJL, Corander J, Schürch AC. 2020. Plasmids shaped the recent emergence of the major nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecium. mBio 11:e03284-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03284-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Parks AR, Peters JE. 2009. Tn7 elements: engendering diversity from chromosomes to episomes. Plasmid 61:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2008.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Peters JE, Craig NL. 2001. Tn7: smarter than we thought. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:806–814. doi: 10.1038/35099006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Peters JE. 2019. Targeted transposition with Tn7 elements: safe sites, mobile plasmids, CRISPR/Cas and beyond. Mol Microbiol 112:1635–1644. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cazorla FM, Olalla L, Torés JA, Pérez-Garcí A, Codina JC, de Vicente A. 1995. A method for estimation of population densities of ice nucleating active Pseudomonas syringae in buds and leaves of mango. J Appl Bacteriol 79:341–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1995.tb03146.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sorensen KN, Kim KH, Takemoto JY. 1998. PCR detection of cyclic lipodepsinonapeptide-producing Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae and similarity of strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:226–230. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.1.226-230.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gross DC, DeVay JE. 1977. Population dynamics and pathogenesis of Pseudomonas syringae in maize and cowpea in relation to the in vitro production of syringomycin. Phytopathology 77:475–483. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-67-475. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Arrebola E, Cazorla FM, Durán VE, Rivera E, Olea F, Codina JC, Pérez-García A, de Vicente A. 2003. Mangotoxin: a novel antimetabolite toxin produced by Pseudomonas syringae inhibiting ornithine/arginine biosynthesis. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 63:117–127. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2003.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Carrión VJ, Gutiérrez-Barranquero JA, Arrebol E, Bardaji L, Codina JC, de Vicente A, Cazorla FM, Murillo J. 2013. The mangotoxin biosynthetic operon (mbo) is specifically distributed within Pseudomonas syringae genomospecies 1 and was acquired only once during evolution. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:756–767. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03007-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Moulton PJ, Vivian A, Hunter PJ, Taylor JD. 1993. Changes in cultivar-specificity toward pea can result from transfer of plasmid RP4 and other incompatibility group P1 replicons to Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi. J Gen Microbiol 139:3149–3155. doi: 10.1099/00221287-139-12-3149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Murillo J, Shen H, Gerhold D, Sharma A, Cooksey DA, Keen NT. 1994. Characterization of pPT23B, the plasmid involved in syringolide production by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato PT23. Plasmid 31:275–287. doi: 10.1006/plas.1994.1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Murillo J, Bardaji L, Navarro de la Fuente L, Führer ME, Aguilera S, Álvarez-Morales A. 2011. Variation in conservation of the cluster for biosynthesis of the phytotoxin phaseolotoxin in Pseudomonas syringae suggests at least two events of horizontal acquisition. Res Microbiol 162:253–261. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Falgueras J, Lara AJ, Fernández-Pozo N, Cantón FR, Pérez-Trabado G, Claros MG. 2010. SeqTrim: a high-throughput pipeline for pre-processing any type of sequence read. BMC Bioinformatics 11:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Coil D, Jospin G, Darling AE. 2015. A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data. Bioinformatics 31:587–589. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Martínez-García PM, Rodríguez-Palenzuela P, Arrebola E, Carrión VJ, Gutiérrez-Barranquero JA, Pérez-García A, Ramos C, Cazorla FM, de Vicente A. 2015. Bioinformatics analysis of the complete genome sequence of the mango tree pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae UMAF0158 reveals traits relevant to virulence and epiphytic lifestyle. PLoS One 10:e0136101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Heredia-Ponce Z, Gutiérrez-Barranquero JA, Purtschert-Montenegro G, Eberl L, Cazorla FM, de Vicente A. 2020. Biological role of EPS from Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae UMAF0158 extracellular matrix, focusing on a Psl-like polysaccharide. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 6:37. doi: 10.1038/s41522-020-00148-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Young A. 2008. Notes on Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae bacterial necrosis of mango (Mangifera indica) in Australia. Austral Plant Dis Notes 3:138–140. doi: 10.1071/DN08053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gutiérrez-Barranquero JA, Arrebola E, Pérez-García A, Codina JC, Murillo J, de Vicente A, Cazorla FM. 2008. Evaluation of phenotypic and genetic techniques to analyze diversity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae strains isolates from mango trees, p 271–281. In Fatmi MB, Collmer A, Iacobellis NS, Mansfield JW, Murillo J, Schaad NW, Ullrich M (ed), Pseudomonas syringae pathovars and related pathogens—identification, epidemiology and genomics. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Aiello D, Ferrante P, Vitale A, Polizzi G, Scortichini M, Cirvilleri G. 2015. Characterization of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae isolated from mango in Sicily and occurrence of copper-resistant strains. J Plant Pathol 97:273–282. doi: 10.4454/JPP.V97I2.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Baltrus DA, Nishimura MT, Romanchuk A, Chang JH, Mukhtar MS, Cherkis K, Roach J, Grant SR, Jones CD, Dangl JL. 2011. Dynamic evolution of pathogenicity revealed by sequencing and comparative genomics of 19 Pseudomonas syringae isolates. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002132. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Teverson DM. 1991. PhD thesis. Genetics of pathogenicity and resistance in the halo-blight disease of beans in Africa. University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hirano SS, Charkowski A, Collmer A, Willis DK, Upper CD. 1999. Role of the Hrp type III protein secretion system in growth of Pseudomonas syringae B728a on host plant in the field. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:9851–9856. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Cuppels DA. 1986. Generation and characterization of Tn5 insertion mutations in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. Appl Environ Microbiol 51:323–327. doi: 10.1128/AEM.51.2.323-327.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
GenBank accession numbers of the different Pseudomonas syringae plasmids (Pss UMAF0081, Pss UMAF0170, Pss 7B44, and Pst PT23) harboring different copA genes were KY362368, KY362372, KY362373, and MSDS00000000, respectively. GenBank accession numbers of the partial nucleotide sequences of rpoD and gyrB genes for each bacterial strain are listed in Table S4 in the supplemental material. The partial nucleotide sequences of the gyrB gene obtained in this study have been deposited at GenBank under the accession numbers MW001941 to MW002005. The partial nucleotide sequences of the rpoD gene obtained in this study have been deposited at GenBank under the accession numbers MW002006 to MW002070. The draft genome sequences obtained in this work have been deposited at GenBank under accession numbers JACTWA000000000 and JACTWB000000000 for Pss UMAF0291 and Pss UMAF3028, respectively.




