Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2021 Mar 17;89(4):e00667-20. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00667-20

Increased Listeria monocytogenes Dissemination and Altered Population Dynamics in Muc2-Deficient Mice

Ting Zhang a,b, Jumpei Sasabe a,b,*, Karthik Hullahalli a,b, Brandon Sit a,b, Matthew K Waldor a,b,c,d,
Editor: Nancy E Freitage
PMCID: PMC8090952  PMID: 33431704

The mucin Muc2 is a major constituent of the mucus layer that covers the intestinal epithelium and creates a barrier between epithelial cells and luminal commensal or pathogenic microorganisms. The Gram-positive foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes can cause enteritis and also disseminate from the intestine to give rise to systemic disease. L. monocytogenes can bind to intestinal Muc2, but the influence of the Muc2 mucin barrier on L. monocytogenes intestinal colonization and systemic dissemination has not been explored.

KEYWORDS: Listeria monocytogenes, Muc2, dissemination, population dynamics

ABSTRACT

The mucin Muc2 is a major constituent of the mucus layer that covers the intestinal epithelium and creates a barrier between epithelial cells and luminal commensal or pathogenic microorganisms. The Gram-positive foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes can cause enteritis and also disseminate from the intestine to give rise to systemic disease. L. monocytogenes can bind to intestinal Muc2, but the influence of the Muc2 mucin barrier on L. monocytogenes intestinal colonization and systemic dissemination has not been explored. Here, we used an orogastric L. monocytogenes infection model to investigate the role of Muc2 in host defense against L. monocytogenes. Compared to wild-type mice, we found that Muc2−/− mice exhibited heightened susceptibility to orogastric challenge with L. monocytogenes, with higher mortality, elevated colonic pathology, and increased pathogen burdens in both the intestinal tract and distal organs. In contrast, L. monocytogenes burdens were equivalent in wild-type and Muc2−/− animals when the pathogen was administered intraperitoneally, suggesting that systemic immune defects related to Muc2 deficiency do not explain the heightened pathogen dissemination observed in oral infections. Using a barcoded L. monocytogenes library to measure intrahost pathogen population dynamics, we found that Muc2−/− animals had larger pathogen founding population sizes in the intestine and distal sites than observed in wild-type animals. Comparisons of barcode frequencies suggested that the colon becomes the major source for seeding the internal organs in Muc2−/− animals. Together, our findings reveal that Muc2 mucin plays a key role in controlling L. monocytogenes colonization, dissemination, and population dynamics.

INTRODUCTION

Muc2 is a highly abundant O-glycosylated mucin glycoprotein that is primarily found on the mucosal surface of the intestinal tract and forms a gel-like structure that is the principal component of the mucus layer found at the interface between the intestinal epithelium and lumen (1, 2). Muc2 is synthesized by goblet cells, where it is oligomerized during intracellular trafficking and stored in secretory granules prior to its secretion (3). Although distributed throughout the intestinal tract, the density and structural organization of Muc2 within the mucus layer varies between sites; for example, two thick layers of Muc2 (a “loose” outer layer and a “firm” inner layer) are found in the colon, while only a porous mucus layer is found in the small intestine (1, 4).

A major physiological role of Muc2 is the creation of a physical barrier that segregates the gut microbiota from the intestinal epithelium (5). This barrier function is augmented by the wire mesh-like structure of Muc2 that serves as a scaffold for binding and displaying host-derived antimicrobial peptides and microbial binding proteins (e.g., human β-defensins, Relm-β, and Zg16) (68). The extensive O-glycosylation of Muc2 exerts both microbe- and host-directed effects that support intestinal homeostasis by supplying nutrients (e.g., carbohydrate moieties) to promote the expansion of gut commensal species and by delivering tolerogenic signals to lamina propria-resident dendritic cells (9, 10). The regulation of Muc2 production and secretion by goblet cells is also integrated into intestinal defense systems against enteric pathogens. For instance, Birchenough et al. found that a subpopulation of goblet cells in the colon releases Muc2-containing granules in response to direct sensing of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) via the intrinsic Nlrp6 (NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 6)-dependent inflammasome (11). In addition, goblet cells undergo hyperplasia and increase their mucus granule sizes in response to signals generated by other intestinal sentinel cells (e.g., Tuft cells) during infection (12).

The impacts of Muc2 on gut homeostasis and host defense against enteric pathogens have been revealed by studies of mice harboring a targeted knockout of the Muc2 gene (Muc2−/−) (13). These Muc2−/− animals exhibit a reduced gap between luminal commensal bacteria and the intestinal epithelium (5, 14), epithelial hyperplasia (13, 14), increased colonic immune cell infiltration (15), altered microbiota (16), and elevated frequencies of colon cancer (13). Similar phenotypes have also been observed in a mouse strain (the Winnie mouse) with a missense mutation in the Muc2 gene (17, 18). Besides intestinal tract anomalies, Muc2−/− mice have systemic inflammation, higher titers of antibodies against bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and flagellin, and elevated levels of iron in circulation (19). In addition, Muc2−/− mice have been found to be more susceptible to challenges with enteric pathogens, including Citrobacter rodentium, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, the nematode parasite Trichuris muris, and the protozoal parasite Entamoeba histolytica (14, 2022).

L. monocytogenes is a Gram-positive foodborne bacterial pathogen that can cause enteritis as well as additional disease manifestations, such as meningitis, that result from its systemic dissemination from the intestinal tract (23). Observations from a rat ligated ileal loop model revealed that L. monocytogenes forms aggregates on intestinal mucus and induces goblet cell degranulation (24). Several L. monocytogenes surface proteins have been reported to bind to Muc2 (25), potentially mediating the pathogen’s attachment to mucus. Using the mucin-expressing cell line HT29X, Coconnier et al. found that the secreted toxin listeriolysin O (LLO) is the major L. monocytogenes component that triggers mucin exocytosis (26, 27). Although goblet cell degranulation is generally recognized as a host defense strategy, L. monocytogenes is also thought to target these mucin-secreting cells to gain access to its host receptor in the intestine, E-cadherin (28, 29).

Here, we used Muc2−/− mice and an orogastric L. monocytogenes infection model to investigate the role of the intestinal mucus layer in host defense against L. monocytogenes. Compared to wild-type (WT) mice, Muc2-deficient animals had heightened susceptibility to orogastric challenge with L. monocytogenes, exhibiting elevated mortality, more severe colonic pathology, and increased bacterial burden in the intestine and distal organs. In contrast, pathogen burdens were similar in Muc2+/+ and Muc2−/− animals after intraperitoneal (i.p.) inoculation of L. monocytogenes. By using barcoded L. monocytogenes (30), we investigated the impact of Muc2 mucin on L. monocytogenes population dynamics during infection. Muc2−/− animals had larger pathogen founding population sizes at intestinal and distal sites, and the genetic relatedness between these bacterial populations exceeded that in WT mice. Together, these findings suggest that Muc2 guards against L. monocytogenes dissemination from the intestine and demonstrate that the presence of this mucin modulates pathogen population dynamics during infection.

RESULTS

Muc2−/− mice have heightened susceptibility to orogastric challenge with L. monocytogenes.

To assess the role of Muc2 in host defense against L. monocytogenes, littermate offspring of Muc2+/− breeders were orogastrically challenged with L. monocytogenes 10403S InlAm, a murinized variant of a human clinical isolate that contains an InlA allele with enhanced binding to murine E-cadherin (31). During the 8-day observation period, 92% (11 out of 12) of Muc2−/− mice died postpathogen challenge (Fig. 1a), whereas only 17% (2 out of 12) of WT (Muc2+/+) mice succumbed (Fig. 1a). In addition, Muc2−/− mice began to die earlier than WT mice (Fig. 1a) and lost more weight (Fig. 1b). Several of the Muc2−/− mice developed diarrhea ∼3 days postinoculation (dpi) (Fig. 1c); in contrast, WT mice do not develop diarrhea in this model. These observations indicate that Muc2 provides protection from the morbidity and mortality of oral L. monocytogenes infection in mice.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Muc2−/− mice have heightened susceptibility to orogastric challenge with L. monocytogenes. (a) Survival curves of Muc2−/− mice (n = 12) and WT littermates (Muc2+/+, n = 12) following orogastric challenge with ∼3 × 109 CFU L. monocytogenes 10403S InlAm. Mice were monitored every 12 h for 8 days. The data are from two independent experiments; the Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test was used to compare the survival curves (****, P < 0.0001). (b) Weight of Muc2−/− (n = 14) and WT (n = 15) mice during the first 3 days postorogastric inoculation of L. monocytogenes. Data are from three independent experiments. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni’s multiple-comparison test were used to assess significance (**, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001). (c) Muc2−/− mice (right) but not WT mice (left) developed signs of diarrhea at 3 dpi.

L. monocytogenes infection exacerbates colonic inflammation in Muc2−/− mice.

The absence of Muc2 is thought to largely eliminate the physical barrier between luminal commensal bacteria and the colonic epithelium, triggering microbially induced intestinal inflammation (15). Colons from L. monocytogenes-infected Muc2−/− mice were visibly more swollen than colons from infected WT mice, suggestive of exacerbated intestinal inflammation in the Muc2−/− group (Fig. 2a and b). Furthermore, the masses of the distal colons from both uninfected and infected Muc2−/− mice were greater than those from corresponding WT mice (Fig. 2c); such differences were not observed in the proximal colons from either uninfected or infected animals (Fig. 2d). The elevated mass of the distal colon in Muc2−/− mice is likely attributable to the influx of immune cells and proliferation of local colonic epithelial cells (14), but the factors that restrict these processes to the distal colon are not clear.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

L. monocytogenes infection exacerbates colonic inflammation in Muc2−/− mice. (a) Representative images of colons from uninfected (−) and infected (+) Muc2−/− and WT mice at 3 days postinoculation (dpi); scale bar, 1 cm. (b) Magnified images of distal colons shown in panel a; scale bar, 1 cm. (c and d) Weight of the distal colon (c) and proximal colon (d) and length of entire colon (e) in uninfected and infected Muc2−/− and WT mice at 3 dpi; 9 to 13 mice per group in panels c and d and 8 to 9 mice per group in panel e. (f) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained distal colonic tissue from uninfected and infected Muc2−/− and WT mice at 3 dpi; the yellow arrows show immune cell infiltration, and the green arrow shows sites of epithelial cell erosion; the blue arrows show granulocytes in the lumen. ANOVA and Fisher multiple-comparison test were used to assess significance in panels c to e (n.s., not significant; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001).

Inflammation of the colon is often associated with reduced colon length (32), and the colons of Muc2−/− mice were significantly shorter than those from WT mice at 3 dpi (Fig. 2a and e). In contrast, colon lengths were similar in uninfected Muc2−/− and WT animals (Fig. 2a and e), suggesting that lack of Muc2 mucin by itself is not sufficient to provoke longitudinal colon shrinkage. As L. monocytogenes challenge did not alter colon length in WT mice (Fig. 2e), these observations suggest that infection-induced colon shortening in Muc2−/− mice is due to the combined effects of the Muc2 mucin deficit and the presence of the pathogen.

Histological analysis of distal colons from WT and Muc2−/− mice using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining corroborated our visual observations of gross pathology. Notably, in Muc2−/− mice, infection induced massive immune cell infiltration into the colonic lamina propria, heightened erosion of colonic epithelial cells, and increased granulocytes in the colon lumen (Fig. 2f). In marked contrast, there was no detectable immune cell infiltration within the colonic lamina propria of WT mice (Fig. 2f). Overall, with the exception of granulocytes in the lumen of the distal colon in a subset of the WT mice, there was limited pathology observed in colons from WT mice 3 dpi (Fig. 2f). Thus, the absence of Muc2 elevates the intestinal inflammatory response to L. monocytogenes.

Muc2 mucin modulates L. monocytogenes intestinal colonization and dissemination.

To address the impact of Muc2 on bacterial colonization patterns, bacterial burdens in the intestines of infected animals were assessed at 3 dpi. Prior to plating, the intestinal samples were treated with gentamicin, an antibiotic that kills extracellular bacteria in the intestinal lumen, but not organisms found within the tissue of the intestine (33). In the small intestine, proximal colon, and distal colon, the Muc2−/− mice carried significantly more L. monocytogenes than WT mice (Fig. 3a to c). The most dramatic difference was observed in the distal colon, where Muc2−/− mice harbored ∼1,000 times more L. monocytogenes than WT mice (Fig. 3c). Thus, the absence of Muc2-containing mucin in the distal colon markedly augments the accessibility of within-tissue niches to the pathogen at this site.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Elevated L. monocytogenes intestinal colonization and dissemination in Muc2−/− mice. Burden of L. monocytogenes in the ileum (a), proximal colon (b), distal colon (c), MLN (d), spleen (e), liver (f), and gallbladder (g) at 3 dpi in orogastrically infected Muc2−/− and WT mice. The intestinal samples (a to c) were treated with gentamicin to kill extracellular bacteria. Data are from three independent experiments with 10 to 15 mice per group. The Mann-Whitney test was used to assess significance (**, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001).

The burden of L. monocytogenes in the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), spleen, and liver were also determined to assess the impact of Muc2 deficiency on systemic pathogen dissemination. Muc2−/− mice had ∼100 times higher L. monocytogenes burdens in MLN, spleens, and livers than WT mice at 3 dpi (Fig. 3d to f), suggesting that Muc2 contributes to the barrier that ordinarily limits L. monocytogenes dissemination from the gut to distal sites. Furthermore, a higher percentage of Muc2−/− mice carried L. monocytogenes in bile recovered from the gallbladder (GB) than WT mice 3 dpi (100% versus 45%) (Fig. 3g). Our unpublished observations suggest that there is a positive correlation between hepatic L. monocytogenes burden and GB colonization, raising the possibility that the elevated frequency of GB colonization in the Muc2-deficient animals is a consequence of the higher pathogen burden in their livers. Even though the Muc2-deficient animals were more likely to have GB colonization than WT mice, the L. monocytogenes burdens in GBs from WT and Muc2−/− mice were similar (∼107 CFU; Fig. 3g), suggesting that Muc2 does not alter the bacterial carrying capacity of the GB.

Kumar et al. recently reported that Muc2−/− mice have an elevated basal level of systemic inflammation (19), suggesting that the absence of a Muc2 barrier alters physiology in distal organs. To test whether Muc2−/− mice have deficiencies in controlling systemic L. monocytogenes infection, WT and Muc2−/− mice were challenged with 105 CFU of L. monocytogenes via the intraperitoneal (i.p.) route. In contrast to our observations with oral inoculation (Fig. 3), similar numbers of L. monocytogenes were recovered from the MLN, spleen, and liver in WT and Muc2−/− mice 3 days following i.p. inoculation (Fig. 4a to c), suggesting that the absence of Muc2 mucin does not compromise the capacity of these organs to control the infection. In addition, Muc2−/− and WT mice exhibited similar weight loss and had comparable colon lengths after i.p. challenge (Fig. 4d and e), suggesting that the susceptibility of Muc2−/− mice to oral pathogen challenge is not explained by a systemic immune defect.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Muc2−/− and WT littermate mice have similar pathogen burdens and disease manifestations after intraperitoneal challenge with L. monocytogenes. Muc2−/− (n = 8) and WT (n = 8) mice were challenged with 1 × 105 CFU of L. monocytogenes 10403S InlAm via the intraperitoneal route. Pathogen burdens recovered from MLN (a), spleen (b), and liver (c) at 3 dpi. (d) Weight of Muc2−/− and WT mice for 3 days following i.p. inoculation. (e) Colon lengths were measured at 3 dpi.

Altered L. monocytogenes population dynamics in Muc2−/− mice.

Since we found that the Muc2-containing intestinal mucus barrier modulates L. monocytogenes intestinal colonization and dissemination, we leveraged sequence tag-based analysis of microbial populations (STAMP) (30, 34) to investigate the impact of Muc2 on L. monocytogenes population dynamics during infection. In this method, DNA-barcoded, but otherwise WT, L. monocytogenes organisms are used to calculate the number of bacteria from the inoculum that seed various infection sites (the founding population, or Nb) (30). Notably, in orally infected mice, Nb values from gentamicin-treated proximal and distal colon samples were significantly higher in Muc2−/− than WT animals (Fig. 5a and b). The difference was particularly pronounced in the distal colon, where Nb was ∼2,000 in Muc2−/− versus ∼50 in WT mice (Fig. 5b), suggesting that Muc2 provides an especially stringent barrier for the pathogen at this site. Presumably, the absence of the Muc2 mucin facilitates pathogen access to permissive niches within colonic tissue. Additional factors, such as the increased influx of immune cells and their accumulation in the colonic lamina propria of Muc2−/− mice (Fig. 2f), may provide additional niches for L. monocytogenes growth, since the pathogen is known to replicate in these cells (35).

FIG 5.

FIG 5

L. monocytogenes population dynamics differ in Muc2−/− and WT mice. Founding population size (Nb) of L. monocytogenes recovered from proximal colon (a) and distal colon (b) of Muc2−/− (n = 11) and WT (n = 13) mice at 3 dpi; data are from three independent experiments. Nb of L. monocytogenes recovered from MLN (c), spleen (d), and liver (e) of Muc2−/− (n = 6) and WT (n = 4) mice at 3 dpi. (f) Nb of L. monocytogenes recovered from bile of Muc2−/− mice at 3 dpi; data (n = 10) are from three independent experiments. (g to l) Genetic relatedness of L. monocytogenes recovered from different sites of Muc2−/− (n = 6) and WT (n = 4) mice 3 dpi. Mann-Whitney tests were used to assess significance in panels a to k (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001).

Nb sizes in internal organs also differed between Muc2−/− and WT animals. Nb values in MLNs, spleens, and livers of Muc2−/− mice were higher than those in WT mice but only reached statistical significance in MLNs (Fig. 5c to e). These observations are consistent with the idea that the Muc2 mucin barrier imposes a bottleneck on L. monocytogenes dissemination from the intestine. In contrast, even though 100% of Muc2−/− mice harbored L. monocytogenes in their GBs, Nb values in GBs from Muc2−/− mice were extremely low (mean Nb, 3; Fig. 5f), as observed before in BALB/c WT mice (30), suggesting that Muc2 does not contribute to the host barrier that restricts L. monocytogenes access to the GB.

By calculating changes in the relative frequency of barcodes, STAMP also enables comparison of the genetic relatedness between bacterial populations recovered from different sites (34). In WT mice, bacterial populations from the proximal (Fig. 5g to i) or distal (Fig. 5j to l) colon were relatively distinct from those resident in the MLN, spleen, and liver (i.e., low genetic relatedness values). These low values are similar to those we found in BALB/c mice (30), which are more permissive to L. monocytogenes infection than C57BL/6 mice, and indicate that L. monocytogenes disseminates from the intestinal tract to distal organs using multiple independent routes (30, 36). In contrast, in Muc2−/− mice, these comparisons revealed a statistically significant higher degree of relatedness between bacterial populations recovered from either the proximal (Fig. 5g to i) or distal (Fig. 5j to l) colon and those from the MLN, spleen, and liver than found in WT animals. These observations suggest that the increases in absolute and founding L. monocytogenes population sizes in the proximal and distal colon (Fig. 3b and c and 5a and b) that are associated with the absence of Muc2 mucin also enable the colon to become the major source for seeding the internal organs. Collectively, these findings reveal that the absence of Muc2 mucin alters L. monocytogenes population dynamics during infection.

DISCUSSION

Here, we found that Muc2−/− mice have heightened susceptibility to orogastric challenge with L. monocytogenes. Compared to WT mice, animals lacking Muc2 exhibited elevated mortality, more severe colonic pathology, and increased pathogen burdens in the intestine as well as in distal organs following oral inoculation of L. monocytogenes. The heightened sensitivity of Muc2−/− mice appears to be dependent on the route of infection, since we found that L. monocytogenes burdens were equivalent in WT and Muc2-deficient animals when the pathogen was administered intraperitoneally. Furthermore, our experiments with barcoded L. monocytogenes demonstrated that Muc2 restricts L. monocytogenes founding population sizes, particularly in the colon. In the absence of Muc2, the colon becomes the dominant site from which the pathogen disseminates to distal organs. Together, these observations reveal that Muc2 mucin plays a critical role in controlling L. monocytogenes colonization, dissemination, and population dynamics.

The elevated susceptibility of Muc2−/− mice to L. monocytogenes challenge is likely attributable to the physical absence of the mucus barrier in the intestine as well as to the indirect effects of the absence of Muc2, including changes in the composition of the microbiota in these mice (16). Muc2 is the dominant mucin component of the mucus barrier that physically limits the access of commensal as well as pathogenic microorganisms to the epithelial surface of the intestine (5, 37); a thinned/absent mucus layer that lacks Muc2 likely facilitates the pathogen’s capacity to approach and ultimately invade intestinal epithelial cells. This host defense mechanism has been postulated for other enteric pathogens, including Citrobacter rodentium and Salmonella Typhimurium, where increased direct contact of these pathogens with the colonic epithelium of Muc2−/− mice was observed (14, 21). Additionally, increased mucus flow during enteric infection expels pathogens from the epithelial surface and is thought to be a host defense mechanism (38). Consistent with this idea, impairment of mucin exocytosis from goblet cells, e.g., by deletion of vesicle-associated membrane protein 8 (VAMP8), leads to heightened host susceptibility to enteric pathogens Citrobacter rodentium and Entamoeba histolytica (39, 40). Although the function of goblet cell secretory granules in Muc2−/− mice has not been precisely described, a “flush out” strategy may be ineffective in Muc2−/− mice given the absence of mucus to support pathogen excretion. Altered mucus homeostasis due to lack of Muc2 production and secretory granule formation could also lead to goblet cell dysfunction, a phenotype that may increase L. monocytogenes’ access to its host receptor, E-cadherin (41).

Besides Muc2’s critical physical role in intestinal defense, its absence has several indirect consequences that likely also contribute to the susceptibility of Muc2−/− mice to oral infection with L. monocytogenes. Using streptomycin-treated mice, Becattini et al. discovered that gut commensal microbes (e.g., Clostridiales such as C. saccharogumia, C. ramosum, and C. hathewayi) confer colonization resistance and protection against oral L. monocytogenes challenge (42). It is plausible that changes in the composition of the microbiota in Muc2−/− mice (16) increase their susceptibility to oral L. monocytogenes challenge through direct antagonism of the pathogen or by other effects on the host. For example, alterations in the intestinal microbiota that accompany Muc2 deficiency could also drive or synergize with the elevated basal colonic inflammation in these animals (15) in a way that contributes to their heightened susceptibility to oral infection with L. monocytogenes.

Mucin glycans can also serve as sources of nutrition for pathogens and are important regulators of bacterial pathogenicity (4345). For example, O-glycans on MUC5AC can suppress the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, facilitating its clearance in a porcine burn wound model (44). The absence of such interkingdom regulatory signals in Muc2−/− mice might modulate the L. monocytogenes virulence gene program and, thus, impact L. monocytogenes systemic dissemination.

Kumar et al. recently reported that Muc2−/− mice have elevated basal levels of systemic inflammation and circulatory iron, conditions that may promote growth of disseminated bacteria and were associated with increased susceptibility to i.p. challenge with LPS (19). This suggested that animals with whole-body knockouts of Muc2 have systemic defects in their response to PAMPs. However, such changes did not appear to alter the capacity of Muc2−/− mice to control systemic infection caused by i.p. administration of L. monocytogenes, as pathogen burdens were similar after using this route of infection in WT and Muc2−/− mice. Further work will be required to decipher the potential extraintestinal contributions of Muc2 to host defense against pathogens, which may be challenge and tissue specific.

The structure of the mucus layer varies in different regions of the intestinal tract; the small intestine is covered by a thin, porous mucus layer, while the colon is heavily coated with two layers of Muc2-containing mucus (1). We found that the effects of the absence of Muc2 were particularly marked in the distal colon, where there was a drastic increase in the burden of within-tissue L. monocytogenes; there was only a moderate elevation in the pathogen burden in the ileum and proximal colon. Consistent with our observations, in a Muc2−/− mouse model of spontaneous colitis, the distal colon was found to have more neutrophilic infiltrates than the proximal colon (15). The distal colon is distinguished by a thick inner mucus layer that is not easily penetrated by microbes (37, 46, 47) and a population of goblet cells that supports the rapid renewal of mucus within this inner layer (48). The severe phenotype we observed in the distal colon supports the idea that this region of the intestine is particularly reliant on Muc2-producing goblet cells for defense.

Muc2 deficiency not only affects the pathogen burden in host tissues but also alters the pathogen’s population dynamics. Our previous (30) and present observations, in two different strains of mice, are consistent with the hypothesis that L. monocytogenes disseminates from the intestinal tract to distal organs using multiple independent routes, a pattern that has been referred to as episodic spread (30). Notably, the pathogen’s dissemination pattern was altered in the Muc2−/− mice. The genetic relatedness of the L. monocytogenes populations recovered from the colon and distal organs (MLN, spleen, and liver) was significantly higher than that observed in WT mice, suggesting that the colon is the source for a larger fraction of organisms that disseminate in Muc2−/− versus WT mice. We also observed a marked increase in both the L. monocytogenes burden and founding population size in the colon of Muc2−/− mice. Together, these observations suggest that Muc2 in the colon is a critical host restriction factor that ordinarily prevents L. monocytogenes colonization and invasion of colonic tissue. The absence of this physical host barrier along with changes in colonic microenvironment facilitate L. monocytogenes proliferation and, thus, enable the colon to become the chief reservoir for dissemination. A deeper understanding of the consequences of and mechanisms by which perturbations of intestinal structure and function modify host defense could provide insight to guide new treatment strategies for disorders where intestinal insults promote systemic disease presentations, such as inflammatory bowel disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture conditions.

The Listeria monocytogenes strain used in this study (Lm-STAMP-200 library; see Table S1 in the supplemental material) is a barcoded derivative (30) of L. monocytogenes 10403S InlAm, a strain where internalin A contains two amino acid substitutions that increase its capacity to bind murine E-cadherin (31). For animal studies, aliquots of the Lm-STAMP-200 library were cultured in brain heart infusion (BHI; BD Biosciences) broth with chloramphenicol (Cm; 7.5 μg/ml) and streptomycin (Sm; 200 μg/ml) at 37°C for 3 h. Bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation (3,000 × g for 10 min), washed twice with 20 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and diluted to the indicated concentration in PBS for inoculation.

Animal studies.

C57BL/6 Muc2−/− mice used in this study were a gift from Anna Velcich (13) and were bred at the Harvard Institutes of Medicine animal facility. Mice were genotyped at 3 weeks of age, and Muc2+/+ (WT) and Muc2−/− mice were cohoused until 10 to 12 weeks of age. Gender- and age-matched littermates that were the offspring of heterozygous Muc2+/− breeders were used throughout the study. As observed by other groups (49), a small fraction of Muc2−/− animals (∼10%) in our colony developed spontaneous colon prolapse by 10 to 12 weeks of age; these mice were euthanized and excluded from the study. For orogastric infection studies, WT and Muc2−/− littermates were fasted for 8 h prior to infection by gavage (18-gauge feeding needle) with ∼3 × 109 CFU of barcoded L. monocytogenes (200 μl) suspended in a 300-μl mixture of 200 mM CaCO3. For intraperitoneal infection studies, WT and Muc2−/− littermates were administered ∼1 × 105 CFU of barcoded L. monocytogenes (200 μl) in PBS via i.p. injection. Mouse body weights were measured prior to inoculation and daily postinoculation for 3 days. To assess gross intestinal pathology, animals were euthanized 3 dpi, and the length and weight of colons were measured. For survival curve analysis after orogastric inoculation, animals were monitored twice per day for 8 days.

To assess bacterial burden, animals were euthanized 3 dpi, and organs (ileum [distal one-third of the small intestines], colon, MLN, spleen, liver, and GB) were collected. Colonic tissues were equally divided into two parts of approximately equal length, which were designated proximal colon (adjacent to cecum) and distal colon (adjacent to anus). Proximal colons, distal colons, and ilea were cut open longitudinally, incubated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) with 100 μg/ml gentamicin for 2 h to kill the extracellular bacteria, transferred to 50-ml conical centrifuge tubes (Corning), and washed with 25 ml of PBS five times on a rotator. The intestinal segments, MLN, spleen, and liver were homogenized in sterile PBS using a beat-beater (BioSpec Products). To collect bile, GBs were transferred to Eppendorf tubes containing 1 ml of PBS and ruptured with 23-gauge needles (Becton, Dickinson). For CFU enumeration, all of the homogenates/samples were serially diluted, plated on BHI-Sm plates, and kept at 37°C for 48 h. For STAMP analysis, homogenates/samples were directly plated on 245-by-245-mm square BHI-Sm plates (Corning).

Histological analysis.

Distal colons from WT and Muc2−/− animals 3 dpi were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 2 h, transferred to 70% ethanol, and kept at 4°C overnight. Samples were embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT solution (Sakura Finetek) and sliced into 10-μm sections using a Leica CM1860 UV cryostat. Samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, mounted with Organo/Limonene mounting medium (Sigma), and scanned (×200 magnification) using a Nikon confocal microscope.

STAMP protocol.

Calculation of Nb and genetic relatedness was performed as previously described (30, 34). Briefly, L. monocytogenes colonies from the indicated organs were washed off the BHI-Sm plates with PBS. Cells were pelleted and genomic DNA was extracted (Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit; Promega) from ∼1 × 1010 bacteria. The region that harbors the 30-bp barcodes was amplified from genomic DNA using primer PLM30 and primer PLM6-P29 (Table S1). The PCR products were purified (MinElute; Qiagen) and quantified (Qubit dsDNA HS assay kit; Life Technologies). Purified PCR products were combined in equimolar concentrations and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq (Miseq reagent kit V2, 50-cycle; Illumina) using primer PLM49. Reaper-12–340 was used to discard sequence reads with low quality (≤Q30) and to trim the sequence following the barcode (50). The trimmed sequences were clustered with QIIME (version 1.6.0) using pick_otus.py with a sequence similarity threshold of 0.9 (51). Nb was then calculated using a custom R script. Genetic distance was estimated using the Cavalli–Sforza chord distance method (52) as described by Abel et al. (34). Genetic relatedness is one minus genetic distance.

Ethics statement.

Animal experiments in this study were carried out in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (53) and were approved by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital IACUC (2016N000416). Mice were euthanized by isoflurane inhalation followed by cervical dislocation.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file 1
IAI.00667-20-s0001.pdf (60.8KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Anna Velcich for providing Muc2−/− mice. We thank members of the Waldor laboratory for helpful discussions.

T.Z. was supported by a Sarah Elizabeth O’Brien Trust Postdoctoral Fellowship. K.H. was supported by the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. This work was supported by NIH grant RO1-AI-042347 (to M.K.W.) and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (M.K.W.).

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Johansson MEV, Larsson JMH, Hansson GC. 2011. The two mucus layers of colon are organized by the MUC2 mucin, whereas the outer layer is a legislator of host-microbial interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(Suppl 1):4659–4665. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006451107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Axelsson MA, Asker N, Hansson GC. 1998. O-glycosylated MUC2 monomer and dimer from LS 174T cells are water-soluble, whereas larger MUC2 species formed early during biosynthesis are insoluble and contain nonreducible intermolecular bonds. J Biol Chem 273:18864–18870. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.30.18864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ambort D, Johansson MEV, Gustafsson JK, Nilsson HE, Ermund A, Johansson BR, Koeck PJB, Hebert H, Hansson GC. 2012. Calcium and pH-dependent packing and release of the gel-forming MUC2 mucin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:5645–5650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120269109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Johansson MEV, Sjövall H, Hansson GC. 2013. The gastrointestinal mucus system in health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 10:352–361. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Johansson MEV, Phillipson M, Petersson J, Velcich A, Holm L, Hansson GC. 2008. The inner of the two Muc2 mucin-dependent mucus layers in colon is devoid of bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:15064–15069. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803124105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Antoni L, Nuding S, Weller D, Gersemann M, Ott G, Wehkamp J, Stange EF. 2013. Human colonic mucus is a reservoir for antimicrobial peptides. J Crohns Colitis 7:e652–e664. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Propheter DC, Chara AL, Harris TA, Ruhn KA, Hooper LV. 2017. Resistin-like molecule β is a bactericidal protein that promotes spatial segregation of the microbiota and the colonic epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:11027–11033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711395114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bergström JH, Birchenough GMH, Katona G, Schroeder BO, Schütte A, Ermund A, Johansson MEV, Hansson GC. 2016. Gram-positive bacteria are held at a distance in the colon mucus by the lectin-like protein ZG16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:13833–13838. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611400113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shan M, Gentile M, Yeiser JR, Walland AC, Bornstein VU, Chen K, He B, Cassis L, Bigas A, Cols M, Comerma L, Huang B, Blander JM, Xiong H, Mayer L, Berin C, Augenlicht LH, Velcich A, Cerutti A. 2013. Mucus enhances gut homeostasis and oral tolerance by delivering immunoregulatory signals. Science 342:447–453. doi: 10.1126/science.1237910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Arike L, Hansson GC. 2016. The densely O-glycosylated MUC2 mucin protects the intestine and provides food for the commensal bacteria. J Mol Biol 428:3221–3229. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Birchenough GMH, Nyström EEL, Johansson MEV, Hansson GC. 2016. A sentinel goblet cell guards the colonic crypt by triggering Nlrp6-dependent Muc2 secretion. Science 352:1535–1542. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gerbe F, Sidot E, Smyth DJ, Ohmoto M, Matsumoto I, Dardalhon V, Cesses P, Garnier L, Pouzolles M, Brulin B, Bruschi M, Harcus Y, Zimmermann VS, Taylor N, Maizels RM, Jay P. 2016. Intestinal epithelial tuft cells initiate type 2 mucosal immunity to helminth parasites. Nature 529:226–230. doi: 10.1038/nature16527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Velcich A, Yang W, Heyer J, Fragale A, Nicholas C, Viani S, Kucherlapati R, Lipkin M, Yang K, Augenlicht L. 2002. Colorectal cancer in mice genetically deficient in the mucin Muc2. Science 295:1726–1729. doi: 10.1126/science.1069094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bergstrom KSB, Kissoon-Singh V, Gibson DL, Ma C, Montero M, Sham HP, Ryz N, Huang T, Velcich A, Finlay BB, Chadee K, Vallance BA. 2010. Muc2 protects against lethal infectious colitis by disassociating pathogenic and commensal bacteria from the colonic mucosa. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000902. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wenzel UA, Magnusson MK, Rydström A, Jonstrand C, Hengst J, Johansson MEV, Velcich A, Öhman L, Strid H, Sjövall H, Hansson GC, Wick MJ. 2014. Spontaneous colitis in Muc2-deficient mice reflects clinical and cellular features of active ulcerative colitis. PLoS One 9:e100217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wu M, Wu Y, Li J, Bao Y, Guo Y, Yang W. 2018. The dynamic changes of gut microbiota in Muc2 deficient mice. Int J Mol Sci 19:2809. doi: 10.3390/ijms19092809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Heazlewood CK, Cook MC, Eri R, Price GR, Tauro SB, Taupin D, Thornton DJ, Png CW, Crockford TL, Cornall RJ, Adams R, Kato M, Nelms KA, Hong NA, Florin THJ, Goodnow CC, McGuckin MA. 2008. Aberrant mucin assembly in mice causes endoplasmic reticulum stress and spontaneous inflammation resembling ulcerative colitis. PLoS Med 5:e54. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liso M, De Santis S, Verna G, Dicarlo M, Calasso M, Santino A, Gigante I, Eri R, Raveenthiraraj S, Sobolewski A, Palmitessa V, Lippolis A, Mastronardi M, Armentano R, Serino G, De Angelis M, Chieppa M. 2020. A specific mutation in Muc2 determines early dysbiosis in colitis-prone Winnie mice. Inflamm Bowel Dis 26:546–556. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izz279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kumar M, Leon-Coria A, Cornick S, Petri B, Mayengbam S, Jijon HB, Moreau F, Shearer J, Chadee K. 2020. Increased intestinal permeability exacerbates sepsis through reduced hepatic SCD-1 activity and dysregulated iron recycling. Nat Commun 11:483–495. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14182-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kissoon-Singh V, Moreau F, Trusevych E, Chadee K. 2013. Entamoeba histolytica exacerbates epithelial tight junction permeability and proinflammatory responses in Muc2(-/-) mice. Am J Pathol 182:852–865. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zarepour M, Bhullar K, Montero M, Ma C, Huang T, Velcich A, Xia L, Vallance BA. 2013. The mucin Muc2 limits pathogen burdens and epithelial barrier dysfunction during Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium colitis. Infect Immun 81:3672–3683. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00854-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hasnain SZ, Wang H, Ghia J-E, Haq N, Deng Y, Velcich A, Grencis RK, Thornton DJ, Khan WI. 2010. Mucin gene deficiency in mice impairs host resistance to an enteric parasitic infection. Gastroenterology 138:1763–1771. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.01.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vázquez-Boland JA, Kuhn M, Berche P, Chakraborty T, Domínguez-Bernal G, Goebel W, González-Zorn B, Wehland J, Kreft J. 2001. Listeria pathogenesis and molecular virulence determinants. Clin Microbiol Rev 14:584–640. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.3.584-640.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pron B, Boumaila C, Jaubert F, Sarnacki S, Monnet JP, Berche P, Gaillard JL. 1998. Comprehensive study of the intestinal stage of listeriosis in a rat ligated ileal loop system. Infect Immun 66:747–755. doi: 10.1128/IAI.66.2.747-755.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lindén SK, Bierne H, Sabet C, Png CW, Florin TH, McGuckin MA, Cossart P. 2008. Listeria monocytogenes internalins bind to the human intestinal mucin MUC2. Arch Microbiol 190:101–104. doi: 10.1007/s00203-008-0358-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Coconnier MH, Dlissi E, Robard M, Laboisse CL, Gaillard JL, Servin AL. 1998. Listeria monocytogenes stimulates mucus exocytosis in cultured human polarized mucosecreting intestinal cells through action of listeriolysin O. Infect Immun 66:3673–3681. doi: 10.1128/IAI.66.8.3673-3681.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liévin-Le Moal V, Huet G, Aubert J-P, Bara J, Forgue-Lafitte M-E, Servin AL, Coconnier M-H. 2002. Activation of mucin exocytosis and upregulation of MUC genes in polarized human intestinal mucin-secreting cells by the thiol-activated exotoxin listeriolysin O. Cell Microbiol 4:515–529. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2002.00210.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nikitas G, Deschamps C, Disson O, Niault T, Cossart P, Lecuit M. 2011. Transcytosis of Listeria monocytogenes across the intestinal barrier upon specific targeting of goblet cell accessible E-cadherin. J Exp Med 208:2263–2277. doi: 10.1084/jem.20110560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kim M, Fevre C, Lavina M, Disson O, Lecuit M. 16 December 2020. Live imaging reveals listeria hijacking of E-cadherin recycling as it crosses the intestinal barrier. Curr Biol doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang T, Abel S, Abel Zur Wiesch P, Sasabe J, Davis BM, Higgins DE, Waldor MK. 2017. Deciphering the landscape of host barriers to Listeria monocytogenes infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:6334–6339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702077114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wollert T, Pasche B, Rochon M, Deppenmeier S, van den Heuvel J, Gruber AD, Heinz DW, Lengeling A, Schubert W-D. 2007. Extending the host range of Listeria monocytogenes by rational protein design. Cell 129:891–902. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chassaing B, Aitken JD, Malleshappa M, Vijay-Kumar M. 2014. Dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. Curr Protoc Immunol 104:15.25.1–15.25.14. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1525s104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Disson O, Grayo S, Huillet E, Nikitas G, Langa-Vives F, Dussurget O, Ragon M, Le Monnier A, Babinet C, Cossart P, Lecuit M. 2008. Conjugated action of two species-specific invasion proteins for fetoplacental listeriosis. Nature 455:1114–1118. doi: 10.1038/nature07303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Abel S, Abel Zur Wiesch P, Chang H-H, Davis BM, Lipsitch M, Waldor MK. 2015. Sequence tag-based analysis of microbial population dynamics. Nat Methods 12:223–226. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bhardwaj V, Kanagawa O, Swanson PE, Unanue ER. 1998. Chronic Listeria infection in SCID mice: requirements for the carrier state and the dual role of T cells in transferring protection or suppression. J Immunol 160:376–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Melton-Witt JA, Rafelski SM, Portnoy DA, Bakardjiev AI. 2012. Oral infection with signature-tagged Listeria monocytogenes reveals organ-specific growth and dissemination routes in guinea pigs. Infect Immun 80:720–732. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05958-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Furter M, Sellin ME, Hansson GC, Hardt W-D. 2019. Mucus architecture and near-surface swimming affect distinct Salmonella Typhimurium infection patterns along the murine intestinal tract. Cell Rep 27:2665–2678. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.McLoughlin K, Schluter J, Rakoff-Nahoum S, Smith AL, Foster KR. 2016. Host selection of microbiota via differential adhesion. Cell Host Microbe 19:550–559. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cornick S, Kumar M, Moreau F, Gaisano H, Chadee K. 2019. VAMP8-mediated MUC2 mucin exocytosis from colonic goblet cells maintains innate intestinal homeostasis. Nat Commun 10:4306–4314. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11811-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cornick S, Moreau F, Gaisano HY, Chadee K. 2017. Entamoeba histolytica-induced mucin exocytosis is mediated by VAMP8 and is critical in mucosal innate host defense. mBio 8:e01323-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01323-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mengaud J, Ohayon H, Gounon P, Mege R-M, Cossart P. 1996. E-cadherin is the receptor for internalin, a surface protein required for entry of L. monocytogenes into epithelial cells. Cell 84:923–932. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81070-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Becattini S, Littmann ER, Carter RA, Kim SG, Morjaria SM, Ling L, Gyaltshen Y, Fontana E, Taur Y, Leiner IM, Pamer EG. 2017. Commensal microbes provide first line defense against Listeria monocytogenes infection. J Exp Med 214:1973–1989. doi: 10.1084/jem.20170495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hoffman CL, Lalsiamthara J, Aballay A. 2020. Host mucin is exploited by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to provide monosaccharides required for a successful infection. mBio 11:183. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00060-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wheeler KM, Cárcamo-Oyarce G, Turner BS, Dellos-Nolan S, Co JY, Lehoux S, Cummings RD, Wozniak DJ, Ribbeck K. 2019. Mucin glycans attenuate the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in infection. Nat Microbiol 4:2146–2154. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0581-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pacheco AR, Curtis MM, Ritchie JM, Munera D, Waldor MK, Moreira CG, Sperandio V. 2012. Fucose sensing regulates bacterial intestinal colonization. Nature 492:113–117. doi: 10.1038/nature11623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Johansson MEV, Gustafsson JK, Holmén-Larsson J, Jabbar KS, Xia L, Xu H, Ghishan FK, Carvalho FA, Gewirtz AT, Sjövall H, Hansson GC. 2014. Bacteria penetrate the normally impenetrable inner colon mucus layer in both murine colitis models and patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut 63:281–291. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ermund A, Schütte A, Johansson MEV, Gustafsson JK, Hansson GC. 2013. Studies of mucus in mouse stomach, small intestine, and colon. I. Gastrointestinal mucus layers have different properties depending on location as well as over the Peyer's patches. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 305:G341–G347. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00046.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Johansson MEV. 2012. Fast renewal of the distal colonic mucus layers by the surface goblet cells as measured by in vivo labeling of mucin glycoproteins. PLoS One 7:e41009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Morampudi V, Dalwadi U, Bhinder G, Sham HP, Gill SK, Chan J, Bergstrom KSB, Huang T, Ma C, Jacobson K, Gibson DL, Vallance BA. 2016. The goblet cell-derived mediator RELM-β drives spontaneous colitis in Muc2-deficient mice by promoting commensal microbial dysbiosis. Mucosal Immunol 9:1218–1233. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Davis MPA, van Dongen S, Abreu-Goodger C, Bartonicek N, Enright AJ. 2013. Kraken: a set of tools for quality control and analysis of high-throughput sequence data. Methods 63:41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.06.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AW. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis. Models and estimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet 19:233–257. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.National Research Council. 2011. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, 8th ed. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1
IAI.00667-20-s0001.pdf (60.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES