Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2021 Mar 17;89(4):e00718-20. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00718-20

The Increased Accumulation of Staphylococcus aureus Virulence Factors Is Maximized in a purR Mutant by the Increased Production of SarA and Decreased Production of Extracellular Proteases

Duah Alkam a, Piroon Jenjaroenpun b, Aura M Ramirez c, Karen E Beenken c, Horace J Spencer d, Mark S Smeltzer c,
Editor: Nancy E Freitage
PMCID: PMC8090970  PMID: 33468580

Mutation of purR was previously shown to enhance the virulence of Staphylococcus aureus in a murine sepsis model, and this cannot be fully explained by increased expression of genes within the purine biosynthesis pathway. Rather, the increased production of specific S. aureus virulence factors, including alpha toxin and the fibronectin-binding proteins, was shown to play an important role.

KEYWORDS: Staphylococcus aureus, extracellular proteases, osteomyelitis, purR, sarA

ABSTRACT

Mutation of purR was previously shown to enhance the virulence of Staphylococcus aureus in a murine sepsis model, and this cannot be fully explained by increased expression of genes within the purine biosynthesis pathway. Rather, the increased production of specific S. aureus virulence factors, including alpha toxin and the fibronectin-binding proteins, was shown to play an important role. Mutation of purR was also shown previously to result in increased abundance of SarA. Here, we demonstrate by transposon sequencing that mutation of purR in the USA300 strain LAC increases fitness in a biofilm while mutation of sarA has the opposite effect. Therefore, we assessed the impact of sarA on reported purR-associated phenotypes by characterizing isogenic purR, sarA, and sarA/purR mutants. The results confirmed that mutation of purR results in increased abundance of alpha toxin, protein A, the fibronectin-binding proteins, and SarA, decreased production of extracellular proteases, an increased capacity to form a biofilm, and increased virulence in an osteomyelitis model. Mutation of sarA had the opposite effects on all of these phenotypes and, other than bacterial burdens in the bone, all of the phenotypes of sarA/purR mutants were comparable to those of sarA mutants. Limiting the production of extracellular proteases reversed all of the phenotypes of sarA mutants and most of those of sarA/purR mutants. We conclude that a critical component defining the virulence of a purR mutant is the enhanced production of SarA, which limits protease production to an extent that promotes the accumulation of critical S. aureus virulence factors.

INTRODUCTION

Recent reports have demonstrated that the purine biosynthesis regulator PurR not only represses expression of genes in the purine biosynthesis pathway but also impacts the production of multiple virulence factors in Staphylococcus aureus (1). Indeed, mutation of purR in a representative isolate of the USA300 clonal lineage was shown to significantly alter the expression of 130 genes, 38 of which were negatively regulated and 92 of which were positively regulated (1). The cumulative result of these changes is increased virulence, as assessed in a murine sepsis model (13). Studies examining the impact of mutating genes in the purine biosynthesis pathway confirm that this can be partially attributed to increased de novo purine synthesis in vivo, but they also demonstrate the involvement of other factors (3). Specifically, purR mutants produce increased levels of alpha toxin and the fibronectin-binding proteins FnbA and FnbB, and the increased production of these virulence factors has been shown to contribute to increases in the cytotoxicity for human neutrophils, the invasion of host cells, and overall virulence (14). These observations account for the hypothesis that, in addition to its role as a key metabolic regulator of purine biosynthesis, PurR acts as a “moonlighting” protein that modulates the production of critical S. aureus virulence factors (1).

Using the Bacillus subtilis PurR binding site (5′-AAACACGAACATTA-3′) as a guide for in silico analysis of the S. aureus USA300 FPR3757 genome, a PurR binding site was identified upstream of fnbA as well as genes within the purine biosynthesis pathway, and the functionality of these sites was confirmed by demonstrating the binding of PurR to a DNA target corresponding to the respective promoter regions (1). This is consistent with the observation that mutation of purR results in increased transcription of fnbA and fnbB (2). These results suggest that PurR represses expression of these genes directly (1). No PurR binding site was identified upstream of the gene encoding alpha toxin (hla), but a binding site was found upstream of the staphylococcal accessory regulator (sarA), and SarA was found to be upregulated in a purR mutant (1). SarA increases alpha toxin production both directly (5) and indirectly via its ability to increase expression of the accessory gene regulator (agr) (6). Based on this and given the lack of a PurR binding site upstream of hla, it was suggested that the increased abundance of SarA may account for the increased abundance of alpha toxin and potentially other extracellular proteins (e.g., LukA) in a purR mutant (1).

At the same time, the functional status of sarA is known to impact the production of extracellular proteases, and changes in the production of these proteases are known to impact the abundance of multiple S. aureus virulence factors, including FnbA, FnbB, and alpha toxin (711). This raises the possibility that the increased production of SarA may play a role in defining the overall phenotype of purR mutants by limiting the production of these proteases, thereby allowing maximum accumulation of S. aureus virulence factors, including alpha toxin and the fibronectin-binding proteins. If so, it would be anticipated that mutation of purR would result in a reduction in the production of extracellular proteases. There are reports indicating that this is the case (3) but also contradictory reports that purR mutants produce increased amounts of almost all of these proteases (1). No PurR binding sites were identified upstream of the genes encoding these proteases, which suggests that, like alpha toxin, any effect of PurR on protease production is likely to occur through an indirect mechanism.

In agreement with the reported moonlighting function of PurR, our transposon sequencing (Tn-Seq) assays in a USA300 (LAC strain) library suggest that the purR mutant exhibits increased fitness in a mature biofilm, compared to planktonic cultures; sarA mutants, on the other hand, were of decreased fitness in a mature biofilm. Given these observations and the compelling reports described above, we hypothesized that the impact of purR on the virulence of S. aureus occurs via both direct and indirect mechanisms, the latter being related at least in part to the impact of the mutation of purR on the production of SarA (1). To address this possibility, we generated purR, sarA, and sarA/purR mutants in the USA300 S. aureus strain LAC. We also generated derivatives of each of these mutants that are unable to produce aureolysin, ScpA, SspA, and SspB. We then characterized all of these mutants with respect to known phenotypes of S. aureus purR mutants (1, 2), as well as their relative virulence in a murine osteomyelitis model.

RESULTS

Impact of mutating purR and sarA on fitness in an established biofilm as assessed by Tn-Seq.

We have a primary clinical interest in osteomyelitis and other forms of orthopedic infection, and one important factor in defining the therapeutic recalcitrance of such infections is formation of a biofilm (12, 13). With this in mind, we utilized a Tn-Seq library generated in the USA300 S. aureus strain LAC (14, 15) to identify mutants that exhibit altered fitness in the context of a mature in vitro-grown biofilm. Mutants with mutations in the global regulator mgrA, the ica operon repressor icaR, and agrA and agrB were found to be more fit in mature biofilms, compared to planktonic cultures, as evidenced by their increased prevalence in the biofilm-derived library in comparison with the same library grown in planktonic culture (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). This is consistent with previous reports indicating that expression of all of these genes limits biofilm formation (1620). In contrast, mutants with mutations in other genes implicated in the pathogenesis of S. aureus infections were found to exhibit reduced fitness in a biofilm. These genes include srrB, which encodes the histidine kinase of the SrrAB two-component signal transduction system shown to be important in a murine osteomyelitis model, and the F1F10 ATPase genes atpA and atpB, which are part of a pathway previously shown to contribute to virulence in a murine abscess model (Fig. S1) (15, 21).

A list of all mutants that exhibited altered fitness in a biofilm to a statistically significant degree based on a log2 fold change of ±1 is provided in Table S1. This list does not include genes within the purine biosynthesis pathway. However, mutation of purR did result in increased fitness in a mature biofilm (Fig. 1A). This was of particular interest to us because mutation of purR has been shown to enhance the production of SarA (1). To the extent that mutation of sarA limits biofilm formation in diverse clinical isolates of S. aureus (2226), this suggests that the increased fitness of purR mutants in a biofilm could be due, at least in part, to increased production of SarA. Indeed, although the reduction in the number of insertions in sarA was not statistically significant because of the small number of insertions detected in the planktonically grown comparator, there was an inverse relationship between purR and sarA in the context of a biofilm (Fig. 1B). We are continuing to investigate the results of our Tn-Seq studies focusing on biofilm formation but, based on these observations, we chose to focus in this report on investigating the significance of purR in expression of sarA in defining the accumulation of critical S. aureus virulence factors and pathogenesis in the clinical context of osteomyelitis.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Tn-Seq results related to purine biosynthesis and SarA. A Tn-Seq library generated in the USA300 strain LAC was used to identify mutants with altered fitness in the stationary-growth phase versus a mature biofilm. (A) Pearson’s correlation of normalized transposon insertion counts from a mature biofilm versus planktonic culture. purR, genes in the purine biosynthesis pathway, and sarA are highlighted. ***, P < 0.001. Values are presented on a log scale. (B) Inverse relationship between the normalized counts observed with purR versus sarA mutants in stationary phase versus a biofilm. Values are presented on a log scale.

Mutation of purR results in an increase in the abundance of SarA.

A primary factor contributing to the reduced ability of sarA mutants to form a biofilm is the increased production of extracellular proteases. With respect to purR, the literature is confusing in this respect, in that there is one report indicating that “secreted proteases have decreased transcription in a purR mutant of S. aureus” (2), while another found that mutation of purR resulted in the increased production of most extracellular proteases (1). Using a gelatin-based fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) assay, we found that mutation of purR results in a modest but statistically significant decrease in overall protease activity, while mutation of sarA results in a dramatic increase irrespective of the functional status of purR (Fig. 2A). We also confirmed that mutation of purR results in a significant increase (∼2-fold) in the production of SarA (Fig. 2B), thus providing a possible explanation for the observation that mutation of purR results in a decrease in overall protease activity.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Impact of purR and sarA on protease production and the production of SarA. Mutations were generated in sarA (ΔS), purR (ΔP), and both sarA and purR (ΔSP) in LAC. Additional derivatives in which the genes encoding aureolysin, ScpA, SspA, and SspB were also mutated (Δproteases) were generated in each of these four strains. (A) Results of Western blots verifying the abundance of SarA and the impact of these mutations on overall protease activity, as determined using a FRET-based assay. *, statistical significance in comparison to the LAC parent strain; **, statistical significance in comparison to the sarA mutant; ***, statistical significance in comparison to all strains with the capacity to produce extracellular proteases. (B) Impact of mutating purR on the abundance of SarA, as assessed by Western blotting using an anti-SarA antibody. Western blots were performed with anti-SarA antibody and whole-cell lysates prepared from stationary-phase cultures after 1:8 dilution to better illustrate differences in the amount of SarA in LAC versus its isogenic purR mutant. The bar chart indicates the combined results from four biological replicates. *, statistical significance in comparison to the results observed with the LAC parent strain. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction, with P values of ≤0.05 being considered statistically significant.

Mutation of purR results in enhanced biofilm formation, increased clumping in the presence of serum, and increased accumulation of specific virulence factors, owing to increased accumulation of SarA and decreased production of extracellular proteases.

In agreement with our Tn-Seq results, mutation of purR has been reported to result in an increased capacity to form a biofilm (2). The increased production of extracellular proteases plays a key role in limiting biofilm formation in sarA mutants (24). This suggests that the limited production of extracellular proteases in a purR mutant may be sufficient to enhance biofilm formation, perhaps owing to the increased production of SarA. Reports describing the impact of S. aureus mutations on biofilm formation are difficult to put into context, owing to differences in the specific manner by which biofilm formation is assessed. The most commonly used method is a microtiter plate-based assay, but even then there is considerable variation, most notably in the use of the medium supplements NaCl and/or glucose and whether the substrate is preconditioned by coating with plasma. Our results demonstrate that biofilm formation in S. aureus is maximized when the medium is supplemented with both salt and glucose and the substrate is coated with plasma, and these are the standard assay conditions we have employed in all our reports (9, 2231). In contrast, the previous report demonstrating that mutation of purR results in increased biofilm formation did not include NaCl as a supplement or the use of plasma coating (2).

To address this, we assessed biofilm formation under alternative conditions that took all of these factors into account. In every case, tryptic soy broth (TSB) supplemented with glucose was used, with the variables being the inclusion of salt in the assay medium and whether the wells of the microtiter plate were preconditioned with human plasma. As in our previous experiments (27), biofilm formation was maximized for the LAC strain under our standard assay conditions (i.e., plasma with salt), and under these conditions mutation of sarA resulted in a significant decrease in biofilm formation irrespective of the functional status of purR, while mutation of purR resulted in an increase in biofilm formation relative to LAC (Fig. 3). With the exception of the purR mutant, eliminating protease production significantly enhanced biofilm formation in all strains, including the sarA/purR mutant, in comparison to the isogenic mutant capable of producing these proteases. Indeed, this was true even for LAC (Fig. 3). Eliminating protease production did appear to have a greater impact in the sarA mutant than in the sarA/purR mutant, but in both cases biofilm formation was restored to a degree that was not significantly different from that observed in the LAC parent strain.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Biofilm formation as a function of purR, sarA, and extracellular proteases. Biofilm formation was assessed in LAC, its isogenic sarA (DS), purR (DP), and both sarA and purR (DSP) mutants, and derivatives of each unable to produce any extracellular protease (Δproteases). All assays used CM from stationary-phase cultures grown in TSB supplemented with glucose. Assays were performed with additional supplementation with NaCl and with human plasma precoating. *, statistical significance in comparison to LAC; **, statistical significance between each strain and its protease-deficient derivative. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction, with P values of ≤0.05 being considered statistically significant.

The results observed under other assay conditions were similar but not identical. Specifically, in medium supplemented with salt and glucose but in the absence of plasma coating, biofilm formation was reduced in sarA, purR, and sarA/purR mutants in comparison to LAC (Fig. S1A). If salt was not included, then biofilm formation was still reduced in sarA and sarA/purR mutants, both with (Fig. S1B) and without (Fig. S1C) plasma coating. In contrast, mutation of purR resulted in an increased capacity to form a biofilm under both of these conditions, although not to an extent comparable to that observed under our standard assay conditions (Fig. 3). Under test conditions that maximize biofilm formation, there was no significant increase in biofilm formation in a protease-deficient purR mutant in comparison to the purR mutant itself (Fig. 3). This is perhaps not surprising since, under these test conditions, the purR mutant was found to form a robust biofilm, thus making it difficult to reproducibly detect any additional increase. However, under other test conditions in which biofilm formation was not maximized in LAC or its purR mutant, an increase was readily apparent in the protease-deficient purR mutant (Fig. S1). Taken together, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that the decrease in protease production observed in a LAC purR mutant is phenotypically apparent in the context of biofilm formation.

A previous report demonstrated that increased production of the fibronectin-binding proteins FnbA and FnbB plays a key role in defining the hypervirulence of purR mutants (2). The increased abundance of these proteins was reflected in the rapid formation, in the presence of horse serum, of visible clumps of bacteria that readily settled out of static cultures, thus resulting in a reduction in the optical density (OD) of the culture. The clumping phenotype in the presence of horse serum was confirmed for the LAC purR mutant (Fig. 4). Mutation of sarA limits the accumulation of FnbA and FnbB, owing to protease-mediated degradation (7, 9), and it would thus be expected that a sarA mutant would not exhibit a clumping phenotype. Mutation of sarA limits the growth of S. aureus to a modest extent (24) and, under the assay conditions we employed, this was reflected in a slight reduction in OD, relative to LAC, but there was no evidence of a clumping phenotype when the sarA mutant was grown in the presence of horse serum. The modest reduction in growth and the absence of a clumping phenotype were also evident in the isogenic sarA/purR mutant. Additionally, enhanced clumping in the presence of horse serum was observed in the protease-deficient sarA mutant, and the clumping phenotype of the sarA/purR mutant was fully restored by eliminating the ability of these mutants to produce extracellular proteases (Fig. 4).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Clumping as a function of purR, sarA, and extracellular proteases. (Left) Cellular clumping was assessed in LAC, sarA (ΔS), purR (ΔP), and both sarA and purR (ΔSP) mutants and the isogenic strains unable to make extraceulluar proteases (Δproteases) based on sedimentation of aggregated bacteria after static incubation. Thus, increased clumping is reflected in decreased OD values. *, statistical significance in comparison to LAC; **, statistical significance in comparison to the purR mutant in the presence of horse serum. Statistical analysis of data shown on the left was performed by ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. ***, statistical significance of the protease-deficient derivative of each mutant in comparison to the same mutant with the capacity to produce extracellular proteases; ◊, statistical significance in the presence of horse serum in comparison to the absence of horse serum with the same strain. Statistical comparisons in this case were made by Student’s unpaired t test. (Right) Visual illustration of the clumping phenotype in LAC, its purR (ΔP) mutant, and its isogenic sarA/purR mutant (ΔSP) with (ΔSPP+) and without (ΔSPP−) the capacity to produce extracellular proteases.

The increased production of alpha toxin has also been implicated in the increased virulence of purR mutants (1), and mutation of sarA has been shown to limit the accumulation of alpha toxin, owing to protease-mediated degradation (7, 911, 29). As assessed by Western blotting, we found that the abundance of alpha toxin was diminished in both sarA and sarA/purR mutants (Fig. 5A) despite the fact that it was increased in a purR mutant (Fig. 5B). The abundance of alpha toxin was also restored in both sarA and sarA/purR mutants by eliminating their ability to produce extracellular proteases (Fig. 5A). The abundance of protein A was also decreased in sarA and sarA/purR mutants (Fig. 5A) and increased in the purR mutant (Fig. 5B) and, as with alpha toxin, the abundance of protein A was restored in both sarA and sarA/purR mutants in isogenic derivatives unable to produce extracellular proteases (Fig. 5A).

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Abundance of alpha toxin and protein A in stationary phase as a function of purR, sarA, and extracellular proteases. Mutations were generated in sarA (ΔS), purR (ΔP), and both sarA and purR (ΔSP) in LAC. Additional derivatives in which the genes encoding aureolysin, ScpA, SspA, and SspB were also mutated (Δproteases) were generated in each of these four strains. (A) Results of Western blots indicating the relative abundance of alpha toxin (top) and protein A (bottom) in each strain. (B) Impact of mutating purR on the abundance of each of these proteins as assessed by Western blotting. Western blots were performed with anti-alpha toxin or anti-protein A antibodies using CM from stationary-phase cultures. (B) CM was diluted by the indicated factor prior to blotting to better illustrate differences in the amount of each protein in LAC versus its isogenic purR mutant. The bar chart indicates the combined results from three biological replicates. *, statistical significance (P ≤ 0.05) in comparison to LAC, as determined using Student's t test.

These results are all based on the analysis of conditioned medium (CM) from stationary-phase cultures grown for 16 h and standardized to an OD of 10.0, and there is evidence to suggest that the impact of purR on the accumulation of S. aureus virulence factors, specifically alpha toxin, is growth phase dependent (1). To address this, we repeated our alpha toxin and protein A Western blots using CM from exponential-phase cultures. The results confirmed that alpha toxin is decreased in sarA and sarA/purR mutants and increased in the purR mutant, in comparison to the isogenic protease-deficient derivatives of each of these same mutants (Fig. 6). However, they also demonstrated that the abundance of protein A is increased in sarA and sarA/purR mutants when assessed using CM from exponential-phase cultures. In contrast, the abundance of protein A was unaffected in the isogenic purR mutant (Fig. 6).

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Abundance of alpha toxin and protein A in exponential phase as a function of purR, sarA, and extracellular proteases. Mutations were generated in sarA (ΔS), purR (ΔP), and both sarA and purR (ΔSP) in LAC. Additional derivatives in which the genes encoding aureolysin, ScpA, SspA, and SspB were also mutated (Δproteases) were generated in each of these four strains. Results shown are representative Western blots indicating the relative abundance of alpha toxin (top) and protein A (bottom) in each strain during the exponential-growth phase.

Overall, the results we report suggest that the increased production of SarA observed in a LAC purR mutant plays an important role in defining the in vitro phenotypes of purR mutants and does so owing to the impact of sarA on the production of extracellular proteases. However, the significance of this is called into question by the growth-phase-dependent results observed with respect to the abundance of protein A. No such differences were observed with respect to the fibronectin-binding proteins and alpha toxin, and these are the virulence factors that have been most directly implicated in the hypervirulence of purR mutants in a murine sepsis model (14). Nevertheless, our clinical focus is on the pathogenesis and therapeutic recalcitrance of osteomyelitis, and protein A has been implicated as an important virulence factor in this clinical context (3235). To the extent that the exponential- and stationary-growth phases are defined by in vitro growth conditions that cannot be definitively correlated with growth in vivo, this makes it important to assess the relevance of our results in vivo in the context of osteomyelitis.

Additionally, mutation of genes within the purine biosynthesis pathway (e.g., purB) attenuates virulence in a murine osteomyelitis model (36), and we have shown that mutation of sarA also limits virulence in this model, owing in large part to the increased production of extracellular proteases (9, 29, 31). Moreover, in a previous study we examined the relative impact of sarA and saeRS on virulence in our osteomyelitis model, and this allowed us to identify isogenic mutants that exhibited significant differences in virulence depending on the functional status of these two regulatory loci (9). Proteomic comparisons of these strains showed that FnbA and FnbB were present in much larger amounts (log2 fold changes of ≥5) in virulent strains (9). Thus, the fact that the abundance of FnbA and that of FnbB are inversely affected by mutation of purR versus sarA further emphasizes the need to assess the relevance of our results in the clinical context of osteomyelitis.

purR mutants are hypervirulent in murine osteomyelitis in a manner dependent on SarA and extracellular proteases.

Our in vivo studies were limited to LAC, its isogenic sarA, purR, and sarA/purR mutants, and isogenic sarA and sarA/purR mutants unable to produce any extracellular protease other than those encoded within the spl operon. The results confirmed that mutation of sarA limited virulence, as evidenced by both reduced cortical bone destruction and decreased reactive bone formation (Fig. 7 and Table S2). In contrast, the purR mutant exhibited a significant increase in cortical bone destruction and new bone formation, compared to LAC. In line with our in vitro assays, the virulence phenotype of the sarA/purR mutant was comparable to that of the isogenic sarA mutant and significantly different from that observed with the isogenic purR mutant. As assessed by cortical bone destruction, virulence was restored in both the sarA and sarA/purR mutants by eliminating the capacity of these mutants to produce aureolysin, ScpA, SspA, and SspB (Fig. 7 and Table S2). Eliminating the production of these proteases also resulted in an increase in new bone formation in comparison to the sarA and sarA/purR mutants, although in this case the increase was not found to be statistically significant (Fig. 7 and Table S2). Bacterial burdens in the bone were significantly reduced in sarA and sarA/purR mutants, compared to LAC, but not in the isogenic purR mutant (Fig. 8 and Table S2). Moreover, unlike the other phenotypes examined, the phenotype of the sarA/purR mutant was more similar to that of the purR mutant than to that of the isogenic sarA mutant. Eliminating the production of aureolysin, ScpA, SspA, and SspB also resulted in a significant increase in bacterial burden in the bone in the sarA mutant (Fig. 8 and Table S2).

FIG 7.

FIG 7

Impact of mutating purR and sarA and the production of extracellular proteases on virulence in a murine osteomyelitis model. (A) μCT images from mice infected with LAC, sarA (ΔS), purR (ΔP), and both sarA and purR (ΔSP) mutants and the isogenic strains unable to make extraceulluar proteases (Δproteases) were taken 14 days after initiation of the infection. Images shown are from the single mouse from each group that exhibited scores that most closely approximated the median observed for each experimental group. (B) Results of quantitative analysis of μCT images from all mice in each experimental group based on cortical bone destruction (left) and reactive new bone (callous) formation (right). Results are shown as box plots reflecting values derived from groups of five mice each infected with the noted strain. Statistical significance analyses are detailed in Table S2 in the supplemental material.

FIG 8.

FIG 8

Impact of mutating purR and sarA and the production of extracellular proteases on bacterial burdens in the bone. Mice were infected with LAC, sarA (ΔS), purR (ΔP), and both sarA and purR (ΔSP) mutants and the isogenic strains unable to make extraceulluar proteases (Δproteases). All of the in vitro data indicate that sarA is epistatic to purR, but this indicates the opposite. CFU values are presented on a log scale. Results are shown as box plots reflecting values derived from groups of five mice each infected with the noted strain. Statistical significance analyses are detailed in Table S2 in the supplemental material.

DISCUSSION

PurR has been shown to provide a critical link between central metabolism and virulence in S. aureus, owing to its ability to directly regulate expression of genes within the purine biosynthesis pathway and independently regulate genes encoding critical virulence factors, including the fibronectin-binding proteins and alpha toxin (14). Indeed, mutation of purR in the USA300 strain LAC was shown to result in increased or decreased expression of 130 genes (1). The data available to date suggest that some of these genes are regulated directly via PurR binding to a conserved binding site, while others are regulated indirectly (1, 2). In the case of genes within the purine biosynthesis pathway and the fibronectin-binding proteins, regulation appears to be direct, with PurR acting as a repressor. This presumably ensures that expression of the genes required for purine biosynthesis is limited under conditions in which purines are readily available and that production of virulence factors like the fibronectin-binding proteins is limited to conditions in which they are needed to promote other factors, including but likely not limited to colonization, biofilm formation, and potentially internalization by host cells (2, 3739). Mutation of purR has also been shown to result in the increased production of alpha toxin, but this appears to occur via an indirect mechanism, since no PurR binding site has been found upstream of the hla gene encoding alpha toxin (1). In a previous report, this was attributed to increased expression of the staphylococcal accessory regulator (sarA), which does contain a putative PurR binding site and is known to positively regulate expression of hla both directly and indirectly by enhancing expression of the accessory gene regulator (agr). The impact of sarA on expression of agr could presumably also account for why most S. aureus extracellular proteases were found to be present in increased amounts in a purR mutant (1). However, there is also a report suggesting that mutation of purR results in decreased transcription of the genes encoding extracellular proteases (3), which is consistent with the results we report demonstrating the decreased abundance of these proteases in a LAC purR mutant.

These observations account for the underlying hypothesis behind the experiments we report. Additionally, our Tn-Seq assays revealed that the purR mutant exhibits increased fitness in a mature biofilm, compared to planktonic stationary-phase cells grown in the same medium. In contrast, none of the mutations in genes involved in the de novo purine biosynthesis pathway was found to impact fitness in a biofilm, perhaps owing to the continual replacement of the medium in our flow cells. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that PurR serves regulatory roles beyond its impact on purine biosynthesis (1, 2). This led us to investigate the role of PurR in regulating the production of SarA. Specifically, much of our focus in recent years has been on sarA, owing to the fact that mutation of sarA results in a greater decrease in the ability to form a biofilm than mutation of any other regulatory loci we have examined (9, 22, 2431, 40). We have also confirmed that this can be directly correlated with the increased production of all extracellular proteases and this results in the reduced accumulation of multiple S. aureus virulence factors and reduced virulence in murine models of sepsis and osteomyelitis (7, 911, 29, 31). Included among the virulence factors that are present in reduced amounts in sarA mutants as a result of protease-mediated degradation are alpha toxin and the fibronectin-binding proteins. Given that mutation of purR results in increased production of SarA, this suggests that the increased accumulation of these virulence factors in purR mutants may be at least partly attributable to the increased production of SarA, which would presumably limit protease production and maximize the abundance of these virulence factors at times when they are needed most.

To test this hypothesis, we generated sarA, purR, and sarA/purR mutants in the USA300 strain LAC. We also generated isogenic derivatives of all of these mutants that are unable to produce the extracellular proteases aureolysin, ScpA, SspA, and SspB. We then evaluated the impact of these mutations on phenotypes previously implicated in the hypervirulence of purR mutants and the relative virulence of these mutants in a murine osteomyelitis model. The results confirmed that mutation of sarA results in an increase in overall protease activity while mutation of purR has the opposite effect. They also confirmed that protease production was increased in the sarA/purR mutant to a level comparable to that observed in the isogenic sarA mutant. This would be anticipated if the impact of PurR on protease production were mediated through its impact on the production of SarA, particularly since no PurR binding sites have been identified upstream of the genes encoding any of the targeted extracellular proteases (1).

The impact of these mutations on biofilm formation was somewhat dependent on the assay conditions used, but the inverse relationship between purR and sarA with respect to protease production and the epistatic impact of sarA in a sarA/purR mutant were also evident in this regard. Specifically, biofilm formation was increased in the LAC purR mutant and decreased in the isogenic sarA and sarA/purR mutants. Under all experimental conditions examined, biofilm formation was enhanced in all mutants and in LAC itself when the ability to produce aureolysin, ScpA, SspA, and SspB was eliminated by mutation of the corresponding genes. This confirms that protease production limits biofilm formation, particularly in a sarA mutant, and that this is true irrespective of the functional status of purR.

Although mutation of purR alters the expression of multiple genes encoding S. aureus virulence factors, there is compelling evidence that the increased production of the fibronectin-binding proteins FnbA and FnbB plays a key role in defining the increased virulence of a purR mutant in a murine sepsis model (2). A phenotypic marker proven to reflect the increased production of these surface-associated proteins is increased clumping in the presence of horse serum. This phenotype was clearly evident in the LAC purR mutant and absent in the isogenic sarA mutant. This is consistent with the observation that mutation of purR results in an increase in production of the fibronectin-binding proteins, while these proteins are present in limited amounts in sarA mutants as a result of protease-mediated degradation (26). As with protease production and biofilm formation, concomitant mutation of sarA abolished the clumping phenotype of the purR mutant. The fact that this was also due to the increased production of extracellular proteases in the sarA/purR mutant was confirmed by demonstrating that the clumping phenotype of the sarA/purR mutant was fully restored by simultaneously eliminating the production of aureolysin, ScpA, SspA, and SspB. Similarly, protein A was also present in an increased amount in a LAC purR mutant and was virtually absent in sarA and sarA/purR mutants at stationary phase, and this phenotype was reversed by eliminating the production of these same proteases.

It has been demonstrated that alpha toxin is produced in elevated amounts in a purR mutant and that this also contributes to its increased virulence (1). As with the fibronectin-binding proteins and protein A, we confirmed that the amount of alpha toxin is increased in a purR mutant and decreased in sarA and sarA/purR mutants. Also, as with these other proteins, the reduced accumulation of alpha toxin was reversed in sarA and sarA/purR mutants unable to produce key extracellular proteases. To the extent that agr enhances the production of alpha toxin and represses the production of the fibronectin-binding proteins and protein A, the fact that the results we observed with all of the proteins were consistent suggests that the impact of mutating sarA on these phenotypes is independent of agr. Thus, to the extent that the impact of sarA on protease production has been shown to be independent of its impact on expression of agr (24), all of these results are consistent with the hypothesis that the increased production of important virulence factors that contribute to the hypervirulence of purR mutants is dependent, at least in part, on the increased production of SarA and the resulting decrease in the production of extracellular proteases that would otherwise limit the accumulation of these virulence factors. Indeed, the importance of this presumably accounts for the presence of a PurR binding site upstream of the gene encoding SarA (1).

Finally, to assess the in vivo relevance of these observations, we evaluated the relative virulence of LAC, its sarA, purR, and sarA/purR mutants, and derivatives of each unable to produce aureolysin, ScpA, SspA, and SspB in a murine osteomyelitis model. The results confirmed our previous reports demonstrating that mutation of sarA limits virulence in this model and that virulence is restored to a significant degree by eliminating the ability of a sarA mutant to produce extracellular proteases (9). These previous experiments were performed with a LAC sarA mutant unable to produce any extracellular protease, including the spl-encoded proteases, while the studies we report here utilized protease-deficient mutants that retained the capacity to produce the spl-encoded proteases. This suggests that the spl-encoded proteases play little role in defining the phenotype of sarA mutants, in comparison to aureolysin, ScpA, SspA, and SspB, but this remains to be examined in a more direct and definitive manner.

In contrast to sarA, mutation of purR significantly enhanced virulence in our osteomyelitis model, as it was previously shown to do in a murine sepsis model (1, 2). This is important because it indicates that purR plays an important role in both acute and chronic forms of S. aureus infection. The possibility that this is due to increased expression of the genes within the purine biosynthesis pathway cannot be ruled out, particularly since mutation of the genes within this pathway has been shown to attenuate virulence in both of these models (1, 36). However, in comparison to the purR mutant, we also demonstrate that virulence is attenuated in the sarA/purR mutant and, to our knowledge, sarA is not known to play a role in the regulation of purine biosynthesis. The fact that bacterial burdens in the bone were higher in the purR mutant than in the sarA mutant is consistent with the observation that the purR mutant exhibited increased virulence while the opposite was true for the sarA mutant. However, in contrast to every other phenotype we assessed, bacterial burdens observed with the sarA/purR mutant were more similar to those observed with the purR mutant than to those observed with the isogenic sarA mutant. This suggests that, with respect to survival in vivo, mutation of purR may play a more predominant role than mutation of sarA, owing to its impact on purine biosynthesis, while in the context of virulence the opposite is true, owing to the increased production of extracellular proteases and its impact on the abundance of important S. aureus virulence factors, including alpha toxin and the fibronectin-binding proteins. To the extent that the increased virulence of a purR mutant was not correlated with an increase in bacterial burdens in the bone, in comparison to the LAC parent strain, this provides an indication of the important moonlighting functions of PurR on virulence.

Thus, we propose a model in which the impact of mutating purR on the virulence of S. aureus, at least in the methicillin-resistant USA300 strain LAC, is dependent to a significant extent on the ability of PurR to repress the production of SarA. With respect to sarA, such a model reflects the need to limit the production of extracellular proteases such that they serve their intended roles in tissue invasion, avoiding host defenses, and the acquisition of nutrients without compromising the availability of critical virulence factors (7, 9, 41, 42). In the case of purR, its metabolic and moonlighting functions would limit expression of genes in the purine biosynthesis pathway and the production of many of these same virulence factors based on need in specific in vivo microenvironments and under changing conditions within the host. Under adverse conditions in which nutrients are limited and biofilm formation potentially offers a survival advantage, reduced production of PurR would both promote purine biosynthesis and maximize the accumulation of critical virulence factors both directly and indirectly by increasing the production of SarA and consequently limiting the production of extracellular proteases, thus maximizing the abundance of important virulence factors.

Finally, the increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance in S. aureus emphasizes the need to consider alternative therapeutic strategies, including those focused on regulatory circuits controlling the production of S. aureus virulence factors (43). We think that the results we report support the hypothesis that sarA is a valid target, in that they suggest that, even under circumstances in which purR production and/or function is reduced as a result of environmental pressures in vivo, inhibition of sarA would remain effective with respect to limiting the virulence of S. aureus in diverse forms of infection, including osteomyelitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics statement.

All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and were performed in compliance with NIH guidelines, the Animal Welfare Act, and U.S. federal law.

Bacterial strains and growth conditions.

Bacterial strains used in this study are summarized in Table S3 in the supplemental material. The Tn-Seq library used in these studies was generated in the USA300 strain LAC and has been described previously (15). Mutants constructed during the course of the studies we report were generated in an erythromycin-sensitive derivative of LAC by Ø11-mediated transduction from existing JE2 mutants available in the Nebraska Transposon Mutant Library (44). Protease-deficient derivatives of LAC unable to produce aureolysin, ScpA, SspA, or SspB were generated as described previously (24, 28); sarA and/or purR mutations were then introduced into the protease-deficient strain by Ø11-mediated transduction. Strains were stored at –80°C in TSB containing 25% (vol/vol) glycerol. For each experiment, strains were recovered from storage by plating on tryptic soy agar with appropriate antibiotic selection. Antibiotics used were erythromycin (5 μg/ml), kanamycin (50 μg/ml), and neomycin (50 μg/ml). For phenotypic assays, all strains were grown at 37°C in TSB without antibiotics, with constant aeration.

Growth conditions for Tn-Seq comparisons.

The Tn-Seq library was generated as described previously in a derivative of the USA300 strain LAC that had been cured of its erythromycin resistance plasmid, thus allowing for selection of transposon insertions (15). An aliquot of the library was thawed on ice and used to inoculate 500 ml of TSB containing erythromycin (5 μg/ml). This culture was grown to exponential phase (OD600 of 1) before cells were harvested and resuspended in TSB containing 25% (vol/vol) glycerol. Aliquots containing 1 × 109 CFU were then stored at –80°C.

Tn-Seq experiments in this study were conducted by thawing three 100-μl aliquots of the library and inoculating each as an independent biological replicate in 25 ml of biofilm medium (TSB supplemented with 0.5% glucose and 3.0% sodium chloride) containing 5 μg/ml erythromycin. These cultures were incubated at 37°C with constant aeration and grown to exponential phase (OD600 of 1). A 8.0-ml aliquot of each replicate was removed and injected into individual chambers of a biofilm flow cell (described below). The remaining culture was allowed to grow to stationary phase (OD600 of ∼10), and ∼5 × 109 CFU were harvested for genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction and sequencing as described below. Reads obtained from these stationary-phase planktonic cultures were used as the baseline comparator for Tn-Seq results observed in mature biofilms.

Biofilms were generated in disposable flow cells (IBI Scientific, Dubuque, IA) as described previously (27). Briefly, flow cells were precoated overnight at 4°C with 4 ml of 20% human plasma diluted in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6). A sterile reservoir of biofilm medium containing erythromycin (5 μg/ml) was connected to the inlet side of each flow cell, while the outlet side was connected to a waste reservoir. A total of 8.0 ml of biofilm medium containing 4 × 108 colony-forming units (CFU) was incubated at 37°C for 8 h without shaking to allow bacterial cells to adhere to the surface of the flow cells. The flow of sterile medium was then started at a rate of 0.5 ml/min and continued for 7 days, at which time bacterial cells were harvested and extracellular DNA was removed as described previously (45). Bacterial cells were then pelleted by centrifugation at 4,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, and gDNA was extracted and processed for sequencing as described below. The numbers of CFU following the 7-day incubation period were assessed and found to be comparable for the three flow cells, with an average colony count of 5 × 1010 CFU.

Tn-Seq library preparation.

In all Tn-Seq experiments, gDNA was extracted using the NucleoBond HMW DNA kit (TaKaRa Bio USA, Inc., Mountain View, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the additional step of incubating the cells in 560 μl Tris-EDTA (TE) (pH 8.0) containing lysostaphin (1 μg/μl) prior to the enzymatic lysis step included as part of the standard kit protocol. The gDNA was then quantified, and 45 μg from each sample was diluted in 150 μl TE before shearing to a peak fragment size of ∼250 bp using an ME220 focused-ultrasonicator (Covaris, Woburn, MA). Next, 1 μg of sheared gDNA was subjected to the NEBNext Ultra II DNA library preparation kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) protocol with key modifications to the PCR amplification step. Specifically, a nested PCR was carried out in which the first PCR was performed with the olj510 forward primer specific to the transposon (15) and the NEBNext indexed reverse primers obtained from NEBNext multiplex oligonucleotides for Illumina were used to amplify the transposon-gDNA junctions, to add a unique barcode to each sample, and to attach the p7 Illumina adaptor. The cycling conditions for this PCR were 98°C for 30 s, 98°C for 10 s, 65°C for 75 s for 25 cycles, and 65°C for 5 min. The second PCR was performed to enhance specificity for the transposon and to attach the p5 Illumina adaptor. Here, the olj511 forward primer specific to the inverted repeat region of the transposon (15) and the NEBNext indexed reverse primers were used with cycling conditions of 98°C for 30 s, 98°C for 10 s, 65°C for 75 s for 15 cycles, and 65°C for 5 min. The quality of the libraries was assessed via the TapeStation (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) and quantitative real-time PCR using the olj512 primer specific to the transposon terminal inverted repeat of reference 15. The validated libraries were then sequenced using the custom sequencing primer olj512 on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 high-output v4 (single-end 100-bp reads) at the Tufts University Core Facility.

Tn-Seq analysis.

The S. aureus USA300 LAC genome of the library parent strain was used as the reference for all Tn-Seq analyses in this study. We previously sequenced this strain and assembled a complete genome, which has since been deposited in GenBank (GenBank accession numbers CP055225 and CP055226). In-house scripts were used for the analyses. Briefly, BWA-MEM was used to align reads to the reference genome (46). Alignments were then further processed using SAMtools and BEDtools to retrieve, to count, and to sum all reads aligned to TA sites (47, 48). Next, the mean counts per gene were normalized by the TTR method in the Transit package, and genes with significant changes in the number of transposon insertions between the comparator planktonic cultures and the mature biofilms were distilled by the ZINB method (49). Genes with a log2 fold change of ±1.0 and a P value of >0.05 were considered significant and are listed in Table S1. A positive log2 fold change value in Table S1 indicates increased insertions in biofilm, compared to planktonic cultures, i.e., increased fitness in biofilm. Negative values indicate reduced fitness in biofilm. Data were visualized using the R package ggplot2 (50).

Clumping assays.

This assay was conducted as described previously (2). Briefly, overnight cultures were diluted to an OD600 of 0.03 in 2 ml of either TSB or TSB containing 10% (vol/vol) horse serum (TSB-S). Cultures were incubated for 3.5 h at 37°C with shaking and constant aeration. The culture was then placed upright and allowed to stand statically for 5 min, to allow cellular clumps to settle. The absorbance of the culture was measured based on a sample taken from the upper portion of the culture. Results are reported based on three biological replicates, each of which included three experimental replicates.

Static biofilm assay.

Biofilm formation was assessed using a microtiter plate assay using four different assay conditions (27). The differences were based on the composition of the medium and whether the wells of the microtiter plate were first coated with human plasma proteins. Specifically, each strain was grown in TSB supplemented with 0.5% glucose with or without supplementation with 0.3% NaCl. Strains were grown overnight in each of these two medium formulations and standardized to an OD600 of 0.05 in fresh medium corresponding to the same medium used for overnight growth. Cultures were then split and added to the wells of the microtiter plate with or without coating overnight at 4°C with 100 μl of 20% human plasma diluted in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6). Biofilm assays were performed under each of the four resulting conditions using previously described methods (27). Results are based on three biological replicates, each of which included six experimental replicates.

CM preparation.

Overnight cultures grown in TSB without antibiotic selection were standardized to an OD600 of 0.05 in fresh TSB and grown to an OD600 of 1.0 (mid-exponential phase) or overnight. Overnight cultures were standardized to an OD600 of 10. At each time point, cultures were clarified by centrifugation and the supernatant was sterilized by filtration. The resulting CM was used immediately or stored at –20°C for Western blotting with anti-alpha toxin and anti-protein A antibodies as described previously (9).

Whole-cell lysate preparation.

SarA Western blots were performed with an anti-SarA antibody and whole-cell lysates prepared as described previously (31). Briefly, strains were cultured overnight at 37°C in TSB with constant shaking. Bacterial cells from a volume of each culture calculated to obtain an equivalent number of cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and resuspended in 750 μl of TEG buffer (25 mM Tris‐HCl [pH 8.0], 25 mM EGTA). Cell suspensions were stored at −20°C until all samples had been collected, at which point samples were thawed on ice, transferred to FastPrep lysing matrix B tubes, and lysed in a FastPrep-24 benchtop homogenizer (MP Biomedicals) using two 40-s intervals at a rate of 6.0 m/s, interrupted by a 5-min interval during which the homogenates were chilled on ice. After centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C, supernatants were harvested and stored at −80°C.

Extracellular protease activity.

Overall extracellular protease activity was assessed using CM and the EnzCheck FRET-based gelatinase/collagenase assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Murine model of osteomyelitis.

The relative capacity of each strain to cause osteomyelitis was assessed using our murine model as described previously (9, 29). Briefly, 6- to 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice were anesthetized, and an incision was made in the right hind limb to expose the femur. A unicortical defect was created in the central region of the right femur, and 2 μl of a bacterial suspension containing 1 × 106 CFU harvested from exponential-phase cultures (OD600 of 1.0) was introduced directly into the intramedullary canal. The wound was then closed and the infection was allowed to develop for 14 days, at which time the mice were humanely euthanized and the infected femurs were harvested for microcomputed tomography (μCT) analysis or for quantitation of bacterial burdens.

Microcomputed tomography.

Image acquisition and analysis were performed according to previously published protocols (9, 29). Briefly, imaging was performed with the SkyScan 1174 X-ray microtomograph (Bruker, Kontich, Belgium) using an isotropic voxel size of 6.7 μm, an X-ray voltage of 50 kV (800 μA), and a 0.25-mm aluminum filter. Reconstruction was carried out using the SkyScan NRecon software, and the reconstructed cross-sectional slices were processed as described previously, using the SkyScan CT-Analyzer software. Using the bone-including binarized images, a semiautomated protocol was run to delineate regions of interest (ROIs) in which the reactive new bone (callus) was isolated from the cortical bone. The resulting images were loaded as ROIs and corrected by drawing inclusive or exclusive contours on the periosteal surface to keep only and strictly the cortical bone. Using these defined ROIs, the volume of cortical bone was calculated; the amount of cortical bone destruction was estimated by subtracting the value obtained from each bone from the average obtained from sham-operated bones inoculated with PBS. New bone formation was quantified by using the subtractive ROI function on the previously delineated cortical bone-including ROI images and calculating the bone volume included in the newly defined ROIs. Statistical analysis of data from each experimental group was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Contrasts were defined to address comparisons of interest, which included assessing the effects among isogenic mutants (LAC, sarA, purR, and sarApurR) and between protease-deficient and parent strains. Unadjusted P values were calculated using permutation tests, and multiplicity adjustments were performed using the Benjamini-Hochberg method, commonly known as the false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment. P values of ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Bacterial burdens in the femur.

Bacterial loads in each femur were determined as reported previously, with minor modifications (9). Briefly, femurs were separated from surrounding soft tissue and homogenized using the Bullet Blender 5 Gold tissue homogenizer (Next Advance, Troy, NY). The 5-ml Navy kit from the same manufacturer was filled with 2 ml sterile PBS prior to placement of the intact femur in the tube. The homogenizer was then run for 10 min at speed of 20 rpm. Subsequently, homogenates were vortex-mixed, serially diluted, and plated on TSB solidified with 1.5% agar. Statistical differences between groups were assessed after logarithmic transformation of CFU data, as described in the previous section.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file 1
Supplemental file 2
IAI.00718-20-s0001.pdf (47.6KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 3
IAI.00718-20-s0002.xlsx (9.5KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 4

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Anthony R. Richardson of the University of Pittsburgh for sharing the Tn-Seq library used in this study and for his comments on the manuscript.

D.A. is supported by National Science Foundation award OIA-1946391. M.S.S. is supported by NIH grant R01-AI119380, the Arkansas Research Alliance, and a generous gift from the Texas Hip and Knee Society. We acknowledge the Tufts University genomics core and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Sequencing Core Facility, supported in part by the Center for Microbial Pathogenesis and Host Inflammatory Responses grant P20GM103625 through the NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sause WE, Balasubramanian D, Irnov I, Copin R, Sullivan MJ, Sommerfield A, Chan R, Dhabaria A, Askenazi M, Ueberheide B, Shopsin B, van Bakel H, Torres VJ. 2019. The purine biosynthesis regulator PurR moonlights as a virulence regulator in Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:13563–13572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904280116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Goncheva MI, Flannagan RS, Sterling BE, Laakso HA, Friedrich NC, Kaiser JC, Watson DW, Wilson CH, Sheldon JR, McGavin MJ, Kiser PK, Heinrichs DE. 2019. Stress-induced inactivation of the Staphylococcus aureus purine biosynthesis repressor leads to hypervirulence. Nat Commun 10:775. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08724-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Goncheva MI, Flannagan RS, Heinrichs DE. 2020. De novo purine biosynthesis is required for intracellular growth of Staphylococcus aureus and for the hypervirulence phenotype of a purR mutant. Infect Immun 88:e00104-20. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00104-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McLean K, Holmes EA, Penewit K, Lee DK, Hardy SR, Ren M, Krist MP, Huang K, Waalkes A, Salipante SJ. 2019. Artificial selection for pathogenicity mutations in Staphylococcus aureus identifies novel factors relevant to chronic infection. Infect Immun 87:e00884-18. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00884-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cheung AL, Ying P. 1994. Regulation of alpha- and beta-hemolysins by the sar locus of Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 176:580–585. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.3.580-585.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chien Y, Manna AC, Cheung AL. 1998. SarA level is a determinant of agr activation in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 30:991–1001. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01126.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Byrum SD, Loughran AJ, Beenken KE, Orr LM, Storey AJ, Mackintosh SG, Edmondson RD, Tackett AJ, Smeltzer MS. 2018. Label-free proteomic approach to characterize protease-dependent and -independent effects of sarA inactivation on the Staphylococcus aureus exoproteome. J Proteome Res 17:3384–3395. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kolar SL, Ibarra JA, Rivera FE, Mootz JM, Davenport JE, Stevens SM, Horswill AR, Shaw LN. 2013. Extracellular proteases are key mediators of Staphylococcus aureus virulence via the global modulation of virulence-determinant stability. Microbiologyopen 2:18–34. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ramirez AM, Byrum SD, Beenken KE, Washam C, Edmondson RD, Mackintosh SG, Spencer HJ, Tackett AJ, Smeltzer MS. 2020. Exploiting correlations between protein abundance and the functional status of saeRS and sarA to identify virulence factors of potential importance in the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis. ACS Infect Dis 6:237–249. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zielinska AK, Beenken KE, Joo HS, Mrak LN, Griffin LM, Luong TT, Lee CY, Otto M, Shaw LN, Smeltzer MS. 2011. Defining the strain-dependent impact of the staphylococcal accessory regulator (sarA) on the alpha-toxin phenotype of Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 193:2948–2958. doi: 10.1128/JB.01517-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zielinska AK, Beenken KE, Mrak LN, Spencer HJ, Post GR, Skinner RA, Tackett AJ, Horswill AR, Smeltzer MS. 2012. sarA-mediated repression of protease production plays a key role in the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus USA300 isolates. Mol Microbiol 86:1183–1196. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mauffrey C, Herbert B, Young H, Wilson ML, Hake M, Stahel PF. 2016. The role of biofilm on orthopaedic implants: the "Holy Grail" of post-traumatic infection management? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 42:411–416. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0694-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zimmerli W, Sendi P. 2017. Orthopaedic biofilm infections. APMIS 125:353–364. doi: 10.1111/apm.12687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.van Opijnen T, Bodi KL, Camilli A. 2009. Tn-seq: high-throughput parallel sequencing for fitness and genetic interaction studies in microorganisms. Nat Methods 6:767–772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grosser MR, Paluscio E, Thurlow LR, Dillon MM, Cooper VS, Kawula TH, Richardson AR. 2018. Genetic requirements for Staphylococcus aureus nitric oxide resistance and virulence. PLoS Pathog 14:e1006907. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Crosby HA, Schlievert PM, Merriman JA, King JM, Salgado-Pabon W, Horswill AR. 2016. The Staphylococcus aureus global regulator MgrA modulates clumping and virulence by controlling surface protein expression. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005604. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Trotonda MP, Tamber S, Memmi G, Cheung AL. 2008. MgrA represses biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 76:5645–5654. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00735-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jefferson KK, Pier DB, Goldmann DA, Pier GB. 2004. The teicoplanin-associated locus regulator (TcaR) and the intercellular adhesin locus regulator (IcaR) are transcriptional inhibitors of the ica locus in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 186:2449–2456. doi: 10.1128/jb.186.8.2449-2456.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Paharik AE, Horswill AR. 2016. The staphylococcal biofilm: adhesins, regulation, and host response. Microbiol Spectr 4:VMBF-0022-2015. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0022-2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lauderdale KJ, Boles BR, Cheung AL, Horswill AR. 2009. Interconnections between sigma B, agr, and proteolytic activity in Staphylococcus aureus biofilm maturation. Infect Immun 77:1623–1635. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01036-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wilde AD, Snyder DJ, Putnam NE, Valentino MD, Hammer ND, Lonergan ZR, Hinger SA, Aysanoa EE, Blanchard C, Dunman PM, Wasserman GA, Chen J, Shopsin B, Gilmore MS, Skaar EP, Cassat JE. 2015. Bacterial hypoxic responses revealed as critical determinants of the host-pathogen outcome by TnSeq analysis of Staphylococcus aureus invasive infection. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005341. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Atwood DN, Loughran AJ, Courtney AP, Anthony AC, Meeker DG, Spencer HJ, Gupta RK, Lee CY, Beenken KE, Smeltzer MS. 2015. Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. Microbiologyopen 4:436–451. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Atwood DN, Beenken KE, Lantz TL, Meeker DG, Lynn WB, Mills WB, Spencer HJ, Smeltzer MS. 2016. Regulatory mutations impacting antibiotic susceptibility in an established Staphylococcus aureus biofilm. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:1826–1829. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02750-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Beenken KE, Mrak LN, Zielinska AK, Atwood DN, Loughran AJ, Griffin LM, Matthews KA, Anthony AM, Spencer HJ, Skinner RA, Post GR, Lee CY, Smeltzer MS. 2014. Impact of the functional status of saeRS on in vivo phenotypes of Staphylococcus aureus sarA mutants. Mol Microbiol 92:1299–1312. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tsang LH, Cassat JE, Shaw LN, Beenken KE, Smeltzer MS. 2008. Factors contributing to the biofilm-deficient phenotype of Staphylococcus aureus sarA mutants. PLoS One 3:e3361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mrak LN, Zielinska AK, Beenken KE, Mrak IN, Atwood DN, Griffin LM, Lee CY, Smeltzer MS. 2012. saeRS and sarA act synergistically to repress protease production and promote biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 7:e38453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Beenken KE, Blevins JS, Smeltzer MS. 2003. Mutation of sarA in Staphylococcus aureus limits biofilm formation. Infect Immun 71:4206–4211. doi: 10.1128/iai.71.7.4206-4211.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Loughran AJ, Atwood DN, Anthony AC, Harik NS, Spencer HJ, Beenken KE, Smeltzer MS. 2014. Impact of individual extracellular proteases on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation in diverse clinical isolates and their isogenic sarA mutants. Microbiologyopen 3:897–909. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Loughran AJ, Gaddy D, Beenken KE, Meeker DG, Morello R, Zhao H, Byrum SD, Tackett AJ, Cassat JE, Smeltzer MS. 2016. Impact of sarA and phenol-soluble modulins on the pathogenesis of osteomyelitis in diverse clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 84:2586–2594. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00152-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rom JS, Atwood DN, Beenken KE, Meeker DG, Loughran AJ, Spencer HJ, Lantz TL, Smeltzer MS. 2017. Impact of Staphylococcus aureus regulatory mutations that modulate biofilm formation in the USA300 strain LAC on virulence in a murine bacteremia model. Virulence 8:1776–1790. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2017.1373926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rom JS, Ramirez AM, Beenken KE, Sahukhal GS, Elasri MO, Smeltzer MS. 2019. The impacts of msaABCR on sarA-associated phenotypes are different in divergent clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 88:e00530-19. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00530-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Claro T, Widaa A, O'Seaghdha M, Miajlovic H, Foster TJ, O'Brien FJ, Kerrigan SW. 2011. Staphylococcus aureus protein A binds to osteoblasts and triggers signals that weaken bone in osteomyelitis. PLoS One 6:e18748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jin T, Zhu YL, Li J, Shi J, He XQ, Ding J, Xu YQ. 2013. Staphylococcal protein A, Panton-Valentine leukocidin and coagulase aggravate the bone loss and bone destruction in osteomyelitis. Cell Physiol Biochem 32:322–333. doi: 10.1159/000354440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mendoza Bertelli A, Delpino MV, Lattar S, Giai C, Llana MN, Sanjuan N, Cassat JE, Sordelli D, Gomez MI. 2016. Staphylococcus aureus protein A enhances osteoclastogenesis via TNFR1 and EGFR signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta 1862:1975–1983. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Widaa A, Claro T, Foster TJ, O'Brien FJ, Kerrigan SW. 2012. Staphylococcus aureus protein A plays a critical role in mediating bone destruction and bone loss in osteomyelitis. PLoS One 7:e40586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Potter AD, Butrico CE, Ford CA, Curry JM, Trenary IA, Tummarakota SS, Hendrix AS, Young JD, Cassat JE. 2020. Host nutrient milieu drives an essential role for aspartate biosynthesis during invasive Staphylococcus aureus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:12394–12401. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1922211117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ahmed S, Meghji S, Williams RJ, Henderson B, Brock JH, Nair SP. 2001. Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin binding proteins are essential for internalization by osteoblasts but do not account for differences in intracellular levels of bacteria. Infect Immun 69:2872–2877. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.5.2872-2877.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Horn J, Stelzner K, Rudel T, Fraunholz M. 2018. Inside job: Staphylococcus aureus host-pathogen interactions. Int J Med Microbiol 308:607–624. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.McCourt J, O'Halloran DP, McCarthy H, O'Gara JP, Geoghegan JA. 2014. Fibronectin-binding proteins are required for biofilm formation by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain LAC. FEMS Microbiol Lett 353:157–164. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Atwood DN, Beenken KE, Loughran AJ, Meeker DG, Lantz TL, Graham JW, Spencer HJ, Smeltzer MS. 2016. XerC contributes to diverse forms of Staphylococcus aureus infection via agr-dependent and agr-independent pathways. Infect Immun 84:1214–1225. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01462-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lehman MK, Nuxoll AS, Yamada KJ, Kielian T, Carson SD, Fey PD. 2019. Protease-mediated growth of Staphylococcus aureus on host proteins is opp3 dependent. mBio 10:e02553-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02553-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pietrocola G, Nobile G, Rindi S, Speziale P. 2017. Staphylococcus aureus manipulates innate immunity through own and host-expressed proteases. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:166. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kane TL, Carothers KE, Lee SW. 2018. Virulence factor targeting of the bacterial pathogen Staphylococcus aureus for vaccine and therapeutics. Curr Drug Targets 19:111–127. doi: 10.2174/1389450117666161128123536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fey PD, Endres JL, Yajjala VK, Widhelm TJ, Boissy RJ, Bose JL, Bayles KW. 2013. A genetic resource for rapid and comprehensive phenotype screening of nonessential Staphylococcus aureus genes. mBio 4:e00537-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00537-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.DeFrancesco AS, Masloboeva N, Syed AK, DeLoughery A, Bradshaw N, Li GW, Gilmore MS, Walker S, Losick R. 2017. Genome-wide screen for genes involved in eDNA release during biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E5969–E5978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704544114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li H. 2013. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv 13033997.
  • 47.Li H. 2011. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27:2987–2993. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Barnett DW, Garrison EK, Quinlan AR, Stromberg MP, Marth GT. 2011. BamTools: a C++ API and toolkit for analyzing and managing BAM files. Bioinformatics 27:1691–1692. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Subramaniyam S, DeJesus MA, Zaveri A, Smith CM, Baker RE, Ehrt S, Schnappinger D, Sassetti CM, Ioerger TR. 2019. Statistical analysis of variability in TnSeq data across conditions using zero-inflated negative binomial regression. BMC Bioinformatics 20:603. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3156-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1
Supplemental file 2
IAI.00718-20-s0001.pdf (47.6KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 3
IAI.00718-20-s0002.xlsx (9.5KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 4

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES