Resistance-guided therapy (RGT) for gonorrhoea may reduce unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. When reflexed from the Aptima Combo 2 assay, the ResistancePlus GC assay demonstrated 94.8% sensitivity and 100.0% specificity for Neisseria gonorrhoeae detection.
KEYWORDS: Neisseria gonorrhoeae, molecular diagnostic, antimicrobial resistance, whole-genome sequencing
ABSTRACT
Resistance-guided therapy (RGT) for gonorrhea may reduce unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. When reflexed from the Aptima Combo 2 assay, the ResistancePlus GC assay demonstrated 94.8% sensitivity and 100.0% specificity for Neisseria gonorrhoeae detection. Of the 379 concordant N. gonorrhoeae-positive samples, 86.8% were found to possess the gyrA S91F mutation, which was highly predictive for ciprofloxacin resistance and stable across 3,144 publicly available N. gonorrhoeae genomes. Our work supports the feasibility of implementing RGT for gonorrhea into routine molecular workflows.
INTRODUCTION
The increasing incidence of gonorrhea globally is a major public health threat. For decades, gonorrhea has been treated before antibiotic susceptibility results are known, according to local treatment guidelines that are generally based on the local prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). In many settings, dual empirical therapy with oral azithromycin (1 g) and intramuscular ceftriaxone (500 mg) is recommended (1). With recent reports of increasing resistance, individualized therapy based on the molecular detection of resistance determinants (resistance-guided therapy [RGT]) has been suggested as a way of improving antimicrobial stewardship and delaying the emergence of AMR (2, 3). In particular, RGT for ciprofloxacin has been incorporated into gonorrhea treatment guidelines in the United Kingdom and was shown to be feasible and effective in a recent multisite clinical study in the United States (4, 5).
Ciprofloxacin resistance in N. gonorrhoeae occurs predominantly through point mutations in the DNA gyrase A gene (gyrA), most commonly a single point mutation at the serine 91 codon (GyrA S91F), which is highly predictive of ciprofloxacin resistance. Other mutations associated with increased ciprofloxacin MICs include a point mutation at the aspartic acid 95 codon of gyrA (D95), and mutations in the topoisomerase IV parC gene (6). The highly recombinogenic nature of N. gonorrhoeae means that continuous surveillance is critical to ensure the ongoing utility of diagnostic markers used for RGT and to detect “diagnostic escape variants” (2). Accordingly, the aims of this study were: (i) to assess the performance characteristics of a recently introduced commercial assay for ciprofloxacin RGT against a widely used nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for N. gonorrhoeae; and (ii) to determine the genomic stability of molecular determinants of ciprofloxacin resistance in a large collection of publicly available N. gonorrhoeae genomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Clinical samples were obtained from the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC), the largest public sexual health service in Melbourne, Australia. A total of 445 clinical samples were collected from March to May 2019 and were stored at room temperature in Hologic Aptima unisex specimen transport tubes (Hologic, San Diego, CA, USA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions and tested for Chlamydia trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae using the Aptima Combo 2 assay (AC2; Hologic, San Diego, CA, USA) within 24 h. Where available, consecutive clinical samples were collected. In the AC2 assay, transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) of diagnostic targets results in the production of luminescent signals, quantified as relative light units (RLUs). The RLU value is then used to categorize results as positive, negative, and equivocal (7).
In total, 400 μl of remnant AC2 samples underwent DNA extraction using the QIASymphony DSP virus/pathogen midi kit complex 400 protocol, as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). These samples were stored as per the manufactures instructions at room temperature prior to testing on the Aptima assay, and were all tested within 14 days post-NAAT. PCR testing for N. gonorrhoeae and the GyrA S91F mutation was performed on 5 μl of extracted DNA using the previously described ResistancePlus GC assay (SpeeDx Pty Ltd., Sydney, Australia) (8, 9) on a LightCycler 480 II (LC480 II; Roche, Switzerland). Briefly, the assay reports detection across five channels using the following targets: (i) detection of the N. gonorrhoeae opa gene; (ii) detection of the N. gonorrhoeae porA gene; (iii) detection of gyrA S91 (wild type); (iv) detection of gyrA S91F; and (v) an internal control to monitor extraction efficiency and qPCR inhibition. Interpretation of the results was performed using the ResistancePlus GC (7500) analysis software. The assay reports the following results: (i) whether N. gonorrhoeae was detected or not detected, and (ii) if N. gonorrhoeae was detected, whether gyrA is wild type, a gyrA S91F mutation, or indeterminant. Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism (version 8.4.3). Binomial 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for all proportions. Differences between groups were calculated using either a Mann-Whitney test or a chi-square test. Bioinformatic analyses are described in the supplemental material.
Ethical approval.
This study was approved by the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/17/POWH/510).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Assessment of the ResistancePlus GC assay for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
In total, 445 clinical samples from different anatomical sites (from 336 patients) were tested using the ResistancePlus GC assay (400 N. gonorrhoeae NAAT-positive and 45 N. gonorrhoeae NAAT-negative Aptima samples) (Table 1). In total 97/336 (28.9%) patients had samples from ≥1 anatomical site. Compared to Aptima NAAT, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the ResistancePlus GC assay for detection of N. gonorrhoeae was 94.8% (379/400; 95% CI = 92.6% to 97.0%) and 100% (45/45; 95% CI = 97.8% to 100.0%), respectively. There was a significant difference in RLU values as reported by the AC2 assay between detected N. gonorrhoeae-positive samples (median RLU 1,536, interquartile range [IQR] 1,453 to 1,583 RLUs) on the ResistancePlus GC assay compared to undetected/discordant samples (median RLU 863, IQR 455 to 1,205 RLUs, P < 0.001), which may suggest a lower bacterial load in negative samples.
TABLE 1.
Specimen type for clinical samples tested using both Aptima Combo 2 and ResistancePlus GC molecular assaysa
| Site | Sample bank 1: N. gonorrhoeae-positive (no. [%]) | Sample bank 2: N. gonorrhoeae-negative (no. [%]) |
|---|---|---|
| Anorectal | 150 (37.5) | 15 (33.3) |
| Pharyngeal | 176 (44.0) | 22 (48.9) |
| Urogenital | 74 (18.5) | 8 (17.8) |
| Total number | 400 | 45 |
Values are given as number of samples (percentages). Sample bank 1 consisted of 400 N. gonorrhoeae NAAT-positive clinical samples that were previously stored for 14 days at room temperature in Hologic Aptima unisex specimen transport tubes (Hologic, San Diego, CA, USA) between 14 March and 29 May 2019. Sample bank 2 consisted of 45 N. gonorrhoeae NAAT-negative clinical samples collected from routine gonorrhea testing in September 2019.
Identification of gyrA alleles.
The ResistancePlus GC assay successfully generated a gyrA result in 329 (86.8%) of 379 samples that were positive for N. gonorrhoeae by AC2 (Table 2). Of these, 206/329 (62.6%) samples had a gyrA S91 wild type (WT) result, and 123/329 (37.4%) had a gyrA S91F mutation. The remaining 50/329 (15.2%) N. gonorrhoeae-positive samples were indeterminate for gyrA (i.e., the ResistancePlus GC assay could not determine whether a WT or mutant gyrA was present). Given that the samples were found to be N. gonorrhoeae positive by the AC2 and ResistancePlus GC assays, it is unlikely the indeterminate result was due to cross-reactivity with nongonococcal strains. Instead, it is likely that the gyrA detection sensitivity is lower than N. gonorrhoeae detection. This is consistent with previous work by Cotton et al. 2020 that reported a sensitivity of 97.1% for detection of gyrA and a sensitivity of 98.5% for detection of N. gonorrhoeae (10). In our study, samples with indeterminate gyrA results had significantly lower AC2 reported RLU values compared to samples with gyrA detected (median RLU 1,091 versus 1,536, P < 0.001) (Fig. 1; Table S1 in the supplemental material). Indeterminate gyrA results were significantly more likely in anorectal samples (28/150; 18.7%) and pharyngeal samples (20/176; 11.4%) compared to urogenital sites (2/74; 2.7%, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2). A limitation of our study was the lack of associated phenotypic data; this limitation reflects the increasing use of molecular testing, which reduces the availability of isolates for additional analyses.
TABLE 2.
ResistancePlus GC results for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae and gyrA in different anatomical sites of infectiona
| Site | No. (%) N. gonorrhoeae detected, gyrA indeterminate | No. (%) N. gonorrhoeae detected, gyrA mutation detected | No. (%) N. gonorrhoeae detected, gyrA mutation not detected | No. (%) N. gonorrhoeae not detected | No. total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anorectal | 28 (7.0) | 43 (10.8) | 70 (17.5) | 9 (2.2) | 150 |
| Pharyngeal | 20 (5.0) | 54 (13.5) | 94 (23.5) | 8 (2.0) | 176 |
| Urogenital | 2 (0.5) | 26 (6.5) | 42 (10.5) | 4 (1.0) | 74 |
| Total number | 50 | 123 | 206 | 21 | 400 |
Values are given as number of samples (percentages). Results for the 400 clinical N. gonorrhoeae NAAT-positive samples as reported by SpeeDx ResistancePlus GC assay.
FIG 1.

Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and characterization of gyrA using the ResistancePlus GC assay in relation to relative light units (RLUs) reported by the Aptima Combo 2 assay. Boxes depict the interquartile range, and the median is represented by a short black line within the box. Whiskers represent the 5th and 95th percentiles and dots represent individual samples. Statistically significant differences between median RLUs are indicated with asterisks (****, P < 0.0001).
FIG 2.
Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and characterization of gyrA in samples derived from different anatomical sites of infection using the ResistancePlus GC assay. Boxes depict the interquartile range, and the median is represented by a short black line within the box. Whiskers represent the 5th and 95th percentiles and dots represent individual samples. Statistically significant differences between median RLUs are indicated with asterisks (****, P < 0.0001; **, P < 0.01). (A) N. gonorrhoeae detected and gyrA S91F mutant detected; (B) N. gonorrhoeae detected and gyrA S91 WT detected; (C) N. gonorrhoeae detected and gyrA indeterminate; (D) N. gonorrhoeae not detected.
Genomic assessment of gyrA S91F across Neisseria gonorrhoeae lineages.
The utility of the ResistancePlus GC assay in RGT depends on the relative frequency and locations of mutations across lineages of ciprofloxacin resistance mutations, particularly gyrA S91F. A collection of 8,179 nonduplicated (one isolate per individual) N. gonorrhoeae global isolates with available MIC data were obtained from Pathogenwatch (11), including isolates from Victoria, Australia (12). Of these, 3,144 isolates were phenotypically resistant to ciprofloxacin and were examined for mutations in gyrA and parC. Isolates were defined as resistant to ciprofloxacin if the MIC was ≥ 1 μg/ml as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (13) (Table S2). In total, 3,100/3,144 (98.6%) of isolates identified as phenotypically ciprofloxacin-resistant had the S91F mutation and 108/5,035 (2.1%) of isolates identified as phenotypically ciprofloxacin-susceptible had the S91F mutation. Accordingly, the sensitivity and specificity of the gyrA S91F mutation for conferring ciprofloxacin resistance in N. gonorrhoeae isolates was 98.6% and 97.9%, respectively. In addition, 3,095/3,100 (99.8%) of isolates with an S91F mutation also harbored a D95 mutation, most commonly D95G (1,996/3,095; 64.5%), D95A (954/3,095; 30.8%), or D95N (145/3,095; 4.7%). Further, mutations in parC were identified in 2,573/3,144 (81.8%) of ciprofloxacin-resistant N. gonorrhoeae. These included mutations at S87 (1,964/2,573; 76.3%), D86 (596/2,573; 23.2%), S88 (106/2,573; 4.1%), and E91 (49/2,573; 1.9%). Of the 44/3,144 (1.4%) ciprofloxacin-resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolates that did not have a gyrA S91F mutation, 2/44 (4.6%) carried a parC mutation (1: D86N, 1: S87R), with no other gyrA or parC mutations identified in the remaining isolates. Ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates with a gyrA S91F mutation were identified across 16 multilocus sequence types (STs) (Table S2), where the dominant STs were ST1901 (945/3,144; 30.1%) and ST7363 (425/3,144; 13.5%). One limitation of our approach was that we relied on phenotypic data reported by other studies, although we applied CLSI criteria for ciprofloxacin resistance to all isolates to enable a standardized comparison.
In summary, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity for detection of N. gonorrhoeae using a commercially available ciprofloxacin RGT assay, with positive results more likely using samples with higher RLU values on the AC2 assay. The bacterial load of N. gonorrhoeae varies between anatomical sites and may therefore affect sensitivity of the assay (14). We also found that indeterminate gyrA results were more likely at lower RLUs from extragenital sites, possibly suggesting a lower bacterial load in these samples and/or potential cross-reactivity with nongonococcal Neisseria isolates. This “therapeutic gap” (i.e., positive for N. gonorrhoeae using TMA and negative for N. gonorrhoeae and/or gyrA indeterminate using the ResistancePlusGC assay) is likely due to differential analytical sensitivity between the TMA-based and PCR-based assays. Although this only constituted a minority of samples in our study (15.2%), in clinical practice this would mean a proportion of patients would have treatment with empirical rather than “tailored” therapy. Importantly, the clinical and economic utility of resistance-guided therapy for ciprofloxacin is likely to vary based on local rates of ciprofloxacin resistance. Finally, we found that the GyrA S91F mutation was both highly predictive for ciprofloxacin resistance and stable across a range of N. gonorrhoeae lineages from multiple geographic settings. Collectively, our work further supports the feasibility of implementing RGT for gonorrhea into routine molecular testing. Future work should explore improved integration of assays for RGT into large-scale NAAT workflows for gonorrhea and monitor clinical outcome data in patients treated using RGT.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by a Project Grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (GNT1147735 to D.A.W., M.Y.C., E.P.F.C., and C.K.F.). E.P.F.C. and D.A.W. are supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Emerging Leadership Investigator Grants (GNT1172873 and GNT1174555, respectively). C.K.F. and C.S.B. are supported by an NHMRC Leadership Investigator Grant (GNT1172900 and GNT1173361, respectively). B.P.H. is supported by an NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1105905).
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
REFERENCES
- 1.Unemo M. 2015. Current and future antimicrobial treatment of gonorrhoea—the rapidly evolving Neisseria gonorrhoeae continues to challenge. BMC Infect Dis 15:364. 10.1186/s12879-015-1029-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tuite AR, Gift TL, Chesson HW, Hsu K, Salomon JA, Grad YH. 2017. Impact of rapid susceptibility testing and antibiotic selection strategy on the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance in gonorrhea. J Infect Dis 216:1141–1149. 10.1093/infdis/jix450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Trembizki E, Guy R, Donovan B, Kaldor JM, Lahra MM, Whiley DM, GRAND study investigators. 2016. Further evidence to support the individualised treatment of gonorrhoea with ciprofloxacin. Lancet Infect Dis 16:1005–1006. 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30271-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Klausner JD, Bristow CC, Soge OO, Shahkolahi A, Waymer T, Bolan RK, Philip SS, Asbel LE, Taylor SN, Mena LA, Goldstein DA, Powell JA, Wierzbicki MR, Morris SR. 2020. Resistance-guided treatment of gonorrhea: a prospective clinical study. Clin Infect Dis 10.1093/cid/ciaa596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fifer H, Saunders J, Soni S, Sadiq ST, FitzGerald M. 2020. 2018 UK national guideline for the management of infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Int J STD AIDS 31:4–15. 10.1177/0956462419886775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Unemo M, Shafer WM. 2014. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the 21st century: past, evolution, and future. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:587–613. 10.1128/CMR.00010-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hologic Inc. 2016. Aptima combo 2 assay (Panther System). Hologic, Inc., San Diego, CA. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ebeyan S, Windsor M, Bordin A, Mhango L, Erskine S, Trembizki E, Mokany E, Tan LY, Whiley D, GRAND2 Study Investigators. 2019. Evaluation of the ResistancePlus GC (beta) assay: a commercial diagnostic test for the direct detection of ciprofloxacin susceptibility or resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Antimicrob Chemother 74:1820–1824. 10.1093/jac/dkz108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Allan-Blitz LT, Ellis OL, Wee R, Truong A, Ebeyan SM, Tan LY, Mokany E, Flynn R, Klausner JD. 2019. Improved determination of Neisseria gonorrhoeae gyrase A genotype results in clinical specimens. J Antimicrob Chemother 74:2913–2915. 10.1093/jac/dkz292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cotton S, McHugh MP, Etherson M, Shepherd J, Templeton KE. 2020. Evaluation of the molecular detection of ciprofloxacin resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae by the ResistancePlus GC assay (SpeeDx). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 99:115262. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sánchez-Busó L, Yeats CA, Taylor B, Goater R, Underwood A, Abudahab K, Argimón S, Ma KC, Mortimer TD, Cole MJ, Grad YH, Martin I, Raphael BH, Shafer WM, Spiteri G, Town K, Wi T, Harris SR, Unemo M, Aanensen DM. 2020. A community-driven resource for genomic surveillance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae at Pathogenwatch. bioRxiv 10.1101/2020.07.03.186726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Williamson DA, Chow EPF, Gorrie CL, Seemann T, Ingle DJ, Higgins N, Easton M, Taiaroa G, Grad YH, Kwong JC, Fairley CK, Chen MY, Howden BP. 2019. Bridging of Neisseria gonorrhoeae lineages across sexual networks in the HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis era. Nat Commun 10:3988. 10.1038/s41467-019-12053-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2020. M100 performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bissessor M, Tabrizi SN, Fairley CK, Danielewski J, Whitton B, Bird S, Garland S, Chen MY. 2011. Differing Neisseria gonorrhoeae bacterial loads in the pharynx and rectum in men who have sex with men: implications for gonococcal detection, transmission, and control. J Clin Microbiol 49:4304–4306. 10.1128/JCM.05341-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

