The development of an effective and durable SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is essential for combating the growing COVID-19 pandemic. The SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) glycoprotein is the main target of neutralizing antibodies elicited during virus infection or following vaccination.
KEYWORDS: coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, S glycoprotein, virus entry, syncytium formation, D614G, polymorphism, metalloprotease, evolution, coronavirus
ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2, a betacoronavirus, is the cause of the COVID-19 pandemic. The SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) glycoprotein trimer mediates virus entry into host cells and cytopathic effects (syncytium formation). We studied the contribution of several S glycoprotein features to these functions, focusing on those that differ among related coronaviruses. Acquisition of the furin cleavage site by the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein decreased virus stability and infectivity but greatly enhanced syncytium-forming ability. Notably, the D614G change found in globally predominant SARS-CoV-2 strains increased infectivity, modestly enhanced responsiveness to the ACE2 receptor and susceptibility to neutralizing sera, and tightened association of the S1 subunit with the trimer. Apparently, these two features of the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein, the furin cleavage site and D614G, have evolved to balance virus infectivity, stability, cytopathicity and antibody vulnerability. Although the endodomain (cytoplasmic tail) of the S2 subunit was not absolutely required for virus entry or syncytium formation, alteration of palmitoylated cysteine residues in the cytoplasmic tail decreased the efficiency of these processes. Since proteolytic cleavage contributes to the activation of the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein, we evaluated the ability of protease inhibitors to suppress S glycoprotein function. Matrix metalloprotease inhibitors suppressed S-mediated cell-cell fusion but not virus entry. Synergy between inhibitors of matrix metalloproteases and TMPRSS2 suggests that both host proteases can activate the S glycoprotein during the process of syncytium formation. These results provide insights into SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein-host cell interactions that likely contribute to the transmission and pathogenicity of this pandemic agent.
IMPORTANCE The development of an effective and durable SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is essential for combating the growing COVID-19 pandemic. The SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) glycoprotein is the main target of neutralizing antibodies elicited during virus infection or following vaccination. Knowledge of the spike glycoprotein evolution, function, and interactions with host factors will help researchers to develop effective vaccine immunogens and treatments. Here, we identify key features of the spike glycoprotein, including the furin cleavage site and the D614G natural mutation, that modulate viral cytopathic effects, infectivity, and sensitivity to inhibition. We also identify two inhibitors of host metalloproteases that block S-mediated cell-cell fusion, a process that contributes to the destruction of the virus-infected cell.
INTRODUCTION
Coronaviruses are enveloped, positive-stranded RNA viruses that cause respiratory and digestive tract infections in animals and humans (1–4). Two betacoronaviruses, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1) and Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), caused deadly outbreaks of severe pneumonia and bronchiolitis in humans in 2002 and 2013, respectively (2, 5). In late 2019, an emergent betacoronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, was shown to cause COVID-19, a severe respiratory disease in humans with 3 to 4% mortality (6–12). MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-1, and SARS-CoV-2 are thought to have originated in bats and infected humans either directly or through intermediate animal hosts (1, 4, 9, 13–15). The efficient transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in humans has resulted in a pandemic that has led to over a million deaths and threatened global health, economies, and quality of life (11, 12, 16). An immediate goal for the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is to identify treatments, including passively administered neutralizing antibodies, that could ameliorate COVID-19 disease and improve survival (17, 18). Another urgent priority is the development of a vaccine that could protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection (19–21).
The SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (S gp) is the major target of virus-neutralizing antibodies that are thought to be important for vaccine-induced protection (17–32). The SARS-CoV-2 S gp mediates the entry of the virus into host cells and influences tissue tropism and pathogenesis (22, 23, 32–35). The trimeric S gp is a class I fusion protein that is cleaved into the S1 and S2 glycoproteins, which associate noncovalently in the trimeric spike. The receptor-binding domain (RBD; residues 331 to 528) of the S1 subunit binds the receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) (22, 23, 32, 35–38). The S2 subunit, which contains a fusion peptide and two heptad repeat regions (HR1 and HR2), mediates fusion of the viral and target cell membranes (22, 35, 39, 40). Following receptor binding of S1, cleavage of S2 at the S2′ site by host proteases (cathepsin B/L in endosomes, TMPRSS2 on the plasma membrane) is thought to activate extensive and irreversible conformational changes in S2 required for membrane fusion (38, 41, 42). The interaction of the HR1 and HR2 regions of S2 results in the formation of a stable six-helix bundle that brings the viral and cell membranes into proximity, promoting virus entry (39, 40).
S gp diversity contributes to host and tissue tropism, transmissibility, and pathogenicity of coronaviruses (1–4, 34). The S gp of SARS-CoV-2 is 79.6% identical in amino acid sequence to that of SARS-CoV-1 (8, 9, 15) but possesses several notable features. First, the SARS-CoV-2 S gp displays a multibasic sequence at the S1/S2 junction that is suitable for cleavage by furin-like proteases; this feature may have been acquired during SARS-CoV-2 evolution from an ancestral bat coronavirus (9, 15, 41, 42). A similar cleavage site sequence is present in the MERS-CoV S gp but not in the SARS-CoV-1 S gp. Second, compared to the original source virus in Wuhan, China, the more prevalent SARS-CoV-2 variants emerging in the global pandemic substitute a glycine residue for aspartic acid 614 (D614G) in the S1 C-terminal domain (CTD2); the D614G change is associated with higher levels of virus replication in cultured human lung cells and in cells expressing human ACE2 and TMPRSS2 (43–45). Third, although the cysteine-rich S2 endodomains of SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 are 97% identical, the latter has an additional cysteine residue in its cytoplasmic tail (15). The S2 endodomain of SARS-CoV-1 is palmitoylated and has been shown to contribute to S gp function and localization to virus assembly sites in the endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi intermediate complex (ERGIC) (46–51).
Here, we evaluate the phenotypes of SARS-CoV-2 S gp mutants with alterations in the distinctive features described above, as well as other features that are potentially important for function. These include (i) the two proposed proteolytic cleavage sites at the S1/S2 junction, as well as the S2′ cleavage site immediately N-terminal to the fusion peptide; (ii) the polymorphic residue Asp/Gly 614; (iii) the putative fusion peptide in the S2 ectodomain; and (iv) the candidate ERGIC retention signal and potentially palmitoylated cysteine residues in the S2 endodomain (Fig. 1). We examined S gp expression, processing, subunit association, glycosylation, and incorporation into human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) pseudoviruses. We evaluated the infectivity, stability, and sensitivity to inhibition of viruses pseudotyped with the S gp variants. We measured the ability of the S gp variants to mediate cell-cell fusion to form syncytia and found that TMPRSS2 and matrix metalloproteases can contribute to the efficiency of this process. Matrix metalloprotease inhibitors blocked S-mediated cell-cell fusion in TMPRSS2– cells and synergized with a TMPRSS2 inhibitor in TMPRSS2+ cells. Our results provide insights into the evolutionary features of the SARS-CoV-2 S gp, as well as host factors, that contribute to viral infectivity and pathogenicity.
RESULTS
Establishment of assays to characterize SARS-CoV-2 S gp phenotypes.
We established assays to characterize SARS-CoV-2 S gp processing, trafficking, incorporation into virus particles and function. As a reference for comparison with S gp mutants, we evaluated the properties of the wild-type S gp (with Asp614) derived from the prototypic SARS-CoV-2 strain responsible for the initial outbreak in Wuhan, Hubei province, China. The wild-type S gp was expressed in 293T cells alone or in combination with HIV-1 Gag/protease, which promotes the budding of lentivirus particles. The S gp precursor, as well as the mature S1 and S2 glycoproteins, could be detected in the cell lysates, on the cell surface, and on lentivirus particles (Fig. 2). The S1 gp was shed into the medium of cells expressing the wild-type S gp alone (Fig. 3A). Very low levels of S gp were detected in the particulate fraction prepared from the culture medium of cells expressing the wild-type S gp without HIV-1 Gag, indicating that the vast majority of the S gp pelleted in the presence of HIV-1 Gag is associated with lentivirus particles and not with extracellular vesicles (Fig. 2 and 3B). We confirmed the presence of particles of the expected size and morphology decorated with S glycoproteins by electron microscopy with a gold-labeled S-reactive convalescent-phase serum (data not shown). A higher ratio of cleaved to uncleaved S gp was present on lentivirus particles than in the cell lysates or on the surface of S gp-expressing cells, as seen previously (32, 38) (Fig. 2 and 3B). The uncleaved wild-type S gp in cell lysates and on the cell surface was modified mainly by high-mannose glycans, whereas the cleaved S1 gp contained complex carbohydrates (Fig. 3C). Both the cleaved (major) fraction and the uncleaved (minor) fraction of the wild-type S gp incorporated into lentivirus particles were modified by complex glycans, indicating passage through the Golgi compartment (52). This result is similar to our finding that HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins can be transported to the cell surface by Golgi body-dependent and Golgi body-bypass pathways, but only those passing through the Golgi compartment are incorporated into HIV-1 virions (53).
To study cytopathic effects mediated by the SARS-CoV-2 S gp, we established the 293T-S and 293T-S-ACE2 cell lines, both of which express the wild-type S gp under the control of a tetracycline-regulated promoter. In addition, the 293T-S-ACE2 cells constitutively express ACE2. Both cell lines propagated efficiently in the absence of doxycycline, a tetracycline analogue (Fig. 4A). 293T-S cells grew nearly as well in the presence of doxycycline as in the absence of the compound. In contrast, doxycycline-induced S gp expression in the 293T-S-ACE2 cells resulted in dramatic cell-cell fusion and cell death. Thus, the coexpression of the SARS-CoV-2 S gp and human ACE2 led to significant cytopathic effects. Similarly, transient expression of the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S gp in 293T-ACE2 cells resulted in the formation of massive syncytia (Fig. 4B and 5). In the same assay, 293T-ACE2 cells expressing the SARS-CoV-1 S gp did not form syncytia. To quantify the amount of S-mediated cell-cell fusion, we adapted the alpha-complementation assay previously used to measure cell-cell fusion mediated by the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins (54). Effector cells expressing the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S gp yielded a signal with ACE2-expressing target cells in the alpha-complementation assay that was ∼370-fold above that seen for the negative-control plasmid (Fig. 5). These results demonstrate that cells expressing the SARS-CoV-2 S gp fuse efficiently with cells expressing human ACE2.
To evaluate the ability of the SARS-CoV-2 S gp to mediate virus entry, we measured the single-round infection of target cells by recombinant HIV-1 and VSV vectors pseudotyped with the wild-type S gp. Infection of 293T-ACE2 cells by both S-pseudotyped vectors was at least 60-fold above the background seen for viruses without envelope glycoproteins (Fig. 5). The lentivirus system was used to characterize all of the mutants, and the more robust VSV system was used for the detailed analysis of selected mutants.
The furin cleavage site reduces virus infectivity, stability, and sensitivity to ACE2 and neutralizing antibodies but enhances S gp syncytium-forming ability.
Presumably during its evolution from an ancestral bat coronavirus, the SARS-CoV-2 S gp acquired a multibasic cleavage site for furin-like proteases at the S1/S2 junction (9, 15, 41, 42). To evaluate the impact of this evolutionary change, we altered the two residues immediately N-terminal to the proposed furin cleavage site (FurinMut in Fig. 1). Compared to the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S gp, the FurinMut S gp was expressed at higher levels in 293T cells and was efficiently incorporated into lentivirus particles but was inefficiently processed into S1 and S2 glycoproteins (Fig. 2 and 3A). Two glycoforms of the uncleaved FurinMut, one with only high-mannose glycans and the other with complex glycans, were present in cell lysates and on the cell surface; however, only the glycoform modified by complex carbohydrates and presumably transported through the Golgi compartment was found in lentivirus particles (Fig. 3C).
In contrast to the wild-type S gp, FurinMut did not mediate syncytium formation or induce cell-cell fusion in the alpha-complementation assay (Fig. 4B and Fig. 5). However, the cell-fusing activity of the FurinMut S gp was increased significantly by coexpression of TMPRSS2 and ACE2 in the 293T target cells (Fig. 5). The infectivity of the FurinMut-pseudotyped virus was 7 to 50 times higher than that of viruses pseudotyped with the wild-type S gp; the infectivity difference between viruses pseudotyped with FurinMut and wild-type S glycoproteins was greater for HIV-1 pseudotypes than for VSV pseudotypes (Fig. 5 and 6A). The infectivity of the FurinMut virus incubated on ice was more stable than that of the wild-type S virus (Fig. 6B). FurinMut viruses were more sensitive to inhibition by soluble ACE2 and convalescent-phase sera than were wild-type viruses (Fig. 6C). Thus, the acquisition of the furin cleavage site by the SARS-CoV-2 S gp decreased virus stability, infectivity, and sensitivity to soluble ACE2 and neutralizing antibodies but greatly enhanced the ability to form syncytia.
Alteration of other potential cleavage sites reduces S gp processing and function.
The SARS-CoV-1 S gp lacks a favorable cleavage site for furin-like proteases but, during infection of a target cell, is thought to be cleaved at a nearby secondary site and at the S2′ site by cellular proteases (cathepsin L, TMPRSS2) (55–57). Alteration of the secondary cleavage site near the S1/S2 junction (S1/S2Mut) in the SARS-CoV-2 S gp resulted in complete lack of proteolytic processing, inefficient incorporation into lentivirus particles, and loss of function in cell-cell fusion and infectivity assays (Fig. 2, 3C, 4B, and 5). Alteration of the S2′ site (S2′Mut) also led to lack of S processing, although low levels of incorporation into lentivirus particles and infectivity were detected. The S2′Mut gp in the lentivirus particles was endoglycosidase H resistant, suggesting that it is modified by complex carbohydrates (Fig. 3C). The S2′Mut gp did not detectably mediate cell-cell fusion (Fig. 5). Thus, despite the presence of the furin cleavage site in these mutants, proteolytic processing did not occur. Both mutants exhibited severe decreases in infectivity and cell-cell fusion. However, coexpression of TMPRSS2 in the ACE2-expressing target cells dramatically enhanced cell-cell fusion by the S1/S2Mut gp but not by the S2′Mut gp (Fig. 5).
The D614G change in the predominant SARS-CoV-2 strain increases S1-trimer association, virus infectivity, and sensitivity to soluble ACE2 and neutralizing antisera.
The change in Asp614 to a glycine residue (D614G) is found in the predominant emerging SARS-CoV-2 strains worldwide (43–45). The D614G S gp was cleaved slightly more efficiently than the wild-type S gp but shed less S1 into the medium of expressing cells (Fig. 2, 3A, and 5). The efficiencies of cell-cell fusion mediated by the D614G and wild-type S glycoproteins were comparable (Fig. 4B and 5). Both lentivirus and VSV vectors pseudotyped with the D614G S gp infected cells 4- to 16-fold more efficiently than viruses with the wild-type S gp (Fig. 5 and 6A). The stabilities of the viruses pseudotyped with D614G and wild-type S glycoproteins on ice were comparable (Fig. 6B). Importantly, the viruses with D614G S gp were ∼7-fold more sensitive to soluble ACE2 and 2- to 5-fold more sensitive to neutralizing antisera than viruses with wild-type S gp (Fig. 6C and D). Soluble ACE2 bound and induced the shedding of S1 from D614G lentivirus particles more efficiently than from particles with the wild-type S gp (Fig. 7A and B). The lentivirus particles with D614G S gp exhibited a significantly greater association of the S1 subunit with the trimer (half-life of >5 days at 37°C) compared with viruses with wild-type S gp (half-life of 2 to 3 days at 37°C) (Fig. 7C). S1 association with detergent-solubilized S gp trimers was greater for D614G than for wild-type S over a range of temperatures from 4 to 37°C (Fig. 7D). Thus, the D614G change enhances virus infectivity, responsiveness to ACE2, and S1 association with the trimeric spike.
Changes in the S2 fusion peptide decrease infectivity.
The putative fusion peptide of the SARS-CoV-2 S2 glycoprotein (residues 816 to 834) has been identified by analogy with the SARS-CoV-1 S gp. Changes in the fusion peptide and a more C-terminal S2 region in SARS-CoV-1 S gp have been suggested to result in fusion-defective mutants (58–60). We introduced analogous changes into the putative fusion peptide of the SARS-CoV-2 S gp (L821A and F823A) and also made a change (F888R) in the downstream region implicated in SARS-CoV-1 S gp function. The L821A and F823A mutants were processed slightly less efficiently than the wild-type S gp. Compared to the wild-type S gp, the F888R mutant exhibited a lower ratio of the S1 gp in cell lysates relative to the S1 gp in cell supernatants, suggesting a decrease in the association of S1 with the S trimer (Fig. 3A and 5). Modest decreases in the level of S glycoproteins on lentivirus particles were observed for all three mutants. L821A and F823A retained the ability to mediate cell-cell fusion, although the syncytia formed were smaller than those induced by the wild-type S gp (Fig. 4B and 5). F888R was severely compromised in the ability to mediate cell-cell fusion; however, this ability was recovered when TMPRSS2 was coexpressed with ACE2 in the target cells (Fig. 5). The infectivity of viruses pseudotyped with these three mutants was greatly decreased, relative to viruses with wild-type S gp (Fig. 5). In summary, these S2 ectodomain changes exert pleiotropic effects, ultimately compromising virus infectivity.
Palmitoylated membrane-proximal cysteines in the S2 endodomain contribute to virus infectivity.
The S2 endodomain of SARS-CoV-1 is palmitoylated, contains an ERGIC-retention signal, and contributes to the interaction of S with the M protein during virus assembly (46–51). We altered the highly similar endodomain of the SARS-CoV-2 S gp, which contains 10 cysteine residues potentially available for palmitoylation. The endodomain/cytoplasmic tail was deleted in the ΔCT mutant, leaving only the two membrane-proximal cysteine residues (Fig. 1). In the ΔERsig mutant, the putative ERGIC-retention signal at the C terminus of the endodomain was deleted. In three additional mutants, the N-terminal five cysteine residues (1st 5C-to-A), the C-terminal five cysteine residues (2nd 5C-to-A), or all 10 cysteine residues (10 C-to-A) were altered to alanine residues.
The ΔCT and ΔERsig mutants were expressed on the cell surface at higher levels than that of the wild-type S gp, and the level of ΔCT on lentivirus particles was significantly increased (Fig. 2, 3C, and 5). Both ΔCT and ΔERsig mediated syncytium formation and virus infection at levels comparable to those of the wild-type S gp (Fig. 4B and 5). Therefore, except for the two membrane-proximal cysteine residues, the SARS-CoV-2 S2 endodomain is not absolutely required for cell-cell fusion or virus entry.
Proteolytic processing of the 2nd 5C-to-A and 10 C-to-A mutants was more efficient than that of the wild-type S gp (Fig. 2 and 5). Although all three mutants with altered endodomain cysteine residues were expressed on the cell surface and incorporated into lentivirus particles, only the 2nd 5C-to-A mutant supported cell-cell fusion and virus infection at wild-type S levels. Of note, the infectivity of lentiviruses pseudotyped with the 1st 5C-to-A and 10 C-to-A mutants was near the background of the assay. These results implicate the membrane-proximal cysteine residues of the S2 endodomain in the virus entry process.
To evaluate the palmitoylation of the wild-type and mutant S glycoproteins, we used hydroxylamine cleavage and mPEG-maleimide alkylation to mass-tag label the palmitoylated cysteine residues (61). The majority of the wild-type S2 gp was palmitoylated, with different species containing one to four acylated cysteines (Fig. 8A). The ΔCT, 1st 5C-to-A, and 2nd 5C-to-A mutants consisted of two species, one without palmitoylation and the other with a single palmitoylated cysteine. The ratio of palmitoylated to unmodified S2 glycoprotein was significantly greater for the 2nd 5C-to-A mutant than for the ΔCT and 1st 5C-to-A mutants. The 10 C-to-A mutant was not detectably palmitoylated. Thus, palmitoylation can occur on multiple different cysteine residues in the SARS-CoV-2 S2 endodomain; however, palmitoylation appears to occur more efficiently on the N-terminal endodomain cysteines, which contribute to virus infectivity.
Given the phenotype of the 10 C-to-A mutant, we tested the effects of a palmitoylation inhibitor, 2-bromopalmitate (2-BP) on the function of the wild-type S gp. 2-BP inhibited SARS-CoV-2 S-mediated cell-cell fusion, syncytium formation, and virus infection (Fig. 8B and data not shown). We verified that 2-BP treatment reduced palmitoylation of the S2 glycoprotein but found that 2-BP also reduced the proteolytic processing of the S precursor (Fig. 8C). Cell-cell fusion and syncytium formation mediated by the HIV-1JR-FL envelope glycoprotein were also inhibited by 2-BP (Fig. 8B and data not shown). Treatment of the effector and target cells individually with 2-BP suggested that the main effect of 2-BP is exerted on the cells expressing the SARS-CoV-2 S and HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins. These results indicate that inhibition of palmitoylation can result in blockade of SARS-CoV-2 S gp function, perhaps through indirect effects. For example, furin palmitoylation is required for association of furin with plasma membrane microdomains and processing of some substrates (62).
Metalloprotease inhibitors block S-mediated cell-cell fusion.
To gain insight into the host cell factors that might influence our experimental outcomes, we tested several inhibitors in the cell-cell fusion, syncytium formation, and lentivirus pseudotype infection assays. Inhibitors of several proteases potentially involved in S gp activation were tested. E64d, which blocks the activity of cysteine proteases like cathepsin B/L, partially inhibited the infection of lentiviruses pseudotyped with SARS-CoV-2 S gp at concentrations up to 100 µM (data not shown). E64d had no effect on SARS-CoV-2 S-mediated syncytium formation. In contrast, two broad-spectrum matrix metalloprotease inhibitors, marimastat and ilomastat, inhibited S-mediated cell-cell fusion and syncytium formation (Fig. 9A to C). These inhibitory effects were specific for the SARS-CoV-2 S gp because neither compound decreased cell-cell fusion or syncytium formation mediated by HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein trimers. Another metalloprotease inhibitor, TAPI-2, also inhibited S-mediated cell-cell fusion, but was less potent and specific than marimastat or ilomastat (data not shown). Cell-cell fusion assays were conducted in which the compounds were incubated with either S-expressing or ACE2-expressing cells, followed by cocultivation of these cells. The results indicate that the primary inhibitory effect of the metalloprotease inhibitors is exerted on the ACE2-expressing target cells (data not shown). Consistent with this interpretation, no effect of marimastat or ilomastat on the processing of the SARS-CoV-2 S gp was observed (Fig. 9D). None of the metalloprotease inhibitors affected the efficiency of lentivirus infection mediated by the SARS-CoV-2 S gp at doses up to 100 µM (data not shown). These results suggest that one or more matrix metalloproteases on the surface of the ACE2-expressing target cells contribute to the efficiency of cell-cell fusion mediated by the SARS-CoV-2 S gp. Of interest, marimastat and ilomastat were much less effective at inhibiting S-mediated cell-cell fusion when TMPRSS2 was coexpressed with ACE2 in the target cells (Fig. 10A). Camostat mesylate, an inhibitor of serine proteases such as TMPRSS2, when used alone had little or no effect on S-mediated cell-cell fusion, syncytium formation, or virus infection of 293T-ACE2 target cells (Fig. 10B and C and data not shown). However, camostat mesylate and marimastat synergistically inhibited S-mediated syncytium formation, consistent with TMPRSS2 and metalloproteases carrying out redundant functions during the cell-cell fusion process (Fig. 10B and C).
DISCUSSION
Many properties contribute to the ability of a virus like SARS-CoV-2 to achieve zoonotic transmission into humans, to spread globally in the human population, to evade host immune systems, and to cause disease. The exposed nature of the spike trimer on the surface of infected cells and viruses renders the S gp particularly subject to evolutionary pressure. Here, we examined several features of the S gp to understand their potential contribution to SARS-CoV-2 infectivity, stability, resistance to neutralization, and cytopathic effects.
Conformational changes in class I viral envelope glycoproteins contribute to virus entry and evasion of host antibody responses (Fig. 11) (63, 64). The pretriggered, “closed” conformation of the SARS-CoV-2 S gp trimer is converted by binding the receptor, ACE2, to more “open” intermediate conformations, with the S1 receptor-binding domains (RBDs) in the “up” position (22, 35–37, 40, 65). Proteolytic cleavage of the S gp in various contexts further activates the S gp, allowing it to achieve fusion-active conformations. The propensity of class I viral envelope glycoproteins to make transitions from the pretriggered conformation to downstream conformations has been termed “reactivity” or “triggerability” (66). Studies of HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins have shown that high triggerability promotes efficient virus infection and broadened tropism but can also render the virus more susceptible to antibody neutralization (66–68).
Our results indicate that two key features of the SARS-CoV-2 S gp, the furin cleavage site presumably acquired during viral passage to humans from bat/intermediate hosts and the D614G change associated with increasing prevalence in human populations, influence related functions of the S gp. Acquisition of the furin cleavage site resulted in decreased infectivity and reduced sensitivity to soluble ACE2 and neutralizing antibodies, phenotypes suggestive of lowered triggerability (Fig. 11). Similarly, furin cleavage stabilizes the pretriggered conformation of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins (69–72). Cleavage of the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S gp, unlike that of SARS-CoV-1, occurs in the S-expressing cell. Upon ACE2 binding, the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S gp efficiently mediates syncytium formation and cytopathic effects, functions that are dramatically enhanced by S1-S2 cleavage. The furin cleavage site-dependent fusion of the membranes of infected cells with those of adjacent ACE2-expressing cells might also enhance cell-to-cell transmission via virus-cell synapses. Increased efficiency of cell-to-cell transmission could counterbalance the decreased cell-free infectivity of the viruses with the furin cleavage site. Increases in the efficiency of proteolytic processing of other class I viral envelope glycoproteins have been associated with broadened viral tropism and enhanced virulence (73–81).
“Restraining residues” participate in molecular bonds that maintain class I viral envelope glycoproteins in pretriggered conformations (67, 68). Alteration of these restraining residues results in increased triggerability (Fig. 11). Asp614 appears to fit the definition of a restraining residue. The D614G change increases virus infectivity and responsiveness to ACE2 but also results in moderate increases in sensitivity to neutralizing antisera. The proximity of Asp614 (in the S1 C-terminal domain [CTD2]) to the S2 fusion peptide-proximal region (FPPR), which abuts the S1 CTD1 and has been proposed to suppress the opening of the S1 RBD (40), could account for these effects on viral phenotypes. Based on the reported structures of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (40, 82), several amino acid residues (Lys835, Gln836, and Lys854) are in close proximity to Asp614 and therefore could potentially influence D614G phenotypes. However, alanine substitutions of these residues did not abolish the observed D614G phenotypes (data not shown). Of note, the D614G change partially compensates for the effects of acquisition of the furin cleavage site on virus infectivity and ACE2 responsiveness (Fig. 11). It will be of interest to evaluate whether other, less common evolutionary changes affect S gp conformational equilibrium (83).
The stability of functional viral spikes may significantly impact modes and efficiency of transmission. Based on the observation that soluble ACE2 induces shedding of the S1 glycoprotein from the SARS-CoV-2 S trimer, downstream “open” conformations may be more labile than the pretriggered conformation. The lability of open spike conformations could potentially nullify any replicative advantage of increased triggerability. The more triggerable FurinMut and D614G mutants solve this potential problem in different ways. By retaining a covalent bond between S1 and S2, FurinMut maintains and even increases spike stability. D614G retains an intact furin cleavage site but strengthens the association of S1 with the S trimer, possibly by improving S1 CTD2-S2 interactions. The resulting higher spike density allows FurinMut and D614G to take replicative advantage of increased triggerability in response to ACE2 binding.
Proteolytic cleavage of the ACE2-bound S gp intermediate promotes conformational changes conducive to achieving membrane fusion. Depending on the context, different proteases may be involved. During cell-free virus entry, cysteine proteases like cathepsin B/L can act on endocytosed viruses. TMPRSS2 expressed on the surface of the ACE2-expressing target cells could enhance both cell-free virus infection and cell-cell fusion mediated by the SARS-CoV-2 S gp. TMPRSS2 enhancement of cell-cell fusion was particularly robust for S gp mutants that were not efficiently cleaved at the S1/S2 junction; that the S2′Mut was an exception hints that TMPRSS2 cleavage at the S2′ site may contribute to the observed enhancement. Our results implicate matrix metalloproteases in cell-cell fusion but not virus infection mediated by the SARS-CoV-2 S gp. Zinc metalloproteases have been implicated in neurovirulent murine coronavirus entry and cell-cell fusion (84). Cytopathic effects resulting from the formation of syncytia may contribute to the damage of lung tissue during SARS-CoV-2 infection (85). Since a number of matrix metalloproteases are expressed in pulmonary tissue and can be upregulated in response to inflammation (86), their potential involvement in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis should be further explored.
The sampling of downstream, open conformations by uncleaved class I viral envelope glycoproteins can result in the elicitation of poorly neutralizing antibodies unable to recognize the native pretriggered conformation. In the case of HIV-1, uncleaved envelope glycoproteins can traffic to the cell surface by bypassing the conventional Golgi transport pathway and therefore are efficiently presented to the host immune system (53). Likewise, substantial fractions of uncleaved SARS-CoV-2 S gp also appeared on the surface of overexpressing 293T cells, even when anterograde Golgi transport was blocked with brefeldin A (Fig. 2 and 3C and data not shown). The use of unconventional secretory pathways (Golgi bypass, lysosomal exocytosis) by conformationally flexible S glycoproteins could account for the observation that the vast majority of antibodies raised to the S gp during natural SARS-CoV-2 infection fail to neutralize the virus (27, 87, 88). Although limited to specific experimental systems, our study highlights the impact of SARS-CoV-2 S gp variation and host factors on spike synthesis, conformation, and sensitivity to inhibition. These insights could assist the development of effective interventions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell lines.
Human female embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cells (ATCC) and COS-1 African green monkey male kidney fibroblasts (ATCC) were grown in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100 µg/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Pen-Strep) (Life Technologies). 293T cells were used for transient expression of the SARS-CoV-2 S gp variants, in some cases with HIV-1 Gag/protease. 293T cells transiently expressing omega-gal and either ACE2 or ACE2+TMPRSS2 were used as target cells in the cell-cell fusion assay. COS-1 cells transiently expressing alpha-gal and SARS-CoV-2 S gp variants or HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins (AD8 or JR-FL strain) were used as effector cells in the cell-cell fusion assay. Cf2Th-CD4/CCR5 canine thymic epithelial cells expressing human CD4 and CCR5 coreceptors were used as target cells for evaluating cell-cell fusion mediated by the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins; Cf2Th-CD4/CCR5 cells were grown in the above medium supplemented with 0.4 mg/ml G418 and 0.2 mg/ml hygromycin.
293T cells constitutively expressing human ACE2 (293T-ACE2 cells) were established by transducing 293T cells with the pLenti-III-hACE2 lentivirus vector (see below). The lentivirus vector was prepared by transfecting 1 × 106 293T cells in a six-well plate with 1.5 µg of psPAX2, 2 µg of pLenti-III-hACE2, and 0.5 µg of pVSVG using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). At 2 days after transfection, the supernatant was harvested, spun at 5,000 rpm for 15 min to remove cell debris, and then filtered (0.45 µm). The filtered supernatant containing recombinant lentiviral vectors was used to transduce 293T cells seeded 1 day before. After 24 h, the cells were selected in DMEM with 2 µg/ml puromycin with 1× Pen-Strep and 10% FBS for 1 week. A polyclonal puromycin-resistant population of 293T-ACE2 cells was shown to express human ACE2 by Western blotting. The 293T-ACE2 cells were used as target cells for infection by lentivirus and VSV pseudotypes and as target cells in cell-cell fusion and syncytium formation assays.
The wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S gp, with Asp614, was inducibly expressed in Lenti-x-293T human female kidney cells from TaKaRa Bio (catalog no. 632180). Lenti-x-293T cells were grown in DMEM with 10% heat-inactivated FBS supplemented with l-glutamine and Pen-Strep.
Lenti-x-293T cells constitutively expressing the reverse tetracycline-responsive transcriptional activator (rtTA; Lenti-x-293T-rtTa cells [D1317]) (89) were used as the parental cells for the 293T-S and 293T-S-ACE2 cell lines. The 293T-S (D1481) cells inducibly expressing the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S gp with a carboxy-terminal His6 tag were produced by transduction of Lenti-x-293T-rtTA cells with the K5648 recombinant lentivirus vector (see below). The packaged K5648 lentivirus vector (60 µl) was incubated with 2 × 105 Lenti-x-293T-rtTA cells in DMEM, tumbling at 37°C overnight. The cells were then transferred to a 6-well plate in 3 ml of DMEM/10% FBS/Pen-Strep and subsequently selected with 10 µg/ml puromycin.
293T-S-ACE2 (D1496) cells inducibly express the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S gp and constitutively express human ACE2. Briefly, the 293T-S-ACE2 cells were produced by transduction of the 293T-S cells with the K5659 recombinant lentivirus vector, which expresses human ACE2 (see below). The packaged K5659 lentivirus vector (60 µl) was incubated with 2 × 105 293T-S cells in DMEM, tumbling at 37°C overnight. The cells were then transferred to a 6-well plate in 3 ml of DMEM/10% FBS/Pen-Strep and subsequently selected with 10 µg/ml puromycin for 4 days.
Plasmids.
The wild-type and mutant SARS-CoV-2 S glycoproteins were expressed transiently by a pcDNA3.1(–) vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) gene sequence, which encodes an aspartic acid residue at position 614, was obtained from the National Center for Biological Information (NC_045512.20). The gene was modified to encode a Gly3 linker and His6 tag at the carboxyl terminus. The modified S gene was codon optimized, synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies, and cloned into the pcDNA3.1(–) vector. S mutants were made using Q5 High-Fidelity 2× Master Mix and KLD Enzyme Mix for site-directed mutagenesis, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (New England Biolabs), and One-Shot TOP10 competent cells.
Inducible expression of the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S gp was obtained using a self-inactivating lentivirus vector comprising TRE3g-SARS-CoV-2-Spike-6×His.IRS6A.Puro-T2A-GFP (K5648) (90). Here, the expression of the codon-optimized, wild-type S gene is under the control of a tetracycline response element (TRE) promoter. The internal ribosome entry site (IRES) allows expression of puro.T2A.EGFP, in which puromycin N-acetyltransferase and enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) are produced by self-cleavage at the Thosea asigna 2A (T2A) sequence.
Constitutive expression of human ACE2 in the 293T-S-ACE2 (D1496) cells was achieved using lentivirus vector (K5659) comprising hCMV-ACE2.IRES.puro. The ACE2 gene (obtained from Addgene [catalog no. 1786]) was placed under the control of the human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) immediate early promoter. The vector also expresses puromycin N-acetyltransferase downstream of an IRES.
To package the recombinant K5648 and K5659 lentiviral vectors, 5 × 105 Lenti-x-293T cells were transfected with 1.5 µg of K5648 or K5659 vector/plasmid, 1.5 µg of lentivirus packaging plasmid (expressing HIV-1 Gag, Pro, Pol, Tat, and Rev), and 1 µg of a plasmid expressing the VSV-G glycoprotein using the FuGene HD reagent (Promega). After 48 h, the cell supernatants were clarified by centrifugation at 3000 rpm and filtered (0.45-µm). Lentiviral vector particles were concentrated 25-fold by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 2 h. Packaged vector preparations were aliquoted in 60-µl volumes and stored at –80°C.
The pLenti-III-hACE2 plasmid was used to establish 293T-ACE2 cells constitutively expressing full-length human ACE2. A plasmid containing the ACE2 gene (Addgene) was digested with NheI and KpnI, and the fragment was ligated into the similarly digested pLenti-III-HA vector plasmid, producing pLenti-III-hACE2.
The pcDNA3.1(–)-sACE2 plasmid expressing soluble ACE2 was made by Q5 site-directed mutagenesis (New England Biolabs) from the pcDNA3.1(–)-ACE2-Strep plasmid (Addgene, catalog no. 1786), using the primers hACE2-strep-for (ccgcagtttgaaaaatagATATGGCTGATTGTTTTTGGAGTTG) and hACE2-strep-rev (atggctccatcctcctccGGAAACAGGGGGCTGGTTAGGA). (Uppercase letters indicate the sequences in the original expressor plasmid.)
Preparation of soluble ACE2.
Expi293F cells, at a density of 3 × 106 cells/ml, were transfected with 100 µg of pcDNA3.1(–)-sACE2 using FectPRO DNA transfection reagent (PolyPlus-transfection). Three days later, cell supernatants were clarified by low-speed centrifugation (1,500 × g for 15 min), filtered (0.45-µm), and incubated with 1 ml of Strep-Tactin resin (IBA Lifesciences) for 2 h at 4°C with rotation. The mixture was applied to a Bio-Rad column, washed with 30 bed volumes of 1× Strep-Tactin washing buffer, and eluted with 10 bed volumes of 1× Strep-Tactin elution buffer. The eluate was concentrated using a 30-kDa MWCO ultrafilter and then dialyzed twice against 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The protein concentration was measured by the Bradford method (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Lentiviruses pseudotyped by S glycoproteins.
Subconfluent 293T cells in a T75 flask were cotransfected with 1 µg of the S plasmid, 1 µg of the psPAX2 HIV-1 Gag-Pol packaging plasmid, and 3 µg of the luciferase-expressing pLucX plasmid, using Effectene (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Three to five days after transfection, the cells and particles were processed.
VSV pseudotyped by S glycoproteins.
Subconfluent 293T cells in a T75 flask were transfected with 15 µg of the SARS-CoV-2 S plasmid using polyethylenimine (Polysciences) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After 24 h, the cells were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 3 to 5 with rVSV-ΔG pseudovirus bearing a luciferase gene (Kerafast) for 2 h at 37°C and then washed six times with 1× PBS. Cell supernatants containing S-pseudotyped VSV were harvested 24 h later, clarified by low-speed centrifugation (2,000 rpm for 10 min), and either characterized immediately or stored at –80°C for later analysis. An additional 0.45-µm filtration step was included in some experiments to further purify the virus, but this step did not affect virus infectivity or neutralization patterns.
S expression, processing, and incorporation into lentivirus particles.
293T cells were transfected to produce lentivirus particles pseudotyped with S gp variants, as described above. At 3 to 5 days after transfection, a fraction of the cells was lysed, and the cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting, as described below. To evaluate the expression of S glycoproteins on the cell surface, the cells were incubated with a 1:100 dilution of NYP01 convalescent-phase serum for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were briefly spun to remove unbound antibody and lysed. Clarified lysates were incubated with protein A-agarose beads for 1 h at room temperature. The beads were washed three times and boiled; the captured proteins were then analyzed by Western blotting. To prepare lentivirus (HIV-1) particles, cell supernatants were collected, filtered (0.45 μm), and pelleted at 100,000 × g for 1 h at 4°C. Samples were Western blotted with 1:2,000 dilutions of rabbit anti-SARS-Spike S1, mouse anti-SARS-Spike S1, rabbit anti-SARS-Spike S2, or rabbit anti-p55/p24/p17 or a 1:10,000 dilution of mouse anti-β-actin as the primary antibodies. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies at a slightly lower dilution were used as secondary antibodies in the Western blots. The adjusted integrated volumes of S, S1, and S2 bands from unsaturated Western blots were calculated using Bio-Rad Image Lab Software. The values for the expression of mutant S glycoproteins were calculated and normalized to the values for the wild-type S gp (WT) as follows:
Deglycosylation of S glycoproteins.
S glycoproteins in cell lysates or on cell surfaces or lentivirus particles were prepared as described above. Protein samples were boiled in 1× denaturing buffer and incubated with PNGase F or Endo Hf (New England Biolabs) for 1 to 1.5 h at 37°C according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The samples were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.
S1 shedding from S gp-expressing cells.
293T cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1(–) plasmids expressing the wild-type and mutant SARS-CoV-2 S glycoproteins, using Effectene according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cell supernatants were collected, filtered (0.45 μm), and incubated with a 1:100 dilution of NYP01 convalescent-phase serum and protein A-agarose beads for 1 to 2 h at room temperature. The beads were washed three times, and the samples were Western blotted with mouse anti-S1 antibody. The band intensity was determined as described above. The subunit association index of each mutant was calculated as follows:
Cell cytotoxicity/MTT assay.
293T-S cells and 293T-S-ACE2 cells seeded in clear 96-well plates at different densities were induced with 1 μg/ml doxycycline. Cell viability was measured using an MTT assay (Abcam) at different times after induction, according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Syncytium formation and inhibition.
293T-ACE2 cells were cotransfected with an eGFP-expressing plasmid and either pcDNA3.1(–) or a pcDNA3.1 plasmid expressing the wild-type or mutant SARS-CoV-2 S gp. For the HIV-1 control, 293T cells were transfected with plasmids expressing eGFP, the HIV-1JR-FL envelope glycoproteins, CD4 and CCR5. At 24 h after transfection, the cells were imaged using a fluorescence microscope with a green light filter. In the syncytium inhibition assay, 10 μM ilomastat, 10 µM marimastat, or 100 µM camostat mesylate was added during transfection, and the cells were imaged at different time points after transfection.
Cell-cell fusion (alpha-complementation) assay.
COS-1 effector cells plated in black-and-white 96-well plates were cotransfected with a plasmid expressing alpha-gal and either pcDNA3.1 or plasmids expressing the SARS-CoV-1 S gp or wild-type or mutant SARS-CoV-2 S glycoproteins at a 1:1 ratio, using Effectene according to the manufacturer’s protocol. At the same time, 293T target cells plated in 6-well plates were cotransfected with plasmids expressing omega-gal and ACE2 at a 1:1 ratio, using Effectene. For the experimental results shown in Fig. 10A and B, 293T target cells were cotransfected with equimolar concentrations of plasmids expressing omega-gal, ACE2, and TMPRSS2. At 48 h after transfection, the target cells were scraped and resuspended in medium. The medium was removed from the effector cells, and the target cells were then added to the effector cells (one target cell well provides sufficient cells for 50 effector cell wells). Plates were spun at 500 × g for 3 min and then incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 3 to 4 h. Medium was aspirated and cells were lysed in Tropix lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The β-galactosidase activity in the cell lysates was measured using Galacto-Star reaction buffer diluent with Galacto-Star substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
In the inhibition assay, to allow for optimal contact, the target cells were scraped and resuspended in medium, and inhibitors were added at the indicated concentrations. The cells were then incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 2 h before they were added to effector cells, as described above.
For the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein control, effector cells were cotransfected with plasmids expressing alpha-gal and HIV-1AD8 Env and Tat at a 1:1:0.125 ratio. 293T target cells were cotransfected with plasmids expressing omega-gal, CD4, and CCR5 at a 1:1:1 ratio.
A variation of the above protocol was used for the cell-cell fusion assays shown in Fig. 8B and 10B. For the experiment shown in Fig. 10B, 293T-S effector cells in black-and-white 96-well plates were transfected with a plasmid expressing alpha-gal using Lipofectamine 3000 and either induced with 1 µg/ml doxycycline or mock treated. In parallel, 293T-ACE2 target cells in 6-well plates were cotransfected with a plasmid expressing omega-gal and a plasmid expressing either TMPRSS2 or, as a control, pcDNA3.1(–). At 1 day after transfection, the target cells were treated with 5 mM EDTA in 1× PBS, resuspended in fresh medium, and aliquoted. The target cells were either untreated as a control or incubated with camostat mesylate, marimastat, or a combination of camostat and marimastat and then added to effector cells. For the experiment shown in Fig. 8B, COS-1 cells were used as effector cells. The effector cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing alpha-gal and a plasmid expressing the HIV-1JR-FL envelope glycoprotein or the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S gp or pcDNA3.1 as a control. For the SARS-CoV-2 S gp-expressing effector cells, 293T-ACE2 cells were used as target cells; for effector cells expressing the HIV-1JR-FL envelope glycoprotein, Cf2Th-CD4/CCR5 cells were used as target cells. The target cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing omega-gal. Alpha-complementation assays were performed 1 day after transfection, as described above.
Virus infectivity and cold sensitivity.
Luciferase-containing recombinant lentivirus and VSV-ΔG vectors pseudotyped with SARS-CoV-2 S gp variants were produced as described above. The recombinant viruses were incubated with 293T-ACE2 cells and, 24 to 48 h later, the luciferase activity in the cells was measured. To measure cold sensitivity, the viruses were incubated on ice for various lengths of time prior to measuring their infectivity, as described above.
Virus neutralization by sACE2 and sera.
Neutralization assays were performed by adding 200 to 300 TCID50 of rVSV-ΔG pseudotyped with SARS-CoV-2 S gp variants into serial dilutions of sACE2 and sera. The mixture was dispensed onto a 96-well plate in triplicate and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Approximately 7 × 104 293T-ACE2 cells were then added to each well, and the cultures were maintained for an additional 24 h at 37°C before the luciferase activity was measured. Neutralization activity was calculated from the reduction in luciferase activity compared to controls. The concentrations of sACE2 and dilutions of sera that inhibited 50% of infection (the IC50 and ID50 values, respectively) were determined by fitting the data in five-parameter dose-response curves using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, Inc.).
Stability of spike glycoprotein on lentivirus particles.
To prepare lentivirus (HIV-1) particles containing wild-type or D614G S gp, ∼7 × 106 293T cells in T75 flasks were transfected with 7.5 µg of psPAX2 and 7.5 µg of the S-expressing pcDNA3.1 plasmid using Lipofectamine 3000. Mock controls did not include the psPAX2 plasmid. Two days later, cell supernatants were collected, clarified by centrifugation at 1,500 × g for 15 min, and filtered (0.45 µm). Supernatants containing lentivirus particles were incubated at 37°C for various lengths of time. The lentivirus particles were then pelleted at 14,000 × g for 1 h at 4°C. The pellets were suspended in 50 µl of 1× LDS buffer containing 100 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and Western blotted using rabbit anti-S1, rabbit anti-S2, and anti-p55/p24/p17 antibodies.
Interaction of soluble ACE2 with S on lentivirus particles.
Lentivirus particles containing the wild-type or D614G S gp prepared as described above were used to measure the binding of soluble ACE2 (sACE2) to the viral spike and to study the effect of sACE2 binding on the shedding of the S1 gp from the spike. After clarification and filtration, the cell supernatants containing the lentivirus particles were incubated with different concentrations of sACE2 at either 0 or 37°C for 1 h. Afterward, the lentivirus particles were pelleted at 14,000 × g for 1 h at 4°C and analyzed by Western blotting as described above.
S1 association with solubilized S gp trimers.
293T cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1 plasmids expressing the wild-type or D614G SARS-CoV-2 S glycoproteins, which contain carboxy-terminal His6 tags, using Lipofectamine 3000. Two days after transfection, the cells were washed and lysed in lysis buffer containing 1% Cymal-5 on ice for 5 min. Clarified cell lysates were aliquoted and incubated at different temperatures for 1 h, cooled on ice, and then incubated with Ni-NTA Superflow beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at 4°C. Beads were washed three times with lysis buffer at 4°C. After washing, the beads were resuspended in 1× LDS and 100 mM DTT, boiled for 5 min, and Western blotted with anti-S1 and anti-S2 antibodies.
Palmitoylation assay.
Potential palmitoylation sites on the SARS-CoV-2 S2 glycoprotein were studied using acyl-PEG exchange (61). Briefly, 293T cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1 plasmids expressing the SARS-CoV-2 S gp variants. Cell lysates in 4% SDS (∼100 µg of total protein) were treated with 10 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine hydrochloride and rotated at 350 rpm for 30 min at room temperature. Then, 25 mM NEM was added, and the sample was incubated at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction was terminated and washed with prechilled methanol-chloroform-H2O (4:1.5:3) sequentially three times. The protein precipitates were dissolved in 60 µl of triethanolamine (TEA) buffer with 4 mM EDTA and 4% SDS. Half of the dissolved protein solution was mixed with 1 M hydroxylamine in TEA buffer (pH 7.3) plus 0.2% Triton X-100, while the remaining half was mixed with TEA buffer plus 0.2% Triton X-100 followed by a 350-rpm rotation for 1 h at room temperature. Reactions were stopped by adding prechilled methanol-chloroform-H2O as mentioned above, and the precipitated pellets were dissolved in TEA buffer plus 4 mM EDTA plus 4% SDS by incubation at 50°C for 10 min. The protein solutions were mixed with 1.33 mM mPEG-mal in TEA plus 0.2% Triton X-100 and incubated at 25°C for 2 h by nutation at 350 rpm. Reactions were stopped by adding prechilled methanol-chloroform-H2O as mentioned above. The protein pellets were dissolved with 1× LDS buffer plus 100 mM DTT and subjected to Western blot analysis with rabbit anti-S2 antibody.
Statistical analysis.
Two-tailed Student t tests were used to determine statistical significance. Significant differences are indicated in the figures by asterisks (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Elizabeth Carpelan for manuscript preparation. We thank Lihong Liu and David Ho (Columbia University) and Peihui Wang (Shandong University) for reagents.
This study was supported by the Genetic Sequencing Core of the University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for AIDS Research (NIH P30 AI27767), by grants from the National Institutes of Health (AI145547 and AI124982), and by a gift from the late William F. McCarty-Cooper.
REFERENCES
- 1.Cui J, Li F, Shi ZL. 2019. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:181–192. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0118-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.de Wit E, van Doremalen N, Falzarano D, Munster VJ. 2016. SARS and MERS: recent insights into emerging coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:523–534. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Graham RL, Baric RS. 2010. Recombination, reservoirs, and the modular spike: mechanisms of coronavirus cross-species transmission. J Virol 84:3134–3146. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01394-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Perlman S, Netland J. 2009. Coronaviruses post-SARS: update on replication and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:439–450. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Song Z, Xu Y, Bao L, Zhang L, Yu P, Qu Y, Zhu H, Zhao W, Han Y, Qin C. 2019. From SARS to MERS, thrusting coronaviruses into the spotlight. Viruses 11:59. doi: 10.3390/v11010059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y, Ren R, Leung KSM, Lau EHY, Wong JY, Xing X, Xiang N, Wu Y, Li C, Chen Q, Li D, Liu T, Zhao J, Liu M, Tu W, Chen C, Jin L, Yang R, Wang Q, Zhou S, Wang R, Liu H, Luo Y, Liu Y, Shao G, Li H, Tao Z, Yang Y, Deng Z, Liu B, Ma Z, Zhang Y, Shi G, Lam TTY, Wu JT, Gao GF, Cowling BJ, Yang B, Leung GM, Feng Z. 2020. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med 382:1199–1207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J, Cao B. 2020. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan. Lancet 395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, Song ZG, Hu Y, Tao ZW, Tian JH, Pei YY, Yuan ML, Zhang YL, Dai FH, Liu Y, Wang QM, Zheng JJ, Xu L, Holmes EC, Zhang YZ. 2020. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 579:265–269. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, Si HR, Zhu Y, Li B, Huang CL, Chen HD, Chen J, Luo Y, Guo H, Jiang RD, Liu MQ, Chen Y, Shen XR, Wang X, Zheng XS, Zhao K, Chen QJ, Deng F, Liu LL, Yan B, Zhan FX, Wang YY, Xiao GF, Shi ZL. 2020. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579:270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. 2020. The species severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol 5:536–544. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lv M, Luo X, Estill J, Liu Y, Ren M, Wang J, Wang Q, Zhao S, Wang X, Yang S, Feng X, Li W, Liu E, Zhang X, Wang L, Zhou Q, Meng W, Qi X, Xun Y, Yu X, Chen Y. 2020. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a scoping review. Euro Surveill 25:2000125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dowd JB, Andriano L, Brazel DM, Rotondi V, Block P, Ding X, Liu Y, Mills MC. 2020. Demographic science aids in understanding the spread and fatality rates of COVID-19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:9696–9698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004911117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Woo PC, Lau SK, Lam CS, Lau CC, Tsang AK, Lau JH, Bai R, Teng JL, Tsang CC, Wang M, Zheng BJ, Chan KH, Yuen KY. 2012. Discovery of seven novel mammalian and avian coronaviruses in the genus deltacoronavirus supports bat coronaviruses as the gene source of alphacoronavirus and betacoronavirus and avian coronaviruses as the gene source of gammacoronavirus and deltacoronavirus. J Virol 86:3995–4008. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06540-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Huynh J, Li S, Yount B, Smith A, Sturges L, Olsen JC, Nagel J, Johnson JB, Agnihothram S, Gates JE, Frieman MB, Baric RS, Donaldson EF. 2012. Evidence supporting a zoonotic origin of human coronavirus strain NL63. J Virol 86:12816–12825. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00906-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jaimes JA, Andre NM, Chappie JS, Millet JK, Whittaker GR. 2020. Phylogenetic analysis and structural modeling of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein reveals an evolutionary distinct and proteolytically sensitive activation loop. J Mol Biol 432:3309–3325. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kissler SM, Tedijanto C, Goldstein E, Grad YH, Lipsitch M. 2020. Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period. Science 368:860–868. doi: 10.1126/science.abb5793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Venkat Kumar G, Jeyanthi V, Ramakrishnan S. 2020. A short review on antibody therapy for COVID-19. New Microbes New Infect 35:100682. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang C, Li W, Drabek D, Okba NMA, van Haperen R, Osterhaus A, van Kuppeveld FJM, Haagmans BL, Grosveld F, Bosch BJ. 2020. A human monoclonal antibody blocking SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Commun 11:2251. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16256-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Callaway E. 2020. The race for coronavirus vaccines: a graphical guide. Nature 580:576–577. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01221-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Billington J, Deschamps I, Erck SC, Gerberding JL, Hanon E, Ivol S, Shiver JW, Spencer JA, Van Hoof J. 2020. Developing vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 and future epidemics and pandemics: applying lessons from past outbreaks. Health Secur 18:241–249. doi: 10.1089/hs.2020.0043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Padron-Regalado E. 2020. Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2: lessons from other coronavirus strains. Infect Dis Ther 9:255–220. doi: 10.1007/s40121-020-00300-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Walls AC, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D. 2020. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 181:281–292 e286. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yuan M, Wu NC, Zhu X, Lee CD, So RTY, Lv H, Mok CKP, Wilson IA. 2020. A highly conserved cryptic epitope in the receptor binding domains of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Science 368:630–633. doi: 10.1126/science.abb7269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Quinlan BD, Mou H, Zhang L, Guo Y, He W, Ojha A, Parcells MS, Luo G, Li W, Zhong G, Choe H, Farzan M. 2020. The SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain elicits a potent neutralizing response without antibody-dependent enhancement. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/2020.04.10.036418. [DOI]
- 25.Robbiani DF, Gaebler C, Muecksch F, Lorenzi JCC, Wang Z, Cho A, Agudelo M, Barnes CO, Gazumyan A, Finkin S, Hägglöf T, Oliveira TY, Viant C, Hurley A, Hoffmann HH, Millard KG, Kost RG, Cipolla M, Gordon K, Bianchini F, Chen ST, Ramos V, Patel R, Dizon J, Shimeliovich I, Mendoza P, Hartweger H, Nogueira L, Pack M, Horowitz J, Schmidt F, Weisblum Y, Michailidis E, Ashbrook AW, Waltari E, Pak JE, Huey-Tubman KE, Koranda N, Hoffman PR, West AP, Jr, Rice CM, Hatziioannou T, Bjorkman PJ, Bieniasz PD, Caskey M, Nussenzweig MC. 2020. Convergent antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent individuals. Nature 584:437–442. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2456-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rogers TF, Zhao F, Huang D, Beutler N, Burns A, He WT, Limbo O, Smith C, Song G, Woehl J, Yang L, Abbott RK, Callaghan S, Garcia E, Hurtado J, Parren M, Peng L, Ramirez S, Ricketts J, Ricciardi MJ, Rawlings SA, Wu NC, Yuan M, Smith DM, Nemazee D, Teijaro JR, Voss JE, Wilson IA, Andrabi R, Briney B, Landais E, Sok D, Jardine JG, Burton DR. 2020. Isolation of potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies and protection from disease in a small animal model. Science 369:956–963. doi: 10.1126/science.abc7520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wec AZ, Wrapp D, Herbert AS, Maurer DP, Haslwanter D, Sakharkar M, Jangra RK, Dieterle ME, Lilov A, Huang D, Tse LV, Johnson NV, Hsieh C-L, Wang N, Nett JH, Champney E, Burnina I, Brown M, Lin S, Sinclair M, Johnson C, Pudi S, Bortz R, Wirchnianski AS, Laudermilch E, Florez C, Fels JM, O’Brien CM, Graham BS, Nemazee D, Burton DR, Baric RS, Voss JE, Chandran K, Dye JM, McLellan JS, Walker LM. 2020. Broad neutralization of SARS-related viruses by human monoclonal antibodies. Science 369:731–736. doi: 10.1126/science.abc7424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zost SJ, Gilchuk P, Case JB, Binshtein E, Chen RE, Nkolola JP, Schafer A, Reidy JX, Trivette A, Nargi RS, Sutton RE, Suryadevara N, Martinez DR, Williamson LE, Chen EC, Jones T, Day S, Myers L, Hassan AO, Kafai NM, Winkler ES, Fox JM, Shrihari S, Mueller BK, Meiler J, Chandrashekar A, Mercado NB, Steinhardt JJ, Ren K, Loo YM, Kallewaard NL, McCune BT, Keeler SP, Holtzman MJ, Barouch DH, Gralinski LE, Baric RS, Thackray LB, Diamond MS, Carnahan RH, Crowe JE, Jr.. 2020. Potently neutralizing and protective human antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Nature 584:443–449. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2548-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu L, Wang P, Nair MS, Yu J, Rapp M, Wang Q, Luo Y, Chan JF, Sahi V, Figueroa A, Guo XV, Cerutti G, Bimela J, Gorman J, Zhou T, Chen Z, Yuen KY, Kwong PD, Sodroski JG, Yin MT, Sheng Z, Huang Y, Shapiro L, Ho DD. 2020. Potent neutralizing antibodies against multiple epitopes on SARS-CoV-2 spike. Nature 584:450–456. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2571-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yu J, Tostanoski LH, Peter L, Mercado NB, McMahan K, Mahrokhian SH, Nkolola JP, Liu J, Li Z, Chandrashekar A, Martinez DR, Loos C, Atyeo C, Fischinger S, Burke JS, Slein MD, Chen Y, Zuiani A, Lelis FJN, Travers M, Habibi S, Pessaint L, Van Ry A, Blade K, Brown R, Cook A, Finneyfrock B, Dodson A, Teow E, Velasco J, Zahn R, Wegmann F, Bondzie EA, Dagotto G, Gebre MS, He X, Jacob-Dolan C, Kirilova M, Kordana N, Lin Z, Maxfield LF, Nampanya F, Nityanandam R, Ventura JD, Wan H, Cai Y, Chen B, Schmidt AG, Wesemann DR, Baric RS, et al. 2020. DNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques. Science 369:806–811. doi: 10.1126/science.abc6284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mercado NB, Zahn R, Wegmann F, Loos C, Chandrashekar A, Yu J, Liu J, Peter L, McMahan K, Tostanoski LH, He X, Martinez DR, Rutten L, Bos R, van Manen D, Vellinga J, Custers J, Langedijk JP, Kwaks T, Bakkers MJG, Zuijdgeest D, Rosendahl Huber SK, Atyeo C, Fischinger S, Burke JS, Feldman J, Hauser BM, Caradonna TM, Bondzie EA, Dagotto G, Gebre MS, Hoffman E, Jacob-Dolan C, Kirilova M, Li Z, Lin Z, Mahrokhian SH, Maxfield LF, Nampanya F, Nityanandam R, Nkolola JP, Patel S, Ventura JD, Verrington K, Wan H, Pessaint L, Van Ry A, Blade K, Strasbaugh A, Cabus M, et al. 2020. Single-shot Ad26 vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques. Nature 586:583–588. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2607-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ou X, Liu Y, Lei X, Li P, Mi D, Ren L, Guo L, Guo R, Chen T, Hu J, Xiang Z, Mu Z, Chen X, Chen J, Hu K, Jin Q, Wang J, Qian Z. 2020. Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat Commun 11:1620. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15562-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tortorici MA, Veesler D. 2019. Structural insights into coronavirus entry. Adv Virus Res 105:93–116. doi: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2019.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li F. 2016. Structure, function, and evolution of coronavirus spike proteins. Annu Rev Virol 3:237–261. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-110615-042301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett KS, Goldsmith JA, Hsieh CL, Abiona O, Graham BS, McLellan JS. 2020. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 367:1260–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shang J, Ye G, Shi K, Wan Y, Luo C, Aihara H, Geng Q, Auerbach A, Li F. 2020. Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2. Nature 581:221–224. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2179-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yan R, Zhang Y, Li Y, Xia L, Guo Y, Zhou Q. 2020. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science 367:1444–1448. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Kruger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, Schiergens TS, Herrler G, Wu NH, Nitsche A, Müller MA, Drosten C, Pöhlmann S. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181:271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Xia S, Liu M, Wang C, Xu W, Lan Q, Feng S, Qi F, Bao L, Du L, Liu S, Qin C, Sun F, Shi Z, Zhu Y, Jiang S, Lu L. 2020. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion. Cell Res 30:343–355. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0305-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cai Y, Zhang J, Xiao T, Peng H, Sterling SM, Walsh RM, Rawson S, Rits-Volloch S, Chen B. 2020. Distinct conformational states of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Science 369:1586–1592. doi: 10.1126/science.abd4251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Coutard B, Valle C, de Lamballerie X, Canard B, Seidah NG, Decroly E. 2020. The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antiviral Res 176:104742. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Pohlmann S. 2020. A multibasic cleavage site in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 is essential for infection of human lung cells. Mol Cell 78:779–784 e775. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Korber B, Fischer WM, Gnanakaran S, Yoon H, Theiler J, Abfalterer W, Hengartner N, Giorgi EE, Bhattacharya T, Foley B, Hastie KM, Parker MD, Partridge DG, Evans CM, Freeman TM, de Silva TI, Sheffield Covid, Genomics Group McDanal C, Perez LG, Tang H, Moon-Walker A, Whelan SP, LaBranche CC, Saphire EO, Montefiori DC, Sheffield COVID-19 Genomics Group. 2020. Tracking changes in SARS-CoV-2 spike: evidence that D614G increases infectivity of the COVID-19 virus. Cell 182:812–827 e819. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhang L, Jackson CB, Mou H, Ojha A, Rangarajan ES, Izard T, Farzan M, Choe H. 2020. The D614G mutation in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein reduces S1 shedding and increases infectivity. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/2020.06.12.148726. [DOI]
- 45.Yurkovetskiy L, Wang X, Pascal KE, Tomkins-Tinch C, Nyalile TP, Wang Y, Baum A, Diehl WE, Dauphin A, Carbone C, Veinotte K, Egri SB, Schaffner SF, Lemieux JE, Munro JB, Rafique A, Barve A, Sabeti PC, Kyratsous CA, Dudkina NV, Shen K, Luban J. 2020. Structural and functional analysis of the D614G SARS-CoV-2 spike protein variant. Cell 183:739–751. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lontok E, Corse E, Machamer CE. 2004. Intracellular targeting signals contribute to localization of coronavirus spike proteins near the virus assembly site. J Virol 78:5913–5922. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.11.5913-5922.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.McBride CE, Li J, Machamer CE. 2007. The cytoplasmic tail of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein contains a novel endoplasmic reticulum retrieval signal that binds COPI and promotes interaction with membrane protein. J Virol 81:2418–2428. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02146-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Stertz S, Reichelt M, Spiegel M, Kuri T, Martinez-Sobrido L, Garcia-Sastre A, Weber F, Kochs G. 2007. The intracellular sites of early replication and budding of SARS-coronavirus. Virology 361:304–315. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.11.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ujike M, Huang C, Shirato K, Makino S, Taguchi F. 2016. The contribution of the cytoplasmic retrieval signal of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus to intracellular accumulation of S proteins and incorporation of S protein into virus-like particles. J Gen Virol 97:1853–1864. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Petit CM, Chouljenko VN, Iyer A, Colgrove R, Farzan M, Knipe DM, Kousoulas KG. 2007. Palmitoylation of the cysteine-rich endodomain of the SARS-coronavirus spike glycoprotein is important for spike-mediated cell fusion. Virology 360:264–274. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.10.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.McBride CE, Machamer CE. 2010. Palmitoylation of SARS-CoV S protein is necessary for partitioning into detergent-resistant membranes and cell-cell fusion but not interaction with M protein. Virology 405:139–148. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Stanley P. 2011. Golgi glycosylation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3:a005199. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhang S, Nguyen HT, Ding H, Wang J, Zou S, Liu L, Guha D, Gabuzda D, Ho DD, Kappes JC, Sodroski J. 2020. Dual pathways of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) envelope glycoprotein trafficking modulate the selective exclusion of uncleaved oligomers from virions. J Virol doi: 10.1128/JVI.01369-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Holland AU, Munk C, Lucero GR, Nguyen LD, Landau NR. 2004. Alpha-complementation assay for HIV envelope glycoprotein-mediated fusion. Virology 319:343–352. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2003.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bosch BJ, Bartelink W, Rottier PJ. 2008. Cathepsin L functionally cleaves the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus class I fusion protein upstream of rather than adjacent to the fusion peptide. J Virol 82:8887–8890. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00415-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Matsuyama S, Ujike M, Morikawa S, Tashiro M, Taguchi F. 2005. Protease-mediated enhancement of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:12543–12547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503203102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Millet JK, Whittaker GR. 2015. Host cell proteases: critical determinants of coronavirus tropism and pathogenesis. Virus Res 202:120–134. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.11.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sainz B, Jr, Rausch JM, Gallaher WR, Garry RF, Wimley WC. 2005. Identification and characterization of the putative fusion peptide of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus spike protein. J Virol 79:7195–7206. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.11.7195-7206.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Madu IG, Roth SL, Belouzard S, Whittaker GR. 2009. Characterization of a highly conserved domain within the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein S2 domain with characteristics of a viral fusion peptide. J Virol 83:7411–7421. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00079-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ou X, Zheng W, Shan Y, Mu Z, Dominguez SR, Holmes KV, Qian Z. 2016. Identification of the fusion peptide-containing region in betacoronavirus spike glycoproteins. J Virol 90:5586–5600. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00015-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Percher A, Ramakrishnan S, Thinon E, Yuan X, Yount JS, Hang HC. 2016. Mass-tag labeling reveals site-specific and endogenous levels of protein S-fatty acylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:4302–4307. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602244113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sergeeva OA, van der Goot FG. 2019. Anthrax toxin requires ZDHHC5-mediated palmitoylation of its surface-processing host enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:1279–1288. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812588116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Harrison SC. 2008. Viral membrane fusion. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15:690–698. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wang Q, Finzi A, Sodroski J. 2020. The conformational states of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins. Trends Microbiol 28:655–667. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ke Z, Oton J, Qu K, Cortese M, Zila V, McKeane L, Nakane T, Zivanov J, Neufeldt CJ, Cerikan B, Lu JM, Peukes J, Xiong X, Kräusslich HG, Scheres SHW, Bartenschlager R, Briggs JAG. 2020. Structures and distributions of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins on intact virions. Nature doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2665-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Haim H, Strack B, Kassa A, Madani N, Wang L, Courter JR, Princiotto A, McGee K, Pacheco B, Seaman MS, Smith ABII, Sodroski J. 2011. Contribution of intrinsic reactivity of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins to CD4-independent infection and global inhibitor sensitivity. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002101. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Herschhorn A, Ma X, Gu C, Ventura JD, Castillo-Menendez L, Melillo B, Terry DS, Smith ABII, Blanchard SC, Munro JB, Mothes W, Finzi A, Sodroski J. 2016. Release of gp120 restraints leads to an entry-competent intermediate state of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins. mBio 7:e01598-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01598-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Herschhorn A, Gu C, Moraca F, Ma X, Farrell M, Smith AB, III, Pancera M, Kwong PD, Schon A, Freire E, Abrams C, Blanchard SC, Mothes W, Sodroski JG. 2017. The beta20-beta21 of gp120 is a regulatory switch for HIV-1 Env conformational transitions. Nat Commun 8:1049. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01119-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Castillo-Menendez LR, Witt K, Espy N, Princiotto A, Madani N, Pacheco B, Finzi A, Sodroski J. 2018. Comparison of uncleaved and mature human immunodeficiency virus membrane envelope glycoprotein trimers. J Virol 92:e00277-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00277-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Haim H, Salas I, Sodroski J. 2013. Proteolytic processing of the human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein precursor decreases conformational flexibility. J Virol 87:1884–1889. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02765-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lu M, Ma X, Reichard N, Terry DS, Arthos J, Smith ABII, Sodroski JG, Blanchard SC, Mothes W. 2020. Shedding-resistant HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins adopt downstream conformations that remain responsive to conformation-preferring ligands. J Virol 94:e00597-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00597-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Pancera M, Wyatt R. 2005. Selective recognition of oligomeric HIV-1 primary isolate envelope glycoproteins by potently neutralizing ligands requires efficient precursor cleavage. Virology 332:145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Andre NM, Cossic B, Davies E, Miller AD, Whittaker GR. 2019. Distinct mutation in the feline coronavirus spike protein cleavage activation site in a cat with feline infectious peritonitis-associated meningoencephalomyelitis. JFMS Open Rep 5:2055116919856103. doi: 10.1177/2055116919856103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Chen J, Lee KH, Steinhauer DA, Stevens DJ, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. 1998. Structure of the hemagglutinin precursor cleavage site, a determinant of influenza pathogenicity and the origin of the labile conformation. Cell 95:409–417. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81771-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Cheng J, Zhao Y, Xu G, Zhang K, Jia W, Sun Y, Zhao J, Xue J, Hu Y, Zhang G. 2019. The S2 subunit of QX-type infectious bronchitis coronavirus spike protein is an essential determinant of neurotropism. Viruses 11:972. doi: 10.3390/v11100972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Claas EC, Osterhaus AD, van Beek R, De Jong JC, Rimmelzwaan GF, Senne DA, Krauss S, Shortridge KF, Webster RG. 1998. Human influenza A H5N1 virus related to a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus. Lancet 351:472–477. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11212-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Frana MF, Behnke JN, Sturman LS, Holmes KV. 1985. Proteolytic cleavage of the E2 glycoprotein of murine coronavirus: host-dependent differences in proteolytic cleavage and cell fusion. J Virol 56:912–920. doi: 10.1128/JVI.56.3.912-920.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kido H, Okumura Y, Takahashi E, Pan HY, Wang S, Yao D, Yao M, Chida J, Yano M. 2012. Role of host cellular proteases in the pathogenesis of influenza and influenza-induced multiple organ failure. Biochim Biophys Acta 1824:186–194. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Le Coupanec A, Desforges M, Meessen-Pinard M, Dube M, Day R, Seidah NG, Talbot PJ. 2015. Cleavage of a neuroinvasive human respiratory virus spike glycoprotein by proprotein convertases modulates neurovirulence and virus spread within the central nervous system. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005261. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Licitra BN, Millet JK, Regan AD, Hamilton BS, Rinaldi VD, Duhamel GE, Whittaker GR. 2013. Mutation in spike protein cleavage site and pathogenesis of feline coronavirus. Emerg Infect Dis 19:1066–1073. doi: 10.3201/eid1907.121094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sun X, Tse LV, Ferguson AD, Whittaker GR. 2010. Modifications to the hemagglutinin cleavage site control the virulence of a neurotropic H1N1 influenza virus. J Virol 84:8683–8690. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00797-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Benton DJ, Wrobel AG, Xu P, Roustan C, Martin SR, Rosenthal PB, Skehel JJ, Gamblin SJ. 2020. Receptor binding and priming of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 for membrane fusion. Nature (2020) 588:327–330. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2772-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Li Q, Wu J, Nie J, Zhang L, Hao H, Liu S, Zhao C, Zhang Q, Liu H, Nie L, Qin H, Wang M, Lu Q, Li X, Sun Q, Liu J, Zhang L, Li X, Huang W, Wang Y. 2020. The impact of mutations in SARS-CoV-2 spike on viral Infectivity and antigenicity. Cell 182:1284–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Phillips JM, Gallagher T, Weiss SR. 2017. Neurovirulent murine coronavirus JHM.SD uses cellular zinc metalloproteases for virus entry and cell-cell fusion. J Virol 91:e01564-16. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01564-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Giacca M, Bussani R, Schneider E, Zentilin L, Collesi C, Ali H, Braga L, Secco I, Volpe MC, Colliva A, Zanconati F, Berlot G, Silvestri F, Zacchigna S. 2020. Persistence of viral RNA, widespread thrombosis and abnormal cellular syncytia are hallmarks of COVID-19 lung pathology. medRxiv doi: 10.1101/2020.06.22.20136358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Greenlee KJ, Werb Z, Kheradmand F. 2007. Matrix metalloproteinases in lung: multiple, multifarious, and multifaceted. Physiol Rev 87:69–98. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00022.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Grieve AG, Rabouille C. 2011. Golgi bypass: skirting around the heart of classical secretion. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3:a005298. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Ghosh S, Dellibovi-Ragheb TA, Kerviel A, Pak E, Qiu Q, Fisher M, Takvorian PM, Bleck C, Hsu VW, Fehr AR, Perlman S, Achar SR, Straus MR, Whittaker GR, de Haan CAM, Kehrl J, Altan-Bonnet G, Altan-Bonnet N. 2020. Beta-coronaviruses use lysosomes for egress instead of the biosynthetic secretory pathway. Cell 183:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Roney IJ, Rudner AD, Couture J-F, Kærn M. 2016. Improvement of the reverse tetracycline transactivator by single amino acid substitutions that reduce leaky target gene expression to undetectable levels. Sci Rep 6:27697. doi: 10.1038/srep27697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Cockrell AS, Kafri T. 2007. Gene delivery by lentivirus vectors. Mol Biotechnol 36:184–204. doi: 10.1007/s12033-007-0010-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]