Enterococcus faecium, a commensal of the human intestine, has emerged as a hospital-adapted, multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogen. Bacteriophages (phages), natural predators of bacteria, have regained attention as therapeutics to stem the rise of MDR bacteria.
KEYWORDS: bacteriophages, Enterococcus, antibiotic resistance, phage-bacterium interactions, phage resistance, cephalosporin, beta-lactams
ABSTRACT
Enterococcus faecium, a commensal of the human intestine, has emerged as a hospital-adapted, multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogen. Bacteriophages (phages), natural predators of bacteria, have regained attention as therapeutics to stem the rise of MDR bacteria. Despite their potential to curtail MDR E. faecium infections, the molecular events governing E. faecium-phage interactions remain largely unknown. Such interactions are important to delineate, because phage selective pressure imposed on E. faecium will undoubtedly result in phage resistance phenotypes that could threaten the efficacy of phage therapy. In an effort to understand the emergence of phage resistance in E. faecium, three newly isolated lytic phages were used to demonstrate that E. faecium phage resistance is conferred through an array of cell wall-associated molecules, including secreted antigen A (SagA), enterococcal polysaccharide antigen (Epa), wall teichoic acids, capsule, and an arginine-aspartate-aspartate (RDD) protein of unknown function. We find that capsule and Epa are important for robust phage adsorption and that phage resistance mutations in sagA, epaR, and epaX enhance E. faecium susceptibility to ceftriaxone, an antibiotic normally ineffective due to its low affinity for enterococcal penicillin binding proteins. Consistent with these findings, we provide evidence that phages potently synergize with cell wall-acting (ceftriaxone and ampicillin) and membrane-acting (daptomycin) antimicrobials to slow or completely inhibit the growth of E. faecium. Our work demonstrates that the evolution of phage resistance comes with fitness defects resulting in drug sensitization and that lytic phages could serve as effective antimicrobials for the treatment of E. faecium infections.
INTRODUCTION
Enterococci are intestinal commensal bacteria and important opportunistic human pathogens (1). Of the two most clinically relevant enterococcal species, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, the emergence of multidrug resistance is observed most commonly with E. faecium (2). Considering that effective antibiotics with activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) E. faecium are limited, clinicians are often forced to use antibiotic combination therapy to treat these infections (3). Although this approach can be life-saving, these regimens increase the risk of patient adverse drug events, drug-drug interactions, and dysbiosis and may fail to cure the infection (4). Arising from desperate treatment dilemmas like these are several examples of the successful use of phage therapy to treat MDR bacterial infections in humans (5–8). These success stories have motivated renewed interest in the use of phage therapy for treatment of bacterial infections. Despite this motivation, relatively little is understood about the bacterial receptors exploited by phages to infect their bacterial hosts and the countermeasures employed by bacteria to avoid phage infection. We believe that understanding the molecular events that lead to phage resistance in MDR bacteria may help mitigate the threat of phage therapy failure.
Recently, our group and others have begun to elucidate the molecular mechanisms that enable successful phage infection of enterococci, and the bulk of these studies were performed for E. faecalis and its interactions with tailed double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) phages (8–15). The molecular mechanisms enabling phage infection in E. faecium are poorly understood. Our knowledge of potential E. faecium phage receptors comes from an in vitro study where the coexistence of phages and E. faecium was studied through multiple passages in laboratory media (12). Whole-genome sequencing of phage-resistant survivors showed mutations in the capsule tyrosine kinase ywqD2 (equivalent to wze), RNA polymerase β-subunit (rpoC), several predicted hydrolases, and a cell wall precursor enzyme. It was proposed that these mutations conferred phage resistance, although direct genetic testing of this hypothesis was not performed. Tandem duplications in a putative phage tail fiber gene (EFV12PHI1_98) supported evolution of phages that overcame adaptive changes that resulted in phage resistance of E. faecium (12).
In this work, we expand on our understanding of phage-enterococcal interactions by identifying genes important for lytic phage infection of clade B strains of E. faecium. We have isolated three previously uncharacterized E. faecium-specific phages and show that each belong to the Siphoviridae morphotype of the Caudovirales and resemble previously described lytic enterococcal phages (9–11, 14). Protein-coding sequence comparison to other enterococcal phages reveals that one phage belongs to a novel enterococcal phage orthocluster, and the remaining two phages belong to previously described enterococcal phage orthoclusters (16). To identify the molecular determinants of E. faecium phage infection, we used these three phages to generate a collection of E. faecium phage-resistant mutants. Phage resistance mutations mapped to genes encoding the cell wall hydrolase-secreted antigen A (sagA), putative teichoic acid precursors of the enterococcal polysaccharide antigen (epa), capsule biosynthesis enzymes, and an arginine-aspartate-aspartate (RDD) protein of unknown function. Capsule and putative teichoic acid biosynthesis proteins were shown to influence phage adsorption. Considering that all of the genes identified are involved in cell wall biochemistry and/or architecture, we determined if these phage resistance mutations result in fitness tradeoffs that lead to altered antimicrobial susceptibility. Phage-resistant strains harboring mutations in sagA, epaX, and epaR showed enhanced susceptibility to cell wall and/or membrane-acting antibiotics, including ceftriaxone, ampicillin, and daptomycin. We discovered that combining phages with cell wall- or membrane-acting antimicrobials acts synergistically to inhibit the growth of E. faecium, suggesting lytic phages could be leveraged in addition to antibiotics to offset the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains of E. faecium in hospitalized patients.
RESULTS
Genome sequence analysis and morphology of novel lytic E. faecium bacteriophages.
E. faecium phages 9181, 9183, and 9184 were isolated from raw sewage by plaque assay using E. faecium clade B strains Com12 and 1,141,733 (17). We chose to focus on clade B strains (commensal associated) given reports that these strains can serve as a reservoir for transmission of multidrug resistance plasmids to clade A1 (hospital-associated) strains (18). Evaluation of phage morphology by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed that all three phages were noncontractile tailed phages characteristic of the Siphoviridae morphotype (Fig. 1) (19). DNA sequence analysis demonstrated that the phage 9181, 9183, and 9184 genomes are 71,854 bp, 86,301 bp, and 44,601 bp in length, respectively (Fig. 1). The genomes of phages 9181 and 9183 were assembled into single contigs. The phage 9184 genome was assembled into two contigs, with a 53-bp sequencing gap located near the 5′ end of a predicted BppU-family phage baseplate upper protein. In total, 123, 128, and 73 open reading frames (ORFs) were identified for phages 9181, 9183, and 9184, respectively (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Genome modularity based on predicted gene function was observed for each phage genome; however, for phage 9181 the lysin and holin genes are located at the 5′ and 3′ termini of the genome (Fig. 1). Functional classifications, consisting of replication or biosynthesis, DNA packaging, phage particle morphogenesis, nucleic acid restriction and modification, host cell lysis, sensory function, sugar transferase, and a potential β-lactamase, could be predicted for approximately 30%, 47%, and 48% of the phage 9181, 9183, and 9184 ORFs, respectively (Table S1). The remaining genes were predicted to be hypothetical genes or genes containing domains of unknown function. A PCR screen for phage lysogeny in phage-resistant E. faecium mutants failed to identify phage 9181, 9183, and 9184 DNA integration within their respective E. faecium host genomes (Table 1, Fig. S1). These data are consistent with a lack of phage DNA among genomic reads from phage 9181-, 9183-, and 9184-resistant E. faecium mutants and the absence of turbid plaques, a feature often attributed to lysogenic phages. Together, these data indicate that phages 9181, 9183, and 9184 are obligate lytic phages when preying on E. faecium Com12 or 1,141,733.
TABLE 1.
Phage | E. faecium host strain | Phage-resistant mutant(s) | No. of phage-resistant mutants |
---|---|---|---|
9181 | Com12 | 81R3-R8 | 6 |
9183 | 1,141,733 | 83R1-R8 | 8 |
9184 | 1,141,733 | 84R1-R6, 84R8 | 7 |
Comparative genome analysis places phages 9181, 9183, and 9184 in distinct orthoclusters.
Comparative genome analysis of phages 9181, 9183, and 9184 was performed with all publicly available enterococcal phage genomes using OrthoMCL, an algorithm that identifies clusters of orthologous proteins from at least two phages, enabling phylogenetic categorization of phage proteins into orthoclusters (16, 20). Of the 10 enterococcal phage orthoclusters originally identified by Bolocan et al. (16), OrthoMCL clustering places phage 9184 into orthocluster I and phage 9183 into orthocluster X (Fig. 2). Phage 9181 forms a new orthocluster that we have named orthocluster XI (Fig. 2). Whole-genome alignments of phages 9183 and 9184 to their nearest orthocluster neighbors, VPE25 and VFW for 9183 and vB_EfaS-DELF1 and IME-EFm5 for 9184, revealed conserved protein sequence identity and similar genome organization (Fig. S2A and B). Conversely, phage 9181 shared little protein sequence identity and genome organization with its nearest neighbors, phage EFC-1 and phage FL4A, supporting its placement as the sole member of a new orthocluster (Fig. S2C). Higher protein sequence identity and more similar genome organization were observed for phages belonging to the same orthocluster rather than phages belonging to different orthoclusters. Since the publication of Bolocan et al. (16), an additional 45 phage genomes have been made publicly available, resulting in the identification of a 12th orthocluster consisting of phages EFA-1 and EFA-2, two recently described phages of unknown morphology (Fig. 2). Consistent with prior observations of orthocluster I phages, a β-lactamase domain-containing protein (ORF35) was found in the genome of phage 9184 (Fig. 1 and Table S1C). Similar to phages in orthocluster X, an integrase family recombinase was found in the genome of phage 9183 (Table S1B). However, prior evidence demonstrates that other members of this orthocluster cannot lysogenize their E. faecalis host (11), which is consistent with the absence of lysogenized phage 9183 in phage 9183-resistant mutants, as mentioned above (Fig. S1B).
E. faecium phages have broad and narrow tropism for laboratory and clinical E. faecium isolates.
We next sought to determine the host range of each phage against strains of E. faecium and E. faecalis. To achieve this, a phage susceptibility assay was performed by spotting 10-fold serially diluted enterococcal cultures on Todd-Hewitt broth (THB) agar embedded with phage 9181, 9183, or 9184. A panel of 10 laboratory E. faecium isolates and 11 contemporary MDR clinical E. faecium isolates were selected for this analysis (Table S4) (17). An E. faecium strain was considered phage susceptible if less than 1 × 105 CFU/ml were recovered following phage exposure, representing greater than 4-log bacterial killing. Phages 9181 and 9183 demonstrated narrow host ranges against laboratory E. faecium strains (Fig. 3A). Besides the host strain on which the phage was isolated (Com12 for phage 9181 and 1,141,733 for phage 9183), only E. faecium Com15 was susceptible to phage 9181, while no other E. faecium laboratory strain tested was susceptible to phage 9183. On the contrary, 60% of the laboratory E. faecium strains were susceptible to phage 9184, including clade A and B strains (Fig. 3A). There was an absence of susceptibility to phage 9181 and 9183 and reduced susceptibility (∼36%) to phage 9184 for the contemporary MDR clinical E. faecium isolates (Fig. 3B). The efficiency of plating assay revealed that phages 9181 and 9184 most efficiently plaqued on their respective host strains (Fig. 3C and D). Together, these data show that phage 9184 has a broader host range than phages 9181 and 9183 and that these phages plaque most efficiently on their E. faecium host strains, a likely by-product of repeated phage propagation on the same strain (21). Interestingly, E. faecium 1,231,501 and 1,230,933, the latter of which is a multidrug-resistant clade A strain, lacked susceptibility to phages 9181, 9183, and 9184. None of the three phages was capable of infecting any of the 10 clinical E. faecalis strains tested (designated UCH12-20 in Table S4), suggesting that these phages are specific for E. faecium.
Phage predation elicits spontaneous and stable phage resistance in E. faecium.
To identify E. faecium genes that are involved in phage infection, we isolated spontaneous phage-resistant E. faecium strains following exposure to phages 9181, 9183, and 9184. Phage-resistant isolates were identified by plating stationary-phase cultures of E. faecium Com12 and 1,141,733 on THB agar embedded with phage 9181, 9183, or 9184. Colonies that arose on these plates represented potential phage-resistant colonies. To confirm the stability of the phage-resistant phenotype, a colony was serially passaged daily for 3 days on THB agar before restreaking again on phage-embedded THB agar. The growth of a strain in the presence of phages following serial passage suggested a stable phage-resistant phenotype (Fig. 4A to C). Six to eight independent phage-resistant strains were further characterized for phages 9181, 9183, and 9184 (Table 1 and Table S2). For phage 9181- and 9183-resistant E. faecium strains (denoted 81R3-8 and 83R1-8, respectively), we observed bacterial growth in the presence of phages to levels that were similar to bacterial growth in the absence of phages, indicating a strong resistance phenotype (Fig. 4A and B and Fig. S3A, B, D, and E). However, for phage 9184 we observed limited phage resistance in all but one presumed E. faecium phage-resistant isolate (Fig. 4C and Fig. S3C and F), suggesting that robust resistance to phage 9184 is multifactorial.
E. faecium phage resistance mutations occur in cell wall biosynthesis and architecture genes and a gene encoding a transmembrane protein.
To identify genetic changes conferring a phage resistance phenotype, we performed whole-genome DNA sequencing of phage-resistant and parental E. faecium strains. We observed unique and conserved genome mutations in strains that had developed phage resistance (Fig. 5A to D and Table S2A to C).
Five of six mutations identified in phage 9181-resistant strains were detected in efvg_rs16270, which in the E. faecium Com12 reference genome is annotated as a hypothetical protein and was flanked by a 5′ sequencing gap. Closure of this sequencing gap by PCR and amplicon sequencing revealed that efvg_rs16270 encodes the E. faecium secreted antigen A (SagA) protein. Whole-genome sequencing showed that all sagA mutations localized at or near the peptidoglycan clamp or active site residues of the NlpC_P60 hydrolase domain of SagA, which was recently shown to function as an endopeptidase that cleaves cross-linked Lys-type peptidoglycan fragments (Fig. 5A and Table S2A) (22). To determine the impact of sagA mutations on protein structure and function, each single-nucleotide polymorphism-associated sagA mutant was assessed by Missense 3D analysis (23). BLASTp alignment of SagA from E. faecium Com12 and Com15 showed 95% identity along the entire length of the protein, and E. faecium Com12 and Com15 exhibited identical protein homology in the NlpC_P60 hydrolase domain (Fig. S4A), suggesting that SagA should be functionally conserved between these two stains. Therefore, we used the E. faecium Com15 NlpC_P60 crystal structure (PDB entry 6B8C) in Missense 3D to assess the impact of residue changes on the structure and function of NlpC_P60 hydrolase in our sagA mutant strains (22). Except for one SagA mutant (81R8; G435V), no structural damaging mutations were found. Using the supernatants and cell pellets of exponentially growing (optical density at 600 nm [OD600], ∼0.8) wild type and sagA mutants, we performed Western blotting for SagA expression. All sagA mutants produced similar levels of both intracellular and secreted SagA, suggesting that these sagA mutants are catalytically inactive or dampened because of mutations in the NlpC_P60 hydrolase domain (Fig. S4B to D). We then complemented the sagA mutations in phage 9181-resistant strains using a construct previously generated, pAM401-sagA, which carries the sagA gene and its native promoter from E. faecium Com15 (24). For all sagA mutants, complementation with pAM401-sagA restored phage susceptibility (Fig. S5A). These results suggest that SagA hydrolase activity is dispensable for E. faecium viability and that non-cross-linked peptidoglycan in E. faecium Com12 is important for phage 9181 infection.
One phage 9181-resistant strain (81R7) harbored mutations in capsule tyrosine kinase (wze) and topoisomerase III (topB) genes and lacked a sagA mutation (Table S2A). Similarly, sequencing analysis of all 9184-resistant strains (84R1-6) revealed an assortment of mutations in the capsule biosynthesis locus. Nonsense, insertion, and deletion mutations were detected in wze, capsule aminotransferase (efsg_rs08090), capsule polymerase (wzy), and capsule nucleotide sugar dehydrogenase (efsg_rs08120) genes (Fig. 5B and Table S2C). Prior coevolution experiments between Myoviridae phage 1 and E. faecium TX1330 revealed a propensity for wze mutations within an evolved phage-resistant E. faecium population (12). Our data are consistent with this observation and suggest that E. faecium capsule serves as a receptor and/or adsorption factor for phage 9181 and 9184. We found that complementation of certain capsule mutants, using the constitutive expression vector pLZ12A (i.e., 84R2 with efsg_rs08120 and 84R5 with efsg_rs08090), partially restored phage 9184 susceptibility, while complementation of other capsule mutants (i.e., 84R6 and 81R7 each with wze) failed to restore phage susceptibility (Fig. S5B and C). This result suggests that capsule is not a major factor mediating phage resistance to phage 9181 (Fig. S5B) and only weakly promotes phage 9184 resistance when select capsule genes are mutated (Fig. S5C). These results emphasize the importance of other non-capsule-associated mutations in conferring phage resistance to phage 9181 (sagA) and phage 9184 (rdd). We attempted to address the non-capsule-associated mutation in strain 81R7 (topB) and its involvement in phage 9181 resistance; however, all attempts to clone topB into pLZ12A resulted in truncated topB inserts following transformation into Escherichia coli, suggesting that constitutive expression of E. faecium topB is toxic to E. coli. Similarly, to address the role of the non-capsule mutation detected in 84R6, which exhibited a robust phage 9184 resistance phenotype, a predicted arginine-aspartate-aspartate gene (rdd) was successfully cloned into pLZ12A, yet transformation of this construct into E. faecium 84R6 was unsuccessful despite repeated attempts. The ease with which pLZ12A-wze and empty pLZ12A vector were transformed into E. faecium 84R6 and our repeated failure to successfully recover transformants harboring pLZ12A-rdd suggest that overexpression of rdd in E. faecium 84R6 is lethal.
Analysis of E. faecium phage 9183-resistant strains (83R1-8) identified mutations in epa genes epaR and epaX (Fig. 5D and Table S2B). Mutation of epaR and epaX results in E. faecalis phage resistance (9, 10, 14), and recently it was determined that the epaR and epaX genes of E. faecalis V583 participate in wall teichoic acid biosynthesis (25). Considering that mutation of the epaX homologs epaOX and epaOX2 from E. faecalis OG1RF conferred phage VPE25 resistance by limiting phage adsorption (10, 11), we suspect that teichoic acids also mediate adsorption of phage 9183 to E. faecium 1,141,733. We were surprised that we did not find any phage 9183-resistant strains with mutations in PIPEF, given the high protein homology and similar genome organization observed between phages 9183, VPE25, and VFW, the latter two of which use PIPEF as a receptor (11) (Fig. 2 and Fig. S2A). To confirm that mutations in the epa locus confer phage resistance in E. faecium, we pursued a complementation strategy similar to that described above with the epaR and epaX mutants identified in the phage 9183-resistant mutants. All phage 9183-resistant mutants complemented with either epaR or epaX were restored for phage susceptibility (Fig. S5D). Given the importance of d-alanylation in teichoic acid biosynthesis, we performed complementation with pLZ12A-dltA in the epaX and dltA double mutant (83R7). We observed that only pLZ12A-epaX, not pLZ12A-dltA, was capable of restoring phage susceptibility in 83R7 (Fig. S5D). Considering that EpaX acts upstream of DltA in the biosynthesis of teichoic acids (25), these data suggest that dltA is dispensable during phage infection, lending further support to the notion that the epa variable locus involved in teichoic acid biosynthesis is a driver of E. faecium infection by phage 9183.
E. faecium phage-resistant mutants have phage adsorption defects.
To determine if phage adsorption defects occur due to phage resistance, we sought to quantify phage 9181, 9183, and 9184 adsorption to wild-type and phage-resistant E. faecium strains using a phage adsorption assay (9, 10, 14). For phage 9181-resistant strains, we observed no significant change in percent adsorption to sagA mutant strain 81R5 or phage-resistant strain 81R7 harboring a wze and topB mutations (Fig. 6A). These results are consistent with the inability of wze complementation to enhance phage 9181 adsorption in 81R7 (Fig. S6A). This result suggests that mutation of wze in E. faecium Com12 has little to no effect on phage 9181 adsorption. Given that SagA is found in supernatants of phage 9181-resistant sagA mutants, it remains possible that phage 9181 adsorbs to SagA or non-cross-linked peptidoglycan at the surface of E. faecium Com12. Furthermore, it is possible that complementation of topB in the 81R7 background causes transcriptional or translational changes in surface-expressed molecules, enabling an enhanced phage 9181 adsorption phenotype (Fig. 6A). Unfortunately, the lack of a sagA knockout mutant and topB complementation vector prevented us from addressing these questions.
Previous work has demonstrated that epa mutants exhibit phage adsorption defects in E. faecalis (9, 10, 13, 14). Since we observed epa mutations that conferred phage 9183 resistance, we sought to determine if epa mutations promote a similar phenotype in E. faecium. We observed a reduction in phage 9183 adsorption to mutants possessing epaR (83R6 and 83R8) and epaX (83R4 and 83R7) mutations compared with the parental strain (Fig. 6B). Although epaX mutants 83R4 and 83R7 were noted to have mutations in gdh and dltA, respectively, we suspect that EpaX was the driver of this phenotype because of the known role of epaX homolog mutations in inhibiting phage VPE25 adsorption to E. faecalis and that EpaX functions upstream of DltA in the biosynthesis of teichoic acid (10, 25). Consistent with this notion, we observed that overexpressing epaR and epaX in phage 9183-resistant mutants 83R3 and 83R4, harboring mutations in epaR and epaX, allowed the strains to regain the ability to adsorb phage 9183 (Fig. S6B). Taken together, these results suggest that mutations in the epa locus of E. faecium lessen phage 9183 adsorption to the surface of its host strain.
To determine if mutations in the capsule locus facilitated phage 9184 adsorption defects, we performed phage 9184 adsorption assays using the wild type and phage 9184-resistant mutants. We observed significant deficits in phage adsorption to strains harboring mutations in capsule polymerase (wzy; 84R1), nucleotide sugar dehydrogenase (efsg_rs08120; 84R4), aminotransferase (efsg_rs08090; 84R5), and tyrosine kinase (wze; 84R6) compared to the parental strain (Fig. 6C). Complementation of 84R2 with efsg_rs08120 restored phage 9184 adsorption, while complementation of 84R6 with wze partially restored phage 9184 absorption, although the change was statistically nonsignificant compared to the empty vector control strain (Fig. S6C). Given that 84R6 also harbors an rdd mutation that encodes a putative transmembrane protein, we cannot definitively conclude that the adsorption deficit was related to the wze mutation, as this wze mutation did not cause an adsorption defect for phage 9181 (Fig. 6A and Fig. S6A). Considering the adsorption defect is greater for the capsule mutants raised against phage 9184 than the phage 9181 capsule mutant 81R7, it is possible that additional surface-associated molecules mediate the attachment of phage 9181 to E. faecium cells. Together, these data indicate that E. faecium capsule contributes to phage 9184 adsorption and is phage specific.
E. faecium phage resistance enhances β-lactam and lipopeptide susceptibility.
With renewed interest focused on utilizing lytic phages for the treatment of bacterial infections and the observation that phage resistance can be a fitness trade-off under antibiotic pressure (26, 27), we sought to determine the impact of E. faecium phage resistance on antimicrobial susceptibility. We performed antimicrobial susceptibility screening using Etest strips for the phage 9181-, 9183-, and 9184-resistant mutants compared to their parental strains to determine if phage resistance altered E. faecium antimicrobial susceptibility. For phage 9181-resistant mutants, we observed an ∼2- to 5-fold reduction in the MIC of ampicillin and an overall reduction in the MIC of ceftriaxone (Table S3A). Interestingly, the enhancement of ampicillin and ceftriaxone susceptibility correlated with phage 9181-resistant mutants harboring mutations in sagA and not wze or topB. For phage 9183-resistant mutants, we also observed a 3- to 5-fold reduction in the MIC of ampicillin and an overall reduction in the MIC of ceftriaxone (Table S3B). Additionally, we noted a 2.5- to 5-fold reduction in the MIC of daptomycin, a lipopeptide class antimicrobial, which was not observed for the phage 9181- or 9184-resistant mutants. These results suggest that the acquisition of phage resistance via mutation of sagA and epa genes in E. faecium is a fitness defect that manifests as enhanced β-lactam susceptibility.
No phage capsule mutants showed a significant difference in antimicrobial susceptibility to β-lactams or lipopeptides, suggesting that mutations to the E. faecium capsule locus and rdd avoid the cost of increased antimicrobial susceptibility to β-lactams and daptomycin (Table S3C).
Lytic phages synergize with β-lactam and lipopeptide antimicrobials to inhibit the growth of E. faecium.
Considering the antibiotic fitness cost associated with phage resistance in E. faecium, we hypothesized that phages 9181 and 9183 would be capable of synergizing with ampicillin, ceftriaxone, and daptomycin to inhibit the growth of E. faecium. To address this question, we performed phage-antibiotic synergy assays where E. faecium was grown in the presence of phages alone, subinhibitory concentrations of ampicillin, ceftriaxone, or daptomycin alone, or a combination of phage and a subinhibitory concentration of antibiotics (Fig. 7A to E). For all three antibiotics, we observed that the combination of phage and subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics were able to inhibit the growth of E. faecium better than phage or antibiotic alone. Given the absence of growth inhibition of E. faecium in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics alone, this result is consistent with a synergistic antimicrobial interaction between phages and antibiotics. Interestingly, the synergy observed between phages 9181 and 9183 and ceftriaxone appeared more potent than the synergy observed between these phages and ampicillin (Fig. 7A to D). A dose-response relationship emerged when ampicillin was combined with phages 9181 and 9183, where decreasing concentrations of ampicillin enabled various degrees of bacterial population recovery (Fig. 7A and B). We also observed that the combination of phage 9183 and daptomycin slowed the growth of E. faecium 1,141,733 more than phage 9183 alone or daptomycin alone (Fig. 7E). This suggests that phage 9183 also synergizes with daptomycin to inhibit E. faecium 1,141,733. These results are consistent with those of Morrisette et al., who observed synergy between the Myoviridae phage 113, β-lactam (ampicillin, ertapenem, and ceftaroline), and lipopeptide antimicrobials against daptomycin-resistant and -tolerant strains of E. faecium (28).
DISCUSSION
Considering the treatment pitfalls due to worsening drug resistance in E. faecium and other bacterial pathogens, the biomedical community is revisiting the use of phage therapy. Since phage therapy’s departure from 20th century Western medicine, new technologies have emerged that have facilitated fine-scale resolution of phage-bacterial molecular interactions. Despite these advancements, for many bacteria, including E. faecium, the molecular factors exploited by phages for infection remain largely understudied (12). We believe that studying the molecular interactions of phages with their E. faecium hosts will inform rational approaches for future phage therapies against this pathogen.
In this work, we describe three novel lytic phages of E. faecium. Using protein-coding orthology, we show that one of these phages, phage 9181, forms a new orthocluster different from the 10 previously described enterococcal phage orthoclusters (16). We show that these phages are specific for E. faecium and exhibit broad and narrow strain tropism. Using whole-genome sequencing and comparative genomics, we provide evidence that sagA, epa, and capsule biosynthesis genes are important for phage infection of E. faecium. We were unable to fully assess if the genes topB and rdd are important in conferring phage 9181 and phage 9184 resistance, respectively. We suspect that these genes aid in phage-E. faecium interactions. Consistent with previous observations in E. faecalis (9, 10, 13, 14), we show that mutations in epaR and epaX limit phage 9183 adsorption to E. faecium, albeit to a lesser extent than that observed for similar mutations in E. faecalis. For example, the difference in phage VPE25 adsorption to wild-type E. faecalis versus an epaOX mutant was ∼80% (10), compared with the ∼35% reduction in phage 9183 adsorption to an epaX (epaOX homolog) mutant (Fig. 6B). This weaker phage 9183 adsorption despite the inability to infect the host closely resembles the ∼50% reduction in phage SHEF2 adherence to epaB and OPDV_11720 (encoding an epaX-like glycosyltransferase) mutants compared to wild-type E. faecalis (29, 30). The partial adsorption of phage 9183 to epaR and epaX mutants despite phage resistance suggests that phage 9183 adherence also depends on the core Epa rhamnopolysaccharide in addition to Epa teichoic acid decorations, similar to phage SHEF2 (29). We show, for the first time, that mutations in the capsule locus, which is absent from E. faecalis (17), limit phage 9184 adsorption to E. faecium 1,141,733 but not phage 9181 adsorption to E. faecium Com12. The ∼50% reduction in phage 9184 adsorption in capsule mutants (Fig. 6C) is comparable to the ∼60 to 80% reduction of phages Ycsa and 8 against acapsular Streptococcus thermophilus (31).
Our investigation into fitness tradeoffs associated with E. faecium phage resistance revealed enhanced susceptibility to cell wall and membrane-acting antibiotics. We demonstrated that phages 9181 and 9183 synergize with cell wall and membrane-targeting antibiotics to more potently inhibit E. faecium. Importantly, this analysis revealed that phages 9181 and 9183 could sensitize E. faecium to ceftriaxone, an antibiotic that normally promotes enterococcal colonization of the intestine due to intrinsic resistance (32). Phage synergy with ceftriaxone is an important discovery, as it suggests a strategy to resensitize enterococci to a third-generation cephalosporin. Exposure to cell wall-acting agents is recognized as a key event prior to hospital-acquired enterococcal infection in susceptible patients, and cephalosporin resensitization could have a broad impact on anti-enterococcal therapy (2, 33). Cephalosporin activity pressures the native intestinal microbiota, altering its ecology and related mucosal immunity and creating a scenario for enterococci to thrive and become dominant members of the microbiota (33 to 36). In patients with weakened immune systems or made vulnerable from hospital procedures such as surgeries, bone marrow ablative chemotherapy, or preexisting alcoholic hepatitis/cirrhosis, these ceftriaxone-associated conditions can tip the scale in favor of infection (33–35, 37, 38). Even in E. faecium strains with ampicillin susceptibility, synergy with ceftriaxone for the treatment of endocarditis was demonstrated to not be absolute, suggesting that current Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines for the treatment of E. faecium endocarditis will lead to suboptimal results (39, 40). Combination therapy with phage and cell wall- or membrane-acting antimicrobials may offer a solution to circumvent this issue while avoiding the risk associated with exposing patients to combination β-lactam agents.
The underlying molecular mechanisms conferring enhanced susceptibility to β-lactams in sagA, epaR, and epaX mutants remain unclear. Given that intrinsic resistance of E. faecium to ceftriaxone is derived, in part, from class A and B penicillin binding proteins (Pbps) (41–44), we hypothesize that modification of the surface architectural display of Pbps in epaR, epaX, and sagA mutants facilitate this phenotype. Parallels to E. faecium sagA mutants can be drawn from mutation of a secreted peptidoglycan hydrolase in E. faecalis, SalB, which also demonstrates enhanced susceptibility to cephalosporins (45). Pairwise amino acid alignment of E. faecium Com12 SagA and E. faecalis SalB revealed 51% identity over the N-terminal coiled-coil domain region, which is expected given their different C-terminal hydrolase domains (SCP in SalB, NlpC_P60 in SagA). Contrary to sagA in E. faecium, salB was shown to be nonessential in E. faecalis and has a homolog (salA) that may partly compensate for the function of salB to maintain cell viability (45). Staining of an E. faecalis salB mutant with a nonspecific, fluorescent penicillin (Bocillin FL) revealed no difference from the wild type. However, this analysis was performed in the absence of ceftriaxone pretreatment, potentially masking subtle changes in the abundance of Pbps in the salB mutant at the cell wall (41). Therefore, it remains unclear if SalB partners with or coordinates the activity of Pbps to induce cephalosporin resistance. A sagA mutant described in our study (81R5; G460D) has a mutation two residues upstream from a peptidoglycan clamp residue (W462) and lacks enhanced susceptibility to ampicillin and ceftriaxone. The reason for this exception and why this mutation confers phage resistance is unclear.
The enhanced susceptibility to β-lactams in epaR and epaX in E. faecium mutants was surprising given prior reports of increased β-lactam resistance in epa mutants in E. faecalis (46). However, we note that all epa mutants tested in that analysis harbored mutations in genes from the core region of the epa locus (i.e., epaA, epaE, epaL, epaN, and epaB). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating enhanced β-lactam sensitivity to epa variable region mutants in enterococci. We observed enhanced susceptibility to daptomycin in E. faecium epaR and epaX mutants, consistent with data from E. faecalis epaR and epaX mutants (9, 14, 47). Given that the epa variable genes have recently been discovered to be involved in teichoic acid biosynthesis (25), we hypothesize that altered display of teichoic acids at the cell surface enables the differential β-lactam and daptomycin susceptibility observed in epa core versus variable region mutants in enterococci. This hypothesis is supported by observations in Staphylococcus aureus, where metabolic perturbations leading to enhanced teichoic acid output or teichoic acid d-alanylation correlate with daptomycin tolerance (48–50). Similarly, mutation of lafB, a gene encoding lipoteichoic acid glycosyltransferase, induces a daptomycin-hypersusceptible phenotype in E. faecium (51). Mutation of bgsB in E. faecalis, which functions with a lafB homolog (bgsA) in lipoteichoic acid anchor biosynthesis, results in enhanced susceptibility to daptomycin (14). A reduction in susceptibility to the β-lactam piperacillin in lafB (E. faecium) or bgsB (E. faecalis) mutants is reminiscent of the effect of epa core region mutations in enterococci (46). A similar pattern of enhanced daptomycin susceptibility at the cost of reduced β-lactam susceptibility, known as the see-saw effect (52), suggests that the altered display or abundance of the wall teichoic acids at the cell surface occurs in response to the modification of rhamnopolysaccharide or lipoteichoic acid. Mutation of epaR or epaX in E. faecium would potentially avoid the daptomycin-β-lactam see-saw effect, making phages that induce these mutations in enterococci attractive antimicrobial candidates. Collectively, these observations suggest that the location of epa mutations, core versus variable region, as well mutations in genes participating in teichoic acid biosynthesis are likely to impact the trajectory of β-lactam and daptomycin susceptibility in enterococci.
E. faecalis epa mutations are detrimental during intestinal colonization and show reduced virulence in a mouse peritonitis infection model (9, 53, 54). epa mutants are more susceptible to bile salts and neutrophils, exhibit reduced biofilm formation, and cannot invade biotic and abiotic surfaces (47, 54–56). Therefore, we predict that epaR and epaX mutants in E. faecium will show a similar intestinal colonization dysfunction. Hydrolase domain mutations in SagA are also likely to induce fitness costs in vivo. SagA was shown to promote E. faecium attachment to multiple connective tissue molecules, including fibrinogen, fibronectin, and collagen (57). Interestingly, peptidoglycan fragments released following SagA hydrolytic activity activate NOD2-mediated mucosal immunity in the intestine, providing protection from Salmonella enterica infection and Clostridioides difficile pathogenesis (22, 24). In E. faecalis, mutation of the sagA-like gene salB altered cell morphology, increased biofilm formation, impacted autolysis, and increased susceptibility to bile salts, detergent, ethanol, peroxide, and heat (58–61). Contrary to SagA, cells expressing SalB were limited in binding fibronectin and collagen type I, suggesting that these proteins exhibit different adherence capacities to host tissue. Considering these observations together, it is possible that phage predation that promotes the formation of sagA mutants would result in E. faecium cells that are compromised for adherence and/or invasion of host tissues and potentially are less immunostimulatory during infection.
The absence of phage-antibiotic synergy for phage-resistant strains harboring capsule, topoisomerase 3 (topB), and the rdd gene does not imply that these mutations do not come with a fitness cost for other antimicrobial agents. We selectively chose to examine β-lactams and daptomycin in this study, given their clinical relevance for treating enterococcal infections. Sensitization to other antibiotics that target pathways other than cell wall biogenesis or membrane stability may exist and remain to be tested. The presence of phage-antibiotic synergy might be a function of how a mutation inhibits phage infection. For instance, bacterial mutations that limit phage adsorption and/or genome ejection (i.e., epa and sagA) into the host cell might result in sensitivity to agents acting at the cell wall or membrane, while mutations that might inhibit phage genome replication (i.e., topB) could sensitize cells to agents that block bacterial DNA replication. Sensitization of E. coli to novobiocin, a topoisomerase inhibitor, following mutation of topB (a type I topoisomerase) supports this theory (62). Additionally, purified capsule from Streptococcus pneumoniae was shown to protect an acapsular mutant of Klebsiella pneumoniae from polymyxin B (63), a lipopeptide antibiotic that normally binds lipopolysaccharide in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria (64). E. faecalis epa variable-locus mutants are also sensitized to polymyxin B (30), suggesting phage resistance sensitizes enterococci to other antibiotics for which they exhibit intrinsic resistance (64).
Although phage-antibiotic synergy represents an enticing approach for treatment of multidrug-resistant E. faecium infections, the narrow host range observed for phages 9181 and 9183 (Fig. 3A and B) will need to be addressed in future studies. Ideal phages would exhibit broader host range activity while retaining synergy with antibiotics. Whether such phages exist in the natural environment is unclear. If not, phage recombineering methods offer promise for precisely broadening the host range of phages (65–67), although whether such an approach would be effective against clinical E. faecium isolates that are β-lactam resistant remains to be determined.
Despite their narrow host range, phages 9181 and 9183 can discriminate between members of E. faecium clade B. The inability of phage 9183 to infect E. faecium Com12 despite this strain exhibiting a near-identical epa locus compared to 1,141,733 (i.e., epa variant 2) (17, 18) suggests phage 9183 adsorbs to Com12 but cannot infect the cell due to an inability to bind a secondary receptor, intracellular restriction, or failure to effectively lyse the cell following intracellular phage replication and assembly. What drives phage 9181 specificity for E. faecium Com12 and Com15 but not 1,141,733 is not clear. The near-identical SagA amino acid sequences between E. faecium Com12 and 1,141,733 (identity, 97%; positives, 97%; gaps, 2%) suggests that the architecture of the peptidoglycan or a mechanism highlighted above for phage 9183 resistance enables E. faecium 1,141,733 resistance to phage 9181 infection. Future studies will seek to identify further host factors that constrain the host range of these phages.
Phage 9184 infects both clade A and B strains. Given the heterogenous nature of the capsule loci between the strains infected by phage 9184, it is difficult to ascertain an attribute of these loci that might serve as a determinant of phage 9184 adsorption and infectivity. Acknowledging that the arginine-aspartate-aspartate (RDD) protein has yet to be proven as a receptor for phage 9184, the conservation of this protein in E. faecium Com12, which is not infected by phage 9184, suggests that RDD is not the factor limiting infection of this strain.
In conclusion, we have identified three previously undescribed phages that infect E. faecium. The study of E. faecium resistance to these phages identified multiple components of the E. faecium cell surface to be critical for productive phage infection. The enhanced sensitivity of sagA, epaR, and epaX mutants to cell wall- and membrane-acting antimicrobials suggests that these proteins represent intriguing antimicrobial targets to be considered for future drug discovery efforts against E. faecium and potentially other Gram-positive pathogens harboring homologs of these genes. The finding that E. faecium phages synergize with β-lactam and lipopeptide antibiotics provides encouragement that phages could be used in combination with these antibiotics to increase their efficacy and possibly repurpose such antibiotics that are currently deemed ineffective against enterococci.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacteria and bacteriophages.
A complete list of the bacterial strains and bacteriophages used in this study can be found in Table S4 in the supplemental material. E. faecium Com12 was cultured in Todd-Hewitt broth (THB), and E. faecium 1,141,733 was cultured in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth at 37°C with rotation at 250 rpm. E. coli strains were cultured in Lennox L broth (LB) at 37°C with rotation at 250 rpm. Semisolid media in petri plates were made by adding 1.5% agar to broth prior to autoclaving. For antibiotic susceptibility testing, Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) was used. When needed, chloramphenicol was added to media at 20 μg/ml or 10 μg/ml for selection of E. coli or E. faecium, respectively. Phage susceptibility assays were performed on THB agar supplemented with 10 mM MgSO4.
Bacteriophage isolation and purification.
Phages 9181, 9183, and 9184 were isolated from wastewater obtained from a water treatment facility located near Denver, Colorado. Fifty milliliters of raw sewage was centrifuged at 3,220 × g for 10 min at room temperature to remove debris. The supernatant was decanted and passed through a 0.45-μm filter. A 100-μl aliquot of filtered wastewater was mixed with 130 μl of E. faecium 1,141,733 or Com12 diluted 1:10 from an overnight culture and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. Molten THB top agar (0.35%), supplemented with 10 mM MgSO4, was added to the bacterium-wastewater suspension and poured over a 1.5% THB agar plate supplemented with 10 mM MgSO4. Following overnight growth at 37°C, plaques were picked with a sterile Pasteur pipette and phages were eluted from the plaque in 500 μl SM-plus buffer (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 8 mM MgSO4, 5 mM CaCl2 [pH 7.4]) overnight (O/N) at 4°C. After O/N elution, the phages were filter sterilized (0.45 μm). This procedure was repeated two more times to ensure clonal phage isolates. To amplify phages to high-titer stocks, 10-fold serially diluted clonal phage isolates were mixed with their appropriate host strain diluted 1:10 from an O/N culture, incubated at room temperature, and then poured over 1.5% THB agar supplemented with 10 mM MgSO4. Top agar from multiple near-confluent lysed bacterial lawns was scraped into a 15-ml conical tube and centrifuged at 18,000 × g for 10 min prior to decanting and 0.45-μm filter sterilization. Using these recovered phages, high-titer phage stocks were generated by infecting 500 ml of early logarithmically (2 × 108 to 3 × 108 CFU/ml) growing E. faecium with phage at a multiplicity of infection of 0.5 following supplementation of media with 10 mM MgSO4. The phage-cell suspension was incubated at room temperature for 15 min and then incubated at 37°C with rotation (200 rpm) for 4 to 6 h. The cultures were centrifuged at 3,220 × g for 10 min at 4°C and the supernatants filtered (0.45 μm). Clarified and filtered lysates were treated with 5 μg/ml each of DNase and RNase at room temperature for 1 h, and phages were precipitated with 1 M NaCl and 10% (wt/vol) polyethylene glycol 8000 (PEG 8000) on ice at 4°C overnight. Phage precipitates were pelleted by centrifugation at 11,270 × g for 20 min and resuspended in 2 ml of SM-plus buffer. A one-third volume of chloroform was mixed by inversion into the phage precipitates and centrifuged at 16,300 × g to separate out residual PEG 8000 into the organic phase. Phages in the aqueous phase were further purified using a cesium chloride gradient as described previously (11). The final titer was confirmed by plaque assay. Crude phage lysates were used for all phage susceptibility and adsorption assays, while cesium chloride gradient-purified phages were used for phage genomic DNA isolation and transmission electron microscopy.
Transmission electron microscopy.
A total of 8 μl of 1 × 1010 PFU/ml phages was applied to a copper mesh grid coated with Formvar and carbon (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 2 min and then gently blotted off with a piece of Whatman filter paper. The grids were rinsed by transferring between two drops of MilliQ water, blotting with Whatman filter paper between each transfer. Finally, the grids were stained using two drops of a 0.75% uranyl formate solution (a quick rinse with MilliQ water following the first drop followed by an additional 20 s of staining). After rinsing and blotting, the grids were allowed to dry for at least 10 min. Samples were imaged on an FEI Tecnai G2 Biotwin TEM at 80 kV with an AMT side-mount digital camera.
Whole-genome sequence analysis of phages and phage-resistant bacteria.
Phage DNA was isolated by incubating phages with 50 μg/ml proteinase K and 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate at 56°C for 1 h, followed by extraction with an equal volume of phenol-chloroform. The aqueous phase was extracted a second time with an equal volume of chloroform, and the DNA was precipitated using isopropanol. Bacterial DNA was isolated using a ZymoBIOMICS DNA miniprep kit (Zymo Research) by following the manufacturer’s protocol. Phage and bacterial DNA samples were sequenced at the Microbial Genome Sequencing Center, University of Pittsburgh, using an Illumina NextSeq 550 platform and paired-end chemistry (2 × 150 bp). Paired-end reads were trimmed and assembled into contigs using CLC genomics workbench (Qiagen). Open reading frames (ORFs) were detected and annotated using rapid annotation subsystem technology (RAST) and the Phage Galaxy structural annotation (version 2020.1) and functional workflows (version 2020.3) (68, 69). Trimmed bacterial genomic reads for E. faecium Com12, 1,141,733, and phage-resistant derivatives were mapped to reference genomes (GCF_000157635.1 [Com12]; GCA_000157575.1 [1,141,733]), downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website. To identify mutations conferring phage resistance, the basic variant detection tool from CLC genomics workbench was used to identify polymorphisms (similarity fraction, 0.5; length fraction, 0.8).
PCR screen for phage lysogeny.
PCR primers to screen for phage 9181, 9183, and 9184 lysogeny were designed to target the phage lysin (phages 9181 and 9184) or integrase (phage 9183) genes (Table S4). PCR was performed using GoTaq Green master mix (Promega) per the manufacturer’s instructions. Bands were visualized from PCRs following electrophoresis of 10 μl of each reaction mixture loaded onto 1% (phage 9184) or 1.5% (phages 9181 and 9183) agarose gels embedded with ethidium bromide. Predicted PCR product sizes were the following: phage 9181 lysin gene (phi9181_ORF001), 432 bp; phage 9183 integrase gene (phi9183_ORF077), 514 bp; phage 9184 lysin gene (phi9184_ORF022), 801 bp.
Enterococcal phage orthology analysis.
Enterococcal phage orthology was performed according to a method described by Bolocan et al. (16). Briefly, publicly available enterococcal genomes were downloaded from the Millard Lab phage genome database (http://millardlab.org/bioinformatics/). As of 15 May 2020, there were 99 complete enterococcal phage genomes. Open reading frames for each enterococcal phage genome were called using Prodigal, and bacteriophage protein Orthologous Groups were identified by OrthoMCL (20, 70). The resulting OrthoMCL matrix was used to generate an orthology tree using the ggplot2 and ggdendro packages in R. Nearest-neighbor phages to phages 9181, 9183, and 9184 from the OrthoMCL analysis were compared using the genome alignment feature of ViP Tree using normalized tBLASTx scores between viral genomes to calculate genomic distance for phylogenetic proteomic tree analysis (71).
Routine molecular techniques, DNA sequencing, and complementation.
Confirmation PCRs were performed using GoTaq Green master mix (Promega) per the manufacturer’s instructions. Q5 DNA polymerase master mix (New England Biolabs) was used for PCRs intended for cloning per the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasmid DNA was purified using a QIAprep Miniprep kit (Qiagen) or a ZymoPURE II plasmid Midiprep kit (Zymo Research). Restriction enzymes and T4 ligase were purchased from New England Biolabs. Sanger DNA sequencing was performed by Quintara Biosciences (San Francisco, CA). A complete list of primers can be found in Table S4. Complementation was performed using plasmid pLZ12A, a derivative of pLZ12 (72) carrying the bacA promoter upstream of the multiple cloning site (9). wze, epaX, dltA, and efsg_rs08090 were cloned into pLZ12A as BamHI and EcoRI fragments. epaR and efsg_rs08120 were cloned into pLZ12A as BamHI and PstI fragments. Plasmids were transformed into E. faecium using a previously described glycine-sucrose method (73, 74). Briefly, 1 ml of overnight culture was inoculated into 50 ml of BHI supplemented with 2% glycine and 0.5 M sucrose and grown overnight at 37°C with rotation (250 rpm). The following day, the cells were pelleted at 7,200 × g, resuspended in an equal volume of prewarmed BHI supplemented with 2% glycine and 0.5 M sucrose, and incubated for 1 h at 37°C statically. The cells were pelleted at 7,200 × g and washed three times in ice-cold electroporation buffer (0.5 M sucrose and 10% glycerol). One to 2 μg of plasmid DNA was electroporated into E. faecium using a Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad) with a 0.2-mm cuvette at 1.7 kV, 200 Ω, and 25 μF.
Phage susceptibility assay.
Overnight bacterial cultures were pelleted, resuspended in SM-plus buffer, and normalized to an OD600 of 1.0. Tenfold serial dilutions of bacteria were spotted on THB agar embedded with phages or THB agar alone, supplemented with 10 mM MgSO4. Phages were embedded at the following concentrations in THB agar: phage 9181 (108 PFU/ml), phage 9183 (107 PFU/ml), and phage 9184 (107 PFU/ml). Plates were incubated overnight at 37°C, and numbers of viable CFU were determined by colony counting.
Isolation of phage-resistant E. faecium strains.
A total of 130 μl of a 1:10 dilution of E. faecium grown O/N was mixed with 10 μl of 10-fold serially diluted phages and added to 5 ml of prewarmed THB top agar (0.35%, wt/vol). Phage-bacterium mixtures were poured onto the surface of THB agar plates (1.5%, wt/vol). The plates were incubated at 37°C until phage-resistant colonies appeared in the zones of clearing. The presumptive resistant colonies were passaged four times by streaking single colonies onto THB agar.
Determination of phage host range.
The host range of phages 9181, 9183, and 9184 were determined using a panel of laboratory and contemporary clinical E. faecium and E. faecalis isolates (Table S4). Overnight bacterial cultures were suspended in SM-plus buffer to an OD600 of 1.0 and 10-fold serially diluted and spotted onto THB agar-containing phages. Plates were incubated O/N at 37°C, and the numbers of viable CFU were determined. Strains that exhibited greater than 4-log killing in the presence of phage were termed phage susceptible, while those that grew beyond this threshold were considered phage resistant.
Efficiency of plating.
Bacterial strains of interest were selected from a single colony to inoculate 3 ml THB and incubated O/N at 37°C with agitation. Bacteria from O/N cultures were 1:10 diluted in SM-plus buffer, and 130 μl was mixed gently with 10 μl of phage 9181 and phage 9184 serially 1:10 diluted in SM-plus buffer using starting titers of 5 × 106 PFU and 1 × 107 PFU, respectively. This phage and bacterial mixture was incubated at room temperature for 15 min to enable phage attachment before 5 ml of prewarmed THB soft agar (0.35%, wt/vol) supplemented with 10 mM magnesium sulfate was mixed in and spread over the surface of THB agar (1.5%, wt/vol) supplemented with 10 mM magnesium sulfate. The soft agar was allowed to solidify and then incubated O/N at 37°C with the petri dish upright to prevent dislodgement of the soft agar. Phage plaques were enumerated following O/N incubation. Given our difficulties forming an evenly spread plaque layer of phage 9184 on E. faecium U37 (75), 6 μl of 10-fold serial dilutions of phage 9184 was spotted onto bacterial lawns of E. faecium U37 or 1,141,733 embedded in THB soft agar (0.35, wt/vol) supplemented with 10 mM magnesium sulfate containing either strain. Following drying of spots, plates were incubated upright O/N at 37°C. Plaques were enumerated following O/N incubation.
Western blot analysis for SagA from bacterial supernatants and pellets.
Western blotting was performed as described previously (22). Briefly, bacteria were grown to exponential phase (OD600, ∼0.8) in BHI. Volumes of 1 ml exponential-phase culture samples were centrifuged at ≥18,000 × g, and supernatants were transferred to a new microcentrifuge tube for preparation. Supernatants were prepared as follows. Ten percent trichloroacetic acid (final; vol/vol) was added and tubes placed at −20°C for 15 min for protein precipitation. Tubes were then spun at maximum speed for 15 min, supernatant was discarded, and the protein pellet was washed twice with 500 μl cold acetone. Tubes were transferred to a 95°C heat block with caps open to evaporate acetone and dry protein pellets. A volume of 60 μl 4% SDS buffer (4% SDS, 50 mM Bis-Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM sodium chloride, 1× Laemmli buffer, 2.5% β-mercaptoethanol) was added to the protein pellets, which were sonicated for 5 min to solubilize. The samples were then placed at 95°C for 5 min to denature proteins. For cell pellet preparation, 1 ml cell pellets was resuspended with 1 ml phosphate-buffered saline, transferred to 2-ml cryovials, and centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 5 min to wash. After discarding supernatant, 50 μl 0.1-mm beads was added, followed by 250 μl 4% SDS buffer (described above). Cryovial tubes were placed in a FastPrep FP120 cell disruptor at maximum speed for 20 s on and 10 s off, and this process was repeated twice more. Tubes were then centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 1 min and then placed at 95°C for 10 min to remove bubbles and denature proteins. Fifteen or 60 μl supernatant or cell pellet sample was loaded for SDS-PAGE. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE on 4 to 20% Criterion TGX precast gels (Bio-Rad) and then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (0.2 mM, BioTrace NT nitrocellulose transfer membranes; Pall Laboratory). For SagA blots, polyclonal SagA serum and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (NA 934V; GE Healthcare) served as primary and secondary antibodies, respectively. Polyclonal SagA primary antibodies and secondary antibody were used at a dilution of 1:25,000 and 1:10,000 (supernatants) or 1:10,000 and 1:5,000 (cell pellets), respectively. Membranes were blocked for 1 h in TBS-T (Tris-buffered saline, 0.1% Tween 20) containing 5% nonfat milk, incubated with blocking buffer containing primary antibody for 1 h, washed five times with TBS-T, incubated with blocking buffer containing secondary antibody, and washed four times with TBS-T. Protein detection was performed with ECL detection reagent (GE Healthcare) on a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP Imaging System.
Bacterial growth curves.
A volume of 250 ml BHI was inoculated with 2.5 ml (1:100) overnight cultures and incubated at 37°C with agitation until an OD600 of ∼0.8.
Phage adsorption assay.
The phage adsorption assay was performed as described previously (10, 11). O/N bacterial cultures were pelleted at 3,220 × g for 10 min and resuspended to 108 CFU/ml in SM-plus buffer. Phage adsorption was determined by mixing 5 × 106 PFU of phage and 5 × 107 CFU of the appropriate bacterial strain in 500 μl and incubating statically at room temperature for 10 min. The bacterium-phage suspensions were centrifuged at 24,000 × g for 1 min, the supernatant was collected, and remaining phages were enumerated by a plaque assay. SM-plus buffer with phage only (no bacteria) served as a control. Percent adsorption was determined as [(PFUcontrol − PFUtest supernatant)/PFUcontrol] × 100. The fold change was calculated by dividing the percent adsorption of phage-resistant mutants by that of the parental strain.
Antibiotic MIC assay.
Antibiotic MIC was determined for each strain using Etest strips (bioMérieux). Single colonies were grown O/N in 3 ml of MHB broth at 37°C with rotation (250 rpm). The following day, overnight cultures were diluted to McFarland 0.5 in MHB broth, and 100 μl of the cell suspension was spread over the surface of MHB agar plates. One Etest strip was placed on the surface of the agar using sterile forceps. The plates were incubated for 18 h at 37°C. The MIC was determined to be the number closest to the zone of inhibition. The mean and standard deviation of the MIC from three independent experiments is reported for each strain.
Phage-antibiotic synergy assay.
O/N cultures of E. faecium Com12 and E. faecium 1,141,733 were normalized to 108 CFU/ml. A volume of 100 μl (107 CFU/ml) of bacteria was added to a sterile 96-well plate in triplicate. Antibiotics were diluted 1:100 into desired wells to achieve the appropriate final concentration. Phages were added to desired wells at 106 PFU/ml, achieving a multiplicity of infection of 0.1. The 96-well plate was loaded onto a BioTek Synergy Plate reader prewarmed to 37°C and agitated continuously for 18 h, allowing for OD600 reading every 30 min.
Data availability.
The Illumina reads for phage 9181, 9183, and 9184 and phage-resistant E. faecium mutants have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive under the accession number PRJEB39873. Assembled phage genomes were submitted to GenBank and were assigned the following accession numbers: MT939240 (phage 9181), MT939241 (phage 9183), and MT939242 (phage 9184).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01AI141479 (B.A.D.), R01GM103593 (H.C.H.), R01CA245292 (H.C.H.), T32AI070084 (J.E.), and T32AR007534 (M.R.M.). J.E. acknowledges support from The Rockefeller University Graduate Program, and H.C.H. acknowledges support from a Kenneth Rainin Foundation Synergy Award.
We thank Jennifer Bourne at the University of Colorado School of Medicine Electron Microscopy Center for preparing and visualizing electron micrographs of phages. We thank the staff at the Microbial Genome Sequencing Center (MiGS) at the University of Pittsburgh for assistance with bacterial and phage whole-genome DNA sequencing.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
REFERENCES
- 1.Arias CA, Murray BE. 2012. The rise of the Enterococcus: beyond vancomycin resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:266–278. 10.1038/nrmicro2761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kristich CJ, Rice LB, Arias CA. 2014. Enterococcal infection—treatment and antibiotic resistance, p 1–62. In Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shakar N (ed), Enterococci: from commensals to leading causes of drug resistant infection. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Beganovic M, Luther MK, Rice LB, Arias CA, Rybak MJ, LaPlante KL. 2018. A review of combination antimicrobial therapy for Enterococcus faecalis bloodstream infections and infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 67:303–309. 10.1093/cid/ciy064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rybak MJ, McGrath BJ. 1996. Combination antimicrobial therapy for bacterial infections. Guidelines for the clinician. Drugs 52:390–405. 10.2165/00003495-199652030-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fish R, Kutter E, Bryan D, Wheat G, Kuhl S. 2018. Resolving digital staphylococcal osteomyelitis using bacteriophage-a case report. Antibiotics 7:87. 10.3390/antibiotics7040087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cano EJ, Caflisch KM, Bollyky PL, Van Belleghem JD, Patel R, Fackler J, Brownstein MJ, Horne B, Biswas B, Henry M, Malagon F, Lewallen DG, Suh GA. 23 July 2020. Phage therapy for limb-threatening prosthetic knee Klebsiella pneumoniae infection: case report and in vitro characterization of anti-biofilm activity. Clin Infect Dis 10.1093/cid/ciaa705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schooley RT, Biswas B, Gill JJ, Hernandez-Morales A, Lancaster J, Lessor L, Barr JJ, Reed SL, Rohwer F, Benler S, Segall AM, Taplitz R, Smith DM, Kerr K, Kumaraswamy M, Nizet V, Lin L, McCauley MD, Strathdee SA, Benson CA, Pope RK, Leroux BM, Picel AC, Mateczun AJ, Cilwa KE, Regeimbal JM, Estrella LA, Wolfe DM, Henry MS, Quinones J, Salka S, Bishop-Lilly KA, Young R, Hamilton T. 2017. Development and use of personalized bacteriophage-based therapeutic cocktails to treat a patient with a disseminated resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00954-17. 10.1128/AAC.00954-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chan BK, Turner PE, Kim S, Mojibian HR, Elefteriades JA, Narayan D. 2018. Phage treatment of an aortic graft infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Evol Med Public Health 2018:60–66. 10.1093/emph/eoy005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chatterjee A, Johnson CN, Luong P, Hullahalli K, McBride SW, Schubert AM, Palmer KL, Carlson PE, Jr, Duerkop BA. 2019. Bacteriophage resistance alters antibiotic-mediated intestinal expansion of enterococci. Infect Immun 87:e00085-19. 10.1128/IAI.00085-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chatterjee A, Willett JLE, Nguyen UT, Monogue B, Palmer KL, Dunny GM, Duerkop BA. 2020. Parallel genomics uncover novel enterococcal-bacteriophage interactions. mBio 11:e03120-19. 10.1128/mBio.03120-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Duerkop BA, Huo W, Bhardwaj P, Palmer KL, Hooper LV. 2016. Molecular basis for lytic bacteriophage resistance in enterococci. mBio 7:e01304-16. 10.1128/mBio.01304-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wandro S, Oliver A, Gallagher T, Weihe C, England W, Martiny JBH, Whiteson K. 2018. Predictable molecular adaptation of coevolving Enterococcus faecium and lytic phage EfV12-phi1. Front Microbiol 9:3192. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lossouarn J, Briet A, Moncaut E, Furlan S, Bouteau A, Son O, Leroy M, DuBow MS, Lecointe F, Serror P, Petit MA. 2019. Enterococcus faecalis countermeasures defeat a virulent Picovirinae bacteriophage. Viruses 11:48. 10.3390/v11010048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ho K, Huo W, Pas S, Dao R, Palmer KL. 2018. Loss-of-function mutations in epaR confer resistance to phiNPV1 Infection in Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00758-18. 10.1128/AAC.00758-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Duerkop BA, Palmer KL, Horsburgh MJ. 2014. Enterococcal bacteriophages and genome defense, p 1–44. In Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N (ed), Enterococci: from commensals to leading causes of drug resistant infection. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bolocan AS, Upadrasta A, Bettio PHA, Clooney AG, Draper LA, Ross RP, Hill C. 2019. Evaluation of phage therapy in the context of Enterococcus faecalis and its associated diseases. Viruses 11:366. 10.3390/v11040366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Palmer KL, Godfrey P, Griggs A, Kos VN, Zucker J, Desjardins C, Cerqueira G, Gevers D, Walker S, Wortman J, Feldgarden M, Haas B, Birren B, Gilmore MS. 2012. Comparative genomics of enterococci: variation in Enterococcus faecalis, clade structure in E. faecium, and defining characteristics of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus. mBio 3:e00318-11. 10.1128/mBio.00318-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.de Been M, van Schaik W, Cheng L, Corander J, Willems RJ. 2013. Recent recombination events in the core genome are associated with adaptive evolution in Enterococcus faecium. Genome Biol Evol 5:1524–1535. 10.1093/gbe/evt111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ackermann HW. 2007. 5500 phages examined in the electron microscope. Arch Virol 152:227–243. 10.1007/s00705-006-0849-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Jr, Roos DS. 2003. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 13:2178–2189. 10.1101/gr.1224503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Holtzman T, Globus R, Molshanski-Mor S, Ben-Shem A, Yosef I, Qimron U. 2020. A continuous evolution system for contracting the host range of bacteriophage T7. Sci Rep 10:307. 10.1038/s41598-019-57221-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kim B, Wang YC, Hespen CW, Espinosa J, Salje J, Rangan KJ, Oren DA, Kang JY, Pedicord VA, Hang HC. 2019. Enterococcus faecium secreted antigen A generates muropeptides to enhance host immunity and limit bacterial pathogenesis. Elife 8:e45343. 10.7554/eLife.45343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ittisoponpisan S, Islam SA, Khanna T, Alhuzimi E, David A, Sternberg MJE. 2019. Can predicted protein 3D structures provide reliable insights into whether missense variants are disease associated? J Mol Biol 431:2197–2212. 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rangan KJ, Pedicord VA, Wang YC, Kim B, Lu Y, Shaham S, Mucida D, Hang HC. 2016. A secreted bacterial peptidoglycan hydrolase enhances tolerance to enteric pathogens. Science 353:1434–1437. 10.1126/science.aaf3552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Guerardel Y, Sadovskaya I, Maes E, Furlan S, Chapot-Chartier MP, Mesnage S, Rigottier-Gois L, Serror P. 2020. Complete structure of the enterococcal polysaccharide antigen (EPA) of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis V583 Reveals that EPA decorations are teichoic acids covalently linked to a rhamnopolysaccharide backbone. mBio 11:e00277-20. 10.1128/mBio.00277-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kortright KE, Chan BK, Koff JL, Turner PE. 2019. Phage therapy: a renewed approach to combat antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 25:219–232. 10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mangalea MR, Duerkop BA. 2020. Fitness trade-offs resulting from bacteriophage resistance potentiate synergistic antibacterial strategies. Infect Immun 88:e00926-19. 10.1128/IAI.00926-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Morrisette T, Lev KL, Kebriaei R, Abdul-Mutakabbir J, Stamper KC, Morales S, Lehman SM, Canfield GS, Duerkop BA, Arias CA, Rybak MJ. 2020. Bacteriophage-antibiotic combinations for Enterococcus faecium with varying bacteriophage and daptomycin susceptibilities. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e00993-20. 10.1128/AAC.00993-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Al-Zubidi M, Widziolek M, Court EK, Gains AF, Smith RE, Ansbro K, Alrafaie A, Evans C, Murdoch C, Mesnage S, Douglas CWI, Rawlinson A, Stafford GP. 2019. Identification of novel bacteriophages with therapeutic potential that target Enterococcus faecalis. Infect Immun 87:e00512-19. 10.1128/IAI.00512-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Smith RE, Salamaga B, Szkuta P, Hajdamowicz N, Prajsnar TK, Bulmer GS, Fontaine T, Kołodziejczyk J, Herry J-M, Hounslow AM, Williamson MP, Serror P, Mesnage S. 2019. Decoration of the enterococcal polysaccharide antigen EPA is essential for virulence, cell surface charge and interaction with effectors of the innate immune system. PLoS Pathog 15:e1007730. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rodriguez C, Van der Meulen R, Vaningelgem F, Font de Valdez G, Raya R, De Vuyst L, Mozzi F. 2008. Sensitivity of capsular-producing Streptococcus thermophilus strains to bacteriophage adsorption. Lett Appl Microbiol 46:462–468. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02341.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rice LB, Lakticová V, Helfand MS, Hutton-Thomas R. 2004. In vitro antienterococcal activity explains associations between exposures to antimicrobial agents and risk of colonization by multiresistant enterococci. J Infect Dis 190:2162–2166. 10.1086/425580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ubeda C, Taur Y, Jenq RR, Equinda MJ, Son T, Samstein M, Viale A, Socci ND, van den Brink MR, Kamboj M, Pamer EG. 2010. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus domination of intestinal microbiota is enabled by antibiotic treatment in mice and precedes bloodstream invasion in humans. J Clin Investig 120:4332–4341. 10.1172/JCI43918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Brandl K, Plitas G, Mihu CN, Ubeda C, Jia T, Fleisher M, Schnabl B, DeMatteo RP, Pamer EG. 2008. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci exploit antibiotic-induced innate immune deficits. Nature 455:804–807. 10.1038/nature07250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Donskey CJ, Chowdhry TK, Hecker MT, Hoyen CK, Hanrahan JA, Hujer AM, Hutton-Thomas RA, Whalen CC, Bonomo RA, Rice LB. 2000. Effect of antibiotic therapy on the density of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the stool of colonized patients. N Engl J Med 343:1925–1932. 10.1056/NEJM200012283432604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hendrickx AP, Top J, Bayjanov JR, Kemperman H, Rogers MR, Paganelli FL, Bonten MJ, Willems RJ. 2015. Antibiotic-driven dysbiosis mediates intraluminal agglutination and alternative segregation of Enterococcus faecium from the intestinal epithelium. mBio 6:e01346-15. 10.1128/mBio.01346-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Duan Y, Llorente C, Lang S, Brandl K, Chu H, Jiang L, White RC, Clarke TH, Nguyen K, Torralba M, Shao Y, Liu J, Hernandez-Morales A, Lessor L, Rahman IR, Miyamoto Y, Ly M, Gao B, Sun W, Kiesel R, Hutmacher F, Lee S, Ventura-Cots M, Bosques-Padilla F, Verna EC, Abraldes JG, Brown RS, Jr, Vargas V, Altamirano J, Caballeria J, Shawcross DL, Ho SB, Louvet A, Lucey MR, Mathurin P, Garcia-Tsao G, Bataller R, Tu XM, Eckmann L, van der Donk WA, Young R, Lawley TD, Starkel P, Pride D, Fouts DE, Schnabl B. 2019. Bacteriophage targeting of gut bacterium attenuates alcoholic liver disease. Nature 575:505–511. 10.1038/s41586-019-1742-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stein-Thoeringer CK, Nichols KB, Lazrak A, Docampo MD, Slingerland AE, Slingerland JB, Clurman AG, Armijo G, Gomes ALC, Shono Y, Staffas A, Burgos da Silva M, Devlin SM, Markey KA, Bajic D, Pinedo R, Tsakmaklis A, Littmann ER, Pastore A, Taur Y, Monette S, Arcila ME, Pickard AJ, Maloy M, Wright RJ, Amoretti LA, Fontana E, Pham D, Jamal MA, Weber D, Sung AD, Hashimoto D, Scheid C, Xavier JB, Messina JA, Romero K, Lew M, Bush A, Bohannon L, Hayasaka K, Hasegawa Y, Vehreschild MJGT, Cross JR, Ponce DM, Perales MA, Giralt SA, Jenq RR, Teshima T, Holler E, Chao NJ, et al. 2019. Lactose drives Enterococcus expansion to promote graft-versus-host disease. Science 366:1143–1149. 10.1126/science.aax3760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, Fowler VG, Jr, Tleyjeh IM, Rybak MJ, Barsic B, Lockhart PB, Gewitz MH, Levison ME, Bolger AF, Steckelberg JM, Baltimore RS, Fink AM, O'Gara P, Taubert KA, Stroke C, American Heart Association Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Kawasaki Disease of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Stroke Council. 2015. Infective endocarditis in adults: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 132:1435–1486. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lorenzo MP, Kidd JM, Jenkins SG, Nicolau DP, Housman ST. 2019. In vitro activity of ampicillin and ceftriaxone against ampicillin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium. J Antimicrob Chemother 74:2269–2273. 10.1093/jac/dkz173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Djoric D, Little JL, Kristich CJ. 2020. Multiple low-reactivity class B penicillin-binding proteins are required for cephalosporin resistance in enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e02273-19. 10.1128/AAC.02273-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Arbeloa A, Segal H, Hugonnet JE, Josseaume N, Dubost L, Brouard JP, Gutmann L, Mengin-Lecreulx D, Arthur M. 2004. Role of class A penicillin-binding proteins in PBP5-mediated beta-lactam resistance in Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol 186:1221–1228. 10.1128/jb.186.5.1221-1228.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rice LB, Carias LL, Rudin S, Hutton R, Marshall S, Hassan M, Josseaume N, Dubost L, Marie A, Arthur M. 2009. Role of class A penicillin-binding proteins in the expression of beta-lactam resistance in Enterococcus faecium. J Bacteriol 191:3649–3656. 10.1128/JB.01834-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sifaoui F, Arthur M, Rice L, Gutmann L. 2001. Role of penicillin-binding protein 5 in expression of ampicillin resistance and peptidoglycan structure in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:2594–2597. 10.1128/aac.45.9.2594-2597.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Djoric D, Kristich CJ. 2017. Extracellular SalB contributes to intrinsic cephalosporin resistance and cell envelope integrity in Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol 199:e00392-17. 10.1128/JB.00392-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Singh KV, Murray BE. 2019. Loss of a major enterococcal polysaccharide antigen (Epa) by Enterococcus faecalis is associated with increased resistance to ceftriaxone and carbapenems. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00481-19. 10.1128/AAC.00481-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dale JL, Cagnazzo J, Phan CQ, Barnes AM, Dunny GM. 2015. Multiple roles for Enterococcus faecalis glycosyltransferases in biofilm-associated antibiotic resistance, cell envelope integrity, and conjugative transfer. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:4094–4105. 10.1128/AAC.00344-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gaupp R, Lei S, Reed JM, Peisker H, Boyle-Vavra S, Bayer AS, Bischoff M, Herrmann M, Daum RS, Powers R, Somerville GA. 2015. Staphylococcus aureus metabolic adaptations during the transition from a daptomycin susceptibility phenotype to a daptomycin nonsusceptibility phenotype. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:4226–4238. 10.1128/AAC.00160-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mechler L, Bonetti EJ, Reichert S, Flotenmeyer M, Schrenzel J, Bertram R, Francois P, Gotz F. 2016. Daptomycin tolerance in the Staphylococcus aureus pitA6 mutant is due to upregulation of the dlt operon. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:2684–2691. 10.1128/AAC.03022-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bertsche U, Weidenmaier C, Kuehner D, Yang SJ, Baur S, Wanner S, Francois P, Schrenzel J, Yeaman MR, Bayer AS. 2011. Correlation of daptomycin resistance in a clinical Staphylococcus aureus strain with increased cell wall teichoic acid production and D-alanylation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3922–3928. 10.1128/AAC.01226-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mello SS, Van Tyne D, Lebreton F, Silva SQ, Nogueira MCL, Gilmore MS, Camargo I. 2020. A mutation in the glycosyltransferase gene lafB causes daptomycin hypersusceptibility in Enterococcus faecium. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:36–45. 10.1093/jac/dkz403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sieradzki K, Tomasz A. 1997. Inhibition of cell wall turnover and autolysis by vancomycin in a highly vancomycin-resistant mutant of Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 179:2557–2566. 10.1128/jb.179.8.2557-2566.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Xu Y, Singh KV, Qin X, Murray BE, Weinstock GM. 2000. Analysis of a gene cluster of Enterococcus faecalis involved in polysaccharide biosynthesis. Infect Immun 68:815–823. 10.1128/iai.68.2.815-823.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rigottier-Gois L, Madec C, Navickas A, Matos RC, Akary-Lepage E, Mistou MY, Serror P. 2015. The surface rhamnopolysaccharide epa of Enterococcus faecalis is a key determinant of intestinal colonization. J Infect Dis 211:62–71. 10.1093/infdis/jiu402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mohamed JA, Huang W, Nallapareddy SR, Teng F, Murray BE. 2004. Influence of origin of isolates, especially endocarditis isolates, and various genes on biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis. Infect Immun 72:3658–3663. 10.1128/IAI.72.6.3658-3663.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ramos Y, Rocha J, Hael AL, van Gestel J, Vlamakis H, Cywes-Bentley C, Cubillos-Ruiz JR, Pier GB, Gilmore MS, Kolter R, Morales DK. 2019. PolyGlcNAc-containing exopolymers enable surface penetration by non-motile Enterococcus faecalis. PLoS Pathog 15:e1007571. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Teng F, Kawalec M, Weinstock GM, Hryniewicz W, Murray BE. 2003. An Enterococcus faecium secreted antigen, SagA, exhibits broad-spectrum binding to extracellular matrix proteins and appears essential for E. faecium growth. Infect Immun 71:5033–5041. 10.1128/iai.71.9.5033-5041.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Breton YL, Mazé A, Hartke A, Lemarinier S, Auffray Y, Rincé A. 2002. Isolation and characterization of bile salts-sensitive mutants of Enterococcus faecalis. Curr Microbiol 45:434–439. 10.1007/s00284-002-3714-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rincé A, Le Breton Y, Verneuil N, Giard J-C, Hartke A, Auffray Y. 2003. Physiological and molecular aspects of bile salt response in Enterococcus faecalis. Int J Food Microbiol 88:207–213. 10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00182-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mohamed JA, Teng F, Nallapareddy SR, Murray BE. 2006. Pleiotrophic effects of 2 Enterococcus faecalis sagA-like genes, salA and salB, which encode proteins that are antigenic during human infection, on biofilm formation and binding to collagen type i and fibronectin. J Infect Dis 193:231–240. 10.1086/498871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shankar J, Walker RG, Wilkinson MC, Ward D, Horsburgh MJ. 2012. SalB inactivation modulates culture supernatant exoproteins and affects autolysis and viability in Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. J Bacteriol 194:3569–3578. 10.1128/JB.00376-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Perez-Cheeks BA, Lee C, Hayama R, Marians KJ. 2012. A role for topoisomerase III in Escherichia coli chromosome segregation. Mol Microbiol 86:1007–1022. 10.1111/mmi.12039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Llobet E, Tomas JM, Bengoechea JA. 2008. Capsule polysaccharide is a bacterial decoy for antimicrobial peptides. Microbiology 154:3877–3886. 10.1099/mic.0.2008/022301-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zavascki AP, Goldani LZ, Li J, Nation RL. 2007. Polymyxin B for the treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens: a critical review. J Antimicrob Chemother 60:1206–1215. 10.1093/jac/dkm357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Dunne M, Rupf B, Tala M, Qabrati X, Ernst P, Shen Y, Sumrall E, Heeb L, Pluckthun A, Loessner MJ, Kilcher S. 2019. Reprogramming bacteriophage host range through structure-guided design of chimeric receptor binding proteins. Cell Rep 29:1336–1350. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Burrowes BH, Molineux IJ, Fralick JA. 2019. Directed in vitro evolution of therapeutic bacteriophages: the appelmans protocol. Viruses 11:241. 10.3390/v11030241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Yehl K, Lemire S, Yang AC, Ando H, Mimee M, Torres MT, de la Fuente-Nunez C, Lu TK. 2019. Engineering phage host-range and suppressing bacterial resistance through phage tail fiber mutagenesis. Cell 179:459–469. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mijalis E, Rasche H. 2017. CPT galaxy tools. https://github.com/tamu-cpt/galaxy-tools/. Accessed 1 May 2020.
- 70.Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Nishimura Y, Yoshida T, Kuronishi M, Uehara H, Ogata H, Goto S. 2017. ViPTree: the viral proteomic tree server. Bioinformatics 33:2379–2380. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Perez-Casal J, Caparon MG, Scott JR. 1991. Mry, a trans-acting positive regulator of the M protein gene of Streptococcus pyogenes with similarity to the receptor proteins of two-component regulatory systems. J Bacteriol 173:2617–2624. 10.1128/jb.173.8.2617-2624.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Shepard BD, Gilmore MS. 1995. Electroporation and efficient transformation of Enterococcus faecalis grown in high concentrations of glycine. Methods Mol Biol 47:217–226. 10.1385/0-89603-310-4:217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zhang X, Paganelli FL, Bierschenk D, Kuipers A, Bonten MJ, Willems RJ, van Schaik W. 2012. Genome-wide identification of ampicillin resistance determinants in Enterococcus faecium. PLoS Genet 8:e1002804. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Rice LB, Carias LL, Donskey CL, Rudin SD. 1998. Transferable, plasmid-mediated VanB-type glycopeptide resistance in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:963–964. 10.1128/AAC.42.4.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The Illumina reads for phage 9181, 9183, and 9184 and phage-resistant E. faecium mutants have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive under the accession number PRJEB39873. Assembled phage genomes were submitted to GenBank and were assigned the following accession numbers: MT939240 (phage 9181), MT939241 (phage 9183), and MT939242 (phage 9184).