Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD007146. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007146.pub3

Comparison 7. Vitamin D (with or without calcium) vs control: subgroup analysis by vitamin D level at baseline.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
7.1 Rate of falls 7   Rate Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
7.1.1 Selected for lower vitamin D levels 2 260 Rate Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.57 [0.37, 0.89]
7.1.2 Not selected for lower vitamin D levels 5 9064 Rate Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.93, 1.13]
7.2 Number of fallers 13   Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
7.2.1 Selected for lower vitamin D levels 4 804 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.70 [0.56, 0.87]
7.2.2 Not selected for lower vitamin D levels 9 25943 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.93, 1.07]
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure