Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 May 4;9(1):141–152. doi: 10.1007/s40745-021-00338-9

Modeling of COVID-19 Cases in Pakistan Using Lifetime Probability Distributions

Muhammad Ahsan-ul-Haq 1,, Mukhtar Ahmed 2, Javeria Zafar 1, Pedro Luiz Ramos 3
PMCID: PMC8095477  PMID: 38624717

Abstract

The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) is a respiratory disease that caused a large number of deaths all over the world since its outbreak. The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared the outbreak a global pandemic. The understanding of the random process related to the behavior infection of COVID-19 is an important health and economic problem. In the proposed study, we analyze the frequency of daily confirmed cases of COVID-19 using different two-parameter lifetime probability distributions. We consider the data from the period of March 11, 2020, to July 25, 2020, of Pakistan. We consider nine lifetime probability distributions for the analysis purpose and the selection of best fit was carried out using log-likelihood, AIC, BIC, RMSE, and R2 goodness-of-fit measures. Results indicate that Weibull distribution provides generally the best-fit probability distribution.

Keywords: Coronavirus, Daily confirmed cases, Data analysis, Lifetime distributions, Goodness-of-fit

Introduction

A viral infectious disease named coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) was initially reported in the mid of December in Wuhan City of China [1]. COVID-19 spread worldwide and it affected more than 213 countries including Pakistan [2]. It is an infectious disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-COV-2). The COVID-19 infection leads to respiratory illness and has the most common symptoms like fever, dry cough, tiredness, other symptoms are also widely reported such as sore throat, diarrhea, and loss of taste or smell, aches, and pains [3]. It is an exceptionally infectious and spreads utilizing real contacts and a respirational globule from the tainted ones, which is presently the principal wellspring of transmission of the malady. The infection can be active as long as 12 h or even two days on a reached surface [4].

In Pakistan, the first report of COVID-19 emerged on 26th February 2020 with two positive cases, within 2 days three new cases were reported in different cities without a connection between these patients [5]. Further, reported cases increased constantly until 12th June, where 139,230, positive cases were reported, later there was a decreasing trend of total cases. The total number of confirmed cases until 25th July was 273,113. The province wise detail of COVID-19 positive cases of Punjab, Sindh, KPK, and Baluchistan was 91,901, 117,598, 33,220, and 11,578 respectively.

The COVID-19 became a worldwide pandemic and its spread could be controlled by taking preventive measures. For the patients, all symptoms above should be ceaselessly checked with essential signs and to maintain a strategic distance from additionally spread, they ought to be hatched with severe clinical measures under preventive rules. The administration needs to discover a system to fight this war in an opportune manner, for example, specialists took further proportions of shutting fringes, suspending network administrations and schools, limiting both local and universal goes until further notification [6]. The reason for these measures is to constrain the odds of physical contact among individuals with the goal of controlling the transmission of COVID-19, especially because the brooding time frame for this infection is moderately longer than different infections.

Because of the novel nature of the virus, there is more prominent vulnerability around the choice on the ideal season of the vanishing of this sickness. In this manner, transient determining is critical even in the smallest insight for anticipating the up and coming month for the better administration of the cultural, financial, social, and general medical problems [7]. Data science techniques have been used to describe the behavior of pandemies, crop harvesting, business data mining, e-commerce fraud as well as others applied problems [819]. In the previous, not many months' scientists have created or utilized existing scientific and measurable strategies to anticipate the quantity of COVID-19 cases and related results. The summed up strategic model shows that pestilence development was exponential in china [20]. In view of the forecast, the circumstance will be exacerbated in whole Europe and the USA will turn into the focal point of new cases during the mid of April 2020 [21]. Around 115 million individuals are already tainted worldwide by March, 05, 2021 with more than 2,570,000 deaths. Expectations/gauges help to reinforce the procedures to keep the pandemic from compounding. Soltani-Kermanshahi et al. [22] worked on the statistical distribution of novel coronavirus in Iran. The study compared three types of parametric distributions known as normal, log-normal, and Weibull distribution of COVID-19 cases based on daily reported data of Iran. Yousaf et al. [5] conducted statistical Analysis of forecasting COVID-19 for the upcoming month in Pakistan.

Due to a lack of epidemiological analyses, there are many uncertainties in assessing the risk of this disease in the population. In Pakistan, it will take at least a year for any future treatment or vaccination of COVID-19. In the meantime, the only way to avoid contact with this virus is through precautionary measures and Lockdowns. It causes economic problems and it is not easy to implement without economic losses. So, effective decisions by policymakers or SOPS need to be implemented. In short, the proper modeling of a pandemic can reduce the exponential spread of this infection. Researchers are needed to fully explain its pathways and mechanisms and to identify potential curative targets, which can be effective in developing common preventive and therapeutic targets. This Global Problem has attracted the interest of researchers, giving rise to several proposals to analyze and predict the evolution of pandemic. The first importance is to check the behavior of the number of cases of COVID-19. For this, we considered different parametric distributions to describe the number of daily reported COVID-19 cases in Pakistan.

This paper aimed to identify the best fit model for the analysis of daily confirmed COVID-19 cases in Pakistan, as well as province wise. It is considered the most common two-parameter lifetime model to fit the data. To the best of our knowledge, for the first time, these probability distributions are used for modeling the number of occurrence of COVID-19 cases. The daily confirmed cases are taken from four provinces of Pakistan (Punjab, Sindh, KPK, and Balochistan). The parameters are estimated using the maximum likelihood approach. The best fit model selection was carried out using AIC, BIC, Coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) criteria.

The rest of the paper is as follows; Sect. 2 is based on information on Covid-19 data of selected regions. In Sect. 3 description of statistical models, Sect. 4 is presented by information about model evaluation measures. In Sect. 5, Data is analyzed by Parameter estimates and goodness of fit measures. Finally, conclusions, discussions, and future research are given in Sect. 6.

Materials and Methods

Lifetime Probability Distributions

Lifetimes models are mathematical functions that return the probability of observing the event of interest given a specific time. Usually referred to as probability density function (pdf), this function is used to achieve the probability that the event takes values in a given time interval. Here, the event of interest is the daily occurrence of COVID-19 in the Pakistan population.

This section presents a brief description of the two-parameter models that will be considered in this study. Exploring the literature, some common probability distributions are used as lifetime distributions. For instance, Weibull distribution (WD), Power function distribution (PFD), Log-Logistic distribution (LLD), Log-Normal distribution (LND), inverse Weibull distribution (IWD), Gumbel distribution (GuD), Burr III distribution (BIIID), Burr XII distribution (BXIID), and Birnbaum Saunders distribution (BSD). The probability density function and range of parameters, range of pdf are given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Investigated PDFs and their parameters

Model PDF Range/values Parameters
WD fx=αβxβα-1e-xβα x>0andα,β>0

α: Scale

β: Shape

PFD fx=βxβ-1αβ 0<x<αandα,β>0

α: Scale

β: Shape

LLD fx=βαxαβ-11+xαβ2 x>0andα,β>0

α: Scale

β: Shape

LND fx=1xβ2πexp-lnx-α22β2 x>0andαR,β>0

α: Scale

β: Shape

IWD fx=αβx-β-1exp-αx-β x>0andα,β>0

α: Scale

β: Shape

GuD fx=1σexp-x-μσ+exp-x-μσ x>0andσ,μ>0

σ: Scale

μ: Shape

BIIID fx=αβx-β-11+x-β-α-1 x>0andα,β>0

α: Shape

β: Shape

BXIID fx=αβxβ-11+xβ-α-1 x>0andα,β>0

α: Shape

β: Shape

BSD fx=12αβ2πβx0.5+βx1.5e-12α2xβ+βx-2 x>0andα,β>0

α: Scale

β: Shape

The two-parameters models considered here are standard in statistical analysis and their properties, applicability, and inferential procedures are presented in the statistical literature. Our aim here is not proposed new distributions but to verify if some of the well-established distributions can be used to describe the frequency numbers of Covid-19 cases.

Data Set

We collect the data for daily positive cases of COVID-19, the time period was from March 11, 2020, to July 25, 2020, which were obtained from the public reports of the National Institute of Health (NIH)—Islamabad, Pakistan. It is also considered the confirmed daily case data from four provinces, Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), and Balochistan. Table 2 presents an exploratory analysis related to the COVID-19.

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of Covid-19 Daily cases data

Regions Mean Var Skewness Kurtosis n
Pakistan 1979 3,183,864 0.85320 2.78342 138
Punjab 695.9 447,935.2 1.19635 3.60396 132
Sindh 1250.6 462,046.3 0.59938 2.51550 90
KPK 253.6 42,014.58 0.87237 3.45107 131
Baluchistan 87.05 8934.262 1.89294 7.16524 133

Model Selection and Inference

Here, it is considered the following goodness-of-fit measures for the selection of best-fitted probability distribution. The measures are Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), Root mean square error (RMSE), and Coefficient of determination (R2). The test statistics are;

AIC=2k-2lnLθ,
BIC=klnn-2lnLθ,
RMSE=i=1nv^i-vin,
R2=1-i=1nyi-xi2i=1nyi-zi2,

where Lθ=i=1nfxi;θ is log-likelihood function evaluated at the MLEs and k refers to the number of parameters in the model. For each parameter θi, MLE involves maximizing the likelihood function by solving the following:

Lθθi=0,i=1,2.

We apply such approach to obtain the likelihood functions for the parameters of the selected models, in this case, numerical techniques were used to obtain such parameter estimates. Interested readers can use statistical softwares such as R with packages that contains some of the cited models implemented, see for instance, Delignette-Muller and Dutang [23]. The codes and routines to obtain the parametes estimates can be obtained upon request.

Results

The parameters of the probability distributions are estimated using the maximum likelihood estimation method. Table 3 presents the estimates for the parameters of all probability models. Table 4 provides the results related to the goodness of fit measures. For Pakistan COVID-19 daily cases, W, Gu, PF, and LL distributions seem to have maximum R2 and minimum AIC, BIC, and RMSE. Hence, among the selected distributions, we conclude that these four distributions can be utilized for describe the distributions of the diary number cases. For Punjab, we observed that W, LL, LN, and Gu distributions returned better fit than the other distributions with smaller RMSE, AIC, and BIC and higher R2 values. Similar conclusions with the Weibull, LL, LN, and Gu distributions are observed for Sind, KPK, and Balochistan provinces.

Table 3.

The parameter estimates of all fitted probability distributions

Model Parameters Pakistan Punjab Sindh KPK Baluchistan
WD α^ 0.8837 0.9771 1.9304 1.0961 0.8656
β^ 1880.7 702.95 1388.8 260.36 81.066
PFD α^ 6825.0 2705.0 3038.0 1035.0 501.00
β^ 0.4967 0.5065 0.9474 0.5146 0.3997
LLD α^ 1168.8 414.92 925.00 176.57 47.856
β^ 1.1194 1.3511 2.7450 1.4216 1.1856
LND μ^ 6.8150 5.9284 6.9634 4.9988 3.7146
σ^ 1.7532 1.3389 0.6219 1.3109 1.4871
IWD α^ 10.806 19.718 346.64 13.803 5.9025
β^ 0.4094 0.5731 0.8829 0.6141 0.6077
GuD μ^ 1167.9 407.59 930.80 160.75 49.097
σ^ 1301.6 443.99 536.88 154.15 57.524
BIIID α^ 14.485 25.116 443.65 16.869 7.8600
β^ 0.4471 0.6113 0.9185 0.6471 0.6673
BXIID α^ 0.0241 0.0269 0.0248 0.0269 0.0237
β^ 6.0873 6.2693 5.8018 7.4420 11.359
BSD α^ 3.8585 2.0913 0.7238 1.7599 1.9144
β^ 156.47 180.59 771.95 86.398 27.486

Table 4.

The goodness-of-fit measures of fitted distributions

Model  − 2L AIC BIC RMSE R2
Pakistan
WD 2367.75 2371.75 2377.60 0.0427 0.9804
PFD 2350.08 2354.08 2359.94 0.0436 0.9747
LLD 2407.84 2411.84 2417.70 0.0554 0.9628
LND 2427.53 2431.53 2437.39 0.0794 0.9165
IWD 2516.58 2520.58 2526.44 0.1239 0.7161
GuD 2425.54 2429.54 2435.40 0.0516 0.9739
BIIID 2501.32 2505.32 2511.18 0.1164 0.7553
BXIID 2690.87 2694.87 2700.73 0.2376 0.2216
BSD 2485.50 2489.50 2495.36 0.2502 0.3964
Punjab
WD 1991.84 1995.84 2001.61 0.0205 0.9953
PFD 2008.69 2012.69 2018.46 0.0865 0.8852
LLD 2012.27 2016.27 2022.04 0.0320 0.9881
LND 2016.73 2020.73 2026.50 0.0442 0.9762
IWD 2085.88 2089.88 2095.64 0.0897 0.8580
GuD 2044.69 2048.69 2054.46 0.0619 0.9617
BIIID 2075.22 2079.22 2084.98 0.0836 0.8813
BXIID 2300.36 2304.36 2310.13 0.2408 0.1445
BSD 2069.77 2073.77 2079.54 0.1628 0.6675
Sindh
WD 1415.28 1419.28 1424.28 0.0271 0.9917
PFD 1443.14 1447.14 1452.14 0.1108 0.7982
LLD 1429.62 1433.62 1438.62 0.0877 0.9166
LND 1423.32 1427.32 1432.32 0.0299 0.9894
IWD 1489.02 1493.02 1498.02 0.1221 0.6703
GuD 1417.87 1421.87 1426.87 0.0328 0.9885
BIIID 1484.58 1488.58 1493.58 0.1168 0.7023
BXIID 1782.73 1786.73 1791.73 0.2852 0.0142
BSD 1443.33 1447.33 1452.33 0.1558 0.7356
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
WD 1710.76 1714.76 1720.51 0.0399 0.9827
PFD 1745.76 1749.76 1755.51 0.1005 0.8491
LLD 1744.55 1748.55 1754.30 0.0538 0.9655
LND 1752.35 1756.35 1762.10 0.0750 0.9309
IWD 1816.05 1820.05 1825.80 0.1080 0.8134
GuD 1740.05 1744.05 1749.80 0.0414 0.9825
BIIID 1808.43 1812.43 1818.18 0.1035 0.8304
BXIID 1993.31 1997.28 2003.03 0.2295 0.2153
BSD 1772.83 1776.80 1782.58 0.1580 0.7199
Balochistan
WD 1449.43 1453.43 1459.21 0.0311 0.9891
PFD 1498.03 1502.03 1507.81 0.1157 0.7659
LLD 1473.02 1477.02 1482.80 0.0503 0.9710
LND 1471.06 1475.06 1480.84 0.0651 0.9518
IWD 1514.77 1518.77 1524.55 0.0910 0.8883
GuD 1519.66 1523.66 1529.44 0.0563 0.9666
BIIID 1506.41 1510.41 1516.19 0.0853 0.9044
BXIID 1610.24 1614.24 1620.02 0.1805 0.5161
BSD 1471.07 1475.07 1480.85 0.1135 0.8552

Overall, it is evident from Table 4 that the best suitable model to describe the data of the different provinces of Pakistan is Weibull distribution. Figures 1, 2 presents a box-plot of R2, RMSE, AIC, and BIC with the results obtained from the different models. As can be seen in the figures, we can easily identify the Weibull distribution performed better than the other models.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Combine box plots of R2 and RMSE for all fitted probability distributions

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Combine box plots of AIC and BIC for all fitted probability distributions

Figure 3 provides the adjusted Weibull distribution with the empirical distributions for Pakistan, and Punjab, Sindh, KPK, and Balochistan provinces. It can be seen the figures that Weibull distribution has a good fit for all the considered datasets, which confirms the goodness of fit tests. Hence, the findings indicate that using Weibull distribution for analysis of COVID-19 daily cases returns more accurate probabilities than using the competitor distributions.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

COVI-19 daily cases and fitted Weibull distribution

From the adjusted results we can compute the expected number of cases assuming different levels of probability. The values can be computed from

xp=λ-logp1k,

where λ and k are the MLEs available in Table 3, x is the integer part of x and p is the probability level. As an example, assuming a probability level ofof 0.5 and using the estimates from Pakistan, we have that x0.5=1241.

It is important to point out that computing estimates in real-time play a key role as a tool for decision making during pandemic periods.In this way, we have provided the necessary codes in R (available in Supplemental Material) to update the estimates and compute the expected values according to different levels.

Discussion

The current study is conducted to analyze COVID-19 daily case data of the Pakistan region, as well as also analyze province wise. Our focus was also to identify the appropriate two-parametric models that can be used to describe the distribution of the daily number of positive COVID-19 cases. It is concluded that the Weibull distribution returned better results when compared with other well-known distributions with two parameters. This conclusion is based on widely used metrics to discriminate models such as R2, AIC, BIC, and RMSE. Visual confirmation was also observed comparing the empirical distributions with the adjusted by the Weibull distribution with different parameters. An interesting aspect of our findings is that while most of the analysis conducted with COVID-19 are aimed to flat the curve of the distributions due to the temporal observations ( the number of infected does not pass a threshold that could collapse the health system) here, we aim to obtain graphs with an exponential decay without a very long-tail, this would imply that there are many days where the number of positives cases are decreasing with few positive cases. Additionally, with the adjusted parameters of the Weibull distribution, we can use the complementary of the cumulative distribution to estimate the probability that a number of cases could be greater or equal to a determinate number of positive cases of COVID-19 in Pakistan or its provinces. To the best of our knowledge, no comparison have been considered using the proposed lifetime models. To the best of our knowledge, no comparison has been considered using the proposed lifetime models. These results are of main interest during resource allocation planning or social isolation policies.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful Journal editor and reviewers for the improvent of this paper. Pedro L. Ramos acknowledges the support of the São Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP Proc. 2017/25971-0).

Abbreviations

Covid-19

Coronavirus disease

WHO

World Health Organization

SARS-COV-2

Severe acute respiratory syndrome

R2

Coefficient of determination

RMSE

Root mean square error

WD

Weibull distribution

PFD

Power function distribution

LLD

Log-logistics distribution

LND

Log-normal distribution

IWD

Inverse Weibull distribution

GuD

Gumbel distribution

BIIID

Burr III distribution

BXIID

Burr XII distribution

BSD

Birnbaum Saunders distribution

NIH

National Institute of Health

KPK

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

AIC

Akaike information criterion

BIC

Bayesian information criterion

MLE

Maximum likelihood estimation

Appendix

# R code for estimating the parameters of Weibull distribution.

x<-c() ##Data to be included

require(MASS)

fit<-fitdistr(x,"weibull")

AIC(fit)

Funding

No funding received for this paper.

Data Availability

Data sets are available on https://covid.gov.pk/.

Declaration

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Code availability

Application code is given in appendix.

Author contributions

All the authors equally contribute in this project.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Paules CI, Marston HD, Fauci AS (2020) Coronavirus infections—more than just the common cold. JAMA 323(8):707–708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Noreen N, Dil S, Niazi S, Naveed I, Khan N, Khan F, Tabbasum S, Kumar D (2020) COVID 19 pandemic and Pakistan; limitations and gaps. Glob Biosecur 1(4)
  • 3.Ceccarelli G, Scagnolari C, Pugliese F, Mastroianni CM, d’Ettorre G (2020) Probiotics and COVID-19. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(8):721–722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fong SJ, Li G, Dey N, Crespo RG, Herrera-Viedma E (2020) Finding an accurate early forecasting model from small dataset: a case of 2019-ncov novel coronavirus outbreak. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.10776
  • 5.Yousaf M, Zahir S, Riaz M, Hussain SM, Shah K (2020) Statistical analysis of forecasting COVID-19 for upcoming month in Pakistan. Chaos Solitons Fractals 138:109926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Raza S, Rasheed MA, Rashid MK (2020) Transmission potential and severity of COVID-19 in Pakistan
  • 7.Petropoulos F, Makridakis S (2020) Forecasting the novel coronavirus COVID-19. PLoS ONE 15(3):e0231236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kumar S (2020) Monitoring novel corona virus (COVID-19) infections in India by cluster analysis. Ann Data Sci 7:417–425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Khakharia A, Shah V, Jain S et al (2021) Outbreak prediction of COVID-19 for dense and populated countries using machine learning. Ann Data Sci 8:1–19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li J, Guo K, Herrera Viedma E, Lee H, Liu J, Zhong Z, Gomes L, Filip FG, Fang SC, Özdemir MS, Liu XH, Lu G, Sh Y (2020) Culture vs policy: more global collaboration to effectively combat COVID-19. The Innovation. 10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu Y, Gu Z, Xia S, Shi B, Zhou X, Shi Y, Liu J (2020) What are the underlying transmission patterns of COVID-19 outbreak? An age-specific social contact characterization EClincialMedicine 22:100354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ianishi P, Junior OA, Henriques MJ, do Nascimento DC, Mattar GK, Ramos PL, Ara A, Louzada F (2020) Probability on graphical structure: a knowledge-based agricultural case. Ann Data Sci 1–19
  • 13.Olson DL, Shi Y (2007) Introduction to business data mining. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shi Y, Tian YJ, Kou G, Peng Y, Li JP (2011) Optimization based data mining: theory and applications. Springer, Berlin [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tien JM (2017) Internet of things, real-time decision making, and artificial intelligence. Ann Data Sci 4(2):149–217 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nascimento DC, Barbosa B, Perez AM, Caires DO, Hirama E, Ramos PL, Louzada F (2019) Risk management in e-commerce: a fraud study case using acoustic analysis through its complexity. Entropy 21(11):1087 [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ramos PL, Nascimento DC, Ferreira PH, Weber KT, Santos TE, Louzada F (2019) Modeling traumatic brain injury lifetime data: improved estimators for the generalized gamma distribution under small samples. PLoS ONE 14(8):e0221332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cao X (2020) COVID-19: immunopathology and its implications for therapy. Nat Rev Immunol 20(5):269–270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jorge, P. R., & Nuno, T. (2020). Predicting the evolution and control of COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/03/31/2020.03.28.20046250.full.pdf [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Roosa K, Lee Y, Luo R, Kirpich A, Rothenberg R, Hyman JM, Yan P, Chowell G (2020) Real-time forecasts of the COVID-19 epidemic in China from February 5th to February 24th, 2020. Infect Dis Model 5:256–263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kumar P, Kalita H, Patairiya S, Sharma YD, Nanda C, Rani M, Rahmani J, Bhagavathula AS (2020) Forecasting the dynamics of COVID-19 pandemic in top 15 countries in April 2020: ARIMA model with machine learning approach. MedRxiv
  • 22.Soltani-Kermanshahi M, Gholami E, Mansori K (2020) Statistical distribution of novel coronavirus in Iran
  • 23.Delignette-Muller ML, Dutang C (2015) fitdistrplus: an R package for fitting distributions. J Stat Softw 64(4):1–34 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sets are available on https://covid.gov.pk/.


Articles from Annals of Data Science are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES