Abstract
Tricarbonylrhenium(I)(α-diimine) complexes are of importance because of their strong cytotoxic and fluorescence properties. Syntheses of such complexes were achieved through a two-step process. First, the pentylcarbonato complexes, fac-(CO)3(α-diimine)ReOC(O)OC5H11 were synthesized through a microwave-assisted reaction of Re2(CO)10, α-diimine, 1-pentanol and CO2 in a few hours. Second, the pentylcarbonato complexes are treated with carboxylic, sulfonic and halo acids to obtain the corresponding carboxylato, sulfonato and halido complexes. This is the first example of conversion of Re2(CO)10 into a rhenium carbonyl complex through microwave-assisted reaction.
Keywords: Rhenium decacarbonyl, α-diimines, microwave-assisted, pentyl carbonate, carboxylate, sulfonate, chloride
Graphical abstract

1. Introduction
The carboxylato and sulfonato derivatives of rhenium(I) tricarbonyl complexes containing α-diimine ligands (N~N) exhibit exceptionally strong cytotoxic properties. The low IC50 (concentration of the compound required for 50% inhibition) values of some of these complexes have been compiled in a recent review article [1]. Almost invariably all rhenium(I) tricarbonyl complexes are obtained from the starting material, rhenium pentacarbonyl chloride, Re(CO)5Cl, possibly due to its ready availability from commercial sources. Customarily, carboxylato rhenium(I) tricarbonyl complexes, Fac-(CO)3(N~N)ReOC(O)R, are obtained from the reaction of the corresponding chlorido complexes, A, with silver triflate as shown in Scheme 1 [2].
Scheme 1.
Conventional synthesis of carboxylato complexes
This method produces undesirable heavy metal salt (AgCl). We took a slightly different but simple synthetic route to carboxylato and sulfonato complexes. The tricarbonyl rhenium(I) pentylcarbonato complexes, Fac-(CO)3(N~N)ReOC(O)OC5H11, a new class of synthon, can be obtained from the treatment of the parent Re2(CO)10 and N~N in the presence of CO2 in 1-pentanol [3]. Subsequent treatment of the tricarbonyl rhenium(I) pentylcarbonato complexes with the corresponding carboxylic and sulfonic acids yield the carboxylato and sulfonato complexes quantitatively as shown in Scheme 2 [4]. The reactions of Re2(CO)10, N~N and CO2 in 1-pentanol afforded the pentylcarbonato complexes over a period of 24–36 h [3]. We observed that the reactions were very slow in low boiling alcohols. Previously we reported that it took more than two weeks to prepare a rhenium-diphosphine propylcarbonato complex from the reaction of Re2(CO)10 and a chelated diphosphine in 1-propanol [5].
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of pentylcarbonato, carboxylato, and sulfonato complexes
Microwave-assisted synthesis of organic compounds has been a routine technique in industry and academia [6]. It is also being used in the synthesis of inorganic and organometallic compounds [7], nanoparticles [8], etc. It shortens the reaction time abruptly. Many organometallic rhenium complexes have been synthesized using microwave-assisted synthesis [9]. To the best of our knowledge, synthesis of any organometallic rhenium complex from parent Re2(CO)10 using microwave-assisted synthesis has not been reported to date. Herein, we report the microwave-assisted synthesis of three tricarbonyl rhenium(I) pentylcarbonato complexes (1–3) directly from the reactions of a mixture of Re2(CO)10, α-diimines, CO2 and 1-pentanol (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3.
Microwave assisted synthesis of pentylcarbonato complexes, 1–3
Additionally, we report the synthesis of 2-pyridinesulfonato (4), chlorido (5) and acetylsalicylato (aka, aspirinato) (6) derivatives from the new synthons, 1–3 (Scheme 4).
Scheme 4.
Synthesis of sulfonato, chlorido and acetylsalicylato complexes, 4–6
2. Experimental Section
Synthesis of 1–3. Re2(CO)10 (0.050 g, 0.076 mmol), 4-methyl-1,10-phenanthroline (0.0382 g, 0.16 mmol) or 4,7-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline (0.033 g, 0.16 mmol) or 3,4,7,8-tetramethyl-1,10-phenanthroline (0.038 g, 0.16 mmol), 4.5 mL of 1-pentanol, and a magnetic stirring bar were placed into a CEM microwave vial. The vial was loaded with CO2, capped, and the contents were stirred for 30 minutes. It was then microwaved into the CEM microwave oven for 3 hours and 30 minutes at 160°C. After the reaction, the vial was cooled in the freezer for several hours. The contents of the vial were transferred into a 100mL round-bottomed flask containing 50mL of hexanes. It was then stirred in the presence of CO2 gas for several hours and cooled in the freezer. Filtration afforded a yellow solid which was washed with hexanes to remove the residual 1-pentanol. The filtrate was kept aside for further examination. The yields range from 68–80%. Characterization of 1: FT-IR (cm−1, CH2Cl2) ʋ(C≡O) 2023(vs), 1918(s) and 1894(s), and ʋ(C=O) 1660(m). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 9.31 (dd, J = 5.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 9.15 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 8.48 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.06 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (dd, J = 8.2, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (dt, J = 5.3, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 3.44 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 2.79 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 3H), 1.23 – 1.11 (m, 2H), 1.09 – 0.89 (m, 4H), 0.65 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ196.43, 191.90, 157.90, 154.58, 153.77, 150.51, 146.51, 146.01, 140.08, 130.58, 127.87, 127.41, 126.87, 125.08, 124.65, 65.31, 28.75, 27.91, 22.20, 19.24, 14.28. Anal. Calcd for C22H21N2O6Re.0.1 CH2Cl2 (%): C, 43.93; H,3.53; N, 4.63. Found: C, 43.67; H, 3.49; N, 4.72. Characterization of 2: FT-IR (cm−1, CH2Cl2) ʋ(C≡O) 2022(vs), 1916(s) and 1892(s), and ʋ(C=O) 1660 (m). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 9.27 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 2H), 8.20 (s, 2H), 7.70 (dd, J = 4.5, 0.8 Hz, 2H), 3.56 (t, J = 4.3 Hz, 2H), 2.91 (s, 3H), 1.31–1.26 (m, 2H), 1.17–1.04 (m, 4H), 0.78 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 198.22, 194.24, 158.69, 153.14, 149.05, 146.91, 130.17, 126.34, 123.68, 65.86, 28.91, 28.12, 22.43, 19.08, 13.79. Anal. Calcd for C23H23N2O6Re (%): C, 45.31; H,3.80; N, 4.60. Found: C, 45.15; H, 3.68; N, 4.45. Characterization of 3: FT-IR (cm−1, CH2Cl2) ʋ(C≡O) 2021(vs), 1915(s) and 1890(s), and ʋ(C=O) 1660. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 9.19 (s, 2H), 8.21 (s, 2H), 3.64 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.82 (s, 6H), 2.66 (s, 6H), 1.37–1.33 (m, 2H), 1.25 – 1.11 (m, 4H), 0.84 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 198.31, 194.48, 158.56, 154.02, 146.43, 145.61, 134.30, 129.06, 123.38, 65.83, 28.90, 28.09, 22.40, 17.60, 14.91, 13.75. Anal. Calcd for C25H27N2O6Re (%): C, 47.09; H,4.27; N, 4.39. Found: C, 46.84; H, 4.16; N, 4.37.
Evaporation of a small amount of the filtrate yielded a yellow residue that might contain pentyl hydrogen carbonate. Because ethyl hydrogen carbonate is a solid, it is likely that pentyl hydrogen carbonate is solid. The IR spectrum of ethyl hydrogen carbonate shows a ʋ(C=O) at 1730 cm−1 [10]. The IR spectrum of the yellow solid residue in dichloromethane did not show any ʋ(C=O) in 1700–1800 cm−1 region. Likewise, the IR spectra of 1–3 lack ʋ(C=O)’s in the same region. Therefore, the microwave heating of 1-pentanol with carbon dioxide might not produce any pentyl hydrogen carbonate.
Synthesis of 4–6. A mixture of 0.1000 g (1.68 × 10−4 mol) of 1, 0.0267 g (1.68 × 10−4 mol) of pyridine-2-sulfonic acid or 0.1000 g (1.64 × 10−4 mol) of 2, 0.0600 g (136.5 μL, 1.64 × 10−3 mol) of concentrated hydrochloric acid (37%, density = 1.185 g/mL) or 0.1000 g (1.57 × 10−4 mol) of 3, 0.0283 g (1.57 × 10−4 mol) of acetylsalicylic acid and 10 mL of dichloromethane were stirred for about six (6) hours in a 50 mL round bottom flask. The reactions were monitored with infrared spectroscopy. We did not detect any pentyl hydrogen carbonate in the dichloromethane solutions during the reactions of 1–3 with the corresponding acids. The IR spectrum of pentyl hydrogen carbonate is expected to exhibit a ʋ(C=O) in 1700–1800 cm−1 region [10]. When the reaction was complete, the solution was concentrated to about 2 mL on a rotary evaporator. It was then carefully mixed with hexane so that no precipitation occurred. The mixture was cooled to −5° C for a day or two. The pale-yellow crystals were obtained through filtration. The yields of 4–6 range from 90 to 100%. Characterization of 4: FT-IR (cm−1, CH2Cl2) ʋ(C≡O) 2030(vs), 1926(s) and 1905(s). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 9.36 (dd, J = 8, 4 Hz, 1H), 9.21 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1H), 8.63 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 8.34 (m, 1H), 8.20 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 4Hz, 1H), 7.89 (dd, J = 8, 4 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (m, 2H), 7.26 (m, 1H), 2.93 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 159.81, 154.48, 153.81, 150.18, 149.52, 147.95, 147.28, 139.42, 137.52, 130.97, 130.90, 127.68, 127.25, 126.27, 125.45, 124.73, 121.99, 19.71. Anal. Calcd for C21H14N3O6ReS. 0.1 C6H14 (%): C, 41.10; H, 2.46; N, 6.65. Found: C, 41.17; H, 2.55; N, 6.46. Characterization of 5: FT-IR (cm−1, CH2Cl2) ʋ(C≡O) 2022(vs), 1917(s) and 1895(s). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 9.21 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1H), 8.22 (s, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1H), 2.93 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 197.91, 190.12, 152.45, 148.78, 146.82, 130.37, 126.59, 123.74, 19.06. Anal. Calcd for C17ClH12N2O3Re (%): C, 39.73; H, 2.35; N, 5.45. Found: C, 39.34; H, 2.22; N, 5.38. Characterization of 6: FT-IR (cm−1, CH2Cl2) ʋ(C≡O) 2019(vs), 1913(s) and 1889(s), ʋ(C=O) 1753 (br, m), and ʋ(C=O) 1630 (br, m). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 9.24 (s, 2H), 8.21 (s, 2H), 7.23 – 7.11 (m, 1H), 7.00 – 6.73 (m, 3H), 2.82 (s, 6H), 2.66 (s, 6H), 2.11 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 169.62, 169.43, 154.66, 149.65, 146.58, 146.06, 134.51, 131.23, 130.37, 130.12, 129.36, 125.09, 123.67, 122.72, 21.28, 18.00, 15.30. Anal. Calcd for C28H23N2O7Re.0.1CH2Cl2 CH2Cl2 (%): C, 48.61; H, 3.36; N, 4.03. Found: C, 48.32; H, 3.18; N, 3.93.
3. Results and Discussion
Previously we reported the synthesis of analogous pentylcarbonato complexes [3]. It was suggested that the ligand substitution reactions followed by homolytic cleavage and subsequent reactions with 1-pentanol and carbon dioxide yielded the pentylcarbonato complexes. The microwave reactions probably follow similar pathways. An average yield of 75% was obtained for 1–3. The IR spectrum of each (1–3) exhibits the characteristic ʋ(C=O) around 1660 cm−1 [3]. The 1H NMR spectrum of each confirms the presence of the pentyl group. Likewise, the 13C NMR spectrum of each shows a resonance due to C=O around δ165. A single crystal of 3 was successfully grown through crystallization in a mixture of dichloromethane and hexane in the presence of carbon dioxide. 3 crystallizes in monoclinic space group P21/n (Fig. 1). The molecule crystallizes as three independent molecules in the lattice (Fig. S7). The molecules differ in torsion angles about the pentyl group. Two of the independent molecules show disorder in the pentyl groups. No solvent is present in the lattice. The crystallographic data (Table S1) and related other information are available in Supplementary materials. The axial Re-CO bond length of 1.894(10) Å is slightly shorter than the equatorial Re-CO bond lengths of 1.917(9) and 1.915(8) Å. A similar trend was previously observed with related other carboxylato complexes [2,3,5,11]. Treatments of 1, 2 and 3 with 2-pyridinesulfonic acid, hydrochloric acid and acetylsalicylic acid in dichloromethane afforded the corresponding sulfonato (4), chlorido (5) and acetylsalicylato (6) complexes respectively. 4–6 were characterized through IR and NMR spectroscopic techniques. The IR spectrum of each exhibits three strong ʋ(C≡O)’s consistent with facial geometry of each complex [3]. Also, 6 shows a broad medium intensity ʋ(C=O) at 1753 cm−1 for the methyl ester group and a second a broad medium intensity ʋ(C=O) at 1630 cm−1 for the -C(=O)O-Re-moiety. The 1H NMR spectrum of 4–6 each confirms the methyl groups present in the aromatic rings and an additional methyl of the acetylsalicylate group. The 13C NMR spectrum of each exhibits the expected number of aromatic and aliphatic carbons. Two down-field resonances due to three terminal carbonyls are observed for 5; however, weak resonances are observed for 4 and 6. For 6, the peaks at δ 169.62 and 169.43 are due to the two C=O groups. Single crystals of 4 – 6 were grown through crystallization in a mixture of dichloromethane and hexane. 4 crystallizes in monoclinic C2/c space group (Fig. 2), 5 crystallizes in triclinic space group P-1 (Fig. S8) and 6 crystallizes in monoclinic space group P21 (Fig. 3 for molecule 1 and Fig. S9 for molecule 2). The crystallographic data and related other information are available in Supplementary material. As expected, the average Re-N lengths of 2.162 Å in 3 and 2.176 Å in 6 are longer the corresponding Re-O lengths of 1.116 Å in 3 and 2.148 Å in 6. A similar trend was also observed in related rhenium (I) carboxylato complexes [12]. In 5, the length of 1.090(4) Å for the C1-O1 bond trans to the Cl atom is shorter than those of 1.149(4) and 1.153(4) Å for the CO bonds cis to the Cl atom. This was also observed in other rhenium chlorido complexes [13]. The Re1-Cl1 bond length of 2.4807(8) Å is comparable to those of 2.478(1) Å [14], 2.491(1) Å [14], 2.459(1) Å [14], and 2.497(2) Å [15] observed for the Re-Cl lengths of similar rhenium(I) chlorido complexes. Re1-O11 bond length of 2.170 (4) Å in 4 is very similar to the Re-O bond distances in related sulfonato complexes [4,16]. However, Re1-O11-S1 bond angle of 127.3(2)° in 4 is smaller than the corresponding bond angles of 130.47(11)° and 130.66(12)° observed in other sulfonato complexes [4,16].
Fig. 1.
Molecular structure of one of three independent molecules in the lattice of 3 (50% probability ellipsoids). Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Select bond distances (Å) and angles (deg): Re(1)-C(1), 1.917(9); Re(1)-C(2), 1.915(8); Re(1)-C(3), 1.894(10); Re(1)-N(1), 2.166(5); Re(1)-N(2), 2.158(6); Re(1)-O(4), 2.116(5); C(3)-Re(1)-O(4), 172.2(3); C(2)-Re(1)-N(2), 173.4(3); C(1)-Re(1)-N(1), 169.6(3); C(20)-O(4)-Re(1), 125.6(4); C(1)-Re(1)-O(4), 96.8(3); C(2)-Re(1)-O(4), 95.1(3); N(1)-Re(1)-O(4), 76.3(2); N(2)-Re(1)-O(4), 79.92(19). See the Supplemental materials for details of the two independent molecules in the lattice that exhibit disorder in the pentyl group.
Fig. 2.
Molecular structure of 4. Select bond distances (Å) and angles (deg): Re1-C1, 1.921(7); Re1-C2, 1.912(7); Re1-C3, 1.890(7); Re1-N22, 2.172(5); Re1-N34, 2.169(5); Re1-O11, 2.170(4); C3-Re1-O11, 174.0(2); C2-Re1-N22, 171.5(3); C1-Re1-N34, 175.4(3); S1-O11-Re1, 127.3(2); C1-Re1-O11, 97.8(2); C2-Re1-O11, 96.3(2); N22-Re1-O11, 78.69(17); N34-Re1-O11, 81.90(16).
Fig. 3.
Molecular structure of one of the two molecules in the lattice of 6. Select bond distances (Å) and angles (deg): Re1-C1A, 1.902(3); Re1-C3A, 1.939(4); Re1-C5A, 1.919(4); Re1-N21A, 2.170(3); Re1-N36A, 2.181(3); Re1-O7A, 2.148(2); C1A-Re1-O7A, 175.73(11); C3A-Re1-N21A, 171.69(13); C5A-Re1-N36A, 172.87(12); Re-O7A-C8A, 120.41(19); C3A-Re1-O7A, 94.26(11); C5A-Re1-O7A, 93.39(12); O7A-Re1-N21A, 80.55(9); O7A-Re1-N36A, 83.33(9). See the Supplemental materials for details of the second molecule in the lattice that exhibit disorder in the acetoxy group.
4. Conclusion and perspectives
The pentylcarbonato complexes serve as very important and convenient synthon. They are readily available through microwave-assisted synthesis. They can be manipulated in ordinary laboratory conditions. They are stable at ambient temperature for years if they are stored in stoppered vials. A wide variety of carboxylato, sulfonato, and related other complexes can be obtained with an almost quantitative yield in a very short period of time. Research is in progress to cut short the microwave reaction times using high boiling alcohols such as 1-hexanol and 1-heptanol.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
Microwave heating of a mixture of rhenium decacarbonyl, α-diimines, 1-pentanol and carbon dioxide yields tricarbonylrhenium(I)(α-diimine) pentylcarbonato complexes.
The pentylcarbonato complexes cleanly convert to the corresponding carboxylato, sulfonato and chlorido complexes in the presence of carboxylic acid, sulfonic acid and hydrochloric acid.
The tricarbonylrhenium (3,4,7,8-tetramethylphen) pentylcarbonato complex crystallizes as three independent molecules in the lattice.
The tricarbonylrhenium (3,4,7,8-tetramethylphen) aspirinato complex crystallizes as two independent molecules in the lattice.
Acknowledgements
This research was partially supported by the NIH Grant No. 5R25GM0058904 to AJW.
Footnotes
Supplementary material
IR and NMR spectra of 1–6. Molecular structures of the 3 independent molecules in the lattice of 3. X-ray structure of 5. X-ray structure of 6 – molecule 2. Crystallographic data for 3 - 6 (PDF)
CCDC 1949461, 1995496, 1952462, and 2008663 (for 3 - 6, respectively) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing data_request@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- [1].Bauer EB, Haase AA, Reich RM, Crans DC, Kühn FE, Organometallic and coordination rhenium compounds and their potential in cancer therapy. Coord. Chem. Rev 393 (2019) 79–117. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Skiba J, Kowalczyk A, Staczek P, Bernas T´, Trzybiński D, Wozńiak K, Schatzschneider U, Czerwieniec R, Kowalski K, Luminescent fac-[Re(CO)3(phen)] carboxylate complexes with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: synthesis and mechanistic insights into the In vitro anticancer activity of fac-[Re(CO)3(phen)(aspirin)]. New J. Chem 43 (2019) 573–583. [Google Scholar]
- [3].Mbagu MK, Kebulu DN, Winstead A, Pramanik SK, Banerjee HN, Iwunze MO, Wachira JM, Greco GE, Haynes GK, Sehmer A, Sarkar FH, Ho DM, Pike RD, Mandal SK, Fac-tricarbonyl(pentylcarbonato)(α-diimine)rhenium complexes: One-pot synthesis, characterization, fluorescence studies, and cytotoxic activity against human MDA-MB-231 breast, CCl-227 colon and BxPC-3 pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. Inorg. Chem. Commun 21 (2012) 35–38. [Google Scholar]
- [4].Wilder PT, Weber DJ, Winstead A, Parnell S, Hinton TV, Stevenson M, Giri D, Azemati S, Olczak P, Powell BV, Odebode T, Tadesse S, Zhang Y, Pramanik SK, Wachira JM, Ghimire S, McCarthy P, Barfield A, Banerjee HN, Chen C, Golen JA, Rheingold AL, Krause JA, Ho DM, Zavalij PY, Shaw R, Mandal SK, Unprecedented anticancer activities of organorhenium sulfonato and carboxylato complexes against hormone-dependent MCF-7 and hormone-independent triple-negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem 441 (2018) 151–163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Johnson K, Frazier T, Becker TM, Miller K, Ho DM, Krause-Bauer J, Mandal SK, One-pot synthesis of manganese(I) and rhenium(I) alkylcarbonato complexes, fac-(CO)3(dppp)MOC(O)OR. Possible trapping of intermediate diphosphine dimers, [(CO)3(dppp)M]2. Inorg. Chem. Commun 4 (2001) 602–605. [Google Scholar]
- [6].Kappe CO, Stadler A, Dallinger D, Microwaves in Organic and Medicinal Chemistry, 2nd ed., Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- [7].Kharissova OV, Kharisov BI, Méndez UO, Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Coordination and Organometallic Compounds, Advances in Induction and Microwave Heating of Mineral and Organic Materials, Stanis Å‚aw Grundas (Ed.), 2011, ISBN: 978–953-307–522-8, InTech, Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/advances-in-induction-and-microwave-heating-of-mineral-and-organic-materials/microwave-assisted-synthesis-of-coordination- and-organometallic-compounds. [Google Scholar]
- [8].Singh AK, Nakate UT, Microwave synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic properties of SnO2 nanoparticles, Adv. Nanopart 2 (2013) 66–70. [Google Scholar]
- [9].(a) Green AEC, Causey PW, Louie AS, Armstrong AF, Harrington LE, Valliant JF, Microwave-assisted synthesis of 3,1,2- and 2,1,8-Re(I) and 99mTc(I)-metallocarborane complexes, Inorg. Chem 45 (2006) 5727–5729; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kimura H, Mori D, Harada N, Ono M, Ohmomo Y, Kajimoto T, Kawashima H, Saji H, Microwave-assisted synthesis of organometallic complexes of 99mTc(CO)₃ and Re(CO)₃: its application to radiopharmaceuticals, Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 60 (2012) 79–85; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Armstrong AF, Valliant JF, Microwave-assisted synthesis of tricarbonyl rhenacarboranes: steric and electronic effects on the 1,2 → 1,7 carborane cage isomerization, Inorg. Chem 46 (2007) 2148–2158; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Armstrong AF, Lebert JM, Brennan JD, Valliant JF , Functionalized carborane complexes of the [M(CO)2(NO)]2+ core (M = 99mTc, Re): a new class of organometallic probes for correlated in vitro and in vivo imaging, Organometallics 28 (2009) 2986–2992; [Google Scholar]; (e) Causey PW, Besanger TR, Schaffer P, Valliant JF, Expedient multi-step synthesis of organometallic complexes of Tc and Re in high effective specific activity. A new platform for the production of molecular imaging and therapy agents, Inorg. Chem 47 (2008) 8213–8221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Bernard J, Köck E-M, Huber RG, Liedl KR, Call L, Schlögl R, Grothe H, Loerting T, Carbonic acid monoethyl ester as a pure solid and its conformational isomerism in the gas-phase. RSC Adv. 7 (2017) 22222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Mandal SK, Ho DM, Orchin M, Reactions of electrophiles with manganese(I) and rhenium(I) alkoxide complexes; reversible absorption of atmospheric CO2. Organometallics 12 (1993) 1714–19. [Google Scholar]
- [12].(a) Winstead AJ, Hinton TV, Parnell S, Azemati S, Varisli BY, Krauss CC, Abebe FA, Zhang Y, McCarthy PC, Zavalij PY, Mandal SK, Tricarbonyl-([1-(4-chlorobenzoyl)-5-methoxy-2-methyl-1H-i ndol-3-yl]acetato)(2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline)rhenium dichloromethane solvate. CSD Communicati on 2019, CCDC 1952473: DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc23jq0d; [DOI] [Google Scholar]; (b) Winstead AJ, Hinton TV, Parnell S, Azemati S, Varisli BY, Krauss CC, Abebe FA, Zhang Y, McCarthy PC, Zavalij PY, Mandal SK, Tricarbonyl-([1-(4-chlorobenzoyl)-5-methoxy-2-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl]acetato)-(3,4,7,8-tetramethyl-1,10-phenanthroli ne)-rhenium dichloromethane solvate. CSD Communication 2019, CCDC 1952474: DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc23jq1f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Orsa DK, Haynes GK, Pramanik SK, Iwunze MO, Greco GE, Ho DM, Krause JA, Hill DA, Williams RJ, Mandal SK, The one-pot synthesis and the fluorescence and cytotoxicity studies of chlorotricarbonyl(α-diimine)rhenium(I), fac-(CO)3(α-diimine)ReCl, complexes. Inorg. Chem. Commun 11 (2008) 1054–1056. [Google Scholar]
- [14].Picón-Ferrer I, Hueso-Ureña F, Illán-Cabeza NA, Jiménez-Pulido SB, Martínez-Martos JM, Ramírez-Expósito MJ, Moreno-Carretero MN, Chlorofac-tricarbonylrhenium(I) complexes of asymmetric azines derived from 6-acetyl-1,3,7-trimethylpteridine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione with hydrazine and aromatic aldehydes: Preparation, structural characterization and biological activity against several human tumor cell lines. J. Inorg. Biochem 103 (2009) 94–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Ma D-L, Che C-M, M Siu F, Yang M, Wong K-Y, DNA Binding and Cytotoxicity of Ruthenium(II) and Rhenium(I) Complexes of 2-Amino-4-phenylamino-6-(2-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine. Inorg. Chem 46 (2007) 740–749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Odebode T, Ph.D. Thesis, 2019; Morgan State University.</References> [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







