Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2021 Mar 3;72(10):3526–3539. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab102

Penicillium chrysogenum polypeptide extract protects tobacco plants from tobacco mosaic virus infection through modulation of ABA biosynthesis and callose priming

Yu Li 1,2,#, Mengting Jiao 1,2,#, Yingjuan Li 1,2, Yu Zhong 1,2, Xiaoqin Li 1,2, Zhuangzhuang Chen 1,2, Suiyun Chen 1,2,, Jianguang Wang 1,2,
Editor: Kris Vissenberg3
PMCID: PMC8096601  PMID: 33687058

Fungal polypeptide-induced callose priming restricts the cell-to-cell movement of tobacco mosaic virus in N. benthamiana via the ABA biosynthetic pathway.

Keywords: ABA, callose, infection, N. benthamiana, plasmodesmata, PDMP, priming, tobacco mosaic virus (TMV)

Abstract

The polypeptide extract of the dry mycelium of Penicillium chrysogenum (PDMP) can protect tobacco plants from tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), although the mechanism underlying PDMP-mediated TMV resistance remains unknown. In our study, we analysed a potential mechanism via RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and found that the abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthetic pathway and β-1,3-glucanase, a callose-degrading enzyme, might play an important role in PDMP-induced priming of resistance to TMV. To test our hypothesis, we successfully generated a Nicotiana benthamiana ABA biosynthesis mutant and evaluated the role of the ABA pathway in PDMP-induced callose deposition during resistance to TMV infection. Our results suggested that PDMP can induce callose priming to defend against TMV movement. PDMP inhibited TMV movement by increasing callose deposition around plasmodesmata, but this phenomenon did not occur in the ABA biosynthesis mutant; moreover, these effects of PDMP on callose deposition could be rescued by treatment with exogenous ABA. Our results suggested that callose deposition around plasmodesmata in wild-type plants is mainly responsible for the restriction of TMV movement during the PDMP-induced defensive response to TMV infection, and that ABA biosynthesis apparently plays a crucial role in PDMP-induced callose priming for enhancing defence against TMV.

Introduction

Plants are unique organisms because they are sessile and cannot escape potential aggression and threats posed by some biotic or abiotic factors. Some pathogens (biotic factors) that successfully invade plants can overcome or evade host immune defences; these pathogens can cause plant diseases and thus threaten plant survival and agricultural production. Viruses are composed of nucleic acid molecules and proteins and can proliferate only in living cells. Throughout the long-term struggle between plants and viruses, plants have evolved a variety of mechanisms to resist viruses. In general, the plant immune system consists of two levels of immune responses: (i) the first involves the ability of plants to recognize pathogen-associated molecules (pathogen-associated molecular patterns, PAMPs) via transmembrane receptors on the surface of plant cells, and this recognition process is referred to as PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI); and (ii) the second involves the ability of resistance genes (R genes) that encode intracellular receptors in plants, to specifically recognize pathogen effectors to activate effector-triggered immunity (Jones and Dangl, 2006; Schwessinger and Ronald, 2012).

Many recent studies have reported a potentiated defence capability that is not accompanied by the induction of specific defence genes until the plant is infected; this phenomenon is referred to as ‘priming’ (Katz et al., 1998; Conrath et al., 2002; 2006; Gamir et al., 2014; Crisp et al., 2016; Mauch-Mani et al., 2017). In one of the earliest studies on seed pre-treatment techniques, Heydecker et al. (1973) proposed the word ‘priming’ as a treatment technique that allows for slow water absorption and gradual seed drying; this technique is also known as seed osmotic regulation. When a plant or part of a plant senses a warning signal from biotic or abiotic factors, it induces a preparatory defensive response. This plant priming process is a type of physiological readiness that enhances defences when plants are re-damaged by insects or microorganisms; this process accelerates and strengthens the plant defence responses (Conrath et al., 2006; Beckers and Conrath, 2007; Kim and Felton, 2013). Priming is believed to be an intrinsic part of induced resistance. Notably, priming protects against pathogens as well as insect arthropods (Engelberth et al., 2004; Frost et al., 2008) and abiotic stress (Beckers and Conrath, 2007; Theocharis et al., 2012).

Elicitors can induce a range of defence responses in plants, including a burst of reactive oxygen species, secondary metabolite accumulation, and pathogen-associated protein expression (Wojtaszek, 1997; van Loon et al., 2006). Dry mycelium of Penicillium chrysogenum (DMP), which constitutes the residual by-product of industry-produced penicillin, does not contain penicillin or live mycelium. It was first reported that extracts of dead P. chrysogenum can induce resistance against Fusarium wilt in melon (Dong and Cohen, 2001). It was then reported that DMP can protect cucumber and tomato plants against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica (Gotlieb et al., 2003). Subsequent studies have shown that an aqueous extract of DMP induces resistance in several crop species under both controlled and field conditions (Thuerig et al., 2006). DMP has been widely used in flue-cured tobacco planting in Yunnan province, China, and the results have yielded good economic and ecological benefits (Yang et al., 2013). However, current studies on DMP have focused mainly on its regulatory effects on crop species. The plant defence response and disease resistance mechanism induced by DMP should be systematically studied to lay a foundation for widespread applications of DMP in crop production. However, the mechanisms through which DMP induces resistance to tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) remain unclear, and related studies are scarce. A polysaccharide (PCPS) and polypeptide extract (PDMP) of DMP have been successfully isolated in our laboratory (Fu et al., 2020). Our previous study indicated that polysaccharides of DMP induced nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production to initiate an early defence response, which in turn improved the resistance of Nicotiana glutinosa to TMV (Fu et al., 2020). However, the effect and underlying mechanism of PDMP on tobacco plants remain unknown. In this study, we used PDMP to investigate the underlying mechanism of its antiviral effect on Nicotiana benthamiana. We speculated that PDMP can be used as a disease resistance inducer to prevent disease.

Abscisic acid (ABA) is a hormone that regulates plant growth and development. ABA is a type of vascular plant hormone that was named for its ability to promote abscission (leaf loss), and is abundant in the organs and tissues of higher plants, particularly in mature and senescent tissues and in organs beginning to senesce. In higher plants, ABA is synthesized through the carotenoid pathway. In the initial reaction, carotene from β-carotene precursors serves as a precursor of intermediate reactions in plastids. In the following reaction, zeaxanthin in plastids is lysed to form xanthoxin through reactions catalysed by members of the 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED) family. In the last reaction, xanthoxin is converted to ABA, which is catalysed by xanthoxin dehydrogenase (ABA2) and aldehyde oxidase (AO3; Seo and Koshiba, 2002; Nambara and Marion-Poll, 2005; Wasilewska et al., 2008). When plants are dehydrated, the ABA concentration sharply increases, and drought stress promotes the widespread biosynthesis of ABA in the roots, xylem, and leaves (Davies and Zhang, 1991). Exposure to water-restriction stress, which leads to dehydration, induces the expression of zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP) in the roots (Audran et al., 1998; Thompson et al., 2000). Under drought conditions, the expression of ZEP in the roots plays an important role in controlling the biosynthesis of ABA. Under normal water conditions, plants produce endogenous amounts of ABA; moreover, the amount of ABA in a tobacco aba2 mutant could be compensated by overexpression of the ZEP gene (Borel et al., 2001). Thus, in our study, using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) technology, we blocked the ABA biosynthetic pathway by mutating the ZEP gene. With an editing efficiency of 85.4%, the powerful CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing vector system allows for easy, rapid genome editing of multiple monocot and dicot species (Ma et al., 2015; Mao et al., 2019). Although many studies have been performed to improve and optimize the CRISPR technique, off-target events cannot be completely avoided (Liu et al., 2017). To determine the mutation events of a target, a classic decoding method is used, which involves amplifying the DNA fragments containing the target sequence by using special primers, constructing clones, and selecting several clones for Sanger sequencing. In this study, we tested not only T0 plants but also T1 and T2 plants, and selected mutants that were stable in the T0, T1, and T2 generations for subsequent experiments.

Callose is a β-1,3-glucan cell wall polymer (Xie and Hong, 2011) that can be reversibly deposited around the neck of plasmodesmata when a plant is injured (Radford et al., 1998; Roberts and Oparka, 2003), and this deposition has a certain regulatory effect on the permeability of plasmodesmata (Northcote et al., 1989; Delmer et al., 1993). Therefore, callose is believed to act as a physical barrier that limits or prevents virus transport between cells. Callose deposition around plasmodesmata is the result of a dynamic regulatory process that involves stimulation of β-1,3-glucanase and callose synthase. Callose usually accumulates in the cell wall around both ends of the plasmodesmata, and this accumulation presses the plasma membrane inward to produce a narrow neck (Hughes and Gunning, 1980; Ding et al., 1992; Radford et al., 1998), thus reducing the space available for the transport of materials through the plasmodesmata (Takahashi and Jaffe, 1984; Northcote et al., 1989).

In this study, we first analysed the effects of PDMP on TMV infection via RNA-seq. We also successfully generated a N. benthamiana ZEP mutant, and investigated the potential mechanism involved in PDMP-mediated resistance to TMV infection. Our study provides new insights into the molecular mechanism of PDMP-mediated resistance to TMV infection in tobacco.

Materials and methods

Plant material and treatment

Seeds of wild-type N. benthamiana were obtained from the seed stock bank of our laboratory (Center for Plant Disease and Pest Biocontrol, Kunming, China). The plants were grown in a greenhouse under a day/night temperature of 28/23 °C, humidity of 50–80%, and light/dark photoperiod of 14 h/10 h. An Agrobacterium strain [Agro-p35s-m30B: green fluorescent protein (GFP)] harbouring TMV was donated by Professor Xiaoying Chen from the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Science. The leaves of the plants in the PDMP treatment were uniformly smeared with 1 mg ml-1 PDMP solution, and those in the TMV treatment were agroinfiltrated with TMV via a 1 ml syringe without a needle. Infiltration buffer containing TMV was prepared as described by Zhong et al. (2015). We adopted the method of local injection of leaves. First, a sterile 1 ml needle was used to gently prick a needle eye on the surface of the leaves, paying attention not to pierce the leaves. With the index finger against the needle eye position, the other hand slowly injected the infiltration buffer (about 100 µl ) into the leaf from the needle eye using a 1 ml syringe without a needle. The leaves of the plants in the PDMP/TMV treatment were pre-treated with PDMP for 7 d and then inoculated with TMV, and the leaves of the plants in the control treatment were smeared with distilled water only. For ABA treatment, an ABA solution (100 µ M; A8060, Solarbio, Beijing, China) was sprayed onto the leaves one day before inoculation with TMV, and after that, the leaves were sprayed with ABA solution every 3 d until the materials were collected.

RNA extraction and transcriptome analysis via RNA-seq

For RNA-seq, leaves were harvested at 7 d post-inoculation (dpi), combined into one composite sample, and then flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Each treatment consisted of three biological replicates. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Takara, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA quality and purity were assessed using NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo, Waltham, USA) and an Agilent 2100 (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) system based on an RNA integrity number (RIN) of at least 8.0. Transcriptome sequencing was performed using the high-throughput Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencing platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).

RNA-seq data analysis

The reference genome used to analyse our RNA-seq data was version Niben101, and was obtained from ftp://ftp.solgenomics.net/genomes/Nicotiana_benthamiana/. Based on the selected reference genome sequence, the mapped reads were combined via StringTie or Cufflinks software. The mapped reads were compared with the original genome annotation information to identify the original unannotated transcription region and to discover new transcripts and new genes of the species to supplement and improve the original genome annotation information. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified based on their fragments per kilobase per million reads (FPKM) via RSEM (RNA-Seq by Expectation-Maximization; Krylov et al., 2003). DEGs with an adjusted P value ≤0.05 and log2(fold change) (log2FC) ≥1 were used to identify the number of DEGs in the different treatments. DESeq2 was subsequently used to determine the false discovery rate (FDR) threshold (adjusted P value). The FDR in the multigroup comparison was less than 0.05, and this value was considered to indicate significantly different expression.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT–PCR)

Total RNA was obtained from leaves using TRIzol reagent (Takara, Tokyo, Japan). The RNA was then reverse transcribed into cDNA using PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (Takara, Tokyo, Japan). The cDNA content was subsequently measured via an ABI 7500 system (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) in conjunction with SYBR™ Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). The cycle threshold (CT) values of the target genes were normalized to the CT value of β-actin/EF1α/F-box. The PCR conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 30 s. The relative expression was analysed according to the 2−ΔΔCt method. The sequence data for ABA2 (EU123520.1), ZEP (XM_016582459.1), β -actin (AB158612) and β -1,3-glucanase (Niben101Scf01001g00005) were retrieved from the NCBI data libraries. The relative expression of the target genes was normalized to those of multiple endogenous control genes, such as the β -actin, EF1α, and F-box genes (Nakano and Mukaihara, 2019). The primers used for qRT–PCR are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

TMV visualization

An Agrobacterium strain [Agro-p35s-m30B: green fluorescent protein (GFP)] harbouring TMV was donated by Professor Xiaoying Chen from the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Science. The GFP fluorescence of the TMV-inoculated plants was observed under a handheld UV lamp (365 nm; Model sb-100 p/FA, Spscientific, USA), and the plants were imaged with a digital camera (Canon 500D, Canon, Japan). The GFP fluorescence of the plants was quantified using ImageJ 2x software.

CRISPR/Cas9

CRISPR/Cas9 pP1C vectors were purchased from Genloci Biotechnologies Inc. (Cat. No. GP0143, Nanjing, China). The experiments were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sequence of the target for CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations of N. benthamiana ZEP is ‘GCTGCCTTTATTGATCTCTAAGG’. ZEP from mutations was amplified and sequenced for verification using the forward primer 5′-ATGTATTCAACTGTGTTTTACACTT-3′ and reverse primer 5′-ACCAGTTACCAGAAACACCATCAAC-3′.

Plant transformation and mutation analysis

pP1C.4 vectors containing gRNA and Cas9 expression cassettes were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 according to the freeze-thaw method. The positive clones were then used to produce NbZEP mutant N. benthamiana via the Agrobacterium-mediated leaf disc transformation technique (Pathi et al., 2013; Hudzieczek et al., 2019). Hygromycin-resistant seedlings were obtained, and the mutants were subsequently identified using PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing. gDNA was extracted from the T0 transgenic plants via a MiniBEST Plant Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Takara, Tokyo, Japan). For the detection of mutations, the genomic regions that included the Cas9/gRNA target sites were amplified via PCR in conjunction with specific primers (see CRISPR/Cas 9 methods). The PCR products were then cloned into T vectors by using a pEASY-T5 Zero Cloning Kit (TransGen, Beijing, China), and the positive clones were sequenced via Sanger sequencing. The resulting reads were aligned with wild-type sequences for the detection of candidate mutant lines using DNAMAN 8.0 software (Lynnon Biosoft Company, USA). To investigate the inheritance of CRISPR/Cas9-induced targeted NbZEP modifications in subsequent generations, three T0 plants with biallelic mutations were self-pollinated, and the resulting T1 plants were then transplanted into soil and grown to maturity. Mutant tobacco lines were identified genetically according to the above-described method. The mutant T2 plants were then used for further analysis.

Quantification of ABA using ELISA

Leaves of wild-type N. benthamiana and the ZEP mutant were collected. The ABA concentrations in the leaf tissue homogenates were measured with a plant ABA ELISA kit (Mlbio, Shanghai, China), and the experiment was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The optical density (OD) value of the samples at 450 nm was measured with a microplate reader (SpectraMax iD5, Molecular Devices, USA).

Aniline blue staining

Aniline blue staining of callose was performed as described by Conrath et al. (1998). Leaves were placed in a phenol solution (water: glycerine: phenol: lactic acid, 1:2:2:1 mass mixture), boiled for 2 min, and then subjected to three 5 min washes with distilled water. The clarified leaves were then dyed with 0.01% aniline blue solution (in 0.1 M PBS; pH 7.0) for 15 min and subsequently washed three times (5 min each) with distilled water, after which they were imaged under an ultraviolet excitation filter (BP 330–385 nm) via a fluorescence microscope (BX50, Olympus, Japan). The experiment was performed three times. The turquoise fluorescence was regarded manually as the regions of interest (ROI) for quantification. Callose deposition was quantified by turquoise fluorescence of callose deposits using ImageJ 2x software. The ‘Freehand selections’ or ‘Magic wand’ was used to define the area of a callose deposit, and ‘Histogram list’ as the reference for calculating fluorescence intensity (Ellinger et al., 2013). Average callose measurements were based on at least six photographs from different leaves.

Western blot assays

The total protein of leaves was extracted with a Plant Protein Extraction Kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China) and quantified via a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Following this, 40 µg of protein was loaded onto 10% SDS-PAGE gels; following electrophoresis the proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, USA), and the membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk powder at 4 °C for 3 h. The membranes were subsequently incubated together with anti- β -1,3-glucanase antibodies (AS07-208; 1:200, Agrisera, Sweden) and anti-plant Rubisco antibodies (QYA00813A, 1:2000; Beijing Qualityard, Beijing, China) overnight at 4 °C, after which they were incubated together with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (QYB001; 1:5000; Beijing Qualityard, Beijing, China) or HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (QYB002; 1:5000; Beijing Qualityard, Beijing, China) for 2 h at 4 °C. The protein fragments were observed with an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) kit (Millipore, USA) under a chemiluminescence imaging system (ChemiDoc XRS+, Bio-Rad, USA). The fragments were analysed and quantified via ImageJ 2x software.

Transmission electron microscopy immunolocalization

The leaves were cut into 1×3 mm pieces that were then placed in a fixation solution consisting of 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde for 2 h at 4 °C. The samples were then subjected to three 10 min washes with 0.1 M PBS, after which they were dehydrated using different concentrations of ethanol (30% for 30 min, 50% for 30 min, 70% for 1 h, 90% for 1 h, 100% for 3 h, changing the 100% ethanol every hour) at 4 °C. The leaves were subjected to three additional 10 min washes with 0.1 M PBS, permeated with ethanol: K4 M resin (1:3) for 1 h and then ethanol: K4 M resin (1:1) for 3 h, embedded in pure K4 M resin for 24 h at 4 °C, polymerized at –20 °C for 72 h, and then kept at 25 °C for 48 h in a UV polymerization box (Electron Microscopy China, Beijing, China). The embedded mass was sliced into semi-thin sections to observe the location, after which 90 nm ultrathin sections were cut with an ultramicrotome (EM UC7, Leica, Germany) and collected on formvar-coated Au grids (Electron Microscopy China, Beijing, China). The sections were subjected to three 5 min washes with 0.1 M PBS and double-distilled water, and then blocked in 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) at 25 °C for 30 min. The sections were incubated together with anti-β-1,3-glucan antibodies (1:100; G7527; Biosupplies, Parkville, Australia) or anti-β-1,3-glucanase antibodies (1:50; AS07-208; Agrisera, Sweden) at 37 °C for 2 h, and then subjected to three 5 min washes with 0.1 M PBS and double distilled water. The sections were subsequently incubated together with anti-mouse IgG/Gold conjugated to 5 nm colloidal gold (1:100; G7527; Sigma, USA) or goat anti-rabbit IgG/Gold conjugated to 10 nm colloidal gold (1:100; bs-0295G-Gold; Bioss, Beijing, China) at 37 °C for 1 h. The sections were subjected to three 5 min washes with 0.1 M PB and double distilled water, and subsequently stained with 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate for 5 min, followed by lead citrate for 5 min at 25 °C. The sections were ultimately observed and imaged with a transmission electron microscope (JEM-1400PLUS, JEOL, Japan).

Ultrastructural observations

Leaves were subjected to three 10 min washes with 0.1 M PBS and then fixed at 4 °C in 1% (w/v) osmium tetroxide for 3 h. Following this, the samples were subjected to three 10 min washes with 0.1 M PBS, dehydrated via different concentrations of ethanol, permeabilized and embedded in Epon812 resin (SPI, USA), which was then polymerized at 60 °C. The embedded mass was sliced into semi-thin sections to observe the location, and ultrathin sections were then cut with an ultramicrotome (EM UC7, Leica, Germany), after which they were collected onto formvar-coated Cu grids (Electron Microscopy China, Beijing, China). The sections were stained with 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate for 15 min, followed by lead citrate for an additional 7 min. The sections were then observed and imaged with a transmission electron microscope (TECNAI G2, FEI, USA). The plasmodesma diameters were measured at the neck region via the TEM Imaging & Analysis software (FEI, USA; Schindelin et al., 2012; Liesche et al., 2019).

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-tests or one-way ANOVA via GraphPad Prism version 5.0a (GraphPad Software). The experiments were performed at least three times.

Results

Identification of interesting DEGs

To investigate the potential mechanism underlying the PDMP-induced resistance of N. benthamiana in response to TMV, we focused on the PDMP/TMV versus TMV comparison; detailed information on the DEGs identified from this comparison is shown in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, three genes were annotated; then, we focused on the interesting DEGs (IRAK4 (interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase4), ABA2 and β-1,3-glucanase). The expression of interesting genes identified from all the comparisons are shown in Table 2. The results indicated that the expression of β-1,3-glucanase and IRAK4 was up-regulated in the TMV versus control and PDMP/TMV versus control comparisons, but down-regulated in the PDMP/TMV versus TMV comparison. We also found that the expression of ABA2 was down-regulated in the TMV versus control comparison and up-regulated in the PDMP/TMV versus TMV comparison; however, no difference in the expression of these genes was observed in the PDMP versus control comparison (Table 2). These results suggest that compared with TMV inoculation alone, PDMP pre-treatment before TMV inoculation could suppress the expression of β-1,3-glucanase and promote the expression of ABA2.

Table 1.

Detailed information on the DEGs in the PDMP/TMV versus TMV comparison.

Gene ID Gene description KEGG
annotation
Log2FC P value Regulation
Niben101Scf17372g01008 Probable LRR receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinase IRAK4 -2.007887 1.6E-26 down
Niben101Scf02839g02012 - - -1.330981 4.9E-25 down
Niben101Scf11624g00001 - - 1.31642 1.4E-12 up
Niben101Scf04641g00012 Secoisolariciresinol dehydrogenase ABA2 1.217216 1.9E-12 up
Niben101Scf04641g01003 Secoisolariciresinol dehydrogenase ABA2 1.070924 4.7E-11 up
Niben101Scf27377g00004 - - 1.142838 1.7E-09 up
Niben101Scf02175g06018 - - -1.137547 9.2E-09 down
Niben101Scf01001g00005 β-1,3-glucanase - -1.032814 2.6E-08 down
Niben101Scf03814g00003 - - -1.031907 2.3E-07 down
Niben101Scf04309g02001 - - 1.019251 3.2E-07 up

Table 2.

Expression of the interesting genes identified in all comparisons.

Gene ID Gene description KO annotation PDMP versus control TMV versus control PDMP/TMversus control PDMP/TM versus TMV
Niben101Scf17372g01008 Probable LRR receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinase IRAK4 N up up down
Niben101Scf04641g00012 Secoisolariciresinol dehydrogenase ABA2 N down N up
Niben101Scf04641g01003 Secoisolariciresinol dehydrogenase ABA2 N down N up
Niben101Scf01001g00005 β-1,3-glucanase
- N up up down

N: no significant difference (P>0.05). Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA.

Because β-1,3-glucanase is associated with callose deposition, and ABA2 is involved in ABA biosynthesis, we speculated that PDMP inhibited TMV movement by inducing callose priming; moreover, the ABA biosynthetic pathway might play an important role in PDMP-induced resistance to TMV.

Validation of DEGs

qRT–PCR assays were performed to validate the expression of interesting DEGs (β-1,3-glucanase and ABA2). The results indicated that the expression trends of both DEGs revealed by qRT–PCR were in accordance with those revealed by RNA-seq (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. S1), which suggests that the RNA-seq data reliably reflected the gene expression changes.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

qRT–PCR-based validation of interesting DEGs (ABA2 and β-1,3-glucanase). The mRNA expression of ABA2 (A) and β-1,3-glucanase (B) were detected via qRT–PCR assay. The cycle threshold (CT) values of the target genes were normalized to the CT value of β-actin. (C) β-1,3-glucanase protein was detected by western blot assay. (D) Quantitative results of β-1,3-glucanase protein fragments. Protein relative amounts of β-1,3-glucanase were quantified relative to the expression of Rubisco. Values are means ±SD (n=6). *: P<0.05, **: P<0.01 and ***: P<0.001 versus the control treatment; ##: P<0.001, versus TMV treatment, as determined by one-way ANOVA.

As shown in Fig. 1A, ABA2 expression significantly decreased (P<0.01) in the TMV treatment compared with that in the control treatment, PDMP reversed the TMV-induced decrease in ABA2 expression in the PDMP/TMV treatment, and no significant difference (P>0.05) in ABA2 expression was found among the PDMP, PDMP/TMV, and control treatments. These results indicated that ABA biosynthesis might be associated with PDMP-induced defence. As shown in Fig. 1B-D, β-1,3-glucanase mRNA and protein expression significantly increased (P<0.001) in the TMV treatment compared with those in the control treatment. Moreover, PDMP decreased β-1,3-glucanase expression in the PDMP/TMV treatment compared with that in the TMV treatment; however, β-1,3-glucanase expression in the PDMP/TMV treatment was still greater compared with the control. β-1,3-glucanase is involved in callose deposition; thus, we speculated that PDMP might induce callose deposition in response to TMV infection. Moreover, the role ABA plays in PDMP-induced callose deposition as a defence response against TMV has not been clarified.

Successful generation of a N. benthamiana ZEP mutant

The ZEP gene encodes an enzyme that plays a catalytic role in the intermediate reaction of the ABA biosynthetic pathway. We first cloned the ZEP gene of N. benthamiana; the nucleic acid and amino acid sequences of NbZEP are shown in Supplementary Fig. S2A. To investigate whether the ABA biosynthetic pathway participates in PDMP-induced callose priming, we generated an N. benthamiana ZEP mutant via Agrobacterium-mediated infection in conjunction with CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology. The target sequence and mutated bases are shown in Supplementary Fig. S2B. In the mutant plants, a single-base insertion of G was detected in the exon of NbZEP. The insertion, which was located at position 74 in NbZEP, produced a premature stop codon (TAA) in the open reading frame (ORF), resulting in a loss-of-function mutation (Supplementary Fig. S2). The mRNA expression of NbZEP in T2 ZEP mutants was measured via a qRT–PCR assay (Fig. 2A), and the ABA concentration in the T2 ZEP mutants was measured via an ELISA (Fig. 2B). As shown in Fig. 2, the expression of NbZEP and the ABA concentration in the mutants were markedly inhibited compared with the wild-type. The results suggested that a N. benthamiana ABA biosynthesis mutant had been generated successfully.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Validation of CRISPR/gRNA-mediated NbZEP genetic mutants. (A) The expression of ZEP was detected via qRT–PCR assays. The cycle threshold (CT) values of the target genes were normalized to the CT value of β-actin. (B) ABA concentration in the leaves of the NbZEP mutant and wild-type plants was determined by an ELISA. Values are means ±SD (n=20). ***: P<0.001 versus wild-type, as determined by Student’s t test.

Movement of TMV-GFP and callose deposition

To investigate the effects of PDMP on resistance to TMV infection, we observed the movement of GFP-labelled TMV with the naked eye under a handheld UV lamp, and detected callose deposition in N. benthamiana by aniline blue staining and microscopy. As shown in Fig. 3A, GFP fluorescence was detected in the inoculated leaves (7 dpi) and the systemic leaves (13 dpi) of both wild-type and mutant plants in the TMV group and the PDMP/TMV group. Quantitation of the green fluorescence of the inoculated and systemic leaves is shown in Fig. 3B, C, respectively. In the wild-type plants, the fluorescence intensity of GFP-labelled TMV in the inoculated and systemic leaves in the PDMP/TMV treatment was markedly reduced compared with that in the TMV treatment alone. In the mutant plants, no difference was found between the TMV and PDMP/TMV treatments. Treatment with exogenous ABA significantly decreased (P<0.001) the fluorescence intensity of TMV in the inoculated and systemic leaves of the mutant plants (Fig. 3B, C). These results suggest that PDMP can significantly suppress the speed of TMV movement, and that its inhibitory effect on TMV could be rescued in the mutant by treatment with exogenous ABA.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Presence of GFP-TMV movement. (A) Movement of TMV is shown by green fluorescence under a UV lamp. Scale bar =1 cm. The green fluorescence in the inoculated leaves (B) and systemic leaves (C) was quantified via ImageJ software. Values are means ±SD (n=6). ***: P<0.001 versus TMV treatment; #: P<0.05 and ###: P<0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA. ‘m’ indicates ABA biosynthesis mutant.

As shown in Fig. 4A, B, callose deposition was observed as turquoise fluorescence after staining with aniline blue and imaged under a fluorescence microscope. These results suggested that PDMP significantly (P<0.001) promoted callose deposition in the wild-type plants inoculated with TMV, whereas little callose deposition was observed in the PDMP/TMV treatment in the mutant. No significant difference (P>0.05) was found between the TMV and PDMP/TMV treatments in the mutant. However, significantly increased (P<0.001) callose deposition was found in the PDMP/TMV treatment of the mutant with ABA compared with the PDMP/TMV treatment of the mutant (Fig. 4A, B). In addition, western blotting showed that in the wild-type plants, β-1,3-glucanase protein amounts in the PDMP/TMV treatment were lower than those in the TMV treatment, whereas no significant difference (P>0.05) was found between the TMV treatment and PDMP/TMV treatment in the mutant. However, treatment with ABA decreased the amount of β-1,3-glucanase protein in the mutant plants (Fig. 4C, D). Taken together, these results suggested that PDMP-induced callose deposition priming depended on ABA biosynthesis.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Presence of callose fluorescence and callose-related protein (β-1,3-glucanase). (A) Callose deposition is shown as turquoise fluorescence after staining with aniline blue and imaged under an ultraviolet excitation filter (BP 330–385 nm) via a fluorescence microscope. Scale bar =100 µ m. (B) Relative callose intensities emitted by aniline blue-stained callose deposits (n=6). The turquoise fluorescence was regarded as the regions of interest (ROI). The turquoise fluorescence was chosen and quantified manually using ImageJ software. (C) Western blot validation of β-1,3-glucanase expression. (D) Protein fragments were quantified relative to the expression of Rubisco via ImageJ software (n=3). Values are means ±SD. *: P<0.05 and ***: P<0.001 versus TMV treatment; #: P<0.05 and ###: P<0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA. ‘m’ indicates ABA biosynthesis mutant.

Immunolocalization of callose

To directly confirm the induction of callose deposition around plasmodesmata by PDMP, β-1,3-glucan and β-1,3-glucanase proteins were detected through immunolocalization experiments. Consistent with the results from the aniline blue staining experiments, compared with the TMV treatment, PDMP/TMV treatment of wild-type plants presented greater amounts of immunogold-labelled β-1,3-glucan and lower amounts of β-1,3-glucanase (Fig. 5A) around the plasmodesmata. However, there was no significant difference (P>0.5) in immunogold-labelled β-1,3-glucan or β-1,3-glucanase between the TMV and the PDMP/TMV treatments in the mutant (Fig. 5A-C). Compared with the TMV-treated wild-type plants, the PDMP/TMV treated wild-type plants presented a greater number of β-1,3-glucan gold particles around the plasmodesmata, but a lower number of β-1,3-glucanase gold particles, whereas no significant difference (P>0.05) in the number of β-1,3-glucan or β-1,3-glucanase gold particles was found between the TMV treatment and the PDMP/TMV treatment in the mutant. However, the addition of ABA increased the number of β-1,3-glucan gold particles and decreased that of β-1,3-glucanase gold particles. Thus, these results indicate that in N. benthamiana, PDMP induces the deposition of callose at plasmodesmata to stimulate resistance to TMV infection through the ABA biosynthetic pathway.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Analysis of immunocolloidal gold coupled with transmission electron microscopy of callose deposits around plasmodesmata. (A) β -1,3-glucan and β -1,3-glucanase were detected around plasmodesmata in the different treatments. Scale bar =200 nm. Quantitative results of β -1,3-glucan (B) and β -1,3-glucanase (C) gold particles around plasmodesmata. The number of gold particles was counted per individual plasmodesma (8–10 plasmodesmata were analysed per sample). Values are means ± SD (n=3). ***: P<0.001 versus TMV treatment; #: P<0.05, ##: P<0.01 and ###: P<0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA. PD: plasmodesma. The red arrows indicate callose particles. ‘m’ indicates ABA biosynthesis mutant.

Ultrastructure and diameters of plasmodesmata

To further verify the results from the aniline blue staining and immunolocalization experiments, the ultrastructure of plasmodesmata were observed by transmission electron microscopy (Fig. 6A). Moreover, the plasmodesmata diameters were measured, and the results are shown in Fig. 6B. These results showed that for the wild-type plants, the PDMP/TMV treatment resulted in narrower plasmodesmata than the TMV treatment; moreover, no significant difference (P>0.5) was found between the TMV and PDMP/TMV treatments in the mutant. Treatment with ABA along with PDMP/TMV decreased the plasmodesmata diameter in the mutant. These results were similar to those obtained from both the aniline blue labelling and immunolocalization experiments. Taken together, the results demonstrated that in N. benthamiana, PDMP induced the deposition of callose around the plasmodesmata in cell walls to stimulate resistance to TMV infection through the ABA biosynthetic pathway.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Plasmodesmata structural parameters. (A) Plasmodesmata ultrastructure was observed via transmission electron microscopy. (B) Plasmodesmata diameters (8–10 plasmodesma were analysed per sample) were measured at the neck region via the TEM Imaging & Analysis software. Scale bar =200 nm. Values are means ±SD (n=27). *: P<0.05 and ***: P<0.001 versus TMV treatment; ##: P<0.01, as determined by one-way ANOVA. The red arrows show the neck of plasmodesmata. The letter ‘m’ indicates ABA biosynthesis mutant.

Discussion

TMV is one of the main viruses that harm tobacco plants in many countries (Zhao et al., 2017), causing economic losses in commercial crops through its infection of host plants; however, safe and effective prevention and treatment methods for TMV are lacking. Researchers have focused on the study of fungal extracts that can protect tobacco from TMV, because a variety of proteins, polysaccharides, and other substances that exert strong anti-TMV activity have been found in various fungi (Chen and Gao, 2006; Li et al., 2014). Few studies have investigated PDMP-mediated resistance to TMV and the underlying mechanism, although DMP has been reported to induce resistance in several plant species under field conditions (Chen et al., 2006; Dong et al., 2006).

In this study, RNA-seq technology was first used to investigate the comprehensive resistance mechanisms induced by PDMP with TMV infection in N. benthamiana. We focused on the differential expression of genes between the PDMP/TMV versus TMV treatments, and found interesting DEGs (β-1,3-glucanase and ABA2). The results indicated that β-1,3-glucanase and ABA2 were not differentially expressed in the PDMP versus control comparison, but were differentially expressed in the PDMP/TMV versus TMV comparison (Table 2), which revealed that PDMP induces priming to resist TMV infection. Despite the limitations of the analysis involving RNA-seq data (many inaccurate or imprecise classifications for GO term analysis), our RNA-seq data implied that PDMP induces priming to promote resistance to TMV infection. Some studies have demonstrated that BABA (β -aminobutyric acid)-induced tolerance to osmotic stress is based on priming to achieve enhanced adaptation responses rather than the direct activation of these responses (Hasegawa et al., 2000; Jakab et al., 2005). In our study, pre-treatment with PDMP did not induce a direct response, but rather induced defence responses after TMV challenge, which indicated that PDMP can induce priming to defend against TMV infection and help tobacco leaves rapidly establish a resistance response after TMV challenge. However, the specific signalling pathways involved in PDMP-induced priming are unclear.

ABA can induce plant defence against viruses (Chen et al., 2013; Alazem and Lin, 2015), and ABA-related recessive resistance against two RNA viruses (bamboo mosaic virus and cucumber mosaic virus) has been reported (Alazem et al., 2014). β-1,3-glucanase, an enzyme that hydrolyses β-1,3-glycosidic bonds in β-1,3-glucans, has been proposed to degrade cell walls (Leubner-Metzger and Meins, 1999). Moreover, β-1,3-glucanase expression was down-regulated and ABA2 expression was up-regulated in the PDMP/TMV versus TMV comparison, which indicates that callose deposition and the ABA pathway might participate in the PDMP-induced priming of resistance to TMV. Although other hormones may also be involved in the regulation of callose (DebRoy et al., 2004; Pieterse et al., 2009; Vicedo et al., 2009) and thus in resistance to TMV, we focused on ABA in this study.

Higher plants indirectly synthesize ABA through a series of catalytic reactions, in which many important enzymes are involved (Fraser and Bramley, 2004; Breitenbach and Sandmann, 2005). Moreover, ZEP, NCED (9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase), and AO aldehyde oxidase) play important roles in this pathway. It has been reported that in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia aba2 mutants, ABA synthesis is hindered by attenuated oxidation of zeaxanthin, and the enzyme that catalyses epoxidation is ZEP, which is encoded by the tobacco ABA2 gene (Marin et al., 1996). Heterologous expression of the alfalfa zeaxanthin epoxidase gene (MsZEP) can confer drought and salt tolerance in Nicotiana tabacum (Zhang et al., 2016). These results revealed that ZEP plays important roles in ABA biosynthesis. Moreover, it has been reported that the pre-treatment of tobacco with ABA contributes to increased resistance against TMV (Fraser, 1982). ABA can down-regulate β-1,3-glucanase activity in tobacco cell cultures (Rezzonico et al., 1998); thus, we speculated that PDMP-induced callose priming for resistance against TMV might depend on the ABA biosynthetic pathway.

To test our hypothesis, N. benthamiana ZEP mutants were successfully obtained using the CRISPR/Cas9 technique. We found that, compared with the PDMP/TMV treatment, the PDMP/TMV treatment in the mutant clearly exhibited faster TMV movement and less callose deposition, which indicated that PDMP cannot induce callose deposition to defend against TMV in the ZEP mutants. However, whether factors other than callose deposition are involved in the restriction of virus movement cannot be excluded. Nevertheless, exogenous ABA treatment could rescue the inhibitory effect of PDMP on TMV. PDMP induces callose deposition through a mechanism dependent on ABA biosynthesis. A previous study indicated that ABA promotes callose deposition and that overexpression of the ABA biosynthesis gene NCED3 reduces PR2 expression and increases callose deposition in Arabidopsis thaliana (Oide et al., 2013). Also, exogenous ABA suppresses β-1,3-glucanase activity and induces synthase activity, both of which are beneficial for the promotion of callose deposition in rice (Liu et al., 2017). Our results led to similar conclusions concerning the positive effect of ABA biosynthesis on callose deposition.

Plant hormone signalling pathways are crucial for plant immune responses and callose deposition. Salicylic acid (SA) is involved in microbe-triggered callose deposition (DebRoy et al., 2004). Moreover, both jasmonic acid (JA)-signal priming and callose deposition are mechanisms involved in hexanoic acid-induced resistance against Botrytis cinerea in tomato plants (Vicedo et al., 2009). The plant defence system ultimately consists of crosstalk among signalling pathways and different hormones (Pieterse et al., 2009). In the present study, we focused on the effects of ABA on PDMP-induced resistance against TMV in tobacco plants. We describe a link among ABA, callose degradation, and callose deposition in PDMP-induced defence priming. The successful infection of a plant by a virus depends on cell-to-cell movement through plasmodesmata (Lucas, 1995; Ding, 1998; Lucas and Lee, 2004), and the modification of plasmodesmata by callose deposition could restrict the movement of viruses between cells (Chen and Kim, 2009; Epel, 2009; Hofmann et al., 2010). The defence-related gene OCP3 (overexpressor of cationic peroxidase 3) represents a specific control point for callose deposition regulated by jasmonic acid, but ultimately requires ABA (García-Andrade et al., 2011). We have demonstrated that PDMP could be considered a priming stimulus and that ABA positively regulates callose deposition upon challenge with TMV. Whether other plant hormones (salicylic acid, jasmonic acid) interplay with ABA to regulate the resistance induced by PDMP needs further work.

To further investigate whether the ABA biosynthetic pathway plays a crucial role in PDMP-induced callose deposition around plasmodesmata to defend against TMV movement, the immunolocalization of callose-related proteins was detected via immunocolloidal gold assays. Moreover, ultrastructure and diameters of plasmodesmata were also observed and detected. Callose is an effective barrier against virus movement, and callose deposition is negatively correlated with β-1,3-glucanase (a callose-degrading enzyme) content in tobacco during resistance to TMV (Beffa et al., 1996). Our results suggest that the PDMP-induced callose deposition around plasmodesmata and impaired TMV movement depend on the ABA biosynthetic pathway. Moreover, exogenous ABA treatment rescued the promoting effect of PDMP on callose deposition around plasmodesmata. Thus, the ABA biosynthetic pathway may directly or indirectly influence callose deposition around plasmodesmata. In our study, the results suggested that the ABA biosynthetic pathway suppresses β-1,3-glucanase activity to trigger changes in callose deposition around plasmodesmata during PDMP-induced resistance to TMV. Moreover, ABA may indirectly promote callose deposition around plasmodesmata via other regulatory mechanisms, such as the regulation of lipid raft-related proteins (Huang et al., 2019) and the promotion of starch degradation (Gamir et al., 2018). The indirect effects of ABA on callose during PDMP-induced resistance need further studies. The intact indole-3-carboxylic acid (I3CA) biosynthetic pathway has been reported to be necessary for I3CA-induced resistance (Pastor-Fernández et al., 2019). I3CA can induce resistance in Arabidopsis against the necrotrophic fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina through priming callose accumulation (Gamir et al., 2018; Pastor-Fernández et al., 2019). In our study, we found that the ABA biosynthetic pathway is necessary for PDMP-induced resistance; however, the underlying mechanism needs to be studied further in depth.

Our study also revealed the interesting DEG Niben101Scf17372g01008, which is annotated as a ‘probable LRR receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinase’; this gene may be associated with TMV or PDMP binding. Many studies have revealed that the leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase (LRR-RLK) BAK1 is a major modulator of PTI in Arabidopsis thaliana (Chinchilla et al., 2007; Heese et al., 2007). The receptor-like kinase BAK1 is crucial for N. benthamiana resistance to pathogens (Chaparro-Garcia et al., 2011). Therefore, we are interested in investigating whether LRR-RLK interacts with PDMP and is related to TMV infection.

As demonstrated in our previous study, PDMP markedly activates the defence of N. glutinosa against TMV and restricts the spread of TMV (Zhong et al., 2015). In the present study, our results revealed for the first time that PDMP-induced callose priming in N. benthamiana against TMV was dependent on the ABA biosynthetic pathway. These findings could provide a theoretical foundation for the application of PDMP as a biocontrol agent. Although further research is needed to assess any additional factors involved in PDMP-induced resistance to TMV in tobacco, the present data show that PDMP-induced resistance is based on priming callose deposition and on the enhanced ABA biosynthetic pathway, which contribute to the knowledge of PDMP-induced resistance of tobacco plants.

Supplementary data

The following supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Fig. S1. qRT-PCR-based validation of genes (ABA2, β-1,3-glucanase, ZEP).

Fig. S2. CRISPR/gRNA-mediated construction of NbZEP genetic mutant.

Table. S1. Primer sets used in this study.

erab102_suppl_Supplementary_Figures_S1_S2_and_Table_S1

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Weihua Pei (Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences) and Yingqi Guo (Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for their advice and technical assistance with electron microscopy. This study was supported by the Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects (No. 2018FA022) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31660038).

Glossary

Abbreviations

ABA

abscisic acid

CRISPR/Cas9

clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9

DEG

differentially expressed gene

DMP

dry mycelium of Penicillium chrysogenum

NCED

9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase

GFP

green fluorescent protein

PAM

protospacer adjacent motif

PDMP

polypeptide extract of dry mycelium of Penicillium chrysogenum

TMV

tobacco mosaic virus

ZEP

zeaxanthin epoxidase

Author contributions

JW and SC conceived and supervised the project; YL, MJ, and YL performed most of the experiments; YL, MJ, and ZC constructed the mutant plants; YL, YZ, and QL analysed the data; YL wrote the manuscript; and YL, JW, and SC gave constructive comments on the project and revised the manuscript.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (JW), upon request.

References

  1. Alazem M, Lin KY, Lin NS. 2014. The abscisic acid pathway has multifaceted effects on the accumulation of Bamboo mosaic virus. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions: MPMI 27, 177–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alazem M, Lin NS. 2015. Roles of plant hormones in the regulation of host-virus interactions. Molecular Plant Pathology 16, 529–540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Audran C, Borel C, Frey A, Sotta B, Meyer C, Simonneau T, Marion-Poll A. 1998. Expression studies of the zeaxanthin epoxidase gene in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia. Plant Physiology 118, 1021–1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beckers GJ, Conrath U. 2007. Priming for stress resistance: from the lab to the field. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10, 425–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beffa RS, Hofer RM, Thomas M, Meins F Jr. 1996. Decreased susceptibility to viral disease of [beta]-1,3-glucanase-deficient plants generated by antisense transformation. The Plant Cell 8, 1001–1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Borel C, Audran C, Frey A, Marion-Poll A, Tardieu F, Simonneau T. 2001. N. plumbaginifolia zeaxanthin epoxidase transgenic lines have unaltered baseline ABA accumulations in roots and xylem sap, but contrasting sensitivities of ABA accumulation to water deficit. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 427–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Breitenbach J, Sandmann G. 2005. zeta-Carotene cis isomers as products and substrates in the plant poly-cis carotenoid biosynthetic pathway to lycopene. Planta 220, 785–793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chaparro-Garcia A, Wilkinson RC, Gimenez-Ibanez S, Findlay K, Coffey MD, Zipfel C, Rathjen JP, Kamoun S, Schornack S. 2011. The receptor-like kinase SERK3/BAK1 is required for basal resistance against the late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans in Nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS One 6, e16608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen S, Dong H, Fan Y, Li W, Cohen Y. 2006. Dry mycelium of Penicillium chrysogenum induces expression of pathogenesis-related protein genes and resistance against wilt diseases in Bt transgenic cotton. Biological Control 39, 460–464. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen LL, Gao BD. 2006. Progress of the research on microbial metabolites against plant virus diseases. Chinese Journal of Biological Control 22, 255–260. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen XY, Kim JY. 2009. Callose synthesis in higher plants. Plant Signaling & Behavior 4, 489–492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen LG, Zhang LP, Li DB, Wang F, and Yu DQ. 2013. WRKY8 transcription factor functions in the TMV-cg defense response by mediating both abscisic acid and ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Acadmy Sciences, USA 110, E1963–E1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chinchilla D, Zipfel C, Robatzek S, Kemmerling B, Nürnberger T, Jones JD, Felix G, Boller T. 2007. A flagellin-induced complex of the receptor FLS2 and BAK1 initiates plant defence. Nature 448, 497–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Conrath U, Beckers GJ, Flors V, Garcia-Agustin P, Jakab G, Mauch F, Newman MA, Pieterse CM, Poinssot B, Pozo MJ. 2006. Priming: getting ready for battle. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 19, 1062–1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Conrath U, Klessig DF, Bachmair A. 1998. Tobacco plants perturbed in the ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation system accumulate callose, salicylic acid, and pathogenesis-related protein 1. Plant Cell Reports 17, 876–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Conrath U, Pieterse CM, Mauch-Mani B. 2002. Priming in plant-pathogen interactions. Trends in Plant Science 7, 210–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Crisp PA, Ganguly D, Eichten SR, Borevitz JO, Pogson BJ. 2016. Reconsidering plant memory: Intersections between stress recovery, RNA turnover, and epigenetics. Science Advances 2, e1501340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Davies WJ, Zhang J. 1991. Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 42, 55–76. [Google Scholar]
  19. DebRoy S, Thilmony R, Kwack YB, Nomura K, He SY. 2004. A family of conserved bacterial effectors inhibits salicylic acid-mediated basal immunity and promotes disease necrosis in plants. Proceedings of the National Acadmy Sciences, USA 101, 9927–9932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Delmer DP, Volokita M, Solomon M, Fritz U, Delphendahl W, Herth W. 1993. A monoclonal antibody recognizes a 65 kDa higher plant membrane polypeptide which undergoes cation-dependent association with callose synthase in vitro and co-localizes with sites of high callose deposition in vivo. Protoplasma 176, 33–42. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ding B. 1998. Intercellular protein trafficking through plasmodesmata. Plant Molecular Biology 38, 279–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ding B, Turgeon R, Parthasarathy MV. 1992. Substructure of freeze-substituted plasmodesmata. Protoplasma 169, 28–41. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dong H, Cohen Y. 2001. Extracts of killed Penicillium chrysogenum induce resistance against Fusarium wilt of melon. Phytoparasitica 29, 421–430. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dong H, Zhang X, Choen Y, Zhou Y, Li W, Li Z. 2006. Dry mycelium of Penicillium chrysogenum protects cotton plants against wilt diseases and increases yield under field conditions. Crop Protection 25, 324–330. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ellinger D, Naumann M, Falter C, Zwikowics C, Jamrow T, Manisseri C, Somerville SC, Voigt CA. 2013. Elevated early callose deposition results in complete penetration resistance to powdery mildew in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 161, 1433–1444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Engelberth J, Alborn HT, Schmelz EA, Tumlinson JH. 2004. Airborne signals prime plants against insect herbivore attack. Proceedings of the National Acadmy Sciences, USA 101, 1781–1785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Epel BL. 2009. Plant viruses spread by diffusion on ER-associated movement-protein-rafts through plasmodesmata gated by viral induced host beta-1,3-glucanases. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 20, 1074–1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fraser RSS. 1982. Are pathogenesis-related proteins involved in acquired systemic resistance of tobacco plants to tobacco mosaic virus? Journal of General Virology 58: 305–313. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fraser PD, Bramley PM. 2004. The biosynthesis and nutritional uses of carotenoids. Progress in Lipid Research 43, 228–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Frost CJ, Mescher MC, Carlson JE, De Moraes CM. 2008. Plant defense priming against herbivores: getting ready for a different battle. Plant Physiology 146, 818–824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fu J, Zhang S, Wu J, Chen Y, Zhong Y, Zhou Y, Wang J, Chen S. 2020. Structural characterization of a polysaccharide from dry mycelium of Penicillium chrysogenum that induces resistance to Tobacco mosaic virus in tobacco plants. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 156, 67–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gamir J, Pastor V, Sánchez-Bel P, Agut B, Mateu D, García-Andrade J, Flors V. 2018. Starch degradation, abscisic acid and vesicular trafficking are important elements in callose priming by indole-3-carboxylic acid in response to Plectosphaerella cucumerina infection. The Plant Journal 96, 518–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gamir J, Sánchez-Bel P, Flors V. 2014. Molecular and physiological stages of priming: how plants prepare for environmental challenges. Plant Cell Reports 33, 1935–1949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. García-Andrade J, Ramírez V, Flors V, Vera P. 2011. Arabidopsis ocp3 mutant reveals a mechanism linking ABA and JA to pathogen-induced callose deposition. The Plant Journal 67, 783–794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gotlieb D, Oka Y, Ben-Daniel B-H, Cohen Y. 2003. Dry mycelium of Penicillium chrysogenum protects cucumber and tomato plants against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica. Phytoparasitica 31, 217–225. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Zhu JK, Bohnert HJ. 2000. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 51, 463–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Heese A, Hann DR, Gimenez-Ibanez S, Jones AM, He K, Li J, Schroeder JI, Peck SC, Rathjen JP. 2007. The receptor-like kinase SERK3/BAK1 is a central regulator of innate immunity in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104, 12217–12222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Heydecker W, Higgins J, Gulliver RL. 1973. Accelerated germination by osmotic seed treatment. Nature 246, 42–44. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hofmann J, Youssef-Banora M, de Almeida-Engler J, Grundler FM. 2010. The role of callose deposition along plasmodesmata in nematode feeding sites. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions: MPMI 23, 549–557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Huang D, Sun Y, Ma Z, et al. . 2019. Salicylic acid-mediated plasmodesmal closure via remorin-dependent lipid organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116, 21274–21284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hudzieczek V, Cegan R, Cermak T, Bacovska N, Machalkova Z, Dolezal K, Plihalova L, Voytas D, Hobza R, Vyskot B. 2019. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of a dioecious plant model Silene latifolia. New Biotechnology 48, 20-28. [DOI] [PubMed]
  42. Hughes JE, Gunning BES. 1980. Glutaraldehyde-induced deposition of callose. Canadian Journal of Botany 58, 250–258. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jakab G, Ton J, Flors V, Zimmerli L, Métraux JP, Mauch-Mani B. 2005. Enhancing Arabidopsis salt and drought stress tolerance by chemical priming for its abscisic acid responses. Plant Physiology 139, 267–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jones JD, Dangl JL. 2006. The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Katz VA, Thulke OU, Conrath U. 1998. A benzothiadiazole primes parsley cells for augmented elicitation of defense responses. Plant Physiology 117, 1333–1339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kim J, Felton GW. 2013. Priming of antiherbivore defensive responses in plants. Insect Science 20, 273–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Krylov DM, Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Koonin EV. 2003. Gene loss, protein sequence divergence, gene dispensability, expression level, and interactivity are correlated in eukaryotic evolution. Genome Research 13, 2229–2235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Leubner-Metzger G, Meins FJ. 1999. Functions and regulation of plant β-1,3-glucanases (PR2). In: Datta SK, Muthukrishnan S, eds. Pathogenesis-related proteins in plants. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press LLC, 49–76. [Google Scholar]
  49. Li N, Li X, Xu R, Xue S, Guo L, Ren J, Huo R, Wang X, Du X, Zhao X. 2014. Selecting fungi which can induce tobacco creating systemic resistance against tobacco mosaic virus. Chinese Tobacco Science 35, 79–84. [Google Scholar]
  50. Liesche J, Gao C, Binczycki P, Andersen SR, Rademaker H, Schulz A, Martens HJ. 2019. Direct comparison of leaf plasmodesma structure and function in relation to phloem-loading type. Plant Physiology 179, 1768–1778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Liu J, Du H, Ding X, Zhou Y, Xie P, Wu J. 2017. Mechanisms of callose deposition in rice regulated by exogenous abscisic acid and its involvement in rice resistance to Nilaparvata lugens Stål (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Pest Management Science 73, 2559–2568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lucas WJ. 1995. Plasmodesmata: intercellular channels for macromolecular transport in plants. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 7, 673–680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lucas WJ, Lee JY. 2004. Plasmodesmata as a supracellular control network in plants. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology 5, 712–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ma X, Zhang Q, Zhu Q, et al. . 2015. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Molecular Plant 8, 1274–1284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Mao Y, Botella JR, Liu Y, Zhu J. 2019. Gene editing in plants: progress and challenges. National Science Review 6, 421–437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Marin E, Nussaume L, Quesada A, Gonneau M, Sotta B, Hugueney P, Frey A, Marion-Poll A. 1996. Molecular identification of zeaxanthin epoxidase of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia, a gene involved in abscisic acid biosynthesis and corresponding to the ABA locus of Arabidopsis thaliana. The EMBO journal 15, 2331–2342. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Mauch-Mani B, Baccelli I, Luna E, Flors V. 2017. Defense priming: an adaptive part of induced resistance. Annual Review of Plant Biology 68, 485–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Nakano M, Mukaihara T. 2019. The type III effector RipB from Ralstonia solanacearum RS1000 acts as a major avirulence factor in Nicotiana benthamiana and other Nicotiana species. Molecular Plant Pathology 20, 1237–1251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Nambara E, Marion-Poll A. 2005. Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism. Annual Review of Plant Biology 56, 165–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Northcote DH, Davey R, Lay J. 1989. Use of antisera to localize callose, xylan and arabinogalactan in the cell-plate, primary and secondary walls of plant cells. Planta 178, 353–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Oide S, Bejai S, Staal J, Guan N, Kaliff M, Dixelius C. 2013. A novel role of PR2 in abscisic acid (ABA) mediated, pathogen-induced callose deposition in Arabidopsis thaliana. The New Phytologist 200, 1187–1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Pastor-Fernández J, Pastor V, Mateu D, Gamir J, Sánchez-Bel P, Flors V. 2019. Accumulating evidences of callose priming by indole- 3- carboxylic acid in response to Plectospharella cucumerina. Plant Signaling & Behavior 14, 1608107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Pathi KM, Tula S, Tuteja N. 2013. High frequency regeneration via direct somatic embryogenesis and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of tobacco. Plant Signaling & Behavior 8, e24354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  64. Pieterse CM, Leon-Reyes A, Van der Ent S, Van Wees SC. 2009. Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity. Nature Chemical Biology 5, 308–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Radford JE, Vesk M, Overall RL. 1998. Callose deposition at plasmodesmata. Protoplasma 201, 30–37. [Google Scholar]
  66. Rezzonico E, Flury N, Meins F Jr, Beffa R. 1998. Transcriptional down-regulation by abscisic acid of pathogenesis-related beta-1,3-glucanase genes in tobacco cell cultures. Plant Physiology 117, 585–592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Roberts AG, Oparka KJ. 2003. Plasmodesmata and the control of symplastic transport. Plant Cell and Environment 26, 103–124. [Google Scholar]
  68. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B. 2012. FIJI: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods 9, 676–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Schwessinger B, Ronald PC. 2012. Plant innate immunity: perception of conserved microbial signatures. Annual Review of Plant Biology 63, 451–482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Seo M, Koshiba T. 2002. Complex regulation of ABA biosynthesis in plants. Trends in Plant Science 7, 41–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Takahashi H, Jaffe MJ. 1984. Thigmomorphogenesis: the relationship of mechanical perturbation to elicitor-like activity and ethylene production. Physiology Plant 61, 405–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Theocharis A, Bordiec S, Fernandez O, Paquis S, Dhondt-Cordelier S, Baillieul F, Clément C, Barka EA. 2012. Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN primes Vitis vinifera L. and confers a better tolerance to low nonfreezing temperatures. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions: MPMI 25, 241–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Thompson AJ, Jackson AC, Parker RA, Morpeth DR, Burbidge A, Taylor IB. 2000. Abscisic acid biosynthesis in tomato: regulation of zeaxanthin epoxidase and 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase mRNAs by light/dark cycles, water stress and abscisic acid. Plant Molecular Biology 42, 833–845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Thuerig B, Binder A, Boller T, Guyer U, Jiménez S, Rentsch C, Tamm L. 2006. An aqueous extract of the dry mycelium of Penicillium chrysogenum induces resistance in several crops under controlled and field conditions. European Jounal of Plant Pathology 114: 185–197. [Google Scholar]
  75. van Loon LC, Rep M, Pieterse CM. 2006. Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology 44, 135–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Vicedo B, Flors V, de la O Leyva M, Finiti I, Kravchuk Z, Real MD, García-Agustín P, González-Bosch C. 2009. Hexanoic acid-induced resistance against Botrytis cinerea in tomato plants. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions: MPMI 22, 1455–1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Wasilewska A, Vlad F, Sirichandra C, Redko Y, Jammes F, Valon C, Frei dit Frey N, Leung J. 2008. An update on abscisic acid signaling in plants and more. Molecular Plant 1, 198–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Wojtaszek P. 1997. Oxidative burst: an early plant response to pathogen infection. The Biochemical Journal 322 (Pt 3), 681–692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Xie B, Hong Z. 2011. Unplugging the callose plug from sieve pores. Plant Signaling & Behavior 6, 491–493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Yang XC, Duan YM, Wang XX, Wang JG, Xu XY, Chen SL, Yin P, Zhu S, Li XJ, Chen SY. 2013. The effect of dry mycelium of Penicillium chrysogenum on the growth of flue-cured tobacco on floating system and resistance against tobacco mosaic under field conditions. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University 28, 169–174. [Google Scholar]
  81. Zhang Z, Wang Y, Chang L, Zhang T, An J, Liu Y, Cao Y, Zhao X, Sha X, Hu T. 2016. MsZEP, a novel zeaxanthin epoxidase gene from alfalfa (Medicago sativa), confers drought and salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Reports 35, 439–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Zhao L, Feng C, Wu K, Chen W, Chen Y, Hao X, Wu Y. 2017. Advances and prospects in biogenic substances against plant virus: A review. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 135, 15–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Zhong Y, Peng JJ, Chen ZZ, Xie H, Luo D, Dai JR, Yan F, Wang JG, Dong HZ, Chen SY. 2015. Dry mycelium of Penicillium chrysogenum activates defense responses and restricts the spread of tobacco mosaic virus in tobacco. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 92, 28–37. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

erab102_suppl_Supplementary_Figures_S1_S2_and_Table_S1

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (JW), upon request.


Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES