Abstract
Aim:
Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improved systemic hemodynamics and outcomes in a preclinical model of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and may also have a neuroprotective role following cardiac arrest. The primary objectives of this study were to determine if iNO during CPR would improve cerebral hemodynamics and mitochondrial function in a pediatric model of lipopolysaccharide-induced shock-associated IHCA.
Methods:
After lipopolysaccharide infusion and ventricular fibrillation induction, 20 1-month-old piglets received hemodynamic-directed CPR and were randomized to blinded treatment with or without iNO (80 ppm) during and after CPR. Defibrillation attempts began at 10 minutes with a 20-minute maximum CPR duration. Cerebral tissue from animals surviving 1-hour post-arrest underwent high-resolution respirometry to evaluate the mitochondrial electron transport system and immunohistochemical analyses to assess neuropathology.
Results:
During CPR, the iNO group had higher mean aortic pressure (41.6±2.0 vs. 36.0±1.4 mmHg; p=0.005); diastolic BP (32.4±2.4 vs. 27.1±1.7 mmHg; p=0.03); cerebral perfusion pressure (25.0±2.6 vs. 19.1±1.8 mmHg; p=0.02); and cerebral blood flow relative to baseline (rCBF: 243.2±54.1 vs. 115.5±37.2%; p=0.02). Among the 8/10 survivors in each group, the iNO group had higher mitochondrial Complex I oxidative phosphorylation in the cerebral cortex (3.60 [3.56, 3.99] vs. 3.23 [2.44, 3.46] pmol O2/s*mg; p=0.01) and hippocampus (4.79 [4.35, 5.18] vs. 3.17 [2.75, 4.58] pmol O2/s*mg; p=0.02). There were no other differences in mitochondrial respiration or brain injury between groups.
Conclusions:
Treatment with iNO during CPR resulted in superior systemic hemodynamics, rCBF, and cerebral mitochondrial Complex I respiration in this pediatric cardiac arrest model.
Keywords: In-hospital cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Pediatrics, shock, Pulmonary Hypertension, inhaled nitric oxide, Physiology, cerebral blood flow, hemodynamics, Laboratory
INTRODUCTION:
Thousand of children have in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCAs) annually1 and while previously improving, survival rates from pediatric IHCA have plateaued in recent years. More than half of children with IHCA do not survive to hospital discharge2,3 and among survivors, neurologic morbidity is common.4 Although high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and epinephrine are associated with improved outcomes from pediatric IHCA, identification and evaluation of other therapeutics is necessary to improve patient outcomes.5,6
Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is used frequently as a pulmonary vasodilator in critically ill children with pulmonary hypertension (PH) or refractory hypoxemic respiratory failure.7 Additionally, iNO and intravenous nitrites may offer post-arrest neuroprotection through reduction of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) generation, protein S-nitrosation to promote pro-survival neuronal signaling pathways, and other potential protective mechanisms.8-11 In a previous laboratory investigation, our group demonstrated superior intra-arrest hemodynamics and improved short-term survival when iNO was administered during CPR in a swine model of shock- and PH-associated adult IHCA.12 These findings suggested that iNO lowered pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and improved blood flow during CPR, but the study did not evaluate cerebral hemodynamics or neurologic injury.
In the present study, we sought to extend previous work to a pediatric model, as shock and PH are frequently present at the time of arrest in hospitalized children.13,14 We also aimed to evaluate intra- and post-arrest markers of neurologic function and injury. We hypothesized that randomized and blinded administration of iNO during CPR in a porcine model of lipopolysaccharide-induced shock- and PH-associated pediatric IHCA would result in: 1) higher systemic blood pressures and cerebral blood flow (CBF) during CPR; 2) improved mitochondrial bioenergetics; 3) decreased generation of mtROS in the brain following CPR; and 4) decreased neuropathologic injury as measured by oxidative injury, apoptosis, and inflammation markers in the brain following CPR.
METHODS:
Animal Preparation and Data Collection
Experimental procedures were in concordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Full methodological details are available in previous publications.12,15–18 Briefly, 20 one-month-old domestic swine (Sus scrofa domesticus; n=10 of each sex) were randomized, anesthetized, and mechanically ventilated. Vascular catheters were placed in the right atrium, and aorta for continuous hemodynamic measurements. A Swan-Ganz catheter was placed in the pulmonary artery (PA) for hemodynamic measurements, arterial blood gas acquisition, and intermittent cardiac output measurement via thermodilution. Through burr holes in the right frontoparietal skull, a brain tissue oxygenation probe (Licox, Integra LifeSciences, Plainsboro, New Jersey, USA) was placed 1 cm into brain tissue and a laser Doppler probe (Periflux, Perimed AB, Sweden) was positioned overlying the dura mater to measure CBF. The electrocardiogram, aortic pressure, right atrial (RA) pressure, PA pressure, coronary perfusion pressure (CoPP), pulse oximetry, end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), laser Doppler-determined relative CBF (rCBF), and brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO2) were recorded in PowerLab (ADInstruments, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA) at a sampling rate of 100–1000 Hz. A CPR quality-recording defibrillator (Zoll R Series; Zoll Medical Corporation, Chelmsford, Massachusetts, USA) measured chest compression rate (compressions/minute) and depth (cm). Arterial and venous blood samples were acquired at predetermined times throughout the experiment for blood gas analyses and plasma was stored for additional analyses.
Resuscitation Protocol
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS; E. coli 055:B5; Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) was administered via intravenous infusion to induce a systemic inflammatory response and pulmonary hypertension. The initial rate of the infusion was 7 mcg/kg/hr and was increased stepwise (7, 14, and 20 mcg/kg/hr) every 10 minutes to a maximum rate of 20 mcg/kg/hr based on previous studies.12,19 After 45 total minutes, LPS was discontinued and ventricular fibrillation (VF) was electrically induced via transthoracic pacing needles in the right ventricle. If the animal developed hypotension with mean arterial pressure (MAP) <40 mmHg prior to 45 minutes, LPS was stopped and VF was induced at that time. Induction of VF facilitated a consistent minimum duration of CPR in which to study the interventions.12,15,17
Upon confirmation of VF, manual CPR commenced for 10 minutes prior to an initial defibrillation attempt. Compressions were delivered at a rate of 100 per minute with guidance from a metronome and the CPR quality-monitoring defibrillator. Mechanical ventilations (tidal volume 10 mL/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure 5 cm H2O, rate 10 per minute with 100% inhaled oxygen) were provided throughout CPR. All animals received HD-CPR as previously detailed12,15–18,20 with chest compression force actively titrated to an aortic systolic pressure of 90 mmHg21 and vasopressors (epinephrine and vasopressin) administered to maintain CoPP ≥20 mmHg.
Animals were randomized to treatment with or without iNO. The INOmax delivery system (Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Dublin, Ireland) was in-line with the ventilator in all experiments with the display screen concealed such that a sole unblinded monitor knew if iNO was provided. Beginning one minute into CPR, that individual provided either iNO (80 ppm) or no iNO and was not otherwise involved in the study. All other investigators remained blinded to group assignment until analyses were complete.
Ten minutes of CPR was provided to all animals followed by an initial defibrillation attempt (50 Joules). In animals without immediate ROSC, resuscitation continued for up to ten additional minutes with defibrillation attempts every two minutes as indicated by rhythm. Animals with ROSC received standardized post-arrest care including intravenous crystalloid and epinephrine (infusion and bolus dosing) to meet MAP goals (45–60 mmHg). In the iNO group, animals received iNO until the study’s endpoint.
Euthanasia, Tissue Acquisition, and Tissue Analyses
One-hour post-ROSC, a craniotomy was performed to expose the brain. Animals were humanely euthanized under anesthesia with potassium chloride, with simultaneous brain tissue extraction. Left frontal cortex and hippocampus were rapidly excised and placed in ice-cold buffer. Fresh tissue underwent immediate mitochondrial respirometry and additional tissue was frozen for neuropathology and cytokine assays.
Assessment of mitochondrial respiration in the cortex and hippocampus was performed via high-resolution respirometry (Oxygraph-2K; OROBOROS Instruments, Innsbruck, Austria). A substrate-uncoupler-inhibitor titration (SUIT) protocol was utilized to measure complex-specific oxidative phosphorylation, maximal oxidative phosphorylation, and inner membrane leak respiration.22–24 Oxygen consumption was recorded with DatLab software (OROBOROS Instruments) and normalized according to citrate synthase as a measure of mitochondrial content. For mtROS quantification, superoxide dismutase was used to transform superoxide, the most proximal ROS product of mitochondrial respiration, to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which was detected using an Amplex UltraRed assay (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) and the Oxygraph-2K high-resolution respirometer equipped with optical sensors (O2K-Fluo LED2-Module, OROBOROS Instruments).
Frozen cortical tissue underwent pathological assessment for quantification of neuronal apoptosis and microglial activation by a blinded nueropathologist. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) staining (ApopTag Plus In Situ Apoptosis Detection Kit; Millipore Sigma, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA) was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The number of apoptotic cells per low-powered (40x) field was quantified using a BX40 microscope (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Evaluation of microglial activation was performed with immunohistochemical quantification of ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule-1 (IBA-1) expression. An anti-IBA-1 rabbit polyclonal antibody (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corp., Osaka, Japan) was applied, followed by Harris hematoxylin (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, Illinois, USA) staining and semi-quantitative ranking from 1 to 3 (least to most expression).
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) with a commercially available kit (Q-Plex porcine cytokine – high sensitivity 4-plex; Quansys Biosciences, Logan, Utah, USA) were performed on cerebral and hippocampal tissue as well as plasma acquired 1-hour post-ROSC to measure interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα). Sample solutions were prepared using a mixture of protease inhibitor and plasma/brain homogenate (1:10 ratio) and sample diluents were added to each sample per manufacter protocol. The plate was imaged using Quansys Imager LS (Quansys Biosciences).
Statistical Analyses
Outcomes included: 1) rCBF, CePP, and PbtO2; 2) systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics; 3) chest compression mechanics; 4) ROSC and 1-hour post-arrest survival; 5) arterial and venous blood gas measurements; 6) cerebral cortical and hippocampal mitochondrial respiration; 7) histopathologic findings; and 8) peripheral blood and cerebral cytokines.
Survival outcomes were compared between groups using Fisher’s exact test. Continuous physiologic data were evaluated as 15-second epochs within each period of the experimental protocol. Values at predetermined timepoints were assessed for normality with the Skewness-Kurtosis test. Normally distributed continuous variables were described as means with standard errors of the mean and evaluated with Student’s t-test. Non-normally distributed continuous variables were described as medians with interquartile ranges and evaluated with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Physiologic variables during the full duration of the LPS period, the CPR period (minutes 1–10), and the post-resuscitation period were compared with a generalized estimating equation regression model that accounted for clustering of epochs within animals. To assess the physiologic effects of LPS, baseline values were compared to values in the final five minutes of the LPS infusion using a paired t-test for normally distributed data and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for non-normally distributed data. Intra-arrest rCBF values were normalized to the first minute of CPR (prior to iNO initiation) due to the arbitrary nature of the raw data output (perfusion units).
Mitochondrial respiration measurements, mtROS values, and cytokine values were compared between groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The Bonferroni correction was applied to cytokine values to account for repeated measurements within each tissue. Histopathology findings were compared with the chi-square test. Statistical analyses were performed with the Stata IC statistical package (Version 14; StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA) and GraphPad Prism (Version 8; GraphPad, San Diego, California, USA). P-values <0.05 were considered significant (<0.0125 for cytokine values).
RESULTS:
The iNO group had lower cardiac output at baseline. There were no other differences between groups at baseline (Supplemental Table 1) or during the LPS infusion (Table 1). Relative to baseline values, at the conclusion of the LPS infusion, animals had higher mean PA pressures (28.1 ± 2.8 mmHg vs. 15.3 ± 0.9 mmHg; p<0.001), lower oxygen saturation (95.9 [94.0, 97.2]% vs. 97.7 [95.3, 98.1]%; p=0.02), lower pH (7.37 ± 0.02 vs. 7.46 ± 0.02; p<0.001), and higher arterial lactate (1.5 ± 0.2 mmol/L vs. 1.2 ± 0.1 mmol/L; p=0.02). Other physiologic measurements did not change significantly from baseline values (Supplemental Table 2). Two animals in the control group and three animals in the iNO group met criteria for termination of LPS and induction of VF prior to 45 minutes. The median duration of the LPS infusion did not differ between groups.
Table 1.
Physiologic Measurements during LPS Infusion
| HD-CPR with iNO (n=10) | HD-CPR (n=10) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heart rate (beats per minute) | 120.9 (12.7) | 119.0 (9.0) | 0.88 |
| Oxygen saturation (%) | 95.2 (0.7) | 95.3 (0.5) | 0.86 |
| Mean aortic pressure (mmHg) | 73.2 (4.6) | 71.1 (3.3) | 0.64 |
| Mean right atrial pressure (mmHg) | 11.1 (3.0) | 10.6 (2.2) | 0.88 |
| Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg) | 31.2 (5.5) | 28.3 (3.9) | 0.60 |
| Coronary perfusion pressure (mmHg) | 55.6 (5.5) | 54.3 (3.89) | 0.81 |
| Aortic diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 66.8 (4.9) | 64.9 (3.4) | 0.70 |
| Aortic systolic pressure (mmHg) | 84.1 (4.9) | 81.8 (3.5) | 0.64 |
| Cardiac output – 30 min. (L/min.)* | 0.80 (0.08) | 0.67 (0.09) | 0.30 |
| End-tidal carbon dioxide (mmHg) | 38.6 (1.1) | 38.0 (0.8) | 0.57 |
| Brain tissue oxygenation (mmHg) | 14.5 (3.4) | 13.3 (2.4) | 0.71 |
| Relative cerebral blood flow (% baseline)** | 108.6 (10.8) | 96.7 (7.4) | 0.27 |
| Cerebral perfusion pressure (mmHg)*** | 62.1 (5.3) | 60.4 (3.8) | 0.75 |
| Duration of LPS infusion (mins.)**** | 36.5 (4.3) | 40.0 (3.3) | 0.53 |
Definition of abbreviations: HD-CPR = hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation; iNO = inhaled nitric oxide.
Unless otherwise noted, values represent mean from LPS infusion period (45 minutes in animals receiving full duration of LPS infusion), compared using generalized estimating equation regression model. Parenthetic numbers indicate SEM.
For intermittent measurements, data distribution for each variable determined with Skewness-Kurtosis test. All data were normally distributed and are displayed as mean and standard error of the mean(in parentheses) and compared using Student’st-test.
Calculated as the percent of the pre-LPS infusion baseline value
Calculated as difference between MAP and RAP
Three animals in HD-CPR with iNO group and two animals in HD-CPR group met criteria for VF induction prior to 45 minutes and thereby received <45 minutes of LPS infusion.
During CPR, the iNO group had higher MAP (41.6 ± 2.0 mmHg vs. 36.0 ± 1.4 mmHg; p=0.005), higher DBP (32.4 ± 2.4 mmHg vs. 27.1 ± 1.7; p=0.03), higher CePP (25.0 ± 2.6 mmHg vs. 19.1 ± 1.8 mmHg; p=0.02), and higher rCBF (percent of baseline CPR value) (243.2 ± 54.1% vs. 115.5 ± 37.3%; p=0.02) (Table 2; Figure 1). The iNO group had higher mixed venous oxygen saturation seven minutes into CPR (21.5 [15.0, 42.0]% vs. 12.0 [10.0, 14.0]%; p=0.045). There were no other blood gas differences between groups at any timepoint (Supplemental Table 3).
Table 2.
Physiologic Measurements during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
| HD-CPR with iNO (n=10) | HD-CPR (n=10) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean aortic pressure (mmHg) | 41.6 (2.00) | 36.0 (1.4) | 0.005 |
| Mean right atrial pressure (mmHg) | 16.6 (1.1) | 16.2 (0.8) | 0.73 |
| Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg) | 29.1 (4.0) | 27.3 (2.9) | 0.66 |
| Coronary perfusion pressure (mmHg) | 20.2 (2.3) | 16.2 (1.6) | 0.08 |
| Aortic diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 32.4 (2.4) | 27.1 (1.7) | 0.03 |
| Aortic systolic pressure (mmHg) | 80.4 (4.8) | 84.0 (3.4) | 0.45 |
| End-tidal carbon dioxide (mmHg) | 24.5 (3.0) | 24.0 (2.1) | 0.88 |
| Brain tissue oxygenation (mmHg) | 28.7 (14.7) | 16.7 (10.4) | 0.41 |
| Relative cerebral blood flow (% baseline)* | 243.2 (54.1) | 115.5 (37.3) | 0.02 |
| Cerebral perfusion pressure (mmHg)** | 25.0 (2.6) | 19.1 (1.8) | 0.02 |
| Chest compression rate (min-1) | 100.8 (0.5) | 100.2 (0.3) | 0.26 |
| Chest compression depth (cm) | 4.2 (0.3) | 4.0 (0.2) | 0.38 |
| CPR duration (min) | 13.2 (1.4) | 12.4 (1.3) | 0.68 |
| Vasopressor doses (n) | 7.8 (1.3) | 6.4 (1.2) | 0.44 |
| Defibrillation attempts (n) | 1 [1, 2] | 1 [1, 2] | 0.90 |
Definition of abbreviations: HD-CPR = hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation; iNO = inhaled nitric oxide.
Mean values from minutes 1–10 of resuscitation period, compared using generalized estimating equation regression model. Parenthetic numbers indicate SEM. Diastolic pressures and coronary perfusion pressure measured during the release phase of chest compressions. Systolic pressures indicate peak pressures during compression phase.
Calculated as the percent of the CBF value from the first 60 seconds of CPR
Calculated as the difference between MAP and RAP
Figure 1: Hemodynamics during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
Graphs represent: A, aortic diastolic blood pressure (DBP); B, mean aortic blood pressure (MAP); C, coronary perfusion pressure (CoPP); D, mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP); E, cerebral perfusion pressure (CePP); and F, relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) during the first ten minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Values are 15-second means for each variable with standard error of the mean depicted with error bars. Blue squares = hemodynamic-directed CPR (HD-CPR) with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO). Gray circles = HD-CPR without iNO. All pressures are mmHg. rCBF is % baseline relative to the first minute (pre-iNO) of CPR. Values from minutes 1–10 compared between groups using a generalized estimating equation accounting for clustering within subjects. *Indicates statistically significant (p<0.05) difference between groups.
Eight animals in each group (80%) achieved ROSC and survived to the 1-hour post-arrest endpoint. Post-arrest, the iNO group continued to have higher CBF relative to pre-experimental baseline (103.9 ± 14.8% vs. 59.5 ± 10.1%; p=0.003). There were no other physiologic differences between groups post-arrest (Table 3).
Table 3.
Post-Resuscitation Physiologic Measurements
| HD-CPR with iNO (n=10) | HD-CPR (n=10) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heart rate (beats per minute) | 117.6 (20.4) | 134.1 (14.4) | 0.42 |
| Oxygen saturation (%) | 95.0 (0.7) | 94.9 (0.5) | 0.94 |
| Mean aortic pressure (mmHg) | 61.2 (2.1) | 59.6 (1.5) | 0.45 |
| Mean right atrial pressure (mmHg) | 7.7 (0.8) | 9.1 (0.6) | 0.11 |
| Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg) | 23.8 (5.0) | 20.2 (3.5) | 0.46 |
| Coronary perfusion pressure (mmHg) | 46.8 (2.8) | 43.9 (1.9) | 0.29 |
| Aortic diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 54.6 (2.9) | 53.1 (2.0) | 0.60 |
| Aortic systolic pressure (mmHg) | 72.2 (3.3) | 72.1 (2.3) | 0.97 |
| End-tidal carbon dioxide (mmHg) | 39.3 (0.9) | 38.2 (0.7) | 0.24 |
| Cardiac output – 5 min. (L/min.)* | 0.54 [0.51, 0.89] | 0.63 [0.57, 0.92] | 0.49 |
| Cardiac output – 30 min. (L/min.)* | 1.10 (0.09) | 0.89 (0.14) | 0.23 |
| Cardiac output – 55 min. (L/min.)* | 1.04 (0.13) | 1.00 (0.26) | 0.90 |
| Brain tissue oxygenation (mmHg) | 16.34 (6.0) | 18.2 (4.2) | 0.75 |
| Cerebral blood flow (% baseline)** | 103.9 (14.8) | 59.5 (10.1) | 0.003 |
| Cerebral perfusion pressure (mmHg)*** | 53.5 (2.3) | 50.5 (1.6) | 0.19 |
Definition of abbreviations: HD-CPR = hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation; iNO = inhaled nitric oxide.
Unless otherwise noted, values represent means from full hour of resuscitation period, compared using generalized estimating equation regression model. Parenthetic numbers indicate SEM.
For intermittent measurements, data distribution for each variable determined with Skewness-Kurtosis test. Normally distributed data displayed as mean and standard error of the mean (in parentheses) and compared using Student’s t-test. Nonparametric data displayed as median and interquartile range (in brackets) and compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Calculated as the percent of the pre-LPS infusion baseline value
Calculated as difference between MAP and RAP
Animals treated with iNO had higher Complex I-driven oxidative phosphorylation in both the cortex (3.60 [3.56, 3.99] pmol O2/s*mg vs. 3.23 [2.44, 3.46] pmol O2/s*mg; p=0.01) and the hippocampus (4.79 [4.35, 5.18] vs. 3.17 [2.75, 4.58]; p=0.02). There were no other differences in mitochondrial respiration or mtROS (Figure 2). There were no differences in histopathologic markers of apoptosis or microglial activation or in cytokine concentrations in the brain or plasma (Table 4).
Figure 2: Cerebral Mitochondrial Respiration and Reactive Oxygen Species Generation.
Box plots represent measurements from cerebral cortex (top panel) and hippocampus (bottom panel): A and E, Complex I oxidative phosphorylation; B and F, maximal oxidative phosphorylation (Complex I + Complex II); C and G, leak respiration; and D and H, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (Complex I + Complex II). Respiration values are provided in pmol O2/s*mg. Reactive oxygen species are provided in pmol H2O2/s*mg. Displayed values were normalized to citrate synthase content and were compared between groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. *Indicates statistically significant (p<0.05) difference between groups.
Table 4.
Histopathology and Cytokines
| HD-CPR with iNO (n=8) | HD-CPR (n=8) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cerebral Histopathology | |||
| TUNEL (n per low-powered field) | 2.5 [0.5, 4] | 3.5 [0.5, 6.5] | 0.68 |
| IBA-1 (semi-quantitative ranking) | 1 [1, 2] | 2.5 [1, 3] | 0.27 |
| Plasma Cytokines* | |||
| IL-1 β | 6.7 [2.7, 26.9] | 16.0 [7.2, 39.5] | 0.23 |
| IL-6 | 213.3 [142.4, 299.6] | 229.0 [162.6, 453.5] | 0.63 |
| IL-8 | 796.0 [723.8, 2429.4] | 1577.7 [893.9, 2310.8] | 0.84 |
| TNF-α | 3.53E4 [3.21E4, 4.21E4] | 4.08E4 [3.46E4, 4.51E4] | 0.23 |
| Cerebral Cortex Cytokines* | |||
| IL-1 β | 1.4 [0.6, 1.7] | 1.7 [0.8, 2.4] | 0.80 |
| IL-6 | 3.3 [3.1, 3.5] | 3.4 [3.2, 3.5] | 0.55 |
| IL-8 | 12.3 [11.6, 17.5] | 14.2 [12.2, 27.3] | 0.46 |
| TNF-α | 9.5 [9.2, 14.7] | 13.3 [10.7, 14.7] | 0.46 |
| Hippocampus Cytokines* | |||
| IL-1 β | 1.3 [0.7, 1.8] | 1.4 [0.9, 2.0] | 0.62 |
| IL-6 | 3.2 [3.1, 3.6] | 3.3 [3.3, 3.6] | 0.54 |
| IL-8 | 15.7 [13.8, 17.0] | 15.5 [12.3, 17.3] | 0.90 |
| TNF-α | 12.5 [9.5, 12.9] | 13.1 [11.6, 15.0] | 0.32 |
Definition of abbreviations: HD-CPR = hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation; iNO = inhaled nitric oxide; TUNEL = terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling; IBA1 = ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1; IL = interleukin; TNF = tumor necrosis factor.
All data displayed as median and interquartile range (in brackets). Histopathology compared using chi-square test. Cytokines compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test with Bonferroni correction applied within each tissue (p<0.0125 considered statistically significant).
All cytokine concentrations are in pg/mL.
DISCUSSION:
In this randomized and blinded preclinical trial in a model of pediatric cardiac arrest associated with LPS-induced systemic inflammation and pulmonary hypertension, the provision of iNO resulted in higher DBP, MAP, and CePP during CPR and higher rCBF both during and following CPR. The iNO group also demonstrated improved Complex I mitochondrial respiration in the brain. These findings are consistent with previous studies demonstrating beneficial effects of iNO during CPR on systemic hemodynamics and neurologic parameters.9–12,25,26 The novel observation of higher intra-arrest rCBF with iNO may be a mechanistic explanation for enhanced mitochondrial respiration. Cumulatively, these data suggest a potential role for iNO as an intra-arrest therapy and as a focus of prospective clinical investigations.
Similar to our previous study in an adult swine model12 and another group’s investigation in rats,25 iNO resulted in higher systemic BPs during CPR. We postulate that this was a result of iNO lowering PVR and increasing pulmonary blood flow,27 thus generating more pulmonary venous return and enhancing cardiac output during chest compressions. The absence of PA pressure differences between groups is likely due to the countering effects of decreased resistance and increased flow, but we did not directly measure PVR or pulmonary blood flow in this study. End-tidal CO2, an indirect measurement of pulmonary blood flow, was also not different between groups. While ETCO2 values are an indicator of pulmonary blood flow in the low-flow state of cardiac arrest, they may be less reliable when high-quality CPR is provided and ETCO2 values are relatively high (e.g., >20 mmHg), as they were in this study. In previous work with the HD-CPR strategy used in this study, ETCO2 was also similar between groups despite differences in hemodynamics and survival.15,17
The consistent physiologic findings across these investigations offer promise for the role of iNO in improving hemodynamics during IHCA, though further work is necessary to specifically determine which patients may benefit from this intervention. Actual pediatric IHCAs occur in the setting of complex disease processes, and PH during IHCA is seldom solely the result of endotoxemia. Therefore, the degree to which PH during IHCA may be reversed or attenuated by the provision of iNO cannot be determined from this study alone. Further experimental and clinical studies are needed to determine how these findings translate to actual clinical practice. Of note, since the majority of pediatric IHCAs are caused by shock or acute respiratory failure,14,28 both of which may be accompanied by elevated PVR,29,30 the role of iNO in pediatric resuscitation may extend beyond just those patients with known PH.
Because of the well-established association of DBP and CoPP during CPR with survival from cardiac arrest,28,31 we hypothesized that higher BPs would result in higher rates of survival as seen in our previous investigation.12 However, 80% of animals in the control group survived, likely due to the modest systemic response to LPS and the efficacy of HD-CPR alone in this pediatric model. Further translational and clinical investigations are needed to evaluate iNO’s impact on survival.
In addition to higher systemic blood pressures during CPR, the iNO group had higher CBF than the group treated with HD-CPR alone. Relative to the first minute of CPR, there was more than a two-fold increase in CBF after initiation of iNO. This was likely driven, at least in part, by the higher MAP and thus higher CePP observed with iNO. Local cerebral vasodilation may also have played a role, especially considering the magnitude of the difference in CBF relative to the difference in CePP and the fact that the iNO group continued to have higher CBF in the post-arrest period even in the absence of differential perfusion pressure. Importanly though, previous studies have had varied results regarding the effect of iNO on the cerebral vasculature. For instance, one murine study did not show improvements in post-arrest CBF as measured by continuous arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging.32 However, another group demonstrated reductions in subarachnoid hemorrhage-associated cerebral vasospasm and dilation of collateral cerebral vessels in a stroke model.33,34 Regardless of mechanism, the potential for iNO to increase CBF during resuscitation from cardiac arrest, when cardiac output and CBF are typically substantially below normal levels,35,36 holds great promise as a safe and plausible means of limiting ischemic injury and improving neurologic outcomes.
In previous porcine studies of pediatric IHCA, mitochondrial dysfunction in the brain persisted after successful resuscitation and was associated with neurobehavioral outcomes. As opposed to standard CPR, HD-CPR partly tempered neurologic dysfunction.17,23 Of particular interest, Complex II-driven respiration was relatively maintained with HD-CPR while Complex I-driven respiration remained depressed.17 In the present study in which all animals were treated with HD-CPR, oxidative phosphorylation in Complex I was higher in animals treated with iNO. This indicates that iNO further enhanced mitochondrial respiratory capacity beyond the effects of the HD-CPR strategy. Complex I (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase) is the largest multimeric enzyme complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain and its function is particularly susceptible to ischemia-reperfusion injury.37 The one-hour post-resuscitation assessment of mitochondrial function in this study may have only been equipped to detect differences in Complex I respiration, since Complex I dysfunction is seen early after cardiac arrest in other animal models and other downstream deficiencies in electron transport are not as well characterized at this early timepoint.38 Our mitochondrial respiration findings build on work by other groups establishing improved mitochondrial function with administration of intravenous nitrites as nitric oxide donors after cardiac arrest.8,10 While multiple molecular mechanisms related to these effects of nitric oxide have been proposed, it is quite possible that the early differences seen here were a direct result of an attenuated ischemic injury from higher CBF in the iNO group.
Unlike previous investigations by Dezfulian and others,10,39–41 iNO did not result in decreased mtROS in the hippocampus or cortex in our study, nor did it result in differential cytokine profiles in the systemic circulation or within brain tissue as has been previously observed.11 These findings could be the effect of differences in the cardiac arrest model, animal species, timing of post-arrest tissue acquisition, brain bioavailability of nitric oxide provided via inhalation as opposed to intravenously administered nitrites, or a host of other factors. Similarly, immunohistochemical evidence of neuronal apoptosis and microglial activation were unchanged with iNO, though this is probably related to the relatively brief duration of post-arrest survival.
This study has limitations. First, these experiments were carried out in previously healthy swine in a controlled environment. Children with IHCA represent a physiologically diverse population whose response to iNO or other resuscitation therapies cannot be predicted from preclinical studies alone. Second, intravenous LPS was utilized in this study to simulate pediatric shock-associated IHCA, a relatively common occurrence.14 Unlike previous work,12,19 animals did not develop severe shock prior to induction of cardiac arrest, potentially due to age-based differences in LPS response or lower LPS potency. This lessened the overall severity of illness, increased survival rates in the control group, and limited our ability to detect a survival benefit associated with iNO. Third, despite the randomized and blinded nature of the study, measured or unmeasured confounders may have played a role in the physiologic differences observed between groups. For instance, the iNO group received a non-statistically significant higher number of vasopressor doses during CPR. Fourth, our experimental endpoint was 1-hour post-arrest survival; future translational studies should examine longer term survival and clinically relevant neurofunctional outcomes. Additional work is also needed to expand our mechanistic understanding of the beneficial effects of iNO, determine its optimal dosing and timing, and better define the characteristics of patients most likely to benefit from it.
CONCLUSIONS:
In this randomized pre-clinical trial in a large animal model of pediatric IHCA associated with LPS-induced shock, blinded treatment with iNO during and following CPR resulted in superior systemic blood pressures, CePP, rCBF, and cerebral mitochondrial Complex I respiration in the brain. These findings suggest that iNO treatment has beneficial effects during CPR and deserves further investigation as a means of improving neurologic outcomes from pediatric cardiac arrest.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (R21HD089132; PI: RAB) and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (R01HL141386; PI: TJK) and was also supported by the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine. Dr. Morgan’s effort was supported by the NIH NHLBI (K23HL148541). The authors report no other conflicts of interest related specifically to this manuscript. Unrelated disclosures include the following: Drs. Sutton and Berg receive grant funding from the NIH. Dr. Himebauch receives grant funding from his institution. Dr. Nadkarni receivies grant funding from the NIH and unrestricted research support from Zoll Medical Corporation. Dr. Kilbaugh receives grant funding from the NIH, the Department of Defense, and non-profit foundations and has previously received investigator-initiated grant support from Mallinckrodt Corporation for a different laboratory study. The authors thank the staff of the laboratory animal facilities at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia for their dedication and Dr. Ron Reeder for his guidance.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:
This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (R21HD089132; PI: RAB) and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (R01HL141386; PI: TJK) and was also supported by the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine. Dr. Morgan’s effort was supported by the NIH NHLBI (K23HL148541). The authors report no other conflicts of interest related specifically to this manuscript. Unrelated disclosures include the following: Drs. Sutton and Berg receive grant funding from the NIH. Dr. Himebauch receives grant funding from his institution. Dr. Nadkarni receivies grant funding from the NIH and unrestricted research support from Zoll Medical Corporation. Dr. Kilbaugh receives grant funding from the NIH, the Department of Defense, and non-profit foundations and has previously received investigator-initiated grant support from Mallinckrodt Corporation for a different laboratory study.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
REFERENCES:
- 1.Holmberg MJ, Ross CE, Fitzmaurice GM, et al. Annual Incidence of Adult and Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019;12(7):e005580. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Girotra S, Spertus JA, Li Y, et al. Survival trends in pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrests: an analysis from Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6(1):42–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Holmberg MJ, Wiberg S, Ross CE, et al. Trends in Survival After Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States. Circulation. 2019;140(17):1398–1408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Slomine BS, Silverstein FS, Christensen JR, et al. Neurobehavioural outcomes in children after In-Hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2018;124:80–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sutton RM, French B, Niles DE, et al. 2010 American Heart Association recommended compression depths during pediatric in-hospital resuscitations are associated with survival. Resuscitation. 2014;85(9):1179–1184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Andersen LW, Berg KM, Saindon BZ, et al. Time to Epinephrine and Survival After Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. JAMA. 2015;314(8):802–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Berger JT, Maddux AB, Reeder RW, et al. Inhaled Nitric Oxide Use in Pediatric Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020;21(8):708–719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vitturi DA, Maynard C, Olsufka M, et al. Nitrite elicits divergent NO-dependent signaling that associates with outcome in out of hospital cardiac arrest. Redox Biol 2020;32:101463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dezfulian C, Alekseyenko A, Dave KR, et al. Nitrite therapy is neuroprotective and safe in cardiac arrest survivors. Nitric Oxide. 2012;26(4):241–250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dezfulian C, Kenny E, Lamade A, et al. Mechanistic characterization of nitrite-mediated neuroprotection after experimental cardiac arrest. J Neurochem. 2016;139(3):419–431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Minamishima S, Kida K, Tokuda K, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide improves outcomes after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation in mice. Circulation. 2011;124(15):1645–1653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Morgan RW, Sutton RM, Karlsson M, et al. Pulmonary Vasodilator Therapy in Shock-associated Cardiac Arrest. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018;197(7):905–912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morgan RW, Topjian AA, Wang Y, et al. Prevalence and Outcomes of Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Associated With Pulmonary Hypertension. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020;21(4):305–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Matos RI, Watson RS, Nadkarni VM, et al. Duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and illness category impact survival and neurologic outcomes for in-hospital pediatric cardiac arrests. Circulation. 2013;127(4):442–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Morgan RW, Kilbaugh TJ, Shoap W, et al. A hemodynamic-directed approach to pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (HD-CPR) improves survival. Resuscitation. 2017;111:41–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Naim MY, Sutton RM, Friess SH, et al. Blood Pressure- and Coronary Perfusion Pressure-Targeted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves 24-Hour Survival From Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest. Crit Care Med 2016;44(11):e1111–e1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lautz AJ, Morgan RW, Karlsson M, et al. Hemodynamic-Directed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves Neurologic Outcomes and Mitochondrial Function in the Heart and Brain. Crit Care Med 2019;47(3):e241–e249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Marquez AM, Morgan RW, Ko T, et al. Oxygen Exposure During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Is Associated With Cerebral Oxidative Injury in a Randomized, Blinded, Controlled, Preclinical Trial. J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9(9):e015032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hatib F, Jansen JR, Pinsky MR. Peripheral vascular decoupling in porcine endotoxic shock. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011;111(3):853–860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sutton RM, Friess SH, Naim MY, et al. Patient-centric blood pressure-targeted cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves survival from cardiac arrest. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;190(11):1255–1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sutton RM, French B, Nishisaki A, et al. American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality targets are associated with improved arterial blood pressure during pediatric cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2013;84(2):168–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kilbaugh TJ, Karlsson M, Byro M, et al. Mitochondrial bioenergetic alterations after focal traumatic brain injury in the immature brain. Exp Neurol 2015;271:136–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kilbaugh TJ, Sutton RM, Karlsson M, et al. Persistently Altered Brain Mitochondrial Bioenergetics After Apparently Successful Resuscitation From Cardiac Arrest. J Am Heart Assoc 2015;4(9):e002232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kilbaugh TJ, Karlsson M, Duhaime AC, Hansson MJ, Elmer E, Margulies SS. Mitochondrial response in a toddler-aged swine model following diffuse non-impact traumatic brain injury. Mitochondrion. 2016;26:19–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brucken A, Derwall M, Bleilevens C, et al. Brief inhalation of nitric oxide increases resuscitation success and improves 7-day-survival after cardiac arrest in rats: a randomized controlled animal study. Crit Care. 2015;19:408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ichinose F. Improving outcomes after cardiac arrest using NO inhalation. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2013;23(2):52–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Derwall M, Ebeling A, Nolte KW, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide improves transpulmonary blood flow and clinical outcomes after prolonged cardiac arrest: a large animal study. Crit Care. 2015;19:328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Berg RA, Sutton RM, Reeder RW, et al. Association Between Diastolic Blood Pressure During Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Survival. Circulation. 2018;137(17):1784–1795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Moudgil R, Michelakis ED, Archer SL. Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;98(1):390–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Knai K, Skjaervold NK. A pig model of acute right ventricular afterload increase by hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Paradis NA, Martin GB, Rivers EP, et al. Coronary perfusion pressure and the return of spontaneous circulation in human cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA. 1990;263(8):1106–1113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kida K, Shirozu K, Yu B, Mandeville JB, Bloch KD, Ichinose F. Beneficial effects of nitric oxide on outcomes after cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in hypothermia-treated mice. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(4):880–889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Terpolilli NA, Feiler S, Dienel A, et al. Nitric oxide inhalation reduces brain damage, prevents mortality, and improves neurological outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage by resolving early pial microvasospasms. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2016;36(12):2096–2107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Terpolilli NA, Kim SW, Thal SC, et al. Inhalation of nitric oxide prevents ischemic brain damage in experimental stroke by selective dilatation of collateral arterioles. Circ Res 2012;110(5):727–738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Maier GW, Newton JR Jr., Wolfe JA, et al. The influence of manual chest compression rate on hemodynamic support during cardiac arrest: high-impulse cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation. 1986;74(6 Pt 2):IV51–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ristagno G, Tang W, Sun S, Weil MH. Cerebral cortical microvascular flow during and following cardiopulmonary resuscitation after short duration of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2008;77(2):229–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Robertson CL, Scafidi S, McKenna MC, Fiskum G. Mitochondrial mechanisms of cell death and neuroprotection in pediatric ischemic and traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol 2009;218(2):371–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Han F, Da T, Riobo NA, Becker LB. Early mitochondrial dysfunction in electron transfer activity and reactive oxygen species generation after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2008;36(11 Suppl):S447–453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dezfulian C, Shiva S, Alekseyenko A, et al. Nitrite therapy after cardiac arrest reduces reactive oxygen species generation, improves cardiac and neurological function, and enhances survival via reversible inhibition of mitochondrial complex I. Circulation. 2009;120(10):897–905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chouchani ET, Methner C, Nadtochiy SM, et al. Cardioprotection by S-nitrosation of a cysteine switch on mitochondrial complex I. Nat Med 2013;19(6):753–759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mangus DB, Huang L, Applegate PM, Gatling JW, Zhang J, Applegate RL 2nd. A systematic review of neuroprotective strategies after cardiac arrest: from bench to bedside (Part I - Protection via specific pathways). Med Gas Res 2014;4:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


