Skip to main content
NCBI home page
MycoKeys logoLink to MycoKeys
. 2021 Apr 27;79:173–192. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.79.60662

Morpho-molecular characterization of Discosia ravennica sp. nov. and a new host record for Sporocadus rosigena

Digvijayini Bundhun 1,2,3, Rajesh Jeewon 4, Indunil C Senanayake 5,6, Erio Camporesi 7,8,9, Janith V S Aluthmuhandiram 2,10, Alvin M C Tang 11, Ji-Chuan Kang 1,✉, Vishwakalyan Bhoyroo 12, Kevin D Hyde 2,6
PMCID: PMC8096799  PMID: 33958954

Abstract

Collections of fungal samples from two dead leaf specimens from Italy were subjected to morphological examination and phylogenetic analyses. Two coelomycetous taxa belonging to two different genera in Xylariomycetidae, Sordariomycetes, namely Discosia and Sporocadus, were identified. The Discosia taxon is revealed as a new species and is herein introduced as Discosia ravennicasp. nov. while the Sporocadus taxon is identified as Sporocadus rosigena. Multi-locus phylogeny based on DNA sequence data of the large subunit (LSU) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal genes, β-tubulin (β-tub) and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2) showed that D. ravennica is related to D. neofraxinea but it forms an independent lineage that supports its new species status. The new taxon also differs from other Discosia species by its unilocular to bilocular, superficial and applanate conidiomata with basal stroma composed of cells of textura angularis, elongate-ampulliform conidiogenous cells and conidia smaller in size. Sporocadus rosigena is here reported as a new host record from Quercus ilex from Italy. Descriptions, illustrations and molecular data for both species are provided in this paper.

Keywords: Amphisphaeriales, asexual morphs, new species, saprobes, taxonomy

Introduction

Members of the Sporocadaceae (Amphisphaeriales, Sordariomycetes) are generally appendage-bearing coelomycetes equally known as “pestalotioid fungi” (Tanaka et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2019). Discosia Lib. ex Durieu & Mont. and Sporocadus Corda are two genera in this family and they were shown to be phylogenetically linked as sister taxa (Jeewon et al. 2002; Maharachchikumbura et al. 2016).

After Libert (1837) established Discosia, it was re-studied by Subramanian and Reddy (1974) who designated D. strobilina Lib. ex Sacc. as lectotype for the genus (Nag Raj 1993; Tanaka et al. 2011). Later, when Sphaeria artocreas Tode was transferred to the genus and combined under D. artocreas (Tode) Fr., the latter was chosen as lectotype of the genus (Fries 1849; Vanev 1991). Morgan-Jones (1964) investigated both D. artocreas [same material examined by Fries (1849)] and D. strobilina and reported them as two different species. Subramanian and Reddy (1974) did not examine the type of D. artocreas, but the features of D. strobilina they observed did not match the same reported by Morgan-Jones (1964). The status of D. artocreas as type species of Discosia, therefore, has not been confirmed (Sutton 1980). Nevertheless, it is currently accepted as the type species of the genus (Crous et al. 2013; Index Fungorum, http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp). Recently, an epitype for D. artocreas was designated (Liu et al. 2019).

Delineation of Discosia taxa was earlier, primarily focused on morphological characteristics such as septation of the conidia, varying proportional lengths of the conidial cells and the conidium size (Subramanian and Reddy 1974; Sutton 1980; Vanev 1991, 1992, 1996; Nag Raj 1993). However, these similar morphological characters have been found to be overlapping for most Discosia species (Sutton 1977, 1980; Nag Raj 1993; Jeewon et al. 2002; Barber et al. 2011; Tanaka et al. 2011). Species of Discosia were earlier also divided into four sections based on the size, septation and pigmentation of the conidia (Subramanian and Reddy 1974). Later, six sections for the species were proposed based on the same conidial morphology (Vanev 1991). Acquisition of DNA sequence data for Discosia species followed by phylogenetic analyses have, however, shown that the concept of subdivision based on morphology alone has been inaccurate and that proper delineation of species must rely on both morphology and molecular phylogeny (Tanaka et al. 2011).

Sporocadus is a recently resurrected genus, characterized by integrated or discrete conidiogenous cells and generally 3-septate, ellipsoid, cylindrical or obovoid conidia which lack appendages (Liu et al. 2019). The genus was originally introduced to accommodate four species, including S. herbarum Corda, S. georginae Corda, S. lichenicola Corda and S. maculans Corda (Corda 1839). No type species for the genus was designated when these species were introduced. However, S. lichenicola was chosen as the lectotype by Hughes (1958). Although Wijayawardene et al. (2016) followed the synonymy of Sporocadus under Seimatosporium by Sutton (1975), Brockman (1976) and Nag Raj (1993) did not accept this. Recently, multi-loci phylogenetic analyses showed that Sporocadus and Seimatosporium are two separate genera, with the former genus usually accommodating taxa without appendages and epitypified by S. lichenicola (Liu et al. 2019).

Documenting fungal species, whether they are novel species or new records, is an important contribution to diversity, taxonomy and plant pathology. It is also imperative that these fungal taxa are studied as a number of them are recognized to be potential emerging plant pathogens and they can impact on disease management strategies (Dugan et al. 2009; Giraud et al. 2010; Ghelardini et al. 2016; Rodeva et al. 2016; Jayasiri et al. 2019; Jayawardena et al. 2020). The aim of this paper is to introduce a new Discosia species collected from Italy based on morphology supported by phylogenetic analyses of combined LSU, ITS, β-tub and rpb2 sequence data. In addition, we report a new host record for a sporocadus-like taxon, identified as Sporocadus rosigena, isolated from Quercus ilex (Fagaceae) in Italy.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and isolation

Samples of plant materials bearing discosia-like and sporocadus-like fungi were collected from dead land leaves of Pyrus sp. and Quercus ilex in the provinces of Ravenna, Oriolo dei Fichi– Faenza and Forlì-Cesena, Fiumana di Predappio, Italy, respectively. They were brought to the laboratory in paper bags and labelled initially as IT 3632 and IT 3569. The specimens were then examined using a dissecting microscope (Motic SMZ-168).

Single-spore isolation was carried out as described in Senanayake et al. (2020). Conidia of the sporocadus-like taxon successfully germinated and were transferred aseptically to malt extract agar (MEA) plates. The cultures were incubated at 18 °C for 2–3 weeks with frequent observations to assess the colony color and other characters.

Morphological studies

Free-hand sections of conidiomata of the Discosia taxon were prepared to examine their morphological characters. The following structures were observed and measured: height, diameter, and shape of conidiomata, conidiomatal wall cell structure, shape and dimensions of conidiophores and conidiogenous cells, length and width of conidia. Morphology of the representatives of the Sporocadus species was obtained from the culture and the morphological characters examined included conidiomata, conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia. All the fungal characters were examined with a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse E600) and digital images were captured with a Nikon DS-U2 and Cannon 750D camera. All measurements were made using the Tarosoft (R) Image Frame Work software v.0.9.0.7. Images used for photo plates were processed with Adobe Photoshop CS6 v. 12.0 (Adobe Systems, USA).

Material deposition

The holotype of the newly described taxon herein was deposited in the Mae Fah Luang University Herbarium (MFLU), Chiang Rai, Thailand while the isotype at the Cryptogamic Herbarium, Kunming Institute of Botany Academia Sinica (HKAS), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China. Herbarium specimen for S. rosigena was also deposited in MFLU while its living culture in Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection (MFLUCC). Facesoffungi and MycoBank numbers are provided as described in Jayasiri et al. (2015) and MycoBank (http://www.MycoBank.org) respectively. Species concepts are discussed following Jeewon and Hyde (2016).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing

Fresh mycelium from the culture of S. rosigena (MFLUCC 18-0387) scraped from the margin of colonies on MEA plates (incubated at room temperature for 4 weeks), and conidiomata of the new taxon (MFLU 18-0131) from natural substrate were used for DNA extraction. Around 20 conidiomata of the new taxon (MFLU 18-0131) were carefully picked from the sterilized material using a fine sterile needle, observed through a stereomicroscope and collected in a 1.5 ml micro-centrifuge tube for subsequent DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was extracted using Forensic DNA Kit (D3591-01, OMEGA bio-tek), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The loci LSU, ITS, β-tub and rpb2 were amplified using primers LR0R/LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990; Rehner and Samuels 1994), ITS5/ITS4 (White et al. 1990; Ward and Adams 1998), BT-2a/BT-2b (Glass and Donaldson 1995) and fRPB2-5F/fRPB2-7cR (Liu et al. 1999; Sung et al. 2007) respectively. Polymerase Chain Reactions (PCR) were conducted in an Applied Biosystems C1000 TouchTM Thermal Cycler with the following PCR conditions for LSU, ITS, β-tub and rpb2 regions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min followed by 34 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s and 30 s of annealing and elongation at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The annealing temperatures were 52 °C for LSU and 58 °C for ITS, β-tub and rpb2. The PCR reaction mixture, 25 µL in final volume, was composed of 0.3 µL of TaKaRa Ex-Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, China), 2.5 µL of 10x Ex-Taq buffer (TaKaRa, China), 3.0 µL (2.5 μM) of dNTPs (TaKaRa, China), 1 µL of genomic DNA, 1 µL (0.4 μM) of each primer, and 16.2 µL of double-distilled H2O. Sequencing of PCR products was carried out with the same primers as mentioned above at the Beijing Biomed Gene Technology Co., Ltd, and Sangon Biotech, Shanghai China. The newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).

Table 1.

Taxa used in the phylogenetic analyses and corresponding GenBank accession numbers.

Taxa Strain number GenBank accession numbers
LSU ITS β-tub rpb2
Discosia artocreas CBS 124848T MH554213 MH553994 MH554662 MH554903
Discosia aff. brasiliensis NRBC 104198 AB593706 AB594774 N/A N/A
Discosia brasiliensis MFLUCC 12-0429 = NTCL094-2 KF827436 KF827432 KF827469 KF827473
MFLUCC 12-0431 = NTCL095 KF827437 KF827433 KF827470 KF827474
MFLUCC 12-0435 = NTCL097-2 KF827438 KF827434 KF827471 KF827475
Discosia fagi MFLU 14-0299A =IT-722AT KM678048 KM678040 N/A N/A
MFLU14-0299B = IT-722B KM678047 KM678039 N/A N/A
Discosia italica MFLU 14-0298A = IT-712AT KM678045 KM678042 N/A N/A
MFLU 14-0298B = IT-712B KM678046 KM678043 N/A N/A
MFLU14-0298C = IT-712C KM678044 KM678041 N/A N/A
Discosia macrozamiae CPC 32109 MH327856 MH327820 MH327895 N/A
Discosia neofraxinea MFLUCC 12-0670 = NTIT469 KF827439 KF827435 KF827472 KF827476
MFLU 15-0375T KR072672 KR072673 N/A N/A
Discosia pini MAFF 410149 AB593708 AB594776 AB594174 N/A
Discosia aff. pleurochaeta KT2192 = MAFF 242782 AB593714 AB594782 AB594180 N/A
KT2179 = MAFF 242778 AB593709 AB594777 AB594175 N/A
KT2188 = MAFF 242779 AB593713 AB594781 AB594179 N/A
Discosia pseudoartocreas CBS 136438T KF777214 KF777161 MH554672 MH554913
Discosia querci MFLUCC 16-0642T MG815830 MG815829 N/A N/A
Discosia ravennica MFLU 18-0131T MT376617 MT376615 MT393594 MW468059
Discosia rubi CBS 143893T MH554334 MH554131 MH554804 MH555038
Discosia tricellularis MAFF 237478 AB593730 AB594798 AB594189 N/A
Discosia tricellularis NBRC 32705T AB593728 AB594796 AB594188 N/A
Discosia yakushimensis MAFF 242774 = NBRC 104194T AB594796 AB594789 AB594187 N/A
Pestalotiopsis hollandica CBS 265.33T AB594188 KM199328 KM199388 MH554936
Pseudopestalotiopsis cocos CBS 272.29T NR_145246 KM199467 MH554938
Sporocadus biseptatus CBS 110324 = MYC 754T MH554179 MH553956 MH554615 MH554853
Sporocadus cornicola CBS 143889 = CPC 23235 MH554326 MH554121 MH554794 MH555029
MFLUCC 14-0448T N/A KU974967 N/A N/A
Sporocadus cotini CBS 139966 = MFLUCC 14-0623T MH554222 MH554003 MH554675 MH554916
Sporocadus incanus CBS 123003T MH554210 MH553991 MH554659 MH554900
Sporocadus lichenicola CBS 354.90 = NBRC 32677 MH554252 MH554035 MH554711 MH554948
CPC 24528 MH554332 MH554127 MH554800 MH555036
NBRC 32625 = IMI 079706T MH883646 MH883643 MH883645 MH883647
Sporocadus mali CBS 446.70T MH554261 MH554049 MH554725 MH554960
Sporocadus microcyclus CBS 424.95T MH554258 MH554045 MH554721 MH554956
CBS 887.68 = NBRC 32680 MH554280 MH554068 MH554744 MH554981
Sporocadus multiseptatus CBS 143899 = CPC 26606T MH554343 MH554141 MH554814 MH555047
Sporocadus rosarum CBS 113832 = UPSC 2172 MH554189 MH553970 MH554629 MH554864
Sporocadus rosigena CBS 116498 MH554200 MH553983 MH554642 MH554883
CBS 129166 = MSCL 860 MH554215 MH553996 MH554665 MH554905
CBS 182.50 MH554233 MH554013 MH554689 MH554926
CBS 250.49 MH554245 MH554023 MH554699 MH554934
CBS 466.96 MH554265 MH554052 MH554728 MH554965
MFLU 16-0239T MG829069 MG828958 N/A N/A
Sporocadus rosigena MFLUCC 18-0387 MT376616 MT376614 MT393595 N/A
Sporocadus rotundatus CBS 616.83T MH554273 MH554060 MH554737 MH554974
Sporocadus sorbi MFLUCC 14-0469T KT281911 KT284774 N/A N/A
CBS 160.25 MH554229 MH554008 MH554684 MH554924
Sporocadus sp. CBS 506.71 MH554268 MH554055 MH554731 MH554968
Sporocadus trimorphus CBS 114203 = UPSC 2430T MH554196 MH553977 MH554636 MH554876
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: CBS: Culture collection of the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands, CPC: Culture collection of Pedro Crous, housed at the Westerdijk Institute, IMI: International Mycological Institute, CABI-Bioscience, Egham, Bakeham Lane, United Kingdom, MAFF: Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, MFLU: Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand, MFLUCC: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Chiang Rai, Thailand, MSCL: Microbial Strain Collection of Latvia, NBRC: Biological Resource Center, UPSC: Uppsala University Culture Collection of Fungi, Sweden. Types, ex-types and authentic strains are indicated with T. Newly generated sequences in this study are indicated in bold. “N/A” sequence is unavailable.

Phylogenetic analyses

Newly generated sequences from LSU, ITS, β-tub and rpb2 during this study (Table 1) were analyzed with other sequences obtained from GenBank along with recently published relevant phylogenies (Wanasinghe et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2019). Sequences for each locus (LSU, ITS, β-tub and rpb2) were aligned using MAFFT V.7.036 (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/; Katoh et al. 2019), with L-INS-i Iterative refinement methods and manually improved when necessary in BioEdit v. 7.0 (Hall 2004). Phylogenetic analyses of the aligned data were based on maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses with details as outlined by Tang et al. (2007, 2009).

RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE (v. 8.2.8) (Stamatakis et al. 2008; Stamatakis 2014) in the CIPRES Science Gateway platform (Miller et al. 2010) was used to generate the ML trees. Optimal ML tree search was conducted with 1000 separate runs, using the default algorithm of the program from a random starting tree for each run. The ultimate tree was selected among suboptimal trees from each run by comparing likelihood scores under the GTRGAMMA substitution model.

Bayesian analysis was executed in MrBayes v. 3. 1. 2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001) through Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling to calculate the posterior probabilities (PP) (Rannala and Yang 1996; Zhaxybayeva and Gogarten 2002). Partitioning of data was initially done by locus and then the parameters of the nucleotide substitution models for every partition were selected independently using MrModeltest v. 2.3 (Nylander 2004). Six Markov chains were run in parallel for 5M generations with trees being sampled every 1000th generation. The distribution of log-likelihood scores was examined to determine the stationary phase for each search and to decide whether additional runs were required to reach convergence, using the program Tracer 1.5 (Rambaut and Drummond 2007). Convergence was declared when the average standard deviation of split frequencies at the end of the total MCMC generations was at 0.01. First 20% of generated trees was discarded as burn-in and the remaining 80% was used to calculate PP of the majority rule consensus tree (Dissanayake et al. 2020). The resulting trees were viewed in FigTree v. 1.4.0 (Rambaut 2012) and annotated in Microsoft PowerPoint (2013). The final alignment was registered in TreeBASE under the submission ID: 27601.

Results

Phylogenetic analyses

The combined gene dataset (LSU, ITS, β-tub and rpb2) used to generate ML tree in Fig. 1 comprised 51 taxa including the newly generated sequences. Pestalotiopsis hollandica (CBS 265.33) and Pseudopestalotiopsis cocos (CBS 272.29) were selected as outgroup. The ML tree topology was similar to the one of the BI consensus tree. The best scoring RAxML tree with final optimization had a likelihood value of -15179.071239. The matrix had 1020 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.74% of gaps and completely undetermined characters. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A= 0.247496, C= 0.245307, G= 0.252993, T= 0.254204, with substitution rates AC= 1.621276, AG= 6.173475, AT= 1.526832, CG= 1.406021, CT= 9.022198, GT= 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α= 0.158554 and Tree-length = 1.305620.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood (RAxML) based on analysis of a combined dataset of LSU, ITS, β-tub and rpb2 sequence data. Bootstrap support values for ML equal to or greater than 70% (black) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) equal to or greater than 0.90 (blue) are defined as ML/PP above or below the nodes. Type collections are in bold while the newly generated sequences are in blue bold type. The tree is rooted to Pestalotiopsis hollandica (CBS 265.33) and Pseudopestalotiopsis cocos (CBS 272.29). The scale bar represents the expected number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

Discosia taxa were divided into two separate clades (A and B). Clade A, consisting of 3 strains of Discosia, grouped with and was sister to Sporocadus with strong statistical support (100% ML, 1.00 PP). Clade B, comprising 21 strains of Discosia, was basal to both Sporocadus and clade A with strong statistical support (100% ML, 1.00 PP). Our strain MFLU 18-0131 was positioned in clade A, basal to both strains of D. neofraxinea (MFLU 15-0375 and MFLUCC 12-0670 = NTIT469), forming an independent lineage with good statistical support (96% ML/ 1.00 PP).

All the Sporocadus species formed a monophyletic clade with strong statistical support (100% ML, 1.00 PP). The strain MFLUCC 18-0387 from this study clustered with the other existing S. rosigena strains with a bootstrap support of 91% ML and 0.98 PP (Fig. 1).

Taxonomy

Discosia ravennica

Bundhun, Jeewon, Camporesi, J.C. Kang & K.D. Hyde, sp. nov.

7170308F-6973-571D-AD49-8DD5F8C27217

837963

Facesoffungi Number: FoF07929

Figure 2

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Discosia ravennica (MFLU 18-0131, holotype) a Herbarium specimen b Conidiomata on the host c, d Vertical sections of conidiomata e Conidioma wall at the base f–h Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia i, j Conidia. Scale bars: 500 μm (b); 200 μm (c, d); 10 μm (e, g–j); 20 μm (f).

Etymology.

The specific epithet ravennica refers to the province of Ravenna, where the fungus was collected.

Holotype.

MFLU 18-0131

Description.

Saprobic on leaves of Pyrus sp. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 45–70 µm high, 410–800 µm diam., stromatic, scattered to gregarious, superficial, rounded to unevenly outlined with complete margins, applanate, unilocular to bilocular, rugose, not glabrous, dull black, ostiolate. Ostiole 50–90 µm diam., circular to oval, opening to the exterior, central. Conidiomatal wall 10–20 µm thick at the base, dark brown in the outermost layer, comprising thick-walled cells of textura angularis, gradually becoming pale towards the inner layer; 10–20 µm thick near the apex, dark brown to black, made up of thick-walled cells of textura epidermoidea; interlocular wall composed of dark brown thick-walled cells of textura prismatica, becoming thin-walled and paler towards the outer layers. Conidiophores up to 40 µm high, originating from the innermost layer cells of the basal stroma, unbranched or at times branched, mostly 0–1-septate, rarely 2-septate or reduced to conidiogenous cells, cylindrical, hyaline, smooth. Conidiogenous cells 8–30 × 0.7–1.5 µm (x– = 14.3 × 1.1 µm, n = 15), subcylindrical to elongate-ampuliform, hyaline, smooth-walled, holoblastic. Conidia 12–16 × 1.5–3 µm (x– = 13.8 × 2.3 µm, n = 40) naviculate, to subcylindrical, narrow towards the base, straight or faintly curved, euseptate, mostly 3-septate, occasionally 2-septate, with septa thicker and darker than the periclinal wall, with cells unequal, hyaline to sub-hyaline, smooth-walled, without constriction at septa, bearing appendages on both apical and basal cells; basal cell 3–6 µm (x– = 3.8 µm) long, narrowly obconic, with truncate base bearing a conspicuous dehiscence scar; 2 median cells, together 6–10 µm (x– = 7.4 µm) long [second cell 4–6 µm (x– = 5.0 µm) long, close to apical cell, almost twice the size of the third cell 2–4 µm (x– = 3.0 µm) long, close to basal cell]; apical cell 3–5 µm (x– = 3.6 µm) long, subconical with acute apex, hyaline at apex and sub-hyaline below; appendages tubular, faintly broad at the base, unbranched, flexuous; appendage on apical cell 5–17 µm (x– = 10.1 µm) long, single, polar; appendage on basal cell 4–17 µm (x– = 9.4 µm) long, single, inserted slightly above conidium base.

Material examined.

ITALY. Province of Ravenna [RA], Oriolo dei Fichi– Faenza; on dead land leaves of Pyrus sp.; 24 Dec. 2017; Erio Camporesi; IT 3632 (MFLU 18-0131, holotype; HKAS 104973, isotype).

Notes.

In the present study, no culture could be obtained for D. ravennica despite several trials on various media including MEA, potato dextrose agar, corn meal agar or water agar at different incubation conditions, the reason for which the species was subjected to direct DNA extraction from conidiomata. Discosia ravennica is morphologically similar to D. neofraxinea in terms of superficial conidiomata, which are not glabrous and 3-septate conidia with cells of unequal length. It also closely resembles D. fraxinea (Schwein.) Nag Raj (1993) in having uni-to bi-locular applanate conidiomata and naviculate to subcylindrical 3-septate conidia with cells of unequal length. The new species, however, also differs from the latter two species as mentioned in Table 2.

Table 2.

Features distinguishing Discosia ravennica, D. fraxinea and D. neofraxinea.

Features Discosia ravennica (this study) Discosia fraxinea (Nag Raj 1993) Discosia neofraxinea (Senanayake et al. 2015)
Host occurrence Leaves of Pyrus sp. Amelanchier vulgaris, Crataegus sp., Fraxinus americana, Populus sp., Sorbus americana and undetermined leaves Leaves of Fagus sylvatica
Known distribution Italy Austria, France, Germany, U.S.A. Italy
Conidiomata Superficial Erumpent Superficial
Basal stroma Composed of cells of textura angularis Composed of cells of textura prismatica Composed of cells of textura prismatica
Conidiogenous cells 8–30 × 0.7–1.5 µm
Subcylindrical to elongate-ampuliform		 7–40 × 1.5–2.5 µm
Subcylindrical to langeniform or ampuliform		 6–40 × 1–2 μm
Cylindrical
Conidia 12–16 × 1.5–3 µm
(x– = 13.8 × 2.3 µm)		 12.5–19 × 2.5–3.5 µm
(x– = 16.2 × 3 µm)		 15–18 × 2.5–3.5 μm
(x– = 16 × 3 μm)
Open in a new tab

Sporocadus rosigena

F. Liu, L. Cai & Crous, in Liu, Bonthond, Groenewald, Cai & Crous, Stud. Mycol. 92: 402 (2018)

211989ED-0B3B-5D38-A063-B97E2EAF4545

Facesoffungi number: FoF07930

Figure 3

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Sporocadus rosigena (MFLU 17-2803) a Leaf of Quercus ilex L b Close-up of conidiomata on host c Upper view of colony on MEAd Conidiomata in culture (MFLUCC 18-0387) e, f Different stages of conidiogenesis (MFLUCC 18-0387) g–j Conidia (MFLUCC 18-0387). Scale bars: 10 μm (e, f); 5 μm (g–j).

  • ≡ Seimatosporium rosicola Wanas., Goonas., Camporesi, & K.D. Hyde, in Wanasinghe et al., Fungal Diversity 193 (2018)

Description.

Saprobic on Quercus ilex L. Sexual morph: Illustrated in Wanasinghe et al. (2018). Asexual morph: Conidiomata (on host) 115–145 µm diam., 70–130 µm high, acervular, solitary to aggregated, semi-immersed, black; (on MEA) 50–70 µm diam., acervular, solitary to aggregated, erumpent, black. Conidiophores (on MEA) cylindrical, branched, hyaline, smooth, up to 30 µm long. Conidiogenous cells (on MEA) 7–18 × 2–3 µm (x– = 10.1 × 2.1 µm, n = 20) cylindrical, enteroblastic, annellidic, integrated or discrete, hyaline, determinate, smooth. Conidia (on MEA) 12–15 × (3–) 5–7 µm (x– = 13.5 × 5.4 µm, n = 47), obovoid, ellipsoid, broad fusiform or subcylindrical, straight or curved, hyaline when immature, pale to moderate brown at maturity, with 3 transverse, thick, darker septa, rarely constricted at the septa, often obtuse at both ends, or well rounded, smooth-walled, no appendage or sheath; basal cell obconic with a truncate base, pale brown or hyaline, thin-walled, 1–2.5 µm long (x– = 2 µm); two median cells doliiform, hyaline or pale brown, turning brown at maturity, together 5–7 µm long (x– = 6.1 µm), second cell from the base 1–3 µm long (x– = 2.5 µm), third cell from the base 1.4–4 µm long (x– = 2.6 µm); apical cell conical with obtuse or rounded apex, concolorous with the median cells, 1.8–3.5 µm long (x– = 2.5 µm).

Culture characteristics.

Colonies on MEA reaching 2–3 cm diam. after 11 days at 18 °C in darkness, filamentous, circular, flat with entire margin, white from above, reverse pale yellow.

Material examined.

ITALY. Province of Forlì-Cesena, Fiumana di Predappio; on dead land leaf of Quercus ilex L. (Fagaceae); 20 Nov. 2017; Erio Camporesi; IT 3569 (MFLU 17-2803); living culture MFLUCC 18-0387.

Notes.

Sporocadus rosigena from the present study shares similar morphology with the other S. rosigena strains in having almost obovoid, ellipsoid or fusiform to subcylindrical conidia (Wanasinghe et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2019). Pairwise comparison of DNA sequence data of the isolate MFLUCC 18-0387 with the other strains of S. rosigena revealed very minor differences and thus, the strain MFLUCC 18-0387 is considered as S. rosigena.

Discussion

Discosia ravennica sp. nov. forms an independent lineage, basal to the two strains of D. neofraxinea (96% ML/ 1.00 PP) (Fig. 1). It is different from D. neofraxinea in its unilocular to bilocular, applanate conidiomata along with elongate-ampulliform conidiogenous cells and conidia smaller in size (Table 2). With regard to DNA sequence data comparison, D. ravennica differs from both strains of D. neofraxinea (MFLU 15-0375 and MFLUCC 12-0670 = NTIT469) in having 14 out of 531 (2.6 %) and 8 out of 512 (1.6%) different base pairs (bp) in the ITS alignments respectively. Moreover, 13 bp out of 229 (5.7%) and 82 bp out of 832 (9.9%) differences in the ß-tub and rpb2 alignments respectively can be observed between D. ravennica and D. neofraxinea (MFLUCC 12-0670 = NTIT469). Sequence data of ß-tub and rpb2 are not available for the strain of D. neofraxinea (MFLU 15-0375) in GenBank and hence could not be compared. Similarly, no molecular data for D. fraxinea are accessible in GenBank, following which the new species, D. ravennica, has been delineated based on morphology (Table 2). The 5.7% and 9.9% differences in nucleotides in ß-tub and rpb2 respectively may acceptably support the establishment of a new species (Jeewon and Hyde 2016). Following this assumption along with the above-mentioned morphological differences and high statistical support, D. ravennica is herein established as a new species.

A peculiar finding from our DNA sequence analyses is the placement of D. neofraxinea and D. ravennica. Both of them constitute a strongly supported independent clade (clade A) basal to species of Sporocadus. One might argue that given their distinct phylogenetic nature, a new genus accommodating these two species might be a possibility. However, in this particular scenario, we would rather take a more conservative and lumping taxonomic approach and maintain the latter two species in Discosia. The reasons we would advocate are that there is a lot of morphological resemblance between members of clades A and B. For instance, when we compare D. neofraxinea and D. ravennica (clade A) with the type species, D. artocreas (clade B), they all have stromatic conidiomata, conidiophores which arise from the upper cell layer of the basal stroma, and hyaline to sub-hyaline, usually 3-septate conidia bearing two appendages (Nag Raj 1993; Senanayake et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2019). The main difference is that D. neofraxinea and D. ravennica have the third cell of their conidia from the base longer than the second cell while D. artocreas has the second cell of its conidia from the base longer than the third cell (Nag Raj 1993) or both median cells of almost equal length (Liu et al. 2019). However, this distinctive characteristic is not sufficient enough for the establishment of a new genus. It might be that the genus is paraphyletic, but until more species are recovered and analyzed to provide further taxonomic insights, we refrain from making any taxonomic amendments. It might also be possible that there is a need to establish species complexes given the wide intraspecies variation as we have seen in other genera such as Phyllosticta (Norphanphoun et al. 2020).

The second recovered species from this study, Sporocadus rosigena, clusters with other S. rosigena strains in a well-supported clade (91% ML / 0.98 PP) in our 4-gene phylogeny (Fig. 1). The latter shows similar topology to the 5-gene phylogeny reported by Liu et al. (2019). Sporocadus rosigena has earlier been reported as saprobic or endophytic on species of Rosa, Rubus, Pyrus (Rosaceae), Rhododendron (Ericaceae) and Vitis (Vitaceae) (Wanasinghe et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2019). In this study, the species was found from Quercus ilex (Fagaceae) and is therefore introduced as a new host record. Different fungi have equally been reported from Quercus ilex in Italy; for instance, the genera Alternaria (Lunghini et al. 2013), Beltrania (Pirozynski 1963), Endothia (Spaulding 1961), Monochaetia (Nag Raj 1993), Neognomoniopsis (Crous et al. 2019), Pestalotia (Nag Raj 1993), Xylaria and Zygosporium (Lunghini et al. 2013), indicating a broad diversity of fungi on the same host. All Sporocadus species in their asexual stage possess 3-septate, obovoid, fusoid to cylindrical conidia, which do not have any appendage. The only exceptions are S. trimorphus and S. rosarum, which are known to produce conidia both with and without appendages (Liu et al. 2019).

Fungal diversity and classification are always ever-changing and require an ongoing assessment (Hyde and Soytong 2008; Jeewon et al. 2017). This becomes especially essential in cases where taxa are described from genera which usually accommodate pathogens. Discosia, for instance, is known to comprise the plant pathogen D. yakushimensis which causes leaf spots on plants such as Symplocos prunifolia (Tanaka et al. 2011). Identifying novel species in a genus may also potentially imply the discovery of emerging pathogens which can cause damage to crops of economic importance (Jayawardena et al. 2019a, 2019b). Evolutionary relationships and ecological roles of fungi have been reported to be intricately linked to the emergence of new species (Zhang et al. 2008; Hyde et al. 2020). However, such phenomena also extend to the recognition of existing species from new hosts, as is the case for S. rosigena in the present study. Documenting records from new hosts has become useful repertoires for mycologists who aim to understand evolution of fungi, host jumping, expanding host diversity and adaptations to different environmental conditions (Hyde et al. 2020). These are equally important for proper quarantine measures, whereby potential pathogens or species known to have a wide host diversity are to be closely monitored with a view to avoid unintentional disturbance to a specific environment (Cai et al. 2011).

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Discosia ravennica
mycokeys.79.60662-treatment1.xml (18.5KB, xml)
XML Treatment for Sporocadus rosigena
mycokeys.79.60662-treatment2.xml (15.1KB, xml)

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by grants of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grants Nos. 31670027 & 31460011) and the Open Research Foundation of the Key Laboratory (Engineering Center) of National Education Ministry at Guizhou University (Grant no. GZUKEY 20160705). Mae Fah Luang University, the Center of Excellence in Fungal Research and the Mushroom Research Foundation, Thailand, are acknowledged for the support provided for research. Rajesh Jeewon is grateful to the University of Mauritius and Mae Fah Luang University for enabling research collaboration. Digvijayini Bundhun thanks Yuanpin Xiao, RS Jayawardena and CS Bhunjun for their help and suggestions. All authors thank Shaun Pennycook for checking the nomenclature of the new taxon.

Citation

Bundhun D, Jeewon R, Senanayake IC, Camporesi E, Aluthmuhandiram JVS, Tang AMC, Kang J-C, Bhoyroo V, Hyde KD (2021) Morpho-molecular characterization of Discosia ravennica sp. nov. and a new host record for Sporocadus rosigena. MycoKeys 79: 173–192. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.79.60662

References

  1. Barber PA, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Pascoe IG, Keane P. (2011) Reassessing Vermisporium (Amphisphaeriaceae), a genus of foliar pathogens of eucalypts. Persoonia 27: 90–118. 10.3767/003158511X617381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brockmann I. (1976) Untersuchungen über die Gattung Discostroma Clements (Ascomycetes). Sydowia 28: 275–338. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cai L, Giraud T, Zhang N, Begerow D, Cai GH, Shivas RG. (2011) The evolution of species concepts and species recognition criteria in plant pathogenic fungi. Fungal Diversity 50: 121–133. 10.1007/s13225-011-0127-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Corda AC. (1839) Icones fungorum hucusque cognitorum 3: 1–55.
  5. Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Guarro J, Cheewangkoon R, van der Bank M, Swart WJ, Stchigel AM, Cano-Lira JF, Roux J, Madrid H, Damm U, Wood AR, Shuttleworth LA, Hodges CS, Munster M, de Jesús Yáñez-Morales M, Zúñiga-Estrada L, Cruywagen EM, de Hoog GS, Silvera C, Najafzadeh J, Davison EM, Davison PJN, Barrett MD, Barrett RL, Manamgoda DS, Minnis AM, Kleczewski NM, Flory SL, Castlebury LA, Clay K, Hyde KD, Maússe-Sitoe SND, Chen S, Lechat C, Hairaud M, Lesage-Meessen L, Pawłowska J, Wilk M, Sliwińska-Wyrzychowska A, Mętrak M, Wrzosek M, Pavlic-Zupanc D, Maleme HM, Slippers B, Mac Cormack WP, Archuby DI, Grünwald NJ, Tellería MT, Dueñas M, Martín MP, Marincowitz S, de Beer ZW, Perez CA, Gené J, Marin-Felix Y, Groenewald JZ. (2013) Fungal Planet description sheets: 154–213. Persoonia 31: 188–296. 10.3767/003158513X675925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crous PW, Carnegie AJ, Wingfield MJ, Sharma R, Mughini G, Noordeloos ME, Santini A, Shouche YS, Bezerra JDP, Dima B, Guarnaccia V, Imrefi I, Jurjević Ž, Knapp DG, Kovács GM, Magistà D, Perrone G, Rämä T, Rebriev YA, Shivas RG, Singh SM, Souza-Motta CM, Thangavel R, Adhapure NN, Alexandrova AV, Alfenas AC, Alfenas RF, Alvarado P, Alves AL, Andrade DA, Andrade JP, Barbosa RN, Barili A, Barnes CW, Baseia IG, Bellanger JM, Berlanas C, Bessette AE, Bessette AR, Biketova AY, Bomfim FS, Brandrud TE, Bransgrove K, Brito ACQ, CanoLira JF, Cantillo T, Cavalcanti AD, Cheewangkoon R, Chikowski RS, Conforto C, Cordeiro TRL, Craine JD, Cruz R, Damm U, de Oliveira RJV, de Souza JT, de Souza HG, Dearnaley JDW, Dimitrov RA, Dovana F, Erhard A, EsteveRaventós F, Félix CR, Ferisin G, Fernandes RA, Ferreira RJ, Ferro LO, Figueiredo CN, Frank JL, Freire KTLS, García D, Gené J, Gęsiorska A, Giberton TB, Gondra RAG, Gouliamova DE, Gramaje D, Guard F, Gusmão LFP, Haitook S, Hirooka Y, Houbraken J, Hubka V, Inamdar A, Iturriaga T, Iturrieta-González I, Jadan M, Jiang N, Justo A, Kachalkin AV, Kapitonov VI, Karadelev M, Karakehian J, Kasuya T, Kautmanová I, Kruse J, Kušan I, Kuznetsova TA, Landell MF, Larsson KH, Lee HB, Lima DX, Lira CRS, Machado AR, Madrid H, Magalhães OMC, Majerova H, Malysheva EF, Mapperson RR, Marbach PAS, Martín MP, Martín-Sanz A, Matočec N, McTaggart AR, Mello JF, Melo RFR, Mešić A, Michereff SJ, Miller AN, Minoshima A, Molinero-Ruiz L, Morozova OV, Mosoh D, Nabe M, Naik R, Nara K, Nascimento SS, Neves RP, Olariaga I, Oliveira RL, Oliveira TGL, Ono T, Ordoñez ME, Ottoni A de M, Paiva LM, Pancorbo F, Pant B, Pawłowska J, Peterson SW, Raudabaugh DB, Rodríguez-Andrade E, Rubio E, Rusevska K, Santiago ALCMA, Santos ACS, Santos C, Sazanova NA, Shah S, Sharma J, Silva BDB, Siquier JL, Sonawane MS, Stchige AM, Svetasheva T, Tamakeaw N, Telleria MT, Tiago PV, Tian CM, Tkalčec Z, Tomashevskaya MA, Truong HH, Vecherskii MV, Visagie CM, Vizzini A, Yilmaz N, Zmitrovich IV, Zvyagina EA, Boekhout T, Kehlet T, Læssøe T, Groenewald JZ. (2019) Fungal planet description sheets: 868–950. Persoonia 42: 291–473. 10.3767/persoonia.2019.42.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dissanayake AJ, Bhunjun CS, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Liu JK. (2020) Applied aspects of methods to infer phylogenetic relationships amongst fungi. Mycosphere 11: 2652–2676. 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/18 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dugan FM, Glawe DA, Attanayake RN, Chen W. (2009) The importance of reporting new host-fungus records for ornamental and regional crops. Plant Health Progress 10: 34. 10.1094/PHP-2009-0512-01-RV [DOI]
  9. Fries EM. (1849) Summa Vegetabilium Scandinaviae. Sectio posterior. Typographia Academica, Uppsala, 259–572.
  10. Ghelardini L, Pepori AL, Luchi N, Capretti P, Santini A. (2016) Drivers of emerging fungal diseases of forest trees. Forest Ecology and Management 381: 235–246. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.032 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Giraud T, Gladieux P, Gavrilets S. (2010) Linking the emergence of fungal plant diseases with ecological speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25: 387–395. 10.1016/j.tree.2010.03.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Glass NL, Donaldson GC. (1995) Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61: 1323–1330. 10.1128/AEM.61.4.1323-1330.1995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hall TA. (2004) BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor 7.0. 1. Carlsbad, CA, USA: Isis Pharmaceuticals.
  14. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hughes SJ. (1958) Revisiones hyphomycetum aliquot cum appendice de nominibus rejiciendis. Canadian Journal of Botany 36: 727–836. 10.1139/b58-067 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hyde KD, Soytong K. (2008) The fungal endophyte dilemma. Fungal Diversity 33: 163–173. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hyde KD, de Silva NI, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, Phookamsak R, Doilom M, Boonmee S, Jayawardena RS, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Senanayake IC, Manawasinghe IS, Liu NG, Abeywickrama PD, Chaiwan N, Karunarathna A, Pem D, Lin CG, Sysouphanthong P, Luo ZL, Wei DP, Wanasinghe DN, Norphanphoun C, Tennakoon DS, Samarakoon MC, Jayasiri SC, Jiang HB, Zeng XY, Li JF, Wijesinghe SN, Devadatha B, Goonasekara ID, Brahmanage RS, Yang EF, Aluthmuhandiram JVS, Dayarathne MC, Marasinghe DS, Li WJ, Dissanayake LS, Dong W, Huanraluek N, Lumyong S, Liu JK, Karunarathna SC, Jones EBG, Al-Sadi AM, Xu JC, Harishchandra D, Sarma VV, Bulgakov T. (2020) AJOM new records and collections of fungi: 1–100. Asian Journal of Mycology 3: 22–294. 10.5943/ajom/3/1/3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jayasiri SC, Hyde KD, Ariyawansa HA, Bhat J, Buyck B, Cai L, Dai YC, Abd-Elsalam KA, Ertz D, Hidayat I, Jeewon R, Jones EBG, Bahkali AH, Karunarathna SC, Liu JK, Luangsa-ard JJ, Lumbsch HT, Maharachchikumbura SSN, McKenzie EHC, Moncalvo JM, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Nilsson H, Pang KL, Pereira OL, Phillips AJL, Raspé O, Rollins AW, Romero AI, Etayo J, Selçuk F, Stephenson SL, Suetrong S, Taylor JE, Tsui CKM, Vizzini A, Abdel-Wahab MA, Wen TC, Boonmee S, Dai DQ, Daranagama DA, Dissanayake AJ, Ekanayaka AH, Fryar SC, Hongsanan S, Jayawardena RS, Li WJ, Perera RH, Phookamsak R, de Silva NI, Thambugala KM, Tian Q, Wijayawardene NN, Zhao RL, Zhao Q, Kang JC, Promputtha I. (2015) The Faces of Fungi database: fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts. Fungal Diversity 74: 3–18. 10.1007/s13225-015-0351-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jayasiri SC, Hyde KD, Jones EBG, McKenzie EHC, Jeewon R, Phillips AJL, Bhat DJ, Wanasinghe DN, Liu JK, Lu YZ, Kang JC, Xu J, Karunarathna SC. (2019) Diversity, morphology and molecular phylogeny of Dothideomycetes on decaying wild seed pods and fruits. Mycosphere 10: 1–186. 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jayawardena RS, Hyde KD, Jeewon R, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Wanasinghe DN, Liu NG, Phillips AJL, Oliveira-Filho JRC, da Silva GA, Gibertoni TB, Abeywikrama P, Carris LM, Chethana KWT, Dissanayake AJ, Hongsanan S, Jayasiri SC, McTaggart AR, Perera RH, Phutthacharoen K, Savchenko KG, Shivas RG, Thongklang N, Dong W, Wei D, Wijayawardena NN, Kang JC. (2019a) One stop shop II: taxonomic update with molecular phylogeny for important phytopathogenic genera: 26–50. Fungal Diversity 94: 41–129. 10.1007/s13225-019-00418-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jayawardena RS, Hyde KD, McKenzie EH, Jeewon R, Phillips AJL, Perera RH, de Silva NI, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Samarakoon MC, Ekanayake AH, Tennakoon DS, Dissanayake AJ, Norphanphoun C, Lin C, Manawasinghe IS, Tian Q, Brahmanage R, Chomnunti P, Hongsanan S, Jayasiri SC, Halleen F, Bhunjun CS, Karunarathna A, Wang Y. (2019b) One stop shop III: taxonomic update with molecular phylogeny for important phytopathogenic genera: 51–75. Fungal Diversity 98: 77–160. 10.1007/s13225-019-00433-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jayawardena RS, Hyde KD, Chen YJ, Papp V, Palla B, Papp D, Bhunjun CS, Hurdeal VG, Senwanna C, Manawasinghe IS, Harischandra DL, Gautam AK, Avasthi S, Chuankid B, Goonasekara ID, Hongsanan S, Zeng XY, Liyanage KK, Liu NG, Karunarathna A, Hapuarachchi KK, Luangharn T, Raspé O, Brahmanage R, Doilom M, Lee HB, Mei L, Jeewon R, Huanraluek N, Chaiwan N, Stadler M, Wang Y. (2020) One stop shop IV: taxonomic update with molecular phylogeny for important phytopathogenic genera: 76–100 (2020). Fungal Diversity 103: 87–218. 10.1007/s13225-020-00460-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jeewon R, Hyde KD. (2016) Establishing species boundaries and new taxa among fungi: recommendations to resolve taxonomic ambiguities. Mycosphere 7: 1669–1677. 10.5943/mycosphere/7/11/4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jeewon R, Liew EC, Hyde KD. (2002) Phylogenetic relationships of Pestalotiopsis and allied genera inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences and morphological characters. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25: 378–392. 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00422-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jeewon R, Wanasinghe DN, Rampadaruth S, Puchooa D, Zhou LG, Liu AR, Wang HK. (2017) Nomenclatural and identification pitfalls of endophytic mycota based on DNA sequence analyses of ribosomal and protein genes phylogenetic markers: A taxonomic dead end?. Mycosphere 8: 1802–1817. 10.5943/mycosphere/8/10/7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. (2019) MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20: 1160–1166. 10.1093/bib/bbx108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Libert MA. (1837) Plantae Cryptogamae, quas in Arduenna collegit. Fasc. 4: 301–400. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu F, Bonthond G, Groenewald JZ, Cai L, Crous PW. (2019) Sporocadaceae, a family of coelomycetous fungi with appendage-bearing conidia. Studies in Mycology 92: 287–415. 10.1016/j.simyco.2018.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD. (1999) Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1799–1808. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lunghini D, Granito VM, Di Lonardo DP, Maggi O, Persiani AM. (2013) Fungal diversity of saprotrophic litter fungi in a Mediterranean maquis environment. Mycologia 105: 1499–1515. 10.3852/13-103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Maharachchikumbura SSN, Hyde KD, Jones EBG, McKenzie EHC, Bhat JD, Dayarathne MC, Huang SK, Norphanphoun C, Senanayake IC, Perera RH, Jayawardena RS, Daranagama DA, Konta S, Goonasekara ID, Zhuang WY, Jeewon R, Phillips AJL, Abdel-Wahab MA, Al-Sadi AM, Bahkali AH, Boonmee S, Boonyuen N, Cheewangkoon R, Dissanayake AJ, Kang J, Li QR, Liu JK, Liu XZ, Liu ZY, Luangsa-ard JJ, Pang KL, Phookamsak R, Promputtha I, Suetrong S, Stadler M, Wen T, Wijayawardene NN. (2016) Families of Sordariomycetes. Fungal Diversity 79: 1–317. 10.1007/s13225-016-0369-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). Ieee, 1–8 pp. 10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129 [Accessed on 28 September 2020] [DOI]
  33. Morgan-Jones G. (1964) Taxonomic and biological studies in the Coelomycetes. PhD thesis, Nottingham, United Kingdom: University of Nottingham.
  34. Nag Raj TR. (1993) Coelomycetous anamorphs with appendage-bearing conidia. Mycologue Publications, Waterloo, Canada, 1101 pp. [Google Scholar]
  35. Norphanphoun C, Hongsanan S, Gentekaki E, Chen YJ, Kuo CH, Hyde KD. (2020) Differentiation of species complexes in Phyllosticta enables better species resolution. Mycosphere 11: 2542–2628. 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/16 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nylander JAA. (2004) MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
  37. Pirozynski KA. (1963) Beltrania and related genera. Mycological Paper 90: 1–37. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rambaut A. (2012) FigTree v. 1.4. Molecular evolution, phylogenetics and epidemiology. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh, Institute of Evolutionary Biology. Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (Accessed on 30 September 2020).
  39. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. (2007) Tracer v1, 4. Available from: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer (Accessed on 10 October 2020).
  40. Rannala B, Yang Z. (1996) Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. Journal of Molecular Evolution 43: 304–311. 10.1007/BF02338839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rehner SA, Samuels GJ. (1994) Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycological Research 98: 625–634. 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80409-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rodeva R, Gabler J, Machowicz-Stefaniak Z, Kačergius A, Zimowska B, Zalewska E, Stoyanova Z. (2016) CPL 1: New, emerging and re-emerging fungal diseases on medicinal and aromatic plants in European domain. Julius-Kühn-Archiv 453: 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  43. Senanayake IC, Rathnayaka AR, Marasinghe DS, Calabon MS, Gentekaki E, Lee HB, Hurdeal VG, Pem D, Dissanayake LS, Wijesinghe SN, Bundhun D, Nguyen TT, Goonasekara ID, Abeywickrama PD, Bhunjun CS, Jayawardena RS, Wanasinghe DN, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, Xiang MM. (2020) Morphological approaches in studying fungi: collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 11: 2678–2754. 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/20 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Senanayake IC, Maharachchikumbura SS, Hyde KD, Bhat JD, Jones EBG, McKenzie EH, Dai DQ, Daranagama DA, Dayarathne MC, Goonasekara ID, Konta S, Li WJ, Shang QJ, Stadler M, Wijayawardene NN, Xiao YP, Norphanphoun C, Li Q, Liu XZ, Bahkali AH, Kang JC, Wang Y, Wen TC, Wendt L, Xu JC, Camporesi E. (2015) Towards unraveling relationships in Xylariomycetidae (Sordariomycetes). Fungal Diversity 73: 73–144. 10.1007/s13225-015-0340-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Spaulding P. (1961) Foreign Diseases of Forest Trees of the World. U.S.D.A. Agriculture Handbook 197: 1–361. [Google Scholar]
  46. Stamatakis A. (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312–1313. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougement J. (2008) A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Systemic Biology 57: 758–771. 10.1080/10635150802429642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Subramanian CV, Reddy KRC. (1974) The genus Discosia. I, Taxonomy. Kavaka 2: 57–89. [Google Scholar]
  49. Sung GH, Sung JM, Hywel-Jones NL, Spatafora JW. (2007) A multigene phylogeny of Clavicipitaceae (Ascomycota, Fungi): identification of localized incongruence using a combinational bootstrap approach. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44: 1204–1223. 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sutton BC. (1975) Coelomycetes V. Coryneum. Mycological Papers 138: 1–224. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sutton BC. (1977) Coelomycetes. VI. Nomenclature of generic names proposed for coelomycetes. Mycological Papers 141: 1–253. [Google Scholar]
  52. Sutton BC. (1980) The Coelomycetes-Fungi imperfecti with pycnidia, acervuli and stromata. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, UK, 496 pp. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tanaka K, Endo M, Hirayama K, Okane I, Hosoya T, Sato T. (2011) Phylogeny of Discosia and Seimatosporium, and introduction of Adisciso and Immersidiscosia genera nova. Persoonia 26: 85–98. 10.3767/003158511X576666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tang AM, Jeewon R, Hyde KD. (2007) Phylogenetic utility of protein (RPB2, β-tubulin) and ribosomal (LSU, SSU) gene sequences in the systematics of Sordariomycetes (Ascomycota, Fungi). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 91: 327. 10.1007/s10482-006-9120-8 [DOI] [PubMed]
  55. Tang AM, Jeewon R, Hyde KD. (2009) A re-evaluation of the evolutionary relationships within the Xylariaceae based on ribosomal and protein-coding gene sequences. Fungal Diversity 34: 127–155. [Google Scholar]
  56. Vanev SG. (1991) Species conception and sections delimitation of genus Discosia. Mycotaxon 41: 387–396. [Google Scholar]
  57. Vanev SG. (1992) Comparative morphological studies of Discosia artocreas and Discosia faginea. Mycotaxon XLIV: 461–470.
  58. Vanev SG. (1996) Fungi of the genus Discosia (Deuteromycotina) in the Mediterranean area. Bocconea 5: 351–357. [Google Scholar]
  59. Vilgalys R, Hester M. (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246. 10.1128/JB.172.8.4238-4246.1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wanasinghe DN, Phukhamsakda C, Hyde KD, Jeewon R, Lee HB, Jones EBG, Tibpromma S, Tennakoon DS, Dissanayake AJ, Jayasiri SC, Gafforov Y, Camporesi E, Bulgakov TS, Ekanayake AH, Perera RH, Samarakoon MC, Goonasekara ID, Mapook A, Li WJ, Senanayake IC, Li J, Norphanphoun C, Doilom M, Bahkali AH, Xu J, Mortimer PE, Tibell L, Tibell S, Karunarathna SC. (2018) Fungal diversity notes 709–839: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa with an emphasis on fungi on Rosaceae. Fungal Diversity 89: 1–236. 10.1007/s13225-018-0395-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ward E, Adams MJ. (1998) Analysis of ribosomal DNA sequences of Polymyxa species and related fungi and the development of genus‐ and species‐specific PCR primers. Mycological Ressearch 102: 965–974. 10.1017/S0953756297005881 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee SJ, Taylor JW. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 315–322. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 [DOI]
  63. Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Wanasinghe DN, Papizadeh M, Goonasekara ID, Camporesi E, Bhat DJ, McKenzie EHC, Phillips AJL, Diederich P, Tanaka K, Li WJ, Tangthirasunun N, Phookamsak R, Dai DQ, Dissanayake AJ, Weerakoon G, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Hashimoto A, Matsumura M, Bahkali AH, Wang Y. (2016) Taxonomy and phylogeny of dematiaceous coelomycetes. Fungal Diversity 77: 1–316. 10.1007/s13225-016-0360-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhang Y, Jeewon R, Fournier J, Hyde KD. (2008) Multi-gene phylogeny and morphotaxonomy of Amniculicola lignicola: novel freshwater fungus from France and its relationships to the Pleosporales. Mycological Research 112: 1186–1194. 10.1016/j.mycres.2008.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhaxybayeva O, Gogarten JP. (2002) Bootstrap, Bayesian probability and maximum likelihood mapping: exploring new tools for comparative genome analyses. BMC Genomics 3: 1–15. 10.1186/1471-2164-3-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Discosia ravennica
mycokeys.79.60662-treatment1.xml (18.5KB, xml)
XML Treatment for Sporocadus rosigena
mycokeys.79.60662-treatment2.xml (15.1KB, xml)

Articles from MycoKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES