Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2021 May 4;12:2513. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22682-3

Unique reactivity of nanoporous cellulosic materials mediated by surface-confined water

Marco Beaumont 1,2,✉, Paul Jusner 1, Notburga Gierlinger 3, Alistair W T King 4, Antje Potthast 1, Orlando J Rojas 2,5, Thomas Rosenau 1,6,✉
PMCID: PMC8097012  PMID: 33947852

Abstract

The remarkable efficiency of chemical reactions is the result of biological evolution, often involving confined water. Meanwhile, developments of bio-inspired systems, which exploit the potential of such water, have been so far rather complex and cumbersome. Here we show that surface-confined water, inherently present in widely abundant and renewable cellulosic fibres can be utilised as nanomedium to endow a singular chemical reactivity. Compared to surface acetylation in the dry state, confined water increases the reaction rate and efficiency by 8 times and 30%, respectively. Moreover, confined water enables control over chemical accessibility of selected hydroxyl groups through the extent of hydration, allowing regioselective reactions, a major challenge in cellulose modification. The reactions mediated by surface-confined water are sustainable and largely outperform those occurring in organic solvents in terms of efficiency and environmental compatibility. Our results demonstrate the unexploited potential of water bound to cellulosic nanostructures in surface esterifications, which can be extended to a wide range of other nanoporous polymeric structures and reactions.

Subject terms: Sustainability, Polymers, Structural properties

The efficiency of chemical reactions in biological systems is often connected to the properties of confined water, but the developments and applications of artificial mimicking systems are impeded by the complexity of the biological systems. Here, the authors show how surface bound water in nanoporous cellulosic fibers can increase the reaction rate of surface acetylation reactions and enable regioselectivity of the reaction

Introduction

Water, as the solvent of life, is ubiquitous in the chemical processes of living organisms1, which thrive only in aqueous systems. Water controls the activity of enzymes, acts as a nucleophile and mediates charge and proton transfer in biological reactions. In the presence of water, nature enables the miraculous array of complex biochemical reactions at high efficiency and under mild conditions. These also include processes which are less favoured in the presence of water2, such as dehydration and esterification. They do nevertheless occur due to presence of optimised enzymes3; and the fact that water is spatially confined in cells and organelles1,4. Confined water is restricted in mobility and features an anomalous behaviour, if compared to the fluid in bulk, this directly affects its chemical and physical properties5,6. Exploiting the potential of this singular water state for chemical reactions has led to very important scientific contributions7, which take advantage of confined water, for example, in artificial porous solids8–12 or biphasic fluid systems13–15. Current limitations are the restrictions to small molecules as reactants, the use of organic solvents and the rather complex design of these reaction systems. Expanding this concept to naturally occurring and sustainable materials, which confine water due to their intrinsic native structure, would be a major contribution to the field. This is especially true in times of climate16 and plastic crises17. This renders the development of sustainable reactions, and materials, most timely and necessary.

Nature’s best polymeric fibres are essential structural components in biological tissues: keratin18, collagen19 and fibroin20,21 as examples of protein fibres, along with cellulose22 and chitin23, as representatives of structured polysaccharide. All these materials are based on nano-scaled assemblies, covered by surface-confined water under ambient conditions. Cellulose fibres are used herein as representative example for this class of hierarchically structured, nanoporous biopolymers. Cellulose24, from the molecular viewpoint, has a rather simple chemical structure based on β-O-1,4-linked glucopyranose repeating units that are assembled into rigid nanofibres, i.e. elementary fibrils, as the smallest subunits (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Hydration layers in nanoporous polymers as reaction media.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Cellulose, as representative example of a hierarchically structured biopolymer, is composed of individual nanofibres (i.e. elementary fibrils), organised into micro-scaled fibres with nanopores and confined spaces that originate from their interfibrillar assembly. Only the surface of these fibers  is chemically accessible (accessible OH-groups are shown as light and dark green beads) and, under ambient conditions, is covered with a hydration layer comprising surface-confined water. This water is explored as nanomedium to promote chemical reactions.

The cellulose nanofibres are composed of inter-connected, axially twisted crystallites25 with a chemically accessible and hydrophilic surface26. The nanoporosity of cellulose originates from this interfibrillar assembly and structural defects that arise from the spatial mismatch and dislocations of individual nanofibers and assembled bundles, enabling solvent interpenetration and fibre swelling27. The abundance of surface hydroxyl groups in this hierarchical structure endows hygroscopicity and sorption-induced swelling of cellulose fibres28,29. Main contributors in the swelling are the surfaces of the individual nanofibers30,31, that are covered with hydration layers, under ambient conditions26,28. Due to the strong cellulose–water interactions, this surface-bound water can be distinguished from bulk water by its properties and it is referred to as freezing or non-freezing (bound) water32–35. Non-freezing water is directly situated at the nanofibre surface, whereas freezing water accumulates in interfibrillar pores32. Interestingly, the omnipresent water has mostly been considered as a major hindrance in cellulose chemistry, when it comes to typical organic chemistry reactions. The presence of water makes reactions either unfavourable or would act as competitor to surface hydroxyl groups. As a consequence, typical reactions have been mainly performed under anhydrous conditions36–38. This is in stark contrast to recent efforts to use water as reaction promoter39,40.

With this work, we hope to induce a paradigm shift in materials chemistry by exposing the potential of confined water to promote surface reactions of nanoporous polymeric structures. This principle is demonstrated here using as example the acetylation of cellulose fibres, as representative nanoporous systems28.

Results

Surface-confined water as reaction medium

Cellulosic fibres of high purity (92% cellulose content) were used as starting material. Due to their hierarchical and nanoporous structure, they can confine up to 0.5 mL of water per gram of fibre (fibre saturation point, Supplementary Table 1). In the case of the cellulosic fibre, cf. Figure 1, only the surface hydroxyl groups of the elementary fibrils are accessible for chemical reactions and, unless noted otherwise, all experiments were conducted using fibres with equilibrated moisture content (EMC) of 7 wt% (at 50% relative humidity and room temperature, Supplementary Table 1). The number of water molecules is in the same stoichiometric range as that of the cellulose´s surface hydroxyl groups and hence water is strongly bound to the surface. In this work, we used solely the solid reactant, N-acetylimidazole41–44 and a catalyst, imidazole, to acetylate the cellulose surface. Imidazole was chosen because of its structural analogy to histidine, its associated enzyme-like catalytic behaviour45 and affinity for cellulose surfaces46. The heterogeneous reaction of cellulose and N-acetylimidazole commenced instantly upon solid-state mixing (Fig. 2A). Efficient mixing was realised by using short vibratory ball milling. In contrast to conventional (mechano)chemical esterifications47–49, acetylation occurred promptly, with no need for continuous energy supply in the form of milling (or heating). Earlier reports on (mechano)chemical esterifications of cellulose and other polymers have relied on the presence of liquid/solution media (chemicals), such as acetic anhydride. To the best of our knowledge, our presented approach is the only true solid-state polymer acetylation method available thus far.

Fig. 2. Acetylation under the confinement of hydration layers.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Cellulose fibres reacted under solvent-free and heterogeneous (solid-phase) conditions with N-acetylimidazole in presence of 7 wt% confined water (a, moist cellulose) and dry condition (b). The kinetics (c) and the infra-red spectra (d) show that water, paradoxically, is a key component for the reaction to occur and increases reaction rate and efficiency (c, 95% confidence intervals are shown in shaded colour).

Ball milling was chosen as it allows under the selected conditions mild mixing of cellulose with the solid reactants. In contrast to previously published results50, neither depolymerisation nor decrystallization occurred (Supplementary Fig. 1). We studied the solid-state acetylation in the presence of different water amounts—dry, 7, 20 and 30 wt%—with respect to kinetics, reaction efficiency and regioselectivity. The calculated reaction efficiency was expressed as the ratio of the degree of substitution (DS) and the molar amount of consumed N-acetylimidazole. Since water is conventionally regarded as a nuisance factor in esterifications, decreasing the efficiency of this type of reaction, we anticipated the highest reaction efficiency for the dry sample. Unexpectedly, we observed the contrary: the presence of 7 wt% water in the fibre increased not only the reaction rate but also its efficiency (Fig. 2c). The kinetic scatter plots were exponentially fitted and resembled the shape of typical diffusion-controlled reactions51. Considering our results, the solid reactants, and the solvent-free reaction conditions, we assume a reaction mechanism based on diffusion through the fibre hydration layers. The reaction is also auto-catalytic as additional formed imidazole (formed after hydrolysis or esterification of N-acetylimidazole), can act as a base catalyst45. This has the effect of accelerating reaction rates inside the fibre, as the reaction proceeds (Supplementary Fig. 2). Increasing the water content in the cellulose sample further, to 20 wt% and 30 wt%, compared to the equilibrated moisture of 7 wt%, did not significantly influence the kinetics of the reactions (Supplementary Fig. 3) but reduced the DS of the acetylated fibres and hence the overall reaction efficiency (Supplementary Table 2). It is important to point out that in all samples the water was structurally confined to the fibres, since even a 30 wt% water content was below the fibre saturation point (Supplementary Table 1).

Control of chemical accessibility and effect on bulk properties

Our results, based on diffusion-edited 1H-NMR spectra of the acetylated fibres (Fig. 3a) in the ionic liquid-electrolyte [P4444][OAc]:DMSO-d652,53 (details can be found in Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Fig. 17–20), showed that smaller amounts of secondary hydroxyl groups were modified at a water content above EMC, i.e. increasing selectivity for the primary 6-OH.

Fig. 3. Water-mediated control of regioselectivity.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Diffusion-edited 1H-NMR spectra (a) identified that increasing water allowed for more control over the acetylation regioselectivity. The primary hydroxyl group (6-OH) was modified with up to 89% selectivity in the presence of 30 wt% water, unparalleled for a simple esterification. At elevated water content and higher hydration, the secondary hydroxyl groups are ‘buried' rendering them chemically less accessible (b).

The regioselectivity of the reaction can thus essentially be controlled through the water content. Increasing it to 30 wt% elevated the selectivity towards the primary C6-hydroxyl group to 89%, yielding a fibre with a DS of 0.20 ± 0.04. The number of modified C6-groups is in the range of the value (DS = 0.25) estimated for full surface coverage, assuming a 24-chain elementary fibril model and the crystallite size of the fibre (Supplementary Table 1). This low DS can be explained by aligning our reasoning with previous studies of the acetylation of tyrosine in enzymes, stating that certain ‘buried’ hydroxyls are not chemically accessible due to hydrogen bonding54. We conclude that increasing the number of water molecules at the cellulose surface decreases the chemical accessibility of all hydroxyls but the secondary hydroxyls in particular, due to water–hydroxyl interactions; and elevates the consumption of the reactant by side-reactions with water (Fig. 3b). Such selective esterification of cellulose was so far only possible in the dissolved form, i.e. under homogeneous conditions, using bulky ester groups55 or by complex multi-step syntheses, especially in the case of small ester groups, such as acetyl56. Therefore, apart from the confinement of the reaction system by surface water, which is a more theoretical facet of our work, here we describe a direct method to esterify the C6–OH of the cellulose fibre surface with high selectivity under solid-state conditions. Going beyond esterifications and derivatizations, only an oxidative heterogeneous method, the TEMPO-oxidation, has been able to selectively modify the surface C6–OH57 with regioselectivities similar or only slightly superior to our approach.

Chemical-mechanical reactions under ball milling50 as well as conventional acid-catalysed heterogeneous surface acetylations58 have been reported to influence cellulose’s bulk properties, reducing its crystallinity and molecular weight. These effects are highly undesirable as they will reduce the materials performance59–61, especially with regard to mechanical properties. Importantly, the reported confined surface acetylation did not affect the bulk crystallinity but increased the molecular weight of cellulose (Supplementary Fig. 1). This is, evidently, in contrast to all methods employing homogeneous derivatization, especially the well-studied acid-catalysed heterogeneous industrial methods for production of cellulose acetate36 but also the well-known TEMPO oxidation62. We further compared the surface structure of acetylated fibres and native fibres with electron and light microscopy (Fig. 4a–c and Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). Independent from the introduced degree of acetylation, the cellulosic fibre structure was hardly affected and is hence well preserved (only minor fibrillation occurred at the fibre surface). As the reaction was performed under heterogeneous conditions, we studied the fibre wettability and surface chemistry by Raman mapping to prove a homogeneous surface coverage. The wettability of the fibres was influenced dramatically, and the water contact angle increased from 12° up to ~134° for the acetylated fibres (Supplementary Fig. 4d), indicating a pronounced fibre hydrophobicity. Chemical imaging of the fibre surface by Raman further confirmed a homogeneous coverage of the surface by acetyl groups, even though we conducted our acetylation in the solid state (Fig. 4e, f and Supplementary Fig. 4c). This is another evidence supporting the involvement of uniform hydration layers as the reaction medium.

Fig. 4. Imaging of the surface of acetylated fibres.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

The confined water-promoted acetylation preserved the morphology of the native cellulosic fibres, as demonstrated via scanning electron (a, b) and light microscopy (c). The carbonyl (C=O) band of the acetyl group is clearly shown in the Raman spectrum of the acetylated fibre (d). Raman mapping images of the hydroxyl (OH) and C=O band (e and f) prove a homogeneous distribution of the acetyl groups on the cellulosic fibre. Raman signal intensities in counts (cts), measured with a charge-coupled device (CCD) detector, are represented by the colour scales.

Reaction efficiency and role of water

Acetylation at EMC yielded a DS of 0.49 ± 0.04 corresponding to the theoretical number of accessible C6- and C2-hydroxyls of ~0.5 mmol/mmol (Supplementary Table 1). The acetylation at C3 position seems to be negligible under our conditions; this is consistent with the literature, since the C3–OH is less accessible and hardly reactive due to its intra-molecular hydrogen bond with the cyclic oxygen atom of the neighbouring cellulose monomer unit63,64 (see chemical structure in Fig. 2a). We further studied acetylation using lower equivalents of N-acetylimidazole (0.3 eq.), demonstrating a reaction efficiency of up to 80% (at EMC) (Supplementary Table 2). This efficiency is remarkable for a bulk solvent-free and heterogeneous reaction (but still containing significant surface water). It is significantly higher than the solvent-based acetylation of cellulose with N-acetylimidazole44 and comparable to the most efficient acetylations of cellulose under homogeneous conditions65,66. While increasing the amount of N-acetylimidazole decreases the reaction efficiency and the reaction rate (Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 5), it seems that the increased reaction time and amount of N-acetylimidazole elevates the frequency of side reactions. This includes hydrolysis of N-acetylimidazole, as a major side reaction, which is also imidazole-catalysed45; and depletes our reaction system of its ‘foundation’ through water consumption.

We further studied the influence of water in a reaction with 0.3 equivalents of N-acetylimidazole and obtained similar results as in the case of 1.5 equivalents: The presence of a water hydration layer (EMC) led to significantly higher reaction kinetics than the dry fibre (dry, ~0 wt% moisture content) (Supplementary Fig. 6). We noticed that a sequential acetylation using 0.3 equivalents N-acetylimidazole at EMC was not possible: We could not acetylate further a fibre with a DS of 0.2, revealing that a native cellulose surface (with its intrinsic hydration layer) was mandatory to enable the reaction.

Additionally, we compared the results to an experiment with a water-free but DMSO-wetted fibre (using the same volume of DMSO as water in the fibre at EMC); this experiment was chosen to reveal if water is directly involved in the reaction mechanism or has only physical effects, such as the solvation of the reactant or a swelling effect to increase the fibres’ accessibility. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 6, the presence of DMSO increased the reaction rate in comparison to the dry fibre, indicating that swelling was important. However, although N-acetylimidazole is freely soluble in DMSO67 and DMSO is a strong cellulose swelling agent68, the reaction rate in the case of the DMSO-fibre was still lower than that of the moist fibre at EMC. This indicates that the surface-confined water is not only acting as solvent medium, increasing the swelling, and thus diffusion of the reactant in the fibre, but it is also directly implicated in the chemical reaction mechanism. It is reported that water is involved in proton transfer reactions from imidazole groups45,69. We assumed that water, as protic solvent, facilitates the proton transfer in the transition state from the cellulose acyl imidazolium intermediate (as schematically shown in Fig. 5a) to the imidazole base catalyst.

Fig. 5. Mechanism of the confined water-promoted surface reaction.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Schematic representation of the possible involvement of the surface-confined water in the imidazole-catalysed acetylation with N-acetylimidazole (a, b). As calculated using methanol as model primary alcohol, presence of water significantly reduced the Gibb’s free energy of activation (∆GTS) (c, d). An analogue transition state was modelled on a cellulose fragment (e). The presence of water facilitates proton transfer promoting the acetylation in a concerted mechanism. Significant strain of the geometry is required to get proton transfer, in the absence of water.

A possible transition state involving a proton transfer of water in a concerted reaction mechanism is shown in Fig. 5a and was further validated through a gas-phase computational study of the acetylation of methanol (as the simplest alcohol model compound) (Fig. 5c). Without water: the Gibb’s free energy of activation (∆GTS) was approximated to 28 kcal/mol. Addition of water relieved the strain in the transition state geometry and, therefore, reduced tremendously ∆GTS to 16 kcal/mol (Fig. 5c, d). Clearly having a small amount of water in the reaction is advantageous for esterification kinetics (due to reduced strain during proton transfer). The mechanism, with water, was also modelled on a cellulose Iβ surface fragment for comparison with the methanol model (Fig. 5e): The reaction proceeded in an analogous mechanism with a very similar ∆GTS of ~15 kcal/mol (see Supplementary Section 1 for more details).

Discussion

Cellulosic fibres, as well as other nanoporous renewable biopolymers, are hygroscopic and intrinsically confine water in its fibrillar structure. Our data show, that such confined water can be exploited as nanomedium to promote singular chemical reactivity at the biopolymer’s surface.

In comparison to a dry acetylation, surface-confined water elevates the reaction efficiency and increases the reaction rate of the cellulose surface acetylation with N-acetylimidazole. In addition, the chemical accessibility of the cellulose hydroxyl groups can be controlled by the amount of confined water on the nanofibre surface, enabling the largely regioselective surface acetylation of cellulose. Modelling of the reaction transition states reveals that the presence of water reduces the activation barrier of the acetylation, by avoiding constrained geometries and enabling a concerted proton transfer mechanism. This, evidently, is in stark contrast to the unfavourable interference of bulk water with conventional esterifications.

More broadly, we demonstrate that confining reactions inside the hydration layer of nanoporous materials is a feasible concept to promote reactions at the polymer surface. We believe that this work can be adapted to a broad range of polymers and reactions and will lead to significant advances in the general field of materials chemistry, analytics and catalysis.

Methods

The cellulosic fibres, TCF-bleached beech sulphite dissolving-grade pulp, were supplied by Lenzing AG (Austria) with a moisture content of ~7 wt%. Properties and specification of the pulp are listed in Supplementary Table 1. The used chemicals were, if not otherwise noted, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Munich, Germany) with a purity of at least 99%. N-Acetylimidazole was supplied in a purity of ≥98% from TCI (TCI Deutschland GmbH, Germany).

Pre-treatment

Imidazole and cellulosic fibres were pre-treated before the solid-state acetylation. The imidazole flakes were pulverised for 2 min in a coffee grinder (KSM 2 Grinder 4041, Braun GmbH, Germany) and stored under exclusion of moisture. The cellulose fibres (2 g) were pre-treated in a vibratory ball mill (Retsch CryoMill, Retsch GmbH, Germany) for 15 min at 25 Hz in a 50 mL vessel using five grinding balls (stainless steel) with a diameter of 0.5 cm and one with a diameter of 1 cm to obtain fluffy fibres (this pre-treatment only increased the initial reaction kinetics and is not mandatory, see Supplementary Fig. 7).

Sample conditioning

The fluffy fibres were equilibrated at a relative humidity (RH) of 50% and 20 °C, the EMC at 50% RH (EMC) was determined gravimetrically to be ~7 wt%. This sample was used for the experiments conducted with fibres at EMC. The dry sample was obtained by vacuum-drying at 40 °C and 10 mbar for 48 h. The dry sample was used to prepare the fibres at 20 and 30 wt% by mixing and equilibrating the fibres in a closed vessel at 20 °C with the respective amount of water for at least 24 h (Samples 20 and 30 wt%). The DMSO sample was prepared by equilibrating the dry sample with dry DMSO (using the same volume as the moisture in the EMC sample, i.e. 7% v/w) in a closed vessel for at least 24 h at 20 °C.

Solid-state acetylation with N-acetylimidazole

Cellulose fibres at EMC (1.0 g dry mass, 6.2 mmol, 1 Eq) were mixed with the respective amount of N-acetylimidazole, i.e. 0.3 Eq (0.20 g, 1.85 mmol) or 1.5 Eq (1.02 g, 9.25 mmol), in a 0.25 mL grinding jar. 10 mol% imidazole (based on the amount of N-acetylimidazole) and stainless-steel grinding balls (17.7 g, 0.5 cm diameter) were added and milled for 0.5 h at 25 Hz in a vibratory ball mill (Retsch CryoMill, Retsch GmbH, Germany). After milling, the samples were equilibrated at 20 °C in a closed vessel. The reaction time was defined as the sum of the milling time and equilibration times. The acetylation was quenched by addition of a saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3. The acetylated fibres were finally washed carefully with DI water and dried at 105 °C for further analysis. The acetylation was performed at various conditions as listed in Supplementary Table 2 to study the influence of confined water and the amount of N-acetylimidazole on the fibre acetylation (all reactions were performed in closed vessels at 20 °C). The DS (or degree of acetylation) was determined using infra-red spectroscopy in attenuated total reflection mode (PerkinElmer Frontier IR single-range spectrometer (PerkinElmer Inc., USA)) using the calibration curve in Supplementary Fig. 8. Further details can be found in the Supplementary Methods.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (2.5MB, pdf)
Peer Review File (201KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge CSC—IT Centre for Science, Finland, and Finnish Grid and Cloud Infrastructure (persistent identifier urn:nbn:fi:research-infras-2016072533) for computational resources. We thank Dr. Markus Bacher, Dr. Sonja Schiehser and Dr. Caio G. Otoni for their support with NMR, GPC and DVS measurements, respectively. Dr. Blaise L. Tardy is acknowledged for helpful discussions and SEM measurement. This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (J4356). For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. The authors thank the financial support from the Austrian Biorefinery Centre Tulln (ABCT), the Academy of Finland (Project # 311255, ‘WTF-Click-Nano’) and the H2020-ERC-2017-Advanced Grant ‘BioELCell’ (788489).

Author contributions

M.B. and T.R. conceived the idea and supervised the project. P.J. and M.B. contributed to general materials preparation and characterisation. N.G. contributed to structural characterisation with Raman and light microscopy. A.W.T.K. performed NMR analysis and computational calculations. A.W.T.K., A.P., O.J.R., T.R. and M.B. provided important conceptual insights. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results. M.B., A.W.T.K. and P.J. wrote the paper in consultation with and input of all authors.

Data availability

Data underlying reported averages in tables and figures, the calibration curve, and the calculation of the regioselectivity is available in figshare repository at 10.6084/m9.figshare.14096071.v1. Other data is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Mika Sipponen and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Marco Beaumont, Email: marcobeaumont1@gmail.com.

Thomas Rosenau, Email: thomas.rosenau@boku.ac.at.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-22682-3.

References

  • 1.Ball P. Water is an active matrix of life for cell and molecular biology. PNAS. 2017;114:13327–13335. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703781114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Marsden SR, Mestrom L, McMillan DGG, Hanefeld U. Thermodynamically and kinetically controlled reactions in biocatalysis - from concepts to perspectives. ChemCatChem. 2020;12:426–437. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201901589. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Küchler A, Yoshimoto M, Luginbühl S, Mavelli F, Walde P. Enzymatic reactions in confined environments. Nat. Nanotech. 2016;11:409–420. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2016.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Weckhuysen BM, Kitagawa S, Tsapatsis M. Reactions in confined spaces. ChemPhysChem. 2018;19:339–340. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201800058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chakraborty S, Kumar H, Dasgupta C, Maiti PK. Confined water: structure, dynamics, and thermodynamics. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017;50:2139–2146. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kumar P, Han S, Stanley HE. Anomalies of water and hydrogen bond dynamics in hydrophobic nanoconfinement. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2009;21:504108. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/50/504108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grommet AB, Feller M, Klajn R. Chemical reactivity under nanoconfinement. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020;15:256–271. doi: 10.1038/s41565-020-0652-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sipponen MH, et al. Spatially confined lignin nanospheres for biocatalytic ester synthesis in aqueous media. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04715-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saha K, Deka J, Hens S, Saikia S, Raidongia K. Chemical reactions under the nanofluidic confinement of reconstructed lamellar membranes. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018;6:22931–22939. doi: 10.1039/C8TA07170E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Muñoz-Santiburcio D, Marx D. Chemistry in nanoconfined water. Chem. Sci. 2017;8:3444. doi: 10.1039/C6SC04989C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Manabe K, Kobayashi S. Dehydrative esterification of carboxylic acids with alcohols catalyzed by polymer-supported sulfonic acids in water. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002;344:270–273. doi: 10.1002/1615-4169(200206)344:3/4<270::AID-ADSC270>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Manabe K, Sun X-M, Kobayashi S. Dehydration reactions in water. Surfactant-type brønsted acid-catalyzed direct esterification of carboxylic acids with alcohols in an emulsion system. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:10101–10102. doi: 10.1021/ja016338q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kreft O, Prevot M, Möhwald H, Sukhorukov GB. Shell-in-shell microcapsules: a novel tool for integrated, spatially confined enzymatic reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:5605–5608. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.S. Koblenz, T., Wassenaar, J. & Reek, J. N. H. Reactivity within a confined self-assembled nanospace. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 247–262 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 15.Song CE, et al. Hydrophobic chirality amplification in confined water cages. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07882-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lenton TM, et al. Climate tipping points—too risky to bet against. Nature. 2019;575:592–595. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03595-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.The European Parliament and the council of the European Union. Directive (EU) 2019/904 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment. Official Journal of the European Union 62, L155/1-18 (2019).
  • 18.Wang B, Yang W, McKittrick J, Meyers MA. Keratin: structure, mechanical properties, occurrence in biological organisms, and efforts at bioinspiration. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2016;76:229–318. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gautieri A, Vesentini S, Redaelli A, Buehler MJ. Hierarchical structure and nanomechanics of collagen microfibrils from the atomistic scale up. Nano Lett. 2011;11:757–766. doi: 10.1021/nl103943u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sohn S, Strey HH, Gido SP. Phase behavior and hydration of silk fibroin. Biomacromol. 2004;5:751–757. doi: 10.1021/bm0343693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nguyen AT, et al. Crystal networks in silk fibrous materials: from hierarchical structure to ultra performance. Small. 2015;11:1039–1054. doi: 10.1002/smll.201402985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Beaumont, M., Potthast, A. & Rosenau, T. Cellulose Nanofibrils: From Hydrogels to Aerogels. in Cellulose Science and Technology (eds. Rosenau, T., Potthast, A. & Hell, J.) 277–339 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2018). 
  • 23.Raabe D, Sachs C, Romano P. The crustacean exoskeleton as an example of a structurally and mechanically graded biological nanocomposite material. Acta Materialia. 2005;53:4281–4292. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.French, A. D., Pérez, S., Bulone, V., Rosenau, T. & Gray, D. In Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology (American Cancer Society, 2018).
  • 25.Majoinen J, et al. Chiral plasmonics using twisting along cellulose nanocrystals as a template for gold nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2016;28:5262–5267. doi: 10.1002/adma.201600940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Paajanen A, Ceccherini S, Maloney T, Ketoja JA. Chirality and bound water in the hierarchical cellulose structure. Cellulose. 2019;26:5877–5892. doi: 10.1007/s10570-019-02525-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ajdary R, Tardy BL, Mattos BD, Bai L, Rojas OJ. Plant nanomaterials and inspiration from nature: water interactions and hierarchically structured hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 2020;n/a:2001085. doi: 10.1002/adma.202001085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen M, Coasne B, Guyer R, Derome D, Carmeliet J. Role of hydrogen bonding in hysteresis observed in sorption-induced swelling of soft nanoporous polymers. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3507. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05897-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee JM, Pawlak JJ, Heitmann JA. Longitudinal and concurrent dimensional changes of cellulose aggregate fibrils during sorption stages. Mater. Charact. 2010;61:507–517. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2010.02.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hatakeyama T, Inui Y, Iijima M, Hatakeyama H. Bound water restrained by nanocellulose fibres. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2013;113:1019–1025. doi: 10.1007/s10973-012-2823-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Uetani K, Yano H. Zeta potential time dependence reveals the swelling dynamics of wood cellulose nanofibrils. Langmuir. 2012;28:818–827. doi: 10.1021/la203404g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.O’Neill H, et al. Dynamics of water bound to crystalline cellulose. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:11840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12035-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hatakeyama T, Nakamura K, Hatakeyama H. Vaporization of bound water associated with cellulose fibres. Thermochim. Acta. 2000;352–353:233–239. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6031(99)00471-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Carles JE, Scallan AM. The determination of the amount of bound water within cellulosic gels by NMR spectroscopy. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1973;17:1855–1865. doi: 10.1002/app.1973.070170618. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nakamura K, Hatakeyama T, Hatakeyama H. Studies on bound water of cellulose by differential scanning calorimetry. Text. Res. J. 1981;51:607–613. doi: 10.1177/004051758105100909. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Steinmeier H. 3. Acetate manufacturing, process and technology—3.1 chemistry of cellulose acetylation. Macromol. Symposia. 2004;208:49–60. doi: 10.1002/masy.200450405. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liebert TF, Heinze T. Tailored cellulose esters: synthesis and structure determination. Biomacromol. 2005;6:333–340. doi: 10.1021/bm049532o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Habibi Y. Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:1519–1542. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60204D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Butler RN, Coyne AG. Water: nature’s reaction enforcer—comparative effects for organic synthesis “in-water” and “on-water”. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:6302–6337. doi: 10.1021/cr100162c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li G, Wang B, Resasco DE. Water-mediated heterogeneously catalyzed reactions. ACS Catal. 2020;10:1294–1309. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b04637. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Riordan JF, Wacker WEC, Vallee BL. N-Acetylimidazole: a reagent for determination of “free” tyrosyl residues of proteins*. Biochemistry. 1965;4:1758–1765. doi: 10.1021/bi00885a012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hagiwara H, et al. Solid state acetylation with acetylimidazole: selective protection of primary alcohols and phenols. Synth. Commun. 1998;28:2001–2006. doi: 10.1080/00397919808007174. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lu Y, et al. Regioselective acetylation of carbohydrates and diols catalyzed by tetramethyl-ammonium hydroxide in water. Green. Chem. 2014;16:4510–4514. doi: 10.1039/C4GC00770K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Beaumont M, et al. Wet esterification of never-dried cellulose: a simple process to surface-acetylated cellulose nanofibers. Green. Chem. 2020;22:5605–5609. doi: 10.1039/D0GC02116D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nothling MD, et al. Simple design of an enzyme-inspired supported catalyst based on a catalytic triad. Chem. 2017;2:732–745. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhao L, et al. Imidazole-doped cellulose as membrane for fuel cells: structural and dynamic insights from solid-state NMR. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:19574–19585. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang W, Zhang X, Liang M, Lu C. Mechanochemical preparation of surface-acetylated cellulose powder to enhance mechanical properties of cellulose-filler-reinforced NR vulcanizates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008;68:2479–2484. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Huang P, et al. One-step dispersion of cellulose nanofibers by mechanochemical esterification in an organic solvent. ChemSusChem. 2012;5:2319–2322. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201200492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hu H, et al. Green mechanical activation-assisted solid phase synthesis of cellulose esters using a co-reactant: effect of chain length of fatty acids on reaction efficiency and structure properties of products. RSC Adv. 2015;5:20656–20662. doi: 10.1039/C5RA02393A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ling Z, et al. Effects of ball milling on the structure of cotton cellulose. Cellulose. 2019;26:305–328. doi: 10.1007/s10570-018-02230-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Khawam A, Flanagan DR. Solid-state kinetic models:basics and mathematical fundamentals. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006;110:17315–17328. doi: 10.1021/jp062746a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.King AWT, et al. Liquid-state NMR analysis of nanocelluloses. Biomacromol. 2018;19:2708–2720. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Koso T, et al. 2D assignment and quantitative analysis of cellulose and oxidized celluloses using solution-state NMR spectroscopy. Cellulose. 2020;27:7929–7953. doi: 10.1007/s10570-020-03317-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Riordan JF, Wacker WEC, Valler BL. ‘Buried’ tyrosyl residues and the activity of trypsin. Nature. 1965;208:1209. doi: 10.1038/2081209a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Xu D, Li B, Tate C, Edgar KJ. Studies on regioselective acylation of cellulose with bulky acid chlorides. Cellulose. 2011;18:405–419. doi: 10.1007/s10570-010-9476-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Fox SC, Li B, Xu D, Edgar KJ. Regioselective esterification and etherification of cellulose: a review. Biomacromol. 2011;12:1956–1972. doi: 10.1021/bm200260d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Okita Y, Saito T, Isogai A. Entire surface oxidation of various cellulose microfibrils by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromol. 2010;11:1696–1700. doi: 10.1021/bm100214b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ifuku S, et al. Surface modification of bacterial cellulose nanofibers for property enhancement of optically transparent composites:dependence on acetyl-group DS. Biomacromol. 2007;8:1973–1978. doi: 10.1021/bm070113b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Aiken WH. Effect of acetylation on water-binding properties of cellulose. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1943;35:1206–1210. doi: 10.1021/ie50407a016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Müller CMO, Laurindo JB, Yamashita F. Effect of cellulose fibers on the crystallinity and mechanical properties of starch-based films at different relative humidity values. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009;77:293–299. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.12.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yang S, et al. Acetylation improves thermal stability and transmittance in FOLED substrates based on nanocellulose films. RSC Adv. 2018;8:3619–3625. doi: 10.1039/C7RA11134G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hiraoki R, Ono Y, Saito T, Isogai A. Molecular mass and molecular-mass distribution of TEMPO-oxidized celluloses and TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils. Biomacromol. 2015;16:675–681. doi: 10.1021/bm501857c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Rosenau, T. et al. Toward a Better Understanding of Cellulose Swelling, Dissolution, and Regeneration on the Molecular Level. in Cellulose Science and Technology (eds. Rosenau, T., Potthast, A. & Hell, J.) 99–125 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2018).
  • 64.Lindh EL, Bergenstråhle-Wohlert M, Terenzi C, Salmén L, Furó I. Non-exchanging hydroxyl groups on the surface of cellulose fibrils: the role of interaction with water. Carbohydr. Res. 2016;434:136–142. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2016.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Asaadi S, et al. High-performance acetylated ioncell-F fibers with low degree of substitution. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018;6:9418–9426. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wu J, et al. Homogeneous acetylation of cellulose in a new ionic liquid. Biomacromol. 2004;5:266–268. doi: 10.1021/bm034398d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Habibian M, Velema WA, Kietrys AM, Onishi Y, Kool ET. Polyacetate and polycarbonate RNA: acylating reagents and properties. Org. Lett. 2019;21:5413–5416. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b01526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Klemm, D. et al. Comprehensive cellulose chemistry. Vol. 1—Fundamentals and Analytical Methods. (Wiley-VCH, 1998).
  • 69.Shimahara H, et al. Tautomerism of histidine 64 associated with proton transfer in catalysis of carbonic anhydrase. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:9646–9656. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609679200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (2.5MB, pdf)
Peer Review File (201KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Data underlying reported averages in tables and figures, the calibration curve, and the calculation of the regioselectivity is available in figshare repository at 10.6084/m9.figshare.14096071.v1. Other data is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES