Skip to main content
Molecular Biology and Evolution logoLink to Molecular Biology and Evolution
. 2021 Jan 12;38(5):1995–2013. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab002

Functional Divergence of Multiple Duplicated Foxl2 Homeologs and Alleles in a Recurrent Polyploid Fish

Rui-Hai Gan 1,2, Yang Wang 1,2, Zhi Li 1,2, Zhao-Xi Yu 3, Xi-Yin Li 1,2, Jin-Feng Tong 1,2, Zhong-Wei Wang 1,2, Xiao-Juan Zhang 1,2, Li Zhou 1,2,, Jian-Fang Gui 1,2,
PMCID: PMC8097289  PMID: 33432361

Abstract

Evolutionary fates of duplicated genes have been widely investigated in many polyploid plants and animals, but research is scarce in recurrent polyploids. In this study, we focused on foxl2, a central player in ovary, and elaborated the functional divergence in gibel carp (Carassius gibelio), a recurrent auto-allo-hexaploid fish. First, we identified three divergent foxl2 homeologs (Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A, and Cgfoxl2b-B), each of them possessing three highly conserved alleles and revealed their biased retention/loss. Then, their abundant sexual dimorphism and biased expression were uncovered in hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis. Significantly, granulosa cells and three subpopulations of thecal cells were distinguished by cellular localization of CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b, and the functional roles and the involved process were traced in folliculogenesis. Finally, we successfully edited multiple foxl2 homeologs and/or alleles by using CRISPR/Cas9. Cgfoxl2a-B deficiency led to ovary development arrest or complete sex reversal, whereas complete disruption of Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B resulted in the depletion of germ cells. Taken together, the detailed cellular localization and functional differences indicate that Cgfoxl2a and Cgfoxl2b have subfunctionalized and cooperated to regulate folliculogenesis and gonad differentiation, and Cgfoxl2b has evolved a new function in oogenesis. Therefore, the current study provides a typical case of homeolog/allele diversification, retention/loss, biased expression, and sub-/neofunctionalization in the evolution of duplicated genes driven by polyploidy and subsequent diploidization from the recurrent polyploid fish.

Keywords: polyploid, gibel carp, gynogenesis, ovary development, foxl2

Introduction

Genome polyploidy has been thought as an evolutionary driving force (Otto 2007; Gui and Zhou 2010; Soltis PS and Soltis DE 2016; Zhou and Gui 2017), and its significance and implications on trait innovation and ecological adaption have been supported from whole-genome sequencing and comparative genomic analyses (Van de Peer et al. 2009, 2017; Soltis et al. 2014; Soltis PS and Soltis DE 2016; Cheng et al. 2018). It might result in the complexity, variability, and diversity of organisms, especially leading to an increased short-term adaptive potential (Van de Peer et al. 2017) and a long-term evolvability (Cheng et al. 2018). Therefore, polyploidy is considered as a main driver of speciation nowadays and shapes almost every aspect of species evolution (Sessa 2019). All plants and most of extant vertebrates have evolved from polyploid ancestors. Two rounds (2R) of whole-genome duplication (WGD) were proposed to trigger the species explosion of vertebrates, and a teleost-specific third WGD (Ts3R) was believed to lead to dramatic rise and rapid radiation of teleosts (Amores et al. 1998; Meyer and Van de Peer 2005). The neopolyploid might firstly undergo a chaos of “genomic shock” (McClintock 1984; Ng et al. 2012), subsequently occur a series of complicated non-Mendelian changes to shape a novel genome, and finally evolve into a paleopolyploid or a new diploid (Comai 2005; Otto 2007; Soltis et al. 2014; Zhou and Gui 2017). These processes are usually referred to as diploidization, during which duplicated genes undergo homeolog or allele diversification, fractionation, sub- or neofunctionalization under relaxed purifying selection (Liu et al. 2009; Cheng et al. 2018). Although the fates of duplicated genes have been well documented in paleopolyploids, the research is scarce in recurrent polyploids with complex genomes.

In addition to the 3R of WGD shared by all teleosts, polyploidy happened repeatedly in some taxonomic fish orders (Leggatt and Iwama 2003; Taylor 2003; Van de Peer et al. 2003; Gui and Zhou 2010; Zhou and Gui 2017; Lu et al. 2021). For example, a salmonid-specific fourth WGD (Ss4R) and an allopolyploidy event were shown to have occurred in the common ancestor of salmonids (Berthelot et al. 2014; Lien et al. 2016) or common carp (Cyprinus carpio) (Xu et al. 2014), respectively. Polyploid Carassius species complex, widely distributing across the Eurasian continent (Liu, Jiang, et al. 2017, Liu, Li, et al. 2017), include allo-tetraploid crucian carp (C. auratus) with 100 chromosomes and auto-allo-hexaploid gible carp (C. gibelio) with over 150 chromosomes (Zhou and Gui 2002; Zhu et al. 2006; Yu et al. 2021). Two extra rounds of polyploidy, including an early allotetraploidy (4R) and a late autotriploidy (5R), were estimated to have undergone during the evolution of gibel carp (Li, Zhang, et al. 2014). Interestingly, gibel carp is able to reproduce by unisexual gynogenesis (Gui and Zhou 2010; Liu et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2015). Compared with other unisexual vertebrates (Neaves and Baumann 2011), 1.2–26.5% male individuals were found in gibel carp natural populations (Jiang et al. 2013; Li et al. 2018), which is determined by extra microchromosomes and is affected by rearing temperature (Li et al. 2016; Li and Gui 2018; Li et al. 2018). A few key genes, such as dsx- and mab-3-related transcription factor 1 (Dmrt1) (Li, Li, et al. 2014) and a novel Setdm (SET domain-containing male-specific gene) located on extra microchromosomes (Li et al. 2017), show predominant or specific expression in gibel carp testis, but it is unclear which might serve as the initiator or master for ovary development in the all-female gynogenetic fish.

Foxl2, belonging to Forkhead (FKH) box (Fox) protein subfamily FoxL, was identified as the earliest key marker of mammal ovarian differentiation (Cocquet et al. 2002; Schmidt et al. 2004; Kocer et al. 2008; Uhlenhaut et al. 2009). Its predominant expression in ovary has been confirmed in some bisexual fishes (Loffler et al. 2003; Nakamoto et al. 2006; Alam et al. 2008; Ijiri et al. 2008; Bertho et al. 2016; Bhat et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2017) and its pivotal roles in ovarian differentiation have been revealed in zebrafish (Danio rerio) (Yang et al. 2017), Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) (Zhang et al. 2017), and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Bertho et al. 2018). Although foxl2 is a conserved transcription factor in metazoan, its evolution in teleosts is complicated (Bertho et al. 2016). Zebrafish has two foxl2 paralogs (foxl2a and foxl2b) resulted from Ts3R. They sequentially and cooperatively regulate zebrafish ovary development and maintenance, and foxl2b plays a dominant role during the process (Yang et al. 2017). In rainbow trout, foxl2a was lost after Ts3R whereas foxl2b was further duplicated into two coorthologs (foxl2b1 and foxl2b2) following Ss4R, which carried the salmonid master sex-determining gene SdY into the nucleus to prevent female differentiation (Bertho et al. 2018). Nile tilapia retained only one foxl2 gene and XX foxl2/ mutant occurred female-to-male sex reversal (Zhang et al. 2017). Here, we chose gibel carp and foxl2, a recurrent hexaploid and master gene in ovary development, as a unique model to reveal the evolutionary fates of duplicated genes. We first investigated the diversification, evolution, and biased expression of foxl2 homeologs and alleles in auto-allo-hexaploid gibel carp. Then, we tried to knockout multiple foxl2 homeologs and/or alleles by using CRISPR/Cas9. Finally, we compared the sex ratio, gonadal histological structure, and dynamic changes of gonadal development-related gene expression among these mutants with wild-types (WTs) during oogenesis.

Results

Diversification and Characterization of foxl2 Homeologs and Alleles

A total of 12 Cgfoxl2 transcripts were cloned from hexaploid gibel carp ovary by homology-based cloning strategy (supplementary fig. S1, Supplementary Material online) and mapped onto the assembled genome of gibel carp (fig. 1A). Multiple nucleotide alignments and phylogenetic analysis showed that six transcripts were annotated as foxl2a and others belonged to foxl2b. The six Cgfoxl2b transcripts were clustered into two groups (three Cgfoxl2b-As and three Cgfoxl2b-Bs) (fig. 1B). The average identities among three Cgfoxl2b-As or Cgfoxl2b-Bs were about 99.7 ± 0.2% and 99.3 ± 0.1% respectively, whereas the average identity between Cgfoxl2b-As and Cgfoxl2b-Bs was about 88.6 ± 0.4%. These data suggest that Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B might be a pair of homeologs derived from early allotetraploidy (4R), and they both have three alleles because of late autotriploidy (5R). The major differences between Cgfoxl2b-As and Cgfoxl2b-Bs homeologs existed in the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) and the 3′ UTR. Thus, the transcripts of Cgfoxl2b-As and Cgfoxl2b-Bs were predicted to encode one CgFoxl2b-A protein (CgFoxl2b-A1/A2/A3) and two CgFoxl2b-B proteins (CgFoxl2b-B1/B2 and CgFoxl2b-B3), and there was only one amino acid difference between CgFoxl2b-B1/B2 and CgFoxl2b-B3. CgFoxl2b-A and CgFoxl2b-B had about 95.0% amino acid identity (supplementary fig. S2, Supplementary Material online).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Molecular characterization of gibel carp foxl2a and foxl2b. (A) Genomic structure and transcript sketch of foxl2a and foxl2b. Exons and introns are shown by rectangle boxes and thick lines, respectively, and their sizes (bp) are indicated upon or below. ORFs and FKH domain are highlighted by black and red boxes, respectively. (B) Phylogenetic tree of vertebrate Foxl2. (C) Gene synteny of vertebrate foxl2. Gibel carp foxl2a-B, foxl2b-A, and foxl2b-B are located on chromosome CgB15, CgA2, and CgB2, respectively. Conserved gene blocks are represented in matching colors, and transcription orientations are indicated by arrows. (D) Localization on metaphase chromosomes of gibel carp Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A, and Cgfoxl2b-B. The chromosomes with green signals (indicated by arrows) were stained by Cgfoxl2a-B-BAC-DNA or Cgfoxl2b-A-BAC-DNA probe labeled with DIG, and the chromosomes with red signals (indicated by arrowheads) were stained by Cgfoxl2b-B-BAC-DNA probe labeled with Biotin. All metaphase chromosomes (blue) were counterstained with DAPI.

Unlike Cgfoxl2b, all six Cgfoxl2a transcripts were aligned to same position in the chromosome CgB15 (fig. 1C). We could not find any other Cgfoxl2a gene in the assembled genome of gibel carp (Wang Y, Li XY, Wu B, Xu M, Wang ZW, Li Z, Zhang XJ, Yin Z, Yang YL, Miao LJ, et al., unpublished data) or clone any other Cgfoxl2a transcripts from ovary. Thus, these Cgfoxl2a transcripts were named as Cgfoxl2a-B, and Cgfoxl2a-A gene might be lost during evolution. According to the differences of 5′ UTR, Cgfoxl2a-B transcripts were also clustered into two classes (Cgfoxl2a-B1/B2/B3-a and Cgfoxl2a-B1/B2/B3-b), which came from the different transcriptional start sites at first and second exon of Cgfoxl2a-B genes, respectively (fig. 1A). Each of them also had three alleles, among which three and two single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) existed in the open reading frame (ORF) and 3′ UTR, respectively. All Cgfoxl2a-B transcripts were predicted to encode the same CgFoxl2a-B protein (CgFoxl2a-B1/B2/B3).

CgFoxl2a-B had 71.6% and 68.7% amino acid identities with CgFoxl2b-A and CgFoxl2b-B, respectively. As a comparative control, eight Cafoxl2 transcripts were cloned from tetraploid crucian carp, which were predicted to encode two proteins of CaFoxl2a-B, CaFoxl2b-A, and CaFoxl2b-B, respectively. We also could not find a region containing foxl2a-A in the assembled genome of crucian carp (Wang Y, Li XY, Wu B, Xu M, Wang ZW, Li Z, Zhang XJ, Yin Z, Yang YL, Miao LJ, et al., unpublished data) and gold fish (Luo et al. 2020) by using GMAP (Wu and Watanabe 2005) or clone any of Cgfoxl2a-A transcripts, which suggested that foxl2a-A gene might have been lost in the ancestor of Carassius complex after 4R. Phylogenetic analysis showed that Carassius complex Foxl2a and Foxl2b were clustered with zebrafish and channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) Foxl2a and Foxl2b, respectively (fig. 1B). Carassius complex Foxl2b-A and Foxl2b-B were grouped into two independent branches, indicating foxl2b-A and foxl2b-B are duplicated in the ancestor of gibel carp and crucian carp. Rainbow trout Foxl2b1 and Foxl2b2, Nile tilapia Foxl2, spotted gar (Lepisosteus oculatus) Foxl2, and coelacanth (Latimeria chalumnae) Foxl2 were first grouped together and then clustered with other teleost Foxl2a. Finally, all fish Foxl2 clustered with tetrapod Foxl2.

Subsequently, the genomic structure and syntenic alignment were also analyzed (fig. 1A and C). All gibel carp foxl2 genes have a biexonic structure same as zebrafish foxl2 (Yang et al. 2017). Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A, and Cgfoxl2b-B are located on chromosome CgB15, CgA2, and CgB2 of gibel carp, respectively (fig. 1C), and three alleles of each gene in the three homologous chromosomes were confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (fig. 1D). For example, three green Cgfoxl2b-A signals were observed from three homologous chromosomes, and three red Cgfoxl2b-B signals were located on another three homologous chromosomes when simultaneously using Cgfoxl2b-A-BAC-DNA and Cgfoxl2b-B-BAC-DNA as probes (fig. 1D). Our previous study had revealed a highly conserved synteny within genomic regions around vertebrate foxl2 and a complementary loss/retention pattern of foxl2a and foxl2b vicinity genes between zebrafish chromosome 15 and chromosome 2 (Yang et al. 2017). Gibel carp chromosome CgA15 and CgB15 retained the overwhelming majority of genes located on zebrafish chromosome 15, except losing the conserved gene block (pik3cb-foxl2) in chromosome CgA15. Compared with zebrafish chromosome 2, gibel carp chromosome CgA2 and CgB2 both retained most genes.

Divergent and Dynamic Expression Patterns in Brain–Pituitary–Gonad Axis

First, the distribution of foxl2as and foxl2bs mRNAs in adult tissues was analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Due to the extremely high identities among three alleles of each foxl2 gene (supplementary fig. S1, Supplementary Material online), four specific pairs of primers (supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online) were designed to amplify Cgfoxl2a-Bs-a, Cgfoxl2a-Bs-b, Cgfoxl2b-As, and Cgfoxl2b-Bs, respectively. Compared with other analyzed tissues, abundant gibel carp foxl2as and foxl2bs transcripts were amplified from brain–pituitary–gonad axis (fig. 2A), indicating their important and conserved roles in reproductive regulation. In hypothalamus and other brains, Cgfoxl2a-Bs-b and Cgfoxl2b-Bs were both remarkably higher than those of Cgfoxl2a-Bs-a and Cgfoxl2b-As. However, only Cgfoxl2a-Bs-a and Cgfoxl2a-Bs-b were highly expressed in the pituitary. Interestingly, Cgfoxl2b-As and Cgfoxl2b-Bs exhibited sexually dimorphic pattern with higher expression in ovary compared with testis, whereas Cgfoxl2a-Bs-a expression was almost absent in gonads and Cgfoxl2a-Bs-b showed similar expression levels between ovary and testis. The divergent expression patterns of gibel carp foxl2s imply significantly biased expression of them in adult tissues.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Divergent expression pattern of gibel carp foxl2a and foxl2b. (A, B) qPCR analysis of Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A, and Cgfoxl2b-B expression in adult tissue (A), unfertilized eggs, 50% epiboly, hatching fry, and ovaries at different developmental stages (B). eef1a1l1 was used as control. Each bar represents mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). (C) Ratios of sequencing clones of Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A, and Cgfoxl2b-B alleles in ovaries and testis at different developmental stages. Asterisks indicate the significant differences (*P <0.05 and **P <0.01). (D) Dynamic codistribution of CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b protein in ovary during oogenesis (20 dph to adult) and adult testis revealed by immunofluorescence localization. Green and red fluorescence are stained by CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b antiserum, respectively, and blue fluorescence is stained by DAPI. Five kinds of somatic cells can be distinguished in gibel carp ovary, including somatic cell in the stromal layer expressing CgFoxl2a (indicated by trapezoid), granulosa cell coexpressing CgFoxl2a/2b (indicated by arrowheads), thecal cell expressing CgFoxl2a (indicated by asterisks), thecal cell coexpressing CgFoxl2a/2b (indicated by hexagons), and thecal cell not expressing CgFoxl2a/2b (indicated by pentagons). The CgFoxl2b immunofluorescence signals in ooplasm of PGCs, oogonia, primary oocyte (I), growth stage oocyte (II), vitellogenic oocyte (III), and maturing oocyte (IV) are indicated by rhombuses. Bars are shown at bottom-right of the images.

Subsequently, we analyzed their dynamic expression changes in unfertilized eggs, 50% epiboly, hatching fry, and developing ovaries from 10 days posthatching (dph) to 270 dph and mature ovary (fig. 2B). Maternal foxl2as and foxl2bs transcripts were detected in unfertilized eggs and their zygotic products are synthesized in hatching fry. During ovary differentiation and maturation, only a few of Cgfoxl2a-Bs-a transcripts were detected. Cgfoxl2a-Bs-b, Cgfoxl2b-As, and Cgfoxl2b-Bs were all abundantly expressed at 25 dph, quickly reached peak values at 35 dph, and then gradually decreased to the lowest values at 190 dph. From 25 to 35 dph, the expression level of Cgfoxl2a-Bs-b was higher (2.5–7.1 fold) than those of Cgfoxl2b-As and Cgfoxl2b-Bs. Along with the maturing of ovary, their expression all mildly increased, and more transcripts of Cgfoxl2b-As and Cgfoxl2b-Bs were detected than Cgfoxl2a-Bs-b.

According to the specific SNPs in three alleles of each foxl2 genes, we tried to present the expression differences among three alleles through sequencing the amplified fragments (fig. 2C). In the developing ovary at 45 dph, more than 92.6% of sequencing clones on average (about 20–30 clones each individual, n = 3) belonged to Cgfoxl2a-B2 and Cgfoxl2a-B3, indicating that the expression levels of Cgfoxl2a-B2 and Cgfoxl2a-B3 were much higher than that of Cgfoxl2a-B1. Although Cgfoxl2a-B1-a still kept low expression, Cgfoxl2a-B1-b seemed to raise about 4-folds of its expression, making up about a quarter of total Cgfoxl2a-B1/B2/B3-b expression in the maturing ovary at 270 dph. The biased expression pattern in developing testis was similar to developing ovary (45 dph), whereas the pattern in maturing testis was remarkably different from those in ovary. Cgfoxl2a-B2 appeared to play a dominant role, occupying two-thirds of Cgfoxl2a-B1/B2/B3-b expression in maturing testis. The three alleles of Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B did not show obviously biased expression in ovary and presented similar expression levels, respectively. In maturing testis, the expression of Cgfoxl2b-B1 was much more abundant than those of other alleles.

Distinct Cellular Localization of CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b during Ovary and Oocyte Development

Two polyclonal antibodies specific for CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b were produced and confirmed by Western blot (supplementary fig. S3, Supplementary Material online). Anti-CgFoxl2a antibody can specifically recognize the overexpressing HA-tagged CgFoxl2a-B protein (HA-CgFoxl2a-B) in 293 T cells and not detect HA-CgFoxl2b-A or HA-CgFoxl2b-B proteins and vice versa for anti-CgFoxl2b antibody. The cellular localization of CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b proteins were assessed in ovaries from 20 dph to adult by immunofluorescence analysis (fig. 2D). At 20 dph, a few of primordial germ cells (PGCs) scattered in the gonadal primordia and were surrounded by somatic cells. Punctate CgFoxl2b immunofluorescence signals were observed in the perinuclear region of PGCs. Three kinds of somatic cells with positive signals in nuclei were distinguished. The first was strongly marked by both CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b (indicated by arrowheads), and the second had intensely CgFoxl2a positive signals in the fusiform nucleus (indicated by asterisks). The third had elliptical nuclei with dispersive and star-like signals of CgFoxl2a (indicated by trapezoid). At 45 dph, oogonia massively proliferated and cysts started to form. A few of oogonia differentiated into primary oocytes (PO, I). In the perinuclear region of oogonia and PO, much punctate CgFoxl2b positive signals were observed. At 50 dph, more oogonia differentiated into PO, where CgFoxl2b localized in the perinuclear region and close to chromatins. Several somatic cells scattered and surrounded PO, implying the initiation of follicular lay formation. PO was first surrounded by granulosa cells (indicated by arrowheads) which were coexpressed CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b, and then by theca cells (indicated by asterisks) emitted only CgFoxl2a immunofluorescence signals. Along with oogonia differentiation and PO growth (60-89 dph), CgFoxl2b proteins in peripheral area of PO nucleus interspersed into ooplasm, and granulosa cells (indicated by arrowheads) coexpressed CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b proteins began to proliferate. Merged imagination clearly discriminated three subpopulations of thecal cells, expressing CgFoxl2a (indicated by asterisks), coexpressing CgFoxl2a/2b (indicated by hexagons) and not expressing CgFoxl2a/2b cell (indicated by pentagons). In maturing ovary, two successive follicular layers, granulosa lay and thecal lay, formed and enclosed vitellogenic oocytes (III) and maturing oocytes (IV). As oocytes grew, CgFoxl2a immunofluorescence signals became weak and CgFoxl2b persisted abundant expression in granulosa cells. In thecal layer surrounding vitellogenic oocytes, about 26.1 ± 7.4%, 8.0 ± 3.0%, and 65.9 ± 8.9% thecal cells were expressed only CgFoxl2a, coexpressed CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b, or expressed neither CgFoxl2a nor CgFoxl2b, respectively. In addition, many CgFoxl2a-expressed cells were observed in the stromal layer throughout ovary development. In testis, very faint CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b immunofluorescence signals were observed only in the spermatogonia (SPG).

CgFoxl2a-B Deficiency Led to Ovary Development Arrest and Sex Reversal in a Dosage-Dependent Manner

The dynamic expression and distinct cellular localization of CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b suggest that their functions might have been diverged. To explore this, we generated Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A, and Cgfoxl2b-B singly or simultaneously disrupted gibel carps using CRISPR/Cas9. The targeting site of Cgfoxl2a-B was chosen in the second exon to disrupt the FKH domain (supplementary fig. S4A, Supplementary Material online). Due to polyploidy nature of gibel carp, a lot of complicatedly mutated genotypes modified at the target sites were detected in the F0 individuals. All of F0 individuals developed normally and grew to fertile females, similar to WT. Two individuals, named as F0-1 and F0-2, were chosen to proliferate by gynogenesis. The sequencing results showed that the mutations of these two F0 individuals both caused a reading frame shift (supplementary fig. S4C and D, Supplementary Material online).

To exclude the influences of environmental factors on gibel carp sex differentiation, we raised WT individuals and Cgfoxl2a-B mutated F1 gynogenetic offspring together to adult in the same cage. Gibel carp became sex mature after raising 1 year. A total of 212 individuals were randomly sampled to identify their genotypes and to analyze their gross morphology and histology of gonads, of which 140 individuals were identified as Cgfoxl2a-B mutants with different mutated genotypes. According to the specific SNPs in three alleles of Cgfoxl2a-B, the 61 F1 gynogenetic offspring of F0-1 were classified into three mutated genotypes (Cgfoxl2a-BΔ47/Δ7 + 11/Δ4 + 5 [n = 5], Cgfoxl2a-BΔ47/Δ23 + 12/Δ2 + 1 [n = 4], and Cgfoxl2a-BΔ55/Δ54/Δ25 + 8 [n = 52]), and the 79 F1 gynogenetic offspring of F0-2 were clustered into six mutated genotypes (Cgfoxl2a-BΔ5/Δ39/Δ10 [n = 16], Cgfoxl2a-BΔ5/Δ39/Δ16 [n = 12], Cgfoxl2a-BΔ44/Δ42 + 1/Δ18 + 12 [n = 38], Cgfoxl2a-BΔ11 + 26/Δ11 + 26/Δ15 + 1 [n = 2], Cgfoxl2a-B+/Δ39/Δ10 [n = 8], and Cgfoxl2a-B+/Δ36/Δ5 [n = 3]), respectively (fig. 3A and B).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Disruption of Cgfoxl2a-B led to ovary development arrest and complete female to male sex reversal. (A) Ratios of normal ovary, arrested ovary, and testis in WT and Cgfoxl2a-B-mutated F1 gynogenetic individuals. One hundred and forty Cgfoxl2a-B-mutated individuals were clustered into nine mutated genotypes, which classified into three groups (I, II, and III) according to the edited efficiency of three alleles. (B) Sequences of Cgfoxl2a-B mutations in the nine mutated genotypes. (C) Gross morphology and histological examination of adult gonads in WT and Cgfoxl2a-B mutants. I, primary oocyte; II, growth stage oocyte; III, vitellogenic oocyte; IV, maturing oocyte. Bars are shown at bottom-right of the images.

The vast majority (95.8%) of WT gibel carp were fertile females (fig. 3A), with ovaries containing a lot of maturing oocytes (IV), vitellogenic oocytes (III), growth stage oocytes (II), and PO (I) (fig. 3C). According to the edited efficiency of three alleles, the mutated genotypes were classified into three groups. The first group (I) included Cgfoxl2a-BΔ47/Δ7 + 11/Δ4 + 5 and Cgfoxl2a-BΔ47/Δ23 + 12/Δ2 + 1 in which the three alleles all created a premature stop codon and lost FKH domain (fig. 3B). About two-thirds of mutated individuals arrested ovary development at primary oocyte growth stage and the rest developed to males. Compared with WT mature ovary, the arrested ovary is small and translucent with a lot of PO and growth stage oocytes, and only a few of oocytes developed to cortical alveolus stage. The mutated males had normal testis, filling numerous SPG, spermatocytes (SPC), and spermatids (SPD) into testicular lobules (fig. 3C). To confirm the knockout effects of CgFoxl2a-B, the individuals of Cgfoxl2a-BΔ47/Δ7 + 11/Δ4 + 5 were sampled to perform immunofluorescence analysis (fig. 4). No CgFoxl2a immunofluorescence signal was observed, implying the disruption of CgFoxl2a-B protein expression in ovary and testis of Cgfoxl2a-BΔ47/Δ7 + 11/Δ4 + 5 (fig. 4). Similar to WT, CgFoxl2b proteins were localized in the perinuclear region of PO, nuclei of all granulosa cells and a minority of thecal cells, and SPG. The second group (II) included five mutated genotypes, in which one or two alleles lost FKH domain and the rest alleles presented sense mutation and deletion between N-terminal and FKH domain (fig. 3B and C). Among 120 adult individuals, about 45.0% individuals were males and 11.7% individuals had arrested ovary, whereas others had normal mature ovaries (fig. 3A). All mutated males had normal testis. The fertilization rates and hatching rates were similar to those in control groups (supplementary table S2, Supplementary Material online). Immunofluorescence analysis also confirmed the loss of CgFoxl2a signal (fig. 4). The third group (III) consisted of the rest two mutated genotypes (Cgfoxl2a-B+/Δ39/Δ10 and Cgfoxl2a-B+/Δ36/Δ5), possessing WT Cgfoxl2a-B1 allele, mutated Cgfoxl2a-B2 allele with sense mutation and deletion between N-terminal and FKH domain and mutated Cgfoxl2a-B3 allele with premature stop codon (fig. 3B). Two individual of Cgfoxl2a-B+/Δ36/Δ5 arrested ovary development and the other developed mature females. Among eight individuals of Cgfoxl2a-B+/Δ39/Δ10, one appears to have arrested ovary, the rest developed to mature males (fig. 3A). Compared with WT ovary, obviously less immunofluorescence CgFoxl2a signals were detected in the arrested ovary of Cgfoxl2a-B+/Δ36/Δ5.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Immunofluorescence localization of CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b proteins in gonads of WT, Cgfoxl2a-BΔ47/Δ7 + 11/Δ4 + 5, Cgfoxl2a-BΔ55/Δ54/Δ25 + 8, Cgfoxl2a-B+/Δ36/Δ5, and Cgfoxl2a-B+/Δ39/Δ10-mutated individuals. No or little CgFoxl2a immunofluorescence signal was observed, and CgFoxl2b immunofluorescence signals were observed in oogonia and PO (indicated by rhombuses), granulosa cell (indicated by arrowheads), thecal cells (indicated by hexagons), and SPG (indicated by arrows). Bars are shown at bottom-right of the images.

Mutated Cgfoxl2a-B Allele with an Intact FKH Domain Can Activate Cgcyp19a1a-A Expression

Due to clinical heterogeneity and haploinsufficiency of human FOXL2 mutations (Verdin and De Baere 2012; Takahashi et al. 2013), we tried to compare the effects of different Cgfoxl2a-B mutated alleles on ovary and testis at oogonia or SPG proliferation stage (fig. 5 and supplementary fig. S5, Supplementary Material online). We chose Cgfoxl2a-BΔ55/Δ54/Δ25 + 8, a mutated genotype having most F1 individuals, to perform further analysis. First, one pair of primers located in the no mutation site was designed to detect the expression of all Cgfoxl2a-B alleles. Consistent with above result (fig. 2B), only a few of Cgfoxl2a-Bs-a transcripts were detected in the WT and Cgfoxl2a-B mutated ovary and testis. Cgfoxl2a-BΔ55/Δ54/Δ25 + 8 ovaries showed about half Cgfoxl2a-B1/B2/B3-b expression level of WT ovary. Although upregulated Cgfoxl2a-B1/B2/B3-b expression (7.5-fold) was observed in Cgfoxl2a-BΔ55/Δ54/Δ25 + 8 testis when it was compared with WT testis, mutated testis had significantly lower Cgfoxl2a-B1/B2/B3-b expression (6.3-fold) than that of WT ovary (fig. 5A). The above results indicate that the mutated Cgfoxl2a-B alleles exhibited differential expression levels between ovary and testis at early gonadal development stage.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Mutated Cgfoxl2a-B allele with an intact FKH domain keep transactivation and transcriptional activation capacity. (A) Total expression level of Cgfoxl2a-B1/B2/B3, Cgcyp19a1a-A, Cgcyp19a1a-B, Cgdmrt1-A, and Cgdmrt1-B. The asterisks indicate the significant differences (**P <0.01). (B) Subcellular localization of WT and mutant CgFoxl2a-B proteins. Nuclear was stained with DAPI and CgFoxl2a-B protein was fused with GFP. Bars are shown at bottom-right of the images. (C) Effect of WT and mutated CgFoxl2 proteins on Cgcyp19a1a-A and Cgcyp19a1a-B promoter activity. WT or mutated Cgfoxl2a-B expression vectors were cotransfected into CAB cells with Cgcyp19a1a promoter construct and/or Cgsf1a-B expression vectors. pRL-TK was used to normalize the expression level. The luciferase activities were detected at 24h posttransfection. Results are the mean ± SD of triplicate transfections. The asterisks indicate the significant differences (**P <0.01). (D) Expression levels of several key genes involved in gonadal development at 89 dph. eef1a1l1 was used as the normalizer. Gene expression levels are relative to that of WT ovary. Each bar represents mean ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate the significant differences (*P <0.05 and **P <0.01).

Subsequently, we first compared the subcellular localization of WT and mutated CgFoxl2a-B proteins in order to analyze whether or not the mutated Cgfoxl2a-B alleles still have function. WT Cgfoxl2a-B2, Cgfoxl2a-B1Δ55, Cgfoxl2a-B2Δ54, and Cgfoxl2a-B3Δ25 + 8 were linked to green fluorescent protein (GFP) and transfected into HEK293T cells, respectively (fig. 5B). Similar to WT CgFoxl2a-B2 protein, the mutated CgFoxl2a-B proteins containing an intact FKH domain encoded by Cgfoxl2a-B2Δ54 localized in the nucleus, implying that they may keep transactivation capacity. The truncated CgFoxl2a-B protein without FKH domain encoded by Cgfoxl2a-B1Δ55 and Cgfoxl2a-B3Δ25 + 8 diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm and nucleus.

A lot of studies have revealed the regulative roles of Foxl2 on cyp19a1 expression (Wang et al. 2007; Bertho et al. 2018). Subsequently, we performed luciferase assays to evaluate the expression of Cgcyp19a1a by co-transfection of Cgcyp19a1a promoter with WT Cgfoxl2a-B2, Cgfoxl2a-B1Δ55, Cgfoxl2a-B2Δ54, and Cgfoxl2a-B3Δ25 + 8, respectively (fig. 5C and supplementary fig. S6, Supplementary Material online). Compared with the control empty vector, overexpression of WT Cgfoxl2a-B2 alone could not trigger Cgcyp19a1a-A transcription, but coexpression of WT Cgfoxl2a-B2 and Cgsf1a-B significantly activated Cgcyp19a1a-A transcription in Crucian carp blastula embryonic cells (CAB) (fig. 5C) and Epithlioma papulosum cyprinid cells (EPC) (supplementary fig. S6, Supplementary Material online) cells. The results imply that Cgfoxl2a-B2 can enhance SF1-activated Cgcyp19a1a-A expression. Although Cgfoxl2a-B1Δ55 and Cgfoxl2a-B3Δ25 + 8 had no effect, overexpression of Cgfoxl2a-B2Δ54 and Cgsf1a-B can activate Cgcyp19a1a-A expression. In addition, overexpression of Cgsf1a-B significantly inhibited Cgcyp19a1a-B expression, which can be rescued by coexpression with WT Cgfoxl2a-B2 or Cgfoxl2a-B2Δ54. The results indicate that CgFoxl2a-B2Δ54 possess transcriptional activation capacity. Consistent with sexually dimorphic expression of Cgfoxl2a-Bs-b, Cgcyp19a1as also had higher expression in ovary than that in testis at oogonia or SPG proliferation stage. Meantime, Cgdmrt1s was downregulated its expression in ovary (fig. 5A). Taken together the above results, we speculate that the downregulated expression of Cgfoxl2a-Bs-b in some gonad may result in lower expression of Cgcyp19a1as, which is not sufficient to initiate ovary development.

We also compared the dynamic expression changes of a dozen of important genes involved in gonadal development, including germ cell markers (vasa and dnd) (Xu et al. 2005; Liu et al. 2015), testis differentiation-related genes (dmrt1 and sox9b) (Forconi et al. 2013; Li, Li, et al. 2014), oocyte-derived factor (gdf9) (Liu et al. 2012), and genes in steroidogenic pathway (sf1a, cyp11a1, cyp17a1, cyp17a2, cyp19a1a, and srd5a1) (Payne and Hales 2004; Park and Jameson 2005; Vizziano et al. 2007; Iwade et al. 2008; Kayampilly et al. 2010; Yang et al. 2017) in WT ovary, mutated ovary and testis (fig. 5D). Except cyp17a1 and cyp17a2, all other genes have two divergent homeologs, which showed significantly biased expression (supplementary fig. S7, Supplementary Material online). Compared with their expression in ovaries (WT and Cgfoxl2a-BΔ55/Δ54/Δ25 + 8 ovaries), dmrt1s, sox9bs, sf1as, cyp11a1s, vasas, cyp17a1-B, and cyp17a2-B remarkably increased, but dnds, cyp19a1a-A, gdf9s, and srd5a1s decreased in Cgfoxl2a-BΔ55/Δ54/Δ25 + 8 testis at 89 dph. In addition, Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B showed similar expression between WT and Cgfoxl2a-BΔ55/Δ54/Δ25 + 8 gonads (fig. 5D).

Complete Disruption of Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B Resulted in Germ Cell Depletion

We also chose conserved sites in the second exon as targeting sites of CRISPR/Cas9 to simultaneously disrupt Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B (supplementary fig. S8A, Supplementary Material online). The F0-mutated Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B individuals were cocultured with WT in the same cage and randomly sampled at each stage from 45 dph to mature adult. Compared with WT gibel carp (97.6% of individuals were females, n = 84), all of Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B double-mutated F0 individuals (n = 59) seemed to have abnormal ovary development, possessing delayed ovary (n = 36), germ cell-depleted gonad (n = 14), ovotestis (n = 6), and testis (n = 3) (fig. 6A and B).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Complete disruption of Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B led to the depletion of germ cell in gibel carp. (A) Ratios of normal ovary, delayed ovary, germ cell-depleted gonad, ovotestis, and testis in WT and F0 Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B-mutated individuals. (B) Gross morphology and histological examination of adult gonads in WT and F0 Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B-mutated individuals. (C) Histological examination of gonads in WT and Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B-mutated individuals at three different stages (45–60, 80–110, and 180–360 dph). I, primary oocyte; II, growth stage oocyte; III, vitellogenic oocyte; IV, maturing oocyte. Bars are shown at bottom-right of the images. (D) Histological examination of gonads in WT and mutated Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B individuals at 45 dph. Green and blue fluorescences are stained by Vasa antiserum and DAPI, respectively. (E) Mutated ratios of F0 Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B individuals with delayed ovary, germ cell-depleted gonad, ovotestis, and testis.

At oogonia proliferation and differentiation stage (45–60 dph, stage I), WT ovaries enlarged, and oogonia rapidly proliferated and started to differentiate to PO. Among 16 F0-mutated Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B individuals, seven, eight, and one individuals had delayed ovary, gonad without germ cell and testis. In comparison with normal ovary, the delayed ovary still retained in oogonia proliferation stage. The gonads without germ cells remained thin thread-like shape, and no PGCs and oogonia were found in the histological sections (fig. 6C), which were confirmed by no positive immunofluorescent signal of Vasa detected in their gonad sections (fig. 6D). Along with the oocyte growth (80–110 dph, stage II), overwhelming majority of WT gonads (95.5%, n = 22) developed into typical ovaries with a lot of PO (I) and growth stage oocytes (II). However, the ratios of delayed ovary, germ cell-depleted gonad, ovotestis, and testis in mutants were 13:4:1:0. The delayed ovaries were still at the oogonia proliferation stage. Gonadal somatic cells proliferated a little in germ cell-depleted gonads, and a huge number of PO (I), growth stage oocyte (II), and spermatogenic cysts containing SPG, SPC, and SPD were mixed in the ovotestis. None of Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B mutants developed mature female and spawned eggs (180–360 dph, stage III). The ratios of arrested ovary, germ cell-depleted gonad, ovotestis, and testis were 16:2:5:2. The results of F0-mutated Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B individuals are distinct from the normal ovary development in the F0-mutated Cgfoxl2a-B individuals, which indicates that CgFoxl2b might play a dominant role in gibel carp oogenesis.

Due to no fertile female obtained in this study, we can only randomly select three F0 individuals with different gonad phenotypes to analyze their genotypes. We also discriminated three alleles of Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B according to their specific SNPs. The mutation rates of F0 individuals with germ cell-depleted gonads were the highest, sequentially followed by F0 individuals having testis, ovotestis, and delayed ovaries, which seemed to positively associate with the severity of ovary defects or changes (fig. 6E and supplementary table S3 and figs. S9–S12, Supplementary Material online). For example, no WT allele of Cgfoxl2b-B was found in the three mutated individuals possessing germ cell-depleted gonad, and their vast majority of sequencing clones (97.1–100.0%) of Cgfoxl2b-A were identified as mutated types (supplementary fig. S10, Supplementary Material online). In addition, all of mutated Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B alleles contain frameshift mutations in FKH domain. The results indicate that complete disruption of Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B led to the depletion of germ cell in gibel carp. The mutated individuals having testis also showed highly mutation rates. However, compared with mutated genotypes in germ cell-depleted gonad, a little more WT Cgfoxl2b-A allele or some mutated Cgfoxl2b-A alleles with intact FKH domain were detected in these mutated individuals with testis (supplementary fig. S12, Supplementary Material online). The average mutation rates of F0 individuals with ovotestis were 76.5 ± 1.3% of Cgfoxl2b-A alleles and 54.3 ± 14.0% of Cgfoxl2b-B alleles, which were lower than those of mutants with germ cell-depleted gonad or testis but higher than those of mutants with delayed ovary (64.2 ± 19.4% of Cgfoxl2b-A alleles and 51.5 ± 2.4% of Cgfoxl2b-B alleles) (supplementary figs. S9–S12, Supplementary Material online).

Similarly, immunofluorescence localization of CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b proteins were analyzed in the F0 individuals with different gonad phenotypes to confirm the knockout effects of CgFoxl2b (fig. 7). Compared with WT ovaries, no CgFoxl2b immunofluorescence signal was observed in the somatic cells of delayed ovary, germ cell-depleted gonad, ovotestis, and testis. However, punctate CgFoxl2b immunofluorescence signals still retained in the oogonia and PO perinuclear region of delayed ovary and ovotestis.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Immunofluorescence localization of CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b proteins in gonads of WT and F0 Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B-mutated gibel carp individuals. No CgFoxl2b immunofluorescence signal was observed in the somatic cells of delayed ovary, germ cell-depleted gonad, ovotestis, and testis. Punctate CgFoxl2b immunofluorescence signals still retained in the oogonia and PO perinuclear region of delayed ovary and ovotestis.

Compensation of Cgfoxl2a in Germ Cell-Depleted Gonad of F0 Mutated Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B Individuals Could Not Rescue the Defects

We also analyzed the dynamic expression changes of above genes in F0-mutated Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B individuals (fig. 8). We first focused on their dynamic changes in germ cell-depleted gonad, which was induced by the complete disruption of Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B (supplementary table S3 and fig. S10, Supplementary Material online). None of vasas and dnds transcripts was detected in the germ cell-depleted gonad (fig. 8). Taking together no Vasa protein detected by immunofluorescent analysis (fig. 6D), the results confirmed the complete depletion of germ cell. Compared with WT ovary, delayed ovary and ovotestis, the five testis differentiation-related or androgen-producing genes (dmrt1s, sox9bs, sf1as, cyp11a1s, and cyp17a1-B) all showed dramatic upregulation expression, whereas the female-biased genes (gdf9s and srd5a1s) were remarkably downregulated expression in germ cell-depleted gonad similar to those in testis. The results implied that the germ cell-depleted gonad developed testis-like gonads without spermatogenic cells, consistent with our previous study in which germ cells was depleted by dnd morpholino-mediated knockdown approach (Liu et al. 2015). Additionally, dmrt1s, sox9b-B, sf1as, cyp11a1-B, and cyp17a1-B raised their expression in germ cell-depleted gonad along with gonad development. cyp19a1as were remarkably upregulated their expression at oogonia proliferation and differentiation stage (I). Significantly, much more abundant Cgfoxl2a-Bs transcripts (3.3–25.3-folds vs. WT ovary) were detected, indicating the compensatory increase of Cgfoxl2a-Bs in the germ cell-depleted gonad (fig. 8).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

qPCR analyses of key genes involved in gonadal development in WT ovaries and delayed ovary, germ cell-depleted gonad, ovotestis, and testis of F0 Cgfoxl2b-A- and Cgfoxl2b-B-mutated individuals at three different stages (45–60, 80–110, and 180–360 dph). eef1a1l1 was used as the normalizer. Gene expression levels are relative to that of WT ovary at stage II. Each bar represents mean ± SD. Asterisks indicate the significant differences (**P <0.01).

The normal ovary of WT and delayed ovary of F0 mutated Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B individuals showed similar expression patterns of all analyzed genes. The expression levels of testis differentiation-related or androgen-producing genes in ovotestis lied halfway in between those of testis and ovary (fig. 8).

More Serious Defects Observed in the Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A, and Cgfoxl2b-B Triple-Mutated Individuals

The F0 individuals simultaneously mutated Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A, and Cgfoxl2b-B were also obtained by coinjection their specific sgRNAs with Cas9 mRNA. Similar to the Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B double mutants, all of Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A, and Cgfoxl2b-B triple mutants (n = 59) had aberrant ovary development (supplementary fig. S13, Supplementary Material online). The ratios of mutated individuals with delayed ovary, germ cell-depleted gonad, ovotestis, and testis were 50.8, 20.3, 11.9, and 17.0%, respectively. Compared with Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B mutated individuals (15.3% with ovotestis and testis), more F0 individuals with mutated Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A, and Cgfoxl2b-B (28.9%) occurred partial or complete ovary to testis sex reversal. Especially, the ratio of complete sex reversal in F0-mutated Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A, and Cgfoxl2b-B individuals (17.0%) was significantly higher than that of Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B individuals (5.1%). The latter is a little higher than that of WT (2.4%). Similar to F0-mutated Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B individuals, no fertile mutated Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A, and Cgfoxl2b-B female was obtained. We analyzed the mutation rates of F0 individuals. The mutation rates of F0-mutated Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A, and Cgfoxl2b-B also appeared to positively correlate with the severity of ovary defects or changes (supplementary table S4 and figs. S14–S17, Supplementary Material online). The disruption of CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b expression were also confirmed by immunofluorescence analysis (supplementary fig. S18, Supplementary Material online). No CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b immunofluorescence signal was observed in germ cell-depleted gonad. However, faint CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b positive signals were detected in delayed ovary and ovotestis. All analyzed genes showed similar dynamic expression changes in the simultaneous disruption of Cgfoxl2a-B/Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B F0-mutated individuals to F0-mutated Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B individuals (supplementary fig. S19, Supplementary Material online).

Discussion

With the explosion of genome sequencing, the importance of polyploidy and postpolyploid diploidization (PPD) in increasing genome complexity, variability, and diversity has been widely discussed later (Van de Peer et al. 2009, 2017; Cheng et al. 2018; Clark and Donoghue 2018; Mandakova and Lysak 2018). In this study, we first identified 12 gibel carp foxl2 cDNAs, belonging to three foxl2 genes (Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A, and Cgfoxl2b-B) located on three chromosomes of CgB15, CgA2, and CgB2, respectively (fig. 1). Thus, here we presented a typical case to show the diversification of homeologs and alleles in a recurrent hexaploid animal. In addition, most of genes analyzed in this study (figs. 5 and 8 and supplementary fig. S19, Supplementary Material online) and our previous study (Mou et al. 2018) have two divergent homeologs, indicating an allo-polyploidy event occurred in the evolution of gibel carp. Consistent with our previous studies about the identification of bmp15 and nanos2 (Jiang et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2020), three alleles with high identities (≥99.0%) of each foxl2 gene were identified in this study, implying an auto-polyploidy event occurred in the evolution of gibel carp.

The complex process of PPD, including chromosomal loss/rearrangement, biased gene retention/loss, gene conversion/chimera/fusion, gene sub-/neofunctionalization, biased gene expression and coexpression networks, transposon reactivation, and epigenetic reprogramming, might generate evolutionarily advantageous genomic changes to shape a novel genome of paleopolyploid or new diploid (Doyle et al. 2008; Xiong et al. 2011; Song and Chen 2015; Yang et al. 2016; Edger et al. 2017; Ramirez-Gonzalez et al. 2018). Two foxl2 paralogs, foxl2a and foxl2b resulting from Ts3R, retained in many basal teleost or one of them lost in other teleost (Bertho et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2017). In this study, we did not detect foxl2a-A in gibel carp and crucian carp genomes, implying the loss of foxl2a-A gene in the ancestor of Carassius complex after allopolyploidy. Moreover, only a few of genes lost after 5R ploidy event suggested that gibel carp might just step into the process of PPD owing to its relatively short evolutionary history.

The biased gene expression was observed not only between Cgfoxl2a and Cgfoxl2b but also between Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B. Using qPCR, we also presented biased expression pattern of three alleles. Similar to zebrafish foxl2a and foxl2b (Yang et al. 2017), Cgfoxl2a and Cgfoxl2b showed sequential expression (fig. 2B and D). Altogether with other studies, foxl2 female-biased and predominant in granulosa expression is conserved and incontrovertible throughout vertebrate (Bertho et al. 2016). Besides granulosa cells, whether thecal cells, oocytes, or other somatic cells express Foxl2 or not seems to be species specific (Govoroun et al. 2004; Pisarska et al. 2004). Gibel carp Foxl2a and Foxl2b proteins showed distinct cellular localization from zebrafish and medaka (Oryzias latipes) (fig. 2D). Medaka has only one copy of foxl2 gene and their foxl2b copy was lost during evolution. Both zebrafish Foxl2a and medaka Foxl2 were detected in the follicular cells surrounding previtellogenic oocytes and vitellogenic oocytes, not in early oocytes (Herpin et al. 2013; Caulier et al. 2015). CgFoxl2a and/or CgFoxl2b are expressed in the nuclei of granulosa cells and theca cells, and somatic cells in stromal layer at the initial stage of follicular layer formation, implying their important roles in folliculogenesis. Interestingly, three subpopulations of thecal cells were identified. In addition, we observed abundant CgFoxl2b proteins distributed in oogonia and PO, which is similar to medaka Foxl2 proteins (Herpin et al. 2013). The expression of Foxl2 proteins in oogonia and PO implies their direct roles in early oogenesis, independent to their roles in cell communication between oocytes and follicular cells. Therefore, our study provides a clear example to show biased and divergent expression and cellular localization of two teleost paralogs. The results also indicate that CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b might display function partition during gibel carp oogenesis.

During ovary development, granulosa cells and theca cells form two layers of ovarian follicle. The interactions among granulosa cells, theca cells, and oocytes are pivotal to folliculogenesis, steroidogenesis, and female oogenesis (Jagarlamudi and Rajkovic 2012; Richards et al. 2018). Foxl2 is one of the earliest known markers of granulosa cell differentiation (Cocquet et al. 2002; Schmidt et al. 2004). Although a few reports described morphological folliculogenesis in teleost species through histological and ultrastructural observation (Grier 2000, 2012; Grier et al. 2009; Quagio-Grassiotto et al. 2011), the studies on the process of folliculogenesis traced by granulosa cell or theca cell marker genes were scarce. By using two antibodies specific for CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b, respectively, we can precisely identify granulosa cells, thecal cells, and their precursor cells. When oogonia differentiate into PO, a few of granulosa cells coexpressed CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b directly attach to meiotic oocytes. Meanwhile, theca cells expressed CgFoxl2a are first recruited to the edge of cysts with oogonia and PO and then encompass granulosa cells. Interestingly, the somatic cells in the stromal layer have elliptical nuclei with star-like signals of CgFoxl2a, whereas theca cells are expressed more abundant CgFoxl2a proteins in their fusiform nuclei. The results suggest that thecal cells recruited from the stromal layer to thecal layer seem to undergo morphological differentiation of nuclei. Along with oocytes grow, granulosa cells proliferate and form a regular and successive monolayer, in which CgFoxl2b proteins persist abundant and CgFoxl2a expression decrease. Simultaneously, three subpopulations of thecal cells, expressing CgFoxl2a, coexpressing CgFoxl2a/2b, and not expressing CgFoxl2a/2b cells, recruit from the stromal layer and form successive thecal lay. Thereafter, granulosa cells and theca cells develop two layers of follicular cells (fig. 9A).

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

Schematic diagram of folliculogenesis (A) and cooperative regulation between Cgfoxl2a and Cgfoxl2b (B) in gibel carp ovary development. Different granulosa cells, thecal cells, and their precursor cells are distinguished by expression of CgFoxl2a (green) and CgFoxl2b (red) proteins, respectively. Different types of gonads, including WT ovary, delayed ovary, germ cell-depleted gonad, ovotestis, and testis, different gonadal development-related genes and their upregulation and downregulation expressions, are indicated in detail.

The complicated and crucial roles of Foxl2 in ovary development and maintenance have been well documented in mammals (Crisponi et al. 2001; Uhlenhaut et al. 2009; Boulanger et al. 2014) and three teleost fishes (Yang et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2017; Bertho et al. 2018). Gibel carp is able to reproduce all female offspring by gynogenesis. Thus, we speculate that foxl2 may act as dominant female-determining transcription factor in unisexual species. In this study, we successfully edited multiple foxl2 homeologs and/or alleles in gibel carp by using CRISPR/Cas9. Although sex of gibel carp is determined by genetic factors, it is also affected by rearing temperature (Li et al. 2016; Li and Gui 2018; Li et al. 2018). Therefore, very low proportion (<3.4%) of males were observed in the WT gynogenetic offspring (figs. 3A and 6A and supplementary fig. S13A, Supplementary Material online). Our results indicate that CgFoxl2a-B deficiency leads to ovary development arrest and complete female to male sex reversal (fig. 3). The phenomenon is different from the defects of premature ovarian failure observed in zebrafish foxl2a−/− females (Yang et al. 2017). Along with sex reversal, the testis differentiation-related or androgen-producing genes remarkably increased their expression, but female-biased genes sharply decreased in Cgfoxl2a-BΔ55/Δ54/Δ25 + 8 testis (fig. 5), which was consistent with previous studies (Yang et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2017; Bertho et al. 2018).

In blepharophimosis-ptosis-epicanthus inversus syndrome patients, more than 200 different FOXL2 mutations have been found, which resulted in pleiotropic effects and clinical heterogeneity (Caburet et al. 2012; Verdin and De Baere 2012; Takahashi et al. 2013). In addition, the loss-of-function of one allele lead to FOXL2 haploinsufficiency (Prueitt and Zinn 2001), which emphasize critical role of its correct gene dosage for normal development. Due to the varied mutations in three Cgfoxl2a-B alleles, we also observed the pleiotropy and haploinsufficiency effects of gonad development in this study. When in-frame mutations were produced in all Cgfoxl2a-B alleles and resulted in truncated CgFoxl2a-B1/B2/B3 protein-lacking FKH domain, the Cgfoxl2a-B−/−/− individuals arrested ovary development at primary oocyte growth stage or developed to males. We also detected two mutated genotypes possessing WT Cgfoxl2a-B1 allele and mutated Cgfoxl2a-B2 and Cgfoxl2a-B3 alleles. However, the WT CgFoxl2a-B1 protein is not sufficient to keep normal ovarian development, which might be due to very low expression level of Cgfoxl2a-B1 allele in ovary at 45 dph (fig. 2C). Interestingly, about half of Cgfoxl2a-B mutated individuals, which were predicted to possess two truncated CgFoxl2a-B proteins without FKH domain and one mutated CgFoxl2a-B protein containing an intact FKH domain, developed to normal females (fig. 3). Subcellular localization showed that the mutated CgFoxl2a-B proteins with an intact FKH domain, such as Cgfoxl2a-B2Δ54, keep transactivation capacity (fig. 5B). Importantly, Cgfoxl2a-B2Δ54 can enhance SF1-activated Cgcyp19a1a-A expression (fig. 5C) similar to the previous study in Tilapia (Wang et al. 2007). We also found higher expression of mutated Cgfoxl2a-B alleles in ovary than that in testis at oogonia or SPG proliferation stage, which may lead to upregulated Cgcyp19a1as expression and downregulated Cgdmrt1s expression in ovary (fig. 5A). It is commonly considered that cyp19a1a upregulation is essential for triggering fish ovarian differentiation and its downregulation will lead to testicular differentiation (Guiguen et al. 2010). Recently, Wu et al. found that cyp19a1a drive ovarian differentiation by suppressing dmrt1 (Wu et al. 2020). Therefore, this is probably the reason why about half of these mutated individuals were females, whereas the other half developed to males. Even though the regulative mechanism of Cgfoxl2a-B2Δ54 differential expression in gibel carp early gonad development is not clear as of now, our results indicate that correct gene dosage of Foxl2a-B is critical for gibel carp ovary development.

Consistent with abundant CgFoxl2b proteins distributed in oogonia and PO, complete disruption of Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B resulted in the depletion of germ cell in gibel carp (figs. 6 and 7 and supplementary table S3, Supplementary Material online). This defect was not observed in the other foxl2 disrupted animals, implying more important roles or other function of foxl2b in gibel carp early oogenesis although we could not exclude the indirect function of foxl2b expressed in somatic cells. The dynamic expression changes of analyzed genes in germ cell depleted gonad were similar to those in testis, but opposite to those in ovary (fig. 8). The results implied that the germ cell-depleted gonad developed testis-like gonads without spermatogenic cells, consistent with our previous study in which germ cells was depleted by dnd morpholino-mediated knockdown approach (Liu et al. 2015). However, the compensatory increase of Cgfoxl2a-Bs transcripts could not rescue the defect of germ cell depletion (fig. 8). Taken together, the detailed cellular localization and function differences indicate that Cgfoxl2a and Cgfoxl2b synergize but differentially govern gibel carp folliculogenesis and gonad differentiation. As shown in figure 9B, CgFoxl2a is expressed in follicular cells and complete disruption of Cgfoxl2a alleles leads to the upregulated expression of testis differentiation-related and androgen-producing genes, which thereby triggers testis development. Cgfoxl2b evolves a new function in oogenesis. In addition to expression in follicular cells, CgFoxl2b is also localized in oogonia and PO, and complete deficiency of Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B alleles results in depletion of germ cells.

In total, we performed an extensive and detailed study on the origin and evolution of three foxl2 homeologs and their alleles in the auto-allo-hexaploid gibel carp. We revealed their functional divergence by editing multiple foxl2 homeologs and/or alleles by using CRISPR/Cas9. In conclusion, the current study covers almost all ranges of complex evolutionary scenarios associated with duplicated genes, including homeolog/allele diversification, retention/loss, biased expression, and sub-/neofunctionalization. Although theoretical presumption of these scenarios and their disparate cases have already been reported, our work has elaborated the evolutionary mechanisms involved in the duplicated foxl2 gene.

Materials and Methods

Maintenance of Fish

Gibel carp clone F was raised and collected from the National Aquatic Biological Resource Center, NABRC. Artificial fertilization, larval hatching, and fry nursing were performed as previously described (Zhu et al. 2018). In order to eliminate the influence of environmental factors on sex, each group consisting of 100–150 WT and 100–150 foxl2 mutated gible carp was reared in the same cage. All sampled fish were anesthetized with MS-222 (Sigma, USA). All procedures were performed with the approval of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Cloning and Sequence Analysis

According to the genome sequences of gibel carp clone F (CI01000363_00413629_00414546 and ENSONIP00000026093-D2), foxl2a and foxl2b cDNAs were amplified from gibel carp ovary cDNA library by 3′ and 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online). The complete cDNA sequences of 12 foxl2 transcripts were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers from MT468195 to MT468206). Multiple amino acid sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis were performed with DNAMAN version 7.0 and Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA 7) (Kumar et al. 2016). All the amino acid sequences used in this study were obtained from GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, last accessed January 23, 2021). The accession numbers are as following: Homo sapiens FOXL2, NP_075555; Mus musculus FOXL2, NP_036150; Gallus gallus FOXL2, NP_001012630; Lepisosteus oculatus Foxl2, XP_006637658; Latimeria chalumnae Foxl2, XP_006001344; Oncorhynchus mykiss Foxl2b1, NP_001117957; Oncorhynchus mykiss Foxl2b2, XP_021437171; Oreochromis niloticus Foxl2, NP_001266707; Ictalurus punctatus Foxl2a, XP_017350481; Ictalurus punctatus Foxl2b, XP_017351917; D. rerio Foxl2a, NP_001038717; D. rerio Foxl2b, NP_001304690; Carassius auratus Fxol2a-B1, MT468189; Carassius auratus Fxol2a-B2, MT468190; Carassius auratus Fxol2b-A1, MT468191; Carassius auratus Fxol2b-A2, MT468192; Carassius auratus Fxol2b-B1, MT468193; and Carassius auratus Fxol2b-B2, MT468194. The exon–intron structure was determined by the aligning mRNA and genomic sequences of gibel carp foxl2s. Syntenic analyses were conducted by comparing the chromosomic regions around foxl2s genes in gibel carp chromosomes (CgA2, CgA15, and CgB15) and crucian carp (C. auratus) chromosomes (CaA2, CaA15, and CaB15) with corresponding regions in H. sapiens chromosome 3, M. musculus chromosome 9, G. gallus chromosome 9, Xenopus tropicalis chromosome 5, and D. rerio chromosomes 2 and 15. The latter information was obtained from the Ensembl (http://www.ensembl.org, last accessed January 23, 2021).

Chromosome Preparation and FISH

Chromosome preparations and FISH analyses were performed as described previously (Li, Zhang, et al. 2014). Cgfoxl2a-B-BAC-DNA and Cgfoxl2b-A-BAC-DNA labeled by DIG-Nick Translation Mix (Roche), and Cgfoxl2b-B-BAC-DNA labeled by Biotin-Nick Translation Mix (Roche) were used as probes.

Generation of foxl2a- and foxl2b-Mutated Gibel Carp by CRISPR/Cas9

Genome edits of gible carp Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B, and Cgfoxl2a-B/Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B by CRISPR/Cas9 were performed as described (He et al. 2018). The sgRNA target site was designed on the second exon to disrupt the FKH domain with the online service website (http://zifit.partners.org/ZiFiT/CSquare9Nuclease.aspx, last accessed January 23, 2021), and gRNA was transcribed with the TranscriptAid T7 High-Yield Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The plasmid pCS2-Cas9 was digested with XbaI (NEB) and then was transcribed using the T7 mMessage mMachine Kit (Ambion) (Liu et al. 2014). About 400 pg of Cgfoxl2a-B sgRNA and 600 pg of Cas9 mRNA were coinjected to the one-cell stage gibel carp embryos. All of F0 individuals of Cgfoxl2a-B mutants grew to fertile females, of which two individuals were chosen to proliferate by gynogenesis to construct Cgfoxl2a-B mutant lines. Similarly, the F0 individuals with mutated Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B or mutated Cgfoxl2a-B/Cgfoxl2b-A/Cgfoxl2b-B were produced by simultaneously disrupted Cgfoxl2b-A and Cgfoxl2b-B, or Cgfoxl2a-B, Cgfoxl2b-A, and Cgfoxl2b-B. No fertile female was obtained from these two mutants.

Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR

Tissues, including heart, liver, spleen, kidney, pituitary, hypothalamus, other brains, ovary, and testis, were sampled from 5-month gibel carp females and males. Unfertilized eggs, 50% epiboly, hatching fry, gonads from WT, and foxl2 mutants at different stages from 10 dph to 1 year old were randomly sampled. qPCR was performed as described (Yang et al. 2017), and specific primes for each gene were listed in supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online. Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1, like 1 (eef1a1l1) was selected as the optimal reference gene according to our previous study (Mou et al. 2018). The relative gene expression levels were calculated with 2−ΔΔCT method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001). All the samples were analyzed in triplicates. For statistical analysis, Tukey’s test was calculated with SPSS software (SPSS Inc.). A probability (P) of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

In order to analyze the expression difference among three alleles of each foxl2 genes, the qPCR products amplified from ovary (45 and 270 dph) and testis (45 and 150 dph) (n = 3) were purified and cloned into Trans5α Chemically Competent Cell. About 20–30 clones of each sample were sequenced and classified according to the specific SNPs in three alleles. The average ratios of sequencing clone numbers were used to show the expression levels.

Polyclonal Antibody Preparation, Western Blot, Histological Section, and Immunofluorescence

Polyclonal antibodies, respectively, specific to the CgFoxl2a and CgFoxl2b were produced by Friendbio Science and Technology (Wuhan) Co. Ltd. Western blot, histological section, and immunofluorescence were performed as described previously (Liu et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2017), and the results were acquired with ImageQuant LAS 4000mini (GE) and Carl Zeiss upright fluorescence microscope Axio Imager M2 (Analytical and Testing Center, IHB, CAS), respectively.

Subcellular Localization

WT Cgfoxl2a-B2, Cgfoxl2a-B2Δ54, Cgfoxl2a-B1Δ55, and Cgfoxl2a-B3Δ25 + 8 were subcloned into XhoI/KpnI sites of pEGFP-N3 vector (BD Biosciences Clontech). All the plasmids were verified by sequence analysis. One microgram plasmids were transfected into HEK293T cells. The cell culture, transfection, fixation, and nuclear staining with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were performed as previously described (Lu et al. 2018). The results were acquired by Carl Zeiss upright fluorescence microscope Axio imager M2 (Analytical and Testing Center, IHB, CAS).

Plasmid Constructs

For luciferase assays, expression plasmids were generated by cloning the full length ORF of WT Cgfoxl2a-B2, Cgfoxl2a-B2Δ54, Cgfoxl2a-B1Δ55, and Cgfoxl2a-B3Δ25 + 8 were subcloned into KpnI/XhoI sites of pcDNA3.1(+) vector. Cgsf1a-B was subcloned into NheI/HindIII sites of pcDNA3.1(+) vector. For promoter activity analysis, 1,329 and 1,140 bp 5′-flanking regulatory region of Cgcyp19a1a-A promoter (GenBank accession number MW160449) and Cgcyp19a1a-B promoter (GenBank accession number MW160450) were subcloned into KpnI/XhoI sites of pGL3-basic luciferase reporter vector (Cgcyp19a1a-Apro-luc and Cgcyp19a1a-Bpro-luc), respectively. All constructs were verified by sequencing.

Transfection and Luciferase Activity Assays

CAB and EPC were seeded overnight in 24-well plates and transfected using FuGENE HD Transfection Reagent (Promega) with various plasmids at a ratio of 10:10:1 (200 ng expression plasmid: 200 ng Cgcyp19a1a-A pro-luc or Cgcyp19a1a-B pro-luc plasmid: 20 ng Renilla luciferase plasmid pRL-TK). Empty vector (pcDNA3.1) was adjusted to ensure DNA concentration in total among wells. Transient transfections and luciferase activity assays were performed as described (Lu, Zhou, et al. 2020). Luciferase activities were measured by a Junior LB9509 luminometer (Berthold, Pforzheim, Germany) and normalized to that of Renilla luciferase activity. All experiments were performed in triplicate and the significant differences were calculated by SPSS software (SPSS Inc.).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary data are available at Molecular Biology and Evolution online.

Supplementary Material

msab002_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful discussion in editing this manuscript. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFD0900204), the Key Program of Frontier Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. QYZDY-SSW-SMC025), and China Agriculture Research System (Grant No. CARS-45-07).

Author Contributions

J.-F.G., L.Z., R.-H.G. designed the study. R.-H.G., Z.L., Z.-X.Y., X.-Y.L., J.-F.T., and X.-J.Z. prepared the samples and carried out the experiments. R.-H.G., L.Z., J.-F.G., and Y.W. analyzed and discussed the results. L.Z., J.-F.G., Y.W., and R.-H.G. wrote the paper.

Data Availability

The DNA sequences have been deposited at National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), accession numbers MW160449, MW160450, and MT468189–MT468206. All other data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Alam MA, Kobayashi Y, Horiguchi R, Hirai T, Nakamura M.. 2008. Molecular cloning and quantitative expression of sexually dimorphic markers Dmrt1 and Foxl2 during female-to-male sex change in Epinephelus merra. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 157(1):75–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amores A, Force A, Yan YL, Joly L, Amemiya C, Fritz A, Ho RK, Langeland J, Prince V, Wang YL, et al. 1998. Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science 282(5394):1711–1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berthelot C, Brunet F, Chalopin D, Juanchich A, Bernard M, Noel B, Bento P, Da SC, Labadie K, Alberti A, et al. 2014. The rainbow trout genome provides novel insights into evolution after whole-genome duplication in vertebrates. Nat Commun. 5(1):3657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertho S, Herpin A, Branthonne A, Jouanno E, Yano A, Nicol B, Muller T, Pannetier M, Pailhoux E, Miwa M, et al. 2018. The unusual rainbow trout sex determination gene hijacked the canonical vertebrate gonadal differentiation pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 115(50):12781–12786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bertho S, Pasquier J, Pan Q, Le Trionnaire G, Bobe J, Postlethwait JH, Pailhoux E, Schartl M, Herpin A, Guiguen Y.. 2016. Foxl2 and its relatives are evolutionary conserved players in gonadal sex differentiation. Sex Dev. 10(3):111–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhat IA, Rather MA, Dar JY, Sharma R.. 2016. Molecular cloning, computational analysis and expression pattern of Forkhead boxl2 (Foxl2) gene in catfish. Comput Biol Chem. 64:9–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boulanger L, Pannetier M, Gall L, Allais-Bonnet A, Elzaiat M, Le Bourhis D, Daniel N, Richard C, Cotinot C, Ghyselinck NB, et al. 2014. FOXL2 is a female sex-determining gene in the goat. Curr Biol. 24(4):404–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Caburet S, Georges A, L’Hôte D, Todeschini A-L, Benayoun BA, Veitia RA.. 2012. The transcription factor FOXL2: at the crossroads of ovarian physiology and pathology. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 356(1–2):55–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Caulier M, Brion F, Chadili E, Turies C, Piccini B, Porcher J, Guiguen Y, Hinfray N.. 2015. Localization of steroidogenic enzymes and Foxl2a in the gonads of mature zebrafish (Danio rerio). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 188:96–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheng F, Wu J, Cai X, Liang J, Freeling M, Wang X.. 2018. Gene retention, fractionation and subgenome differences in polyploid plants. Nat Plants. 4(5):258–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Clark JW, Donoghue P.. 2018. Whole-genome duplication and plant macroevolution. Trends Plant Sci. 23(10):933–945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cocquet J, Pailhoux E, Jaubert F, Servel N, Xia X, Pannetier M, De Baere E, Messiaen L, Cotinot C, Fellous M.. 2002. Evolution and expression of FOXL2. J Med Genet. 39(12):916–921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Comai L. 2005. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nat Rev Genet. 6(11):836–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Crisponi L, Deiana M, Loi A, Chiappe F, Uda M, Amati P, Bisceglia L, Zelante L, Nagaraja R, Porcu S, et al. 2001. The putative Forkhead transcription factor FOXL2 is mutated in blepharophimosis/ptosis/epicanthus inversus syndrome. Nat Genet. 27(2):159–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Doyle JJ, Flagel LE, Paterson AH, Rapp RA, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Wendel JF.. 2008. Evolutionary genetics of genome merger and doubling in plants. Annu Rev Genet. 42(1):443–461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Edger PP, Smith R, McKain MR, Cooley AM, Vallejo-Marin M, Yuan Y, Bewick AJ, Ji L, Platts AE, Bowman MJ, et al. 2017. Subgenome dominance in an interspecific hybrid, synthetic allopolyploid, and a 140-year-old naturally established neo-allopolyploid monkeyflower. Plant Cell. 29(9):2150–2167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Forconi M, Canapa A, Barucca M, Biscotti MA, Capriglione T, Buonocore F, Fausto AM, Makapedua DM, Pallavicini A, Gerdol M, et al. 2013. Characterization of sex determination and sex differentiation genes in Latimeria. PLoS One. 8(4):e56006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Govoroun MS, Pannetier M, Pailhoux E, Cocquet J, Brillard JP, Couty I, Batellier F, Cotinot C.. 2004. Isolation of chicken homolog of the FOXL2 gene and comparison of its expression patterns with those of aromatase during ovarian development. Dev Dyn. 231(4):859–870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Grier H. 2000. Ovarian germinal epithelium and folliculogenesis in the common snook, Centropomus undecimalis (Teleostei: centropomidae). J Morphol. 243(3):265–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Grier HJ. 2012. Development of the follicle complex and oocyte staging in red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus Linnaeus, 1776 (Perciformes, Sciaenidae). J Morphol. 273(8):801–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Grier HJ, Uribe-Aranzábal MC, Patino R.. 2009. The ovary, folliculogenesis, and oogenesis in teleosts. In: Jamieson BGM, editor. Reproductive biology and phylogeny of fishes (agnathans and bony fishes). Enfield (NH: ): Science Publishers. p. 25–84. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gui JF, Zhou L.. 2010. Genetic basis and breeding application of clonal diversity and dual reproduction modes in polyploid Carassius auratus gibelio. Sci China Life Sci. 53(4):409–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Guiguen Y, Fostier A, Piferrer F, Chang CF.. 2010. Ovarian aromatase and estrogens: a pivotal role for gonadal sex differentiation and sex change in fish. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 165(3):352–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. He WX, Wu M, Liu Z, Li Z, Wang Y, Zhou J, Yu P, Zhang XJ, Zhou L, Gui JF.. 2018. Oocyte-specific maternal Slbp2 is required for replication-dependent histone storage and early nuclear cleavage in zebrafish oogenesis and embryogenesis. RNA. 24(12):1738–1748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Herpin A, Adolfi MC, Nicol B, Hinzmann M, Schmidt C, Klughammer J, Engel M, Tanaka M, Guiguen Y, Schartl M.. 2013. Divergent expression regulation of gonad development genes in medaka shows incomplete conservation of the downstream regulatory network of vertebrate sex determination. Mol Biol Evol. 30(10):2328–2346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ijiri S, Kaneko H, Kobayashi T, Wang DS, Sakai F, Paul-Prasanth B, Nakamura M, Nagahama Y.. 2008. Sexual dimorphic expression of genes in gonads during early differentiation of a teleost fish, the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Biol Reprod. 78(2):333–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Iwade R, Maruo K, Okada G, Nakamura M.. 2008. Elevated expression of P450c17 (CYP17) during testicular formation in the frog. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 155(1):79–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jagarlamudi K, Rajkovic A.. 2012. Oogenesis: transcriptional regulators and mouse models. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 356(1–2):31–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jiang FF, Wang ZW, Zhou L, Jiang L, Zhang XJ, Apalikova OV, Brykov VA, Gui JF.. 2013. High male incidence and evolutionary implications of triploid form in northeast Asia Carassius auratus complex. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 66(1):350–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jiang SY, Wang Y, Zhou L, Chen F, Li Z, Gui JF.. 2020. Molecular characteristics, genomic structure and expression patterns of diverse bmp15 alleles in polyploid gibel carp clone F. Acta Hydrobiol Sin. 44:518–527. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kayampilly PP, Wanamaker BL, Stewart JA, Wagner CL, Menon KM.. 2010. Stimulatory effect of insulin on 5alpha-reductase type 1 (SRD5A1) expression through an Akt-dependent pathway in ovarian granulosa cells. Endocrinology 151(10):5030–5037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kocer A, Pinheiro I, Pannetier M, Renault L, Parma P, Radi O, Kim KA, Camerino G, Pailhoux E.. 2008. R-spondin1 and FOXL2 act into two distinct cellular types during goat ovarian differentiation. BMC Dev Biol. 8(1):36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K.. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 33(7):1870–1874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Leggatt RA, Iwama GK.. 2003. Occurrence of polyploidy in the fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fisher. 13(3):237–246. [Google Scholar]
  35. Li XY, Gui JF.. 2018. Diverse and variable sex determination mechanisms in vertebrates. Sci China Life Sci. 61(12):1503–1514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Li XY, Li Z, Zhang XJ, Zhou L, Gui JF.. 2014. Expression characterization of testicular DMRT1 in both Sertoli cells and spermatogenic cells of polyploid gibel carp. Gene 548(1):119–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Li XY, Liu XL, Ding M, Li Z, Zhou L, Zhang XJ, Gui JF.. 2017. A novel male-specific SET domain-containing gene Setdm identified from extra microchromosomes of gibel carp males. Sci Bull. 62(8):528–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Li XY, Liu XL, Zhu YJ, Zhang J, Ding M, Wang MT, Wang ZW, Li Z, Zhang XJ, Zhou L, et al. 2018. Origin and transition of sex determination mechanisms in a gynogenetic hexaploid fish. Heredity (Edinburgh) 121(1):64–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Li XY, Zhang QY, Zhang J, Zhou L, Li Z, Zhang XJ, Wang D, Gui JF.. 2016. Extra microchromosomes play male determination role in polyploid gibel carp. Genetics 203(3):1415–1424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Li XY, Zhang XJ, Li Z, Hong W, Liu W, Zhang J, Gui JF.. 2014. Evolutionary history of two divergent Dmrt1 genes reveals two rounds of polyploidy origins in gibel carp. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 78:96–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lien S, Koop BF, Sandve SR, Miller JR, Kent MP, Nome T, Hvidsten TR, Leong JS, Minkley DR, Zimin A, et al. 2016. The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization. Nature 533(7602):200–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu D, Wang Z, Xiao A, Zhang Y, Li W, Zu Y, Yao S, Lin S, Zhang B.. 2014. Efficient gene targeting in zebrafish mediated by a zebrafish-codon-optimized cas9 and evaluation of off-targeting effect. J Genet Genom. 41(1):43–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Liu S, Li Z, Gui JF.. 2009. Fish-specific duplicated dmrt2b contributes to a divergent function through Hedgehog pathway and maintains left-right asymmetry establishment function. PLoS One. 4(9):e7261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu W, Li SZ, Li Z, Wang Y, Li XY, Zhong JX, Zhang XJ, Zhang J, Zhou L, Gui JF.. 2015. Complete depletion of primordial germ cells in an All-female fish leads to Sex-biased gene expression alteration and sterile All-male occurrence. BMC Genomics 16(1):971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu XL, Jiang FF, Wang ZW, Li XY, Li Z, Zhang XJ, Chen F, Mao JF, Zhou L, Gui JF.. 2017. Wider geographic distribution and higher diversity of hexaploids than tetraploids in Carassius species complex reveal recurrent polyploidy effects on adaptive evolution. Sci Rep. 7(1):5395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Liu XL, Li XY, Jiang FF, Wang ZW, Li Z, Zhang XJ, Zhou L, Gui JF.. 2017. Numerous mitochondrial DNA haplotypes reveal multiple independent polyploidy origins of hexaploids in Carassius species complex. Ecol Evol. 7(24):10604–10615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu Z, Chen A, Yang Z, Wei H, Leng X.. 2012. Molecular characterization of growth differentiation factor 9 and its spatio-temporal expression pattern in gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio). Mol Biol Rep. 39(4):3863–3870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD.. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25(4):402–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Loffler KA, Zarkower D, Koopman P.. 2003. Etiology of ovarian failure in blepharophimosis ptosis epicanthus inversus syndrome: FOXL2 is a conserved, early-acting gene in vertebrate ovarian development. Endocrinology 144(7):3237–3243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lu M, Li XY, Li Z, Du WX, Zhou L, Wang Y, Zhang XJ, Wang ZW, Gui JF.. 2021. Regain of sex determination system and sexual reproduction ability in a synthetic octoploid male fish. Sci China Life Sci. 64(1):77–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lu WJ, Zhou L, Gao FX, Sun ZH, Li Z, Liu XC, Li SS, Wang Y, Gui JF.. 2018. Divergent expression patterns and function of two cxcr4 paralogs in hermaphroditic Epinephelus coioides. IJMS 19(10):2943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lu WJ, Zhou L, Gao FX, Zhou YL, Li Z, Zhang XJ, Wang Y, Gui JF.. 2020. Dynamic and differential expression of duplicated Cxcr4/Cxcl12 genes facilitates antiviral response in hexaploid gibel carp. Front Immunol. 11:2176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Luo J, Chai J, Wen Y, Tao M, Lin G, Liu X, Ren L, Chen Z, Wu S, Li S, et al. 2020. From asymmetrical to balanced genomic diversification during rediploidization: subgenomic evolution in allotetraploid fish. Sci Adv. 6(22):eaaz7677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Mandakova T, Lysak MA.. 2018. Post-polyploid diploidization and diversification through dysploid changes. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 42:55–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. McClintock B. 1984. The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226(4676):792–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Meyer A, Van de Peer Y.. 2005. From 2R to 3R: evidence for a fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD). Bioessays 27(9):937–945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Mou CY, Wang Y, Zhang QY, Gao FX, Li Z, Tong JF, Zhou L, Gui JF.. 2018. Differential interferon system gene expression profiles in susceptible and resistant gynogenetic clones of gibel carp challenged with herpesvirus CaHV. Dev Comp Immunol. 86:52–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Nakamoto M, Matsuda M, Wang DS, Nagahama Y, Shibata N.. 2006. Molecular cloning and analysis of gonadal expression of Foxl2 in the medaka, Oryzias latipes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 344(1):353–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Neaves WB, Baumann P.. 2011. Unisexual reproduction among vertebrates. Trends Genet. 27(3):81–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ng DW, Lu J, Chen ZJ.. 2012. Big roles for small RNAs in polyploidy, hybrid vigor, and hybrid incompatibility. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 15(2):154–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Otto SP. 2007. The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell 131(3):452–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Park SY, Jameson JL.. 2005. Minireview: transcriptional regulation of gonadal development and differentiation. Endocrinology 146(3):1035–1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Payne AH, Hales DB.. 2004. Overview of steroidogenic enzymes in the pathway from cholesterol to active steroid hormones. Endocr Rev. 25(6):947–970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Pisarska MD, Bae J, Klein C, Hsueh AJ.. 2004. Forkhead l2 is expressed in the ovary and represses the promoter activity of the steroidogenic acute regulatory gene. Endocrinology 145(7):3424–3433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Prueitt RL, Zinn AR.. 2001. A fork in the road to fertility. Nat Genet. 27(2):132–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Quagio-Grassiotto I, Grier H, Mazzoni TS, Nobrega RH, de Arruda AJ.. 2011. Activity of the ovarian germinal epithelium in the freshwater catfish, Pimelodus maculatus (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Siluriformes): germline cysts, follicle formation and oocyte development. J Morphol. 272(11):1290–1306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ramirez-Gonzalez RH, Borrill P, Lang D, Harrington SA, Brinton J, Venturini L, Davey M, Jacobs J, van Ex F, Pasha A, et al. 2018. The transcriptional landscape of polyploid wheat. Science 361(6403):eaar6089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Richards JS, Ren YA, Candelaria N, Adams JE, Rajkovic A.. 2018. Ovarian follicular theca cell recruitment, differentiation, and impact on fertility: 2017 update. Endocr Rev. 39(1):1–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Schmidt D, Ovitt CE, Anlag K, Fehsenfeld S, Gredsted L, Treier AC, Treier M.. 2004. The murine winged-helix transcription factor Foxl2 is required for granulosa cell differentiation and ovary maintenance. Development 131(4):933–942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sessa EB. 2019. Polyploidy as a mechanism for surviving global change. New Phytol. 221(1):5–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Soltis PS, Liu X, Marchant DB, Visger CJ, Soltis DE.. 2014. Polyploidy and novelty: gottlieb’s legacy. Philos Trans R Soc B. 369(1648):20130351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Soltis PS, Soltis DE.. 2016. Ancient WGD events as drivers of key innovations in angiosperms. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 30:159–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Song Q, Chen ZJ.. 2015. Epigenetic and developmental regulation in plant polyploids. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 24:101–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Takahashi A, Kimura F, Yamanaka A, Takebayashi A, Kita N, Takahashi K, Murakami T.. 2013. The FOXL2 mutation (c.402C>G) in adult-type ovarian granulosa cell tumors of three Japanese patients: clinical report and review of the literature. Tohoku J Exp Med. 231:243–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Taylor JS. 2003. Genome duplication, a trait shared by 22,000 species of ray-finned fish. Genome Res. 13(3):382–390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Uhlenhaut NH, Jakob S, Anlag K, Eisenberger T, Sekido R, Kress J, Treier AC, Klugmann C, Klasen C, Holter NI, et al. 2009. Somatic sex reprogramming of adult ovaries to testes by FOXL2 ablation. Cell 139(6):1130–1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Van de Peer Y, Maere S, Meyer A.. 2009. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat Rev Genet. 10(10):725–732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Van de Peer Y, Mizrachi E, Marchal K.. 2017. The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat Rev Genet. 18(7):411–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Van de Peer Y, Taylor JS, Meyer A.. 2003. Are all fishes ancient polyploids? J Struct Funct Genomics. 3(1–4):65–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Verdin H, De Baere E.. 2012. FOXL2 impairment in human disease. Horm Res Paediatr. 77(1):2–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Vizziano D, Randuineau G, Baron D, Cauty C, Guiguen Y.. 2007. Characterization of early molecular sex differentiation in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Dev Dyn. 236(8):2198–2206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Wang DS, Kobayashi T, Zhou LY, Paul-Prasanth B, Ijiri S, Sakai F, Okubo K, Morohashi K, Nagahama Y.. 2007. Foxl2 up-regulates aromatase gene transcription in a female-specific manner by binding to the promoter as well as interacting with ad4 binding protein/steroidogenic factor 1. Mol Endocrinol. 21(3):712–725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Wu K, Song W, Zhang Z, Ge W.. 2020. Disruption of dmrt1 rescues the all-male phenotype of the cyp19a1a mutant in zebrafish - a novel insight into the roles of aromatase/estrogens in gonadal differentiation and early folliculogenesis. Development 147(4):dev182758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Wu TD, Watanabe CK.. 2005. GMAP: a genomic mapping and alignment program for mRNA and EST sequences. Bioinformatics 21(9):1859–1875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Xiong Z, Gaeta RT, Pires JC.. 2011. Homoeologous shuffling and chromosome compensation maintain genome balance in resynthesized allopolyploid Brassica napus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108(19):7908–7913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Xu H, Gui J, Hong Y.. 2005. Differential expression of vasa RNA and protein during spermatogenesis and oogenesis in the gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio), a bisexually and gynogenetically reproducing vertebrate. Dev Dyn. 233(3):872–882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Xu P, Zhang X, Wang X, Li J, Liu G, Kuang Y, Xu J, Zheng X, Ren L, Wang G, et al. 2014. Genome sequence and genetic diversity of the common carp, Cyprinus carpio. Nat Genet. 46(11):1212–1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Yang J, Liu D, Wang X, Ji C, Cheng F, Liu B, Hu Z, Chen S, Pental D, Ju Y, et al. 2016. The genome sequence of allopolyploid Brassica juncea and analysis of differential homoeolog gene expression influencing selection. Nat Genet. 48(10):1225–1232., [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Yang YJ, Wang Y, Li Z, Zhou L, Gui JF.. 2017. Sequential, divergent, and cooperative requirements of foxl2a and foxl2b in ovary development and maintenance of zebrafish. Genetics 205(4):1551–1572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Yu P, Wang Y, Yang WT, Li Z, Zhang XJ, Zhou L, Gui JF.. 2021. Upregulation of the PPAR signaling pathway and accumulation of lipids are related to the morphological and structural transformation of the dragon-eye goldfish eye. Sci China Life Sci. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1814-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Zhang J, Sun M, Zhou L, Li Z, Liu Z, Li XY, Liu XL, Liu W, Gui JF.. 2015. Meiosis completion and various sperm responses lead to unisexual and sexual reproduction modes in one clone of polyploid Carassius gibelio. Sci Rep. 5(1):10898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Zhang QQ, Zhou L, Li Z, Gan RH, Yu ZX, Gui JF, Wang Y.. 2020. Allelic diversification, syntenic alignment and expression patterns of nanos2 in polyploid gibel carp. Acta Hydrobiol Sin. 44:1087–1096. [Google Scholar]
  93. Zhang X, Li M, Ma H, Liu X, Shi H, Li M, Wang D.. 2017. Mutation of foxl2 or cyp19a1a results in female to male sex reversal in XX Nile Tilapia. Endocrinology 158:2634–2647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Zhou L, Gui JF.. 2002. Karyotypic diversity in polyploid gibel carp, Carassius auratus gibelio Bloch. Genetica 115(2):223–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Zhou L, Gui JF.. 2017. Natural and artificial polyploids in aquaculture. Aquacult Fish. 2(3):103–111. [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhu HP, Ma DM, Gui JF.. 2006. Triploid origin of the gibel carp as revealed by 5S rDNA localization and chromosome painting. Chromosome Res. 14(7):767–776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Zhu YJ, Li XY, Zhang J, Li Z, Ding M, Zhang XJ, Zhou L, Gui JF.. 2018. Distinct sperm nucleus behaviors between genotypic and temperature-dependent sex determination males are associated with replication and expression-related pathways in a gynogenetic fish. BMC Genomics. 19(1):437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

msab002_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

The DNA sequences have been deposited at National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), accession numbers MW160449, MW160450, and MT468189–MT468206. All other data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


Articles from Molecular Biology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES