Abstract
Understanding the structure–property relationships in Zero‐dimensional (0D) organic–inorganic metal halide perovskites (OMHPs) is essential for their use in optoelectronic applications. Moreover, increasing the emission intensity, particularly for blue emission, is considerably a challenge. Here, intriguing pressure‐induced emission (PIE) is successfully achieved from an initially nonluminous 0D OMHP [(C6H11NH3)4BiBr6]Br·CH3CN (Cy4BiBr7) upon compression. The emission intensity increases significantly, even reaching high‐efficiency blue luminescence, as the external pressure is increased to 4.9 GPa. Analyses of the in situ high‐pressure experiments and first‐principle calculations indicate that the observed PIE can be attributed to the enhanced exciton binding energy associated with [BiBr6]3– octahedron distortion under pressure. This study of Cy4BiBr7 sheds light on the relationship between the structure and optical properties of OMHPs. The results may improve potential applications of such materials in the fields of pressure sensing and trademark security.
Keywords: blue luminescence, diamond anvil cell, high pressure, pressure‐induced emission, zero‐dimensional perovskites
The deformation of bismuth bromide octahedra stimulated by lattice shrinkage enhances exciton–phonon coupling, resulting in bright blue emission at pressure of 4.9 GPa or low temperature for the Zero‐dimensional (0D) organic–inorganic metal halide perovskite [(C6H11NH3)4BiBr6]Br·CH3CN (Cy4BiBr7). This research provides a new research approach for the acquisition of the high efficiency blue emitting materials.

1. Introduction
Organic–inorganic metal halide perovskites (OMHPs) have attracted considerable attention due to their exceptional properties, such as excellent charge transport, exceptional band gap tenability, and efficient luminescence.[ 1 ] For Zero‐dimensional (0D) OMHPs, individual metal halide octahedral anions are completely surrounded and isolated by organic cations.[ 2 ] Because of the strong spatial confinement of isolated metal halides, the emissions of 0D OMHPs feature broadband spectra, large Stokes shifts, and high photoluminescence (PL) quantum efficiencies.[ 3 ] These remarkable features make them excellent candidates for use as solid‐state phosphors. Therefore, the recent studies have favored 0D OMHPs.[ 4 ] However, a large Stokes shift is the main reason for the lack of blue luminescence in 0D OMHPs. Thus, developing an effective strategy to achieve high‐efficiency blue luminescence with 0D OMHPs remains a pressing challenge.
Pressure, as an independent thermodynamic parameter, has been the focus of achieving efficient blue luminescence for 0D OMHPs. Since the influence of composition changes is avoided, hydrostatic pressure is considered to be the easiest way to adjust the physical properties of materials by changing the electronic structure.[ 5 ] Recently, there have been some reports about pressure enhancing the emission of OMHPs.[ 6 ] However, due to the structural distortion of metal halides under pressure, the self‐trapping exciton binding is enhanced, which usually leads to a red‐shift for emission peak (i.e., the Stokes shift increases). In particular, Zhang et al. found that when (C6H5C2H4NH3)2PbBr4 was subjected to enhanced pressure, the blue emission of the free‐exciton state weakened or disappeared, and the red emission of the self‐trapping exciton state appeared or increased.[ 7 ] Therefore, overcoming large structural distortion under pressure is a considerable challenge.
Consequently, decreasing the Stokes shift is the key to achieving blue luminescence for 0D OMHPs. It has been reported that heavy ns2 electron structure atoms (such as lead and bismuth) cause a small Stokes shift due to the strong spin–orbit coupling perturbations in metal halide crystals.[ 8 ] However, the use of lead ions may restrict large‐scale manufacturing due to its toxicity and possible bioaccumulation.[ 9 ] Bi3+ has the same 6S26P0 electronic structure as Pb2+ and a similar ionic radius, and Bi‐based halide perovskites exhibit lower toxicity and better chemical stability than lead.[ 10 ] Thus, Bi3+ is an excellent candidate for use in lead‐free low‐toxicity perovskite materials.[ 11 ] In addition, rigidifying the chemical environment around metal halide anions in crystals is also an efficient method for reducing the Stokes shift of 0D organic–inorganic hybrid materials.[ 12 ]
Herein, we perform a systematic high‐pressure study of a 0D OMHPs [(C6H11NH3)4BiBr6]Br·CH3CN (Cy4BiBr7). The organic cation C6H11NH3 + confines the bismuth bromide octahedron in a relatively rigid hydrogen bond network. Cy4BiBr7 exhibits an unexpected pressure‐induced emission (PIE) at room temperature (RT) when the intrinsically nonemitting crystals are compressed to 4.9 GPa. The pressure‐dependent absorption spectra, angle‐dispersive synchrotron X‐ray diffraction (ADXRD) patterns, and Raman spectra combined with temperature‐dependent emissions and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (SCXRD) results, and theoretical calculations indicate that the attracting blue emission resulted from the exciton transitions with the enhanced exciton binding energy that are triggered by the minor distortion of the [BiBr6]3– octahedron under pressure. The results demonstrate that lead‐free metal halides are promising for high‐efficiency blue luminescence and that pressure‐controlled emission can overcome the limits of conventional synthetic chemistry.
2. Results and Discussion
The precise structure ofCy4BiBr7 was determined by SCXRD (Tables S1 and S2, Supporting Information). As depicted in Figure 1a, the Bi3+ cation occupies the center of the octahedron, and six bromide ions are located at the vertices. The [BiBr6]3– octahedra are periodically embedded in the crystal lattice together with the organic cations C6H11NH3 + to from bulk materials, thus creating an 0D OMHP structure at the molecular level. Hydrogen bond interactions among the various components are not neglected in Cy4BiBr7 (Tables S3 and S4, Supporting Information). As shown in Figure 1b, [BiBr6]3– octahedra connect to the surrounding organic cation C6H11NH3 + through strong N‐H···Br hydrogen bonds. Acetonitrile molecules are also linked by hydrogen bonds with the [BiBr6]3– octahedron (Figure S1, Supporting Information). The purity of Cy4BiBr7 was confirmed by the well‐overlapped powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns between the as‐synthesized samples and the simulated single‐crystal data (Figure S2, Supporting Information).
Figure 1.

a) View of the structure ofCy4BiBr7 at RT. b) View of N—H···Br hydrogen bonding interactions (turquoise dashed line) between an individual [BiBr6]3– and C6H11NH3 + at RT. Color codes: pink = Bi; green = Br; brown = C; blue = N; white = H; blue polyhedral = BiBr6. c) Temperature‐dependent PL spectra of Cy4BiBr7 from RT down to 77 K in the solid state under ambient conditions. d) Schematic of the temperature stimulation and distortion of the [BiBr6]3– octahedron in Cy4BiBr7 under ambient conditions.
Unexpectedly, Cy4BiBr7 initially did not exhibit a PL response to external pressure and showed bright blue emission as the pressure increased. As shown in Figure 2a, with increasing pressure, an emission peak suddenly appears. With a further increase in pressure, the PL of Cy4BiBr7 exhibits an apparent enhancement. Note that the corresponding PL intensity shows a remarkable increase with increasing pressure, eventually reaching a maximum at a pressure of 4.9 GPa. Upon further compression, the PL intensity gradually decreased and was reached when the pressure approached 13.0 GPa. This interesting PIE phenomenon can also be demonstrated from the changes in the PL photograph under laser irradiation at 355 nm. It is obvious that when the pressure increases to a certain value, the pressure‐dependent PL photographs clearly turn bright, as shown in Figure 2c. Similarly, the Cy4BiBr7 crystals also gradually display blue PL as the temperature decreases under ambient conditions (Figure 1c). This blue emission peak at λ EM = 441 nm has a small Stokes shift of 47 nm and remains unchanged within a large excitation wavelength range (Figures S3–S6, Supporting Information).
Figure 2.

a) Pressure‐dependent PL spectra of Cy4BiBr7. b) Changes in the absorption spectra of Cy4BiBr7 with increasing pressure. c) Corresponding PL photographs under UV irradiation (λ ex = 355 nm) and in situ high‐pressure optical micrographs in a diamond anvil cell at selected pressures of 1 atm and 0.5, 2.8, 3.8, and 4.9 GPa.
The absorption spectra of Cy4BiBr7 upon compression are shown in Figure 2b. The Cy4BiBr7 crystals are colorless under ambient light and ambient conditions and have an absorption edge located at ≈400 nm (Figure S7, Supporting Information). It is found that the absorption spectra of Cy4BiBr7 are greatly stable up to 13.0 GPa. With the increase in external pressure, the absorption spectra underwent a successive redshift, indicating the band gap narrowing of Cy4BiBr7 with the pressure changes. This band gap engineering as a function of pressure should be highly related to the octahedral motif changes with increasing pressure.
To investigate the relationship between the optical properties and structural evolution upon compression, we performed in situ high‐pressure ADXRD up to ≈20.13 GPa. The evolutionary information for the structure of Cy4BiBr7 upon compression is shown in Figure 3a. The first peak centered around 2θ = 2.6° corresponding to the Bragg (001) reflection, and the others have labeled shown in Figure S8, Supporting Information. As the pressure increased, all Bragg diffraction peaks monotonically shifted toward higher diffraction angles, which resulted from the pressure‐induced lattice contraction. Moreover, no new peaks appeared upon compression, indicating that Cy4BiBr7 did not experience any structural phase transition. And ADXRD results analysis also revealed thatCy4BiBr7 possesses the same space symmetry at ambient conditions and 20.13 GPa (Figure 3b). The Raman spectra of Cy4BiBr7 with a frequency distribution from 100 to 1700 cm−1 upon compression are shown in Figure 3c. Under ambient pressure, the vibrational mode (155.78 cm–1) was associated with the [BiBr6]3– octahedra, and this movement originated from the distortion of the [BiBr6]3– octahedron (Figure S9, Supporting Information).[ 13 ] As the pressure increased, the vibrational mode of Alg in [BiBr6]3– octahedra showed a normal movement in the direction of a high Raman shift, which was attributed to the reduction of interatomic distance.[ 14 ] As the progressive deteriorated crystallinity under higher pressure, the vibrational intensity of A1g mode weakened until disappeared. The peak around 1334.71 cm–1 at ambient pressure can be attributed to the vibration modes of C6H11NH3 + cation.[ 15 ] With increasing pressure, the vibrational modes of C6H11– show a monotonic blue‐shift. However, the vibrational modes of –NH3 + hardly shifted with pressure (Figure S10, Supporting Information). We speculate that this was due to the pressure‐induced lattice shrinkage limiting the atomic vibration and concurrently increasing the interreaction between the C6H11NH3 + cation and the [BiBr6]3– anion. It was worthy to note that the ADXRD and Raman peaks returned to the initial positions upon the complete release of pressure, indicating the pressure‐dependent reversibility ofCy4BiBr7.
Figure 3.

a) Representative in situ ADXRD patterns of Cy4BiBr7 in the presence of silicon oil as the pressure‐transmitting medium during the high‐pressure experiments. b) Rietveld refinements of Cy4BiBr7 at ambient conditions and 20.13 GPa. c) Raman spectra of Cy4BiBr7 at high pressure. d) Pressure‐dependent mid‐infrared spectra of Cy4BiBr7.
To further investigate the behavior of the organic and its interplay with the inorganic moiety, we carried out high‐pressure infrared absorption spectrum (IR) experiments at RT to provide information about the C6H11NH3 + cation changes, as shown in Figure 3d. As pressure rises, vibrational peaks from the organic moiety shift and broaden, which can be exactly elucidated by the intensified interatomic force and the decreased crystallinity.[ 16 ] Both blue‐shifts and red‐shifts were observed in characteristic modes (Figures S11 and S12, Supporting Information). The volume of the lattice underwent considerable shrinkage, leading to strenuous repulsion between the [BiBr6]3– octahedron and the electron waves on the H atoms in the cyclohexyl group. Hence, the frequency of C—H stretching in C6H11– increased. However, both the N—H stretching and bending modes in the NH3 + experienced red‐shift as pressure increased. This reverse change trend for N—H modes relative to the C—H and C—N modes can be attributed to the cationic charge on NH3 +. The pressure‐induced lattice shrinkage further enhanced the electrostatic attraction between the cationic charge in NH3 + and their neighboring anionic charge on the [BiBr6]3– anion.
Rietveld refinements of the ADXRD patterns can obtain the unit cell parameters ofCy4BiBr7 at different pressures (Table S5, Supporting Information). The variations in cell parameters and cell volume of Cy4BiBr7 upon compression are displayed in Figure 4a and Figure S13, Supporting Information. It is obvious that the unit cell parameters and cell volume of Cy4BiBr7 were greatly reduced below 5.0 GPa. Above 5.0 GPa, the rate of reduction slows down. Notably, cell parameters and cell volume ofCy4BiBr7 were continuously compressed without collapses, which confirmed that Cy4BiBr7 did not undergo phase transition within the detection pressure range. More importantly, such structural evolutions correspond to the trend in the experimental measurements of emission enhancement.
Figure 4.

a) The lattice constants of Cy4BiBr7 as a function of pressure. b,c) Illustrations of the PIE mechanism associated with free excitons under ambient conditions and upon compression. Ground state (GS), free exciton (FE) state, self‐trapped exciton (STE) state, exciton transition energy (E ex), and free‐carrier (FC) state. d) Computed DOS at 0, 5.0, and 15.0 GPa. The inserts describe the changes in the local [BiBr6]3– octahedron upon compression: shortening of Bi—Br bonds and narrowing of Br—Bi—Br angles. The computed VBM and CBM are ambient conditions at e) 0 GPa, f) 5.0 GPa, and g) 15.0 GPa. The main components are the d orbitals of Bi and p orbitals of Br.
Through the above analysis, we can guess that there was relevance between the PIE of Cy4BiBr7 and the lattice shrinkage. Moreover, the low‐temperature SCXRD data under ambient conditions verified that lattice shrinkage induced the blue emission of Cy4BiBr7 (Figure S14, Supporting Information). As shown in Figure 1d, upon decreasing the temperature, the bond lengths and bond angles of the [BiBr6]3– octahedron changed with shrinkage of the lattice. The larger values of ∆d (Bi—Br bond length distortion) and δ 2 (BiBr6 octahedral angle variance) at low temperatures than RT intuitively reflected this change (see Supporting Information for details).[ 17 ] We found that the bismuth bromide octahedron in Cy4BiBr7 has a lesser structural distortion than other 0D OMHPs (Table S6, Supporting Information). This may be used to explain the small Stokes shift blue emission of Cy4BiBr7 at low temperature or high pressure. It should be noted that there was also no phase change between low temperatures and RT (Figure S15, Supporting Information). In metal halide perovskites, the distortion of the metal halide octahedron can improve exciton–phonon coupling, thereby activating PL.[ 18 ] Thus, the abovementioned PIE of Cy4BiBr7 at RT should originate from the slight distortion of the [BiBr6]3– octahedron upon compression.
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed to investigate the structural, electronic, and spectral properties of Cy4BiBr7. The [BiBr6]3– octahedra were separated to form 0D structure (Figure 4d) that could be altered under pressure. Upon compression to 5.0 GPa, the Bi—Br bond lengths were shortened from ≈2.80 Å under ambient conditions to 2.78 Å, and the Br—Bi—Br bond angles were narrowed by 4°. Upon further compression to 15.0 GPa, the Bi—Br bond length became even shorter at ≈2.70 Å, and the Br‐Bi‐Br angles decreased by 10° (Figure 4d). This analysis indicates that the observed PIE is from the local structural changes in the [BiBr6]3– octahedron. The electronic properties evolved with structural changes. The density of states (DOS, Figure 4d) of Cy4BiBr7 around the Fermi level mainly included the d orbitals of Bi atoms and p orbitals of Br atoms. Under ambient conditions, the valence band maximum (VBM) mainly encompassed the d orbitals of Bi and p orbitals of Br, and the conduction band minimum (CBM) was contributed by the d orbitals of Bi and p orbitals of the two Br atoms in each [BiBr6]3– octahedron (Figure 4e). Upon compression, the Bi—Br bond interactions strengthened and displayed large overlap at high pressures (Figure 4f,g). Another important feature is that the d orbitals of Bi that form CBM are relatively diffuse, and the majority of Br atoms in the [BiBr6]3– octahedron contribute to the CBM. Thus CBM upon compression in general shows better overlaps than under ambient conditions. Hence, the VBM moves upward and the CBM moves downward to the Fermi level under compression, and the band gaps gradually decrease (Figure 4d).
Based on the above results, we propose that the changes in the electronic properties are responsible for the PIE of Cy4BiBr7. Incident photons are absorbed by promoting electrons from the GS into higher energy excited states, including the FC state and FE state (Figure 4b). Under ambient conditions, the Bi—Br bonds are weak, and the lattice is characterized by weak electron–phonon coupling, which results in the bound excitons being readily detrapped from the STE state to the FE state by thermal activation, thus hindering emission. However, upon compression, the large CBM within the distorted octahedral motif can accommodate the STE state, and the strong Bi—Br bonds enhance electron–phonon coupling. Stable STE states are thus formed and enhance the emission intensity (Figure 4c).
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, we have designed and synthesized a Cy4BiBr7 crystal with a lead‐free 0D OMHP structure. Notably, by applying mild pressures, we were able to make originally nonluminescent crystals emit a bright blue color. Specifically, the pressure deformed the bismuth bromide octahedron, resulting in enhanced electron–phonon coupling. In situ high‐pressure ADXRD and Raman spectra, as well as the DFT results, further corroborate this PIE mechanism. Furthermore, the variable‐temperature SCXRD analysis supported this finding. Our work verifies the possibility of PL engineering in 0D lead‐free OMHPs with enhanced functionality through high‐pressure structural modulation. Additionally, our study provides a new avenue for exploiting high‐efficiency blue luminescence materials.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
Supporting Information
Acknowledgements
M.‐E.S. and T.G. contributed equally to this work. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (numbers 92061201, 21825106, 21725304, and 11774125), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M640681 and 2019T120632), the Program for Science and Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province (164100510005), the Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in Universities of Henan Province (19IRTSTHN022), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and Zhengzhou University
Sun M.‐E., Geng T., Yong X., Lu S., Ai L., Xiao G., Cai J., Zou B., Zang S.‐Q., Pressure‐Triggered Blue Emission of Zero‐Dimensional Organic Bismuth Bromide Perovskite. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2004853. 10.1002/advs.202004853
Contributor Information
Siyu Lu, Email: sylu2013@zzu.edu.cn.
Guanjun Xiao, Email: xguanjun@jlu.edu.cn.
Bo Zou, Email: zoubo@jlu.edu.cn.
Shuang‐Quan Zang, Email: zangsqzg@zzu.edu.cn.
Data Availability Statement
Research data are not shared.
References
- 1.a) Li W., Wang Z., Deschler F., Gao S., Friend R. H., Cheetham A. K., Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 16099; [Google Scholar]; b) Quan L. N., Rand B. P., Friend R. H., Mhaisalkar S. G., Lee T. W., Sargent E. H., Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 7444; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Stranks S. D., Snaith H. J., Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 391; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Lin J., Lai M., Dou L., Kley C. S., Chen H., Peng F., Sun J., Lu D., Hawks S. A., Xie C., Cui F., Alivisatos A. P., Limmer D. T., Yang P., Nat. Mater. 2018, 17, 261; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Liu Y., Cui J., Du K., Tian H., He Z., Zhou Q., Yang Z., Deng Y., Chen D., Zuo X., Ren Y., Wang L., Zhu H., Zhao B., Di D., Wang J., Friend R. H., Jin Y., Nat. Photonics 2019, 13, 760; [Google Scholar]; f) Fang T., Zhang F., Yuan S., Zeng H., Song J., InfoMat 2019, 1, 211; [Google Scholar]; g) Kumawat N. K., Liu X. K., Kabra D., Gao F., Nanoscale 2019, 11, 2109; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Jin Y., Wang Z. K., Yuan S., Wang Q., Qin C., Wang K. L., Dong C., Li M., Liu Y., Liao L. S., Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 30, 1908339; [Google Scholar]; i) Quan L. N., Garcia de Arquer F. P., Sabatini R. P., Sargent E. H., Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801996; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) Li Z., Chen Z., Yang Y., Xue Q., Yip H. L., Cao Y., Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1027; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; k) Sun J., Wu J., Tong X., Lin F., Wang Y., Wang Z. M., Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1700780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zhou C., Tian Y., Wang M., Rose A., Besara T., Doyle N. K., Yuan Z., Wang J. C., Clark R., Hu Y., Siegrist T., Lin S., Ma B., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2017, 56, 9018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lin H., Zhou C., Tian Y., Siegrist T., Ma B., ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 3, 54. [Google Scholar]
- 4.a) Saparov B., Mitzi D. B., Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 4558; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Li Q., Zhang L., Chen Z., Quan Z., J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 16089. [Google Scholar]
- 5.a) Bai F., Bian K., Huang X., Wang Z., Fan H., Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 7673; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Xiao G., Wang Y., Han D., Li K., Feng X., Lv P., Wang K., Liu L., Redfern S. A. T., Zou B., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 13970; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Wang Q., Zhang S., Wang B., Yang X., Zou B., Yang B., Lu S., Nanoscale Horiz. 2019, 4, 1227; [Google Scholar]; d) Yao Z. Q., Xu J., Zou B., Hu Z., Wang K., Yuan Y. J., Chen Y. P., Feng R., Xiong J. B., Hao J., Bu X. H., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2019, 58, 5614; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Huang X., Zhu J., Ge B., Deng K., Wu X., Xiao T., Jiang T., Quan Z., Cao Y. C., Wang Z., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 3198; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Li Q., Niu W., Liu X., Chen Y., Wu X., Wen X., Wang Z., Zhang H., Quan Z., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 15783; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Nagaoka Y., Hills‐Kimball K., Tan R., Li R., Wang Z., Chen O., Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606666; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Lu X., Wang Y., Stoumpos C. C., Hu Q., Guo X., Chen H., Yang L., Smith J. S., Yang W., Zhao Y., Xu H., Kanatzidis M. G., Jia Q., Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 8663; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Lin J., Chen H., Gao Y., Cai Y., Jin J., Etman A. S., Kang J., Lei T., Lin Z., Folgueras M. C., Quan L. N., Kong Q., Sherburne M., Asta M., Sun J., Toney M. F., Wu J., Yang P., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 23404; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) Yin T., Fang Y., Chong W. K., Ming K. T., Jiang S., Li X., Kuo J. L., Fang J., Sum T. C., White T. J., Yan J., Shen Z. X., Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705017; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; k) Yin T., Liu B., Yan J., Fang Y., Chen M., Chong W. K., Jiang S., Kuo J. L., Fang J., Liang P., Wei S., Loh K. P., Sum T. C., White T. J., Shen Z. X., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1235; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; l) Jaffe A., Lin Y., Mao W. L., Karunadasa H. I., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.a) Liang Y., Zang Y., Huang X., Tian C., Wang X., Cui T., J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 124, 8984; [Google Scholar]; b) Ma Z., Li F., Sui L., Shi Y., Fu R., Yuan K., Xiao G., Zou B., Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 8, 2000713; [Google Scholar]; c) Guo S., Zhao Y., Bu K., Fu Y., Luo H., Chen M., Hautzinger M. P., Wang Y., Jin S., Yang W., Lu X., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59, 17533; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Cao Y., Qi G., Sui L., Shi Y., Geng T., Zhao D., Wang K., Yuan K., Wu G., Xiao G., Lu S., Zou B., ACS Mater. Lett. 2020, 2, 381; [Google Scholar]; e) Xiao G., Cao Y., Qi G., Wang L., Liu C., Ma Z., Yang X., Sui Y., Zheng W., Zou B., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 10087; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Yuan Y., Liu X. F., Ma X., Wang X., Li X., Xiao J., Li X., Zhang H. L., Wang L., Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1900240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Zhang L., Wu L., Wang K., Zou B., Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1801628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.a) Jacobs P. W. M., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1991, 52, 35; [Google Scholar]; b) Morad V., Shynkarenko Y., Yakunin S., Brumberg A., Schaller R. D., Kovalenko M. V., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 9764; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Noculak A., Morad V., McCall K. M., Yakunin S., Shynkarenko Y., Worle M., Kovalenko M. V., Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 5118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hu H., Dong B., Zhang W., J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 11436. [Google Scholar]
- 10.a) Yang B., Chen J., Hong F., Mao X., Zheng K., Yang S., Li Y., Pullerits T., Deng W., Han K., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2017, 56, 12471; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zhang R., Mao X., Yang Y., Yang S., Zhao W., Wumaier T., Wei D., Deng W., Han K., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2019, 58, 2725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.a) Pious J. K., Muthu C., Dani S., Saeki A., Nair V. C., Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 2647; [Google Scholar]; b) Lou Y., Fang M., Chen J., Zhao Y., Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 3779; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Park B. W., Philippe B., Zhang X., Rensmo H., Boschloo G., Johansson E. M., Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 6806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lin H., Zhou C., Chaaban M., Xu L.‐J., Zhou Y., Neu J., Worku M., Berkwits E., He Q., Lee S., Lin X., Siegrist T., Du M.‐H., Ma B., ACS Mater. Lett. 2019, 1, 594. [Google Scholar]
- 13.a) McCall K. M., Stoumpos C. C., Kostina S. S., Kanatzidis M. G., Wessels B. W., Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 4129; [Google Scholar]; b) Zhang L., Liu C., Wang L., Liu C., Wang K., Zou B., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 11213; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Li Q., Yin L., Chen Z., Deng K., Luo S., Zou B., Wang Z., Tang J., Quan Z., Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Laane J., Jagodzinski P. W., Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 44. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Niemann R. G., Kontos A. G., Palles D., Kamitsos E. I., Kaltzoglou A., Brivio F., Falaras P., Cameron P. J., J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 2509. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kong L., Liu G., Gong J., Hu Q., Schaller R. D., Dera P., Zhang D., Liu Z., Yang W., Zhu K., Tang Y., Wang C., Wei S. H., Xu T., Mao H. K., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 8910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.a) Zhou L., Liao J. F., Huang Z. G., Wei J. H., Wang X. D., Chen H. Y., Kuang D. B., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2019, 58, 15435; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Chen D., Dai F., Hao S., Zhou G., Liu Q., Wolverton C., Zhao J., Xia Z., J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 7322. [Google Scholar]
- 18.a) Ma Z., Liu Z., Lu S., Wang L., Feng X., Yang D., Wang K., Xiao G., Zhang L., Redfern S. A. T., Zou B., Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4506; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ma Z., Li F., Zhao D., Xiao G., Zou B., CCS Chem. 2020, 2, 71; [Google Scholar]; c) Fang Y., Zhang L., Wu L., Yan J., Lin Y., Wang K., Mao W. L., Zou B., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2019, 58, 15249; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Shi Y., Ma Z., Zhao D., Chen Y., Cao Y., Wang K., Xiao G., Zou B., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 6504; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Li Q., Chen Z., Yang B., Tan L., Xu B., Han J., Zhao Y., Tang J., Quan Z., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 1786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting Information
Data Availability Statement
Research data are not shared.
