WCK 4282 (cefepime 2 g-tazobactam 2 g) maximizes systemic exposure of tazobactam and restores cefepime activity against various extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)- and cephalosporinase-producing strains in vitro. We describe clinical WCK 4282 exposure efficacies against various serine β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in a murine pneumonia model.
KEYWORDS: ESBL, Escherichia coli, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics
ABSTRACT
WCK 4282 (cefepime 2 g-tazobactam 2 g) maximizes systemic exposure of tazobactam and restores cefepime activity against various extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)- and cephalosporinase-producing strains in vitro. We describe clinical WCK 4282 exposure efficacies against various serine β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in a murine pneumonia model. Clinical cefepime-resistant isolates (17 Enterobacterales and 2 P. aeruginosa) were utilized. Isolates expressed ESBLs, cephalosporinases, and/or serine carbapenemases (KPC and OXA-48-like). WCK 4282 MICs were 4 to 32 μg/ml. For in vivo experiments, lungs of neutropenic mice were inoculated using standard inoculum (107 log10 CFU/ml). Serine carbapenemase-producing isolates were also assessed using a low inoculum (1:5 dilution). Treatment mice received a human-simulated regimen (HSR) of cefepime, meropenem (control for serine carbapenemase expression with low inoculum experiments), or WCK 4282 human-simulated regimens. Efficacy was assessed as change in log10 CFU/lungs at 24 h compared with 0-h controls. At standard inoculum, the mean 0-h bacterial burden was 6.65 ± 0.23 log10 CFU/lungs, and it increased at 24 h by 2.48 ± 0.60 log10 CFU/lungs among untreated controls. Initial bacterial burdens of lower inocula ranged from 5.81 ± 0.12 to 6.39 ± 0.13 log10 CFU/lungs. At standard and/or low inocula, cefepime and meropenem provided minimal activity. WCK 4282 produced a >1 log10 reduction against 9/9 ESBL-/cephalosporinase-producing strains. WCK 4282 provided variable activity among mice infected with standard or lower inocula of OXA-48-like-producers. WCK 4282 exposures provided 0.53 ± 1.07 log10 CFU/lungs growth against KPC producers at a standard inoculum versus bacteriostasis (−0.15 ± 0.54 change in log10 CFU/lungs) at a low inoculum. WCK 4282 produced potent in vivo activity against ESBL- and cephalosporinase-producing Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates and potential activity against OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales isolates in a neutropenic pneumonia model.
TEXT
Pneumonia is the largest contributor to infectious mortality due to difficulties in antimicrobial lung penetration and the incidence of multidrug resistance (1–3). Bacterial pneumonia is commonly caused by Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains that may harbor one or more extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), cephalosporinases, or carbapenemases (1–6). In fact, from 2012 to 2017, there has been a 53.3% increase in incidence in infections caused by ESBL-producing bacteria (7). Often, carbapenems will be initiated as therapy to treat pneumonia caused by ESBL-producing isolates; however, their use is associated with the emergence of carbapenemase-producing strains and increased drug resistance (8–11). Other available broad-spectrum antibiotics (i.e., ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and piperacillin-tazobactam) that can potentially treat pneumonia due to ESBL-producing isolates have mixed efficacy results (12–15). Moreover, the MERINO trial recently demonstrated the inferiority of piperacillin-tazobactam compared with meropenem treatment for ceftriaxone nonsusceptible Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (16). There is a clear need for a novel carbapenem-sparing antibiotic that can treat pneumonia caused by ESBL-producing isolates.
WCK 4282 (cefepime 2 g-tazobactam 2 g, administered every 8 h as a 1.5-h infusion) is an antibiotic that has shown potent activity against penicillinase-, cephalosporinase-, and ESBL-harboring Gram-negative bacteria in vitro (17). Additional in vitro studies have shown the potential utility of WCK 4282 against OXA-48-like-producing and KPC-producing isolates; however, there are sparse data in vivo (18, 19). Given the promising in vitro “carbapenem-like” spectrum of WCK 4282, we sought to evaluate WCK 4282 efficacy against serine β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates in a neutropenic murine lung infection model.
(This data was presented virtually at IDWeek 2020.)
RESULTS
Human-simulated plasma pharmacokinetic studies.
The free antibiotic time above the MIC (fT>MIC), the free area under the concentration-time curve (fAUC), and the maximum free antibiotic concentration (fCmax) achieved with the murine cefepime and tazobactam human-simulated regimens (HSRs) were comparable to those achieved in healthy volunteers receiving cefepime-tazobactam (2 g/2 g) every 8 h as a 1.5 h infusion (Table 1). The murine cefepime HSR regimen consisted of 16, 18.5, 8, and 4 mg/kg doses at 0, 1, 3.5, and 5.75 h during each 8 h interval as monotherapy and in combination with tazobactam. The tazobactam component consisted of one 20 mg/kg dose given at 0 h during each 8-h interval. Confirmatory pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that the observed concentrations were equivalent to the simulated regimens for cefepime as monotherapy, as well as to cefepime and tazobactam in combination (Fig. 1).
TABLE 1.
Comparison of predicted pharmacodynamic index (%fT>MIC) in healthy volunteers and murine human-simulated regimens (HSR)
| Drug | Regime |
%fT>MIC (μg/ml) |
fAUC (mg · h/liter) | fCmax (μg/ml) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 | 128 | ||||
| Cefepime | Human, 2 g | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 97 | 67 | 38 | 9 | 0 | 730 | 79 |
| Murine HSR | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 93 | 63 | 33 | 10 | 0 | 703 | 75 | |
| Tazobactam | Human, 2 g | 100 | 100 | 89 | 73 | 58 | 45 | 34 | 23 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 223 | 39 |
| Murine HSR | 95 | 85 | 75 | 65 | 55 | 45 | 34 | 24 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 222 | 39 | |
FIG 1.
Observed murine free cefepime plasma concentration (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) for WCK 4282 human-simulated regimen (HSR) and cefepime HSR compared with the expected human and murine exposures. (A) cefepime alone and in the presence of tazobactam, and (B) tazobactam in the presence of cefepime.
Standard and low in vivo efficacy studies.
Starting average 0-h bacterial burden (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) for the standard inoculum experiments was 6.65 ± 0.23 log10 CFU/lungs across all isolates. Bacterial burdens increased to 9.13 ± 0.59 log10 CFU/lungs in the 24-h controls. For the ESBL/cephalosporin-producing strains, the change in the bacterial burdens after 24 h among control, cefepime HSR, and WCK 4282 HSR groups is shown in Fig. 2. The bacterial densities among the ESBL/cephalosporinase-producing E. coli increased by 2.12 ± 0.82 log10 CFU/lungs after cefepime HSR exposure. Comparatively, WCK 4282 HSR produced a potent −2.70 ± 0.63 (range, −1.80 ± 0.48 to −3.27 ± 0.42) log10 CFU/lungs average reduction in bacterial burden against the same isolates. WCK 4282 HSR achieved at least 1 log10 and 2 log10 reductions against 7 and 6 of the 7 examined ESBL-producing E. coli isolates, respectively. For ESBL-/AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa isolates, cefepime and WCK 4282 exposures resulted in average bacterial burden reductions of −0.23 ± 1.01 and −2.04 ± 0.18 log10 CFU/lungs, respectively.
FIG 2.
Change in bacterial density (mean ± SD) at 24 h for mice receiving control, cefepime HSR, and WCK 4282 HSR for isolates harboring various ESBLs and/or cephalosporinases for E. coli and P. aeruginosa.
Starting 0-h bacterial burden for OXA-48-like-producing isolates using the standard inoculum ranged from 6.54 ± 0.18 to 6.83 ± 0.17 log10 CFU/lungs. Averaged observed changes in bacterial density after cefepime HSR and WCK 4282 HSR exposures were 1.58 ± 0.93 and −0.11 ± 0.76 log10 CFU/lungs, respectively (Fig. 3) with only 1 isolate achieving a >1 log10 reduction. In the KPC-producing isolates, the standard starting 0-h inoculum ranged from 6.49 ± 0.30 to 7.02 ± 0.16 log10 CFU/lungs. Modest WCK 4282 activity (0.53 ± 1.07 log10 CFU/lungs average growth) was observed compared with that in the cefepime HSR counterpart (2.08 ± 0.59 log10 CFU/lungs average growth), as shown in Fig. 4.
FIG 3.
Change in bacterial density (mean ± SD) at 24 h for mice receiving control, cefepime HSR, WCK 4282 HSR, and meropenem HSR for isolates harboring an OXA-48-like enzyme with or without ESBLs/cephalosporinases for standard and low inocula.
FIG 4.
Change in bacterial density (mean ± SD) at 24 h for mice receiving control, cefepime HSR, WCK 4282 HSR, and meropenem HSR for isolates harboring KPC with or without ESBLs for standard and low inocula.
Three isolates (EC 734, ECL 123, and EA 59) were excluded from the low-inoculum studies due to inadequate isolate fitness resulting in the inability of these isolates to induce infection at the low starting bacterial burden, as evidenced by the lack of bacterial growth among the control groups. The ranges of the 0-h bacterial burden for the lower inoculum among the OXA-48-like- and KPC-producing isolates were 5.82 ± 0.37 to 6.39 ± 0.13 and 5.81 ± 0.12 to 6.18 ± 0.30 log10 CFU/lungs, respectively. For the OXA-48-like-producing isolates, the observed increases in bacterial burden were 0.94 ± 1.20 and 0.83 ± 1.13 log10 CFU/lungs after cefepime and meropenem HSR exposures, respectively. On the other hand, the WCK 4282 HSR exhibited greater activity with the lower inoculum relative to that with the standard inoculum; the average reduction in bacterial burden was −1.16 ± 0.22 log10 CFU/lungs (Fig. 3). For KPC-producing isolates at the lower inoculum, similar growth was seen between cefepime (1.79 ± 0.12 log10 CFU/lungs) and meropenem (1.78 ± 0.79 log10 CFU/lungs) HSR groups (Fig. 4). Consistent with the findings from the experiments with the standard inoculums, modest and variable degrees of in vivo activity was observed with WCK 4282 HSR (−0.15 ± 0.54 log10 CFU/lungs average reduction).
DISCUSSION
For years, the empirical antibiotic workhorse for bacterial pneumonia infections has been piperacillin-tazobactam; however, with the rising incidence of Gram-negative bacteria expressing different variants of ESBLs, there is a clear need for empirical therapy replacement. Other potential options, such as carbapenems, may be effective treatment options, but they are associated with long-term multidrug-resistant repercussions. Choosing an appropriate empirical option is key to improving patient outcomes. A retrospective study by Cheng and colleagues evaluated the risk factors associated with increased mortality for ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae bacteremic pneumonia among 111 patients (20). Using univariate and multivariate analyses, severe sepsis, critical illness, and the presence of rapidly fatal underlying disease were found to be associated with increased 30-day mortality. On the other hand, selecting appropriate empirical therapy was associated with a decrease in mortality for the univariate (odds ratio [OR], 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09 to 0.49) and the multivariate (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.55) analyses. Other studies reported similar findings (21, 22), which further highlights the need for novel empirical therapies for the successful management of the infection due to ESBL phenotypes.
In our study, we evaluated a variety of ESBL-/cephalosporinase-producing E. coli and ESBL-producing/AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa isolates. The results show, using plasma exposures, that WCK 4282 exhibited potent in vivo activity against all the examined isolates, including the ceftolozane–tazobactam-, and piperacillin–tazobactam-resistant phenotypes. The addition of high-dose tazobactam restored cefepime activity by effectively inhibiting the ESBL variant enzymes, often contributing to increased cefepime MICs, as evidenced by the lower WCK 4282 MICs (17, 19). The cefepime component of WCK 4282 was pharmacodynamically optimized to achieve its pharmacodynamic target of fT>MIC of 50 to 70% for isolates with MICs of up to 16 μg/ml relative to the combination (WCK 4282) MIC (23). Thus, our in vivo observations corroborate these findings by demonstrating potent WCK 4282 efficacy against ESBL- and cephalosporinase-producing E. coli and P. aeruginosa isolates, with WCK 4282 MICs of up to 16 μg/ml. WCK 4282 could potentially be considered as a carbapenem-sparing empirical antibiotic for bacterial pneumonia infections.
Unlike ESBL-producing organisms, variable WCK 4282 efficacy was observed with OXA-48-like-producing isolates at a standard inoculum. Although only 1 isolate was able to achieve a >1 log10 CFU/lungs reduction after WCK4282 HSR exposure, all 6 isolates had suppressive growth. Infections caused by OXA-48-like-producing organisms continue to burden North African and European countries (24). While there are several novel antibiotics targeting KPC-producing bacteria, a few possess activity against OXA-48-like enzymes. Theoretically, both ceftazidime and cefepime are stable in the presence of OXA-48-like enzymes; however, when paired with ESBL enzymes, both antibiotics are rendered ineffective (24–26). The addition of tazobactam can potentially enhance cefepime activity when in the presence of OXA-48-like and ESBL enzymes. While some bacterial reductions were observed with the WCK HSR compared with the cefepime HSR against the OXA-48-like-producing strains, the efficacy observed against the majority of the strains examined in our in vivo studies at the standard inoculum did not achieve a degree that would be predictive of clinical cure. On the other hand, enhanced bacterial killing was observed when a lower inoculum of the OXA-48-like-producing organisms was utilized to induce infection. Interestingly, WCK 4282 had a >1 log10 CFU/lungs reduction with 3/4 of the OXA-48-like-producing isolates, despite isolate growth in the presence of meropenem and cefepime HSR exposures. In particular, the growth under a meropenem HSR points toward efficient expression of serine carbapenemases, even at a relatively lower infecting load. The observed activity with WCK 4282 with lower-bacterial-burden infections is likely attributed to the high-dose cefepime and tazobactam in the combination, which could overcome the lower magnitudes of ESBL and OXA-48-like production. Thus, the results from our studies provide evidence that WCK 4282 could have a place in therapy for OXA-48-like-producing strains in clinical scenarios where lower inoculum and high drug concentrations would predominate, such as complicated urinary tract infections or complicated intra-abdominal infection with good source control.
For KPC-producing isolates, there is some literature suggesting that pairing tazobactam to cefepime is synergistic and enhances cefepime activity, which allows for the treatment of KPC-producing isolates. At both the standard and the low inocula, the addition of tazobactam to cefepime had a suppressive effect on KPC-producing isolates (∼0.5 log10 CFU/lungs growth and net stasis); however, this did not translate into efficacy against this infection entity. The results from our in vivo observations, together with the lack of reduction in the MIC when cefepime is combined with tazobactam (Table 2), are consistent with the findings from previously published studies that demonstrated the instability of tazobactam in the presence of KPC-type β-lactamases (27).
TABLE 2.
Isolates included in neutropenic murine lung infection model in vivo efficacy studies and their respective MICs
| β-lactamase class | Isolatea | Genotype | MIC (μg/ml)b |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cefepime | WCK 4282 (TZBc 8 μg/ml) | Piperacillin-tazobactam | Ceftolozane-tazobactam | Meropenem | Imipenem | |||
| ESBL and/or cephalosporinase | EC 741 | Not determined | >128 | 4 | >128 | 32 | 0.12 | 0.25 |
| EC 739 | MIR-1/ACT-1, DHA-1/DHA-2, CTX-M GR-1 | >128 | 4 | 64 | 32 | 0.06 | 0.5 | |
| EC 737 | CMY, TEM | >128 | 8 | >128 | >128 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
| EC 731 | TEM, PBP3 insert | >128 | 8 | >128 | 64 | 0.12 | 0.5 | |
| EC 732 | CTX-M Gr-1/2, PBP3 insert | >128 | 8 | >128 | 64 | 0.06 | 0.12 | |
| EC 740 | CMY, TEM | >128 | 8 | >128 | 64 | 0.06 | 0.25 | |
| EC 728 | CMY, TEM, PBP3 insert | 64 | 16 | >128 | >128 | 0.06 | 1 | |
| PSA 1881 | AmpC, VEB | >128 | 16 | 16 | >128 | 2 | 1 | |
| PSA 1882 | AmpC, VEB, CTX-M, OXA-1, OXA-2 | >128 | 16 | 16 | >128 | 16 | 16 | |
| KPC | EA 59 | KPC, TEM | 16 | 16 | >128 | 16 | 32 | 32 |
| KP 909 | KPC-3, SHV, TEM | 32 | 16 | >128 | 128 | 8 | 16 | |
| KP 910 | KPC, SHV, TEM | 32 | 16 | >128 | >128 | 8 | 16 | |
| KP 906 | KPC, SHV, TEM | 32 | 32 | >128 | 128 | 16 | 16 | |
| OXA-48-like | KP 813 | OXA-48, CTXM-15, TEM-1, SHV-12 | >512 | 8 | NA | NA | 4 | NA |
| KP 733 | OXA-48, CTXM-15, TEM-1, SHV-12 | >512 | 8 | NA | NA | 4 | NA | |
| EC 734 | OXA-48/181, TEM, PBP3 insert | >128 | 8 | >128 | 128 | 1 | 1 | |
| KP 911 | OXA-181, CMY, SHV, TEM, CTXM Gr-1 | 64 | 16 | >128 | 128 | 32 | 8 | |
| KP 908 | OXA-181, CTXM Gr-1, CMY, SHV | 128 | 16 | >128 | >128 | 32 | 8 | |
| ECL 123 | OXA-48, CTXM-15, ACT, TEM-OSBL | >512 | 64 | NA | NA | 4 | NA | |
EC, E. coli; PSA, P. aeruginosa; EA, Enterobacter aerogenes (now Klebsiella aerogenes); KP, Klebsiella pneumoniae; ECL, Enterobacter cloacae.
NA, not available.
TZB, tazobactam.
WCK 4282 efficacy was previously evaluated in a neutropenic thigh infection model using the same isolates examined in the current investigation (C. G. Gill, K. Abdelraouf, and D. P. Nicolau, unpublished data). In the thigh infection model, 6 of the 7 ESBL-/cephalosporinase-producing isolates achieved a >1 log10 CFU/lungs reduction upon the administration of WCK 4282 human-simulated exposure. Similarly to the lung model, 3 of the OXA-48-like-producing isolates examined had variable suppressive growth with WCK 4282, whereas minimal suppressive activity was observed among the KPC-producing isolates. Thus, the parallel observations across two different infection models substantiate the utility of WCK 4282 for the treatment for ESBL and cephalosporinase producers, as well as its potential role for the management of low acute clinical infection due to OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales.
In summary, infection caused by serine β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales spp. and P. aeruginosa continues to be problematic, especially bacterial pneumonia. WCK 4282 is a pharmacodynamically optimized treatment that has shown efficacy against ESBL-producing E. coli and P. aeruginosa up to an MIC of 16 μg/ml, with potential to treat OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales in lower-bacterial-burden infections. The in vivo potency of WCK 4282 using achievable human exposures suggests that this compound may play an important carbapenem-sparing role in the management of select β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ethics.
All animal experiments were conducted in concordance with the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences standards. The study protocol (no. HHC-2019-0112) was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Hartford Hospital (assurance no. A3185-01).
Antimicrobial test agents.
Commercially available cefepime (lots 108175c and 108011c; WG Critical Care, Paramus, NJ) and meropenem (lot 008D91; Fresenenius Kabi, Lake Zurich, IL) 1-g vials and analytical grade tazobactam (lot 05/08, MicroConstants, Inc.; San Diego, CA; lot 89786-04-09; Ambeed, Inc., Arlington Heights, IL) were used for in vivo experiments. Cefepime and meropenem were diluted in concordance with the package insert and further diluted to the desired final concentrations in normal saline (NS). Tazobactam doses were reconstituted and diluted in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer. All doses were administered subcutaneously as a final volume of 0.1 ml.
Isolates.
Prior to study, all isolates were stored frozen at −80°C in skim milk. Isolates were subcultured twice on Trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood (Becton, Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD) and incubated at 37°C for 18 to 24 h. A total of 19 clinical Enterobacterales (n = 17) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2) isolates were included for in vivo studies. The expressed β-lactamases and broth microdilution MICs of each strain are reported in Table 2. In total, 7 E. coli isolates used in experiments harbored one or more ESBL and/or cephalosporinase among other non-ESBL-type β-lactamases (TEM, n = 4; CTX-M, n = 2; CMY, n = 2; MIR-1/ACT-1 and/or DHA-1/DHA-2, n = 1; genotype not determined, n = 1). These E. coli isolates were cefepime, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and piperacillin-tazobactam resistant according to CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints (28, 29). The 2 P. aeruginosa isolates harbored at least one ESBL, plus AmpC-overproduction (CTX-M, n = 1; VEB, n = 2; OXA-1/OXA-2, n = 1). Both P. aeruginosa were cefepime and ceftolozane-tazobactam resistant according to CLSI breakpoints (28) and were cefepime, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and piperacillin-tazobactam resistant according to EUCAST breakpoints (29). Four Klebsiella pneumoniae, one E. coli, and one Enterobacter cloacae isolate harbored an OXA-48-like enzyme with expression of additional β-lactamases (TEM, n = 5; CTX-M, n = 5; CMY, n = 2, ACT, n = 1; SHV, n = 4). The remaining Enterobacterales isolates (K. pneumoniae, n = 3 and Enterobacter aerogenes [Klebsiella aerogenes], n = 1) harbored a KPC with additional TEM- and/or SHV-derived enzymes.
Animals.
Specific pathogen-free, female, CD-1 mice (20 to 22 g) were obtained from Charles River Laboratories, Inc. (Raleigh, NC). All animals were allowed to acclimatize for 48 h prior to study procedures and were housed in groups of six animals at controlled room temperature in HEPA-filtered cages (Innovive, San Diego, CA). Cages were supplemented with paper nesting material for enrichment purposes. Study rooms were maintained with diurnal cycles (12 h light/12 h dark), and food and water were provided ad libitum. Monitoring was conducted three times daily for signs of morbidity; mice were euthanized if found moribund and tissues were harvested.
Neutropenic lung infection model.
Mice in all experiments were prepared as follows. To induce neutropenia, cyclophosphamide 250 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) on days −4 and −1, respectively. To aid in developing the human-simulated regimens, a predictable degree of renal impairment was produced using 5 mg/kg of uranyl nitrate administered i.p. on day −3 (30). Mice were anaesthetized with isoflurane and inoculated intranasally with 0.05 ml of 107 to 108 CFU/ml (or 106 to 107 for lower-inoculum studies) bacterial suspensions in NS with mucin 3% (wt/vol). After anesthesia, mice recovered in an O2-enriched chamber, then randomized to treatment or control groups.
Human simulated plasma pharmacokinetic studies.
A human-simulated regimen (HSR) was developed to simulate cefepime-tazobactam plasma pharmacokinetics of intravenous (i.v.) WCK 4282 (2 g/2 g every 8 h [q8h] administered over 1.5 h) based on a previous healthy volunteer study (31). Murine dosing regimens were developed using previously estimated pharmacokinetic parameters of cefepime (volume of the central compartment, 0.1460728 liters/kg; absorption constant, 1.4015008 h−1; elimination constant, 1.3485326 h−1 and tazobactam (volume of the central compartment, 0.33343189 liters/kg; absorption constant, 3.0973355 h−1; elimination constant, 0.85528953 h−1 from prior murine infection model studies in Phoenix WinNonlin (Centera, Princeton, NJ) (32, 33).
Following simulation, confirmatory pharmacokinetic experiments were conducted for cefepime monotherapy, as well as for cefepime and tazobactam combination, to demonstrate that the observed concentrations were comparable to the derived HSR profiles. Mice were prepared for pharmacokinetic experiments as described above. Groups of six mice per time point were euthanized by terminal cardiac puncture following CO2 asphyxiation. Blood samples were collected at six time points (0.75 h, 1.5 h, 2.5 h, 3.75 h, 5 h, and 7 [or 7.5] h). Blood was collected in sodium-fluoride EDTA tubes (Becton, Dickinson and Co.) and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 8°C. Separated plasma was stored at −80°C until drugs concentrations were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method previously described (C. G. Gill et al., unpublished data). Free drug human and murine studies were corrected for cefepime (humans, 20%; mice, 0%) and tazobactam (humans, 30%; mice, 25%) protein binding (34, 35).
Standard and low inoculum in vivo efficacy studies.
Standard inoculum efficacy studies were conducted as follows. Two hours after inoculation, one group of six mice per isolate was sacrificed using CO2 asphxyation followed by cervical dislocation. The remaining groups received one of the following regimens for 24 h: WCK 4282 HSR, cefepime HSR, or a normal saline control administered at the same frequency as the WCK 4282 regimen. Following 24 h of treatment, the mice were sacrificed using the same methods stated above. The lungs were aseptically harvested and homogenized in NS. Lung homogenates were serially diluted onto Trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood plates, and the colony counts (CFU/lungs) were determined after overnight incubation. Efficacy was assessed by the change in log10 CFU/lungs from the 0-h control and reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Similarly to previous studies, a >1 log10 CFU/lungs reduction in bacterial burden was used as a surrogate to predict efficacy in humans (36–38).
Low-inoculum lung infection studies were conducted for 3 of the 4 KPC- and 4 of the 6 OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales isolates in a similar fashion as stated above, with a few exceptions. For one, the bacterial inoculums were subjected to a 1:5 dilution relative to the standard inoculum. Furthermore, in order to demonstrate adequate carbapenemase in vivo activity for mice infected with the lower inoculum, an additional group per isolate was administered a previously determined HSR of meropenem simulating a 1 g q8h 30-min infusion to serve as a negative control (39). All other dosing groups, harvesting techniques, and assessments of efficacy were conducted in the same fashion as described for the standard inoculum experiments.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We recognize Alissa Padgett, Charlie Cote, Deborah Santini, Janice Cunningham, Elias Mullane, Courtney Bouchard, Jennifer Tabor-Rennie, Rebecca Stewart, Nicole DeRosa, Lauren McLellan, Elizabeth Cyr, Elizabeth Martin, Olesya Slipchuk, Christian Gill, Iris Chen, Sergio Reyes, Christina Sutherland, and Julio Rodriguez from the Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development for their vital assistance in this study.
This project was funded by Wockhardt Bio AG, Switzerland.
The funder provided financial support and did not exercise control over the conduct or reporting of the research.
D.P.N. served as a consultant or speaker’s bureau member or has received research funding from Allergan, Bayer, Cepheid, Merck, Melinta, Pfizer, Wockhardt, Shionogi, Tetraphase. M.J.L. and K.A. have no conflicts to declare.
REFERENCES
- 1.Cilloniz C, Martin-Loeches I, Garcia-Vidal C, San Jose A, Torres A. 2016. Microbial etiology of pneumonia: epidemiology, diagnosis and resistance patterns. Int J Molecular Science 17:2120. doi: 10.3390/ijms17122120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Giuliano KK, Baker D, Quinn B. 2018. The epidemiology of nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia in the United States. Am J Infect Control 46:322–327. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ramirez JA, Wiemken TL, Peyrani P, Arnold FW, Kelley R, Mattingly WA, Nakamatsu R, Pena S, Guinn BE, Furmanek SP, Persaud AK, Raghuram A, Fernandez F, Beavin L, Bosson R, Fernandez-Botran R, Cavallazzi R, Bordon J, Valdivieso C, Schulte J, Carrico RM, for the University of Louisville Pneumonia Study Group. 2017. Adults hospitalized with pneumonia in the United States: incidence, epidemiology, and mortality. Clin Infect Dis 65:1806–1812. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Doi Y, Iovleva A, Bonomo RA. 2017. The ecology of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) in the developed world. J Travel Med 24:S44–S51. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taw102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vincent J-L, Sakr Y, Singer M, Martin-Loeches I, Machado FR, Marshall JC, Finfer S, Pelosi P, Brazzi L, Aditianingsih D, Timsit J-F, Du B, Wittebole X, Máca J, Kannan S, Gorordo-Delsol LA, De Waele JJ, Mehta Y, Bonten MJM, Khanna AK, Kollef M, Human M, Angus DC, EPIC III Investigators. 2020. Prevalence and outcomes of infection among patients in intensive care units in 2017. JAMA 323:1478–1487. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Watkins RR, Van Duin D. 2019. Current trends in the treatment of pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. F1000Res 8(F1000 Faculty Rev):121. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.16517.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jernigan JA, Hatfield KM, Wolford H, Nelson RE, Olubajo B, Reddy SC, McCarthy N, Paul P, McDonald LC, Kallen A, Fiore A, Craig M, Baggs J. 2020. Multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in U.S. hospitalized patients, 2012–2017. N Engl J Med 382:1309–1319. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cao J, Song W, Gu B, Mei Y, Tang J, Meng L, Yang C, Wang H, Zhou H. 2013. Correlation between carbapenem consumption and antimicrobial resistance rates of Acinetobacter baumannii in a university-affiliated hospital in China. J Clin Pharmacol 53:96–102. doi: 10.1177/0091270011435988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kazmierczak KM, de Jonge BLM, Stone GG, Sahm DF. 2020. Longitudinal analysis of ESBL and carbapenemase carriage among Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected in Europe as part of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) global surveillance programme, 2013–17. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:1165–1173. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McLaughlin M, Advincula MR, Malczynski M, Qi C, Bolon M, Scheetz MH. 2013. Correlations of antibiotic use and carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:5131–5133. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00607-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Musicha P, Cornick JE, Bar-Zeev N, French N, Masesa C, Denis B, Kennedy N, Mallewa J, Gordon MA, Msefula CL, Heyderman RS, Everett DB, Feasey NA. 2017. Trends in antimicrobial resistance in bloodstream infection isolates at a large urban hospital in Malawi (1998–2016): a surveillance study. Lancet Infectious Diseases 17:1042–1052. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30394-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee SY, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. 2007. Cefepime pharmacodynamics in patients with extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and non-ESBL infections. J Infection 54:463–468. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2006.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Palacios-Baena ZR, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez B, Calbo E, Almirante B, Viale P, Oliver A, Pintado V, Gasch O, Martínez-Martínez L, Pitout J, Akova M, Peña C, Molina Gil-Bermejo J, Hernández A, Venditti M, Prim N, Bou G, Tacconelli E, Tumbarello M, Hamprecht A, Giamarellou H, Almela M, Pérez F, Schwaber MJ, Bermejo J, Lowman W, Hsueh P-R, Paño-Pardo JR, Torre-Cisneros J, Souli M, Bonomo RA, Carmeli Y, Paterson DL, Pascual Á, Rodríguez-Baño J, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI)/European Study Group of Bloodstream Infections and Sepsis (ESGBIS)/INCREMENT Group. 2017. Empiric therapy with carbapenem-sparing regimens for bloodstream infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: results from the INCREMENT cohort. Clin Infect Dis 65:1615–1623. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tamma PD, Rodriguez-Bano J. 2017. The use of noncarbapenem β-lactams for the treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamase infections. Clin Infect Dis 64:972–980. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wilson APR. 2017. Sparing carbapenem usage. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:2410–2417. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Harris PNA, Tambyah PA, Lye DC, Mo Y, Lee TH, Yilmaz M, Alenazi TH, Arabi Y, Falcone M, Bassetti M, Righi E, Rogers BA, Kanj S, Bhally H, Iredell J, Mendelson M, Boyles TH, Looke D, Miyakis S, Walls G, Al Khamis M, Zikri A, Crowe A, Ingram P, Daneman N, Griffin P, Athan E, Lorenc P, Baker P, Roberts L, Beatson SA, Peleg AY, Harris-Brown T, Paterson DL, MERINO Trial Investigators and the Australasian Society for Infectious Disease Clinical Research Network (ASID-CRN). 2018. Effect of piperacillin-tazobactam vs meropenem on 30-day mortality for patients with E coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection and ceftriaxone resistance: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 320:984–994. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Livermore DM, Mushtaq S, Warner M, Turner SJ, Woodford N. 2018. Potential of high-dose cefepime/tazobactam against multiresistant Gram-negative pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother 73:126–133. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Castanheira M, Duncan LR, Rhomberg PR, Sader HS. 2017. Enhanced activity of cefepime-tazobactam (WCK 4282) against KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae when tested in media supplemented with human serum or sodium chloride. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 89:305–309. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sader HS, Castanheira M, Mendes RE, Flamm RK, Jones RN. 2017. Antimicrobial activity of high-proportion cefepime-tazobactam (WCK 4282) against a large number of Gram-negative isolates collected worldwide in 2014. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02409-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02409-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cheng W-L, Hsueh P-R, Lee C-C, Li C-W, Li M-J, Chang C-M, Lee N-Y, Ko W-C. 2016. Bacteremic pneumonia caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: appropriateness of empirical treatment matters. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 49:208–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2014.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tacconelli E, Cataldo MA, Mutters NT, Carrara E, Bartoloni A, Raglio A, Cauda R, Mantengoli E, Luzzaro F, Pan A, Beccara LA, Pecile P, Tinelli M, Rossolini GM. 2019. Role of place of acquisition and inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy on the outcome of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 54:49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tumbarello M, Spanu T, Di Bidino R, Marchetti M, Ruggeri M, Trecarichi EM, De Pascale G, Proli EM, Cauda R, Cicchetti A, Fadda G. 2010. Costs of bloodstream infections caused by Escherichia coli and influence of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase production and inadequate initial antibiotic therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:4085–4091. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00143-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Craig WA. 1998. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis 26:1–10; quiz 11–12. doi: 10.1086/516284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kidd JM, Livermore DM, Nicolau DP. 2020. The difficulties of identifying and treating Enterobacterales with OXA-48-like carbapenemases. Clin Microbiol Infect 26:401–403. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pitout JDD, Peirano G, Kock MM, Strydom K-A, Matsumura Y. 2019. the global ascendency of OXA-48-type carbapenemases. Clin Microbiol Rev 33:e00102-19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00102-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stewart A, Harris P, Henderson A, Paterson D. 2018. Treatment of infections by OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01195-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01195-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Papp-Wallace KM, Bethel CR, Distler AM, Kasuboski C, Taracila M, Bonomo RA. 2010. Inhibitor resistance in the KPC-2 beta-lactamase, a preeminent property of this class A beta-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:890–897. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00693-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2020. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 30th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 29.The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 2020. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters, version 10.0. http://www.eucast.org.
- 30.Nicolau DP, Onyeji CO, Zhong M, Tessier PR, Banevicius MA, Nightingale CH. 2000. Pharmacodynamic assessment of cefprozil against Streptococcus pneumoniae: implications for breakpoint determinations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1291–1295. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.5.1291-1295.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bhatia A, Chugh R, Gupta M. 2016. Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of WCK 4282 (FEP-TAZ) in healthy subjects. Abstr 26th Euro Congress Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, Amsterdam, Netherlands, abstr 4396, p 1260. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Basel, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Abdelraouf K, Chavda KD, Satlin MJ, Jenkins SG, Kreiswirth BN, Nicolau DP. 2020. Piperacillin-tazobactam-resistant/third-generation cephalosporin-susceptible Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates: resistance mechanisms and in vitro-in vivo discordance. Int J Antimicrobial Agents 55:105885. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Monogue ML, Tsuji M, Yamano Y, Echols R, Nicolau DP. 2017. Efficacy of humanized exposures of cefiderocol (S-649266) against a diverse population of Gram-negative bacteria in a murine thigh infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01022-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01022-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Melchers MJ, Mavridou E, Seyedmousavi S, van Mil AC, Lagarde C, Mouton JW. 2015. Plasma and epithelial lining fluid pharmacokinetics of ceftolozane and tazobactam alone and in combination in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:3373–3376. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04402-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Melchers MJ, van Mil AC, Lagarde C, den Hartigh J, Mouton JW. 2017. Pharmacodynamics of cefepime combined with tazobactam against clinically relevant Enterobacteriaceae in a neutropenic mouse thigh model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00267-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00267-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Abdelraouf K, Stainton SM, Nicolau DP. 2019. In vivo pharmacodynamic profile of ceftibuten-clavulanate combination against extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the murine thigh infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00145-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00145-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bulitta JB, Hope WW, Eakin AE, Guina T, Tam VH, Louie A, Drusano GL, Hoover JL. 2019. Generating robust and informative nonclinical in vitro and in vivo bacterial infection model efficacy data to support translation to humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e02307-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02307-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wiskirchen DE, Crandon JL, Furtado GH, Williams G, Nicolau DP. 2011. In vivo efficacy of a human-simulated regimen of ceftaroline combined with NXL104 against extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and non-ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3220–3225. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00024-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.DeRyke CA, Banevicius MA, Fan HW, Nicolau DP. 2007. Bactericidal activities of meropenem and ertapenem against extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a neutropenic mouse thigh model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:1481–1486. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00752-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




