The ability of vancomycin-arginine (V-r) to extend the spectrum of activity of glycopeptides to Gram-negative bacteria was investigated. Its MIC toward Escherichia coli, including β-lactamase expressing Ambler classes A, B, and D, was 8 to 16 μg/ml.
KEYWORDS: Escherichia coli, Gram-negative bacteria, antibiotic resistance, arginine, cationic peptides, multidrug resistance, vancomycin conjugate
ABSTRACT
The ability of vancomycin-arginine (V-r) to extend the spectrum of activity of glycopeptides to Gram-negative bacteria was investigated. Its MIC towards Escherichia coli, including β-lactamase expressing Ambler classes A, B, and D, was 8 to 16 μg/ml. Addition of 8 times the MIC of V-r to E. coli was acutely bactericidal and associated with a low frequency of resistance (<2.32 × 10−10). In vivo, V-r markedly reduced E. coli burden by >7 log10 CFU/g in a thigh muscle model. These data warrant further development of V-r in combatting E. coli, including resistant forms.
INTRODUCTION
Novel antibiotics are desperately needed to combat priority 1 or urgent-threat pathogens (1–3). With only four new classes of antibiotics introduced into the market since the early 1960s (4), structural modifications of current antibiotics provide an attractive and possibly speedier approach to fulfill this significant unmet clinical need. Vancomycin is a standard-of-care glycopeptide antibiotic for the treatment of Gram-positive infections (5). Numerous reports have demonstrated augmentation of its antimicrobial activity against resistant strains via different chemical modifications (6–9). Furthermore, its molecular structure has been successfully manipulated to create a broader spectrum of activity in the targeting of Gram-negative bacteria via adjuvant, formulation, and cationic/lipophilic interventions (10, 11) or synergy with existing Gram-negative antibiotics (12, 13). Recently, the covalent conjugation of l-arginine to vancomycin, to produce vancomycin-l-arginine (V-R), led to promising Gram-negative properties via a cell wall mode of action (14). These findings encouraged us to further characterize the corresponding diastereomer vancomycin-d-arginine (V-r) in animal models of E. coli infection using the d-isomer of arginine to reduce the risk of conjugate hydrolysis (Fig. 1).
FIG 1.
Vancomycin and vancomycin-d-arginine (V-r).
V-r was synthesized in a single chemical step from commercially available vancomycin HCl (StruChem, Wujiang City, China) and d-arginine amide dihydrochloride (Aladdin Chemical Co., Shanghai, China). The crude compound was purified and isolated as the corresponding HCl salt at 95% purity by high-performance liquid chromatography based on a previously described procedure (14). Identity was confirmed by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance and time of flight mass spectrometry, and HCl content was quantified by ion-exchange chromatography. In various physicochemical screens, V-r behaved similarly to vancomycin, including no observed cellular cytotoxicity at concentrations ranging from 100 to 750 μM on human erythrocytes, HepG2, and primary renal proximal tubule epithelial cells employing fetal bovine serum-deficient media to negate compound quenching (15) (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Physicochemical properties of vancomycin-arginine (V-r) and vancomycin
Physicochemical propertiesa | V-r | Vancomycin |
---|---|---|
Mol wt (free base) | 1,604 | 1,449 |
LogD (octanol/buffer) | Less than −4.01 | −5.14b |
TD solubility in saline (mg/ml) | 373 | > 50 |
PPB (mouse/human % bound) | 65/76 | 50/50 |
Red blood cell lysis (CC50, μM) | >750 | >750 |
HepG2 cell cytotoxicity (CC50, μM) | >750 | >750 |
hRPTEC biomarkersc (CC50, μM) | >100 | >100 |
FoR (at 8× MIC) | <2.32 × 10−10 | Not determined |
TD, thermodynamic; PPB, plasma protein binding; hRPTEC, human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells; CC50, concentration at which 50% cytotoxicity is observed; FoR, frequency of resistance.
LogD vancomycin reported according to Dave and Morris (29).
Includes cell count, nuclear size, DNA structure, mitochondrial mass, mitochondrial membrane potential, phospholipidosis, and glutathione content.
MICs were determined in alignment with CLSI guidelines as previously described for V-R and cationic antimicrobial peptides (14, 16). The MIC range of V-r against 29 different E. coli strains was 8 to 16 μg/ml (MIC90, 16 μg/ml), including those with multiple resistance mechanisms (Table 2). The MIC of V-r against the efflux pump mutant strain JW0451-2 was 8 μg/ml, suggesting that V-r is unlikely to be a substrate for efflux in this pathogen. Notably, the MIC of V-r was also 8 μg/ml against two out of five of the Acinetobacter baumannii strains tested. In comparison, the MICs of vancomycin were significantly higher, at 64 to 256 μg/ml, against all E. coli and A. baumannii strains tested. Importantly, the antimicrobial potency of V-r towards a number of Gram-positive bacteria remained intact (Table 2). In frequency-of-resistance (FoR) assays at 8 times the MIC of V-r (128 μg/ml), E. coli ATCC 25922 demonstrated an extremely low FoR, at <2.32 × 10−10, which is similar to or lower than those with standard-of-care therapies, such as ciprofloxacin (17, 18). Time-kill assays were performed against uropathogenic E. coli strains, including the sequence type 131 (ST131) NCTC 13341 isolate. V-r, but not vancomycin, demonstrated rapid bactericidal activity to limits of detection (i.e., 100 CFU/ml) within 1 or 4 h of exposure, and this was maintained up to 24 h (Fig. 2).
TABLE 2.
Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of V-r and vancomycin
Organism | Strain | Source, resistance mechanism or genotypea | Ambler class | MIC (μg/ml) of: |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
V-r | Vancomycin | ||||
E. coli | ATCC 25922 | CLSI susceptible reference strain | 16 | 128 | |
E. coli | UTI89 | Clinical isolate from patient with acute bladder infection | 16 | 128 | |
E. coli | NCTC 13441 | Uropathogenic E. coli ST131, blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1, blaTEM-1, aac6'-lb-cr, mph(A), catB4, tet(A), dfrA7, aadA5, sul1 | A, D | 16 | 128 |
E. coli | NCTC 13462 | blaCTX-M-2 | A | 16 | 128 |
E. coli | NCTC 13846 | Clinical isolate, bacteremia, UK 2013, EUCAST reference isolate, mcr-1 | 8 | 64 | |
E. coli | AR055 | blaNDM-1, mph(A), blaCMY-6, dfrA17, sul1, tet(A), rmtC, aac(3)-IIa, blaOXA-1, aadA5 | B, C, D | 16 | 128 |
E. coli | AR089 | strB, blaCMY-2, tet(B), strA, sul2 | C | 16 | 128 |
E. coli | AR0114 | strB, blaTEM-1B, blaKPC-3, aadB, dfrA5, sul1, strA, sul2, cmIA1 | A | 16 | 256 |
E. coli | AR0137 | blaNDM-6, blaOXA-9, mph(A), blaTEM-1A, blaCMY-42, blaCTX-M-15, dfrA17, qnrS1, sul1, tet(B), aadA1, aac(3)-IIa, blaOXA-1, aadA5 | B | 16 | 128 |
E. coli | AR0150 | blaNDM-5, mph(A), blaTEM-1B, blaCMY-42, dfrA17, sul1, tet(A), aadA5 | A, B, C | 8 | 128 |
E. coli | AR0346 | mcr-1, ESBL | A | 16 | 256 |
E. coli | AR0349 | mcr-1, ESBL | A | 16 | 128 |
E. coli | AR0350 | mcr-1 | - | 16 | 128 |
E. coli | AR0493 | mcr-1, ESBL | A | 16 | 256 |
E. coli | AR0494 | mcr-1 | - | 8 | 128 |
E. coli | B096a | Clinical isolate (UK) 2016, AmpC | C | 16 | 128 |
E. coli | B808 | Clinical isolate (UK) 2016, blaTEM-1, blaCTX-M-15 | A | 16 | 256 |
E. coli | ATCC BAA-2340 | blaKPC | A | 16 | 128 |
E. coli | ATCC BAA-2469 | blaNDM-1 | B | 16 | 128 |
E. coli | ExPEC H5 | Clinical isolate (UK) | 8 | 128 | |
E. coli | H4/5 | Clinical isolate, blaTEM-1, blaCTX-M-15 | A | 16 | 256 |
E. coli | IR3 | Clinical isolate, blaNDM-1 | B | 8 | 128 |
E. coli | IR45 | Clinical isolate, blaNDM-1 | B | 16 | 128 |
E. coli | IR57 | Clinical isolate, blaNDM-1 | B | 16 | 256 |
E. coli | Swiss 2 (AF45) | Clinical isolate (South Africa) ST101, mcr-1 | 16 | 128 | |
E. coli | Swiss 13 | Clinical isolate (France) ST69, mcr-1 | 16 | 128 | |
E. coli | Swiss 15 | Clinical isolate (Switzerland) ST446, mcr-1, blaCTX-M | A | 16 | 128 |
E. coli | BW25113 | Parent strain of BW25113ΔacrB::kan mutant | 8 | 128 | |
E. coli | JW0451-2 | BW25113ΔacrB::kan, AcrB-deficient mutant, defective in ArcAB-TolC multidrug efflux system | 8 | 128 | |
A. baumannii | ATCC 19606 | Isolated from urine, genome-sequenced strain | 32 | 128 | |
A. baumannii | ACC00527 | Clinical respiratory isolate (USA) 2012, blaOXA-24 | D | 8 | 128 |
A. baumannii | B803 | Clinical isolate (UK) 2016 | 32 | 128 | |
A. baumannii | GS2AB1 | Multiresistant clinical isolate (southern Europe) 2017 | 16 | 128 | |
A. baumannii | Naval-81 | Clinical isolate (USA) 2006 | 8 | 128 | |
S. aureus | ATCC 29213 | CLSI susceptible reference strain | 2 | 2 | |
S. aureus | NRS 384 | USA300-0114 MRSA, community associated | 0.5 | 2 | |
E. faecalis | ATCC 29212 | CLSI QC strain | 1 | 2 | |
E. faecalis | B575 | Clinical isolate (northwest UK) | 1 | 2 | |
S. agalactiae | B057 | Clinical isolate (northwest UK) | 0.06 | 0.5 | |
S. agalactiae | B063 | Clinical isolate (northwest UK) | 0.06 | 1 | |
S. pneumoniae | ATCC 49619 | Reference strain | 0.25 | 0.5 | |
S. pneumoniae | 3259-03 | Clinical isolate (northwest UK) | 0.5 | 0.5 |
ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase.
FIG 2.
Time-kill of vancomycin-arginine (V-r) and vancomycin against E. coli uropathogens UTI89 and NCTC 13441.
Plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of V-r after subcutaneous (s.c.) administration (20 and 121 mg/kg) was determined in naive male CD-1 mice (n = 3/group) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for analysis with a lower limit of quantitation of 5 ng/ml (Table 3). V-r displayed first-order elimination, similar to vancomycin, after s.c. administration (19, 20). Prior to efficacy studies, a single s.c. administration of V-r was shown to be well tolerated in male CD-1 mice (n = 3) at the highest dose tested (800 mg/kg).
TABLE 3.
PK parameters of V-r in CD-1 mice after s.c. administration
PK parametera | V-r at 20 mg/kg | V-r at 121 mg/kg |
---|---|---|
Half-life (h) | 0.87 | 1.29 |
Cmax (mg/liter) | 20.4 | 98.4 |
Clearance (ml/min/kg) | 7.8 | 5.4 |
AUC (mg · h/liter) | 42.7 | 366 |
Vd (liter/kg) | 0.59 | 0.60 |
Cmax, maximum concentration of drug in plasma; AUC, area under the curve; Vd, volume of distribution.
Using a screening-based strategy, preliminary proof-of-concept studies with V-r employed an abbreviated 9-h thigh muscle infection model in male CD-1 mice rendered neutropenic (21). To that end, an E. coli ATCC 25922 isolate was inoculated at 9.7 × 104 CFU into both thigh muscles per mouse (n = 5 per experimental group). V-r was administered s.c. every 2 h (110 to 880 mg/kg total dose) starting 1 h postinfection. At 9 h, thigh homogenates were prepared, and CFU were enumerated after culture on CLED (cystine-, lactose-, and electrolyte-deficient) agar. Compared to pretreatment and vehicle burdens of 5.1 ± 0.2 and 7.1 ± 0.1 log10 CFU/g tissue, respectively, V-r exhibited a dose-dependent reduction in bacterial burden of 1.2 to 3.4 log10 compared with vehicle (Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance using StatsDirect Statistical Analysis Software) (Table 4). V-r doses at 440 and 880 mg/kg afforded 1.0- and 1.3-log10 reductions below stasis, respectively, with an extrapolated static dose of 215 mg/kg. As anticipated, vancomycin failed to significantly impact E. coli burden at a dose equivalent to the highest dose of V-r. In a 24-h thigh muscle infection model, E. coli UTI89 was inoculated at 7.8 × 104 CFU into one thigh muscle per mouse (n = 5 to 8 per group) and treated with V-r (total dose, 200 to 1,400 mg) using an every-6-h dosing regimen from 1 h postinfection. All doses of >200 mg/kg significantly reduced burden below stasis by up to 2.7 log10 CFU/g. These bactericidal effects of V-r were statistically superior to those of ciprofloxacin, which induced a 1.4 log10 reduction from stasis (Fig. 3 and Table 5). Overall, V-r caused an ∼4 to 7.5 log10 reduction in bacterial burden, compared with vehicle control, over the entire dose range.
TABLE 4.
Efficacy of V-r in an E. coli ATCC 25922 thigh muscle infection model (9 h) in neutropenic CD-1 mice
Group, total dose over 9 h (mg/kg) | Log10 (group geometric mean ± SD CFU/g) | Log10 change from vehicle (CFU/g) | P value (versus vehicle) |
---|---|---|---|
Pretreatment | 5.1 ± 0.18 | −2.01 | 0.0045 |
Vehicle | 7.11 ± 0.12 | 0 | 0 |
V-r, 110 | 5.87 ± 0.60 | −1.24 | 0.0415 |
V-r, 440 | 4.14 ± 0.63 | −2.97 | <0.0001 |
V-r, 880 | 3.76 ± 0.40 | −3.35 | <0.0001 |
Vancomycin, 800 | 6.60 ± 0.66 | −0.51 | Not significant |
FIG 3.
Efficacy of V-r in reducing E. coli UTI89 burden in a 24-h thigh muscle infection model in neutropenic CD-1 mice.
TABLE 5.
Efficacy of V-r in reducing E. coli UTI89 burden in 24-h thigh muscle infection model in neutropenic CD-1 mice
Group, total dose over 24 h (mg/kg) | Log10 (group geometric mean ± SD CFU/g) | Log10 change from vehicle (CFU/g) | P value (versus vehicle) |
---|---|---|---|
Pretreatment | 4.76 ± 0.18 | −4.95 | 0.0248 |
Vehicle | 9.71 ± 0.17 | 0 | 0 |
V-r, 200 | 5.60 ± 2.28 | −4.11 | 0.0217 |
V-r, 400 | 3.27 ± 1.88 | −6.43 | <0.0001 |
V-r, 700 | 2.58 ± 0.25 | −7.13 | <0.0001 |
V-r, 1,050 | 2.08 ± 0.89 | −7.63 | <0.0001 |
V-r, 1,400 | 2.68 ± 1.38 | −7.03 | <0.0001 |
Vancomycin, 1,272 | 8.48 ± 1.31 | −1.23 | Not significant |
Ciprofloxacin, 20 | 3.32 ± 0.14 | −6.39 | <0.0007 |
The MIC data confirm previous findings that the coupling of arginine with vancomycin bestows significant antimicrobial activity of the V-r conjugate against E. coli infection while remaining effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (14). Such in vitro findings were effectively translated into thigh muscle infection models, where a total 24-h dose of 250 mg/kg V-r reduced E. coli burden to pretreatment (stasis) levels. Since area under the curve over 24 h in the steady state divided by the MIC (AUC/MIC ratio) is the primary PK/pharmacodynamic predictor of vancomycin (5), this static dose corresponds to a total AUC/MIC of 47.3. Based on a free (f) fraction of 35%, as determined in plasma protein binding studies (Table 1), the fAUC/MIC of V-r was 16.5. As an approximation of exposure using allometric scaling (22), this would be equivalent to a human dose of ∼20 mg/kg, with a dose of 28 mg/kg required to elicit an additional 1-log10 kill. Such allometric doses of V-r are in line with the daily and loading doses of vancomycin in humans (5).
The positive efficacy data support the notion that the cationic feature of arginine within V-r allows for breaching of the stubborn outer membrane of E. coli isolates and possibly other Gram-negative bacteria (14). The sequelae of events leading to V-r-mediated E. coli eradication likely involve (i) improved cell surface association with negatively charged groups, (ii) effective translocation across the outer membrane leading to enhanced drug uptake, and (iii) disruption of peptidoglycan synthesis within the periplasmic space (6, 14). To our knowledge, the current findings describe the first report of a marked abrogation of E. coli burden in vivo with a minimally modified vancomycin-cationic transporter conjugate. Previously, it was reported that vancomycin-QC14, a strongly lipophilic/cationic molecule, reduced thigh muscle infection of a carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii strain (23). Because V-r was highly effective in time-kill assays against E. coli NCTC 13441, a pandemic uropathogenic clone (24), a logical next step would be to evaluate the conjugate in a model of urinary tract infection (UTI). Based on the high renal elimination of vancomycin in humans (25) in a nonmetabolized form (26), it is reasonable to hypothesize that V-r may drive a highly targeted therapeutic intervention to combat E. coli-associated UTIs.
These data further underscore a precedent for creating a novel Gram-negative active agent by transforming a commonly used and selective Gram-positive antibiotic by introducing certain cationic features through a simple and scalable synthesis protocol (14). Such an approach, in consort with effective in silico predictions (27, 28), might expedite antibiotic development and increase the overall probability of success of drug candidates. Most important, this would help to arrest the insidious pandemic of difficult-to-treat bacterial infections.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to Patricia A. Bradford (Antimicrobial Specialists LLC, USA) for critically reviewing the manuscript. We also thank D. Corbett and J. Gould (Evotec, UK), D. Turner (Cyprotex, UK), Y. Huang, M. Gassen, and J. Li (WuXi AppTec, China) and their respective teams for support with synthesis, in vitro, and animal studies described herein.
All studies described in this report were financed solely by SuperTrans Medical Ltd. (Israel).
Stanford University has filed patent applications on this and related technology, supported in part by the National Institutes of Health grants R01GM117278 (L.C.) and NIH-CA031845 and NSF CHE-1566423 (P.A.W.), which has been licensed by SuperTrans Medical for the treatment of bacterial infectious diseases. P.A.W. and L.C. serve as consultants to the company.
REFERENCES
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019. CDC’s antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tacconelli E, Magrini N. 2017. Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/WHO-PPL-Short_Summary_25Feb-ET_NM_WHO.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Peri AM, Doi Y, Potoski BA, Harris PNA, Paterson DL, Righi E. 2019. Antimicrobial treatment challenges in the era of carbapenem resistance. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 94:413–425. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.De Oliveira DMP, Forde BM, Kidd TJ, Harris PNA, Schembri MA, Beatson SA, Paterson DL, Walker MJ. 2020. Antimicrobial resistance in ESKAPE pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev 33:e00181-19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00181-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rybak MJ, Le J, Lodise TP, Levine DP, Bradley JS, Liu C, Mueller BA, Pai MP, Wong-Beringer A, Rotschafer JC, Rodvold KA, Maples HD, Lomaestro BM. 2020. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a revised consensus guideline and review by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm 77:835–864. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Antonoplis A, Zang X, Huttner MA, Chong KKL, Lee YB, Co JY, Amieva MR, Kline KA, Wender PA, Cegelski L. 2018. A dual-function antibiotic-transporter conjugate exhibits superior activity in sterilizing MRSA biofilms and killing persister cells. J Am Chem Soc 140:16140–16151. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b08711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Umstätter F, Domhan C, Hertlein T, Ohlsen K, Mühlberg E, Kleist C, Zimmermann S, Beijer B, Klika KD, Haberkorn U, Mier W, Uhl P. 2020. Vancomycin resistance is overcome by conjugation of polycationic peptides. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 59:8823–8827. doi: 10.1002/anie.202002727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Umstätter F, Domhan C, Hertlein T, Ohlsen K, Mühlberg E, Kleist C, Zimmermann S, Beijer B, Klika KD, Haberkorn U, Mier W, Uhl P. 2020. Corrigendum: vancomycin resistance is overcome by conjugation of polycationic peptides. Angew Chem Int Ed 59:17326–17326. doi: 10.1002/anie.202007022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wu Z-C, Cameron MD, Boger DL. 2020. Vancomycin C-terminus guanidine modifications and further insights into an added mechanism of action imparted by a peripheral structural modification. ACS Infect Dis 6:2169–2180. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Blaskovich MAT, Hansford KA, Butler MS, Jia Z, Mark AE, Cooper MA. 2018. Developments in glycopeptide antibiotics. ACS Infect Dis 4:715–735. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dhanda G, Sarkar P, Samaddar S, Haldar J. 2019. Battle against vancomycin-resistant bacteria: recent developments in chemical strategies. J Med Chem 62:3184–3205. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gordon NC, Png K, Wareham DW. 2010. Potent synergy and sustained bactericidal activity of a vancomycin-colistin combination versus multidrug-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:5316–5322. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00922-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhou A, Kang TM, Yuan J, Beppler C, Nguyen C, Mao Z, Nguyen MQ, Yeh P, Miller JH. 2015. Synergistic interactions of vancomycin with different antibiotics against Escherichia coli: trimethoprim and nitrofurantoin display strong synergies with vancomycin against wild-type E. coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:276–281. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03502-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Antonoplis A, Zang X, Wegner T, Wender PA, Cegelski L. 2019. Vancomycin-arginine conjugate inhibits growth of carbapenem-resistant E. coli and targets cell-wall synthesis. ACS Chem Biol 14:2065–2070. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.9b00565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zink D, Chuah JKC, Ying JY. 2020. Assessing toxicity with human cell-based in vitro methods. Trends Mol Med 26:570–582. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2020.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wiegand I, Hilpert K, Hancock REW. 2008. Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc 3:163–175. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Martinez JL, Baquero F. 2000. Mutation frequencies and antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1771–1777. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.7.1771-1777.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Charrier C, Salisbury A-M, Savage VJ, Moyo E, Forward H, Ooi N, Cheung J, Metzger R, McGarry D, Walker R, Cooper IR, Ratcliffe AJ, Stokes NR. 2016. In vitro biological evaluation of novel broad-spectrum isothiazolone inhibitors of bacterial type II topoisomerases. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:2831–2839. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Crandon JL, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. 2010. Comparative efficacies of human simulated exposures of telavancin and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a range of vancomycin MICs in a murine pneumonia model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:5115–5119. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00062-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lepak AJ, Zhao M, Andes DR. 2017. Comparative pharmacodynamics of telavancin and vancomycin in the neutropenic murine thigh and lung infection models against Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00281-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00281-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Everett M, Sprynski N, Coelho A, Castandet J, Bayet M, Bougnon J, Lozano C, Davies DT, Leiris S, Zalacain M, Morrissey I, Magnet S, Holden K, Warn P, De Luca F, Docquier J-D, Lemonnier M. 2018. Discovery of a novel metallo-β-lactamase inhibitor that potentiates meropenem activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00074-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00074-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.FDA. Guidance for industry: estimating the maximum safe starting dose in initial clinical trials for therapeutics in adult healthy volunteers. 2005. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Washington, DC. https://www.fda.gov/media/72309/download. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yarlagadda V, Manjunath GB, Sarkar P, Akkapeddi P, Paramanandham K, Shome BR, Ravikumar R, Haldar J. 2016. Glycopeptide antibiotic to overcome the intrinsic resistance of Gram-negative bacteria. ACS Infect Dis 2:132–139. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.5b00114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nicolas-Chanoine M-H, Bertrand X, Madec J-Y. 2014. Escherichia coli ST131, an intriguing clonal group. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:543–574. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00125-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Matzke GR, Zhanel GG, Guay DRP. 1986. Clinical pharmacokinetics of vancomycin. Clin Pharmacokinet 11:257–282. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198611040-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cao M, Feng Y, Zhang Y, Kang W, Lian K, Ai L. 2018. Studies on the metabolism and degradation of vancomycin in simulated in vitro and aquatic environment by UHPLC-triple-TOF-MS/MS. Sci Rep 8:15471. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33826-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Richter MF, Drown BS, Riley AP, Garcia A, Shirai T, Svec RL, Hergenrother PJ. 2017. Predictive compound accumulation rules yield a broad-spectrum antibiotic. Nature 545:299–304. doi: 10.1038/nature22308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Richter MF, Hergenrother PJ. 2019. The challenge of converting Gram-positive-only compounds into broad-spectrum antibiotics: challenges in developing broad-spectrum antibiotics. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1435:18–38. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dave RA, Morris ME. 2016. A quantitative threshold for high/low extent of urinary excretion of compounds in humans: threshold for high/low urinary excretion. Biopharm Drug Dispos 37:287–309. doi: 10.1002/bdd.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]