Corrigendum

New Phytologist 210 (2016), 1219–1228, doi: 10.1111/nph.13929

Since its publication, it has been brought to our attention that there is an error in Fig. 4(b) of de Boer et al. (2016). There was in incorrect reference to ‘log₁₀’, and this has now been removed. The correct figure is shown below.

Figure 4.

Reduction of stomatal size extends viable ranges in g _smax. (a) Box plots of g _smax (upper panels), f _gc (middle panels) and a _gc (lower panels) separated for pteridophytes, gymnosperms and angiosperms (left) and three angiosperm subclades (right). The early angiosperm clade includes the ANITA‐grade, Chloranthales and magnoliids. Circles in boxes indicate the median, the bottom and top of each box denotes the first and third quartile, respectively, and whiskers denote the 5^th and 95^th percentiles. Data points outside whiskers are shown individually. Letters denote significant differences between group means (P < 0.05, with Bonferroni correction). (b) Two‐dimensional morphospace expressed in terms of a _gc and g _smax. Data points indicate species‐averaged combinations a _gc and g _smax, with g _smax calculated following Eqn 1. The solid black line represents the standardized major axis (SMA) regressions fitted on all species, the pink and green lines denote the SMAs across subsets of angiosperm and gymnosperm species, respectively. See Table 1 and Supporting Information Table S4 for detailed statistics. Dashed lines indicate f _gc as a percentage.

We apologize to our readers for this mistake.