The authors would like to draw attention to an error in Figure 5 of this Research Article. The top line of Figure 5 does not show the correct cage ([L1+2B1]); rather, [L1+2B1N] has been shown twice. The corrected figure is shown below. This mistake does not affect the scientific conclusions of the paper.
Figure 1.
Side‐, window‐, and top‐views of the electrostatic potential inside the cavities of the socially sorted [L1+2B1X] cages, mapped onto the 0.0004 a.u. total electron density isosurface calculated at the M06‐2X/6‐311+G(d,p) level of theory.