Skip to main content
AIDS Research and Therapy logoLink to AIDS Research and Therapy
. 2021 May 5;18:27. doi: 10.1186/s12981-021-00353-z

Predictors of mortality rate among adult HIV-positive patients on antiretroviral therapy in Metema Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective follow-up study

Kefale Lejadiss Workie 1, Tilahun Yemanu Birhan 1, Dessie Abebaw Angaw 1,
PMCID: PMC8097881  PMID: 33952282

Abstract

Background

Globally Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS) is an ongoing public health issue associated with high morbidity and mortality. Efforts have been made to reduce HIV/AIDS-related morbidity and mortality by delivering antiretroviral therapy. However, the incidence and predictors of mortality in border areas like Metema were not investigated. This study aimed to assess predictors of mortality rate among adult HIV-positive patients on antiretroviral therapy at Metema Hospital.

Methods

Retrospective follow-up study was employed among ART patients from January 1, 2013, to December 30, 2018. Data were entered in Epi-data 3.1 and exported to STATA 14 for analysis. Kaplan–Meier and Log-Rank test was used to compare survival differences among categories of different variables. In bi-variable analysis p-values < 0.20 were entered into a multivariable analysis. Multivariate Weibull model was used to measure the risk of death and identify the significant predictors of death. Variables that were statistically significant at p-value < 0.05 were concluded as predictors of mortality.

Result

A total of 542 study participants were included. The overall incidence rate was 6.7 (95% CI: 5.4–8.4) deaths per 100 person-years of observation. Being male (HR = 2.4; 95% CI: 1.24–4.62), STAGE IV (HR = 5.64; 95% CI: 2.53–12.56), stage III (HR = 3.31; 95% CI: 1.35–8.10), TB-coinfection (HR = 3.71; 95% CI: 1.59–8.64), low hemoglobin (HR = 4.14; 95% CI: 2.18–7.86), BMI ≤ 15.4 kg/m2 (HR = 2.45; 95% CI: 1.17–5.10) and viral load > 1000 copy/ml (HR = 6.70; 95% CI: 3.4–13.22) were found to be a significant predictor for mortality among HIV patients on ART treatment.

Conclusion

The incidence of death was high. Being male, viral load, those with advanced STAGE (III & IV), TB co-infected, low BMI, and low hemoglobin were at a higher risk of mortality. Special attention should be given to male patients and high public interventions needed among HIV patients on ART to reduce the mortality rate.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12981-021-00353-z.

Keywords: Adults, AIDS, ART, Death, Ethiopia, HIV

Background

Globally Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS) is an ongoing public health issue associated with high morbidity and mortality [1, 2]. An estimated 37 million people were living with HIV across the globe; among those, 70% reside in Sub-Saharan Africa [24].

Accessing antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been increased since 2005, globally an estimated 21.7 million people were accessing antiretroviral therapy (ART) and 940,000 people died from AIDS-related illnesses at the end of 2017 [3, 5, 6]. Even though the introduction of Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) brought a significant reduction of mortality and morbidity among patients living with HIV (PLHIV), several patients die after starting ART [79]. Since the success of ART depends on regular patient follow up, treatment adherence and awareness of patients regarding the relevance of ART in his life [10, 11]. AIDS-related mortality among ART experienced patients’ ranges from 4.5 to 17% [1214]. Ethiopia is one HIV high burden Sub-Saharan country where an estimated 610,000 HIV infected people and 15,000 AIDS-related mortality occurred at the end of 2017 [15, 16]. The prevalence of HIV in Ethiopia ranges from 1.13 to 1.4% in the Amhara region [17], Metema Hospital accounts for 6.3% of HIV prevalence [10]. The survival and epidemiology of HIV in Ethiopia vary along the study periods, geographic regions, and the study population [15, 18]. Many studies in Ethiopia indicated that the incidence of mortality among HIV-infected patients who are on ART ranges from 1.75 deaths per 100 person-years of observation to 7 death per 100-person year of observation which was lowest in Jinka and highest in Asela [1927]. Despite the risk factors of mortality among people who are on ART were researched, some settings which provide HIV/AIDS care and treatment services for a high number of seasonal daily migrant workers (Mobile workers) and movable populations like Metema Hospital were not fully addressed. There was a high magnitude of HIV in Metema Hospital compared to regional and national reports. Even though governmental and many non-governmental organizations exerted great efforts on HIV care and treatment in Metema Hospitals in all settings. However, HIV/AIDS-related mortality continues a major public health concern in the area. As a result, there is a need for local data to provide evidence for organizations working on HIV/AIDS and ART at national, regional, and district levels on risk factors of mortality among HIV/AIDS patients who are on ART. Hence, this study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of mortality among adult HIV/AIDS patients who were on ART at Metema Hospital, Ethiopia.

Methods

Study setting, design, and period

Institutional based retrospective follow-up study was conducted from January 1, 2013, to December 30, 2018, in Metema Hospital, which is located in west Gondar province of the Amhara National Regional State. It is 158 km away from Gondar town, 338 km from Bahir Dar (the capital of Amhara), and 908 km from the country’s capital Addis Ababa.

The town has a total population of 119,054 (63,433 males and 55,617 females) [45]. There are over 120,000 seasonal migrant workers (a majority of males) traveling to Metema for temporary labor and return to their original residence after 3–6 months of stay every year. The town is also noted for its border with Sudan Ethio-Sudan highway. Metema Hospital provides services for over 420,000 catchment population in West Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia, per year. Metema Hospital HIV/AIDS care and treatment clinic was established in 2005. It provides care, treatment, and monitoring for HIV-positive patients as per the national guideline.

Study population, sample size, and sampling procedure

All adult HIV-positive individuals who were on ART at Metema Hospital and who enrolled from January 1, 2013, to December 30, 2018, were included. However, transferred in-patients with incomplete baseline data and unknown initiation date of treatment and status of patients were excluded. The sample size was estimated using Log-Rank and Cox proportional hazard model in STATA version 14. The calculation was done based on the assumption that type I error of 5%, power of 80% and the exposure is body mass index (BMI) the most significant variable [21]. Survival probability for patients with body mass index greater than 18.5 kg/m2 = 0.93. Based on this, the calculated sample size by using STATA 14 software is 542. Regarding the sampling technique, a record of study participants have been filtered first from the ART database according to their entry time to follow up, next patients have been filtered using age and eligibility criteria, then we give a unique number for the remaining records and select each record for our study using systematic random sampling.

Data collection technique and quality control issues

The outcome variable was the time event (death) of patients on ART. The independent variables considered in the study were socio-demographic characteristics such as age, sex, level of education, occupation, marital status, clinical factors like WHO clinical stage, CD4 count, functional status, TB/HIV co-infection, opportunistic infection other than TB, drug adherence, viral load, hemoglobin level, body mass index (BMI) and substance use which is a behavioral factor.

Drug adherence

In this study was based on records as Good (equal to or greater than 95% or ≤ 3 doses missed per month), Fair (85–94% or 4–8 doses missed per month) or Poor (less than 85% or ≥ 9 doses missed per month), health workers used reports by the patient or by directly counting the pills to classify adherence. Those patients who adhere greater than or equal to 95% was considered as good adherence; 85–94% fair adherence and Less than 85% was considered as poor adherence [28]. Patient more than three months late for a scheduled visit and who did not return later during follow-up was considered as lost to follow up [29].

The hemoglobin level > 10 gm/dl was categorized as normal hemoglobin and hemoglobin ≤ 10 gm/dl was categorized as low hemoglobin level [30]. In this study, viral load > 1000 copies/ml was recorded as high viral load and viral load ≤ 1000 copies/ml was recorded as low viral load [31]. Substance use was recorded as among those three factors such as alcohol, cigarette smoking, and khat chewing, with a minimum of one record documented in patients' charts or register present.

To assure the data quality, high emphasis was given in designing a data collection instrument. The training was given for data collectors and supervisors to have a common understanding of the purpose of research and the techniques of data collection. A standard checklist was used to record information extracted from electronic and patient cards. Before the actual data collection pretest was done on 25 patient charts, those charts were not included in the study. A standard checklist was used for recording information from the database and patient cards. This form was developed using the standardized ART entry and follow-up form employed by the ART clinic. Three experienced ART Nurses who were trained on comprehensive HIV care were involved in data collection. Throughout the data collection process, completeness, consistency, and accuracy were checked by supervisors and the principal investigator daily.

Data management and analysis

The data was entered in Epi-data 3.1 and exported to STATA 14 for analysis. Descriptive statistics including proportions, median, tables, and charts was done to describe the characteristics of study participants. Nonparametric estimations of Kaplan–Meier was done graphically and Log-rank test was used to compare the survival probabilities of categorical variables. After fitting the survival model, the proportional hazard assumption was checked using a graphical and global test (goodness test). The model goodness of fit was checked by using the Cox-Snell residual. Cox proportional and parametric models were compared using Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) or Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC). Weibull model was selected since they have low value of AIC and had a good fitness of the Cox Snell residual. Those covariates with a p-value < 0.2 in the bi-variable analysis were again fitted to the multivariable Weibull regression analysis. Both crud and adjusted hazard ratio with the corresponding 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was calculated to show the strength of association. In multivariable analysis, covariates with a p-value of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline Scio-demographic, Clinical, and treatment-related characteristics

A total of 542 HIV infected patients on ART were included in this study. Among those, more than half of the 285 (52.6%) study participants were females. The median age of study participants was 32 (IQR = 26–39) years. Nearly two-thirds of the study participants were not educated. Almost half of the 278 (51.3%) study participants disclosed their HIV status and nearly half of the 274 (50.5%) study subjects are co-infected with tuberculosis (TB) (Table 1). Among the study subjects, 179 (33.0%) had a baseline CD4 count < 200 cells/mm3, and the baseline WHO staging 2470 (45.6%) of patients were at stage I followed by stage III and stage IV 115 (21.2%). Most of the 413 (76.2%) of the study participants had working functional status and three-fourths of the study subjects had good treatment adherence (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of adults HIV positive patients on ART at Metema Hospital from January 2013 to December 2018

Baseline variable Survival status
Censored Dead Total
N % N % N %
Sex
 Male 204 44.5 53 63.1 257 47.4
 Female 254 55.5 31 36.9 285 52.6
Age (years)
 15–24 60 13.1 7 8.3 67 12.4
 25–34 211 46.1 28 33.3 239 44.1
 35–44 118 25.8 24 28.6 142 26.2
 ≥ 45 69 15.0 25 29.8 94 17.3
Education
 Not educated 267 58.3 60 71.4 327 60.3
 Primary 118 25.8 15 17.9 133 24.5
 Secondary & above 73 15.9 9 10.7 82 15.2
Marital status
 Single 102 22.3 22 26.2 124 22.5
 Married 190 41.5 28 33.3 218 40.3
 Divorced 117 25.6 24 28.6 141 26.1
 Widowed 19 4.1 2 2.4 21 4.0
 Separated 30 6.5 8 9.5 38 7.1
Substance use
 Yes 38 9.8 39 46.4 77 16.4
 No 348 90.2 45 53.6 393 83.6
Occupation
 Daily laborer 170 37.1 45 53.6 215 39.7
 Farmer 111 24.2 20 23.8 131 24.2
 Housewife 95 20.7 15 17.9 110 20.3
 Merchant 61 13.3 2 2.4 63 11.6
 Others 21 4.7 2 2.3 23 4.2
Hemoglobin level (g/dl)
 ≤ 10 74 16.2 49 58.3 123 22.7
 > 10 384 83.8 35 41.7 419 77.3
Viral load (copy/ml)
 ≤ 1000 395 88.6 22 37.9 417 82.7
 > 1000 51 11.4 36 62.1 87 17.3
CD4 (cells/m3)
 ≤ 200 116 25.3 63 75.0 179 33.0
 201–350 109 23.8 7 8.3 116 21.4
 ≥ 351 233 50.9 14 16.7 247 45.6
TB-co-infection
 Yes 206 45.0 68 81.0 274 50.5
 No 252 55.0 16 19.0 268 49.5
BMI (kg/m2)
 ≥ 18.5 284 62.0 36 42.9 320 59.0
 15.5–18.4 119 26.0 28 33.3 147 27.2
 ≤ 15.4 55 12.0 20 23.8 75 13.8
WHO stage
 Stage I 234 51.1 13 15.4 247 45.6
 Stage II 51 11.1 14 16.7 65 12.0
 Stage III 94 20.5 21 25.0 115 21.2
 Stage IV 79 17.3 36 42.9 115 21.2
Functional status
 Working 374 81.7 39 46.4 413 76.2
 Ambulatory 40 8.7 18 21.4 58 10.7
 Bedridden 44 9.6 27 32.2 71 13.1
Adherence
 Good 340 74.2 67 79.8 407 75.0
 Fair 64 14.0 3 3.5 67 12.4
 Poor 54 11.8 14 16.7 68 12.6
HIV disclosure
 Yes 239 52.2 39 46.4 278 51.3
 No 219 47.8 45 53.6 264 48.7
Other OIs
 Yes 40 8.7 27 32.1 67 12.4
 No 418 91.3 57 67.9 475 87.6

Incidence of mortality

The study subjects followed a total of 72 months after initiation of treatment with a total observation time of 1245 person years. During those total follow up period, the overall incidence rate of mortality was 6.7 (95% CI (5.4–8.4)) per 100-person year of observation. Over the 72 months follow-up period; 4.9 per 100 adult-months (95% CI 3.7–6.3) died during the first 12 months and 0.7 per 100 adult-months (95% CI 0.4–1.1) died during the second year of follow-up. The cumulative survival probability of patients on ART was 77.44% at the end of the study period (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Cumulative survival probability of the patients on ART at Metema Hospital from January 1, 2013 to December 30, 2018

Comparison of survival experience by different factors

Using the Kaplan–Meier survival curve, the survival experience of the patients was assessed with different categories of predictor variables. Patients with normal hemoglobin had a longer survival experience than those adults with low hemoglobin (Fig. 2) and the difference were statistically significant (Log-Rank, p < 0.001) (Table 2). The observed difference of longer survival of patients with a viral load below threshold compared with those adults above the threshold was found to be statistically significant (Log-Rank, p < 0.001) (Table 2). Patients with TB-co-infection at the era of ART were shorter survival experience than those adults with no TB co-infection (Fig. 2) and the difference were statistically significant (Log-Rank p < 0.001) (Table 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Survival curves for the follow-up of adults on ART according to their Hemoglobin level, viral load, sex & TB-confection at starting of ART

Table 2.

Survival experience comparison with time and Log-Rank value among HIV/AIDS patients on ART at Metema Hospital, Jan 1, 2013 to Dec 30, 2018

Variables Meantime(by month) 95% CI Log-Rank p-value
Lower Upper
Sex
 Male 26 24 29 0.0013
 Female 30 27 32
Age (years)
 15–24 25 21 29 0.0075
 25–34 29 27 31
 35–44 27 24 31
 ≥ 45 29 24 33
Education level
 No educated 27 25 29 0.0446
 Primary 29 26 32
 Secondary & above 32 27 36
Marital status
 Single 25 22 28 0.3807
 Married 31 28 34
 Divorced 24 21 27
 Widowed 27 19 35
 Separated 36 28 45
Substance use
 Yes 21 16 25 < 0.001
 No 29 27 31
Occupation
 Daily laborer 25 22 27 0.0032
 Farmer 27 24 31
 Housewife 30 26 33
 Merchant 30 26 32
 Others 35 29 40
Hemoglobin (g/dl)
 ≤ 10 24 20 27 < 0.001
 > 10 29 27 31
Viral load (copy/ml)
 ≤ 1000 30 29 32 < 0.001
 > 1000 24 11 28
CD4 count
 ≤ 200 (cells/m3) 25 22 27 < 0.001
 201–350 (cells/m3) 34 30 38
 ≥ 351 28 25 30
TB
 Yes 24 22 27 < 0.001
 No 32 29 34
BMI (kg/m2)
 ≥ 18.5 29 27 31 < 0.002
 15.5–18.4 26 23 29
 ≤ 15.4 28 24 33
WHO clinical stage
 Stage I 29 26 31 < 0.001
 Stage II 30 25 35
 Stage III 28 24 31
 Stage IV 26 22 29
Functional status
 Working 29 27 31 < 0.001
 Ambulatory 26 21 32
 Bedridden 26 21 31
Adherence
 Good 28 26 30 0.026
 Fair 29 24 33
 Poor 26 21 30
Disclosure
 Yes 31 28 33 0.1506
 No 25 23 28
Other OI
 Yes 28 23 33 < 0.001
 No 28 26 30

Assessing proportional hazard assumption and model selection criteria

Graphical assessment of the proportional hazard assumption was done by comparing the estimated ln(–ln) survivor curves versus ln (survival time) over different categories of variables. The graph of the two categories of tuberculosis and hemoglobin level hazards does not cross each other, which means that the proportional hazard assumption was satisfied (Fig. 3). An additional global test of proportional-hazard assumption based on the Schoenfeld residuals was done and all independent variables satisfy the proportional hazard assumption (Chi square = 11.76, p-value = 0.6971) (Table 3). The model with the smallest value of AIC and BIC was selected. Due to these criteria, the Weibull model was selected and found to be appropriate for this study (Additional file 1).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Plot of ln (-ln (survival probability)) versus ln (survival time) for assessing proportional hazard of hemoglobin level and TB co-infection of patients at Metema Hospital, Ethiopia, from January 1, 2013 to December 30, 2018.

Table 3.

Test result of proportional-hazard assumption for predictor variables of mortality among ART- experienced patients at Metema Hospital, from January 2013 to December 2018

Variables rho Chi2 Df Prob > Chi2
Age − 0.06467 0.42 1 0.5161
Sex − 0.10241 0.67 1 0.4121
Education − 0.05530 0.20 1 0.6525
HGB − 0.00172 0.00 1 0.9884
Viral load 0.06474 0.28 1 0.5986
CD4 0.06057 0.29 1 0.5897
TB 0.10124 0.59 1 0.4439
BMI 0.00815 0.00 1 0.9446
WHO stage 0.07673 0.34 1 0.5609
Functional status − 0.10651 0.65 1 0.4185
Adherence − 0.11155 0.81 1 0.3691
Disclosure 0.21609 3.19 1 0.0740
Other OI 0.07467 0.47 1 0.4943
Occupation − 0.19293 2.52 1 0.1122
Marital status − 0.06543 0.25 1 0.6162
Global test 11.76 15 0.6971

The Cox-Snell residuals (together with their Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazard function) were done to check the goodness of fit for all models. The figure shows that the plot of the Nelson Aalen cumulative hazard function with Cox-Snell follows the 45° line closely. Hence, the output shows Cox–Snell residuals of the Weibull model were satisfied the overall model fitness compared with other models. Among all models, the Weibull model was appropriately fitted data compared with others (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Cox Snell graph for checking model adequacy of Weibull

Predictors of mortality among adult patients on ART

After fitting a bi-variable hazard regression model, most predictor variables, i.e., age, sex educational level, occupation, hemoglobin level, viral load, TB co-infection, WHO stage, functional status, adherence, disclosure status OI other than TB and BMI were found to have p-value < 0.2 and entered into multivariable analysis and variables such as sex, hemoglobin level, viral load, WHO clinical stage, and TB co-infection were found to be significant predictors of mortality at 5% level of significance.

In our study, the effect of other variables was constant, the hazard of death among males was 2.4 (HR = 2.4; 95% CI (1.24, 4.62)) times higher than females. Patients with low hemoglobin patients were 4.14 (HR = 4.14; 95% CI (2.18–7.86)) times higher risk of death than those with normal hemoglobin. The hazard of death among patients who had a high viral load was 6.7 ((HR = 6.70; 95% CI (3.40–13.22)) times higher than that of low viral load. Patients at baseline on ART advanced CLINICAL stage IV had 5.64 (HR = 5.64, 95% CI (2.53–12.56)) times increased risk of mortality compared to those presenting with WHO clinical Stage I at the initiation of ART (Table 4).

Table 4.

Hazard ratios from the single variable and multivariable analysis of the association between the possible predictors of mortality

Independent variables CHR (95% CI) AHR (95% CI)
Age in years
 15–24 1.00 1.00
 25–34 0.99 (0.43–2.27) 0.70 (0.25–1.92)
 35–44 1.51 (0.65–3.50) 1.11 (0.37–3.31)
 ≥ 45 2.29 (0.99–5.31) 2.43 (0.81–7.31)
Sex
 Female 1.00 1.00
 Male 2.10 (1.35–3.27) 2.40 (1.24–4.62)***
Education level
 No education 1.94 (0.96–3.90) 0.68 (0.26–1.79)
 Primary 1.10 (0.48–2.52) 0.59 (0.19–1.82)
 Secondary & above 1.00 1.00
Hemoglobin
 Low 5.73 (3.71–8.85) 4.14 (2.18–7.86)***
 Normal 1.00 1.00
Viral load
 ≤ 1000 1.00 1.00
 > 1000 9.84 (5.78–16.73) 6.70 (3.40–13.22)***
CD4
 ≤ 200 6.90 (3.87–12.31) 1.71 (0.77–3.76)
 201–350 0.89 (0.36–2.20) 0.53 (0.16–1.76)
 > 351 1.00 1.00
TB coinfection
 Yes 5.24 (3.04–9.05) 3.71 (1.59-8.64)***
 No 1.00 1.00
BMI in kg/m2
 ≥ 18.5 1.00 1.00
 15.5–18.4 1.88 (1.15–3.09) 1.07 (0.51–2.22)
 ≤ 15.4 2.43 (1.41–4.20) 2.45 (1.17–5.10)***
WHO clinical stage
 Stage I 1.00 1.00
 Stage II 3.92 (1.84–8.34) 2.58 (0.94–7.07)
 Stage III 3.63 (1.82–7.24) 3.31 (1.35–8.10)***
 Stage IV 6.52 (3.46–12.30) 5.64 (2.53–12.56)***
Functional status
 Working 1.00 1.00
 Ambulatory 3.57 (2.04–6.23) 1.04 (0.48–2.24)
 Bedridden 4.40 (2.70–7.18) 0.93 (0.45–1.94)
Adherence
 Good 1.00 1.00
 Fair 0.27 (0.08–0.86) 0.38 (0.08–1.70)
 Poor 1.37 (0.77–2.43) 0.92 (0.40–2.09)
Disclosure status
 Yes 1.00 1.00
 No 1.43 (0.93–2.19) 0.84 (0.45–1.58)
OIs other than TB
 Yes 3.41 (2.16–5.39) 1.19 (0.55–2.55)
 No 1.00 1.00
Occupation
 Merchant 1.00 1.00
 Daily laborer 8.86 (2.15–36.54) 5.57 (0.71–43.94)
 Farmer 5.97 (1.39–25.53) 3.81 (0.45–32.01)
 Housewife 4.90 (1.12–21.44) 5.74 (0.68–48.23)
 Othersa 2.62 (0.37–18.56) 0.45 (0.02–9.14)

HR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval; OIs: Opportunistic infection; 1: reference; BMI: body mass index

***Indicates that the variables significantly associated with the outcome at a 95% level of significance (P < 0.005)

aIndicates that driver, students, and jobless

Discussion

This study aimed to assess the incidence and predictors of mortality among adult HIV patients on ART at Metema Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Many other studies presented different predictors for mortality, and our study also assessed the magnitude of mortality and corresponding socio-demographic, clinical, and treatment-related factors. In this study, the overall incidence rate of mortality among adult HIV/ADIS patients who are on ART was 6.7 (95% CI (5.4–8.4)) per 100-person year of observation, consistent with other studies conducted in different areas of Ethiopia [20, 27]. This might be due to the implementation of ART services based on the ART guideline. However, the current finding of this study is higher than in other studies of Ethiopia [18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 26]. This difference might be due to our study was conducted in large number of migrant workers and daily laborers since daily laborers pass their time in the whole day in the work place and they do not have enough time to come health facility for medication and follow up. Because of the nature work, they are also more mobile and have no constant workplace that may end up with loss to follow up and poor treatment adherence which promotes death. Also, this group of population had low income (unable to feed themselves) and they believe that taking ART medication on an empty stomach is difficult and dangerous that leads them to seek an alternative options like holy water by stopping ART which facilitates death. However, the current finding is lower than the findings in Cameroon [32] and Uganda [33]. This might be due to a variation in the ART enrollment period with different treatment eligibility criteria and there was a variation in the implementation of new WHO treatment initiation recommendations in Sub-Saharan countries [34].

In this study, the hazards of death among male patients were 2.4 times higher than females in line with other studies [13, 35, 36], systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in low and middle-income country [14] and south Africa [37]. Since females have a better opportunity to practice the early diagnosis of HIV/AIDS, such as at a time of pregnancy, females were screened for HIV tests as a part of the PMTCT program. Besides this, a higher risk of mortality in males might be due to behavioral factors of males like substance use, potentially leading to late HIV diagnosis and poor adherence to ART. Also, another study assessing mortality rate among HIV positive patients in Uganda indicated that male patients 37% more risk of mortality compared to female patients at the starting of ART [13].

In this study, those ART clients with higher viral load had an increased hazard of death in agreement with the study conducted in seven teaching Hospitals of Ethiopia [27]. This could be a lower rate of viral suppression and poor immunological recovery at baseline.

Similarly, patients who had advanced WHO clinical stages (stage III and IV) were a higher hazard of death than those in the WHO clinical stage I consistency with studies conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa [12, 3841]. This reflects the advanced immunodeficiency increases the risk of mortality.

Patients who had low hemoglobin levels have an increased hazard of death than those who had normal hemoglobin levels. This finding is comparable with the studies conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa [8, 33, 4244]. This might be the HIV is directly affecting the bone marrow and the high incidence of anemia might increase with the progression of HIV infection, which probably has contributed to the increasing the risk of mortality. Moreover, anemia among HIV patients can lead to impaired physical functioning, psychological distress, poor quality of life, accelerated disease progression, and shorter life expectancy [30].

Patients with TB-co infected with increased the hazard of death compared to clients not developing TB. This finding is consistent with studies conducted in rural Uganda [33] and in Ethiopia [21, 22]. This might be due to host responses to M. tuberculosis enhance HIV replication, accelerating the natural progression of HIV, and further depressing cellular immunity [45]. Decreased gut absorption of anti-tuberculosis drugs leads to impaired treatment outcomes including mortality. Furthermore, TB and HIV is double burden infection which leads to cause of mortality worldwide [46].

In this study, the hazard of death among patients with BMI ≤ 15.4 kg/m2 was 2.4 times higher than those with a BMI ≥ 18.5 kg/m2. This study is similar to studies conducted in Tanzania [8], Ethiopia [22], Cameroon [32], Uganda [33], and Malawi [38]. Patients with lower BMI are malnourished and unable to cope with the disease and had a high exposure to opportunistic infections that leads to death [47].

Limitation of study

The potential limitation of this study was because of the retrospective nature of the study which lacks completeness of patient records like substance use, provision of opportunistic infection, prophylaxis status, and hospitalization of patients. We could not ascertain that all recorders of mortality were AIDS-related, so all mortality was considered as HIV/ AIDS-related because of the lack of records on the cause of mortality.

Conclusion

In this study, the incidence of mortality was high. Patients on ART who have Advanced WHO patients (stage III and IV), viral load > 1000 copy /ml, hemoglobin ≤ 10 mg/dl, TB co-infection, BMI ≤ 15.4 kg/m2, and being male sex had a higher risk of mortality. Special attention should be given to male patients and high public interventions needed among HIV patients on ART to reduce the mortality rate. Nutritional support and close monitoring of patients in the early period of ART treatment initiation is very vital to improve patient survival.

Supplementary Information

12981_2021_353_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13.9KB, docx)

Additional file 1. AIC and BIC value for model comparison of Cox and parametric model

Acknowledgements

The researcher would like to thank the University of Gondar for ethical approval. We also like to extend our appreciation to data collectors and Metema hospital staff for their devoted cooperation.

Abbreviations

AIC

Akaike Information Criteria

AIDS

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

ART

Antiretroviral Therapy

BIC

Bayesian Information Criteria

MI

Body mass index

HAART

Highly active antiretroviral therapy

Hgb

Hemoglobin

OI

Opportunistic infection

PMTCT

Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission

PYO

Person Year Observation

UNAIDS

United Nations Joint Program on HIV/AIDS

WHO

World Health Organization

Authors' contributions

KL and DA and TY conceived of the study and were involved in the design of the study, coordination and reviewed the article, analysis, report writing, and preparation of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate data

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee of the University of Gondar. A permission letter was also obtained from Metema Hospital. All information collected from patient cards were kept strictly confidential and the names of patients on ART were not included in the data collection tool.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interests concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Kefale Lejadiss Workie, Email: kefalelije@gmail.com.

Tilahun Yemanu Birhan, Email: yemanu.tilahun@gmail.com.

Dessie Abebaw Angaw, Email: dessieabebaw96@gmail.com.

References

  • 1.Piot P, et al. Defeating AIDS—advancing global health. Lancet. 2015;386(9989):171–218. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60658-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Marrazzo JM, et al. HIV prevention in clinical care settings: 2014 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society–USA Panel. JAMA. 2014;312(4):390–409. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.HIV/AIDS, U.N.J.P., United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). . Unaids Data 2018, 2018. 20(18): p. 1–369.
  • 4.Boutayeb A. The impact of HIV/AIDS on human development in African countries. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(S1):S3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-S1-S3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Granich R, et al. Trends in AIDS deaths, new infections and ART coverage in the top 30 countries with the highest AIDS mortality burden; 1990–2013. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0131353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Verma S. Health, well-being and development of adolescents through awareness about HIV/AIDS. J Psychosoc Res. 2016;11(1):183. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ojikutu BO, et al. Predictors of mortality in patients initiating antiretroviral therapy in Durban, South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2008;98(3):204–208. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Johannessen A, et al. Predictors of mortality in HIV-infected patients starting antiretroviral therapy in a rural hospital in Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8(1):52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wajanga BM, et al. Inpatient mortality of HIV-infected adults in sub-Saharan Africa and possible interventions: a mixed methods review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0627-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ababa, A., Report on the 2014 round antenatal care based Sentinel HIV Surveillance in Ethiopia. Ethiop Public Heal Instititute, 2015.
  • 11.Ayele W, et al. Treatment outcomes and their determinants in HIV patients on anti-retroviral treatment program in selected health facilities of Kembata and Hadiya zones, Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Region, Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2176-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jerene D, et al. Predictors of early death in a cohort of Ethiopian patients treated with HAART. BMC Infect Dis. 2006;6(1):136. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rubaihayo J, et al. Trends and predictors of mortality among HIV positive patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy in Uganda. Infect Dis Rep. 2015;7(3):66–73. doi: 10.4081/idr.2015.5967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gupta A, et al. Early mortality in adults initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC): a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(12):e28691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Biset Ayalew M. Mortality and its predictors among HIV infected patients taking antiretroviral treatment in Ethiopia: a systematic review. AIDS Res Treat. 2017;2017:5415298. doi: 10.1155/2017/5415298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Susuman AS. HIV/AIDS in Ethiopia: health view. J Asian Afr Stud. 2017;52(3):302–313. doi: 10.1177/0021909615570957. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.EHNRI F. HIV related estimates and projections for Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: FMoH; 2012. pp. 6–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tarekegne D, et al. Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection in a cohort of tuberculosis patients at Metema Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a 3 years retrospective study. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9(1):1–6. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2004-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hambisa MT, Ali A, Dessie Y. Determinants of mortality among HIV positives after initiating antiretroviral therapy in Western Ethiopia: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study. Int Sch Res Notices. 2013;20(13):491601. doi: 10.1155/2013/491601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Alemu AW, Sebastián MS. Determinants of survival in adult HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy in Oromiyaa, Ethiopia. Glob Health Action. 2010;3(1):5398. doi: 10.3402/gha.v3i0.5398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tachbele E, Ameni G. Survival and predictors of mortality among human immunodeficiency virus patients on anti-retroviral treatment at Jinka Hospital, South Omo, Ethiopia: a six years retrospective cohort study. Epidemiol Health. 2016;38:e2016049. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2016049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Damtew B, Mengistie B, Alemayehu T. Survival and determinants of mortality in adult HIV/Aids patients initiating antiretroviral therapy in Somali Region, Eastern Ethiopia. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;22(1):138. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.22.138.4352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Biadgilign S, Reda AA, Digaffe T. Predictors of mortality among HIV infected patients taking antiretroviral treatment in Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study. AIDS Res Ther. 2012;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/1742-6405-9-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tadele A, Shumey A, Hiruy N. Survival and predictors of mortality among adult patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy at Debre-markos referral hospital, North West Ethiopia; a retrospective cohort study. J AIDS Clin Res. 2014;5:2. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mengesha S, Belayihun B, Kumie A. Predictors of survival in HIV-infected patient after Initiation of HAART in Zewditu Memorial Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;2014:250913. doi: 10.1155/2014/250913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tadesse K, Haile F, Hiruy N. Predictors of mortality among patients enrolled on antiretroviral therapy in Aksum hospital, northern Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e87392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fekade D, et al. Predictors of survival among adult Ethiopian patients in the national ART program at Seven University Teaching Hospitals: a prospective cohort study. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2017;27(1):63–71. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v27i1.7S. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gurmu, D.E., Predictors of mortality among human immunodeficiency virus infected patients' records in Gondar University hospital, Ethiopia. 2011, Citeseer.
  • 29.Organization WH. Patient monitoring guidelines for HIV care and antiretroviral therapy (ART). 2006.
  • 30.Melese H, et al. Anemia among adult HIV patients in Ethiopia: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Hiv/aids. 2017;9:25. doi: 10.2147/HIV.S121021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ministry of Health, E., National Comprehensive HIV Prevention, Care and Treatment Training for Health care Providers. 2017.
  • 32.Sieleunou I, et al. Determinants of survival in AIDS patients on antiretroviral therapy in a rural centre in the Far-North Province, Cameroon. Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14(1):36–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02183.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moore DM, et al. Determinants of early and late mortality among HIV-infected individuals receiving home-based antiretroviral therapy in rural Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Synd. 2011;58(3):289. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182303716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Organization, W.H., Progress report 2016: prevent HIV, test and treat all: WHO support for country impact. 2016, World Health Organization.
  • 35.Setegn T, et al. Predictors of mortality among adult antiretroviral therapy users in southeastern Ethiopia: retrospective cohort study. AIDS Res Treat. 2015;2015:148769. doi: 10.1155/2015/148769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gunda DW, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of mortality among adult HIV patients initiating ART in rural setting of HIV care and treatment services in north western Tanzania: a retrospective cohort study. J Sex Transm Dis. 2017;2017:7075601. doi: 10.1155/2017/7075601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Naidoo K, et al. High mortality rates in men initiated on anti-retroviral treatment in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(9):e0184124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ferradini L, et al. Scaling up of highly active antiretroviral therapy in a rural district of Malawi: an effectiveness assessment. The lancet. 2006;367(9519):1335–1342. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68580-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lawn SD, et al. Early mortality among adults accessing antiretroviral treatment programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS. 2008;22(15):1897. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32830007cd. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Djomand G, et al. Virologic and immunologic outcomes and programmatic challenges of an antiretroviral treatment pilot project in Abidjan. Cote d'Ivoire Aids. 2003;17:S5–S15. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200317003-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zachariah R, et al. Risk factors for high early mortality in patients on antiretroviral treatment in a rural district of Malawi. AIDS. 2006;20(18):2355–2360. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32801086b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Etard J-F, et al. Mortality and causes of death in adults receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy in Senegal: a 7-year cohort study. AIDS. 2006;20(8):1181–1189. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000226959.87471.01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Stringer JS, et al. Rapid scale-up of antiretroviral therapy at primary care sites in Zambia: feasibility and early outcomes. JAMA. 2006;296(7):782–793. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.7.782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Toure S, et al. Rapid scaling-up of antiretroviral therapy in 10,000 adults in Cote d’Ivoire: two-year outcomes and determinants. AIDS. 2008;22(7):873. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f768f8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Falvo JV, et al. Arc of a vicious circle: pathways activated by Mycobacterium tuberculosis that target the HIV-1 long terminal repeat. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;45(6):1116–1124. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2011-0186TR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Swaminathan S, Padmapriyadarsini C, Narendran G. HIV-associated tuberculosis: clinical update. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(10):1377–1386. doi: 10.1086/652147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Van der Sande MA, et al. Body mass index at time of HIV diagnosis: a strong and independent predictor of survival. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;37(2):1288–1294. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000122708.59121.03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12981_2021_353_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13.9KB, docx)

Additional file 1. AIC and BIC value for model comparison of Cox and parametric model

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from AIDS Research and Therapy are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES