Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 5.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Immunol. 2020 Dec 3;359:104253. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2020.104253

Novel T regulatory cells come of age: The curious incident of a mouse in Tennessee, delayed thymectomy and chimeric receptors!

David W Scott a,*, Megan K Levings b
PMCID: PMC8099040  NIHMSID: NIHMS1697217  PMID: 33307362

Several seminal events built on years of basic discoveries led to recognition of the critical role of a subset of T cells, termed regulatory T cells or Tregs, in controlling both immunity and tolerance. The concept that immune responses could be controlled by T cells was first proposed by Gershon and Kondo in the 1970′s [1,2], the first year of publication of our journal. At the time they were called “suppressor cells”, with activity demonstrated primarily in phenomenological cell mixing experiments, but interpretations were limited by the lack of the markers and reagents we have today. This observation was followed by what might be referred to as a bandwagon effect of publications, but ended approximately 12 years later with a molecular analysis of so-called MHC linkage to “I-J” or lack thereof [3]. But with the end of suppressor T cells came the rise of Tregs, with the combined findings of Sakaguchi and colleagues on post-neonatal thymectomy [4], clinical observations of IPEX patients [5] and the cloning of FOXP3 [6], enabling a fortuitous link with the scurfy mouse, the latter being “the curious incident of the mouse in Tennessee” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v = TfSI5WRwDXM)! The scurfy mutation occurred spontaneously in a mouse colony at the Oak Ridge National Laboratories during World War II, enabling the subsequent cloning of FoxP3 by Ramsdell and colleagues [7].

The current issue of CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY contains 16 research and review articles that celebrate the current landscape of “Treg” research and highlight the emergence of novel approaches to enhance their efficacy. For example, several articles describe how antigen-specific CD4 + or CD8 + Tregs can be generated and expanded by applying approaches initiated by Zelig Eshhar in Israel [8] and applied clinically for cancer in the form of CAR (Chimeric Antigen Receptor) T cell therapy [9,10].

Thus, a major focus of this issue are reviews by Rosado-Sánchez and Levings [11], Janssens and Cools [12], and Rana and Biswas [13] that discuss the evolution of CAR-engineered Tregs. These articles emphasize the issues in generating and improving the design of specific Treg for use in transplantation, autoimmunity and hemophilia, for example. Savinov et al. [14] discuss the challenge of careful selection of chimeric receptors, a factor that is extremely important in the derivation of specific and non-specific Tregs for transplantation, as put forth by Alzhrani and colleagues [15].

Pohl et al. [16] and Fu et al. [17] present original research articles demonstrating the efficacy of scFv engineered Tregs and FoxP3-transduced expanded specific Tregs in experimental animal models for multiple sclerosis and hemophilia, respectively.

In their article, Mannie et al.[18] propose that the affinity of T cell recognition can modulate Treg function in designing tolerogenic vaccines. In addition, Planchais and colleagues [19] argue that the oxidative environment may alter the repertoire and behavior of B cells in driving autoimmunity. Osei-Bordom et al. [20] review the unique role of the liver as a driver of Tregs, while Bertolini and colleagues emphasize the involvement of the gut in driving oral tolerance via Tregs [21].

In their review on immune regulation in lymphopenic hosts, Waldmann and Graca [22] suggest a mechanism for “infectious tolerance” to explain the bystander effect of Tregs. Akkaya and Shevach [23] review how Tregs may be the master criminals of the immune system (like “Macavity, the Mystery Cat” in T.S. Elliot’s poem) [24] by not only stealing cytokines like IL-2, but also stripping membrane receptors off antigen presenting cells, although not necessarily disappearing as in the poem.

Reviews by Lees [25] and Li et al. [26] bring us back to appreciate how cytotoxic CD8 + T cells can also play an important role in in regulating undesirable responses in autoimmunity and adverse reactions to therapeutics.

Overall, the special issue of CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY highlights both the multitude of ways that Tregs can act as conductors of the immunologic orchestra and the progress over the five decades since the discovery of “suppressor (T) cells” [1]

Footnotes

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  • [1].Gershon RK, Kondo K, Infectious immunological tolerance, Immunology 21 (6) (1971) 903–914. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Gershon RK, T cell control of antibody production, Contemp Top Immunobiol 3 (1974) 1–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Steinmetz M, et al. , A molecular map of the immune response region from the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse, Nature 300 (5887) (1982) 35–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Sakaguchi S, Takahashi T, Nishizuka Y, Study on cellular events in post-thymectomy autoimmune oophoritis in mice. II. Requirement of Lyt-1 cells in normal female mice for the prevention of oophoritis, J Exp Med 156 (6) (1982) 1577–1586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Powell BR, Buist NR, Stenzel P, An X-linked syndrome of diarrhea, polyendocrinopathy, and fatal infection in infancy, J Pediatr 100 (5) (1982) 731–737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Bennett CL, et al. , The immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX) is caused by mutations of FOXP3, Nat Genet 27 (1) (2001) 20–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Ramsdell F, Ziegler SF, FOXP3 and scurfy: how it all began, Nat Rev Immunol 14 (5) (2014) 343–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Eshhar Z, et al. , Functional expression of chimeric receptor genes in human T cells, J Immunol Methods 248 (1–2) (2001) 67–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Kalos M, June CH, Adoptive T cell transfer for cancer immunotherapy in the era of synthetic biology, Immunity 39 (1) (2013) 49–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].June CH, Sadelain M, Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy, N Engl J Med 379 (1) (2018) 64–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Rosado-Sanchez I, Levings MK, Building a CAR-Treg: Going from the basic to the luxury model, Cell Immunol 358 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Janssens I, Cools N, Regulating the regulators: Is introduction of an antigen-specific approach in regulatory T cells the next step to treat autoimmunity? Cell Immunol 358 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Rana J, Biswas M, Regulatory T cell therapy: Current and future design perspectives, Cell Immunol 356 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Radichev IA, et al. , Towards antigen-specific Tregs for type 1 diabetes: Construction and functional assessment of pancreatic endocrine marker, HPi2-based chimeric antigen receptor, Cell Immunol 358 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Alzhrani A, et al. , Identification, selection, and expansion of non-gene modified alloantigen-reactive Tregs for clinical therapeutic use, Cell Immunol 357 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].De Paula Pohl A, et al. , Engineered regulatory T cells expressing myelin-specific chimeric antigen receptors suppress EAE progression, Cell Immunol 358 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Fu RY, et al. , CD4(+) T cells engineered with FVIII-CAR and murine Foxp3 suppress anti-factor VIII immune responses in hemophilia a mice, Cell Immunol 358 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Mannie MD, et al. , Tolerogenic vaccines: Targeting the antigenic and cytokine niches of FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells, Cell Immunol 355 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Planchais C, et al. , Stimulation with FITC-labeled antigens confers B cells with regulatory properties, Cell Immunol 355 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Osei-Bordom D, Bozward AG, Oo YH, The hepatic microenvironment and regulatory T cells, Cell Immunol 357 (2020) 104195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Bertolini TB, et al. , Role of orally induced regulatory T cells in immunotherapy and tolerance, Cell Immunol 359 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Waldmann H, Graca L, Infectious tolerance. What are we missing? Cell Immunol 354 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Akkaya B, Shevach EM, Regulatory T cells: Master thieves of the immune system, Cell Immunol 355 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Chinitz DE, A Companion to T, John Wiley and Sons, Eliot S, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Lees JR, CD8+ T cells: The past and future of immune regulation, Cell Immunol 357 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Li LZ, Zhang Z, Bhoj VG, Conventional T cell therapies pave the way for novel Treg therapeutics, Cell Immunol (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES