Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
. 2007 May 31;4(2):136–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2001.00954.x

Transdermal Clonidine Skin Reactions

L Michael Prisant 1
PMCID: PMC8099223  PMID: 11927798

Abstract

The clonidine transdermal therapeutic system is being used as a therapy for blood pressure treatment. Systemic side effects seem to be fewer than with oral clonidine. However, localized skin reactions occur frequently and the incidence increases with the dose and duration of use. Common signs include erythema, scaling, vesiculation, excoriation, and induration. Allergic contact dermatitis is less frequent but common. Hyperpigmentation and depigmentation also occur. Pretreatment with 0.5% hydrocortisone is associated with less skin irritation and higher blood levels. Although oral clonidine is no longer widely used in the management of hypertension, awareness of these reactions to the transdermal delivery of this agent is important.


Transdermal clonidine was introduced in 1984 as a transcutaneous antihypertensive drug that can be delivered for up to 168 hours. 1 , 2 The transdermal therapeutic system (TTS) for Catapres‐TTS consists of a 0.2‐mm adhesive patch with a drug reservoir and a rate‐controlling membrane. Figure 3 shows the design of the delivery system. The patient is advised to place the patch on the upper arm or torso and to rotate the site. 3

Figure 3.

Diagram of transdermal clonidine delivery system

The α2 stimulant in this delivery system, which results in decreased sympathetic nerve activity, seems to be better tolerated than oral clonidine in terms of dry mouth and drowsiness. 4 , 5 It takes 2–3 days to achieve initial therapeutic blood levels. 6 On discontinuation, rebound and/or overshoot hypertension is less likely to occur, due to the skin depot of clonidine, except in elderly patients. 7 , 8 However, dermatologic reactions occur commonly (Figures 1 and 2 and Table). The patient may complain of pruritus, and the objective signs include erythema, scaling, vesiculation, excoriation, and induration.

Figure 1.

Examine the arms and upper chest. What do you notice?

Figure 2.

A close‐up view of erythematous squares on the chest, showing varying stages of erythema and scaling in squares due to transdermal clonidine

Table.

Adverse Skin Reactions With Transdermal Clonidine

Author (Year) n Duration (WK) Skin Reaction Dermatitis
Boekhorst (1983) 19 21 4–28 52% 14%
Groth et al. (1983) 20 29 4 ? 38%
McMahon (1983) 20 73 12 ? 6%
Weber et al. (1984) 5 20 12 10% 0%
Weber et al. (1984) 21 85 12 9% ?
Schaller et al.(1985) 22 7 4 43% 0%
Burris and Mroczek (1986) 4 25 4 64% 8%
Hollifield (1986) 10 2681 12 ? 15%
Kellaway and Lubbe (1986) 15 135 12 51% 15%
Popli et al. (1986) 23 30 5 ? 0%
McChesney et al. (1987) 24 28 12–36 39% 12%
Horning et al. (1988) 9 20 104 50% ?
Fillingim et al. (1989) 25 41 88 41% 5%
Schmidt et al. (1989) 8 22 12–20 50% 23%
McMahon et al. (1990) 26 39 8 33% 9%
Burris et al. (1991) 27 23 8 ? 13%
Lueg et al. (1991) 28 60 8 20% 2%
Houston and Hays (1993) 29 35 8 29% 9%
Weidler et al. (1992) 30 66 20 ? 5%

Several types of dermatologic reactions have been reported, including early erythema associated with pruritus, allergic contact dermatitis, and alterations in skin pigmentation. 3 Allergic dermatitis occurs more commonly in whites than in blacks 9 and in women than in men. 10 One report 11 indicated that the sensitization rate with clonidine TTS is 34% in white women, 18% in white men, 14% in black women, and 8% in black men. Depigmentation and hyperpigmentation have been observed in African Americans. 12 There is a relationship between duration of patch use and the rate of development of allergic dermatitis. 13 , 14

In a single‐blind study with a 2‐week placebo patch run‐in and a 12‐week maintenance period, 15 the rates of erythema and induration were 52% vs. 11% and 24% vs. 0% for active drug vs. placebo, respectively. Fifteen percent of patients discontinued treatment due to severe skin reactions. 8

Potential causes of the allergic contact dermatitis could be from the active drug, the adhesive, the diffusion membrane, the solvent, or the enhancer. 16 Most studies have indicated that the skin reactions are related to the drug itself and not other factors. 13 , 17 Other transdermal delivery systems are used with nicotine, nitroglycerin, scopolamine, estradiol, and testosterone; cutaneous and allergic reactions are less frequent. 16 Treatment with 0.5% hydrocortisone or over‐the‐counter antacids (magnesium‐aluminum hydroxide suspension) has been used to ameliorate skin reactions. 18

References

  • 1. Prisant LM, Bottini B, DiPiro JT, et al. Novel drug‐delivery systems for hypertension. Am J Med. 1992;93:45S–55S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Elliott WJ, Prisant LM. Drug delivery systems for antihypertensive agents. Blood Press Monit. 1997;2:53–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Transdermal clonidine for hypertension. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 1985;27:95–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Burris JF, Mroczek WJ. Transdermal administration of clonidine: a new approach to antihypertensive therapy. Pharmacotherapy. 1986;6:30–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Weber MA, Drayer JI, Brewer DD, et al. Transdermal continuous antihypertensive therapy. Lancet. 1984;1:9–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Langley MS, Heel RC. Transdermal clonidine. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 1988;35:123–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Metz S, Klein C, Morton N. Rebound hypertension after discontinuation of transdermal clonidine therapy. Am J Med. 1987;82:17–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Schmidt GR, Schuna AA, Goodfriend TL. Transdermal clonidine compared with hydrochlorothiazide as monotherapy in elderly hypertensive males. J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;29:133–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Horning JR, Zawada ET Jr, Simmons JL, et al. Efficacy and safety of two‐year therapy with transdermal clonidine for essential hypertension. Chest. 1988;93:941–945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hollifield J. Clinical acceptability of transdermal clonidine: a large‐scale evaluation by practitioners. Am Heart J. 1986;112:900–906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Sensitive and ethnic skin. A need for special skin‐care agents? Dermatol Clin. 1991;9:89–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Doe N, Seth S, Hebert LA. Skin depigmentation related to transdermal clonidine therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:2129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Maibach H. Clonidine: irritant and allergic contact dermatitis assays. Contact Dermatitis. 1985;12:192–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Dick JB, Northridge DB, Lawson AA. Skin reactions to longterm transdermal clonidine. Lancet. 1987;1:516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kellaway GS, Lubbe WF. A community‐based trial of transdermal antihypertensive therapy with clonidine (Catapres‐TTS). N Z Med J. 1986;99:711–714. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Carmichael AJ. Skin sensitivity and transdermal drug delivery. A review of the problem. Drug Saf. 1994;10:151–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Maibach HI. Oral substitution in patients sensitized by transdermal clonidine treatment. Contact Dermatitis. 1987;16:1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ito MK, O'Connor DT. Skin pretreatment and the use of transdermal clonidine. Am J Med. 1991;91:42S–49S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Boekhorst JC. Allergic contact dermatitis with transdermal clonidine. Lancet. 1983;2:1031–1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Groth H, Vetter H, Knusel J, et al. Allergic skin reactions to transdermal clonidine. Lancet. 1983;2:850–851. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Weber MA, Drayer JI, McMahon FG, et al. Transdermal administration of clonidine for treatment of high BP. Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:1211–1213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Schaller MD, Nussberger J, Waeber B, et al. Transdermal clonidine therapy in hypertensive patients. Effects on office and ambulatory recorded blood pressure values. JAMA. 1985;253:233–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Popli S, Daugirdas JT, Neubauer JA, et al. Transdermal clonidine in mild hypertension. A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146:2140–2144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. McChesney JA, Ryan C, Shaw RE, et al. Transdermal clonidine for the treatment of essential hypertension. Compr Ther. 1987;13:49–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Fillingim JM, Matzek KM, Hughes EM, et al. Long‐term treatment with transdermal clonidine in mild hypertension. Clin Ther. 1989;11:398–408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. McMahon FG, Jain AK, Vargas R, et al. A double‐blind comparison of transdermal clonidine and oral captopril in essential hypertension. Clin Ther. 1990;12:88–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Burris JF, Papademetriou V, Wallin JD, et al. Therapeutic adherence in the elderly: transdermal clonidine compared to oral verapamil for hypertension. Am J Med. 1991;91:22S–28S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Lueg MC, Herron J, Zellner S. Transdermal clonidine as an adjunct to sustained‐release diltiazem in the treatment of mild‐to‐moderate hypertension. Clin Ther. 1991;13:471–481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Houston MC, Hays L. Transdermal clonidine as an adjunct to nifedipine‐GITS therapy in patients with mild‐to‐moderate hypertension. Am Heart J. 1993;126:918–923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Weidler D, Wallin JD, Cook E, et al. Transdermal clonidine as an adjunct to enalapril: an evaluation of efficacy and patient compliance. J Clin Pharmacol. 1992;32:444–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Clinical Hypertension are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES