Skip to main content
JAAOS Global Research & Reviews logoLink to JAAOS Global Research & Reviews
. 2021 May 4;5(5):e21.00041. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00041

Symptomatic Atlas Hypoplasia in a Latin-American Patient: Case Report and Literature Review

Matias Pereira Duarte 1, Gasto Camino Willhuber 1, Matias Petracchi 1, Marcelo Gruenberg 1, Carlos Alberto Sola 1
PMCID: PMC8099396  PMID: 33945518

Abstract

Background:

Atlas hypoplasia is an infrequent cause of upper cervical stenosis. Only 24 cases in nonsyndromic adult population have been published. We are not aware of previous reports describing isolated fully formed atlas hypoplasia in a Latin-American patient. The purpose of this work was to report a case of an 80-year-old Argentinian woman with cervical myelopathy because of atlas hypoplasia and a literature review about this subject.

Methods:

A clinical case and an extended review of the literature are presented. We assessed from each case: age, sex, posterior atlanto-dens interval, surgical treatment, outcomes, and follow-up period.

Results:

Neurologic symptoms markedly improved after posterior decompression from severe to moderate in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scoring System and from four to three on the Nurick scale. Twenty-five patients were analyzed (mean 58.4 years, 32% female). The mean posterior atlanto-dens interval was 8.8 mm. Twenty-three patients underwent decompression alone, and two needed posterior fusion. All patients reported clinical improvement at an average follow-up of 13 months.

Conclusion:

Cervical myelopathy caused by fully formed atlas hypoplasia is not an exclusive pathology of far east population, and it may present in nonsyndromic patients. Surgical treatment by C1 laminectomy improved neurologic impairment.

Study Design:

Case report and literature review.


Cervical myelopathy in elderly patients occurs most frequently in the subaxial spine because of degenerative spondylosis.1 Spinal cord compression at the C1 level is infrequent because the cervical canal diameter is larger at this level.2 The available literature concerning upper cervical compression is based on anecdotal cases or small series.3,4,5,6,7 C1 stenosis etiology can be divided into congenital or acquired. Congenital pathologies correspond to any anatomical anomaly of the atlas, such as clefts or aplasias of anterior and posterior arches, os odontoideum, or dens hypertrophy, either alone or in combination.8 Isolated pure atlas hypoplasia (anatomically complete but small Atlas ring) is a very infrequent anomaly.3 A posterior midline cleft is the most usual encountered abnormality (3% to 4% in cervical radiographs), with a much higher prevalence than anterior arch defects (<1%).4 Many of these congenital anomalies, including atlas hypoplasia, may occur as part of different syndromes, such as Arnold-Chiari, Klippel-Feil, Down,5 and Turner syndrome; ankylosing spondylitis; achondroplasia (more often related to foramen magnum stenosis)9; and mucopolysaccharidosis, such as Morquio syndrome.6,10,11 On the other hand, acquired C1 stenosis may present as a consequence of trauma, osteoarthritis, or pannus formation because of evolved rheumatoid arthritis, which is unusual these days as a consequence of medical therapy improvements.

The objective of this study was to present a case of isolated symptomatic C1 hypoplasia in a Latin-American female patient. In addition, a literature review regarding this subject was done.

Methods

After our Institutional Ethical Committee approval and patient informed consent, we present a clinical case and the data analysis from a narrative literature review. A bibliographic search was conducted according to the following criteria: articles in PUBMED including case reports and case series, involving humans aged 18 years or older, with C1 complete hypoplasia and with or without myelopathy. The search was achieved using the following MeSH terms: “C1 stenosis,” “atlas congenital anomalies,” and “cervical myelopathy.” We obtained additional cases from these articles' references.

Exclusion criteria included pediatric patients, with another anatomical anomaly such as medial cleft, total or partial agenesis, or any syndromic background, including Arnold-Chiari malformation, Klippel-Feil syndrome, gonadal dysgenesis, Down syndrome, Turner syndrome, ankylosing spondylitis, achondroplasia, Morquio syndrome, and ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament.

The following data were collected from each case if available: author, year of publication, patients' age, sex, posterior atlanto-dens interval (PADI, measured from posterior border of dens to the C1 lamina), surgical procedure, outcomes, follow-up period, and any other relevant information if necessary.

Case Presentation

An 80-year-old woman without a relevant medical background reported a 6-year history of neck pain and gait disturbance. She also referred increased urinary frequency with occasional episodes of incontinence. The neurologic examination demonstrated hyperactive deep tendon reflexes in all four limbs with a positive bilateral Hoffmann sign. Lhermitte sign was positive, neither Babinski nor clonus signs were detected. The patient's gait was moderately spastic. Hand dexterity was progressively lost. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scoring System12 preoperatively scored 8 of 18 (severe impairment), and her Nurick scale was 4.13

Lateral cervical spine radiographs revealed a small posterior arch of the atlas and bilateral ponticulus posticus (Figures 1, A and B), the C2/C3 spinolaminar line was marked, and the anterior aspect of the posterior arch of the atlas rested ventral to it (Figure 2). Spondylotic changes were present throughout the entire cervical spine. No atlantoaxial instability was detected on flexion and extension views (Figures 1C and D). Axial and sagittal CT scan revealed a hypoplastic intact posterior arch of the atlas. PADI measurement was 11 mm (Figure 3B and D). Magnetic resonance images revealed a remarkably flattened spinal cord at C1 and also a diffuse and subtle high signal image in the spinal cord on the STIR sequence suggesting edema because of compression. A hypertrophic transverse ligament and an odontoid bone cyst were also identified. The available space for the spinal cord, measured from the most dorsal aspect of the transverse ligament to the C1 lamina confluence, was narrowed to 6.5 mm (Figures 4A–C). As no instability signs were detected, the patient underwent decompression surgery by removing the posterior arch of the atlas without perioperative complications. This resulted in a notable improvement in limbs numbness and gait disturbance. At 12 months of follow-up, the postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scoring System score was 13 of 18 (moderate impairment), and Nurick grade was 3 with notable gait and numbness improvement.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Anterior-posterior (A) and lateral (B) cervical radiographs showing a relatively small atlas. Flexion (C) and extension (D) cervical radiographs demonstrating no notable instability.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Lateral cervical radiographs showing the case. The C2/C3 spinolaminar line was marked, and the ventral aspect of the posterior arch of C1 lies ventral to this line. The C2/C3 spinolaminar line was drawn, starting from C3 and extending cranially through C2 to the lamina of C1. When the ventral lamina of C1 lay ventral to this line, the spinolaminar test is defined as positive, which indicated the possibility of the existence of a relatively narrow canal of C1.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Sagittal (A and B) and axial (C and D) CT scan images showing decreased values of the C1 diameter and posterior atlanto-dens interval.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Sagittal (A and B) and axial (C) MRIs showing a minimal space available for the cord with values below 7 mm. There is a bone cyst at the tip of the dens and a thick transverse ligament that allows a narrow corridor for the medullary cord.

Case Series Analysis Results

Twenty-five cases were included in this review (Table 1), including the one presented in this article. All cases but eight corresponded to oriental ethnicity (Japanese and Chinese), two patients were from Belgium,18 four from India,6 and one from Saudi Arabia.27 This is the first report of a Latin-American female patient in America. Eight patients were female (32%). The average age was 58.4 years (ranging from 22 to 81). The mean PADI was 8.8 mm (ranging from 5.5 to 14 mm); for two patients, this value was not available (cases 17 and 20).24,27

Table 1.

Literature Review of Fully Formed Atlas Hypoplasia Cases

Author (yr) Case Number Sex Age PADI (mm) Treatment Outcomes Follow-up (mo) Associated Characteristics
Ishii et al14 (1984) 1 M 58 8 C1 laminectomy Residual moderate disability NA
Sawada et al15 (1989) 2 M 38 7 C1 laminectomy Clinical improvement NA
Komatsu et al. [16] (1993) 3 M 56 7.7 C1 laminectomy + craniectomy Clinical improvement 2
Tokiyoshi et al17 (1994) 4 M 55 7 C1 laminectomy + craniectomy Clinical improvement 12
Benitah et al18 (1994) 5 F 41 7 C1 and C2 laminectomy Clinical improvement NA Associated congenital hypertrophy of the laminae of C1 and C2
6 M 78 8 C1 and C2 laminectomy Clinical improvement NA Extensive unilateral osteophytes on the left C1–C2 joint in a violinist
Noguchi et al19 (1998) 7 M 81 10 C1 laminectomy Residual moderate disability NA
Okamoto et al20 (1998) 8 NA 77 11 C1 laminectomy + posterior fusion Good recovery NA
Phan et al21 (1998) 9 M 80 8 C1 laminectomy + craniectomy Some improvement of his clinical symptoms 6
10 M 75 7 C1 laminectomy Improvement of his clinical symptoms 2.5
May et al22 (2001) 11 M 66 10 C1 laminectomy + craniectomy Residual moderate disability NA
Nishikawa et al23 (2001) 12 M 82 12 C1 laminectomy Clinical improvement NA
13 M 72 11 C1 laminectomy Clinical improvement 3 Died at 3 months because of dissecting abdominal aneurysm
14 F 22 9 C1 laminectomy Clinical improvement 72
Tsuruta et al7 (2003) 15 F 79 8 C1 laminectomy Clinical improvement—able to walk with a cane 18 Partial ossification of the transverse ligament
Chang et al24 (2007) 16 M 79 6.9 C1 laminectomy Clinical improvement
JOA from 3 to 11/17
NA
17 M 62 NA C1 laminectomy + occipito-atlanto-axial fusion with wire fixation Clinical improvement
JOA from 13 to 17/17
NA Atlantoaxial instability
Hsu et al25 (2007) 18 M 38 12.4 C1 laminectomy + duraplasty Clinical improvement NA
Tang et al26 (2010) 19 F 58 5.5 C1 laminectomy Notable improvement NA Partial ossification of the transverse ligament, hypertrophy of the dens
Bokhari and Baeesa27 (2012) 20 F 68 NA C1 laminectomy Clinical improvement 6 Partial ossification of the transverse ligament
Nehete et al6 (2018) 21 F 47 11 C1 laminectomy Reduced neck pain, able to write 3
22 F 52 7 C1 laminectomy Able to walk 18
23 M 60 14 C1 laminectomy Spasticity better 12 Previously operated C2–C7 laminectomy
24 M 35 5.5 C1 and C2 laminectomy Minimal improvement 12
Pereira duarte et al 25 F 80 11 C1 laminectomy Clinical improvement
JOAm from 8 to 13/18
Nurick from 4 to 3.
12

JOAm = Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scoring System, PADI = posterior atlanto-dens interval

Twenty-three patients underwent decompression surgery with their variants: 15 patients, C1 laminectomies alone (60%); 3 patients, C1 and C2 laminectomy (cases 5, 6, and 24)6,18; 4 patients required C1 laminectomy associated with craniectomy (cases 3, 4, 9, and 11)16,17,21,22; and 1 patient was treated with C1 laminectomy and duraplasty (case 18).25 Two of 25 patients were treated by C1 laminectomy and posterior fusion; case 17 was due to radiographic atlantoaxial instability24; and in case 8,20 this information was not available. None of the articles reviewed assessed technical surgical problems or intraoperative complications related to vascular malformations or neurological anomalies associated.

Outcomes measurements were heterogeneous, the overall analysis showed consistency in clinical improvement after decompression; however, only two cases reported by Chan et al24 were evaluated with de JOA score preoperatively and postoperatively. Follow-up data were only available in 13 cases (52%), and the average period of follow-up was 13 months (ranging from 2 to 72 months).

Discussion

We report a case of one myelopathic Latin-American female patient with C1 stenosis because of atlas hypoplasia and a thorough literature review in nonsyndromic adult patients. As far as we know, we present the largest literature review of patients affected with this pathology, and this is the first case reported in America. We are not aware of previous reports in this region, this could be due to unfamiliarity to this entity from clinicians, radiologists, or surgeons.

Wackenheim28 first described hypoplasia of the atlas in 1974 as a cause of upper cervical stenosis without myelopathy. Ishii et al14 and Sawada et al15 were the next in describing cases of atlas hypoplasia accompanied by cervical myelopathy in nonsyndromic adult patients. Throughout the years, different authors3,6,7,23,24 have published their cases along with literature reviews. As far as we concern, all of them are heterogeneous—including adult and pediatric patients, with and without syndromic backgrounds—and incomplete series of patients because many cases have never been recorded in any of them.24-26 Some cases14,19,20 were reported in low impact far east journals, and they were retrieved from Tsuruta et al7 report.

After revising each paper meticulously, 28 cases were excluded: 16 pediatric patients3,6,25 (some of them with congenital syndromes), 1 subaxial multilevel stenosis, 1 Arnold-Chiari malformation,7 1 Klippel-Feil syndrome, 1 ankylosing spondylitis, 1 Morquio syndrome,6 1 patient with a complete absence of the posterior arch (Currarino classification type E),29 3 retroodontoideal mass of uncertain origin,7,30, 2 patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament,7,24 and 1 adult with bipartite atlas and atlantoaxial instability that refused surgery.3,31 A total of 25 patients were reviewed along with ours.

Anatomy and Embryology

To understand the congenital malformations of the atlas, it is required to know its developmental process. The formation of the atlas starts from three ossification centers originating from the first sclerotome. Both lateral ossification centers begin growing posteriorly within 7 to 7 weeks of embryogenesis to form the posterior arch and unite against each other within 4 months.32 Atlas hypoplasia could be caused by a failure in the dorsal expansion of the two lateral primary ossification centers because of a chondrogenesis error or resulting from premature fusion or early ossification of the neural arches.21,23

The dimensions of the upper cervical canal were first studied by Steel33 in 1968, who proposed the “Rule of Thirds,” explaining why cervical stenosis at the atlas level was so rare. More recently, Kelly et al2 did a cadaveric study and established that the normal C1 inner sagittal diameter, measured from the most posterior aspect of the fovea dentis to the most posterior portion of the ventral lamina, ranged from 23.5 to 38.1 mm, with a mean of 30.8 ± 2.4 mm. Hypoplasia of the atlas was defined when the inner sagittal diameter of the atlas is less than 28.9 mm. This study defined an objective criterion for atlas hypoplasia in adults. In our case, this distance measured in CT scan was 23.3 mm in the axial plane and 23.5 mm in the sagittal plane (Figures 3 A and C). The normal sagittal diameter of the canal at this level, also known as PADI or SAC (space available for the cord), is 19 to 32 mm at C115 measured from the posterior aspect of the dens until the anterior aspect of the posterior arch of the atlas. In our case, the PADI was 11 mm (Figures 3B and D), which is larger than the mean PADI obtained from this series, 8.8 mm. The sagittal diameter of the dural sac, measured from the transverse ligament to the posterior arch, is between 12 and 21 mm at C128; in our case, it was reduced to 6.5 mm because of a hypertrophic transverse ligament.

Clinical Presentation

The clinical presentation of C1 stenosis is similar to subaxial cervical myelopathy. Cervical pain, spasticity, gait and sensory disturbance, loss of manual dexterity, and urinary incontinence are the most often described symptoms.23 Trauma or degenerative changes25 such as ligamentum flavum buckling, pannus or synovial cyst formation, and ossification of the transverse ligament7,26,27 may act as stressors that exacerbate the symptomatology in elders. In our analysis, we found a slight yet positive correlation between PADI values and age of clinical presentation (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Correlation analysis between posterior atlanto-dens interval and patients' age. The correlation coefficient was of 0.19 showing a slight yet positive correlation of these factors.

Diagnosis

The diagnosis can be made with cervical lateral radiographs, CT scan, or cervical magnetic resonance imaging. The C2/C3 spinolaminar line test, proposed by Oshima et al,30 using a lateral cervical plain radiograph is a useful, sensitive (100%), and specific (97%) tool for screening. The prevalence of positive spinolaminar line in asymptomatic patients was 4.4%,30,34 92.8% of them were older than 60 years old.34 The most accurate and specific diagnostic method was described by Kelly et al,2 when measuring an AP C1 canal diameter of less than 28.9 mm.

Treatment

C1 stenosis treatment consists of a posterior atlas laminectomy.3,6 However, it is necessary to perform a thorough evaluation of the cervical spine and the craniovertebral junction. When atlantoaxial or craniocervical junction instability is found, concomitant fusion is necessary. Many patients underwent extended decompressions besides C1 laminectomy, and half of them do not report the follow-up period. As these procedures can cause instability, a longer follow-up should be required to determine the real outcomes of these decompressions.

Limitations

We acknowledge that this study has its limitations. First of all, we conducted a literature review without applying a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis workflow. Although we could have missed some reports, we have included all the cases found by the time, applying strict criteria in each documented patient and obtaining all the relevant information. Second, our review is based on previous case reports and small series analysis, generating a low level of evidence and possible bias of patient selection and data collection. Finally, although we cannot generalize our statement as the level of evidence achieved is low, we are able to offer a complete guide for diagnosing, evaluating, and treating this pathology all over the world because we have confirmed that it is not a specific pathology of eastern population.

Conclusion

Isolated fully formed C1 hypoplasia causing high cervical stenosis and myelopathy is an infrequent entity. It can present clinically at a wide range of ages and be successfully treated with C1 posterior arch excision alone if no further instability is detected. To our knowledge, this is the first case reported in America. We encourage surgeons of all over the world to consider this entity when C1 stenosis is present since it is not an exclusive anomaly of the Far East population.

Footnotes

None of the following authors or any immediate family member has received anything of value from or has stock or stock options held in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article: Dr. Pereira Duarte, Dr. Camino Willhuber, Dr. Petracchi, Dr. Gruenberg, and Dr. Sola.

We state that all authors contributed significantly with the creation of this article. All authors whose names appear on the submission made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data or the creation of new software used in the work; drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content; approved the version to be published; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The article has been read and approved by all the authors. The requirements for authorship as stated earlier in this document have been met, and each author believes that the article represents honest work.

References

  • 1.Bakhsheshian J, Mehta VA, Liu JC: Current diagnosis and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Glob Spine J 2017;7:572-586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kelly MP, Oshima Y, Yeom JS, Agarwal R, Bajwa NS, Riew KD: Defining hypoplasia of the atlas: A cadaveric study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:E1243-E1247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Joaquim AF, Baum G, Tan LA, Riew KD: C1 stenosis—an easily missed cause for cervical myelopathy. Neurospine 2019;16:456-461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Currarino G, Rollins N, Diehl JT: Congenital defects of the posterior arch of the atlas: A report of seven cases including an affected mother and son. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:249-254. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Martich V, Ben-Ami T, Yousefzadeh DK, Roizen NJ: Hypoplastic posterior arch of C-1 in children with Down syndrome: A double jeopardy. Radiology 1992;183:125-128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nehete LS, Bhat DI, Gopalakrishnan MS, et al. : Unusual cause of high cervical myelopathy-C1 arch stenosis. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2018;9:37-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tsuruta W, Yanaka K, Okazaki M, Matsumura A, Nose T: Cervical myelopathy caused by hypoplasia of the atlas and ossification of the transverse ligament—case report. Neurol Med Chir 2003;43:55-59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kasliwal MK, Traynelis VC: Hypertrophic posterior arch of atlas causing cervical myelopathy. Asian Spine J 2012;6:284-286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kessler JT: Congenital narrowing of the cervical spinal canal. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1975;38:1218-1224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shukla D, Arvind S, Devi BI: Myelopathy in a dwarf: A case of Morquio's syndrome without odontoid hypoplasia. Neurol India 2011;59:126-127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Solanki GA, Martin KW, Theroux MC, et al. : Spinal involvement in mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (Morquio-Brailsford or Morquio A syndrome): Presentation, diagnosis and management. J Inherit Metab Dis 2013;36:339-355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Nouri A, et al. : The modified Japanese orthopaedic association scale: Establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2017;26:78-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sadasivan KK, Reddy RP, Albright JA: The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Yale J Biol Med 1993;66:235-242. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ishii H, Kumano O, Kawashita T, Hiraoka T, Yamaguchi H: Two cases of subforaminal stenosis headache due to hypoplasia of the atlas [Japanese]. Chubu Sei-kei Saigai Geka Gakkai ZasshiJpn 1984;27:1378-1381. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sawada H, Akiguchi I, Fukuyama H, Kameyama M, Koyama T: Marked canal stenosis at the level of the atlas. Neuroradiology 1989;31:346-348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Komatsu Y, Shibata T, Yasuda S, Ono Y, Nose T: Atlas hypoplasia as a cause of high cervical myelopathy. Case report. J Neurosurg 1993;79:917-919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tokiyoshi K, Nakagawa H, Kadota T: Spinal canal stenosis at the level of the atlas: Case report. Surg Neurol 1994;41:238-240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Benitah S, Raftopoulos C, Balériaux D, Levivier M, Dedeire S: Upper cervical spinal cord compression due to bony stenosis of the spinal canal. Neuroradiology 1994;36:231-233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Noguchi A, Harada Y, Okabe S, Kohno T, Kamata K, Takahashi H: A surgical case of cervical canal stenosis caused by atlas hypoplasia in an elderly patient [Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 1998;26:623-626. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Okamoto K, Sumi M, Ikeda M, Sawamura S, Kataoka O: A case of cervical myelopathy with developmental canal stenosis at the level of the atlas. A case report. Kobe J Med Sci 1998;44:135-140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Phan N, Marras C, Midha R, Rowed D: Cervical myelopathy caused by hypoplasia of the atlas: Two case reports and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 1998;43:629-633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.May D, Jenny B, Faundez A: Cervical cord compression due to a hypoplastic atlas. Case report. J Neurosurg 2001;94(1 suppl):133-136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nishikawa K, Ludwig SC, Colón RJ, Fujimoto Y, Heller JG: Cervical myelopathy and congenital stenosis from hypoplasia of the atlas: Report of three cases and literature review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976);2001;26:E80-E86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chang H, Cho WJ, Park JB, et al. : Cervical myelopathy secondary to atlas hypoplasia - reports of 3 adult cases. Asian Spine J 2007;1:48-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hsu YH, Huang WC, Liou KD, Shih YH, Lee LS, Cheng H: Cervical spinal stenosis and myelopathy due to atlas hypoplasia. J Chin Med Assoc 2007;70:339-344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tang JG, Hou SX, Shang WL, Wu WW: Cervical myelopathy caused by anomalies at the level of atlas. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:E77-E79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bokhari R, Baeesa S: Atlas hypoplasia and ossification of the transverse atlantal ligament: A rare cause of cervical myelopathy. Case Rep Neurol Med 2012;2012:893284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wackenheim A: Roentgen Diagnosis of the Craniovertebral Region. New York, Springer, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sabuncuoglu H, Ozdogan S, Karadag D, Kaynak ET: Congenital hypoplasia of the posterior arch of the atlas: Case report and extensive review of the literature. Turk Neurosurg 2011;21:97-103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Oshima Y, Kelly MP, Song KS, et al. : Spinolaminar line test as a screening tool for C1 stenosis. Glob Spine J 2016;6:370-374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Atasoy C, Fitoz S, Karan B, Erden I, Akyar S: A rare cause of cervical spinal stenosis: Posterior arch hypoplasia in a bipartite atlas. Neuroradiology 2002;44:253-255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vangilder JC, Menezes AH: Craniovertebral junction abnormalities. Clin Neurosurg 1983;30:514-530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Steel H: Anatomical and mechanical considerations of the atlantoaxial articulations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1968;50:1481-1482. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kunakornsawat S, Letho, Pluemvitayaporn T, et al. : Variation of C1 spinolaminar line and prevalence of C1 stenosis in normal population. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2018;28:1029-1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAAOS Global Research & Reviews are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES