Methylation of the promoter region of the gene encoding O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) predicts better response to the alkylating chemotherapeutic temozolomide (TMZ) in glioblastomas (GBM).1 Testing for MGMT promoter methylation is therefore required for World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4 GBMs, whereas in grade 2-3 gliomas, testing is more variable between institutions.
Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and IDH2 (“IDHmut”) are present in the majority of WHO grade 2-3 astrocytomas, and in ~10% of grade 4 gliomas. The presence of IDHmut is now required for the diagnosis of oligodendroglioma, along with 1p/19q codeletion.2 Because IDHmut increases overall genomic CpG methylation, it is strongly associated with MGMT promoter methylation. Indeed, one prior report suggested that the MGMT promoter is methylated in virtually all IDHmut astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas.3 However, this is controversial.4 At Northwestern Memorial Hospital (NMH), which uses a pyrosequencing assay to screen for MGMT promoter methylation in every WHO grade 2-4 glioma, 17/97 (17.5%) of IDHmut astrocytomas lacked MGMT promoter methylation (Figure 1A). In contrast, only 2/53 (3.8%) of IDHmut, 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendrogliomas were negative (P = .019 by Fisher’s exact test). In The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), 30/257 (11.7%) of IDHmut astrocytomas lacked MGMT promoter methylation, but only 1/169 (0.6%) IDHmut, 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendrogliomas was MGMT-unmethylated (P > .0001 by Fisher’s exact test) (Figure 1A).
Fig. 1.
MGMT promoter methylation in IDHmut gliomas. (A) Summary of MGMT promoter methylation according to IDHmut in WHO grade 2-4 gliomas. N = 515 cases from NMH (Northwestern Memorial Hospital) and 626 cases from TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas). (B) Pattern of MGMT CpG methylation in IDHmut oligodendrogliomas vs IDHmut astrocytomas. Each column represents the mean beta value of 168 IDHmut, 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendrogliomas, minus the mean beta value of 260 IDHmut astrocytomas, at a single CpG site associated with the MGMT gene from TCGA. CpG methylation data obtained from http://xena.ucsc.edu. P values were calculated at each site by two-tailed t-tests with Bonferroni correction. (Note that cohort sizes slightly vary compared to (A), due to rare cases in each subgroup lacking sufficient annotation for analysis.)
Detailed analysis of MGMT methylation showed that, compared to IDHmut astrocytomas, IDHmut, 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendrogliomas had significantly higher average methylation beta values at 44.9% of all 147 MGMT CpG sites (Figure 1B). At the transcriptionally sensitive north shore and island regions, 69% of sites were significantly more methylated in oligodendrogliomas. None were significantly more methylated in astrocytomas.
At NMH, IDHmut astrocytomas without MGMT promoter methylation were similar in WHO grade (χ 2 = 3.2, P = .19) and survival (hazard ratio = 1.3, P = .57) compared to IDHmut astrocytomas with MGMT promoter methylation. TCGA IDHmut astrocytomas also showed no significant correlation between unmethylated MGMT promoter and WHO grade (χ 2 = 0.58, P = .75), cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP) status (P = .13 by Fisher’s exact test), or survival (hazard ratio = 1.2, P = .67). Surprisingly, MGMT-unmethylated IDHmut astrocytomas at NMH tended to occur in slightly younger patients (mean age = 32.5 vs 38.0 years, P = .03). This age difference was nearly identical in TCGA IDHmut astrocytomas (32.6 vs 38.6 years, P = .01).
In sum, whereas MGMT promoter methylation is more common in IDHmut astrocytomas than in IDH wild-type astrocytomas, it is even more common in IDHmut, 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendrogliomas, to the point of being present in nearly all oligodendrogliomas. This comports with data from EORTC 220335; and further shows (i) an inverse association between age and MGMT methylation; (ii) differential methylation between IDHmut astrocytomas and IDHmut oligodendrogliomas at specific CpG sites within the MGMT gene; (iii) overall survival in MGMT-methylated vs -unmethylated IDHmut astrocytomas.
Thus, while IDHmut increases genomic methylation, the extent to which specific genes are methylated likely depends on other factors, such as cell lineage. While lack of MGMT methylation has been described as an adverse prognostic marker in grade 4 IDHmut gliomas,4 its clinical significance in IDHmut grade 2-3 astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas is less clear, perhaps in part because they are not always treated with TMZ upfront. Although overall survival in MGMT-unmethylated IDHmut astrocytomas was not significantly worse in this current study, the EORTC 22033 study did suggest worse progression-free survival in such tumors.5MGMT analysis may also help predict the risk of post-TMZ hypermutation in astrocytomas.6 In contrast, since nearly all oligodendrogliomas are MGMT-methylated, its routine testing in oligodendrogliomas might not be necessary. Finally, while the association between younger patient age and increased odds of unmethylated MGMT promoter in IDHmut astrocytomas is interesting, an explanation for this is not yet apparent.
Funding
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01NS102669 (C.H.), R01NS117104 (C.H.), R01NS118039 (C.H.), and by the Northwestern SPORE in Brain Cancer P50CA221747.
Conflict of interest statement. The authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest.
Authorship statement. Project conception: C.H. Project implementation: C.H. and K.M. Manuscript preparation and editing: C.H. and R.S.
References
- 1. Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):997–1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mulholland S, Pearson DM, Hamoudi RA, et al. MGMT CpG island is invariably methylated in adult astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations. Int J Cancer. 2012;131(5):1104–1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Molenaar RJ, Verbaan D, Lamba S, et al. The combination of IDH1 mutations and MGMT methylation status predicts survival in glioblastoma better than either IDH1 or MGMT alone. Neuro Oncol. 2014;16(9):1263–1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bady P, Kurscheid S, Delorenzi M, et al. The DNA methylome of DDR genes and benefit from RT or TMZ in IDH mutant low-grade glioma treated in EORTC 22033. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;135(4):601–615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mathur R, Zhang Y, Grimmer MR, et al. MGMT promoter methylation level in newly diagnosed low-grade glioma is a predictor of hypermutation at recurrence. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22(11):1580–1590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

