ABSTRACT
Hyperphosphatemic familial tumoral calcinosis (HFTC) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in FGF23, GALNT3, KLOTHO, or FGF23 autoantibodies. Prominent features include high blood phosphate and calcific masses, usually adjacent to large joints. Dental defects have been reported, but not systematically described. Seventeen patients with HFTC followed at the National Institutes of Health underwent detailed clinical, biochemical, molecular, and dental analyses. Studies of teeth included intraoral photos and radiographs, high‐resolution μCT, histology, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A scoring system was developed to assess the severity of tooth phenotype. Pulp calcification was found in 13 of 14 evaluable patients. Short roots and midroot bulges with apical thinning were present in 12 of 13 patients. Premolars were most severely affected. μCT analyses of five HFTC teeth revealed that pulp density increased sevenfold, whereas the pulp volume decreased sevenfold in permanent HFTC teeth compared with age‐ and tooth‐matched control teeth. Histology revealed loss of the polarized odontoblast cell layer and an obliterated pulp cavity that was filled with calcified material. The SEM showed altered pulp and cementum structures, without differences in enamel or dentin structures, when compared with control teeth. This study defines the spectrum and confirms the high penetrance of dental features in HFTC. The phenotypes appear to be independent of genetic/molecular etiology, suggesting hyperphosphatemia or FGF23 deficiency may be the pathomechanistic driver, with prominent effects on root and pulp structures, consistent with a role of phosphate and/or FGF23 in tooth development. Given the early appearance and high penetrance, cognizance of HFTC‐related features may allow for earlier diagnosis and treatment. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Keywords: BONE MICRO‐COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (μCT), BONE QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (QCT), DENTAL BIOLOGY, DISORDERS OF CALCIUM/PHOSPHATE METABOLISM, FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 23 (FGF23), MOLECULAR PATHWAYS—DEVELOPMENT, PARATHYROID HORMONE, VITAMIN D
Introduction
Hyperphosphatemic familial tumoral calcinosis (HFTC; Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [OMIM]: 211900) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by deficiency of active fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), a hormonal regulator of phosphate and vitamin D homeostasis.( 1 ) FGF23 is produced by osteoblasts and osteocytes in response to high blood phosphate and 1,25‐dihydroxy vitamin D [1,25(OH)2D].( 2 , 3 ) FGF23 binds to FGF receptor‐1 (FGFR1) and coreceptor KLOTHO to downregulate sodium/phosphate cotransporters NPT2a and NPT2c and 25‐hydroxyvitamin D‐1α‐hydroxylase, which converts inactive 25‐hydroxyvitamin D to 1,25(OH)2D, thereby inhibiting phosphate reabsorption and active vitamin D formation in renal proximal tubules.( 4 , 5 , 6 )
Intact FGF23 (iFGF23) undergoes posttranslational O‐glycosylation by the enzyme UDP‐GalNAc:polypeptide N‐acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 3 (GALNT3), which is thought to stabilize and protect iFGF23 from furin degradation.( 7 ) Without glycosylation, iFGF23 is cleaved into physiologically inactive C‐ and N‐terminal fragments. Therefore, HFTC is a disorder of iFGF23 deficiency.( 8 ) Causes include mutations in FGF23, GALNT3, or KLOTHO.( 9 , 10 , 11 ) FGF23 autoantibodies cause an acquired form of tumoral calcinosis.( 12 )
HFTC manifests across a broad clinical spectrum, including painful subcutaneous masses, calcification around joints, hyperostosis of long bone diaphyses, systemic inflammation, ocular involvement, and dental pathology.( 13 ) Most diagnosed patients develop symptoms by 2–13 years of age.( 14 ) Because of its rarity, phenotypic variability, and unfamiliarity with signs and symptoms, HFTC is likely underdiagnosed; patients may also carry mutations that do not have detectable clinical symptoms.
Dental pathology may be the most common phenotypic feature of HFTC.( 1 ) Several case reports and small series have described short, bulbous roots, obliteration of pulp chambers and canals, and periapical radiolucencies.( 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ) Hyperphosphatemia is speculated to be the primary contributor,( 20 ) but molecular and cellular mechanisms have not been explored. To better define the spectrum, natural history, and pathophysiology of HFTC‐associated dental findings, we performed a detailed analysis of a cohort of 17 patients.
Patients and Methods
Patients
The study was approved by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Institutional Review Board. All patients or legal guardians provided informed consent. Patients underwent clinical, biochemical, genetic, and dental examinations. This study was performed in accordance with STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines for human observational investigations.
Dental phenotype scoring
Dental panoramic and/or periapical radiographs and intraoral photographs were taken for 14 and 11 patients, respectively. For patient 1, radiographs taken prior to enrollment were retrieved. Dental radiographs were not available for patients 9 and 14 because of young age and/or lack of cooperation. Exfoliated/extracted primary and permanent teeth were collected from five patients and four age‐ and tooth‐matched healthy controls. Dental radiographs were independently read by a dentist (PJG) and a trained dental student (AEL) to determine the severity of root morphology using a predefined scoring system (Fig. 1). The reliability of the scoring system was examined by intra‐ and interrater reliability analyses. The intrarater reliability ranged from 0.75 to 1, and the interrater reliability between two dentists ranged from 0.52 to 1. Third molars were excluded.
Calcification scoring
Soft tissue calcification was scored on a semiquantitative system developed by the investigators. Patients were assigned to groups ranging from 0 (no calcification) to 3+ (marked/diffuse calcification involving all three anatomical compartments: craniofacial/neck, abdomen/pelvis, and axial skeleton), and 1+ and 2+ (involving one or two anatomical compartments, respectively). Vascular calcification was scored as yes/no based on its presence on radiographs.
Biochemical
Biochemical evaluation (phosphate, calcium, vitamin D, and PTH) were performed by standard techniques. Intact and C‐terminal FGF23 (cFGF23) were measured in multiple ELISAs (Kainos Laboratories, Immutopics Quidel, or the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, USA).
Genetic analysis
GALNT3 sequencing was performed for patients 11, 16, and 17 in a commercial laboratory (Connective Tissue Gene Tests [CTGT]) and for patients 1–6, 8, 13, and 14 in a research laboratory using Multiplex PCR kit (QIAGEN) and ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). FGF23 sequencing was performed in a commercial laboratory (GeneDx). Patient 9 was found to have a triplication within chromosome 13, which likely altered the expression of KLOTHO (Greenwood Genetic Center). The National Center for Biotechnology Information reference sequences and OMIM numbers are in Supplementary Information Table S1.
Micro‐computed tomography
Teeth samples were analyzed using a μCT 50 scanner (Scanco Medical) at 70 kVp, 76 μA, 0.5 Al filter, 900‐ms integration, and 10‐μm voxel size. AnalyzePro 1.0 (AnalyzeDirect) was used to reconstruct and analyze images. Images were anatomically oriented and calibrated to a linear standard curve created using hydroxyapatite phantoms with known densities. Enamel was segmented ≥1650 mg HA/cm3, and dentin/cementum at 600–1649 mg HA/cm3. HFTC dentin and cementum were indistinguishable by density, so dentin and cementum were combined for analysis. Pulp was segmented using a combination of manual and semiautomatic functions. Heat maps were generated for density visualization.
Histology
Teeth were fixed in formalin for 48 h and hemisected axially using an Isomet slow‐speed diamond saw (Buehler). Half were demineralized in acetic acid/formalin/sodium chloride, embedded in paraffin, sectioned buccolingually at 5‐μm thickness, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome. Images were acquired using an Aperio CSO Slide Scanner (Leica Biosystems).
Scanning electron microscopy
Hemisected teeth were embedded in acrylic, ground on 320‐ and 1200‐grit sandpaper, and polished using 1‐μm and one‐quarter–μm diamond pastes. Samples were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 10 s, and fixed sequentially in 1% glutaraldehyde overnight and 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h. Samples were dehydrated in ethanol, incubated in hexamethyldisilazane, and air‐dried. Samples were mounted on aluminum specimen mount stubs (Electron Microscopy Sciences), coated with 5‐nm gold, and analyzed using the Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope S4800 (Hitashi) at 10 kV.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed by two‐tailed unpaired t tests (GraphPad Prism 8.4 software; GraphPad). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Incidence of root abnormalities by tooth type and severity were compared using a χ2 test (SAS 9.4 TS1M6; SAS Institute). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Summary of National Institutes of Health cohort
A cohort of 17 patients with HFTC (6 males, 11 females) was seen at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) between 2007 and 2020 (Table 1). Eight had compound heterozygous GALNT3 mutations; three were novel. Four had homozygous GALNT3 mutations, one novel. Patient 12 had compound heterozygous FGF23 mutations, one novel. Patient 10 had neutralizing FGF23 autoantibodies. Patient 9 was found to have a chromosome 13 triplication in the KLOTHO‐containing region. Patients 7 and 15 had unknown but presumably genetic causes. Predicted protein changes are provided in Supplementary Information Table S2.
Table 1.
Patient | Age at symptom onset/current age (y) | Length of follow‐up (y) | Gender | Dental calcification a | Vascular calcification | Soft tissue calcification b | Phosphate c (age‐specific normal range mg/dl) | FGF23 | Genetic mutation e | Treatment | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intact (22–63 pg/ml) | C‐term d (≤230 RU/ml) | Gene | DNA change | |||||||||
1 | 12/48 | 12 | F | Y | N | 1+ | ↑ 7.3 (2.5–4.8) | ↓ 17 | ↑ 1210 | GALNT3 | c.1312C>T, c.1774C>T | ACZ, NC |
2 f | 5/17 | 11 | F | Y | Y | 2+ | ↑ 8.8 (3.1–5.5) | 34 | ↑ 2880 | GALNT3 | c.516‐2A>T, c.260_266del | SEV, ACZ, PB, AL, CAN |
3 f | 9/15 | 7 | F | Y | N | 0 | ↑ 6.8 (3.1–5.5) | 39 | ↑ 1985 | GALNT3 | c.516‐2A>T, c.260_266del | SEV, ACZ, PB |
4 g | 10/38 | 9 | M | Y | Y | 3+ | ↑ 5.5 (2.5–4.8) | ↓ 8 j | ↑ 660 | GALNT3 | c.1584dup | SEV, ACZ, PB, NC, AL, TT, ANA, CAN |
5 g | None/25 | 6 | M | Y | N | 0 | ↑ 5.5 (2.5–4.5) | 39 | ↑ 971 | GALNT3 | c.1584dup | n/a |
6 | 3/20 | 8 | F | Y | N | 1+ | ↑ 6.6 (3.1–5.5) | 38 j | ↑ 884 | GALNT3 | c.516‐2A>T, c.1524+5G>A | SEV, ACZ, PB |
7 | 45/63 | 6 | F | N | Y | 3+ | 4.8 (2.5–4.8) | 46 j | ↑ 1190 | Unknown | n/a | SEV, ACZ, PB |
8 | 1/12 | 5 | F | n/a | N | 2+ | ↑ 7.0 (3.0–5.7) | 22 | ↑ 1031 | GALNT3 | c.746_749del, c.892del | SEV, ACZ, PB |
9 | 6 mo/19 | 6 | F | n/a i | N | 2+ | ↑ 5.3 (2.5–5.1) | 42 | 66 | KLOTHO | arr 13q13.1q14.3(32,887,503‐53,157,340)x4 dn k | n/a |
10 | 3 wk/12 | 5 | M | Y | N | 2+ | ↑ 7.2 (3.2–6.3) | ↑ 13,000 | ↑ 33,000 | Autoimmune | n/a | SEV, ACZ, PB, TT |
11 | 10/47 | 4 | M | Y | Y | 3+ | ↑ 5.4 (2.5–4.5) | ↓ 19 | ↑ 1420 | GALNT3 | c.766G>C k | SEV, ACZ, PB |
12 | 11/46 | 3 | M | Y | Y | 2+ | ↑ 6.5 (2.5–4.5) | 41 | ↑ 890 | FGF23 | c.211A>G, c.107G>A k | SEV, ACZ |
13 g | 8/27 | 2 | F | Y | N | 2+ | ↑ 6.4 (2.5–4.5) | ↓ 21 | ↑ 1470 | GALNT3 | c.1584dup | n/a |
14 f | None/2 | 1 | M | n/a | N | 0 | ↑ 7.4 (3.1–6.0) | 23 | ↑ 2260 | GALNT3 | c.516‐2A>T, c.260_266del | SEV |
15 | 7/53 | 1 | F | Y | Y | 3+ | ↑ 5.8 (2.5–4.5) | ↓ 16 | ↑ 1910 | Unknown | n/a | LC, ACZ, ANA, SEV |
16 | 4/12 | 1 | F | Y | N | 2+ | ↑ 7.1 (3.0–5.7) | 23 | ↑ 1860 | GALNT3 | c.985G>A k , c.1677_1680dup k | SEV, ACZ, AL, TT |
17 | 10/74 | 1 | F | Y | Y | 2+ | ↑ 5.4 (2.5–4.5) | 31 | ↑ 2450 | GALNT3 | c.746_749del, c.926T>G k | SEV |
Range h | 1–45/2–74 | 1–12 | Prevalence h | 4.8–8.8 | 8–46 | 660–2880 | ||||||
Mean h | 10.4/33.3 | 5.1 | 5 M 10 F | 12/13 | 7/15 | 12/15 | 6.4 | 27.8 | 1538.1 | |||
Median h | 9/27 | 5 | 6.5 | 23 | 1420 |
Abbreviations: ACZ, acetazolamide; AL, aluminum hydroxide; ANA, anakinra; CAN, canakinumab; FGF23, fibroblast growth factor 23; GALNT3, UDP‐GalNAc:polypeptide N‐acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 3; HFTC, hyperphosphatemic familial tumoral calcinosis; LC, lanthanum carbonate; n/a, not available; NC, nicotinamide; PB, probenecid; SEV, sevelamer; TT, topical thiosulfate.
More detailed dental data provided in Supplementary Information Table S3.
Soft tissue calcification grading: 0 normal – 3+ severe.
To convert phosphate to mmol/L, multiply by 0.323.
C‐terminal FGF23 [3M–17Y ≤230, ≥18 Y ≤ 180 RU/mL].
More genetic data included in Supplementary Information Table S2.
Patients 2, 3, and 14 are siblings.
Patients 4, 5, and 13 are siblings.
Calculated excluding patients 9 and 10.
Dental radiographs were not available. An exfoliated primary tooth had normal pulp morphology, but increased pulp density (200.8 mg HA/cm3) by μCT analysis.
Some iFGF23 were measured by Kainos Laboratories. The rest were measured by Immutopics Quidel.
Novel mutation.
A wide genotype‐independent phenotypic spectrum exists, as found in the affected brothers (patients 4 and 5) with the same mutation and similar phosphate levels. Patient 4 was severely affected with tibial hyperostosis at age 10 years, which was misdiagnosed as osteomyelitis, and multiple, diffuse painful calcifications surrounding his shoulder, elbow, hip, and buttocks, and visceral and vascular calcifications starting at age 14 years (Fig. 2). Despite the lack of clinical symptoms or calcifications, his brother (patient 5) had an elevated C‐reactive protein, suggesting ongoing, subclinical calcification causing systemic inflammation. Elevated blood phosphate concentrations were present in most patients at 6.4 ± 1.0 mg/dl (normal: adults 2.5–4.5, children 3.0–5.7 mg/dl). Except for the patients with autoantibodies or KLOTHO mutation, all had low or normal iFGF23 and significantly elevated cFGF23.
Classification and spectrum of dental phenotypes
Patients had short roots, pulp calcification, midroot bulges with apical thinning, and enamel defects. To quantify the severity of root alteration, a scoring scale was developed (Fig. 1A ). Each tooth was scored from 1 to 4 (normal, mild, moderate, or severe, respectively; Supplementary Information Table S3; cohort average 2.9 ± 0.7). Periapical and panoramic radiographs were used to classify each tooth (Fig. 1B ). Although the entire spectrum could be observed in a single patient (Fig. 1C ), some had only moderate and severe phenotypes (Fig. 1D ). Premolars were most severely affected, followed by canines, molars, and incisors (Fig. 1E ; Supplementary Information Fig. S1). The severity of root alteration between tooth types were significantly different at p < 0.0001 using the χ2 test. Of patients with dental radiographs, 13 out of 14 (93%) showed partial to complete pulp obliteration. Notably, the patient without pulp obliteration (patient 7) had no identifiable FGF23 or GALNT3 mutation, and findings were inconsistent with a KLOTHO mutation. Of the 10 patients with GALNT3 mutations and comprehensive dental exams, 100% had shortened, thistle‐shaped roots and pulp obliteration.
Other findings, not observed in all patients and probably unrelated to HFTC, were seen. White, chalky enamel was observed in patients 2 and 6, possibly caused by mild fluorosis (Supplementary Information Fig. S2). Gray enamel discoloration was observed in patients 1, 7, and 12. Patient 7 also had moderate enamel hypoplasia and facial surface pitting.
Reduced pulp volume and increased density in HFTC
Five extracted or exfoliated teeth from patients 2, 5, 6, 9, and 15 were analyzed by high‐resolution μCT (Fig. 3A,B ). Compared with matched controls (five teeth from four controls), HFTC teeth exhibited dramatically altered pulpal morphology characterized by obliterated pulp chambers and irregular root canals (Fig. 3B,E ). Altered density distribution was also observed with increased density towards the core of the root (Fig. 3C ). Overall, HFTC teeth exhibited a sevenfold increase in pulp density (53 ± 58 vs 382 ± 39 mg HA/cm3, p = 0.0004) and a sevenfold decrease in pulp volume (22 ± 8 vs 3 ± 1 mm3, p = 0.0088) compared with healthy control teeth (Fig. 3D ). Cementum and dentin in HFTC teeth were indistinguishable by density, further highlighting root development disturbances; combined cementum and dentin densities were reported. Enamel and dentin/cementum densities were not different between HFTC and controls (Supplementary Information Fig. S3). Available permanent HFTC teeth had limited enamel volume because of deep caries, bruxism, and/or crowns.
Despite pulp obliteration, sensory nerves appeared to be present and functioning. Patients 4, 5, 6, and 15 experienced mild‐to‐severe dental sensitivity, which was likely caused by dental caries in patients 4 and 5 (Fig. 3E ). Patient 6 did not have active caries and responded normally to electric pulp testing, despite having severe occlusal attrition from bruxism (Fig. 3E ; Supplementary Information Fig. S2). The cause of generalized dental sensitivity in patient 15 was unknown; her maxillary right first premolar developed a fistula requiring the tooth to be extracted (Fig. 3E ).
Teeth were further examined by histology and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Histological analyses of a tooth from patient 15 were compared with an adult‐ and tooth‐matched control (Fig. 4A–F ). Analyses revealed relatively normal cementum and dentin layers grossly, histologically (Fig. 4A ), and by density (Supplementary Information Table S4). However, Masson's trichrome staining identified significant structural differences (Fig. 4E ), possibly owing to abnormal dentin collagen orientation. The most prominent finding was an obliterated pulp cavity filled with highly dense, calcified material seen as a mix of small rounded elements (psammoma bodies) and larger blocks of calcified material (Fig. 4C,D ). Neither the capillaries nor the normal polarized odontoblastic cell layer lining the inner aspect of dentin were detected in the tooth of the patient with HFTC (Fig. 4C , arrows). The widening of the midroot area appeared to be caused by pulp cavity expansion and thickened dentin layer (Fig. 4A,D ). SEM analysis revealed that, compared with controls, the HFTC tooth had normal enamel structure and normal dentin and dentinal tubules with odontoblast processes (Fig. 5A–D ). However, major differences were seen within the pulp and cementum (Fig. 5C,D ). HFTC pulp showed abnormal areas with structures that resembled dentinal tubules (Fig. 5C ; Supplementary Information Fig. S4), along with a widening of the cellular cementum (Fig. 5D ).
HFTC primary teeth also exhibit pulpal alterations
Primary dentition from pediatric patients had findings similar to the mild or moderate phenotypes of HFTC permanent dentition. Patient 2ʼs dental radiographs from 6–17 years of age showed abnormal development (Fig. 6). Although crowns appeared to form normally, signs of pulp calcification during root development were visible at age 6 years. She and her siblings (patients 3 and 14) share the same GALNT3 mutation. Her younger sister, 15 years old at her most recent visit, showed similar, but milder dental findings. The youngest sibling, at 16 months, was too young for dental radiographs.
Interestingly, patient 10 whose disease was caused by FGF23 autoantibodies also had an abnormal, but a subtly distinct, tooth phenotype compared with other pediatric patients with HFTC (Supplementary Information Fig. S5). Clinically, the teeth appeared normal, but upon radiographical inspection, pulp calcification in primary and developing permanent teeth was observed.
Discussion
These data represent the most in‐depth analyses to date of dental findings in a large cohort of patients with low or inappropriately normal iFGF23, high cFGF23, and high phosphate. Characteristic findings of thistle‐shaped roots and pulp obliteration appeared at an early age. This could serve as a phenotypic marker of HFTC, offering an opportunity for early diagnosis. Because the findings also occurred in the patient with autoimmune‐mediated disease, it suggests the pathophysiology is not genetic per se, but caused by either a lack of FGF23 or high blood phosphate, suggesting one or both are important for pulp and root development.
Characteristic dental findings can be used for early HFTC diagnosis
For the first time, we show in‐depth μCT, histological, and SEM analyses of HFTC teeth, showing dramatic replacement of normal pulp with dense, calcified material and altered densities in pulp, dentin, and cementum. Consistent with a recent case report,( 21 ) pulp obliteration and internal pulp calcification were observed in our cohort. The presence of normal dentinal tubules with remnants of odontoblastic processes indicates that dentin‐producing cells, odontoblasts, functioned normally during early dental development. Though odontoblasts normally maintain a single layer of highly polarized cell bodies throughout the life of a tooth,( 22 ) the odontoblasts in HFTC appear to have lost their polarity and migrated to the center of the pulp. As calcification progressed, some odontoblasts may have become trapped within the disordered and calcified matrix. The calcified mass and hypercementosis in our study parallels findings from a family with HFTC.( 16 ) Understanding the dental phenotype aids in identifying pathognomonic signs of HFTC.
Although patients presented with a broad spectrum of clinical symptoms, specific dental findings were consistently present. For example, asymptomatic siblings exhibited characteristic HFTC dental abnormalities before any systemic symptoms developed. Thus, dentists may be the first provider to detect signs of HFTC, which could lead to early interventions and possible reduction of future systemic calcifications.
Pathophysiology of HFTC dental findings
All patients with GALNT3 and FGF23 mutations and FGF23 autoantibodies had what we classify as a characteristic tumoral calcinosis dental phenotype consisting of short, thistle‐shaped roots and pulp calcification. The unifying pathophysiological findings in all were elevated blood phosphate, low or inappropriately normal iFGF23, and elevated cFGF23, or FGF23 inaccessible for binding and signaling due to anti‐FGF23 autoantibodies.( 12 ) It has been suggested that high levels of cFGF23 may block iFGF23 signaling, (23 ) and for that reason, patients with an iFGF23 in the low‐normal range may have functional loss of iFGF23ʼs capacity to bind and signal. Therefore, it is not possible to discern whether the dental phenotype is attributable to high phosphate or an absence of iFGF23 signaling.
Notably, the patient with a triplication within chromosome 13 likely affecting KLOTHO did not have the characteristic dental phenotype. She had a profound neurological deficit that made dental X‐rays impossible; a single exfoliated primary tooth exhibited normal pulp morphology, but modestly increased pulp density, and her blood phosphate was only mildly elevated. Similarly, patient 7, who had normal pulp morphology, did not have a GALNT3 or FGF23 mutation, and did not have findings consistent with a KLOTHO mutation, had classic calcinosis findings, a markedly elevated cFGF23, and a blood phosphate that was at the upper limit of the normal range.
Mouse models of phosphate and FGF23 disorders have informed the role of inorganic phosphate and FGF23 in development, maintenance, disease, and repair of tooth tissues.( 24 ) Fgf23 ablation in a mouse model resulted in hyperphosphatemia, narrow pulp chambers with ectopic matrix formation, accumulation of osteoid and increased apoptosis in alveolar bone, periodontal ligament space narrowing, and alteration of cementum structure, but did not demonstrate altered root length or shape.( 25 ) Conversely, the X‐linked hypophosphatemic (Hyp) mouse exhibited increased FGF23 levels, enlarged pulp chambers, widened predentin, interglobular dentin, and irregular dentinal tubule distribution.( 26 ) Because phosphate plays a significant role in tooth development and maintenance, the interactions of phosphate and other genes that regulate phosphate( 27 ) with other factors, such as calcium, vitamin D, and PTH, are also important considerations. Furthermore, it is likely that additional enzymes, or incompletely understood inorganic molecules, such as pyrophosphate, may play important roles in this complex pathophysiology.
Interestingly, similar, but milder, dental radiographic findings (pulp calcification and short roots) have been reported in pseudohypoparathyroidism,( 28 ) another rare inherited hyperphosphatemic disorder. However, the characteristic short, thistle‐shaped roots seen in HFTC have not been reported in pseudohypoparathyroidism, suggesting that elevated phosphate alone is not sufficient to replicate the dental phenotype seen in tumoral calcinosis.
HFTC tooth defects develop at a young age
In our cohort, and contrary to a previous report,( 20 ) pulp obliteration and short roots were also observed in primary teeth. μCT analysis of primary teeth suggests a milder defect in primary versus permanent teeth. Permanent premolar roots were most severely affected, while permanent incisor roots were least affected. This suggests that HFTC affects dental development of permanent tooth roots most severely at ages 9–11 years, when incisors are completing root formation and premolar roots are actively developing. Root development of the premolars start at about 7–8 years of age and continue until about 11–12 years of age. They are the last teeth (other than third molars) to undergo root development. Systemic processes contributing to abnormal root formation appear to peak at the time. HFTC may lead to early exfoliation of primary teeth; all pediatric patients had complete permanent dentition by age 11 years, whereas this process usually occurs up to age 12 years. Once established, the dental phenotype does not appear to significantly change over time, as evidenced by the lack of root severity changes in patient 4ʼs radiographs from 2011–2017 (Supplementary Information Fig. S6), and the fact that older patients did not appear to have a more pronounced dental phenotype compared with younger patients. These data suggest the dental phenotype in HFTC is caused by a primary rather than an acquired defect.
Clinical significance
With the calcified irregular pulp canals in HFTC, root canal therapy may not be possible. Consequently, dental treatment options for pulpal pathology in patients with HFTC may be limited to extractions. Thus, proper oral hygiene and regular preventive care to reduce the risk of caries and tooth loss is imperative.
Despite altered root morphology, patients with HFTC have successfully undergone oral surgical, periodontal, and orthodontic treatments. Patients 15 and 17 have had dental implants for several years without any associated complications and maintained adequate alveolar bone levels. In addition, several patients have worn orthodontic appliances without reported complications or an increase in external root resorption. This suggests HFTC teeth do not ankylose to the surrounding alveolar bone, allowing adequate teeth movement.
Although this study describes the largest reported HFTC cohort, the sample size remains small because of the rarity of the disease. Because the NIH is a tertiary referral center, referral bias may affect our findings, and the patients may represent the severe end of the spectrum.
This study adds significant new insights into HFTC and tooth development, suggesting a role for blood phosphate and/or FGF23 in root and pulp development. Pulp obliteration is one of the first signs of HFTC and can serve as an early diagnostic marker, allowing for earlier therapeutic intervention. The regulation of pulp formation by phosphate and FGF23 remains an important area warranting further investigation.
Author contributions
Alisa Lee: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; project administration; resources; software; validation; visualization; writing‐original draft; writing‐review & editing. Emily Chu: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; resources; software; supervision; validation; visualization; writing‐review & editing. Pamela Gardner: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; resources; supervision; validation; visualization; writing‐review & editing. Olivier Duverger: Data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; resources; supervision; validation; visualization; writing‐review & editing. Amanda Saikali: Formal analysis; investigation; visualization; writing‐review & editing. Sean Wang: Formal analysis; investigation; visualization; writing‐review & editing. Rachel Gafni: Data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; resources; supervision; validation; visualization; writing‐review & editing. Iris Hartley: Data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; supervision; validation; writing‐review & editing. Kelly Ten Hagen: Funding acquisition; resources; supervision; writing‐review & editing. Martha Somerman: Formal analysis; funding acquisition; resources; supervision; writing‐review & editing.
Authors' roles
Alisa Lee: Study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing–original draft. Emily Chu: Study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation. Pamela Gardner: Study design, data analysis, data interpretation. Olivier Duverger: Data collection, data analysis, data interpretation. Amanda Saikali: Data collection, data analysis. Sean Wang: Data collection. Rachel Gafni: Data analysis, data interpretation. Iris Hartley: Data collection, data analysis, data interpretation. Kelly Ten Hagen: Data interpretation. Martha Somerman: Data interpretation. Michael Collins: Study design, data interpretation, writing–original draft. The manuscript was reviewed, edited, and approved by all authors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Peer review
The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1002/jbm4.10470.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
This work was made possible through the National Institute of Health (NIH) Medical Research Scholars Program, a public‐private partnership supported jointly by the NIH and contributions to the Foundation for the NIH from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, Genentech, the American Association for Dental Research, the Colgate‐Palmolive Company, and other private donors (AEL); the Intramural Research Programs of National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)/NIH (PJG, OD, AS, SKW, RIG, IRH, KGT, MTC); and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)/NIH (EYC, MJS). The funders were not involved in preparing this manuscript. We thank the patients and their families for their cooperation and assistance with this research. We thank Dr. Brian Foster and Mr. Michael Chavez (The Ohio State University) for arranging sample shipment and providing guidance with histology. We thank Dr. Cathrine Hoyo, Ms. Rachel Maguire, and Dr. Sarah Park for providing control tooth samples (North Carolina State University, Newborn Epigenetics Study funded by R24ES028531). We thank Dr. Shoji Ichikawa (Ambry Genetics) for genetic testing. We thank Dr. Markku Miettinen and Dr. Michelly Sampaio De Melo (National Cancer Institute/NIH) for assistance with histopathological interpretation. We thank Dr. Carlos Ferreira (National Human Genome Research Institute/NIH) for providing insights into interpreting genetic testing results. We thank Dr. Luis Fernandez de Castro Diaz (NIDCR/NIH) for μCT, histology, and sample preparation training sessions. We thank Dr. Priyam Jani (NIDCR/NIH) for helping with sample preparation. We thank Dr. Matthew Hoffman (NIDCR/NIH) for serving as AEL's advisor. We thank Ms. Aster Kenea (NIAMS/NIH) for assistance with histology scans. We thank the NIH Medical Arts team for illustrating the schematic diagram. We thank Cindy Clark (NIH Library Editing Service) for reviewing the manuscript. We thank Paul Juneau (Division of Data Services, NIH Library, Office of Research Services, NIH/Contractor‐Zimmerman Associates) for statistical consulting and analyses.
References
- 1. Ramnitz MS, Gafni RI, Collins MT. Hyperphosphatemic familial tumoral calcinosis. In Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, et al., eds. Genereviews® [Internet]. University of Washington; 2018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bhattacharyya N, Chong WH, Gafni RI, Collins MT. Fibroblast growth factor 23: state of the field and future directions. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2012;23(12):610‐618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Blau JE, Collins MT. The PTH‐vitamin D‐FGF23 axis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2015;16(2):165‐174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bacchetta J, Bardet C, Prie D. Physiology of FGF23 and overview of genetic diseases associated with renal phosphate wasting. Metabolism. 2019;103:153865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Shimada T, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki Y, et al. FGF‐23 is a potent regulator of vitamin D metabolism and phosphate homeostasis. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19(3):429‐435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Prie D, Friedlander G. Reciprocal control of 1,25‐dihydroxyvitamin D and FGF23 formation involving the FGF23/Klotho system. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(9):1717‐1722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kato K, Jeanneau C, Tarp MA, et al. Polypeptide GalNAc‐transferase T3 and familial tumoral calcinosis. Secretion of fibroblast growth factor 23 requires O‐glycosylation. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(27):18370‐18377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Frishberg Y, Ito N, Rinat C, et al. Hyperostosis‐hyperphosphatemia syndrome: a congenital disorder of O‐glycosylation associated with augmented processing of fibroblast growth factor 23. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(2):235‐242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Benet‐Pages A, Orlik P, Strom TM, Lorenz‐Depiereux B. An FGF23 missense mutation causes familial tumoral calcinosis with hyperphosphatemia. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(3):385‐390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Topaz O, Shurman DL, Bergman R, et al. Mutations in GALNT3, encoding a protein involved in O‐linked glycosylation, cause familial tumoral calcinosis. Nat Genet. 2004;36(6):579‐581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ichikawa S, Imel EA, Kreiter ML, et al. A homozygous missense mutation in human KLOTHO causes severe tumoral calcinosis. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2007;7(4):318‐319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Roberts MS, Burbelo PD, Egli‐Spichtig D, et al. Autoimmune hyperphosphatemic tumoral calcinosis in a patient with FGF23 autoantibodies. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(12):5368‐5373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Boyce AM, Lee AE, Roszko KL, Gafni RI. Hyperphosphatemic tumoral calcinosis: pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and challenges in management. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Rafaelsen S, Johansson S, Raeder H, Bjerknes R. Long‐term clinical outcome and phenotypic variability in hyperphosphatemic familial tumoral calcinosis and hyperphosphatemic hyperostosis syndrome caused by a novel GALNT3 mutation; case report and review of the literature. BMC Genet. 2014;15:98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lyles KW, Burkes EJ, Ellis GJ, Lucas KJ, Dolan EA, Drezner MK. Genetic transmission of tumoral calcinosis: autosomal dominant with variable clinical expressivity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985;60(6):1093‐1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Burkes EJ Jr, Lyles KW, Dolan EA, Giammara B, Hanker J. Dental lesions in tumoral calcinosis. J Oral Pathol Med. 1991;20(5):222‐227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Favia G, Lacaita MG, Limongelli L, et al. Hyperphosphatemic familial tumoral calcinosis: odontostomatologic management and pathological features. Am J Case Rep. 2014;15:569‐575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Krstevska A, Gale S, Blair F. Tumoral calcinosis: a dental literature review and case report. Dent Update. 2012;39(6):416‐418, 421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ramnitz MS, Gourh P, Goldbach‐Mansky R, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization and treatment of a cohort with familial tumoral calcinosis/hyperostosis‐hyperphosphatemia syndrome. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(10):1845‐1854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Vieira AR, Lee M, Vairo F, et al. Root anomalies and dentin dysplasia in autosomal recessive hyperphosphatemic familial tumoral calcinosis (HFTC). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;120(6):e235‐e239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Yilanci HO, Akkaya N, Ozbek M, Celik HH. Dental findings of hyperphosphatemic familial tumoral calcinosis. Oral Radiol. 2017;33:65‐70. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kawashima N, Okiji T. Odontoblasts: specialized hard‐tissue‐forming cells in the dentin‐pulp complex. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2016;56(4):144‐153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Goetz R, Nakada Y, Hu MC, et al. Isolated C‐terminal tail of FGF23 alleviates hypophosphatemia by inhibiting FGF23‐FGFR‐Klotho complex formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(1):407‐412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Foster BL, Tompkins KA, Rutherford RB, et al. Phosphate: known and potential roles during development and regeneration of teeth and supporting structures. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today . 2008;84(4):281‐314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Chu EY, Fong H, Blethen FA, et al. Ablation of systemic phosphate‐regulating gene fibroblast growth factor 23 (Fgf23) compromises the dentoalveolar complex. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2010;293(7):1214‐1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Abe K, Ooshima T, Masatomi Y, Sobue S, Moriwaki Y. Microscopic and crystallographic examinations of the teeth of the X‐linked hypophosphatemic mouse. J Dent Res. 1989;68(11):1519‐1524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Foster BL, Nociti FH Jr, Somerman MJ. The rachitic tooth. Endocr Rev. 2014;35(1):1‐34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hejlesen J, Underbjerg L, Gjorup H, Sikjaer T, Rejnmark L, Haubek D. Dental anomalies and orthodontic characteristics in patients with pseudohypoparathyroidism. BMC Oral Health. 2019;20(1):2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.