Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
. 2007 May 31;4(3):169–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2002.01400.x

Omapatrilat Provides Long‐Term Control of Hypertension: A Randomized Trial of Treatment Withdrawal

Robert Guthrie 1, Richard A Reeves 2
PMCID: PMC8101813  PMID: 12045365

Abstract

Omapatrilat simultaneously inhibits neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin‐converting enzyme, increasing levels of vasodilatory peptides while decreasing production of angiotensin II. This study evaluated the clinical effects of withdrawal of omapatrilat after a patient's hypertension had been controlled (seated diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) on omapatrilat for at least 6 months, with or without adjunctive antihypertensive medications. This double‐blind study randomized 83 patients to receive either their established omapatrilat dose or placebo for 8 weeks; any concomitant antihypertensive medications were kept constant. Patients continuing on omapatrilat had no change in blood pressure. Patients whose chronic omapatrilat treatment was replaced by placebo had clinically important increases in both systolic (+16.5 mm Hg) and diastolic (+9.6 mm Hg) blood pressures (both p<0.001). An increase in blood pressure was also seen in patients who were taking adjunctive antihypertensive medications prior to withdrawal of omapatrilat. This study demonstrates that when compared to withdrawal placebo, omapatrilat maintains clinically and statistically significant blood pressure reductions.


Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and is poorly controlled worldwide. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) have been shown to be related to cardiovascular disease leading to morbidity and mortality. 1 The benefits of treating hypertension and reducing blood pressure (BP) have been documented in numerous clinical trials. 2 , 3 , 4

Omapatrilat is a new antihypertensive agent with a unique mechanism of action. 5 It simultaneously inhibits two key enzymes involved in BP homeostasis: neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE). 6 Simultaneous inhibition of neutral endopeptidase and ACE increases vasodilatory peptides, including atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide and it also increases the half‐life of other vasodilator peptides, including bradykinin and adrenomedullin. 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 By inhibiting the renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system and potentiating the vasodilatory peptides, omapatrilat reduces vasoconstriction and enhances vasodilation, thereby decreasing vascular tone and lowering BP. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 Short‐term (8–12 weeks) clinical trials show omapatrilat to be well tolerated and efficacious in hypertensive patients, 15 , 16 and data from ongoing long‐term, open‐label studies suggest that patients receive persistent and effective BP control for up to 5 years with omapatrilat given as monotherapy (Bristol‐Myers Squibb Company, data on file, 2002).

While many patients require increasing doses or additional medications to maintain BP control, it is unusual for studies that document the persistence of antihypertensive efficacy to be performed. The primary objective of this study was to compare the change in SBP and DBP, over 8 weeks, in subjects continued on omapatrilat with those whose treatment was replaced by placebo. The safety and tolerability of discontinuation of omapatrilat and continued active treatment were also assessed.

METHODS

The study was conducted under the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments and approved by the Institutional Review Boards/Ethics Committees. All subjects were required to give written informed consent before participating.

Study subjects were a subset of a larger group of 1098 subjects enrolled in an ongoing, long‐term, open‐label trial of once‐daily omapatrilat given for ≥6 months with or without adjunctive antihypertensive medications for treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. Subjects were ≥18 years of age, had documented pretreatment seated DBP (SeDBP) 95–110 mm Hg, and had their BP controlled (SeDBP <90 mm Hg) for ≥2 months with a stable dose of omapatrilat ≥20 mg.

Eighty‐three subjects were randomized to receive either placebo (n=41) or their regular once‐daily omapatrilat dosages (n=42). Baseline demographic characteristics, untreated BP, withdrawal baseline BP, and omapatrilat dosage at randomization were similar in both treatment groups (Table). Subjects taking any adjunctive antihypertensive medications at baseline, including hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine, or atenolol (omapatrilat group, 43%; placebo group, 51%), continued this therapy.

Table.

Baseline Demographic Characteristics/Trough Seated Efficiency Measures

Baseline Placebo Omapatriat
(n=41) (n=42)
Age, years
Mean (SD) 57.5 (10.5) 56.2 (10.1)
Range 35–77 36–80
Age Group n (%)
<65 years 31 (76) 32 (76)
≥65–74 years 7 (17) 9 (22)
≥75 years 3 (7) 1 (2)
Gender, n (%)
Male 29 (71) 30 (71)
Female 12 (2.9) 12 (2.9)
Race,n (%)
White 37 (90) 38 (90)
Black 3 (7) 3 (7)
Other 1 (2) 1 (2)
Duration of hypertension, years
Mean (SD) 9.4 (7.3) 10.4 (10.8)
Range 1–28 0–57
Short‐term baseline:*
SeDEP, mmHg‐
Mean (SD) 100.4 (3.9) 100.5 (3.8)
Range 95.3–110.0 94.7–110.0
SeSEP, mmHg
Mean (SD) 156.7 (13.3) 154.6 (13.5)
Range 133.3–196.0 132.0–184.7
Withdrawal baseline**
SeDBP mmHg
Mean (SD) 83.6 (5.4) 85.7(3.0)
Range 69.3–92.0 78.7–97.3
SeSEP, mmHg
Mean (SD) 130.7 (9.3) 131.3 (8.6)
Range 101.3–152.0 111.3–151.2
Months treated in long term study prior to withdrawal
Mean (SD) 14.4 (5.3) 15.3 ((6.4)
Range 8–25 7–28
Adjunct use at withdrawal Baseline, n (%)
Yes 21 (51) 18 (43)
No 20 (49) 24 (57)
Omapatrilat dose at withdrawal baseline (mg)
0 2 (5.0) 0 (0)
20 19 (46.0) 23 (55)
40 11 (27.0) 10 (24)
80 9 (22.0) 9 (21)
SeDEP=seated diastolic blood pressure; SeSBP=seated systolic blood pressure; *baseline was the last assessment prior to randomization into the short‐term double‐ blind period; **withdrawal substudy baseline was the last assessment prior to treatment during withdrawal substudy therapy

Subjects were seen at office visits every 2 weeks for 8 weeks after randomization. At each visit, seated BP was measured in triplicate, 24 hours after the preceding dose of study medication, by trained observers using auscultation and a mercury sphygmomanometer, according to a standardized protocol. Compliance with omapatrilat, placebo, and the adjunctive antihypertensive medications was assessed by pill counts at each visit. Safety and tolerability were assessed using open‐ended questions about adverse events, physical examinations, and periodic laboratory testing. Subjects with SeDBP >100 mm Hg confirmed within 1 week were discontinued from the double‐blind study and returned to open‐label treatment with omapatrilat. All subjects resumed long‐term, open‐label treatment with omapatrilat after completion of the study.

RESULTS

At the end of 8 weeks, placebo‐treated subjects had clinically important increases in both seated SBP (SeSBP, +16.5 mm Hg) and SeDBP (+9.6 mm Hg), while omapatrilat‐treated subjects showed no significant changes in SeSBP or SeDBP (Figure). The difference in SeSBP and SeDBP between the two groups was 13.5 and 7.9 mm Hg, respectively (both p<0.001). Most of the increases in BP occurred by 2 weeks. Five subjects (12%) in the placebo group were discontinued for a disqualifying rise in SeDBP (>100 mm Hg). At 8 weeks, increases in BP in subjects receiving placebo plus adjunctive antihypertensive therapy equaled approximately one half of the increases seen in subjects receiving placebo alone (SeSBP, 11.2 mm Hg vs. 20.9 mm Hg; SeDBP, 6.6 mm Hg vs. 12.2 mm Hg). No differences were noted in BP change between subjects receiving omapatrilat plus adjunctive therapy and those receiving omapatrilat alone. While similar studies are unusual, a few have been conducted with diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and calcium channel blockers. 17 , 18 , 19 , 20

Figure.

Figure

Mean change from baseline at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks in trough seated systolic (SeSBP) and diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP). SeSBP and SeDBP increased significantly after withdrawal to placebo compared with continuation of omapatrilat therapy.

No serious adverse events were reported. The overall adverse event and adverse drug experience incidences were higher in the placebo group than in the omapatrilat group. One placebo‐treated subject discontinued because of an adverse event and was reinitiated on omapatrilat therapy.

New or worsening headaches were reported by nine placebo‐treated subjects (22%) and one omapatrilat‐treated subject (2.4%). Although mild to moderate hypertension is often considered asymptomatic, weak correlations with headache have been observed. 21 A reduction in incidence of headache has been shown to follow pharmacologic lowering of BP in subjects with mild to moderate hypertension. 21 , 22

DISCUSSION

In hypertensive subjects with BP that is well controlled with stable doses of omapatrilat, withdrawal of omapatrilat and replacement with placebo was followed by clinically important and statistically significant increases in both SeSBP and SeDBP, occurring primarily within the first 2 weeks. Of the subjects receiving placebo, 12% required discontinuation due to unacceptable increases in BP. This suggests that the actual mean increase in BP would have been greater had these subjects continued on placebo for the full 8 weeks.

In conclusion, this study confirms the clinically significant BP reductions provided by omapatrilat and suggests adverse consequences of discontinuing antihypertensive therapy.

Acknowledgment: Financial support for this study was provided by Bristol‐Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ.

References

  • 1. Levy D, Larson MG, Vasan RS, et al. The progression from hypertension to congestive heart failure. JAMA. 1996;275:1557–1562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. He J, Whelton PK. Elevated systolic blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular and renal disease: overview of evidence from observational epidemiologic studies and randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 1999;138(3 pt 2):S212–S219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Staessen JA, Gasowski J, Wang JG, et al. Risks of untreated and treated isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly: a meta‐analysis of outcome trials. Lancet. 2000;355:865–872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, et al. Effects of intensive blood‐pressure lowering and low‐dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. Lancet. 1998; 351:1755–1762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Robl JA, Sun C‐Q, Stevenson J, et al. Dual metalloprotease inhibitors: mercaptoacetyl‐based fused heterocyclic dipeptide mimetics as inhibitors of angiotensin‐converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase. J Med Chem. 1997;40:1570–1577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Gros C, Noel N, Souque A, et al. Mixed inhibitors of angiotensin‐converting enzyme (EC 3.4.15.1) and enkephalinase (EC 3.4.24.11): rational design, properties, and potential cardiovascular applications of glycopril and alatriopril. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:4210–4214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Graf K, Gräfe M, Auch‐Schwelk W, et al. Bradykinin degrading activity in cultured human endothelial cells. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;20(suppl 9):S16–S20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kenny AJ, Stephenson SL. Role of endopeptidase‐24.11 in the inactivation of atrial natriuretic peptide. FEBS Lett. 1988;232:1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lisy O, Jougasaki M, Schirger JA, et al. Neutral endopeptidase inhibition potentiates the natriuretic actions of adrenomedullin. Am J Physiol. 1998;275(3 pt 2):F410–F414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Trippodo NC, Panchal BC, Fox M. Repression of angiotensin II and potentiation of bradykinin contribute to the synergistic effects of dual metalloprotease inhibition in heart failure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;272:619–627. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Cody RJ, Laragh JH, Case DB, et al. Renin system activity as a determinant of response to treatment in hypertension and heart failure. Hypertension. 1983;5(5 pt 2):III36–III42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Laragh JH. The renin system and new understanding of the complications of hypertension and their treatment. Arzneimittelforschung. 1993;43:247–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Massien C, Azizi M, Guyene T‐T, et al. Pharmacodynamic effects of dual neutral endopeptidase‐angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibition versus angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibition in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;65:448–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Vesterqvist O, Liao W, Manning JA, et al. Pharmacodynamic effects of multiple doses of omapatrilat in healthy subjects [abstract]. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;65:132. Abstract PI‐61. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ruddy M, Guthrie R, Papademetriou V, et al., For The Omapatrilat Investigators . The safety and 24‐hour antihypertensive efficacy of the vasopeptidase inhibitor omapatrilat: a pilot study [abstract]. J Hypertens. 1999;17(suppl 3):S64. Abstract P1.157. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zusman R, Atlas S, Kochar M, et al. Efficacy and safety of omapatrilat, a vasopeptidase inhibitor [abstract]. Am J Hypertens. 1999;12(4 pt 2):125A. Abstract D060. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Maland LJ, Lutz LJ, Castle CH. Effects of withdrawing diuretic therapy on blood pressure in mild hypertension. Hypertension. 1983;5:539–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Castle CH, Wolbach RA. Long‐term systemic arterial blood pressure control with nicardipine. Am J Cardiol. 1989;-64:35H–41H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Vaur L, Bobrie G, Dutrey‐Dupagne C, et al. Short‐term effects of withdrawing angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor therapy on home self‐measured blood pressure in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens. 1998;11:165–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Bevan EG, Pringle SD, Waller PC, et al. Effects of atenolol withdrawal in patients on triple antihypertensive therapy. J Hum Hypertens. 1993;7:89–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Cooper WD, Glover DR, Hormbrey JM, et al. Headache and blood pressure: evidence of a close relationship. J Hum Hypertens. 1989;3:41–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hansson L, Smith DH, Reeves R, et al. Headache in mild‐to‐moderate hypertension and its reduction by irbesartan therapy. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1654–1658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Clinical Hypertension are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES