Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 May 6;11:9648. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89150-2

Hybrid bilayer membranes on metallurgical polished aluminum

Tomas Sabirovas 2, Aušra Valiūnienė 1,, Gintaras Valincius 2
PMCID: PMC8102548  PMID: 33958658

Abstract

In this work we describe the functionalization of metallurgically polished aluminum surfaces yielding biomimetic electrodes suitable for probing protein/phospholipid interactions. The functionalization involves two simple steps: silanization of the aluminum and subsequent fusion of multilamellar vesicles which leads to the formation of a hybrid bilayer lipid membrane (hBLM). The vesicle fusion was followed in real-time by fast Fourier transform electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (FFT EIS). The impedance-derived complex capacitance of the hBLMs was approximately 0.61 µF cm−2, a value typical for intact phospholipid bilayers. We found that the hBLMs can be readily disrupted if exposed to > 400 nM solutions of the pore-forming peptide melittin. However, the presence of cholesterol at 40% (mol) in hBLMs exhibited an inhibitory effect on the membrane-damaging capacity of the peptide. The melittin-membrane interaction was concentration dependent decreasing with concentration. The hBLMs on Al surface can be regenerated multiple times, retaining their dielectric and functional properties essentially intact.

Subject terms: Biochemistry, Chemistry

Introduction

Artificial lipid membranes provide a suitable platform for investigations of biological membrane related processes such as membrane-protein interactions1,2, ion permeability35, redox reactions6,7, etc. Medical diagnostics810, drug screening11,12, and environmental controls1315 are often based on artificial lipid membranes by the combination of biological recognition with a physicochemical transducer. The obvious advantages of membrane-based biosensors are the nature-like environment and the relatively simple preparation through a self-assembly process.

Emanating from the pioneering work of Mueller on bilayer lipid membranes (“black lipid membranes”)16,17, various approaches were developed for the formation of artificial lipid membranes. Among these, solid supported lipid bilayers received considerable recognition. Several different strategies can be adopted for the formation of the lipid membrane on a solid support. One of them is supported lipid bilayers, where lipid bilayer is formed directly on solid support such as oxidized silicon18, silica19, mica20, aluminum21, titanium22, etc. The advantage of using solid supports is an increase in the robustness and stability of the artificial membranes as well as the ability to probe the surface with powerful analytical techniques (e.g. quartz crystal microbalance23, atomic force microscopy24, surface plasmon resonance25, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy26). The major drawback of supported lipid bilayers is the thinness of the water layer between the bilayer and solid support, which can present unfavorable interactions to a) the incorporation of transmembrane proteins, b) protein-substrate interactions, and c) loss of protein lateral mobility27.

Another widely used strategy is to form artificial bilayers on modified surfaces with a polymer layer or self-assembled monolayer2835. Such functionalization of the surface decouples the artificial membrane from the substrate and, in principle, more readily allows for the transmembrane proteins to preserve their function. Modification of the surface with molecular anchors can be easily achieved either by thiol-metal or silane-oxide surface chemistry. Gold34 as a substrate has been most extensively studied for the formation of bilayer lipid membranes but other surfaces are viable choice as well e.g. silica36, indium tin oxide (ITO)37, fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO)38, cadmium tin oxide (CTO)39, Ti/TiO24042, aluminum4346, etc. In the majority of these cases, such surfaces require special preparation techniques e.g. magnetron sputtering, which increases the total expense towards investigations of membrane related processes or for applications of electrochemical/electroanalytical devices. Therefore, the magnitude of the literature clearly indicates metallurgical surfaces have extensive potential to be used as membrane-based biosensor platforms. Previously, we investigated metallurgical titanium surface for the phospholipid bilayer formation41,42, since titanium exhibits excellent biocompatibility, high chemical stability, and non-toxicity47. Nevertheless, preparation of metallurgical titanium surface e.g. surface polishing is challenging due to the hardness of material. Therefore, other cost-efficient and soft metal surfaces should be explored for phospholipid bilayer formation as well. One of them is aluminum. The major advantages of aluminum compared to titanium surface is the near effortless preparation of the surface due to the softness of the material and its higher affinity towards silane-based compounds48. The later has been already exploited to make aluminum surfaces corrosion resistant or to display self-cleaning surface properties49,50. Due to the easily achievable structuration of cylindrical pores by an anodization process, aluminum surfaces found usage for pore-spanning bilayers45,46,51. Also, metallic nanostructured aluminum surfaces is an emerging tool for SPR based biosensing applications5255, since aluminum generates surface plasmons in the visible and UV regions56. Moreover, evidence exists that Al substrates can be used for surface-enhanced fluorescence and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopies5759. The challenge of surface oxidation and material degradation (corrosion and pitting) have to be faced. These issues are usually addressed by the means of oxygen plasma to produce an oxide protecting layer on the aluminum surfaces. We believe, protective self-assembled silane monolayers and phospholipid overlayers could potentially be used for substrate protection in biologically relevant environments and at the same time expand the field of the sensitive optical biosensor applications based on metallurgical aluminum surface.

The objective of this work was to design biomimetic hybrid bilayer lipid membranes (hBLMs) on the surface of metallurgical polished aluminum. Biomimetic hBLMs on Al surfaces may be of use in biomedical applications both as membrane-based bioanalytical devices or functional interfaces capable of immobilization of membrane bound proteins and peptides. In this study we developed a simple procedure for the formation of the hybrid bilayers and investigated the feasibility of their repetitive regeneration without losing functional properties. Using the membrane disrupting peptide, melittin, we showed that such hBLMs can be effectively used for the detection of membrane damaging agents such as pore forming peptides and proteins.

Experimental

Preparation of the metallurgical aluminum surface

Metallurgical aluminum plate (25 × 55 mm, thickness 0.125 mm) (> 99.0%, Goodfellow GmbH) was polished with a 200,00 grit diamond lapidary paste with a diamond powder (size ≤ 0.1 µm) concentration of 50% at the speed of 1000 rpm until a mirror-like surface was observed. The process of surface polishing was carried out in the air. The polished aluminum plate was then cleaned by ultrasound for 10 min in (i) hexane (≥ 99%, Reachem, Slovakia), (ii) 2-propanol (≥ 99.5%, Sigma-Aldrich), (iii) 2 min in Milli-Q water (Milli Q-plus-Millipore system (USA)), then dried under a nitrogen gas stream.

Self-assembled monolayer formation

Freshly polished and cleaned metallurgical aluminum surfaces, as just described above, were used for the formation of octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS) (> 90%, Sigma-Aldrich) self-assembled monolayers. The silanization solution was prepared by heating 45 mL heptane to 60–65 °C and adding OTS at 2.5 mM concentration. The aluminum plate was immersed into a silanization solution for 45 min, then heated at 100 °C for 1 h in air to remove adsorbed water and solvent residues.

Hybrid bilayer lipid membrane (hBLM) completion

Hybrid bilayer lipid membranes were formed by the vesicle fusion method described in the reference60. Briefly, vesicle solutions were prepared from 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC) (Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc., USA) or molar ratio mixtures of 60% DOPC and 40% cholesterol (Chol) (Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc., USA) in chloroform (99%, Sigma-Aldrich) to a concentration of 10 mM. A desired amount of the lipid solutions was transferred to separate vials and evaporated under a nitrogen stream until the formation of the lipid film was observed. The lipid film was re-suspended in phosphate buffer (0.1 M NaCl, 0.01 M NaH2PO4, pH adjusted to 7.1 with NaOH), to a final 1.5 mM total lipid concentration. The NaCl, NaH2PO4 and NaOH were purchased from Reachem Slovakia p. a.

Regeneration of self-assembled monolayer

Regeneration of the self-assembled monolayer was carried as following: (i) hybrid bilayer lipid membranes were formed on silanized metallurgical Al surfaces via the vesicle fusion method, (ii) the cell was washed with a copious amount of phosphate buffer (pH 7.1), (iii) the phosphate buffer solution was drained out of the cell, (iv) a solution of 2-propanol in Milli-Q water (volume % ratio 50/50) was added into the cell with a pipette and vigorously agitated by refluxing (partial withdrawal and re-adding using a pipette) the 2-propanol/H2O solution in contact with the surface a few times to disintegrate the hybrid bilayer (the action was repeated for 5 times), (v) the cell was lastly washed with a copious amount of phosphate buffer (pH 7.1) and thus completing the first regeneration.

Electrochemical measurements

Measurements of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) were carried out in phosphate buffer (pH 7.1). A three-electrode conventional system was used for measurements configuration, where the aluminum plate served as the working electrode, saturated silver-silver chloride (Ag/AgCl/NaCl(sat.)) microelectrode (M-401F, Bedford, USA) as a reference electrode and platinum (99.99% purity, Aldrich) wire as an auxiliary electrode, which was coiled around the barrel of the reference electrode. CV measurements were carried out at a scan rate of 10 mV s-1 and a scan step at 1 mV using the µAutolab (Utrecht, the Netherlands). The potential was scanned between − 1.1 V and − 0.5 V versus Ag/AgCl/NaCl(sat.).

EIS were measured using µAutolab (unless indicated otherwise) (Utrecht, the Netherlands) in a frequency range from 0.1 Hz to 50 kHz. In cases where it was deemed necessary to avoid the influence of corrosion of the aluminum surface and to investigate the kinetics of the vesicle fusion process, fast Fourier transform (FFT) electrochemical impedance spectrometer EIS-128/16 (University of Kiel, Germany)61, which registers EI spectrum very fast (within 1.06 s in a frequency range between 1.5 Hz and 50 kHz), was used instead.

An additional platinum wire electrode (connected to the 1 μF capacitor) was used as a quasi-reference electrode to reduce the impedance of the reference electrode at the higher frequencies for FFT-EIS measurements. The obtained data are normalized to the geometric surface area of 0.32 cm2 of the working electrode. The electrode potentials in the article are versus Ag/AgCl/NaCl(sat.).

All measurements were performed at room temperature of 21 ± 3 °C. Multiple experiments (2 to 15) were carried out for determining standard deviations.

Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy

Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the aluminum functionalized with OTS self-assembled monolayer were registered using the spectrometer Bruker Alpha (Germany) equipped with a diamond attenuated total reflection (ATR) detector. The spectra were acquired in the wavenumbers range from 4000 cm−1 to 400 cm−1 at 4 cm−1 resolution from 100 scans. The spectrum of the aluminum was used as a reference and all experiments were carried out at ambient conditions.

Contact angle measurements

The contact angle was measured with Theta Lite Optical Tensiometer from Biolin Scientific (Finland) company by placing 6 droplets of 10 µL Milli-Q water. The contact angle measurements were performed immediately after the aluminum plate was cleaned or silanized.

Results and discussion

Formation of self-assembled monolayer

The formation of the artificial membranes on self-assembled monolayers (SAM) requires sufficient surface free energy62. For that reason, the aluminum surface was functionalized with octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS) monolayer by a simple silanization procedure. The most straightforward way to detect self-assembled monolayer (SAM) is to measure wetting properties–contact angles (CA) before and after silanization of the Al surface. Metallurgical aluminum surfaces exhibited hydrophilic properties showing CA values of 41.72° ± 3.96°. After the silanization procedure, the values of contact angles increased to 105.13° ± 2.02° clearly demonstrating hydrophobic properties of the silanized Al surface. The obtained contact angle values of 105.13° ± 2.02° for the silanized Al surface are slightly higher than those obtained on OTS monolayer formed on mechanically polished Ti surface (102.27° ± 1.76°)41 and lower than those obtained on OTS formed on FTO (119° ± 7°)38 surface. However, the change of the wetting characteristics from hydrophilic to hydrophobic in all cases attests for the formation of the organic OTS monolayer on the surface, and consequently shows that functionalized metallurgical aluminum surface has sufficient surface free energy, needed for further immobilization of phospholipid layer62.

Metallurgical Al surfaces before and after silanization procedure were tested with cyclic voltammetry (CV) in phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.1) in order to determine the potential range of non-Faradaic processes needed for further surface evaluation with EIS. The potential range for the CV measurements was chosen empirically by measuring the equilibrium potential, which was around − 0.65 V versus Ag/AgCl/NaCl(sat.), and increasing the potential to more negative and positive values. Cyclic voltammetry curves showed that Faradaic processes occur on the Al surface over the potential range from − 1.1 V to − 0.5 V (Fig. 1, dashed line). Usually, it is expected that aluminum is covered with a naturally occurring Al oxide which at neutral pH (~ 7) is expected to be electrochemically stable63. However, in a presence of the chloride anions the passive oxide film becomes unstable and local corrosion occurs64. Therefore, ideal polarizability was not observed on the aluminum surface (Fig. 1, dashed line), since oxidation and reduction processes take place in the investigated potential range. After the formation of OTS monolayer on the Al surface, even in the presence of chloride anions, almost ideal polarizability was observed in the potential range from − 1.1 V to − 0.65 V (Fig. 1, solid line). This effect can be attributed to the formation of a self-assembled monolayer resulting in the blockage of the interface aluminum–buffer solution.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cyclic voltammograms of the metallurgical aluminum surface before and after silanization at the scan rate of 10 mV s−1 in phosphate buffer, pH 7.1.

The OTS monolayers on the Al surface were also analyzed with ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, which allows assessing the order in alkyl chains of the SAM65,66. Figure 2 displays the C-H stretching region where three vibration absorbance bands are observed. The bands at 2852 cm−1 and 2923 cm−1 can be assigned to C-H symmetric (ѵs(CH2)) and asymmetric (ѵas(CH2)) stretching of methylene, respectively. The weak band at 2960 cm−1 is assigned to methyl asymmetric stretching (ѵas(CH3))65,66. The position of ѵas(CH2) band can be used for the evaluation of the order in alkyl chains66. For highly ordered octadecanethiol SAMs on the gold surface, the band of ѵas(CH2) appears at 2917 cm−1, shifting to higher wavenumbers as the gauche conformations along with the methylene chain increases (i.e. disorder)65,66. In our case, ѵas(CH2) appears at 2923 cm−1 indicating some disorder in the OTS SAMs. Also, the lower band intensity of ѵs(CH3) relative to ѵs(CH2) shows that the methyl groups are parallel to the surface, as observed in mixed SAMs with lower packing densities on gold67.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

C–H stretching region of ATR-FTIR spectra of OTS self-assembled monolayer formed on the metallurgical polished aluminum surface.

Formation of hybrid bilayer membranes

Contact angle, cyclic voltammetry, and ATR-FTIR measurements (Figs. 1, 2) attest for the formation of OTS monolayers needed for immobilization of the hybrid bilayer lipid membranes. EIS, which is capable of detecting the dielectric properties of the surface, was applied for investigation of the hybrid bilayer formation on the metallurgical aluminum surface. Typically, the semi-circular shape of EI response in the complex capacitance plot is observed for ideally polarizable interfaces demonstrating nearly ideal capacitive behavior26,34,41,68. The approximate complex capacitance values can be obtained from the Cole–Cole plots by taking the radius of the semi-circle and multiplying it by two. For detailed capacitance values and equivalent circuits used to model electrochemical impedance data please see Supporting material data (Fig. 1S-5S, Table 1S-4S).

Figure 3 shows electrochemical impedance spectra in Cole–Cole plots of the metallurgical Al surface functionalized with an OTS monolayer and a hBLM. Initially, the metallurgical aluminum surface exhibited relatively high values of complex capacitance reaching 4.82 ± 0.59 µF cm−2 (Fig. 3, open triangles). As expected, the silanization of the aluminum surface causes the “shrinkage” of the semi-circle demonstrating a decrease of complex capacitance by approximately four-fold to 1.1 ± 0.11 µF cm−2 (Fig. 3, open circles) and indicating the formation of the dielectric layer of OTS monolayer on the Al surface. By comparison, the OTS analog octadecanethiol, which forms ordered, compact SAMs on gold surfaces34,69 exhibit complex capacitance values well below 1 µF cm−2. The difference in the capacitance values is an indication of void spaces (defects) in the SAM exposing the Al surface and, consequently, these defects increase the complex capacitance of the SAM70. Taking into account that OTS silanized mechanically polished titanium41 and magnetron sputtered titanium40 surfaces were successfully applied for the formation of hBLMs albeit exhibiting complex capacitance values above 1 µF cm−2, the silanized metallurgical Al surface was also tested for the formation of bilayer lipid membranes via vesicle fusion. After immobilization of hBLMs, the complex capacitances decreased to 0.61 µF cm−2 ± 0.07 µF cm−2 (Fig. 3, filled circles), which is a value typical for phospholipid bilayers.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Electrochemical impedance spectra in Cole–Cole plot of Al, OTS and DOPC:Chol (molar % ratio 6:4) hBLM, formed by vesicle fusion method after 30 min incubation time. The applied potential: − 0.7 V versus Ag/AgCl/NaCl(sat.). Mean complex capacitance values with standard deviations are displayed as well.

The process of vesicle fusion was monitored in real-time using FFT-EIS method by measuring EIS every 5 s for 40 min. Figure 4 shows the complex capacitance evolution after injection of DOPC:Chol (molar % ratio 6:4) vesicles on the OTS monolayer. The decrease of the complex capacitance was noticeable after 5 s indicating that vesicle fusion process was triggered instantaneously (Fig. 4). As incubation time increases, the semicircle in Fig. 4 “shrinks” further indicating the decrease of the complex capacitance from 0.86 µF cm−2 (after 5 s) to 0.61 ± 0.07 µF cm−2. The completion of vesicle fusion typically occurred within approximately 500 s. Fusion completion can be detected by the limit capacitance value of 0.61 ± 0.07 µF cm−2 which is comparable to those obtained for bilayer lipid membranes formed on gold (~ 0.6 μF cm−2)33,34, FTO (0.82 ± 0.10 μF cm−2)38 and mechanically polished Ti surfaces (0.61 µF ± 0.06 µF cm−2 )41.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Cole–Cole plots of FFT impedance spectra of the DOPC:Chol (molar % ratio 6:4) vesicle fusion process on silanized aluminum surface. The applied potential: − 0.7 V versus Ag/AgCl/NaCl(sat.). Inset—surface coverage, θ, of the lipid layer over time.

The vesicle fusion progression can be followed by the parameter, θ, which approximately indicates the fraction of the surface covered by the hBLM:

θ=CSAM-CmeasCSAM-ChBLM 1

where CSAM—the magnitude of complex capacitance of self-assembled monolayer, Cmeas—the magnitude of the complex capacitance measured at a specific time during the vesicle fusion and ChBLM—the magnitude of complex capacitance at 100% coverage by the hybrid bilayer membrane (0.61 µF cm−2).

As observed in Fig. 4 inset, the step-like increase of surface coverage to θ = 0.34 was observed within the first 5 s. At 100 s the coverage reached its first plateau at θ = 0.42. The increase resumed at approx. 180 s reaching coverage of θ = 0.94 in 560 s. Then, slow convergence towards θ → 1 was observed over the next 350 s. The formation of a 100% hBLM was typically observed between 900 and 1000 s. For the sake of reproducibility, we typically use 30 min (1800s) of vesicle fusion during which almost defect-free hBLMs were formed.

The trace shown in Fig. 4 inset represents a typical kinetics curve for amphiphilic molecules undergoing two-stage adsorption. During the first stage molecules adsorb onto the surface of adsorbate (in our case the SAM) establishing maximal area of contact. In our case this corresponds to a horizontal orientation (striped phase) of the phospholipid molecules on anchor SAMs. Then, as adsorption proceeds, the molecules rearrange themselves into a more compact arrangement corresponding, in our case, to a phospholipid monolayer oriented nearly parallel to the surface normal.

In conclusion, our finding allows us to conclude that the vesicle fusion led to a formation of intact, essentially defect free hBLMs. This leads to a broader conclusion of applicability of the metallurgical Al surface for the formation of hybrid bilayer lipid membrane (hBLM) by the vesicle fusion method.

Regeneration of self-assembled monolayer for the formation of the artificial membrane

Regeneration experiments were carried out to explore the possible exploitation of the OTS SAMs for multiple hBLM formations. Firstly, the OTS SAM was monitored with EIS after the silanization procedure. After that, the hBLM was formed via the vesicle fusion method, and the formation of sequential hBLMs was monitored with EIS after each reconstitution. Figure 5 displays EIS data obtained after 7 regenerations (details for regeneration procedure are presented in Experimental. It was observed that complex capacitance values of the SAM and hBLMs slightly changed after each reformation of an hBLM. Initially, the OTS complex capacitances were 1.16 µF cm−2 (Fig. 5, open circles). Over the course of the regeneration sequence the values of the complex capacitance of the SAM increased to 1.42 µF cm−2 after the 6th hBLM formation (Fig. 5, open diamonds). This feature can be attributed to the loss of the dielectric layer and adsorption of water molecules into the SAM. The sequential hBLMs follow the same tendency of an increase in the complex capacitance value, however, this tendency was less noticeable. Particularly, the complex capacitance values increased slightly from 0.68 µF cm−2 following the first formation of hBLM to 0.74 µF cm−2 of the 7th formation of hBLM (Fig. 5, filled diamonds). The apparent transformation of EIS occurs at the end of the semi-circle as indicated by the arrow in Fig. 5, inset. The end of the semi-circle consistently shifts towards the “northeast” direction with increasing numbers of SAM regenerations. Such EIS responses are usually obtained when the size of the defects in the membrane increases26. Significantly, however, even though sequential, multiple formation of hBLMs on regenerated SAMs increases SAM defectiveness, these OTS SAMs on metallurgical aluminum surfaces can be regenerated up to 6 times and re-used for multiple formations of hBLMs.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Cole–Cole plots of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of the OTS SAM regeneration for DOPC:Chol (molar % ratio 6:4) hybrid bilayer formation on the metallurgical aluminum surface. The applied potential for EI measurements: − 0.7 V versus Ag/AgCl/NaCl(sat.). Inset shows an enlarged part of the complex capacitance plot of the hBLM formations.

Melittin interaction with artificial membrane

Melittin, a major component of bee venom71, is a 26 amino acid cationic peptide existing as a monomer in an aqueous environment72,73. Its amphipathic properties allow it to easily associate with the structures like lipid bilayers. When bound to lipid bilayers melittin adopts an α-helical conformation and disrupts the bilayer lipid membrane by the formation of a pore. Figure 6 displays Cole–Cole plots of the hBLMs after a 60 min interaction with solutions containing various amounts of melittin. In all cases exposure of the hBLM to melittin triggers EIS spectral changes consistent with the disruption of the phospholipid insulating layer and increases of a complex capacitance. The effect of melittin was found to be dependent on concentration and lipid composition. After exposure of DOPC:Chol (molar % ratio 6:4) hBLM to 200 nM melittin solution, the EI spectra (Fig. 6a) remained almost unchanged. An increase of melittin concentration to 400 nM results in a significant increase of the complex capacitance of the DOPC:Chol hBLM from 0.64 µF cm−2 to 0.94 µF cm−2 (Fig. 6c). Further increase in melittin concentration to 500 nM results in a disintegration of the hBLM which is evident from the complex capacitance increase to 1.06 µF cm−2 (data not shown), a value close to the complex capacitance value of the bare anchor SAM with no phospholipid overlayer.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Electrochemical impedance spectra in Cole–Cole plot of melittin interaction: (a) and (c)—with DOPC:Chol (molar % ratio 6:4), (b) and (d)—with DOPC hybrid bilayer lipid membranes. The applied potential: − 0.7 V versus Ag/AgCl/NaCl(sat.).

In cholesterol-free hBLMs (100% DOPC) the melittin effect on membrane capacitance is quite significant even at low melittin concentrations. At 100 nM, the complex capacitance of the DOPC bilayer slightly increased from 0.80 µF cm−2 to 0.88 µF cm−2 (Fig. 6b). However, at 400 nM of melittin the cholesterol-free DOPC hBLM was fully disrupted as indicated by a large complex capacitance increase from 0.80 µF cm−2 to 1.16 µF cm−2 (Fig. 6d).

Our findings indicate an inhibitory effect by cholesterol towards melittin induced damage of the bilayer74,75. Actually, the membrane-bound melittin can exist in two orientations: parallel, where only interactions with lipid head group occurs, and perpendicular, where it reconstitutes into the hydrophobic core of the membrane, leading to pore formation76. These orientations are highly dependent on melittin concentration. At lower concentrations (approximately below 0.5 µM77, however it must be noted that exact concentration depends on the many factors e.g. lipids, ionic strength, pH)7880, the peptide binds to the surface of the bilayer in parallel conformation. In our case the major difference between cholesterol-free and cholesterol-loaded hBLMs is observed at low melittin concentrations. We speculate that the melittin peptide cannot penetrate the membranes with cholesterol and remains oriented parallel but at concentrations, above 400 nM, the peptide overcomes this resistance to penetration and adopts more vertical orientations, creating pores (defects), and increasing the capacitance complex of the system.

The disruptive effect of the peptide on the hybrid bilayers can be utilized to design impedimetric biosensors for the detection of membrane damaging toxins such as melittin. For this purpose, the extent of damage can be quantified as follows:

MD=1-CSAM-CmelittinCSAM-ChBLM 2

where MD denotes the membrane damage: CSAM—is the complex capacitance value of the OTS monolayer, Cmelittin—the complex capacitance of the hBLM after 60 min of exposure to melittin, ChBLM—the complex capacitance value of the hBLM.

Figure 7a displays the dependence of MD versus melittin concentration. The curve indicates a non-linear dependence. Therefore, for analytical purposes, the semilogarithmic inverse concentration plot (Fig. 7b) is better, which we found empirically, and exhibits relatively a good linear dependence in the concentration range from 100 to 500 nM. We believe this interval of melittin concentration can be extended by properly adjusting phospholipid composition of hBLMs which requires further investigation.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(a)—Dependence of the membrane damage, MD, on melittin concentration, (b)—same data depicted in logMD versus inverse of melittin concentration.

Conclusions

In this work we assembled hybrid bilayer lipid membranes on polished metallurgical aluminum surfaces. Functionalized by an OTS monolayer the Al surface triggers fast and effective vesicle fusion leading to a formation of a layer of phospholipid. Experimental data suggest that 900 s are sufficient for the formation of compact and highly insulating hBLMs with the complex capacitance value of 0.61 ± 0.07 µF cm−2 as measured by the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The hBLMs can be regenerated multiple times, which makes hBLMs on metallurgical polished Al a convenient reusable platform for peptide membrane interaction studies.

The hBLMs in our study are sufficiently fluid to allow a biologically relevant response to the membrane damaging agent, melittin from bee venom. The response was found to be dependent on cholesterol content in the hBLMs, with cholesterol acting as a moderate inhibitor of melittin damage, consistent with earlier studies on vesicles74,75,81. The melittin effect was reproducible and concentration dependent which suggests utility of the hBLMs on metallurgical Al as a robust platform for biosensor design.

Our study also shows that the regenerable hBLMs on Al are superior to the ones on gold substrates not only because of the price considerations, but also because of the possibility of the multiple usage and regeneration without considerable loss of the integrity as is typically the case for the gold-tethered BLMs82. Commercial availability of low-priced metallurgical Al surfaces, straightforward surface preparation and surface regeneration by a simple mechanical polishing can provide a superior and a convenient platform for cost-efficient membrane-based bioanalytical devices.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (131.5KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by European Regional Development Fund under “Promotion of Centers of Excellence and Innovation and Technology Transfer Centers” program No. 01.2.2-CPVA-K-703, Grant No. 01.2.2-CPVA-K-703-03-0010.

Author contributions

A.V. and G.V. conceived the project and wrote the main manuscript text, T.S. performed the experiments and prepared Figs. 17. All authors discussed the results and reviewed the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-89150-2.

References

  • 1.Berry T, Dutta D, Chen R, Leong A, Wang H, Donald WA, Parviz M, Cornell B, Willcox M, Kumar N, Cranfield CG. Lipid membrane interactions of the cationic antimicrobial peptide chimeras melimine and cys-melimine. Langmuir. 2018;34(38):11586–11592. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li S, Cao C, Yang J, Long Y-T. Detection of peptides with different charges and lengths by using the aerolysin nanopore. ChemElectroChem. 2019;6(1):126–129. doi: 10.1002/celc.201800288. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Krishna G, Schulte J, Cornell BA, Pace RJ, Osman PD. Tethered bilayer membranes containing ionic reservoirs: Selectivity and conductance. Langmuir. 2003;19(6):2294–2305. doi: 10.1021/la026238d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang X, Fu W, Palivan CG, Meier W. Natural channel protein inserts and functions in a completely artificial, solid-supported bilayer membrane. Sci. Rep. 2013;3(1):2196. doi: 10.1038/srep02196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xiao H, Hong D, Zhu T, Liu S, Li G. Electrochemical sensing of the ion-channel formation of OmpF. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2009;39(8):1163–1167. doi: 10.1007/s10800-009-9778-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gutiérrez-Sanz O, Olea D, Pita M, Batista AP, Alonso A, Pereira MM, Vélez M, De Lacey AL. Reconstitution of respiratory complex I on a biomimetic membrane supported on gold electrodes. Langmuir. 2014;30(29):9007–9015. doi: 10.1021/la501825r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chung M-W, Liu Y-C, Yen T-H, Chiang M-H. Bilayer vesicles as a noncovalent immobilization platform of electrocatalysts for energy conversion in neutral aqueous media. ChemElectroChem. 2018;5(1):20–24. doi: 10.1002/celc.201701051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Murakami Y, Zhang Z, Taniguchi T, Sohgawa M, Yamashita K, Noda M. A high-sensitive detection of several tens of nm of amyloid-beta by cantilever-type biosensor immobilized DPPC liposome incorporated with cholesterol. Procedia Eng. 2016;168:565–568. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.526. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fritzen-Garcia MB, Zoldan VC, Oliveira IRWZ, Soldi V, Pasa AA, Creczynski-Pasa TB. Peroxidase immobilized on phospholipid bilayers supported on au (111) by DTT self-assembled monolayers: Application to dopamine determination. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013;110(2):374–382. doi: 10.1002/bit.24721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Patrice FT, Zhao L-J, Fodjo EK, Li D-W, Qiu K, Long Y-T. Highly sensitive and selective electrochemical detection of dopamine using hybrid bilayer membranes. ChemElectroChem. 2019;6(3):634–637. doi: 10.1002/celc.201801367. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ingólfsson HI, Andersen OS. Screening for small molecules' bilayer-modifying potential using a gramicidin-based fluorescence assay. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 2010;8(4):427–436. doi: 10.1089/adt.2009.0250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tadaki D, Yamaura D, Araki S, Yoshida M, Arata K, Ohori T, Ishibashi K-i, Kato M, Ma T, Miyata R, Tozawa Y, Yamamoto H, Niwano M, Hirano-Iwata A. Mechanically stable solvent-free lipid bilayers in nano- and micro-tapered apertures for reconstitution of cell-free synthesized hERG channels. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):17736. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17905-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guan H, Zhang F, Yu J, Chi D. The novel acetylcholinesterase biosensors based on liposome bioreactors–chitosan nanocomposite film for detection of organophosphates pesticides. Food Res. Int. 2012;49(1):15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.07.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nikolelis DP, Andreou VG. Electrochemical transduction of interactions of atrazine with bilayer lipid membranes. Electroanalysis. 1996;8(7):643–647. doi: 10.1002/elan.1140080708. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Coldrick Z, Penezić A, Gašparović B, Steenson P, Merrifield J, Nelson A. High throughput systems for screening biomembrane interactions on fabricated mercury film electrodes. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2011;41(8):939–949. doi: 10.1007/s10800-011-0319-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mueller P, Rudin DO, Ti Tien H, Wescott WC. Reconstitution of cell membrane structure in vitro and its transformation into an excitable system. Nature. 1962;194(4832):979–980. doi: 10.1038/194979a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mueller P, Rudin DO, Tien HT, Wescott WC. Methods for the formation of single bimolecular lipid membranes in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. 1963;67(2):534–535. doi: 10.1021/j100796a529. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tamm LK, McConnell HM. Supported phospholipid bilayers. Biophys. J. 1985;47(1):105–113. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83882-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jing Y, Trefna H, Persson M, Kasemo B, Svedhem S. Formation of supported lipid bilayers on silica: Relation to lipid phase transition temperature and liposome size. Soft Matter. 2014;10(1):187–195. doi: 10.1039/C3SM50947H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zasadzinski JA, Helm CA, Longo ML, Weisenhorn AL, Gould SA, Hansma PK. Atomic force microscopy of hydrated phosphatidylethanolamine bilayers. Biophys. J. 1991;59(3):755–760. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82288-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jackman JA, Tabaei SR, Zhao Z, Yorulmaz S, Cho N-J. Self-Assembly formation of lipid bilayer coatings on bare aluminum oxide: Overcoming the force of interfacial water. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7(1):959–968. doi: 10.1021/am507651h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cho N-J, Frank CW. Fabrication of a planar zwitterionic lipid bilayer on titanium oxide. Langmuir. 2010;26(20):15706–15710. doi: 10.1021/la101523f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Keller CA, Kasemo B. Surface specific kinetics of lipid vesicle adsorption measured with a quartz crystal microbalance. Biophys. J. 1998;75(3):1397–1402. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74057-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mingeot-Leclercq M-P, Deleu M, Brasseur R, Dufrêne YF. Atomic force microscopy of supported lipid bilayers. Nat. Protoc. 2008;3(10):1654–1659. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Reimhult E, Zäch M, Höök F, Kasemo B. A multitechnique study of liposome adsorption on AU and lipid bilayer formation on SiO2. Langmuir. 2006;22(7):3313–3319. doi: 10.1021/la0519554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Valincius G, Meškauskas T, Ivanauskas F. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of tethered bilayer membranes. Langmuir. 2012;28(1):977–990. doi: 10.1021/la204054g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Boxer SG. Molecular transport and organization in supported lipid membranes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000;4(6):704–709. doi: 10.1016/S1367-5931(00)00139-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wong JY, Majewski J, Seitz M, Park CK, Israelachvili JN, Smith GS. Polymer-cushioned bilayers. I. A structural study of various preparation methods using neutron reflectometry. Biophys. J. 1999;77(3):1445–1457. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)76992-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hillebrandt H, Wiegand G, Tanaka M, Sackmann E. High electric resistance polymer/lipid composite films on indium−tin−oxide electrodes. Langmuir. 1999;15(24):8451–8459. doi: 10.1021/la990341u. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hausch M, Zentel R, Knoll W. Synthesis and characterization of hydrophilic lipopolymers for the support of lipid bilayers. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1999;200(1):174–179. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3935(19990101)200:1<174::AID-MACP174>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nuzzo RG, Allara DL. Adsorption of bifunctional organic disulfides on gold surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983;105(13):4481–4483. doi: 10.1021/ja00351a063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Naumann R, Schiller SM, Giess F, Grohe B, Hartman KB, Kärcher I, Köper I, Lübben J, Vasilev K, Knoll W. Tethered lipid bilayers on ultraflat gold surfaces. Langmuir. 2003;19(13):5435–5443. doi: 10.1021/la0342060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jeuken LJC, Daskalakis NN, Han X, Sheikh K, Erbe A, Bushby RJ, Evans SD. Phase separation in mixed self-assembled monolayers and its effect on biomimetic membranes. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007;124(2):501–509. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2007.01.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McGillivray DJ, Valincius G, Vanderah DJ, Febo-Ayala W, Woodward JT, Heinrich F, Kasianowicz JJ, Löscheb M. Molecular-scale structural and functional characterization of sparsely tethered bilayer lipid membranes. Biointerphases. 2007;2(1):21–33. doi: 10.1116/1.2709308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Han X, Critchley K, Zhang L, Pradeep SN, Bushby RJ, Evans SD. A novel method to fabricate patterned bilayer lipid membranes. Langmuir. 2007;23(3):1354–8. doi: 10.1021/la062636v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Han X, Cheetham MR, Sheikh K, Olmsted PD, Bushby RJ, Evans SD. Manipulation and charge determination of proteins in photopatterned solid supported bilayers. Integr. Biol. (Camb.) 2009;1(2):205–11. doi: 10.1039/b815601h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hillebrandt H, Tanaka M. Electrochemical characterization of self-assembled alkylsiloxane monolayers on indium−tin oxide (ITO) semiconductor electrodes. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2001;105(19):4270–4276. doi: 10.1021/jp004062n. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gabriūnaitė I, Valiūnienė A, Valincius G. Formation and properties of phospholipid bilayers on fluorine doped tin oxide electrodes. Electrochim. Acta. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Valiūnienė A, Margarian Ž, Gabriūnaitė I, Matulevičiūtė V, Murauskas T, Valinčius G. Cadmium stannate films for immobilization of phospholipid bilayers. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016;163(9):H762–H767. doi: 10.1149/2.0331609jes. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Valiūnienė A, Petrulionienė T, Balevičiūtė I, Mikoliūnaitė L, Valinčius G. Formation of hybrid bilayers on silanized thin-film Ti electrode. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 2017;202:62–68. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2016.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sabirovas T, Valiūnienė A, Valincius G. Mechanically polished titanium surface for immobilization of hybrid bilayer membrane. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018;165(10):G109–G115. doi: 10.1149/2.0101810jes. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sabirovas T, Valiūnienė A, Gabriunaite I. Valincius G (2020) Mixed hybrid bilayer lipid membranes on mechanically polished titanium surface. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2020;1862(6):183232. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2020.183232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Marchal D, Pantigny J, Laval JM, Moiroux J, Bourdillon C. Rate constants in two dimensions of electron transfer between pyruvate oxidase, a membrane enzyme, and ubiquinone (coenzyme Q8), its water-insoluble electron carrier. Biochemistry. 2001;40(5):1248–1256. doi: 10.1021/bi002325y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Roskamp RF, Vockenroth IK, Eisenmenger N, Braunagel J, Köper I. Functional tethered bilayer lipid membranes on aluminum oxide. ChemPhysChem. 2008;9(13):1920–1924. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200800248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lazzara TD, Carnarius C, Kocun M, Janshoff A, Steinem C. Separating attoliter-sized compartments using fluid pore-spanning lipid bilayers. ACS Nano. 2011;5(9):6935–6944. doi: 10.1021/nn201266e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Drexler J, Steinem C. Pore-suspending lipid bilayers on porous alumina investigated by electrical impedance spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2003;107(40):11245–11254. doi: 10.1021/jp030762r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Abdel-Hady Gepreel M, Niinomi M. Biocompatibility of Ti-alloys for long-term implantation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013;20:407–415. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Picard L, Phalip P, Fleury E, Ganachaud F. Chemical adhesion of silicone elastomers on primed metal surfaces: A comprehensive survey of open and patent literatures. Prog. Org. Coat. 2015;80:120–141. doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.11.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Deflorian F, Rossi S, Fedrizzi L. Silane pre-treatments on copper and aluminium. Electrochim. Acta. 2006;51(27):6097–6103. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.02.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rodič P, Milošev I. One-step ultrasound fabrication of corrosion resistant, self-cleaning and anti-icing coatings on aluminium. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019;369:175–185. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.03.082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Miller CJ, Majda M. Microporous aluminum oxide films at electrodes. 3. Lateral electron transport in self-assembled monolayers of N-methyl-N′-octadecyl-4,4′-bipyridinium chloride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986;108(11):3118–3120. doi: 10.1021/ja00271a059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lee K-L, Hsu H-Y, You M-L, Chang C-C, Pan M-Y, Shi X, Ueno K, Misawa H, Wei P-K. Highly sensitive aluminum-based biosensors using tailorable fano resonances in capped nanostructures. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):44104. doi: 10.1038/srep44104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Canalejas-Tejero V, Herranz S, Bellingham A, Moreno-Bondi MC, Barrios CA. Passivated aluminum nanohole arrays for label-free biosensing applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014;6(2):1005–1010. doi: 10.1021/am404509f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Skinner JL, Hunter LL, Talin AA, Provine J, Horsley DA. Large-area subwavelength aperture arrays fabricated using nanoimprint lithography. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2008;7(5):527–531. doi: 10.1109/TNANO.2008.2002648. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chan GH, Zhao J, Schatz GC, Van Duyne RP. Localized surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy of triangular aluminum nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008;112(36):13958–13963. doi: 10.1021/jp804088z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Oliveira LC, Herbster A, Moreira CdS, Neff FH, Lima AMN. Surface plasmon resonance sensing characteristics of thin aluminum films in aqueous solution. IEEE Sens. J. 2017;17(19):6258–6267. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2017.2741583. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Malicka J, Gryczynski I, Gryczynski Z, Lakowicz JR. Surface plasmon-coupled ultraviolet emission of 2,5-diphenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazole. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2004;108(50):19114–19118. doi: 10.1021/jp047136u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Dörfer T, Schmitt M, Popp J. Deep-UV surface-enhanced Raman scattering. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2007;38(11):1379–1382. doi: 10.1002/jrs.1831. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lay CL, Koh CSL, Wang J, Lee YH, Jiang R, Yang Y, Yang Z, Phang IY, Ling XY. Aluminum nanostructures with strong visible-range SERS activity for versatile micropatterning of molecular security labels. Nanoscale. 2018;10(2):575–581. doi: 10.1039/C7NR07793A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ragaliauskas T, Mickevicius M, Rakovska B, Penkauskas T, Vanderah DJ, Heinrich F. Valincius G (2017) Fast formation of low-defect-density tethered bilayers by fusion of multilamellar vesicles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1859;5:669–678. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Popkirov GS, Schindler RN. A new impedance spectrometer for the investigation of electrochemical systems. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1992;63(11):5366–5372. doi: 10.1063/1.1143404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Silin VI, Wieder H, Woodward JT, Valincius G, Offenhausser A, Plant AL. The role of surface free energy on the formation of hybrid bilayer membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124(49):14676–14683. doi: 10.1021/ja026585+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Pournaghi-Azar MH, Razmi-Nerbin H. Voltammetric behaviour and electrocatalytic activity of the aluminum electrode modified with nickel and nickel hexacyanoferrate films, prepared by electroless deposition. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1998;456(1):83–90. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(98)00284-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Natishan PM, O’Grady WE. Chloride ion interactions with oxide-covered aluminum leading to pitting corrosion: A review. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2014;161(9):C421–C432. doi: 10.1149/2.1011409jes. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Porter MD, Bright TB, Allara DL, Chidsey CED. Spontaneously organized molecular assemblies. 4. Structural characterization of n-alkyl thiol monolayers on gold by optical ellipsometry, infrared spectroscopy, and electrochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987;109(12):3559–3568. doi: 10.1021/ja00246a011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Laibinis PE, Whitesides GM, Allara DL, Tao YT, Parikh AN, Nuzzo RG. Comparison of the structures and wetting properties of self-assembled monolayers of n-alkanethiols on the coinage metal surfaces, copper, silver, and gold. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113(19):7152–7167. doi: 10.1021/ja00019a011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Budvytyte R, Valincius G, Niaura G, Voiciuk V, Mickevicius M, Chapman H, Goh H-Z, Shekhar P, Heinrich F, Shenoy S, Lösche M, Vanderah DJ. Structure and properties of tethered bilayer lipid membranes with unsaturated anchor molecules. Langmuir. 2013;29(27):8645–8656. doi: 10.1021/la401132c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Valincius G, Mickevicius M, Penkauskas T, Jankunec M. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of tethered bilayer membranes: An effect of heterogeneous distribution of defects in membranes. Electrochim. Acta. 2016;222:904–913. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.11.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ragaliauskas T, Mickevicius M, Budvytyte R, Niaura G, Carbonnier B, Valincius G. Adsorption of β-amyloid oligomers on octadecanethiol monolayers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014;425:159–167. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.03.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Vanderah DJ, Arsenault J, La H, Gates RS, Silin V, Meuse CW, Valincius G. Structural variations and ordering conditions for the self-assembled monolayers of HS(CH2CH2O)3–6CH3. Langmuir. 2003;19(9):3752–3756. doi: 10.1021/la026580q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Terwilliger TC, Eisenberg D. The structure of melittin. II. Interpretation of the structure. J. Biol. Chem. 1982;257(11):6016–6022. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)65098-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bello J, Bello HR, Granados E. Conformation and aggregation of melittin: Dependence of pH and concentration. Biochemistry. 1982;21(3):461–465. doi: 10.1021/bi00532a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Schwarz G, Beschiaschvili G. Kinetics of melittin self-association in aqueous solution. Biochemistry. 1988;27(20):7826–7831. doi: 10.1021/bi00420a036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Chen L-Y, Cheng C-W, Lin J-J, Chen W-Y. Exploring the effect of cholesterol in lipid bilayer membrane on the melittin penetration mechanism. Anal. Biochem. 2007;367(1):49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Benachir T, Monette M, Grenier J, Lafleur M. Melittin-induced leakage from phosphatidylcholine vesicles is modulated by cholesterol: A property used for membrane targeting. Eur. Biophys. J. 1997;25(3):201–210. doi: 10.1007/s002490050032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.van den Bogaart G, Guzmán JV, Mika JT, Poolman B. On the mechanism of pore formation by melittin. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283(49):33854–33857. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805171200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Humbert C, Busson B. Chapter 10—sum-frequency generation spectroscopy of biointerfaces. In: Pradier CM, Chabal YJ, editors. Biointerface Characterization by Advanced IR Spectroscopy. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011. pp. 279–321. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Raghuraman H, Chattopadhyay A. Effect of ionic strength on folding and aggregation of the hemolytic peptide melittin in solution. Biopolymers. 2006;83(2):111–121. doi: 10.1002/bip.20536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kashiwada A, Mizuno M, Hashimoto J. pH-Dependent membrane lysis by using melittin-inspired designed peptides. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016;14(26):6281–6288. doi: 10.1039/C6OB01002D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Klocek G, Schulthess T, Shai Y, Seelig J. Thermodynamics of melittin binding to lipid bilayers. Aggregation and pore formation. Biochemistry. 2009;48(12):2586–2596. doi: 10.1021/bi802127h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Pandidan S, Mechler A. Nano-viscosimetry analysis of the membrane disrupting action of the bee venom peptide melittin. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):10841. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47325-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Rakovska B, Ragaliauskas T, Mickevicius M, Jankunec M, Niaura G, Vanderah DJ, Valincius G. Structure and function of the membrane anchoring self-assembled monolayers. Langmuir. 2015;31(2):846–857. doi: 10.1021/la503715b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (131.5KB, docx)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES