Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transl Stroke Res. 2020 Nov 7;12(5):742–753. doi: 10.1007/s12975-020-00868-z

Refined ischemic penumbra imaging with tissue pH and diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging

Jesse Cheung 1,2,, Madeline Doerr 2,3,, Ranliang Hu 4, Phillip Zhe Sun 2,4
PMCID: PMC8102648  NIHMSID: NIHMS1644948  PMID: 33159656

Abstract

Imaging has played a vital role in our mechanistic understanding of acute ischemia and the management of acute stroke patients. The most recent DAWN and DEFUSE-3 trials showed that endovascular therapy could be extended to a selected group of late-presenting stroke patients with the aid of imaging. Although perfusion and diffusion MRI have been commonly used in stroke imaging, the approximation of their mismatch as the penumbra is oversimplified, particular in the era of endovascular therapy. Briefly, the hypoperfusion lesion includes the benign oligemia that does not proceed to infarction. Also, with prompt and effective reperfusion therapy, a portion of the diffusion lesion is potentially reversible. Therefore, advanced imaging that provides improved ischemic tissue characterization may enable new experimental stroke therapeutics and eventually further individualize stroke treatment upon translation to the clinical setting. Specifically, pH imaging captures tissue of altered metabolic state that demarcates the hypoperfused lesion into ischemic penumbra and benign oligemia, which remains promising to define the ischemic penumbra’s outer boundary. On the other hand, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) differentiates the most severely damaged and irreversibly injured diffusion lesion from the portion of diffusion lesion that is potentially reversible, refining the inner boundary of the penumbra. Altogether, the development of advanced imaging has the potential to transform not only the experimental stroke research but also aid clinical translation and patient management.

Keywords: acute stroke, acidification, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), MRI mismatch, penumbra, pH MRI

Introduction

Stroke is one of the primary causes of adult mortality, morbidity, and disability [1, 2]. Ischemic stroke is caused by a vascular blockage that results in sudden and severe hypoperfusion, leading to neurologic dysfunctions and brain tissue injury. The most severely hypoperfused brain tissue forms a core of irreversible damage (infarction) and the surrounding hypoperfused area is at risk of infarction (penumbra). If cerebral perfusion is not restored promptly, the infarction core may expand over time to the hypoperfused territory [3]. The goal of acute stroke treatment is to rapidly and safely recanalize the occluded vessel(s), salvage ischemic tissue, prevent infarct growth, and minimize hemorrhagic complications [46].

The transition from stroke onset time-clock to tissue-clock based treatment

Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) administered within the first 4.5 hours of stroke onset has been and continues to be the standard care of acute stroke treatment [7]. tPA restores perfusion and improves functional outcomes by inducing fibrin degradation to break down the blood clot. However, tPA’s therapeutic time window is very narrow, limiting it to a very small group of stroke patients. Although time is critical, there has been tremendous interest in individualizing stroke therapy by transitioning from stroke onset time-based treatment (time clock) to salvageable tissue-based patient enrollment (tissue clock) [8, 9]. The key is to identify stroke patients with substantial penumbra tissue who are likely to benefit from reperfusion treatment [10]. Recent DAWN [11] and DEFUSE-3 [12] trials have shown that imaging-guided late-window recanalization is beneficial in carefully selected large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke patients. Although routine stroke imaging has been well established in stroke clinical trials, it has been recognized that there are limitations. Patients in the DAWN trial had relatively small infarctions (average core < 10 ml). The majority of stroke patients (~70%) presenting 6–24 hrs with NIH stroke scale (NIHSS) over 6 are not DAWN and DEFUSE-3 eligible [13]. As Fisher and Xiong pointed out, it is urgent to determine both the lowest Alberta stroke program early CT score (ASPECTS) and the largest ischemic core volume where thrombectomy is no longer beneficial [14]. The ASPECTS is calculated by deducting 1 point from a score of 10 points for any evidence of early ischemic change for each of the defined regions, which provides a quantitative topographic CT score of acute stroke.

MRI has also been recently shown in the WAKE-UP trial to be useful in guiding tPA thrombolysis in stroke patients with unknown stroke onset time [15]. In this study, the presence of DWI lesion and the absence of parenchymal hyperintensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI was used as a surrogate marker for early infarction amenable to thrombolytic therapy. However, many patients with early infarcts may be excluded by this approach since FLAIR hyperintense lesion can occur in 15% of patients imaged under 3 hours and in 41% of patients imaged at 3 to 4.5 hours [16]. A more accurate tissue marker has tremendous potential to improve selection in patients with unknown stroke onset time. Furthermore, a more tissue-specific imaging marker may also be helpful in evaluating strokes that do not arise from anterior-circulation large vessel occlusions. For example, lacunar-type and posterior fossa infarctions may have different imaging characteristics than anterior circulation territorial infarctions [17].

Stroke imaging

Imaging has played a crucial role in identifying acute stroke patients for thrombolytic and endovascular treatments [18]. There are four essential tasks of acute stroke imaging: to detect the presence of hemorrhage, to identify the location and severity of occlusion(s), to measure infarct core volume, and to estimate the penumbral tissue [10, 19]. Both CT and MRI have advantages and disadvantages in stroke imaging [2024]. CT is currently the most commonly used imaging modality due to its wide availability and rapid acquisition. On the other hand, MRI is versatile and can characterize the hemodynamic, metabolic, and structural status of the ischemic tissue, which provides a comprehensive characterization of the ischemic core and penumbra [25, 26]. Whereas MRI exams may take longer than CT, it is worth noting that fast stroke MRI protocols with good diagnostic quality have been performed in scan times rivaling that of CT protocols for the evaluation of acute stroke patients [27].

Acute ischemia induces a cascade of tissue changes (Fig. 1), depending on the level and duration of hypoperfusion [2830]. Ischemic tissue initially suffers from disrupted gene expression and protein synthesis under the condition of mild hypoperfusion (35–50 ml/100g/min). Such changes are, however, not detectable using non-invasive imaging. With the further reduction in perfusion, ischemic tissue transitions from aerobic to anaerobic glycolysis and causes changes in cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRG) and lactate production (25–35 ml/100g/min). Although MR spectroscopy, such as 1H and phosphorous 31P MRS, can detect such metabolite changes, the spatiotemporal resolution of MRS is not sufficient for acute stroke imaging [3134]. Upon metabolic disruption, ischemic tissue becomes acidic (lactic acidosis) with glutamate release, which represents a narrow range of perfusion thresholds between selective neuronal loss (25–50 ml/100g/min) and infarction (under 22 ml/100g/min) [3539]. With a further reduction of perfusion level, key tissue metabolites such as phosphocreatine and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) deplete, which quickly leads to irreversible tissue injury and infarction. It is critical for stroke imaging to capture events along this cascade of worsening tissue damage so that the ischemic tissue can be staged correctly in real-time for individualizing stroke therapy.

Fig. 1:

Fig. 1:

A diagram of ischemic tissue injury cascades following acute stroke. Note that the glucose metabolism, lactate, and pH changes occur before infarction, suggesting that such indices are biomarkers for defining ischemic penumbra (Markus HS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(3):353–61).

Diffusion and Perfusion MRI

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is currently the operational gold standard for defining the ischemic core [8, 40]. It has been documented that the ischemic core has a reduced apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the first 7 days, followed by ADC normalization and subsequent increases above that of healthy tissue [41]. Within the first hours of stroke onset, DWI is the most sensitive and specific means of depicting the extent and size of infarction. It has been relied upon to establish the infarction volume thresholds in which recanalization will likely be futile and risky if above [42, 43]. Perfusion weighted MRI (PWI) can be performed using either contrast-enhanced or non-contrast methods to depict the severity of ischemia [4448]. Whereas arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion MRI provides superior perfusion measurement, it is often technically challenging in the acute stroke setting, and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI is more widely used [4951]. In the absence of revascularization, the infarction may grow from the initial DWI lesion to approach the PWI lesion. It is worth noting that not all hypoperfusion lesions will proceed to infarction, likely because the collateral circulation can sustain the ischemic tissue and, therefore, slow down or even prevent infarction growth [52]. Altogether, DWI and PWI lesion mismatch has been postulated as an operational penumbra to identify stroke patients for reperfusion treatment in an extended time window [53].

Limitation of routine diffusion and perfusion MRI

Although diffusion and perfusion imaging has been widely used, the perfusion/diffusion (PWI/DWI) lesion mismatch paradigm is oversimplified. The mismatch could not adequately depict the heterogeneity of the viable ischemic tissues [54]. The PWI/DWI mismatch may not only contain a mixture of penumbral and benign oligaemic tissue but also fail to include a portion of the reversible diffusion lesion. Specifically, the perfusion thresholds for ischemic injury varies with sex, age, and tissue type (gray versus white matter) [5558]. The perfusion lesion often overestimates the penumbra by including the mild ischemic area unlikely to infarct (benign oligemia) [59]. On the other hand, the DWI lesion suffers from graded metabolic disruption and could overestimate the ischemic core [6062]. A portion of the DWI lesion is reversible with early thrombolysis, even in cases with large DWI lesions [6366]. Whereas DWI reversal had been considered infrequent [67], recent studies revived the concept of DWI renormalization in patients with early recanalization [68]. For example, Hsia et al. pointed out, “Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) evolution in patients with early, complete revascularization, now more commonly seen with endovascular therapy, is strikingly different from our historical understanding.” [69] The study concluded that recanalization and reperfusion lead to an earlier increase in intensity and a more rapid ADC normalization of the ischemic core than before. Early revascularization and ADC normalization often occur together, which may serve as a potential biomarker for developing future adjunctive treatment.

The refined mismatch paradigm

Building on the initial concept of perfusion/diffusion lesion mismatch, Kidwell et al. proposed a modified mismatch paradigm to refine the imaging definition of the ischemic penumbra [52]. The refined penumbra has its outer boundary smaller than the perfusion lesion, so the hypoperfused benign oligemia is excluded from the penumbra. Also, the modified penumbra’s inner boundary extends into the diffusion lesion to include a portion of diffusion lesion that is potentially salvageable [70]. Although the modified mismatch paradigm based on clinical observation is highly plausible, there has been a lack of stroke imaging techniques to reliably characterize the heterogeneous ischemic tissue to refine the penumbra definition. The development of advanced stroke imaging techniques could improve the identification of salvageable tissues, leading to the development of new clinical protocols and monitoring therapeutic strategies.

Emerging Stroke Imaging Methods - Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI)

The ADC calculation assumes a monoexponential decay of MRI signal versus diffusion b value [7173]. However, diffusion in biological tissue does not precisely follow a Gaussian free diffusion profile due to displacement restriction and barriers [74]. Kurtosis is an index that describes the degree of non-Gaussian diffusion that has been overlooked in routine diffusion MRI. DKI quantifies not only the diffusion rate (i.e., diffusivity) but also the degree of deviation from the Gaussian diffusion profile (i.e., kurtosis) [7578]. In a study of acute/subacute ischemic stroke patients, Hui concluded that ischemia preferentially alters the intra-axonal environment and proposed focal enlargement of axons known as axonal swelling or beading as a potential mechanism for kurtosis change following stroke [79].

It has been shown that, in a transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) rat model, the DWI lesion without kurtosis abnormality renormalizes after early reperfusion. In contrast, the kurtosis lesion within the DWI lesion shows a poor response to reperfusion [80]. Briefly, Fig. 2 shows mean diffusivity (MD) and kurtosis (MK) images before and after reperfusion in rats, documenting partial diffusion lesion renormalization. The MD lesion was considerably larger than the MK lesion during MCAO. After reperfusion (90 min MCAO), the MD lesion partially reversed to about the same size as the acute MK lesion during MCAO. In contrast, the MK lesion had little change before and after reperfusion. This observation suggests that the routine DWI lesion is heterogeneous, and DKI may distinguish the irreversibly damaged infarction core from the portion of potentially reversible DWI lesions. Such experimental stroke finding is consistent with the clinical observation that early recanalization in acute stroke patients often results in partial DWI reversibility that is correlated with functional outcomes [64, 81]. Although the routine DKI protocol requires a minimal of 31 scans, a fast DKI protocol has been developed that requires 13 scans, reducing the scan time by over 50% [8284]. The diffusion/kurtosis mismatch region has shown a trend of higher perfusion than the infraction core [85]. Because it has been reported that thresholding ADC does not predict DWI reversibility [86], DKI and DWI likely capture different aspects of ischemic tissue injury, complementing each other. The use of DKI to define infarction core potentially avoids the overestimation of irreversibly damaged infarction tissue and allow for an accurate depiction of ischemic penumbra for EVT in an extended recanalization window.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

DKI predicts diffusion renormalization after early (90 min MCAO) reperfusion (Cheung et al. Stroke 2012:2252–4).

Emerging Stroke Imaging Methods – Tissue pH

Acidosis is associated with oxygen-glucose deprivation and is a surrogate marker for energetic disruption in ischemic tissue [87, 88]. Cytosolic pH drop causes intracellular Na+ accumulation, which subsequently increases Ca2+ by the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger [89, 90]. Calcium overload contributes to cell death. Under normal physiological conditions, tissue pH is relatively uniform and stable; however, abnormal glucose and oxygen metabolism changes the tissue pH during acute ischemic stroke. Indeed, pH is one of the last indices to change before ischemic tissue progresses towards infarction [28, 91]. A set of optical imaging studies have shown that acidic foci may recruit the ischemic penumbra into infarction [92]. Regi et al. showed that regional cerebral and cortical blood flows are not different between the permanent stroke (60 min) group and another transient ischemia group of four repeated ischemic episodes, 15-minute each separated by 5-min reperfusion. At the same time, pH was significantly different [93]. This observation suggests that pH had greater power to define different severity of ischemic tissue injury. However, pH imaging is either invasive [9498] or of insufficient spatiotemporal resolution for the acute stroke setting [99101].

Amide Proton Transfer pH-sensitive MRI

Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging, a specific form of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI, has been developed for pH imaging by sensitizing to pH-dependent chemical exchanges between amide protons from endogenous mobile proteins/peptides and water protons [102110]. The endogenous amide proton chemical exchange is dominantly base-catalyzed in the brain, and APT MRI can be used as a sensitive non-invasive pH measurement technique within the physiologically relevant pH [111113]. pH imaging may help define the ischemic penumbra where hypoperfused tissue with intact pH corresponds to benign oligemia. In contrast, the hypoperfused tissue with pH drop identifies metabolic penumbra that is at risk of infarction. The use of pH mapping enables refining the perfusion/diffusion lesion mismatch into acidosis-based penumbra (concurrent perfusion and pH drop) and benign oligemia (hypoperfused tissue with little pH change) [114, 115]. Such additional pH-sensitive metabolic imaging along with the diffusion and perfusion MRI may improve prediction of tissue outcome and ultimately help guide stroke treatment [116].

Substantial progress has been achieved in fast pH MRI to make it amenable in the acute stroke setting. It has been shown that an intermediate RF saturation power level maximizes the pH contrast between the ischemic lesion and the contralateral normal area [117]. The pH-dependent APT MRI effect correlates with lactate concentration, as expected [118]. However, the commonly used pH-weighted image is susceptible to concomitant relaxation and magnetization transfer (MT) that are not pH specific. Zhou et al. showed that T1-normalized CEST effects for the intact white and gray matter are about equal for pH-dependent APT contrast. Yet, MT contrast asymmetry and nuclear overhauser enhancement (NOE) effects are significantly different [119]. Manual lesion outlining has been chosen to overcome pH-weighted image heterogeneity not specific to pH for segmenting ischemic lesions in pH-weighted images [114]. To correct the pH-independent background heterogeneity, Guo et al. postulated that MTRasym (Fig. 3a) heterogeneity from the intact tissue could be described as a multilinear regression (Fig. 3b) of magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and relaxation (i.e., 1/T1), and dubbed it magnetization transfer and relaxation normalized APT (MRAPT) analysis [120]. The development of MRAPT analysis improves pH imaging specificity and enables absolute pH mapping [121]. Perfusion and diffusion images (Figs. 3d and 3f) reveal pronounced perfusion, pH, and diffusion lesion mismatch, which has been postulated to correspond to infarction (diffusion lesion - black, Fig. 3f), metabolic penumbra (pH/diffusion mismatch - green, Fig. 3f) and benign oligemia (perfusion/pH mismatch - red, Fig. 3f). It is worth noting that the diffusion lesion has a worse pH drop than the penumbra [122]. Also, kurtosis lesion suffers from worse pH drop than that of the diffusion/kurtosis lesion mismatch, corroborating the refined mismatch paradigm [123]. Also, the pH-specific MRI allows fast field inhomogeneity correction that minimizes the acquisition time, which makes it highly amenable to the acute stroke setting [124, 125].

Fig. 3:

Fig. 3:

Demonstration of pH-specific MRI in an acute stroke rat. a) pH-weighted MTRasym. b) The multilinear regression between MTRasym, R1w and MMTR from the intact tissue, per pixel, correction of which results in c) pH-specific ΔMRAPTR map. Rat perfusion (d) and diffusion (e) images reveal perfusion/pH/diffusion lesion mismatch (Guo et al., Neuroimage 2016:242–9).

Wang et al. demonstrated the potential use of pH lesion in refining acute [121]. Fig. 4 overlays multiparametric MRI triangle), pH/diffusion lesion mismatch (green square), perfusion/pH lesion mismatch (red circle), and perfusion/diffusion lesion mismatch (solid pink circle). Fig. 4a shows that although diffusion lesion has significantly reduced ADC from all three mismatch regions (i.e., pH/diffusion, perfusion/pH, and perfusion/diffusion mismatches), the mismatch regions have substantially overlapped perfusion and diffusion values. Although all ischemic areas have significantly reduced cerebral blood flow (CBF) from the contralateral brain, only PWI/pH mismatch has a significantly higher perfusion level than the diffusion lesion (Fig. 4b). Fig. 4c shows that while ADC cannot differentiate perfusion/diffusion, perfusion/pH, and pH/diffusion mismatches, their pH was significantly different, being 6.84±0.10, 7.01±0.04, and 6.71±0.12, respectively. This data suggests the potential use of pH to sensitize the heterogeneous metabolic disruption within the routine PWI/DWI lesion mismatch. Indeed, Fig. 4d shows that regions of diffusion lesion, pH/DWI lesion mismatch, and PWI/pH lesion mismatch can be clustered using multi-dimensional perfusion, pH, and diffusion indices, augmenting routine perfusion and diffusion-based stroke imaging.

Fig. 4:

Fig. 4:

Comparison of perfusion, pH and diffusion indices from diffusion lesion, pH/diffusion lesion mismatch, perfusion/pH lesion mismatch and perfusion/diffusion mismatch from all animals. a) ADC vs. CBF. b) pH vs. CBF. c) pH vs. ADC. d) Three-dimensional stratification of CBF, ADC and pH indices from diffusion lesion, pH/diffusion lesion mismatch, and perfusion/pH lesion mismatch. CBF=cerebral blood flow, ADC=apparent diffusion coefficient.

It is worth noting that there could be non-negligible T1 changes following the acute stroke [126128], while the mean MT ratio (MMTR) from ±3.5 ppm shows little change [121]. After accounting for the difference in relaxation time, a recent study showed that the pH-sensitive APT signal dominates the NOE effect, supporting the continued use of MTRasym and amalgamations of it (e.g., MRAPT analysis) for pH imaging in the acute stroke setting [129].

New Imaging-based Ischemic Tissue Classification

The recent development of DKI and pH MRI provides a tangible means to refine the mismatch paradigm (Fig. 5). Fig. 5a shows the routine PWI/DWI mismatch paradigm, in which the DWI lesion defines the infarction core (black), and the PWI/DWI lesion mismatch identifies the salvageable penumbra tissue (red). With the development of DKI and pH imaging, we postulate that the heterogeneous ischemic lesion can be refined (Fig. 5b). Specifically, the PWI/DWI mismatch includes benign oligemia (hypoperfusion tissue without pH change, region IIb in red), and metabolic penumbra (hypoperfused acidic tissue, region IIa in light green). In addition, the DWI lesion contains an irreversible infarction core (DKI lesion, region Ia in black) and a portion of DWI lesion that is still salvageable despite its worse pH drop than region IIa (DWI/DKI lesion mismatch, region Ib in dark green). Altogether, the penumbra is defined by pH/DKI lesion mismatch (regions Ib (dark green) + region IIa (light green)). Although additional work is needed to fully establish that pH/DKI mismatch is the penumbra, accumulating data suggest that advanced stroke imaging has the potential to augment the routine perfusion/diffusion mismatch paradigm. A fast and refined tissue characterization may provide the urgently needed imaging evidence to individualize and transform the state-of-the-art stroke patient care.

Fig. 5:

Fig. 5:

Illustration of the refined mismatch paradigm. a) The routine PWI/DWI mismatch paradigm. b) Modified penumbra defined by pH/DKI mismatch.

Clinical translation of DKI and pH imaging

Although it may seem challenging to incorporate advanced MRI to the acute stroke clinical settings, there have been increasing reports of DKI and pH stroke imaging, particularly in large stroke centers where the infrastructure and workflow enable exploration of novel stroke imaging and treatment. Specifically, pH-sensitive APT MRI has been translated to study acute stroke patients with preliminary yet promising results, especially for those with relatively delayed presentation of 24–48 hours [130133]. For example, Heo et al. demonstrated pH-sensitive imaging in acute stroke patients at 3 Tesla, with a scan time of 3 min 14 s [133]. Because the simplistic MTRasym index includes contributions from APT, NOE, and possibly relaxation changes, the APT effect was quantified using an extrapolated semisolid MT reference signal technique (rAPT#). The pH/diffusion and perfusion/pH scatter plots from two representative stroke patients are shown in Fig. 6. The first patient had a perfusion/pH lesion mismatch with minor pH/diffusion mismatch (Fig. 6a). The scatter plot showed two clusters; the diffusion lesion showed significantly relative ADC (rADC) drop (Fig. 6b) while the perfusion/pH lesion mismatch showed intact rADC and delayed relative bolus transit time (rBTT), as expected (Fig. 6c). In the second stroke patient, there were both noticeable pH/diffusion and perfusion/pH lesion mismatches (Fig. 6d). The rADC and rAPT# scatter plot shows that the pH/diffusion lesion mismatch is of higher rADC than the diffusion lesion (Fig. 6d). Although pH/diffusion lesion mismatch has lower rAPT# than the contralateral normal tissue, the pH/diffusion lesion mismatch and diffusion lesion had reasonably overlapped pH-weighted MRI contrast. Also, pH/diffusion and perfusion/pH lesion mismatches displayed delayed bolus transit time (Fig. 6f).

Fig. 6:

Fig. 6:

Comparisons of diffusion/pH/perfusion deficits, pH/diffusion and perfusion/pH scatterplots in two acute stroke patients at 1 day from symptom onset. a-c: A patient with pH/perfusion mismatch, but minor diffusion/pH mismatch. d– f: A patient with pH/perfusion mismatch, as well as diffusion/pH mismatch. The distributions of the diffusion deficit area (red), pH-diffusion mismatch (green), and perfusion-pH mismatch (blue) were markedly different from those of the contralateral normal tissue (black).

For the clinical translation of DKI, Yin et al. implemented a multi-band fast DKI protocol at 3 Tesla, with a scan time of 2 min 10 s. They reported that for ischemic lesions over 1 cm in diameter, kurtosis lesions are of stronger correlation with the follow-up T2 MRI than those of diffusion MRI [134]. Also, Zhu et al. studied 156 stroke patients and analyzed 199 lesions in regions of periventricular white matter, corpus callosum, cerebellum, basal ganglia and thalamus, brainstem, and gray-white matter junctions. They concluded that DKI could reveal the differences in microstructure changes among various locations affected by acute ischemic stroke and performed better than diffusivity [135]. Guo et al. compared MK, axial kurtosis, and radial kurtosis in acute stroke patients. They concluded that axial kurtosis is better suited for diagnosing acute ischemic lesions in highly anisotropic brain regions, such as the corpus callosum and corona radiate. In contrast, MK may be appropriate for the lesions in low anisotropic or isotropic brain regions, such as the thalamus, subcortical white matter, and cerebral cortices [136].

Future directions for acute stroke imaging and acute stroke research

Advanced imaging may help guide the development of new stroke therapeutics such as novel neuroprotection in combination with effective reperfusion like alkalinizing agents [137], Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE1) [138, 139], and acid ion sensing channel (ASIC)-blockers [140, 141]. In particular, the most recent Stroke Preclinical Assessment Network (SPAN) aims to test new compounds/interventions in animal models of cerebral ischemia following the stroke treatment academic industry roundtable recommendations [142145]. Future work to reduce the scan time for DKI and pH imaging is needed to enable a full panel of stroke MRI examinations without delaying the treatment. Advanced stroke imaging could also facilitate their translation and benefit new acute stroke trials, building on the successes of DAWN and DEFUSE3.

Acknowledgments

Funding: This study was supported in part by grants from NIH/NINDS 2R01NS083654 (to Sun) and Emory University Synergy Grant (to Hu and Sun).

Footnotes

Ethical approval: All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest: Authors have no conflict of interest other than the funding mentioned above.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This Author Accepted Manuscript is a PDF file of a an unedited peer-reviewed manuscript that has been accepted for publication but has not been copyedited or corrected. The official version of record that is published in the journal is kept up to date and so may therefore differ from this version.

References

  • 1.Benjamin EJ, et al. , Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2019. 139(10): p. e56–e528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Campbell BCV, et al. , Ischaemic stroke. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 2019. 5(1): p. 70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Moussaddy A, Demchuk AM, and Hill MD, Thrombolytic therapies for ischemic stroke: Triumphs and future challenges. Neuropharmacology, 2018. 134: p. 272–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Heit JJ, Zaharchuk G, and Wintermark M, Advanced Neuroimaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Penumbra and Collateral Assessment. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, 2018. 28(4): p. 585–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Catanese L, Tarsia J, and Fisher M, Acute Ischemic Stroke Therapy Overview. Circulation Research, 2017. 120(3): p. 541–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vilela P. and Rowley HA, Brain ischemia: CT and MRI techniques in acute ischemic stroke. European Journal of Radiology, 2017. 96: p. 162–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.NINDS rt-PA Stroke Group, Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. New England Journal of Medicine, 1995. 333: p. 1581–1587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vert C, Parra-Fariñas C, and Rovira À, MR imaging in hyperacute ischemic stroke. European Journal of Radiology, 2017. 96: p. 125–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang S-H, et al. , Precision Medicine for Ischemic Stroke, Let Us Move Beyond Time Is Brain. Translational stroke research, 2018. 9(2): p. 93–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu L, et al. , Oligemia, Penumbra, Infarction: Understanding Hypoperfusion with Neuroimaging. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, 2018. 28(4): p. 599–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nogueira RG, et al. , Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct. New England Journal of Medicine, 2017. 378(1): p. 11–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Albers GW, et al. , Thrombectomy for Stroke at 6 to 16 Hours with Selection by Perfusion Imaging. New England Journal of Medicine, 2018. 378(8): p. 708–718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Desai SM, et al. , Thrombectomy 6–24 hours after stroke in trial ineligible patients. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 2018. 10(11): p. 1033–1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fisher M. and Xiong Y, Evaluating patients for thrombectomy. Brain Circulation, 2018. 4(4): p. 153–159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Thomalla G, et al. , MRI-Guided Thrombolysis for Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset. New England Journal of Medicine, 2018. 379(7): p. 611–622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Aoki J, et al. , FLAIR can estimate the onset time in acute ischemic stroke patients. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 2010. 293(1–2): p. 39–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yoo AJ, et al. , Diffusion weighted imaging reversibility in the brainstem following successful recanalization of acute basilar artery occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg, 2010. 2(3): p. 195–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Puig J, et al. , From “Time is Brain” to “Imaging is Brain”: A Paradigm Shift in the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. J Neuroimaging, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Leslie-Mazwi TM, et al. , MR Imaging Selection of Acute Stroke Patients with Emergent Large Vessel Occlusions for Thrombectomy. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, 2018. 28(4): p. 573–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kidwell CS and Hsia AW, Imaging of the brain and cerebral vasculature in patients with suspected stroke: advantages and disadvantages of CT and MRI. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2006. 6(1): p. 9–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Leslie-Mazwi TM, et al. , Endovascular Stroke Treatment Outcomes After Patient Selection Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Criteria. JAMA Neurol, 2016. 73(1): p. 43–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McTaggart RA, et al. , Mechanical embolectomy for acute ischemic stroke beyond six hours from symptom onset using MRI based perfusion imaging. J Neurol Sci, 2017. 375: p. 395–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Menjot de Champfleur N, et al. , Efficacy of Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomographic Perfusion-Selected Patients in SWIFT PRIME Trial (Solitaire FR With the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke). Stroke, 2017. 48(6): p. 1560–1566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Almiri W, et al. , [Diagnostic Imaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke]. Radiologe, 2019. 59(7): p. 603–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bateman M, et al. , Diffusion and Perfusion MR Imaging in Acute Stroke: Clinical Utility and Potential Limitations for Treatment Selection. Top Magn Reson Imaging, 2017. 26(2): p. 77–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dijkhuizen RM, et al. , Functional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging of brain reorganization after experimental stroke. Translational stroke research, 2012. 3(1): p. 36–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nael K, et al. , Six-Minute Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for Evaluation of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke, 2014. 45(7): p. 1985–1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hossmann KA, Viability thresholds and the penumbra of focal ischemia. Ann Neurol, 1994. 36(4): p. 557–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Back T, Pathophysiology of the Ischemic Penumbra—Revision of a Concept. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 1998. 18(6): p. 621–638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Markus HS, Cerebral perfusion and stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2004. 75(3): p. 353–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Williams SR, et al. , Quantitative estimation of lactate in the brain by 1H NMR. Magn Reson Med, 1988. 7(4): p. 425–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Terrier F, et al. , Lactate mapping in ischemic rat kidneys using 1H spectroscopic imaging. Investigative Radiology, 1992. 27(4): p. 282–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dijkhuizen RM, et al. , Spatial assessment of the dynamics of lactate formation in focal ischemic rat brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 1999. 19(4): p. 376–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hyder F. and Rothman DL, Advances in Imaging Brain Metabolism. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2017. 19(1): p. 485–515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Obrenovitch TP, et al. , Brain tissue concentrations of ATP, phosphocreatine, lactate, and tissue pH in relation to reduced cerebral blood flow following experimental acute middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 1988. 8(6): p. 866–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Paschen W, et al. , Lactate and pH in the brain: association and dissociation in different pathophysiological states. J Neurochem, 1987. 48(1): p. 154–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Allen K, et al. , Acute Cerebral Ischaemia: Concurrent Changes in Cerebral Blood Flow, Energy Metabolites, pH, and Lactate Measured with Hydrogen Clearance and 31P and1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. III. Changes Following Ischaemia. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 1988. 8(6): p. 816–821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Katsura K, et al. , Extra- and Intracellular pH in the Brain During Ischaemia, Related to Tissue Lactate Content in Normo- and Hypercapnic rats. Eur J Neurosci, 1992. 4(2): p. 166–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Göttler J, et al. , Flow-metabolism uncoupling in patients with asymptomatic unilateral carotid artery stenosis assessed by multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 2018. 39(11): p. 2132–2143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Smith AG and Hill CR, Imaging assessment of acute ischaemic stroke: a review of radiological methods. The British Journal of Radiology, 2018. 91(1083): p. 20170573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.An H, et al. , Signal evolution and infarction risk for apparent diffusion coefficient lesions in acute ischemic stroke are both time- and perfusion-dependent. Stroke, 2011. 42(5): p. 1276–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bonney PA, et al. , The Continued Role and Value of Imaging for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Neurosurgery, 2019. 85(suppl_1): p. S23–S30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Olivot J-M, et al. , Impact of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Lesion Volume on the Success of Endovascular Reperfusion Therapy. Stroke, 2013. 44(8): p. 2205–2211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rordorf G, et al. , Regional ischemia and ischemic injury in patients with acute middle cerebral artery stroke as defined by early diffusion-weighted and perfusion-weighted MRI. Stroke, 1998. 29(5): p. 939–943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schaefer PW, et al. , Assessing tissue viability with MR diffusion and perfusion imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2003. 24(3): p. 436–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wu O, Ostergaard L, and Sorensen AG, Technical aspects of perfusion-weighted imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 2005. 15(3): p. 623–37, xi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Alsop DC, et al. , Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med, 2015. 73(1): p. 102–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Haller S, et al. , Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion of the Brain: Emerging Clinical Applications. Radiology, 2016. 281(2): p. 337–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bokkers RP, et al. , Whole-brain arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in patients with acute stroke. Stroke, 2012. 43(5): p. 1290–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang DJJ, et al. , The value of arterial spin-labeled perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke: comparison with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI. Stroke, 2012. 43(4): p. 1018–1024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wintermark M, et al. , Comparative overview of brain perfusion imaging techniques. Stroke, 2005. 36(9): p. e83–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kidwell CS, Alger JR, and Saver JL, Evolving paradigms in neuroimaging of the ischemic penumbra. Stroke, 2004. 35(11 Suppl 1): p. 2662–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Schlaug G, et al. , The ischemic penumbra: operationally defined by diffusion and perfusion MRI. Neurology, 1999. 53(7): p. 1528–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wu O, et al. , Predicting tissue outcome in acute human cerebral ischemia using combined diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR imaging. Stroke, 2001. 32(4): p. 933–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bristow MS, et al. , MR perfusion and diffusion in acute ischemic stroke: human gray and white matter have different thresholds for infarction. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2005. 25(10): p. 1280–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Arakawa S, et al. , Ischemic thresholds for gray and white matter: a diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance study. Stroke, 2006. 37(5): p. 1211–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Shin W, et al. , Quantitative cerebral perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: evaluation of reproducibility and age- and gender-dependence with fully automatic image postprocessing algorithm. Magn Reson Med, 2007. 58(6): p. 1232–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zaharchuk G, Arterial spin label imaging of acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 2011. 21(2): p. 285–301, x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kidwell CS, Alger JR, and Saver JL, Beyond mismatch: evolving paradigms in imaging the ischemic penumbra with multimodal magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke, 2003. 34(11): p. 2729–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nicoli F, et al. , Metabolic counterpart of decreased apparent diffusion coefficient during hyperacute ischemic stroke: a brain proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging study. Stroke, 2003. 34(7): p. e82–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Geisler BS, et al. , Blood-oxygen-level-dependent MRI allows metabolic description of tissue at risk in acute stroke patients. Stroke, 2006. 37(7): p. 1778–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.An H, et al. , Evaluation of MR-derived cerebral oxygen metabolic index in experimental hyperoxic hypercapnia, hypoxia, and ischemia. Stroke, 2009. 40(6): p. 2165–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kidwell CS, et al. , Thrombolytic reversal of acute human cerebral ischemic injury shown by diffusion/perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of Neurology, 2000. 47(4): p. 462–469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Labeyrie MA, et al. , Diffusion lesion reversal after thrombolysis: a MR correlate of early neurological improvement. Stroke, 2012. 43(11): p. 2986–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Soize S, et al. , How sustained is 24-hour diffusion-weighted imaging lesion reversal? Serial magnetic resonance imaging in a patient cohort thrombolyzed within 4.5 hours of stroke onset. Stroke, 2015. 46(3): p. 704–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Tisserand M, et al. , Does Diffusion Lesion Volume Above 70 mL Preclude Favorable Outcome Despite Post-Thrombolysis Recanalization? Stroke, 2016. 47(4): p. 1005–1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Inoue M, et al. , Early diffusion-weighted imaging reversal after endovascular reperfusion is typically transient in patients imaged 3 to 6 hours after onset. Stroke, 2014. 45(4): p. 1024–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Yoo J, et al. , Ischemic Diffusion Lesion Reversal After Endovascular Treatment. Stroke, 2019. 50(6): p. 1504–1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hsia AW, et al. , Rapid Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Evolution After Early Revascularization. Stroke, 2019. 50(8): p. 2086–2092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kohno K, et al. , Relationship between diffusion-weighted MR images, cerebral blood flow, and energy state in experimental brain infarction. Magn Reson Imaging, 1995. 13(1): p. 73–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hossmann KA, et al. , NMR imaging of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the evaluation of metabolic suppression and recovery after prolonged cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 1994. 14(5): p. 723–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Norris D, Niendorf T, and Leibfritz D, Health and infarcted brain tissues studied at short diffusion times: the origins of apparent restriction and the reduction in apparent diffusion coefficient. NMR in Biomedicine, 1994. 7(7): p. 304–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Desmond PM, et al. , The value of apparent diffusion coefficient maps in early cerebral ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2001. 22(7): p. 1260–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Jensen JH and Helpern JA, MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis. NMR Biomed, 2010. 23(7): p. 698–710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Weber RA, et al. , Diffusional kurtosis and diffusion tensor imaging reveal different time-sensitive strokeinduced microstructural changes. Stroke, 2015. 46(2): p. 545–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Li C, et al. , Evaluation of Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging in Sub-acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison with Rehabilitation Treatment Effect. Cell Transplant, 2019. 28(8): p. 1053–1061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zhang S, et al. , Diffusional kurtosis imaging in evaluating the secondary change of corticospinal tract after unilateral cerebral infarction. American journal of translational research, 2017. 9(3): p. 1426–1434. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hansen B. and Jespersen SN, Recent Developments in Fast Kurtosis Imaging. Frontiers in Physics, 2017. 5(40). [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Hui ES, et al. , Stroke assessment with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Stroke, 2012. 43(11): p. 2968–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Cheung JS, et al. , Stratification of heterogeneous diffusion MRI ischemic lesion with kurtosis imaging: evaluation of mean diffusion and kurtosis MRI mismatch in an animal model of transient focal ischemia. Stroke, 2012. 43(8): p. 2252–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Fiehler J, et al. , Predictors of apparent diffusion coefficient normalization in stroke patients. Stroke, 2004. 35(2): p. 514–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hansen B, et al. , Experimentally and computationally fast method for estimation of a mean kurtosis. Magn Reson Med, 2013. 69(6): p. 1754–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wu Y, et al. , Comparison of image sensitivity between conventional tensor-based and fast diffusion kurtosis imaging protocols in a rodent model of acute ischemic stroke. NMR Biomed, 2016. 29(5): p. 625–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zhou IY, et al. , Fast diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) with Inherent COrrelation-based Normalization (ICON) enhances automatic segmentation of heterogeneous diffusion MRI lesion in acute stroke. NMR Biomed, 2016. 29(12): p. 1670–1677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Wang E, et al. , pH imaging reveals worsened tissue acidification in diffusion kurtosis lesion than the kurtosis/diffusion lesion mismatch in an animal model of acute stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2017. 37(10): p. 3325–3333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Loh PS, et al. , Apparent diffusion coefficient thresholds do not predict the response to acute stroke thrombolysis. Stroke, 2005. 36(12): p. 2626–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Astrup J, Siesjo BK, and Symon L, Thresholds in cerebral ischemia - the ischemic penumbra. Stroke, 1981. 12(6): p. 723–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Sako K, et al. , Correlation of local cerebral blood flow, glucose utilization, and tissue pH following a middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. Stroke, 1985. 16(5): p. 828–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Siesjo BK, Pathophysiology and treatment of focal cerebral ischemia. Part II: Mechanisms of damage and treatment. J Neurosurg, 1992. 77(3): p. 337–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Jeffs GJ, et al. , The role of the Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger (NCX) in neurons following ischaemia. J Clin Neurosci, 2007. 14(6): p. 507–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Uria-Avellanal C. and Robertson NJ, Na⁺/H⁺ exchangers and intracellular pH in perinatal brain injury. Translational stroke research, 2014. 5(1): p. 79–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Tomlinson FH, Anderson RE, and Meyer FB, Brain pHi, cerebral blood flow, and NADH fluorescence during severe incomplete global ischemia in rabbits. Stroke, 1993. 24(3): p. 435–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Regli L, Anderson RE, and Meyer FB, Effects of intermittent reperfusion on brain pHi, rCBF, and NADH during rabbit focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke, 1995. 26(8): p. 1444–51; discussion 1451–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Mutch WA and Hansen AJ, Extracellular pH changes during spreading depression and cerebral ischemia: mechanisms of brain pH regulation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 1984. 4(1): p. 17–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Csiba L, Paschen W, and Hossmann KA, A topographic quantitative method for measuring brain tissue pH under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. Brain Res, 1983. 289(1–2): p. 334–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.LaManna JC, Intracellular pH determination by absorption spectrophotometry of neutral red. Metab Brain Dis, 1987. 2(3): p. 167–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Peek KE, et al. , Glucose metabolism and acidosis in the metabolic penumbra of rat brain. Metab Brain Dis, 1989. 4(4): p. 261–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Khan T, et al. , Tissue pH determination for the detection of metabolically active, inflamed vulnerable plaques using near-infrared spectroscopy: an in-vitro feasibility study. Cardiology, 2005. 103(1): p. 10–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Adam WR, Koretsky AP, and Weiner MW, 31P-NMR in vivo measurement of renal intracellular pH: effects of acidosis and K+ depletion in rats. Am J Physiol, 1986. 251(5 Pt 2): p. F904–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Hohn-Berlage M, et al. , Imaging of brain tissue pH and metabolites. A new approach for the validation of volume-selective NMR spectroscopy. NMR Biomed, 1989. 2(5–6): p. 240–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Edden RA, et al. , Optimized detection of lactate at high fields using inner volume saturation. Magn Reson Med, 2006. 56(4): p. 912–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ward KM, Aletras AH, and Balaban RS, A new class of contrast agents for MRI based on proton chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST). J Magn Reson, 2000. 143(1): p. 79–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zhou J, et al. , Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI. Nat Med, 2003. 9(8): p. 1085–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Sun PZ and Sorensen AG, Imaging pH using the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI: Correction of concomitant RF irradiation effects to quantify CEST MRI for chemical exchange rate and pH. Magn Reson Med, 2008. 60(2): p. 390–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Sun PZ, et al. , Early experience of translating pH-weighted MRI to image human subjects at 3 Tesla. Stroke, 2010. 41(10 Suppl): p. S147–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Zong X, et al. , Sensitivity and source of amine-proton exchange and amide-proton transfer magnetic resonance imaging in cerebral ischemia. Magn Reson Med, 2014. 71(1): p. 118–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Li H, et al. , Imaging of amide proton transfer and nuclear Overhauser enhancement in ischemic stroke with corrections for competing effects. NMR Biomed, 2015. 28(2): p. 200–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sun PZ, et al. , A method for accurate pH mapping with chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI. Contrast Media Mol Imaging, 2016. 11(3): p. 195–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Jin T, et al. , Enhancing sensitivity of pH-weighted MRI with combination of amide and guanidyl CEST. Neuroimage, 2017. 157: p. 341–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Wu Y, et al. , pH-sensitive amide proton transfer effect dominates the magnetization transfer asymmetry contrast during acute ischemia-quantification of multipool contribution to in vivo CEST MRI. Magn Reson Med, 2018. 79(3): p. 1602–1608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Jokivarsi KT, et al. , Proton transfer ratio, lactate, and intracellular pH in acute cerebral ischemia. Magn Reson Med, 2007. 57(4): p. 647–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Sun PZ, Wang E, and Cheung JS, Imaging acute ischemic tissue acidosis with pH-sensitive endogenous amide proton transfer (APT) MRI--correction of tissue relaxation and concomitant RF irradiation effects toward mapping quantitative cerebral tissue pH. Neuroimage, 2012. 60(1): p. 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Jin T, et al. , MR imaging of the amide-proton transfer effect and the pH-insensitive nuclear overhauser effect at 9.4 T. Magn Reson Med, 2013. 69(3): p. 760–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Sun PZ, et al. , Detection of the ischemic penumbra using pH-weighted MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2007. 27(6): p. 1129–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Zhou J. and van Zijl PC, Defining an Acidosis-Based Ischemic Penumbra from pH-Weighted MRI. Transl Stroke Res, 2011. 3(1): p. 76–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Dani KA and Warach S, Metabolic imaging of ischemic stroke: the present and future. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2014. 35(6 Suppl): p. S37–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Sun PZ, et al. , Simplified quantitative description of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging during acute ischemia. Magn Reson Med, 2007. 57(2): p. 405–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Sun PZ, et al. , Association between pH-weighted endogenous amide proton chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI and tissue lactic acidosis during acute ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2011. 31(8): p. 1743–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Zhou IY, et al. , Determination of multipool contributions to endogenous amide proton transfer effects in global ischemia with high spectral resolution in vivo chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI. Magn Reson Med, 2019. 81(1): p. 645–652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Guo Y, et al. , pH-sensitive MRI demarcates graded tissue acidification during acute stroke - pH specificity enhancement with magnetization transfer and relaxation-normalized amide proton transfer (APT) MRI. Neuroimage, 2016. 141: p. 242–249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Wang E, et al. , Mapping tissue pH in an experimental model of acute stroke – Determination of graded regional tissue pH changes with non-invasive quantitative amide proton transfer MRI. NeuroImage, 2019. 191: p. 610–617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Back T, et al. , Diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in experimental stroke. Correlation with cerebral metabolites. Stroke, 1994. 25(2): p. 494–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Lu D, et al. , Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging of Stroke Lesion With Hemodynamic and Metabolic MRI in a Rodent Model of Acute Stroke. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2018. 210(4): p. 720–727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Sun PZ, Fast correction of B0 field inhomogeneity for pH-specific magnetization transfer and relaxation normalized amide proton transfer imaging of acute ischemic stroke without Z-spectrum. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2020. 83(5): p. 1688–1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Sun PZ, Demonstration of magnetization transfer and relaxation normalized pH-specific pulse-amide proton transfer imaging in an animal model of acute stroke. Magn Reson Med, 2020. 84(3): p. 1526–1533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Ewing JR, et al. , T1 and magnetization transfer at 7 Tesla in acute ischemic infarct in the rat. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1999. 41(4): p. 696–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Zhang XY, et al. , A new NOE-mediated MT signal at around −1.6ppm for detecting ischemic stroke in rat brain. Magn Reson Imaging, 2016. 34(8): p. 1100–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.McGarry BL, et al. , Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for Stroke Onset Time Estimation in Permanent Cerebral Ischemia. J Vis Exp, 2017. 2017(127). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Wu L, Jiang L, and Sun PZ, Investigating the origin of pH-sensitive magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry MRI contrast during the acute stroke: Correction of T(1) change reveals the dominant amide proton transfer MRI signal. Magn Reson Med, 2020. 84(5): p. 2702–2712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Tee YK, et al. , Comparing different analysis methods for quantifying the MRI amide proton transfer (APT) effect in hyperacute stroke patients. NMR in Biomedicine, 2014. 27(9): p. 1019–1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Harston GW, et al. , Identifying the ischaemic penumbra using pH-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Brain, 2015. 138(Pt 1): p. 36–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Msayib Y, et al. , Quantitative CEST imaging of amide proton transfer in acute ischaemic stroke. Neuroimage Clin, 2019. 23: p. 101833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Heo HY, et al. , Improving the detection sensitivity of pH-weighted amide proton transfer MRI in acute stroke patients using extrapolated semisolid magnetization transfer reference signals. Magn Reson Med, 2017. 78(3): p. 871–880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Yin J, et al. , Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging of Acute Infarction: Comparison with Routine Diffusion and Follow-up MR Imaging. Radiology, 2018. 287(2): p. 651–657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Zhu L-H, et al. , Diffusion kurtosis imaging of microstructural changes in brain tissue affected by acute ischemic stroke in different locations. Neural Regeneration Research, 2019. 14(2): p. 272–279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Guo YL, et al. , Parameters of diffusional kurtosis imaging for the diagnosis of acute cerebral infarction in different brain regions. Exp Ther Med, 2016. 12(2): p. 933–938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Anderson RE and Meyer FB, Protection of focal cerebral ischemia by alkalinization of systemic pH. Neurosurgery, 2002. 51(5): p. 1256–65; discussion 1265–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Chang HB, et al. , Na(+)/H(+) exchanger in the regulation of platelet activation and paradoxical effects of cariporide. Experimental neurology, 2015. 272: p. 11–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Song S, et al. , Selective role of Na(+) /H(+) exchanger in Cx3cr1(+) microglial activation, white matter demyelination, and post-stroke function recovery. Glia, 2018. 66(11): p. 2279–2298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Xiong ZG, et al. , Neuroprotection in ischemia: blocking calcium-permeable acid-sensing ion channels. Cell, 2004. 118(6): p. 687–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Pignataro G, Simon RP, and Xiong ZG, Prolonged activation of ASIC1a and the time window for neuroprotection in cerebral ischaemia. Brain, 2007. 130(Pt 1): p. 151–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.McCabe C, et al. , Animal models of ischaemic stroke and characterisation of the ischaemic penumbra. Neuropharmacology, 2018. 134: p. 169–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Dhanesha N, et al. , Treatment with Uric Acid Reduces Infarct and Improves Neurologic Function in Female Mice After Transient Cerebral Ischemia. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2018. 27(5): p. 1412–1416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Shin HK, Huang PL, and Ayata C, Rho-Kinase Inhibition Improves Ischemic Perfusion Deficit in Hyperlipidemic Mice. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 2014. 34(2): p. 284–287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Savitz SI, et al. , Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable X. Stroke, 2019. 50(4): p. 1026–1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES