Apilactobacillus kunkeei is a fructophilic lactic acid bacterium found in fructose-rich environments such as flowers, fruits, fermented food, honey, and honeydew, as well as in the guts of fructose-feeding insects. We report here the draft genome sequences of three Apilactobacillus kunkeei strains isolated from the gut microbial community of three honeybees.
ABSTRACT
Apilactobacillus kunkeei is a fructophilic lactic acid bacterium found in fructose-rich environments such as flowers, fruits, fermented food, honey, and honeydew, as well as in the guts of fructose-feeding insects. We report here the draft genome sequences of three Apilactobacillus kunkeei strains isolated from the gut microbial community of three honeybees.
ANNOUNCEMENT
The honeybee digestive track microbiota is dominated by Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species (1, 2), including Apilactobacillus kunkeei (3), a fructophilic and facultative anaerobic Gram-positive rod-shaped bacterium. First identified in damaged grapes (4), it was also found to be an important bacterial component of the bacterial flora in honey, honeydew honey, royal jelly, and pollen from diverse sources (2, 5, 6). It plays a protective role against bee pathogens (7). Present in the gut microbiota of the nine known Apini species (8), it might potentially control pathogens in bees and humans (6, 7, 9). These three A. kunkeei strains were isolated by the dissection of 3 Apis mellifera individuals, picked in the vicinity of the laboratory. The guts, from foregut to hindgut, were removed from the bees and opened with a sterile scalpel. The gut contents were plated onto MRS plus fructose (2% [wt/vol]) agar medium (10). Subculturing was carried out until isolates were obtained. Pure cultures were grown at 30°C for 48 h for DNA extraction according to a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol (11). These strains were identified as A. kunkeei by sequencing the 16S amplicons produced with primers 27F and 1492R (12) and comparing them to GenBank sequences (13). Sequencing libraries were prepared with the TruSeq Nano DNA PCR-free library preparation kit (Illumina). Whole-genome sequencing was carried out within one Illumina MiniSeq run with a 2 × 151-bp paired-end read length, using a MiniSeq high-output kit, which provided genome coverage in the range of 219.8× to 361.9×. The Illumina conversion software bcl2fastq2 version 2.20 was automatically run through the MiniSeq local run manager set with default parameters in order to trim the adapters and to demultiplex the samples based on their respective indices. The sequencing quality of the MiniSeq run was high, with 92% of the reads above the quality Phred score of 30. The reads were evaluated for quality, adaptor contamination, and the presence of Ns using FastQC version 0.11.9 (14). The genomes were assembled with the SPAdes version 3.10 genome assembler (15), yielding between 45 and 54 contigs (≥200 bp), and assessed with QUAST (16). The genome lengths varied between 1,485,566 and 1,548,283 bp, within a GC content range of 35.47% to 36.57%. These results are congruent with the literature for fructophilic lactobacilli. These bacteria would have undergone a reductive evolution (17, 18), leading to much smaller genomes (1.42 to 1.55 Mb) than those in other lactobacilli (2.46 Mb on average). The Prokaryotic Genome Automatic Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (19) and RAST version 2.0 were used to carry out automated gene annotation (20). Using PlasmidFinder (21) and plasmidSPAdes (22), no plasmids were detected. No phage, prophage, or transposon sequences were found in the annotated genomes, in contrast to previous reports (18). Neither annotation found any genes for motility, photosynthesis, or nitrogen metabolism. The numbers of coding sequences were similar to previous reports for fructophilic lactobacilli (17, 18). No toxin or virulence genes or pathogenicity islands were detected through annotation. Putative resistance genes to the fluoroquinolone antibiotic class were found in all genomes, with strain NN5 also containing putative resistance genes to beta-lactamase. These three genome sequences will add to the knowledge of this species within a local bee population.
Data availability.
This genome-sequencing project has been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) and genome databases. The GenBank, SRA, BioProject, and BioSample accession numbers for the three individual strains are given in Table 1, along with their genome statistics.
TABLE 1.
Genome characteristic | Data for Apilactobacillus kunkeei strain: |
||
---|---|---|---|
UASWS1867-NN5 | UASWS1868-NN17 | UASWS1870-NN20 | |
Total length (bp) | 1,485,566 | 1,548,283 | 1,504,698 |
GC content (%) | 36.57 | 35.47 | 36.37 |
No. of CDSa | 1,338 | 1,384 | 1,341 |
No. of tRNAs | 61 | 65 | 64 |
No. of rRNAs | 6 | 4 | 5 |
Sequencing yield (Mbp) | 326.56 | 435.83 | 544.49 |
Final coverage (×) | 219.8 | 281.5 | 361.9 |
SRA accession no. for raw reads | SRX5823656 | SRX5823655 | SRX5823657 |
No. of contigs | 46 | 45 | 54 |
N50 (bp) | 78,107 | 135,180 | 55,820 |
GenBank accession no. for genome | VBSD00000000 | VBSE00000000 | VBSF00000000 |
BioProject accession no. | PRJNA542049 | PRJNA542050 | PRJNA542054 |
BioSample accession no. | SAMN11607713 | SAMN11607714 | SAMN11607716 |
CDS, coding sequences.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by New Nordic Healthbrands AB (Denmark) and the Strategic Research Fund of the HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland.
The private funder did not influence in any way or review the analysis or the study design. K. K. Jensen is an employee of the private funder.
REFERENCES
- 1.Olofsson TC, Vasquez A. 2008. Detection and identification of a novel lactic acid bacterial flora within the honey stomach of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Curr Microbiol 57:356–363. doi: 10.1007/s00284-008-9202-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Corby-Harris V, Maes P, Anderson KE. 2014. The bacterial communities associated with honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers. PLoS One 9:e95056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB, Mattarelli P, O'Toole PW, Pot B, Vandamme P, Walter J, Watanabe K, Wuyts S, Felis GE, Gänzle MG, Lebeer S. 2020. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:2782–2858. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Edwards CG, Haag KM, Collins MD, Hutson RA, Huang YC. 1998. Lactobacillus kunkeei sp. nov.: a spoilage organism associated with grape juice fermentations. J Appl Microbiol 84:698–702. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00399.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Crovadore J, Gérard F, Chablais R, Cochard B, Bergman Jensen KK, Lefort F. 2017. Deeper insight in beehives: metagenomes of royal jelly, pollen, and honey from lavender, chestnut, and fir honeydew and epiphytic and endophytic microbiota of lavender and rose flowers. Genome Announc 5:e00425-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00425-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Asama T, Arima T-H, Gomi T, Keishi T, Tani H, Kimura Y, Tatefuji T, Hashimoto K. 2015. Lactobacillus kunkeei YB38 from honeybee products enhances IgA production in healthy adults. J Appl Microbiol 119:818–826. doi: 10.1111/jam.12889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Arredondo D, Castelli L, Porrini MP, Garrido PM, Eguaras MJ, Zunino P, Antúnez K. 2018. Lactobacillus kunkeei strains decreased the infection by honey bee pathogens Paenibacillus larvae and Nosema ceranae. Benef Microbes 9:279–290. doi: 10.3920/BM2017.0075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vásquez A, Forsgren E, Fries I, Paxton RJ, Flaberg E, Szekely L, Olofsson TC. 2012. Symbionts as major modulators of insect health: lactic acid bacteria and honeybees. PLoS One 7:e33188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Berríos P, Fuentes JA, Salas D, Carreño A, Aldea P, Fernández F, Trombert AN. 2018. Inhibitory effect of biofilm-forming Lactobacillus kunkeei strains against virulent Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in honeycomb moth (Galleria mellonella) infection model. Benef Microbes 9:257–268. doi: 10.3920/BM2017.0048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.De Man JC, Rogosa M, Sharpe ME. 1960. A medium for the cultivation of Lactobacilli. J Appl Bacteriol 23:130–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1960.tb00188.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lefort F, Douglas GC. 1999. An efficient micro-method of DNA isolation from mature leaves of four hardwood tree species Acer, Fraxinus, Prunus and Quercus. Ann For Sci 56:259–263. doi: 10.1051/forest:19990308. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kim SH, Jeong HS, Kim YH, Song SA, Lee JY, Oh SH, Kim HR, Lee JN, Kho W-G, Shin JH. 2012. Evaluation of DNA extraction methods and their clinical application for direct detection of causative bacteria in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis culture fluids from patients with peritonitis by using broad-range PCR. Ann Lab Med 32:119–125. doi: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.2.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. 2013. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 41:36–42. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.
- 15.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Filannino P, Di Cagno R, Tlais AZA, Cantatore V, Gobbetti M. 2019. Fructose-rich niches traced the evolution of lactic acid bacteria toward fructophilic species. Crit Rev Microbiol 45:65–81. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2018.1543649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Asenjo F, Olmos A, Henríquez-Piskulich P, Polanco V, Aldea P, Ugalde JA, Trombert AN. 2016. Genome sequencing and analysis of the first complete genome of Lactobacillus kunkeei strain MP2, an Apis mellifera gut isolate. PeerJ 4:e1950. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Ciufo S, Li W. 2013. Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. In The NCBI handbook, 2nd ed. National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Carattoli A, Zankari E, Garcia-Fernandez A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Aarestrup FM, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Antipov D, Hartwick N, Shen M, Raiko M, Lapidus A, Pevzner P. 2016. plasmidSPAdes: assembling plasmids from whole genome sequencing data. Bioinformatics 32:3380–3387. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
This genome-sequencing project has been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) and genome databases. The GenBank, SRA, BioProject, and BioSample accession numbers for the three individual strains are given in Table 1, along with their genome statistics.
TABLE 1.
Genome characteristic | Data for Apilactobacillus kunkeei strain: |
||
---|---|---|---|
UASWS1867-NN5 | UASWS1868-NN17 | UASWS1870-NN20 | |
Total length (bp) | 1,485,566 | 1,548,283 | 1,504,698 |
GC content (%) | 36.57 | 35.47 | 36.37 |
No. of CDSa | 1,338 | 1,384 | 1,341 |
No. of tRNAs | 61 | 65 | 64 |
No. of rRNAs | 6 | 4 | 5 |
Sequencing yield (Mbp) | 326.56 | 435.83 | 544.49 |
Final coverage (×) | 219.8 | 281.5 | 361.9 |
SRA accession no. for raw reads | SRX5823656 | SRX5823655 | SRX5823657 |
No. of contigs | 46 | 45 | 54 |
N50 (bp) | 78,107 | 135,180 | 55,820 |
GenBank accession no. for genome | VBSD00000000 | VBSE00000000 | VBSF00000000 |
BioProject accession no. | PRJNA542049 | PRJNA542050 | PRJNA542054 |
BioSample accession no. | SAMN11607713 | SAMN11607714 | SAMN11607716 |
CDS, coding sequences.