Abstract
Hyperpolarization (HP) of a carbon-13 molecule via dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) involves polarization at low temperature, followed by a dissolution procedure producing a solution with highly polarized spins at room temperature. This dissolution DNP method significantly increases the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) over 10,000-fold and facilitates the use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) to image not only metabolism, but also the extracellular microenvironment. The extracellular tumor microenvironment (TME) closely interacts with tumor cells and stimulates their growth and metastasis. Thus, the ability to detect pathological changes in the TME is pivotal for the detection and study of cancers. This Review highlights the potential use of MRS to study features of the tumoral TME – elevated export of lactate, reduced interstitial pH, imbalanced redox equilibrium, and altered metal homeostasis. The promising outcomes of both in vitro and in vivo assays and suggest that DNP-MRS may be a useful technique to study aspects of the TME. With continued improvements, this tool has the potential to study the TME and provide guidance for accurate patient stratification and precise personal therapy.
Keywords: hyperpolarization, dynamic nuclear polarization, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, biosensors, carbon-13 cellular substrates, tumor microenvironment
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
The tumor microenvironment (TME) refers to the altered and pathological surroundings of growing tumor cells. It is mainly composed of tumor cells, tumor stroma, immune cells, and the extracellular matrix (ECM) [1]. The TME closely interacts with tumor cells and promotes tumor progression and therapeutic resistance [2]. In comparison to the normal tissue microenvironment, the TME exhibits many differences, including abnormal tissue architecture, elevated oxidative stress, extracellular acidification, metabolic alterations, and abnormal ECM dynamics [3]. A variety of strategies have been employed to study the tumor microenvironment using non-invasive imaging methods, including NMR spectroscopy of protons and other nuclei, chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST), and nuclear imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) [4, 5]. The initial successful translation of the dynamic nuclear polarization – magnetic resonance spectroscopy (DNP-MRS) technique to hyperpolarize (HP) [1-13C]pyruvate for clinical imaging of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) in 2013 [6] led to a new era of the use of this method in patient studies, with promising outcomes summarized in prior review articles [7]. Expanding the scope of DNP-MRS to characterize the TME may provide complementary information that could enhance the ability to diagnose and treat cancer effectively. In this review, we focus on the development and implementation of 13C-labeled TME biosensors.
Dynamic nuclear polarization of 13C labeled cellular substrates is an emerging clinical technique, which can significantly increase 13C NMR sensitivity over 10,000-fold, allowing for MRS detection in vitro and in vivo [8]. However, DNP-MRS has strict criteria for successful implementation, including the requirement for a high concentration preparation, the ability to form a glass upon freezing, low probe toxicity, long spin-lattice relaxation times (T1) for the interrogated 13C nucleus, and spectrally resolvable chemical shift differences upon reaction [9]. The study of the TME using DNP-MRS is a relatively new concept. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to (i) summarize the basics of the DNP-MRS imaging technique; (ii) elucidate the biochemical processes responsible for four important possible TME imaging biomarkers: elevated cellular export of lactate, reduced interstitial pH, imbalanced cellular redox equilibrium, and altered metal homeostasis; and (iii) highlight in vitro and in vivo assays using DNP-MRS to characterize the status of TME and their correlation with tumor behavior.
1. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging using Hyperpolarized Carbon-13 Biosensors via Dynamic Nuclear Polarization
Non-proton MRS can be challenging for imaging owing to low sensitivity. Spin polarization can be employed to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). DNP and parahydrogen-induced polarization (PHIP) are commonly used methods for spin polarization. DNP is a powerful technique that can substantially increase the nuclear spin polarization of 13C in cellular substrate molecules and improve its 13C NMR signal sensitivity over 10,000 fold [8]. The DNP procedure involves cooling a mixture of 13C biosensor compound, a free radical reagent, and in some cases a solvent or glass former to ~1 K. The sample is then irradiated with microwave frequency in a strong magnetic field to transfer the polarization from electron spins on the radicals to the 13C nuclei of the biosensor molecules. Finally, it is warmed up rapidly (dissolution) for subsequent experimental steps (Figure 1a) [10, 11]. For example, we polarized [1-13C]1,2-glycerol carbonate (GLC) to 29.5% at 5 T (back-calculated to time of dissolution), corresponding to ~29,400 fold enhancement of SNR after dissolution (Figure 1b). After dissolution, the polarization rapidly returns to its thermodynamic equilibrium, with exponential decay of hyperpolarized signal with time constant T1 (Figure 1c). PHIP is an alternative modality to DNP, involving a catalyzed hydrogenation reaction by adding para-enriched hydrogen (para-H2) to an unsaturated substrate molecule. However, the application of PHIP can be limited due to the availability of unsaturated precursors for the target substrate [12, 13]. An alternative approach called signal amplification by reversible exchange (SABRE) relies on transferring polarization from para-H2 through the scalar coupling framework of a metal complex to the substrate, which can keep the substrate chemically unchanged [14]. In order to be eligible for animal models and human clinical imaging studies, the HP biosensor should preserve the polarization long enough for dissolution, intravenous injection, and imaging data collection. The basic criteria for using DNP-MRS are as follows: the HP 13C biosensor molecules should (i) be nontoxic, with safety of injecting sufficiently high concentrations of 50–250 mM for detection; (ii) have rapid cell transport or enzyme-catalyzed conversion; (iii) have a sufficiently long spin-lattice relaxation (T1); (iv) polarize well enough to generate sufficient signal enhancement (typically greater than 5% polarization); and (v) demonstrate an observable chemical shift separation (≥5 ppm) between the agent and resulting HP metabolites [9]. In this Review, we focus on the application of dissolution DNP-MRS for interrogating the status of the TME.
2. Hyperpolarized 13C MRS Biosensors for Imaging the Tumor Microenvironment
In this Review, we highlight four TME conditions, including elevated export of lactate, reduced interstitial pH, increased oxidative stress, and altered metal homeostasis. We describe the potential mechanism of using corresponding HP 13C biosensors to target their biomarkers for the detection and of the tumor. The HP 13C biosensor molecules and their fundamental mechanisms of action are summarized in Figure 2. DNP-MRS also boasts the capability of simultaneously studying the distorted tumor vasculature present within the TME using HP [13C]urea or other probes, which have been used for measuring regional blood flow in preclinical cancer models [15].
2.1. Imaging HP 13C-Lactate in the Tumor Microenvironment
Unconstrained tumor proliferation and invasion and therapeutic resistance usually correlate with alterations in cellular metabolism and extracellular conditions, indicative of the Warburg effect – an upregulation of aerobic glycolysis and lactic acid fermentation through the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) catalyzed reaction [16]. Figure 3 shows the metabolic pathway of pyruvate and the function of the monocarboxylate transporters (MCT). Intravenously injected pyruvate rapidly metabolizes into lactate, alanine, and CO2, with the metabolic rates and metabolite ratios depending on the function of the tissues. Owing to the increased uptake of pyruvate via MCT1 and MCT4 and increased activity of LDH in the tumor cells, the increased conversion of pyruvate to lactate (or a high ratio of [lactate]/[pyruvate]) is observed in tumors [17–19]. Thus, HP [1-13C]pyruvate provides a method of estimating the flux through this pathway and characterizing the metabolic status of a tumor. This method has been successfully translated to human clinical application to noninvasively characterize alterations in tumor metabolism for patients [6].
An important link between heightened glycolytic flux and the TME is the increased cellular export of lactate, a process that can be investigated using DNP MRS. Increased concentrations of exported lactate in the TME conditions to support the tumor, for example, by suppressing immune effector cells [20] and influencing nearby stromal and vascular cells [21]. K. R. Keshari et al investigated the HP [1-13C]pyruvate-to-HP [1-13C]lactate flux in real-time using DNP-MRS combined with a bio-reactor platform of living renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells. They found RCC cells have much a higher flux rate than the normal renal proximal tubule cells and the metastatic RCC cells have more rapid export of lactate to the extracellular space. These differences are likely mediated by the differential expression of MCT4 [22]. Subsequently, K. R. Keshari et al injected HP [1-13C]pyruvate in a living human prostate tissue slice culture platform. They observed a significantly increased [1-13C]pyruvate to [1-13C]lactate flux in malignant in comparison to the benign prostate tissues and provided mechanistic evidence for HP[1-13C]lactate as a prostate cancer biomarker [17]. R. Sriram et al developed a DNP-MRS compatible 3D cell/tissue culture bio-reactor to dynamically interrogate HP [1-13C]lactate production and efflux in human RCC cells, aiming at testing the correlation of this process with cancer aggressiveness, metastasis, and response to therapy [23]. Using this DNP-MRS bio-reactor platform, B. L. Koelsch et al were able to separate extra- and intracellular weighted HP metabolites of RCC cells and assess the ability of membrane transport in real-time [24]. These techniques have been extended to in vivo model systems to estimate lactate export in tumors and to provide a link to the TME. B. Feuerecker et al co-polarized [1-13C]pyruvate and [1,4-13C2]fumarate, and measured the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the produced lactate using HP diffusion-weighted MRS. They linked the ADC ratio of lactate to pyruvate to the distribution of lactate in the intra- and extracellular compartments to report the transport, while measuring fumarate-to-malate conversion to detect necrosis and rule out its interference with lactate ADC [25]. More recently, R. Sriram et al used dynamic diffusion-weighted HP 13C pyruvate MRI to interrogate tumor lactate production and compartmentalization in a murine orthotopic model of human RCCs [26]. Furthermore, X. Zhu et al used this method based on a slice-selective double spin echo sequence to monitor the cellular lactate transport on the transgenic adenocarcinoma of the prostate (TRAMP) model [27]. Taken together, these prior studies suggest feasibility for imaging lactate in the TME using hyperpolarized 13C.
2.2. Imaging decreased interstitial pH (pHe)
Solid tumors have heterogeneous perfusion, high metabolic activity, rapid cell proliferation, and typically develop an acidic interstitial microenvironment with pH 6.5 – 7.2, in contrast to pH 7.4 in normal and healthy tissues [28]. Extracellular acidification is commonly associated with local invasion and metastasis in a variety of cancers, including melanoma, breast, colon, renal, and PCa [29, 30]. Mechanisms of extracellular pH (pHe) acidification include monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) [31], Na+/H+ exchanger 1 [32], vacuolar H+-ATPase [33], and outward-facing carbonic anhydrase isoforms [34]. Measurement of pHe exhibits value for detecting an invasive and potentially metastatic phenotype. Methods for imaging pHe include (i) pH sensitive contrast agents for 1H MRI [35–37], and paramagnetic chemical exchange saturation transfer mechanism (paraCEST) [38]; (ii) other non-proton MRS, for example the 31P biosensor, 3-aminopropyl phosphonate [39–43], and 19F probes such as 3-[N-(4-fluoro-2-trifluoromethylphenyl)-sulphamoyl]-propionic acid (known as ZK-150471) [41, 44, 45] and 6-fluoropyridoxol [46, 47]; and (iii) hyperpolarized MRS, including the SABRE [48, 49] techniques introduced above, (iv) nuclear imaging techniques such as PET and SPECT [50, 51], and (v) dissolution DNP, which is the focus of this Review on 13C-labeled biosensors.
A variety of methods have been employed for imaging of pH using DNP-MRS [10, 52–56]. The most widely reported biosensor for pH imaging using DNP-MRS is H13CO3−. The core mechanism of the method is that mammalian tissues preserve a highly regulated acid-base balance via an equilibrated reaction between HCO3− and CO2, catalyzed by the enzyme carbonic anhydrase in the extracellular environment [57]. Theoretically, if exogenous HP H13CO3− can rapidly equilibrate in tissues and establish a chemical equilibrium with HP 13CO2, their detectable signals can be used to image pHe using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, pH = pKa + log10([HCO3−]/[CO2]), assuming pKa is known in vivo [58]. F. D. Gallagher et al intravenously injected HP H13CO3− in a mouse tumor model. First, they measured the T1s of H13CO3− and 13CO2 in vivo as 10.1 ± 2.9 s and 9.8 ± 2.5 s respectively at 9.4 T and found their apparent T1s become equal due to the rapid interconversion, so that calculated pH would not vary in the course of HP decay. They then imaged pHe and demonstrated that the average tumor pHe was significantly lower than the surrounding tissue [10]. The same group quantified carbonic anhydrase activity through the rapid exchange rate of H13CO3− and 13CO2 catalyzed by carbonic anhydrase by analyzing the change in signal decay before and after selective saturation of the HP 13CO2 resonance. They have found that tumor cells overexpress carbonic anhydrase to compensate for decreased enzymatic activity due to the acidic extracellular TME [59].
Although HP H13CO3− has been demonstrated as a useful biosensor compound for in vivo pHe imaging using MRS [10, 60], H13CO3− has several challenges, including low polarization, difficulties in preparing for hyperpolarization at high concentration, fast T1 relaxation, and the use of toxic reagents such as Cs for the formulation [60]. These challenges have been mitigated by developing methods that rapidly produce HP H13CO3− and HP 13CO2 indirectly from a more readily polarized precursor compound via a chemical reaction, while preserving the nuclear spin order (polarization). For example, R.K. Ghosh et al. exploited the rapid decarboxylation of HP [1,2-13C] pyruvate with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to produce hyperpolarized [1-13C] acetate, 13CO2, and H13CO3− [61]. More recently, tissue pH was measured in vivo using HP 13C-ethyl acetyl carbonate. The compound was rapidly hydrolyzed by esterase in vivo to 13C-monoacetyl carbonate, which then decomposed to HP 13CO2 [62]. Similarly, we polarized non-toxic 13C-carbonated small organic precursor molecules, and subsequently hydrolyzed them to HP H13CO3− and biocompatible components via a base-catalyzed dissolution step [52, 54, 63]. We verified HP [1-13C]1,2-glycerol carbonate (13C-GLC) as an excellent candidate for this HP H13CO3− producing method since 13C-GLC and its hydrolytic products including H13CO3−, 13CO2, and glycerol are nontoxic at high concentration [64] and 13C-GLC can rapidly (< 30 s) achieve >98 % breakdown at elevated temperature (~75 °C) in the presence of NaOH. In combination with hyperpolarized 13C MRS, we employed this method to image pHe in the TRAMP model and correlated decreases in tumor pH to the increased grade of tumors (Figure 4). The subsequent in vitro assays and in vivo evaluation on PCa staging demonstrated this method can achieve a high polarization, produce high concentrations of HP H13CO3− in solution, and consequently obtain large signal gains for pHe imaging [52, 54]. One important general consideration in the use of precursor molecules to generate H13CO3− is the potential for the generation of side products during chemical production. In order to facilitate future clinical translation of these methods, careful optimization of reaction conditions would be necessary.
In addition to the method of measuring the ratio of HP H13CO3− to HP 13CO2 to calculate pHe using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, other HP compounds exhibiting a pH-dependent chemical shift can be used to measure pH. In principle, a pH dependent chemical shift method has advantages including a potentially greater SNR because the signal is not split between two resonances. In contrast, bicarbonate has the advantages of being a non-toxic, endogenous molecule, routinely used in clinical medicine, suggesting feasibility for clinical translation. These chemical shift pH probes include N-(2-acetamido-)2-aminoethanesulfonic acid (ACES) [53], zymonic acid (ZA) [56], and [2-13C, D10]diethylmalonic acid [55], among others [65, 66], all of which exhibit a large pH-dependent 13C chemical shift over the physiologic range. For example, co-polarization of [2-13C, D10]diethylmalonic acid with [1–13C,D9]tert-butanol, a reference compound with a pH-independent chemical shift, could accurately image pH via 13C NMR and MRS in phantom experiments [55]. Importantly, S. Duwel et al imaged pHe within healthy rats’ bladders and kidneys, and xenograft tumors using co-polarized ZA and urea. They demonstrated the feasibility of measuring pHe via monitoring the chemical shift variation of ZA signals relative to urea, or between ZA’s two 13C labeled sites upon pH changes. This method exhibits several advantages, in particular, the independence of concentration, temperature, ionic strength, and protein concentration [56]. Overall, these prior promising studies suggest a future potential for clinical translation of hyperpolarized 13C pH imaging for the detection of the acidic tumoral microenvironment in aggressive tumors.
2.3. Imaging imbalanced redox processes
Oxidative stress arises when the production of cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydroxyl (OH•), superoxide (O2−•), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and nitric monoxide (NO•), generated as metabolic by-products by biological systems overwhelm the intrinsic antioxidants. For example, mitochondria use oxygen to produce adenosine triphosphate, leading to the production of ROS [67]. Overproduction of free radicals can cause damage to biomolecules and lead to the development of chronic diseases including cancer [68, 69]. Moreover, some other non-radical molecules such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), nitric oxide, hypochlorous acid, and peroxynitrite that can generate free radicals under various conditions like the Fenton reaction may therefore cause oxidative stress [70]. The human body has built-in immune defense systems of counteracting oxidative stress by producing antioxidants as free radical scavengers to prevent and repair damages caused by radicals [71]. Consequently, rapid cancer cell proliferation and drug resistance are correlated with a highly reduced intracellular microenvironment as a result of a high-level accumulation of reducing agents such as glutathione [72, 73] and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) [74] to maintain the reduction-oxidation (redox) balance [75]. This intracellular reducing environment is generally coupled with an oxidizing TME.
Ascorbic acid (AA) is an essential reducing agent (antioxidant) and cofactor of numerous enzymes to activate biosynthetic reactions [76–79]. Importantly, as shown in Figure 5a, AA and its oxidized form, dehydroascorbic acid (DHA), are closely coupled to two primary cellular antioxidants: glutathione (GSH) and NADPH [76]. Cells have two types of transporters to uptake AA: sodium-dependent vitamin C transporters (SVCT1, 2) directly transport AA into cells [80], while most tissues acquire AA through the transport of DHA into cells via glucose transporters (GLUT1, GLUT2, and GLUT4), which exhibit a similar affinity for both DHA and glucose and are overexpressed in most tumors [81, 82]. Inside the cells, DHA is rapidly reduced to AA through two reactions with either GSH or GSH-dependent enzymes including the thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases, glutaredoxin, and protein disulfide isomerase, and the predominant NADPH-dependent enzyme such as selenoprotein and thioredoxin reductase [76, 83, 84]. Thus, the rate of intracellular reduction of DHA to AA reflects oxidative stress since it is determined by the availability of NADPH [85, 86].
Importantly, the properties of AA and DHA make them the prime candidates for in vivo metabolic investigation using DNP-MRS [84, 87]. DHA shares the same membrane transporters with glucose and therefore exhibits rapid uptake [88], and the interconversion between DHA and AA is also rapid, enabling detection of intracellular DHA reduction on the hyperpolarized timescale. Therefore, researchers have evaluated the feasibility of using [1-13C]-DHA and [1-13C]-AA as ideal redox couple biosensor candidates for hyperpolarized redox imaging and considered their potential for clinical translation. For example, two significant initial research works published in 2011 elucidated the above-described redox mechanism, demonstrated a relatively high level of hyperpolarization of [1-13C]-DHA and [1-13C]-AA, and importantly proved the hypothesized mechanism. K. R. Keshari et al [87] interrogated the in vivo rapid transformation of HP [1-13C] DHA to HP [1-13C] AA in different organs and tumors, such as in liver, kidney, within tumor and in TRAMP model, as well as in normal rat brains, where DHA are well perfused (Figure 5b). TRAMP mice exhibited an increased conversion ratio of AA/[AA + DHA] within the tumor in comparison to the normal prostate gland or the surrounding benign tissue, but there was no significant difference in the liver and kidney between TRAMP and normal mice. Thus, the feature suggests the feasibility of using HP [1-13C] DHA as a biosensor for the detection of PCa. The cardiopulmonary effects of DHA on mice under anesthesia are well-known, but use of this redox sensor in humans may be possible in the future based on better preparative methods, and more sensitive hyperpolarized 13C imaging tools. Interestingly, a high and rapid reduction of HP [1-13C] DHA within the brain was observed, identifying DHA as an excellent biosensor to cross the blood-brain barrier to detect the oxidative stress inside the brain [89].
Another research work reported by S. E. Bohndiek et al [84] implicated AA and DHA could be used as extra- and intercellular biosensor candidates respectively. They observed that the extracellular pool of [1-13C]-AA was oxidized rapidly in suspensions of hypoxic EL4 lymphoma cells, suggesting the generation of oxidative stress with hydrogen peroxide from cancer cells that deplete oxygen and nutrients from medium [90, 91]. They also found that intracellular [1-13C]-DHA was reduced rapidly in both EL4 tumor cell suspension and in vivo EL4 tumor xenografts. Therefore, these results suggest HP [1-13C]-AA could be used for detecting ROS in the extracellular environment, where high concentrations of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide may be present [90]. Additionally, imaging AA/DHA metabolism provides an approach for determining in vivo metabolism of NADPH and the ratio of GSSG/GSH ratio, both of which indicate oxidative stress [92]. In a follow up study from our groups, we extended the hyperpolarized 13C AA approach to a similar 11C PET imaging approach, where we found that extracellular [1-11C]AA could be oxidized to [1-11C]AA, and then internalized [93]. Thus, HP [1-13C]-DHA and AA (and potentially, their 11C analogs) might be used to image redox status in vivo for the characterization of cancers including PCa [87, 94].
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is an important metabolite involved in cellular redox metabolism reactions and processes. The concentrations of H2O2 in the intra- and extracellular spaces play a crucial role in determining the proliferation, survival, or death of the cells [95]. The intracellular homeostatic concentration ranges from 0.1 ~ 100 nM, depending on the cell type, while about 100-fold concentration gradient from extracellular to intracellular has been estimated. A higher concentration of H2O2 evokes inflammatory responses and leads to tumor growth, metastasis, growth arrest, and cell death [96]. Thus, the concentration of H2O2 acts as a potential biomarker for detecting the presence and progress of a variety of pathological changes. Accordingly, 13C biosensors have been developed for imaging H2O2. A. R. Lippert et al imaged oxidative H2O2 using HP 13C-benzoylformic acid as a 13C MRI contrast agent, which selectively and rapidly reacts with H2O2 to produce HP 13C-benzoic acid [97]. Wibowo et al developed 13C thiourea (TU) to image the dynamics of H2O2 in vivo with high sensitivity and spatiotemporal resolution. They demonstrated that 13C-TU is highly polarizable (10.4 ± 1.1% polarization) with a long T1 (53.8 ± 3.7 s at 3T). HP 13C TU is oxidized by H2O2 to produce chemically distinguishable product HP 13C thiourea dioxide that is subsequently hydrolyzed to urea [98]. Overall, the biological relevance of these H2O2 measurements, and limits of in vivo detection remain an area for future study. Taken together, these prior studies demonstrate a potential to use hyperpolarized 13C MRI for the detection of alterations in redox homeostasis in the TME.
2.4. Imaging Alterations of Trace Divalent Metal Ions
Trace divalent ions, such as zinc, calcium, copper, iron, and selenium, play a vital role in many biochemical reactions for maintaining biological processes and function. Alterations in metal homeostasis are associated with pathological changes in the metabolic microenvironment of cancers [99–101]. Thus, the distribution of these metal ions could be potential biomarkers used for the detection of cancers and the prediction of therapy [102].
In principle, DNP-MRS could be well suited to the detection of metals. Two prior publications reported by A. Mishra et al [103] and S. Wang et al [104] established a solid foundation for the further development of this area. Mishra et al initially demonstrated the feasibility of using HP 13C-labeled metal chelators EDTA and EGTA to identify divalent metals including, Pb2+, As2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ via the distinct carboxyl resonance variation by metal coordination (Figure 6a). They subsequently applied this technique to differentiate between biologically essential and toxic divalent metals and determined the concentration of Ca2+ in human serum [103]. However, one challenge potentially limiting the application of this method as an in vivo biosensor is the high concentration of Ca2+, leading to challenges in generating image contrast.
S. Wang et al focused on the development of hyperpolarized amino acid-derived sensors for the detection of Zn2+ [104]. In normal prostate, zinc accumulates intracellularly to a remarkably high concentration, and then coordinates with citrate to be secreted into the prostatic fluid. In contrast, the zinc accumulation property becomes dysfunctional in de-differentiated PCa, leading to a 60–80% decrease in zinc concentration [105]. S. Wang et al identified [1-13C]L-cysteine ([1-13C]Cys) and [1-13C2] iminodiacetic acid ([1-13C]IDA) as compounds with specificity and targetability of Zn2+ binding over other endogenous cations Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ and negligible chemical shift changes over the physiological pH range from 6.5 to 7.4. Importantly, these two biosensors showed (i) a good level of hyperpolarization (13.4 ± 0.6% and 6.6 ± 0.9% back-calculated polarization for Cys and IDA, respectively), (ii) a large chemical change in the presence of Zn2+ (+4.6 and +7.3 ppm in the presence of equimolar Zn2+, respectively), (iii) the linear correlation of the chemical shift differences ([1-13C]Cys) or area% of bound peak ([1-13C]IDA) as the function of the concentrations of Zn2+ at low concentration range (0.25 and 0.5 eq.), and (iv) sufficient T1 for MRI scans. However, due to substantial signal line broadening, [1-13C]IDA exhibited limited applicability. In subsequent assays, it was verified that HP [1-13C]Cys could accurately determine Zn2+ concentration in biological samples – rat serum and prostate extracts with low and high concentrations. The current results suggest feasibility of using HP 13C metal chelators as potential biosensors to image pathologies associated with alterations in metal ions homeostasis such as PCa, neurodegenerative diseases, and diabetes.
3. Summary and Prospect of HP TME biosensors in Medical Applications
The TME plays a critical role in the processes of cancerous growth, invasion, and metastasis. The DNP-MRS methods described in this review could be used to interrogate the abnormal TME. In turn, they could provide information for disease prognostication and precise personal therapy. The TME imaging methods described in this review have the potential for clinical utility. For example, decreases in tumor pHe measured with HP pH imaging methods could be used to detect transformation from indolent to aggressive cancer phenotypes in diseases such as prostate or breast cancer. This is under active investigation in our laboratories. In order to drive these methods into broader use in a clinical setting, an impact on patient management would be needed, for example, to detect locally aggressive disease, to help guide appropriate surgical or oncologic management. In this review, we considered four cancer properties in TME, including elevated export of lactate, reduced interstitial pH, increased oxidization stress, and altered metal homeostasis. Imaging of these pathologies with HP MRS has strong potential to be included in future clinical studies.
4. Acknowledgement
R.R.F. recognizes research funding from a David Blitzer Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award, DOD W81XWH-16-1-0389 (PC150932), DOD W81XWH-19-1-0866 (PC180733), and R21-EB026012.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This Author Accepted Manuscript is a PDF file of a an unedited peer-reviewed manuscript that has been accepted for publication but has not been copyedited or corrected. The official version of record that is published in the journal is kept up to date and so may therefore differ from this version.
6. References
- 1.Arneth B, Tumor Microenvironment. Medicina, 2019. 56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Whiteside TL, The tumor microenvironment and its role in promoting tumor growth. Oncogene, 2008. 27: 5904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen F, et al. , New horizons in tumor microenvironment biology: challenges and opportunities. BMC Med, 2015. 13: 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhou Z, et al. , Molecular imaging of the tumor microenvironment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2017. 113: 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Penet M-F, et al. , Molecular imaging of the tumor microenvironment for precision medicine and theranostics. Adv. Cancer Res, 2014. 124: 235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nelson SJ, et al. , Metabolic imaging of patients with prostate cancer using hyperpolarized [1–13C]pyruvate. Sci. Transl. Med, 2013. 5: 198ra108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brindle KM, et al. , Tumor imaging using hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med, 2011. 66: 505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, et al. , Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of > 10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 2003. 100: 10158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Keshari KR, et al. , Chemistry and biochemistry of 13C hyperpolarized magnetic resonance using dynamic nuclear polarization. Chem. Soc. Rev, 2014. 43: 1627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gallagher FA, et al. , Magnetic resonance imaging of pH in vivo using hyperpolarized 13C-labelled bicarbonate. Nature, 2008. 453: 940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Overhauser AW, Polarization of nuclei in metals. Phys. Rev, 1953. 92: 411. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Reineri F, et al. , ParaHydrogen Induced Polarization of 13C carboxylate resonance in acetate and pyruvate. Nat. Commun, 2015. 6: 5858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Eills J, et al. , Real-Time Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Detection of Fumarase Activity Using Parahydrogen-Hyperpolarized [1–13C]Fumarate. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2019. 141: 20209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Adams RW, et al. , Reversible Interactions with para-Hydrogen Enhance NMR Sensitivity by Polarization Transfer. Science, 2009. 323: 1708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.von MC, et al. , Imaging of blood flow using hyperpolarized [(13)C]urea in preclinical cancer models. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2011. 33: 692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gatenby RA, et al. , Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2004. 4: 891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Keshari KR, et al. , Metabolic Reprogramming and Validation of Hyperpolarized 13C Lactate as a Prostate Cancer Biomarker Using a Human Prostate Tissue Slice Culture Bioreactor. Prostate, 2013. 73: 1171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bok R, et al. , The role of lactate metabolism in prostate cancer progression and metastases revealed by dual-agent hyperpolarized 13C MRSI. Cancers, 2019. 11: 257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hong CS, et al. , MCT1 Modulates Cancer Cell Pyruvate Export and Growth of Tumors that Co-express MCT1 and MCT4. Cell Rep, 2016. 14: 1590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fischer K, et al. , Inhibitory effect of tumor cell-derived lactic acid on human T cells. Blood, 2007. 109: 3812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Koukourakis MI, et al. , Comparison of Metabolic Pathways between Cancer Cells and Stromal Cells in Colorectal Carcinomas: a Metabolic Survival Role for Tumor-Associated Stroma. Cancer Res, 2006. 66: 632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Keshari KR, et al. , Hyperpolarized 13C-Pyruvate Magnetic Resonance Reveals Rapid Lactate Export in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinomas. Cancer Res, 2013. 73: 529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sriram R, et al. , Real-time measurement of hyperpolarized lactate production and efflux as a biomarker of tumor aggressiveness in an MR compatible 3D cell culture bioreactor. NMR Biomed, 2015. 28: 1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Koelsch BL, et al. , Separation of extra- and intracellular metabolites using hyperpolarized 13C diffusion weighted MR. J. Magn. Reson, 2016. 270: 115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Feuerecker B, et al. , Hyperpolarized 13C diffusion MRS of co-polarized pyruvate and fumarate to measure lactate export and necrosis. J. Cancer, 2017. 8: 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sriram R, et al. , Non-Invasive Assessment of Lactate Production and Compartmentalization in Renal Cell Carcinomas Using Hyperpolarized (13)C Pyruvate MRI. Cancers, 2018. 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhu X, et al. , Dynamic diffusion-weighted hyperpolarized (13) C imaging based on a slice-selective double spin echo sequence for measurements of cellular transport. Magn Reson Med, 2019. 81: 2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gatenby RA, et al. , Acid-Mediated Tumor Invasion: a Multidisciplinary Study. Cancer Res, 2006. 66: 5216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kato Y, et al. , Acidic extracellular microenvironment and cancer. Cancer Cell Int, 2013. 13: 89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Webb BA, et al. , Dysregulated pH: a perfect storm for cancer progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2011. 11: 671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Halestrap AP, et al. , The monocarboxylate transporter family-Role and regulation. IUBMB Life, 2012. 64: 109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cardone RA, et al. , The role of disturbed pH dynamics and the Na+/H+ exchanger in metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2005. 5: 786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Forgac M, Vacuolar ATPases: rotary proton pumps in physiology and pathophysiology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 2007. 8: 917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Supuran CT, Carbonic anhydrases: novel therapeutic applications for inhibitors and activators. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery, 2008. 7: 168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Garcia-Martin ML, et al. , High resolution pHe imaging of rat glioma using pH-dependent relaxivity. Magn. Reson. Med, 2006. 55: 309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Raghunand N, et al. , Renal and systemic pH imaging by contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn. Reson. Med, 2003. 49: 249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Martinez GV, et al. , Imaging the extracellular pH of tumors by MRI after injection of a single cocktail of T1 and T2 contrast agents. NMR Biomed, 2011. 24: 1380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Aime S, et al. , Paramagnetic Lanthanide(III) complexes as pH-sensitive chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) contrast agents for MRI applications. Magn. Reson. Med, 2002. 47: 639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bhujwalla ZM, et al. , Estimations of intra- and extracellular volume and pH by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy: effect of therapy on RIF-1 tumors. Br. J. Cancer, 1998. 78: 606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lutz NW, et al. , Quantitative In Vivo Characterization of Intracellular and Extracellular pH Profiles in Heterogeneous Tumors: A Novel Method Enabling Multiparametric pH Analysis. Cancer Res, 2013. 73: 4616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ojugo ASE, et al. , Measurement of the extracellular pH of solid tumours in mice by magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a comparison of exogenous 19F and 31P probes. NMR Biomed, 1999. 12: 495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.McCoy CL, et al. , The effect of blood flow modification on intra- and extracellular pH measured by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy in murine tumours. Br J Cancer, 1995. 72: 905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gillies RJ, et al. , 31P-MRS measurements of extracellular pH of tumors using 3-aminopropylphosphonate. Am. J. Physiol, 1994. 267: C195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Frenzel T, et al. , Noninvasive in vivo pH measurements using a fluorinated pH probe and fluorine-19 magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Invest. Radiol, 1994. 29: S220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Aoki Y, et al. , Measurement of intratumor pH by pH indicator used 19F-magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Measurement of extracellular pH decrease caused by hyperthermia combined with hydralazine. Invest. Radiol, 1996. 31: 680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mehta VD, et al. , 6-Fluoropyridoxol: a novel probe of cellular pH using 19F NMR spectroscopy. FEBS Lett, 1994. 349: 234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hunjan S, et al. , Simultaneous intracellular and extracellular pH measurement in the heart by 19F NMR of 6-fluoropyridoxol. Magn. Reson. Med, 1998. 39: 551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Shchepin RV, et al. , 15N Hyperpolarization of Imidazole-15N2 for Magnetic Resonance pH Sensing via SABRE-SHEATH. ACS Sens, 2016. 1: 640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Olaru AM, et al. , SABRE hyperpolarisation of vitamin B3 as a function of pH. Chem. Sci, 2017. 8: 2257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Vavere AL, et al. , A Novel Technology for the Imaging of Acidic Prostate Tumors by Positron Emission Tomography. Cancer Res, 2009. 69: 4510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Flavell RR, et al. , Caged [18F]FDG Glycosylamines for Imaging Acidic Tumor Microenvironments Using Positron Emission Tomography. Bioconjugate Chem, 2016. 27: 170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Korenchan DE, et al. , Dynamic nuclear polarization of biocompatible 13C-enriched carbonates for in vivo pH imaging. Chem. Commun, 2016. 52: 3030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Flavell RR, et al. , Application of Good’s buffers to pH imaging using hyperpolarized 13C MRI. Chem. Commun, 2015. 51: 14119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Korenchan DE, et al. , Hyperpolarized in vivo pH imaging reveals grade-dependent acidification in prostate cancer. Oncotarget, 2019. 10: 6096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Korenchan DE, et al. , Dicarboxylic acids as pH sensors for hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Analyst, 2017. 142: 1429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Duwel S, et al. , Imaging of pH in vivo using hyperpolarized (13)C-labelled zymonic acid. Nat Commun, 2017. 8: 15126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Swietach P, et al. , New insights into the physiological role of carbonic anhydrase IX in tumour pH regulation. Oncogene, 2010. 29: 6509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Stabenau EK, T.A.H., Determination of the constants of the henderson-hasselbalch equation, (alpha)co2 and pka, in sea turtle plasma. J. exp. Biol, 1993. 180. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gallagher FA, et al. , Carbonic Anhydrase Activity Monitored In Vivo by Hyperpolarized 13C-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Demonstrates Its Importance for pH Regulation in Tumors. Cancer Res, 2015. 75: 4109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gallagher FA, et al. , Imaging pH with hyperpolarized 13C. NMR Biomed, 2011. 24: 1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ghosh RK, et al. , Efficient production of hyperpolarized bicarbonate by chemical reaction on a DNP precursor to measure pH. Magn. Reson. Med, 2015. 74: 1406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Maptue N, et al. , Esterase-Catalyzed Production of Hyperpolarized 13C-Enriched Carbon Dioxide in Tissues for Measuring pH. ACS Sens, 2018. 3: 2232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Korenchan DE, et al. , Using bidirectional chemical exchange for improved hyperpolarized [(13) C]bicarbonate pH imaging. Magn Reson Med, 2019. 82: 959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sloviter HA, et al. , Effects of the intravenous administration of glycerol solutions to animals and man. J. Clin. Invest, 1958. 37: 619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hundshammer C, et al. , Hyperpolarized amino acid derivatives as multivalent magnetic resonance ph sensor molecules. Sensors, 2018. 18: 600/1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chen J, et al. , Simultaneous Assessment of Intracellular and Extracellular pH Using Hyperpolarized [1–13C]Alanine Ethyl Ester. Anal. Chem, 2020. 92: 11681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Pham-Huy LA, et al. , Free radicals, antioxidants in disease and health. Int. J. Biomed. Sci, 2008. 4: 89. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Fridovich I, Fundamental aspects of reactive oxygen species, or what’s the matter with oxygen? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci, 1999. 893: 13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Fang Y-Z, et al. , Free radicals, antioxidants, and nutrition. Nutrition, 2002. 18: 872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lloyd RV, et al. , The origin of the hydroxyl radical oxygen in the Fenton reaction. Free Radical Biol. Med, 1997. 22: 885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Valko M, et al. , Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer. Chem.-Biol. Interact, 2006. 160: 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Balendiran GK, et al. , The role of glutathione in cancer. Cell Biochem. Funct, 2004. 22: 343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ballatori N, et al. , Glutathione dysregulation and the etiology and progression of human diseases. Biol. Chem, 2009. 390: 191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sattler UGA, et al. , The anti-oxidant capacity of tumour glycolysis. Int. J. Radiat. Biol, 2009. 85: 963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Cairns RA, et al. , Regulation of cancer cell metabolism. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2011. 11: 85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Linster CL, et al. , Vitamin C. Biosynthesis, recycling and degradation in mammals. FEBS J, 2007. 274: 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Murad S, et al. , Regulation of collagen synthesis by ascorbic acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 1981. 78: 2879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Tolbert LC, et al. , Effect of ascorbic acid on neurochemical, behavioral, and physiological systems mediated by catecholamines. Life Sci, 1979. 25: 2189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kojo S, Vitamin C: basic metabolism and its function as an index of oxidative stress. Curr. Med. Chem, 2004. 11: 1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Tsukaguchi H, et al. , A family of mammalian Na+-dependent L-ascorbic acid transporters. Nature 1999. 399: 70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Rumsey SC, et al. , Absorption, transport, and disposition of ascorbic acid in humans. J. Nutr. Biochem, 1998. 9: 116. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Liang W-J, et al. , Vitamin C transport systems of mammalian cells. Mol. Membr. Biol, 2001. 18: 87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Corti A, et al. , Cellular pathways for transport and efflux of ascorbate and dehydroascorbate. Arch. Biochem. Biophys, 2010. 500: 107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bohndiek SE, et al. , Hyperpolarized [1–13C]-Ascorbic and Dehydroascorbic Acid: Vitamin C as a Probe for Imaging Redox Status in Vivo. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2011. 133: 11795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Tong X, et al. , The molecular determinants of de novo nucleotide biosynthesis in cancer cells. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev, 2009. 19: 32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Vander Heiden MG, et al. , Understanding the Warburg Effect: The Metabolic Requirements of Cell Proliferation. Science 2009. 324: 1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Keshari KR, et al. , Hyperpolarized 13C dehydroascorbate as an endogenous redox sensor for in vivo metabolic imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 2011. 108: 18606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Vera JC, et al. , Mammalian facilitative hexose transporters mediate the transport of dehydroascorbic acid. Nature 1993. 364: 79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Huang J, et al. , Dehydroascorbic acid, a blood-brain barrier transportable form of vitamin C, mediates potent cerebroprotection in experimental stroke. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 2001. 98: 11720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Burdon RH, Superoxide and hydrogen peroxide in relation to mammalian cell proliferation. Free Radical Biol. Med, 1995. 18: 775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Halliwell B, Oxidative stress in cell culture: an under-appreciated problem? FEBS Lett, 2003. 540: 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Salamanca-Cardona L, et al. , (13)C-labeled biochemical probes for the study of cancer metabolism with dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Metab, 2015. 3: 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Carroll VN, et al. , [11C]Ascorbic and [11C]dehydroascorbic acid, an endogenous redox pair for sensing reactive oxygen species using positron emission tomography. Chem. Commun, 2016. 52: 4888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Keshari KR, et al. , Hyperpolarized [1–13C]dehydroascorbate MR spectroscopy in a murine model of prostate cancer: comparison with 18F-FDG PET. J. Nucl. Med, 2013. 54: 922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Di Marzo N, et al. , The role of hydrogen peroxide in redox-dependent signaling: homeostatic and pathological responses in mammalian cells. Cells, 2018. 7: 156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Sies H, Hydrogen peroxide as a central redox signaling molecule in physiological oxidative stress: Oxidative eustress. Redox Biol, 2017. 11: 613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Lippert AR, et al. , A Hydrogen Peroxide-Responsive Hyperpolarized 13C MRI Contrast Agent. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2011. 133: 3776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Wibowo A, et al. , Real-Time in Vivo Detection of H2O2 Using Hyperpolarized 13C-Thiourea. ACS Chem. Biol, 2017. 12: 1737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Schwartz MK, Role of trace elements in cancer. Cancer Res, 1975. 35: 3481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Navarro SSA, et al. , Trace elements and cancer risk: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Cancer Causes Control, 2007. 18: 7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Serra M, et al. , Understanding Metal Dynamics Between Cancer Cells and Macrophages: Competition or Synergism? Front Oncol, 2020. 10: 646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Ahmadi N, et al. , Alterations in serum levels of trace element in patients with breast cancer before and after chemotherapy. Caspian J Intern Med, 2018. 9: 134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Mishra A, et al. , Hyperpolarized Multi-Metal 13C-Sensors for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Anal. Chem, 2016. 88: 10790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Wang S, et al. , Amino Acid-Derived Sensors for Specific Zn2+ Detection Using Hyperpolarized 13C Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Chem. - Eur. J, 2019. 25: 11842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Costello LC, et al. , A comprehensive review of the role of zinc in normal prostate function and metabolism; and its implications in prostate cancer. Arch. Biochem. Biophys, 2016. 611: 100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]