Abstract
Purpose
Plexiform neurofibromas (NF) develop in children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) and can be associated with several skeletal co-morbidities. Preclinical mouse studies revealed Nf1 deficiency in osteoprogenitor cells disrupts, in a MEK-dependent manner, pyrophosphate (PPi) homeostasis and skeletal mineralization. The etiology of NF-associated skeletal manifestations remains unknown.
Methods
We used mouse models of NF1 neurofibromas to assess bone mineralization of skeletal structures adjacent to tumors. Expression of genes involved in pyrophosphate homeostasis was assessed in mouse and human NF tumors and Schwann cell cultures. We used Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) to assess tumor-associated changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in an individual with NF1 following treatment with the MEK inhibitor selumetinib.
Results
We detected increased non-mineralized bone surfaces adjacent to tumors in mouse models of NF1 neurofibromas. Expression of Enpp1, a PPi-generating ectophosphatase, and ANKH, a PPi transporter, was increased in mouse and human neurofibroma-derived tissues and Schwann cells, respectively. In one patient, tumor-associated reductions in BMD were partially rescued following therapy with selumetinib.
Conclusion
Results indicate that NF-associated skeletal pathologies in NF1 are associated with dysregulated pyrophosphate homeostasis in adjacent NF tumors and suggest that treatment of NFs with MEK inhibitors may improve skeletal manifestations of the disease.
Keywords: Neurofibromatosis, neurofibromas, bone mineralization, pyrophosphate, MEK inhibitor
INTRODUCTION
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a cancer-predisposing genetic syndrome caused by inherited or sporadic mutations in the NF1 gene1. Twenty to 50% of individual with NF1 present with plexiform neurofibromas (NF)2,3, which are congenital tumors that grow over lifetime and are thus more apparent in older individuals. These Schwann cell-derived tumors enlarge most prominently during the first decade of life4,5 and, like many other NF1 manifestations, arise from somatic mutations of the wildtype NF1 allele or from loss of NF1 heterozygosity. Loss of neurofibromin, encoded by NF1, allows for persistent RAS activity and thereby leads to activation of the RAS/MEK/ERK pathway. Recently, the MEK inhibitor Selumetinib was shown to significantly reduce NF burden in children with NF16,7.
As many as 30% of individuals with NF1 develop skeletal manifestations, including osteopenia, tibial dysplasia and pseudarthrosis, or scoliosis 8. While somatic loss of NF1 in bone cells was detected in tibial pseudarthrosis9–11 and dystrophic scoliosis cases12, and while the different types of spinal deformities (with dystrophic features or not) in NF1 are well described13–15, NF-associated skeletal manifestations have been less investigated. Individuals with NF1 presenting with paraspinal neurofibromas have six-fold higher odds of developing scoliosis compared to patients without paraspinal tumors, and up to 63% of NF1 individuals with dystrophic scoliosis have evidence of paraspinal tumors on MRI16–18. Although “erosive” defect of bone from contiguous neurogenic tumors were suspected, no direct evidence beyond X-rays and BMD are available to explain how tumors may alter adjacent skeletal elements19,20. Figure 1A,B illustrates one such patient with rapidly progressing dystrophic scoliosis associated with vertebral body and rib deformities immediately adjacent to a plexiform neurofibroma. Plexiform tumors affecting the extremities may also present with progressive skeletal deformity, bone loss and length discrepancy. Figure 1C,D depicts a patient with unilateral leg NF and progressive deformity of the pelvis, acetabulum and proximal femur associated with the tumor. Subtrochanteric femoral diameter of the tumor-laden leg in this patient decreased over 7 years (Figure 1E). Thus, skeletal co-morbidities exist at multiple sites among individuals with NF1 and NFs.
Figure 1. Plexiform neurofibroma-associated NF1 skeletal manifestations.
(A) Standing X-ray (top) and MRI (bottom) of an adolescent female patient with NF1 NF-associated dystrophic scoliosis. The scoliotic curve progressed from a Cobb angle of 40° to 79° in one year. (B) Three-dimensional CT spine reconstructions of the same patient. White arrows indicate vertebral body (top) and rib head (bottom) deformity on the concave side adjacent to tumor that are not evident on the convex side or further from the tumor (black arrows). (C) Longitudinal X-ray imaging of a child with bone loss associated with a unilateral NF extending from the left pelvis throughout the entire extremity. White arrows show deformity of the pelvis, acetabulum and proximal femur. (D) MRI imaging at presentation depicts the location and involvement of the NF. (E) Quantification of tumor-associated femur deformity by serial measurements of the sub-trochanteric femur diameter. Affected: Tumor-laden femur; Unaffected: contralateral side. X-rays with measurement sites are shown in Supplementary Figure 2.
Results from conditional mouse models of Nf1 deletion in the bone mesenchymal lineage and expression profiling of patient-derived bone stromal cells supported a model whereby loss of NF1 leads to activation of genes promoting the accumulation of inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi), a strong inhibitor of hydroxyapatite formation and bone mineralization 21. We have shown that upregulation of PPi pathway-related genes in mouse osteoprogenitor cells following deletion of Nf1, including Enpp1 (an ectophosphatase generating PPi), Ank (a channel transporting PPi in the extracellular milieu) and Spp1 (Osteopontin, an extracellular protein inhibiting hydroxyapatite formation), is MEK-dependent 21. In this study, we investigated whether the expression of genes involved in PPi homeostasis was altered in NFs and whether skeletal changes were associated with adjacent neurofibromas. Furthermore, we present an individual with NF1 presenting with reduced bone mineral density (BMD) associated with a unilateral NF who saw marked improvement in BMD concomitant with response of the tumor to MEKi therapy.
METHODS
Mouse models.
Control and tamoxifen-inducible Plp-creERT;Nf1flox/flox mice 22–24 received Tamoxifen (75mg/kg) i.p. twice daily for 3 days at 2-months of age. Periostin-cre;Nf1 flox/flox mice 24–26 and Dhh-cre;Nf1flox/flox mice 24,27 were generated as described before. No randomization was used for animal studies. Mice were euthanized between 8–10 months of age. Both genders were included in the measurements. All mouse procedures were approved by appropriate institutional IACUC boards.
Histological measurements.
Tissues were immersion-fixed in PBS-based 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded undecalcified in methyl methacrylate before staining by Von Kossa/Van Gieson to stain mineralized bone and non-mineralized collagenous bone matrix, respectively. Histomorphometric measurements were performed using the Bioquant Image Analysis System (R&M Biometrics, Nashville, TN), blinded to genotype and following ASBMR guidelines 28,29. Osteoid parameters were measured directly by manual tracing from images taken at 20X magnification.
Immunocytochemistry.
Sections were deplastified before rehydration, followed by IHC using an antibody against S-100 (clone 15E2E2, Sigma, MAB079–1), a HRP-coupled goat anti-mouse IgG (Abcam, ab6789) and the Dako Liquid DAB+ Substrate Chromogen System (Agilent Technologies, K346811–2).
Human Schwann cell gene expression analysis.
Enrichment and culture of NF1−/− Schwann cells from NFs was done as described previously 30. Normal human embryonic Schwann cells (ScienCell Research Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA) were cultured as NF1−/− Schwann cells. RNA-Seq libraries were constructed from 1μg total RNA after ribosomal RNA depletion (Ribo-Zero GOLD and Illumina TruSeq RNA Sample Prep V2 Kit, Illumina, San Diego, CA). Data were processed using RTA v.1.18.64 and CASAVA v.1.8.2. software. Data for cultured Schwann cells from NFs of individuals with NF1 (N=23) and cultured normal human embryonic Schwann cell controls (N=7) were further processed using standard Tuxedo pipeline 31. Resulting gene expression datasets were then Log2 transformed. Genes with median Log2 FPKM score below 0.5 in both groups were considered not expressed and removed from further analysis.
Human and mouse gene expression microarray data.
We re-analyzed published human and mouse (GEO accession: GSE14038, GSE41747) microarray datasets, including human nerve, human NF tumor, mouse nerve, and mouse neurofibroma samples 32,33. Raw CEL files were pre-processed and gene expression levels were normalized (Bioconductor/affy package’s Robust Multi-array Average method) 34. Differentially expressed genes were predicted using Bioconductor/limma package 35.
RNAseq analysis.
RNA was isolated from trigeminal nerve tissues from Periostin-cre;Nf1flox/flox mice (RNeasy Plus Mini Kit, Qiagen) with DNase I treatment (Qiagen) for 15min. 400ng total RNA was used as input for RNA-seq library construction (Kapa Stranded mRNA kit). TruSeq adapter sequences were used for indexing. Library were PCR-amplified 12 cycles. Equimolar amounts of each library were run as 12-plexed 1.65pM pools, single-indexed, on a NextSeq 500—75 cycle, high output V2 kit to produce single-end reads. QC-passed reads were aligned to the mouse reference genome (mm10) using STAR 2.4.2a 36 and reads were translated to transcriptome coordinates using Salmon 0.60 37. Isoform data were collated to single gene IDs using the R package biomaRt 38, and abundance estimates were upper quartile normalized using R. Abundance values for genes were used as input for DESeq2 to identify differentially-expressed genes 39 using an adjusted p-value cutoff of <0.05.
Whole-body Dual-energy X-ray analysis.
Children aged 5–16 enrolled at the NIH on a phase 2 clinical trial of Selumetinib (SPRINT, NCT01362803) underwent a baseline DXA of whole body, proximal femur and lumbar spine using a Hologic Discovery A, using standard positioning technique. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the National Cancer Institute, and all participants provided written informed consent. Patients found to have an abnormal result in any of these body regions (Z-score ≤ −2.0) had repeat imaging performed after 1 year on treatment. Height and age-adjusted Z-scores were calculated for whole body, total body less head (a.k.a. “subtotal”), lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck using data from the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study. One subject out of 11 was excluded due to hip surgery during the study period.
Femoral diameter measurements.
Femur diameter was measured directly from X-ray films taken as standard-of-care. Locations of diameter measurement are shown in Supplementary Figure 2.
Statistics.
All gene expression data and distributions are represented as boxplots. Pair-wise comparison were performed using standard two-sided t-tests in R.
Ethics Statement.
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the National Cancer Institute, and all participants provided written informed consent.
RESULTS
We first evaluated differences in skeletal mineralization adjacent to Nf1-deficient neurofibroma tumors using the inducible Plp-CreERT;Nf1flox/flox mouse model, where the Nf1flox allele is conditionally deleted in myelinating Schwann cells at 2 months of age under the control of the Myelin proteolipid protein (Plp) promoter 23. Histological examination of vertebral bones from mutant mice euthanized at 9–11 months of age, at a time where large paraspinal plexiform neurofibromas associated with peripheral nerves and dorsal root ganglia are readily detectable, showed vertebral processes surrounded by S100+ NFs that appeared completely unmineralized (Supplementary Figure 1A). We also observed cases of tumors infiltrating the pelvic bones, where non-mineralized bone matrix (osteoid) and S100+ tumors were co-localized (Supplementary Figure 1B). Trabecular osteoid surfaces and volumes were increased in the vertebrae of Plp-creERT;Nf1flox/flox mice adjacent to S100+ neurofibromas, although to a lesser extent than in vertebral processes immediately adjacent to tumors. In mutant mice, this increase in cancellous osteoid parameters was not evident in vertebrae adjacent to normal nerves (Figure 2A,B) and bone volume in lumbar vertebrae not associated with tumors was normal (BV/TV: 18.06 ±5.8 in WT versus 18.30±4.8 in cKO, n= 6–9). In a second mouse model in which the Cre recombinase is driven by the Desert Hedgehog (Dhh) promoter to conditionally ablate the Nf1flox allele in embryonic Schwann cell precursors (Dhh-cre;Nf1flox/flox )27, increased vertebral osteoid volume and surface adjacent to neurofibroma tumors were also observed (Supplementary Figure 1C). These findings demonstrate, in two independent Schwann cell-specific Nf1 conditional knockout mouse models, the existence of altered mineralization closely associated with neurofibromas.
Figure 2. Osteoidosis and increased expression of PPi-related genes associated with murine neurofibromas.
(A) Representative images of Von Kossa/Van Gieson-stained (top) and S100+ nerves (bottom) thoracic vertebral sections from control and Plp-CreERT;Nf1flox/flox mice. N: Normal nerve; T: plexiform tumor adjacent to vertebral bone. Osteoid (non-mineralized bone) is stained pink (white arrows) and mineralized bone is stained black. Bar: 50um. (B) Osteoid Surfaces/Bone Surfaces (OS/BS), Osteoid Volume/Bone Volume (OV/BV) and Osteoid Width (O. Wi.) in vertebral cancellous bone regions adjacent to normal nerves or NF tumors in control and Plp-creERT;Nf1flox/flox (cKO) mice (WT: n=6 vertebral bodies from 3 mice), cKO without adjacent tumor (“-“, n=9 vertebral bodies from 4 mice) and adjacent to tumor (“+”, n=7 vertebral bodies from 4 mice). *, p<0.05, one-way ANOVA and post hoc pair-wise comparison with Bonferroni adjustment. (C,D) Normalized expression levels in neurofibromas from (C) Dhh-cre;Nf1flox/flox (n=15) and control (normal sciatic nerve, n=15) mice (Microarray) and (D) from Periostin-cre;Nf1flox/flox (n=6) and control (Trigeminal nerve, n=6) mice (RNAseq). *: p<0.05; **: p<0.01 by two-sided t-test.
To determine whether dysregulation of PPi homeostasis potentially contributed to neurofibroma-associated mineralization defects, and because the measurement of tissue PPi level was technically not feasible, we measured expression of genes promoting PPi generation and extracellular transport in tumors from multiple mouse models. Microarray analysis of neurofibromas from Dhh-cre;Nf1flox/flox mice compared to WT sciatic nerves (GSE41747)32 identified increased expression of Enpp1 in neurofibroma tumors, whereas expression of Ank was reduced (Figure 2C). Transcriptome profiling of trigeminal nerve tumors from Periostin-cre;Nf1flox/flox mice25 and control nerves confirmed these results in an independent mouse model of Nf1-deficient neurofibromas (Figure 2D), in which Cre-mediated Nf1 ablation occurs in the neural crest-derived Schwann cell lineage after embryonic day E11.
We then tested whether activation of the PPi pathway was also evident in human NF1 NFs. Transcriptome profiling of low-passage Schwann cell cultures from NFs of individuals with NF1 showed increased expression of ANKH compared to control embryonic Schwann cells (Figure 3A), but no difference in ENPP1 expression (not shown). Independent microarray expression analysis of human NF tissues (GSE14038, GSE41747)33 further confirmed higher ANKH expression compared to normal sciatic nerves (Figure 3B). Although not statistically significant, expression of ENPP1 trended higher in NF1 NFs compared to control (Figure 3B).
Figure 3. Activation of genes regulating PPI in human plexiform neurofibromas.
(A) Gene expression in cultured Schwann cells (SCs) from NFs of individuals with NF1 (n=24) versus cultured embryonic Schwann cell controls (n=7)(RNAseq). (B) Gene expression in human NF1 NF tissue (n=13) versus normal sciatic nerve control tissue (n=3)(Microarray). *: p<0.05; ***: p<0.001 by two-sided t-test.
Results presented here from both conditional mouse models and patient-derived tumors all concur to support the notion that activation of genes regulating PPi homeostasis in NF1 neurofibromas is associated with decreased bone mineralization and likely contributes to skeletal co-morbidities in children with NF1. The response of NF1 NFs to MEK inhibitor (MEKi) therapy6 and the MEK dependency of PPi pathway activation21 thus implied that treatment of NF1 plexiform tumors with MEK inhibitors may have beneficial effects on bone mineralization. To investigate this model further, baseline and post-therapy whole-body Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry scans of ten subjects from the National Cancer Institute phase 1/2 clinical trial (NCT01362803) of Selumetinib for inoperable NFs were examined. Of these, one subject had a unilateral NF of the leg that allowed for comparison of BMD to the contralateral leg without tumor. In this patient, BMD of the tumor-laden leg was dramatically reduced compared to the contralateral leg without tumor; this difference was not observed among participants without leg NF (Figure 4A, baseline). Following 1-year of MEKi therapy, the subject’s NF showed a partial response with volumetric reduction of 23% (1267 mL vs 973 mL), and the difference in BMD between tumor-laden and contralateral leg improved from −15% to −8% (Figure 4A, post-MEKi). Whereas 1-year of MEKi therapy did not affect total hip and femoral neck adjusted Z-scores in subjects without leg NFs, it markedly improved these parameters in the affected leg of this patient (Figure 4B,C).
Figure 4. Case presentation of improved tumor-associated BMD following MEKi therapy.
(A) Difference in BMD between left and right legs is shown for 9 individuals without leg NF (grey circles) and one patient with a left-leg NF (blue diamond) at baseline (left) and following 1-year MEKi therapy (right). MRI shows left-sided tumor involvement and volumetric reduction following therapy. (B, C) Height adjusted total hip (B) and femoral neck (C) Z-scores at baseline and following 1-year MEKi therapy.
DISCUSSION
MEK-dependent PPi pathway activation in NFs suggests tumor-associated skeletal co-morbidities in NF1 result, at least in part, from a local inhibition of bone mineralization. The rate of bone accrual and mineralization is high during childhood/adolescence and coincides with the initial active growth of NFs and, importantly, their response to MEKi therapy. Therefore, our findings highlight a common therapeutic window where MEKi therapy may reduce both tumor burden and tumor-associated PPi pathway activation, allowing for proper mineralization of the affected bony structures in children. This secondary therapeutic effect was observed in the PN-laden femur/hip of a single available patient with unilateral NF, despite the short-term duration of the treatment and the remaining presence of tumor post-treatment. This effect was not observed in the skeleton of patients without adjacent tumors, thus supporting it is specific to the skeleton associated with regional PN. Because of the preliminary nature of our findings in a single human patient, longitudinal evaluation of additional patients will be necessary to confirm efficacy of MEK inhibitors to treat the skeletal manifestations associated with neurofibroma tumors, as well as other potential effects at other bone sites and on bone growth. This PPi-dependent mechanism will also require confirmation of increased PPi generation in plexiform tumors and does not exclude other mechanisms such as alterations in blood flow or nutrient utilization.
The model proposed here may apply to other neurofibroma-associated skeletal manifestations of NF1, including craniofacial abnormalities associated with orbital NFs, dystrophic scoliosis, and, potentially, any skeletal structure adjacent to NFs. The potential clinical utility of MEKi may thus extend beyond the treatment of NFs to positively impact the many neurofibroma-associated skeletal co-morbidities in children with NF1, thus supporting the need for integrated, comprehensive and collaborative care clinics for patients with NF1. Lastly and importantly, results from this study highlight the opportunity for ongoing and future clinical trials testing MEK inhibitors as therapeutics for NF1 NFs to investigate skeletal co-morbidities, which may inform the design of more effective clinical management strategies for patients with NF1.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank Gerard Portela, Mark Ahlman, John Shern, Stuart Almond, Dr. B. Stephens Richards and Dr. Molly Dempsey for their help with different aspects of this work. Research reported in this publication was supported by the Department of Defense (NF140019, FE), the Texas Neurofibromatosis Foundation (J.J.R), and Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children (J.J.R.). F.E. (R21-AR072483, R01-AG055394), N.R (R01-NS28840), J.J.R and D.W.C. (U54-CA196519-04) and S.D.R. (K12-HD000850) were supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION PAGE
Dr. Elefteriou received research funding from Alexion.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hirbe AC, Gutmann DH. Neurofibromatosis type 1: a multidisciplinary approach to care. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(8):834–843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mautner VF, Asuagbor FA, Dombi E, et al. Assessment of benign tumor burden by whole-body MRI in patients with neurofibromatosis 1. Neuro Oncol. 2008;10(4):593–598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Plotkin SR, Bredella MA, Cai W, et al. Quantitative assessment of whole-body tumor burden in adult patients with neurofibromatosis. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dombi E, Solomon J, Gillespie AJ, et al. NF1 plexiform neurofibroma growth rate by volumetric MRI: relationship to age and body weight. Neurology. 2007;68(9):643–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nguyen R, Dombi E, Widemann BC, et al. Growth dynamics of plexiform neurofibromas: a retrospective cohort study of 201 patients with neurofibromatosis 1. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7:75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dombi E, Baldwin A, Marcus LJ, et al. Activity of Selumetinib in Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Related Plexiform Neurofibromas. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(26):2550–2560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gross AM, Wolters PL, Dombi E, et al. Selumetinib in Children with Inoperable Plexiform Neurofibromas. N Engl J Med. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Elefteriou F, Kolanczyk M, Schindeler A, et al. Skeletal abnormalities in neurofibromatosis type 1: approaches to therapeutic options. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A(10):2327–2338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stevenson DA, Zhou H, Ashrafi S, et al. Double inactivation of NF1 in tibial pseudarthrosis. American journal of human genetics. 2006;79(1):143–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Paria N, Cho TJ, Choi IH, et al. Neurofibromin deficiency-associated transcriptional dysregulation suggests a novel therapy for tibial pseudoarthrosis in NF1. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(12):2636–2642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sant DW, Margraf RL, Stevenson DA, et al. Evaluation of somatic mutations in tibial pseudarthrosis samples in neurofibromatosis type 1. Journal of medical genetics. 2015;52(4):256–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Margraf RL, VanSant-Webb C, Mao R, et al. NF1 Somatic Mutation in Dystrophic Scoliosis. J Mol Neurosci. 2019;68(1):11–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Crawford AH. Pitfalls of spinal deformities associated with neurofibromatosis in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989(245):29–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Durrani AA, Crawford AH, Chouhdry SN, Saifuddin A, Morley TR. Modulation of spinal deformities in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Spine. 2000;25(1):69–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ramachandran M, Tsirikos AI, Lee J, Saifuddin A. Whole-spine magnetic resonance imaging in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 and spinal deformity. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17(6):483–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lykissas MG, Schorry EK, Crawford AH, Gaines S, Rieley M, Jain VV. Does the presence of dystrophic features in patients with type 1 neurofibromatosis and spinal deformities increase the risk of surgery? Spine. 2013;38(18):1595–1601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nguyen R, Dombi E, Akshintala S, Baldwin A, Widemann BC. Characterization of spinal findings in children and adults with neurofibromatosis type 1 enrolled in a natural history study using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurooncol. 2015;121(1):209–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hu Z, Liu Z, Qiu Y, Xu L, Yan H, Zhu Z. Morphological Differences in the Vertebrae of Scoliosis Secondary to Neurofibromatosis Type 1 With and Without Paraspinal Neurofibromas. Spine. 2016;41(7):598–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hunt JC, Pugh DG. Skeletal lesions in neurofibromatosis. Radiology. 1961;76:1–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lodish MB, Dagalakis U, Sinaii N, et al. Bone mineral density in children and young adults with neurofibromatosis type 1. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2012;19(6):817–825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.de la Croix Ndong J, Makowski AJ, Uppuganti S, et al. Asfotase-alpha improves bone growth, mineralization and strength in mouse models of neurofibromatosis type-1. Nat Med. 2014;20(8):904–910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Doerflinger NH, Macklin WB, Popko B. Inducible site-specific recombination in myelinating cells. Genesis. 2003;35(1):63–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mayes DA, Rizvi TA, Cancelas JA, et al. Perinatal or adult Nf1 inactivation using tamoxifen-inducible PlpCre each cause neurofibroma formation. Cancer Res. 2011;71(13):4675–4685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhu Y, Romero MI, Ghosh P, et al. Ablation of NF1 function in neurons induces abnormal development of cerebral cortex and reactive gliosis in the brain. Genes Dev. 2001;15(7):859–876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rhodes SD, He Y, Smith A, et al. Cdkn2a (Arf) loss drives NF1-associated atypical neurofibroma and malignant transformation. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(16):2752–2762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lindsley A, Snider P, Zhou H, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel Schwann and outflow tract endocardial cushion lineage-restricted periostin enhancer. Dev Biol. 2007;307(2):340–355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wu J, Williams JP, Rizvi TA, et al. Plexiform and dermal neurofibromas and pigmentation are caused by Nf1 loss in desert hedgehog-expressing cells. Cancer Cell. 2008;13(2):105–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, et al. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Committee. J Bone Miner Res. 1987;6:595–610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dempster DW, Compston JE, Drezner MK, et al. Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry: a 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(1):2–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Muir D, Neubauer D, Lim IT, Yachnis AT, Wallace MR. Tumorigenic properties of neurofibromin-deficient neurofibroma Schwann cells. The American journal of pathology. 2001;158(2):501–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(3):562–578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jessen WJ, Miller SJ, Jousma E, et al. MEK inhibition exhibits efficacy in human and mouse neurofibromatosis tumors. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(1):340–347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Miller SJ, Jessen WJ, Mehta T, et al. Integrative genomic analyses of neurofibromatosis tumours identify SOX9 as a biomarker and survival gene. EMBO Mol Med. 2009;1(4):236–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gautier L, Cope L, Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA. affy--analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(3):307–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(7):e47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods. 2017;14(4):417–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Durinck S, Moreau Y, Kasprzyk A, et al. BioMart and Bioconductor: a powerful link between biological databases and microarray data analysis. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(16):3439–3440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome biology. 2014;15(12):550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




