Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Oct 27;44(11):2400–2409. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1836045

Soy Diferente: A Qualitative Study on the Perceptions of Recovery Following Traumatic Brain Injury Among Spanish-speaking US Immigrants

Monique R Pappadis 1,2, Angelle M Sander 2,3, Margaret A Struchen 2,4, Diana Kurtz Mazzei 2,5
PMCID: PMC8109840  NIHMSID: NIHMS1660095  PMID: 33108224

Abstract

Purpose:

To explore the impact of traumatic brain injury (TBI) on the quality of life (QoL) and self-concept of Spanish-speaking US Hispanic immigrants with TBI.

Materials and methods:

A prospective, qualitative study conducted in a county level I trauma center and community. Semi-structured interviews on QoL and self-concept following TBI were conducted with twenty-four Spanish-speaking US Hispanic immigrants with TBI living in the community at least 6 months following injury.

Results:

Perceived facilitators of QoL included faith, hopefulness in recovery, empathy for others, and support from others. Perceived barriers to QoL mentioned were symptoms/consequences of injury, employment/financial changes, loss of independence, fear/uncertainty, stigma/shame, lack of medical care, and decreased social integration. Participants described their self-concept after TBI as either a maintained self or loss of self. Those who viewed themselves differently reported physical and emotional changes, gender role conflict, loss of self-worth, and total loss due to the TBI.

Conclusions:

Spanish-speaking US Hispanic immigrants held a strong faith and positive outlook after TBI in spite of the significant barriers to recovery. A need exists for programs to support creatively the recovery of Spanish-speaking US Hispanic immigrants with limited access to care and resources.

Keywords: emigrants and immigrants, Hispanic Americans, quality of life, self concept, social integration, traumatic brain injuries

Introduction

Hispanics are the largest US ethnic minority group, making up 18.3% of the total population [1]. They are disproportionately represented among persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) [2]. Unfortunately, Hispanics with TBI have poorer outcomes compared to Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) in the areas of employment and other productive activities [3, 4]. Racial/ethnic minorities, specifically Hispanics, report poorer functional outcomes, less access to rehabilitation services, decreased employment or productive activity, and poorer community integration following TBI compared to NHW [5, 6, 7].

Access to care, particularly for immigrants, presents significant challenges.[8] Compared to NHW, Hispanics with TBI report longer wait times to see an emergency room physician [9]. They are also more likely to be discharged home and less likely to receive rehabilitation services following acute hospitalization [10, 11], and have worse functional outcomes at one-year post injury [12]. Ethnic disparities in outcomes following TBI may be partially explained by insurance status [4]. Uninsured Hispanics with TBI are at greater risk for mortality compared to uninsured African Americans and insured Non-Hispanic whites with TBI [13]. Whether privately insured, publically insured, or uninsured, Hispanics have a lower rate of receiving post-acute care following hospitalization [14]. Primary language is a potential contributor to disparities in health care access and outcomes for Hispanics with TBI. Over seventy percent of Hispanics in the United States speak Spanish at home [15].

In the U.S., there are an estimated 10.5 million undocumented immigrants, of which 73% are from Latin America. The majority reside in California, Texas, Florida, New York, New Jersey and Illinois. Undocumented immigrants from Mexico and other parts of Latin America reported having less health care access, less use of healthcare services (i.e., physician visits) and poorer care encounters compared to US-born Mexicans and other US-born Latin Americans [16]. Undocumented immigrants in the US are treated at nonprofit safety net hospitals that receive public funding and are legally required to provide care regardless of insurance status or ability to pay [17]. Under the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), which passed in 2010, undocumented immigrants are not eligible for health insurance for catastrophic illnesses, including traumatic brain injuries, causing an ongoing national debate over medical care access [18]. Under the current U.S.administration, proposed policy changes may cause even greater health care disparities among undocumented immigrants in the US, especially in Texas [19].

Few studies have examined the needs, barriers, outcomes, and experiences of Spanish-speaking persons with TBI in the United States [20]. Spanish-speaking individuals with TBI experience unique challenges and report long-term functional impairments [21], such as barriers to service utilization, lack of financial/medical resources, lack of language services, and difficulties with activities of daily living. The proportion of foreign language speakers in the neighborhood has been shown to moderate the relationship between nativity (US born or immigrant) and productive activity at one-year post TBI [22]. Furthermore, persons with TBI in the U.S. who are non-US born and Spanish-speaking are more likely to report greater misconceptions about TBI than those who are not [23]. The challenges faced by Spanish-speaking Hispanics with TBI have the potential to negatively affect quality of life (QoL) and self-concept.

A number of studies have explored QoL and self-concept following TBI [24, 25, 26, 27]. During and after the first year, individuals with TBI report a decrease in health-related QoL. In addition, they generally report negative changes to their self-concept or sense of self, which is also related to emotional distress and lower subjective QoL. In over 40 years, there has been a paucity of studies exploring the lived experience of ethnic minorities with TBI [28]. In the existing studies, some recurring themes include a disconnection with self and others, unresolved emotional sequelae, internal and external resources to support recovery, and the reconstruction of self-identity. However, no study has qualitatively explored the unique perceptions of QoL and self-concept in the recovery of Spanish-speaking persons with TBI in the U.S. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the unique experiences of non-US born Spanish-speaking persons with TBI, who are living in the U.S. Specifically, we explored their perspectives of the impact of TBI on their QoL and self-concept at least 6 months following injury.

Methods

Participants

Spanish-speaking persons with medically documented TBI were recruited based on their consecutive admission to the Neurosurgery Intensive Care Unit of a large county Level I trauma center. Participants were part of a larger study assessing racial/ethnic diversity in community integration among persons with TBI. Participants for the larger study had to meet the following eligibility criteria: medical documentation of mild, moderate, or severe TBI; age ≥ 18 years; English- or Spanish-speaking; discharge to a private residence following either acute care or inpatient rehabilitation; at least 3 months living in their community; at least 6 months post injury to ensure that participants have attempted to integrate back into their community; and absence of any pre-existing severe neurological (e.g., stroke, Parkinson’s disease), psychiatric (e.g., bipolar, schizophrenia), or developmental and intellectual disabilities (e.g., autism) that could impact community integration irrespective of TBI. However, only transcripts from the non-US born, Spanish-speaking persons with TBI will be addressed in this study. The Institutional Review Board of Baylor College of Medicine and Affiliated Hospitals approved this study.

Procedures

Potential participants were invited to participate in the study by phone and/or mail. Informed written consent, a semi-structured interview, and assessment measures were conducted in each participant’s home at approximately 6 months after injury (Mean=9.25; SD=4.64, range= 6-21) by the first author, who is bilingual in English and Spanish. All audio-recorded interviews were conducted in Spanish by the first author (MRP), and were later transcribed into Spanish using a professional transcription service. The semi-structured interview questions assessed participants’ perception of the impact of the TBI on their QoL and self-concept. The main interview questions were: (1) “How has the brain injury affected the overall quality of your life?”; (2a) “How has the brain injury affected the way you see yourself?”; and (2b) “Do you see yourself as the same as before your injury or different?”

Qualitative Data Analysis

Two independent research team members (MRP and DKM) who are fluent in Spanish independently coded all interviews. Qualitative data analysis was based on the multi-step coding process of grounded theory [29]. Coding involved reading the transcript in Spanish line-by-line several times and then identifying key words or statements using direct responses from the participants. Independently generated themes of the two coders were compared for consistency and then core themes were identified. Coders then discussed any coding discrepancies until consensus was achieved. Codes and the data used to identify the codes from the participants’ responses were back-translated into English for reporting and checking accuracy. All authors reviewed and confirmed the codes. We created a respondent-by-theme matrix to explore theme patterns and guide the constant comparative analysis [30]. The analysis was conducted using the qualitative analysis software NVivo 10 [31]. Excerpts from the data were selected to illustrate the final core themes identified. Embedded in the description of the results are direct quotes or statements by the participants, which are denoted in italics. The study results are reported following the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) reporting guidelines.

To ensure rigor and trustworthiness of the data[32], we used the following strategies. The interviewer established rapport with the participants and, in some cases with family members, early following injury while the participant was hospitalized in the acute hospital. The interviewer then maintained contact until the former patients had been living in the community for at least six months, which is a slight variation from prolonged engagement. For investigator triangulation, two coders were used for the data analysis, and the research team provided feedback on the coding decisions. To ensure transferability, we provided thick descriptions of the participants’ experiences by including contextual information with the quotes. Lastly, we documented our research procedures and code development, as well as provided the exemplar quotes in both English and Spanish (See Supplemental material) to ensure dependability and confirmability of the results.

Results

Twenty-four individuals who self-identified as Hispanic and indicated that Spanish was their primary language were recruited and participated in the qualitative interview (table 1). Just over half of the participants had a medically documented mild TBI (best 24-hour Glasgow Coma (GCS) score: 13 to 15), while the remainder sustained moderate-to-severe TBI (GCS score: 3 to 12) [33]. Best 24-hour GCS score is the preferred GCS score in neurotrauma research, as the GCS score is confounded by lesion removal, anesthesia, sedation, or alcohol [34, 35, 36].Seventy-nine percent were male, and 79% had less than a high school education. The mean age of the participants was 38.2 years (SD=16.9). Half of the participants had lived in the United States for five years or less. The participants emigrated from various Latin American countries, including Mexico, El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala. Participants largely self-identified as Catholic and as actively practicing their religion. The majority (83.3%) were employed pre-injury, but only 38% were employed at the time of assessment. Sixty-five percent of participants reported annual household incomes of less than $20,000, and had an average of 3.9 people residing in the home (SD=1.6). The etiologies of injury were motor vehicle or motorcycle accident (n=8), assault (n=7), fall/jump (n=4), auto-pedestrian (n=3), gunshot wound (n=1), and being hit by an object (n=1).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics (N=24)

Time post injury
  mean months (SD) [min-max] 9.29 (4.60) [6-21]
Time in the US
  mean years (SD) [min-max] 10.54 (9.66) [1-36]
Injury Severity
  Mild 13 (54.2)
  Moderate 5 (20.8)
  Severe 6 (25.0)
Age
  mean (SD) [min-max] 38.17 (16.92) [19-84]
Gender, n (%)
  Female 5 (20.8)
  Male 19 (79.2)
Education
  mean years (SD) [min-max] 6.96 (3.96) [0-16]
Income
  ≤ $20K 13 (65.0)
  $20,001K - $40K 5 (25.0)
  >$40K 2 (10.0)
Marital Status, n (%)
  Married/Cohabitating 12 (50)
  Never Married/Separated/Widowed/Divorced 12 (50)
Live with, n (%)
  Spouse/Significant Other 8 (33.3)
  Parent 3 (12.5)
  Other relative 8 (33.3)
  Friend/Roommate 4 (16.7)
  Alone 1 (4.2)
Country of Origin, n (%)
  El Salvador 5 (20.8)
  Guatemala 3 (12.5)
  Honduras 4 (16.7)
  Mexico 12 (50.0)
Pre-Injury Productivity, n (%)
  Employed 21 (87.5)
  Homemaker 1 (4.2)
  Non productive 2 (8.3)
Post-Injury Productivity, n (%)
  Employed 9 (37.5)
  Student 1 (4.2)
  Homemaker 1 (4.2)
  Nonproductive 13 (54.2)
Mechanism of Injury, n (%)
  MVA/MCA 8 (33.3)
  Auto-pedestrian 3 (12.5)
  Fall/ Jump 4 (16.7)
  Assault 7 (29.2)
  GSW 1 (4.2) 
  Hit by Object 1 (4.2) 

Note. SD: standard deviation; MVA: motor vehicle accident; MCA: motorcycle accident; GSW: Gunshot wound.

Metacoding, the examination of the relationships among themes, resulted in identifying overarching metathemes [30]. We consolidated the inductively derived codes into themes, and then aggregated the major themes into larger metathemes. Two metathemes, driven by the study questions and four emerged themes, were identified: QoL and Self Concept. The four emerged themes were: (1) Facilitators of QoL, (2) Barriers to QoL, (3) Maintained Self, and (4) Loss of Self. Figure 1 is a visual representation of the thematic network that summarizes the study results [37]. The participants perceived the traumatic brain injury to have a positive or negative influence on both their quality of life and self-concept following injury. Table 2 includes the metathemes, categories, and examples of the codes identified inductively. Direct quotes in Spanish and English are availabile in the Supplemental Tables 1 and 2.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Thematic Network of Quality of Life (QoL) and Self-Concept following Traumatic Brain Injury.

Table 2.

TBI-related Experiences by Themes, Categories, and Codes

Theme Category Code Examples
Facilitators of Quality of Life Faith Attend church more often
God
Hopefulness in recovery Being optimistic
Move forward with life
Resiliency
Empathy for others with disability Understand pain of others
Support from others Support from family/friends
Support from support group
Barriers to Quality of Life Decreased Social Integration Decreased social network
Decreased participation in activities
Employment/Financial Changes Decreased working abilities
Unable to work
Fear or Uncertainty Fear of sustaining a second injury
Uncertainty about future
Loss of Independence Limited
Need assistance
Lack of Medical Care Difficulty obtaining care
Need surgery or procedure
Stigma and Shame Shame
Treated differently
Symptoms or Consequences of Injury Cognitive
Emotional
Physical
Maintained Self Same Person Feel normal
No effect from the TBI
Loss of Self Different Person % different (e.g., 4%, 20%, 90%)
Cognitively/Emotionally different
Physically different
Gender Role Conflict Assistance with maintaining family
Not the same man
Loss of Self-worth I am nothing

QUALITY OF LIFE

The majority of participants (n=18, 75%) felt that the TBI affected their overall QoL. Some of the effects were perceived as positive, such as no longer using drugs or alcohol, or attaching increased value to life. Others were perceived as negative, such as not being able to do pre-injury activities, inability to work, loss of sense of smell and taste, and feelings that the TBI completely changed their life. The remaining 25% of participants perceived no impact of the TBI on their QoL. These participants described themselves as feeling normal, and not experiencing changes in work or communication with family, and that they think the same as before their injury. Most of those who did not believe that the TBI affected their QoL still identified changes, such as being careful, fear and anxiety that is getting better with time, having physical changes (scars), and going to church more.

Supplemental Table 1 provides illustrative quotations for the themes and subthemes for the QoL meta-theme. No theme pattern differences in perspectives of QoL were noticed based on years in the United States (≤5 years vs. >5 years) or injury severity (mild vs. moderate-to-severe) after reviewing a respondent-by theme matrix.

Facilitators of Quality of Life

Faith

Nearly all participants were of Catholic faith and actively practicing their religion. They described being thankful to God for being their source of recovery, giving them the license to continue living, providing another opportunity for their family to see them alive, and showing His favor. Many talked about the role God plays in their life and recovery, such as placing God’s authority before medical doctors, and returning them to normalcy by feeling like a normal person and 100%. They had an overwhelming sense of gratitude for life and recognition of God’s role in their recovery and the prevention of potentially worse outcomes following the TBI.

“But, thanks to my Lord who lifts me up. I know that one day, my Father will give things again so that I be who I was before. In addition, with the Lord, I feel very different, very happy. Because I do believe in Him. Faith – I never accepted and I know that one day…He will lift me up, slowly, but He will lift me up.”

(P161, male, severe TBI, 11 months post)

Hopefulness in Recovery

Recovery was described frequently in terms of percentage, such as 85-90%. Participants described the importance of being optimistic or hopeful in their recovery after the TBI. They described their resiliency by being able to move forward with life after injury. It was mentioned frequently that, with time, symptoms will get better and circumstances will improve. A participant described his perception that there will always be problems, but that focusing on the positive is necessary for improvement: “we have been given a second opportunity to continue living.” (P343, male, mild TBI, 21 months post).

Some participants described that the injury led them to place greater value on life because they realized that it is vulnerable to loss. Others described their attempts to de-emphasize the injury itself, as they adapt to injury-related changes, which they perceive as a process.

One participant viewed their experience positively as a success:

“I feel good, what they have done to me in the hospital, everything has been successful and will always be…will continue to be that way.” (P575, male, severe TBI, 7 months post)

Empathy for others

Some participants reported that they gained a new empathy for individuals with disabilities, as they understood the resulting pain and loss. One participant desired that others be as well as he, as he saw himself recuperated (P481, male, moderate TBI, 10 months post). In contrast, not all participants viewed themselves as recovered. A Salvadorian woman with children not living in the United States felt immobilized because she wanted to help others who were suffering from a recent hurricane but felt useless, mostly because of the barrier of not speaking English. She described experiencing many catastrophes and wars in her home country and once being courageous, but now feeling spiritless (P217, female, mild TBI, 6 months post). The TBI and inability to speak English made her feel useless to others and she was no longer in the financial position to return to her home country.

The participants have placed greater importance on their lives, which gave them a greater understanding of the experiences of others with TBI:

“We give life and things more importance. Everything around us …and to better understand the pain of others. Because we already lived it.” (P343, male, mild TBI, 21 months post)

Support from others

Due to the cognitive and physical limitations following their injury, many received or continued to receive support from their family or friends throughout the recovery process. None of the participants had medical insurance and they relied on county resources for their medical care. One participant detailed how he needed help for everything except eating. He joined a support group with other men with brain injury from Mexico because none of them receives assistance outside of the support group:

“I’m in a group of people with disabilities, and we support each other. All Mexican and we don’t receive any help. We do everything for each other. That’s how we all move forward.” (P261, male, moderate TBI, 19 months post)

Barriers to Quality of Life

Symptoms or Consequences of Injury

Symptoms explored behavioral, cognitive, emotional, personality, and physical changes common following TBI. The vast majority of participants experienced physical changes, such as body image changes, decreased movement or mobility, dizziness, new onset of a seizure disorder, fatigue and sensory/perceptual impairments (i.e., vision, taste, smell, hearing, visuospatial). Many stated that the physical changes affected their ability to return to work following their injury. Another participant described how in the past he could run so fast that immigration officers could not catch him. After his injury, he always feels as if he is going to fall if he runs, and knows that now they would be able to catch him.

Cognitive changes, such as decreased memory and concentration, affected their QoL. One participant from Honduras shared several stories of losing things or money due to memory problems. For example, he was at the store and forgot that he put his wallet down. Once he remembered and returned, someone emptied out the money (P507, male, mild TBI, 6 months post). Memory changes was the most frequently mentioned cognitive change.

“Memory. That’s where I think it most affected me. Because I do one thing or I am in a place and awhile later I don’t remember what I did or where I was. That’s where I believe I was most affected.”

(P150, male, moderate TBI, 11 months post)

Common psychological changes following injury included emotional distress, decreased mood, anger, and aggression. A participant reported the inability to control his behavior, disinhibition, particularly with making decisions, which negatively affected his QoL leading to uncertainty about the future (P154, male, moderate TBI, 7 months post). One participant hoped to recover physically and emotionally in order to have a normal life, and although she has sought psychological help, she still feels the same:

I’m just at home thinking about the accident, the failures, pure negative things, so I think that fills my heart with bad emotions and that’s not good for a normal life. I think my thoughts are going to focus on what I am living and not on what has already happened. (P130, female, severe TBI, 8 months post)

Employment/Financial Changes

As non-US born Spanish speakers, inability to work caused significant financial struggles for many. Only nine of the participants maintained employment following their injury. One female from Mexico decided to go to college following her injury, while another maintained her role as a homemaker. The remaining participants lost their ability to work and had not returned to work by 6-months post injury. They reported significant financial challenges, which resulted in emotional distress.

“My economic situation…is what I feel bad about…it changed my entire life.” (P605, male, mild TBI, 6 months post)

Through tears, a mother, living apart from her children, described how her finances changed due to her inability to work.

I did not come here for luxuries, but to send money to my children so they can study and to save something. Why? So that I can return to them. And, what happened? I had to spend the money. Because the savings I had been saving was spent….because of not working all of this time without a job or anything. And, I had to study. I had to eat. (P217, female, mild TBI, 6 months post).

Those who were able to return to work experienced more pressure, decreased patience from others, made errors, or could do only half of what was done before. When a participant was asked if others notice his changes at work, he said, “Yes. But what are they going to say now? Errors are like that. One day it’s one and tomorrow it’s another.” His memory problems caused him to make errors, which were noticed by others. He wanted them to have patience with him but they would still pressure him to work.

Loss of Independence

Many perceived a loss of independence related to injury-associated financial challenges, physical limitations, or housing changes. They described being able to do as they pleased before, but now being limited, dependent, or needing assistance from others. One participant lost his vision following the TBI, and desired to do things like before, such as working and going out. It bothered him to have to depend on government assistance and rely on others for housing.

One participant was completely independent before her injury, but following the injury she struggles with the fact that now she has to depend on others:

“I used to do my things, I fixed my suitcase, I went out, I went in, I went, I came, I was independent and now I don’t…It’s serious because now I depend [on others].” (P335, female, mild TBI, 20 months post)

Fear/Uncertainty

Some participants shared fears with which they were dealing, such as fear about getting another TBI, getting lost, and doing things that will harm them. One individual described his desire to return to his home country due to the difficulties experienced in the United States following his injury. Some questioned their future goals and plans, or why they came to the United States in the first place. These thoughts were associated with increased stress.

“I have to be very careful not to injury myself…the injury could be worsened.” (P611, male, mild TBI,6 months post)

Stigma and Shame

Some described a stigma associated with having a TBI. They perceived others as treating them differently, resulting in feelings of shame. Many experienced shame walking in their neighborhood, where people see them, and refused to go to the store due to shame. There was concern for how others perceived them or concern that others would laugh at them for not being able to do the things done before. For one male, the belief that no one thought he was efficient or saying, “no one needs me,” negatively affected his life after injury. A participant, who stayed indoors due to feelings of shame, described her injury due to a car collision as, “it completely changed my life from one day to the next.” (P130, female, severe TBI, 8 months post)

Lack of Medical Care

Medical care, such as needed surgeries or bone flap replacements, was often difficult to access. Some perceived that they could not rely on their physicians once they returned to the community because of the challenges with accessing health care. A female participant described her experiences with wanting to talk to someone about her problems, but not wanting to talk to a therapist or social worker and share her feelings with someone that doesn’t care and only listen. Just 6 months post injury, one male participant described experiencing delay in care, “They have to first attend to the emergencies….my operation that they are going to do can wait one year, two or more years. Now they are leaving me like this.” Immigration status plays a role in the ability to access and obtain health care.

Care is often delayed for undocumented immigrants, which affects how they perceive their recovery:

“I need another surgery and I’m not 100%. But if I had another surgery, I would already feel 100%.” (P575, male, severe TBI, 7 months post)

Decreased Social Integration

Individuals reported changes in their friendships, where they noticed their social network had decreased. Friends that they had before the injury were no longer seen. One person described the lack of someone in whom to confide. Several participants felt that it was easier to stay inside than to go out. Fears prevented some from going out, such as being fearful of being hit by a car again, falling, or getting lost due to decreased memory. Others acknowledged not being able to do things like before and always needing someone to help them; therefore, they tended to stay indoors.

“I don’t go out, I don’t do anything. I’m only in the house.”

(P616, male, moderate TBI, 6 months post)

SELF-CONCEPT

Supplemental Table 2 depicts the representative quotes, themes, and subthemes for the self-concept meta-theme. No theme pattern differences in perspectives of self-concept were found based on years in the US (≤5 years vs. >5 years) and injury severity (mild vs. moderate-to-severe).

Maintained Self

When asked whether they believed that the TBI affected the way they view themselves, some participants (n=9; 38%) did not think so. They stated that they viewed themselves the same, as a normal person or the same person as before. Some acknowledged initial effects in the days following the injury, but did not believe there were long-lasting changes affecting their self-concept.

“Nothing has changed, as I see myself. Nothing has changed. Well, I feel that I see myself the same. I feel the same.” (P423, male, mild TBI, 8 months post)

Others acknowledged physical changes, such as cut hair that will grow back, scars, or walking with four tires (wheelchair), but still considered themselves the same.

“We are…normal, new people. We consider ourselves as a normal person. The only impediment is that we do not walk and we can’t do things like others, but we consider ourselves as a normal person.” (P261, male, moderate TBI, 19 months post)

Loss of Self

The majority of participants reported viewing themselves as a different person compared to before the injury. They reported a loss of self, soy diferente. They viewed themselves as a different person, often due to changes in physical abilities or emotions. Others described their loss of self as a total loss, loss of self-worth, or loss of their ability to maintain their perceived social role (i.e., gender role conflict). Many perceived changes with work, school, friends, and social life.

Different Person

Perceptions of being a different person following injury were described in either percent change, or specific cognitive, emotional, or physical changes. Similar to how they described their QoL after injury, without prompting, some reported their changes to self in terms of percent differences, ranging from 4% to 80%. They viewed themselves as 100% or whole prior to injury and as incomplete following injury. For example, a participant felt 10-15% less every time he looked in the mirror to comb his hair, as it reminded him that he still needed to have another head surgery. Another participant felt 80% different because of differences in how he thought and what he could or could not do, and he described always wanting to cry because of his limitations.

“I feel different. Yes, like before [I was] 100%, now I feel like 70% to 80%.” (P515, male, mild TBI, 6 months post)

Others felt different because of cognitive, emotional, or physical changes after injury. Some noticed changes in their thinking and the emotional toll the TBI had caused. They felt depressed when thinking about all of the consequences of the injury

“Emotionally. Yes, I am different because something will affect me emotionally fast. For example, when I am here I want to cry or something. Quickly it makes things worse for myself. I quickly feel very sensitive….very sensitive.” (P217, female, mild TBI, 6 months post)

Others described the physical changes, such as the inability to walk straight, severe headaches, decreased mobility, or weight gain. One participant described not feeling the same because of a metal plate placed in his head that bothers him, saying, “These materials in my body are not of my body.”

“It [the TBI] has affected….I can’t walk very fast. I’m also getting fat.” (P557, male, severe TBI, 6 months post)

Total Loss

Nearly a third of the participants described the change to their self-concept as a total change. They described that the TBI affected multiple areas of their life, such as employment, cognitive and emotional changes, physical changes, social network changes, and how they see themselves. Despite maintaining hope for the future and faith in God, they believed that they would never again be the same person. Because of the perceived losses, a 29-year-old male participant felt that he was dead in life because he could not do the things in which he placed value. Therefore, in the moments of experiencing great losses following TBI, Spanish-speaking immigrants often used their faith to guide their recovery and view of self.

“A great loss.”(P615, 84-year-old male, mild TBI, 12 months post)

“Wow! Completely, I was on the positive side, and now I’m on the negative side. So, my status changed…by my studies, my job, so much by my job, so much for friends, everything changed. Right now, I’m at home doing nothing, that is, it changed completely. (P130, female, severe TBI, 8 months post)

Loss of Self-worth

Because they viewed their lives and themselves differently, they described not having self-worth or feeling worthless. Some also mentioned that they felt that others no longer saw their worth and no longer needed them as before. For some, decreased abilities and/or inability to work, negatively affected how they viewed themselves, or perceived credibility from others. One participant described isolating himself from others because they say incorrect things around him and it only causes anger, stress, and emotional distress.

“Like right now…I don’t feel like I’m anything. I feel, who knows, like I’m worthless.” (P050, male, moderate TBI, 11 months post)

Gender Role Conflict

Only a few male participants described how they viewed themselves differently in terms of not being the man as before and being afraid of helping around the home. One mentioned how the TBI affected his life 100% and that he struggled with coping with the fact that he is no longer working and hoping that his wife is able to support him. Aware of their changes, they try to help their wives as much as they can with caring for their children, while they are no longer working and providing for the family.

“100%. In that, I’m not how I was before. I can’t be how I was before. I feel very sad. I feel down. I’m not the man I was before who pitched in with many things. Waiting for my wife to take care of me because it has 100% affected my life.” (P161, male, severe TBI, 11 months post)

Discussion

This qualitative study uniquely adds to the literature base by providing a unique glimpse of the lived experiences of non-US born, Spanish-speaking immigrants with TBI living in the U.S., who are an underserved and underrepresented population in rehabilitation. Considering that most participants received no rehabilitation services following injury, the most frequently mentioned facilitators of QoL were faith/religion and maintaining a positive outlook on life. Nearly all of the participants were actively practicing their religion and relied heavily on their faith and relationship with God to guide their positive outlook on life and recovery. In a national survey of Hispanics in the U.S., 61% reported that religion is very important in their lives, and religiosity is greatest among immigrant Hispanics compared to those who are 1st-3rd generation [38]. Hispanics often report an external health locus of control, where they rely solely on God to determine their health [39, 40].

Although religiosity has not previously been explored in depth among Hispanics with TBI, prior studies have found the importance of religion and spirituality among persons with TBI. Actively practicing a religion was associated with greater misconceptions about TBI among ethnic minorities, with Spanish-speaking persons with TBI reporting greater percentage of misconceptions than English-speaking Hispanics and Blacks [23]. Other TBI-related studies have found that religion and spiritual beliefs uniquely predict post-injury psychosocial outcomes [41, 42], and vulnerability is often perceived through the awareness of God’s relationship to their mortality [43]. Additional work is needed to further explore the role of spirituality and religion in conceptualizing the injury, making sense of its consequences, reconstruction of self-identity, and supporting post-traumatic growth and resiliency in Spanish-speaking US immigrants with TBI.

Similar to the results from previous studies with only English-speaking populations [28, 44, 45, 46], we also found that the consequences of injury (cognitive, physical, emotional, social, employment) negatively affect the QoL and self-concept of Spanish-speaking immigrants with TBI following injury. Participants perceived that their injury disrupted lives, causing them to focus on barriers to recovery, such as changes in employment and financial situation, fears or uncertainty about the future, and decreased social and community participation. The changes noted after injury resulted in the majority of participants viewing themselves differently or as a different person following injury. In earlier studies of sense of self following acquired brain injury, relationships with others and coping strategies were an important part of regaining a sense of self after injury [47, 48].

Although many participants acknowledged changes in their relationships as result of injury, they did not perceive relationship changes as a reason for feeling different or loss of self. Instead, they focused on the physical, cognitive, and emotional changes that made them feel dissimilar from their pre-injury selves. A meta-synthesis on studies exploring the TBI recovery experience revealed that people with TBI may have strong feelings of loss — social disconnection, disconnection with pre-injury self, and mind/body disconnection — which results in negative emotional sequelae after injury [28]. This is consistent with the disconnection with pre-injury self (i.e., different person) and mind/body disconnection (i.e., TBI physical and cognitive sequelae) described by the Spanish-speaking immigrants.

This study significantly contributes to the literature by exploring the experiences of Spanish-speaking individuals with TBI in the US, where current research is minimal [20]. It is important to understand the different contexts and experiences reported by Spanish-speaking immigrants following injury. In some cases, the TBI occurred within months of them arriving in the United States, and most, if not all, received no rehabilitation services following injury. Even when undocumented immigrants during acute care receive a recommendation for inpatient rehabilitation based on a physical therapy evaluation, many patients are discharged home without services [49]. Spanish-speaking Hispanics have the greatest rates of severe disability and are also less likely to have medical insurance, which reduces their odds of receiving post-TBI rehabilitation services [50]. Recently, health care workers communicated their shared concerns about undocumented Hispanic immigrants interacting with health and social services, as it may lead to deportation because of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) under the current U.S. administration [19].

Recent studies have continued to demonstrate the disparities in access to rehabilitation services for Hispanics with TBI [11, 51, 52]. Without medical insurance, the participants had limited or no access to needed health care services, such as when one participant described going for an extended time without a bone flap replacement. Policies can influence the access to care following TBI among immigrant populations. The undocumented population in Texas is steadily growing, and current policies make it challenging for them to access medical insurance coverage [53, 54]. As evidenced by the words of one of our participants, fear regarding deportation results in feelings of vulnerability after TBI, and may disincline these patients to seek out needed medical and rehabilitation services. Non-English-speaking Hispanics experience significant barriers to accessing medical services, receiving quality care, and achieving optimal health outcomes [55]. Undocumented immigrants with TBI experience similar healthcare disparities as racial/ethnic minorities with TBI in the US [56, 57].

The findings from the current study have implications for rehabilitation professionals treating Spanish-speaking immigrants with TBI. They should be aware of the special issues faced by this population that may impact recovery. For example, they may need assistance identifying and accessing follow-up medical services and other resources. They may need to be reassured that accessing medical care will not result in penalties due to their immigration status. Given that some participants perceive their Spanish language as a barrier to recovery, availability of Spanish-speaking health professionals and Spanish language education materials should be a priority. Faith and positive thinking in this population can be utilized to build resiliency skills when coping with TBI-related difficulties. Professionals should be aware that some immigrants might be leaving situations in their countries of origin that are worse than the consequences of the TBI, and that this context may influence their perception of the TBI and their response to interventions.

In addition, national and state-level brain injury organizations should consider advocating for improved healthcare access for undocumented persons with TBI from Latin America. Forming partnerships with organizations that are dedicated to serving persons from Latin America in the US such as, the UnidosUS and the League of United Latin American Citizens, may be beneficial. Other engagement strategies might include developing Spanish-language educational materials, creating marketing campaigns regarding how to access services, collaborating with community-based organizations (e.g., religious/faith organizations, health centers, and community centers), advertising or special programming on Univision, creating YouTube informational videos, and sharing information on social media platforms. The aforementioned engagement strategies may help bridge the information gap and address the access to care needs of Spanish-speaking US immigrants with TBI.

Limitations

While attempts were made to recruit consecutive TBI admissions to a Neurosurgery intensive care unit, recruitment was conducted at 6 months following injury, and not all Spanish speakers with injury could be located at that time. This created a bias in the sample toward Spanish-speaking immigrants who remained in the United States and had a stable living environment at 6 months after injury. The sample consisted of persons with mostly complicated mild TBI, and the results may not be generalizable to those with moderate to severe TBI. The sample was heterogeneous in terms of their countries of origin and their time in the United States, which may influence their perceptions of the consequences of injury and course of recovery.

Conclusions

Spanish-speaking US Hispanic immigrants held a strong faith and positive outlook after TBI in spite of the significant barriers to recovery. Rehabilitation professionals should be aware of the unique positive and negative perceptions of this population and their limited access to care and resources so that they can tailor referrals and treatments appropriately and develop programs to support creatively their recovery.

One participant nicely summed up the unique experiences of Spanish-speaking immigrants who sustain a TBI in the United States:

“That’s life and God knows why. And here we are struggling in this country because the opportunities in this country aren’t available over there [in our country]. It’s never available there… Here we are struggling for life. And we will continue until we are fine. Let’s see how it goes, God willing. If God wants to take us, let it be.” (P507, male, mild TBI, 6 months post)

Supplementary Material

Supp 1

Implications for Rehabilitation.

  • Spanish-speaking US Hispanic immigrants may experience significant barriers to care following traumatic brain injury (TBI), such as access to rehabilitation services and follow-up care.

  • Rehabilitation professionals should consider the importance of faith and encourage positive thinking and social support when working with Spanish-speaking US Hispanic immigrants on how to cope with TBI-related challenges.

  • Access to Spanish-speaking rehabilitation professionals, translators and Spanish language educational materials could help reduce language-related barriers to recovery among Spanish-speaking US immigrants with TBI.

  • Rehabilitation facilities should develop partnerships with community-based organizations serving the uninsured or underinsured to address the access to rehabilitation and medical needs of Spanish-speaking US immigrants with TBI.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grant #H133B03117 from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) for the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Community Integration of Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury. The contents of this publication were developed under grants from NIDLRR (grant numbers H133B031117, 90DPTB0016, 90DP0028, 90RT5007); National Institute on Aging (NIA grant numbers K01AG065492; P30AG024832; P30AG059301), and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD contract number L60 MD009326). The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this article are those of the authors and should not be construed as an official institutional position or any other federal agency, policy, or decision unless so designated by other official documentation.

The contents of this publication do not necessarily represent the policy of the NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, or the National Institutes of Health, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

We would like to acknowledge Sarah Toombs Smith, PhD, ELS for editing this manuscript. We also would like to recognize and thank, Roxann Grover O’Day, MA, for the design of the thematic framework developed from this work.

Footnotes

Disclosure Statement: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.U.S. Census Bureau PD. Annual Estimates of the Resident Population by Sex, Age, Race, and Hispanic Origin for the United States and States: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018 2019 [updated June 2019; cited 2019 November 19, 2019].
  • 2.Dismuke CE, Gebregziabher M, Yeager D, et al. Racial/Ethnic Differences in Combat- and Non-Combat-Associated Traumatic Brain Injury Severity in the Veterans Health Administration: 2004-2010. Am J Public Health. 2015. Aug;105(8):1696–702. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Arango-Lasprilla JC, Ketchum JM, Lewis AN, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in employment outcomes for persons with traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal investigation 1-5 years after injury. PM R. 2011. Dec;3(12):1083–91. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sander AM, Pappadis MR, Davis LC, et al. Relationship of race/ethnicity and income to community integration following traumatic brain injury: investigation in a non-rehabilitation trauma sample. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;24(1):15–27. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2009-0450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gary KW, Arango-Lasprilla JC, Stevens LF. Do racial/ethnic differences exist in post-injury outcomes after TBI? A comprehensive review of the literature. Brain Inj. 2009. Sep;23(10):775–89. doi: 10.1080/02699050903200563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Arango-Lasprilla JC, Kreutzer JS. Racial and ethnic disparities in functional, psychosocial, and neurobehavioral outcomes after brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010. Mar-Apr;25(2):128–36. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181d36ca3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sander AM, Pappadis MR, Clark AN, et al. Perceptions of community integration in an ethnically diverse sample. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011. Mar-Apr;26(2):158–69. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181e7537e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fernandez A, Rodriguez RA. Undocumented Immigrants and Access to Health Care. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. Apr 1;177(4):536–537. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bazarian JJ, Pope C, McClung J, et al. Ethnic and racial disparities in emergency department care for mild traumatic brain injury. Acad Emerg Med. 2003. Nov;10(11):1209–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cuthbert JP, Corrigan JD, Harrison-Felix C, et al. Factors that predict acute hospitalization discharge disposition for adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011. May;92(5):721–730 e3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meagher AD, Beadles CA, Doorey J, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in discharge to rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2015. Mar;122(3):595–601. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS14187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Arango-Lasprilla JC, Rosenthal M, Deluca J, et al. Functional outcomes from inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: how do Hispanics fare? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007. Jan;88(1):11–8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alban RF, Berry C, Ley E, et al. Does health care insurance affect outcomes after traumatic brain injury? Analysis of the National Trauma Databank. Am Surg. 2010. Oct;76(10):1108–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Englum BR, Villegas C, Bolorunduro O, et al. Racial, ethnic, and insurance status disparities in use of posthospitalization care after trauma. J Am Coll Surg. 2011. Dec;213(6):699–708. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.JM K, Lopez M. Use of Spanish declines among Latinos in major U.S. metros: Pew Research Center; 2017. [updated October 31, 2017; cited 2020 February 27, 2020]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/10/31/use-of-spanish-declines-among-latinos-in-major-u-s-metros/
  • 16.Ortega AN, Fang H, Perez VH, et al. Health care access, use of services, and experiences among undocumented Mexicans and other Latinos. Arch Intern Med. 2007. Nov 26;167(21):2354–60. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.21.2354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Knowlton LM, Morris AM, Tennakoon L, et al. Financial Stability of Level I Trauma Centers Within Safety-Net Hospitals. J Am Coll Surg. 2018. Aug;227(2):172–180. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.03.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Beck TL, Le TK, Henry-Okafor Q, et al. Medical Care for Undocumented Immigrants: National and International Issues. Prim Care. 2017. Mar;44(1):e1–e13. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2016.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Callaghan T, Washburn DJ, Nimmons K, et al. Immigrant health access in Texas: policy, rhetoric, and fear in the Trump era. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019. Jun 5;19(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4167-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Arango-Lasprilla JC. Traumatic brain injury in Spanish-speaking individuals: research findings and clinical implications. Brain Inj. 2012;26(6):801–4. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.655368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jamison L, Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, Wright J. Preliminary investigation of longitudinal sociodemographic, injury and psychosocial characteristics in a group of non-English speaking Latinos with brain injury. Brain Inj. 2012;26(6):805–13. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.655367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lequerica AH, Botticello A, O’Neill J, et al. Relationship Between Hispanic Nativity, Residential Environment, and Productive Activity Among Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: A TBI Model Systems Study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019. Jan/Feb;34(1):E46–E54. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pappadis MR, Sander AM, Struchen MA, et al. Common misconceptions about traumatic brain injury among ethnic minorities with TBI. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011. Jul-Aug;26(4):301–11. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181e7832b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Beadle EJ, Ownsworth T, Fleming J, et al. The Impact of Traumatic Brain Injury on Self-Identity: A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Self-Concept Changes. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016. Mar-Apr;31(2):E12–25. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Polinder S, Haagsma JA, van Klaveren D, et al. Health-related quality of life after TBI: a systematic review of study design, instruments, measurement properties, and outcome. Popul Health Metr. 2015;13:4. doi: 10.1186/s12963-015-0037-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stocchetti N, Zanier ER. Chronic impact of traumatic brain injury on outcome and quality of life: a narrative review. Crit Care. 2016. Jun 21;20(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1318-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vickery CD, Gontkovsky ST, Caroselli JS. Self-concept and quality of life following acquired brain injury: a pilot investigation. Brain Inj. 2005. Aug 20;19(9):657–65. doi: 10.1080/02699050400005218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Levack WM, Kayes NM, Fadyl JK. Experience of recovery and outcome following traumatic brain injury: a metasynthesis of qualitative research. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(12):986–99. doi: 10.3109/09638281003775394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Transaction; 1967. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bernard HR, Wutich A, Ryan GW. Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. SAGE publications; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.NVivo qualitative data analysis software. 10. QSR International Pty Ltd.; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for program evaluation. 1986;1986(30):73–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974. Jul 13;2(7872):81–4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pastorek NJ, Hannay HJ, Contant CS. Prediction of global outcome with acute neuropsychological testing following closed-head injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004. Oct;10(6):807–17. doi: 10.1017/s1355617704106012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shahin H, Gopinath SP, Robertson CS. Influence of alcohol on early Glasgow Coma Scale in head-injured patients. J Trauma. 2010. Nov;69(5):1176–81; discussion 1181. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181edbd47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rundhaug NP, Moen KG, Skandsen T, et al. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: effect of blood alcohol concentration on Glasgow Coma Scale score and relation to computed tomography findings. J Neurosurg. 2015. Jan;122(1):211–8. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS14322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Attride-Stirling J Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research. 2001;1(3):385–405. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Taylor P, Lopez M, Martinez J, et al. V. Politics, Values and Religion. Pew Research Center. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Smart JF, Smart DW. Acceptance of disability and the Mexican American culture. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Clark AN, Sander AM, Pappadis MR, et al. Caregiver characteristics and their relationship to health service utilization in minority patients with first episode stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2010;27(1):95–104. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2010-0584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Waldron-Perrine B, Rapport LJ, Hanks RA, et al. Religion and spirituality in rehabilitation outcomes among individuals with traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2011. May;56(2):107–16. doi: 10.1037/a0023552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Philippus A, Mellick D, O’Neil-Pirozzi T, et al. Impact of religious attendance on psychosocial outcomes for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A NIDILRR funded TBI Model Systems study. Brain Inj. 2016;30(13–14):1605–1611. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1199903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.McColl MA, Bickenbach J, Johnston J, et al. Spiritual issues associated with traumatic-onset disability. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2000;22(12):555–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Polinder S, Haagsma JA, van Klaveren D, et al. Health-related quality of life after TBI: a systematic review of study design, instruments, measurement properties, and outcome. Population health metrics. 2015;13(1):4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dijkers MP. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury: a review of research approaches and findings. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2004;85:21–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Caplan B, Bogner J, Brenner L, et al. The impact of traumatic brain injury on self-identity: A systematic review of the evidence for self-concept changes. Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. 2016;31(2):E12–E25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nochi M Struggling with the labeled self: people with traumatic brain injuries in social settings. Qual Health Res. 1998. Sep;8(5):665–81. doi: 10.1177/104973239800800507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nochi M Reconstructing self-narratives in coping with traumatic brain injury. Soc Sci Med. 2000. Dec;51(12):1795–804. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00111-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wyrick JM, Kalosza BA, Coritsidis GN, et al. Trauma care in a multiethnic population: effects of being undocumented. J Surg Res. 2017. Jun 15;214:145–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Marquez de la Plata C, Hewlitt M, de Oliveira A, et al. Ethnic differences in rehabilitation placement and outcome after TBI. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007. Mar-Apr;22(2):113–21. doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000265099.29436.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gao S, Kumar RG, Wisniewski SR, et al. Disparities in Health Care Utilization of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injuries Are Related to Insurance, Race, and Ethnicity: A Systematic Review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018. May/Jun;33(3):E40–E50. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Budnick HC, Tyroch AH, Milan SA. Ethnic disparities in traumatic brain injury care referral in a Hispanic-majority population. J Surg Res. 2017. Jul;215:231–238. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.03.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kuruvilla R, Raghavan R. Health care for undocumented immigrants in Texas: past, present, and future. Tex Med. 2014. Jul 1;110(7):e1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zuckerman S, Waidmann TA, Lawton E. Undocumented immigrants, left out of health reform, likely to continue to grow as share of the uninsured. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011. Oct;30(10):1997–2004. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Timmins CL. The impact of language barriers on the health care of Latinos in the United States: a review of the literature and guidelines for practice. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2002. Mar-Apr;47(2):80–96. doi: 10.1016/s1526-9523(02)00218-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ram P, Miah FT, Wyrick JM, et al. Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: Ethnicity, Documentation, and Insurance Status. Crit Care Med. 2020. Jan;48(1):31–40. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fuentes A, Schoen C, Kulzer RR, et al. Impact of racial-ethnic minority status and systemic vulnerabilities on time to acute TBI rehabilitation admission in an urban public hospital setting. Rehabilitation psychology. 2019;64(2):229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp 1

RESOURCES