Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2021 Jan 21;59(2):e01763-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01763-20

Method for Specific Identification of the Emerging Zoonotic Pathogen Vibrio vulnificus Lineage 3 (Formerly Biotype 3)

Hector Carmona-Salido a, Naiel Bisharat b, Carmen Amaro a,
Editor: Brad Fenwickc
PMCID: PMC8111150  PMID: 33148703

Vibrio vulnificus is a zoonotic pathogen that is spreading worldwide due to global warming. Lineage 3 (L3; formerly biotype 3) includes the strains of the species with the unique ability to cause fish farm-linked outbreaks of septicemia. The L3 strains emerged recently and are particularly virulent and difficult to identify. Here, we describe a newly developed PCR method based on a comparative genomic study useful for both rapid identification and epidemiological studies of this interesting emerging group.

KEYWORDS: Vibrio vulnificus, biotype 3, septicemia, fish farms, PCR identification, emergent pathogen

ABSTRACT

Vibrio vulnificus is a zoonotic pathogen that is spreading worldwide due to global warming. Lineage 3 (L3; formerly biotype 3) includes the strains of the species with the unique ability to cause fish farm-linked outbreaks of septicemia. The L3 strains emerged recently and are particularly virulent and difficult to identify. Here, we describe a newly developed PCR method based on a comparative genomic study useful for both rapid identification and epidemiological studies of this interesting emerging group. The comparative genomic analysis also revealed the presence of a genetic duplication in the L3 strains that could be related to the unique ability of this lineage to produce septicemia outbreaks.

INTRODUCTION

Vibrio vulnificus is a zoonotic pathogen that inhabits marine and estuarine water ecosystems located in temperate and warm zones (1). Global warming is causing V. vulnificus to spread to new geographic areas around the world (24). For this reason, the species has been proposed as a biological barometer of climate change (5). V. vulnificus can cause septicemia with a high probability of death in immunocompromised patients, especially those with a high iron content in their blood (1, 68). Septicemia is acquired after contact of a wound with seawater or aquatic animals (mainly diseased farmed fish) or after ingestion of raw shellfish (6, 911). Epidemiological data from the United States confirm that both hospitalization and mortality rates associated with V. vulnificus infections are among the highest of all water/foodborne infectious diseases (6, 11). The most complete epidemiological data set on the human diseases caused by V. vulnificus comes from the COVIS system from the United States (https://www.cdc.gov/vibrio/surveillance.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fnationalsurveillance%2Fcholera-vibrio-surveillance.htm).

The species has been classically subdivided into three biotypes (Bts) (12, 13). Bt3 was the last group described and clusters together the only strains of the species associated with fish farm-linked outbreaks of septicemia (13). This biotype emerged in Israel in 1996 and, since then, has remained a major threat to humans handling farmed fish in that country (14, 15), especially during the summer months when water temperature rises (1). Interestingly, there are no reports of human infections caused by Bt3 strains outside Israel. One of the reasons could be that biotyping fails as a consequence of the numerous exceptions to the original biotype descriptions that have been found (16). In fact, the only methods that can clearly distinguish these strains from the rest of the species and from other pathogenic vibrios are genomic-based methods, such as genome sequencing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, or multiple locus sequence typing (MLST), which are costly and time consuming (17).

A new biologically meaningful classification system for V. vulnificus has recently been proposed (18). This new system is based on a phylogenetic analysis of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) present in the core genome of the species and divides V. vulnificus into five well-supported phylogenetic lineages (L). According to this new system, Bt3 isolates belong to L3 and constitute a genetically homogeneous group, clearly distinguishable from the rest (15, 18).

The aim of this work was to design a rapid and sensitive method for the specific identification of V. vulnificus L3. For this purpose, specific L3 markers were sought out by comparing the genomes of representative strains of the main lineages of the species. Once one of them was selected, a new PCR method was designed with two target genes, one for the identification of the species and the other for the identification of the lineage. The new PCR method showed 100% reliability and sensitivity after being tested with more than 200 strains from different origins and lineages. The comparative genomic analysis also revealed the presence of a genetic duplication in the L3 strains that could be related to the unique ability of this lineage to produce septicemia outbreaks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Core genome L3.

We first identified the unique genes of L3. To this end, we downloaded 12 genomes from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) from the three major lineages (18) (Table 1). All genomes were annotated using the software Prokka (19) with default options independently from their assembly level (complete/closed genome or contigs). With the annotation files, the core genome for each lineage was established using Proteinortho (20), using fasta amino file (.faa) from Prokka.

TABLE 1.

List of V. vulnificus strains downloaded from NCBI and used for Proteinortho analysis

Strain Level Lineage Source of isolation ANI (%)a
YJ016 Complete 1 Human blood 96.41
CMCP6 Complete 1 Human blood 96.26
ENV1 Complete 1 Oyster 97.12
FORC016 Complete 1 Human blood 96.39
MO6-24/O Complete 1 Human blood 96.54
CECT4999 Complete 2 Eel 97.17
95-8-161 Contig 2 Eel 97.10
ATCC 27562 Complete 2 Human blood 97.06
NV22 Contig 2 Seawater 97.13
12 Contig 3 Human blood 99.87
BAA87 Contig 3 Human blood 99.86
VVyb1 Contig 3 Human blood
a

Compared with VVyb1.

Briefly, Proteinortho takes several annotated genomes (nucleotides or proteins) and performs a blast-based search for homologies between genomes. It allows the user to obtain a list of homologous genes between strains or species. In our case, we used Proteinortho to search for homologous genes inside L3 and exclusive to this group.

Gene selection and primer design.

Among the unique genes of L3, we chose a gene encoding a protein with a putative function, pgiA. Next, we confirmed by in silico BLASTN (v2.9.0) analysis among the 12 strains that the selected gene was specific to L3 strain genomes and designed primers compatible (similar melting temperature [Tm]) with those specific for the species target gene, vvhA (21). Basically, we searched the area shown in Fig. 1 that corresponds to a part of a hypothetical protein plus pgiA plus a noncoding region. With this information, the primers we designed were 5′-AGCCACTCTCCTGCGAGCAG-3′ and 5′-GAGGTGTGCGAGCGCCGAT-3′.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Schematic representation of pgiAL3 and surrounding genes in the Vvyb1 L3 strain. Each arrow corresponds to a gene detected and annotated with Prokka software. The purple rectangle represents the 834-bp amplified sequence by this PCR method. This sequence is formed by a part of the sequence for a hypothetical protein, pgiAL3, and a part of a noncoding region. HP, hypothetical protein.

After that, we studied the PgiA protein. First, we performed a BLASTP analysis in the NCBI database to look for similar sequences in the database and make sure that the function of the gene corresponds to the one Prokka provided. Besides, we compared the sequence with other Vibrio species.

DNA extraction and PCR conditions.

To make sure the selected gene was only present in L3 strains, we tested all the V. vulnificus strains available in our laboratories (n = 217) coming from different sources (environmental and clinical) and countries and belonging to the five lineages (Fig. 2). The DNA was extracted by resuspending overnight cultures of bacteria in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), boiling them at 100°C for 10 min, and storing them with ice a minimum of 5 min before using them.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Doughnut and pie charts with V. vulnificus sources (n = 217). Most strains were isolated from diseased organisms (clinical). The rest were isolated from environmental or healthy organisms. Percentages in pie charts correspond to the total of strains, whereas percentages in the doughnut correspond to each category.

We established the PCR conditions as follows: 95°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles each at 94°C for 10 s, 55°C for 5 s, and 72°C for 5 s, with a final step of 72°C for 2 min. For PCR revelation, we loaded and ran the PCR-amplified product on a 2% agarose gel with DNA Safe stain for 25 min at 100 V.

RESULTS

To identify the unique genes of L3, we first downloaded representative genomes from the three major lineages. Table 1 shows the genomes used for this purpose, the lineage to which they belong, and the source of isolation and average nucleotide identity (ANI) values compared with those of the VVyb1 strain. Orthologous gene detection was performed by running Proteinortho, and we found that there was a total of 292 genes specific to L3, most of them encoding genes annotated as “hypothetical proteins” by Prokka (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). For the new PCR method, we selected a gene encoding a protein with a putative function, pgiA. Interestingly, we found two similar but different open reading frames (ORFs) annotated as pgiA in the genomes analyzed, one present in all lineages and the other exclusive to L3 (pgiAL3) (Table S1). Furthermore, pgiAL3 is located in the middle of two copies of a DNA segment next to several genes encoding tRNA (Table 2). This duplicated zone putatively encodes lactate uptake and utilization as well as resistance to phospholipase A2 (22, 23).

TABLE 2.

List of identified genes in the vicinity of pgiAL3 and putative functiona

Gene Annotationb Putative function (reference)
lonA ATP-dependent protease La type II Involved in virulence regulation (31)
yejF Putative ABC transporter ATP-binding protein YejF Counteracts antimicrobial peptides (32)
dmlR HTH-type transcriptional regulator DmlR Possible regulator for the operon lutABC (33)
lutP-1 l-Lactate permease Putatively involved in improved growth from lactate (sepsis biomarker) in the blood from septicemic patients (22, 30)
lutA-1 Lactate utilization protein A
lutB-1 Lactate utilization protein B
lutC-1 Lactate utilization protein C
lplT-1 Lysophospholipid transporter LplT Resistance against host phospholipase A2, a sepsis biomarker (23, 29)
pgiAL3 Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase Protease activity (34), molecular mimicry (35)
csy3 CRISPR-associated protein Csy3
lutP-2 l-Lactate permease Putatively involved in improved growth from lactate (sepsis biomarker) in the blood from septicemic patients (22, 30)
lutA-2 Lactate utilization protein A
lutB-2 Lactate utilization protein B
lutC-2 Lactate utilization protein C
lplT-2 Lysophospholipid transporter LplT Resistance against host phospholipase A2, a sepsis biomarker (23, 29)
ompA Outer membrane protein A Serum resistance and pathogenicity (36)
tRNA-Ser(tga)
tRNA-Ser(tga)
tRNA-Phe(gaa)
tRNA-Asn(gtt)
a

Information pertaining specifically to pgiAL3 is in boldface type. Information pertaining to the duplicated genes putatively related to sepsis is underlined.

b

Annotation with Prokka or BLAST (best hit when Prokka annotation was “hypothetical protein”).

After in silico analysis, we isolated the DNA from all V. vulnificus strains available in our laboratories (217 in total). The strains came from different sources and locations (Fig. 2); 66% of them were clinical samples (from humans or animals), whereas 29% came from environmental isolations. We then applied the newly developed PCR method. Figure 3 shows a representative electrophoresis gel for some of the strains used in this study, including L3 and non-L3 strains. For all tested strains, we observed the 519- bp band corresponding to the species-specific gene (vvha) while only the samples from the L3 strains showed the second band, the 834-bp band corresponding to the pgiAL3 gene plus the selected adjacent areas (Fig. 1). No false-positive or -negative result was obtained for any of the 217 strains tested. This result indicated a 100% sensitivity and reliability for the new PCR.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Detection of V. vulnificus L3 by multiplex PCR. The PCR targets the species-specific gene vvha (amplified fragment; 519 bp) and the pgiAL3 plus surrounding zones (see Fig. 1) (amplified fragment, 834 bp). Lanes A to K, L3 strains 12, 32, 97, 162, 1003, 11028, Vvyb1, Yb88, Yb95, V247, and V233. Lanes L and M, non-L3 strains YJ016 (L1) and CECT4999 (L2). N, negative control. Colors were changed to black and white for a better visualization.

DISCUSSION

This paper describes a newly developed PCR method useful for the identification of V. vulnificus L3, the only group of the species that causes septicemia outbreaks linked to fish farms (13). The marker gene for the identification of L3 was selected after comparing the genomes of representative strains of the main phylogenetic lineages of the species. The PCR was then designed and validated with more than 200 V. vulnificus strains belonging to the five lineages described, as well as some others that are yet to be analyzed. It should be noted that the new PCR method showed 100% reliability and sensitivity, which makes it a powerful tool not only in diagnosis but also in taxonomic and epidemiological studies. Interestingly, L3 has only been reported in Israel. Applying this methodology to clinical and environmental samples (fish, water, and shellfish), it would be possible to know whether this lineage is present only in Israel or has spread to other geographical areas, which would help to understand the epidemiology of the species (6). In recent years, increases in both the number of V. vulnificus strains present in coastal waters and clinical cases of human vibriosis have been reported worldwide (4, 7, 24, 25). These increases have been linked to global warming. In this scenario, rapid and sensitive detection methods, such as this new PCR, will be the key to identifying and preventing present and future outbreaks due to the species and, in particular, to this lineage.

The selected marker gene has turned out to be a variant of the pgiA gene, two variants being present in the L3 strains. Probably, pgiAL3 has been acquired by horizontal gene transfer from other Vibrio species, since the protein has a great similarity with other Vibrio PgiA (for example, V. aestuarianus; similarity, 90.37%). Remarkably, pgiAL3 is located in the middle of two copies of a putative genomic island, as suggested by the size of the fragment (11 kb) and the vicinity of genes encoding tRNA (26, 27). The putative island encodes lactate uptake (lutP) and utilization (lutABC) as well as for resistance to phospholipase A2 (lplT) (22, 23). Interestingly, both lactate and phospholipase A2 are considered biomarkers of sepsis, because their levels in the plasma of patients with sepsis have been suggested to predict mortality (2830). Therefore, the presence of this duplicated putative genomic island could be related to the ability of L3 to cause septicemia outbreaks (13). Further studies are under way to find out the relevance of this hypothetic island in the virulence and abilities of L3. Finally, the application of the designed PCR in any clinical and research laboratory would allow researchers to not only diagnose cases of disease due to L3 but also understand the epidemiology of the lineage and the species, especially in a changing environment due to global warming.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file 1
JCM.01763-20-s0001.pdf (241.8KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was financed by grants AGL2017-87723-P (Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades [Spain] plus FEDER funds) and AICO/2020/076 (Generalitat Valenciana [Spain]). Héctor Carmona-Salido has been supported by the FPI grant PRE2018-083819 (Ministerio de Ciencia, Inovación y Universidades [Spain]).

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hernández‐Cabanyero C, Amaro C. 2020. Phylogeny and life cycle of the zoonotic pathogen Vibrio vulnificus. Environ Microbiol 22:4133–4148. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Paz S, Bisharat N, Paz E, Kidar O, Cohen D. 2007. Climate change and the emergence of Vibrio vulnificus disease in Israel. Environ Res 103:390–396. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Martinez-Urtaza J, Bowers JC, Trinanes J, DePaola A. 2010. Climate anomalies and the increasing risk of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus illnesses. Food Res Int 43:1780–1790. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Böer SI, Heinemeyer E-A, Luden K, Erler R, Gerdts G, Janssen F, Brennholt N. 2013. Temporal and spatial distribution patterns of potentially pathogenic Vibrio spp. at recreational beaches of the German North Sea. Microb Ecol 65:1052–1067. doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0221-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baker-Austin C, Trinanes J, Gonzalez-Escalona N, Martinez-Urtaza J. 2017. Non-cholera vibrios: the microbial barometer of climate change. Trends Microbiol 25:76–84. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Oliver JD. 2006. Vibrio vulnificus, p 349–366. In Thompson FL, Austin B, Swings J (ed), The biology of vibrios. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baker-Austin C, Oliver JD. 2018. Vibrio vulnificus: new insights into a deadly opportunistic pathogen. Environ Microbiol 20:423–430. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ceccarelli D, Amaro C, Romalde JL, Suffredini E, Vezzulli L. 2019. Vibrio Species, p 347–388. In Doyle MP, Diez-Gonzalez F, Hill C. (ed), Food microbiology. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dalsgaard A, Frimodt-Møller N, Bruun B, Høi L, Larsen JL. 1996. Clinical manifestations and molecular epidemiology of Vibrio vulnificus infections in Denmark. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 15:227–232. doi: 10.1007/BF01591359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Amaro C, Biosca EG. 1996. Vibrio vulnificus biotype 2, pathogenic for eels, is also an opportunistic pathogen for humans. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:1454–1457. doi: 10.1128/AEM.62.4.1454-1457.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Oliver JD. 2015. The biology of Vibrio vulnificus. Microbiol Spectr 3:VE-0001-2014. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.VE-0001-2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tison DL, Nishibuchi M, Greenwood JD, Seidler RJ. 1982. Vibrio vulnificus biogroup 2: new biogroup pathogenic for eels. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:640–646. doi: 10.1128/AEM.44.3.640-646.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bisharat N, Agmon V, Finkelstein R, Raz R, Ben-Dror G, Lerner L, Soboh S, Colodner R, Cameron DN, Wykstra DL, Swerdlow DL, Farmer J. 1999. Clinical, epidemiological, and microbiological features of Vibrio vulnificus biogroup 3 causing outbreaks of wound infection and bacteraemia in Israel. Lancet 354:1421–1424. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02471-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zaidenstein R, Sadik C, Lerner L, Valinsky L, Kopelowitz J, Yishai R, Agmon V, Parsons M, Bopp C, Weinberger M. 2008. Clinical characteristics and molecular subtyping of Vibrio vulnificus illnesses. Emerg Infect Dis 14:1875–1882. doi: 10.3201/eid1412.080499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bisharat N, Koton Y, Oliver JD. 2020. Phylogeography of the marine pathogen, Vibrio vulnificus, revealed the ancestral scenarios of its evolution. Microbiologyopen 9:e1103. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sanjuán E, Fouz B, Oliver JD, Amaro C. 2009. Evaluation of genotypic and phenotypic methods to distinguish clinical from environmental Vibrio vulnificus strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1604–1613. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01594-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bisharat N, Cohen DI, Harding RM, Falush D, Crook DW, Peto T, Maiden MC. 2005. Hybrid Vibrio vulnificus. Emerg Infect Dis 11:30–35. doi: 10.3201/eid1101.040440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roig FJ, González-Candelas F, Sanjuán E, Fouz B, Feil EJ, Llorens C, Baker-Austin C, Oliver JD, Danin-Poleg Y, Gibas CJ, Kashi Y, Gulig PA, Morrison SS, Amaro C. 2018. Phylogeny of Vibrio vulnificus from the analysis of the core-genome: implications for intra-species taxonomy. Front Microbiol 8:2613. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lechner M, Findeiss S, Steiner L, Marz M, Stadler PF, Prohaska SJ. 2011. Proteinortho: detection of (Co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 12:124. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Morris JG, Wright AC, Roberts DM, Wood PK, Simpson LM, Oliver JD. 1987. Identification of environmental Vibrio vulnificus isolates with a DNA probe for the cytotoxin-hemolysin gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:193–195. doi: 10.1128/AEM.53.1.193-195.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chai Y, Kolter R, Losick R. 2009. A widely conserved gene cluster required for lactate utilization in Bacillus subtilis and its involvement in biofilm formation. J Bacteriol 191:2423–2430. doi: 10.1128/JB.01464-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lin Y, Bogdanov M, Lu S, Guan Z, Margolin W, Weiss J, Zheng L. 2018. The phospholipid-repair system LplT/Aas in Gram-negative bacteria protects the bacterial membrane envelope from host phospholipase A2 attack. J Biol Chem 293:3386–3398. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Baker-Austin C, Trinanes JA, Taylor NGH, Hartnell R, Siitonen A, Martinez-Urtaza J. 2013. Emerging Vibrio risk at high latitudes in response to ocean warming. Nat Clim Chang 3:73–77. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1628. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Deeb R, Tufford D, Scott GI, Moore JG, Dow K. 2018. Impact of climate change on Vibrio vulnificus abundance and exposure risk. Estuaries Coast 41:2289–2303. doi: 10.1007/s12237-018-0424-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hou Y-M. 1999. Transfer RNAs and pathogenicity islands. Trends Biochem Sci 24:295–298. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01428-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Williams KP. 2002. Integration sites for genetic elements in prokaryotic tRNA and tmRNA genes: sublocation preference of integrase subfamilies. Nucleic Acids Res 30:866–875. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.4.866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tappy L, Chioléro R. 2007. Substrate utilization in sepsis and multiple organ failure. Crit Care Med 35:S531–S534. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000278062.28122.A4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tan TL, Goh YY. 2017. The role of group IIA secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2-IIA) as a biomarker for the diagnosis of sepsis and bacterial infection in adults—a systematic review. PLoS One 12:e0180554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ryoo SM, Lee J, Lee Y-S, Lee JH, Lim KS, Huh JW, Hong S-B, Lim C-M, Koh Y, Kim WY. 2018. Lactate level versus lactate clearance for predicting mortality in patients with septic shock defined by sepsis-3. Crit Care Med 46:e489–e495. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rogers A, Townsley L, Gallego-Hernandez AL, Beyhan S, Kwuan L, Yildiz FH. 2016. The LonA protease regulates biofilm formation, motility, virulence, and the type VI secretion system in Vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol 198:973–985. doi: 10.1128/JB.00741-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Eswarappa SM, Panguluri KK, Hensel M, Chakravortty D. 2008. The yejABEF operon of Salmonella confers resistance to antimicrobial peptides and contributes to its virulence. Microbiology (Reading) 154:666–678. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/011114-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chiu KC, Lin CJ, Shaw GC. 2014. Transcriptional regulation of the l-lactate permease gene lutP by the LutR repressor of Bacillus subtilis RO-NN-1. Microbiology (Reading) 160:2178–2189. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.079806-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Richards GP, Hammer CH, Garfield MK, Parveen S. 2004. Characterization of a lysyl aminopeptidase activity associated with phosphoglucose isomerase of Vibrio vulnificus. Biochim Biophys Acta 1700:219–229. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2004.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Alam J, Kim YC, Choi Y. 2014. Potential role of bacterial infection in autoimmune diseases: a new aspect of molecular mimicry. Immune Netw 14:7–13. doi: 10.4110/in.2014.14.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Weiser JN, Gotschlich EC. 1991. Outer membrane protein A (OmpA) contributes to serum resistance and pathogenicity of Escherichia coli K-1. Infect Immun 59:2252–2258. doi: 10.1128/IAI.59.7.2252-2258.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1
JCM.01763-20-s0001.pdf (241.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES