Skip to main content
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2021 May;51(6):471–480. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.11.007

Evidence of population structuring following population genetic analyses of Fasciola hepatica from Argentina

Nicola J Beesley a,, Elizabeth Attree a, Severo Vázquez-Prieto b,c,, Román Vilas d, Esperanza Paniagua e,f, Florencio M Ubeira e,f, Oscar Jensen g, Cesar Pruzzo h, José D Álvarez i, Jorge Bruno Malandrini j, Hugo Solana k, Jane E Hodgkinson a
PMCID: PMC8113023  PMID: 33581141

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name ga1.jpg

Keywords: Fasciola hepatica, Population genetics, Population structure, Clones, Argentina

Highlights

  • 320 Argentinian Fasciola hepatica were genotyped using a panel of microsatellites.

  • Overall there was high genotypic richness: 263 distinct genotypes were identified.

  • Population structuring of F. hepatica was evident across Argentina.

  • Within these sub-populations there is largely random mating.

  • Transmission of clonemates occurs: clonal parasites accounted for 26.6% of all parasites.

Abstract

Fasciola hepatica, the liver fluke, is a trematode parasite that causes disease of economic importance in livestock. As a zoonosis this parasite also poses a risk to human health in areas where it is endemic. Population genetic studies can reveal the mechanisms responsible for genetic structuring (non-panmixia) within parasite populations and provide valuable insights into population dynamics, which in turn enables theoretical predictions of evolutionary dynamics such as the evolution of drug resistance. Here we genotyped 320 F. hepatica collected from 14 definitive hosts from four provinces in Argentina. STRUCTURE analysis indicated three population clusters, and principal coordinate analysis confirmed this, showing population clustering across provinces. Similarly, pairwise FST values amongst all four provinces were significant, with standardised pairwise FST (F′ST) ranging from 0.0754 to 0.6327. Therefore, population genetic structure was evident across these four provinces in Argentina. However, there was no evidence of deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, so it appears that within these sub-populations there is largely random mating. We identified 263 unique genotypes, which gave a clonal diversity of 82%. Parasites with identical genotypes, clones, accounted for 26.6% of the parasites studied and were found in 12 of the 14 hosts studied, suggesting some clonemate transmission.

1. Introduction

The digenean trematode parasite, Fasciola hepatica, causes disease of economic importance in livestock worldwide (Mezo et al., 2011). An estimated 250 million sheep and 350 million cattle are at risk of infection (Hillyer and Apt, 1997). As a zoonosis, infection with F. hepatica is recognised as a neglected tropical disease by the World Health Organisation. Human infection is endemic in parts of South America, western Europe and Iran (Mas-Coma, 2005; World Health Organisation, 2007). In Argentina, prevalence of fasciolosis in cattle, based on the presence of eggs in faeces, has been reported to be as high as 77% (Moriena et al., 2004) and human endemic areas of fasciolosis have been detected in Argentina (Bargues et al., 2016). Drug resistance in F. hepatica is a substantial threat to the control of this parasite, in particular for the highly effective drug, triclabendazole (Kelley et al., 2016, Fairweather et al., 2020). Resistance was first reported in Australia more than two decades ago (Overend and Bowen, 1995) and is now widespread, including in Argentina (Olaechea et al., 2011), however we do not know the evolutionary dynamics of drug resistance development in F. hepatica. Population genetic studies can reveal the mechanisms responsible for genetic structuring (non-panmixia) within parasite populations and provide insights into population dynamics, which in turn enables theoretical predictions of evolutionary dynamics such as the evolution of drug resistance (Cornell et al., 2003, Schwab et al., 2006, Gorton et al., 2012).

Several studies exploring genetic structuring in populations of digenean trematodes have provided insights into life history characteristics such as modes of reproduction, life cycle patterns, use of multiple host species, and population sizes; and provide a useful basis to further understand the underlying mechanisms that may influence population structure in F. hepatica. In parasites with exclusively aquatic life cycles, it was proposed that the aquatic environment represents an ideal opportunity for dispersal and random mixing of parasites prior to infection of the definitive host, thus promoting panmixia and reducing co-transmission of clonemates generated by asexual reproduction in the intermediate host (a mollusc) (Criscione and Blouin, 2006). Empirical data has been generated that provides support for this theory, most often by studying the second intermediate host of different trematode parasites (e.g Maritrema novaezealandensis, Keeney et al., 2007a, Keeney et al., 2007b; Coitocaecum parvum, Lagrue et al., 2009; Gymnophallus sp., Leung et al., 2009; and Proctoeces cf. lintoni, Valdivia et al., 2014) and sometimes, the definitive host (e.g Lecithochirium fusiforme, Criscione et al., 2011). Fasciola hepatica, together with Schistosoma mansoni, are semi-terrestrial trematode/host systems, with one intermediate host (snail) and display reduced opportunity for dispersion of parasites as cercariae produced from asexual reproduction in the snail either infect the definitive host directly (Schistosoma spp.) or via vegetation (F. hepatica, as encysted metacercariae). There is evidence that such systems demonstrate low clonal diversities of 85% (305 of 360) and 80% (284 of 357) for S. mansoni parasites (Prugnolle et al., 2002, Prugnolle et al., 2004). A recent study in the trematode Dicrocoelium dendriticum (land snail-ant-ungulate) revealed the lowest clonal diversity for any trematode to date, with only 54 of 272 (19.9%) genotypes being unique. This observation was consistent with the restricted movements of the snails and ants under investigation, and the likely localised adherence of the slime balls, containing the cercariae, that infect the ant (Criscione et al., 2020). Appreciating the geographical scale over which studies are conducted facilitates their interpretation. For example, study of the snail intermediate host of the three-host trematode Diplostomum pseudospathacerum (snail-fish-bird), showed no genetic structure of parasites infecting snails over a large geographic range (>300 km), which the authors attributed to mitigation of any local effects of the snail, due to dispersion of the parasite by the highly motile bird definitive host (Louhi et al., 2010), whilst comparison of the three-host trematodes (two hosts of which are shared), Coitocaecum parvum and Stegodexamene anguillae, showed that population structures were dependent on the dispersal abilities of the most mobile host (a fish and an eel, respectively) (Blasco-Costa et al., 2012).

To appreciate the opportunities for disruption of panmixia and the role of random versus non-random transmission in F. hepatica, one has to consider the life cycle and dispersal of free-living stages (Gorton et al., 2012). Eggs are passed in the faeces of their definitive hosts; an individual parasite produces large numbers of eggs (up to 25,000 eggs per adult per day, Happich and Boray, 1969), which may or may not mix in the gallbladder prior to passing out in the faeces (Fairweather, 2011). The miracidium that hatches from the egg is motile and moves rapidly in localised water sources, but is relatively short lived and will die within a few hours if it does not penetrate the (semi-terrestrial) mud snail (typically Galba spp.) (Smith and Grenfell, 1984). Following the asexual development (effectively clonal expansion) that takes place within the snail (Thomas, 1883, Krull, 1941, Hodgkinson et al., 2018), the cercariae that are subsequently shed may have little opportunity for mixing as they rapidly encyst on vegetation, possibly aggregated in small clumps (Abrous et al., 2001). Therefore, it is possible that the transmission of parasites from asexual reproduction to the definitive host occurs over small scales, leading to the possibility of localised co-transmission of clonemates. Indications of clumped clonal transmission in sheep infrapopulations on a farm was reported by Vilas et al. (2012), with additional evidence for non-random transmission from the definitive to snail hosts, although higher clonal diversities ranging from 89-98% were also observed (Vilas et al., 2012, Beesley et al., 2017, Howell et al., 2020). There is some suggestion that infected Galba truncatula may disperse more and have higher dispersal survival than uninfected snails, however the authors considered it more likely that they were observing increased susceptibility of immigrant snails compared with local snail populations (Correa et al., 2017).

It is likely that, due to local and global movements of livestock and humans, the definitive host is the most mobile host, with the greatest opportunity for parasite mixing in F. hepatica, although this remains untested and is very much dependent on the extent of movement within countries and regions. For example, the median movement distance of cattle from one farm to another in Argentina is 140 km (range 9–2137 km), with most movements occurring within the same region (Aznar et al., 2011). Whilst existing studies provide some insight into genetic structuring in F. hepatica (Morozova et al., 2004, Semyenova et al., 2006, Walker et al., 2007, Walker et al., 2011, Teofanova et al., 2011, Vilas et al., 2012, Elliott et al., 2014, Thang et al., 2020), some studies lack power, or provide limited opportunities to infer life history characteristics. Given its complex life cycle, there is a need for extensive analysis of population genetic structure in F. hepatica. Here, we are interested in understanding population genetic structuring (disruption of panmixia) at a geographical level, determining the extent of clonal transmission, and identifying if there is evidence to support random (or non-random) mating at a local level within livestock, predominantly cattle, in Argentina.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Populations of F. hepatica

A total of 338 adults of F. hepatica were collected from the livers of 14 naturally infected individual hosts, 11 cattle (n = 258), two sheep (n = 49) and one foal (n = 31), between April and September 2016 from four provinces in Argentina (Fig. 1). The animal identification, host species, number of parasites, and geographical origins are listed in Table 1; parasites collected from animals originating from the same farm have the same farm number. Parasites from each host were collected in plastic containers (Sigma-Aldrich, Spain), washed extensively in physiological saline (PanReac AppliChem, Spain) and fixed in 95% ethanol (Roche, Switzerland) until extraction of genomic DNA.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Provincial map of Argentina detailing the locations of sampling sites. Labels match those listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Fasciola hepatica populations collected from sheep, cattle and a horse in Argentina.

Animal ID Host No. of parasitesa Farm No. Locality Province
ANC Cow 14 (14) 1 Ancasti, Departamento Ancasti Catamarca
TLR Cow 13 (13) 2 Telaritos, Departamento Capayán Catamarca
ARSOV Sheep 24 (24) 3 Alto Río Senguer, Departamento Río Senguer Chubut
DOP Cow 14 (13) 4 Dorama Oporto, Departamento de Sarmiento Chubut
GL1 Cow 12 (6) 5 Granja Lloyd, Departamento de Sarmiento Chubut
GL2 Cow 20 (20) 5 Granja Lloyd, Departamento de Sarmiento Chubut
GLOV Sheep 25 (23) 5 Granja Lloyd, Departamento de Sarmiento Chubut
SPCH Cow 20 (18) 6 Colhué Huapi, Departamento de Sarmiento Chubut
SVCH Foal 31 (31) 7 Colhué Huapi, Departamento de Sarmiento Chubut
BA1 Cow 28 (27) 8 Berón de Astrada Corrientes
BA2 Cow 37 (35) 8 Berón de Astrada Corrientes
RT1 Cow 12 (12) 9/10b Rosario del Tala Entre Ríos
RT2 Cow 48 (45) 9/10b Rosario del Tala Entre Ríos
RT3 Cow 40 (39) 9/10b Rosario del Tala Entre Ríos

aNumber of parasites successfully genotyped at Fh_2, Fh_5, Fh_6, Fh_10, Fh_11, Fh_12, Fh_13 and Fh_15, and used in subsequent analyses, is shown in parentheses

bParasites from Rosario del Tala were collected from two farms from the same locality; information on which animals originated from which farm was not available

2.2. Generation of a multilocus genotype (MLG)

In order to avoid contamination with eggs or sperm, a small section of each parasite anterior to the ventral sucker was used for DNA extraction. Samples were lysed in 300 μl of SSTNE extraction buffer (Blanquer, 1990. Phylogeographie intraspecifique d’un poisson marin, le flet Platichthys flesus L. (Heterosomata). Polymorphisme des marqueurs nucleaires et mitochondriaux. PhD thesis, University of Montpellier, France, for the preparation of 1L extraction buffer solution: 17.532 g of NaCl (PanReac AppliChem), 6.055 g of Tris (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 ml of EDTA 0.2 M (Sigma-Aldrich), 76.08 mg of EGTA (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 ml of spermidine (363 mg/5 ml H20, −20 °C, Sigma-Aldrich), 1 ml of spermine (261 mg/5 mL H20, −20 °C, Sigma-Aldrich), autoclave and store at −4°C) plus sodium dodecyl sulphate (0.1%, PanReac AppliChem) and 5 μl of proteinase K (20 mg/ml, Roche) for 3 h at 55 °C. After 20 min at 70 °C, samples were treated with 7.5 μl of RNase (10 mg/ml, Promega, Spain) for 1 h at 37 °C for RNA degradation. Total DNA was purified after protein precipitation (5 M NaCl) with freezing absolute ethanol (1 ml, Roche).

Each of the 338 F. hepatica samples (Table 1) was subjected to PCR and subsequent capillary electrophoresis to amplify a panel of 15 microsatellites (Cwiklinski et al., 2015). This panel has been used for population genetic analyses of F. hepatica from Great Britain (Beesley et al., 2017). PCR and capillary electrophoresis were carried out as described previously (Cwiklinski et al., 2015, Beesley et al., 2017), with the following modifications: (i) PCR products were diluted 50-fold prior to multiplexing 1 μl with 8.8 μl of formamide (Applied Biosystems, UK) and 0.2 μl of GeneScan 600 LIZ dye size standard v2.0 (Applied Biosystems) and (ii) the capillary sequencer used was an ABI 3500XL genetic analyser (Applied Biosystems) and fragment sizes were determined using 3500 Series Data Collection software 3.1 (Applied Biosystems).

2.3. Population genetic analyses

Allele calling from the electropherograms was successful for nine loci in the majority (92.9%) of parasites (Supplementary Table S1). Locus Fh_8 was excluded from analyses as we suspected the presence of null alleles. Any parasites with missing data at the other loci were also excluded. This left 320 parasites with an eight locus (Fh_2, Fh_5, Fh_6, Fh_10, Fh_11, Fh_12, Fh_13 and Fh_15) MLG for subsequent analyses (Table 1; Supplementary Table S1).

GenClone 2.0 (Arnaud-Haond and Belkhir, 2007, available from https://wwz.ifremer.fr/clonix/Logiciels/GenClone-2.0) was used to identify multicopy MLGs and calculate corresponding Psex values, adjusted using FIS values (Parks and Werth, 1993). Psex is the probability of observing n copies of an MLG in a sample size of N given sexual reproduction. If Psex < 0.05 at n = 2 then all copies of that MLG can be considered to be a product of asexual reproduction (Gregorius, 2005). Before calculating Psex values, preliminary analyses (STRUCTURE, principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and pairwise FST – see below) were untaken to assess the population structure and decide at which sub-population level to assess Psex. For these preliminary analyses, all multicopy MLGs (≥2 parasites sharing an identical MLG based on eight loci) were initially assumed to be clonemates and to have arisen from asexual reproduction within the snail, and thus were reduced to one instance (261 parasites). The preliminary analyses indicated that Psex should be assessed at the province level. Following analysis of Psex, only multicopy MLGs with a Psex < 0.05 (i.e. those that were statistically significant) were reduced to one instance (263 parasites). Genotypic richness (Dorken and Eckert, 2001) was calculated for each province using the formula (G – 1)/(N – 1) [where G = the number of unique MLGs and N = the number of individuals]. The dataset of 263 parasites was used for the remaining analyses: STRUCTURE, PCoA, pairwise FST, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, linkage disequilibrium, gene diversity.

STRUCTURE 2.3.4 (Pritchard et al., 2000, available from http://web.stanford.edu/group/pritchardlab/structure.html) was used to detect population structure. We trialled a number of different settings as suggested by Wang (2017). For the ancestry model, the admixture model was chosen which allows for individuals having mixed ancestry. As well as the default settings (uniform prior, same ALPHA for all populations, and an initial ALPHA value of 1) we also tested the alternative prior, allowed ALPHA to vary for each population, and reduced the initial ALPHA value to 1/K (0.0714). For the allele frequency model, we trialled both correlated and independent allele frequencies among populations (Wang, 2017). To determine the most appropriate value for K, STRUCTURE HARVESTER (Earl and vonHoldt, 2012, available from http://taylor0.biology.ucla.edu/structureHarvester/) was used to interrogate the results and calculate the mean and standard deviation Ln probability for each value of K. All the settings showed similar results with the mean of the estimated Ln probability peaking at the same value of K (Pritchard et al., 2000). We present the settings with the highest peak: admixture model (alternative prior, ALPHA allowed to vary for each population, and an initial value of ALPHA of 0.0714) with the correlated allele frequency model. Burn-in length was set at 500,000 and followed by 100,000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo repeats. K was set at 1 to 14 (the number of animals) and repeated 20 times. Results were plotted in R 3.6.1 (available from http://www.R-project.org/), using ggplot2 (Wickham, 2016).

We also assessed population structure using a multivariate method, PCoA, in Genalex v6.51b2 (Peakall and Smouse, 2006, Peakall and Smouse, 2012). A pairwise genetic distance matrix between each individual parasite was calculated and then PCoA was performed using the standardised covariance method. Pairwise FST values between parasites from the different provinces and corresponding P values were calculated using FSTAT 2.9.3.2 (Goudet, 1995, available from https://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm) and Arlequin 3.5.1.3 (Excoffier and Lischer, 2010 available from http://cmpg.unibe.ch/software/arlequin35/). Multiple comparisons were addressed using the sequential Bonferroni method (Holm, 1979). Since high within-population genetic diversity will reduce the maximum value that FST can reach, FST was standardised (F′ST) using RecodeData (Meirmans, 2006, available from http://www.patrickmeirmans.com). The initial FST was divided by the maximum value of FST given the present within-population variance (Meirmans and Hedrick, 2011).

The number of different alleles and genotypes at each locus was calculated within each province and globally using GENEPOP 4.2.1 (Rousset, 2008, available from http://kimura.univ-montp2.fr/~rousset/Genepop.htm). Gene diversity was calculated using FSTAT 2.9.3.2 (Goudet, 1995); values were averaged across all loci for each province. To determine if there were deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, FIS and a corresponding one-tailed P value were calculated across all loci for each province using FSTAT 2.9.3.2 (Goudet, 1995). Unphased pairwise linkage disequilibrium tests for all pairs of loci in each province were performed using Arlequin 3.5.1.3 (Excoffier and Lischer, 2010). The number of permutations was set at 20,000 and the number of initial conditions for the Expectation Maximisation (EM) algorithm was set at five. There are 28 pairs of loci to test within each province; if four or more of these are significant (P < 0.05) this would be a sign that there is some level of linkage disequilibrium (cumulative binomial probability = 0.049; Waples, 2015).

Ethical approval

Adult F. hepatica samples were recovered during post mortem examination of slaughtered animals by veterinary officers. No experiment was conducted on live animals. Ethical approval was not required under national laws of Argentina.

2.5. Data availability

Data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article. Genotypes from all parasites are available in Supplementary Table S1. Raw data is available from the corresponding author on request.

3. Results

3.1. Evidence of population structure of F. hepatica collected across Argentina

STRUCTURE, PCoA and pairwise FST all support the conclusion that there is population structuring of F. hepatica across these four provinces of Argentina. STRUCTURE analysis indicates K = 3 as the most likely number of population clusters; this is the value of K at which the mean estimated Ln probability peaks (−6728.3; S.D. = 1.76) and plateaus (Pritchard et al., 2000; Fig. 2A). The iteration with the highest estimated Ln probability was chosen and a bar plot produced of the population clusters (Fig. 2B). There is strong clustering by region: parasites from Corrientes, parasites from Entre Ríos and parasites from Catamarca and Chubut. Similarly, PCoA analysis (Fig. 3) indicates population structure; this is particularly evident in parasites from Corrientes, however parasites from Chubut and Entre Ríos also show separation on axis 2 (Fig. 3). Further support for the STRUCTURE and PCoA analyses is seen based on pairwise FST, with parasites from Corrientes showing the greatest differentiation. Furthermore, pairwise FST values amongst the four regions were significant (Table 2). When FST was standardised (F′ST; Table 3) genetic differentiation was apparent amongst all four regions, with the values largely consistent with results from STRUCTURE and PCoA.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Results from Structure 2.3.4 (Pritchard et al., 2000), the admixture model (alternative prior, ALPHA allowed to vary for each population and an initial value of ALPHA of 0.0714) with the correlated allele frequency model was run 20 times for K = 1 to 14. Burn-in length was 500,000 followed by 100,000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo repeats. (A) The mean ± standard deviation of the estimated Ln probability is plotted for each value of K. The peak is at K = 3. (B) Bar plot from Structure 2.3.4 for K = 3. Results are grouped by province. There is strong clustering by region: parasites from Corrientes, parasites from Entre Ríos, and parasites from Catamarca and Chubut.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Result of principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on a pairwise genetic distance matrix between each individual parasite and the standardised covariance method was performed in Genalex v6.51b2 (Peakall and Smouse, 2006, Peakall and Smouse, 2012). PCoA analysis also shows population structure; this is particularly evident in parasites from Corrientes (triangles), however parasites from Chubut (squares) and Entre Ríos (circles) also show separation on axis 2.

Table 2.

Pairwise FST results and corresponding P values between Fasciola hepatica parasites from each province studied in Argentina.

Province Catamarca Chubut Corrientes Entre Rios
Catamarca 0 0.0030 0.0000 0.0000
Chubut 0.0200 a 0 0.0000 0.0000
Corrientes 0.3471 a 0.2666 a 0 0.0000
Entre Rios 0.0350 a 0.0339 a 0.2897 a 0

FST values are below the diagonal and P values are above the diagonal.

aSignificant differences based on the sequential Bonferroni method (Holm, 1979).

Table 3.

Standardised pairwise FST (F′ST) results between Fasciola hepatica parasites from each province studied in Argentina.

Province Catamarca Chubut Corrientes Entre Rios
Catamarca 0
Chubut 0.0754 0
Corrientes 0.6327 0.5890 0
Entre Rios 0.1309 0.1289 0.6301 0

F′ST were calculated by dividing the initial FST by the maximum value of FST given the present within-population variance (Meirmans and Hedrick, 2011).

3.2. Genetically identical parasites (clones) were identified in F. hepatica from Argentina

We identified 263 distinct MLGs; with 28 of these MLGs identified more than once (Table 4). Initial analyses revealed 261 distinct MLGs and 30 multicopy MLGs, but following analyses of Psex at the regional level, two multicopy MLGs from Corrientes were found to have Psex > 0.05 at n = 2 (Psex = 0.291 for MLG143 and MLG149; Psex = 0.297 for MLG157 and MLG163; Supplementary Table S1). These MLGs were therefore likely to have arisen from sexual reproduction rather than asexual reproduction i.e. these were not clonemates. The remaining Psex values were significant at n = 2, and ranged from 9.43 × 10−7 to 1.96 × 10−12 in Catamarca, 9.49 × 10−7 to 1.01 × 10−12 in Chubut, 0.00479 in Corrientes, and 3.49 × 10−8 to 7.13 × 10−10 in Entre Ríos. This supports the conclusion that the majority of multicopy MLGs represent parasites that arise from asexual reproduction during the clonal expansion within the snail intermediate host i.e. the majority are clonemates. Overall values for genotypic richness, a measure of the number of distinct MLGs, ranged from 0.615 to 0.984.

Table 4.

Summary statistics following population genetic analyses of Fasciola hepatica across four regions of Argentina.

Parameter Province
All locations
Catamarca Chubut Corrientes Entre Ríos
No. of parasites successfully genotyped 27 135 62 96 320
No. of alleles Fh_2 11 19 6 19 23
Fh_5 10 22 4 13 25
Fh_6 14 24 4 23 29
Fh_10 9 10 2 10 11
Fh_11 9 11 2 9 11
Fh_12 5 11 6 8 12
Fh_13 5 6 3 3 7
Fh_15 5 9 1 7 9
No. of genotypes Fh_2 15 49 11 52 94
Fh_5 13 50 4 35 74
Fh_6 13 62 5 64 116
Fh_10 10 24 3 39 46
Fh_11 14 27 3 25 38
Fh_12 7 23 13 16 32
Fh_13 8 11 3 6 12
Fh_15 5 16 1 9 17
No. of distinct MLGs 17 98 61 87 263
No. of multicopy MLGs a 6 15 1 6 28
No. of clones a 16 52 2 15 85
Genotypic richness b, c 0.615 0.726 0.984 0.905 ND
Gene diversity b, d 0.728 0.739 0.310 0.735 ND
FIS (P value) b 0.010 (0.4734) 0.009 (0.2859) 0.041 (0.2063) 0.027 (0.0797) ND
No. of loci pairs showing LD (P value < 0.05) b, e 2 3 0 2 ND

aOnly multicopy multilocus genotypes (MLGs) with Psex values < 0.05 at n = 2 (i.e. clonemates) are included in these counts.

bMulticopy MLGs with Psex values < 0.05 at n = 2 (i.e. clonemates) were reduced to one instance for these analyses (263 parasites).

cGenotypic richness was calculated using the formula (G – 1)/(N – 1) [where G = the number of unique MLGs and N = the number of individuals] (Dorken and Eckert, 2001).

dGene diversity was averaged across loci.

eLinkage disequilibrium (LD) was assessed by performing pairwise tests for all 28 pairs of loci. If four or more of these were significant (P < 0.05) this would be a sign that there was some level of linkage disequilibrium (cumulative binomial probability = 0.049; Waples, 2015).

The majority (17) of the 28 clones were represented by two parasites (Table 5). The maximum number of clonemates representing a single clone was six (Table 5). The total number of clonal parasites was 85 (0.266; Table 4). We identified clonal parasites in 12 of the 14 definitive hosts studied, and the highest number of different clones identified in a single animal was five (Table 5). Clones/clonemates were also shared amongst hosts from the same locality (RT1, RT2 and RT3; Table 5), and from two farms (Farms 1 and 2) in distinct, but geographically close, localities (ANC and TLR; Fig. 1; Table 5).

Table 5.

Distribution of clonemates (multicopy multilocus genotypes (MLGs) of Fasciola hepatica amongst the individual definitive hosts studied in Argentina.

Animal ID No. of parasites successfully genotyped No. of clonal parasites No. of clonemates (parasites identified with each repeated MLG)a
3 4 6 8 9 12 18 39 40 42 54 55 56 66 81 88 96 97 99 101 103 150 178 180 181 206 212 216
ANC 14 10 4 2 2 1 1
TLR 13 6 2 1 1 2
ARSOV 24 4 4
DOP 13 7 2 3 2
GL1 6 0
GL2 20 15 6 3 6
GLOV 23 6 6
SPCH 18 5 3 2
SVCH 31 15 5 4 2 2 2
BA1 27 0
BA2 35 2 2
RT1 12 3 1 1 1
RT2 45 7 1 2 2 1 1
RT3 39 5 2 1 1 1
TOTAL 320 85 6 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 3 2 6 3 6 6 3 2 5 4 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 2

aOnly multicopy MLGs with Psex values < 0.05 at n = 2 (i.e. clonemates) are included in these counts and the number assigned to each MLG matches the ID codes given in Supplementary Table S1.

3.3. Sub-populations largely show random mating, high gene diversity and no evidence of linkage disequilibrium

We found no deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in any province; we calculated FIS and corresponding one-tailed P values, to assess if each sub-population deviated from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. All values were non-significant and ranged from 0.009 to 0.041 (Table 4). This indicates that there is largely random mating between parasites within each sub-population. Similarly, we found no evidence of linkage disequilibrium in any province; we performed unphased pairwise linkage disequilibrium tests between each pair of loci. Up to three pairs of loci were significant in each province but this is less than would be expected by chance (four or more pairs, P < 0.05 cumulative binomial probability = 0.049; Waples, 2015; Table 4).

The majority of regions showed gene diversity of ~0.73, however parasites from Corrientes showed a lower gene diversity of 0.310 (Table 4). This region also had a correspondingly lower number of alleles and genotypes detected, even at loci that were highly polymorphic in the other regions, e.g. Fh_6 (Table 4). Interestingly this region still showed high genotypic diversity: we identified 61 unique MLGs of the 62 parasites successfully genotyped (genotypic richness = 0.984; Table 4).

4. Discussion

In this study we report population genetic structuring in F. hepatica infecting livestock, predominantly cattle, across Argentina. None of the provinces showed evidence of deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (FIS P value > 0.05), so mating appears random and the amount of self-fertilisation is negligible. Movement of the definitive host is thought to represent the greatest opportunity for parasite mixing, hence reduced livestock movement due to the large geography of Argentina and the distance across which these samples were collected (up to 2250 km), may explain population structuring. Specific detail of animal movement was not known except for Corrientes, where the farm owner reported no import of livestock, effectively rendering it a closed or isolated herd, and it is interesting to note that this population showed the greatest genetic differentiation and lowest gene diversity. We cannot discount that these differences we observed at the geographical level may be due to our limited ability to detect variation amongst hosts at a local level, as we were relying on just one or two hosts per farm, as a random representation of the parasite population as a whole. In 2012, Vilas et al. reported genetic structuring of F. hepatica when sampling the total adult parasite burden of 10 sheep within a flock, but did not observe similar structuring in cattle populations (Vilas et al., 2012). In the study reported here, the majority of parasites originated from cattle and this may have influenced our findings of random mating. There is no standard sampling protocol to assess among infrapopulation genetic structure in a local area but Gorton et al. (2012) recommend sampling all individual parasites from 20–30 hosts when infection levels are low, or 20–30 parasites per host from 10 or more hosts when infection levels are high. This sampling approach, together with a better understanding of animal movement amongst farms, should generate greater confidence in the underlying mechanisms causing population structuring in Argentina.

Observing F. hepatica metacercariae directly on vegetation is not possible so it is not known if they aggregate in ‘clumps’ on pasture. However, metacercariae are known to aggregate in petri dishes (Abrous et al., 2001) and our own observations under experimental conditions suggest that they rapidly encyst on the first substrate they encounter, often congregating in large numbers (200–300 metacercariae) in small regions of visking tubing, although it is not known if this occurs on pasture. Thus, there is opportunity for extensive transmission of clones to the definitive host. We found 263 unique MLGs from the 320 parasites successfully genotyped, giving a clonal diversity of 82%. We identified genetically identical parasites (clones) in 12 of 14 definitive hosts studied, a finding consistent with previous studies in livestock, where 61% and 85% of hosts studied contained genetically identical parasites (Vilas et al., 2012, Beesley et al., 2017). This supports the theory that following clonal expansion within the snail, there is some co-transmission of clonemates to the definitive host, similar to previous reports (Beesley et al., 2017), but does not extend to the low clonal diversity observed in sheep for F. hepatica (Vilas et al., 2012), and it does not occur to the same extent as clonemate co-transmission recently observed for D. dendriticum (Criscione et al., 2020).

Generally, clonemates were found within the same host (Table 5), but we also identified clonemates shared amongst animals, for example, in Rosario del Tala, Entre Ríos clonemates were found shared amongst three animals, likely due to animals co-grazing as they originated from the same locality. However, the presence of multiple clonemates shared between two geographically close sampling sites (ANC and TLR) is novel. Since these two locations are approximately 75 km apart, it seems unlikely that these animals would have co-grazed. In the absence of further information, one explanation might be the movement/selling of livestock between the two farms (Walker et al., 2007). Another possibility would be the transfer of snails from one area to another via humans, livestock or wildlife (Mas-Coma et al., 2009; Van Leuwen, 2012. Speeding up the snail’s pace: bird-mediated dispersal of aquatic organisms. PhD thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands). Although we did not identify clonemates shared between different species of animals, Walker et al. (2007) recovered fluke from sheep and cattle with identical composite mitochondrial haplotypes. Most of the clones we identified in this study were represented by two parasites (clonemates), but we also identified up to six parasites with the same genotype. This agrees with previous findings of up to nine or 10 parasites with the same genotype (Vilas et al., 2012, Beesley et al., 2017), and has also been reported in Fascioloides magna, where nine parasites in one deer had the same five locus allozyme genotype (Mulvey et al., 1991). Within D. dendriticum, up to 22 parasites shared the same genotype in the second intermediate ant host (Criscione et al., 2020). However, in S. mansoni the mean number of copies of a clone was 3.15 (standard error ± 0.47; Prugnolle et al., 2004), and findings from aquatic trematodes usually report a maximum of two to four copies of each clone (Rauch et al., 2005, Criscione and Blouin, 2006, Keeney et al., 2007a, Lagrue et al., 2009, Leung et al., 2009, Valdivia et al., 2014).

We identified high genotypic richness and high gene diversity in the majority of regions. Three of the four provinces we studied had high gene diversity (~0.73; Table 4). However, Corrientes had a lower gene diversity of 0.310, together with lower numbers of alleles and genotypes identified at each locus, even when correcting for sample size differences (data not shown). Since there was no evidence of non-random mating, the reduced gene diversity in Corrientes could therefore be a result of a smaller effective population size. Previous analysis of parasites from three Argentinian provinces (Catamarca, Chubut and Salta) revealed only minor genetic variation (Carnevale et al., 2017). Similarly, in this study Catamarca and Chubut had the lowest pairwise F′ST (0.0754) and showed lower genetic differentiation on PCoA, however these studies lacked power as they relied on small numbers of parasites (Carnevale et al., (2017) used 22 parasites, whilst in this study Catamarca was represented by 27 parasites). In Great Britain, genotypic richness of F. hepatica within the majority of individual definitive hosts was >0.8 (range: 0.343–1.0; Beesley et al., 2017), and hosts can acquire a genetically diverse set of parasites even over a short grazing period (Walker et al., 2011). Similarly, genotypic richness of S. mansoni has been reported to be 0.795 and 0.847 (Prugnolle et al., 2002, Prugnolle et al., 2004). However, amongst aquatic trematodes with two- or three-host life cycles, there is a greater ability for dispersal of clones within the environment, and the majority of genotypes within the second intermediate host or the definitive host are unique. Genotypic richness in these cases is often reported to be greater than 0.95 (Rauch et al., 2005, Criscione and Blouin, 2006, Keeney et al., 2007a, Lagrue et al., 2009, Leung et al., 2009, Valdivia et al., 2014).

For population genetic studies there is a preference for co-dominant, neutral genetic markers that allow measures of observed and expected heterozygosity such as microsatellites and allozymes (Hurtrez-Bousses et al., 2004, Vázquez-Prieto et al., 2011, Vilas et al., 2012, Cwiklinski et al., 2015, Beesley et al., 2017). Initial attempts to apply the panel of microsatellites developed by Hurtrez-Boussès et al. (2004) to F. hepatica in the UK were unsuccessful, necessitating development of a new panel of markers (Cwiklinski et al., 2015). It is reassuring in this regard that, although five loci (Fh_1, Fh_3, Fh_4, Fh_7 and Fh_14) had to be excluded, this work has highlighted the versatility of this microsatellite panel for analysis of the population genetic structure of F. hepatica from countries other than the UK. Indeed, many of the same alleles were identified in both Argentinian and British F. hepatica populations. Given the different patterns of population genetic structure between cattle and sheep in Spain (Vilas et al., 2012), our report here of population structuring in Argentina, and a general tendency towards clonal transmission, highlights how these microsatellites can complement and extend on existing studies to better understand F. hepatica transmission, and to more confidently predict development of drug resistance in F. hepatica.

In conclusion, the work presented here shows that there is evidence for population structuring of F. hepatica across Argentina and that there appears to be random mating within populations (although one must consider the caveats of our sampling approach); in addition there is evidence for some clonemate transmission.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the time and expertise of an anonymous reviewer, who enhanced the accuracy and interpretation of this manuscript. This work was supported by Grant RTA2017-00010-C02-01 from the Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (INIA, Spain), the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UK (BB/P001912/1) and the Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, UK. S.V.P. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina. H. Solana is Principal Professional from the Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas (CIC-BA) de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Research at the Laboratorio de Biología Celular y Molecular is supported by SECAT-UNCPBA and CIVETAN CONICET, both of Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (ANPCyT PICT 2012/ N° 865-Préstamo BID) (all Argentina) and Contrato N°:017-2012-CONCYTEC-OAJ (CONCYTEC–Perú).

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.11.007.

Contributor Information

Nicola J. Beesley, Email: nbeesley@liverpool.ac.uk.

Severo Vázquez-Prieto, Email: severovazquezprieto@gmail.com.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.csv (35.7KB, csv)

References

  1. Abrous M., Vareille-Morel C., Rondelaud D., Dreyfuss G., Cabaret J. Metacercarial aggregation in Digenea (Fasciola hepatica and Paramphistomum daubneyi): environmental or species determinism? J. Helminthol. 2001;75:307–311. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X01000476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnaud-Haond, S., Belkhir, K. 2007. GENCLONE: a computer program to analyse genotypic data, test for clonality and describe spatial clonal organization. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 7, 15–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01522.x.
  3. Aznar M.N., Stevenson M.A., Zarich L., León E.A. Analysis of cattle movements in Argentina, 2005. Prev. Vet. Med. 2011;98:119–127. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bargues M.D., Malandrini J.B., Artigas P., Soria C.C., Velásquez J.N., Carnevale S., Mateo L., Khoubbane M., Mas-Coma S. Human fascioliasis endemic areas in Argentina: multigene characterisation of the lymnaeid vectors and climatic-environmental assessment of the transmission pattern. Parasites Vectors. 2016;9 doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1589-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beesley N.J., Williams D.J.L., Paterson S., Hodgkinson J. Fasciola hepatica demonstrates high levels of genetic diversity, a lack of population structure and high gene flow: possible implications for drug resistance. Int. J. Parasitol. 2017;47:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blasco-Costa I., Waters J.M., Poulin R. Swimming against the current: genetic structure, host mobility and the drift paradox in trematode parasites. Mol. Ecol. 2012;21:207–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05374.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carnevale S., Malandrini J.B., Pantano M.L., Soria C.C., Rodrigues-Silva R., Machado-Silva J.R., Velásquez J.N., Kamenetzky L. First genetic characterization of Fasciola hepatica in Argentina by nuclear and mitochondrial gene markers. Vet. Parasitol. 2017;245:34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cornell S.J., Isham V.S., Smith G., Grenfell B.T. Spatial parasite transmission, drug resistance, and the spread of rare genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2003;100:7401–7405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0832206100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Correa A.C., De Meeûs T., Dreyfuss G., Rondelaud D., Hurtrez-Boussès S. Galba truncatula and Fasciola hepatica: genetic costructures and interactions with intermediate host dispersal. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017;55:186–194. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Criscione C.D., Blouin M.S. Minimal selfing, few clones, and no among-host genetic structure in a hermaphroditic parasite with asexual larval propagation. Evolution. 2006;60:553–562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Criscione C.D., Vilas R., Paniagua E., Blouin M. More than meets the eye: detecting cryptic microgeographic population structure in a parasite with a complex life cycle. Mol. Ecol. 2011;20:2510–2524. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05113.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Criscione C.D., van Paridon B.J., Gilleard J.S., Goater C.P. Clonemate cotransmission supports a role for kin selection in a puppeteer parasite. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020;117:5970–5976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1922272117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cwiklinski K., Allen K., LaCourse J., Williams D.J., Paterson S., Hodgkinson J.E. Characterisation of a novel panel of polymorphic microsatellite loci for the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica, using a next generation sequencing approach. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015;32:298–304. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dorken M.E., Eckert C.G. Severely reduced sexual reproduction in northern populations of a clonal plant, Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae) J. Ecol. 2001;89:339–350. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00558.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Earl D.A., vonHoldt B.M. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2012;4:359–361. doi: 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Elliott T., Muller A., Brockwell Y., Murphy N., Grillo V., Toet H.M., Anderson G., Sangster N., Spithill T.W. Evidence for high genetic diversity of NAD1 and COX1 mitochondrial haplotypes among triclabendazole resistant and susceptible populations and field isolates of Fasciola hepatica (liver fluke) in Australia. Vet. Parasitol. 2014;200:90–96. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Excoffier L., Lischer H.E.L. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010;10:564–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fairweather I. Reducing the future threat from (liver) fluke: realistic prospect of quixotic fantasy? Vet. Parasitol. 2011;180:133–143. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fairweather I., Brennan G.P., Hanna R.E.B., Robinson M.W., Skuce P.J. Drug resistance in liver fluke. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs. Drug. Resist. 2020;12:39–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2019.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gorton M.J., Kasl E.L., Detwiler J.T., Criscione C.D. Testing local-scale panmixia provides insights into the cryptic ecology, evolution, and epidemiology of metazoan animal parasites. Parasitology. 2012;139:981–997. doi: 10.1017/S0031182012000455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Goudet J. FSTAT (vers. 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 1995;86:485–486. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111627. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gregorius H.-R. Testing for clonal propagation. Heredity. 2005;94:173–179. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Happich F.A., Boray J.C. Quantitative diagnosis of chronic fasciolosis. 2. The estimation of daily total egg production of Fasciola hepatica and the number of adult flukes in sheep by faecal egg counts. Aust. Vet. J. 1969;45:329–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1969.tb05012.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hillyer G.V., Apt W. Food-borne trematode infections in the Americas. Parasitol. Today. 1997;13:87–88. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4758(97)01000-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hodgkinson J.E., Cwiklinski K., Beesley N., Hartley C., Allen K., Williams D.J.L. Clonal amplification of Fasciola hepatica in Galba truncatula: within and between isolate variation of triclabendazole-susceptible and -resistant clones. Parasit. Vectors. 2018;11:363. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2952-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Statist. 1979;6:65–70. [Google Scholar]
  27. Howell A.K., Malalana F., Beesley N.J., Hodgkinson J.E., Rhodes H., Sekiya M., Archer D., Clough H.E., Gilmore P., Williams D.J.L. Fasciola hepatica in UK horses. Equine. Vet. J. 2020;52:194–199. doi: 10.1111/evj.13149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hurtrez-Boussès S., Durand P., Jabbour-Zahab R., Guégan J.-F., Meunier C., Bargues M.-D., Mas-Coma S., Renaud F. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers in the liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica) Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2004;4:689–690. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00786.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Keeney D.B., Waters J.M., Poulin R. Clonal diversity of the marine trematode Maritrema novaezealandensis within intermediate hosts: the molecular ecology of parasite life cycles. Mol. Ecol. 2007;16:431–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03143.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Keeney D.B., Waters J.M., Poulin R. Diversity of trematode genetic clones within amphipods and the timing of same-clone infections. Int. J. Parasitol. 2007;37:351–357. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kelley J.M., Elliott T.P., Beddoe T., Anderson G., Skuce P., Spithill T.W. Current threat of triclabendazole resistance in Fasciola hepatica. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32:458–469. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2016.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Krull W.H. The number of cercariae of Fasciola hepatica developing in snails infected with a single miracidium. Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Washington. 1941;8:55–58. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lagrue C., Poulin R., Keeney D.B. Effects of clonality in multiple infections on the life-history strategy of the trematode Coitocaecum parvum in its amphipod intermediate host. Evolution. 2009;63:1417–1426. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00619.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Leung T.L.F., Poulin R., Keeney D.B. Accumulation of diverse parasite genotypes within the bivalve second intermediate host of the digenean Gymnophallus sp. Int. J. Parasitol. 2009;39:327–331. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Louhi K.-R., Karvonen A., Rellstab C., Jokela J. Is the population genetic structure of complex life cycle parasites determined by the geographic range of the most motile host? Infect. Genet. Evol. 2010;10:1271–1277. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mas-Coma S. Epidemiology of fascioliasis in human endemic areas. J. Helminthol. 2005;79:207–216. doi: 10.1079/JOH2005296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mas-Coma, S., Valero, M.A., Bargues, M.D. 2009. Chapter 2. Fasciola, lymnaeids and human fascioliasis, with a global overview on disease transmission, epidemiology, evolutionary genetics, molecular epidemiology and control. Adv. Parasitol. 69, 41–146. doi: 10.1016/S0065-308X(09)69002-3. [DOI] [PubMed]
  38. Meirmans P.G. Using the AMOVA framework to estimate a standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution. 2006;60:2399–2402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Meirmans P.G., Hedrick P.W. Assessing population structure: FST and related measures. Mol. Ecol. 2011;11:5–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02927.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mezo M., González-Warleta M., Castro-Hermida J.A., Muiño L., Ubeira F.M. Association between anti-F. hepatica antibody levels in milk and production losses in dairy cows. Vet. Parasitol. 2011;180:237–242. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Moriena R., Racioppi O., Alvarez J.D. Fasciolosis en bovinos del nordeste argentine. Prevalencia según edad. Revista Veterinaria. 2004;15:3–4. [Google Scholar]
  42. Morozova E.V., Chrisanfova G.G., Arkhipov I.A., Semyenova S.K. Polymorphism of the ND1 and CO1 mitochondrial genes in populations of liver fluke Fasciola hepatica. Genetika. 2004;40:817–820. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mulvey M., Aho J.M., Lydeard C., Leberg P.L., Smith M.H. Comparative population genetic structure of a parasite (Fascioloides magna) and its definitive host. Evolution. 1991;45:1628–1640. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb02668.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Olaechea F.V., Lovera V., Larroza M., Raffo F., Cabrera R. Resistance of Fasciola hepatica against triclabenzadole in cattle in Patagonia (Argentina) Vet. Parasitol. 2011;178:364–366. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.12.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Overend D.J., Bowen F.L. Resistance of Fasciola hepatica to triclabendazole. Aust. Vet. J. 1995;72:275–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1995.tb03546.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Parks J.C., Werth C.R. A study of spatial features of clones in a population of bracken fern, Pteridium aquilinum (Dennstaedtiaceae) Am. J. Bot. 1993;80:537–544. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1993.tb13837.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Peakall R., Smouse P.E. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2006;6:288–295. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Peakall R., Smouse P.E. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2537–2539. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155:945–959. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Prugnolle F., De Meeus T., Durand P., Sire C., Theron A. Sex-specific genetic structure in Schistosoma mansoni: evolutionary and epidemiological implications. Mol. Ecol. 2002;11:1231–1238. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01518.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Prugnolle F., Choisy M., Théron A., Durand P., de Meeûs T. Sex-specific correlation between heterozygosity and clone size in the trematode Schistosoma mansoni. Mol. Ecol. 2004;13:2859–2864. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rauch G., Kalbe M., Reusch T.B.H. How a complex life cycle can improve a parasite's sex life. J. Evol. Biol. 2005;18:1069–1075. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00895.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Rousset F. GENEPOP’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2008;8:103–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Schwab A.E., Churcher T.S., Schwab A.J., Basáñez M.-G., Prichard R.K. Population genetics of concurrent selection with albendazole and ivermectin or diethylcarbamazine on the possible spread of albendazole resistance in Wuchereria bancrofti. Parasitology. 2006;133:589–601. doi: 10.1017/S003118200600076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Semyenova, S.K., Morozova, E.V., Chrisanfova, G.G., Gorokhov, V.V., Arkhipov, I.A., Moskvin, A.S., Movsessyan, S.O., Ryskov, A.P. 2006. Genetic differentiation in Eastern European and Western Asian populations of the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica, as revealed by mitochondrial NAD1 and COX1 genes. J. Parasitol. 92, 525–530. doi: 10.1645/GE-673R.1. [DOI] [PubMed]
  56. Smith G., Grenfell B.T. The influence of water temperature and pH on the survival of Fasciola hepatica miracidia. Parasitology. 1984;88:97–104. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000054378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Teofanova D., Kantzoura V., Walker S., Radoslavov G., Hristov P., Theodoropoulos G., Bankov I., Trudgett A. Genetic diversity of liver flukes (Fasciola hepatica) from Eastern Europe. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2011;11:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Thang T.N., Vázquez-Prieto S., Vilas R., Paniagua E., Ubeira F.M., Ichikawa-Seki M. Genetic diversity of Fasciola hepatica in Spain and Peru. Parasitol. Int. 2020;76:102100. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2020.102100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Thomas A.P. The life history of the liver-fluke (Fasciola hepatica) Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 1883;23:99–133. [Google Scholar]
  60. Valdivia I.M., Criscione C.D., Cárdenas L., Durán C.P., Oliva M.E. Does a facultative precocious life cycle predispose the marine trematode Proctoeces cf. lintoni to inbreeding and genetic differentiation among host species? Int. J. Parasitol. 2014;44:183–188. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Vázquez-Prieto S., Vilas R., Mezo M., González-Warleta M., Ubeira F.M., Paniagua E. Allozyme markers suitable for population genetic analysis of Fasciola hepatica. Vet. Parasitol. 2011;176:84–88. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Vilas R., Vázquez-Prieto S., Paniagua E. Contrasting patterns of population genetic structure of Fasciola hepatica from cattle and sheep: implications for the evolution of anthelmintic resistance. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2012;12:45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Walker S.M., Prodöhl P.A., Fletcher H.L., Hanna R.E.B., Kantzoura V., Hoey E.M., Trudgett A. Evidence for multiple mitochondrial lineages of Fasciola hepatica (liver fluke) within infrapopulations from cattle and sheep. Parasitol. Res. 2007;101:117–125. doi: 10.1007/s00436-006-0440-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Walker, S.M., Johnston, C., Hoey, E.M., Fairweather, I., Borgsteede, F., Gaasenbeek, C., Prodӧhl, P.A., Trudgett, A. 2011. Population dynamics of the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica: the effect of time and spatial separation on the genetic diversity of fluke populations in the Netherlands. Parasitology 138, 215–223. doi: 10.1017/S0031182010001149. [DOI] [PubMed]
  65. Wang J. The computer program STRUCTURE for assigning individuals to populations: easy to use but easier to misuse. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2017;17:981–990. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Waples R.S. Testing for Hardy-Weinberg proportions: have we lost the plot? J. Hered. 2015;106:1–19. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esu062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wickham H. Springer-Verlag; New York: 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. [Google Scholar]
  68. WHO – World Health Organisation. 2007. Report of the WHO informal meeting on use of triclabendazole in fascioliasis control. WHO headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland 17 – 18 October 2006 [online]. Available at: http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/preventive_chemotherapy/WHO_CDS_NTD_PCT_2007.1.pdf (Accessed 26 August 2020).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.csv (35.7KB, csv)

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article. Genotypes from all parasites are available in Supplementary Table S1. Raw data is available from the corresponding author on request.

RESOURCES