Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2021 May 11;12:2653. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22849-y

Variability of plasmid fitness effects contributes to plasmid persistence in bacterial communities

Aida Alonso-del Valle 1, Ricardo León-Sampedro 1,2, Jerónimo Rodríguez-Beltrán 1,2, Javier DelaFuente 1, Marta Hernández-García 1,3, Patricia Ruiz-Garbajosa 1,3, Rafael Cantón 1,3, Rafael Peña-Miller 4,, Alvaro San Millán 1,2,5,
PMCID: PMC8113577  PMID: 33976161

Abstract

Plasmid persistence in bacterial populations is strongly influenced by the fitness effects associated with plasmid carriage. However, plasmid fitness effects in wild-type bacterial hosts remain largely unexplored. In this study, we determined the fitness effects of the major antibiotic resistance plasmid pOXA-48_K8 in wild-type, ecologically compatible enterobacterial isolates from the human gut microbiota. Our results show that although pOXA-48_K8 produced an overall reduction in bacterial fitness, it produced small effects in most bacterial hosts, and even beneficial effects in several isolates. Moreover, genomic results showed a link between pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects and bacterial phylogeny, helping to explain plasmid epidemiology. Incorporating our fitness results into a simple population dynamics model revealed a new set of conditions for plasmid stability in bacterial communities, with plasmid persistence increasing with bacterial diversity and becoming less dependent on conjugation. These results help to explain the high prevalence of plasmids in the greatly diverse natural microbial communities.

Subject terms: Evolutionary genetics, Antimicrobials, Bacterial evolution, Bacteriology


The variability of plasmid fitness effects on wild-type bacterial hosts have been largely unknown until this study, which shows that plasmid persistence increases with bacterial diversity and becomes less dependent on conjugation. This could explain why plasmids remain so common in nature.

Introduction

Plasmids are extra-chromosomal mobile genetic elements able to transfer between bacteria through conjugation1. Plasmids carry accessory genes that help their hosts to adapt to a myriad of environments, and thus play a key role in bacterial ecology and evolution2. A key example of the importance of plasmids in bacterial evolution is their central role in the spread of antibiotic resistance mechanisms among clinical pathogens over recent decades3,4. Some of the most clinically relevant resistance genes, such those encoding carbapenemases (ß-lactamase enzymes able to degrade carbapenem antibiotics), are carried on conjugative plasmids that spread across high-risk bacterial clones5,6.

Despite the abundance of plasmids in bacterial populations and the potential advantages associated with their acquisition, these genetic elements generally produce physiological alterations in their bacterial hosts that lead to a reduction in fitness79. These fitness costs make it difficult to explain how plasmids are maintained in bacterial populations over the long-term in the absence of selection for plasmid-encoded traits, a puzzle known as “the plasmid-paradox”10. Different solutions to this paradox have been proposed. For example, compensatory evolution contributes to plasmid persistence by alleviating the costs associated with plasmid carriage, and a high conjugation rate can promote the survival of plasmids as genetic parasites1118.

Over the past decades, many studies have investigated the existence conditions for plasmids in bacterial populations14,1823. However, understanding of plasmid population biology is held in check by limitations of the model systems used for its study. First, most experimental reports of fitness costs have studied associations between plasmids and bacterial strains from different ecological origins9,1214,16,17,2427 (with notable exceptions15,28,29). These examples do not necessarily replicate plasmid fitness effects in natural bacterial hosts, which remain largely unexplored. Second, studies tend to analyse the fitness effects of a single plasmid in a single bacterium. However, plasmid fitness effects can differ between bacteria26,27,3032, and this variability may impact plasmid persistence in bacterial communities (for a relevant example see ref. 33). Third, most mathematical models of plasmid population biology study clonal or near-clonal populations. However, bacteria usually live in complex communities, in which conjugative plasmids can spread between different bacterial hosts3436. To fully understand plasmid persistence in natural bacterial populations, it will be necessary to address these limitations.

In this study, we provide a detailed characterisation of the distribution of plasmid fitness effects in wild-type bacterial hosts. We use the clinically relevant carbapenem-resistance conjugative pOXA-48-like plasmid, pOXA-48_K8 (ref. 35), and 50 enterobacteria strains isolated from the gut microbiota of patients admitted to a large tertiary hospital in Madrid. Incorporation of the experimentally determined plasmid fitness effects into a population biology model provides new key insights into the existence conditions of plasmids in bacterial communities.

Results

Construction of a pOXA-48_K8 transconjugant collection

We studied the fitness effects of the plasmid pOXA-48_K8 in a collection of ecologically compatible (environmentally co-occurring) bacterial hosts. pOXA-48-like plasmids are enterobacterial, broad-host-range, conjugative plasmids, belonging to the IncL plasmid family, and are mainly associated with Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli3739. pOXA-48-like plasmids encode the carbapenemase OXA-48 and are distributed worldwide, making it one of the most clinically important carbapenemase-producing plasmids6,38. The gut microbiota of hospitalised patients is a frequent source of enterobacteria clones carrying pOXA-48-like plasmids6. In recent studies, we described the in-hospital epidemiology of pOXA-48-like plasmids in a large collection of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)- and carbapenemase-producing enterobacteria isolated from >9000 patients in our hospital over a period of 2 years (R-GNOSIS collection, see “Methods”)35,4042. pOXA-48-carrying enterobacteria were the most frequent carbapenemase-producing enterobacteria in the hospital, with 171 positive isolates, and they colonised 1.13% of the patients during the study period (105/9275 patients). In this study, we focused on plasmid pOXA-48_K8, which is the most common pOXA-48-like plasmid in our hospital35 (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1. Experimental model system.

Fig. 1

Representation of pOXA-48_K8 plasmid and the enterobacteria strains used in this study. a pOXA-48_K8 (accession number MT441554). Reading frames are shown as arrows, indicating the direction of transcription. Colours indicate gene function classification (see legend). The blaOXA-48 gene is shown in pink. b Schematic representation of the experimental design used in this study. c Unrooted phylogeny of whole-genome assemblies from E. coli clones (left) and Klebsiella spp. clones (right). Branch length gives the inter-assembly mash distance (a measure of k-mer similarity). The grouping of multilocus sequence types (ST) is also indicated (E. coli ST6217 belongs to the ST10 group). Note that the sequencing results revealed that a subset of isolates initially identified as K. pneumoniae were in fact Klebsiella quasipneumoniae (n = 4) and Klebsiella variicola (n = 1).

To study the fitness effects of pOXA-48_K8, we selected 50 isolates from the R-GNOSIS collection as bacterial hosts (Fig. 1b). Our criteria were to select (i) pOXA-48-free isolates recovered from patients with no record of colonisation by a pOXA-48-carrying enterobacteria, to try to avoid selecting clones in which compensatory evolution had already reduced plasmid-associated costs; (ii) isolates from the most frequent pOXA-48-carrying species, K. pneumoniae and E. coli; and (iii) strains isolated from patients located in wards, in which pOXA-48-carrying enterobacteria were commonly reported35. The underlying rationale was to select clones which were naive to pOXA-48_K8, but ecologically compatible with it (i.e., isolated from patients coinciding on wards with others who were colonised with pOXA-48-carrying clones). We selected 25 K. pneumoniae and 25 E. coli isolates that are representative of the R-GNOSIS study and cover the K. pneumoniae and E. coli phylogenetic diversity in the collection (see “Methods”, Fig. 1c, and Supplementary Data 1). It is important to note that, because of the nature of the R-GNOSIS collection, the isolates used in this study produce ESBLs. However, ESBL-producing enterobacteria are widespread not only in hospitals but also in the community43, and most pOXA-48-carrying enterobacteria isolated in our hospital also produce ESBLs40.

pOXA-48_K8 was introduced into the collection of recipient strains by conjugation (see “Methods”), and the presence of the plasmid was confirmed by PCR and antibiotic susceptibility testing (Supplementary Data 2). The presence of the entire pOXA-48_K8 plasmid was confirmed by sequencing the complete genomes of the 50 transconjugant clones, which also revealed the genetic relatedness of the isolates (Fig. 1c). In line with previous studies35,44, the sequencing results revealed that a subset of isolates initially identified as K. pneumoniae in fact belonged to the species Klebsiella quasipneumoniae (n = 4) and Klebsiella variicola (n = 1). These species are also hosts of pOXA-48-like plasmids in our hospital35, and so were maintained in the study (Fig. 1b).

Measuring pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects

To measure pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects, we performed growth curves and competition assays for all the plasmid-carrying and plasmid-free clones in the collection. We first performed growth curves in pure cultures to calculate maximum growth rate (μmax) and maximum optical density (ODmax), which can be used to estimate the intrinsic population growth rate (r) and carrying capacity (K), respectively (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). We also measured the area under the growth curve (AUC), which integrates information about r and K. To estimate plasmid-associated fitness effects, we compared these parameters between each plasmid-carrying and plasmid-free pair of isogenic isolates (Fig. 2a). The results showed that pOXA-48_K8 produced a moderate decrease in the parameters extracted from the growth curves, which was more evident in Klebsiella spp. isolates (Fig. 2a paired Wilcoxon signed-rank exact test: E. coli, AUC, V = 114, P = 0.20; ODmax, V = 76, P = 0.020; μmax, V = 186, P = 0.54. Klebsiella spp., AUC, V = 54, P = 0.003; ODmax, V = 44, P = 0.001; μmax, V = 119, P = 0.25). However, no differences were observed between the distribution of relative growth parameters for pOXA-48_K8-carrying E. coli and Klebsiella spp. clones (Wilcoxon rank-sum test: AUC, W = 345, P = 0.38; ODmax, W = 335, P = 0.50; μmax, W = 347, P = 0.36).

Fig. 2. pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects in a set of ecologically compatible wild-type enterobacteria.

Fig. 2

a Relative values of growth curve parameters (plasmid-carrying/plasmid-free isogenic clones): area under the growth curve (AUC), maximum optical density (ODmax), and maximum growth rate (μmax), represented as boxplots for E. coli (red) and Klebsiella spp. (blue) isolates separately. Horizontal lines inside boxes indicate median values, the upper and lower hinges correspond to the 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers extend to observations within 1.5 times the interquartile range. Dots represent each relative value. Values <1 indicate a reduction in these parameters associated with plasmid acquisition. Four and six biological replicates of the growth curves were performed for the wild-type isolates and the transconjugants, respectively (see Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). b Relative fitness (w) of plasmid-carrying clones compared with plasmid-free clones obtained by competition assays (red, E. coli; blue, Klebsiella spp. see “Methods” for details). Values <1 indicate a reduction in w due to plasmid acquisition; values >1 indicate an increase in w. Bars represent normalised relative fitness after subtracting the effect of pBGC (average result of five independent biological replicates of the competition pOXA-48-carrying vs. pBGC-carrying strains divided by the average result of five independent biological replicates of the competition pOXA-48-free vs. pBGC-carrying strains), and error bars represent the propagated standard error. Two horizontal lines indicate those clones showing significant costs or benefits associated with carrying pOXA-48 plasmid (Bonferroni corrected two-sampled t test, P < 0.05). The names of the clones for which the relative fitness was calculated using E. coli strain J53 carrying the pBGC vector, instead of the pBGC-carrying parental strain, are indicated in pink. Source data are provided as Source data files.

Competition assays allow measurement of the relative fitness (w) of two bacteria competing for resources in the same culture45. Competition between otherwise isogenic plasmid-carrying and plasmid-free clones thus provides a quantitative assessment of the fitness costs associated with plasmid carriage. For the competition assays, we used flow cytometry; strains were labelled using an in-house developed small, non-transferable plasmid vector, called pBGC, that encodes an inducible green fluorescent protein (GFP; Supplementary Fig. 3). pBGC was introduced into the wild-type isolate collection by electroporation, and all pOXA-48-carrying and pOXA-48-free clones were competed against their pBGC-carrying parental strain. We were unable to introduce pBGC into eight of the isolates; in those cases, for the competitor, we used E. coli strain J53 carrying the pBGC vector (see “Methods” for details). Data from the competition assays were used to calculate the competitive fitness of pOXA-48-carrying clones relative to their plasmid-free counterparts (Fig. 2b). There were no significant differences between the fitness effects of pOXA-48_K8 in Klebsiella spp. and E. coli isolates (ANOVA effect of species × plasmid interaction; F = 0.088, df = 1, P = 0.767, Shapiro–Wilk normality test for w values: Klebsiella spp., P = 0.21; E. coli, P = 0.15).

To validate our results, we compared the values obtained from growth curves and competition assays. This analysis revealed a weak but significant correlation between relative fitness values and the parameters extracted from the growth curves (Pearson’s correlation, AUC, R = 0.4, P = 0.005; ODmax, R = 0.33, P = 0.021; μmax, R = 0.4, P = 0.004, Supplementary Fig. 4).

The distribution of pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects

Results from the competition assays showed that the overall effect of pOXA-48_K8 was a small, but significant reduction in relative fitness (mean w = 0.971, ANOVA effect of plasmid; F = 70.04, df = 1, P = 1.02 × 10−15). However, plasmid fitness effects varied greatly between the isolates in the collection, producing a normal distribution ranging from a >20% reduction to almost a 20% increase in relative fitness (Figs. 2b and 3a; Shapiro–Wilk normality test, P = 0.14). Indeed, plasmid acquisition was associated with a significant fitness decrease in only 14 strains, and 7 isolates showed a significant increase in fitness (Bonferroni corrected two-sampled t test, P < 0.05). These results revealed a highly dynamic scenario in which a plasmid produces a wide distribution of fitness effects in different bacterial hosts, ranging from costs to benefits.

Fig. 3. Distribution of plasmid fitness effects.

Fig. 3

Comparison between plasmid fitness effects obtained in this study and those from previous studies. a Distribution of pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects in the ecologically compatible collection of enterobacteria isolates. Bars indicate the number of E. coli (red) and Klebsiella spp. (blue) strains in each relative fitness category. The grey dotted line indicates the mean relative fitness of the population. Note that relative fitness values are normally distributed (w = 0.971, var = 0.0072, one-sided Shapiro–Wilk normality test, P = 0.14). The inset shows the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the relative fitness of pOXA-48_K8-carrying E. coli (red), Klebsiella spp. (blue) clones, both individually and combined (black). b Distribution of plasmids fitness effects in bacterial hosts obtained in a previous meta-analysis46. Most of the included studies were based on associations between plasmids and bacterial strains from different ecological origins. Bars indicate the number of plasmid–bacterium associations in each relative fitness category. The grey dotted line indicates the mean relative fitness across studies. Relative fitness values are not normally distributed (w = 0.91, var = 0.029; one-sided Shapiro–Wilk normality test, P = 0.0006). The inset shows the CDF of the relative fitness of pOXA-48_K8-carrying enterobacteria analysed in our study (black) and the CDF of the relative fitness of plasmid-carrying bacteria form Vogwill and MacLean meta-analysis (green). Source data are provided as a Source data file.

To place our results in context with previous reports, we compared the distribution of pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects with the results from a recent meta-analysis of plasmid fitness effects by Vogwill and MacLean46 (Fig. 3). These authors recovered data for 50 plasmid–bacterium pairs from 16 studies. The fitness effects obtained in those reports showed a higher mean plasmid cost (mean w = 0.91) and differed significantly from the distribution of fitness effects we report here for pOXA-48_K8 in wild-type enterobacteria (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, V = 922, P = 0.006). The discrepancy between these distributions may, at least in part, reflect the different nature of plasmid–bacterium associations considered in the different studies. Although the plasmids studied in earlier reports were isolated from natural sources, they were introduced into bacterial hosts that are not necessary recovered from the same sources, and the detected fitness effects may not be fully representative of wild-type plasmid–bacterium associations. Our study, on the other hand, analysed the fitness effects of pOXA-48_K8 in ecologically compatible bacterial hosts. Taken together, the data suggest that the distribution of plasmid fitness effects is likely influenced by the ecological compatibility between plasmids and their bacterial hosts.

pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects across bacterial phylogeny

A key limit to the prediction of plasmid-mediated evolution is the inability to anticipate plasmid fitness effects in new bacterial hosts. This is particularly relevant to the evolution of antibiotic resistance because some of the most concerning multi-resistant clinical pathogens arise from very specific associations between resistance plasmids and high-risk bacterial clones4,6,47. Interestingly, a recent study in an important pathogenic E. coli lineage (ST131) showed that the acquisition and maintenance of resistance plasmids is associated with specific genetic signatures48. Pursuing this idea, we analysed pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects across the whole-genome phylogeny of our isolates, with the aim of determining if genetic content could help to predict plasmid fitness effects (Fig. 4). We calculated the genetic relatedness of Klebsiella spp. and E. coli isolates by reconstructing their core genome phylogeny (Fig. 4a). Plasmid fitness effects can also be strongly influenced by the accessory genome. For example, the presence of further mobile genetic elements can deeply impact the costs of plasmids24,49. Therefore, we also constructed trees from the distance matrix of the accessory gene network50, which includes plasmid content (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4. Fitness effects of pOXA-48_K8 across bacterial genome content.

Fig. 4

An association was found between pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects and bacterial host genomic content for four K. pneumoniae ST1427 isolates. a Core genome relationships among E. coli (left) and Klebsiella spp. (right). Tree construction is based on polymorphisms in the core genome. The outer circle indicates the relative fitness of pOXA-48-carrying bacterial hosts (see legend for colour code; red indicates fitness costs and green indicates fitness benefits associated with pOXA-48_K8 carriage). Asterisks denote clones with a phylogenetic signal associated with plasmid fitness effects (LIPA, P < 0.05). b Accessory genome relationships among E. coli (left) and Klebsiella spp. (right) isolates. This tree is a gene content tree constructed based on the distance matrix of the accessory gene network of each group. The outermost circle indicates relative fitness as in a. The intermediate circles indicate presence/absence of plasmids belonging to the different plasmid families named in the figure. Note that only two isolates do not carry any plasmids. Asterisks denote clones with a significant phylogenetic signal associating accessory genome composition with pOXA-48 fitness effects (LIPA, P < 0.05).

For each group of isolates, we scanned the fitness effects of pOXA-48_K8 across the core and accessory genome using the local indicator of phylogenetic association index51,52 (LIPA; see Supplementary Fig. 5, Supplementary Data 3, and “Methods” for the complete analysis). For the E. coli isolates, the results showed no association of pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects with the core or accessory phylogenies (LIPA, P > 0.1). In contrast, for Klebsiella spp., LIPA indices revealed a significant phylogenetic signal in four clones, in which pOXA-48_K8 produced a high fitness cost, all of them belonging to ST1427 (Kpn01, Kpn04, Kpn08, and Kpn13, accounting for four of the five ST1427 clones analysed in this study; LIPA, P < 0.05). Three of these ST1427 clones also produced a significant signal in the analysis of fitness effects across the accessory genome (Kpn01, Kpn08, and Kpn13; LIPA, P < 0.05). Therefore, we analysed the specific association between the native plasmid content of each clone and pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects in Klebsiella spp. (Supplementary Fig. 6). Our analysis revealed that the presence of plasmids belonging to the IncFIA or IncH1B families, and the absence of plasmids belonging to the IncFIB family, were associated with high pOXA-48_K8 costs (Supplementary Fig. 6). However, since those specific plasmid profiles are closely associated with ST1427 clones in our collection, it is difficult to disentangle the relative contribution of core genome/accessory genome/plasmid content in determining the fitness costs of pOXA-48_K8 in this particular ST. Further work will be required to dissect the role of each of these genomic compartments.

The results revealed that pOXA-48_K8 tended to produce a high cost in K. pneumoniae clones belonging to ST1427. Interestingly, although K. pneumoniae ST1427 is relatively common in our hospital (4.8% of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae42), none of the 103 pOXA-48-carrying K. pneumoniae isolates recovered in the R-GNOSIS collection belong to this ST35 (Fisher’s exact test for count data, 8/166 vs. 0/103, P = 0.025). These results suggest that the high cost associated with plasmid acquisition in this clade may limit in-hospital spread of pOXA-48-carrying K. pneumoniae ST1427. Conversely, pOXA-48-like plasmids are commonly associated with K. pneumoniae ST11 in our hospital35,40, and in the four ST11 clones tested in this study, pOXA-48_K8 produced non-significant (Kpn07, Kpn20, and Kpn23) or even beneficial fitness effects (Kpn22, Fig. 4a; pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects in ST1427 [n = 5] vs. in ST11 [n = 4], Welch’s unequal variances two-tailed t test, t = −2.39, df = 7, P = 0.048).

Modelling the impact of variability of fitness effects on plasmid stability

In general, mathematical models of plasmid population biology consider a clonal population in which the plasmid produces a constant reduction in growth rate14,1823. These models usually include the rate of plasmid loss through segregation53,54 and the rate of horizontal plasmid transfer by conjugation19,20,55, and some of them also incorporate a rate of compensatory mutations that alleviate plasmid fitness costs over time14,23. Our results show that plasmids produce variable fitness effects in naturally compatible bacterial hosts, and we argued that this variability could strongly influence plasmid stability in natural polyclonal bacterial communities. To assess the effect of the variability of fitness effects on plasmid stability in bacterial communities, we developed a simple mathematical model based on Stewart and Levin’s pioneering work on plasmid existence conditions19. Our specific aim was to inform this simple mathematical model with the experimentally determined distribution of pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects, in order to assess the consequences of the variability of fitness effects on the maintenance of plasmids in polyclonal bacterial communities (such as those in natural microbiota).

The model describes the population dynamics of multiple subpopulations competing for a single exhaustible resource in well-mixed environmental conditions, assuming that transition between plasmid-bearing and plasmid-free cells is driven by segregation events. The growth rate of each subpopulation is determined by a substrate-dependent Monod term that depends on the extracellular resource concentration, and therefore each strain can be described by two structurally identifiable parameters53: the resource conversion rate (ρ) and the specific affinity for the resource (Vmax/Km). These parameters were estimated from the ODs of each strain growing in monoculture (with and without plasmids) using a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method with a Metropolis–Hastings sampler56 (see “Methods”, Fig. 5a, and Supplementary File 1).

Fig. 5. Modelling pOXA-48 fitness effects.

Fig. 5

a Distribution of parameter values obtained using Bayesian inference to estimate growth kinetic parameters from OD measurements obtained for each strain in isolation. Diamonds represent Klebsiella spp. strains and circles E. coli clones; filled symbols denote plasmid-bearing strains and empty symbols plasmid-free cells. The ellipses represent standard deviations of best-fit normal distributions (green for plasmid-bearing strains and orange for plasmid-free cells). b Bars represent a distribution of plasmid fitness effects obtained from in silico competition experiments with parameter values determined from experimental growth curves. The solid curve represents the computationally estimated distribution obtained by randomly sampling wild-type and transconjugant parameter distributions obtained using the MCMC algorithm and numerically solving the model to evaluate the relative fitness associated with plasmid carriage. c Fraction of plasmid-bearing cells (after competing against plasmid-free cells) as a function of the rate of horizontal transfer for random plasmid–host associations sampled from the MCMC parameter distribution. The dotted line illustrates the mean of 104 pair-wise competition experiments under the assumption that plasmid-bearing is associated with a constant reduction in fitness in different clones (w = 0.985, var = 0), while the solid line is obtained by considering a wide variability of fitness effects (w = 0.985, var = 0.0070). The arrow denotes the difference in the conjugation threshold that positively selects for plasmids in the population, supporting the tenet that the variability of fitness effects maintains plasmids in the population at lower conjugation rates. d Stability of plasmids as a function of plasmid cost and conjugation rate. Yellow area corresponds to the range of conjugation rates and plasmid costs that positively selects for the plasmid in the population, while red denotes the plasmid is unstable. Solid lines illustrate the critical conjugation rate estimated numerically after performing 103 pair-wise competition experiments under the assumption that plasmid-bearing is associated with different levels of variability of fitness effects (see legend). Note that the increase in plasmid stability associated with the variability of fitness effects is more relevant for plasmids producing low average fitness cost, and becomes negligible for plasmids producing large average fitness cost, which depend more dramatically on a high conjugation rate. Source data are provided as a Source data file.

By solving the system of differential equations (Eqs. (46), described in “Methods”), we were able to evaluate the final frequency of plasmid-bearing cells in an in silico competition experiment of duration T time units and quantify the fitness effect of the plasmid on the strain. Figure 5b shows the relative fitnesses obtained after performing computational pair-wise competition experiments between plasmid-bearing and plasmid-free subpopulations (with parameter values shown in Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 7), resulting in a theoretical distribution of fitness effects (w = 0.985, var = 0.0070) that is consistent with the experimentally measured one presented in Fig. 3 (w = 0.971, var = 0.0072; Supplementary Fig. 8, R2 = 0.603).

Previous studies showed that the probability of plasmid fixation is correlated with the rate of horizontal transmission19,20,53. As previous models, we consider horizontal transmission of plasmids as a function of the densities of donor and recipient cells, with conjugation events occurring at a constant rate. Competition experiments between plasmid-free and plasmid-carrying clones for a range conjugation rates are illustrated in Fig. 5c; while at low horizontal transmission rates plasmid-free cells outcompete plasmid-bearing cells, at higher conjugative rates, plasmid-bearing cells increase in frequency. Crucially, allowing the fitness effects to vary (sampling for random plasmid–host associations from the MCMC parameter distribution) reduces the conjugation threshold that helps the plasmid to persist in the population, compared to assuming a fixed fitness effect (Fig. 5c). The effect of the variability of fitness effects on plasmid stability is particularly relevant for plasmids producing low average fitness cost (such as pOXA-48_K8), because the availability of hosts where the plasmid produces moderate effects or is beneficial is relatively high. For plasmids producing a large average fitness cost, the conjugation threshold required for plasmid maintenance is less affected by the variability of plasmid fitness effects in the different bacterial hosts (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. 9).

Community complexity promotes plasmid persistence

Our results strongly suggest that community complexity should promote plasmid persistence by giving the plasmid access to a subpopulation of permissive bacterial hosts. To explore how plasmid stability is affected by increasing community complexity and rates of horizontal transmission, we randomly sampled N = 104 plasmid-free cells from the distribution of growth parameters estimated using the MCMC algorithm. These random communities were used to study the population dynamics of plasmids transmitting vertically and horizontally in multi-strain communities. The fitness cost (or benefit) of bearing plasmids was modelled as a random variable that modifies the wild-type (plasmid-free) growth rate by a factor σ, such that if σ = 0, the distribution of fitness effects has zero variance (Fig. 6a), but if σ > 0, the result is a symmetrical heavy-tailed distribution with a right-hand tail expanding towards positive fitness effects (Fig. 6b), indicating the existence of plasmid–host associations in which plasmid carriage produces a fitness benefit.

Fig. 6. Plasmid peristence in complex communities.

Fig. 6

Modelling plasmid persistence in polymicrobial communities, assuming fixed (a, c) or variable (b, d) plasmid fitness effects. a, b Relative fitness histogram obtained by randomly sampling 104 parameter values from the parameter distribution shown in the inset plot (points illustrate the expected values of each distribution and ellipses their standard deviation; green, plasmid-bearing bacteria; orange, plasmid-free bacteria). The green ellipse in b is larger as a consequence of considering that the cost of plasmid-bearing is normally distributed with variance (σ2 = 0.007). As a result, the distribution of plasmid fitness effects also has higher variance, with a considerable fraction of plasmid–host associations producing a benefit to the host. Dotted red lines indicate mean relative fitness of plasmid carrying cells. c, d Colour gradient represents the percentage of cells carrying plasmids at the end of 5000 stochastic simulations; orange indicates a population without plasmids and green a community composed of plasmid-carrying cells. If plasmid-bearing is associated with a fixed fitness cost for all members of the community, plasmid maintenance requires a high conjugation rate. The increased proportion of plasmid-bearing cells in d indicates that a distribution of plasmid fitness effects with high variance reduces the critical conjugation rate needed to maintain plasmids in the population, enabling plasmids to persist at low conjugation rates. e Mean fraction of plasmid-bearing cells as a function of the number of strains in the community with a conjugation rate γ = 1.5 × 10−11. If the plasmid always produces a reduction in host fitness (mean w < 1 and low variance), plasmid frequency decreases as the number of strains in the community increases (green line). In contrast, for higher variance at the same mean w, the fraction of plasmid-bearing cells increases with community complexity (orange line).

To assess how the variability of fitness effects influences plasmid persistence in polymicrobial communities, we extended the model to consider populations composed of subsets of 1, 2, 3, 4,…, M ≤ N cell types sampled randomly from the wild-type parameter distribution (see “Methods”, and Supplementary Figs. 10 and 11). This enabled us to estimate the relative frequency of plasmid-bearing cells at the end of a long-term experiment and evaluate the stability of the plasmid in multi-strain communities with different population structures. Initial bacterial densities were determined by first running the system forward (with all strains initially present at equal densities and carrying pOXA-48) for T = 24 time units, and then clearing all plasmid-free cells from the population. This assumption is akin to patients receiving an antibiotic therapy that clears all plasmid-free cells from the bacterial community. The results obtained after 5000 computer simulations over a range of conjugation rates and numbers of cell types in the community are shown in Fig. 6. The simulations either assumed an identical fitness cost for all strains (w = 0.985, var = 0; Fig. 6a, c) or allowed plasmid fitness effects to vary according to the experimentally determined fitness effects (w = 0.985, var = 0.0070; Fig. 6b, d).

Although the mean fitness cost was the same in both conditions, the results of the computational experiments suggest that allowing fitness effects to vary between members of the community markedly increases the chances of plasmid persistence, especially at low conjugation rates. More importantly, in the numerical simulations, plasmid frequency decreased as a function of the number strains in the community when plasmid acquisition was associated with a constant fitness cost, but increased with community complexity for distributions of fitness effects with larger variance (Fig. 6c–e). The explanation for this effect is that if plasmid fitness cost is identical for all community members, diversity simply means extra competition for plasmid-carrying cells, and plasmid persistence becomes more dependent on a high conjugation rate. In contrast, if the fitness effects vary, a larger number of available bacterial hosts in the population increases the probability of the plasmid arriving to a host, in which it produces no costs or beneficial fitness effect. This is an important result because it implies that increasing bacterial community complexity could increase the probability of plasmid persistence in natural environments. Given that most natural microbiota are complex and plasmids can usually conjugate and replicate in different clones, our results may help to explain the high prevalence of plasmids in nature. The results also indicate that the threshold conjugation rate for plasmid persistence may be lower than previously thought. In fact, once plasmids are present in multiple members of a community, they may be able to persist even in the absence of conjugation (Fig. 6d).

Discussion

In this study, we determined the fitness effects of a carbapenem-resistance plasmid in 50 wild-type enterobacteria recovered from the human gut microbiota. The distribution of pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects had a symmetrical shape, with a small average fitness cost and tails expanding towards negative and positive fitness effects (Fig. 3a). According to our simple mathematical model, two key implications arise from this experimentally determined distribution of plasmid fitness effects. First, the probability of plasmid persistence becomes less dependent on a high conjugation rate. This effect is particularly pronounced for plasmids producing a small average cost, but becomes negligible for plasmids producing a large cost (Fig. 5e). Second, and arguably most importantly, the probability of plasmid persistence increases with the number of bacterial strains in the community (Fig. 6). This result is in line with those from recent studies showing that community complexity may promote plasmid stability through source–sink plasmid transfer dynamics29 and by providing multiple plasmid-permissive bacterial phylotypes33,34.

The complex and multi-clonal nature of most natural bacterial communities attests the likely relevance of our findings to the extremely high prevalence of plasmids in bacterial populations57. The human gut microbiota, for example, includes a great variety of bacteria from hundreds of species58, including several strains from the Enterobacterales order alone59. Our experimental system is in fact inspired by the dynamics of pOXA-48-like plasmids in the gut microbiota of hospitalised patients. In a recent study, we observed that once patients are colonised by a pOXA-48-carrying clone, the plasmid spreads through conjugation to other resident enterobacteria present in the gut microbiota35. Crucially, pOXA-48-like plasmids usually persist in the gut of patients throughout the hospital stay and can be detected in subsequent hospital admissions months or years later, and not necessarily in the original colonising strain35. Our results indicate that the variability of pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects could help to explain the long-term persistence of this and other plasmids in the human gut microbiota.

Another interesting result of this study is that pOXA-48_K8 produced a particularly elevated cost in K. pneumoniae isolates belonging to ST1427 (Fig. 4a). ST1427 is under-represented among the pOXA-48-carrying K. pneumoniae isolates in our hospital, which are dominated by ST1135,40. Remarkably, in the four K. pneumoniae ST11 clones tested in this study, pOXA-48_K8 produced non-significant (Kpn07, Kpn20, and Kpn23) or even beneficial fitness effects (Kpn22, Fig. 4a). Therefore, despite the small number of K. pneumoniae clones analysed, our results suggest that genetic differences between strains of the same species can explain differences in plasmid fitness cost, dictating the epidemiology of plasmid–bacterium associations in clinical settings. Further analysis of a larger sample of K. pneumoniae isolates from the different STs will be needed to elucidate the genetic basis underlying these specific interactions between bacterial phylogeny and pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects.

The main experimental limitation of our study is that plasmid fitness effects were determined in vitro, using planktonic cultures in lysogeny broth (LB) medium. This is the standard practise in the field, and previous studies have shown that plasmid fitness effects measured in laboratory conditions correlate with those measured in animal models46; however, our results may not be fully representative of pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects in the human gut. Future studies will need to explore more complex in vitro systems60, as well as in vivo animal models61. Another limitation is that, although in this study we used pOXA-48-free isolates recovered from patients with no record of colonisation by a pOXA-48-enterobacteria, it is impossible to completely rule out the possibility of the previous presence of a pOXA-48-like plasmid in these isolates, which could have led to pre-existing compensatory adaptations affecting the magnitude of pOXA-48_K8 fitness effects. Finally, another important limitation of our study is that we modelled bacterial communities with a simple resource competition model that does not consider spatial structure62, complex ecological interactions between community members63, plasmid–host co-evolution64, or differential rates of horizontal transmission31. Although more complex models65 will be needed to integrate bacterial community complexity and plasmid fitness effects, consideration of diverse polymicrobial populations with complex spatiotemporal interactions would likely only increase variance of fitness effects, therefore promoting plasmid stability.

Methods

Strains, pOXA-48_K8 plasmid, and culture conditions

We selected 50 representative ESBL-producing clones form the R-GNOSIS collection (Supplementary Data 1). This collection was constructed in our hospital as part of an active surveillance-screening programme for detecting patients colonised by ESBL/carbapenemase-producing enterobacteria, from March 4th, 2014 to March 31st, 2016 (R-GNOSIS-FP7-HEALTH-F3-2011-282512, https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/282512/reporting/es, approved by the Ramón y Cajal University Hospital Ethics Committee, Reference 251/13)40,42. The screening included a total of 28,089 samples from 9275 patients admitted at four different wards (gastroenterology, neurosurgery, pneumology, and urology) in the Ramon y Cajal University Hospital (Madrid, Spain). The characterisation of samples was performed during the R-GNOSIS study period40,66; rectal swabs were plated on Chromo ID-ESBL and Chrom-CARB/OXA-48 selective agar media (BioMérieux, France) and bacterial colonies able to grow on these media were identified by MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) and further characterised by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). For the present study, we selected 25 E. coli and 25 K. pneumoniae ESBL-producing isolates from the R-GNOSIS collection. The strains were representative of E. coli and K. pneumoniae diversity in the R-GNOSIS collection (randomly chosen form the most common PFGE profiles42), they did not carry any carbapenemase gene and they were recovered from patients not colonised by other pOXA-48-carrying clones. To construct the transconjugants, we used the most common pOXA-48-like plasmid variant from the R-GNOSIS collection in our hospital, according to plasmid genetic sequence (pOXA-48_K8, accession number MT441554)26. Bacterial strains were cultured in LB at 37 °C in 96-well plates with continuous shaking (250 r.p.m.) and on LB agar plates at 37 °C.

Construction of transconjugants collection

We performed an initial conjugation round to introduce pOXA-48_K8 plasmid from wild-type E. coli C609 strain35, into E. coli β3914 (ref. 67), a diaminopimelic acid (DAP) auxotrophic laboratory mutant of E. coli K-12 (kanamycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline resistant, Supplementary Data 1), which was used as the common counter-selectable donor. The pOXA-48-carrying wild-type E. coli C609 and E. coli β3914 were streaked from freezer stocks onto solid LB agar medium with ertapenem 0.5 µg/ml and DAP 0.3 mM, respectively, and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Donor and recipient colonies were independently inoculated in 2 ml of LB in 15-ml culture tubes and incubated overnight. After growth, donor and recipient cultures were collected by centrifugation (15 min, 1500 × g) and cells were re-suspended in each tube with 300 µl of sterile NaCl 0.9%. Then, the suspensions were mixed in a 1:1 proportion, spotted onto solid LB medium with DAP 0.3 mM and incubated at 37 °C overnight. Transconjugants were selected by streaking the conjugation mix on LB with ertapenem (0.5 µg/ml), DAP 0.3 mM, tetracycline (15 µg/ml), and kanamycin (30 µg/ml). The presence of pOXA-48_K8 was checked by PCR, using primers for blaOXA-48 gene and for the replication initiation protein gene repC (Supplementary Table 2).

We used the counter-selectable E. coli β3914/pOXA-48_K8 donor to conjugate plasmid pOXA-48_K8 in the 50 wild-type strains. We used the same protocol described above, but the final conjugation mix was plated on LB with no DAP (to counter-select the donor) and with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (to select for transconjugants). The optimal concentration of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was experimentally determined for each isolate in the collection and ranged from 64 µg/ml to 384 µg/ml. The presence of pOXA-48_K8 in the transconjugants was checked by PCR, as described above, and by antibiotic susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing (see below). To test the stability of plasmid pOXA-48_K8 in the transconjugants, we propagated cultures in LB with no antibiotic selection (two consecutive days, 1:10,000 dilution) and plated cultures on LB agar. After ON incubation at 37 °C, 100 independent colonies of each transconjugant were replicated both on LB agar and LB agar with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid to identify pOXA-48-carrying colonies (including negative controls of plasmid-free wild-type clones). Results showed that the plasmid was overall stable in the transconjugants; 100% stable in 43 isolates, and ≥90% stable in the 7 remaining isolates.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

Antibiotic susceptibility profiles were determined for every wild-type and transconjugant strain by the disc diffusion method, following the EUCAST guidelines (www.eucast.org; Supplementary Data 2). We used the following antimicrobials agents: imipenem (10 µg), ertapenem (10 µg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20/10 µg), rifampicin (30 µg), streptomycin (300 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), and amikacin (30 µg; BioRad, CA, USA). pOXA-48-carrying and pOXA-48-free strains were pre-cultured in Müller-Hinton (MH) broth at 37 °C in 15 ml test tubes with continuous shaking (250 r.p.m.), and disc diffusion antibiograms were performed on MH agar plates (BBL, Becton Dickinson, MD, USA).

Growth curves

Pre-cultures of plasmid-free and plasmid-carrying strains (four and six replicates of the plasmid-free and the plasmid-carrying strains, respectively) were prepared by inoculating single independent colonies into LB broth and overnight incubation at 37 °C with continuous shaking (250 r.p.m.). Overnight cultures were diluted 1:1000 into fresh LB in 96-well plates, which were incubated during 22 h at 37 °C with shaking (250 r.p.m.) in a plate reader (Synergy HTX Multi-Mode Reader, BioTek Instruments, Inc, VT, USA). ODs were measured every 15 min during the incubation. The maximum growth rate (μmax), maximum optical density (ODmax), and AUC were determined using the growthrates and flux packages in R. We calculated the relative ODmax, μmax, and AUC, by dividing the average value of each parameter for the pOXA-48-carrying isolate between that of the pOXA-48-free isolate using the following formula:

RelativeODmax,Vmax,AUC=PlasmidcarryingODmax,Vmax,AUCPlasmidfreeODmax,Vmax,AUC 1

Construction of pBGC, a non-mobilisable, GFP-expressing plasmid

To fluorescently label the wild-type isolates for competition assays using flow cytometry, we constructed the pBGC plasmid, a non-mobilizable version of the gfp-carrying small plasmid pBGT25 (Supplementary Fig. 3, accession number MT702881). The pBGT backbone was amplified, except for the region including the oriT and blaTEM1 gene, using the pBGC Fw/Rv primers. The gfp terminator region was independently amplified using the GFP-Term Fw/Rv primers (Supplementary Table 2). PCR amplifications were made with Phusion Hot Start II DNA Polymerase at 2 U/µl (ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, USA), and PCR products were digested with DpnI to eliminate plasmid template before setting up the assembly reaction (New England BioLabs, MA, USA). Finally, pBGC was constructed by joining the amplified pBGT backbone and the gfp terminator region using the Gibson Assembly Cloning Kit (New England BioLabs, MA, USA). Resulting reaction was transformed by heat shock into NEB 5-alpha Competent E. coli (New England BioLabs, MA, USA), following manufacturer’s instructions. Transformation product was plated on LB agar with arabinose 0.1% and chloramphenicol 30 µg/ml, and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Plasmid-bearing colonies were selected by green fluorescence. The gfp gene in pBGC is under the control of the PBAD promoter, so GFP production is generally repressed and induced by the presence of arabinose. pBGC was completely sequenced using primers described in Supplementary Table 2. We confirmed that neither pOXA-48_K8, nor helper plasmid pTA-Mob68, could mobilised pBGC by conjugation using the conjugation protocol described above, confirming that pBGC plasmid is not mobilizable. Finally, pBGC plasmid was introduced into our isolate collection by electroporation (Gene Pulser Xcell Electroporator, BioRad, CA, USA). Of note, we were not able to obtain pBGC-carrying transformants in eight of the isolates due, in part, to a pre-existing high chloramphenicol resistance phenotype (Ec13, Kpn10, Kpn11, and Kpn19–Kpn23).

Competition assays using flow cytometry

We performed competition assays45, using flow cytometry, to obtain the relative fitness of pOXA-48-carrying isolates compared to their pOXA-48-free parental counterparts. We used the collection of pBGC transformed wild-type isolates as competitors against their isogenic pOXA-48-carrying and pOXA-48-free isolates. Specifically, two sets of competitions were performed for each isolate: pOXA-48-free vs. pBGC-carrying, and pOXA-48-carrying vs. pBGC-carrying (the “pBGC-carrying” are the wild-type pOXA-48-free isolates carrying pBGC). Five biological replicates of each competition were performed. Pre-cultures were incubated overnight in LB in 96-well plates at 225 r.p.m. and 37 °C, then mixed 1:1 and diluted 10,000-fold in 200 µl of fresh LB in in 96-well plates. Mixtures were competed for 24 h in LB at 37 °C and 250 r.p.m. (the low initial cell density and the strong shaking hinders pOXA-48_K8 conjugation, see control experiment below). To determine the initial proportions, initial 1:1 mix were diluted 2000-fold in 200 µl of NaCl 0.9 % with l-arabinose 0.1%, and incubated at 37 °C at 250 r.p.m. during 1.5 h to induce GFP expression (inducible GFP expression allows avoiding the costs associated with GFP production during the overnight competition). The measurements were performed via flow cytometry using a CytoFLEX Platform (Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, IN, US) with the following parameters: 50 μl/min flow rate, 22 μm core size, and 10,000 events recorded per sample (Supplementary Fig. 12). After 24 h of incubation, final proportions were determined as described above, after 2000-fold dilution of the cultures. The fitness of each strain relative to its pBGC-carrying parental isolate was determined using the formula:

w=ln(Nf/Ni)ln(Nf,pBGC+/Ni,pBGC+) 2

where w is the relative fitness of the pOXA-48-carrying (wpOXA-48+) or pOXA-48-free (wpOXA-48-) isolates compared to the pBGC-bearing parental clone, Ni and Nf are the number of cells of the pBGC-free clone at the beginning and end of the competition, and Ni,pBGC and Nf,pBGC are the number of cells of the pBGC-carrying clone at the beginning and end of the competition, respectively. The fitness of the pOXA-48-carrying isolates relative to the pOXA-48-free parental isolates were calculated with the formula, wpOXA-48+/wpOXA-48− to correct for the fitness effects of pBCG (see Supplementary Fig. 13 for pBGC fitness effects). Specifically, the average result of five independent biological replicates of the competition pOXA-48-carrying vs. pBGC-carrying (wpOXA-48+) was divided by the average result of five independent biological replicates of the competition pOXA-48-free vs. pBGC-carrying (wpOXA-48−), and the error propagation method was used to calculate the standard error of the resulting value. Note that the fitness effects of pBGC did not correlate with those form pOXA-48 (Pearson’s correlation, R = 0.11, t = 0.66, df = 39, P = 0.51). For the eight strains where pBGC plasmid could not be introduced (Ec13, Kpn10, Kpn11, and Kpn19–Kpn23), pOXA-48-carrying and pOXA-48-free isolates were competed against a pBGC-carrying E. coli J53 (ref. 69; a sodium azide resistant laboratory mutant of E. coli K-12), following the same protocol described above. In general, we prefer to perform competitions assays between isogenic bacteria to avoid interactions between clones that may affect the outcome of the competition for reasons beyond the presence of the plasmid under study (such as bacteriocin production). However, we did not observe any evidence of growth inhibition between the eight wild-type isolates and E. coli J53 in the flow cytometry data, and the relative fitness results obtained with these competitions were comparable to those obtained in the isogenic competitions (two-tailed t test, t = 1.64, df = 11.2, P = 0.13). To confirm that the isogenic competitions and those against E. coli J53/pBGC produced similar results, we selected 10 random isolates from the 42 isolates with fitness data calculated from isogenic competitions, and repeated their competitions against E. coli J53/pBGC (Supplementary Fig. 14). Results showed that relative fitness values calculated with isogenic competitions and those using E. coli J53/pBGC presented a good correlation (Pearson’s correlation, R = 0.81, t = 3.96, df = 8, P = 0.004, Supplementary Fig. 14). Finally, we performed controls to test for the potential conjugative transfer of pOXA-48_K8 during head-to-head competitions by plating the final time points of the competition assays on amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (with the adequate concentration for each isolate), and chloramphenicol (30 µg/ml). No transconjugants were detected in these controls, showing that the low initial inoculum size we used in the competitions (10,000-fold dilution), and the vigorous shaking of the liquid cultures prevented pOXA-48_K8 conjugation.

DNA extraction and genome sequencing

Genomic DNA of all the pOXA-48_K8-bearing strains was isolated using the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, WI, USA), and quantified using the QuantiFluor dsDNA system (Promega, WI, USA), following manufacturers’ instructions. Whole-genome sequencing was conducted at the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics (Oxford, UK), using the Illumina HiSeq4000 platform with 125 base pair (bp) paired-end reads and at MicrobesNG (Birmingham, UK), using Illumina platforms (MiSeq or HiSeq2500) with 250 bp paired-end reads.

Bioinformatic analyses

The Illumina sequence reads were trimmed using the Trimmomatic v0.33 tool70. SPAdes v3.9.0 (ref. 71) was used to generate de novo assemblies from the trimmed sequence reads with the –cov-cutoff flag set to “auto”. QUAST v4.6.0 (ref. 72) was used to generate assembly statistics. Three genomes were dropped from the analysis because of the poor quality of the sequences (two E. coli [Ec09 and Ec17] and one K. pneumoniae [Kpn05]). All the de novo assemblies used reached enough quality, including total size of 5–7 Mb, and the total number of contigs over 1 kb was <200. Prokka v1.5 (ref. 73) was used to annotate the de novo assemblies with predicted genes. The reads and the annotated genomes have been uploaded the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under the BioProject ID PRJNA641166. The seven-gene ST of all the isolates was determined using the multilocus sequence-typing tool (https://github.com/tseemann/mlst). The plasmid content of each genome was characterised using PlasmidFinder 2.1 (ref. 74), and the antibiotic resistance gene content was characterised with ResFinder 3.2 (ref. 75) (Supplementary Data 1).

In order to confirm the presence of the entire pOXA-48_K8 plasmid, the sequences belonging to pOXA-48_K8 plasmid in the transconjugants were mapped using as reference the complete sequence of plasmid from the donor strain, which had been previously sequenced by PacBio35 (from K. pneumoniae k8—GenBank accession number MT441554). Snippy v3.1 (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy) was used to check that no SNPs or indels accumulated in pOXA-48_K8 during strain construction. Coding sequences in pOXA-48_K8 were predicted and annotated using Prokka 1.14.6 software73. Plasmid annotation was complemented with the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline76.

To determine distances between genomes we used Mash v2.0 (ref. 77) with the raw sequence reads, and a phylogeny was constructed with mashtree v0.33 (ref. 78). For the analysis of the core genome we calculated the genetic relatedness of isolates belonging to Klebsiella spp. and to E. coli by reconstructing their core genome phylogeny with an alignment of the SNPs obtained with Snippy v3.1 (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy). A maximum likelihood tree was generated using IQ-TREE with automated detection of the best evolutionary model79. The tree was represented with midpoint root using the phylotools package in R (https://github.com/helixcn/phylotools) and visualised using the iTOL tool80. We also constructed a distance matrix of the accessory gene network to analyse the accessory genome. To this end, we used AccNET, a tool that allows to infer the accessory genome from the proteomes and cluster them based on protein similarity50. The set of representative proteins was used to build a binary matrix (presence/absence of proteins in the accessory genome) in the R environment and a cladogram to classify the strains according to the accessory genomes. The Euclidean distance was calculated by the “dist” function and a hierarchical clustering was performed with UPGMA using the “hclust” function in the R environment. This cladogram was represented with midpoint root using the phylotools package in R (https://github.com/helixcn/phylotools) and visualised using the iTOL tool80.

Analysis of plasmid fitness effects across bacterial phylogeny

We tested for the presence of phylogenetic signal in core and accessory genomes of E. coli and K. pneumoniae using several statistical tests available in the phylosignal R package51. In essence, these analyses are designed to identify statistical dependence between a given continuous trait (relative fitness) and the phylogenetic tree of the taxa from which the trait is measured. Therefore, a positive phylogenetic signal indicates that there is a tendency for related taxa to resemble each other81. Several indices have been proposed to identify phylogenetic signal, but the choice among them is not straightforward82. We first assayed the methods implemented in the phyloSignal function, which produce global measures of phylogenetic signal (i.e., across the whole phylogeny). The methods employed were Abouheif’s Cmean, Moran’s I index, Bloomberg’s K and K*, and Pagel’s λ (ref. 51). All methods except Pagel’s λ detected a marginally significant phylogenetic signal in the K. pneumoniae core genome (Supplementary Data 3 [first tab]; 0.11 > P > 0.02). Abouheif’s Cmean and Moran’s I (but not Bloomberg’s K and K*, and Pagel’s λ) also detected a marginally significant signal in the K. pneumoniae accessory genome tree (Supplementary Data 3 [first tab]; P < 0.056 for both cases). Intrigued by these results, we used the LIPA based on local Moran’s I, which is meant to detect local hotspots of phylogenetic signal51,52. LIPA, implemented in the lipaMoran function, computes local Moran’s I indexes for each tip of the phylogeny and a non-parametric test to ascertain statistical significance (Supplementary Fig. 5 and Supplementary Data 3 [second tab]).

To investigate the relationship between pOXA-48_K8 fitness effect and the native plasmid content we performed a factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD) using the FactoMine R package83. This method is similar to a multiple factor analysis or a classical principal component analysis, but taking into account and combining different types of variables (quantitative and qualitative). The graphical outputs including variables, factor map, and individuals factor map show the distribution of the bacterial isolates across the different factors, including the presence/absence of the different plasmid variants (qualitative variables), the relative fitness of plasmid-carrying isolates, and the total number of plasmids carried by each isolate (quantitative variables). The extraction and visualisation of the FAMD output was carried out with the Factoextra package on R environment (http://www.r-project.org).

Plasmid population dynamics model

We used a simple mathematical model of microbial growth under resource limitation to study the role of the DFE in the ecological dynamics of a plasmid spreading in a bacterial population14. Bacterial growth rate was modelled as a saturating function of the environmental resource concentration, R,

G(R)=ρVmaxRKm+R=ρu(R), 3

where ρ denotes the cell’s efficiency to convert resource molecules into biomass and uR a resource uptake function that depends on the maximum uptake rate (Vmax) and a half-saturation constant (Km). If we denote with Bp the density of plasmid-bearing cells and with B0 the density of plasmid-free cells (each with its own growth kinetic parameters and growth functions denoted Gp(R) and G0(R), respectively), then the density of each subpopulation can be described by a system of ordinary differential equations:

dRdt=up(R)u0(R)dR, 4
dBpdt=(1λ)Gp(R)Bp+γB0BpdBp, 5
dB0dt=G0RB0+λGpRBpγB0BpdB0. 6

where λ represents the rate of segregational loss rate and d a dilution parameter. Moreover, we represent with γ the rate of conjugative transfer, and therefore we model plasmid conjugation as a function of the densities of donor and recipient cells. By numerically solving the system of equations (using standard differential equations solvers in Matlab), we obtain the final density of each bacterial type in an experiment of T=24 units of time with d=0 (to replicate the batch culture conditions used to estimate the DFE experimentally).

Model parametrization

Parameters of the population dynamics model were jointly determined using a Metropolis–Hastings MCMC (scripts coded in R and available in a public repository56) by fitting a simple Monod model described by the cell’s specific affinity (Vmax/Km) and its resource conversion rate (ρ) to growth curves of each strain growing in isolation, with and without plasmids. This data-fitting algorithm implements a Metropolis–Hastings sampler that was executed for 1 × 107 iterations, with a burn-in parameter of 0.2 and a thinning of 100 iterations. We used an adaptive proposal variance method as a first step of the MCMC algorithm to adjust the acceptance probabilities for the proposed updates. During this period no samples were stored in the chain until the acceptance ratio reached a target value, then we fixed the proposal variance and started storing the MCMC iterations. Figures in Supplementary File 1 display posterior distributions obtained for each parameter and Supplementary Table 1 the maximum likelihood values estimated for each strain. As illustrated in panel a (Supplementary File 1), traces of chains presented good mixing, with convergence of the Markov chains verified by obtaining Gelman–Rubin Rhat statistical values near one for all strains. We tested robustness to different priors by considering uniform, lognormal, beta, and gamma distributions, and obtaining similar maximum likelihood estimates for all prior distributions (Supplementary File 1c, d; ANOVA P > 0.05, H0: there are significant differences in estimates when considering different priors). Identifiability of parameters was confirmed using a data cloning algorithm84,85 such that, as the number of clones increases, the marginal posterior distribution converges to the maximum likelihood estimate (Supplementary File 1f, g; ANOVA P > 0.05 for all strains, H0: there are significant differences in estimates when considering different number of clones). Data and scripts necessary to produce the MCMC diagnostic plots can be downloaded from http://www.github.com/ccg-esb/pOXA48/.

Stochastic simulations of polymicrobial communities

Numerical experiments were performed by randomly sampling N=1×104 cells from the parameter distribution obtained after applying the MCMC algorithm to all 50 strains and fitting a bivariate Normal distribution. We then assembled 5000 synthetic communities composed of a random subset of M<N different strains sampled from this distribution, and solved a multi-strain extension of the population dynamics model. For each numerical experiment, the total density of strain i would be Bi(t)=Bpi(t)+B0i(t), where Bpi and B0i denote, respectively, the densities of plasmid-bearing and plasmid-free cells of type 1iM. To model the fitness effects of bearing plasmids, we introduced a parameter, σ, such that when σ=0, the fitness difference between Bpi and B0i corresponds to a fixed reduction in growth rate (corresponding to a DFE with variance 0 and mean w=0.985). Conversely, if σ>0, then growth kinetic parameters for each plasmid-bearing strain in the community were determined by sampling si from a Normal distribution, N(0,σ2), and multiplying both Vmaxi and ρi by a factor of (1+si). Supplementary Fig. 15 shows a sample of parameter values for plasmid-bearing and plasmid-free cells obtained from considering different mean and variances in a theoretical distribution of plasmid fitness effects.

As with the single-strain model, we consider segregational loss as a transition from Bpi to B0i occurring at a rate λ, but now we also consider that plasmid-free cells can acquire plasmids via conjugation from any plasmid-bearing strain in the community, at a constant rate γ, and with equal probability of transferring between different bacterial hosts. Therefore, we obtain a system of 2M+1 differential equations that can be written, for each strain i, as follows:

dBpidt=(1λ)Gpi(R)Bpi+γj=1MBpjB0idBpi, 7
dB0idt=G0i(R)B0i+λGpi(R)Bpiγj=1MBpjB0idB0i. 8

Furthermore, if R^ represents the input of resource into the system, then

dRdt=i=1M(upi(R)+u0i(R))d(RR^). 9

Initial bacterial densities were determined by first running the system forward (with all strains initially present at equal densities) for T=24 time units, and then clearing all plasmid-free cells from the population. This assumption is consistent with patients receiving antimicrobial therapy that clears all susceptible (plasmid-free) cells from the microbiota or, in an experimental microcosm, to a round of growth in selective media after an overnight culture. As we are interested in the long-term population dynamics, we ran each simulation starting from the aforementioned initial condition until the plasmid fraction was below a threshold ϵ>0 (i.e., plasmid extinction), the plasmid fraction was near 100% and the total plasmid-free density was below ϵ (i.e., plasmid fixation), or wild-type and transconjugant subpopulations appeared to co-exist indefinitely in the population (either in equilibrium or exhibiting oscillatory behaviour, as illustrated in Supplementary Figs. 10 and 11).

Statistical analyses

Analyses were performed using R (v. 3.5.0). Pearson’s product-moment correlation was used to assess the linear relationship between growth curves parameters and relative fitness values obtained from competition assays, and between the relative fitness values obtained in the competition assays using isogenic competitors and those using E. coli J53/pBGC. To test the normal distribution of data from growth curves and competition assays, Shapiro–Wilk normality tests were performed. For normally distributed data, two-way ANOVA test and Tukey-Kramer honest significant difference were used to assess the reduction in relative fitness associated with the presence of the plasmid, and the differences in relative fitness values between species. Two-sampled t test with Bonferroni correction was used to assess the significance of pOXA-48_K8-associated fitness effects in the different bacterial hosts. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the distribution of fitness effects obtained in our study with those form Vogwill and MacLean meta-analysis46 (not normally distributed: Shapiro–Wilk normality test, P = 0.0006). Wilcoxon signed-rank test was also used to determine differences between species in relative ODmax, μmax, and AUC extracted from growth curves (Shapiro–Wilk normality test, P < 0.004 for all parameters except μmax in Klebsiella spp., where P = 0.215). To determine differences in growth curve parameters between pOXA-48-carrying and pOXA-48-free isolates, paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with continuity correction were performed for E. coli isolates and Klebsiella spp. isolates.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Peer Review File (6.2MB, pdf)
Reporting Summary (3.3MB, pdf)
41467_2021_22849_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (424.9KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1 (15.1KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 2 (28.2KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 3 (15.1KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (ERC grant agreement no. 757440-PLASREVOLUTION) and by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (co-funded by European Development Regional Fund “a way to achieve Europe”) grant PI16-00860. R.C. acknowledges financial support from European Commission (grant R-GNOSIS-FP7-HEALTH-F3-2011-282512) and Plan Nacional de I+D+i2013–2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPIR D16/0016/0011) co-financed by European Development Regional Fund “A way to achieve Europe” (ERDF), Operative programme Intelligent Growth 2014–2020. A.S.M. is supported by a Miguel Servet Fellowship (MS15-00012). J.R.-B. acknowledges financial support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Miguel Servet programme; CP20/00154), co-funded by ESF “Investing in your future” and Juan de la Cierva-Incorporación Fellowship (IJC2018-035146-I) co-funded by Agencia Estatal de Investigación del Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. M.H.-G. was supported with a contract from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain (iP-FIS programme, ref. IFI14/00022). R.P.-M. was supported by PAPIIT-UNAM (IN209419) and CONACYT (Ciencia Básica grant A1-S-32164). We thank the Oxford Genomics Centre at the Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics (funded by Wellcome Trust grant reference 203141/Z/16/Z) for the generation and initial processing of the sequencing data.

Source data

Source Data (302.4KB, zip)

Author contributions

A.S.M., A.A.-d.V., and R.P.M. conceived the study. R.C. designed and supervised sampling and collection of R-GNOSIS bacterial isolates. M.H.-G. and P.R.-G. collected the bacterial isolates and performed bacterial characterisation. A.A.-d.V. performed the experimental work with help from J.R.-B. and J.D.F. A.A.-d.V., J.R.-B., and J.D.F. analysed experimental results. R.L.-S. and J.R.-B. performed the bioinformatic/phylogenetic analyses. R.P.M. developed the mathematical model and computer simulations. A.S.M. supervised the study. A.S.M., A.A.-d.V., and R.P.-M. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript, and all the authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript and approved it.

Data availability

The sequences generated and analysed during the current study and the annotated genomes of the isolates under study are available in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA), BioProject ID: PRJNA641166Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The code generated during the current study is available in GitHub56,86.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Rafael Peña-Miller, Email: rafael.penamiller@gmail.com.

Alvaro San Millán, Email: alvsanmillan@gmail.com.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-22849-y.

References

  • 1.Lederberg J. Cell genetics and hereditary symbiosis. Physiol. Rev. 1952;32:403–430. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1952.32.4.403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Frost LS, Leplae R, Summers AO, Toussaint A. Mobile genetic elements: the agents of open source evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005;3:722–732. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Partridge, S. R., Kwong, S. M., Firth, N. & Jensen, S. O. Mobile genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.31, e00088–17 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.San Millan, A. Evolution of plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance in the clinical context. Trends Microbiol.26, 978–985 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 5.Bonomo RA, et al. Carbapenemase-producing organisms: a global scourge. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018;66:1290–1297. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.David S, et al. Epidemic of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Europe is driven by nosocomial spread. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4:1919–1929. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0492-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.San Millan, A. & MacLean, R. C. Fitness costs of plasmids: a limit to plasmid transmission. Microbiol. Spectr.5, 1–12 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.Baltrus DA. Exploring the costs of horizontal gene transfer. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013;28:489–495. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.San Millan A, et al. Integrative analysis of fitness and metabolic effects of plasmids in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. ISME J. 2018;12:3014–3024. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0224-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Harrison, E. & Brockhurst, M. A. Plasmid-mediated horizontal gene transfer is a coevolutionary process. Trends Microbiol.20, 262–267 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11.Bouma JE, Lenski RE. Evolution of a bacteria/plasmid association. Nature. 1988;335:351–352. doi: 10.1038/335351a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dahlberg C, Chao L. Amelioration of the cost of conjugative plasmid carriage in Eschericha coli K12. Genetics. 2003;165:1641–1649. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.4.1641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dionisio F, Conceiçã IC, Marques ACR, Fernandes L, Gordo I. The evolution of a conjugative plasmid and its ability to increase bacterial fitness. Biol. Lett. 2005;1:250–252. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.San Millan A, et al. Positive selection and compensatory adaptation interact to stabilize non-transmissible plasmids. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:5208. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Harrison E, Guymer D, Spiers AJ, Paterson S, Brockhurst MA. Parallel compensatory evolution stabilizes plasmids across the parasitism-mutualism continuum. Curr. Biol. 2015;25:2034–2039. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Loftie-Eaton, W. et al. Compensatory mutations improve general permissiveness to antibiotic resistance plasmids. Nat. Ecol. Evol.1, 1354–1363 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Wein T, Hülter NF, Mizrahi I, Dagan T. Emergence of plasmid stability under non-selective conditions maintains antibiotic resistance. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10600-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lopatkin AJ, et al. Persistence and reversal of plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1689. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01532-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stewart FM, Levin BR. The population biology of bacterial plasmids: a PRIORI conditions for the existence of conjugationally transmitted factors. Genetics. 1977;87:209–228. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.2.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bergstrom CT, Lipsitch M, Levin BR. Natural selection, infectious transfer and the existence conditions for bacterial plasmids. Genetics. 2000;155:1505–1519. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.4.1505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zwanzig, M. et al. Mobile compensatory mutations promote plasmid survival. mSystems4, e00186–18 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 22.Lili LN, Britton NF, Feil EJ. The persistence of parasitic plasmids. Genetics. 2007;177:399–405. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.077420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ponciano JM, De Gelder L, Top EM, Joyce P. The population biology of bacterial plasmids: a hidden Markov model approach. Genetics. 2007;176:957–968. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.061937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.San Millan A, Heilbron K, MacLean RC. Positive epistasis between co-infecting plasmids promotes plasmid survival in bacterial populations. ISME J. 2014;8:601–612. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.San Millan, A., Escudero, J. A., Gifford, D. R., Mazel, D. & MacLean, R. C. Multicopy plasmids potentiate the evolution of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. Nat. Ecol. Evol.1, 0010 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 26.De Gelder L, Ponciano JM, Joyce P, Top EM. Stability of a promiscuous plasmid in different hosts: No guarantee for a long-term relationship. Microbiology. 2007;153:452–463. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2006/001784-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Humphrey B, et al. Fitness of Escherichia coli strains carrying expressed and partially silent IncN and IncP1 plasmids. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hall JPJ, et al. Environmentally co-occurring mercury resistance plasmids are genetically and phenotypically diverse and confer variable context-dependent fitness effects. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;17:5008–5022. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hall JPJ, Wood AJ, Harrison E, Brockhurst MA. Source-sink plasmid transfer dynamics maintain gene mobility in soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:8260–8265. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600974113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Di Luca MC, et al. Low biological cost of carbapenemase-encoding plasmids following transfer from Klebsiella pneumoniae to Escherichia coli. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017;72:85–89. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gama JA, Kloos J, Johnsen PJ, Samuelsen Ø. Host dependent maintenance of a bla NDM-1-encoding plasmid in clinical Escherichia coli isolates. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66239-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kottara, A., Hall, J. P. J., Harrison, E. & Brockhurst, M. A. Variable plasmid fitness effects and mobile genetic element dynamics across Pseudomonas species. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.94, fix172 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 33.Li L, et al. Plasmids persist in a microbial community by providing fitness benefit to multiple phylotypes. ISME J. 2020;14:1170–1181. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0596-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Klümper U, et al. Broad host range plasmids can invade an unexpectedly diverse fraction of a soil bacterial community. ISME J. 2015;9:934–945. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Leon-Sampedro, R. et al. Pervasive transmission of a carbapenem resistance plasmid in the gut microbiota of hospitalized patients. Nat. Microbiol.10.1038/s41564-021-00879-y (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Dahlberg C, et al. Interspecies bacterial conjugation by plasmids from marine environments visualized by gfp expression. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998;15:385–390. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025935. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Poirel L, Héritier C, Tolün V, Nordmann P. Emergence of oxacillinase-mediated resistance to imipenem in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004;48:15–22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.1.15-22.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pitout, J. D. D., Peirano, G., Kock, M. M., Strydom, K.-A. & Matsumura, Y. The global ascendency of OXA-48-Type carbapenemases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.33, e00102–19 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 39.Ledda, A. et al. Hospital outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales associated with an OXA-48 plasmid carried mostly by Escherichia coli ST399. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2020.06.15.148189 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.Hernández-García M, et al. Characterization of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from colonized patients in a university hospital in Madrid, Spain, during the R-GNOSIS project depicts increased clonal diversity over time with maintenance of high-risk clones. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018;73:3039–3043. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Diaz-Agero, C. et al. Local prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae intestinal carriers at admission and co-expression of ESBL and OXA-48 carbapenemase in Klebsiella pneumoniae: a prevalence survey in a Spanish University Hospital. BMJ Open9, e024879 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Maechler F, et al. Contact isolation versus standard precautions to decrease acquisition of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales in non-critical care wards: a cluster-randomised crossover trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020;20:575–584. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30626-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Karanika S, Karantanos T, Arvanitis M, Grigoras C, Mylonakis E. Fecal colonization with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and risk factors among healthy individuals: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016;63:310–318. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Holt KE, et al. Genomic analysis of diversity, population structure, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae, an urgent threat to public health. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E3574–E3581. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501049112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lenski, R. E., Rose, M. R., Simpson, S. C. & Tadler, S. C. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. Am. Nat.138, 1315–1341 (1991).
  • 46.Vogwill T, Maclean RC. The genetic basis of the fitness costs of antimicrobial resistance: a meta-analysis approach. Evol. Appl. 2015;8:284–295. doi: 10.1111/eva.12202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Stoesser, N. et al. Evolutionary history of the global emergence of the Escherichia coli epidemic clone ST131. MBio7, e02162 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 48.McNally A, et al. Combined analysis of variation in core, accessory and regulatory genome regions provides a super-resolution view into the evolution of bacterial populations. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1006280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.San Millan, A., Toll-Riera, M., Qi, Q. & MacLean, R. C. Interactions between horizontally acquired genes create a fitness cost in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nat. Commun.6, 6845 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 50.Lanza VF, Baquero F, De La Cruz F, Coque TM. AcCNET (Ac cessory Genome C onstellation Net work): comparative genomics software for accessory genome analysis using bipartite networks. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:283–285. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Keck F, Rimet F, Bouchez A, Franc A. Phylosignal: an R package to measure, test, and explore the phylogenetic signal. Ecol. Evol. 2016;6:2774–2780. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geogr. Anal. 2010;27:93–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cooper NS, Brown ME, Caulcott CA. A mathematical method for analysing plasmid stability in micro-organisms. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1987;133:1871–1880. doi: 10.1099/00221287-133-7-1871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Paulsson J, Ehrenberg M. Noise in a minimal regulatory network: plasmid copy number control. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2001;34:1–59. doi: 10.1017/S0033583501003663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Simonsen L, Gordon DM, Stewart FM, Levin BR. Estimating the rate of plasmid transfer: an end-point method. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1990;136:2319–2325. doi: 10.1099/00221287-136-11-2319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.San Millan, A. et al. pNUK73: a Metropolis-Hastings MCMC implementation used to fit a bacterial growth curve. figshare 10.6084/m9.figshare.1127995 (2014).
  • 57.Acman M, van Dorp L, Santini JM, Balloux F. Large-scale network analysis captures biological features of bacterial plasmids. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:2452. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16282-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Almeida A, et al. A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota. Nature. 2019;568:499–504. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0965-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Martinson JNV, et al. Rethinking gut microbiome residency and the Enterobacteriaceae in healthy human adults. ISME J. 2019;13:2306–2318. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0435-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Stalder, T. et al. Evolving populations in biofilms contain more persistent plasmids. Mol. Biol. Evol.37, 1563–1576 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 61.Gumpert, H. et al. Transfer and persistence of a multi-drug resistance plasmid in situ of the infant gut microbiota in the absence of antibiotic treatment. Front. Microbiol.8, 1852 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 62.Nadell CD, Drescher K, Foster KR. Spatial structure, cooperation and competition in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14:589–600. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Coyte KZ, Schluter J, Foster KR. The ecology of the microbiome: networks, competition, and stability. Science. 2015;350:663–666. doi: 10.1126/science.aad2602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Jordt, H. et al. Coevolution of host–plasmid pairs facilitates the emergence of novel multidrug resistance. Nat. Ecol. Evol.4, 863–869 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 65.Lopatkin, A. J. & Collins, J. J. Predictive biology: modelling, understanding and harnessing microbial complexity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.18, 507–520 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 66.Hernández-García M, et al. Intestinal co-colonization with different carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales isolates is not a rare event in an OXA-48 endemic area. EClinicalMedicine. 2019;15:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Le Roux F, Binesse J, Saulnier D, Mazel D. Construction of a Vibrio splendidus mutant lacking the metalloprotease gene vsm by use of a novel counterselectable suicide vector. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;73:777–784. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02147-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Strand TA, Lale R, Degnes KF, Lando M, Valla S. A new and improved host-independent plasmid system for RK2-based conjugal transfer. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e90372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Matsumura, Y., Peirano, G. & Pitout, J. D. D. Complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli J53, an azide-resistant laboratory strain used for conjugation experiments. Genome Announc. 6, e00433–18 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 70.Bolger MA, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data | Bioinformatics | Oxford Academic. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bankevich A, et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012;19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Seeman T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation | Bioinformatics | Oxford Academic. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Carattoli A, et al. In Silico detection and typing of plasmids using plasmidfinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zankari E, et al. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012;67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Haft DH, et al. RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D851–D860. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ondov BD, et al. Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol. 2016;17:132. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0997-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Katz, L. S. et al. Mashtree: a rapid comparison of whole genome sequence files. J. Open Source Softw.4, 1762 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 79.Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life v2: online annotation and display of phylogenetic trees made easy. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W475–W478 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 81.Blomberg SP, Garland T, Ives AR. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution. 2003;57:717–745. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Münkemüller T, et al. How to measure and test phylogenetic signal. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2012;3:743–756. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00196.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Lê S, Josse J, Husson F. FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 2008;25:1–18. doi: 10.18637/jss.v025.i01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lele SR, Nadeem K, Schmuland B. Estimability and likelihood inference for Generalized Linear Mixed Models using data cloning. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2010;105:1617–1625. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09757. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lele SR, Dennis B, Lutscher F. Data cloning: easy maximum likelihood estimation for complex ecological models using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Ecol. Lett. 2007;10:551–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01047.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Alonso-del Valle, A. et al. pOXA48: variability of plasmid fitness effects contributes to plasmid persistence in bacterial communities. Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.4605352 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Peer Review File (6.2MB, pdf)
Reporting Summary (3.3MB, pdf)
41467_2021_22849_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (424.9KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1 (15.1KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 2 (28.2KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 3 (15.1KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The sequences generated and analysed during the current study and the annotated genomes of the isolates under study are available in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA), BioProject ID: PRJNA641166Source data are provided with this paper.

The code generated during the current study is available in GitHub56,86.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES