Skip to main content
The Journal of International Medical Research logoLink to The Journal of International Medical Research
. 2021 May 4;49(5):03000605211012379. doi: 10.1177/03000605211012379

Pathogen distribution and risk factors for urinary tract infection in infants and young children with retained double-J catheters

Jianfeng Wang 1,2,*, Yu Cao 3,*, Li Zhang 1,2, Guoqing Liu 1,2, Chunjing Li 1,2,
PMCID: PMC8113964  PMID: 33947257

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the pathogens and potential risk factors for urinary tract infection (UTI) in patients with retained double-J catheters (DJCs).

Methods

In total, 107 infants and young children with DJCs were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were included in the infection group (n = 30) or non-infection group (n = 77), according to UTI presence or absence. The species and characteristics of pathogens were investigated, and the clinical features of the patients were recorded for further analysis.

Results

Gram-negative bacilli were the most common causative pathogens (69.2%), among which Escherichia coli was most frequent (38.5%). The second most common causative pathogens were Gram-positive cocci (28.2%), among which Enterococcus faecalis was most frequent (10.3%). UTIs among patients in this study were associated with the following factors: catheter retention (long-term) (odds ratio [OR] = 2.514, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.176–5.373), sex (male) (OR = 2.966, 95% CI = 1.032–8.529), DJC retention (long-term) (OR = 1.869, 95% CI = 1.194–2.926), and DJC number (unilateral) (OR = 0.309, 95% CI = 0.103–0.922).

Conclusions

Infants and young children with DJCs were likely to experience UTIs, mainly caused by Gram-negative bacilli. Long-term catheter retention or DJC retention, male sex, and bilateral DJC retention were risk factors for UTI.

Keywords: Infant, child, double-J catheter, urinary tract infection, risk factor, Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, catheter retention

Introduction

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common infectious disease in children.1 Many factors may contribute to UTI onset, including congenital diseases (e.g., vesicoureteral reflux or repetitive ureter malformation)2 and iatrogenic factors (e.g., catheterization).3 Patients with indwelling double-J catheters (DJCs) are more likely to experience UTI, compared with patients who lack DJCs.4,5 Compared with older children, symptoms of UTI in infants and young children under the age of 3 years considerably differ, but the diagnosis is dependent on urine culture.68 However, little is known regarding the species of pathogens and other risk factors associated with UTI onset in infants and young children with DJCs. Thus, we performed this retrospective analysis to investigate potential risk factors for UTI in patients with DJCs.

Patients and methods

Participants and UTI assessment

The protocols were approved by the institutional review board of the Foshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital (approval no. FSFY-MEC-2019-012). Infants and young children with DJCs, who were treated in Foshan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital from January 2014 to January 2019, were included in this retrospective analysis. The parents of all patients in the study provided written or verbal informed consent to participate. All patients provided urine bacterial cultures after admission, prior to the administration of any antimicrobial agent; only patients with negative culture results were permitted to undergo DJC insertion into the ureter. All patients provided at least one urine bacterial culture before catheter removal; urine cultures were also performed for patients with suspected UTI (>10 white blood cells [WBC]/μL) during post-discharge follow-up. Bladder urine samples were collected simultaneously for bacterial culture during DJC removal. Urine samples (5.0 mL each) used for bacterial culture were obtained by bladder catheterization or using a plastic bag attached to cleaned genitalia. Patients were classified into infection and non-infection groups according to their culture results. UTI diagnostic criteria were based on European Association of Urology Guidelines on Paediatric Urology: UTI was defined as a bacterial colony count >105 colony-forming units/mL.9 Pathogen identification was performed using the BD Phoenix-100 automatic microbial identification analyzer (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Measurement data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation; differences regarding rates or percentages were compared by the chi-squared test. A binary logistic regression model was constructed to identify the associations of clinical features with UTI. Risk factors were expressed using adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient and clinical characteristics

In total, 107 infants and young children (55 boys and 52 girls) with DJCs from Jan 2014 to Jan 2019 were retrospectively analyzed in Foshan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital in the study. The mean age was 12.4±8.4 months (range, 3–36 months). Thirty patients were diagnosed with UTI (infection group) and 77 patients were infection-free (non-infection group). Patient age, weight, and other characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups (Table 1). Clinical features potentially associated with UTI were examined and are summarized in Table 2.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics.

Group Patients (cases) J catheter indwelling (cases)
Disease classification (cases)
Unilateral Bilateral Weight (kg) Age (months) UPJO UVJO EU VUR CM UUTC Others
Infection 30 22 8 10.3 ± 2.5 13.5 ± 8.0 13 3 4 5 2 1 2
Non-infection 77 62 15 9.6 ± 2.5a 11.9 ± 8.6b 37 7 9 14 5 2 3

aP = 0.0995; bP = 0.191.

CM, congenital megaureter; EU: ectopic ureter; UPJO, ureteropelvic junction obstruction; UUTC, upper urinary tract calculi; VUR, vesicoureteric reflux.

Table 2.

Clinical features potentially associated with urinary tract infection.

Clinical features Infection group (cases) Non-infection group (cases)
Surgery time
 <1 hour 8 16
 ≥1 hour and <2 hours 7 30
 ≥2 hours and <3 hours 8 21
 ≥3 hours and <4 hours 7 10
Catheter indwelling time
 <3 days 4 24
 ≥3 days and <7 days 15 42
 ≥7 days 11 11
Hematuria
 Yes 22 64
 No 8 13
 Sex
 Male 21 34
 Female 9 43
Oral antibiotics after discharge
 Never 19 38
 Intermittent 8 30
 Continuous 3 9
 DJC indwelling time
 ≥4 weeks and <5 weeks 3 24
 ≥5 weeks and <6 weeks 11 30
 ≥6 weeks and <7 weeks 8 16
 ≥7 weeks and <8 weeks 5 4
 ≥8 weeks 3 3
DJC number
 Unilateral 18 62
 Bilateral 12 15

DJC, double-J catheter.

UTI in patients and species of pathogens

Urine culture results were positive for 30 patients (Table 3); 39 strains of pathogens were detected. Six patients developed fever and were hospitalized, but none progressed to sepsis. The remaining 24 patients received oral antibiotics in an outpatient clinic. The incidence of UTI was 28.04%. The culture results exhibited a single pathogen species in 21 urine samples and two pathogen species in eight samples. In addition, fungus was detected in one patient. Gram-negative bacteria (27 strains, 69.2%) were the major pathogens and Escherichia coli was the dominant bacteria, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gram-positive cocci were the second most common causative pathogens (11 strains, 28.2%), mainly including Enterococcus faecalis, followed by Enterococcus faecium and Staphylococcus aureus.

Table 3.

Species of pathogens identified in 30 patients with urinary tract infection.

Pathogens Gram-negative bacteria (cases, %)
Gram-positive bacteria (cases, %)
E. coli KPC PAE Others E. faecalis E. faecium S. aureus Others Fungus (cases,%)
Strains (%) 15(38.5) 5(12.8) 4(10.3) 3(7.7) 4(10.3) 2(5.1) 2(5.1) 3(7.7) 1(2.6)

E. coli, Escherichia coli; E. faecalis, Enterococcus faecalis; E. faecium, Enterococcus faecium; KPC, Klebsiella pneumoniae; PAE, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; S. aureus: Staphylococcus aureus.

Risk factors for UTI

Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the occurrence of UTI in infants and young children with DJCs was significantly associated with the following factors: catheter retention time, sex, DJC retention time, and DJC number. Among these factors, long-term catheter retention (OR = 2.514, 95% CI = 1.176–5.373; P = 0.017), sex (male) (OR = 2.966, 95% CI = 1.032–8.529; P = 0.044), and long-term DJC retention (OR = 1.869, 95% CI = 1.194–2.926; P = 0.006) were identified as risk factors for UTI; while the DJC number (unilateral) (OR = 0.309, 95% CI = 0.103–0.922; P = 0.035) was protective against UTI (Table 4).

Table 4.

Logistic regression analysis of urinary tract infection in infants and young children with indwelling DJCs.

Factors OR 95% CI P
Surgery time
 Short versus long (each additional hour) 1.142 0.682–1.911 0.615
Catheter retention time
 Short versus long (each additional week) 2.514 1.176–5.373 0.017
Hematuria
 Yes versus no (follow-up period) 0.691 0.198–2.413 0.562
Sex
 Female versus male 2.966 1.032–8.529 0.044
 Oral antibiotics after discharge
 Never versus occasional/continuous 0.695 0.331–1.460 0.337
DJC retention time
 Short versus long (each additional week) 1.869 1.194–2.926 0.006
DJC number
 Bilateral versus unilateral 0.309 0.103–0.922 0.035
 Age 0.459 0.962–1.089 0.459

DJC, double-J catheter.

Discussion

Infants and children with DJCs usually exhibit unclear or nonspecific symptoms when UTI occurs (e.g., only abnormal WBC count in urine), although some patients may exhibit bacteremia.10 For children with UTI, the WBC count in urine would be affected by DJC placement, and therefore it is inappropriate for use as a UTI diagnostic criterion.11 Accordingly, diagnosis continues to rely on bacterial culture of urine samples.6,9 In the present study, bacterial cultures were performed for all patients during hospitalization and for some patients during follow-up. Bladder urine samples for bacterial culture were also collected during DJC withdrawal. Repeated culture might avoid missed diagnosis but can also greatly improve the rate of pathogen detection; this may explain the high incidence of UTI found in our study. The main pathogens identified were Gram-negative bacilli, including E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa; these results were consistent with prior findings that E. coli is the most common causative bacteria for UTI in infants and young children.8 Furthermore, K. pneumoniae is a species of opportunistic bacteria distributed in the perineum, which may easily colonize the urinary tract.12 P. aeruginosa also colonizes the vulva surface and could easy enter the urinary tract.13 Notably, Gram-positive cocci were detected in some urine samples, mainly including E. faecalis, S. aureus, and E. faecium. E. faecalis establishes a symbiotic relationship with E. coli and is reportedly a common pathogen in the urinary tract.14 S. aureus, which adheres to the skin surface, can be introduced into the urinary tract during catheter placement.15 E. faecium is likely to colonize the urinary tract because of its specialized fimbriae.16 A strain of Candida albicans was also detected in a urine sample, and the presence of fungus could likely be attributed to dysbiosis caused by the long-term application of antibiotics;17 this treatment history was confirmed by reviewing the patient’s medical records.

When a catheter is inserted into the urinary tract, bacteria in the urine might adhere to the catheter wall and generate bacterial biofilms on the catheter surface. Microscopic analysis of bacterial biofilms reveals a honeycomb structure, which is difficult for antibiotics to infiltrate; the corresponding repeated antibiotic application may lead to multidrug resistance.18 A relationship between DJC and UTI was previously reported, whereby the retention time was positively correlated with the UTI incidence.1921 Because DJC placement can attenuate ureteral peristalsis and cause bladder–ureter regurgitation,22,23 the risk of UTI is substantially increased when DJCs are placed in bilateral ureters. Our study indicated that long-term retention and indwelling of DJCs in bilateral ureters constituted risk factors for UTI. The results emphasize the need for rapid removal of DJCs, especially for patients with bilateral DJCs, to reduce the risk of UTI. Generally, bacteria distributed on the body surface do not migrate into the bladder because of the urinary tract defense mechanism, but catheter retention may disrupt this balance. Longer catheter retention is reportedly associated with a higher incidence of UTI.24,25 In the present study, some children retained catheters for durations of longer than 1 week because they did not return to the hospital for timely catheter withdrawal after discharge. Considering the risk caused by long-term catheter retention, the catheters should be withdrawn before patient discharge when possible.

Compared with female infants and young children, male infants and young children are more likely to experience UTI due to congenital phimosis.26 Few male infants undergo circumcision in China, although some eventually undergo this surgery in adulthood.27 Phimosis is regarded as a risk factor for UTI.28,29 Bacteria could colonize the prepuce cavity and cause retrograde infection.30

Previous studies revealed that surgery time was correlated with postoperative UTI incidence,31,32 but our results indicated no correlation between operation time and UTI incidence. This difference could be related to multiple contributing factors. First, most operations in this study were performed by laparoscopy and involved minimal organ-related damage. Second, the included infants and young children were energetic and active; continuous physical activity after surgery reportedly helps to reduce the risk of UTI.33 Finally, the number of urine samples from patients included in this retrospective analysis may have been insufficient.

For parents of patients with DJCs, any change in urine color after discharge could serve as a reminder to return to the hospital. Approximately 30% of cases of idiopathic hematuria are reportedly associated with UTI.34 However, for children with DJCs, hematuria is a common complication that is unrelated to UTI.35,36

A previous study showed that children younger than 2 years of age were more likely to experience UTI.37 However, our study did not find that age was a risk factor for infection. Notably, most children in this study were younger than 2 years of age (median age, 10 months); thus, differences may have been difficult to discern. To prevent UTI after discharge, some community or family physicians may prescribe antibiotics continuously or intermittently for patients with DJCs; as we noted above, bacteria in biofilm communities are difficult to kill, and oral antibiotics are reportedly ineffective for preventing catheter-related infections.31,38 These findings were confirmed in the present study.

There were some limitations in this study. First, patients in this study only underwent urine bacterial culture analyses, rather than DJC bacterial culture analyses. It remains controversial whether simultaneous DJC cultures are necessary. Some studies have suggested that the results of DJC cultures are consistent with the results of urine culture because bacteria that colonize DJCs can be released into urine;39,40 conversely, some studies have shown that the detection rate was much higher for DJC culture than for bladder urine culture, and the detected pathogens may differ between culture methods.3,41 In this study, patients did not undergo both culture analyses simultaneously; thus, we could not draw a definitive conclusion regarding this point. Second, because of the limited number of cases included in this study, it was difficult to clearly summarize any drug sensitivity characteristics.

In conclusion, infants and young children with DJCs were more likely to experience UTI, and Gram-negative bacilli were the most common causative pathogens. Rapid catheter or DJC withdrawal, especially for boys or patients with double DJCs, could aid in preventing UTI.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding: This study was funded by the Foshan Science and Technology Innovation Project (grant no. 1920001000300) and Guangdong Medical Science and Technology Research Fund (grant no. 20205792148508).

References

  • 1.O'Brien K, Stanton N, Edwards A, et al. Prevalence of urinary tract infection (UTI) in sequential acutely unwell children presenting in primary care: exploratory study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2011; 29: 19–22. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2011.554268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Visuri S, Jahnukainen T, Taskinen S. Prenatal complicated duplex collecting system and ureterocele-Important risk factors for urinary tract infection. J Pediatr Surg 2018; 53: 813–817. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Klis R, Korczak-Kozakiewicz E, Denys A, et al. Relationship between urinary tract infection and self-retaining double-J catheter colonization. J Endourol 2009; 23: 1015–1019. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carroll D, Chandran H, Joshi A, et al. Endoscopic placement of double-J ureteric stents in children as a treatment for primary obstructive megaureter. Urol Ann 2010; 2: 114–118. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.68860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roupakias S, Sinopidis X, Tsikopoulos G, et al. Dimercaptosuccinic acid scan challenges in childhood urinary tract infection, vesicoureteral reflux and renal scarring investigation and management. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2017; 69: 144–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hudson A, Romao RLP, MacLellan D. Urinary tract infection in children. CMAJ 2017; 189: E608. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cataldi L, Zaffanello M, Gnarra M, et al. Urinary tract infection in the newborn and the infant: state of the art. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23: 90–93. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.513851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Leung AKC, Wong AHC, Leung AAM, et al. Urinary tract infection in children. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov 2019; 13: 2–18. doi: 10.2174/1872213X1366618122815494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hoen LA, Bogaert G, Radmayr C, et al. Update of the EAU/ESPU guidelines on urinary tract infections in children. J Pediatr Urol 2021: S1477-5131(21)00068-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.01.037. Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Magín EC, García-García JJ, Sert SZ, et al. Efficacy of short-term intravenous antibiotic in neonates with urinary tract infection. Pediatr Emerg Care 2007; 23: 83–86. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3180302c47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kawahara T, Miyamoto H, Ito H, et al. Discolored ureteral stents: findings in urinalysis and urine culture. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0122984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lin WH, Kao CY, Yang DC, et al. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of Klebsiella pneumoniae from community-acquired recurrent urinary tract infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 33: 1533–1539. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2100-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jiménez-Guerra G, Heras-Cañas V, Gutiérrez-Soto M, et al. Urinary tract infection by Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: evolution of antimicrobial resistance and therapeutic alternatives. J Med Microbiol 2018; 67: 790–797. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tien BYQ, Goh HMS, Chong KKL, et al. Enterococcus faecalis promotes innate immune suppression and polymicrobial catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Infect Immun 2017; 85: e00378-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00378-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Badhan R, Singh DV, Badhan LR, et al. Evaluation of bacteriological profile and antibiotic sensitivity patterns in children with urinary tract infection: a prospective study from a tertiary care center. Indian J Urol 2016; 32: 50–56. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.173118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sillanpää J, Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, et al. Characterization of the ebp(fm) pilus-encoding operon of Enterococcus faecium and its role in biofilm formation and virulence in a murine model of urinary tract infection. Virulence 2010; 1: 236–246. doi: 10.4161/viru.1.4.11966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sloane PD, Kistler CE, Reed D, et al. Urine culture testing in community nursing homes: gateway to antibiotic overprescribing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017; 38: 524–531. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang JM, Liu J, Wang K, et al. Observations of bacterial biofilm on ureteral stent and studies on the distribution of pathogenic bacteria and drug resistance. Urol Int 2018; 101: 320–326. doi: 10.1159/000490621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Joshi R, Singh DR, Sharma S. Lower urinary tract infection and bacterial colonization in patient with double J ureteral stent. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2011; 9: 165–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Toprak T, Şahin A, Kutluhan MA, et al. Does duration of stenting increase the risk of clinical infection?. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2020; 91: 237–240. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2019.4.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kehinde EO, Rotimi VO, Al-Hunayan A, et al. Bacteriology of urinary tract infection associated with indwelling J ureteral stents. J Endourol 2004; 18: 891–896. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Janssen C, Buttyan R, Seow CY, et al. A role for the hedgehog effector Gli1 in mediating stent-induced ureteral smooth muscle dysfunction and aperistalsis. Urology 2017; 104: 242.e1–242.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lumiaho J, Heino A, Aaltomaa S, et al. A short biodegradable helical spiral ureteric stent provides better antireflux and drainage properties than a double-J stent. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2011; 45: 129–133. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2010.544673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Barnum T, Tatebe LC, Halverson AL, et al. Outcomes associated with insertion of indwelling urinary catheters by medical students in the operating room following implementation of a simulation-based curriculum. Acad Med 2020; 95: 435–441. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Net P, Karnycheff F, Vasse M, et al. Urinary tract infection after acute stroke: impact of indwelling urinary catheterization and assessment of catheter-use practices in French stroke centers. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2018; 174: 145–149. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2017.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shaikh N, Morone NE, Bost JE, et al. Prevalence of urinary tract infection in childhood: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2008; 27: 302–308. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31815e4122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ma Q, Fang L, Yin WQ, et al. Chinese shang ring male circumcision: a review. Urol Int 2018; 100: 127–133. doi: 10.1159/000464449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen CJ, Satyanarayan A, Schlomer BJ. The use of steroid cream for physiologic phimosis in male infants with a history of UTI and normal renal ultrasound is associated with decreased risk of recurrent UTI. J Pediatr Urol 2019; 15: 472.e1–472.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dubrovsky AS, Foster BJ, Jednak R, et al. Visibility of the urethral meatus and risk of urinary tract infections in uncircumcised boys. CMAJ 2012; 184: E796–E803. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Anyanwu LJ, Kashibu E, Edwin CP, et al. Microbiology of smegma in boys in Kano, Nigeria. J Surg Res 2012; 173: 21–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.04.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bitsori M, Maraki S, Koukouraki S, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa urinary tract infection in children: risk factors and outcomes. J Urol 2012; 187: 260–264. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tominaga H, Setoguchi T, Ishidou Y, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection and urinary tract infection after spine surgery. Eur Spine J 2016; 25: 3908–3915. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4674-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Goudie A, Dynan L, Brady PW, et al. Costs of venous thromboembolism, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, and pressure ulcer. Pediatrics 2015; 136: 432–439. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Valavi E, Nickavar A, Aeene A. Urinary metabolic abnormalities in children with idiopathic hematuria. J Pediatr Urol 2019; 15: 165.e1–165.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ključevšek D, Ključevšek T. Percutaneous insertion of double-J ureteral stent in children with ureteral obstruction: our experiences. J Pediatr Urol 2013; 9: 188–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ozden E, Mercimek MN, Yakupoǧlu YK, et al. Modified Clavien classification in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: assessment of complications in children. J Urol 2011; 185: 264–268. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Beiraghdar F, Panahi Y, Einollahi B, et al. Predisposing factors for renal scarring in children with urinary tract infection. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2012; 23: 532–537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pennesi M, Amoroso S, Bassanese G, et al. Frequency of urinary tract infection in children with antenatal diagnosis of urinary tract dilatation. Arch Dis Child 2020; 105: 260–263. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Aydin HR, Irkilata L, Aydin M, et al. Incidence of bacterial colonisation after indwelling of double-J ureteral stent. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2016; 87: 291–294. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2015.4.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yeniyol CO, Tuna A, Yener H, et al. Bacterial colonization of double J stents and bacteriuria frequency. Int Urol Nephrol 2002; 34: 199–202. doi: 10.1023/a:1023285422278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kliś R, Szymkowiak S, Madej A, et al. Rate of positive urine culture and double-J catheters colonization on the basis of microorganism DNA analysis. Cent European J Urol 2014; 67: 81–85. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2014.01.art18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of International Medical Research are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES