Abstract
At numerous locations of the body, transition zones are localized at the crossroad between two types of epithelium and are frequently associated with neoplasia involving both type of tissues. These transition zones contain cells expressing markers of adult stem cells that can be the target of early transformation. The mere fact that transition zone cells can merge different architecture with separate functions implies for a unique plasticity that these cells must display in steady state. However, their roles during tissue regeneration in normal and injured state remain unknown. Here, by using in vivo lineage tracing, single-cell transcriptomics, computational modeling and a three-dimensional organoid culture system of transition zone cells, we identify a population of Krt17+ basal cells with multipotent properties at the squamo-columnar anorectal junction that maintain a squamous epithelium during normal homeostasis and can participate in the repair of a glandular epithelium following tissue injury.
Subject terms: Differentiation, Stem cells, Intestinal stem cells, Gastrointestinal models, Gastrointestinal system
Transition zones connect distinct epithelia, contain cells expressing stem cell markers, and contribute to cancer development. Here, the authors examine the mouse anorectal junction, identifying a population of Krt17-positive basal cells that contribute to squamous and glandular epithelia during homeostasis and repair.
Introduction
Several of our organs have a region called transition zone (TZ) that connects two distinct epithelia such as stratified and glandular epithelia1. These junction areas can be found throughout the body in the eye, esophagus, stomach, ovary, cervix, and anus and are a site of associated pathology in human and mouse including cancers with poor prognosis2–8 and pre-lesional conditions such as ulcer, Barrett’s esophagus9, and developmental disorders such as cloaca malformation10. These TZ are composed of cells expressing markers of adult stem cells11–13 that can be the target of early transformation14–17. These junctions between our organs allow us to have a continuous lining of tissues, such as in the digestive tract. When affected, the anorectal region is usually associated with high invalidity of patients including fecal incontinence. It is thus essential to understand how important these TZ are to preserve organ homeostasis. In this work, by studying the properties of the anorectal TZ at the single cell level and by combining technologies such as organoid culture, gene sequencing and the use of mouse models, we have identified a population of Keratin 17 positive (Krt17+) basal cells with multipotent properties that maintain a squamous epithelium during normal homeostasis, and can participate to the repair of a wounded glandular epithelium.
Results
Multilineage potential of Krt17+ TZ cells during homeostasis
In any species, the abrupt transition from one epithelia to another can be readily detected histologically and molecularly as each epithelium expresses characteristic proteins, such as Krt14/5 for the anal stratified epithelium and Krt8 for the glandular rectal epithelium11 (Supplementary Fig. 1a and Fig. 1a). The hyperproliferative-associated-Krt1718 marks specifically TZ cells1,2 (Fig. 1a) with a low expression level in anal canal cells proximal to the TZ (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Krt17 expression correlates with the active renewal occurring in the anorectal TZ (Supplementary Fig. 1c). The mere fact that TZ cells can merge these different epithelia with separate functions implies for a plasticity, that these cells must display in steady state. However, it is unknown if TZ cells have any role in renewing of the epithelium during normal homeostasis and after an injured condition.
Inducible genetic fate mapping method allows the identification of stem cells in many epithelial tissues19. To investigate the contribution of the Krt17+ basal TZ cells to the renewing of the stratified and/or glandular epithelium, we performed lineage tracing using K17CreERT2;R26RGFP bigenic mice (Fig. 1b) using one injection of tamoxifen to label permanently few cells at the TZ (Fig. 1c, d). No Krt17+GFP+ cells were detected in non-induced K17CreERT2;R26RGFP mice analyzed short and long chase (n = 3) (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 1d) confirming the tight regulation of K17CreER activity in the basal TZ cells. Since lineage tracing is reporting transcriptional activity of the Krt17 gene, we report the location of Krt17 transcripts in the anorectal region via high quality in situ hybridization. We showed by RNAscope technology that Krt17 transcript was exclusively found in the anal TZ region, when compared to the anal canal and the rectum (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b and quantified in Supplementary Fig. 2c). Furthermore, tamoxifen injection itself does not change Krt17 transcript (Supplementary Fig. 2c), neither Krt17 endogenous protein expression level (Supplementary Fig. 3a) and does not induce proliferation of Krt17+ TZ cells (Supplementary Fig. 3b).
We found that lineage-marked GFP+ TZ cells are found in the stratified epithelium of the anal canal after short and long-term tracing and not in the Krt8+ glandular epithelium (at least three mice for each time point analyzed) (Fig. 1c–e). GFP positive cells are still found in mainly all stratified epithelium of the anal canal after 1-year lineage tracing (Fig. 1d) strongly indicating that all the Krt17+ TZ cells are long-term, self-renewing adult stem cells. Moreover, GFP+ lineage traced cells colocalized with differentiated epithelial cell type Krt10+ and Loricrin+ (Fig. 1f) showing the multilineage potential of the Krt17+ stem cells.
To analyze the hierarchical organization of the anorectal cells we have performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis20,21 from purified FACS-sorted cells (Supplementary Fig. 4), and we obtained initially eight distinct clusters (Supplementary Fig. 5a). A Gene ontology analysis for molecular pathways illustrated that one cluster was specially enriched in signaling cascades involving lipid and steroid metabolism (Supplementary Fig. 5b). This cluster represents anal glands that are present below the anal TZ. These glands are positive for the Oil red O staining and we confirmed at the protein level that perilipin-2, highly expressed in this cluster by sc-RNA seq, marks indeed the anal glands (Supplementary Fig. 5c). Two other clusters identify fibroblasts (Supplementary Fig. 5d) and hair follicle (Supplementary Fig. 5e) with known genes22, such as Lhx2 and Lgr5 expressed in the bulge of the hair follicle but not in the anal TZ (Supplementary Fig. 5f, g). These three clusters were further removed from our analysis to only focus on the epithelial anorectal cells (Fig. 2a). From this new analysis, four clusters were found. One cluster, enriched in Epcam, Krt8 and numerous mucins mRNA, identified the rectum cell population (Fig. 2a, b). Differentiated anal canal cells are found in the cluster enriched in Krt10 and Gpc3 genes (Fig. 2c). Anal canal cells, depending on their proximal or distal localization, express low level of mRNA Krt17 (Fig. 2d). Notably, the anal TZ population can be separated into two Krt17+ clusters representing the basal and suprabasal cell layer (Fig. 2d, e). Glandular and stratified basal cells are marked by the epithelial polarized marker α6-integrin (Fig. 2e, f). Cells localized at the basal layer of the TZ show heterogeneity and can express differential level of Krt6 expression depending on their location. TZ cells closer to the anal canal express Krt6 only in the suprabasal layer (Fig. 2fi), whereas TZ cells closer to the rectum express Krt6 in the basal and suprabasal layers (Fig. 2fii). At this location, closer to the rectum, basal TZ cells also express the stem cell marker CD3411 (Fig. 2g). The adherens junction protein nectin-423 marks the suprabasal TZ cells (Fig. 2e, f). The scRNA-seq data also shows that the glycoprotein Gpc3 seems to be exclusively expressed in the anal canal population compared to the TZ (Fig. 2c, h). Overall, the scRNA-seq data revealed heterogeneity within the anal TZ population (Fig. 2i), and suggest that cells located at different positions in the basal layer have distinct molecular signatures.
Krt17+ TZ cells self-renew and differentiate in 3D organoid
To test the long-term proliferation potential and the self-renewal ability of the anal Krt17+ TZ cells compared to the anal epithelium, we have used three-dimensional organoid culture system. We have used microdissection technique, mouse genetic and flow cell sorting using the K17CreERT2;R26RGFP mouse model induced with tamoxifen for 2 days to label specifically the TZ with GFP in combination with the cell surface marker Epcam expressed in a majority of epithelial cells (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 4). As a control we verified that tracing was initiated only in K17+ TZ cells; In vitro tamoxifen assay, where culture media was supplemented with tamoxifen for 1 week, confirmed that GFP was only induced in TZ organoids and not in anal canal organoids or with oil control supplementation (Supplementary Fig. 6a). Each sorted cell population, stratified (GFP-EpcamLow), TZ (GFP+EpcamLow), and glandular (GFP-EpcamHigh) can grow as organoid culture and resemble their tissue of origin by histology (Fig. 3b), where stratified squamous epithelium in the TZ and anal canal organoids can be seen in contrast to a single layer of columnar cells in the glandular rectal organoid, molecularly by qPCR (Fig. 3c), Western blot (Fig. 3d), and immunofluorescence (Fig. 3e–g). The level of protein expression seen in the tissue is maintained in each organoid population such as Epcamlow/Krt14+ in anal canal and TZ (Fig. 3e), Gpc3 in anal canal (Fig. 3f), EpcamHigh/Krt8+ in rectum (Fig. 3e–g) and Krt17high in TZ organoid only (Fig. 3d, g). However, after subcloning and serial passages (Fig. 3h and Supplementary Fig. 6b), only the TZ organoids and not the anal canal can be maintained unlimited time in culture (15 passages and plus which correspond to 131 days) demonstrating their ability to self-renew and validate their stem cell potential (Fig. 3h). As expected, rectum organoids can also be maintained unlimited time in culture (five passages and plus) as stem cells may reside in crypt similar than in the colon24. Because not all TZ organoid clones were successfully clonogenic, we tested if we could enrich for a basal TZ subpopulation of cells by FACS-sorting cells based on Nectin4 expression (Supplementary Fig. 6c), as we previously showed their expression specifically in suprabasal layers of TZ (Fig. 2e, f). Two populations were FACS-sorted; basal Nectin4− TZ cells and suprabasal Nectin4+ TZ cells (Supplementary Fig. 6c, d). Among these populations, only basal TZ population was able to be maintained for an unlimited time in culture compared to suprabasal TZ cells showing that only a small fraction of basal TZ displays stem cells properties (Supplementary Fig. 6d). The stem cell potential of the anal TZ is further confirmed by the expression of the differentiated markers Krt10 and loricrin expressed in the TZ-derived organoids (Fig. 3i), and the anal canal marker Gpc3 also found in some regions of the TZ organoid (Fig. 3i) showing the multilineage potential of the Krt17+ cells as previously demonstrated in vivo (Fig. 1f).
In silico approach reveals anal TZ differentiation path
Next, we have used computational models to predict the hypothetical trajectory or pseudotime25 that could stand from our single cell mRNA sequencing datasets. We have examined the differentiation trajectory that could exist between the anal TZ clusters, the anal canal cluster and the rectum cluster. Differentiation trajectory reconstruction on the four remaining clusters using the slingshot R package26,27 suggests three trajectories (Fig. 4a). However, only two trajectories suggest a differentiation trajectory. This is illustrated by pseudotime values, which contain information about ranking and distance of every cell within a given trajectory (Fig. 4b). As shown, Trajectory 1, which suggests a differentiation progression from the anal TZ basal cells to the anal canal (Fig. 4c), displays the longest distribution of pseudotime values, spanning more clusters and cells (Fig. 4b). Trajectory 2, which describes a hierarchical relationship between the anal TZ basal cells and the anal TZ suprabasal (Fig. 4c), shows also a wide range of pseudotime values, in contrast to trajectory 3 (rectum) in which all values are concentrated in a shorter range (Fig. 4b). This result indicates that trajectory 3 is essentially one cluster of relatively homogeneous cells, which doesn’t suggest a differentiation trajectory. Altogether, the scRNA seq analysis supports our in vivo lineage tracing data and our in vitro organoid assay showing that, during normal homeostasis, anal TZ cells maintain the stratified squamous epithelium by giving rise to suprabasal TZ cells and anal canal population (Figs. 1 and 3h–i).
Injured Krt17+ TZ cells display a phenotypic plasticity
Another essential feature attributed to stem cells in vivo is their ability to repair injured tissue28,29. To test if the anorectal TZ cells were capable of epithelial reconstitution in vivo and investigate their potential plasticity, we lineage-traced TZ Krt17+ GFP+ cells after removal of adjacent rectal glandular epithelium (Fig. 5a, b). Four weeks is generally sufficient for the glandular epithelium to be repaired30. We therefore analysed the contribution of the GFP+-derived anal TZ cells to the repairing glandular epithelium at the beginning, and at the end of the healing phase (1 and 4 weeks of post-wound respectively). Interestingly we found that at 1 week of post-wound, few GFP+ derived anal TZ cells, continuous to the TZ, are found in a transition state by co-expressing the Krt17 and the Krt8 proteins (Fig. 5c, d) in three mice over five analysed. In contrast, at 4 weeks of post-wound we detected GFP+ rectal crypt derived from anal Krt17+ TZ cells in eight mice over 13 analysed (Fig. 5c, d). No GFP+ crypts were found in oil injected mice 4 weeks of post-EDTA wound. At least 100 slides with 9 µm-thick sections were screened for each mouse (n = 4) (Fig. 5c). These newly formed crypts expressed Krt8 but not Krt17 (Fig. 5c) and contain differentiated cell types, such as enteroendocrine cells (positive for chromogranin A) and alcian-blue positive-goblet cells specifically found in glandular epithelium demonstrating their ability to give rise to cells from multilineages (Fig. 5e). Anal Krt17+ TZ cells are therefore multipotent in response to epithelial injury. The GFP+ rectal crypts derived from the Krt17+ TZ cells are not found continuous to the TZ such as seen, when colonic stem cells are lineage traced after injury31. We postulate that the wound activates two stem cell compartments (the rectal stem cell and the anal TZ) and rectal cells are dominantly responsible for the regeneration. Moreover, staining with EdU at shorter time point (48 h) after the wound (Supplementary Fig. 3b) shows that rectal cells are highly proliferative compared to TZ cells. This suggests that residual rectal epithelial cells, closer to TZ, rapidly expand and could contribute to the distance between anal Krt17+ TZ cell tracing and TZ over time. To further confirm TZ cells multipotency, we also challenged TZ cells by performing a second type of injury. K17CreERT2;R26RGFP mice were injected twice with tamoxifen to mark TZ cells and anal TZ was mechanically wounded the next day (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b). Similar to EDTA wound, at 1 week post-mechanical wound, few GFP+ anal TZ cells, continuous to the TZ, co-expressing Krt17 and Krt8 were found (Supplementary Fig. 7c). Furthermore, GFP+ cells were also co-localizing with alcian-blue positive goblet cells confirming their multipotent property (Supplementary Fig. 7c). Together, these findings establish that a minority of anal Krt17+ TZ cells, when challenged by removing its direct neighbors, can contribute to rectal repair by their ability to change their fate that allow them to give rise to a different epithelium in response to injury.
To investigate dynamics of Krt17+ cells in regeneration, we performed single cell analysis upon injury (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Fig. 8). K17CreERT2;R26RGFP mice were injected twice with tamoxifen and subjected to EDTA wound the next day (Fig. 5a, b). At 1 week of post-EDTA wound, cells were sorted following the established FACS strategy based on Epcam expression, which was maintained (Supplementary Fig. 8a, b). After single-cell RNA sequencing, we obtained ten clusters (Supplementary Fig. 8c) including hair follicles, fibroblasts, and anal glands clusters, which were further removed as previously done (Supplementary Fig. 5) to focus on anorectal cells. After removal of these three clusters (Supplementary Fig. 8c, d), seven clusters were identified (Fig. 6a). Two clusters with stratified epithelial cells enriched with wound/regeneration genes, such as IL-33 were found (Supplementary Fig. 8e). One cluster enriched for differentiation markers such as Krt10 was identified as anal canal/TZ suprabasal cluster (Supplementary Fig. 8e). Two clusters enriched for rectum specific genes were found such as Muc13 and Krt8 (Fig. 6). Transition zone cells were identified in one cluster enriched in previously shown markers, such as Nectin 4 and Krt6a (Supplementary Fig. 8e and Fig. 2g). More interestingly, an additional cluster, absent in unwound analysis (Fig. 2), was identified as “TZ hybrid state” cells. This cluster is enriched for TZ marker Krt17 and glandular markers Muc13 and Krt8.
Then, pseudotime analysis was performed on the post-wound single cell RNAseq dataset (Fig. 6b). We found three major trajectories representing a hierarchical relationship between TZ cells to anal canal/suprabasal cells and wounded epithelial cells. The third trajectory stands for TZ cells transitioning to the “TZ hybrid state” to finally go towards the rectum which support our previous data, where TZ cells displayed multipotency when subjected to injury (Fig. 5). In contrast to the normal condition (Fig. 4), the rectal trajectory in the wounded tissue (pseudotime 3 Fig. 6b) displays a differentiation path. Although pseudotime values are somehow concentrated at the bottom, reflecting the homogeneous rectal cell cluster, their distribution is clearly more elongated than the rectal normal trajectory. This has been confirmed by performing an unsupervised pseudotime analysis on a subset of clusters including the TZ hybrid and rectal cells (Fig. 6c). One trajectory was found suggesting a hierarchical relationship between TZ Krt17+ cells and Krt8+/Muc13+ cells.
JunB is involved in the proper differentiation of anal TZ
We then analyzed pathways enriched in Krt17+ cell clusters and focused on the Jun family as interestingly this pathway has been involved in other epithelial stem cells, such as hair follicle bulge stem cells and is associated with wound response32. First, we have confirmed by immunostaining that the AP-1 transcription factor JunB was enriched at the anal TZ (Fig. 6d, e), but not the anal canal or the rectum confirming the scRNAseq analysis. Moreover, in a wounded situation we showed that JunB is also expressed in cells participating in both chemical and mechanical wound repair (Fig. 6f and Ext. Data Fig. 7c). We further showed using shRNA in the organoid culture, that JunB is essential for TZ cells ability to differentiate properly. Two shRNA JunB (sh2 and sh3), which have the most efficient JunB downregulation, showed alteration in differentiation markers Krt10 and loricrin by immunofluorescence and western blot analysis on FACS sorted RFP+ organoids (Fig. 6i, j). These data suggest that JunB may participate into the wound repair by promoting differentiation of the anal TZ cells, which may undergo further plasticity program to give rise to a fully functional glandular cell type.
Discussion
These results of in vivo lineage tracing, 3D organoid culture and in vivo regeneration assays using mouse TZ samples, identified a reservoir of multipotent stem cells for surrounding epithelia that participate to the maintenance of both tissue type. This study has global relevance to stem cell function in many other regenerative tissues. We showed that anorectal TZ cells, which are locally restricted between the stratified squamous epithelium of the anal canal and the simple glandular epithelium of the rectum, contributes to tissue renewal of the anal canal only upon normal homeostasis. Upon injury a minority of anal Krt17+ TZ cells can contribute to rectal repair and give rise to a fully differentiated rectal crypt. This cell fate change during their response to wounding is a common property of many epithelial stem cells in their tissue of origin33. In contrast to other stem cell niches, transition zones are naturally subjected to mechanical stress and microbiota exposition1. Thus wounding and healing mechanisms are often activated in the TZ. Here, anal TZ, which have initially squamous-like properties, are able to repair and become a fully differentiated glandular cell-type. This plasticity induced by injury of the surrounding epithelium, may also exist in the progeny of the anal TZ as reported in hair follicle bulge stem cells34 and in the eye limbus TZ following ablation of the stem cell compartment35. One of the existing theories is that different epithelial tissues have their own unique tissue specific stem cells to maintain homeostasis of the tissue from which they are derived36. Instead, here we propose that TZ cells could represent a backup reservoir of stem cells for surrounding epithelium and their phenotypic plasticity seen during wound healing could represent an hallmark of tumor initiation37. In human and mouse, TZ are cancer-prone stem cell niches. Therefore, understanding how these TZ cells participate in driving cancer will be highly relevant for cancer prevention and regression.
Methods
Mice
Mice are housed in a sterile barrier facility as previously described38. The housing conditions of all the mice followed strickly the ethical regulation. Mice are housed in individually ventilated cages (IVC, sealsafe plus TECHNIPLAST) according to SPF FELASA standards and food and water were given at libitum. For social enrichment, six mice per cages are generally housed with sterile nesting materials such as cotton or compressed wood chips for nidification. The room temperature ranged from 20 and 25 °C. The relative ambient humidity was 55% +/−15. Semi-natural light cycle of 12:12 was used. All experiments were approved by the European and national regulation (ethical committee C2EA14, protocols # 4572, #8287, and #2244) and carried out using standard procedures. Transgenic mouse lines have been previously described: K17CreERT239, Rosa26-lsl-ZsGreen1 (Jackson laboratories, stock no.007906). We have backcrossed our double transgenic mouse lines into the C57/BL6J background for six generations. Females and males have been used in all experiments.
Lineage tracing analysis
K17CreERT2 mice were crossed with Rosa26-lsl-ZsGreen1 reporter mice, which express the Green Fluorescent protein following Cre excision of a loxP-flanked cassette, to generate K17CreERT2;R26RGFP bigenic mice (Fig. 1b). To induce GFP expression, K17CreERT2;R26RGFP mice received daily intraperitoneal injections of 2 mg of tamoxifen (Sigma) or sunflower oil alone (vehicle) for 2 days. Anorectal specimens (n = 3 mice per time point) were harvested at the following time after tamoxifen administration: 10 h, 48 h, 3 weeks, and 1 year (Fig. 1c, d). Percentage of GFP+ cells was quantified by analyzing at least ten different areas of anorectal TZ from 19 mice. Total number of cells was counted using DAPI staining in stratified and glandular epithelia. The number of GFP+ cells was counted using Zen software and photoshop CC2019 and the percentage of GFP cells was calculated according to total number of cells (reported as 100%).
Immunostaining and histology
The anorectal tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4 °C. The sample was then washed three times in PBS 1× and put in sucrose 30% overnight at 4 °C. Lastly, the tissue was put in two volumes of sucrose 30% and one volume of OCT (Tissue-Tek, Sakura, Torrance, CA) for few hours and embedded in OCT compound. For some antibodies, such as Krt6 and nectin-4, the anorectal tissue was fixed in methanol for 30 min at −20 °C instead of the paraformaldehyde and process in 30% sucrose, as previously described. Ten micrometer frozen sections were used to performed immunofluorescence. Briefly, sections were permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 (Euromedex 2000-B) in PBS 1× for 10 min at room temperature and blocked in 2.5% normal goat serum, 2.5% normal donkey serum, 2% gelatin (Sigma G7765), 1% bovine serum albumin, 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS 1× for at least 30 min at room temperature. Whenever mouse antibodies were required, the MOM kit (vector Lab) was used. Primary antibodies were incubated in the blocking solution overnight at 4 °C. After three washes for 10 min in 0.1% Triton X-100 PBS 1×, secondary antibodies diluted in the blocking solution containing DAPI (1 µg/ml ThermoScientific 62248) was added for 45 min at room temperature. After three washes for 10 min in 0.1% Triton X-100 PBS 1×, slides were mounted in prolong Gold antifade (Invitrogen, P36934). The list of primary and secondary antibodies is in the Supplementary Table 1. Fluorescent images were acquired using a Confocal microscope ZEISS LSM 880. All images were analyzed using ZEN software and Photoshop. Histologies were performed by the IPC/CRCM Experimental Pathology platform (ICEP), and analyzed by two independent pathologists at the Paoli Calmettes Institute.
EdU staining
Mice were injected intraperitoneally with 0.25 mg EdU (Abcam, ab146186) for 4 h and tissue was processed as described in the previous sections. The Click-iT EdU AlexaFluor 647 Imaging kit, (Invitrogen C10640) was used to detect proliferative cells according to the manufacturer instructions.
Oil Red O staining
Slides were dip in 60% isopropanol one time quickly then stained in working Oil Red O solution (30 ml of stock solution mixed with 20 ml of distilled water) for 15 min at RT. Slides were dip in 60% isopropanol one time quickly followed by one quick dip in distilled water. Slides were counterstained with EnVision™ Hematoxylin (SM806 Dako K8008) for 5 min and washed ten times in distilled water. Slides were mounted with Aqueous mounting gel (Aquatex Merck Milipore 1.08532.0050).
Alcian blue staining
OCT sections (9 μm) were stained with Alcian Blue (Biognost AB2-OT-100) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and counterstained with nuclear fast red (Merck).
RNAscope fluorescent assays
To detect Lgr5 and Krt17 at the mRNA level, OCT sections (9 μm) were prepared on superfrost plus slides and RNAscope highly sensitive probes against Lgr5 (Cat # 311021-C2; ACD Inc.), and Krt17 (Cat #479911; ACD Inc.) were used in the RNAscope fluorescent assay according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Catalog Number 320293). Briefly, fixed frozen sections were baked at 60 °C and then post-fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde. Gradient dehydration using 50%, 70 and 100% ethanol was performed and slides were then processed for antigen retrieval followed by pretreatment with protease III, and then incubated with targeting probes for 2 h at 40 °C in a humidity-controlled chamber. Finally, AMP signal amplification followed by RNAscope Amp4-AltB(550) was carried out for fluorescent visualization. A housekeeping gene POLR2A was used as a positive control to ensure the RNA quality of the tissue, in addition, a negative control probe targeting bacterial DapB was used to assess nonspecific background labeling.
Human samples
Anorectal tissue samples from adult patients were approved by the Paoli-Calmettes Institute Strategic Orientation Committee (authorization TZ-cancers-IPC 2015-021). Informed written consent was given by the patients. Samples came from discarded tissues after surgery.
Isolation and purification of anorectal epithelial cells by flow cytometry
The anorectal regions of at least five K17CreERT2;R26RGFP mice induced with tamoxifen for 2 days were microdissected under a dissecting scope (Leica MZ6), and pooled in epithelial cell culture medium40 containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for further dissociation. Tissues were cut in small pieces using scissor and scalpel in 4 ml HBSS 1× + 50 μl collagenase 20% from Clostridium histolyticum (Sigma C2674) and were incubated with high agitation 45 min at 37 °C. Then, 4.2 μl of DNAse I (10 mg/ml Sigma DN25) were added followed by 10 min incubation at 37 °C under agitation. Samples were then resuspended with 12 ml cold PBS 1× and placed in a 50 ml conical tube filled until 50 ml with PBS 1× and centrifuged for 10 min at 4 °C at 200×g. Pellets were resuspended with 20 ml cold PBS 1× and filtered through 70 μm filter. To avoid cell death, 200 μl of FBS was added. To dissociate left over tissues on the filter, 1 ml of TrypLE express enzyme (GibcoTM, 12605010) was added followed by 5 min incubation at 37 °C. Trypsin activity was then stopped by adding 3 ml of epithelial cell culture medium +10% FBS and the mix was filtered through 40 μm filter and centrifuged 10 min at 4 °C at 300 × g. Pellets were resuspended in PBS 1 × 2%FBS. Primary antibody was added to samples 30–45 min on ice and covered with foil. Samples were then washed with PBS 1× 2% FBS and centrifuged 5 min at 4 °C at 300 × g. After discarding the supernatant, secondary antibody was added for 20 min at 4 °C and then washed again with PBS 2% FBS. Finally, FVD780 (1/1000, Thermofisher) was added to stain dying cells. Cell sorting was performed using a FACS Aria II equipment (BD Bioscience) and FACS diva software.
Organoid culture
After FACS isolation, 4000–10,000 cells were cultured in 25 µl Matrigel (Corning, 356231) on 48-well plate. Three hundred microliter of medium (Supplemental Table 2) supplemented with 10 μM Y-27632 (only first 5 days to avoid anoïkis) were added to wells and the plate was incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2. The medium was changed every 3–4 days. Upon outgrowth, organoids were passaged every 10–15 days either by mechanical dissociation by gentle pipetting or by enzymatic dissociation with TrypLE express enzyme (GibcoTM, 12605010). Medium was supplemented with 10 μM Y-27632 the first 3 days.
Imaging organoids
Brightfield images, GFP and RFP expressions were monitored using the Leica M205 FA stereomicroscope.
Embedding for histology
Organoids were washed with PBS and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with 300 µl of low melting agarose 2% (Promega, V2111). Polymerized agarose was transferred to a 1.5 ml Eppendorf and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4 °C under agitation. The sample was then washed three times in PBS 1× and put in PBS sucrose 30% overnight at 4 °C. Finally, organoids were incubated with gelatin 7.5%/sucrose 15% in PBS at 37 °C for at least 30 min and put in mold to freeze at −80 °C.
Clonogenicity assay
Organoids were washed with PBS and incubated for 5 min at 37 °C with 200 µl of medium (Supplemental Table 2) + 1 µl collagenase 20% from Clostridium histolyticum (Sigma C2674) to dissociate matrigel. Under the stereomicroscope (Leica M205 FA), for each passage, at least three organoids of around 150 μm were isolated for anal canal and TZ and 540 µm for rectum. The size difference corresponds to the fact that stratified organoids (anal canal and TZ) contain more cells overall than simple glandular epithelium organoids (rectum). Each organoid was dissociated for 5 min at 37 °C with 20 µl of TrypLE express enzyme (GibcoTM, 12605010) and after washing, replated in 25 µl of matrigel. Three hundred microliter of medium (Supplemental Table 2) supplemented with 10 μM Y-27632 (only the first 5 days to avoid anoïkis) were added to wells and the plate was incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2.
In vitro tamoxifen assay
Anal canal cells were sorted by previously established FACS strategy, cultured in 25 µl Matrigel (Corning, 356231) on 48-well plate and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2. At passage 1, culture media was supplemented with oil control or tamoxifen (0.1 µM) in culture media during 7 days and the medium was changed three times every 2 days. As a positive control, we sorted TZ cells based on Epcam expression from K17CreERT2;R26RGFP bigenic mice non-induced with tamoxifen, and we added the tamoxifen in culture media similarly to the anal canal.
Lentiviral infection of organoids with ShRNA JunB
Vector control (SMARTvector Non-Targeting Mcmv-TurboRFP control particles #S08-005000-01) and sh JunB 1,2,3 vectors (sh1 JunB #V3SM7592-234927818, Sh2 JunB #V3SM7592-236055786 and sh3 JunB #V3SM7592-237743179) were produced by Horizon. 2.5 × 106 viral particles were combined with 2 µg of polybrene (Sigma TR1003-G) and incubated 10 min at room temperature in organoid culture medium. 2 × 104 dissociated organoids cells were then added to virus and polybrene solution and incubated 10 min at room temperature. Twenty-five microliter of Matrigel (Corning ref 356231) were added to the mix and 25 µl of the suspension were dispensed into the center of each well of a 48-well plate. After 10 min, 300 µl of medium containing Y-27632 was added. Twenty-four hours after infection organoids were washed by adding 10 ml of basal medium and centrifugated as previously described. The pellet was suspended with Matrigel and suspension was dispended in wells as previously described. Y-27632 was added to the medium the first 3 days.
Western blot
Organoids were lysed with lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH7.2; 350 mM NaCl; 1% Triton X-100; 0.5% Na deoxycholate; 0.1% SDS; 20 mM MgCl2 and Inhibitor Cocktail) and proteins were separated by NuPAGE 4–12% Bis–Tris 1.0 mm mini protein gel, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and blocked for 1 h with 5% non-fat milk or 5% BSA in TBS 1× (Tris Buffer Saline: 1 M Tris pH 7.4–7.5; 5 M NaCl) depending of the primary antibody. Membranes were subjected to immunoblotting using antibodies against the following proteins at the indicated dilutions: GAPDH (1/5000), Krt17 (1/20000), Krt8 (1/4000), Krt10 (1/500) in 5% non-fat milk and Jun B (1/2000) in 5% BSA. See Supplemental Table 1 for complete reference list of the antibodies used. Full scan blots are provided in the Supplementary information. Membranes were then washed three times with TBS 0.1% Tween for 10 min. Fluorescent secondary antibodies or HRP-coupled secondary antibodies listed in the supplementary Table 1 were used at 1/1000 in 5% non-fat milk or 5% BSA. Fluorescents images were acquired using Biorad Chemidoc imager and HRP immunoblots were developed using standard ECL Prime (Amersham, RPN 2236).
Real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated, using a Qiagen Rneasy Micro Kit, and used to produce cDNA using the Maxima first strand cDNA synthesis kit. Reverse transcription reactions were diluted to 10 ng/μl and 1–2 μl of cDNA was used to perform Real time PCR using the CFX96 real-time PCR System, CFX Manager Software and the Ssofast EvaGreen Supermix reagent. All reactions were run in triplicate and analyzed using the ΔΔCT method with relative expression normalized to GAPDH. (See Supplemental Table 3 for all primer sequences).
Single cells RNA sequencing
After tissue dissection and dissociation, FACS purified suspended cells were partitioned into nanoliter-scale Gel Bead-In-Emulsions (GEMs) with the Chromium Single Cell Controller (10× Genomics) (performed by HalioDx company and TGML Marseille Luminy platform). After cell encapsulation and barcoding, library preparation followed the standard scRNAseq protocol comprising reverse transcription, amplification, and indexing (10× Genomics). Sequencing was performed using a NextSeq Illumina device (Illumina). Illumina bcl files were basecalled, demultiplexed and aligned to the mouse mm10 genome using the cellranger software (version 3.1.0, 10× Genomics). All downstream analyses were done with R/Bioconductor packages, R version 4.0.3 (2020-10-10) [https://cran.r-project.org/; http://www.bioconductor.org/]. Raw counts were imported into R and single cell data was analyzed with the ‘Seurat’ package v.3.2.221. After filtering for library size (between 200 and 5000 features per cell) and mitochondrial gene expression (less than 25%), pre-processing was performed using Seurat functions for counts normalization (NormalizeData using the LogNormalize method), scaling (ScaleData using the 2000 most variable features), dimension reduction with principal component analysis (PCA) (RunPCA with default parameters), construction of a shared nearest neighbor (SNN) graph (FindNeighbors using ten dimensions of reduction as input) and clustering (FindClustering with a resolution of 0.2). Data was adjusted for cell cycle using the CellCycleScoring function and regressing for S and G2/M phases scores. After visualization with Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) dimensional reduction technique [https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03426], contaminating cell types were filtered out (i.e., anal glands, hair follicle, and fibroblasts) followed by re-scaling of each dataset. An additional filtering based on the expression of Lgr5, Lhx2, Tbx1, was necessary in the normal sample to remove hair follicle cells that were contaminating the basal cluster. After filtering of bad quality and contaminating cells, 939 cells from the normal sample and 4147 cells from the wounded sample were used for all downstream analyses. Markers of each cluster were identified using the wilcox test option of the FindAllMarkers function, with a bonferroni p value adjustment. The same criteria for filtering, dimension reduction, clustering, visualization, adjusting for cell cycle, and pseudotime were used to analyze the normal and the wounded sample. Cell-filtering parameters are nFeature_RNA > 200, nFeature_RNA < 5000, percent.mt < 25%. Other parameters included ScaleData (x, vars.to.regress = c(“S.Score”, “G2M.Score”)), RunPCA(x) # default parameters, FindNeighbors(dims = 1:10), FindClusters(resolution = 0.2), RunUMAP(dims = 1:10).
Pseudotime analysis
We used the dynverse R package to compare across pseudotime algorithms and choose the one best suited for our dataset27. Final trajectory (pseudotime) analyses were performed using the slingshot R package26. To this end, clustering information was extracted from Seurat objects and passed directly to slingshot’s main function, using the “Basal” cell cluster as the starting cluster. The same “granularity” parameters (i.e., Omega = 20) were used for both conditions, normal and wounded, to assure comparability. Once pseudotime trajectories were identified, a general additive model (GAM) was fitted to identify genes, whose expression was significantly associated to each trajectory.
Rectal wound
Chemical wound
To remove rectal crypts close to the anorectal TZ we treated the anorectal region with hot EDTA followed by a mechanical wound as previously described41 using 2–4 months old K17CreERT2;R26RGFP bigenic mice injected with tamoxifen 2 days before the wound (for lineage tracing experiments). Briefly, under isofluorane anesthesia, a thin catheter equipped with a small balloon, was inserted into the anus and 200 μl of hot (50 °C) fresh 0.25 M EDTA/PBS was added using a syringe and a thin catheter. After 2 min of exposure, one wash with PBS was done and the balloon was deflated and catheters removed. Epithelial wound was performed using an electric brush closed to the anorectal TZ for approximatively 1 min, and removal of the rectum crypts confirmed under a dissecting microscope. Mice were monitored carefully after the injury and analyzed 2 weeks and 4 weeks of post-wound.
Mechanical wound
Under isofluorane anesthesia, 2–4-months-old K17CreERT2;R26RGFP bigenic mice injected with tamoxifen 2 days before the wound, were subjected to a mechanical wound using a sterile scalpel (InterFocus #10073-14) inserted into the anus. The glandular region close to the anal transition zone was scraped with the scalpel to create the wound. Mice were monitored carefully after the injury and analyzed 1 week of post-wound.
All mice were injected subcutaneously with 50 µl of METACAM (1 mg/kg) before every wounding experiment.
Quantifications
Krt17 protein expression was evaluated for each region (anal canal, TZ, and rectum). At least eight areas have been quantified per regions and per mice (n = 3 mice per condition). Immunostainings were performed the same day with the same antibody solution and identical imaging settings were applied, when comparing different conditions. Images were acquired with a Confocal microscope ZEISS LSM 880 and were analyzed with ImageJ. A threshold was applied to all images to remove the background before measuring the integrated density, while keeping the same ROI for each images (see Supplemental methods for details). For EdU quantification, eight areas per mice and per region were manually counted using Zen software and photoshop CC2019. Krt17 expression was used to separate TZ from anal canal and rectum. At least eight different areas of TZ and anal canal and 16 different crypts from nine mice were quantified (n = 3 per condition). Percentage of EdU+ cells was calculated according to total number of DAPI cells (reported as 100%). CD34 fraction was quantified manually and the percentage of CD34 was calculated according to total number of DAPI cells (reported as 100%). Quantification on EdU+ cells within the CD34+ population was quantified manually, and the percentage of EdU was calculated according to total number of CD34+ cells (reported as 100%).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
Processing of the slides for histology was performed by Emilie Agavnian in the experimental histopathology (ICEP) core facility at the Institut Paoli Calmettes. All organoid cultures were done in the 3D-Hub-O platform at CRCM. We thank Manon Richaud and Françoise Mallet in the Flow cytometry facility, Daniel Isnardon and Magda Rodriguez (especially for the RNAscope quantification) in the microscopic core facility at the CRCM, Charlyne Gard for the scRNA seq experiment at Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, TAGC, TGML, Marseille, France. Ghislain Bidaut in the Cibi platform for the initial scRNAseq analysis, David Owens for the K17CreERT2 mouse lines and Marc Lopez for the anti-nectin-4 monoclonal antibody. Jean-Christophe Orsoni and Arnaud Capel in the mouse facility at the CRCM. Samuel Granjeaud for helping with statistics. This study was supported by ANR grant #ANR20-CE13-0009-01 (G.G.) and ANR-10-INBS-0009-10 (platform TAGC), partly supported by research funding from the Canceropôle Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur, Institut National du Cancer and Région Sud, grants from the Excellence Initiative of Aix-Marseille University A∗Midex, “Investissement d’avenir” (CapoStromEx) and Inserm Plan Cancer AAP single cell (G.G. and H.H.V). L.M. is a recipient of the French ministerial research fellowship and the Ligue National Contre le Cancer fellowship.
Source data
Author contributions
L.M. designed and performed all the experiments, analyzed the data, did all the quantifications and wrote the manuscript. V.C. performed some cryosectionning, immunostainings, wounding, shRNA experiments, western blot and analyzed the data. G.G. designed experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. H.H.V. performed all the bioinformatics single cell analysis. A.O. performed cryosectionning, immunostainings and mouse genetics. Z.H. and J.P. performed all RNAscope experiments. F.P. and C.B-C. provided human anal samples and histological analysis. E.C.J provided histological analysis. C.G. assisted with gene ontology analysis and analyzed the data.
Data availability
All the raw scRNA sequencing data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under Series GSE163394 (Accession # GSM4982239 and GSM4982240) Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Nick Barker and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Change history
8/4/2021
The original version of this Article was updated shortly after publication, because the Supplementary Methods file was inadvertently omitted. The error has now been fixed and the PDF is available to download from the HTML version of the Article.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-23034-x.
References
- 1.McNairn A, Guasch G. Epithelial transition zones: merging microenvironments, niches, and cellular transformation. Eur. J. Derm. 2011;21:21–28. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2011.1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Guasch G, et al. Loss of TGFbeta signaling destabilizes homeostasis and promotes squamous cell carcinomas in stratified epithelia. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:313–327. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fluhmann CF. Carcinoma in situ and the transitional zone of the cervix uteri. Obstet. Gynecol. 1960;16:424–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Deans GT, McAleer JJ, Spence RA. Malignant anal tumours. Br. J. Surg. 1994;81:500–508. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Waring GO, 3rd, Roth AM, Ekins MB. Clinical and pathologic description of 17 cases of corneal intraepithelial neoplasia. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1984;97:547–559. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90371-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shannon BA, McNeal JE, Cohen RJ. Transition zone carcinoma of the prostate gland: a common indolent tumour type that occasionally manifests aggressive behaviour. Pathology. 2003;35:467–471. doi: 10.1080/00313020310001619154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bleuming SA, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein signaling suppresses tumorigenesis at gastric epithelial transition zones in mice. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8149–8155. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nam KT, et al. Gastric tumor development in Smad3-deficient mice initiates from forestomach/glandular transition zone along the lesser curvature. Lab Invest. 2012;92:883–895. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2012.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang X, et al. Residual embryonic cells as precursors of a Barrett’s-like metaplasia. Cell. 2011;145:1023–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Runck LA, et al. Defining the molecular pathologies in cloaca malformation: similarities between mouse and human. Dis. Model Mech. 2014;7:483–493. doi: 10.1242/dmm.014530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Runck, L. A., Kramer, M., Ciraolo, G., Lewis, A. G. & Guasch, G. Identification of epithelial label-retaining cells at the transition between the anal canal and the rectum in mice. Cell Cycle9, 3039–3045 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Cotsarelis, G., Cheng, S. Z., Dong, G., Sun, T. T. & Lavker, R. M. Existence of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate: implications on epithelial stem cells. Cell57, 201–209 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 13.Flesken-Nikitin A, et al. Ovarian surface epithelium at the junction area contains a cancer-prone stem cell niche. Nature. 2013;495:241–245. doi: 10.1038/nature11979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jiang M, et al. Transitional basal cells at the squamous-columnar junction generate Barrett’s oesophagus. Nature. 2017;550:529–533. doi: 10.1038/nature24269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Moon, H., Zhu, J., Donahue, L. R., Choi, E. & White, A. C. Krt5+/Krt15+ foregut basal progenitors give rise to cyclooxygenase-2-dependent tumours in response to gastric acid stress. Nat. Commun.10, 2225 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Herfs, M. et al. A discrete population of squamocolumnar junction cells implicated in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer. PNAS109, 10516–10521 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 17.Yamamoto Y, et al. Mutational spectrum of Barrett’s stem cells suggests paths to initiation of a precancerous lesion. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:10380. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Depianto, D., Kerns, M. L., Dlugosz, A. A. & Coulombe, P. A. Keratin 17 promotes epithelial proliferation and tumor growth by polarizing the immune response in skin. Nat. Genet.42, 910–914 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Blanpainm, C. & Simons, B. D. Unravelling stem cell dynamics by lineage tracing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 489–502 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 20.Wagner, A., Regev, A. & Yosef, N. Revealing the vectors of cellular identity with single-cell genomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1145–1160 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Stuart T, et al. Integration of single-cell data. Cell. 2019;177:1888–1902. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tudorita Tumbar GG, et al. Defining the epithelial stem cell niche in skin. Science. 2004;303:5. doi: 10.1126/science.1092436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fabre S, et al. Prominent role of the Ig-like V domain in trans-interactions of nectins. Nectin3 and nectin 4 bind to the predicted C-C’-C”-D beta-strands of the nectin1 V domain. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:27006–27013. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203228200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Barker N, et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature. 2007;449:1003–1008. doi: 10.1038/nature06196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chloé, S. & Baron, A. v. O. Unravelling cellular relationships during development and regeneration using genetic lineage tracing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 753–765 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 26.Street K, et al. Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:477. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4772-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Saelens, W., Cannoodt, R., Todorov, H. & Saeys, Y. A comparison of single-cell trajectory inference methods. Nat. Biotechnol.37, 547–554 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 28.Lu CP, et al. Identification of stem cell populations in sweat glands and ducts reveals roles in homeostasis and wound repair. Cell. 2012;150:136–150. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Blanpain, C. & Fuchs, E. Stem cell plasticity. Plasticity of epithelial stem cells in tissue regeneration. Science344, 1242281 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Fukuda M, et al. Small intestinal stem cell identity is maintained with functional Paneth cells in heterotopically grafted epithelium onto the colon. Genes Dev. 2014;28:1752–1757. doi: 10.1101/gad.245233.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ishibashi F, et al. Contribution of ATOH1+ cells to the homeostasis, repair, and tumorigenesis of the colonic epithelium. Stem Cell Rep. 2018;10:27–42. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Singh, K. & Camera, E. JunB defines functional and structural integrity of the epidermo-pilosebaceous unit in the skin. Nat. Commun.9, 3425 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 33.Watt GDaFM. Stem cell heterogeneity and plasticity in epithelia. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16:465–476. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rompolas, P., Mesa, K. R. & Greco, V. Spatial organization within a niche as a determinant of stem‐cell fate. Nature502, 513–518 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 35.Nasser W, et al. Corneal-committed cells restore the stem cell pool and tissue boundary following injury. Cell Rep. 2018;22:323–331. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Visvader, J. E. & Clevers, H. Tissue-specific designs of stem cell hierarchies. Nat. Cell Biol.18, 349–355 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 37.Gupta, P. B. et al. Phenotypic plasticity: driver of cancer initiation, progression, and therapy resistance Cell Stem Cell24, 65–78 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 38.McCauley, H., Chevrier, V., Birnbaum, D. & Guasch, G. De-repression of ELMO1 in cancer stem cells drives progression of TGFβ-deficient squamous cell carcinoma from transition zones. ELife6, e22914 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Doucet Y, Woo SH, Ruiz ME, Owens DM. The Touch Dome defines an epidermal niche specialized for mechanosensory signaling. Cell Rep. 2013;6:1759–1765. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nowak J, Fuchs E. Isolation and culture of epithelial stem cells. Methods Mol. Bio. 2009;482:215–232. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-060-7_14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sugimoto S, et al. Reconstruction of the human colon epithelium in vivo. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22:171–176. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All the raw scRNA sequencing data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under Series GSE163394 (Accession # GSM4982239 and GSM4982240) Source data are provided with this paper.