Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology logoLink to Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
. 2021 Apr 29;9:642697. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.642697

Tlx3 Exerts Direct Control in Specifying Excitatory Over Inhibitory Neurons in the Dorsal Spinal Cord

Filipe A Monteiro 1,2,3,*, Rafael M Miranda 1,2,3, Marta C Samina 1,2,3, Ana F Dias 2,3,4, Alexandre A S F Raposo 5,6, Patrícia Oliveira 3,7, Carlos Reguenga 1,2,3, Diogo S Castro 3,5,8,†, Deolinda Lima 1,2,3,†
PMCID: PMC8117147  PMID: 33996801

Abstract

The spinal cord dorsal horn is a major station for integration and relay of somatosensory information and comprises both excitatory and inhibitory neuronal populations. The homeobox gene Tlx3 acts as a selector gene to control the development of late-born excitatory (dILB) neurons by specifying glutamatergic transmitter fate in dorsal spinal cord. However, since Tlx3 direct transcriptional targets remain largely unknown, it remains to be uncovered how Tlx3 functions to promote excitatory cell fate. Here we combined a genomics approach based on chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by next generation sequencing (ChIP-seq) and expression profiling, with validation experiments in Tlx3 null embryos, to characterize the transcriptional program of Tlx3 in mouse embryonic dorsal spinal cord. We found most dILB neuron specific genes previously identified to be directly activated by Tlx3. Surprisingly, we found Tlx3 also directly represses many genes associated with the alternative inhibitory dILA neuronal fate. In both cases, direct targets include transcription factors and terminal differentiation genes, showing that Tlx3 directly controls cell identity at distinct levels. Our findings provide a molecular frame for the master regulatory role of Tlx3 in developing glutamatergic dILB neurons. In addition, they suggest a novel function for Tlx3 as direct repressor of GABAergic dILA identity, pointing to how generation of the two alternative cell fates being tightly coupled.

Keywords: T-cell leukemia homeobox 3, dorsal horn, spinal cord, excitatory neuron, chromatin immunoprecipitation

Introduction

The dorsal horn of the spinal cord modulates and conveys peripheral somatosensory input related to pain, itch, touch, cold, and warm to higher brain centres. This is accomplished by a heterogeneous neuronal population composed of various subtypes of relay neurons and interneurons (Lima and Coimbra, 1986; Caspary and Anderson, 2003; Helms and Johnson, 2003; Todd, 2010; Haring et al., 2018). The correct generation of excitatory and inhibitory neurons is crucial in eliciting accurate physiological responses to somatosensory events, and disturbing the balance between these two cell populations has been associated with the pathological perception of pain (Scholz and Woolf, 2002; Yekkirala et al., 2017).

Knowledge on the cellular and molecular developmental mechanisms governing cell fate choice and cell subtype specification is central for understanding neuronal diversity and is being currently used for deciphering somatosensory circuits at the dorsal spinal cord (Prescott et al., 2014; Hernandez-Miranda et al., 2017). Most of the neurons that settle in the superficial dorsal horn are generated during the late phase of dorsal neurogenesis [embryonic day (E) 12 to E13.5] from a common pool of progenitors expressing the transcription factors Gsx1/2 and Ascl1 (Gross et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2002; Mizuguchi et al., 2006; Wildner et al., 2006). From these progenitors, two related subpopulations arise in a salt and pepper manner: GABAergic dILA neurons characterized by the expression of Ptf1a, Lbx1, Pax2, Lhx1/5, and Gbx1 homeodomain (HD) transcription factors (Gross et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2002; Glasgow et al., 2005; John et al., 2005; Pillai et al., 2007), and glutamatergic dILB neurons, which co-express Tlx1/3, Lbx1, Lmx1b, Prrxl1, and Brn3a (Cheng et al., 2004, 2005; Xu et al., 2008; Rebelo et al., 2010). In the Tlx1/3 knockout mice, prospective dILB neurons are transformed into Pax2+-dILA cells (Cheng et al., 2004), whereas in Ptf1a knockout mice, prospective dILA neurons switch into Tlx3+-dILB cells (Glasgow et al., 2005), with the resulting cells expressing, in both cases, subtype specific, terminal differentiation markers. Altogether, these observations indicate that Ptf1a and Tlx3 (partially redundant with Tlx1) function as selector genes of both GABAergic dILA and glutamatergic dILB neurons, respectively. Importantly, they also suggest that the mechanisms providing the two neuronal subtypes are intertwined, with specification of either dlLA or dlLB identity occurring at the expenses of the alternative cell fate. In support of this is the fact that, in dILA neurons, Ptf1a promotes Pax2, Lhx1, and Lhx5 expression while repressing Tlx3 and Lmx1b (Glasgow et al., 2005). Conversely, in dILB neurons, Tlx3 promotes the expression of Prrxl1, Lmx1b, and Brn3a/Pou4f1 (Qian et al., 2002; Xu et al., 2008) and antagonizes Lbx1-mediated specification of GABAergic phenotype (Cheng et al., 2005).

Although advances have been made in the identification of transcriptional regulators involved in specifying both classes of dorsal late-born interneurons (Cheng et al., 2004, 2005; Glasgow et al., 2005; Mizuguchi et al., 2006; Wildner et al., 2006), little is known on the underlying molecular mechanisms, in particular the associated transcriptional networks. In the present study, we investigate Tlx3 direct gene regulatory actions in the context of its regulatory function in dorsal spinal cord neurogenesis (Cheng et al., 2004, 2005). Using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by next generation sequencing (ChIP-seq) of Tlx3 and gene expression profiling of the developing dorsal spinal cord, we generated a comprehensive list of Tlx3 direct target genes, which were further validated in Tlx3 null embryos. We found Tlx3 to activate genes with a wide spectrum of functions involved in the early specification and later differentiation aspects of glutamatergic dILB neurons. Surprisingly, we also found Tlx3 to work as a repressor of many GABAergic genes. We conclude that the role of Tlx3 as a selector gene of excitatory dILB neurons involves direct and opposite regulation of genes involved in dILB and dILA specification and differentiation.

Materials and Methods

Animals

The animals used in this study were maintained in accordance with the European Union Directive 2010/63/EU, national Decreto-lei n°113-2013, and the protocols described were approved by the IBMC Ethical Committee and by the Portuguese Veterinarian Board. NMRI and C57BL/6 mouse strains were bred and housed at the i3S animal facility, under temperature-, and light-controlled conditions. The embryonic day 0.5 (E0.5) was the midday of the vaginal plug.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation

Tlx3 chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays using either dorsal or ventral spinal cord tissue from NMRI mouse embryos at E14.5 were performed as previously described (Regadas et al., 2014). For gene target validation, one Tlx3 peak for each locus within a shortest distance from the TSS was selected. ChIP-qPCR validation was performed using the following primers: Lmx1b TGTGTGAGGAATATCAATGGAGT and GG GAGACAGCCAGTGCTTA; Prrxl1 TTATGCGCCATTAGACT TGC and CTCTCTGCCTGGGTGAAAAT; Pou4f1 GCCTCA GATTTCCACTCCAT and GAAGGCTCCACTTCATCACC; Tl x3 TTTCCGCTGCTAATTCCTCT and ATTTCGGGTTTGA GAAGCTG; Slc17a6 GCTGCCTTATGCCACCAT and CGGTC CCTTGGTACATCATT; Npy1r TATCTCCAGACCCCAGAG GA and GCCTACAGCAGAAGTGGACA; Cck ACCGCTGCTA TTGCCTTAGT and ACCCTGTCCTTCCTTCCTCT; Grin3a T CCTGCATGTGGTAGTTTGG and GCAAGGCAATGAGAATA GCA; Zic1 CTTTTGCGGTTTATCTTCCTG and GGTGTC GTCCTTTCAATTCAT; Trpc3 TGATGGCTTAATTTCCCC TAA and GCCCTGCTTCATTCTCACTT; Robo2 CAGC AATTTAGTGAGAGCCAAT and GGAATCAAGTCCAGATG TTTCA; Lphn2 AGCGAGGCTAACGAGAAGG and CTT GCCTGCATTGATGATTT; Gpr26 GAGAGGGGAGTGGGG TTAAT and AAGCTCTAAGCGGATGCTTT; Zic2 CGGC CCTATGAATATGAACA and TTTGTTGCAGCTTTTCTTGG; Pax2 GCCGTTTATCTCTCCTTCCA and GGTTCCCCAGCT ACAGTCTC; Lhx1 CCGCAGTACCATTGTCTTCA and TTTT TGCTACATCCCCCAAT; Lhx5 ACGAGTTGTCAGCGAAACC and ATTCATCTCCCTCCCGTTC; Gbx1GAGCCATTCACA CAATCACC and CCAGCGTTCTCATCTCGTT; Slc32a1 TTCA CTAAGGGGGAGTTGGT and ACCAGCACAACATGCAAAC; Grik3 GTTCCTTGAGGCCATGTTTC and TCGACTGG GGACCTTTTAGA; Sall3 TCAAATCGCCAATCACCTTA and TCCCCAGCTCATCACAAATA; Dll1 (ORF1) GTCTCAGGA CCTTCACAGTAG and GAGCAACCTTCTCCGTAGTAG; and, Ppp1r9a (ORF2) GCAGCCGAAAATGAGAAAGT and TCGATCCAGTAGCTCTCCAA.

ChIP-Seq

The product of several ChIP assays was pooled in order to generate enough material for library preparation, which was quantified with Picogreen (Invitrogen). Libraries were prepared from 10 ng of immunoprecipitated DNA according to standard Illumina ChIP-seq protocol and sequenced with Illumina HiSeq2000. Raw reads were mapped to the mouse genome (NCBI37/mm9) with Bowtie version 0.12.7 (Langmead et al., 2009), and PCR duplicates removed with SAMTools (Li et al., 2009). Peaks were called with MACS 1.4.1 (Zhang et al., 2008) with P-value cut-off at 10–5. Subsampling confirmed that peak calling saturation was achieved with approximately 90% of sequenced reads. Peaks were annotated to the nearest transcription start site (TSS) using Peak Analyzer 1.4 (Salmon-Divon et al., 2010). Tlx3 peak at genomic coordinates chr8: 69213987-69215025 was re-annotated from Npy5r to Npy1r, as Npy5r is not expressed at E14.5 mouse dorsal spinal cord and Npy1r expression has been shown to be Tlx3-dependent (Guo et al., 2012). Sequencing data has been deposited at ArrayExpress1 with the accession number E-MTAB-6974. To retrieve Tlx3 binding profile in selected genomic segments, Tlx3 ChIP-seq data set was loaded into UCSC Genome Browser2 (Waterston et al., 2002) and the ENCODE ChIP-seq data sets for H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K27ac from E14.5 neural tube and the conservation across 30 vertebrates species analyzed.

Gene Expression Profiling

Dorsal spinal cords dissected from litters of E14.5 wild type embryos of unknown sex were processed for RNA extraction using Trizol and RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) extraction procedures. Five replicates of wild type embryos were analyzed, each sample with tissue pooled from three embryos. Expression profiling was done using Affymetrix Mouse Gene 1.0 ST Arrays at the Gene Expression Unit of Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência. Data analyses were performed using R and Bioconductor. Statistical analysis was performed using False Discovery Ratio (FDR) with P-value < 0.05. Following common criteria in the field, a log2 expression average of biological replicates ≥7 was used to determine expressed genes. Expression profiling data has been deposited at ArrayExpress (see text footnote 1) with the accession number E-MTAB-9963.

Motif Searches and Gene Ontology

De novo search for enriched DNA motifs within 20 bp of Tlx3 peak summits was performed using CisFinder software3 (Sharov and Ko, 2009) with default parameters, using equivalent 3 kb upstream genomic regions as background control. To search for co-enriched motifs in the vicinity of Tlx3 binding events, CisFinder search was performed using 200 bp genomic regions centered at peak summits, upon masking of the Tlx3 motif. Searches for transcription factor motif similarities was performed against mouse motif database using Tomtom algorithm4 (Gupta et al., 2007) with default parameters. Genomic distribution of Tlx3 peaks was performed using ChIPpeakAnno. Gene annotation was performed according to the nearest TSS allowing for a maximum distance of 2.14 Mb and considering ENSEMBL coding genes only. Functional annotation and enrichment for gene ontology (GO) terms was determined using DAVID 6.8 version5 (Huang da et al., 2009). Terms with a P-value < 5.0 × 10–2 and a Functional Annotation Clustering Enrichment Score >2.0 were considered enriched. For Biological Processes, clustering was performed, and representative terms from each cluster are shown. For clarity, clusters of generic terms were not displayed.

Immunofluorescence and in situ Hybridization

Immunofluorescence was performed as previously described (Rebelo et al., 2010). The guinea pig anti-Tlx3 and rabbit anti-Lmx1b antibodies (1:1000 dilution) were a gift from Tomas Müller (Max-Delbrück-Centrum for Molecular Medicine, Germany). For in situ hybridization, Tlx3 null and control embryos kindly provided by Dr. Leping Cheng (Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, China) were fixed in 4% PFA/PBS at 4°C for 48 h, and then placed in 30% sucrose/PBS overnight. Embryos were embedded in OCT compound (Surgipath) and frozen before sectioning in a cryostat (Leica). Embryos serial sections (10 μm thick) were collected in a way that cervical, thoracic and lumbar axial levels were represented in each microscope slide. Each axial level was carefully mapped for each embryo using an Atlas of Mouse Development. Cryosections were processed for in situ hybridization as previously described (Casarosa et al., 1999). Probes were synthesized by in vitro transcription of PCR fragments containing a T7 site and amplified in two consecutive rounds using cDNA from E14.5 mouse dorsal spinal cord tissue. Primers used included a T7 priming sequence (GGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGG) in reverse and the following sequences: Lphn2/Adgrl2 GCTTCTGTACCAACCCCAGA and CACTGGCAGCGTCT CTATCA, Gpr26 CTTCTGACCCCTTCGTGTATTC and TT TGGGTTACAGCAGCAAACA, Zic2 GGGCACCTTAGGATCG TCTTAT and GAAAAAGAAAAGGCCCATCAC, Lhx1 GGA TGAAACAGCTAAGCGCG and GCTGACATGGAGTGGAG AGG, Lhx5 CCAAAGAACGCCGCATGAAA and TTCG TTGAGCTCAGGGTTGG, Sall3 CCTCAGTACAGCTTCAGG and CTGATGTTGGTACAGTGGG. Robo2 (Sabatier et al., 2004) and Gbx1 (John et al., 2005) probes were generated from plasmids provided by Mark Tessier-Lavigne (Genentech, California) and Stefan Britsch (Ulm University, Germany), respectively. For double staining, in situ hybridization was followed by immunofluorescence with a few modifications. Briefly, C57BL/6 mouse embryo tissue sections were incubated with guinea pig anti-Tlx3 antibody (1:50 dilution) for two days at 4°C. Fluorescent and bright-field z-stack images were captured on a Zeiss Axio Imager Z1 microscope with a Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.40 Oil DIC objective, with a step size of 0.27 μm. The acquired fluorescent z-stack images were deconvolved using Huygens professional 19.10 software. In situ signals, using one selected z-plane image, were converted into a red pseudocolor and merged with the fluorescent signals of the matching z-plane image, using Fiji/ImageJ software (Schindelin et al., 2012).

Cell Culture

ND7/23 cell line was from the European Collection of Cell Cultures. This cell line was cultured and transfected as previously described (Monteiro et al., 2014) with a Tlx3 expressing vector (Regadas et al., 2013).

RNA Extraction and Real-Time Quantitative PCR

RNA extraction and real-time qPCR assays were performed essentially as previously described (Monteiro et al., 2014), with the following modifications: (i) RNA was purified using total RNA isolation kit (NZYTech), including a step of DNase I treatment of the binding column, and cDNA was prepared using oligo dT primers and M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase (NZYTech) according to the manufacturer’s instructions; (ii) real-time qPCR analysis was performed using the NZYSpeedy qPCR Green Master Mix (NZYTech) on a CFX384 qPCR System (Bio-Rad). The primer sequences were CCTGACAAAGAAGCGCCTTA and ACACGTTTGGGCAAAAGTACA for Tlx3 targeting the 3′UTR, and TTGCTGACCTGCTGGATTAC and GTCCTTTTCACCAGCAAGC for Hprt housekeeping gene. Expression of endogenous Tlx3 transcript was normalized to the control gene Hprt.

Statistical Analysis

For gene expression profiling of E14.5 dorsal spinal cord, see respective section above. For in situ hybridizations, the number of E14.5 mouse embryos used ranged from n = 3 to n = 7 in wild type and n = 3 to n = 4 in Tlx3 knockout mice, being the exact number for each experiment depicted in the figure legends. ChIP-qPCR experiments, on E14.5 chromatin, were performed at least twice with independent samples and one representative experiment is shown. The results are plotted as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and significance determined by Student’s t-test. The statistical significance of the overlap of gene lists was determined using a hypergeometric distribution calculator available at http://nemates.org/MA/progs/overlap_stats.html, using the estimated number of genes in the Affymetrix microarray. The representation factor is the number of overlapping genes divided by the expected number of overlapping genes drawn from two independent groups, with a representation factor >1 indicating a greater overlap than expected by chance. RT-qPCR results are shown as the mean of triplicates ± SD of two independent experiments. Student’s t-test statistical analysis was used to determine statistical significance between cells transfected with empty vector (vector) and cells transfected with mouse Tlx3.

Results

Characterization of Tlx3 Transcriptional Program in Embryonic Dorsal Spinal Cord

To understand how Tlx3 acts as a selector gene in the specification of the glutamatergic populations of dorsal horn neurons, we began by defining the repertoire of genes directly regulated by Tlx3 by combining genome-wide mapping of Tlx3 binding sites with expression profiling of dorsal spinal cord region. For that, we performed ChIP-seq using chromatin extracted from mouse dorsal spinal cord at embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5), a stage at which Tlx3 is highly expressed in newly born postmitotic neurons (Figure 1A). This resulted in a list of 4,521 binding sites (P < 10−5) (Supplementary Table 1 and Figure 1B), which shows consistent enrichment in a bin-by-bin analysis for the expected Tlx3 consensus binding motif TAATTA (Figure 1C). Binding motif is composed by a HD half-site (i.e., TAAT or ATTA) overlapping a second half-site, resembling the consensus binding sequence for Tlx3 family members previously identified by in vitro approaches (Berger et al., 2008; Noyes et al., 2008; Pujato et al., 2014). Most of the Tlx3 target sites (∼70%) fall within intergenic regions located at distances greater than 10 kb from the nearest TSS, suggesting preferential binding to distal regulatory elements (Figure 1D). Association of binding events to putative target genes was performed so as to maximize the statistical significance of the overlap between Tlx3 “bound” genes and a list of genes expressed in E14.5 dorsal spinal cord (Supplementary Table 2 and see section “Materials and Methods” for details). Accordingly, 4,521 Tlx3 binding sites (P < 10−5) are associated with 2,773 putative target genes, 1,900 of which are expressed in dorsal spinal cord region (Supplementary Table 3 and Figure 1B). In line with a large proportion of the detected Tlx3 binding events being regulatory, the comparison with the genome-wide profiles of histone marks obtained from whole neural tube at the same developmental stage provided by ENCODE (Gorkin et al., 2020) revealed a strong signal of histone 3 lysine 4 monomethylation (H3K4me1) and H3K4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) (Supplementary Figure 1), which in combination with H3K27 acetylation (H3K27ac) mark active enhancers or promoters, respectively (Shlyueva et al., 2014). In addition, we also found the group of Tlx3 bound genes to significantly overlap with that of genes expressed in dorsal spinal cord (representation factor: 1.4; P < 3.493e-113), again supporting the biological relevance of our Tlx3 genome-wide binding data set.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Characterization of Tlx3 transcriptional program in embryonic dorsal spinal cord. (A) Immunofluorescence analysis of Tlx3 and Lmx1b in E14.5 mouse spinal cord. Expression of Tlx3 and Lmx1b extensively co-localize in dorsal spinal cord, whereas in dorsal root ganglion only Tlx3 is detected. (B) Strategy used to identify direct targets of Tlx3 in dorsal spinal cord. (C) Heat map displays sequencing signal intensity in genomic regions centered at Tlx3 peak summits, ordered top-to-bottom by increasing P-value (left). Highest enriched motif in each bin of 500 bound regions (middle). Enrichment ratio of each motif matches in bound sequences over upstream control sequences (right). (D) Genomic features associated with Tlx3 binding sites (top) and relative association to the nearest TSS (bottom). (E) Biological processes over-represented in the list of Tlx3 putative target genes (i.e., bound and expressed in the dorsal spinal cord) using DAVID GO analysis. Colored bars represent the GO category, KEGG pathway or InterPro protein class and in front of each bar is the number of target genes associated with that term. (F) Summary of the functions controlled by Tlx3 in the dILB neurons specification.

Next, we performed GO analyses to identify terms overrepresented in the list of Tlx3 target genes (i.e., genes bound and expressed in the dorsal spinal cord) using DAVID (Huang da et al., 2009). Consistent with Tlx3 known function in the specification and subsequent differentiation of glutamatergic dorsal horn precursor neurons, we found enrichment of terms derived from different GO categories, KEGG pathways and InterPro protein families related to neuron fate commitment, differentiation, projection development and migration (Supplementary Tables 4–6 and Figures 1E,F). Of particular notice were genes encoding transcription factors (namely of the HD family) with a known function in “spinal cord development,” related to glutamatergic differentiation (e.g., Prrxl1 and Isl1) and, surprisingly, also to GABAergic differentiation (e.g., Lhx1 and Gbx1) (discussed below). In addition, several genes were related to synapse signaling and assembly, suggesting a role for Tlx3 also in later steps of neuronal differentiation. Altogether, these data indicate that Tlx3 regulates distinct aspects of spinal dorsal horn neurogenesis, including early steps of neuronal sub-type specification and later processes of neuronal maturation (Figure 1F).

Tlx3 Directly Promotes Glutamatergic Differentiation

To assess whether Tlx3 binding is associated with the regulation of excitatory differentiation markers, we charted the Tlx3 targets encoding for transcription factors and terminal differentiation molecules that were reported in the literature as Tlx3-dependent genes. Analysis of null mice for Tlx genes identified a set of transcription factor genes specifically expressed in dILB but not in dILA spinal dorsal horn neurons in a Tlx1/3 or Tlx3 dependent manner. These include Lmx1b, Prrxl1/Drg11, and Pou4f1/Brn3a (Qian et al., 2002; Xu et al., 2008; Zou et al., 2012), being Lmx1b and Prrxl1 involved in dorsal spinal cord morphogenesis (Chen et al., 2001; Ding et al., 2004; Rebelo et al., 2010) and Pou4f1 required for the early wave of neuropeptide Tac1 expression (Xu et al., 2008). Strikingly, all these genes were associated with Tlx3 binding events identified by ChIP-seq and subsequently validated by ChIP-qPCR from dorsal spinal cord chromatin (but not from ventral spinal cord chromatin as expected, given that Tlx3 is not expressed in that region) (Figures 2A,B). Noteworthy, the enrichment of histone marks at Tlx3 peaks at those gene loci were indicative of Tlx3 occupancy at active cis-regulatory elements (Figure 2A). In addition, Tlx3 was recruited to its own locus at multiple sites (Figures 2A,B), suggesting an auto-regulatory feedback loop. Overexpression of Tlx3 in ND7/23 neuronal cell line strongly repressed the expression of endogenous Tlx3 mRNA (Supplementary Figure 2), suggesting autorepression as a control mechanism of Tlx3 transcription, a feature previously described for Prrxl1 (Monteiro et al., 2014).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Tlx3 directly controls the expression of transcription factors and terminal differentiation genes involved in glutamatergic differentiation. (A) Tlx3 binding profile (in black) within genomic regions spanning target genes. Target gene structure and direction of transcription (blue), H3K4me1 (light blue), H3K4me3 (blue), and H3K27ac (green), as well as multispecies vertebrate conservation (green) plots are shown. ENCODE annotations are from histone marks of ChIP-seq data sets using E14.5 mouse neural tube (Gorkin et al., 2020). Data tracks extracted using the UCSC genome browser (Waterston et al., 2002). Binding sites validated by ChIP-qPCR are marked by red asterisks. (B) Validation of Tlx3 binding sites by independent ChIP-qPCR using chromatin extracted from either E14.5 dorsal or ventral spinal cords. Two negative control regions (ORF1/2) are shown. Mean ± SD; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 as compared to ORF2 with Student’s t-test; n = 3 experimental replicates.

Genetic ablation in mouse embryos has also previously shown that Tlx1/3 positively regulate the expression of the vesicular glutamate transporter Slc17a6/Vglut2 (Fremeau et al., 2001), as well as a set of synaptic transmission genes characteristic of the glutamatergic phenotype, such as genes encoding for neuropeptides Grp, Tac1, Cck, Sst, Adcyap1 and Nts; neuropeptide receptors Grpr, Galr1, Npy1r, and Tacr1; glutamate receptors Gria2, Gria3, Grin3a, and Grin3b; GABA receptors Gabra1, Gabra5, and Gabrb2, and signaling molecule Prkcg/PKC gama (Cheng et al., 2004; Li et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2008, 2013; Guo et al., 2012). Strikingly, we found prominent Tlx3 binding to a large number of these genes, namely Slc17a6, Cck, Adcyap1, Nts, Galr1, Npy1r, Grin3a, and Gabrb2 (Supplementary Table 1 and Figures 2A,B). We did not find evidence that the Tlx3-dependent genes Grp, Tac1, Sst, Grpr, Tacr1, Gria2, Gria3, Grin3b, Gabra1, Gabra5, and Prkcg are under direct control of Tlx3, although we cannot exclude that this may result from a limitation of our gene annotation strategy, which considers only the nearest TSS to a Tlx3 binding event. Taken together, our results show that the Tlx3 role as a master regulator of dorsal horn glutamatergic neuronal differentiation and peptidergic transmitter phenotype acquisition is largely based on direct binding mechanisms and identifies many important examples of target genes involved.

Previous analysis of double Tlx1/3 or Tlx3 null mouse spinal cords by in situ hybridization has also revealed deregulation of genes not yet associated with glutamatergic or GABAergic neurotransmitter phenotypes. Several neuronal differentiation genes, namely the transcription factors Ebf2, Maf/c-Maf, and Mafa (Qian et al., 2002; Hu et al., 2012) and effector genes Pcp4, Trpc3, and Enc1 (Li et al., 2006) were shown to be downregulated, and the transcription factors Zic1 and Zic4 (Ding et al., 2004) upregulated. Interestingly, we found Tlx3 binding to genes encoding all above mentioned transcription factors as well as Pcp4, Trpc3, and Enc1 (Supplementary Table 1 and Figures 2A,B). These observations further highlight the complexity of the transcriptional program directly governed by Tlx3.

Beyond ascertaining whether known Tlx3-depentent genes were under Tlx3 direct regulation, we also probed our gene list to identify novel direct targets whose expression has not yet been shown to depend on Tlx3. With that aim, we focused on four genes: three associated with at least one highly significant (top 10% lowest P-value) Tlx3 binding event and with enriched expression in superficial dorsal horn (Robo2, Lphn2, and Gpr26), as determined by the analysis of expression patterns in the literature and public in situ hybridization database GenePaint6 (Li et al., 2006; Eichele and Diez-Roux, 2011); and one not associated with Tlx3 binding (Zic2) to function as negative control (Figure 3A). These Tlx3 binding events were validated through ChIP-qPCR (Figure 3B). To verify whether these novel target genes are expressed in Tlx3+-cells, we performed double-staining experiments for Tlx3 protein and transcript of putative target genes, combining immunofluorescence with mRNA in situ hybridization, respectively. We found that, in contrast to Zic2, Robo2, Lphn2, and Gpr26 are extensively expressed in Tlx3+-cells across the superficial dorsal horn (Figure 3C, arrows). In addition, these targets were also expressed in few Tlx3–-cells (Figure 3C, asterisks). During spinal cord development, Tlx1 and Tlx3 redundancy is restricted to cervical and thoracic levels, whereas at the lumbar level solely Tlx3 is expressed (Qian et al., 2002; Cheng et al., 2004, 2005). Therefore, we used lumbar spinal cord cross sections from E14.5 embryos to test whether the expression of any of these genes was altered in Tlx3 null mice. In the spinal cord dorsal horn of Tlx3 knockout embryos, a marked reduced expression of Roundabout homolog 2 (Drosophila) (Robo2), Latrophilin 2 (Lphn2), and G protein-coupled receptor 26 (Gpr26) was found, as compared to wild type controls (Figure 3D, arrows), which is in line with the observed broad expression of these target genes in Tlx3+-cells. By contrast, the expression of Zic2 was not changed between both conditions. While Robo2 is a well-known axonal pathfinding and neuronal migration receptor molecule (Jaworski et al., 2010), the roles of G protein-coupled receptors Lphn2 and Gpr26 in the dorsal spinal cord have not yet been determined. Lphn2 has been implicated in postsynaptic target recognition in the hippocampus (Anderson et al., 2017) and Gpr26 is apparently related to anxiety and depression associated behaviors (Zhang et al., 2011).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Identification of novel Tlx3 target genes. (A) Tlx3 binding profile (black) within genomic regions spanning target genes. Target gene structure and direction of transcription (blue) as well as multispecies vertebrate conservation plot (green) are shown. Binding sites used for ChIP-qPCR validation are marked by red asterisks. (B) Validation of Tlx3 binding sites by independent ChIP-qPCR using chromatin extracted from E14.5 dorsal spinal cords. Two negative control regions (ORF1/2) are shown. Mean ± SD; *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 as compared to ORF1 with Student’s t-test; n = 3 experimental replicates. (C) Expression of Robo2, Lphn2, Gpr26, and Zic2 in Tlx3+ neurons. a–d In situ hybridizations using transverse sections of lumbar spinal cord of E14.5 wild type embryos. a1–d2 Double staining of Tlx3 protein (a1–2, b1–2, c1–2, d1–2, green) with either Robo2 (a1–2, red), Lphn2 (b1–2, red), Gpr26 (c1–2, red), and Zic2 (d1–2, red) mRNA. Note that bright-field in situ hybridization signals were converted into red pseudocolor signals. Note the extensive co-expression of Robo2, Lphn2, and Gpr26 with Tlx3 (a1–2, b1–2, c1–2, arrows), but little co-expression of Zic2 with Tlx3. Expression of putative target genes in Tlx3– cells is labeled an asterisk. Scale bars: a–d 50 μm; a1–d2 20 μm. (D) Reduction or loss of the expression of target genes in Tlx3 null dorsal spinal cord assessed by in situ hybridization. a–h Transverse sections through the lumbar spinal cord of E14.5 wild type [a (n = 5); c (n = 4); e (n = 6); g (n = 4)] and Tlx3 null mutants [b (n = 3); d (n = 3); f (n = 3); h (n = 3)]. Expression of Robo2, Lphn2, and Gpr26 was markedly reduced (b, d, f, arrow). Zic2 expression was not affected (h), as previously observed (Ding et al., 2004). Scale bar: 100 μm.

Tlx3 Directly Suppresses GABAergic Differentiation

A close inspection of genes associated with Tlx3 binding events revealed many potential targets associated with dILA neuronal development, suggesting a putative direct role of Tlx3 as suppressor of GABAergic cell fate. To investigate this, we validated Tlx3 binding to GABAergic differentiation genes by ChIP-qPCR and compared their expression in wild type versus Tlx3 null embryos. Tlx3 binding sites were found associated with Pax2, Lhx1, Lhx5, and Gbx1 homeobox genes and Sall3, a zinc finger transcription factor encoding gene (Figures 4A,B). In Tlx3 mutants, the expression of Lhx1, Lhx5, Gbx1, and Sall3 transcripts was markedly increased in the dorsal horn (Figure 4C, arrows). Sall3 was recently shown to be exclusively expressed in GABAergic neurons of the dorsal horn (Haring et al., 2018) and is important for terminal differentiation of olfactory glomerular interneurons (Harrison et al., 2008). These data suggest that Tlx3 suppresses GABAergic genetic program in excitatory glutamatergic neurons, by directly binding to homeobox genes that promote the inhibitory neuron identity.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

Tlx3 directly controls the expression of transcription factors and terminal differentiation genes involved in GABAergic differentiation. (A) Tlx3 binding profile (black) within genomic regions spanning target genes. Target gene structure and direction of transcription (blue) as well as multispecies vertebrate conservation plots (green) are shown. Binding sites validated by ChIP-qPCR are marked by red asterisks. (B) Validation of Tlx3 binding sites by independent ChIP-qPCR using chromatin extracted from E14.5 dorsal spinal cords. Negative control region (ORF1) is shown. Mean ± SD; **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 as compared to ORF1 with Student’s t-test; n = 3 experimental replicates. (C) Derepression of GABAergic markers in Tlx3 null dorsal spinal cord assessed by in situ hybridization. a–h Transverse sections through the lumbar spinal cord of E14.5 wild type [a (n = 6); c (n = 6); e (n = 7); g (n = 3)] and Tlx3 null mutants [b (n = 4); d (n = 3); f (n = 3); h (n = 3)]. Lhx1, Lhx5, Gbx1, and Sall3 expression in the dorsal horn was markedly increased (b, d, f, h, arrow) in Tlx3 mutants as compared to controls. Scale bar: 100 μm.

Previous studies have also found the expression of generic markers of GABAergic differentiation to be upregulated in the dorsal spinal cord of Tlx1/3 null embryos. This is the case of Gad1/2 and Slc32a1/Viaat, involved, respectively, in GABA synthesis and transport (Cheng et al., 2004), and genes encoding for neuropeptides Sst (early expression wave), Npy and Pnoc, and glutamate receptors Grik1, Grik2, Grik3, Grm3, Grm4, and Grm5 genes (Cheng et al., 2004; Huang et al., 2008; Xu et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2012), all terminal differentiation genes mainly expressed in spinal dorsal horn GABAergic neurons. Strikingly, of all the above genes, we found Tlx3 binding to Slc32a1, Grik2, Grik3, Grm3, Grm4, Grm5, and Gad2 (Supplementary Table 1 and Figures 4A,B). Altogether these results suggest that Tlx3 suppresses GABAergic differentiation in dILB neurons at distinct levels, including transcription factors but also terminal differentiation genes with exclusive expression in dILA neurons (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Open in a new tab

A model for a dual activity of Tlx3 in promoting glutamatergic, while concomitantly suppressing GABAergic specification program in dILB neurons. Tlx3 direct target genes include transcription factors, neuropeptides, neuropeptide and glutamate and GABA receptors, and molecules for neurotransmitter transport. Genes expressed in glutamatergic cells, most of which are Tlx3+/Pax2–-cells, are markedly reduced or eliminated in Tlx3 knockout mice, whereas genes expressed in GABAergic cells, most of which are Tlx3–/Pax2+-cells, are upregulated in Tlx3 knockout mice. Expression data was retrieved from the following reported studies: Qian et al., 2002 (a), Cheng et al., 2004 (b), Cheng et al., 2005 (c), Li et al., 2006 (d), Xu et al., 2008 (e), Guo et al., 2012 (f), Xu et al., 2013 (g), Huang et al., 2008 (h), and our study (*) using Tlx3 single knockout (§), Tlx1/3 double knockout (§), and/or Tlx3 conditional knockout (#) mice. Line, direct regulation; dashed line, indirect regulation; arrow, activation of expression; blunt line, inhibition of expression.

Discussion

Accumulating evidence shows that Tlx3 plays a pivotal role in the morphogenesis of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, where it functions as a master regulator of the development of excitatory glutamatergic neurons (Xu et al., 2008). This role is exerted redundantly with Tlx1 where both factors are co-expressed, namely at more rostral regions (Cheng et al., 2004). Several Tlx3-dependent genes were previously identified in mouse dorsal spinal cord through gene targeting studies in mice (Qian et al., 2002; Cheng et al., 2004, 2005; Li et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2008, 2013; Guo et al., 2012). However, understanding how this protein functions has been compromised by the lack of data on direct molecular interactions. In this study, we bridged this gap by providing the first genome-wide characterization of Tlx3 transcriptional program in the developing nervous system. This expanded the list of Tlx3 targets, representing an important resource for future studies.

Our study argues that Tlx3 activates a broad and complex transcriptional program in the differentiation of late-born glutamatergic dILB neurons, while repressing genes associated with the alternative GABAergic dILA phenotype. This dual activity is in line with evidence showing that mechanisms specifying dILA and dILB cell lineages, which are derived from the same progenitor pool (Gross et al., 2002; Muller et al., 2002), are tightly coupled. Accordingly, while loss of determinants of one lineage (e.g., Tlx1/3, Gsx1/2, Ascl1, Ptf1a, and Lbx1) results in conversion into the alternative phenotype (Cheng et al., 2004, 2005; Glasgow et al., 2005; Mizuguchi et al., 2006), their forced expression is sufficient, in some cases, to cause a neurotransmitter cell fate switch (Mizuguchi et al., 2006; Wildner et al., 2006; Hori et al., 2008). These loss- and gain-of-function studies support the idea that each of these lineage precursors has the plasticity to differentiate into the alternative phenotype.

Virtually all genes known to be specifically expressed in Tlx3+ glutamatergic neurons, including transcription factors and terminal effector genes, are dependent on Tlx3, since their expression is markedly reduced or eliminated in Tlx3 knockout mice (Qian et al., 2002; Cheng et al., 2004, 2005; Li et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2008, 2013; Guo et al., 2012). Thus, Tlx3 appears to be at the head of the differentiation of superficial dorsal horn glutamatergic neurons. Strikingly, our results suggest that most of these transcription factors, as well as many of the terminal effector genes, are in fact under the direct control of Tlx3 (Figure 5). In line with such master control function, an important group of the here identified direct targets of Tlx3 encodes for transcriptional regulators such as Lmx1b, Prrxl1, and Pou4f1/Brn3a (Qian et al., 2002; Xu et al., 2008), whose combinatorial and dynamic expression is likely to generate various subpopulations of mature excitatory dorsal horn neurons (Rebelo et al., 2010). In addition, our work suggests that Tlx3 also activates downstream effectors of glutamatergic phenotype (Brohl et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2013), similarly to the model proposed for Ptf1a in dILA lineage specification (Guo et al., 2012; Borromeo et al., 2014).

The present results indicate that Tlx3 transactivates genes associated with dILB identity, which is in line with the previous observation that Tlx3 physically interacts with the transcriptional coactivator cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-response element-binding protein (CREB)-binding protein (CBP), and that this interaction is necessary for the expression of glutamatergic neuronal subtype markers in differentiating embryonic stem cells (Shimomura et al., 2015). Although a role for Tlx3 in transcriptional repression has been less documented, several lines of evidence suggest this activity may rely on the interaction with cofactors of the Gro/TLE family: (i) Tlx closely related paralogs (Tlx1, Tlx2, and Tlx3) contain a conserved Engrailed homology 1 (Eh1)-like motif (present in most HD proteins) that mediates the recruitment of Gro/TLE corepressors, which have been implicated in the patterning of ventral neuronal subtypes (Muhr et al., 2001); (ii) Tlx1 and Tlx3 were shown to physically interact with TLE1 (Riz et al., 2009); and (iii) Tlx1–TLE1 interaction is necessary for Tlx1 transcriptional regulation of target genes (Riz et al., 2009, 2010).

Tlx3 gene ablation results also in supernumerary dILA neurons, suggesting the concomitant regulation of both alternative cell fates (Cheng et al., 2004, 2005). Previously, it has been speculated that Tlx3 may repress the dILA neuronal fate (while promoting dILB identity) via mechanism based on protein-protein interactions with other important determinant Lbx1 (Cheng et al., 2005). Our observations open an alternative pathway whereby Tlx3 binds to and directly represses not only GABAergic differentiation factors (i.e., Pax2, Lhx1/5, and Gbx1), but also terminal effector GABAergic genes (i.e. Grik2/3, Grm3/4/5, and Slc32a1) (Figure 4, and Cheng et al., 2004; Cheng et al., 2005; Guo et al., 2012). In the current study, the biological significance of Tlx3 binding to dILA and dILB genes is based on gene expression analysis of Tlx3 knockout mice. As in these mice glutamatergic dILB precursors are transformed into GABAergic dILA neurons, we cannot exclude the possibility that the gene expression changes observed are an indirect consequence from this fate conversion. Nevertheless, the fact that Tlx3 ectopic expression in developing chick dorsal spinal cord results in robust glutamatergic differentiation at the expenses of expression of GABAergic marker genes in presumptive GABAergic cells (Cheng et al., 2004) argues in favor of Tlx3 playing direct regulatory roles.

An important question that remains to be addressed is how can Tlx3 function simultaneously as an activator and repressor in the same cellular context. Examples of other HD factors with similar dual activities include Pbx1 and Chx10, during midbrain and spinal cord development, respectively (Clovis et al., 2016; Villaescusa et al., 2016). In the latter case, it was shown that Chx10 HD protein promotes the expression of spinal V2a interneuron genes, while concomitantly suppressing the expression of motor neuron genes by acting as a DNA-binding competitor of the Isl1-Lhx3-HD complex (Clovis et al., 2016). It is tempting to speculate that similar mechanisms may be at play in the case of Tlx3, although this remains to be further investigated. In any case, both activation and repression are associated with direct DNA binding and most likely result from differences at regulatory regions targeted by Tlx3. One possibility is that the binding of Tlx3 to variants of its consensus binding motif could result in Tlx3 adopting distinct protein structures leading to the recruitment of co-factors with distinct activities. Alternatively, activation versus repression could rely on the combinatorial action of Tlx3 with distinct groups of transcription factors that co-occupy the same gene regulatory regions. Although not conclusively, none of these hypotheses was supported by our de novo search for enriched DNA motifs at the vicinity of Tlx3 binding events (data not shown).

In conclusion, our data strongly indicate that Tlx3 may concomitantly promote and repress gene expression, biasing dILB precursors to become excitatory glutamatergic neurons while suppressing the alternative inhibitory GABAergic cell fate (Figrue 5). This dual transcriptional activity of a HD selector gene may be of particular importance in developmental contexts, when segregation of related differentiated cell types takes place from a common pool of progenitors.

Data Availability Statement

Datasets presented in this study can be found in ArrayExpress with accession numbers E-MTAB-6974 (Tlx3 ChIP-seq from mouse E14.5 dorsal spinal cord) and E-MTAB-9963 (Transcription profiling of mouse E14.5 dorsal spinal cord).

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the IBMC Ethical Committee and by the Portuguese Veterinarian Board.

Author Contributions

FM, CR, DC, and DL conceived and designed the research. FM, RM, MS, and AD performed the research. FM, AR, PO, CR, DC, and DL analyzed the data. FM, DC, and DL wrote the manuscript and supervised the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Thomas Müller for providing Tlx3 and Lmx1b antibodies, Leping Cheng for providing Tlx3 null embryos and Daniel Sobral (IGC) for bioinformatics analyses.

Funding. This work is a result of the project Norte-01-0145-FEDER-000008 – Porto Neurosciences and Neurologic Disease Research Initiative at I3S, supported by Norte Portugal Regional Operational Program (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER). This work was also supported by FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (Grants PTDC/SAU-OBD/099886/2008 to DL and PTDC/NEU-NMC/0315/2012 to DC) and Universidade do Porto/Banco Santander Totta (Projetos Pluridisciplinares to FM). We acknowledge the support of POCI-01-0145-FEDER-022122, granted to i3S Scientific Platform Advanced Light Microscopy, member of the national infrastructure PPBI-Portuguese Platform of BioImaging.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.642697/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1

Pattern of H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K27ac histone marks around Tlx3 peak summits in E14.5 mouse neural tube (DOCX 1461 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (1.4MB, DOCX)
Supplementary Figure 2

Overexpression of Tlx3 induces repression of the endogenous Tlx3 expression in ND7/23 cells (DOCX 675 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (674.8KB, DOCX)
Supplementary Table 1

Genomic coordinates of Tlx3 binding sites determined by ChIP-Seq (XLSX 448 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (447.7KB, XLSX)
Supplementary Table 2

Genes expressed in E14.5 mouse dorsal spinal cord (XLSX 391 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (391KB, XLSX)
Supplementary Table 3

List of Tlx3 target regions associated to genes that are expressed in embryonic dorsal spinal cord (XLSX 369 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (368.4KB, XLSX)
Supplementary Table 4

Overrepresented gene ontology biological process categories associated with Tlx3 target gene (XLSX 326 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (325.3KB, XLSX)
Supplementary Table 5

Overrepresented gene ontology KEGG pathway terms associated with Tlx3 target gene (XLSX 25 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (24.1KB, XLSX)
Supplementary Table 6

Overrepresented gene ontology InterPro terms associated with Tlx3 target genes (XLSX 46 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (45.2KB, XLSX)

References

  1. Anderson G. R., Maxeiner S., Sando R., Tsetsenis T., Malenka R. C., Sudhof T. C. (2017). Postsynaptic adhesion GPCR latrophilin-2 mediates target recognition in entorhinal-hippocampal synapse assembly. J. Cell Biol. 216 3831–3846. 10.1083/jcb.201703042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger M. F., Badis G., Gehrke A. R., Talukder S., Philippakis A. A., Pena-Castillo L., et al. (2008). Variation in homeodomain DNA binding revealed by high-resolution analysis of sequence preferences. Cell 133 1266–1276. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borromeo M. D., Meredith D. M., Castro D. S., Chang J. C., Tung K. C., Guillemot F., et al. (2014). A transcription factor network specifying inhibitory versus excitatory neurons in the dorsal spinal cord. Development 141 2803–2812. 10.1242/dev.105866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brohl D., Strehle M., Wende H., Hori K., Bormuth I., Nave K. A., et al. (2008). A transcriptional network coordinately determines transmitter and peptidergic fate in the dorsal spinal cord. Dev. Biol. 322 381–393. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Casarosa S., Fode C., Guillemot F. (1999). Mash1 regulates neurogenesis in the ventral telencephalon. Development 126 525–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caspary T., Anderson K. V. (2003). Patterning cell types in the dorsal spinal cord: what the mouse mutants say. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4 289–297. 10.1038/nrn1073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen Z. F., Rebelo S., White F., Malmberg A. B., Baba H., Lima D., et al. (2001). The paired homeodomain protein DRG11 is required for the projection of cutaneous sensory afferent fibers to the dorsal spinal cord. Neuron 31 59–73. 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00341-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng L., Arata A., Mizuguchi R., Qian Y., Karunaratne A., Gray P. A., et al. (2004). Tlx3 and Tlx1 are post-mitotic selector genes determining glutamatergic over GABAergic cell fates. Nat. Neurosci. 7 510–517. 10.1038/nn1221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng L., Samad O. A., Xu Y., Mizuguchi R., Luo P., Shirasawa S., et al. (2005). Lbx1 and Tlx3 are opposing switches in determining GABAergic versus glutamatergic transmitter phenotypes. Nat. Neurosci. 8 1510–1515. 10.1038/nn1569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Clovis Y. M., Seo S. Y., Kwon J. S., Rhee J. C., Yeo S., Lee J. W., et al. (2016). Chx10 Consolidates V2a Interneuron Identity through Two Distinct Gene Repression Modes. Cell Rep. 16 1642–1652. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.06.100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ding Y. Q., Yin J., Kania A., Zhao Z. Q., Johnson R. L., Chen Z. F. (2004). Lmx1b controls the differentiation and migration of the superficial dorsal horn neurons of the spinal cord. Development 131 3693–3703. 10.1242/dev.01250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eichele G., Diez-Roux G. (2011). High-throughput analysis of gene expression on tissue sections by in situ hybridization. Methods 53 417–423. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.12.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fremeau R. T., Jr., Troyer M. D., Pahner I., Nygaard G. O., Tran C. H., Reimer R. J., et al. (2001). The expression of vesicular glutamate transporters defines two classes of excitatory synapse. Neuron 31 247–260. 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00344-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Glasgow S. M., Henke R. M., Macdonald R. J., Wright C. V., Johnson J. E. (2005). Ptf1a determines GABAergic over glutamatergic neuronal cell fate in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Development 132 5461–5469. 10.1242/dev.02167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gorkin D. U., Barozzi I., Zhao Y., Zhang Y., Huang H., Lee A. Y., et al. (2020). An atlas of dynamic chromatin landscapes in mouse fetal development. Nature 583 744–751. 10.1038/s41586-020-2093-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gross M. K., Dottori M., Goulding M. (2002). Lbx1 specifies somatosensory association interneurons in the dorsal spinal cord. Neuron 34 535–549. 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00690-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Guo Z., Zhao C., Huang M., Huang T., Fan M., Xie Z., et al. (2012). Tlx1/3 and Ptf1a control the expression of distinct sets of transmitter and peptide receptor genes in the developing dorsal spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 32 8509–8520. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6301-11.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gupta S., Stamatoyannopoulos J. A., Bailey T. L., Noble W. S. (2007). Quantifying similarity between motifs. Genome. Biol. 8:R24. 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Haring M., Zeisel A., Hochgerner H., Rinwa P., Jakobsson J. E. T., Lonnerberg P., et al. (2018). Neuronal atlas of the dorsal horn defines its architecture and links sensory input to transcriptional cell types. Nat. Neurosci. 21 869–880. 10.1038/s41593-018-0141-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Harrison S. J., Parrish M., Monaghan A. P. (2008). Sall3 is required for the terminal maturation of olfactory glomerular interneurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 507 1780–1794. 10.1002/cne.21650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Helms A. W., Johnson J. E. (2003). Specification of dorsal spinal cord interneurons. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13 42–49. 10.1016/s0959-4388(03)00010-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hernandez-Miranda L. R., Muller T., Birchmeier C. (2017). The dorsal spinal cord and hindbrain: From developmental mechanisms to functional circuits. Dev. Biol. 432 34–42. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hori K., Cholewa-Waclaw J., Nakada Y., Glasgow S. M., Masui T., Henke R. M., et al. (2008). A nonclassical bHLH Rbpj transcription factor complex is required for specification of GABAergic neurons independent of Notch signaling. Genes. Dev. 22 166–178. 10.1101/gad.1628008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hu J., Huang T., Li T., Guo Z., Cheng L. (2012). c-Maf is required for the development of dorsal horn laminae III/IV neurons and mechanoreceptive DRG axon projections. J. Neurosci. 32 5362–5373. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6239-11.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Huang M., Huang T., Xiang Y., Xie Z., Chen Y., Yan R., et al. (2008). Ptf1a, Lbx1 and Pax2 coordinate glycinergic and peptidergic transmitter phenotypes in dorsal spinal inhibitory neurons. Dev. Biol. 322, 394–405. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.06.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Huang da W., Sherman B. T., Lempicki R. A. (2009). Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4 44–57. 10.1038/nprot.2008.211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jaworski A., Long H., Tessier-Lavigne M. (2010). Collaborative and specialized functions of Robo1 and Robo2 in spinal commissural axon guidance. J. Neurosci. 30 9445–9453. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6290-09.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. John A., Wildner H., Britsch S. (2005). The homeodomain transcription factor Gbx1 identifies a subpopulation of late-born GABAergic interneurons in the developing dorsal spinal cord. Dev. Dyn. 234 767–771. 10.1002/dvdy.20568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Langmead B., Trapnell C., Pop M., Salzberg S. L. (2009). Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome. Biol. 10:R25. 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Li H., Handsaker B., Wysoker A., Fennell T., Ruan J., Homer N., et al. (2009). The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25 2078–2079. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Li M. Z., Wang J. S., Jiang D. J., Xiang C. X., Wang F. Y., Zhang K. H., et al. (2006). Molecular mapping of developing dorsal horn-enriched genes by microarray and dorsal/ventral subtractive screening. Dev. Biol. 292 555–564. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.01.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lima D., Coimbra A. (1986). A Golgi study of the neuronal population of the marginal zone (lamina I) of the rat spinal cord. J. Comp. Neurol. 244 53–71. 10.1002/cne.902440105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mizuguchi R., Kriks S., Cordes R., Gossler A., Ma Q., Goulding M. (2006). Ascl1 and Gsh1/2 control inhibitory and excitatory cell fate in spinal sensory interneurons. Nat. Neurosci. 9 770–778. 10.1038/nn1706 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Monteiro C. B., Costa M. F., Reguenga C., Lima D., Castro D. S., Monteiro F. A. (2014). Paired related homeobox protein-like 1 (Prrxl1) controls its own expression by a transcriptional autorepression mechanism. FEBS Lett. 588 3475–3482. 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Muhr J., Andersson E., Persson M., Jessell T. M., Ericson J. (2001). Groucho-mediated transcriptional repression establishes progenitor cell pattern and neuronal fate in the ventral neural tube. Cell 104 861–873. 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00283-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Muller T., Brohmann H., Pierani A., Heppenstall P. A., Lewin G. R., Jessell T. M., et al. (2002). The homeodomain factor lbx1 distinguishes two major programs of neuronal differentiation in the dorsal spinal cord. Neuron 34 551–562. 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00689-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Noyes M. B., Christensen R. G., Wakabayashi A., Stormo G. D., Brodsky M. H., Wolfe S. A. (2008). Analysis of homeodomain specificities allows the family-wide prediction of preferred recognition sites. Cell 133 1277–1289. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Pillai A., Mansouri A., Behringer R., Westphal H., Goulding M. (2007). Lhx1 and Lhx5 maintain the inhibitory-neurotransmitter status of interneurons in the dorsal spinal cord. Development 134 357–366. 10.1242/dev.02717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Prescott S. A., Ma Q., De Koninck Y. (2014). Normal and abnormal coding of somatosensory stimuli causing pain. Nat. Neurosci. 17 183–191. 10.1038/nn.3629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pujato M., Kieken F., Skiles A. A., Tapinos N., Fiser A. (2014). Prediction of DNA binding motifs from 3D models of transcription factors; identifying TLX3 regulated genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 42 13500–13512. 10.1093/nar/gku1228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Qian Y., Shirasawa S., Chen C. L., Cheng L., Ma Q. (2002). Proper development of relay somatic sensory neurons and D2/D4 interneurons requires homeobox genes Rnx/Tlx-3 and Tlx-1. Genes. Dev. 16 1220–1233. 10.1101/gad.982802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rebelo S., Reguenga C., Lopes C., Lima D. (2010). Prrxl1 is required for the generation of a subset of nociceptive glutamatergic superficial spinal dorsal horn neurons. Dev. Dyn. 239 1684–1694. 10.1002/dvdy.22305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Regadas I., Matos M. R., Monteiro F. A., Gomez-Skarmeta J. L., Lima D., Bessa J., et al. (2013). Several cis-regulatory elements control mRNA stability, translation efficiency, and expression pattern of Prrxl1 (paired related homeobox protein-like 1). J. Biol. Chem. 288 36285–36301. 10.1074/jbc.M113.491993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Regadas I., Soares-Dos-Reis R., Falcao M., Matos M. R., Monteiro F. A., Lima D., et al. (2014). Dual role of Tlx3 as modulator of Prrxl1 transcription and phosphorylation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1839 1121–1131. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Riz I., Hawley T. S., Luu T. V., Lee N. H., Hawley R. G. (2010). TLX1 and NOTCH coregulate transcription in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Mol. Cancer 9:181. 10.1186/1476-4598-9-181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Riz I., Lee H. J., Baxter K. K., Behnam R., Hawley T. S., Hawley R. G. (2009). Transcriptional activation by TLX1/HOX11 involves Gro/TLE corepressors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 380 361–365. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.01.099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sabatier C., Plump A. S., Le M., Brose K., Tamada A., Murakami F., et al. (2004). The divergent Robo family protein rig-1/Robo3 is a negative regulator of slit responsiveness required for midline crossing by commissural axons. Cell 117 157–169. 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00303-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Salmon-Divon M., Dvinge H., Tammoja K., Bertone P. (2010). PeakAnalyzer: genome-wide annotation of chromatin binding and modification loci. BMC Bioinform. 11:415. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., Frise E., Kaynig V., Longair M., Pietzsch T., et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9 676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Scholz J., Woolf C. J. (2002). Can we conquer pain? Nat. Neurosci. 5 Suppl 1062–1067. 10.1038/nn942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sharov A. A., Ko M. S. (2009). Exhaustive search for over-represented DNA sequence motifs with CisFinder. DNA Res. 16 261–273. 10.1093/dnares/dsp014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Shimomura A., Patel D., Wilson S. M., Koehler K. R., Khanna R., Hashino E. (2015). Tlx3 promotes glutamatergic neuronal subtype specification through direct interactions with the chromatin modifier CBP. PLoS One 10:e0135060. 10.1371/journal.pone.0135060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Shlyueva D., Stampfel G., Stark A. (2014). Transcriptional enhancers: from properties to genome-wide predictions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15 272–286. 10.1038/nrg3682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Todd A. J. (2010). Neuronal circuitry for pain processing in the dorsal horn. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11 823–836. 10.1038/nrn2947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Villaescusa J. C., Li B., Toledo E. M., Rivetti Di Val Cervo P., Yang S., Stott S. R., et al. (2016). A PBX1 transcriptional network controls dopaminergic neuron development and is impaired in Parkinson’s disease. EMBO J. 35 1963–1978. 10.15252/embj.201593725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Waterston R. H., Lindblad-Toh K., Birney E., Rogers J., Abril J. F., Agarwal P., et al. (2002). Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420 520–562. 10.1038/nature01262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wildner H., Muller T., Cho S. H., Brohl D., Cepko C. L., Guillemot F., et al. (2006). dILA neurons in the dorsal spinal cord are the product of terminal and non-terminal asymmetric progenitor cell divisions, and require Mash1 for their development. Development 133 2105–2113. 10.1242/dev.02345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Xu Y., Lopes C., Qian Y., Liu Y., Cheng L., Goulding M., et al. (2008). Tlx1 and Tlx3 coordinate specification of dorsal horn pain-modulatory peptidergic neurons. J. Neurosci. 28 4037–4046. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4126-07.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Xu Y., Lopes C., Wende H., Guo Z., Cheng L., Birchmeier C., et al. (2013). Ontogeny of excitatory spinal neurons processing distinct somatic sensory modalities. J. Neurosci. 33 14738–14748. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5512-12.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Yekkirala A. S., Roberson D. P., Bean B. P., Woolf C. J. (2017). Breaking barriers to novel analgesic drug development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16 545–564. 10.1038/nrd.2017.87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang L. L., Wang J. J., Liu Y., Lu X. B., Kuang Y., Wan Y. H., et al. (2011). GPR26-deficient mice display increased anxiety- and depression-like behaviors accompanied by reduced phosphorylated cyclic AMP responsive element-binding protein level in central amygdala. Neuroscience 196 203–214. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.08.069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhang Y., Liu T., Meyer C. A., Eeckhoute J., Johnson D. S., Bernstein B. E., et al. (2008). Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome. Biol. 9 R137. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Zou M., Li S., Klein W. H., Xiang M. (2012). Brn3a/Pou4f1 regulates dorsal root ganglion sensory neuron specification and axonal projection into the spinal cord. Dev. Biol 364 114–127. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.01.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1

Pattern of H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K27ac histone marks around Tlx3 peak summits in E14.5 mouse neural tube (DOCX 1461 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (1.4MB, DOCX)
Supplementary Figure 2

Overexpression of Tlx3 induces repression of the endogenous Tlx3 expression in ND7/23 cells (DOCX 675 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (674.8KB, DOCX)
Supplementary Table 1

Genomic coordinates of Tlx3 binding sites determined by ChIP-Seq (XLSX 448 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (447.7KB, XLSX)
Supplementary Table 2

Genes expressed in E14.5 mouse dorsal spinal cord (XLSX 391 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (391KB, XLSX)
Supplementary Table 3

List of Tlx3 target regions associated to genes that are expressed in embryonic dorsal spinal cord (XLSX 369 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (368.4KB, XLSX)
Supplementary Table 4

Overrepresented gene ontology biological process categories associated with Tlx3 target gene (XLSX 326 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (325.3KB, XLSX)
Supplementary Table 5

Overrepresented gene ontology KEGG pathway terms associated with Tlx3 target gene (XLSX 25 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (24.1KB, XLSX)
Supplementary Table 6

Overrepresented gene ontology InterPro terms associated with Tlx3 target genes (XLSX 46 kb).

Click here for additional data file. (45.2KB, XLSX)

Data Availability Statement

Datasets presented in this study can be found in ArrayExpress with accession numbers E-MTAB-6974 (Tlx3 ChIP-seq from mouse E14.5 dorsal spinal cord) and E-MTAB-9963 (Transcription profiling of mouse E14.5 dorsal spinal cord).

Articles from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES