Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2021 Apr 27;87(10):e00008-21. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00008-21

Bacteriophages against Vibrio coralliilyticus and Vibrio tubiashii: Isolation, Characterization, and Remediation of Larval Oyster Mortalities

Gary P Richards a,, Michael A Watson a, David Madison b, Nitzan Soffer c,*, David S Needleman d, Douglas S Soroka d, Joseph Uknalis d, Gian Marco Baranzoni d,*, Karlee M Church c,*, Shawn W Polson e, Ralph Elston f, Chris Langdon b, Alexander Sulakvelidze c
Editor: Christopher A Elkinsg
PMCID: PMC8117752  PMID: 33674441

Shellfish hatcheries encounter episodic outbreaks of larval oyster mortalities, jeopardizing the economic stability of hatcheries and the commercial shellfish industry. Shellfish pathogens like Vibrio coralliilyticus and Vibrio tubiashii have been recognized as major contributors of larval oyster mortalities in U.S.

KEYWORDS: Vibrio coralliilyticus, Vibrio tubiashii, oyster, larvae, bacteriophage therapy, phage, isolation, characterization, genomic sequencing, mortalities, coral

ABSTRACT

Vibrio coralliilyticus and Vibrio tubiashii are pathogens responsible for high larval oyster mortality rates in shellfish hatcheries. Bacteriophage therapy was evaluated to determine its potential to remediate these mortalities. Sixteen phages against V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii were isolated and characterized from Hawaiian seawater. Fourteen isolates were members of the Myoviridae family, and two were members of the Siphoviridae. In proof-of-principle trials, a cocktail of five phages reduced mortalities of larval Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) and Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) by up to 91% 6 days after challenge with lethal doses of V. coralliilyticus. Larval survival depended on the oyster species, the quantities of phages and vibrios applied, and the species and strain of Vibrio. A later-generation cocktail, designated VCP300, was formulated with three lytic phages subsequently named Vibrio phages vB_VcorM-GR7B, vB_VcorM-GR11A, and vB_VcorM-GR28A (abbreviated 7B, 11A, and 28A, respectively). Together, these three phages displayed host specificity toward eight V. coralliilyticus strains and a V. tubiashii strain. Larval C. gigas mortalities from V. coralliilyticus strains RE98 and OCN008 were significantly reduced by >90% (P < 0.0001) over 6 days with phage treatment compared to those of untreated controls. Genomic sequencing of phages 7B, 11A, and 28A revealed 207,758-, 194,800-, and 154,046-bp linear DNA genomes, respectively, with the latter showing 92% similarity to V. coralliilyticus phage YC, a strain from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Phage 7B and 11A genomes showed little similarity to phages in the NCBI database. This study demonstrates the promising potential for phage therapy to reduce larval oyster mortalities in oyster hatcheries.

IMPORTANCE Shellfish hatcheries encounter episodic outbreaks of larval oyster mortalities, jeopardizing the economic stability of hatcheries and the commercial shellfish industry. Shellfish pathogens like Vibrio coralliilyticus and Vibrio tubiashii have been recognized as major contributors of larval oyster mortalities in U.S. East and West Coast hatcheries for many years. This study isolated, identified, and characterized bacteriophages against these Vibrio species and demonstrated their ability to reduce mortalities from V. coralliilyticus in larval Pacific oysters and from both V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii in larval Eastern oysters. Phage therapy offers a promising approach for stimulating hatchery production to ensure the well-being of hatcheries and the commercial oyster trade.

INTRODUCTION

Shellfish hatcheries play a key role in providing seed oysters for commercial planting and aquaculture operations. In the United States, individual hatcheries raise billions of oyster larvae annually to produce the seed needed to sustain the commercial industry (1, 2). Intermittent high larval mortality rates caused by Vibrio spp. have produced shortages of larvae and seed oysters needed by the commercial shellfish industry (1, 3). Elston et al. (1) report larval oyster mortality rates on the Pacific Coast as high as 59% annually during years when episodic vibriosis occurs, although some producers claim losses to be much higher. East Coast hatcheries also suffer intermittent Vibrio-associated losses in larval shellfish production, with two hatcheries reporting >80% mortality rates in recent years (personal communication with hatchery managers). Among the pathogens that are particularly infectious to larval oysters and other bivalves are Vibrio tubiashii and Vibrio coralliilyticus (49). Vibrio tubiashii was initially identified in diseased shellfish along the U.S. East Coast (4) and has been associated periodically with major hatchery die-offs along the Atlantic and Pacific Coasts (1, 5, 10, 11). Until recently, many of the hatchery-associated outbreaks along the U.S. Pacific Coast were linked to V. tubiashii; however, PCR and genomic sequencing revealed that some of these isolates from disease outbreaks (i.e., strains ATCC 19105, RE22, and RE98) were actually V. coralliilyticus (1215). Vibrio coralliilyticus was initially identified as a pathogen that caused disease in corals and the destruction of coral reefs (1619). Richards et al. (8) identified some strains of V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii that are infectious to commercially important Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) and Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) larvae. In that study, V. tubiashii was particularly pathogenic in larval Eastern oysters and generally noninfectious to larval Pacific oysters, while some V. coralliilyticus strains were highly infectious to both Eastern and Pacific oyster larvae. More recently, we identified additional strains of coral-associated V. coralliilyticus that were infectious to Pacific oyster larvae (9). Fortunately, both V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii are known to be infectious to oysters only during their free-swimming larval stage, which is generally their first 2 to 3 weeks of life. After that stage, larvae undergo metamorphosis, lose their motility, and appear no longer susceptible to these pathogens. For some strains of V. coralliilyticus, enhanced infectivity to corals and larval oysters is notable at elevated seawater temperatures (9, 2023), such as those used in some commercial shellfish hatcheries.

Phage interventions are being employed increasingly to treat bacterial infections in fish and shellfish aquaculture operations and have been shown to have a protective effect to reduce disease and mortality (reviewed in references 2428). Vibriophages were effective in reducing pathogenic vibrios in aquaculture, including the pathogens Vibrio harveyi in shrimp (2931), Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shrimp (32, 33), and Vibrio anguillarum in various fish larvae (34, 35). To begin to remediate the economically significant problem of V. coralliilyticus- and V. tubiashii-associated mortalities in molluscan shellfish hatcheries, a plan was devised to isolate, identify, and characterize lytic phages against these pathogens and determine the efficacy of mixtures (cocktails) of these phages to reduce larval oyster mortalities. To the best of our knowledge, phages against V. tubiashii have not been previously reported; however, phages against V. coralliilyticus have been reported, including strain YC, which was evaluated for use in phage therapy in corals (36). Ramphul et al. (37) performed genomic analyses on three V. coralliilyticus phages that they isolated in Japan, but they did not determine if the phages reduced mortalities of larval shellfish or corals. In a series of recent studies from South Korea, Kim and colleagues identified several indigenous phages that reduced larval Pacific oyster mortalities after subjecting the larvae to strains of V. coralliilyticus that are found in South Korea (3840). In all three studies, reductions in larval Pacific oyster mortalities were observed over a period of 24 h. To date, no longer-term studies have been reported, nor have studies with other species of oysters or strains of V. coralliilyticus.

In this study, we describe the isolation and characterization of novel phages against V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii obtained from a Hawaiian shellfish hatchery whose source seawater was obtained from a 900-m-deep pipeline and directly from a 21-m-deep (shallow) water pipeline. Phage characterization includes host specificity studies, morphological identification of family lineage, determination of calcium or magnesium dependence for infectivity, genomic sequencing, and bioinformatic analysis of selected strains. Host specificity testing targeted strains of V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii that are found in the United States and pose a threat to U.S. shellfish hatcheries. We also demonstrate by proof-of-principle efficacy testing that phage treatment effectively reduces V. coralliilyticus- and V. tubiashii-induced mortalities in both Eastern and Pacific oyster larvae over an extended period (6 days).

RESULTS

Phage isolation from seawater.

Seawater samples were kindly provided from shellfish tanks at the Kona Coast Shellfish hatchery in Kailua-Kona, HI. Most phages were isolated against V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii from hatchery seawater when the source seawater was supplied from a 900-m-deep pipeline maintained by the Natural Energy Laboratory of Hawaii Authority (NELHA) in Kailua-Kona. Phages were seldom isolated after the hatchery substituted seawater from a 674-m-deep pipeline. Direct testing of seawater from a NELHA shallow (21-m-deep) pipeline identified one additional phage.

Host specificity.

Eight strains of V. coralliilyticus and two strains of V. tubiashii, listed in Table 1, were tested for host specificity against 16 plaque-purified phages. Differences were observed in specificity among the phage strains, with all but 2 of the phages infecting V. coralliilyticus RE98, 6 of the 16 phages infecting V. coralliilyticus 09-105-8, and 14 of the phages infecting V. tubiashii ATCC 19106 (Table 2). The broadest host specificity was achieved with phage 28A, subsequently named Vibrio phage vB_VcorM-GR28A (see below for naming of phages), which was lytic toward 7 strains of V. coralliilyticus (Table 2). Phage 28A was the only phage isolated from water from the 21-m-deep NELHA pipeline. No phages were isolated against the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) type strain of V. tubiashii (ATCC 19109).

TABLE 1.

Strains of Vibrio coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii used in this studya

Vibrio strain Source Method(s) of species authentication Authentication reference
Vibrio coralliilyticus
 RE22 Ralph Elston Complete genome sequencing Richards et al. (14)
 RE98 Ralph Elston Complete genome sequencing Richards et al. (13)
 ATCC 19105 ATCC PCR of vcpA, the zinc metalloprotease gene of V. coralliilyticus Wilson et al. (12)
 09-105-8 Ralph Elston 16S rRNA gene sequencing, PCR of the vcpA gene This study
 RE90 Ralph Elston 16S rRNA gene sequencing This study
 ATCC BAA-450 (type strain) ATCC Draft genome sequencing Kimes et al. (58)
 OCN008 Blake Ushijima Draft genome sequencing Ushijima et al. (59)
 OCN014 Blake Ushijima Complete genome sequencing Ushijima et al. (60)
Vibrio tubiashii
 ATCC 19106 ATCC Genome sequencing Temperton et al. (61)
 ATCC 19109 (type strain) ATCC Complete genome sequencing Richards et al. (62)
a

ATCC, American Type Culture Collection.

TABLE 2.

Host specificity of 16 phages toward 8 strains of V. coralliilyticus and 2 strains of V. tubiashiia

Phage ID Host specificity
Vibrio coralliilyticus
Vibrio tubiashii
RE98 ATCC 19105 09-105-8 RE22 RE90 ATCC BAA-450 OCN008 OCN014 ATCC 19106 ATCC 19109
1A + +
1D + +
3A + +
3C + +
5A + +
5C + +
6A + + +
6B + + +
6C + + +
7A + + +
7B + + +
11A + +
11B + +
11D + +
23A +
28A + + + + + + +
a

Results are based on plaque formation on lawns of specific host vibrios.

Morphological characterization of phages.

Plaque-purified isolates were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to confirm virus presence and to aid in the taxonomic categorization of the phages into families. Figure 1 shows representative high-magnification micrographs (direct magnification, ×300,000). Two of the phage isolates were Siphoviridae phages (11B and 23A) with straight and curved tails, respectively. All other phages displayed head and relatively long tail structures and were identified as Myoviridae phages based on the appearance of contracted tail sheaths. Heads generally appeared icosahedral or rounded. Unusual, peplomer-like spikes extended out from the apices of some phage heads. Mean head dimensions and tail lengths are shown in Table 3. All the Myoviridae phages were of morphotype A1, while the Siphoviridae were of morphotype B1. Based on head and tail measurements (Table 3), these phages varied in overall size, with the larger phages measuring ∼300 nm in total length (head plus tail, not including the tail fibers) and the shortest measuring ∼140 nm in length for phage 23A. As sheaths contract, some appear to segment and travel up the central tube until they merge and coalesce near the head (e.g., see Fig. 1, phages 1D, 3C, 5C, 7A, and 7B). Among the myovirus isolates, only 7B commonly had a flexible tail tube (Fig. 1) during and after sheath constriction; however, the uncontracted tails were always straight (not shown). Many of the phages had visible necks, some with collars. Tail fibers, when visible, were of a variety of lengths (short in phages 3A and 7A and long in 6A) (Fig. 1).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Transmission electron micrographs of 16 vibriophage isolates. Bars, 100 nm.

TABLE 3.

Morphological attributes of 16 phages against V. coralliilyticus

Phage designation Family Morphotypea Dimensions (nm)b
Other distinguishing feature(s)
Head Tail length
1A Myoviridae A1 110 × 110 116
1D Myoviridae A1 105 × 111 118 Peplomer-like head spikes
3A Myoviridae A1 104 × 110 111
3C Myoviridae A1 102 × 108 110
5A Myoviridae A1 104 × 111 109 Peplomer-like head spikes
5C Myoviridae A1 96 × 101 121
6A Myoviridae A1 98 × 100 191
6B Myoviridae A1 101 × 108 192
6C Myoviridae A1 98 × 105 187
7A Myoviridae A1 102 × 109 189
7B Myoviridae A1 104 × 119 195 Flexible tail tube
11A Myoviridae A1 105 × 105 103
11B Siphoviridae B1 100 × 109 126
11D Myoviridae A1 97 × 108 113
23A Siphoviridae B1 49 × 51 90 Tail spikes
28A Myoviridae A1 81 × 86 87
a

Morphotypes A1 and B1 are characterized by head dimensions as follows: Myoviridae morphotype A1 has an isometric head (length-to-width ratio of 1) and a contractile tail, while Siphoviridae morphotype B1 has an isometric head, as described previously by Ackermann and DuBow (63), and a noncontractile tail.

b

Dimensions are based on the means from 5 to 12 measurements.

Calcium and magnesium dependence.

Magnesium (MgCl2) supplementation of the plaque assay medium was essential for plaque formation for all the phage isolates, except for phage 28A, which required calcium (CaCl2) supplementation. None of the other phages required calcium for plaque formation.

Phage treatment to reduce larval oyster mortalities.

Testing was conducted on larval oysters to determine the effectiveness of a phage cocktail in reducing mortalities from exogenously added V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii. Prophylactic phage treatment of Eastern oyster larvae was performed 15 min before the addition of three different vibrios: V. coralliilyticus strain RE98, V. coralliilyticus ATCC 19105, and V. tubiashii ATCC 19106. The initial VTP100 cocktail contained phages 1D, 6A, 6B, 7B, and 11A. Titrations of VTP100 and Vibrio isolates were performed simultaneously with their inoculation in the larvae to ensure accurate counts. The cocktail titer was 3.45 × 106 PFU/μl, and 10 μl was added to 1-ml treatment wells, giving a final phage concentration of 3.45 × 107 PFU/ml. Titers for V. coralliilyticus strains RE98 and ATCC 19105 were both 1.0 × 107 CFU/ml, and that for V. tubiashii was 6.5 × 104 CFU/ml. For the negative-control larvae, 80.5% survived to day 6 (144 h). Mean percent survivals of larvae challenged with the three vibrios (RE98, ATCC 19105, and ATCC 19106) without phage pretreatment were 0.0%, 2.0%, and 34.0%, respectively (Fig. 2A). In contrast, phage pretreatment followed by administration of lethal doses of RE98, ATCC 19105, and V. tubiashii ATCC 19106 gave significantly increased survival rates of 66.0% (P < 0.0001), 72.9% (P < 0.0001), and 62.0% (P = 0.0015), respectively (Fig. 2A).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Proof-of-principle testing in a 24-well-plate assay showing the percent survival of Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) larvae (A) and Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) larvae (B) after the addition of V. coralliilyticus strain RE98 or ATCC 19105 or V. tubiashii strain ATCC 19106 with or without treatment with phage cocktail VTP100. The negative control is the larvae only, while the positive controls are the larvae plus individual Vibrio strains (without phages). (A) For Eastern oysters, the titer of phage treatment is 3.45 × 107 PFU/ml, titers of V. coralliilyticus strains RE98 and 19105 are both 1.0 × 107 CFU/ml, and the titer of V. tubiashii ATCC 19106 is 6.5 × 104 CFU/ml. (B) For Pacific oyster larvae, the titer of the phage treatment was 1.1 × 107 PFU/ml, and the titer of V. coralliilyticus RE98 was 8.0 × 107 CFU/ml, that of V. coralliilyticus ATCC 19105 was 7.0 × 106 CFU/ml, and that of V. tubiashii ATCC 19106 was 1.4 × 106 CFU/ml (N = 3; n = 18). Bars represent standard errors of the means (SEM).

A similar experiment was performed on Pacific oyster larvae challenged with the same three vibrios. The phage titer of the treatment was 1.1 × 107 PFU/ml, while the titers of V. coralliilyticus RE98 and ATCC 19105 and V. tubiashii ATCC 19106 were 8.0 × 107, 7.0 × 106, and 1.4 × 106 CFU/ml, respectively. Negative-control larvae yielded 91.9% survival after 6 days (Fig. 2B). Challenge of Pacific oyster larvae with V. coralliilyticus strains RE98 and ATCC 19105 and V. tubiashii ATCC 19106 (positive mortality controls) resulted in 6-day survival rates of 0, 19.6, and 88.8%, respectively (Fig. 2B). Phage treatment resulted in 91.0% survival of V. coralliilyticus ATCC 19105-challenged larvae after 6 days, which was significantly higher than the 19.5% survival rate noted for the Vibrio-challenged larvae without phage treatment (P < 0.0001). Unlike the Eastern oyster study, Pacific oyster larvae were generally not susceptible to V. tubiashii ATCC 19106 infection, with only 11.2% mortality observed, which was not significantly different from the 8.1% mortality observed in the larva-only controls (P = 0.35). The inability of V. tubiashii to infect Pacific oysters was demonstrated previously (8, 41). The survival rate of larvae after V. coralliilyticus RE98 and phage treatment was only 20.9% (Fig. 2B). The relatively poor performance of the cocktail against RE98 is attributable to challenge with a high dose of RE98 (8 × 107 PFU/ml) and an insufficient dose of phages (1.1 × 107 PFU/ml), which led us to perform a dose-response study, as reported below.

Phage dose-response study.

The effects of different phage doses were studied on larval Pacific oysters challenged with a mixture of V coralliilyticus (RE98 and ATCC 19105) and V. tubiashii (ATCC 19106). The number of vibrios added remained constant at 7 × 103 CFU/ml, while the concentration of the phage cocktail varied over the range of 1.2 × 106 PFU/ml (undiluted) to 1.2 × 102 PFU/ml. Negative controls consisted of larvae only, while positive controls consisted of larvae plus vibrios (no phage). Results after 6 days demonstrated dose-dependent increases in the survival of Vibrio-challenged larvae as phage concentrations increased (Table 4). The overall effectiveness of the treatment was observed at Vibrio-to-phage ratios of 1:170 and 1:17, with 81.4 and 67.6% survival rates, respectively, compared to 85.2% survival in the larva-only controls and only 31.8% survival in the Vibrio-only controls (Table 4). Larval survival was poor at a 1:1.7 ratio and lower, indicating that lower ratios of phage to Vibrio may not be acceptable treatment options.

TABLE 4.

Effects of phage dosage on the survival of Vibrio-challenged Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) larvae 6 days after treatment with phage cocktail VTP100

Treatment Phage concn (PFU/ml) Vibrio/phage ratioa Mean survival (%)
Larvae only (negative control) 0 NA 85.2
Larvae + vibrios + undiluted phages 1.2 × 106 1:170 81.4
Larvae + vibrios + 10−1 dilution of phages 1.2 × 105 1:17 67.6
Larvae + vibrios + 10−2 dilution of phages 1.2 × 104 1:1.7 41.4
Larvae + vibrios + 10−3 dilution of phages 1.2 × 103 1:0.17 28.8
Larvae + vibrios + 10−4 dilution of phages 1.2 × 102 1:0.017 36.9
Larvae + vibrios only (positive mortality control) 0 NA 31.8
a

NA, not applicable.

Efficacy of cocktail VCP300.

Phage 28A was isolated much later than the other phages and was not available when phage cocktail VTP100 was formulated and tested. The characterization of 28A showed a much broader host specificity than those of the other phages (Table 2). Its discovery allowed the formulation of a new, three-phage cocktail (VCP300) consisting of phages 7B, 11A, and 28A in a proportion of 1:1:2, respectively. Trials were performed to determine the cocktail’s efficacy to reduce Vibrio-associated mortalities. Pacific oyster larvae (7 days postfertilization) were treated with lethal doses of V. coralliilyticus RE98 or OCN008 (9.5 × 104 CFU/ml and 1.1 × 105 CFU/ml, respectively), followed by 3.45 × 106 PFU/ml of the phage cocktail, giving Vibrio-to-phage ratios of 1:36 and 1:31, respectively. Controls consisted of larvae only and larvae with phage treatment (no vibrios). The survival rates of larvae in the two controls after 6 days were not significantly different (98.8 and 97.8%, respectively [P > 0.05]), indicating no negative effects of the phage cocktail on larval survival (Fig. 3). In contrast, few if any of the V. coralliilyticus RE98- and OCN008-challenged larvae survived (only 3.9 and 0.0%, respectively), whereas the corresponding survival rates with phage treatment were 94.4 and 90.3%, respectively (Fig. 3). Phage treatment significantly enhanced larval survival after challenge with both Vibrio strains (P < 0.0001).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Survival of larval oysters after challenge with Vibrio coralliilyticus with and without phage treatment in 24-well-plate assays. Seven-day-old postfertilized Pacific oyster larvae were treated with phage cocktail VCP300 at 3.45 × 106 PFU/ml of seawater followed by inoculation 15 min later with a lethal dose of V. coralliilyticus strain RE98 at 9.5 × 104 CFU/ml seawater or V. coralliilyticus OCN008 at 1.1 × 105 CFU/ml of seawater. Negative controls consisted of larvae only (NC) and larvae plus the phage cocktail (Phage Cont). Mortalities were recorded 6 days later. Results are from three experiments performed in quadruplicate (N = 3; n = 12). Significance levels of paired data are shown. Bars represent standard deviations (SD).

Naming of phages in cocktail VCP300.

Phages 7B, 11A, and 28A were named Vibrio phage vB_VcorM-GR7B, Vibrio phage vB_VcorM-GR11A, and Vibrio phage vB_VcorM-GR28A, respectively, according to the convention of the Bacterial and Archaeal Subcommittee of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, as described by Adriaenssens and Brister (42). For brevity, these phages are abbreviated 7B, 11A, and 28A throughout this paper, although by convention, their official abbreviations are GR7B, GR11A, and GR28A, respectively.

DNA sequencing, annotation, and bioinformatic analysis.

Efforts to extract DNA from the three phages in VCP300 were difficult. Previously published phage DNA extraction methods or commercial kits did not produce sufficient quantities or quality of DNA for sequencing. Consequently, a method was developed, as described in Materials and Methods, requiring sample dialysis and the use of a heat-labile DNase that could be inactivated at 58°C instead of at ∼80°C, which is required to inactivate most DNase preparations. The lower temperature was necessary to prevent premature lysis of the phage heads and subsequent phage DNA damage by DNases that had not yet been fully heat inactivated. The method generated a good quality and quantity of phage DNAs. Illumina MiSeq sequencing was performed on phages 7B, 11A, and 28A and revealed double-stranded, linear DNA genomes of 207,758, 194,800, and 154,046 bp with G+C contents of 42.7, 44.9, and 47.7% and mean sequencing coverages of 403×, 3,092×, and 6,346×, respectively (Table 5). The sequences were deposited into GenBank under accession numbers MT366760, MT366761, and MT366762, respectively. Annotations of phages 7B, 11A, and 28A gave 240, 250, and 195 open reading frames (ORFs) consisting mostly of hypothetical proteins, although 32, 33, and 43 named proteins were obtained, respectively (Table 6). BLAST searches revealed that sequences for phages 7B and 11A were unique from other sequences in the NCBI nucleotide database. They were also different from each other. In contrast, the sequence of 28A closely aligned with that of V. coralliilyticus phage YC (GenBank accession number MH375644.1), with 90% query coverage and 92% sequence identity. Phage YC was isolated from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, and its genome contains 147,890 bp, compared to 156,046 bp for phage 28A. Pairwise alignments of the phage sequences illustrate that (i) phages 7B and 11A have some similarity to each other, (ii) phages 28A and YC share close similarity, and (iii) phages 7B and 11A share no relationship to phage 28A or YC (Fig. 4).

TABLE 5.

Genomic features of phages in the VCP300 cocktaila

Feature Value for phage
7B 11A 28A
GenBank accession no. MT366760 MT366761 MT366762
Genome length (bp) 207,758 194,800 154,046
G+C content (%) 42.7 44.9 47.7
No. of ORFs 240 250 195
 No. of named ORFs 32 33 43
 % of named ORFs 13.3 13.2 22.1
No. of tRNA species NI 1 NI
a

Abbreviations: ORF, open reading frame; NI, none identified.

TABLE 6.

Annotation of named open reading frames detected in phages 7B, 11A, and 28A from cocktail VCP300a

Named ORF
Phage 7B Phage 11A Phage 28A
Nucleoside triphosphate pyrophosphohydrolase MazG DNA helicase CxxC_CXXC_SSSS domain-containing protein
Peptidase_S78_2 domain-containing protein Helicase ATP-binding domain-containing protein Single-stranded DNA-binding protein
Thymidylate synthase GTP cyclohydrolase I type 1 DNA end protector protein
Anaerobic ribonucleoside-triphosphate reductase-activating protein Radical SAM domain-containing protein ParB domain-containing protein
Anaerobic ribonucleoside triphosphate reductase Nucleoside triphosphatase DinG family ATP-dependent helicase
6-Pyruvoyl tetrahydropterin synthase-like protein DNA ligase Ribonuclease H
Chaperone protein DnaJ AAA_28 domain-containing protein Recombination endonuclease
Phage DNA helicase DNA topoisomerase IV subunit A Recombination endonuclease subunit
GTP cyclohydrolase I type 1 Topoisomerase II large subunit Endolysin
Radical SAM domain protein Lysine 2,3-aminomutase 7-Cyano-7-deazaguanine synthase
Nucleoside triphosphatase NudI 7-Cyano-7-deazaguanine synthase DNA_ligase_A3 domain-containing protein
DNA ligase 7-Cyano-7-deazaguanine synthase Baseplate protein (T4-like gp48)
AAA_28 domain-containing protein DNA ligase Head completion protein (gp4)
DNA gyrase subunit A Dihydrofolate reductase DNA primase
DNA topoisomerase II ATP-dependent DNA helicase InPase domain-containing protein
Lysine 2,3-aminomutase Ribonuclease HI Heat shock protein 60-kDa family chaperone
7-Cyano-7-deazaguanine synthase Glutaredoxin domain-containing protein PAS domain-containing protein
7-Cyano-7-deazaguanine synthase Putative major capsid protein Sliding-clamp-loader subunit
DNA ligase Peptidase_S78_2 domain-containing protein ATP-dependent DNA helicase UvsW
Dihydrofolate reductase Baseplate-puncturing device PDDEXK_1 domain-containing protein
ATP-dependent DNA helicase DNA primase Major capsid protein
Ribonuclease HI PDDEXK_1 domain-containing protein Prohead assembly (scaffolding) protein
DNA primase TGT domain-containing protein Portal protein
Putative chromosome segregation protein Sigma70_r2 domain-containing protein Tail tube protein
Acyl carrier protein Protein RecA Terminase large subunit
TGT domain-containing protein Putative permease Neck protein
Sigma70_r2 domain-containing protein Metallophos_2 domain-containing protein Neck protein
Protein RecA Holliday junction ATP-dependent DNA helicase Peroxidase_4 domain-containing protein
Metallophos_2 domain-containing protein Polyphosphate kinase Peptidase S74 domain-containing protein
Putative DNA polymerase III Thymidylate synthase Baseplate wedge protein
Polyphosphate kinase 6-Pyruvoyl tetrahydropterin synthase-like protein DNA-binding protein
DHH family phosphohydrolase/phosphoesterase Chaperone protein RNA polymerase sigma factor RpoS
HintN domain-containing protein SegD
DNA-directed DNA polymerase
GIY-YIG domain-containing protein
PhoH-like protein
Ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase large subunit
Ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase subunit beta
Glutaredoxin domain-containing protein
RIIB protein
DNA primase/helicase phage-associated gp41
Recombination and repair protein
Thymidylate synthase
a

The entries in this table represent three independent lists, with named ORFs presented in the order of their sequence locus as listed in GenBank.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Pairwise alignment of phage sequences. Nucleotide sequences of phages 7B (GenBank accession number MT366760), 11A (accession number MT366761), 28A (accession number MT366762), and YC (accession number MH375644.1) were aligned using BLAST and visualized with Easyfig v. 2.2.5 (57). Sequence identities with Expect values lower than 0.001 are represented by a color scale ranging from orange (64%) to blue (100%). Coding sequence (CDS) regions are represented by the small gray arrows.

DISCUSSION

We report the isolation and characterization of novel phages against V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii and their effectiveness in reducing mortalities in Eastern and Pacific oyster larvae. Early efforts to obtain phages in coastal waters off the U.S. mainland were unsuccessful. The lack of phage detection in continental U.S waters may have been due to the absence of host vibrios in the water at the time of sample collection. All but one of the phages reported in this study were isolated from Hawaiian seawater that had been pumped from a 900-m-deep pipeline to the hatchery oyster tanks. Shortly after these initial isolations, the hatchery converted to a seawater source that was 674-m deep, after which phages were rarely isolated during samplings over a 2-year period. It is uncertain if the phages or their hosts prefer deepwater habitation or if phage detection in water originating from deep sources was the result of transport by underwater currents. Only one phage was isolated from the 21-m-deep pipeline. We determined that phage infectivity, as determined by the formation of plaques in media deficient in magnesium, calcium, or both, depended on the presence of magnesium for 15 of the 16 phages and calcium for 1 phage. Both magnesium and calcium levels are typically high in seawater and even higher in deep seawater. Whether seawater chemistry stimulated either V. coralliilyticus or V. tubiashii growth or infectibility by phages once in the hatchery is uncertain.

The effectiveness of phage treatment to reduce mortalities from V. coralliilyticus RE98 and OCN008 in Pacific oyster larvae is noteworthy because both strains are highly pathogenic in larval oysters. Phage treatment was highly effective against these strains. Strain RE98 was isolated over 2 decades ago from a hatchery in Oregon and was shown to be highly pathogenic to larval Pacific and Eastern oysters (1, 8, 9, 41). OCN008 was originally isolated from Hawaii and associated with the coral disease Montipora white syndrome (19). More recently, we identified OCN008 as a pathogen of Pacific oyster larvae (9). Hatcheries in Hawaii have reported occasional losses due to suspected vibriosis, leading to speculation that indigenous OCN008 may be one of the principal etiological agents. In the present study, the efficacy of phage therapy to reduce larval oyster mortalities from these and other strains was assessed over a period of 6 days. As shown in Fig. 2, the survival of larvae can decrease each day, depending on the Vibrio strain and dosage as well as the amount of phage present. Other studies have evaluated larval mortalities for only short (24-h) periods (3941), which is insufficient to determine the true mortality/survival rates of V. coralliilyticus infection or the efficacy of phage treatment. Although larvae may show pathological signs of Vibrio infection after 24 h, morbidity levels may not peak until much later.

In our studies on the efficacy of phage cocktail VTP100 to reduce larval Eastern and Pacific oyster mortalities, we show that a single phage treatment protects the larvae from V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii infection, effectively reducing larval mortalities in a dose-dependent manner. Although the reduction in mortalities was obvious at Vibrio-to-phage ratios of 1:170 and 1:17, the overall effectiveness of phage treatment in hatcheries will likely depend on numerous confounding factors, including the concentrations of pathogens and pathogen-specific phages as well as the overall condition of the larvae. As stated previously, V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii are opportunistic pathogens (8, 43). As such, they are more likely to cause infection when the larvae are stressed. Stressors may include physicochemical, nutritional, and biological factors, such as extremes of temperature; seawater salinity or pH fluctuations; low dissolved oxygen levels; inadequate or excessive larval feeding or poor feed (e.g., algal) choices; the presence of chemical or biological contaminants; the presence of other potential shellfish pathogens, which could collectively stress the larvae; and differences in the type and design of individual hatcheries (e.g., those with batch versus flowthrough larval propagation systems) (3, 44). Probiotic organisms may also be important in reducing stresses caused by potential pathogens (7).

In the present in vitro studies, the artificial nature of the test system (raising larvae in wells of 24-well plates) likely stressed the control larvae to some degree, which may account for the 19.5% mortality in the study on Eastern oyster larvae (Fig. 2A), the 8.1% mortality in the study on Pacific oyster larvae (Fig. 2B), and the 14.8% mortality in the phage dose dependence study (Table 4). Hatcheries commonly experience increasing mortality rates as springtime spawning extends into the summer months when Vibrio levels are on the rise due to faster Vibrio growth at elevated seasonal temperatures and the inability to maintain adequate sanitation and disinfection of the hatchery’s tanks, pipes, and pumps, etc., as the season progresses.

Our studies revealed phage interventions as an effective treatment to reduce larval oyster mortalities, suggesting that phage therapy may be applicable to full-scale hatchery applications. Phage treatment may be the key to reducing larval mortalities when used prophylactically before the pathogens can establish a foothold and reproduce to very high levels within the larvae. In the in vitro studies described in this paper, oyster larvae were treated with phages followed by challenge with a relatively high level (lethal dose) of vibrios 15 min later. This would be a worst-case scenario for a hatchery, as initial levels of vibrios in the hatchery water and larvae should be low at the start of each new batch of larvae. Hatcheries disinfect their tanks between production batches, so lower levels of phages may provide adequate protection against low levels of V. coralliilyticus or V. tubiashii. Consequently, prophylactic treatment with phages may be a very feasible therapeutic approach for preventing larval shellfish infections. The presence of low levels of phage-susceptible V. coralliilyticus or V. tubiashii in the larvae, seawater, or algal cultures should allow phage enrichment to potentially increase phage titers over their initial levels.

It remains unclear whether phage cocktail VCP300 could also remediate coral disease caused by V. coralliilyticus in affected reefs or in coral farms designed to regrow coral for replanting in previously damaged reefs. One lytic Myoviridae phage against V. coralliilyticus has been shown effective in preventing tissue lysis and photoinactivation in juvenile corals in vitro (34).

Genomic sequences were obtained for the three phages used in VCP300. Two of the sequences (phages 7B and 11A) were unique from any other sequences in the NCBI database. This might have been expected since deep seawater from a remote location is likely to provide phages with unique attributes. DNA from these phages was also more difficult to extract using standard methods. The major problem encountered was with the initial DNase treatment, which would normally be performed at a temperature of around 37°C with heat inactivation of the DNase at 80°C. Our phages prematurely lysed before the DNase could be fully inactivated, compromising the integrity of the phage DNA. To circumvent this problem, a shrimp-derived heat-labile double-strand-specific DNase (HL-dsDNase) from Norway was obtained and used to inactivate host DNA followed by DNase inactivation at 58°C, as described in Materials and Methods. Phage capsids were then lysed by heating to 80°C to release undamaged phage DNA in the absence of host DNA. Phage sensitivity to higher temperatures could result from different structural protein characteristics for phages originating from cold-water environments. The other phage in VCP300 (phage 28A) was obtained from warmer (surface) water and was closely related to V. coralliilyticus YC obtained from waters of the Great Barrier Reef (34). Its annotation revealed head, tail, neck, baseplate, and other potential scaffolding proteins (Table 6).

Regarding the use of VCP300 in shellfish hatcheries, phage therapy shows much potential; however, additional work is needed to test these principles in upscaled studies to realize the full potential of this technology. Further research is required to (i) determine the best method to dose larvae with phages, such as adding phages to the water directly, as was done in this study, or through the algal feed or adding them to concentrated larvae after a drop (when hatcheries remove and concentrate larvae on a screen during water changes); (ii) identify whether a single dose of the cocktail is sufficient to provide optimal outcomes and what dose(s) is optimal; (iii) determine the best time to add phages as a prophylactic measure to prevent Vibrio outgrowth; (iv) evaluate the persistence of phages within tank water and larvae during periods of no or low V. coralliilyticus or V. tubiashii contamination versus periods when vibrios are prevalent; (v) determine if phage treatment has any long-term positive or negative effects on oyster maturation or mortality; (vi) demonstrate the effectiveness of VCP300 treatment to reduce larval mortalities from other strains of V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii; (vii) evaluate the application of phage therapy in batch versus flowthrough hatchery systems; and (viii) characterize Vibrio levels throughout the treatment process. In summary, this study demonstrates a proof of principle that phage therapy protects Eastern oyster larvae from lethal doses of V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii and Pacific oyster larvae from lethal doses of V. coralliilyticus. Successful treatment on a broad scale has the potential to enhance the economic stability of hatcheries and the commercial shellfish industry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.

Vibrio coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii strains were obtained from the sources described in Table 1. Their identifications were authenticated by genomic sequencing, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and/or PCR of the vcpA zinc metalloprotease gene of V. coralliilyticus (Table 1). Bacterial cultures were routinely maintained by streaking on Difco marine agar (Becton, Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD) and/or by inoculating 1 to 2 colonies into Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (Becton, Dickinson and Co.) containing 1% NaCl followed by overnight incubation at 22°C to 26°C.

Seawater.

Seawater was initially obtained for phage testing from Alabama, California, Delaware, Oregon, and Washington; however, no phages against the target vibrios were obtained. Consequently, Hawaiian seawater was obtained for testing from tanks of shellfish from the Kona Coast Shellfish hatchery in Kailua-Kona, HI. The source of their seawater was the Natural Energy Laboratory of Hawaii Authority (NELHA), which also supplies seawater for over 40 tenant aquaculture farms on their site. For this study, seawater from the Kona Coast Shellfish hatchery had been obtained initially from NELHA’s 900-m-deep, 149-cm-diameter pipeline and later from a 674-m-deep, 102-cm-diameter pipeline at Keyhole Point in Kailua-Kona. The 900-m-deep seawater was nutrient rich, was approximately 6°C, had a salinity of 34.3 ppt, and had a pH of 7.6. The seawater was warmed using a heat exchanger before being pumped into the hatchery tanks. Seawater was also provided directly from NELHA from 900-m-, 674-m-, and 21-m-deep pipelines. NELHA pumps approximately 110 million liters of seawater every day for neighboring aquaculture farms, including the Kona-Coast Shellfish hatchery. Seawater was shipped from the hatchery and from NELHA by FedEx and arrived in Delaware for testing within 2 days. All samples were shipped with an ice pack during warmer months and at ambient temperatures during cooler months.

Phage plaque assay and isolation from direct assays of seawater.

A double-agar plaque assay for phages against V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii was performed as recently described (45) but with V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii used as host strains. Approximately 2 ml of seawater from the various sources was filtered through a 0.22-μm Millex GV syringe filter (Merck Millipore Ltd., Tullagreen, Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork, Ireland) and assayed without enrichment. After incubation at 26°C for 48 to 72 h, plaques were enumerated on a Quebec dark-field colony counter (Leica, Buffalo, NY). Small agar plugs from isolated plaques were picked into 25 μl sterile seawater and stored at 4°C. The liquid was serially diluted in seawater and re-plaque purified at least four times. The 25 μl of sterile seawater from these plaque-purified phage plugs is referred to here as the phage stock.

Analysis for phages in seawater enrichments and plaque purification.

In addition to direct plaque assays of the seawater, ∼500 ml of seawater samples was also enriched for phages by combining the samples with 500 ml of double-strength LB broth containing a total of 2% NaCl. Next, 250 μl of either a V. coralliilyticus or a V. tubiashii culture in LB broth (optical density at 600 nm [OD600] = 0.6 to 0.8) was added and incubated at 26°C at 250 rpm overnight. The enrichments were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min, and portions of the supernatants were passed through 0.22-μm Millex GV filters. Filtrates were serially diluted and tested by plaque assays to obtain plates with good separation of plaques. Plaques were purified by sequentially picking isolated plaques and plating by a plaque assay at least 4 times.

Host specificity.

The specificities of 16 phages were determined against eight strains of V. coralliilyticus and two strains of V. tubiashii by a plaque assay and/or spot testing. Spot testing on lawns of susceptible host cells was conducted as previously described (45). All incubations were performed at 26°C.

Transmission electron microscopy.

A 5- to 10-μl drop of each plaque-purified phage isolate was pipetted onto a sheet of Parafilm and overlaid for 10 to 15 s with a Formvar (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA)-coated copper grid (400 mesh; Ted Pella Inc., Redding, CA). The grid was gently blotted on Whatman filter paper, negatively stained for 3 to 5 s with 1% phosphotungstic acid (Polysciences Inc., Warrington, PA) at pH 7.0, blotted again, allowed to air dry, and examined under a Philips (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) CM12 transmission electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV. Images were collected with a 4000M-T1-GE-AMT detector (DVC Co., Austin, TX) and processed with AMT V600 software (AMT, Danvers, MA).

Magnesium- and calcium-dependent plaque formation.

The requirement for magnesium and/or calcium for the formation of plaques was determined for all phage isolates by performing the above-described plaque assay procedure with and without the addition of 250 μM MgCl2, 250 μM CaCl2, or both to the top agar. Magnesium and calcium are never added to the bottom agar layer in our plaque assays. Plates were incubated for up to 48 h at 26°C, and the formation of plaques was recorded.

Sources of larval oysters, algae, and seawater.

Larval Eastern oysters, seawater, and algae (serving as food for the larvae) were kindly provided by Rutgers University’s Aquaculture Innovation Center (AIC) in North Cape May, NJ, via the Cape May-Lewes Ferry, as previously described (8). Larvae, algae, and seawater were also shipped for next-day delivery via FedEx by the University of Maryland Horn Point Laboratory Oyster Hatchery, Cambridge, MD. The compositions of the algal feedstocks are listed below. All Eastern oyster larvae were shipped with hatchery seawater. Pacific oyster larvae were provided by Taylor Shellfish Farms, Quilcene, WA. For shipping, these larvae were dewatered by passing through a fine cloth, wrapping the cloth in damp-paper toweling, and chilling with ice packs. Larvae, along with algae and seawater, were shipped on ice to the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) in Dover, DE, overnight via FedEx. These were 6- to 7-day-old postfertilized larvae upon receipt. Subsamples of larvae, seawater, and algae were pretested for background Vibrio presence by spread plating 100 μl of seawater or algae onto thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose (TCBS) agar (Becton, Dickinson and Co.), followed by overnight incubation at 26°C. Larval subsamples consisted of up to 100 mg of larvae that were crushed and then diluted in 900 μl of sterile seawater, of which 100 μl was streaked on TCBS plates and incubated overnight. Only larvae, algae, and seawater that contained negligible amounts of vibrios were used for in vitro experimentation. Hatchery seawater that accompanied both Eastern and Pacific oyster larvae was 0.22-μm filtered, vigorously aerated for a minimum of 30 min, and used to resuspend the Pacific oyster larvae and to dilute Eastern and Pacific oyster larvae for Vibrio challenge studies (see below). Algal cultures provided by the hatcheries were used to feed the larvae approximately every other day throughout the experiments. Algae for Eastern oysters consisted of a mixture of Pavlova lutheri and Nannochloropsis chui. Algae for Pacific oysters consisted of a mixture of P. lutheri, Nannochloropsis sp., Tetraselmis sp., and Isochrysis galbana.

Preparation of phage cocktail VTP100.

The relative efficacy of the phages in reducing V. coralliilyticus- and V. tubiashii-induced mortalities in larval Eastern and Pacific oysters was evaluated. Initial trials were performed with a phage cocktail, designated VTP100, that contained five different phages (1D, 6A, 6B, 7B, and 11A). The production of VTP100 was upscaled at Intralytix Inc., Baltimore, MD, by enrichment and tangential flow filtration through a 100-kDa capsule, followed by buffer exchange to sterile, natural seawater or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Phages included in the cocktail were selected based on different specificities toward host V. coralliilyticus strains and different morphologies (differences in head and tail dimensions and tail flexibility). This cocktail was used to treat larvae and to monitor larval mortalities in the presence and absence of exogenously added V. coralliilyticus and/or V. tubiashii. Approximately equal numbers of the five filtered phages from enrichment cultures were combined to form the cocktail, the titer of which was determined to obtain total PFU per milliliter and which was stored for up to 3 weeks at 4°C before the titer was redetermined and the cocktail was used in oyster larval challenge studies. Phages in VTP100 were all capable of utilizing V. coralliilyticus RE98 as a host; therefore, phage titers of the cocktail were determined by a plaque assay on RE98 cells, thus giving total PFU per milliliter rather than counts of individual phage strains in the cocktail. Titers of the five phage types were not individually determined.

Initial challenge of larval oysters.

In initial proof-of-concept studies, 0.5 ml of seawater containing 15 to 30 larvae (6 days postfertilization) was added to wells of 24-well Costar plates (Corning Inc., Corning, NY). Larvae in each well were fed 50 μl of an algal mix and then allowed to acclimate overnight. Initial counts of larvae were performed using a stereozoom microscope, and any dead larvae were noted at that time. Dead larvae were seldom observed during initial counting. Next, the volume of seawater was adjusted to 1.0 ml/well using 0.22-μm-filtered and aerated seawater from the hatchery from which the larvae were obtained. Hatchery seawater was used throughout these experiments to minimize stresses on the larvae that could have occurred from the use of seawater from a different source. Plates were covered and maintained at ∼25°C on the shelf of a laminar flow hood. Under these conditions, there was sufficient oxygen transfer to sustain the larvae, as determined by the motility and overall survival of the negative controls.

Eastern and Pacific oyster larvae were either (i) unchallenged (negative controls), (ii) challenged with V. coralliilyticus RE98 or ATCC 19105 or V. tubiashii ATCC 19106 (positive mortality controls), or (iii) prophylactically treated with phage cocktail VTP100 followed by Vibrio ∼15 min later, referred to here as Vibrio plus phage treatment. The titer of the phage inoculum was determined by a plaque assay at the same time that the wells were being inoculated with the cocktail. The number of phages added per well in the Eastern oyster experiments was 3.45 × 107 PFU, and that for the Pacific oyster experiments was 1.1 × 107 PFU. Approximately 15 min after phage treatment, specific vibrios were added. Titers of the Vibrio inocula were determined using a quantitative pour plate assay on three dilutions plated in triplicate (46). Vibrio colonies were enumerated after incubation at 26°C for 48 h. Dead and live larvae were enumerated microscopically at daily intervals for 6 days. Three experiments were performed on both Eastern and Pacific oyster larvae in replicates of six wells per treatment (N = 3; n = 18). Significant differences in survival between Vibrio-challenged larvae and larvae containing vibrios plus phage treatment were determined by paired t tests (correlated-pair t tests) with significance at an alpha level of <0.05.

Phage dose dependence trials.

Pacific oyster larvae were dispensed in 24-well plates at approximately 25 larvae per well. The larvae were fed an algal mix, provided by the larval oyster supplier (Taylor Shellfish), and acclimated overnight, after which they were counted. Phage cocktail VTP100 was then inoculated at concentrations ranging from 1.2 × 102 to 1.2 × 106 PFU/ml. Approximately 15 min later, a 1:1:1 mixture of V. coralliilyticus strains RE98 and ATCC 19105 and V. tubiashii strain ATCC 19106 was added to the oysters at a combined titer of 7 × 103 CFU/well. Negative controls consisted of larvae only, while the positive control was larvae plus vibrios (no phages). Plates were incubated at 26°C, and larval mortalities were determined after 6 days. Three experiments were performed with six replicates per treatment (N = 3; n = 18).

Preparation of phage cocktail VCP300.

Refinements were made over several years to identify other formulations of phage cocktails. Further studies during that period resulted in the isolation of an additional phage (28A) with broader host specificity. Consequently, a final cocktail (designated VCP300) was formulated, consisting of a 1:1:2 ratio of phages 7B, 11A, and 28A. The selected ratio was based on the host specificities of the individual phages toward eight strains of V. coralliilyticus and one strain of V. tubiashii. The selection of these three phages for the cocktail was also based on further characterization of the phages by DNA sequencing and bioinformatic analysis, as described below.

Efficacy testing of cocktail VCP300.

The efficacy of phage cocktail VCP300 to reduce larval Pacific oyster mortalities from exogenously added V. coralliilyticus strains RE98 and OCN008 was evaluated in 24-well plates, after feeding, acclimating overnight, and counting as described above (see “Initial challenge of larval oysters”). Approximately 30 larvae were added per well, using 7-day-old postfertilized oysters treated with VCP300 at 3.45 × 106 PFU/ml of seawater, followed by inoculation 15 min later with a lethal dose of V. coralliilyticus RE98 (9.5 × 104 CFU/ml seawater) or OCN008 (1.1 × 105 CFU/ml seawater). Surviving larvae were recorded at 6 days postchallenge, and percent larval survivals were recorded. Results are from three experiments performed in quadruplicate (N = 3; n = 12). Negative-control larvae were also compared with larvae to which only phages were added. Three assays were performed with 12 replicates per assay (N = 3; n = 36). Statistical differences were determined using paired t tests between larvae only and phage-treated larval controls as well as between Vibrio-challenged larvae and Vibrio-challenged larvae treated with the phage cocktail.

DNA extraction and purification of VCP300 phages.

Several published methods were unsuccessful in initial phage DNA extractions, including a commercially available phage DNA extraction kit. The problem was identified as premature phage lysis due to the high temperature during DNase inactivation, as described in Discussion. Consequently, alternate methods to extract, purify, and concentrate the DNAs were evaluated. The method providing the highest levels and quality of DNA required the use of a DNase that could be inactivated at a low temperature (58°C) and is as follows. For each phage extraction, 12 plaque assays were performed in permissive host cells using 10 μl of an undiluted (high-titer) phage stock per 100-mm-diameter petri dish. Assay mixtures were incubated at 26°C overnight, producing plaques too numerous to count. After incubation, 5 ml of phage buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 10 mM MgSO4, 68 mM NaCl, and 1 mM CaCl2) was added to each plate, and the mixture was incubated overnight at room temperature. The phage buffer was removed from each plate and combined to give total volumes of ≥40 ml. The buffer was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.22-μm filter. Approximately 30 ml of filtrate was obtained and dialyzed in 1 liter of sterile distilled water (dH2O) for 8 h using SnakeSkin dialysis tubing (10,000 MWCO [molecular weight cutoff], 16-mm dry inside diameter; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL) with one water change after 4 h. Dialysates were ultracentrifuged at 100,000 × g (27,100 rpm) at 4°C (6 tubes with 4 ml/tube) for 4 h. Supernatants were carefully pipetted off and discarded. One hundred microliters of 1× DNase buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was diluted from the 10× stock, added to each tube, and vortex mixed for 30 s, and the six tubes were combined. Twenty microliters of heat-labile double-strand-specific DNase (HL-dsDNase; ArcticZymes Technologies, Tromsø, Norway) at 2 U/μl (40 U total) was added along with 1 μl (20 μg/μl) of Invitrogen PureLink RNase A (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to inactivate residual host Vibrio nucleotides. Tubes were gently mixed, centrifuged for 2 s, and incubated at 26°C overnight. Sixty microliters of 10× DNase inactivation buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 9.5], 25 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM dithiothreitol [DTT]) was added, and the DNase was inactivated at 58°C for 15 min. The DNase inactivation buffer was prepared by making a Tris-HCl–MgCl2 solution first, followed by autoclaving, adding the CaCl2 and DTT, stirring to dissolve the CaCl2, and passing the solution through a 0.22-μm filter, according to ArcticZymes’ instructions. For the ArcticZymes DNase to be fully and irreversibly inactivated, the pH of the phage-DNase inactivation buffer solution must be >8, with the DTT at a concentration of 1 mM. The 10× DNase inactivation buffer, when added to fresh 1× DNase buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at the above-mentioned proportions (1:10), produced a pH of 8.3. The solution was then heated to 80°C for 10 min in a water bath to lyse the phage capsids, releasing the DNA. An equal amount (∼660 μl) of phage lysis buffer (0.5 M Tris plus 0.5% SDS [pH 8.5], filter sterilized through a 0.22-μm filter) was added, followed by incubation at 56°C for 1 h.

Purification of the phage DNAs was performed by phenol-chloroform extraction as previously described (47). The DNA was precipitated with ice-cold isopropanol at −20°C overnight. Samples were centrifuged at 10,000 × g at 2°C for 30 min. Small to moderate-sized white pellets were typically obtained. The isopropanol was discarded, and the pellet and sides of the tubes were gently rinsed with 1 ml of ice-cold 75% ethanol (EtOH). The EtOH was discarded, and the tubes were rinsed with 1 ml of ice-cold 100% EtOH. Tubes were drained and dried under a sterile hood. Pellets were rehydrated overnight in 25 μl nuclease-free H2O. DNA purity and concentrations were initially tested on a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and produced an A260/A280 ratio of ∼1.9 and ∼480 ng DNA/μl (12 μg total DNA). The DNA was maintained at 4°C and provided to the sequencing facility within 2 days of collection.

DNA sequencing and assembly.

Phage DNA concentrations were further quantified using Qubit dsDNA (double-stranded DNA) HS (high-sensitivity) and ssDNA (single-stranded DNA) HT (high-throughput) assay kits with a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Approximately 50 ng of DNA was fragmented using microTUBE-15 AFA screw-cap beads (Covaris, Woburn, MA) and an M220 focused ultrasonicator (Covaris) with default settings to achieve a 350-bp peak. Library construction was performed using the Accel-NGS 1S Plus DNA library kit and the 1S Plus indexing kit (12 indices, 1 reaction each, set A; Swift Biosciences, Ann Arbor, MI) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Library quality and quantity were determined using a high-sensitivity DNA kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) on a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Libraries were then diluted to 20 pM and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform with MiSeq reagent kit v2 (300 cycles) in paired-end mode with 2- by 150-bp reads. The quality of raw reads was assessed using FastQC (Babraham Bioinformatics, Cambridge, UK). The raw data were filtered and trimmed using Trimmomatic (v. 0.36) (48). Filtered reads were assembled in SPAdes (v. 3.10.1) (49) and further improved using Pilon (v. 1.19) (50). Contig quality was checked using Quast (v. 5.0.2) (51) before and after Pilon improvement. Contigs were aligned and reordered to the host (Vibrio) genomes using ProgressiveMauve (52). Host genomic sequences and a 5,463-bp sequence representing the PhiX 174 internal control phage from the Swift Biosciences library kit were removed using Vim text editor software. VirSorter (53) (v. 1.03) was used to determine all virus sequences.

Annotation of phage genomes.

The three phage genomes were annotated using a phage genome annotation pipeline developed at the University of Delaware Bioinformatics Core Facility. The pipeline is based upon iterative execution of the Prokka (54) annotation package (v. 1.14.5) beginning with the highest-confidence sources and proceeding to lower-confidence sources, ensuring the highest-quality annotations to the most genes possible. The priority order for annotation used informative hits (i.e., not similar to “hypothetical/unknown protein”) found in the Prokka “Kingdom Viruses” database (v. 1.14.5); UniProt/Swiss-Prot (55) taxonomy=viruses, evidence codes 1 to 3 (retrieved 19 March 2020); UniProt/Swiss-Prot taxonomy=viruses, evidence codes 4 and 5 (retrieved 19 March 2020); UniProt/TrEMBL (55) taxonomy=viruses, evidence codes 1 to 3 (retrieved 19 March 2020); UniProt/TrEMBL taxonomy=viruses, evidence codes 4 and 5 (retrieved 19 March 2020); GenBank proteins (taxonomy search terms Vibrio phage and Vibrio virus); (retrieved 16 March 2020); RASTtk (56) annotation hits with phage database prioritized (v. 2.0; retrieved 18 March 2020); the Prokka “Kingdom Bacteria” database (v. 1.14.5); UniProt/Swiss-Prot taxonomy=bacteria, evidence codes 1 to 3 (retrieved 19 March 2020); and UniProt/Swiss-Prot taxonomy=bacteria, evidence codes 4 and 5 (retrieved 19 March 2020). Annotations similar to “[X] domain-containing protein” made during any round were held and applied to still unannotated proteins at the end to allow more informative annotations to take precedence. Annotations were manually edited as needed for clarity and consistency and provided to GenBank.

BLAST search.

Similarities of nucleotide sequences for phages 7B, 11A, 28A, and YC (GenBank accession number MH375644.1) were determined using MegaBLAST. Sequence similarities were visualized with Easyfig (v. 2.2.5) (57), and sequence identities with Expect values of <0.001 are represented by a color scale.

Data availability.

Raw sequencing data used to assemble phage 7B, 11A, and 28A genomes were deposited to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject accession number PRJNA607513. Annotated genome assemblies were submitted to GenBank under accession numbers MT366760, MT366761, and MT366762, respectively. Bacteriophage isolates are available from the USDA culture collection under a material transfer agreement (contact the corresponding author [Gary.Richards@usda.gov] for cultures).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the many individuals who participated in this decade-long study, particularly the following, whose affiliations at the time of their service are listed. For collections and shipment of seawater samples for phage screening, we thank Ronald Lau, Jennifer Tanaka, Jessica Johnson, and Ryan Conroy (Kona Coast Shellfish, Kailua-Kona, HI); Keith Olson and Jan War (Natural Energy Laboratory of Hawaii Authority, Kailua-Kona, HI); Greg Dale, Enid Weaver, and Pong Xayavong (Coast Seafoods Co., Eureka, CA); John Ewart (University of Delaware Marine Laboratory, Lewes, DE); and William Burkhardt (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Dauphin Island, AL). We also thank the following individuals for providing hatchery samples of oysters, seawater, and algae: Brenda Landau, Dave Jones, Devon Shoemaker, Sean Towers, Matthew Neuman, Joshua Kiernan, Michael De Luca, and David Bushek (New Jersey Aquaculture Innovation Center, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Cape May, NJ); Edmund Jones, Joan Hendricks, and Benoit Eudeline (Taylor Shellfish Farms, Quilcene, WA); and Stephanie Tobash-Alexander (University of Maryland, Horn Point Laboratory Oyster Hatchery, Cambridge, MD). We thank Jacob Chamblee, Joelle Woolston, Zack Hobbs, Bradley Anderson, and Lauren Hittle (Intralytix Inc., Columbia, MD) for preparation and purification of phage cocktails and Blake Ushijima (Smithsonian Marine Station, Fort Pierce, FL) for Vibrio coralliilyticus cultures. We acknowledge the support, advice, and/or technical assistance of Bill Dewey and Bill Taylor (Taylor Shellfish Farms, Shelton, WA), Sue Cudd and Mark Weigardt (Whiskey Creek Shellfish Hatchery, Tillamook, OR), Dan Cheney and Kristin Rasmussen (Pacific Shellfish Institute, Olympia, WA), Robin Downey (Pacific Coast Shellfish Grower’s Association, Olympia, WA), Judy Edwards (Coast Seafoods Co., Quilcene, WA), Robert Rheault (East Coast Shellfish Grower’s Association, Toms River, NJ), Ildiko Polyak (AquaTechnics Inc., Sequim, WA), Peter Cooke (New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM), Claudia Häse and Jonathan Sun (Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR), and John Woloszyn (Intralytix Inc., Columbia, MD).

This work was supported by intramural funding from the USDA Agricultural Research Service under CRIS projects 1935-42000-065-00D and 8072-42000-081-00D (G.P.R.); USDA NIFA SBIR grants 2013-33610-20844 and 2015-33610-23952 to Intralytix Inc. (A.S.); the Anja Robinson Shellfish Fellowship and the Mamie Markham Endowment Award to the Hatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University (C.L.); and HHS, NIH, National Institute of General Medical Sciences grant NIH P20 GM103466 (Delaware INBRE) to the University of Delaware (S.W.P.). The use of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Elston RA, Hasegawa H, Humphrey KL, Polyak IK, Häse CC. 2008. Re-emergence of Vibrio tubiashii in bivalve shellfish aquaculture: severity, environmental drivers, geographical extent and management. Dis Aquat Organ 82:119–134. 10.3354/dao01982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Banks P, Geiger S, Herrmann J, Robertson C, Robinson L, VanderKooy S. 2014. Current regulations related to the propagation, transport, and release of hatchery raised oysters in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission publication 238. Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, Ocean Springs, MS. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Modak TH, Gomez-Chiarri M. 2020. Contrasting immunomodulatory effects of probiotic and pathogenic bacteria on Eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica, larvae. Vaccines 8:588. 10.3390/vaccines8040588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tubiash HS, Chanley PE, Leifson E. 1965. Bacillary necrosis, a disease of larval and juvenile bivalve mollusks. I. Etiology and epizootiology. J Bacteriol 90:1036–1044. 10.1128/JB.90.4.1036-1044.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brown C. 1981. A study of two shellfish-pathogenic Vibrio strains isolated from a Long Island hatchery during a recent outbreak of disease. J Shellfish Res 1:83–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kesarcodi-Watson A, Kaspar H, Lategan MJ, Gibson LF. 2009. Challenge of New Zealand greenshell mussel Perna canaliculus larvae using two Vibrio pathogens: a hatchery study. Dis Aquat Organ 86:15–20. 10.3354/dao02100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kesarcodi-Watson A, Miner P, Nicolas J-L, Robert R. 2012. Protective effect of four potential probiotics against pathogen-challenge of the larvae of three bivalves: Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas), flat oyster (Ostrea edulis) and scallop (Pecten maximus). Aquaculture 344–349:29–34. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.02.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Richards GP, Watson MA, Needleman DS, Church KM, Häse CC. 2015. Mortalities of Eastern and Pacific oyster larvae by the pathogens Vibrio coralliilyticus and Vibrio tubiashii. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:292–297. 10.1128/AEM.02930-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ushijima B, Richards GP, Watson MA, Schubiger CB, Häse CC. 2018. Factors affecting infection of corals and larval oysters by Vibrio coralliilyticus. PLoS One 13:e0199475. 10.1371/journal.pone.0199475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Elston R, Leibovitz L, Relyea D, Zatila J. 1981. Diagnosis of vibriosis in a commercial oyster hatchery epizootic, a case history. Aquaculture 24:53–62. 10.1016/0044-8486(81)90043-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Elston RA, Frelier PF, Cheney D. 1999. Extrapallial abscesses associated with chronic bacterial infections in the intensively cultured juvenile Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas). Dis Aquat Organ 37:115–120. 10.3354/dao037115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wilson B, Muirhead A, Bazanella M, Huete-Stauffer C, Vezzulli L, Bourne DG. 2013. An improved detection and quantification method for the coral pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus. PLoS One 8:e81800. 10.1371/journal.pone.0081800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Richards GP, Bono JL, Watson MA, Needleman DS. 2014. Complete genome sequence for the shellfish pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus RE98 isolated from a shellfish hatchery. Genome Announc 2:e01253-14. 10.1128/genomeA.01253-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Richards GP, Kingham BF, Shevchenko O, Watson MA, Needleman DS. 2018. Complete genome sequence of Vibrio coralliilyticus RE22, a marine bacterium pathogenic toward larval shellfish. Microbiol Res Announc 7:e01332-18. 10.1128/MRA.01332-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Spinard E, Kessner L, Gomez-Chiarri M, Rowley DC, Nelson DR. 2015. Draft genome sequence of the marine pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus RE22. Genome Announc 3:e01432-15. 10.1128/genomeA.01432-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ben-Haim Y, Rosenberg E. 2002. A novel Vibrio sp. pathogen of the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Biol 141:47–55. 10.1007/s00227-002-0797-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sussman M, Willis BL, Victor S, Bourne DG. 2008. Coral pathogens identified for white syndrome (WS) epizootics in the Indo-Pacific. PLoS One 3:e2393. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Munn CB. 2015. The role of vibrios in diseases of corals. Microbiol Spectr 3:VE-0006-2014. 10.1128/microbiolspec.VE-0006-2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ushijima B, Videau P, Burger AH, Shore-Maggio A, Runyon CM, Sudek M, Aeby GS, Callahan SM. 2014. Vibrio coralliilyticus strain OCN008 is an etiological agent of acute Montipora white syndrome. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:2102–2109. 10.1128/AEM.03463-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ben-Haim Y, Thompson FL, Thompson CC, Cnockaert MC, Hoste B, Swings J, Rosenberg E. 2003. Vibrio coralliilyticus sp. nov., a temperature-dependent pathogen of the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:309–315. 10.1099/ijs.0.02402-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ben-Haim Y, Zicherman-Keren M, Rosenberg E. 2003. Temperature-regulated bleaching and lysis of the coral Pocillopora damicornis by the novel pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4236–4242. 10.1128/aem.69.7.4236-4242.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vidal-Dupiol J, Ladrière O, Meistertzheim AL, Foure L, Adjeroud M, Mitta G. 2011. Physiological responses of the scleractinian coral Pocillopora damicornis to bacterial stress from Vibrio coralliilyticus. J Exp Biol 214(Part 9):1533–1545. 10.1242/jeb.053165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ushijima B, Videau P, Poscablo D, Stengel JW, Beurmann S, Burger AH, Aeby GS, Callahan SM. 2016. Mutation of the toxR or mshA genes from Vibrio coralliilyticus strain OCN014 reduces infection of the coral Acropora cytherea. Environ Microbiol 18:4055–4067. 10.1111/1462-2920.13428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Oliveira J, Castilho F, Cunha A, Pereira MJ. 2012. Bacteriophage therapy as a bacterial control strategy in aquaculture. Aquac Int 20:879–910. 10.1007/s10499-012-9515-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Richards GP. 2014. Bacteriophage remediation of bacterial pathogens in aquaculture: a review of the technology. Bacteriophage 4:e975540. 10.4161/21597081.2014.975540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pal S. 2015. Phage therapy an alternate disease control in aquaculture: a review on recent advances. IOSR J Agric Vet Sci 8:68–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Letchumanan V, Chan KG, Pusparajah P, Saokaew S, Duangjai A, Goh BH, Ab Mutalib NS, Lee LH. 2016. Insights into bacteriophage application in controlling Vibrio species. Front Microbiol 7:1114. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kalatzis PG, Castillo D, Katharios P, Middelboe M. 2018. Bacteriophage interactions with marine pathogenic vibrios: implications for phage therapy. Antibiotics (Basel) 7:15. 10.3390/antibiotics7010015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vinod MG, Shivu MM, Umesha KR, Rajeeva BC, Krohne G, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I. 2006. Isolation of Vibrio harveyi bacteriophage with a potential for control of luminous vibriosis in hatchery environments. Aquaculture 255:117–124. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.12.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Karunasagar I, Shivu MM, Girisha SK, Krohne G, Karunasagar I. 2007. Biocontrol of pathogens in shrimp hatcheries using bacteriophages. Aquaculture 268:288–292. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.04.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stalin N, Srinivasan P. 2017. Efficacy of potential phage cocktails against Vibrio harveyi and closely related Vibrio species isolated from shrimp aquaculture environment in the south east coast of India. Vet Microbiol 207:83–96. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lomeli-Ortega CO, Martinez-Diaz SF. 2014. Phage therapy against Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) larvae. Aquaculture 434:208–211. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.08.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stalin N, Srinivasan P. 2016. Characterization of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and its specific phage from shrimp pond in Palk Strait, South East coast of India. Biologicals 44:526–533. 10.1016/j.biologicals.2016.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Silva YJ, Costa L, Pereira C, Mateus C, Cunha A, Calado R, Gomes NC, Pardo MA, Hernandez I, Almeida A. 2014. Phage therapy as an approach to prevent Vibrio anguillarum infections in fish larvae production. PLoS One 9:e114197. 10.1371/journal.pone.0114197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rorbo N, Ronneseth A, Kalatzis PG, Rasmussen BB, Engell-Sorensen K, Kleppen HP, Wergeland HI, Gram L, Middelboe M. 2018. Exploring the effect of phage therapy in preventing Vibrio anguillarum infections in cod and turbot larvae. Antibiotics (Basel) 7:42. 10.3390/antibiotics7020042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cohen Y, Pollock FJ, Rosenberg E, Bourne DG. 2013. Phage therapy treatment of the coral pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus. Microbiologyopen 2:64–74. 10.1002/mbo3.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ramphul C, Casareto BE, Dohra H, Suzuki T, Yoshimatsu K, Yoshinaga K, Suzuki Y. 2017. Genome analysis of three novel lytic Vibrio coralliilyticus phages isolated from seawater, Okinawa, Japan. Mar Genomics 35:69–75. 10.1016/j.margen.2017.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kim HJ, Jun JW, Giri SS, Chi C, Yun S, Kim SG, Kim SW, Kang JW, Han SJ, Jwon J, Oh WT, Park SC. 2019. Application of the bacteriophage pVco-14 to prevent Vibrio coralliilyticus infection in Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) larvae. J Invertebr Pathol 167:107244. 10.1016/j.jip.2019.107244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kim HJ, Giri SS, Kim SG, Kim SW, Kwon J, Lee SB, Park SC. 2020. Isolation and characterization of two bacteriophages and their preventative effects against pathogenic Vibrio coralliilyticus causing mortality of Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) larvae. Microorganisms 8:296. 10.3390/microorganisms8060926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kim HJ, Jun JW, Giri SS, Kim SG, Kim SW, Kwon J, Lee SB, Chi C, Park SC. 2020. Bacteriophage cocktail for the preservation of multiple-antibiotic-resistant and mono-phage-resistant Vibrio coralliilyticus infection in Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) larvae. Pathogens 9:831. 10.3390/pathogens9100831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Estes RM, Friedman CS, Elston RA, Herwig RP. 2004. Pathogenicity testing of shellfish hatchery bacterial isolates on Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas larvae. Dis Aquat Organ 58:223–230. 10.3354/dao058223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Adriaenssens E, Brister JR. 2017. How to name and classify your phage: an informal guide. Viruses 9:70. 10.3390/v9040070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Frydenborg BR, Krediet CJ, Teplitski M, Ritchie KB. 2014. Temperature-dependent inhibition of opportunistic Vibrio pathogens by native coral commensal bacteria. Microb Ecol 67:392–401. 10.1007/s00248-013-0334-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2004. Hatchery culture of bivalves. A practical manual. FAO fisheries technical paper 471. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Richards GP, Chintapenta LK, Watson MA, Abbott AG, Ozbay G, Uknalis J, Oyelade AA, Parveen S. 2019. Bacteriophages against pathogenic vibrios in Delaware Bay oysters (Crassostrea virginica) during a period of high levels of pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Food Environ Virol 11:101–112. 10.1007/s12560-019-09365-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Richards GP, Fay JP, Dickens KA, Parent MA, Soroka DS, Boyd EF. 2012. Predatory bacteria as natural modulators of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus in seawater and oysters. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:7455–7466. 10.1128/AEM.01594-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147. 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Roux S, Enault F, Hurwitz BL, Sullivan MB. 2015. VirSorter: mining viral signal from microbial genomic data. PeerJ 3:e985. 10.7717/peerj.985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.UniProt Consortium. 2019. UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D506–D515. 10.1093/nar/gky1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Overbeek R, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Shukla M, Thomason JA, III, Stevens R, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F. 2015. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep 5:8365. 10.1038/srep08365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sullivan MJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. 2011. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 27:1009–1010. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kimes NE, Grim CJ, Johnson WR, Hasan NA, Tall BD, Kothary MH, Kiss H, Munk AC, Tapia R, Green L, Detter C, Bruce DC, Brettin TS, Colwell RR, Morris PJ. 2012. Temperature regulation of virulence factors in the pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus. ISME J 6:835–846. 10.1038/ismej.2011.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ushijima B, Videau P, Aeby GS, Callahan SM. 2013. Draft genome sequence of Vibrio coralliilyticus strain OCN008, isolated from Kane’ohe Bay, Hawai’i. Genome Announc 1:e00786-13. 10.1128/genomeA.00786-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ushijima B, Videau P, Poscablo D, Vine V, Salcedo M, Aeby G, Callahan SM. 2014. Complete genome sequence of Vibrio coralliilyticus strain OCN014, isolated from a diseased coral at Palmyra Atoll. Genome Announc 2:e01318-14. 10.1128/genomeA.01318-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Temperton B, Thomas S, Tait K, Parry H, Emery M, Allen M, Quinn J, MacGrath J, Gilbert J. 2011. Permanent draft genome sequence of Vibrio tubiashii strain NCIMB 1337 (ATCC19106). Stand Genomic Sci 4:183–190. 10.4056/sigs.1654066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Richards GP, Needleman DS, Watson MA, Bono JL. 2014. Complete genome sequence of the larval shellfish pathogen Vibrio tubiashii type strain ATCC 19109. Genome Announc 2:e01252-14. 10.1128/genomeA.01252-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ackermann H-W, DuBow MS. 1987. Viruses of prokaryotes, volume I: general properties of bacteriophages. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Raw sequencing data used to assemble phage 7B, 11A, and 28A genomes were deposited to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject accession number PRJNA607513. Annotated genome assemblies were submitted to GenBank under accession numbers MT366760, MT366761, and MT366762, respectively. Bacteriophage isolates are available from the USDA culture collection under a material transfer agreement (contact the corresponding author [Gary.Richards@usda.gov] for cultures).


Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES