Skip to main content
NEJM Group COVID-19 Collection logoLink to NEJM Group COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2021 May 5:NEJMc2104974. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2104974

Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 Variants

Laith J Abu-Raddad 1,, Hiam Chemaitelly 1, Adeel A Butt 2, for the National Study Group for COVID-19 Vaccination
PMCID: PMC8117967  PMID: 33951357

To The Editor: The messenger RNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) has 95% efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19).1 Qatar launched a mass immunization campaign with this vaccine on December 21, 2020. As of March 31, 2021, a total of 385,853 persons had received at least one vaccine dose and 265,410 had completed the two doses. Vaccination scale-up occurred as Qatar was undergoing its second and third waves of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, which were triggered by expansion of the B.1.1.7 variant (starting in mid-January 2021) and the B.1.351 variant (starting in mid-February 2021). The B.1.1.7 wave peaked during the first week of March, and the rapid expansion of B.1.351 started in mid-March and continues to the present day. Viral genome sequencing conducted from February 23 through March 18 indicated that 50.0% of cases of Covid-19 in Qatar were caused by B.1.351 and 44.5% were caused by B.1.1.7. Nearly all cases in which virus was sequenced after March 7 were caused by either B.1.351 or B.1.1.7.

Data on vaccinations, polymerase-chain-reaction testing, and clinical characteristics were extracted from the national, federated Covid-19 databases that have captured all SARS-CoV-2–related data since the start of the epidemic (Section S1 of the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org). Vaccine effectiveness was estimated with a test-negative case–control study design, a preferred design for assessing vaccine effectiveness against influenza (see the Supplementary Appendix).2 A key strength of this design is the ability to control for bias that may result from differences in health care–seeking behavior between vaccinated and unvaccinated persons.2

The estimated effectiveness of the vaccine against any documented infection with the B.1.1.7 variant was 89.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.9 to 92.3) at 14 or more days after the second dose (Table 1 and Table S2). The effectiveness against any documented infection with the B.1.351 variant was 75.0% (95% CI, 70.5 to 78.9). Vaccine effectiveness against severe, critical, or fatal disease due to infection with any SARS-CoV-2 (with the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants being predominant within Qatar) was very high, at 97.4% (95% CI, 92.2 to 99.5). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results (Table S3).

Table 1. Vaccine Effectiveness against Infection and against Disease in Qatar.

Type of Infection or Disease PCR-Positive Persons PCR-Negative Persons Effectiveness (95% CI)*
Vaccinated Unvaccinated Vaccinated Unvaccinated
number of persons percent
Infection
PCR-confirmed infection with the B.1.1.7 variant
After one dose 892 18,075 1241 17,726 29.5 (22.9–35.5)
≥14 days after second dose 50 16,354 465 15,939 89.5 (85.9–92.3)
PCR-confirmed infection with the B.1.351 variant
After one dose 1329 20,177 1580 19,926 16.9 (10.4–23.0)
≥14 days after second dose 179 19,396 698 18,877 75.0 (70.5–78.9)
Disease §
Severe, critical, or fatal disease caused by the B.1.1.7 variant
After one dose 30 468 61 437 54.1 (26.1–71.9)
≥14 days after second dose 0 401 20 381 100.0 (81.7–100.0)
Severe, critical, or fatal disease caused by the B.1.351 variant
After one dose 45 348 35 358 0.0 (0.0–19.0)
≥14 days after second dose 0 300 14 286 100.0 (73.7–100.0)
Severe, critical, or fatal disease caused by any SARS-CoV-2
After one dose 139 1,966 220 1,885 39.4 (24.0–51.8)
≥14 days after second dose 3 1,692 109 1,586 97.4 (92.2–99.5)
*

Vaccine effectiveness was estimated with the use of a test-negative case–control study design,2 with persons found positive by polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serving as cases in the analysis and those found negative by PCR serving as controls. PCR-positive and PCR-negative persons were matched one to one according to age, sex, nationality, and reason for PCR testing. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as described by Jackson and Nelson2 (see the Supplementary Appendix).

A B.1.1.7 infection was identified as an S gene “target failure” in an analysis conducted with the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kit platform (Thermo Fisher Scientific), with the criteria of a PCR cycle threshold value no higher than 30 for the genes encoding both the nucleocapsid protein (N) and ORF1ab but a negative outcome for the gene encoding the spike protein (S) applied. The median date of vaccination was March 1 for PCR-positive persons and February 28 for the matched PCR-negative persons.

Because only B.1.351 and B.1.1.7 viruses were identified in viral genome sequencing in Qatar after March 7, 2021, the criteria used to identify a B.1.351 infection involved the complement of the criterion for S that was used to identify a B.1.1.7 infection — that is, any infection with a cycle threshold value no higher than 30 for the genes encoding N, ORF1ab, and S between March 8 and March 31 was regarded as a B.1.351 infection. The median date of vaccination was March 7 for the PCR-positive persons and March 1 for the matched PCR-negative persons.

§

Effectiveness against severe, critical, or fatal disease caused by PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection was analyzed. The B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants were dominant in Qatar during the study period. Severe, critical, and fatal coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) were defined on the basis of the World Health Organization criteria3 for classifying SARS-CoV-2 infection severity and Covid-19–related death.

Vaccine effectiveness was also assessed with the use of a cohort study design by comparing the incidence of infection among vaccinated persons with the incidence in the national cohort of persons who were antibody-negative (Section S2). Effectiveness was estimated to be 87.0% (95% CI, 81.8 to 90.7) against the B.1.1.7 variant and 72.1% (95% CI, 66.4 to 76.8) against the B.1.351 variant, findings that confirm the results reported above.

The BNT162b2 vaccine was effective against infection and disease in the population of Qatar, despite the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants being predominant within the country; however, vaccine effectiveness against the B.1.351 variant was approximately 20 percentage points lower than the effectiveness (>90%) reported in the clinical trial1 and in real-world conditions in Israel4 and the United States.5 In Qatar, as of March 31, breakthrough infections have been recorded in 6689 persons who had received one dose of the vaccine and in 1616 persons who had received two doses. Seven deaths from Covid-19 have been also recorded among vaccinated persons: five after the first dose and two after the second dose. Nevertheless, the reduced protection against infection with the B.1.351 variant did not seem to translate into poor protection against the most severe forms of infection (i.e., those resulting in hospitalization or death), which was robust, at greater than 90%.

Supplementary Appendix

Disclosure Forms

This letter was published on May 5, 2021, at NEJM.org.

Footnotes

Supported by the Biomedical Research Program and the Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Biomathematics Research Core at Weill Cornell Medicine–Qatar; the Ministry of Public Health; and Hamad Medical Corporation. The Qatar Genome Program supported the viral genome sequencing.

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org.

References

  • 1.Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020;383:2603-2615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jackson ML, Nelson JC. The test-negative design for estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness. Vaccine 2013;31:2165-2168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.COVID-19 clinical management: living guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization, January 25, 2021. (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-clinical-2021-1). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dagan N, Barda N, Kepten E, et al. BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in a nationwide mass vaccination setting. N Engl J Med 2021;384:1412-1423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thompson MG, Burgess JL, Naleway AL, et al. Interim estimates of vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers — eight U.S. locations, December 2020–March 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70:495-500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from The New England Journal of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Massachusetts Medical Society

RESOURCES