Skip to main content
AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology logoLink to AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology
letter
. 2008 Jan;29(1):6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0761

“Mid-term,” “Long-term,” and Other Terms: Making Sense of Clinical Follow-up

Rishi Gupta a
PMCID: PMC8119098  PMID: 18055563

The recently published article by Abruzzo et al1 describes late midterm clinical outcomes in patients treated with basilar artery stenting and angioplasty. In the first paragraph of the discussion, the authors note that this is the first description of late-midterm follow up for patients treated with this modality. Yu et al2 published their experience with 15 patients treated with basilar artery stenting and followed the patients for a mean of 26 months. This paper should be cited in the current manuscript to detail previous experience with midterm and longer term follow-up.

References

  • 1.Abruzzo TA, Tong FC, Waldrop AS, et al. Basilar artery stent angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial athero-occlusive disease: complications and late midterm clinical outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:808–15 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yu W, Smith WS, Singh V, et al. Long-term outcome of endovascular stenting for symptomatic basilar artery stenosis. Neurology 2005;64:1055–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Neuroradiology

RESOURCES