Abstract
Introduction
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is an idiopathic, functional and chronic relapsing disorder. Physiological and psychological variables have been linked with etiology of IBS. In this study, we will determine the prevalence of IBS in local setting and its association with anxiety and depression.
Materials and methods
This cross-section study was conducted in multiple cities of Pakistan. One thousand and seven hundred and sixty (1,760) participants from general population between the age group 18 to 50 were enrolled in the study after informed consent. Diagnosis of IBS was made by assessing participants via ROME III criteria. Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) was used to determine if the participants had anxiety and depression.
Results
IBS was present in 456 (25.9%) participants. IBS was significantly more prevalent in females compared to males. Anxiety was significantly more common in participants with IBS compared to participants without IBS (53.0% vs. 23.0%; p-value < 0.00001). Similarly, depression was significantly more common in participants with IBS (50.6% vs. 21.5%; p-value < 0.00001).
Conclusion
IBS is very common in Pakistan, but rarely diagnosed. It is important anyone, particularly at young age, presenting with diarrhea or constipation should be evaluated for IBS. Simultaneously, patients diagnosed with IBS should be screened for anxiety and depression, and managed accordingly.
Keywords: irritable bowel syndrome, anxiety, depression
Introduction
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) affects 1 out of 10 persons of the general population worldwide [1]. IBS is an idiopathic, functional and chronic relapsing disorder, which may be caused due to psychosocial factors; altered motility, and/or altered sensory function of gastrointestinal tract [2]. IBS is characterized by abdominal pain and discomfort with frequent episodes of diarrhea and constipation [3]. It can be diagnosed clinically, based on exclusion of any organic disease [4]. Major causative agents that have been observed in occurrence of IBS includes prolonged infectious diseases, smoking, mucosal markers of inflammation, female gender, hypochondriasis and posttraumatic syndrome disease, etc. [5].
Physiological and psychological variables have been linked with etiology and severity of irritable bowel syndrome. Various studies have reported a high prevalence of psychiatric disorders in patients with IBS [6,7]. Globally lot of work has been done to establish association between IBS and psychological disorders. However, in developing countries, there is very limited data related to IBS and risk factors associated with it. In this study, we will determine the prevalence of IBS and its association with psychological disorders such as anxiety and depression.
Materials and methods
This cross-section study was conducted in multiple cities of Pakistan. One thousand and seven hundred and sixty (1,760) participants from general population between the age group 18 to 50, of either gender, were enrolled in the study after informed consent. Participant’s age and gender were noted in self-structured questionnaire. Diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome was made via ROME III criteria [8]. ROME III criteria define IBS as recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort for at least three days/months during the last three months associated with two or more of the following symptoms: improvement of pain with defecation, onset associated with a change in frequency of stool and onset associated with change in form of stool [8]. Patients diagnosed with IBS based on Rome III criteria were labelled as case group and patients negative for IBS was included as reference group.
To assess anxiety and depression among participants, Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) was used. Score of less than eight (08) on each sub-scale of anxiety and depression indicated pathological anxiety and depression [9]. Interviewer filled the questionnaire after explaining each question to participant in the native language.
Statistical analysis was done using SPSS v. 24.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, United States). Continuous variables were analyzed via descriptive statistics and were presented as means and standard deviations (SDs) while categorical data were presented as frequency and percentage. Chi-square was applied as appropriate. p-value of less than 0.05 meant that the difference between the groups is significant and the null hypothesis is void.
Results
IBS was present in 456 (25.9%) participants. IBS was significantly more prevalent in females compared to males (61.7% vs. 38.3%; p-value < 0.00001). IBS was common in participants aged between 18 and 30 years (44.0%) (Table 1).
Table 1. Characteristics of case and control group.
Characteristics | IBS positive (n = 456) | IBS negative (n = 1,304) | p-value |
Gender (%) | |||
Male | 175 (38.3) | 682 (52.3%) | <0.00001 |
Female | 281 (61.7) | 622 (47.7%) | |
Age in years (%) | |||
18-30 | 201 (44.0%) | 401 (30.7%) | <0.00001 |
31-40 | 155 (33.9%) | 341 (26.1%) | |
41-50 | 100 (21.9%) | 562 (43.0%) |
In participants who were diagnosed with IBS based on ROME III criteria, the most common symptom was bloating (68.4%), followed by frequency of stool of more than 3 per day (44.0%) and abdominal pain relieved by passing stool (38.5%) (Table 2).
Table 2. Irritable bowel syndrome symptoms.
Irritable bowel syndrome symptoms | Frequency | Percentages |
Bloating | 312 | 68.4 |
Stool more than three per day | 201 | 44.0 |
Abdominal Pain relieved by passing stool | 176 | 38.5 |
Loose or watery stool | 172 | 37.7 |
Stool less than three per week | 152 | 33.3 |
Mucus in stool | 62 | 13.5 |
Anxiety was significantly more common in participants with IBS compared to participants without IBS (53.0% vs. 23.0%; p-value < 0.00001). Similarly, depression was significantly more common in participants with IBS (50.6% vs. 21.5%; p-value, < 0.00001) (Table 3).
Table 3. Anxiety and depression in case and control group.
HADS score | Anxiety | Depression | ||||
IBS positive (n = 456) | IBS negative (n = 1,304) | p-value | IBS positive (n = 456) | IBS negative (n = 1,304) | p-value | |
Less than 8 | 242 (53.0%) | 301 (23.0%) | <0.00001 | 231 (50.6%) | 281 (21.5%) | <0.00001 |
More than 8 | 214 (47.0%) | 1003 (77.0%) | 225 (49.4%) | 1023 (78.5%) |
Discussion
In this study, the prevalence of IBS was found to be more common in young people between the ages of 18-30 (44%). Majority of the participants with IBS in our study were reported to have symptoms of anxiety and depression. In our study, in patients who were diagnosed with IBS, the most common complaint was bloating (68.4%), followed by increase frequency of stool of more than three per day (44.0%) and abdominal pain relieved by passing stool (38.5%). American Gastroenterology Association (AGA) reported similar findings in a recent technical review [10]. It showed that psychological stress is known to aggravate gastrointestinal symptoms leading to severe diarrhoea, abdominal discomfort, etc. Moreover, psychological and psychiatric comorbidity is generally found among IBS patients. Women were reported to show supremacy over men in terms of having IBS, which is also believed to be present in women in the West [11].
Drossman et al. explored the association between IBS and psychological comorbidities, and found a positive link between the two. He found that 60% of patients with IBS have psychosocial problems [12]. Even though the exact origin of IBS is difficult to track down, it is believed that improper functioning of brain-gut pathways may be responsible for causing the disease [13]. This points towards the idea that abdominal symptoms have a tendency to affect anxiety and depression. These factors, in turn, affect the physiological factors [14]. Some other researches were able to prove the positive correlation between IBS and psychological comorbidities such as anxiety and depression [15-17]. However, there were some researches that could not find any such association [15,18-19].
A recent study by the Anxiety and Depression Association of America shown that seven out of 10 United States adults are reported to undergo stress and anxiety moderately every day [20]. Stress is an unavoidable and existing part of our life [21]. Recent studies have shown high prevalence of stress in university students [22,23]. Along with stress and anxiety, depression is also believed to be faced by a lot of college students. Wolfran et al. Stated in his study published in 2010 that in the USA, approximately 10% of university students are either diagnosed with depression, or were treated for it [24]. This correlates with findings of our study, which shows that the prevalence of IBS was more frequent in between age group of 18-30 years, which is a university-going age.
Based on our study, we suggest that it is extremely important to provide psychiatric evaluation to anyone showing IBS-like symptoms, particularly in young population. As psychiatric symptoms can be presenting symptoms in patients with IBS, psychiatrists and psychologists should also be trained to screen for IBS, particularly in young population. Regular screening in universities and workplace for IBS may help in early diagnosis of IBS and may help alleviate the risk factors such as anxiety and stress, early in the course of disease.
To the best of our knowledge, it is the first study in local setting that studies the association of anxiety and depression with IBS. Considerably large sample size makes the finding of study reliable. Since data was collected from multiple cities, the sample was diverse. However, because of nature of study design, definite association cannot be established between IBS and psychological issues. Prospective studies are needed to consolidate the findings of our study.
Conclusions
In this study, the prevalence of IBS was considerably high and prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with IBS was also considerably high. It is important anyone presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms should be screened for diagnosis of IBS. After confirmation of IBS, patient should undergo complete psych evaluation for anxiety, stress and depression. Management of IBS should include management of anxiety, stress and depression as well.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Jinnah Sindh Medical University issued approval JSMU/S/IRB/2019-033
Animal Ethics
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
References
- 1.Global burden of irritable bowel syndrome: trends, predictions and risk factors. Black CJ, Ford AC. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:473–486. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-0286-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Review article: the incidence and risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome in population-based studies. Creed F. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;50:507–516. doi: 10.1111/apt.15396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Irritable bowel syndrome. Weaver KR, Melkus GD, Henderson WA. Am J Nurs. 2017;117:48–55. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000520253.57459.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome. Spiller R, Garsed K. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1979–1988. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of irritable bowel syndrome after infectious enteritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Klem F, Wadhwa A, Prokop LJ, et al. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1042–1054. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Psychosocial determinants of irritable bowel syndrome. Surdea-Blaga T, Băban A, Dumitrascu DL. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:616–626. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i7.616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Psychological factors in irritable bowel syndrome. Toner BB, Garfinkel PE, Jeejeebhoy KN. Can J Psychiatry. 1990;35:158–161. doi: 10.1177/070674379003500210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hospital anxiety and depression scale assessment of 100 patients before and after using low vision care: A prospective study in a tertiary eye-care setting. Rishi P, Rishi E, Maitray A, Agarwal A, Nair S, Gopalakrishnan S. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65:1203–1208. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_436_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Evaluation of anxiety and depression among patients hospitalized on an internal medicine service. Lépine JP, Godchau M, Brun P, Lempérière T. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4037594. Ann Med Psychol. 1985;143:175–189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.AGA technical review on irritable bowel syndrome. Drossman DA, Camilleri M, Mayer EA, Whitehead WE. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:2108–2131. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.37095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Irritable bowel syndrome in developing countries--a disorder of civilization or colonization? Gwee KA. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005;17:317–324. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2005.00627.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Psychosocial aspects of the functional gastrointestinal disorders. Levy RL, Olden KW, Naliboff BD, Bradley LA, Francisconi C, Drossman DA, Creed F. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1447–1458. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gut memories: towards a cognitive neurobiology of irritable bowel syndrome. Kennedy PJ, Clarke G, Quigley EM, Groeger JA, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36:310–340. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Altered neuro-endocrine-immune pathways in the irritable bowel syndrome: the top-down and the bottom-up model. Stasi C, Rosselli M, Bellini M, Laffi G, Milani S. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:1177–1185. doi: 10.1007/s00535-012-0627-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Abuse in women and men with and without functional gastrointestinal disorders. Alander T, Heimer G, Svardsudd K, Agreus L. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1856–1864. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-0101-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Cho HS, Park JM, Lim CH, et al. Gut Liver. 2011;5:29–36. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2011.5.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia among women veterans: prevalence and association with psychological distress. Savas LS, White DL, Wieman M, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:115–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03847.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Evidence for alterations in central noradrenergic signaling in irritable bowel syndrome. Berman S, Suyenobu B, Naliboff BD, et al. Neuroimage. 2012;63:1854–1863. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Validity and reliability of the Malay-language translation of the Rome III Diagnostic Questionnaire for irritable bowel syndrome. Lee YY, Waid A, Tan HJ, Chua SB, Whitehead WE. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:746–750. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06943.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Physical activity reduces stress. Understanding the Facts Reports. [Mar;2021 ];https://adaa.org/understanding-anxiety/related-illnesses/other-related-conditions/stress/physical-activity-reduces-st
- 21.Mental health of college students and their non-college-attending peers: results from the National Epidemiologic Study on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Blanco C, Okuda M, Wright C, Hasin DS, Grant BF, Liu SM, Olfson M. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65:1429–1437. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.12.1429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Assessing the risk factors for suicidal thoughts at a nontraditional commuter school. Gillman JL, Kim HS, Alder SC, Durrant LH. J Am Coll Health. 2006;55:17–26. doi: 10.3200/JACH.55.1.17-26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Depression and suicide ideation among students accessing campus health care. Mackenzie S, Wiegel JR, Mundt M, et al. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2011;81:101–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01077.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Depression Care: Using the Chronic Care Model in a University Health Center ([PowerPoint]). American College Health Association,Philadelphia,PA. [Mar;2021 ];Wolfram Wolfram, R. R., 2010 2010. http://www.acha.org/AnnualMeeting/handouts10.cfm 2010