Skip to main content
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2021 Jul;274:129957. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129957

Photo-assisted electrochemical advanced oxidation processes for the disinfection of aqueous solutions: A review

Josué Daniel García-Espinoza a, Irma Robles a, Alfonso Durán-Moreno b, Luis A Godínez a,
PMCID: PMC8121763  PMID: 33979920

Abstract

Disinfection is usually the final step in water treatment and its effectiveness is of paramount importance in ensuring public health. Chlorination, ultraviolet (UV) irradiation and ozone (O3) are currently the most common methods for water disinfection; however, the generation of toxic by-products and the non-remnant effect of UV and O3 still constitute major drawbacks. Photo-assisted electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs) on the other hand, appear as a potentially effective option for water disinfection. In these processes, the synergism between electrochemically produced active species and photo-generated radicals, improve their performance when compared with the corresponding separate processes and with other physical or chemical approaches. In photo-assisted EAOPs the inactivation of pathogens takes place by means of mechanisms that occur at different distances from the anode, that is: (i) directly at the electrode’s surface (direct oxidation), (ii) at the anode’s vicinity by means of electrochemically generated hydroxyl radical species (quasi-direct), (iii) or at the bulk solution (away from the electrode surface) by photo-electrogenerated active species (indirect oxidation).

This review addresses state of the art reports concerning the inactivation of pathogens in water by means of photo-assisted EAOPs such as photo-electrocatalytic process, photo-assisted electrochemical oxidation, photo-electrocoagulation and cathodic processes. By focusing on the oxidation mechanism, it was found that while quasi-direct oxidation is the preponderant inactivation mechanism, the photo-electrocatalytic process using semiconductor materials is the most studied method as revealed by numerous reports in the literature. Advantages, disadvantages, trends and perspectives for water disinfection in photo-assisted EAOPs are also analyzed in this work.

Keywords: Photo-assisted AOPs, Advanced oxidation processes, Pathogen inactivation, Electrochemical disinfection, Photo-assisted disinfection

Graphical abstract

Image 1

Highlights

  • There is an increasing potential for photo-assisted EAO disinfection processes.

  • Disinfection at the electrode/solution interphase depends on the anode material.

  • Indirect disinfection can be carried out by a variety of electro-generated oxidants.

  • Solar EAOPs are effective and cost competitive approaches for pathogen inactivation.

Abbreviations, acronyms and symbols

AOPs

Advanced oxidation processes

BDD

Boron doped diamond

CFU

Colony forming unit

DOM

Dissolved organic matter

DSA

Dimensionally stable anode

Standard oxidation potential

EAOPs

Electrochemical advanced oxidation processes

EC

Electro-coagulation

FTO

Fluorine-doped tin oxide

GAC

Granular activated carbon

h+

holes

hv

quantum energy of a photon

λ

wavelength

MMO

Mixed metal oxide

NOM

Natural organic matter

NTN

Nanotubes

PEC

Photo-electrocatalysis

PTFE

Polytetrafluoroethylene

RHS

Reactive halogen species

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

SHE

Standard hydrogen electrode

SS

Stainless-steel

UV

Ultraviolet

WHO

World Health Organization

1. Introduction

According to the Update and Sustainable Development Goal Baselines of UNICEF and the World Health Organization (WHO), 2.3 billion people currently lack basic sanitation services and about 159 million people still collect drinking water directly from surface water sources (World Health Organization, 2017). Treated wastewater quality often limits its reuse, mainly in those regions where the infrastructure is not sufficient and therefore, poor treatment and deficient disinfection represents a serious health problem. In this context, it is important to point out that fecal contaminated water sources are particularly troublesome. Diarrhea, for instance, is one of the world’s major killers resulting in approximately 4% of all deaths worldwide (WHO/UNICEF, 2017; World Health Organization, 2017).

Human pathogens, that are transmitted through fecal contamination, are not only common cause for disease in drinking water, but have also been found to persist for considerable periods of time in water sources and in soil which, in time, drains into underground water supplies (Macphee et al., 2009). In addition to fecal source pathogens such as enteric bacteria (e.g., strains of E. coli), domestic wastewater is characterized by organic matter, nutrients, pathogens and traces of bio-recalcitrant pollutants. In this regard, it is widely accepted that althought the removal of easily degradable wastewater pollutants such as organic matter, nitrogen and phosphorus is efficiently carried out by means of biological processes, the degradation of persistent pollutants and the disinfection step, often constitute the final and the most relevant stage of the wastewater treatment process (Martínez-Huitle and Brillas, 2008).

Nowadays, chlorination is by far the most popular method for the disinfection of drinking-water and treated wastewater. Chlorine kills harmful microorganisms, has decolorization properties and oxidize most organic molecules (Cheswick et al., 2020; Drogui and Daghrir, 2015; Martínez-Huitle and Brillas, 2008). The disinfection mechanism of free chlorine on bacterial cells relates to oxidative damage to membranes, nucleic acids, proteins, amino acids, cell walls and other lipids, causing a loss of viability (Cheswick et al., 2020). However, the interaction of active chlorine and natural organic matter (NOM) produces disinfection by-products such as trihalomethanes, haloacetic acids, haloacetonitriles and haloketones, some of which are endocrine disruptors involved in brain cancer, immune and reproductive system problems and organism feminization. Therefore, the generation of halogenated by-products in chlorination process represents a considerable disadvantage from the environmental and health points of view (Lacasa et al., 2019).

Ultraviolet (UV) assisted disinfection processes on the other hand, constitute a popular and attractive alternative to chlorination for water reuse, wastewater reclamation and domestic water disinfection (Carré et al., 2018; Gallandat et al., 2021; Li et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020a). Although UV treated wastewaters do not contain halogenated by-products, it has been found that several organic compounds and pollutants can be partially degraded under UV irradiation giving rise to by-products that are often more toxic than their parent compounds (Russo et al., 2019). In addition, the disinfection efficiency of UV is affected by several factors such as suspended particles concentration and size or dispersed microbial concentration (He et al., 2020). It is important to point out that some antibiotic resistant bacteria survive after UV disinfection (Guo and Kong, 2019) and some other bacteria revive in the darkness after UV treatment (Chen et al., 2020). Furthermore, a number of pathogens, particularly some virus species, are naturally resistant to traditional treatments such as UV and chlorination (Li et al., 2014).

Ozone (O3) is also a strong oxidizing agent and an efficient option for pathogen inactivation (Chang et al., 2020; Girgin Ersoy et al., 2019; Perry et al., 2019) as well as for decolorization, taste and odor control for water reuse (Zhang et al., 2020d). Its performance in disinfection processes of real secondary effluents has not only found to be quite efficient by itself but also substantially improved by synergetic coupling to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or UV irradiation (Malvestiti and Dantas, 2018). Ozone disinfection however is an expensive process without remnant effect that can also be characterized by the formation of toxic by-products (Drogui and Daghrir, 2015). Furthermore, it has some limitations in terms of the inactivation of resistant pathogens such as Cryptosporidium parvumoocysts and Giardia lamblia (Shi et al., 2021). In addition, competitive reactions with organic matter, as well as changes in pH, alkalinity and temperature, could modify its solubility in water and affect the oxidant efficiency (Meas et al., 2011, Zhang et al., 2020d).

Separation processes such as adsorption using biochars, biosand or geosorbents have also been used for pathogen removal (Guan et al., 2020; Mira Anuar and Chan, 2020; Rahman et al., 2020). In these cases, however, the eventual saturation of the adsorbent surface and the fact that some pathogens cannot be retained due to their large size when compared to the dimensions of the pore and channel structure of the adsorbent, have resulted in a limited use of the adsorption approximation. In this regard, other separation technologies such as ultrafiltration, nanofiltration or reverse osmosis have been developed to efficiently remove pathogens from water (pore size of the membranes of 2 nm) (Cruz et al., 2017; El-Ghzizel et al., 2020). In these cases however, other limitations such as membrane fouling and the high trans membrane pressure (up to 100 bar) are considered as two of the main challenges to overcome in the future in order to increase the effectiveness of this approach (Metcalf and Eddy, 2003).

Despite the uncomplicated and simple performance of these processes, their high chemical consumption and treatment cost constitute major barriers in field applications (Garcia-Segura et al., 2020; Lacasa et al., 2019).

To overcome these drawbacks, the development of alternative disinfection technologies is still an attractive and major focus of research. In this regard, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) stand out as a feasible approach for the inactivation of pathogens. AOPs are characterized by the generation of highly reactive oxidizing species, particularly hydroxyl radicals (OH) with a high standard oxidation potential (E° = 2.8 V vs. standard hydrogen electrode, SHE) that are capable of attacking a wide variety of pollutant species (Brillas, 2020; Martínez-Huitle and Brillas, 2009; Martinez-Huitle and Ferro, 2007).

Several AOPs have been proved for disinfection purposes. For instance, UV/H2O2 process is five times faster in inactivation and inhibition of microorganisms as well as in degrading aromatic compounds than those of other popular technologies (Bustillo-Lecompte et al., 2016; Malvestiti and Dantas, 2018; C. Wang et al., 2019). The Fenton reaction, which is based on the use of a mixture of iron ions (Fe2+) and H2O2 that generates OH under mild acidic conditions, has been successfully tested as an attractive disinfection alternative (García-Fernández et al., 2019; Rodríguez-Chueca et al., 2012). Nevertheless, the large chemical consumption of H2O2 and the need to add and maintain appropriate ionic Fe concentrations in an acidic medium, coupled with the requirement to remove the iron species and neutralize the acid of the aqueous effluent after treatment, constitute major cost barriers for large-scale applications (Brillas and Martínez-Huitle, 2015; Fernández et al., 2018; García-Espinoza et al., 2019; Robles et al., 2020a, 2020b).

In the context of the cost limitation of AOPs, the electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs) stand out as environmentally friendly approaches due to the possibility of generating reactive species using electric current. For this reason, they are in general low cost processes, which are easily operated and therefore constitute an efficient option for the inactivation of an extensive variety of pathogens, oscillating from virus, bacteria, parasites and algae (Lacasa et al., 2019; Martínez-Huitle et al., 2015; Martínez-Huitle and Brillas, 2008).

The effectiveness of the EAOPs such as electrochemical oxidation (Anfruns-Estrada et al., 2017; Bruguera-Casamada et al, 2016, 2017; Candia-Onfray et al., 2018; Cano et al., 2016; Corona-Bautista et al., 2021; Cotillas et al, 2018, 2020; Frontistis et al., 2017; Guitaya et al., 2015; Hernández-Pimentel et al., 2020; Herraiz-Carboné et al, 2020a, 2020b; Medrano-Rodríguez et al., 2020; Mousset et al., 2018; Pacheco-Álvarez et al., 2019), electrocoagulation (Anfruns-Estrada et al., 2017; Villalobos-Lara et al., 2021), electro-Fenton (Campos et al., 2020; Droguett et al., 2020; Olvera-Vargas et al., 2019; Ren et al., 2020; Robles et al., 2020a; Salazar et al., 2019; Thiam et al., 2020) and coupled EAOPs with other technologies (Cotillas et al., 2016b; Hashim et al., 2020; Jhones dos Santos et al., 2021; Llanos et al., 2015) has been proven by several research works worldwide on the inactivation of pathogens and the treatment of wastewater.

In the framework of EAOPs, the inactivation of pathogens can be achieved by direct oxidation which occurs when the pathogen reacts directly at the anode’s surface (Comninellis, 1994; Comninellis and Nerini, 1995; Panizza, 2010) or by quasi-direct oxidation by physi- or chemi-sorbed OH radicals in the anode’s surface vicinity (Comninellis et al., 2008; Groenen-Serrano, 2018; Groenen-Serrano et al., 2013; Marselli et al., 2003). Furthermore, indirect oxidation can also take place by means of the electrochemical generation of a mediator such as O3, H2O2, active chlorine or active bromine, among others, which in turn can disinfect aqueous effluents in the bulk solution (de Moura et al., 2015; García-Espinoza et al., 2018; Kanakaraju et al., 2018; Martinez-Huitle and Ferro, 2007; Martínez-Huitle and Panizza, 2018).

The combination of the electrochemical processes with other technologies in order to increase the efficiencies obtained by the single electrolytic processes is a popular research topic (Brillas, 2020; Martínez-Huitle et al., 2015). Particularly, the improvement of the EAOPs disinfection performance can be achieved by coupling an external source of energy such as UV or visible irradiation, giving rise to photo-assisted EAOPs in which electrogenerated mediators are photo-activated by irradiation, resulting in an increased generation of oxidizing agents in the anode’s surface as well as in the bulk of the aqueous solution (Cotillas et al., 2016a; de Vidales et al., 2015; Martínez-Huitle et al., 2015; Sirés et al., 2014; Souza et al., 2014).

Fig. 1 depicts a scheme of a photo-electrochemical reactor where the inactivation of microorganisms (from virus to parasites eggs (nm to μm of size)), can be achieved by the three inactivation mechanisms defined by the particular reaction zone in which disinfection occurs (Fig. 1a). As can be seen in Fig. 1b, the electrogenerated species such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive halogen species (RHS) or photo-generated holes (h+) are capable of interacting with the microorganism eventually causing damage to the components of the membrane cell, attacking cellular components and leading to further oxidative damages. As can be observed in Fig. 1c, the bacterial envelope, composed of the outer membrane and the periplasm layer, have the largest probability of being exposed to ROS attack when compared to other cellular components (An et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2016). Fig. 1c also shows a scheme on which it can be observed that Fe2+ and H2O2 species could permeate through cell porins, thus generating the OH species which in turn, cause damage to the periplasm and inner membrane of the microorganism.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Inactivation of microorganisms in water by (a) photo-assisted EAOPs via direct, quasi-direct and indirect oxidation, (b) electrogenerated oxidants, photons and (c) cell damage of the outer membrane of a microorganism by h+, OH, RHS and photons.

It is important to highlight however that in order to achieve inactivation of a pathogen it is necessary to carry on at least one of the inactivation mechanisms, and hence, the complete degradation or mineralization of the pathogens is not essential to accomplish an efficient inactivation process.

In this context, this work offers an overview of the application of photo-assisted EAOPs for disinfection of water. The fundamentals and characteristics for the direct, quasi-direct and indirect oxidation disinfection paths are highlighted in order to understand the role of the different oxidizing agents that participate in microorganism’s inactivation. Finally, the perspectives of the photo-assisted EAOPs for disinfection purposes are discussed.

2. Infectious agents commonly found in water and wastewater

Since wastewater contain numerous types of microorganisms that constitute a threat to human health as well as to ecological stability (Lam et al., 2020), the discussion of the different photo-assisted EAOPs disinfection methods starts with a brief description of the different types of pathogens that are found in contaminated waters.

As can be seen in Fig. 2, over the last 12 years there has been a large number of publications dealing with various pathogens whose size range between nm and μm. As it can be noted, the intensity of the circles is related with the amount of articles (n = 97) and the inactivation of E. coli by photo-assisted EAOPs shows the highest amount of literature reports (white circles, 68%), followed by S. aureus (red circles, 8.2%), C. parapsilosis (blue circles, 4.1%), and E. faecalis (dark blue circles, 3.1%); other pathogens are reported with less of 2% of the total.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Proportion of scientific reports on the inactivation of pathogens by photo-assisted EAOPs.

Considering that the major groups of pathogenic organisms are: (a) bacteria, (b) viruses, (c) protozoans and (d) helminths (Sperling, 2008) it is important to point out that the initial microorganism density as well as the nature of mixed bacterial populations in water play an important role in the selection of a disinfection process, since the combination affects the type, cost and required treatment time for complete microbial inactivation (Venieri et al, 2012, 2013). In this regard for example, while bacteria are physically protected at high population density values, suspended solids and turbidity can decrease the performance of the photo-assisted EAOPs due to irregular light intensity scattering (Rather and Lo, 2020). Aquatic media for example is characterized by the presence of ions such as Cl (up to 755 mg/L), as reported by García-Espinoza and Mijaylova Nacheva, 2019; and Magazinovic et al., 2004 and Br (10 μg/L to 67 mg/L), as reported by Heeb et al., 2014, which may exert an important effect in the disinfection process. In the presence of NaCl or NaBr for instance, photo-electrocatalytic inactivation efficiencies of the pathogens are remarkably enhanced due to the formation of RHS (Nie et al., 2014a). The production of RHS can also be successfully couped to a high electrolyte concentration which results in fast inactivation due to high ionic conductivity values (Domínguez-Espíndola et al., 2019). In this regard, it is important to note that due to the complex combination of effects in real effluents, many studies employ synthetic solutions of known composition so that salts such as Na2SO4, NaNO3 and NaCl are used to achieve a convenient conductivity level for the electrochemical events to take place. In any case, real effluents are usually contaminated with a wide variety of pathogens and in this context, some of the major infectious agents reported in the literature that have been dealt with photo-assisted EAOPs, are characterized by different size, from virus to protozoan.

The adenoviruses for example, with average size of 0.08 μm, typically cause infections in respiratory tract, gastroenteritis and conjunctivitis (Goikhman et al., 2020); the MS-2 bacteriophage, on the other hand, with an average size of 0.03 μm, is an indicator for human enteric virus, which demonstrates notable resistance to photo-catalytic disinfection (Cho et al., 2011). Both adenoviruses and the bacteriophage represent 4.1% of the reports related with their inactivation by photo-assisted EAOPs (Fig. 2).

A pathogen with a higher size than viruses is K. pneumoniae, with an average size of 0.4 μm, which is a type of Gram-negative bacteria that can cause different types of infections, including pneumonia. Increasingly, K. pneumoniae bacteria have developed antimicrobial resistance, most recently to the class of antibiotics known as carbapanems (Srinivasan and Patel, 2008) and its inactivation by photo-assisted EAOPs has been scarcely studied with only 1% of the literature reports (Fig. 2).

B. atrophaeus and B. subtilis are bacillus, Gram-positive, aerobic and spore-forming, which are commercially available bacteria that can be used as a sterilization biological indicator (Sella et al., 2015). These bacilli show sizes from 1 to 1.5 μm and 3.1% of the articles of the photo-assisted EAOPs, report their inactivation (Fig. 2).

S. aureus on the other hand, is Gram-positive bacterium, a major bacterial human pathogen that causes clinical manifestations such as bacteremia, infective endocarditis, skin and soft tissue infections (Boucher and Corey, 2008). S. aureus presents similar size than bacillus, around 1 μm; and 8.2% of the articles surveyed, inform the performance of the photo-assisted EAOPs on its inactivation (see Fig. 2).

As it can be seen from data in Fig. 2, E. coli (2 μm of average size) is not only the most studied pathogen, with 68% of the articles, but also the main bacterium of the fecal (thermotolerant) coliform group, being present in large numbers in the feces of humans and animals. E. coli causes diarrhea by fecal oral transmission mechanism and therefore, it is the most researched out of all the pathogens not only because its presence indicates fecal contamination from human and animal origin but because its laboratory detection is relatively simple (Sperling, 2008).

E. faecalis on the other hand, is an important Gram-positive bacterium with an average size of 2.5 μm, which is frequent cause of many serious human infections, including urinary tract disease, endocarditis, bacteremia and wound infections. Diseases with E. faecalis can be especially troublesome because of their frequent resistance to multiple antibiotics (Kau et al., 2005). According to Figs. 2 and 3.1% of the articles related to photo-assisted EAOPs deal with the inactivation of E. faecalis.

P. aeruginosa on the other hand, is a rod-shaped Gram-negative bacterium, ubiquitous in soil and water as well as in animals and in plants with a contimous increase of its antibiotic resistance (Domínguez-Espíndola et al., 2019). This aerobic pathogen, with an average size of 2.3 μm, has been poorly evaluated with photo-assisted EAOPS with 1% of the literature reports.

M. aeruginosa is a photosynthetic cyanobacterium that plays an important role in global oxygenation; also, it forms water blooms in nutrient rich waters, causing water contamination and public health threats (Qu et al., 2018). According to Fig. 2, the average size of M. aeruginosa is 3 μm and only 1% of the articles of photo-assisted EAOPs report its inactivation.

The mycobacteria such as M. avium, M. kansasii and M. smegmatis have frequently been isolated from drinking water and hospital water distribution systems (Brugnera et al., 2013). The mycobacteria are potential pathogens involved in pulmonary or cutaneous diseases. There has been evidence that water can be the vehicle through which mycobacteria infect the human body; and chlorination is not efficient to fully inactivate them (Brugnera et al., 2012). The average sizes of the mycobacteria are 3–4 μm and 4.1% of the scientific articles report their inactivation.

With a high size of about 4.5 μm, C. parvum is a protozoan and a parasite that cannot survive without a host and commonly causes cryptosporidiosis, a diarrheal disease. P. expansum on the other hand, is a pathogen which causes the Blue mold disease, the most economically important postharvest disease of fruit and vegetables in storage (Errampalli, 2014). Both C. parvum and P. expansum have been scarcely assessed by means of photo-assisted EAOPs with 1% of the literature reports each one.

Finally, C. parapsilosis present an average size of 7 μm and it is the most frequently isolated agent in hospital settings and responsible for 80% of fungal infections contracted in these facilities. C. parapsilosis affects immunocompromised individuals including those who require prolonged use of intravenous catheter, such as dialysis and cancer patients (Pires et al., 2016; Souza et al, 2017, 2019). The inactivation of C. parapsilosis has been reported in 4.2% of the articles concerning photo-assisted EAOPs (Fig. 2).

As it can be noted, in the last years, photo-assisted EAOPs have been tested in the inactivation of several pathogens in aqueous solutions.

3. Photo-assisted disinfection of wastewaters using EAOPs

The scheme shown in Fig. 3a summarizes the main reactions and mechanisms expected for the generation of oxidants by direct, quasi-direct and indirect oxidation processes that take place in photo-assisted EAOPs (photo-electrocatalysis, photo-electrochemical oxidation, photo-electrocoagulation and photo-electro Fenton processes). Fig. 3b on the other hand, depicts the section in this work in which each mechanism is discussed.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(a) Mechanisms and zones of reaction for direct, quasi-direct and indirect oxidization in photo-assisted EAOPs. Me+ = metal, X = Cl or Br, Rads = microorganism, Pads = inactivated microorganism. (b) section of this review in which each mechanism is discussed: 4.1 direct oxidation; 5.1 quasi-direct oxidation; 6.1.1 Indirect oxidation (inactivation) of pathogens using photo-anodes; 6.1.2 indirect oxidation (inactivation) of pathogens using DSA or BDD anodes; 6.2 photo-electrocoagulation; 6.3 cathodic processes.

As can be seen in this scheme, there is a variety of oxidizing species that are produced in different zones of the reactor where they react with the pathogen membrane or most exposed structure thus producing inactivation. The inactivation process is therefore strongly dependent on the oxidation potential of the disinfection agent. Table 1 compiles the standard potential values of some oxidizing species that are generated in the photo-assisted EAOPs along with the oxidation mechanism as described by the scheme shown in Fig. 3a.

Table 1.

Standard potential value of some oxidizing species and their oxidation mechanism.

Oxidation Oxidizing species Standard potential (V vs. SHE)
Direct Direct electron transfer at anode surface
h+ on TiO2 3.20
Quasi-direct OH 2.80
Indirect SO4•- 2.6
O3 2.08
Cl 2.40
S2O82- 2.05
Cl2_ 2.00
Br 1.96
H2O2 1.76
HClO pH 3-8 1.49
Cl2 pH < 3 1.36
HBrO 1.33
O2 1.23
Br2 1.09
ClO pH > 8 0.89

It is interesting to note that as expected, the most powerful oxidizing agents are those that react with the pathogen either on the surface of the electrode or very close to the electrode-solution interphase. In this regard, a classification of the oxidation mechanism reported on the literature (n = 95), can be made relating the distance from the anode’s surface with the type of microorganism. As it can be seen in Fig. 4a, most of the pathogen’s inactivation reports correspond to quasi-direct oxidation reaction with OH radical species (42.11%) reporting inactivation of pathogens ranging from small viruses to large protozoan microorganisms. The indirect oxidation mechanism reports, add up 33.7% of the reviewed articles, corresponding to an inactivation mechanism promoted by RHS (12.63%), followed by the Fenton reaction (8.42%), electrocoagulation (6.32%), H2O2 (5.26%) and sulphate radical (1.05%). The pure direct oxidation mechanism is scarcely reported (3.16%), nevertheless, more than one oxidation mechanism could be taking place: direct and indirect (2.11%), direct and quasi-direct (h+ and OH) (16.84%), direct, quasi-direct and indirect (h+, OH and RHS) (1.05%) and quasi and indirect (OH and RHS) (1.05%) (see Fig. SM1-a). The size of the microorganisms that are inactivated in these processes can be related to their relative resistance to the attack of the photo-electrogenerated chemical oxidants.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

(a) Scheme relating the oxidation mechanisms of microorganism inactivation by photo-assisted EAOPs and the relative resistance of pathogens. A: Direct, B: Direct and indirect, C: Direct and Quasi-direct (h+ and OH), D: Direct, quasi-direct and indirect (h+, OH and RHS), E: Quasi-direct (OH), F: Quasi and indirect (OH and RHS), G: Indirect (electrocoagulation), H: Indirect (Fenton), I: Indirect (H2O2), J: Indirect (RHS), K: Indirect (sulphate radical). (b) Wavelength and power of the UV and Visible photon’s as a function of the relative number of papers (size of the corresponding circle) using photo-assisted EAOPs for disinfection purposes.

For photo-assisted EAOPs a source of photons characterized by UV or Visible energy has been employed. Fig. 4b shows a classification of the emission wavelength of the photonic source and the corresponding power. As expected, the use of UV energy represents 72.54% of the published articles related to the disinfection of water by photo-assisted EAOPs (21.57% UVC, 3.92% UVB and 47.06% UVA). On the other hand, the cheaper and widely available use of visible energy was reported on the 27.46% of the articles (see Fig. SM1-b). The visible energy is typically supplied by solar simulators equipped with Xe lamps. Since UV photons are more energetic than visible light photons, more energetic h+ are generated under UV irradiation, which should produce faster oxidizing reactions and more efficient disinfection processes. As a consequence, the use of UV energy still represents a better alternative when compared to visible radiation for the promotion of reactive species. However, it is important to develop disinfection processes that, instead of UV energy, are capable of efficiently using visible radiation.

4. Direct oxidation

4.1. Fundamentals of direct oxidation

As it is shown in Fig. 3a, the direct oxidation or inactivation of the pathogens occurs right at the anode or photo-anode surface. These electrodes can be the so-called dimensionally stable anodes (DSA), mixed metal oxides (MMO) or boron doped diamond (BDD) electrodes. Using EAOPs, direct electron extraction after pathogen adsorption on the anode surface can result in effective microorganism inactivation without the involvement of other substances (Eq. (1)) (Martínez-Huitle and Panizza, 2018; Panizza and Cerisola, 2007, 2009).

RadszePads (1)

The mechanism shown in Eq. (1) is commonly known as direct oxidation and it is characterized by the exclusive mediation of electrons, which in addition, must capable oxidizing the pathogen’s external structure at potentials lower than that of oxygen evolution (Garcia-Segura et al., 2018; Panizza and Cerisola, 2007). Since the electron transfer that produces inactivation is usually slow, the adsorption of the pathogen on the anode controls the process and does not lead to the complete pollutant mineralization (Garcia-Segura et al., 2018).

The photo-assisted electrocatalytical oxidation (also called photo-electrocatalysis (PEC)) has received increased attention due to the combined advantages of photo-catalytical and electrochemical processes (He et al., 2020). By using semiconductor materials such as TiO2, WO3 and ZnO (Garcia-Segura and Brillas, 2017; Li et al., 2011; Nie et al., 2014a) photo-anode illumination of a semiconductor–electrolyte interface with photons having enough energy to generate electron–hole (e/h+) pairs (Daghrir et al, 2013, 2014) can promote effective separation of the photo-generated carriers within the space charge layer. In this way, photo-generated electrons and h+ are separated and pathogens are inactivated in the photo-anode providing at the same time electrons that are transported to cathode through an external circuit (Eq. (2)) (Lam et al, 2019, 2020; Philippidis et al., 2010).

Semicond+hvSemicondecb+Semicondhvb+ (2)

In Eq. (2) the subscripts cb and vb denote the conduction and valence bands, respectively (Domínguez-Espíndola et al., 2019; Venieri et al., 2013).

In this context, a good example of photo-assisted direct oxidation of a representative pathogen agent was reported by Yu et al. (2008) who inactivated E. coli using photo-electro generated h+ at ZnIn2S4 photo-anodes (Yu et al., 2008). As it was shown in this direct photo-electrochemical process, h+ were found to be the major reactive species and therefore, the photo-catalytically generated h+ species act as a bactericide (Jin et al., 2020b; Li et al, 2011, 2013; Rather and Lo, 2020). This idea is consistent with the report of (Nie et al., 2014a) who found that photo-generated h+ species were predominantly responsible for PEC inactivation processes (Nie et al., 2014a).

For direct disinfection processes, a careful reactor arrangement is particularly important in order to effectively carry out the reaction between the photo-generated oxidant and the pathogen agent. A study by (Pablos et al., 2017a) for example, found that photo-generated h+ at the surface TiO2 electrodes covered by E. coli, showed significant differences in bacterial inactivation based on the way in which the reactor’s illumination set up was arranged. In his way, E. coli inactivation was noticeably diminished when the photo-electrodes were illuminated from the back side of the reactor, away from the region in which the surface adsorbed bacteria were located (Pablos et al., 2017a). The white circle at the left side of the Fig. 4a shows that the direct inactivation mechanism has been studied only with E. coli.

5. Quasi-direct oxidation

5.1. Fundamentals of quasi-direct oxidation

As it can be seen in the black dotted lines in Fig. 3a, the quasi-direct oxidation occurs few nm from the photo-anode or anode surfaces. In the case of oxidation of pathogens due to OH radical species produced by water oxidation at the anode surface, the inactivation process takes place in the vicinity of the electrode-solution interphase. In this way, a thin disinfection region aligned to the anode’s surface (<20 nm) is defined by the short lifetime as well as by the high chemical reactivity of the OH molecule. Therefore, as can be seen in Eq. (3), a quasi-direct oxidation process of pathogen agents take place in the vicinity of the anode surface where powerful oxidant species are generated from water or electrolyte electrooxidation reactions (Comninellis et al., 2008; Groenen-Serrano, 2018; Groenen-Serrano et al., 2013; Marselli et al., 2003).

Hence, depending on the applied potential, the inactivation of pathogens is known to occur through direct electron transfer in the potential region before oxygen evolution or by means of quasi-indirect oxidation via electrogenerated OH (Anglada et al., 2009; Panizza and Cerisola, 2009). Since direct and quasi-direct oxidation take place at or near the electrode surface, the concomitant reactions are nearly always mass transfer limited with a preponderant effect of the transport rates towards and from electrodes (Garcia-Segura et al., 2020).

In addition, the oxidation reaction of water for the generation of OH is always in competition with the secondary reaction of anodic dissociation of these radicals in oxygen and with the oxygen evolution reaction (see Eqs. (4), (5)) (Amadelli et al., 2000).

M+H2OM(OH)+H++e (3)
2(OHads)O2+2H++2e (4)
2H2O4H++O2+e (5)

While the OH radical species is considered as the main promoter for the inactivation of pathogens in quasi-direct disinfection reactions due to its high oxidation potential (Brillas, 2020; Martínez-Huitle and Brillas, 2009; Martinez-Huitle and Ferro, 2007) its activity is strongly related to its interaction with the anode’s surface (Comninellis et al., 2008). In this way, non-active anodes such as boron doped diamond (BDD) are preferred due to their high oxygen over-potential, achieving the oxidation of organic compounds by an electrochemical step mediated by physi-sorbed OH radicals. Active anode materials such as IrO2 or RuO2 on the other hand, exhibit lower oxygen over-potential and oxidation effectiveness; since the surface of these materials can be oxidized thus limiting the accumulation of OH (Polcaro et al., 2002).

Photo-assisted electrocatalytic processes have been largely explored in recent times for water disinfection due to their high efficiency, operability under ambient conditions and the associated low-cost of the equipment (Cho et al., 2019; Egerton, 2011; Garcia-Segura and Brillas, 2017; Rather and Lo, 2020). In these processes, the potential gradient forces the electrons towards the cathode, thus promoting the photo-generated h+ reaction at the anode with water to yield OH radicals (Eq. (6) – (8)) (Garcia-Segura and Brillas, 2017; Gupta et al., 2019; He et al., 2020; Venieri et al., 2013).

Semicondhvb++H2OSemicondOH+H+ (6)
Semicondhvb++OHSemicondOH (7)
Semicondecb+Semicondhvb+recombination (8)

As it is shown in Fig. 4a, letter E, the quasi-direct oxidation is the most informed inactivation mechanism with 42.1% of the total reports of photo-assisted EAOPs for water disinfection, and it has been tested on several pathogens, paryicularly E. coli with 24.2%, followed by S. aureus with 3.1%, C. parapsilosis, MS2 coliphage and M. smegmatis with 2.1%.

5.2. Reports of quasi-direct oxidation

5.2.1. TiO2

In this context, TiO2 is by far the most studied photo-catalyst for quasi-direct oxidation due to its efficient photo-activity, high chemical stability and non-toxicity (Daghrir et al., 2013; Fujishima and Zhang, 2006; He et al., 2020). For example, a TiO2 photo-anode was integrated in a portable water disinfection device by Montenegro-Ayo et al. (2020), in which a 365 nm light emitting submergible two-sided diode lamp is powered by a rechargeable battery. This disinfection device was able to achieve 5-log inactivation of E. coli in 10 s of treatment in model water samples by means of photo-electrogenerated OH radicals (Montenegro-Ayo et al., 2020).

Photo-catalytic inactivation of E. coli and E. faecalis in water samples can also be enhanced by applying a positive potential on TiO2/Ti films under simulated solar radiation (Venieri et al, 2012, 2013). The quantity of E. coli cells were reduced by approximately 6 orders of magnitude after 15 min of PEC treatment in water at 2 V of applied potential and at an initial concentration of 107 CFU mL−1 (Venieri et al., 2013). A 6.2 log reduction in E. faecalis population was also achieved after 15 min of PEC treatment in water at 10 V of applied potential and an initial concentration of 107 CFU mL−1 (Venieri et al., 2012).

Antibiotic-resistance bacteria and antibiotic-resistance genes such as E. coli S1-23 and blaTEM-1 and aac(3)-II were chosen by Jiang et al. (2017) as pathogens to prove the effectiveness of a photo-electrocatalytic process for their inactivation using TiO2 nanotubes (NTN). Their results showed an effective inactivation and an intracellular and extracellular leakage of the bacteria towards the environment (Jiang et al., 2017).

Additional efforts have been made in order to enhance the photocatalytic properties of TiO2. In this regard, the enrichment of Ti3+ species within the semiconductor structure (self-doping) by cathodic polarization of TiO2 improves its electronic and optical properties (Cho et al., 2019). In this way, oxygen vacancies (e.g. Ti3+ self-doping), are formed within the lattice of TiO2 NTN arrays during the electrochemical reduction process of pristine TiO2 at different negative potentials ranging from −1.2 to −1.5 V. Disinfection with the TiO2 NTN arrays were observed to enhance the photo-electrocatalytic activity in the UV and visible regions of the electromagnetic spectrum (Liao et al., 2014) yielding a photo-current density 250% higher than that of pristine TiO2. Highly ordered TiO2 NTN arrays directly synthesized by anodizing Ti foil have also attracted considerable attention due to their unique chemical and physical properties as well as their excellent capability for instant inactivation and rapid decomposition of E. coli. (Li et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2013; Nie et al., 2014a; Sun et al., 2014). For instance, photo-electrocatalytic disinfection using a highly ordered TiO2 TNT array, resulted in a 100% inactivation of E. coli (1.0 × 107 CFU mL−1) within 97 s, which was almost 2.2 times faster than that using a nanoparticulated TiO2 photo-anode (Liu et al., 2013).

The high reactivity of {001} facets exposed in nano-sized single crystals and superior electron transport properties of the TiO2 NTN array, enhance the E. coli removal efficiency of TiO2-based photo-catalysts (Li et al., 2016). In addition to the crystalline phase anatase, pure rutile TiO2 photo-anodes with 100% exposed {111} facets possess visible light activity (Liu et al., 2014). The origin of the visible light activity of such {111} faceted rutile TiO2 can be associated to Ti3+ doping achieving 99.97% inactivation of 1.0 × 107 CFU mL−1 E. coli cells within 10 min of photo-electrocatalysis treatment (Liu et al., 2014). Ribeiro et al. (2015) also compared the performance of photo-electrocatalytic and photo-catalytic processes using TiO2; finding that the photo-electrochemical treatment was more efficient than the photo-catalytic one for S. aureus inactivation (Ribeiro et al., 2015).

For Gram-negative bacteria, such as E. coli, the outer membrane, the cell wall and the cytoplasmic membrane are located in the outer part of the cell, and thus, these parts of the microorganism are the most suitable targets for OH radical attack (An et al., 2016). In this regard, An et al. (2016) found that the use of a TiO2 NTN array photo-anode causes oxidative damage to the protein membrane, particularly to bacterial energy metabolism such as respiration and adenosine triphosphate generation, which results in a lethal effect (An et al., 2016).

As opposed to the effective quasi-direct oxidation produced by OH radical species, a report by (Zhang et al., 2020b) showed that direct h+ transfer exert little effect on bacteria inactivation, probably due to h+ scavenging phenomena caused by the NaCl electrolyte. The concomitant transfer of photo-generated electrons to the cathode on the other hand, results in the production of ROS; such as H2O2 and O2, which were found to play a critical role in the inactivation of E. coli bacteria (Guan et al., 2020).

Other TiO2 NTN arrangements have been explored for disinfection purposes. A Ag/AgBr/TiO2 NTN array electrode , was prepared and used to study the oxidative attack of photo-electrocatalytically produced OH, O2•−, h+ and Br0 to the external and internal membrane of E. coli. (Hou et al., 2012). Furthermore, in photo-electrocatalytic processes, electronegative E. coli membrane surfaces can get in direct contact with photo-generated h+ and OH radical species due to the strong adsorption promoted by the positive polarization potential (electromigration) of the anode surface (Cho et al, 2011, 2019; Kang et al., 2010; Pablos et al, 2017a, 2017b).

5.2.2. Doped photo-anodes

As it was previously mentioned, TiO2 is by far the most popular semiconductor material for photo-electrocatalytic applications. One major disadvantage of this material however is related to its high energy band gap which limits its light absorption properties to the UV region of the electromagnetic spectrum. In this context, and in order to open the possibility for solar energy (400–780 nm) usage, modified TiO2 semiconductor photo-anodes with band−gap energies between 1.7 and 2.0 eV are ideal candidates (Zhang et al., 2020b). In this way, the absorption spectra of TiO2 can be extended well into the visible region by doping the semiconductor lattice with anions such as nitrogen. Therefore, an N-doped Ti/TiO2 photo-anode was prepared, characterized and tested for the removal of fecal coliform from a municipal wastewater facility under visible energy irradiation; reaching log-inactivation values higher than 1.2 units (Daghrir et al., 2014). The mixing of 2p states in the valence band of N and O, results in narrowing of the TiO2 semiconductor band-gap and the consequent shifting absorption onset to lower energies.

N-doped TiO2 NTN as photo-anode substrates were also evaluated for the inactivation of E. coli by (Pablos et al., 2017b) and in contrast to the effect observed by Daghrir et al. (2014), these photo-anode structures showed that while electrochemically assisted photo-catalytic inactivation of bacteria occurred under UV–Vis irradiation, no effect was observed under visible irradiation (Daghrir et al., 2014; Pablos et al., 2017b).

Another example of this type of materials was reported by He et al. (2020) who prepared Ti plates with highly orientated anatase on which TiO2 NTN arrays decorated by antimony doped tin oxide (SnO2–Sb) and silver nanoparticles (Ag) were constructed. In this novel photo-anode the SnO2–Sb/Ti promotes the generation of ROS and the Ag content on TiO2 substantially boosted the activity of the catalyst by increasing the separation of photo-induced e/h+ pairs (He et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2014). This feature allowed a high E. coli inactivation performance as compared with a substrate in which the incorporation of SnO2–Sb or Ag were absent.

Domínguez-Espíndola et al. (2019) on the other hand, reported a fast and total inactivation of P. aeruginosa using Ag-decorated TiO2 photo-anodes deposited on indium tin oxide. The set up also consisted on a stainless-steel (SS) cathode and UVA irradiation. Their experiments revealed total inactivation of the pathogen within 5 min using coatings loaded with 4% w/w of Ag, 0.25 M Na2SO4 as electrolyte and 1.70 V vs. Ag|AgCl (3 M KCl) as the applied bias potential (Domínguez-Espíndola et al., 2019). As expected, the presence of Ag was identified to significantly increase the response of TiO2 towards bacterial inactivation. Upon an applied cell potential of 1.5 V the TiO2/Ag (4% w/w) photo-anode also achieved complete inactivation of fecal coliform bacteria in the solution within 6 min (Domínguez-Espíndola et al., 2017). Brugnera et al. (2014) also prepared a Ti/TiO2–Ag photo-anode that was used in photo-electrocatalytic disinfection experiments, achieving full inactivation of M. smegmatis in 3 min using UV irradiation and 99.6% in 30 min employing visible irradiation (Brugnera et al., 2014). A previous study reported one year before by the same group, pointed out that a total mycobacterium inactivation with an initial population of 7.5 × 104 CFU mL−1, was completely elicited within 3 min of treatment using a Ti/TiO2–Ag photo-anode. The presence of Ag nanoparticles in the electrode were observed to be responsible for a 1.5 times larger degradation rate constant when compared to an unmodified Ti/TiO2 anode (Brugnera et al., 2013).

TiO2 NTN array electrodes have also been coated with Ag nanoparticles (16% w/w), showing excellent performance for the disinfection of water containing M. smegmatis. In this way, 100% inactivation was achieved after 3 min of photo-electrocatalytic treatment (5.1 × 103 CFU mL−1 in 0.05 M Na2SO4, pH 6, applied potential of 1.5 V and UV irradiation) (Brugnera et al., 2012).

Ag has therefore been proven to induce effective antibacterial activity, increasing the visible light excitation of TiO2, fostering charge transfer events at the solution/semiconductor interphase, facilitating the production of OH radicals and promoting as a consequence the fast and effective inactivation of microorganisms (Brugnera et al., 2014; Domínguez-Espíndola et al, 2017, 2019; He et al., 2003; Rahmawati et al., 2011). Ag also alters the transport system within the cell membrane resulting in catastrophic permeability, osmoregulation, electron transport and respiration events that eventually lead to cell death (Mafa et al., 2020). Domínguez-Espíndola et al. (2017) and Domínguez-Espíndola et al. (2019) also reported that Ag acts as photo-generated electron-trapping sites that prevent the recombination of photo-generated e/h+ pairs; thus increasing the bacterial inactivation rate (Domínguez-Espíndola et al, 2017, 2019). However, according to Pires et al. (2016), the incorporation of Ag into Ti/TiO2 electrodes does not improve the inactivation of C. parapsilosis as expected; suggesting that Ag nanoparticles may act in some cases as recombination sites for e/h+ pairs (Pires et al., 2016).

5.2.3. ZnO

In addition to TiO2, some other wide band gap semiconductor materials have been explored for water disinfection processes. In this regard, Zinc oxide (ZnO) has attracted much attention since it is a widely available n-type semiconductor material (band gap>3 eV), that is characterized by its low cost, non-toxicity and high photo-activity (Lam et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2017; Sapkal et al., 2012). Lam et al. (2020) for example, developed a photo-catalytic fuel cell based on ZnO/Zn or TiO2/ZnO/Zn anodes in which electricity production was coupled with bacteria disinfection. The corresponding experiments reached complete E. coli inactivation after 60 min of treatment by the combined effects of h+ injection and OH production (Lam et al., 2020). Gupta et al. (2019) on the other hand, reported the disinfection performance of a ZnO/CuI nanorod array that was grown on a fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrate. The novel arrangement of materials in the photo-anode structure produced a potential barrier that was assumed to prevent charge carrier recombination which resulted not only in outstanding charge separation and extended visible light absorption, but also in an excellent activity towards bacterial inactivation (Gupta et al., 2019). OH, h+ and superoxide radicals were identified as the species responsible for inactivation of E. coli by means of an oxidative stress mechanism that lead to membrane damage; achieving 95% inactivation when compared to UV illuminated samples that reached 20% (Sapkal et al., 2012).

5.2.4. WO3

Tungsten trioxide (WO3) is another attractive semiconductor material that has been widely explored due to its relatively low cost and ability to absorb visible light (band gap of 2.5–2.8 eV). This feature extends the photo-catalytic activity of the semiconductor anode into the visible light region leading to utilization of approximately 30% of solar radiation, as opposed to pure TiO2 (Juodkazytė et al., 2020; Koo et al., 2019; Scott-Emuakpor et al., 2012; Souza et al., 2017). In this context, Souza et al. (2017) compared the inactivation of C. parapsilosis using Na2SO4, NaNO3 and NaCl as electrolytes in photo-electrocatalytic process employing a W/WO3 photo-anode (Souza et al., 2017). The inactivation mechanism of the microorganism was found to be associated with the attack of OH radicals to the cell membrane, where the microorganism-catalyst contact takes place. Souza et al. (2019) reported that the OH radical, responsible for microorganism death, were readily produced on the electrode surface and seemed to be the main reactive species, even in a high chloride ion concentration solution (Souza et al., 2019).

5.2.5. Cu2O, CuO

Cooper oxide is another semiconductor material that has been investigated as photo-electrode material due to its abundance, low cost, non-toxicity, inherently p-type character, high optical absorption and good charge transport properties. Cu2O is a direct-gap semiconductor with a relative low band gap energy of ∼2.1 eV (Lam et al., 2020; Masudy-Panah et al., 2016).

In this way, CuO catalyst particles have been used in a stirred photo-reactor using FTO and Pt as anode and cathode, respectively for E. coli inactivation. The experiments showed an increase of more than three times in the photo-electrocatalytic inactivation rate process compared with the one obtained in the photo-catalytic experiment performed in the absence of an external potential bias (Eswar et al, 2018a, 2018b).

5.2.6. Photo-anodes prepared or mixed with activated carbon or graphite

Another interesting approach for the development of photo-active semiconductor anodes consist on the addition of carbonaceous material to the semiconductor substrate. Mesones et al. (2020) for example, reported a photo-electrochemical three-dimensional reactor using a commercial anode of RuOx/Ti and an illuminated photo-catalyst of granular activated carbon (GAC)-TiO2 composite that was designed to work as a bipolar electrode (Mesones et al., 2020). Although several phenomena were assumed to take place in this system (adsorption, photolysis, electrolysis and photo-catalysis), bacterial inactivation was essentially mediated by OH radicals. In this way, a high value for the E. coli inactivation kinetic constant was obtained by combining photo-catalytic and electrochemical processes to produce OH radicals using a GAC-TiO2 composite, UVA radiation and 10 mA/cm2 of electric current density (Mesones et al., 2020). Furthermore, since the carbonaceous materials are usually characterized by a large number of surface active sites, excellent adsorption properties towards various organics and microorganisms result in a potential enhancement of the photo-catalytic activity of the composites of TiO2-carbonauceous materials (Nie et al., 2014b; Rahmawati et al, 2010, 2011; Zhang et al., 2011).

5.2.7. Other photo-anode materials

Among photo-anodes, mediator-based Z-schemes between two different semiconductors have been reported to possess a higher charge separation efficiency due to e/h+ annihilation by the mediator. For example, Rather and Lo (2020) reported a study of the performance of the g-C3N4/Ag/AgCl/BiVO4 heterojunction in the disinfection of E. coli present in sewage; achieving bacterium concentration values lower than those for permissible discharge limits (Rather and Lo, 2020). Spherical silver nanoparticles grown on silicon carbide (Ag@SiC) on the other hand, were evaluated for the photo-electrocatalytic inactivation of E. coli using Pt and FTO as counter and working electrodes, respectively, with an optimum Ag load of 3% w/w. The experiments allowed to find that at 3.0 V of applied potential, the rate of the photo-electrocatalytic process was four times higher than photo-catalytic oxidation (Adhikari et al., 2018). Coupling TiO2 with narrow-band gap semiconductor materials and metal composites has also been observed to be effective in enhancing the visible radiation activity and in simultaneous improvement of the charge separation efficiency. In this way, E. coli bacteria treated with a Ag/AgBr/TiO2 electrode were found to be substantially damaged, forming pits and holes in the cell walls (Hou et al., 2012). DSA anodes coupled with a Ti/TiO2 cathode can also be employed for the inactivation of adenovirus, with UV irradiation and 5 A of applied current, promoting the UV photo-assisted production of OH radical species (Monteiro et al., 2015).

6. Indirect oxidation

6.1. Fundamentals of indirect oxidation by photo-electrocatalytic production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and photo-assisted-electro generation of active chlorine, active bromide and persulphate

The indirect oxidation or inactivation of pathogens is achieved through the electrochemical generation of a mediator in bulk solution such as reactive halogen species (RHS), persulphate (S2O82−) or reactive oxygen species (ROS). The indirect oxidation takes place in the bulk solution (Fig. 3) where the electrogenerated species migrates few mm from the electrodes surface to interact with the microorganisms achieving their inactivation. In spite of to their convenient high oxidation power, ROS such as OH, O•-2, HOO, O3 and H2O2 are characterized by important limitations such as a short lifetime and rapid recombination with several scavenger species (Li et al., 2011). In this context, other oxidants are the preferred choice and in this regard, it is well known that halogen radical compounds are effective bactericides which can be produced by photo-electrocatalytic oxidation of halide ions at the surface of illuminated photo-anodes (Li et al., 2013; Selcuk et al., 2006). This process is possible because these radicals are capable of forming stable di-halide radical anions (X•-2) in the presence of X (Li et al., 2011).

The photo-electrochemical generation of RHS (e.g. Cl2, HClO, ClO, Br2, HBrO and BrO), is therefore a process of high interest because it offers the possibility to produce the disinfectant chemicals on-demand and on-site (Juodkazytė et al., 2020). Active chlorine for example (Cl2, HClO, ClO) can be generated by two main processes in the presence of a semiconductor material and UV irradiation. First, OH can be anodically produced by means of the oxidation of adsorbed water on the electrode surface (Eqs. (5), (6), (7)) and the products resulting from this reaction could in turn oxidize chloride ions (Eq. (9)). Furthermore, adsorbed chloride ions on the semiconductor surface could also be directly oxidized by photo-generated h+ under UV irradiation leading to the formation of Cl/HOCl species (Eq. (10)). In the absence of competitive reactions with pathogens, the formation of active chlorine in solution takes place (Eq. (11)) (Fraga et al., 2009; Koo et al., 2019).

SemicondOH+ClHClO (9)
Semicondhvb++ClSemicondCl (10)
Cl+ClCl2 (11)

As shown by Eq. (12), chlorine can also be produced by direct oxidation of dissolved Cl ions at the anode’s surface:

2Cl- → Cl2 (aq) + 2e (12)

In any case, Cl2 in aqueous medium is hydrolyzed to produce hypochlorous acid which, depending on the pH of the solution, partially reacts with the solvent to give rise to hypochlorite ions (Eq. (13) – (14)).

Cl2 (aq) + H2O ↔ HClO + Cl + H+ (13)
HClO ↔ ClO + H+ pKa = 7.55 (14)

The subsequent photo-activation of active chlorine by the homolytic rupture of HClO is described by Eq. (15) (García-Espinoza et al., 2020; Sánchez-Montes et al., 2020).

HClO+hvOH+Cl (15)

The standard potential (E° vs. SHE) of these chloro-species correspond to 1.36,1.49 and 0.89 V for Cl2, HClO and ClO, respectively. As expected, the predominant form of the oxidant depends on the pH of the solution. In this way, while Cl2 is quite stable under strong acidic conditions (pH < 3), HClO and ClO are the predominant forms in the pH range of 3–8 and above 8, respectively (Sirés and Brillas, 2012). In addition to Cl2, HClO and ClO, radicals such as Cl (E° = 2.4 V vs. SHE) react with Cl ions to produce long-lived and reactive Cl2•− radicals (E° = 2.0 V vs. SHE) (Nie et al., 2014a; Wang et al., 2016).

As in the case of chlorine, bromide ions can be oxidized at the anode’s surface to produce hypobromous acid (Eq. (16)) which in turn, undergoes an acid/base equilibrium characterized by a pKa = 8.65 which, as can be seen in Eq. (14), is slightly smaller than that of hypochlorous acid (see Eq. (17)).

Br + H2O ↔ HOBr + H+ + 2e (16)
HOBrH++BrO (17)

As shown by Eq. (18) – (20), Br ions can react at the anode’s surface either by direct oxidation (Eq. (18)) or by sequential h+ injection in photo-assisted processes producing intermediate Br radicals (Eq. (19) and (20)) (Selcuk et al., 2006).

2BrBr2+2e (18)
BrBr+e (19)
2BrBr2 (20)

As in the case of chloride, the resulting Br2 spontaneously hydrolyzes in aqueous medium leading to the formation of active bromide species (Br2, HOBr, BrO). In the same way, the photolysis of active bromine results in the formation of OH and Br radical species (see Eq. (21)) (García-Espinoza et al., 2020; Selcuk et al., 2006).

HBrO+hvOH+Br (21)

The reported standard potentials (E° vs. SHE) for the Br2/Br, HOBr/Br and Br/Br couples are 1.087, 1.33 and 1.96 V, respectively (Li et al., 2011). Since the pH of wastewater is usually close to neutrality, HBrO or HClO are typically the most stable forms of active bromine and chlorine. HClO and HBrO in turn, are characterized by E° vs. SHE values of 1.33 and1.49 V , which also explains the better disinfection performance of active chlorine when compared to active bromine.

It is also interesting to note that although the E° values of HOCl and HOBr are less oxidizing when compared to that of the OH radical species, they are in general more selective and can therefore react faster with electron-rich moieties such as the pathogen’s membrane (Wang et al., 2016). The RHS therefore show different reaction pathways to those exhibited by OH. RHS for instance, react preferentially via one-electron oxidation, dehydrogenation and addition to unsaturated C–C bonds, whereas OH reacts almost exclusively following the last two pathways (Grebel et al., 2010).

Sulphate ions on the other hand, are also another important kind of indirect oxidation agent in disinfection processes. In solution, sulphate anions interact with the anode, where persulphate ions and peroxydisulfuric acid are produced according to Eq. (22). In presence of UV radiation, the persulphate ions undergo photo-conversion to produce the sulphate radical as has been reported by Sirés and co-workers (Eq. (23)) (Sirés et al., 2014).

2SO42− ↔ S2O82− + 2e (22)
S2O82+hv2(SO4) (23)

In the last decade, (SO4•-) based treatment processes have gained attention due not only to the high oxidation power of sulphate radicals (E° = 2.5–3.1 V vs. SHE), but also to their nonselective reactivity (Zhi et al., 2020). The SO4•- radical species is therefore a powerful oxidant that rapidly attacks a variety of organic compounds, as well as pathogen membrane structures; following reaction pathways that are similar to those that characterize OH chemistry, (Tan et al., 2021).

6.1.1. Indirect oxidation (inactivation) of pathogens using photo-anodes

As it is the case for most direct photocatalytic studies, indirect processes have been widely explored using TiO2 semiconductor anode materials. Indirect photo-assisted inactivation of E. coli using a highly oriented TiO2 TNT anode was for example studied by Sun et al. (2016). These authors found not only high pathogen inactivation efficiencies but also that the ROS concentration in the PEC system was closer to the H2O2 concentration than to that of the OH radical species (Sun et al., 2016).

In a more sophisticated approach, an indirect photo-electrocatalytic process assisted by O3, using a TiO2 NTN photo-anode and DSA cathode, was found to completely inactivate C. parapsilosis in swimming pool water within 45 min of treatment. The study carried out by Kim et al. (2019) found that the efficient inactivation process was based on the generation of ROS which were provided by the photo-electrocatalytic oxidation of water, O3 production by photo-generated electrons at the TiO2 surface and the O3 reaction with water and UV photons (Kim et al., 2019).

MoS2 has a more suitable band gap energy (∼1.6–1.9 eV) when compared to other metal-oxide based semiconductors (Zhang et al., 2020b). The MoS2/MoOx heterojunction for instance, allows to obtain complete inactivation of a 106 CFU mL−1 E. coli solution prepared using a NaCl electrolyte and applying 0.5 V and visible irradiation. After 2 h of treatment, indirect complete pathogen oxidation was achieved by means of the photo-electrochemically produced H2O2 and O2 which were found the key reactive oxidative species for E. coli inactivation (Zhang et al., 2020b). In a related study, Xiong et al. (2015) reported the complete inactivation of 7 log of E. coli within 2 h using an n-type Cu2O film electrode. In this case, H2O2, injection of photo-generated h+ and the inherent toxicity of the Cu2O film were found to be the main factors for pathogen’s inactivation (Xiong et al., 2015).

In addition of the use of ROS, indirect oxidation of pathogens using RHS is also very effective. (Nie et al., 2014a) for example, reported the use of a TiO2 NTN as photo-anode and UV irradiation at 365 nm, for the inactivation of E. coli in aqueous solution containing a bromide based electrolyte. These authors observed that by increasing the NaBr concentration in solution from 0.1 to 1 mM, the time required to achieve complete inactivation of E. coli sharply decreased 600 times due to the photo-electro-catalytical bactericidal performance of RHS (Nie et al., 2014a).

W/WO3 electrodes have also been successfully used for the photo-electrocatalytic inactivation of C. parapsilosis in wastewater containing a high concentration of Cl ions. Souza et al. (2019) for example reported inactivation of this pathogen within 1 min and almost 40% degradation of the by-products after 120 min of electrolytic treatment (Souza et al., 2019). Chlorine radicals (Cl, Cl2−•) formed on the surface of WO3 photo-anode, have also been shown to have a high bacteria-killing power from experiments that assessed the inactivation of B. subtilis and E. coli in a NaCl electrolyte solution (Juodkazytė et al., 2020; Koo et al., 2019).

The important role of the reactive chlorine species in visible light-irradiated PEC experiments was identified by Koo et al. (2019) by comparing inactivation pathogen data in experiments carried out in the presence and in the absence of chlorine (Koo et al., 2019). The relative weight of OH and RHS in the PEC generation experiments reported in their work, revealed that the most important oxidant in the pathogen inactivation experiments corresponds to RHS since in the presence of chlorine ions, OH radical species are readily scavenged by Cl anions, which in turn results in the production of active chlorine. (Koo et al., 2019).

The PEC treatment of virus contaminated solutions in the presence of 1.0 mM Br, shows a high virucidal efficiency, enabling complete inactivation of a ∼1000 median tissue culture infectious dose of adenovirus population within 31.7 s. The highly efficient virucidal performance of PEC-Br treatments has been attributed to the high production of ROS and additional halogen viricide chemicals such as active bromide resulting from the PEC indirect-halide oxidation, as well as the direct inactivation at the photo-anode surface (Li et al., 2014).

6.1.2. Indirect oxidation (inactivation) of pathogens using DSA or BDD anodes

When electrochemical oxidation processes and UV light are not considered to be simultaneously operating at the electrode-solution interphase, and rather complementing each other’s effect in a synergistic way, indirect disinfection processes using highly electro-catalytic and non-photoactive electrodes have been shown to be effective approaches. Under this perspective, it must be noted that UV irradiation represents a highly effective disinfection method that, although costly, can be combined with other disinfection procedures such as electrochemical oxidation (Cotillas et al., 2016a; Haaken et al., 2013; Martín de Vidales et al., 2016; Singla et al., 2020). The electrodes employed in this type of processes are usually the DSA, MMO or BDD electrodes (Panizza and Cerisola, 2005, 2009). The electrode material is a decisive criterion for a moderate energy consumption of UV coupled to an electrochemical oxidation reactor. For instance, a UV-electrochemical oxidation reactor operating with MMO electrodes requires 2–6 times lower electric charge input and shows a 5–10 times lower energy consumption compared to the average consumption of BDD electrodes (Haaken et al., 2013) and in contrast to BDD electrodes, no chlorite, chlorate and perchlorate were detected on processes using MMO electrodes. The unwanted reactivation of reversibly UV damaged E. coli, for example, is completely prevented at a concentration of electrogenerated total oxidants of 0.4–0.5 mg/L (Haaken et al, 2013, 2014). Furthermore, the problem of biofilm covering UV lamps in treating real wastewater photo-reactors, can be inhibited by means of the electrochemical generation of oxidants (Haaken et al., 2014). In E. coli contaminated synthetic urine for example, a MMO anode coupled with UV irradiation constitutes a good option for pathogen inactivation (complete removal after 30 min of treatment vs. 45 min using single electrochemical oxidation) in which full disinfection of wastewater depended not only on the production of disinfectant species but also on the concentration of chlorides added and on the concentration of reduced nitrogen species in solution (Singla et al., 2020). Under specific electrolyte composition conditions, MMO anodes coupled to UV irradiation also promotes the indirect oxidation of the pathogens by means of the activation of sulfite to generate persulphate. In these processes, the complete inactivation of 5.4-log of E. coli is achieved after 30 min of treatment (Chen et al., 2021).

It is important to point out that UV irradiation contributes to minimize the concentration of available hypochlorite in the electrochemical reactor and that it also has a positive effect on the prevention of the formation of undesirable and hazardous chlorate and perchlorate by-products (Cotillas et al., 2016a). In this regard, commercial reactors such as DiaCell® cell, equipped with a BDD anode, SS cathode and a UV irradiation source, has been successfully used for the disinfection of an E. coli contaminated real secondary effluent. This study revealed an improvement of four times the inactivation rate when compared to a single electrolysis approach in which the main inactivation mechanism consisted on the indirect oxidation in the bulk solution by means of photo-activated species derived from active chlorine (Martín de Vidales et al., 2016).

6.2. Fundamentals of photo-electrocoagulation

Photo-assisted electrocoagulation in another indirect disinfection process that has attracted the attention of several research groups around the world. As depicted in Fig. 3, in electrocoagulation (EC) processes, electrical current through the cell causes not only the electrochemical dissolution of the anode, but also the formation of a coagulant which in turn separates the contaminant from the solution (Çalışkan et al., 2020). In EC reactors Mn+ is anodically released on-site and OH ions in solution produce metal monomeric and polymeric hydroxide complex species (e.g. M(OH)n) which act as coagulant agents that catch and destabilize colloidal species in wastewater (Çalışkan et al., 2020). Additionally, the H2 gas bubbles generated at the cathode cause the flotation of pollutants and, consequently, an electro-flotation phenomenon can take place (Bruguera-Casamada et al., 2019). With the integration of a UV energy source, photo-electrocoagulation processes emerge as an integrated approach in which the electro-dissolution of Fe or Al anodes is used to generate coagulant particles that not only remove suspended solids, colloidal material, pathogens as well as other dissolved solids in contaminated water (Eq. (24) – (25)), but simultaneously promotes the formation of disinfecting OH and chlorine radicals by means of UV or visible radiation (Eq. (26) – (27)) (Cotillas et al, 2014a, 2014b; Garcia-Segura and Brillas, 2017).

Fe+2H2OFe(OH)2(S)+H2 (24)
Al+3H2OAl(OH)3(S)+32H2 (25)
ClO+hvO+Cl (26)
O+H2OOH+OH (27)

6.2.1. Pathogen inactivation or removal using photo-electrocoagulation

Photo-electrocoagulation is an interesting approach that has been shown to be an attractive alternative for the treatment of actual wastewater from secondary settles using either Al or Fe anodes and SS cathode (Cotillas et al, 2014a, 2014b). The photo-assisted process allowed to obtain a substantial increase in the production of Fe coagulants with the related decrease in turbidity at low current intensities, when compared to the single EC approach. Furthermore, the incorporation of UV irradiation to the disinfection system results in a substantially smaller current density requirement (1.44 A/m2) for complete inactivation of E. Coli when compared to the non-illuminated process. The main disinfectant species formed during photo-electrocoagulation for both, Al and Fe anodes, are hypochlorite and chloramines. The difference is assumed to be due to the photo-induced production of OH and chlorine radicals that result from hypochlorite decomposition (Eq. (26) – (27)). In this regard, it is important to point out that the application of high current densities during the photo-electrocoagulation of urban wastewater samples reduces the process efficiency due to an increase in the solid’s concentration, which in turn induces a decrease in the UV transmission of solution (Cotillas et al, 2014a, 2014b). Despite the fact that both Al and Fe anodes are efficient for E. coli inactivation, it is also interesting to note that while the electrode consumption of the Fe is 1.7 times larger than that for an Al electrode (1 vs. 0.59 kg/m3), Al anodes need three times more energy than that required for Fe electrodes (17.4 vs. 5 kWh/m3) (Çalışkan et al., 2020).

Lalwani et al. (2019) on the other hand, studied the sequential two step electrocoagulation-photo-catalytic oxidation processes for the treatment of a pharmaceutical industry effluent in which a system using either Al or Fe electrodes, achieves complete elimination of a pre-existing microbial population of E. coli in a crude drug effluent (Lalwani et al., 2019).

Additional synergistic effects for the purpose of disinfection, have been observed by adding ozone to the photo-electrocoagulation treatment system (Barzegar et al., 2019). In this case, UV irradiation in the presence of O3 increases the photo-electrocoagulation process efficiency by means of additional free radicals which are produced either by direct photo-activation of O3 (Eq. (28) and (29)) or by the photo-decomposition of iron hydroxide species (see Eq. (33)) (Barzegar et al., 2019).

O3+UVO(D1)+O2 (28)
O(D1)+H2OOH+OH (29)

6.3. Fundamentals of cathodic processes

In addition to the pathogen inactivation processes promoted in the anodic side of a photo-assisted electrolytic process, there are also complementary disinfection events taking place in the cathodic region. The electrocatalytic reduction of dissolved oxygen via 2e at cathode surface for example, produces H2O2 in acidic medium according to Eq. (30) (Brillas, 2020; Brillas et al., 2009; Peralta-Hernández et al., 2006).

O2+2H++2eH2O2 (30)

For this purpose, electrodes made of carbonaceous materials such as carbon fibers, carbon felts and reticulated carbon vitreous are commonly used due to their high superficial area, high overpotential for H2 evolution and to their low catalytic activity for H2O2 reduction (Bañuelos et al., 2016; García-Rodríguez et al., 2016; Mousset and Dionysiou, 2020; Pérez et al., 2017a; Zárate-Guzmán et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2018). Furthermore, the performance of the carbonaceous cathodes towards H2O2 generation can be improved by the addition of PTFE and carbon black (Jiao et al., 2020; Pérez et al, 2017b, 2019; Zhang et al., 2020c; Zhao et al., 2019).

The electrochemical generation of H2O2 in the presence of Fe2+ results in the Fenton mixture which readily produces OH radicals (Eq. (31)). This electrochemical approach is commonly known as the electro-Fenton advanced oxidation process and due to its high oxidation power and efficiency, it has been intensively explored for different water treatment applications (Dirany et al., 2012; Fernández et al., 2018; García-Espinoza et al., 2019; Robles et al., 2020a; Sirés et al., 2014). The continuous OH production in this case, is favored through the concomitant cathodic reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ as shown in Eq. (32) (Deng et al., 2020; Thiam et al., 2020).

Fe2++H2O2OH+OH+Fe3+ (31)
Fe3++eFe2+ (32)

The performance of the electro-Fenton process can further be improved by irradiation with UV or visible energy from either a commercial lamp emitting UVA with λ = 315–400 nm, UVB with λ = 280–315 nm or UVC with λ = 100–280 nm or using natural sunlight in (Brillas, 2020; Brillas et al., 2000; Coria et al., 2018; Thiam et al., 2020). The radiation energy causes the photo-reduction shown in Eq. (33) that transforms the Fe3+ species at acidic pH into Fe2+, as well as the photolysis of some refractory intermediates. A typical example of this phenomenon is the photo-decarboxylation of stable complexes of linear carboxylic acids with Fe3+ (Eq. (34)) (Brillas, 2020; Coria et al., 2018; Thiam et al., 2020).

Fe(OH)2++hvFe2++OH (33)
Fe(OOCR)2++hvFe2++CO2+R (34)

Under high energy irradiation of UVC energy, additional photolysis events of organic intermediates as well as homolysis of H2O2 to produce OH radicals via Eq. (35) also occurs.

H2O2+hv2OH (35)

6.3.1. Reports of photo-assisted electrochemical reduction

The photo-assisted processes described are not only used to treat organic pollutants in water effluents but have also been explored for the development of disinfection technology. In this way, pathogen inactivation based on an electrochemical reduction processes has been tested as an alternative to improve the efficiency of solar disinfection, using a reticulated vitreous carbon cathode and a Ti/RuO2 anode (Jin et al, 2020a, 2020b). The preparatory anodization of the cathode allowed to duplicate the amount of electrogenerated H2O2 due to the addition oxygen-bearing functional groups on the electrode surface. Combining H2O2 electro-generation with sunlight shortened the E. coli disinfection time from 150 to 120 min (Jin et al., 2020a). It is also interesting to note that the authors of this study found that the increase in the applied current density resulted in larger amounts of electrochemically produced H2O2 which surprisingly had no effect on the disinfection (Jin et al., 2020b). Pathogen inactivation by the photo-electrochemical reduction is therefore carried out by the indirect action of photons and electrochemically produced ROS such as H2O2 and singlet oxygen species (Jin et al., 2020b).

6.3.2. Reports of photo-assisted electro-Fenton

The indirect oxidation by the Fenton reaction assisted by UV irradiation has also been tested for disinfection purposes. (Peralta-Hernández and Godínez, 2014) for example, used a tubular photo-reactor where bare and TiO2-covered carbon cloths were used as cathode and anode respectively. Using electrochemically produced H2O2 and Fe2+ ions previously dispersed on a cation exchange membrane, they achieved full inactivation of E. coli after 10 min of treatment (Peralta-Hernández and Godínez, 2014). The photo-electro Fenton process is also efficient for the elimination of the antibiotic activity of antibiotics against microorganisms such has S. aureus and E. coli, in a reactor constructed with a gas diffusion electrode as cathode, a Ti/IrO2 or BDD as anode, UV irradiation and dissolved Fe2+ (Valero et al., 2017; Vidal et al., 2019; Villegas-Guzman et al., 2017). Compared with electro-Fenton, the H2O2 accumulation observed in photo-electro Fenton processes is significantly smaller. This observation can be explained by considering (i) the photo-decomposition of H2O2 during the photo-electro Fenton process (Eq. (35)) and (ii) the light promoted increase of the Fenton reaction (Eq. (31)), due to the reconversion of Fe3+ into Fe2+ (Eq. (32)) (Villegas-Guzman et al., 2017). In this way, the photo-electro Fenton process allows a more efficient elimination of antimicrobial activity when compared to other electrochemical processes such as the electrochemical oxidation and the electro-Fenton approach due to a synergistic effect between light and the Fenton mixture that noticeably increases the production of ROS (Bruguera-Casamada et al., 2019; Valero et al., 2017; Vidal et al., 2019).

It is also interesting to point out that photo-assisted EAOPs can be used as a first stage of treatment, aimed to increase the biodegradability of the pollutants before the biological process is applied. For example, Vidal et al. (2018) reported a study of the performance of a photo-electro Fenton process, using a carbon-PTFE air-diffusion electrode as cathode, a BDD anode and UV irradiation, followed by anaerobic biodigestion (Vidal et al., 2018). Using this combination, the antimicrobial activity for S. aureus revealed complete inactivation (Vidal et al., 2018). Furthermore, it was possible to observe that the integration of a biological system with a photo-electrochemical processes, allowed the removal of recalcitrant intermediate compounds which are commonly formed at the end of the first electrochemical treatment stage.

EC processes with Fe electrodes followed by UVA irradiated photo-electro-Fenton processes that employ an air-diffusion cathode and a BDD or DSA anode, have also been tested for the disinfection of wastewater (Bruguera-Casamada et al., 2019). In this type of processes, the bacteria were poorly removed by the flocs formed in EC but largely inactivated by the photo-electro Fenton process in which the BDD anode promotes pathogen inactivation at circumneutral pH by active chlorine and BDD(OH) radicals, whereas the DSA led to quick inactivation at pH 3.0 (Bruguera-Casamada et al., 2019).

As depicted in Fig. 4a, the indirect inactivation of pathogens can be carried out by photo-assisted EOPs such as photo-coagulation, photo-electro-Fenton and by electrogenerated ROS, RHS and sulphate radical species (letters G, H, I, J and K inf Fig. 4a). Such mechanism has been proved in the disinfection of contaminated water with E. coli, adenovirus, P. aeruginosa, bacillus species, M. aeruginosa and C. parapsilosis. It is therefore interesting to point out that the combination and the synergistic effect of direct, quasi-direct and indirect oxidation mechanisms have also been explored in the literature (see Fig. 4a, letters B, C, D and F) for the inactivation of microorganisms.

7. Economic aspects and scale-up of the photo-assisted EAOPs

The economic cost of photo-assisted EAOPs for water disinfection could be divided in the initial investment (which is mainly related to electrodes and lamps) and the operating costs, which are associated to energy requirements and electrode and parts replacement. Typical anode materials such as BDD and DSA are known to be expensive, but very stable, thus providing low replacement and maintenance costs. Semiconductor, carbonaceous materials, and metallic electrodes such as Al or Fe on the other hand, are affordable options for EAOPs but have the associated disadvantage of a higher replacement frequency. In terms of energy requirements for pathogen inactivation promoted by EAOPs, the specific electric energy (EEO) in kWh m−3 order−1, can be calculated using Eq. (36), where E is the cell voltage (V), Wlamp the power of the lamp (kW), I the current intensity (kA), t the operation time (h), V the volume (m3) and C0 and Cf the initial and final pathogen concentration after 1 order of magnitude removal (CFU mL−1), respectively (Herraiz-Carboné et al., 2020b).

EEO=(E I+Wlamp)tV LogC0Cf (36)

(Herraiz-Carboné et al., 2020b) reported that the electric energy consumption for UV assisted electrochemical oxidation using a BDD anode at the high applied current density of 50 A m−2, is slightly higher than that required for the UV disinfection process (0.395 vs. 0.389 kWh m−3 order−1). Nevertheless, the use of a MMO anode and BDD anode at the low current density of 5 A m−2, leads to lower electric energy requirements. In this way, photo-assisted EAOPs may successfully compete with other AOPs in terms of sustainability, for instance, photo-conductive diamond electrochemical oxidation shows the faster and more efficient performance in terms of energy consumption when compared to the same process when assisted by ultrasound and with the process itself at bench scale remediation plants (Fernández-Marchante et al., 2021a). To obtain the economic viability of the photo-assisted EAOPs for water disinfection however, it is important to consider the use of renewable energy sources and to elucidate the optimal operational conditions of such processes; thus allowing safe treated water produced under minimum energetic requirements.

Reports on photo-assisted EAOPs for water disinfection at pilot or real wastewater plant scale, are scarce in the literature. This not only reflects intellectual property and know-how considerations, but also the incipient nature of this approach. In any case however, the scale-up of EAOPs has been reported in some investigations. For example, Cotillas et al. (2020), recently reported wastewater reclamation in an integrated electro-disinfection-electrocoagulation process (Cotillas et al., 2020). Such approach, operates with a real secondary effluent and a flow rate of 50 L h−1; allowing complete E. coli depletion at current densities in the 5–10 A m−2 range. Otter et al. (2020) on the other hand, evaluated water supply systems operating with solar-driven electro-chlorination processes in rural regions (Otter et al., 2020). This technology manages to supply communities with safe water. Isidro et al. (2018) also evaluated a system integrated by coagulation-flocculation, lamellar sedimentation and filtration processes in a column unit at pilot scale. This process was followed by electrochemical disinfection using a commercial CabECO® cell reaching more than 4 log units of disinfection of highly faecal-polluted surface water (Isidro et al., 2018).

8. Future trends and perspectives

Since the high energetic consumption is one of the major drawbacks in electrochemical processes, it is important the development of renewable energy –driven photo-assisted EAOPs technologies to minimize the energetic cost and to be potentially implemented in remote locations (Ganiyu et al., 2020; Ganiyu and Martínez-Huitle, 2020). Among the different approaches under study, the conversion of solar energy through the use of photo-voltaic cells (Ganiyu et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2016), wind energy by wind turbines (Fernández-Marchante et al., 2021b; Malek et al., 2016) and the use microbial fuel cells (Hou et al., 2020; Jiménez González et al., 2020) represent attractive directions for the development of technologies to reduce the environmental problems associated with fossil fuels.

On the other hand, it is also imperative the develop new electrode materials. Sub-stoichiometric titanium oxides (TinO2n-1, 4 ≤ n ≤ 10, also known as Magneli phases) for example, are ceramic and promising anode materials for the disinfection and treatment of water (Becerril-Estrada et al., 2020; Ganiyu et al., 2016; Ouarda et al., 2020). Particularly, Ti4O7 materials are attractive electrodes due to their high electrical conductivity (∼1000 S cm−1), chemical stability, high oxygen evolution potential (2.0–2.5 V vs. SHE) and lower manufacturing cost when compared to non-active anodes such as BDD (Silva Barni et al., 2020; Trellu et al., 2020). The degradation pathway using Ti4O7 anodes is associated by “quasi-free” M(OH) electrogenerated radicals (Olvera-Vargas et al., 2018). To our knowledge, there are not studies on the evaluation of Ti4O7 as an anode material in a photo-assisted EAOPs for water disinfection purposes. Biochar also constitute excellent materials for the promotion of H2O2 by means of the reduction of dissolved oxygen. These materials are obtained by spend biomass sources such as animal feedings (Y. Wang et al., 2019), agricultural or woody materials (Deng et al., 2019), food wastes (Tovar et al., 2019) and sewage sludge (Huang et al., 2020; Mian and Liu, 2019) among others (Do Minh et al., 2020). Recent studies of biochar materials focuses on their use as simultaneous adsorbents and 3D-cathodes where adsorption, disinfection and pollutants degradation occur followed by the regeneration of the electrode material surface (Bañuelos et al., 2015; Mesones et al., 2020; Robles et al., 2020b). The integration of such materials in photo-assisted EAOPs for the inactivation of microorganisms by indirect oxidation will be a relevant topic of research and technology development in upcoming years.

Moreover, since most of the studies of the photo-assisted EAOPs have focused on the inactivation of E. coli, it is necessary to extend the pathogen inactivation spectrum of these technologies by evaluating other microorganisms such as helminth eggs, antibiotic-resistant bacteria and viruses. It is important to increase the number of studies that focus on the inactivation of the particularly resistant helminth eggs since around 2.5 billion people worldwide are infected with helminths (Jiménez et al., 2016). In view of the membrane resistant character of these pathogens, recent studies have shown promising results by approaching the problem through AOPs (Morales-Pérez et al., 2016; Robles et al., 2020a). Although research has also been carried out on the inactivation of some of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, the validation of the photo-assisted EAOPs on them (E. coli, K. pneumoniae. S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, Nontyphoidal salmonella, Shigella species and N. gonorrhoeae) is important since the WHO has classified bacterial resistance as one of the greatest threats to public health in the 21st century (World Health Organization, 2014).

The recent global pandemic coronavirus disease (COVID-19) for instance, has triggered a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Even though the known route of transmission is due to direct contact or via respiratory droplets, recent studies have reported that SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid has been found in WWTP samples (La Rosa et al., 2020; Mandal et al., 2020). In fact, sodium hypochlorite treatment and the current disinfection guideline outlined by the WHO might not secure a complete removal of SARS-CoV-2 in medical wastewater septic tanks (Zhang et al., 2020a,b,c,d,e). In the context of a fast-changing understanding of the COVID-19 disease and the SARS-CoV-2 virus, it is essential to develop effective water disinfection processes that guarantee the complete inactivation of the virus. Since photo-assisted EAOPs have been successfully demonstrated as affective alternative for the inactivation of a variety viruses (Li et al., 2014), such processes stand out as a potentially important approach for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 contaminated wastewater.

Furthermore, efforts need to focus on the development of mature technologies to evolve proof of concept studies into technology packages ready for commercialization (Lacasa et al., 2019). To achieve that point, it is mandatory to carry out studies in scenarios with the consideration and complications associated to real-water matrix effects, overcoming limitations of synthetic laboratory solutions which, on the one hand, typically use concentrations of pollutants that are higher than those found in real wastewater; and which are also characterized by low electric conductivity values than those commonly employed in laboratory assays (e.g., 0.05 M Na2SO4) (Garcia-Segura et al., 2020). Since the electric conductivity defines for the most part the applied current for a given potential, the increase of the conductivity decreases the energetic consumption of the processes (Garcia-Segura et al., 2018). Other constituents of the real-wastewater which are necessary to evaluate in photo-assisted EAOPs are the dissolved organic matter (DOM), the NOM and NO3. The DOM is usually ignored in lab-scale experiments resulting in high efficacies due to the lack of the scavenger-effect of the DOM (Giannakis et al., 2021). The NOM consist of humic substances such as humic acid and fulvic acid, and they can have both inhibitory and synergistic effects on the performance of AOPs. For instance, the NOM can act as photosensitizer improving the yields of the UV/H2O2 process (Sharma et al., 2015), and they can introduce a inhibitory effect on the efficiency of the electrochemical oxidation process (Lebik-Elhadi et al., 2018). The NO3 on the other hand, can absorb UV irradiation acting as an inner filter to hinder light transmission through the aqueous solution (Yang et al., 2019). Finally, it has been reported that NO3 could generate OH radicals in aquatic media under UV irradiation, thus increasing the efficiency of the AOPs (Spiliotopoulou et al., 2015). As it can be noted, the effect of these substances on the AOPs is still not clear and further studies on the subject are needed. Future studies can also help to fill the herein pointed-out gaps, thus facilitating the application of photo-assisted EAOPs for water disinfection purposes in real scenarios.

9. Conclusions

Photo-assisted EAOPs have emerged as effective methods to achieve the disinfection of water, since they combine the electro-generation of reactive species at electrodes and the photolytic production of radicals. This review presented an overview of the oxidation mechanisms by photo-assisted EAOPs for water disinfection, in which the place where the pathogen’s inactivation occurs, defines to a good extent the oxidation mechanism. The quasi-direct oxidation by OH was found as the most studied mechanism of pathogen inactivation mostly generated by photo-electrocatalysis using photo-anodes, by photo-assisted electrochemical oxidation using DSA and BDD anodes and by photo-electro-Fenton processes. The presence of halides in solution results in the photo-electro-generation of RHS, which in turn, promotes the indirect oxidation of pathogens.

Photo-assisted indirect oxidation processes like electrocoagulation are also efficient processes for microorganism inactivation. Photo-assisted electrogenerated persulphate process for water disinfection is nowadays scarcely reported and an interesting option to be explored in subsequent years.

Among the microorganisms that have been explored, E. coli is by far the most studied pathogen and therefore, future efforts should focus on the evaluation of other antibiotic-resistant bacteria as well as resistant pathogens like helminth eggs and highly toxic and health-threaten agents such as viruses.

UV irradiation on the other hand, is the most popular photon’s source in photo-assisted EAOPs studies but, it is important for the development of cost optimized disinfection processes that, new materials, arrangements and methods are explored in the future in order to take advantages of solar energy.

Aiming to achieve the deployment of these processes at pilot and full-scale, the understanding of the pathogen inactivation mechanism, the evaluation of their performance using real-wastewater matrixes, the optimization of the electrochemical reactors’ configuration as well as renewable energy–driven technologies are needed.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the Mexican Council for Science and Technology; CONACYT (Grant No. PENTA2019-1-303758 and CB-2016-01-285309), the Ministry for Education, Science, Technology and Innovation of CDMX (SECTEI/259/2019) and to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant No. OPP1156657), for their financial support of this work.

Handling Editor: Derek Muir

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129957.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (29.3KB, docx)

References

  1. Adhikari S., Eswar N.K.R., Sangita S., Sarkar D., Madras G. Investigation of nano Ag-decorated SiC particles for photoelectrocatalytic dye degradation and bacterial inactivation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem. 2018;357:118–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.02.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amadelli R., De Battisti A., Girenko D.V., Kovalyov S.V., Velichenko A.B. Electrochemical oxidation of trans-3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid at PbO2 electrodes: direct electrolysis and ozone mediated reactions compared. Electrochim. Acta. 2000;46:341–347. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00590-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. An T., Sun H., Li G., Zhao H., Wong P.K. Differences in photoelectrocatalytic inactivation processes between E. coli and its isogenic single gene knockoff mutants: destruction of membrane framework or associated proteins? Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016;188:360–366. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.02.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anfruns-Estrada E., Bruguera-Casamada C., Salvadó H., Brillas E., Sirés I., Araujo R.M. Inactivation of microbiota from urban wastewater by single and sequential electrocoagulation and electro-Fenton treatments. Water Res. 2017;126:450–459. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.09.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Anglada A., Urtiaga A., Ortiz I. Pilot scale performance of the electro-oxidation of landfill leachate at boron-doped diamond anodes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009;43:2035–2040. doi: 10.1021/es802748c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bañuelos J.A., García-Rodríguez O., El-Ghenymy A., Rodríguez-Valadez F.J., Godínez L.A., Brillas E. Advanced oxidation treatment of malachite green dye using a low cost carbon-felt air-diffusion cathode. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016;4:2066–2075. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2016.03.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bañuelos J.A., García-Rodríguez O., Rodríguez-Valadez F.J., Manríquez J., Bustos E., Rodríguez A., Godínez L.A. Cathodic polarization effect on the electro-Fenton regeneration of activated carbon. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2015;45:523–531. doi: 10.1007/s10800-015-0815-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barzegar G., Wu J., Ghanbari F. Enhanced treatment of greywater using electrocoagulation/ozonation: investigation of process parameters. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 2019;121:125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.10.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Becerril-Estrada V., Robles I., Martínez-Sánchez C., Godínez L.A. Study of TiO2/Ti4O7 photo-anodes inserted in an activated carbon packed bed cathode: towards the development of 3D-type photo-electro-Fenton reactors for water treatment. Electrochim. Acta. 2020;340 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.135972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Boucher H.W., Corey G.R. Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008;46 doi: 10.1086/533590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brillas E. A review on the photoelectro-Fenton process as efficient electrochemical advanced oxidation for wastewater remediation. Treatment with UV light, sunlight, and coupling with conventional and other photo-assisted advanced technologies. Chemosphere. 2020;250 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brillas E., Calpe J.C., Casado J. Mineralization of 2,4-D by advanced electrochemical oxidation processes. Water Res. 2000;34:2253–2262. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00396-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brillas E., Martínez-Huitle C.A. Decontamination of wastewaters containing synthetic organic dyes by electrochemical methods. An updated review. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015;166–167:603–643. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brillas E., Sirés I., Oturan M.A. Electro-fenton process and related electrochemical technologies based on fenton’s reaction chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2009;109:6570–6631. doi: 10.1021/cr900136g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brugnera M.F., Miyata M., Fujimura Leite C.Q., Zanoni M.V.B. Silver ion release from electrodes of nanotubes of TiO2 impregnated with Ag nanoparticles applied in photoelectrocatalytic disinfection. J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem. 2014;278:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.12.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brugnera M.F., Miyata M., Zocolo G.J., Fujimura Leite C.Q., Boldrin Zanoni M.V. A photoelectrocatalytic process that disinfects water contaminated with Mycobacterium kansasii and Mycobacterium avium. Water Res. 2013;47:6596–6605. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brugnera M.F., Miyata M., Zocolo G.J., Leite C.Q.F., Zanoni M.V.B. Inactivation and disposal of by-products from Mycobacterium smegmatis by photoelectrocatalytic oxidation using Ti/TiO2-Ag nanotube electrodes. Electrochim. Acta. 2012;85:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.08.116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bruguera-Casamada C., Araujo R.M., Brillas E., Sirés I. Advantages of electro-Fenton over electrocoagulation for disinfection of dairy wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2019;376 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bruguera-Casamada C., Sirés I., Brillas E., Araujo R.M. Effect of electrogenerated hydroxyl radicals, active chlorine and organic matter on the electrochemical inactivation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa using BDD and dimensionally stable anodes. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2017;178:224–231. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.01.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bruguera-Casamada C., Sirés I., Prieto M.J., Brillas E., Araujo R.M. The ability of electrochemical oxidation with a BDD anode to inactivate Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria in low conductivity sulfate medium. Chemosphere. 2016;163:516–524. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bustillo-Lecompte C.F., Ghafoori S., Mehrvar M. Photochemical degradation of an actual slaughterhouse wastewater by continuous UV/H2O2 photoreactor with recycle. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016;4:719–732. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2015.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Çalışkan Y., Öztürk H., Bektaş N., Yatmaz H.C. UVA enhanced electrocoagulation comparing Al and Fe electrodes for reclamation of greywater. Separ. Sci. Technol. 2020:1–11. doi: 10.1080/01496395.2020.1786701. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Campos S., Salazar R., Arancibia-Miranda N., Rubio M.A., Aranda M., García A., Sepúlveda P., Espinoza L.C. Nafcillin degradation by heterogeneous electro-Fenton process using Fe, Cu and Fe/Cu nanoparticles. Chemosphere. 2020;247 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Candia-Onfray C., Espinoza N., Sabino da Silva E.B., Toledo-Neira C., Espinoza L.C., Santander R., García V., Salazar R. Treatment of winery wastewater by anodic oxidation using BDD electrode. Chemosphere. 2018;206:709–717. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cano A., Barrera C., Cotillas S., Llanos J., Cañizares P., Rodrigo M.A. Use of DiaCell modules for the electro-disinfection of secondary-treated wastewater with diamond anodes. Chem. Eng. J. 2016;306:433–440. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Carré E., Pérot J., Jauzein V., Lopez-Ferber M. Impact of suspended particles on UV disinfection of activated-sludge effluent with the aim of reclamation. J. Water Process Eng. 2018;22:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.01.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chang R., Pandey P., Li Y., Venkitasamy C., Chen Z., Gallardo R., Weimer B., Jay-Russell M. Assessment of gaseous ozone treatment on Salmonella Typhimurium and Escherichia coli O157:H7 reductions in poultry litter. Waste Manag. 2020;117:42–47. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen L., Xue Y., Luo T., Wu F., Alshawabkeh A.N. Electrolysis-assisted UV/sulfite oxidation for water treatment with automatic adjustments of solution pH and dissolved oxygen. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;403 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen P.F., Zhang R.J., Huang S. Bin, Shao J.H., Cui B., Du Z.L., Xue L., Zhou N., Hou B., Lin C. UV dose effects on the revival characteristics of microorganisms in darkness after UV disinfection: evidence from a pilot study. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;713 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cheswick R., Moore G., Nocker A., Hassard F., Jefferson B., Jarvis P. Chlorine disinfection of drinking water assessed by flow cytometry: new insights. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020;19 doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.101032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Cho K., Lee S., Kim H., Kim H.E., Son A., Kim E. ju, Li M., Qiang Z., Hong S.W. Effects of reactive oxidants generation and capacitance on photoelectrochemical water disinfection with self-doped titanium dioxide nanotube arrays. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019;257 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117910. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Cho M., Cates E.L., Kim J.H. Inactivation and surface interactions of MS-2 bacteriophage in a TiO2 photoelectrocatalytic reactor. Water Res. 2011;45:2104–2110. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Comninellis C. Electrocatalysis in the electrochemical conversion/combustion of organic pollutants for waste water treatment. Electrochim. Acta. 1994;39:1857–1862. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(94)85175-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Comninellis C., Kapalka A., Malato S., Parsons S.A., Poulios I., Mantzavinos D. Advanced oxidation processes for water treatment: advances and trends for R&D. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2008;83:769–776. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1873. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Comninellis C., Nerini A. Anodic oxidation of phenol in the presence of NaCl for wastewater treatment. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1995;25:23–28. doi: 10.1007/BF00251260. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Coria G., Pérez T., Sirés I., Brillas E., Nava J.L. Abatement of the antibiotic levofloxacin in a solar photoelectro-Fenton flow plant: modeling the dissolved organic carbon concentration-time relationship. Chemosphere. 2018;198:174–181. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Corona-Bautista M., Picos-Benitez R., Villaseñor-Basulto D., Bandala E., Peralta-Hernández J.M. Chemosphere in press; 2021. Discoloration of Azo Dye Brown HT Using Different Advanced Oxidation Processes. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Cotillas S., Cañizares P., Martín De Vidales M.J., Sáez C., Rodrigo M.A., Llanos J. Electrocoagulation-UV irradiation process for urban wastewater reuse. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2014;41:133–138. doi: 10.3303/CET1441023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Cotillas S., de Vidales M.J.M., Llanos J., Sáez C., Cañizares P., Rodrigo M.A. Electrolytic and electro-irradiated processes with diamond anodes for the oxidation of persistent pollutants and disinfection of urban treated wastewater. J. Hazard Mater. 2016;319:93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.01.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Cotillas S., Lacasa E., Sáez C., Cañizares P., Rodrigo M.A. Disinfection of urine by conductive-diamond electrochemical oxidation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018;229:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Cotillas S., Llanos J., Castro-Ríos K., Taborda-Ocampo G., Rodrigo M.A., Cañizares P. Synergistic integration of sonochemical and electrochemical disinfection with DSA anodes. Chemosphere. 2016;163:562–568. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Cotillas S., Llanos J., Miranda O.G., Díaz-Trujillo G.C., Cañizares P., Rodrigo M.A. Coupling UV irradiation and electrocoagulation for reclamation of urban wastewater. Electrochim. Acta. 2014;140:396–403. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Cotillas S., Llanos J., Moraleda I., Cañizares P., Rodrigo M.A. Scaling-up an integrated electrodisinfection-electrocoagulation process for wastewater reclamation. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;380 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122415. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Cruz M.C., Romero L.C., Vicente M.S., Rajal V.B. Statistical approaches to understanding the impact of matrix composition on the disinfection of water by ultrafiltration. Chem. Eng. J. 2017;316:305–314. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.01.081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Daghrir R., Drogui P., Delegan N., El Khakani M.A. Removal of chlortetracycline from spiked municipal wastewater using a photoelectrocatalytic process operated under sunlight irradiations. Sci. Total Environ. 2014;466–467:300–305. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Daghrir R., Drogui P., El Khakani M.A. Photoelectrocatalytic oxidation of chlortetracycline using Ti/TiO 2 photo-anode with simultaneous H2O2 production. Electrochim. Acta. 2013;87:18–31. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.09.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. de Moura D.C., do Nascimento Brito C., Quiroz M.A., Pergher S.B.C., Martinez-Huitle C.A. Cl-mediated electrochemical oxidation for treating an effluent using platinum and diamond anodes. J. Water Process Eng. 2015;8:e31–e36. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.11.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. de Vidales M.J.M., Sáez C., Pérez J.F., Cotillas S., Llanos J., Cañizares P., Rodrigo M.A. Irradiation-assisted electrochemical processes for the removal of persistent organic pollutants from wastewater. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2015;45:799–808. doi: 10.1007/s10800-015-0825-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Deng F., Li S., Cao Y., Fang M.A., Qu J., Chen Z., Qiu S. A dual-cathode pulsed current electro-Fenton system: improvement for H2O2 accumulation and Fe3+ reduction. J. Power Sources. 2020;466 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228342. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Deng F., Olvera-Vargas H., Garcia-Rodriguez O., Zhu Y., Jiang J., Qiu S., Yang J. Waste-wood-derived biochar cathode and its application in electro-Fenton for sulfathiazole treatment at alkaline pH with pyrophosphate electrolyte. J. Hazard Mater. 2019;377:249–258. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Dirany A., Sirés I., Oturan N., Özcan A., Oturan M.A. Electrochemical treatment of the antibiotic sulfachloropyridazine: kinetics, reaction pathways, and toxicity evolution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;46:4074–4082. doi: 10.1021/es204621q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Do Minh T., Song J., Deb A., Cha L., Srivastava V., Sillanpää M. Biochar based catalysts for the abatement of emerging pollutants: a review. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;394 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124856. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Domínguez-Espíndola R.B., Bruguera-Casamada C., Silva-Martínez S., Araujo R.M., Brillas E., Sirés I. Photoelectrocatalytic inactivation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa using an Ag-decorated TiO2 photoanode. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2019;208:83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Domínguez-Espíndola R.B., Varia J.C., Álvarez-Gallegos A., Ortiz-Hernández M.L., Peña-Camacho J.L., Silva-Martínez S. Photoelectrocatalytic inactivation of fecal coliform bacteria in urban wastewater using nanoparticulated films of TiO2 and TiO2/Ag. Environ. Technol. 2017;38:606–614. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2016.1205148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Droguett C., Salazar R., Brillas E., Sirés I., Carlesi C., Marco J.F., Thiam A. Treatment of antibiotic cephalexin by heterogeneous electrochemical Fenton-based processes using chalcopyrite as sustainable catalyst. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;740 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Drogui P., Daghrir R. Chlorine for water disinfection: properties, applications and health effects. 2015. 1-32. [DOI]
  57. Egerton T.A. Does photoelectrocatalysis by TiO2 work? J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2011;86:1024–1031. doi: 10.1002/jctb.2616. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. El-Ghzizel S., Zeggar H., Tahaikt M., Tiyal F., Elmidaoui A., Taky M. Nanofiltration process combined with electrochemical disinfection for drinking water production: feasibility study and optimization. J. Water Process Eng. 2020;36 doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101225. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Errampalli D. Postharvest Decay: Control Strategies. 2014. Penicillium expansum (blue mold) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Eswar N.K.R., Gupta R., Ramamurthy P.C., Madras G. Influence of copper oxide grown on various conducting substrates towards improved performance for photoelectrocatalytic bacterial inactivation. Mol. Catal. 2018;451:161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.mcat.2017.12.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Eswar N.K.R., Singh S.A., Madras G. Photoconductive network structured copper oxide for simultaneous photoelectrocatalytic degradation of antibiotic (tetracycline) and bacteria (E. coli) Chem. Eng. J. 2018;332:757–774. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Fernández-Marchante C.M., Souza F.L., Millán M., Lobato J., Rodrigo M.A. Does intensification with UV light and US improve the sustainability of electrolytic waste treatment processes? J. Environ. Manag. 2021;279 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Fernández-Marchante C.M., Souza F.L., Millán M., Lobato J., Rodrigo M.A. Improving sustainability of electrolytic wastewater treatment processes by green powering. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;754 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Fernández D., Robles I., Rodríguez-Valadez F.J., Godínez L.A. Novel arrangement for an electro-Fenton reactor that does not require addition of iron, acid and a final neutralization stage. Towards the development of a cost-effective technology for the treatment of wastewater. Chemosphere. 2018;199:251–255. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Fraga L.E., Anderson M.A., Beatriz M.L.P.M.A., Paschoal F.M.M., Romão L.P., Zanoni M.V.B. Evaluation of the photoelectrocatalytic method for oxidizing chloride and simultaneous removal of microcystin toxins in surface waters. Electrochim. Acta. 2009;54:2069–2076. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.08.060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Frontistis Z., Antonopoulou M., Venieri D., Konstantinou I., Mantzavinos D. Boron-doped diamond oxidation of amoxicillin pharmaceutical formulation: statistical evaluation of operating parameters, reaction pathways and antibacterial activity. J. Environ. Manag. 2017;195:100–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Fujishima A., Zhang X. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis: present situation and future approaches. Compt. Rendus Chem. 2006;9:750–760. doi: 10.1016/j.crci.2005.02.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Gallandat K., Kolus R.C., Julian T.R., Lantagne D.S. A systematic review of chlorine-based surface disinfection efficacy to inform recommendations for low-resource outbreak settings. Am. J. Infect. Contr. 2021;49(1):90–103. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Ganiyu S.O., Brito L.R.D., De Araújo Costa E.C.T., Dos Santos E.V., Martínez-Huitle C.A. Solar photovoltaic-battery system as a green energy for driven electrochemical wastewater treatment technologies: application to elimination of Brilliant Blue FCF dye solution. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019;7 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2019.102924. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Ganiyu S.O., Martínez-Huitle C.A. The use of renewable energies driving electrochemical technologies for environmental applications. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020;22:211–220. doi: 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.07.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Ganiyu S.O., Martínez-Huitle C.A., Rodrigo M.A. Renewable energies driven electrochemical wastewater/soil decontamination technologies: a critical review of fundamental concepts and applications. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020;270 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118857. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Ganiyu S.O., Oturan N., Raffy S., Cretin M., Esmilaire R., van Hullebusch E., Esposito G., Oturan M.A. Sub-stoichiometric titanium oxide (Ti4O7) as a suitable ceramic anode for electrooxidation of organic pollutants: a case study of kinetics, mineralization and toxicity assessment of amoxicillin. Water Res. 2016;106:171–182. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. García-Espinoza J.D., Mijaylova-Nacheva P., Avilés-Flores M. Electrochemical carbamazepine degradation: effect of the generated active chlorine, transformation pathways and toxicity. Chemosphere. 2018;192:142–151. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. García-Espinoza J.D., Mijaylova Nacheva P. Effect of electrolytes on the simultaneous electrochemical oxidation of sulfamethoxazole, propranolol and carbamazepine: behaviors, by-products and acute toxicity. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019;26:6855–6867. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-4020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. García-Espinoza J.D., Robles I., Gil V., Becerril-Bravo E., Barrios J.A., Godínez L.A. Electrochemical degradation of triclosan in aqueous solution. A study of the performance of an electro-Fenton reactor. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019;7 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. García-Espinoza J.D., Zolfaghari M., Mijaylova Nacheva P. Synergistic effect between ultraviolet irradiation and electrochemical oxidation for removal of humic acids and pharmaceuticals. Water Environ. J. 2020;34:232–246. doi: 10.1111/wej.12456. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. García-Fernández I., Miralles-Cuevas S., Oller I., Malato S., Fernández-Ibáñez P., Polo-López M.I. Inactivation of E. coli and E. faecalis by solar photo-Fenton with EDDS complex at neutral pH in municipal wastewater effluents. J. Hazard Mater. 2019:85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.07.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. García-Rodríguez O., Bañuelos J.A., El-Ghenymy A., Godínez L.A., Brillas E., Rodríguez-Valadez F.J. Use of a carbon felt-iron oxide air-diffusion cathode for the mineralization of Malachite Green dye by heterogeneous electro-Fenton and UVA photoelectro-Fenton processes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016;767:40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.01.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Garcia-Segura S., Brillas E. Applied photoelectrocatalysis on the degradation of organic pollutants in wastewaters. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2017;31:1–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2017.01.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Garcia-Segura S., Nienhauser A.B., Fajardo A.S., Bansal R., Coonrod C.L., Fortner J.D., Marcos-Hernández M., Rogers T., Villagran D., Wong M.S., Westerhoff P. Disparities between experimental and environmental conditions: research steps toward making electrochemical water treatment a reality. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020;22:9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Garcia-Segura S., Ocon J.D., Chong M.N. Electrochemical oxidation remediation of real wastewater effluents — a review. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 2018;113:48–67. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2017.09.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Giannakis S., Lin K.Y.A., Ghanbari F. A review of the recent advances on the treatment of industrial wastewaters by Sulfate Radical-based Advanced Oxidation Processes (SR-AOPs) Chem. Eng. J. 2021;406 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127083. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Girgin Ersoy Z., Barisci S., Dinc O. Mechanisms of the Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis inactivation by ozone. LWT (Lebensm.-Wiss. & Technol.) 2019;100:306–313. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.10.095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Goikhman Y., Drori Y., Friedman N., Sherbany H., Keller N., Mendelson E., Pando R., Mandelboim M. Adenovirus load correlates with respiratory disease severity among hospitalized pediatric patients. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;97:145–150. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Grebel J.E., Pignatello J.J., Mitch W.A. Effect of halide ions and carbonates on organic contaminant degradation by hydroxyl radical-based advanced oxidation processes in saline waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010;44:6822–6828. doi: 10.1021/es1010225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Groenen-Serrano K. Electrochemical Water and Wastewater Treatment. 2018. Indirect electrochemical oxidation using hydroxyl radical, active chlorine, and peroxodisulfate; pp. 133–164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Groenen-Serrano K., Weiss-Hortala E., Savall A., Spiteri P. Role of hydroxyl radicals during the competitive electrooxidation of organic compounds on a boron-doped diamond anode. Electrocatalysis. 2013;4:346–352. doi: 10.1007/s12678-013-0150-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Guan P., Prasher S.O., Afzal M.T., George S., Ronholm J., Dhiman J., Patel R.M. Removal of Escherichia coli from lake water in a biochar-amended biosand filtering system. Ecol. Eng. 2020;150 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105819. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  89. Guitaya L., Drogui P., Blais J.F. In situ reactive oxygen species production for tertiary wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015;22:7025–7036. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3907-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Guo M.T., Kong C. Antibiotic resistant bacteria survived from UV disinfection: safety concerns on genes dissemination. Chemosphere. 2019;224:827–832. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Gupta R., Modak J.M., Madras G. Behavioral analysis of simultaneous photo-electro-catalytic degradation of antibiotic resistant: E. coli and antibiotic via ZnO/CuI: a kinetic and mechanistic study. Nanoscale Adv. 2019;1:3992–4008. doi: 10.1039/c9na00483a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Haaken D., Dittmar T., Schmalz V., Worch E. Disinfection of biologically treated wastewater and prevention of biofouling by UV/electrolysis hybrid technology: influence factors and limits for domestic wastewater reuse. Water Res. 2014;52:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.12.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Haaken D., Schmalz V., Dittmar T., Worch E. Limits of UV disinfection: UV/electrolysis hybrid technology as a promising alternative for direct reuse of biologically treated wastewater. J. Water Supply Res. Technol. - Aqua. 2013;62:442–451. doi: 10.2166/aqua.2013.134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  94. Hashim K.S., Ali S.S.M., AlRifaie J.K., Kot P., Shaw A., Al Khaddar R., Idowu I., Gkantou M. Escherichia coli inactivation using a hybrid ultrasonic–electrocoagulation reactor. Chemosphere. 2020;247 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. He C., Xiong Y., Chen J., Zha C., Zhu X. Photoelectrochemical performance of Ag-TiO2/ITO film and photoelectrocatalytic activity towards the oxidation of organic pollutants. J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem. 2003;157:71–79. doi: 10.1016/S1010-6030(03)00080-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. He H., Sun S., Gao J., Huang B., Zhao T., Deng H., Wang X., Pan X. Photoelectrocatalytic simultaneous removal of 17α-ethinylestradiol and E. coli using the anode of Ag and SnO2-Sb 3D-loaded TiO2 nanotube arrays. J. Hazard Mater. 2020;398 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Heeb M.B., Criquet J., Zimmermann-Steffens S.G., Von Gunten U. Oxidative treatment of bromide-containing waters: formation of bromine and its reactions with inorganic and organic compounds - a critical review. Water Res. 2014;48:15–42. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Hernández-Pimentel V.M., Regalado-González C., Nava-Morales G.M., Meas-Vong Y., Castañeda-Serrano M.P., García-Almendárez B.E. Effect of neutral electrolyzed water as antimicrobial intervention treatment of chicken meat and on trihalomethanes formation. J. Appl. Poultry Res. 2020;29:622–635. doi: 10.1016/j.japr.2020.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  99. Herraiz-Carboné M., Cotillas S., Lacasa E., Cañizares P., Rodrigo M.A., Sáez C. Removal of antibiotic resistant bacteria by electrolysis with diamond anodes: a pretreatment or a tertiary treatment? J. Water Process Eng. 2020;38 doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101557. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  100. Herraiz-Carboné M., Cotillas S., Lacasa E., Cañizares P., Rodrigo M.A., Sáez C. Enhancement of UV disinfection of urine matrixes by electrochemical oxidation. J. Hazard Mater. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Hou Y., Li X., Zhao Q., Chen G., Raston C.L. Role of hydroxyl radicals and mechanism of escherichia coli inactivation on Ag/AgBr/TiO2 nanotube array electrode under visible light irradiation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;46:4042–4050. doi: 10.1021/es204079d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Hou Y., Yuan G., Qin S., Tu L., Yan Y., Yu Z., Lin H., Chen Y., Zhu H., Song H., Wang S. Photocathode optimization and microbial community in the solar-illuminated bio-photoelectrochemical system for nitrofurazone degradation. Bioresour. Technol. 2020;302 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Huang Y.F., Huang Y.Y., Chiueh P. Te, Lo S.L. Heterogeneous Fenton oxidation of trichloroethylene catalyzed by sewage sludge biochar: experimental study and life cycle assessment. Chemosphere. 2020;249 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Isidro J., Llanos J., Sáez C., Lobato J., Cañizares P., Rodrigo M.A. Pre-disinfection columns to improve the performance of the direct electro-disinfection of highly faecal-polluted surface water. J. Environ. Manag. 2018;222:135–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Jhones dos Santos A., Sirés I., Brillas E. Removal of bisphenol A from acidic sulfate medium and urban wastewater using persulfate activated with electroregenerated Fe2+ Chemosphere. 2021;263 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Jiang Q., Yin H., Li G., Liu H., An T., Wong P.K., Zhao H. Elimination of antibiotic-resistance bacterium and its associated/dissociative blaTEM-1 and aac(3)-II antibiotic-resistance genes in aqueous system via photoelectrocatalytic process. Water Res. 2017;125:219–226. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Jiao Y., Ma L., Tian Y., Zhou M. A flow-through electro-Fenton process using modified activated carbon fiber cathode for orange II removal. Chemosphere. 2020;252 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Jiménez B., Maya C., Velásquez G., Torner F., Arambula F., Barrios J.A., Velasco M. Identification and quantification of pathogenic helminth eggs using a digital image system. Exp. Parasitol. 2016;166:164–172. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2016.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Jiménez González M.L., Benítez C.H., Juarez Z.A., Pérez E.Z., Coutiño V.Á.R., Robles I., Godínez L.A., Rodríguez-Valadez F.J. Study of the effect of activated carbon cathode configuration on the performance of a membrane-less microbial fuel cell. Catalysts. 2020;10 doi: 10.3390/catal10060619. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  110. Jin Y., Shi Y., Chen Z., Chen R., Chen X., Zheng X., Liu Y. Combination of sunlight with hydrogen peroxide generated at a modified reticulated vitreous carbon for drinking water disinfection. J. Clean. Prod. 2020;252 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119794. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  111. Jin Y., Shi Y., Chen Z., Chen R., Chen X., Zheng X., Liu Y., Ding R. Enhancement of solar water disinfection using H2O2 generated in situ by electrochemical reduction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020;267 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118730. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Juodkazytė J., Petrulevičienė M., Parvin M., Šebeka B., Savickaja I., Pakštas V., Naujokaitis A., Virkutis J., Gegeckas A. Activity of sol-gel derived nanocrystalline WO3 films in photoelectrochemical generation of reactive chlorine species. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020;871 doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114277. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  113. Kanakaraju D., Glass B.D., Oelgemöller M. Advanced oxidation process-mediated removal of pharmaceuticals from water: a review. J. Environ. Manag. 2018;219:189–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Kang Q., Lu Q.Z., Liu S.H., Yang L.X., Wen L.F., Luo S.L., Cai Q.Y. A ternary hybrid CdS/Pt-TiO2 nanotube structure for photoelectrocatalytic bactericidal effects on Escherichia Coli. Biomaterials. 2010;31:3317–3326. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Kau A.L., Martin S.M., Lyon W., Hayes E., Caparon M.G., Hultgren S.J. Enterococcus faecalis tropism for the kidneys in the urinary tract of C57BL/6J mice. Infect. Immun. 2005;73:2461–2468. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.4.2461-2468.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Kim J.Y.U., Bessegato G.G., de Souza B.C., da Silva J.J., Zanoni M.V.B. Efficient treatment of swimming pool water by photoelectrocatalytic ozonation: inactivation of Candida parapsilosis and mineralization of Benzophenone-3 and urea. Chem. Eng. J. 2019;378 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  117. Koo M.S., Chen X., Cho K., An T., Choi W. In situ photoelectrochemical chloride activation using a WO3 electrode for oxidative treatment with simultaneous H2 evolution under visible light. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53:9926–9936. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. La Rosa G., Bonadonna L., Lucentini L., Kenmoe S., Suffredini E. Coronavirus in water environments: occurrence, persistence and concentration methods - a scoping review. Water Res. 2020;179 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Lacasa E., Cotillas S., Saez C., Lobato J., Cañizares P., Rodrigo M.A. Environmental applications of electrochemical technology. What is needed to enable full-scale applications? Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2019;16:149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.coelec.2019.07.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  120. Lalwani J., Cj S., Thatikonda S., Challapalli S. Sequential treatment of crude drug effluent for the elimination of API by combined electro-assisted coagulation-photocatalytic oxidation. J. Water Process Eng. 2019;28:195–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.01.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  121. Lam S.M., Ooi J.K., Kee M.W., Sin J.C. Photocatalytic fuel cell using tio2/zno/zn photoanode for greywater and bacteria abatements with power generation concomitantly. Key Eng. Mater. 2019;821 KEM:366–371. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.821.366. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  122. Lam S.M., Sin J.C., Lin H., Li H., Zeng H. Greywater and bacteria removal with synchronized energy production in photocatalytic fuel cell based on anodic TiO2/ZnO/Zn and cathodic CuO/Cu. Chemosphere. 2020;245 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Lebik-Elhadi H., Frontistis Z., Ait-Amar H., Amrani S., Mantzavinos D. Electrochemical oxidation of pesticide thiamethoxam on boron doped diamond anode: role of operating parameters and matrix effect. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 2018;116:535–541. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.03.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  124. Lee S.L., Ho L.N., Ong S.A., Wong Y.S., Voon C.H., Khalik W.F., Yusoff N.A., Nordin N. A highly efficient immobilized ZnO/Zn photoanode for degradation of azo dye Reactive Green 19 in a photocatalytic fuel cell. Chemosphere. 2017;166:118–125. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Li G., Liu X., Zhang H., An T., Zhang S., Carroll A.R., Zhao H. In situ photoelectrocatalytic generation of bactericide for instant inactivation and rapid decomposition of Gram-negative bacteria. J. Catal. 2011;277:88–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2010.10.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  126. Li G., Liu X., Zhang H., Wong P.K., An T., Zhao H. Comparative studies of photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic inactivation of E. coli in presence of halides. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2013;140–141:225–232. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  127. Li G., Liu X., Zhang H., Wong P.K., An T., Zhou W., Li B., Zhao H. Adenovirus inactivation by in situ photocatalytically and photoelectrocatalytically generated halogen viricides. Chem. Eng. J. 2014;253:538–543. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Li G., Nie X., Chen J., Wong P.K., An T., Yamashita H., Zhao H. Enhanced simultaneous PEC eradication of bacteria and antibiotics by facilely fabricated high-activity {001} facets TiO2 mounted onto TiO2 nanotubular photoanode. Water Res. 2016;101:597–605. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Li W., Li M., Qiang Z. Improvement of UV disinfection reactor performance by ring baffles: the matching between the hydrodynamics and UV radiation. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;379 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122381. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  130. Liao W., Yang J., Zhou H., Murugananthan M., Zhang Y. Electrochemically self-doped tio2 nanotube arrays for efficient visible light photoelectrocatalytic degradation of contaminants. Electrochim. Acta. 2014;136:310–317. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  131. Liu X., Han Y., Li G., Zhang H., Zhao H. Instant inactivation and rapid decomposition of Escherichia coli using a high efficiency TiO2 nanotube array photoelectrode. RSC Adv. 2013;3:20824–20828. doi: 10.1039/c3ra43708f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  132. Liu X., Zhang H., Liu C., Chen J., Li G., An T., Wong P.K., Zhao H. UV and visible light photoelectrocatalytic bactericidal performance of 100% {1 1 1} faceted rutile TiO2 photoanode. Catal. Today. 2014;224:77–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.09.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  133. Llanos J., Cotillas S., Cañizares P., Rodrigo M.A. Conductive diamond sono-electrochemical disinfection (CDSED) for municipal wastewater reclamation. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2015;22:493–498. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Macphee D., Wells R., Kruth A., Todd M., Elmorsi T., Smith C., Pokrajac D., Strachan N., Mwinyhija M., Scott-Emuakpor E., Nissen S., Killham K. A visible light driven photoelectrocatalytic fuel cell for clean-up of contaminated water supplies. Desalination. 2009;248:132–137. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.05.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  135. Mafa P.J., Patala R., Mamba B.B., Liu D., Gui J., Kuvarega A.T. Plasmonic Ag3PO4/EG photoanode for visible light-driven photoelectrocatalytic degradation of diuretic drug. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;393 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124804. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  136. Magazinovic R.S., Nicholson B.C., Mulcahy D.E., Davey D.E. Bromide levels in natural waters: its relationship to levels of both chloride and total dissolved solids and the implications for water treatment. Chemosphere. 2004;57:329–335. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.04.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Malek P., Ortiz J.M., Schulte-Herbrüggen H.M.A. Decentralized desalination of brackish water using an electrodialysis system directly powered by wind energy. Desalination. 2016;377:54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.08.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  138. Malvestiti J.A., Dantas R.F. Disinfection of secondary effluents by O3, O3/H2O2 and UV/H2O2: influence of carbonate, nitrate, industrial contaminants and regrowth. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018;6:560–567. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.12.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  139. Mandal P., Gupta A.K., Dubey B.K. A review on presence, survival, disinfection/removal methods of coronavirus in wastewater and progress of wastewater-based epidemiology. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020;8 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Marselli B., Garcia-Gomez J., Michaud P.-A., Rodrigo M.A., Comninellis C. Electrogeneration of hydroxyl radicals on boron-doped diamond electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2003;150:D79. doi: 10.1149/1.1553790. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  141. Martín de Vidales M.J., Cotillas S., Perez-Serrano J.F., Llanos J., Sáez C., Cañizares P., Rodrigo M.A. Scale-up of electrolytic and photoelectrolytic processes for water reclaiming: a preliminary study. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016;23:19713–19722. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7189-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Martínez-Huitle C.A., Brillas E. Decontamination of wastewaters containing synthetic organic dyes by electrochemical methods: a general review. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2009;87:105–145. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.09.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  143. Martínez-Huitle C.A., Brillas E. Electrochemical alternatives for drinking water disinfection. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47:1998–2005. doi: 10.1002/anie.200703621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Martinez-Huitle C.A., Ferro S. Electrochemical oxidation of organic pollutants for the wastewater treatment: direct and indirect processes. ChemInform. 2007;38 doi: 10.1002/chin.200714276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Martínez-Huitle C.A., Panizza M. Electrochemical oxidation of organic pollutants for wastewater treatment. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2018;11:62–71. doi: 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.07.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  146. Martínez-Huitle C.A., Rodrigo M.A., Sirés I., Scialdone O. Single and coupled electrochemical processes and reactors for the abatement of organic water pollutants: a critical review. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:13362–13407. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Masudy-Panah S., Siavash Moakhar R., Chua C.S., Tan H.R., Wong T.I., Chi D., Dalapati G.K. Nanocrystal engineering of sputter-grown CuO photocathode for visible-light-driven electrochemical water splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8:1206–1213. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b09613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Meas Y., Godinez L.A., Bustos E. Synthetic Diamond Films: Preparation, Electrochemistry, Characterization, and Applications. 2011. Ozone generation using boron-doped diamond electrodes; pp. 311–331. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  149. Medrano-Rodríguez F., Picos-Benítez A., Brillas E., Bandala E.R., Pérez T., Peralta-Hernández J.M. Electrochemical advanced oxidation discoloration and removal of three brown diazo dyes used in the tannery industry. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020;873 doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114360. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  150. Mesones S., Mena E., López Muñoz M.J., Adán C., Marugán J. Synergistic and antagonistic effects in the photoelectrocatalytic disinfection of water with TiO2 supported on activated carbon as a bipolar electrode in a novel 3D photoelectrochemical reactor. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2020;247 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  151. Metcalf Eddy. fourth ed. McGraw-Hill; New York, USA: 2003. Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse. [Google Scholar]
  152. Mian M.M., Liu G. Sewage sludge-derived TiO2/Fe/Fe3C-biochar composite as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for degradation of methylene blue. Chemosphere. 2019;215:101–114. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Mira Anuar N., Chan C.-M. Adsorption of Escherichia coli from landfill leachate using Dredged marine soils as Geosorbent: the influence of temperature. Mater. Today Proc. 2020;31:278–281. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  154. Monteiro G.S., Staggemeier R., Klauck C.R., Bernardes A.M., Rodrigues M.A.S., Spilki F.R. Degradation and inactivation of adenovirus in water by photo-electro-oxidation. Braz. J. Biol. 2015;75:37–42. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.00813suppl. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Montenegro-Ayo R., Barrios A.C., Mondal I., Bhagat K., Morales-Gomero J.C., Abbaszadegan M., Westerhoff P., Perreault F., Garcia-Segura S. Portable point-of-use photoelectrocatalytic device provides rapid water disinfection. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;737 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Morales-Pérez A.A., Maravilla P., Solís-López M., Schouwenaars R., Durán-Moreno A., Ramírez-Zamora R.M. Optimization of the synthesis process of an iron oxide nanocatalyst supported on activated carbon for the inactivation of Ascaris eggs in water using the heterogeneous Fenton-like reaction. Water Sci. Technol. 2016;73:1000–1009. doi: 10.2166/wst.2015.576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Mousset E., Dionysiou D.D. Photoelectrochemical reactors for treatment of water and wastewater: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020;18:1301–1318. doi: 10.1007/s10311-020-01014-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  158. Mousset E., Wang Z., Olvera-Vargas H., Lefebvre O. Advanced electrocatalytic pre-treatment to improve the biodegradability of real wastewater from the electronics industry — a detailed investigation study. J. Hazard Mater. 2018;360:552–559. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Nie X., Li G., Gao M., Sun H., Liu X., Zhao H., Wong P.K., An T. Comparative study on the photoelectrocatalytic inactivation of Escherichia coli K-12 and its mutant Escherichia coli BW25113 using TiO2 nanotubes as a photoanode. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014;147:562–570. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.09.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  160. Nie X., Li G., Wong P.K., Zhao H., An T. Synthesis and characterization of N-doped carbonaceous/TiO2 composite photoanodes for visible-light photoelectrocatalytic inactivation of Escherichia coli K-12. Catal. Today. 2014;230:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.09.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  161. Olvera-Vargas H., Rouch J.C., Coetsier C., Cretin M., Causserand C. Dynamic cross-flow electro-Fenton process coupled to anodic oxidation for wastewater treatment: application to the degradation of acetaminophen. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2018;203:143–151. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.03.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  162. Olvera-Vargas H., Zheng X., Garcia-Rodriguez O., Lefebvre O. Sequential “electrochemical peroxidation – electro-Fenton” process for anaerobic sludge treatment. Water Res. 2019;154:277–286. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.01.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Otter P., Sattler W., Grischek T., Jaskolski M., Mey E., Ulmer N., Grossmann P., Matthias F., Malakar P., Goldmaier A., Benz F., Ndumwa C. Economic evaluation of water supply systems operated with solar-driven electro-chlorination in rural regions in Nepal, Egypt and Tanzania. Water Res. 2020;187 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Ouarda Y., Trellu C., Lesage G., Rivallin M., Drogui P., Cretin M. Electro-oxidation of secondary effluents from various wastewater plants for the removal of acetaminophen and dissolved organic matter. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;738 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Pablos C., Marugán J., Adán C., Osuna M., van Grieken R. Performance of TiO2 photoanodes toward oxidation of methanol and E. coli inactivation in water in a scaled-up photoelectrocatalytic reactor. Electrochim. Acta. 2017;258:599–606. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  166. Pablos C., Marugán J., Van Grieken R., Dunlop P., Hamilton J., Dionysiou D., Byrne J.A. Electrochemical enhancement of photocatalytic disinfection on aligned TiO2 and nitrogen doped TiO2 nanotubes. Molecules. 2017;22 doi: 10.3390/molecules22050704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Pacheco-Álvarez M.O.A., Picos A., Pérez-Segura T., Peralta-Hernández J.M. Proposal for highly efficient electrochemical discoloration and degradation of azo dyes with parallel arrangement electrodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019;838:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  168. Panizza M. Electrochemistry for the Environment. 2010. Importance of electrode material in the electrochemical treatment of wastewater containing organic pollutants; pp. 25–54. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  169. Panizza M., Cerisola G. Direct and mediated anodic oxidation of organic pollutants. Chem. Rev. 2009;109:6541–6569. doi: 10.1021/cr9001319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Panizza M., Cerisola G. Electrocatalytic materials for the electrochemical oxidation of synthetic dyes. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2007;75:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  171. Panizza M., Cerisola G. Application of diamond electrodes to electrochemical processes. Electrochim. Acta. 2005;51:191–199. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.04.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  172. Peralta-Hernández J.M., Godínez L.A. Electrochemical hydrogen peroxide production in acidic medium using a tubular photo-reactor: application in advanced oxidation processes. J. Mex. Chem. Soc. 2014;58:348–355. doi: 10.29356/jmcs.v58i3.144. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  173. Peralta-Hernández J.M., Meas-Vong Y., Rodríguez F.J., Chapman T.W., Maldonado M.I., Godínez L.A. In situ electrochemical and photo-electrochemical generation of the fenton reagent: a potentially important new water treatment technology. Water Res. 2006;40:1754–1762. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Pérez J.F., Llanos J., Sáez C., López C., Cañizares P., Rodrigo M.A. On the design of a jet-aerated microfluidic flow-through reactor for wastewater treatment by electro-Fenton. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2019;208:123–129. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.04.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  175. Pérez J.F., Llanos J., Sáez C., López C., Cañizares P., Rodrigo M.A. The jet aerator as oxygen supplier for the electrochemical generation of H2O2. Electrochim. Acta. 2017;246:466–474. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  176. Pérez J.F., Sáez C., Llanos J., Cañizares P., López C., Rodrigo M.A. Improving the efficiency of carbon cloth for the electrogeneration of H2O2: role of polytetrafluoroethylene and carbon black loading. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017;56:12588–12595. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02563. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  177. Perry J.J., Peña-Melendez M., Yousef A.E. Ozone-based treatments for inactivation of Salmonella enterica in tree nuts: inoculation protocol and surrogate suitability considerations. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019;297:21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Philippidis N., Nikolakaki E., Sotiropoulos S., Poulios I. Photoelectrocatalytic inactivation of E. coli XL-1 blue colonies in water. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2010;85:1054–1060. doi: 10.1002/jctb.2394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  179. Pires R.H., Brugnera M.F., Zanoni M.V.B., Giannini M.J.S.M. Effectiveness of photoelectrocatalysis treatment for the inactivation of Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto in planktonic cultures and biofilms. Appl. Catal. Gen. 2016;511:149–155. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.11.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  180. Polcaro A.M., Mascia M., Palmas S., Vacca A. Kinetic study on the removal of organic pollutants by an electrochemical oxidation process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002;41:2874–2881. doi: 10.1021/ie010669u. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  181. Qu J., Shen L., Zhao M., Li W., Jia C., Zhu H., Zhang Q. Determination of the role of microcystis aeruginosa in toxin generation based on phosphoproteomic profiles. Toxins. 2018;10 doi: 10.3390/toxins10070304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Rahman M.Y.A., Nachabe M.H., Ergas S.J. Biochar amendment of stormwater bioretention systems for nitrogen and Escherichia coli removal: effect of hydraulic loading rates and antecedent dry periods. Bioresour. Technol. 2020;310 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Rahmawati F., Kusumaningsih T., Hapsari A.M., Hastuti A. Ag and Cu loaded on TiO2/graphite as a catalyst for Escherichia coli-contaminated water disinfection. Chem. Pap. 2010;64:557–565. doi: 10.2478/s11696-010-0036-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  184. Rahmawati F., Kusumaningsih T., Hastuti A. Photo- and electro-catalysis for solar disinfection of Escherichia coli-contaminated water using Ag-TiO2/graphite. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2011;93:1602–1612. doi: 10.1080/02772248.2011.604322. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  185. Rather R.A., Lo I.M.C. Photoelectrochemical sewage treatment by a multifunctional g-C3N4/Ag/AgCl/BiVO4 photoanode for the simultaneous degradation of emerging pollutants and hydrogen production, and the disinfection of E. coli. Water Res. 2020;168 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Ren G., Zhou M., Zhang Q., Xu X., Li Y., Su P. A novel stacked flow-through electro-Fenton reactor as decentralized system for the simultaneous removal of pollutants (COD, NH3-N and TP) and disinfection from domestic sewage containing chloride ions. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;387 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  187. Ribeiro M.A., Cruz J.M., Montagnolli R.N., Bidoia E.D., Lopes P.R.M. Photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical inactivation of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply. 2015;15:107–113. doi: 10.2166/ws.2014.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  188. Robles I., Becerra E., Barrios J.A., Maya C., Jiménez B., Rodríguez-Valadez F.J., Rivera F., García-Espinoza J.D., Godínez L.A. Inactivation of helminth eggs in an electro-Fenton reactor: towards full electrochemical disinfection of human waste using activated carbon. Chemosphere. 2020;250 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Robles I., Moreno-Rubio G., García-Espinoza J.D., Martínez-Sánchez C., Rodríguez A., Meas-Vong Y., Rodríguez-Valadez F.J., Godínez L.A. Study of polarized activated carbon filters as simultaneous adsorbent and 3D-type electrode materials for electro-Fenton reactors. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020;8:104414. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Rodríguez-Chueca J., Mosteo R., Ormad M.P., Ovelleiro J.L. Factorial experimental design applied to Escherichia coli disinfection by Fenton and photo-Fenton processes. Sol. Energy. 2012;86:3260–3267. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2012.08.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  191. Russo D., Tammaro M., Salluzzo A., Andreozzi R., Marotta R. Modeling and validation of a modular multi-lamp photo-reactor for cetylpyridinium chloride degradation by UV and UV/H2O2 processes. Chem. Eng. J. 2019;376 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  192. Salazar R., Gallardo-Arriaza J., Vidal J., Rivera-Vera C., Toledo-Neira C., Sandoval M.A., Cornejo-Ponce L., Thiam A. Treatment of industrial textile wastewater by the solar photoelectro-Fenton process: influence of solar radiation and applied current. Sol. Energy. 2019;190:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.07.072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  193. Sánchez-Montes I., Pérez J.F., Sáez C., Rodrigo M.A., Cañizares P., Aquino J.M. Assessing the performance of electrochemical oxidation using DSA® and BDD anodes in the presence of UVC light. Chemosphere. 2020;238 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Sapkal R.T., Shinde S.S., Sapkal D.M., Babar A.R., Shinde V.V., Jalkute C.B., Moholkar A.V., Rajpure K.Y., Sonawane K.D., Patil P.S., Bhosale C.H. Photoelectrocatalytic activity of spray deposited ZnO thin films against E. coli Davis. Energy Mater. Mater. Sci. Eng. Energy Syst. 2012;7:417–424. [Google Scholar]
  195. Scott-Emuakpor E.O., Kruth A., Todd M.J., Raab A., Paton G.I., Macphee D.E. Remediation of 2,4-dichlorophenol contaminated water by visible light-enhanced WO 3 photoelectrocatalysis. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012;123–124:433–439. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  196. Selcuk H., Sarikaya H.Z., Bekbolet M., Anderson M.A. Bromate formation on the non-porous TiO2 photoanode in the photoelectrocatalytic system. Chemosphere. 2006;62:715–721. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Sella S.R.B.R., Vandenberghe L.P.S., Soccol C.R. Bacillus atrophaeus: main characteristics and biotechnological applications – a review. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2015;35:533–545. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2014.922915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Sharma J., Mishra I.M., Kumar V. Degradation and mineralization of Bisphenol A (BPA) in aqueous solution using advanced oxidation processes: UV/H2O2 and UV/S2O82- oxidation systems. J. Environ. Manag. 2015;156:266–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Shi Q., Chen Z., Liu H., Lu Y., Li K., Shi Y., Mao Y., Hu H.Y. Efficient synergistic disinfection by ozone, ultraviolet irradiation and chlorine in secondary effluents. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;758 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Silva Barni M.F., Doumic L.I., Procaccini R.A., Ayude M.A., Romeo H.E. Layered platforms of Ti4O7 as flow-through anodes for intensifying the electro-oxidation of bentazon. J. Environ. Manag. 2020;263 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Singla J., Sangal V.K., Singh A., Verma A. Application of mixed metal oxide anode for the electro-oxidation/disinfection of synthetic urine: potential of harnessing molecular hydrogen generation. J. Environ. Manag. 2020;255 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Sirés I., Brillas E. Remediation of water pollution caused by pharmaceutical residues based on electrochemical separation and degradation technologies: a review. Environ. Int. 2012;40:212–229. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Sirés I., Brillas E., Oturan M.A., Rodrigo M.A., Panizza M. Electrochemical advanced oxidation processes: today and tomorrow. A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014;21:8336–8367. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-2783-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Souza B.A., Perini J.A., Giannini M.J.S.M., Zanoni M.V.B. Fast removal of Candida parapsilosis from hemodialysis dialysate using ultraviolet or visible light at nanoporous W/WO3 electrodes. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019;7 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  205. Souza B.C.A., Guaraldo T.T., Brugnera M.F., Pires R.H., Giannini M.J.S.M., Zanoni M.V.B. Antifungal properties of high efficient W/WO3 electrodes acting under UV-Vis and visible light and chloride medium. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2017;28:2084–2093. doi: 10.21577/0103-5053.20170053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  206. Souza F.L., Sáez C., Cañizares P., Motheo A.J., Rodrigo M.A. Coupling photo and sono technologies to improve efficiencies in conductive diamond electrochemical oxidation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014;144:121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  207. Sperling M. vs. IWA Publishing; 2008. Wastewater Characteristics, Treatment and Disposal, Choice Reviews Online. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  208. Spiliotopoulou A., Hansen K.M.S., Andersen H.R. Secondary formation of disinfection by-products by UV treatment of swimming pool water. Sci. Total Environ. 2015;520:96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Srinivasan A., Patel J.B. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase–producing organisms: an ounce of prevention really is worth a pound of cure. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2008;29:1107–1109. doi: 10.1086/594129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Sun H., Li G., An T., Zhao H., Wong P.K. Unveiling the photoelectrocatalytic inactivation mechanism of Escherichia coli: convincing evidence from responses of parent and anti-oxidation single gene knockout mutants. Water Res. 2016;88:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Sun H., Li G., Nie X., Shi H., Wong P.K., Zhao H., An T. Systematic approach to in-depth understanding of photoelectrocatalytic bacterial inactivation mechanisms by tracking the decomposed building blocks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48:9412–9419. doi: 10.1021/es502471h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Tan J., Li Z., Li J., Wu J., Yao X., Zhang T. Graphitic carbon nitride-based materials in activating persulfate for aqueous organic pollutants degradation: a review on materials design and mechanisms. Chemosphere. 2021;262 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Thiam A., Salazar R., Brillas E., Sirés I. In-situ dosage of Fe2+ catalyst using natural pyrite for thiamphenicol mineralization by photoelectro-Fenton process. J. Environ. Manag. 2020;270 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Tovar A.K., Godínez L.A., Espejel F., Ramírez-Zamora R.M., Robles I. Optimization of the integral valorization process for orange peel waste using a design of experiments approach: production of high-quality pectin and activated carbon. Waste Manag. 2019;85:202–213. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.12.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Trellu C., Rivallin M., Cerneaux S., Coetsier C., Causserand C., Oturan M.A., Cretin M. Integration of sub-stoichiometric titanium oxide reactive electrochemical membrane as anode in the electro-Fenton process. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;400 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125936. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  216. Valero P., Verbel M., Silva-Agredo J., Mosteo R., Ormad M.P., Torres-Palma R.A. Electrochemical advanced oxidation processes for Staphylococcus aureus disinfection in municipal WWTP effluents. J. Environ. Manag. 2017;198:256–265. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Venieri D., Chatzisymeon E., Politi E., Sofianos S.S., Katsaounis A., Mantzavinos D. Photoelectrocatalytic disinfection of water and wastewater: performance evaluation by qPCR and culture techniques. J. Water Health. 2013;11:21–29. doi: 10.2166/wh.2012.208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Venieri D., Chatzisymeon E., Sofianos S.S., Politi E., Xekoukoulotakis N.P., Katsaounis A., Mantzavinos D. Removal of faecal indicator pathogens from waters and wastewaters by photoelectrocatalytic oxidation on TiO2/Ti films under simulated solar radiation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012;19:3782–3790. doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-0768-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Vidal J., Huiliñir C., Santander R., Silva-Agredo J., Torres-Palma R.A., Salazar R. Degradation of ampicillin antibiotic by electrochemical processes: evaluation of antimicrobial activity of treated water. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019;26:4404–4414. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2234-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Vidal J., Huiliñir C., Santander R., Silva-Agredo J., Torres-Palma R.A., Salazar R. Effective removal of the antibiotic nafcillin from water by combining the photoelectro-fenton process and anaerobic biological digestion. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;624:1095–1105. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Villalobos-Lara A.D., Álvarez F., Gamiño-Arroyo Z., Navarro R., Peralta-Hernández J.M., Fuentes R., Pérez T. Electrocoagulation treatment of industrial tannery wastewater employing a modified rotating cylinder electrode reactor. Chemosphere. 2021;264 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Villegas-Guzman P., Hofer F., Silva-Agredo J., Torres-Palma R.A. Role of sulfate, chloride, and nitrate anions on the degradation of fluoroquinolone antibiotics by photoelectro-Fenton. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017;24:28175–28189. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0404-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Wang C., Moore N., Bircher K., Andrews S., Hofmann R. Full-scale comparison of UV/H2O2 and UV/Cl2 advanced oxidation: the degradation of micropollutant surrogates and the formation of disinfection byproducts. Water Res. 2019;161:448–458. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Wang W.L., Wu Q.Y., Huang N., Wang T., Hu H.Y. Synergistic effect between UV and chlorine (UV/chlorine) on the degradation of carbamazepine: influence factors and radical species. Water Res. 2016;98:190–198. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Wang Y., Dong H., Li L., Tian R., Chen J., Ning Q., Wang B., Tang L., Zeng G. Influence of feedstocks and modification methods on biochar’s capacity to activate hydrogen peroxide for tetracycline removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2019;291 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  226. WHO/UNICEF . Who; 2017. Progress on Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene - Joint Monitoring Programme 2017 Update and SDG Baselines. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12329. [Google Scholar]
  227. World Health Organization Diarrhoeal disease. 2017. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diarrhoeal-disease [WWW Document]. URL.
  228. World Health Organization . World Health Organization; 2014. Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Report on Surveillance. [Google Scholar]
  229. Xiong L., Ng T.W., Yu Y., Xia D., Yip H.Y., Li G., An T., Zhao H., Wong P.K. N-type Cu2O film for photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic processes: its stability and inactivation of E. coli. Electrochim. Acta. 2015;153:583–593. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.11.169. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  230. Yang Q., Ma Y., Chen F., Yao F., Sun J., Wang S., Yi K., Hou L., Li X., Wang D. Recent advances in photo-activated sulfate radical-advanced oxidation process (SR-AOP) for refractory organic pollutants removal in water. Chem. Eng. J. 2019;378 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  231. Yu H., Quan X., Zhang Y., Ning M., Chen S., Zhao H. Electrochemically assisted photocatalytic inactivation of Escherichia coli under visible light using a ZnIn2S4 film electrode. Langmuir. 2008;24:7599–7604. doi: 10.1021/la800835k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  232. Zárate-Guzmán A.I., González-Gutiérrez L.V., Godínez L.A., Medel-Reyes A., Carrasco-Marín F., Romero-Cano L.A. Towards understanding of heterogeneous Fenton reaction using carbon-Fe catalysts coupled to in-situ H2O2 electro-generation as clean technology for wastewater treatment. Chemosphere. 2019;224:698–706. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  233. Zhang F.J., Chen M.L., Oh W.C. Photoelectrocatalytic properties and bactericidal activities of silver-treated carbon nanotube/titania composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011;71:658–665. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.01.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  234. Zhang Guosheng, Li W., Chen S., Zhou W., Chen J. Problems of conventional disinfection and new sterilization methods for antibiotic resistance control. Chemosphere. 2020;254 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  235. Zhang Guan, Zhang Z., Xia D., Qu Y., Wang W. Solar driven self−sustainable photoelectrochemical bacteria inactivation in scale−up reactor utilizing large−scale fabricable Ti/MoS2/MoOx photoanode. J. Hazard Mater. 2020;392 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  236. Zhang Q., Zhou M., Ren G., Li Yawei, Li Yanchun, Du X. Highly efficient electrosynthesis of hydrogen peroxide on a superhydrophobic three-phase interface by natural air diffusion. Nat. Commun. 2020;11 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15597-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  237. Zhang D., Ling H., Huang X., Li J., Li W., Yi C., Zhang T, Jiang, YoHe Y, Deng S, Zhang X, Wang X, Liu Y, Li G, Qu J. Potential spreading risks and disinfection challenges of medical wastewater by the presence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral RNA in septic tanks of Fangcang Hospital. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;741:140445. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Zhang T., Tao Y.Z., Yang H.W., Chen Z., Wang X.M., Xie Y.F. Study on the removal of aesthetic indicators by ozone during advanced treatment of water reuse. J. Water Process Eng. 2020;36 doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101381. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  239. Zhang Y., Wang A., Tian X., Wen Z., Lv H., Li D., Li J. Efficient mineralization of the antibiotic trimethoprim by solar assisted photoelectro-Fenton process driven by a photovoltaic cell. J. Hazard Mater. 2016;318:319–328. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  240. Zhao Q., An J., Wang S., Qiao Y., Liao C., Wang C., Wang X., Li N. Superhydrophobic air-breathing cathode for efficient hydrogen peroxide generation through two-electron pathway oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;11:35410–35419. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b09942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  241. Zhi D., Lin Y., Jiang L., Zhou Y., Huang A., Yang J., Luo L. Remediation of persistent organic pollutants in aqueous systems by electrochemical activation of persulfates: a review. J. Environ. Manag. 2020;260 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  242. Zhou W., Rajic L., Zhao Y., Gao J., Qin Y., Alshawabkeh A.N. Rates of H2O2 electrogeneration by reduction of anodic O2 at RVC foam cathodes in batch and flow-through cells. Electrochim. Acta. 2018;277:185–196. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (29.3KB, docx)

RESOURCES