Skip to main content
Communications Biology logoLink to Communications Biology
. 2021 May 14;4:586. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02110-4

Specification of oxytocinergic and vasopressinergic circuits in the developing mouse brain

María Pilar Madrigal 1,, Sandra Jurado 1,
PMCID: PMC8121848  PMID: 33990685

Abstract

Oxytocin (OXT) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) support a broad range of behaviors and homeostatic functions including sex-specific and context-appropriate social behaviors. Although the alterations of these systems have been linked with social-related disorders such as autism spectrum disorder, their formation and developmental dynamics remain largely unknown. Using novel brain clearing techniques and 3D imaging, we have reconstructed the specification of oxytocinergic and vasopressinergic circuits in the developing mouse brain with unprecedented cellular resolution. A systematic quantification indicates that OXT and AVP neurons in the hypothalamus display distinctive developmental dynamics and high cellular plasticity from embryonic to early postnatal stages. Our findings reveal new insights into the specification and consolidation of neuropeptidergic systems in the developing CNS.

Subject terms: Development of the nervous system, Neuronal development


Madrigal and Jurado use brain clearing techniques and 3D imaging to generate high-resolution reconstructions of oxytocinergic and vasopressinergic circuits in the developing mouse brain, which are known to play a crucial role in social behaviours. They provide insight into the specification and consolidation of these circuits from embryonic to early postnatal stages of development.

Introduction

Oxytocin (OXT) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) are evolutionarily conserved neuropeptides implicated in the regulation of complex social behaviors. These neuropeptides are synthesized in the hypothalamus where are processed into a nine amino acid peptide chain only differing in two amino acids1. OXT was first identified for its systemic function in parturition and lactation24. Additionally, cumulative evidence indicated a prominent role of OXT in parental and copulatory behaviors57 and as a pro-social neuromodulator8,9 increasing the salience of social stimuli and regulating social behaviors as well as aggression, anxiety, fear, and trust1020. Conversely, AVP has been proposed to antagonize OXT-mediated functions21,22 like increasing social stress23 and reducing interpersonal trust in humans2325. However, this view is being revisited after several studies exposed a more complex scenario for the interplay of OXT and AVP in the central nervous system (CNS)5,6,8,9,26. Although the details of how OXT and AVP interact to modulate neuronal function remain unknown, numerous studies have revealed that alterations of OXT and AVP circuits may underlie mental disorders often characterized by deficits in social interaction such as autism2731, social anxiety and aggression26,32, and schizophrenia3335.

Previous work suggests that the balance between OXT- and AVP-mediated signaling is likely to determine the display of appropriate social behaviors, thus understanding their simultaneous developmental dynamics is crucial for having a complete picture of their regulatory roles. Most studies characterizing the expression of OXT and AVP projections have employed histological methods and in situ hybridization in fixed sections3639 which provide insightful information, but are difficult to extrapolate to circuit formation in the entire brain. Furthermore, most of the previous work has focused on the rat brain4046 even though an increasing number of studies employ the mouse as an experimental model, thus highlighting the need for more accurate connectivity maps for this commonly used species.

To overcome these current challenges, we have now implemented the iDISCO+ clearing technique to analyze the expression of endogenous neuropeptides. This method in combination with light sheet fluorescent microscopy has allowed us to generate 3D reconstructions of the oxytocinergic and vasopressinergic systems in the entire mouse brain from early development to adulthood. This methodology achieves cell-specific resolution allowing a systematic quantification of oxytocinergic and vasopressinergic cells. Our data revealed that OXT and AVP neurons first appear at the caudal hypothalamic regions followed by rostral areas. Interestingly, different hypothalamic nuclei show marked differences between OXT and AVP expression during development. The rostral nuclei, such as the anterodorsal preoptic nucleus (ADPN) and the periventricular nucleus (PeVN), together with neighboring areas such as the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST) display a fairly homogeneous expression whereas the caudal nuclei (supraoptic nucleus (SON), paraventricular nucleus (PVN), and the retrochiasmatic area (RCH)) exhibit greater heterogeneity with a large population of neurons coexpressing both OXT and AVP during early postnatal stages. Our analysis indicates that the accessory nucleus (AN) is the most heterogeneous of the hypothalamic nuclei with a rostral section almost exclusively constituted by OXT and OXT + AVP neurons and a caudal region enriched with AVP neurons.

Although the expression of OXT + AVP neurons is quite high at postnatal day seven (PN7), most of the nuclei exhibit an increase in the number of OXT neurons in detriment of the mixed OXT + AVP population during postnatal development. This switch in neuropeptide expression is particularly significant in BNST and ADPN, where the presence of AVP neurons decreases drastically in the adult brain. These developmental adaptations are expected to have functional consequences impacting the ratio of AVP/OXT innervation to their projection sites.

In addition to wild type animals, we have characterized OXT expression in a commercial OXT-Cre mouse line47. These studies have confirmed our observation of a significant increase of oxytocinergic neurons in most hypothalamic nuclei as development progresses. Strikingly, some OXT positive neurons in the SON and RCH of the commercial OXT-Cre line are not recognized by standard OXT antibodies suggesting the presence of nucleus-specific OXT precursors.

In summary, our in-depth circuit analysis has revealed that OXT and AVP expression exhibits distinct developmental dynamics in the mouse brain. These dynamic adaptations are likely to modulate the functional properties of different brain regions according to their developmental stage, thus contributing to the refinement of the neuronal circuits that support context-appropriate social behaviors later in life.

Results

Application of iDISCO+ for identifying OXT and AVP hypothalamic circuits

Understanding the formation and developmental dynamics of oxytocinergic and vasopressinergic circuits is of great significance given their regulatory role in social behaviors. The identification of alterations during the development of these systems is expected to reveal critical insights into the underlying causes of several neuropsychiatric disorders1935. Most of OXT and AVP innervation in the CNS comes from the hypothalamus, a brain area comprising highly heterogeneous nuclei. Pioneer work using in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry techniques described with great detail the hypothalamic circuit in the developing rat brain4046, however, the mouse brain attracted less attention partly because of its smaller size which hinders the identification of the intricate hypothalamic nuclei. Because an increasing number of studies particularly on social behavior utilize mouse models, it is necessary to improve our understanding of the development of OXT and AVP circuits in this species.

Recent advances on tissue clearing techniques have enabled the study of neuronal connectivity in the whole brain by means of light sheet microscopy and 3D reconstructions4850. Here, we implemented a protocol for 3D imaging of solvent-cleared brains, adapted from the iDISCO+ protocol described in Renier et al.51. Incubation time for anti-OXT and anti-AVP antibodies was optimized according to brain size and tissue firmness. Best results were obtained with incubation times of 5 days for E16.5 brains, 10 days for PN0, 2 weeks for PN7, and 3 weeks for adult brains. In our hands, these modifications resulted in fully cleared brains (Fig. 1a) with very low background which allowed to unambiguously distinguish single cells in different hypothalamic nuclei and neighboring brain areas (Fig. 1b, Supplementary movie 1) including (from rostral to caudal): BNST (bed nucleus of stria terminalis), PeVN (periventricular nucleus), VMPO (ventromedial preoptic nucleus), ADPN (anterodorsal preoptic nucleus), SON (supraoptic nucleus), SCH (suprachiasmatic nucleus), PVN (paraventricular nucleus), RCH (retrochiasmatic area) and AN (accessory nucleus, constituted by scattered cells within the hypothalamic area not included in any of the other nuclei52). This method in combination with 3D image processing, enabled isolation of single hypothalamic nuclei (surface Imaris tool; Fig. 1c), and the analysis of different neuronal populations within each nucleus (spots Imaris tool; Fig. 1d). The technique additionally allowed us to identify a small population of OXT and AVP positive cells in other brain areas such as the medial amygdala (MeA), where OXT and AVP positive neurons were mainly found in the anteriodorsal and anteroventral part (Table 1). These results indicate that iDISCO+ provides an excellent method for preserving the identity of peptides like OXT and AVP, and permits the identification of intricate nuclei such as hypothalamic structures.

Fig. 1. iDISCO+, a useful tool for distinguishing between nuclei.

Fig. 1

Representative image of the hypothalamus of one hemisphere of an adult mouse brain processed with the iDISCO+ protocol and stained for OXT (green) and AVP (red) (a) in which distinct neuronal populations can be easily resolved. The image shows the hypothalamic area displaying oxytocinergic and vasopressinergic neurons pseudocolored in each hypothalamic nucleus and surrounding areas such as the BNST (b). OXT and AVP expression in each nucleus are represented using the Imaris surface tool (c). OXT and AVP neurons in each nucleus are identified and outlined for performing quantitative analysis (d). Arrows: D dorsal; V ventral; M medial; L lateral. PeVN periventricular nucleus, ADPN anterodorsal preoptic nucleus, BNST bed nucleus of stria terminalis, VMPO ventromedial preoptic nucleus, SON supraoptic nucleus, PVN paraventricular nucleus, RCH retrochiasmatic area, AN accessory nucleus, SCH suprachiasmatic nucleus. Scale bar: 300 µm.

Table 1.

Total number of OXT, AVP, and OXT + AVP neurons in the hypothalamus nuclei during development.

OXT E16.5 PN0 PN7 Adult
BNST 0.00 2.00 ± 2.00 16.00 ± 9.94 100.00 ± 36.46
PVN 24.50 ± 14.22 123.75 ± 33.62 131.25 ± 70.70 461.25 ± 20.60
SON 116.75 ± 12.60 33.00 ± 13.37 83.50 ± 50.49 216.00 ± 44.67
VMPO 0.00 6.25 ± 2.46 3.25 ± 3.25 8.75 ± 4.84
RCH 99.25 ± 11.92 63.25 ± 16.85 70.75 ± 8.62 101.75 ± 28.05
ADPN 0.00 0.00 17.75 ± 14.79 75.00 ± 28.67
PeVN 0.00 30.25 ± 18.22 50.50 ± 31.62 123.50 ± 45.17
AN 0.00 37.5 ± 15.76 11.50 ± 5.45 164.75 ± 18.28
SCH 0.00 3.67 ± 1.61 0.67 ± 0.58 4.00 ± 1.78
MeA 0.00 0.25 ± 0.25 0.25 ± 0.25 0.50 ± 0.50
AVP E16.5 PN0 PN7 Adult
BNST 0.00 2.75 ± 1.80 9.50 ± 3.80 1.5 ± 0.65
PVN 61.5 ± 8.87 138.25 ± 33.69 88.00 ± 59.30 206.50 ± 74.77
SON 129 ± 6.36 122.25 ± 12.64 207.25 ± 17.67 169.50 ± 45.75
VMPO 0.00 4.00 ± 0.58 2.00 ± 1.22 2.25 ± 0.48
RCH 107.50 ± 20.23 73.00 ± 14.70 128.00 ± 40.19 69.75 ± 8.54
ADPN 0.00 3.25 ± 2.93 3.25 ± 2.29 2.00 ± 0.71
PeVN 0.00 11.50 ± 4.33 56.5 ± 31.47 14.5 ± 3.28
AN 0.00 85.00 ± 10.87 92.00 ± 16.91 95.00 ± 12.51
SCH 0.00 368.67 ± 24.50 322.67 ± 27.57 175.25 ± 27.68
MeA 0.00 0.00 2.75 ± 1.38 0.00
OXT-AVP E16.5 PN0 PN7 Adult
BNST 0.00 53.75 ± 8.09 157.50 ± 11.91 53.50 ± 49.58
PVN 130.75 ± 16.27 68.75 ± 31.07 388.00 ± 72.50 93.50 ± 24.13
SON 13.50 ± 2.72 51.50 ± 18.31 168.75 ± 40.24 78.75 ± 29.56
VMPO 0.00 8.00 ± 2.80 14.50 ± 3.07 21.00 ± 12.92
RCH 11.75 ± 1.25 63.75 ± 23.67 86.00 ± 32.54 50.00 ± 4.42
ADPN 0.00 23.50 ± 6.96 58.75 ± 23.57 17.00 ± 14.02
PeVN 0.00 10.25 ± 4.25 91.00 ± 14.87 57.00 ± 37.41
AN 0.00 24.50 ± 14.15 148.25 ± 11.52 15.50 ± 4.17
SCH 0.00 0.67 ± 0.58 2.33 ± 0.29 3.00 ± 1.47
MeA 0.00 0.50 ± 0.50 7.50 ± 1.19 3.00 ± 1.78

Quantification of total number of each neuron population for different developmental stages (E16.5, PN0, PN7, and adult brain).

Results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4 brains).

BNST bed nucleus of stria terminalis, PVN paraventricular nucleus, SON supraoptic nucleus, VMPO ventromedial preoptic nucleus, RCH retrochiasmatic area, ADPN anterodorsal preoptic nucleus, PeVN periventricular nucleus, AN accessory nucleus, SCH suprachiasmatic nucleus, MeA medial amygdalar nucleus.

Different hypothalamic nuclei exhibit distinct temporal windows of OXT and AVP expression

The precise anatomical resolution achieved by iDISCO+ allowed the isolation of individual hypothalamic nuclei for quantification of both OXT and AVP neurons at a variety of developmental stages (see Supplementary movies 25 for 3D whole-brain reconstructions). Our analysis revealed significant differences in the expression dynamics of OXT and AVP in the developing mouse hypothalamus. Whereas OXT and AVP positive neurons could be identified at caudal nuclei like the PVN, SON, and RCH as early as E16.5, rostral hypothalamic nuclei remained unlabeled (Fig. 2a–d, Supplementary Fig. 1, and Tables 1 and 2). However, at PN0 all the hypothalamic nuclei showed neurons expressing OXT and AVP with the exception of the SCH which expresses AVP cells almost exclusively53 (Fig. 2e–h and Supplementary Fig. 1). OXT and AVP expression patterns were similar in all hypothalamic nuclei from early postnatal to adulthood (Fig. 2i–p). These data indicate that OXT and AVP neurons first appear in caudal areas, in agreement with the role of these nuclei as main sources of OXT and AVP modulation (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 1)54. As a general rule, the number of OXT and AVP neurons increases over development in all hypothalamic areas (Table 1). This proliferation is likely to occur in parallel with brain growth and its increasing demands for neuromodulatory innervation.

Fig. 2. OXT and AVP expression patterns in the developing mouse hypothalamus.

Fig. 2

Snapshot of a whole-brain stained with an anti-OXT (green) and anti-AVP (red) antibody. Brain coronal sections at multiple developmental stages: E16.5 (ad), PN0 (eh), PN7 (il) and young adult (mp). 3v third ventricle, PeVN periventricular nucleus, ADPN anterodorsal preoptic nucleus, BNST bed nucleus of stria terminalis, VMPO ventromedial preoptic nucleus, SON supraoptic nucleus, PVN paraventricular nucleus, RCH retrochiasmatic area, AN accessory nucleus, SCH suprachiasmatic nucleus. Scale bar: 200 µm.

Table 2.

Percentage of OXT, AVP, and OXT + AVP neurons in the hypothalamus nuclei during development.

OXT E16.5 PN0 PN7 Adult
BNST 0.00 4.35 ± 4.35 7.418 ± 4.41 72.63 ± 24.28
PVN 10.65 ± 5.94 35.08 ± 7.33 19.54 ± 9.38 61.76 ± 4.29
SON 44.81 ± 3.16 15.79 ± 6.52 17.16 ± 9.96 45.06 ± 4.46
VMPO 0.00 34.29 ± 12.42 8.13 ± 8.13 41.55 ± 22.95
RCH 46.30 ± 5.70 30.91 ± 8.00 29.87 ± 7.97 43.84 ± 7.87
ADPN 0.00 0.00 18.40 ± 7.25 71.26 ± 23.78
PeVN 0.00 49.41 ± 15.75 17.90 ± 10.50 61.42 ± 20.64
AN 0.00 23.49 ± 9.16 4.35 ± 2.02 59.79 ± 1.68
SCH 0.00 0.69 ± 0.40 0.16 ± 0.16 2.22 ± 0.86
MeA 0.00 25.00 ± 25.00 0.00 25.00 ± 25.00
AVP E16.5 PN0 PN7 Adult
BNST 0.00 5.49 ± 4.02 4.90 ± 1.77 0.82 ± 0.33
PVN 28.23 ± 3.72 39.63 ± 7.15 12.30 ± 7.02 25.26 ± 6.12
SON 50.03 ± 2.70 58.93 ± 3.12 45.38 ± 2.49 34.45 ± 6.12
VMPO 0.00 22.80 ± 4.63 10.63 ± 7.10 8.10 ± 2.18
RCH 48.15 ± 5.82 38.04 ± 8.18 42.49 ± 4.61 32.74 ± 5.28
ADPN 0.00 11.46 ± 7.86 3.69 ± 1.90 2.24 ± 1.02
PeVN 0.00 21.90 ± 5.20 22.78 ± 8.09 7.55 ± 1.88
AN 0.00 57.53 ± 5.01 36.18 ± 6.04 34.62 ± 2.60
SCH 0.00 98.93 ± 0.48 99.08 ± 0.14 96.05 ± 1.22
MeA 0.00 0.00 22.69 ± 8.60 0.00
OXT+AVP E16.5 PN0 PN7 Adult
BNST 0.00 90.16 ± 8.34 87.68 ± 5.95 26.55 ± 24.07
PVN 61.12 ± 8.71 25.29 ± 14.44 68.16 ± 15.94 12.98 ± 4.06
SON 5.16 ± 0.93 25.28 ± 9.57 38.19 ± 9.90 20.48 ± 9.86
VMPO 0.00 42.92 ± 14.30 81.25 ± 11.25 50.35 ± 25.07
RCH 5.56 ± 0.75 31.06 ± 10.80 27.64 ± 3.78 23.43 ± 3.36
ADPN 0.00 88.54 ± 7.86 77.91 ± 8.45 26.50 ± 22.93
PeVN 0.00 28.69 ± 11.73 59.33 ± 18.03 31.03 ± 21.02
AN 0.00 18.98 ± 11.00 59.47 ± 6.30 5.59 ± 1.34
SCH 0.00 0.12 ± 0.12 0.54 ± 0.18 1.73 ± 0.79
MeA 0.00 25.00 ± 25.00 52.31 ± 17.91 50.00 ± 28.87

Quantification of percentage of each neuron population for different developmental stages (E16.5, PN0, PN7, and adult brain).

Results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4 brains).

BNST bed nucleus of stria terminalis, PVN paraventricular nucleus, SON supraoptic nucleus, VMPO ventromedial preoptic nucleus, RCH retrochiasmatic area, ADPN anterodorsal preoptic nucleus, PeVN periventricular nucleus, AN accessory nucleus, SCH suprachiasmatic nucleus, MeA medial amygdalar nucleus.

Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of OXT and AVP expression in different hypothalamic nuclei was revealed by flatmap representations of 3D brain reconstructions (Fig. 3). Hypothalamic flatmaps convey the intensity of OXT and AVP positive cells providing a quantitative representation of cell density in each nucleus. 3D-based hypothalamic flatmaps showed clear differences between nuclei in the expression pattern of OXT and AVP during development (see density quantifications in Supplementary Fig. 2). Remarkably, whereas the density of OXT positive neurons seems to steadily increase (Fig. 3e–h), AVP neurons show the opposite behavior (Fig. 3i–l). Interestingly, neurons co-expressing OXT and AVP show an increase at early postnatal stage (PN0) (Fig. 3m–p), coinciding with a critical period for the maturation of social behaviors.

Fig. 3. OXT, AVP, and OXT + AVP cell density in the developing mouse hypothalamus.

Fig. 3

3D hypothalamic flatmap representations of OTX (eh), AVP (il) and OXT + AVP cells (mp) in each nucleus at a range of developmental stages: E16.5 (a), PN0 (b), PN7 (c) and adult (d). Flatmaps show the expression intensity of each cell population at each developmental stage. Please note the difference intensity scale according to the developmental stage. The minimum intensity is represented in turquoise and the maximum in pink. 3v third ventricle, PeVN periventricular nucleus, ADPN anterodorsal preoptic nucleus, BNST bed nucleus of stria terminalis, VMPO ventromedial preoptic nucleus, SON supraoptic nucleus, PVN paraventricular nucleus, RCH retrochiasmatic area, AN accessory nucleus, SCH suprachiasmatic nucleus. Scale bar: 200 µm.

Neurons co-expressing AVP and OXT are a common feature of the developing hypothalamus

Cell quantification confirmed that AVP and OXT systems in distinct hypothalamic nuclei differ in their temporal dynamics (Fig. 4). The percentage of AVP neurons is higher earlier in life and progressively declines during adulthood in most of the nuclei (Figs. 4 and 5, Table 2, percentage of AVP neurons normalized to total number of cells: E16.5: 42.62 ± 2.78; PN0: 52.25 ± 6.04; PN7: 27.97 ± 3.11; Adult: 27.43 ± 3.65; n = 4 per each developmental stage, mean ± S.E.M). This reduction is also observed in AVP-dominant nuclei like the SCH53 where the percentage of AVP-expressing cells decreases from early postnatal stages (PN0) to adulthood (Supplementary Fig. 3 and Fig. 5). Most nuclei show a similar reduction in the percentage of AVP cells with maturation, with the exception of the PVN that exhibits a non-significant increase of vasopressinergic neurons in the adult brain (Fig. 4w and Table 2).

Fig. 4. AVP and OXT systems in distinct hypothalamic nuclei differ in their temporal dynamics.

Fig. 4

Whole-mount immunolabeling against OXT and AVP at PN0 mouse hypothalamus pseudocolored in each nucleus (ae). Nucleus segmentation shows OXT (green) and AVP (red) at different stages: PN0 (fj), PN7 (ko), and young adult (pt). Percentage of each neuronal population, OXT, AVP, and OXT + AVP neurons, in each nucleus during development (uy; n = 4 brains per stage; data are represented as mean ± S.E.M). Abbreviations: PeVN periventricular nucleus, SON supraoptic nucleus, PVN paraventricular nucleus, ADPN anterodorsal preoptic nucleus, BNST bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Scale bar: 100 μm.

Fig. 5. Quantification of OXT and AVP neurons during development.

Fig. 5

Percentage of OXT, AVP and OXT + AVP neurons is represented at E16.5, PN0, PN7, and adult brain. OXT and AVP co-labeling peaks at PN7 and then decreases in favor of OXT expression in most nuclei with the exception of SCH which is primarily constituted by AVP-expressing neurons (ai). Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M (n = 4) and data points are included on each graph. T-Student test, p-value % OXT: PVNE16.5-PN0 = 0.041; PVNE16.5-Adult = 0.00043; PVNPN0-Adult = 0.02003; PVNPN7-Adult = 0.00640; SONE16.5-PN0 = 0.00706; SONE16.5-PN7 = 0.03818; SONPN0-Adult = 0.00999; SONPN7-Adult = 0.04302; ADPNPN0-PN7 = 0.04423; ADPNPN0-Adult = 0.02410; BNSTPN0-Adult = 0,03249; BNSTPN7-Adult = 0,03840; ANPN0-Adult = 0.00800; ANPN7-Adult = 0.000001; p-value % AVP: PVNPN0-PN7 = 0.03430; SONPN0-PN7 = 0.01465; SONPN0-Adult = 0.01190; PeVNPN0-Adult = 0.04089; VMPOPN0-Adult = 0.02835; ANPN0-PN7 = 0.03459; ANPN0-Adult = 0.00668; p – value % OXT + AVP: PVNE16.5-Adult = 0.00243; PVNPN7-Adult = 0.01533; SONE16.5-PN7 = 0.01596; RCHE16.5-PN7 = 0.00122; RCHE16.5-Adult = 0.00205; ADPNPN0-Adult = 0.04295; BNSTPN0-Adult = 0.04666; BNSTPN7-Adult = 0.04869; ANPN0-PN7 = 0.01873; ANPN7-Adult = 0.00016. PeVN periventricular nucleus, ADPN anterodorsal preoptic nucleus, BNST bed nucleus of stria terminalis, VMPO ventromedial preoptic nucleus, SON supraoptic nucleus, PVN paraventricular nucleus, RCH retrochiasmatic area, AN accessory nucleus, SCH suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Quantification of 3D imaging revealed that at early postnatal stages most hypothalamic nuclei exhibit a high percentage of neurons co-expressing OXT and AVP (Figs. 4f–o and 5, Tables 1 and 2; percentage of cells from the whole hypothalamus combining all nuclei E16.5: OXT = 34.66% ± 3.21; AVP = 42.62% ± 2.78; OXT + AVP = 22.72% ± 2.75; PN0: OXT = 20.93% ± 4.91; AVP = 52.25% ± 6.04; OXT + AVP = 26.83% ± 10.74; PN7: OXT = 12.91% ± 4.41; AVP = 27.97% ± 3.11; OXT + AVP = 39.39% ± 6.97; Adult: OXT = 52.00% ± 5.10; AVP = 27.43% ± 3.65; OXT + AVP = 17.25% ± 5.91; n = 4 per each stage). This phenomenon is quite prominent in some nuclei, such as ADPN and neighboring areas like the BNST, where the percentage of neurons co-expressing OXT and AVP decreases in the adult brain, although in a rather heterogeneous fashion (Figs. 4x–y, 5 and Table 2, percentage of AVP + OXT neurons: PN0: ADPN = 88.54% ± 7.86; BNST = 90.16% ± 8.34; PN7: ADPN=77.91% ± 8.45; BNST = 87.68% ± 5.95; Adult: ADPN = 26.50% ± 22.93; BNST = 26.55% ± 24.07; n = 4 per each stage). In the rest of the nuclei, co-labeling of OXT and AVP reaches a peak at PN7 that thereafter steadily decreases over time (Fig. 4u–w and Supplementary Fig. 3q–s), with the exception of SCH which is primarily constituted by AVP-expressing neurons (Supplementary Fig. 3t and Fig. 5, Tables 1 and 2; SCH neurons: PN0: OXT: 0.69% ± 0.40; AVP = 98.93% ±  0.48; OXT + AVP = 0.12% ± 0.12; PN7: OXT = 0.16% ± 0.16; AVP = 99.08% ± 0.14; OXT + AVP = 0.54% ± 0.18; Adult: OXT = 2.22% ± 0.86; AVP = 96.05% ± 1.22; OXT + AVP = 1.73% ± 0.79; n = 4 per each stage).

In contrast, OXT neurons exhibit the opposite trend with their lowest expression at PN7 from when OXT significantly increases to reach its maximum levels in the adult brain (Fig. 4). The transition from OXT + AVP to OXT expression is more pronounced in the BNST and ADPN where the percentage of AVP neurons is drastically reduced in the adult brain, although with some variability as previously observed39 (Fig. 4x and y). These results indicate that neurons co-expressing OXT and AVP are a common feature of the developing mouse hypothalamus. The functional role of this mixed neuronal population remains unexplored. However, it is tempting to speculate that OXT and AVP may share common signaling pathways during early development as immature forms of the OXT and AVP receptors may be activated by both neuropeptides during embryonic and early postnatal stages55,56. Furthermore, our results indicate that OXT and AVP neurons follow independent specification patterns in different hypothalamic nuclei. Together, these data show that OXT and AVP systems in the mouse brain are highly dynamic during early development and continue their remodeling until the postnatal period.

Cell diversity among hypothalamic nuclei during development

3D analysis of OXT and AVP expression across the hypothalamus revealed a high degree of variability in their specification patterns. Thus most of the rostral nuclei, particularly ADPN, BNST, PeVN, and SCH, show higher degree of homogeneity (Fig. 6a–h) whereas caudal nuclei (SON, PVN, RCH, and AN) are more heterogeneous containing a large number of OXT + AVP neurons during early development (Fig. 6i–p). Among the homogeneous areas, adult ADPN and BNST consist mainly of OXT neurons (Fig. 6ai–bi and e-f) whereas SCH is almost exclusively made up of AVP neurons53 (Fig. 6di and h). Lastly, the PeVN exhibits an intermediate behavior with a low percentage of OXT + AVP neurons (Fig. 6ci–g). On the other hand, heterogeneous nuclei like the PVN can be subdivided in well-defined subregions where AVP neurons concentrate at the dorsolateral (rostral view, arrow in Fig. 6ii) and intermediate region (lateral view, arrow in Fig. 6m), similarly to what has been described in the rat brain57. Our results revealed that this distribution is maintained from newborn to adulthood. However, at early embryonic stages OXT + AVP neurons appear mostly located at the rostral PVN whereas AVP neurons concentrate in the caudal area at E16.5. Similarly, OXT and AVP expression in the SON is restricted to defined areas, with a high percentage of OXT neurons in the rostral section and most AVP cells concentrated in the ventrolateral region57 (Fig. 6ji and n). The RCH is also constituted by two well-differentiated areas of high cellular heterogeneity (Fig. 6ki and o), one along the surface (arrow in Fig. 6ki) and another surrounding the dorsomedial area (arrowhead in Fig. 6ki). Note these two RCH subregions appear highly interconnected (Supplementary movie 6), a feature that had not been appreciated previously, and that it seems a feature of early developmental stages. Among all nuclei, the AN exhibit the most pronounced cellular heterogeneity across all developmental stages because its rostral part is almost exclusively constituted by OXT and OXT + AVP neurons whereas the caudal region is formed mainly by AVP neurons (Fig. 6li and p).

Fig. 6. Cellular diversity within the hypothalamic nuclei.

Fig. 6

Whole-mount immunolabeling against OXT and AVP in the adult mouse hypothalamus and surrounding areas such as the BNST. Nucleus segmentation shows OXT (green) and AVP (red) in distinct nuclei. The top panel shows the most homogeneous nuclei including ADPN, BNST, PeVN, and SCH (ah) and the bottom panel the most heterogeneous ones, PVN, SON, RCH, and AN (ip). Each nucleus (ad and il) is represented by two images from different perspectives: a rostral (aidi and iili) and a lateral view (ef and mp).

Spatial distribution of OXT and AVP neurons in the developing PVN

Spatial differences in the expression pattern of OXT and AVP neurons are likely due to distinct functional demands during development. We aimed to explore specific cell-type distribution dynamics analyzing 3D reconstructions of the PVN, a prominent brain source for OXT and AVP. Despite some subtle differences, OXT and AVP neurons follow a similar expression pattern in the midline and the rostro-caudal axis (Fig. 7). As such, during early developmental stages (E16.5, PN0), both OXT and AVP neurons can be found mostly distributed away from the midline to progressively populate the most medial regions as development progresses (Fig. 7a–h) but with some noticeable differences: whereas OXT neurons are more abundant in the region nearest to the midline, AVP neurons are concentrated in the intermediate regions (also see Fig. 6m and 6ii). This trend is also observed in the OXT + AVP neuron population (Fig. 7, 7i–l), which from a fairly homogeneous distribution in the proximal regions expand to the midline by PN7. In contrast, OXT and AVP expression exhibits different dynamics in the rostro-caudal axis. At early developmental stages, OXT and OXT + AVP neurons are abundant at the PVN caudal region whereas they ultimately appear uniformly expressed in the adult PVN (Fig. 7a–d and i–l). AVP neurons on the other hand are less abundant in the caudal axis and mostly concentrate in the intermediate regions (Fig. 7e–h). This diversity is likely to respond to different roles of the different hypothalamic nuclei as main sources of OXT and AVP innervation at distinct stages of development.

Fig. 7. Spatial cell distribution in the PVN during development.

Fig. 7

Cell distribution of OXT (ad), AVP (eh) and OXT + AVP (il) neurons are represented at E16.5, PN0, PN7 and adult brain. Each plot shows the cell distribution, represented as spots in the 3D brain reconstruction. Colors indicate distance to the midline. Each developmental stage is indicated with a histogram of different color. Each plot includes the minimum value, quartile 1 (Q1), median, quartile 3 (Q3) and the maximum value per each axis (x, y and z). X position: E16.5 OXT: min = 961.00; Q1 = 1009.00; median = 1046.00; Q3 = 1072.00; max = 1146.00; E16.5 AVP: min = 972.00; Q1 = 1014.00; median = 1050.00; Q3 = 1078.00; max = 1146.00; E16.5 OXT + AVP: min = 973.00; Q1 = 1006.00; median = 1040.00; Q3 = 1069.00; max = 1147.00; P0 OXT: min = 378.00; Q1 = 467.00; median = 526.00; Q3 = 569.00; max = 673.00; P0 AVP: min = 367.00; Q1 = 477.00; median = 525.00; Q3 = 561.00; max = 673.00; P0 OXT + AVP: min = 400.00; Q1 = 477.00; median = 529.00; Q3 = 568.00; max = 673.00; P7 OXT: min = 165.00; Q1 = 258.00; median = 313.00; Q3 = 371.00; max = 536.00; P7 AVP: min = 161.00; Q1 = 257.00; median = 309.00; Q3 = 357.00; max = 595.00; P7 OXT + AVP: min = 164.00; Q1 = 263.00; median = 302.00; Q3 = 346.00; max = 514.00; Adult OXT: min = 855.00; Q1 = 915.00; median = 958.00; Q3 = 1014.00; max = 1241.00; Adult AVP: min = 859.00; Q1 = 940.00; median = 981.00; Q3 = 1026.00; max = 1230.00; Adult OXT + AVP: min = 871.00; Q1 = 934.00; median = 971.00; Q3 = 1013.00; max = 1090.00. Z position: E16.5 OXT: min = 89.10; Q1 = 222.00; median = 270.00; Q3 = 307.00; max = 341.00; E16.5 AVP: min = 74.00; Q1 = 236.00; median = 273.00; Q3 = 304.00; max = 341.00; E16.5 OXT + AVP: min = 88.80; Q1 = 233.00; median = 268.00; Q3 = 308.00; max = 328.00; P0 OXT: min = 890.00; Q1 = 1043.00; median = 1143.00; Q3 = 1219.00; max = 1306.00; P0 AVP: min = 891.00; Q1 = 1042.00; median = 1128.00; Q3 = 1215.00; max = 1307.00; P0 OXT + AVP: min = 892.00; Q1 = 1039.00; median = 1147.00; Q3 = 1222.00; max = 1299.00; P7 OXT: min = 504.00; Q1 = 743.00; median = 871.00; Q3 = 1002.00; max = 1162.00; P7 AVP: min = 504.00; Q1 = 747.00; median = 825.00; Q3 = 929.00; max = 1153.00; P7 OXT + AVP: min = 501.00; Q1 = 723.00; median = 802.00; Q3 = 892.00; max = 1151.00; Adult OXT: min = 669.00; Q1 = 914.00; median = 1059.00; Q3 = 1245.00; max = 1471.00; Adult AVP: min = 678.00; Q1 = 991.00; median = 1091.00; Q3 = 1198.00; max = 1468.00; Adult OXT + AVP: min = 680.00; Q1 = 978.00; median = 1069.00; Q3 = 1168.00; max = 1329.00.

Heterogeneity of oxytocinergic cells during early development

In addition to wild type animals, we analyzed OXT expression in a commercial transgenic line. The OXT-Cre mice (Jackson Laboratories, ID 02423435) express a Cre recombinase sequence right after the stop codon of the OXT gene and they are an effective tool for identifying OXT neurons47. To this aim, we bred these animals with a tdTomato reporter line to identify OXT-expressing cells. An anti-RFP antibody was used to enhance the signal of OXT-tdTomato cells in combination with the anti-OXT antibody (PS38) used in iDISCO+ experiments (Fig. 8). Analysis of the OXT-tdTomato mouse line over development revealed that OXT expression can be identified as early as E14.5 (Fig. 8a–aii) with no detectable signal prior, that stage (no OXT signal was detected at E12.5). In agreement with our previous results, OXT-tdTomato cells first appear in caudal nuclei like the PVN, SON, and RCH (Figs. 8, 2, and 3). Surprisingly, tdTomato-expressing cells do not perfectly colocalize with OXT positive neurons identified by immunohistofluorescence during embryonic and early postnatal stages. Remarkably just ~20% of the identified OXT neurons were RFP positive at E16.5 (22.81% ± 4.44; n = 3; Fig. 8b–bii). We further tested the ability of the PS38 anti-OXT antibody to detect OXT expression at early developmental stages (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4) comparing it with another commercial antibody (see “Material and Methods” for details) finding that PS38 was particularly suitable for early OXT identification (Figs. 1 and 2; Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4). Thus, the lack of colocalization between OXT and tdTomato in this mouse line, may suggest changes in the internal program of OXT positive cells likely due to functional changes during embryonic and early postnatal development58. This heterogeneity is developmentally regulated as co-labeling increases as maturation progresses (Fig. 8c–f) to reach an almost complete co-localization in the adult PVN (Fig. 8f–fii) as previously described in this mouse line47 (~92% co-expression in PVN and SON was reported in the original characterization by Wu et al.,47). However, these early OXT precursors persist until adulthood in particular areas like the SON and the RCH (Fig. 9). In fact, these nuclei retain a significant number of this oxytocinergic subpopulation at both PN7 and in the adult brain, following a heterogeneous distribution in the RCH (Fig. 9a–ai and b–bi) and a highly organized pattern in the SON where these neurons form a distinctive lateral subregion (Fig. 9c–ci and d–di). These findings reveal a niche of molecularly distinct oxytocinergic neurons (not-recognized by PS38 but visible from E14.5 in OXT-tdTomato mice) that may retain some immature features in the adult SON and RCH.

Fig. 8. Analysis of OXT expression in an OXT-tdTomato mouse line.

Fig. 8

Coronal sections of the PVN at a range of stages: E14.5 (aaii), E16.5 (bbii), E18.5 (ccii), PN0 (ddii), PN7 (eeii) and adult (ffii). Immunohistofluorescence against anti-RFP (red) and anti-OXT (green). Scale bar: 50 µm in ad, 150 µm in e, f.

Fig. 9. Development of SON and RCH in an OXT-tdTomato mouse line.

Fig. 9

Brain coronal sections show the RCH (a, ai, b, bi) and SON (c, ci, d, di) at a range of stages: PN7 (a, ai, c, ci) including adult (b, bi, d, di). Immunohistofluorescence against anti-OXT (green), anti-RFP (red), and anti-AVP (white). White line represents the population of RFP positive cells not recognized by the PS38 OXT antibody. Abbreviations: SON supraoptic nucleus, RCH retrochiasmaticarea. Scale bar: 100 µm.

Discussion

Until now, a complete picture of the OXT and AVP innervation in the developing mouse brain has been lacking whereas more detailed information has been available for the rat brain. This lack of knowledge has prevented establishing meaningful correlations between anatomical and functional data obtained from transgenic mouse lines and mouse behavioral studies11,1620. Our work aims to overcome these current challenges by providing a detailed analysis of the OXT and AVP systems in the developing mouse brain. Here, we have implemented novel iDISCO+ clearing techniques to generate high cell-resolution brain-wide maps of the developing OXT and AVP systems. Systematic 3D cell quantification revealed that the formation of these circuits exhibits specific features distinct from the rat and other rodents which need to be considered when working with this animal model.

Similar to other rodents58,59, mouse OXT and AVP are mostly synthesized in the PVN, SON, and AN. However, vasopressinergic and oxytocinergic cells can be found in other hypothalamic areas as well as non-hypothalamic regions, where these systems have been less studied. The cellular resolution achieved by the iDISCO+ clearing method revealed OXT and AVP neurons in non-hypothalamic areas like the MeA and particularly, the BNST (Supplementary movies 15) where OXT- and AVP-expressing neurons have been difficult to identify by traditional approaches3639. These findings are different from the rat brain where OXT and AVP neurons have not been described in the BNST at any developmental stage4046. These differences in OXT and AVP expression may relate to distinctive functions of the OXT and AVP systems in the rat and mouse brain. As such, studies in OXT knock out mice indicated that, contrary to rats, OXT ablation does not prevent sexual or maternal behavior in mice despite being indispensable for the milk ejection reflex and lactation4,60. Interestingly, the mouse BNST has been suggested to participate in social recognition through an OXT-mediated signaling involving the MeA61. Thus the presence of a small population of OXT and AVP neurons in these areas in the mouse brain is suggestive of local peptidergic regulation which may be unique to mice. Furthermore, oxytocinergic and vasopressinergic systems appear to be sexually dimorphic in mice6269 even during early development70, although sexual dimorphism may be may less prominent in the developing AVP system70,71. Another interesting difference is the presence of a well-defined pool of AVP neurons in the dorsolateral SON in the mouse brain (Figs. 2, 4 and Supplementary movie 2), whereas AVP neurons in the rat have been reported to first appear in the SON ventromedial region57.

In this study, we employed an anti-OXT antibody (PS38) that specifically recognizes OXT-neurophysin I42,59. The OXT gene is cleaved to generate multiple OXT intermediate forms and the carrier protein neurophysin I required to transport OXT to secretory granules72. Neurophysin I facilitates the transport of OXT throughout the secretory pathway and is released together with OXT, but its function as a signaling molecule remains unknown. Given that neurophysin I is required for OXT trafficking and storage, it is not surprising that the two proteins co-localize at the subcellular level73 and that the expression pattern of the two is identical from embryonic stages to adulthood74, indicating their maturation occurs in parallel and is indistinguishable. This notion is further strengthen in our work where the PS38 antibody recognized OXT-expressing neurons from early developmental stages to adulthood in the mouse hypothalamus as reported previusly4046. Interestingly, the expression of OXT and AVP neurons within distinct hypothalamic areas revealed distinct developmental dynamics. One of the most striking developmental patterns was observed in the SCH nucleus where the total number of AVP neurons declined significantly over time. Previous studies have reported an increase of hypothalamic volume in parallel with organism growth75, thus the decrease of the relative abundance of AVP neurons in the SCH likely reflects a switch in the internal program of these neurons rather than overall neuronal loss due to developmentally-regulated cellular apoptosis or pruning mechanisms. SCH is considered the master regulator of the circadian clock in mammals76 which experiences drastic developmental changes as it transitions from non-photic cues, such as maternal hormonal cycles, to photic ones after birth77,78, thus we hypothesize that the developmental dynamics of SCH AVP-expressing neurons is likely to reflect this functional adaption.

Parallel to the observed changes in SCH, our findings point to a substantial reorganization of the OXT/AVP balance in most hypothalamic nuclei during development (Figs. 24, and Tables 1 and 2). In general, our data indicate that the vasopressinergic system matures earlier than oxytocinergic neurons, which were found scarce at PN7 in agreement with previous reports3639. Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization studies in the rat brain indicated the existence of several intermediate OXT forms during early development59. In this regard, the analysis of a transgenic OXT mouse line (OXT-tdTomato) revealed a significant percentage of oxytocinergic neurons that are not recognized by anti-OXT PS38 (Fig. 8) indicating the presence of distinct OXT precursors during early development. Given that the OXT-Cre transgenic line used in this study47 was generated following a knock-in strategy that ensured the co-expression of OXT and Cre, discrepancies in OXT and RFP co-localization may be due to changes in the internal program of OXT positive cells likely due to functional changes during embryonic and early postnatal development58,59. Consisting with this notion, co-localization progressively increased over time suggesting that OXT processing is a developmentally regulated process58,59. However, OXT processing appears to exhibit region-specific properties since areas like the SON and RCH retain a significant number of OXT-tdTomato neurons (not recognized by the PS38 anti-OXT antibody) until adulthood (Fig. 9). Although the existence of immature non-amidated forms of OXT in the hypothalamus is well documented58,59, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an OXT precursor specific to the SON and RCH. To note, this OXT subpopulation is organized in a particular niche within the SON suggesting the existence of a defined area with potentially distinctive properties. Our studies indicate that the OXT-Cre line employed here will be a useful tool to carry out functional analysis of this particular subpopulation of OXT neurons.

Little is known about the function of OXT and AVP peptides during early development. However, immature OXT forms coexist with the mature amidated form during the entire postnatal life58 suggesting that these immature precursors may contribute to hypothalamic neuromodulation by means that remain to be elucidated. OXT seems to undergo a more intensive maturation program than AVP, which has fewer immature precursors and a mature form that can be detected as early as E16.543. In contrast, amidated OXT is first detected at birth and subsequently coexists with immature precursors until late postnatal stages36,46. This phenomenon is well-documented in prairie voles79, a trend observed in the present study and suspected to be common in other mammals including humans. Intriguingly, some immature OXT forms are capable of activating the oxytocin receptor, which is widely expressed before birth80, suggesting a role of these precursors in the consolidation of the oxytocinergic circuit. In fact, magnocellular OXT neurons exhibit undeveloped morphology and electrophysiological properties at birth that are progressively refined by reducing spontaneous activity and decreasing action potential-evoked calcium entry during the first postnatal weeks8183. These changes are accompanied by a switch in the regulatory mechanisms of cytosolic calcium from extrusion to sequestration into the endoplasmic reticulum84 which has been postulated to impact neuropeptide exocytosis84. In this scenario, the appearance of amidated OXT may influence the magnocellular neuron maturation as OXT modulates neuronal excitability85, contributing to shape synaptic transmission and plasticity. Consistent with this notion, our analysis has revealed that the AVP and OXT circuits undergo two periods of intense remodeling. The first occurs at time of birth, and coincides with a critical period for social behavior. The second occurs at PN7, when the OXT/AVP ratio appears to increase in most hypothalamic nuclei. The functional consequences of this rearrangement are unknown, but these adjustments may underlie a critical period for hypothalamic maturation during the first two postnatal weeks8183, which is likely involve profound cellular plasticity events as neurotransmitter switches86. This complex scenario is further expanded in the present study by the finding of tissue-specific OXT precursors (Fig. 9) in the SON and RCH which are likely to differentially impact the maturation of the oxytocinergic system in these particular regions and their target sites. Furthermore, OXT has been reported to modulate astroglial and microglial function87,88 by activating mechanisms that impact brain homeostasis and immunoresponse, as well as social behavior87,88.

In summary, the present study highlights the importance of applying novel imaging tools to analyzing the properties of specific circuits in the whole brain. Improved brain clearing methods in combination with light sheet fluorescent microscopy and 3D reconstruction allow high resolution analysis of specific pathways to address their dynamics during physiological and pathological conditions. The potency of these novel technologies has revealed the developing mouse hypothalamus as a dynamic structure that undergoes intense remodeling up to the postnatal period with different nucleus exhibiting distinct temporal and spatial dynamics of the specification of OXT and AVP pathways. Our findings provide new information to understand the specification of these neuronal circuits, which is a critical step for uncovering the wiring alterations and cellular dysfunctions underlying social deficits.

Methods

Animals

Experiments were performed in wild type ICR mice bred in-house. Brains were extracted at E16.5, PN0, and PN7 from young female adults (2–3 months). Data from female and male animals were pooled for E16.5, PN0, and PN7 animals. A limitation of the study is the use of a mixture of male and female brains to analyze early developmental stages (E16.5, PN0, and PN7) hindering the detection of potential sex differences. Oxytocin-Ires-Cre:Rosa26iDTR/+OXT-Cre (OXT-Cre thereafter) mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (strain ID 024234). These animals express Cre recombinase under the control of the endogenous OXT promoter and has been used previously to specifically target oxytocinergic neurons47. In this configuration, Cre and Oxt are transcribed as a single bicistronic mRNA and the IRES sequence allows simultaneous translation of both OXT and Cre proteins from the same transcript47. OXT-Cre mice were bred with a tdTomato reporter line (Ai9, Jackson Laboratories strain ID 007909) which exhibit a Cre reporter allele with a loxP-flanked STOP cassette preventing transcription of the red fluorescent protein variant tdTomato inserted into the Gt(ROSA)26Sor locus. OXT-tdTomato mice express robust tdTomato fluorescence following Cre-mediated recombination. All experiments were performed according to Spanish and European Union regulations regarding animal research (2010/63/EU), and the experimental procedures were approved by the Bioethical Committee at the Instituto de Neurociencias and the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Animals were housed in ventilated cages in a standard pathogen-free facility, with free access to food and water on a 12 h light/dark cycle.

Immunohistofluorescence

Mice were intracardially perfused and brains were extracted and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS overnight. Embryos were fixed overnight by immersion in 4% PFA. Samples were embedded in agarose (4%) and sectioned at 50 µm using a Leica VT1000 S vibratome. Sections were rinsed three times in PBS and incubated 1 h in PBST (0.3% Triton, 2% Normal Goat Serum). Samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C in a rotating shaker with the following primary antibodies: mouse anti-oxytoxin PS3842,59 (1:800; kindly provided by Dr. Harold Gainer; NIH); rabbit anti-oxytocin (1:800; Millipore, AB911); rabbit anti-RFP (1:1000; Abcam, ab62341); rat anti-RFP (1:1000; Chromotek, 5f8-100); rabbit anti-vasopressin (1:800; Millipore, PC234L). Note that mouse anti-OXT (PS38) and rabbit anti-OXT label a highly overlapping pool of OXT neurons in the adult brain (Supplementary Fig. 4), but rabbit anti-OXT is not able to identify OXT neurons at early developmental stages (Supplementary Fig. 5), in contrast to PS38 which detects OXT-positive cells as early as E16.5 (Figs. 2 and 3). AVP antibody recognizes the mature peptide which is detected as early as E16.5 indicating that AVP maturation occurs much earlier than OXT maturation. Tissue was rinsed three times in PBS and incubated with the corresponding secondary antibody: goat anti-mouse Alexa-488 (1:500; Invitrogen, A32723); donkey anti-mouse Alexa-647 (1:500; Jackson ImmunoResearch, 715-605-150); goat anti-rabbit Alexa-594 (1:500; Invitrogen, A11072); donkey anti-rat Alexa-594 (1:500; Jackson ImmunoResearch, 712-585-153). After rinsing sections were incubated 10 min at room temperature (RT) with 0.001% DAPI (4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride, Sigma, D9542) in PBS for nuclear staining. Slices were mounted with Mowiol 40-88 (Millipore, 475904) for histology.

Immunolabeling-enabled three-dimensional imaging of solvent-cleared organ (iDISCO+)

Whole-mount immunostaining and iDISCO+ optical clearing was performed as described in Renier et al.,50 and Renier et al.,51. Mice were intracardially perfused and brains were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS overnight. Embryos were fixed in 4% PFA immersion overnight. Brains were dehydrated using a series of concentrations of methanol (50, 80, 100, and 100%) and then incubated in 6% H2O2 in methanol overnight in order to bleach the samples. After rehydratation, samples were blocked with PBS-GT (0.5% Triton X-100, 0.2% gelatin) for durations that depended on developmental stage: overnight for E16.5 brains; 2 days for PN0 and PN7 brains; and 4 days for adult brains. Brains were incubated with OXT and AVP primary antibodies (mouse anti-oxytocin, Gainer Lab, NIH, PS3842,59 (1:1000) and rabbit anti-vasopressin, Millipore PC234L (1:2000)) diluted in 0.1% saponin (Sigma, S4521) PBS-GT solution for 5 days (E16.5), 10 days (PN0), 2 weeks (PN7) or 3 weeks (adult brain) at 37 °C on a rotating shaker. Afterward, samples were incubated with secondary antibodies directly conjugated to a fluorophore donkey anti-mouse Alexa-647 (1:500; Jackson ImmunoResearch, 715-605-150) or goat anti-rabbit Alexa-594 (1:500; Invitrogen, A11072) at 37 °C overnight or two days for adult brains. Immunostaining controls using secondary antibodies (without primary antibodies) were performed to test the specificity of the primary antibodies for OXT and AVP.

For the clearing, brains were dehydrated in 20, 40, 60, and 80% methanol in H2O at RT in a rotating shaker. Shaker incubations were for 1 h for embryonic and postnatal brains, and 1.5 h for adults. Specimens were then incubated twice in 100% methanol for 1–1.5 h, and treated overnight in 1 volume of 100% methanol and l/3 volumes of 100% dichloromethane (DCM; Sigma-Aldrich; 270997). On the next day, brains were incubated in 100% DCM for 30 min. Lastly, samples were cleared in 100% dibenzylether (DBE; Sigma-Aldrich; 108014) until becoming translucent.

Microscopy and imaging processing

Confocal microscopy was performed with a laser scanning Leica SPE-II DM5550 microscope with ×10, ×20, and ×40 objectives. Brains were imaged on a bidirectional triple light-sheet microscope (Ultramicroscope II, LaVision Biotec) equipped with a binocular stereomicroscope (MXV10, Olympus) with a ×2 objective (MVPLAPO, Olympus) using a 5.7 mm working distance dipping cap. Samples were placed in an imaging reservoir made of 100 % quartz (LaVision BioTec) filled with ethyl cinnamate (Aldrich, 112372-100G). The step size in Z-orientation between each image was fixed at 3 μm for 2.5× and 4× magnifications for nuclei identification and cell counting, and 5 μm for 0.63×, 1×, and 1.6× magnifications for whole-brain images analysis. 3D imaging was performed using ImspectorPro software (LaVision BioTec) and processed by the Imaris x64 software (version 9.2.1, Bitplane). Video analysis was optimized for cell identification.

Nuclei identification, cell counting, and positioning

Quantifications of OXT and AVP cells in each hypothalamic nucleus were calculated using alternate hemispheres of four brains. Brains at different developmental stages were processed and quantified using Imaris x64 software (version 9.2.1, Bitplane) using the tools for 3D reconstruction and segmentation. Boundaries of hypothalamic nuclei were identified according to the mouse brain atlas of Franklin and Paxinos89. The volume estimation of each nucleus was generated using immunohistochemical labeling as a guide and the Surface Imaris tool. False colors were assigned to these brain areas with the Surface Imaris tool. High-quality 3D images were selected for cell quantification. For accurate quantification of AVP- and OXT-expressing cells the fluorescence threshold was set manually and false positives were discarded from the final analysis using Imaris Spots tool. It is notable that at embryonic stages the image resolution, is not as sharp due to a greater abundance of blood vessels and neuronal processes. 3D pictures and movies were generated with Imaris. Cell 3D positioning was achieved by the statistical data-visualization module of Imaris, vantage view. High dimensional color plots were generated to analyze the 3D distribution of each cell population in the three axes (x, y and z).

Statistics and reproducibility

Several rounds of experiments were performed to assure the accuracy of the results. Samples were processed simultaneously and measurements were performed once the staining protocols were completed in no particular order. The authors were not blind to the age of animals during the processing of the samples since the size of the brain correlates with the age. However, the authors were blind during the analysis. Data were analyzed with Imaris and exported to Excel (Microsoft, Inc.) for data handling. Sample size were estimated using the power analysis set to significance level <0.05 and 0.80 to achieve over 80% of power with n = 4 samples per group. For statistical analysis, cell counts were estimated to follow a negative binomial distribution and adjusted to account for false positives. Samples were discarded when exhibiting poor immunostaining or deficient clearing. Results in the bar graph plot are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. Statistically significant differences were determined using an unpaired t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Peer Review File (2.3MB, pdf)
42003_2021_2110_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (6.2KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Video 1 (2.9MB, mov)
Supplementary Video 2 (1.9MB, mov)
Supplementary Video 3 (3.5MB, mov)
Supplementary Video 4 (6.4MB, mov)
Supplementary Video 5 (3.9MB, mov)
Supplementary Video 6 (2.1MB, mov)
Reporting Summary (356.2KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under the grant SAF2017-82524-R (to S.J.), the “Severo Ochoa” Program for Centres of Excellence in R&D (SEV-2013-0317 and SEV-2017-0723) and the Generalitat Valenciana through the program Prometeo/2019/014 (to S.J.). The mouse anti-OXT antibody was kindly provided by Dr. Harold Gainer, NIH. We thank Dr. Cristina Marquez (IN) for her insightful comments and Dr. Juan Antonio Moreno Bravo for his help with video editing and technical issues. We also are grateful to all Jurado Lab members for their support during the realization of this work and their assistance editing the manuscript.

Author contributions

The project was led by S.J. Brain sample preparation, data acquisition, and analysis was done by M.P.M. Result interpretation, manuscript preparation, and editing was done by S.J. and M.P.M. with help of members from the Jurado Lab and the Instituto de Neurociencias (CSIC-UMH).

Data availability

All the data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. There are no restrictions on the data availability.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

6/11/2021

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02314-8.

Change history

6/17/2021

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s42003-021-02314-8

Contributor Information

María Pilar Madrigal, Email: mmadrigal@umh.es.

Sandra Jurado, Email: sjurado@umh.es.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42003-021-02110-4.

References

  • 1.Caldwell, H. K. & Young, W. S. Oxytocin and vasopressin: genetics and behavioral implications. Handbook of Neurochemistry and Molecular Neurobiology. 573–607 (2006).
  • 2.Gimpl G, Fahrenholz F. The oxytocin receptor system: structure, function, and regulation. Physiol. Rev. 2001;81:629–683. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pedersen CA, Ascher JA, Monroe YL, Prange AJ., Jr. Oxytocin induces maternal behavior in virgin female rats. Science. 1982;216:648–650. doi: 10.1126/science.7071605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nishimori K, et al. Oxytocin is required for nursing but is not essential for parturition or reproductive behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:11699–11704. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hammock EA, Young LJ. Oxytocin, vasopressin and pair bonding: implications for autism. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2006;361:2187–2198. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lim MM, Young LJ. Neuropeptidergic regulation of affiliative behavior and social bonding in animals. Horm. Behav. 2006;50:506–517. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McCarthy MM, Wright CL, Schwarz JM. New tricks by an old dogma: mechanisms of the organizational/activational hypothesis of steroid-mediated sexual differentiation of brain and behavior. Horm. Behav. 2009;55:655–665. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Caldwell HK. Oxytocin and vasopressin: powerful regulators of social behavior. Neuroscientist. 2017;23:517–528. doi: 10.1177/1073858417708284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Caldwell HK. Neurobiology of sociability. Adv. Exp. Med Biol. 2012;739:187–205. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1704-0_12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Witt DM, Carter CS, Walton DM. Central and peripheral effects of oxytocin administration in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) Pharm. Biochem Behav. 1990;37:63–69. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90042-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McCarthy MM. Oxytocin inhibits infanticide in female house mice (Mus domesticus) Horm. Behav. 1990;24:365–375. doi: 10.1016/0018-506x(90)90015-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Insel TR, Young LJ. The neurobiology of attachment. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001;2:129–136. doi: 10.1038/35053579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bartz JA, Zaki J, Bolger N, Ochsner KN. Social effects of oxytocin in humans: context and person matter. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011;15:301–309. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dulac C, O’Connell LA, Wu Z. Neural control of maternal and paternal behaviors. Science. 2014;345:765–770. doi: 10.1126/science.1253291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rilling JK, Young LJ. The biology of mammalian parenting and its effect on offspring social development. Science. 2014;345:771–776. doi: 10.1126/science.1252723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dölen G, Darvishzadeh A, Huang KW, Malenka RC. Social reward requires coordinated activity of nucleus accumbens oxytocin and serotonin. Nature. 2013;501:179–184. doi: 10.1038/nature12518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Marlin BJ, Mitre M, D’Amour JA, Chao MV, Froemke RC. Oxytocin enables maternal behaviour by balancing cortical inhibition. Nature. 2015;520:499–504. doi: 10.1038/nature14402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nardou R, et al. Oxytocin-dependent reopening of a social reward learning critical period with MDMA. Nature. 2019;7754:116–120. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1075-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Viviani D, et al. Oxytocin selectively gates fear responses through distinct outputs from the central amygdala. Science. 2011;333:104–107. doi: 10.1126/science.1201043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yoshida M, et al. Evidence that oxytocin exerts anxiolytic effects via oxytocin receptor expressed in serotonergic neurons in mice. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:2259–2222. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5593-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.de Vries GJ, Veenema AH, Brown CH. Vasopressin and oxytocin: keys to understanding the neural control of physiology and behaviour. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2012;24:527. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2012.02305.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Young LJ, Wang Z. The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nat. Neurosci. 2004;7:1048–1054. doi: 10.1038/nn1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shalev I, et al. Vasopressin needs an audience: neuropeptide elicited stress responses are contingent upon perceived social evaluative threats. Horm. Behav. 2011;60:121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Heinrichs M, von Dawans B, Domes G. Oxytocin, vasopressin, and human social behavior. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2009;30:548–557. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brunnlieb C, Münte TF, Krämer U, Tempelmann C, Heldmann M. Vasopressin modulates neural responses during human reactive aggression. Soc. Neurosci. 2013;8:148–164. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2013.763654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meyer-Lindenberg A, Domes G, Kirsch P, Heinrichs M. Oxytocin and vasopressin in the human brain: social neuropeptides for translational medicine. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2011;12:524–538. doi: 10.1038/nrn3044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lee HJ, Caldwell HK, Macbeth AH, Tolu SG, Young WS., 3rd A conditional knockout mouse line of the oxytocin receptor. Endocrinology. 2008;149:3256–3263. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Crawley JN, et al. Social approach behaviors in oxytocin knockout mice: comparison of two independent lines tested in different laboratory environments. Neuropeptides. 2007;41:145–163. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2007.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Winslow JT, Insel TR. The social deficits of the oxytocin knockout mouse. Neuropeptides. 2002;26:221–229. doi: 10.1054/npep.2002.0909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Green L, et al. Oxytocin and autistic disorder: alterations in peptide forms. Biol. Psychiatry. 2001;50:609–613. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01139-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Meyer-Lindenberg A, et al. Genetic variants in AVPR1A linked to autism predict amygdala activation and personality traits in healthy humans. Mol. Psychiatry. 2009;14:968–975. doi: 10.1038/mp.2008.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Consiglio AR, Lucion AB. Lesion of hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus and maternal aggressive behavior in female rats. Physiol. Behav. 1996;59:591–596. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02117-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Caldwell HK, Stephens SL, Young WS., 3rd Oxytocin as a natural antipsychotic: a study using oxytocin knockout mice. Mol. Psychiatry. 2009;14:190–196. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee PR, et al. Social interaction deficits caused by chronic phencyclidine administration are reversed by oxytocin. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005;30:1883–1894. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Goldman M, Marlow-O’Connor M, Torres I, Dorsa DM, Koenig JI. Diminished plasma oxytocin in schizophrenic patients with neuroendocrine dysfunction and emotional deficits. Schizophr. Res. 2008;98:247–255. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jing X, Ratty AK, Murphy D. Ontogeny of the vasopressin and oxytocin RNAs in the mouse hypothalamus. Neurosci. Res. 1998;30:343–349. doi: 10.1016/s0168-0102(98)00017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Caqueret A, Boucher F, Michaud JL. Laminar organization of the early developing anterior hypothalamus. Dev. Biol. 2006;298:95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nakai S, et al. The POU domain transcription factor Brn-2 is required for the determination of specific neuronal lineages in the hypothalamus of the mouse. Genes Dev. 1995;9:3109–3121. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.24.3109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Otero‐García M, Agustin‐Pavon C, Lanuza E, Martinez‐García F. Distribution of oxytocin and co‐localization with arginine vasopressin in the brain of mice. Brain Struct. Funct. 2016;221:3445–3473. doi: 10.1007/s00429-015-1111-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Buijs RM, Velis DN, Swaab DF. Ontogeny of vasopressin and oxytocin in the fetal rat: early vasopressinergic innervation of the fetal brain. Peptides. 1980;1:315–324. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(80)90009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sinding C, Robinson AG, Seif SM, Schmid PG. Neurohypophyseal peptides in the developing rat fetus. Brain Res. 1980;195:177–186. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90875-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Whitnall MH, Key S, Ben-Barak Y, Ozato K, Gainer H. Neurophysin in the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system. II. Immunocytochemical studies of the ontogeny of oxytocinergic and vasopressinergic neurons. J. Neurosci. 1985;1:98–109. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-01-00098.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Altstein M, Gainer H. Differential biosynthesis and posttranslational processing of vasopressin and oxytocin in rat brain during embryonic and postnatal development. J. Neurosci. 1988;8:3967–3977. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-11-03967.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Laurent FM, Hindelang C, Klein MJ, Stoeckel ME, Felix JM. Expression of the oxytocin and vasopressin genes in the rat hypothalamus during development: an in situ hybridization study. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 1989;46:145–154. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(89)90152-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Trembleau A, Ugrumov M, Roche D, Calas A. Vasopressin and oxytocin gene expression in intact rats and under catecholamine deficiency during ontogenesis. Brain Res. Bull. 1995;37:437–448. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(95)00020-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lipari EF, et al. The hypothalamic magnocellular neurosecretory system in developing rats. Eur. J. Histochem. 2001;45:163–168. doi: 10.4081/1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wu Z, et al. An obligate role of oxytocin neurons in diet induced energy expenditure. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e45167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dodt HU, et al. Ultramicroscopy: three-dimensional visualization of neuronal networks in the whole mouse brain. Nat. Methods. 2007;4:331–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chung K, Deisseroth K. CLARITY for mapping the nervous system. Nat. Methods. 2013;10:508–513. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Renier N, et al. iDISCO: a simple, rapid method to immunolabel large tissue samples for volume imaging. Cell. 2014;159:896–910. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Renier N, et al. Mapping of brain activity by automated volume analysis of immediate early genes. Cell. 2016;165:1789–1802. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Farina E, Valentino B, Lipari D. Immunohistochemical research on oxytocin in the hypothalamic accessory nuclei. Ital. J. Anat. Embryol. 1995;100:189–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Welsh DK, Takahashi JS, Kay SA. Suprachiasmatic nucleus: cell autonomy and network properties. Annu Rev. Physiol. 2010;72:551–577. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sawchenko PE, Swanson LW. Immunohistochemical identification of neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus that project to the medulla or to the spinal cord in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 1982;205:260–272. doi: 10.1002/cne.902050306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tribollet E, Charpak S, Schmidt A, Dubois-Dauphin M, Dreifuss JJ. Appearance and transient expression of oxytocin receptors in fetal, infant, and peripubertal rat brain studied by autoradiography and electrophysiology. J. Neurosci. 1989;9:1764–1773. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-05-01764.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hammock EAD. Developmental perspectives on oxytocin and vasopressin. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40:24–42. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hou-Yu A, Lamme AT, Zimmerman EA, Silverman AJ. Comparative distribution of vasopressin and oxytocin neurons in the rat brain using a double-label procedure. Neuroendocrinology. 1986;44:235–246. doi: 10.1159/000124651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Grinevich V, Desarménien MG, Chini B, Tauber M, Muscatelli F. Ontogenesis of oxytocin pathways in the mammalian brain: late maturation and psychosocial disorders. Front Neuroanat. 2015;8:164. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ben-Barak Y, Russell JT, Whitnall MH, Ozato K, Gainer H. Neurophysin in the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system. I. Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies. J. Neurosci. 1985;5:81–97. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-01-00081.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Winslow JT, Insel TR. The social deficits of the oxytocin knock out mouse. Neuropeptides. 2002;36:221–229. doi: 10.1054/npep.2002.0909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ferguson JN, Aldag JM, Insel TR, Young LJ. Oxytocin in the medial amygdala is essential for social recognition in the mouse. J. Neurosci. 2001;21:8278–8285. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-20-08278.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rood BD, et al. Site of origin of and sex differences in the vasopressin innervation of the mouse (Mus Musculus) brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 2013;521:2321–2358. doi: 10.1002/cne.23288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Scott N, Prigge M, Yizhar O, Kimchi T. A sexually dimorphic hypothalamic circuit controls maternal care and oxytocin secretion. Nature. 2015;525:519–522. doi: 10.1038/nature15378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Simerly RB. Organization and regulation of sexually dimorphic neuroendocrine pathways. Behav. Brain Res. 1998;92:195–203. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(97)00191-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Smith, C. J. W., DiBenedictis, B. T. & Veenema, A. H. Comparing vasopressin and oxytocin fiber and receptor density patterns in the social behavior neural network: Implications for cross-system signaling, Front. Neuroendocrinol.10.1016/j.yfrne.2019.02.001 (2019) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 66.Szot P, Dorsa DM. Differential timing and sexual dimorphism in the expression of the vasopressin gene in the developing rat brain. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 1993;73:177–183. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(93)90136-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Uhl-Bronner S, Waltisperger E, Martínez-Lorenzana G, Condes Lara M, Freund-Mercier MJ. Sexually dimorphic expression of oxytocin binding sites in forebrain and spinal cord of the rat. Neuroscience. 2005;135:147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Yang CF, et al. Sexually dimorphic neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus govern mating in both sexes and aggression in males. Cell. 2013;153:896–909. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bales KL, et al. Neonatal oxytocin manipulations have long-lasting, sexually dimorphic effects on vasopressin receptors. Neuroscience. 2007;144:38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tamborski, S., Mintz, E., M. & Caldwell, H. K. Sex differences in the embryonic development of the central oxytocin system in mice. J. Neuroendocrinol. 10.1111/jne.12364 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 71.Otero-García M, Agustín-Pavón C, Lanuza E, Martínez-García F. Extending the socio-sexual brain: arginine-vasopressin immunoreactive circuits in the telencephalon of mice. Brain Struct. Funct. 2014;219:1055–1081. doi: 10.1007/s00429-013-0553-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Rao VV, Löffler C, Battey J, Hansmann I. The human gene for oxytocin-neurophysin I (OXT) is physically mapped to chromosome 20p13 by in situ hybridization. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1992;61:271–273. doi: 10.1159/000133420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Belenky M, Castel M, Young WS, 3rd, Gainer H, Cohen S. Ultrastructural immunolocalization of rat oxytocin-neurophysin in transgenic mice expressing the rat oxytocin gene. Brain Res. 1992;583:279–286. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(10)80034-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Butovsky E, et al. Chronic exposure to D9-tetrahydrocannabinol downregulates oxytocin and oxytocin-associated neurophysin in specific brain areas. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 2006;31:795–804. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2006.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Moore RY, Bernstein ME. Synaptogenesis in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus demonstrated by electron microscopy and synapsin I immunoreactivity. J. Neurosci. 1989;9:2151–2162. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-06-02151.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Mohawk JA, Green CB, Takahashi JS. Central and peripheral circadian clocks in mammals. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2012;35:445–462. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sladek M, et al. Insight into molecular core clock mechanism of embryonic and early postnatal rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:6231–6236. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401149101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Sumova A, Sladek M, Polodarova L, Novakova M, Houdek P. Circadian system from conception till adulthood. Prog. Brain Res. 2012;199:83–103. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-59427-3.00005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Yamamoto Y, et al. Neonatal manipulations of oxytocin alter expression of oxytocin and vasopressin immunoreactive cells in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus in a gender-specific manner. Neuroscience. 2004;125:947–955. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tribollet E, Barberis C, Jard S, Dubois-Dauphin M, Dreifuss JJ. Localization and pharmacological characterization of high affinity binding sites for vasopressin and oxytocin in the rat brain by light microscopic autoradiography. Brain Res. 1988;442:105–118. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)91437-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Swaab DF. Development of the human hypothalamus. Neurochem. Res. 1995;20:509–519. doi: 10.1007/BF01694533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Widmer H, Amerdeil H, Fontanaud P, Desarménien MG. Postnatal maturation of rat hypothalamoneurohypophysial neurons: evidence for a developmental decrease in calcium entry during action potentials. J. Neurophysiol. 1997;77:260–271. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.1.260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Chevaleyre V, Dayanithi G, Moos FC, Desarmenien MG. Developmental regulation of a local positive autocontrol of supraoptic neurons. J. Neurosci. 2000;20:5813–5819. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-15-05813.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lee SH, Park KH, Ho WK, Lee SH. Postnatal developmental changes in Ca2+ homeostasis in supraoptic magnocellular neurons. Cell Calcium. 2007;41:441–450. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2006.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jo YH, Stoeckel ME, Freund-Mercier MJ, Schlichter R. Oxytocin modulates glutamatergic synaptic transmission between cultured neonatal spinal cord dorsal horn neurons. J. Neurosci. 1998;18:2377–2386. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-07-02377.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Spitzer NC. Neurotransmitter switching in the developing and adult brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2017;40:1–19. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Loth MK, Donaldson ZR. Oxytocin, dopamine, and opioid interactions underlying pair bonding: highlighting a potential role for microglia. Endocrinology. 2021;162:bqaa223. doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqaa223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Wang YF, Hatton GI. Astrocytic plasticity and patterned oxytocin neuronal activity: dynamic interactions. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:1743–1754. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4669-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Franklin, K. B. J. & Paxinos, G. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates (Academic Press, 1997).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Peer Review File (2.3MB, pdf)
42003_2021_2110_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (6.2KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Video 1 (2.9MB, mov)
Supplementary Video 2 (1.9MB, mov)
Supplementary Video 3 (3.5MB, mov)
Supplementary Video 4 (6.4MB, mov)
Supplementary Video 5 (3.9MB, mov)
Supplementary Video 6 (2.1MB, mov)
Reporting Summary (356.2KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All the data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. There are no restrictions on the data availability.


Articles from Communications Biology are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES