Skip to main content
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health logoLink to International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
. 2021 Apr 21;18(9):4422. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094422

Changes in Multimorbidity and Polypharmacy Patterns in Young and Adult Population over a 4-Year Period: A 2011–2015 Comparison Using Real-World Data

Sara Mucherino 1,2,, Antonio Gimeno-Miguel 3,4,, Jonas Carmona-Pirez 3,4, Francisca Gonzalez-Rubio 3,4,5, Ignatios Ioakeim-Skoufa 3,5,6, Aida Moreno-Juste 3,4, Valentina Orlando 1,2, Mercedes Aza-Pascual-Salcedo 3,4, Beatriz Poblador-Plou 3,4, Enrica Menditto 1,2,*,, Alexandra Prados-Torres 3,4,
Editor: Paul B Tchounwou
PMCID: PMC8122591  PMID: 33919351

Abstract

The pressing problem of multimorbidity and polypharmacy is aggravated by the lack of specific care models for this population. We aimed to investigate the evolution of multimorbidity and polypharmacy patterns in a given population over a 4-year period (2011–2015). A cross-sectional, observational study among the EpiChron Cohort, including anonymized demographic, clinical and drug dispensation information of all users of the public health system ≥65 years in Aragon (Spain), was performed. An exploratory factor analysis, stratified by age and sex, using an open cohort was carried out based on the tetra-choric correlations among chronic diseases and dispensed drugs during 2011 and compared with 2015. Seven baseline patterns were identified during 2011 named as: mental health, respiratory, allergic, mechanical pain, cardiometabolic, osteometabolic, and allergic/derma. Of the epidemiological patterns identified in 2015, six were already present in 2011 but a new allergic/derma one appeared. Patterns identified in 2011 were more complex in terms of both disease and drugs. Results confirmed the existing association between age and clinical complexity. The systematic associations between diseases and drugs remain similar regarding their clinical nature over time, helping in early identification of potential interactions in multimorbid patients with a high risk of negative health outcomes due to polypharmacy.

Keywords: multimorbidity, polypharmacy, chronic diseases, real-world data, epidemiology

1. Introduction

Polypharmacy is referred to as the concurrent use of multiple drugs, and it can be the natural consequence of multimorbidity, more often intended as the coexistence of two or more chronic diseases [1]. However, inappropriate polypharmacy increases the risk of unnecessary drug use, potential drug–drug and drug–disease interactions, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) [2,3], representing an economic and public health issue related to the quality and efficiency of health care [4,5]. The lack of development of specific care models for this population aggravates multimorbidity and polypharmacy [6].

Large-scale population studies based on real-world data represent an excellent opportunity to analyze the complexity of drug prescribing and clinical conditions and allow us to investigate the existence of systematic associations among drugs and diseases [7,8,9,10]. Factor analysis can improve the understanding of multimorbidity and polypharmacy in a real-world context. In 2015, we conducted a study that revealed the existence of systematic associations among chronic diseases and dispensed drugs, identifying up to six patterns of multimorbidity and polypharmacy [11]. Hence, this study aims to compare the baseline epidemiological patterns of multimorbidity and polypharmacy of the EpiChron Cohort in 2011 with those published in 2015 and to describe the clinical evolution of the clinical clusters identified.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design, Study Population, and Variables

We performed an observational, cross-sectional study in the EpiChron Cohort [12]. This cohort includes the anonymized demographic, drug dispensation and clinical information of 98% of users of the public health system in Aragon, Spain (about 1.3 million inhabitants). We collected data from 2011 and compared them with previously published data from 2015 [11] in order to make a 4-year comparison.

The study population included all the subjects living in the Aragon region up to 65 years of age who were users of the public health system. Patients aged 65 and older were excluded from the study to allow for focus on young and adult populations for reasons already explained [11]. We stratified the population by sex and into three age groups: 0–14, 15–44 and 45–65 years, as for the previous analysis to compare the same age groups. For each subject, we analyzed all the diagnoses of chronic diseases from primary care and hospital electronic health records and all dispensed drugs from pharmacy billing records during 2011.

Diagnoses were coded initially based, first on the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) and then converted to codes of the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision (ICD-9). Finally, they were grouped in the Expanded Diagnostic Clusters (EDC) of the ACG System (version 11.0, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA). We included in the analysis all 114 diseases classified as chronic by Salisbury et al. [13] and coded in binary format (i.e., presence/absence of the disease). As in the 2015 study, we also included rhinitis, following the World Health Organization (WHO) indications [14], and acute lower respiratory tract infection, as it can generate chronic sequelae. We classified dispensed drugs according to their Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code at the third level and included chronic and acute drug dispensation with a prevalence of at least 3% in 2015. The Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Aragón (CEICA) approved the study (ethical approval code: PI18/041) and waived the requirement for patient consent, since data of the EpiChron Cohort are anonymized, and no interventions on individuals were performed.

2.2. Statistical Analyses

As we used an open cohort, we performed a descriptive analysis of both 2011 and 2015 populations by describing demographic and clinical information expressed as frequencies, means, standard deviations (SD), and medians. We compared differences between patient characteristics using the chi-squared test for categorical variables or the unpaired t-test for numerical variables, as appropriate, considering statistically significant a p value < 0.05. Patients’ characteristics compared were age, area of living, immigrant status, deprivation index and number of chronic diseases, multimorbidity, and number of drugs related to the reference year. The deprivation index is strictly related to the census section of subjects, which represents the degree of deprivation from the lowest (Q1) to the highest (Q4) of the administrative health area to which it belongs.

An exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify multimorbidity and polypharmacy patterns according to a correlation matrix to decide which diagnoses and dispensed drugs comprised each pattern. Tetra-choric correlation matrices were used due to the dichotomous nature of both chronic diagnoses and administrated medicines. We performed factor extraction based on the principal factor method. We also applied an oblique rotation (Oblimin) to facilitate factor interpretation.

Scree plots were used to decide the number of factors to extract in each group. To determine which codes formed each pattern, we included those with scores >0.30 for each factor. This is the threshold factor loading traditionally used when deciding whether to accept a variable as belonging to a factor [11]. Nonetheless, as done in the previous study, EDCs and ATC codes with scores between 0.25 and 0.30 were included in a factor if considered relevant in the clinical explanation of the pattern.

As done in the previous work [11], we included EDCs with a prevalence >1–2% and ATC codes with a prevalence >3–5% in each age and sex group. Some ATCs with lower prevalence were also covered based on their potential relevance for interactions or side effects. The inclusion and exclusion criteria of EDCs and ATC codes used for each sex and age group were the same, explicitly explained in the 2015 study [11]. We used this prevalence threshold to increase the epidemiological interest of the study, and for statistical reasons regarding collinearity amongst some of the studied variables. The order of factors depends on the prevalence of its components. ATCs and EDCs with higher prevalence values will be identified in the first factors.

We evaluated sample adequacy using the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) test. We only considered values >0.60 as acceptable. Moreover, we calculated the proportion of cumulative variance as a measure of the model’s goodness-of-fit. This measurement describes the data variability explained by the patterns. We conducted all statistical analyses in STATA (version 12.0, StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA).

2.3. Differences in the Clinical Patterns Evaluation Process

Once we obtained the data, the clinical nature of the patterns identified, and the comparability of the patterns over the 4-year period analyzed, we identified the presence of potential interactions between diseases and drugs within the patterns and the substantial differences observed. The associations found in each pattern were independently reviewed by three pharmacists (E.M., V.O., and S.M.) and seven physicians (F.G.R., M.A.S., A.M.J., A.J.M., I.I.S., J.C.P. and A.P.T.) from the research team. Subsequently, a consensus meeting was held to discuss and analyze the differences that existed at the turn of four years. We retained the names of the clusters given in the previous published study with 2015 data, wherever possible, to ensure a better reading of the difference over the years. Finally, the differences observed between 2011 and 2015 were compared with existing literature.

3. Results

Subjects identified up to 65 years old in the Aragon region were 1,000,390 during 2011 and 887,572 during 2015. Comparison and description of demographic and clinical characteristics of the two study populations are shown in Table 1 for women and Table 2 for men. Firstly, for both the years 2011 and 2015, we detected a statistically significant increase in the number of drugs and chronic conditions for both sexes as age increases.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of women in 2011 and 2015.

Subjects’ Characteristics 0–14 Years 15–44 Years 45–65 Years
Women 2011 2015 p Value 2011 2015 p Value 2011 2015 p Value
DEMOGRAPHIC
Population (N) 72,940 78,534 245,171 205,122 170,584 168,587
Age (mean (SD)) 7.79
(3.71)
7.03
(4.21)
<0.001 31.57
(8.21)
31.71 (8.45) <0.001 54.23
(6.03)
54.43
(5.96)
<0.001
Area of living (n (%)) 0.001 a <0.001 a <0.001 a
Urban 43,911 (60.20%) 46,649 (59.40%) 155,773 (63.54%) 127,450 (62.13%) 109,249 (64.04%) 106,244 (63.02%)
Rural 29,008 (39.77%) 31,885 (40.60%) 89,252 (36.40%) 77,672 (37.87%) 61,279 (35.92%) 62,343 (36.98%)
Unknown 21
(0.03%)
- 146
(0.06%)
- 56
(0.03%)
Immigrant status (n (%)) 0.032 a <0.001 a <0.001 a
Native 61,997 (85.00%) 67,740 (86.26%) 199,026 (81.18%) 168,839 (82.31%) 159,239 (93.35%) 156,311 (92.72%)
Immigrant 10,168 (13.94%) 10,761 (13.70%) 46,100 (18.80%) 36,277 (17.69%) 11,331
(6.64%)
12,275 (7.28%)
Unknown 775
(1.06%)
33
(0.04%)
45
(0.02%)
6
(0.00%)
14
(0.01%)
1
(0.00%)
Deprivation index (n (%)) b <0.001 a <0.001 a 0.007 a
Q1 20,305 (27.84%) 22,448 (28.58%) 69,079 (28.18%) 55,733 (27.17%) 44,754 (26.24%) 43,546 (25.83%)
Q 2 18,719 (25.66%) 19,019 (24.22%) 60,847 (24.82%) 50,671 (24.70%) 43,587 (25.55%) 43,732 (25.94%)
Q 3 14,137 (19.38%) 15,556 (19.81%) 48,256 (19.68%) 41,415 (20.19%) 35,696 (20.93%) 35,040 (20.78%)
Q 4 19,743 (27.07%) 21,511 (27.39%) 66,913 (27.29%) 57,303 (27.94%) 46,512 (27.27%) 46,269 (27.45%)
Unknown 36
(0.05%)
- 76
(0.03%)
- 35
(0.02%)
-
CLINICAL
Number of chronic diseases e <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 mean (SD) 0.67
(0.92)
1.00
(1.05)
0.89
(1.24)
1.47
(1.47)
2.28
(2.18)
3.06
(2.34)
 median (P25; P75) 0
(0; 1)
1
(0; 2)
0
(0; 1)
1
(0; 2)
2
(1; 3)
3
(1; 4)
Multimorbidity
(n (%)) c
11,525 (15.80%) 20,022 (25.49%) <0.001 56,798 (23.17%) 80,521 (39.26%) <0.001 95,722 (56.11%) 120,101 (71.24%) <0.001
Number of drugs d,e <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 mean (SD) 2.40
(2.42)
2.16
(2.09)
2.80
(3.12)
2.67
(2.71)
5.13
(4.66)
4.34
(3.75)
 median (P25; P75) 2
(0; 4)
2
(0; 3)
2
(0; 4)
2
(0; 4)
4
(1; 8)
4
(1; 6)

a Missing values were not considered when performing test and p value. b Deprivation index: degree of deprivation from the lowest (Q1) to the highest (Q4) of the administrative health area to which it belongs. c Defined as the coexistence of 2 or more chronic diseases. d Refers to different drugs dispensed at the third level of the anatomical, therapeutic, chemical (ATC) classification system. e Non-parametric test.

Table 2.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of men in 2011 and 2015.

Subjects’ Characteristics 0–14 Years 15–44 Years 45–65 Years
Men 2011 2015 p Value 2011 2015 p Value 2011 2015 p Value
DEMOGRAPHIC
Population (N) 77,391 82,893 260,915 190,658 173,389 161,778
Age (mean (SD)) 7.82
(3.72)
7.04
(4.21)
<0.001 31.68
(8.18)
31.54
(8.67)
0,768 54.00
(6.01)
54.36
(5.93)
<0.001
Area of living (n (%)) <0.001 a <0.001 a <0.001 a
Urban 46,346 (59.89%) 48,943 (59.04%) 160,106 (61.36%) 113,262 (59.41%) 102,994 (59.40%) 94,223 (58.24%)
Rural 31,022 (40.08%) 33,950 (40.96%) 100,728 (38.61%) 77,396 (40.59%) 70,349 (40.57%) 67,555 (41.76%)
Unknown 23
(0.03%)
- 81
(0.03%)
- 46
(0.03%)
Immigrant status (n (%)) <0.001 a <0.001 a <0.001 a
Native 65,525 (84.67%) 71,506 (86.26%) 206,631 (79.19%) 160,073 (83.96%) 159,095 (91.76%) 149,258 (92.26%)
Immigrant 11,040 (14.27%) 11,357 (13.70%) 54,219 (20.78%) 30,577 (16.04%) 14,292 (8.24%) 12,519 (7.74%)
Unknown 826
(1.07%)
30
(0.04%)
65
(0.02%)
8
(0.00%)
2
(0.00%)
1
(0.00%)
Deprivation index (n (%)) b <0.001 a <0.001 a 0.011 a
Q 1 21,455 (27.72%) 23,695 (28.59%) 69,997 (26.83%) 49,759 (26.10%) 43,513 (25.10%) 40,042 (24.75%)
Q 2 19,695 (25.45%) 19,725 (23.80%) 64,037 (24.54%) 46,709 (24.50%) 44,237 (25.51%) 41,522 (25.67%)
Q 3 15,168 (19.60%) 16,465 (19.86%) 52,872 (20.26%) 39,962 (20.96%) 37,330 (21.53%) 34,511 (21.33%)
Q 4 21,052 (27.20%) 23,008 (27.76%) 73,953 (28.34%) 54,228 (28.44%) 48,285 (27.85%) 45,703 (28.25%)
Unknown 21
(0.03%)
- 56
(0.02%)
- 24
(0.01%)
-
CLINICAL
Number of chronic diseases e <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 mean (SD) 0.76
(0.99)
1.12
(1.11)
0.62
(1.01)
1.14
(1.24)
1.70
(1.94)
2.48
(2.12)
 median (P25; P75) 0
(0; 1)
1
(0; 2)
0
(0; 1)
1
(0; 2)
1
(0; 3)
2
(1; 3)
Multimorbidity (n (%)) c 14,748 (19.06%) 24,386 (29.42%) <0.001 38,788 (14.87%) 55,704 (29.22%) <0.001 75,251 (43.40%) 99,176 (61.30%) <0.001
Number of drugs d,e <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 mean (SD) 2.50
(2.50)
2.27
(2.20)
1.71
(2.34)
1.78
(2.10)
3.53
(3.88)
3.42
(3.32)
 median (P25; P75) 2
(0; 4)
2
(0; 3)
1
(0; 3)
1
(0; 3)
2
(0; 5)
3
(1; 5)

a Missing values were not considered when performing test and p value. b Deprivation index: degree of deprivation from the lowest (Q1) to the highest (Q4) of the administrative health area to which it belongs. c Defined as the coexistence of 2 or more chronic diseases. d Refers to different drugs dispensed at the third level of the anatomical, therapeutic, chemical (ATC) classification system. e Non-parametric test.

3.1. Comparison of Multimorbidity and Polypharmacy Patterns

All the six epidemiological patterns identified in 2015 were also maintained during 2011, named as respiratory, mental health, cardiometabolic, endocrinological, osteometabolic, and mechanical pain. In addition, a new one appeared in 2011 mainly in younger age groups, recognized as an allergic/derma factor. Comparison of multimorbidity and polypharmacy patterns are detailed in Table 3.

Table 3.

Comparison of multimorbidity and polypharmacy patterns identified in each age and sex group in 2011 and 2015.

Gender 0–14 Years 15–44 Years 45–65 Years
2011 2015 2011 2015 2011 2015
Women Allergic–Derma Respiratory–Acute Infection Mechanical
Pain
Mental Health Mental Health Mental Health
Respiratory-Asthma–Acute Infection Respiratory–Asthma–Allergic Respiratory Respiratory Respiratory Respiratory
Allergic Mental Health Mental
Health
Endocrinological Cardiometabolic Cardiometabolic
Mental Health Endocrinological Osteometabolic Osteometabolic
Men Allergic–Derma Respiratory–Acute Infection Mental Health–Pain Mental Health Respiratory Mental Health
Respiratory–Asthma–Acute Infection Respiratory–Asthma–Allergic Respiratory–Allergic Mechanical Pain Cardiometabolic Cardiometabolic
Allergic Mental Health Cardiometabolic Respiratory Mental Health Respiratory
Mental Health Derma

3.1.1. Girls Aged 0–14 Years

Scree plot identified four factors during 2011 versus three during 2015 (Table 4). Factors identified in 2015 in girls in this age group were generally already present in 2011, but with the addition of an allergic/derma component recognized in 2011 and not maintained in 2015. In contrast, the first factor of 2015 was identified as respiratory/acute infection due to the presence of acute lower respiratory tract infection conditions and anti-infectives, corticosteroids, antifungals, and antibiotics. Second factors were similar in both years, having respiratory/asthmatic character due to the equal presence of asthma but differed for drugs-related such as adrenergics and corticosteroids for 2011 and antihistamines and decongestants for 2015. The third factor, the allergic one, with allergic rhinitis and antihistamines and decongestants, appeared only in 2011 in the pediatric population. The last factor identified as mental health remained unchanged over the years due to the presence of developmental disorders and psychosocial disorders of childhood as frequent childhood mental conditions. The KMO sampling adequacy index was 0.72 in 2011 and 0.73 in 2015, while a cumulative variance percentage was of 34.0% in 2011 and 33.2% in 2015.

Table 4.

Patterns of chronic diseases (EDC codes) and drugs (ATC codes) and factor loading scores in women. Diseases are highlighted in bold.

Year 2011 Prevalences Values Year 2015 Prevalences Values
0–14 years
FACTOR 1: ALLERGIC/DERMA Prev (%) Values FACTOR 1: RESPIRATORY/ACUTE INFECTION Prev (%) Values
M01A Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids 38.65 0.6462 H02A Corticosteroids for systemic use, pain 9.40 0.6427
J01C Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins 34.11 0.6454 RES02 Acute lower respiratory tract infection 11.06 0.6355
N02B Other analgesics and antipyretics 17.85 0.5855 R03A Adrenergics, inhalants 10.68 0.6224
R05C Expectorants, excl. combinations with cough suppressants 22.57 0.5845 J01C Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins 33.57 0.5882
R05D Cough suppressants, excl, combinations with expectorants 22.14 0.5616 N02B Other analgesics and antipyretics 22.57 0.5116
J01D Other beta-lactam antibacterials 5.30 0.4862 J01F Macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins 8.76 0.4816
S01A Anti-infectives 6.86 0.4411 N05B Anxiolytics 3.64 0.4570
J01F Macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins 8.24 0.4225 S01A Anti-infectives 9.63 0.4271
D07A Corticosteroids, plain 7.87 0.4198 M01A Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids 34.45 0.4174
A03F Propulsives 2.04 0.3905 D07A Corticosteroids, plain 8.05 0.4097
D01A Antifungals for topical use 3.44 0.3817 D01A Antifungals for topical use 3.97 0.3684
N05B Anxiolytics 3.71 0.3750 A07C Electrolytes with carbohydrates 4.15 0.3648
D06A Antibiotics for topical use 4.34 0.3681 D06A Antibiotics for topical use 5.07 0.3583
SKN02 Dermatitis and eczema 18.13 0.2929
FACTOR 2: RESPIRATORY/ASTHMA/
ACUTE INFECTION
Prev (%) Values FACTOR 2: RESPIRATORY/ASTHMA/
ALLERGIC
Prev (%) Values
H02A Corticosteroids for systemic use, plain 6.93 0.4682 R06A Antihistamines for systemic use 13.63 0.6105
R03A Adrenergics, inhalants 7.50 0.8946 ALL03 Allergic rhinitis 4.23 0.7546
RES02 Acute lower respiratory tract infection 8.21 0.7506 S01G Decongestants and antiallergics 2.68 0.7419
ASMA Asthma 6.25 0.6038 R01A Decongestants and other nasal preparations for topical use 3.90 0.6744
ASMA Asthma 7.18 0.3489
FACTOR 3: ALLERGIC Prev (%) Values
R06A Antihistamines for systemic use 10.50 0.5823
ALL03 Allergic rhinitis 2.90 0.8316
S01G Decongestants and antiallergics 1.92 0.7065
R01A Decongestants and other nasal preparations for topical use 3.03 0.6528
FACTOR 4: MENTAL HEALTH Prev (%) Values FACTOR 3: MENTAL HEALTH Prev (%) Values
N06B Psychostimulants, agents used for ADHD and nootropics 0.89 0.7123 N03A Antiepileptics 0.36 0.6693
N03A Antiepileptics 0.36 0.6379 N06B Psychostimulants, agents used for ADHD and nootropics 0.74 0.5403
NUR19 Developmental disorder 1.19 0.6150 NUR19 Developmental disorder 2.15 0.3793
PSY14 Psychosocial disorders of childhood 3.40 0.3113 A02B Drugs for peptic ulcers and GERD 0.69 0.3761
PSY14 Psychosocial disorders of childhood 5.36 0.3287
15–44 years
FACTOR 1: MECHANICAL PAIN Prev (%) Values
M01A Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids 30.97 0.7664
M03B Muscle relaxants, centrally acting agents 4.08 0.5416
A02B Drugs for peptic ulcer and GERD 10.67 0.5046
N02B Other analgesics and antipyretics 19.65 0.5007
M02A Topical products for joint and muscular pain 3.80 0.4578
N02A Opioids 2.68 0.4304
J01C Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins 19.96 0.3998
MUS14 Low back pain 4.20 0.3607
R05D Cough suppressants, excl. combinations with expectorants 9.30 0.3497
A03F Propulsives 4.27 0.3157
FACTOR 2: RESPIRATORY Prev (%) Values FACTOR 1: RESPIRATORY Prev (%) Values
R05C Expectorants, excl. combinations with cough suppressants 14.62 0.4734 M01A Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids 30.85 0.3224
J01F Macrolides. lincosamides and streptogramins 7.94 0.3563 R06A Antihistamines for systemic use 14.83 0.8167
S01C Anti-inflammatory agents and anti-infectives in combination 2.15 0.9123 R03A Adrenergics, inhalants 5.24 0.7087
R03A Adrenergics, inhalants 3.95 0.8991 R01A Decongestants and other nasal reparations for topical use 8.50 0.6800
ASMA Asthma 4.15 0.6915 S01G Decongestants and antiallergics 3.10 0.6329
R06A Antihistamines for systemic use 11.12 0.6647 ASMA Asthma 6.67 0.4935
R01A Decongestants and other nasal preparations for topical use 6.37 0.5650 RES02 Acute lower respiratory tract infection 2.38 0.4617
RES02 Acute lower respiratory tract infection 2.25 0.5564 ALL03 Allergic rhinitis 12.64 0.4243
ALL03 Allergic rhinitis 7.27 0.3956 H02A Corticosteroids for systemic use. plain 3.30 0.4065
H02A Corticosteroids for systemic use, plain 2.35 0.3574 J01F Macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins 9.55 0.3837
J01C Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins 21.02 0.3651
J01M Quinolone antibacterials 3.64 0.3413
J01D Other beta-lactam antibacterials 3.42 0.3320
N02B Other analgesics and antipyretics 20.89 0.3169
D07A Corticosteroids, plain 5.54 0.3086
FACTOR 3: MENTAL HEALTH Prev (%) Values FACTOR 2: MENTAL HEALTH Prev (%) Values
N06A Antidepressants 6.10 0.9314 N06A Antidepressants 6.95 0.8600
N05B Anxiolytics 8.86 0.7156 N03A Antiepileptics 2.75 0.7610
N03A Antiepileptics 2.22 0.6426 N05B Anxiolytics 11.11 0.7584
PSY09 Depression 4.55 0.6301 N05A Antipsychotics 2.03 0.5738
N05A Antipsychotics 1.83 0.5151 PSY09 Depression 6.76 0.5535
PSY01 Anxiety, neuroses 2.65 0.4704 A02B Drugs for peptic ulcers and GERD 10.42 0.4688
N02C Antimigraine preparations 1.48 0.2683 N02A Opioids 3.83 0.4575
PSY01 Anxiety, neuroses 4.89 0.4333
PSY19 Sleep disorders of nonorganic origin 3.65 0.3776
N02C Antimigraine preparations 1.74 0.3742
NUR21 Neurologic disorders, other 2.33 0.3556
NUR03 Peripheral neuropathy, neuritis 2.60 0.3093
FACTOR 4: ENDOCRINOLOGICAL Prev (%) Values FACTOR 3: ENDOCRINOLOGICAL Prev (%) Values
B03A Iron preparations 7.73 0.9181 B03A Iron preparations 8.97 0.7959
H03C Iodine therapy 4.24 0.7731 H03C Iodine therapy 5.61 0.6469
HEM02 Iron deficiency, other deficiency anemias 4.10 0.5908 HEM02 Iron deficiency, other deficiency anemias 6.18 0.5369
B03B Vitamin B12 and folic acid 3.53 0.5032 B03B Vitamin B12 and folic acid 3.99 0.4798
G03A Hormonal contraceptives for systemic use 3.03 0.3399 H03A Thyroid preparations 4.30 0.4306
C05C Capillary stabilizing agents 3.02 0.2817 END04 Hypothyroidism 6.29 0.3658
45–65 years
FACTOR 1: MENTAL HEALTH Prev (%) Values FACTOR 1: MENTAL HEALTH Prev (%) Values
N06A Antidepressants 16.63 0.8254 N06A Antidepressants 18.21 0.8980
N05B Anxiolytics 22.35 0.7021 N05B Anxiolytics 24.67 0.6682
N03A Antiepileptics 5.70 0.5976 PSY09 Depression 16.81 0.6131
N05C Hypnotics and sedatives 6.12 0.5944 N05C Hypnotics and sedatives 6.08 0.5592
PSY09 Depression 12.93 0.5871 N03A Antiepileptics 7.01 0.5406
N02A Opioids 8.24 0.4676 PSY01 Anxiety, neuroses 6.70 0.4116
A02B Drugs for peptic ulcer and GERD 30.90 0.4483 N02A Opioids 10.24 0.3805
PSY01 Anxiety, neuroses 4.13 0.4187 PSY19 Sleep disorders of nonorganic origin 10.29 0.3618
PSY19 Sleep disorders of nonorganic origin 6.54 0.4111 A02B Drugs for peptic ulcers and GERD 29.06 0.3379
M01A Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids 46.56 0.4095
A03F Propulsives 6.28 0.3674
M03B Muscle relaxants, centrally acting agents 7.11 0.3614
MUS13 Cervical pain syndromes 2.38 0.3128
MUS14 Low back pain 7.52 0.2733
NUR21 Neurologic disorders, other 3.57 0.2617
NUR03 Peripheral neuropathy, neuritis 4.59 0.2524
FACTOR 2: RESPIRATORY Prev (%) Values FACTOR 2: RESPIRATORY Prev (%) Values
N02B Other analgesics and antipyretics 30.15 0.3050 R03A Adrenergics, inhalants 7.93 0.7548
R03A Adrenergics, inhalants 6.21 0.8711 R06A Antihistamines for systemic use 16.74 0.7487
R05C Expectorants, excl. combinations with cough suppressants 20.41 0.7092 R01A Decongestants and other nasal preparations for topical use 8.22 0.6301
RES02 Acute lower respiratory tract infection 4.46 0.7032 ASMA Asthma 6.38 0.5872
R06A Antihistamines for systemic use 13.51 0.6205 H02A Corticosteroids for systemic use, pain 6.77 0.4867
ASMA Asthma 4.45 0.5862 J01F Macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins 10.82 0.4468
R01A Decongestants and other nasal preparations for topical use 7.03 0.5761 J01M Quinolone antibacterials 6.61 0.4313
J01F Macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins 9.29 0.5400 ALL03 Allergic rhinitis 10.50 0.4032
J01M Quinolone antibacterials 6.42 0.5128 J01C Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins 17.97 0.3853
H02A Corticosteroids for systemic use, plain 5.25 0.5007 N02B Other analgesics and antipyretics 29.09 0.3269
J01C Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins 17.98 0.4622
R05D Cough suppressants, excl. combinations with expectorants 11.74 0.4230
ALL03 Allergic rhinitis 6.33 0.2741
FACTOR 3: CARDIOMETABOLIC Prev (%) Values FACTOR 3: CARDIOMETABOLIC Prev (%) Values
DIAB Diabetes 4.99 0.7288 HTA Hypertension 20.49 0.9601
HTA Hypertension 19.06 0.6791 C09A ACE inhibitors, plain 5.06 0.7041
NUT03 Obesity 9.00 0.6258 DIAB Diabetes 5.58 0.5854
B01A Antithrombotic agents 6.49 0.4258 NUT03 Obesity 11.62 0.5014
CAR11 Disorders of lipid metabolism 23.70 0.3817 B01A Antithrombotic agents 6.51 0.3699
ARTRITIS Degenerative joint disease 11.66 0.3318 CAR11 Disorders of lipid metabolism 32.89 0.2951
C05C Capillary stabilizing agents 9.78 0.2882
EYE08 Glaucoma 2.93 0.2823
GSU08 Varicose veins of lower extremities 15.78 0.2771
FACTOR 4: OSTEOMETABOLIC Prev (%) Values FACTOR 4: OSTEOMETABOLIC Prev (%) Values
M05B Drugs affecting bone structure and mineralization 6.29 0.9690 A12A Calcium 6.10 0.8032
A12A Calcium 8.96 0.8944 END02 Osteoporosis 8.98 0.7869
END02 Osteoporosis 9.45 0.8609

Abbreviations: ATC, anatomical therapeutic chemical classification; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EDC, expanded diagnostic clusters; GERD, gastro-esophageal reflux disease; Prev, prevalenc.

3.1.2. Women Aged 15–44 Years

In women in this age group, the epidemiological factors identified in 2015 were already similar in 2011 but appearing less complex (Table 4). Mechanical pain factor was identified in 2011, factor not maintained during 2015, characterized by low back pain as the only condition and drugs such as opioids, muscle relaxants, NSAID. Other factors identified are comparable, such as the respiratory one, which includes asthma, allergic rhinitis, acute lower respiratory tract infection, but more pertaining drugs were recorded during 2015. The mental health factor was also comparable but appeared as a third factor in 2011 and as the first factor in 2015. Depression and anxiety were recorded during the mental health of 2011 with antidepressants, anxiolytics, and antiepileptics, while, during 2015, sleep, neurologic, and peripheral disorders were also recorded. The last factor identified was the endocrinological with iron deficiency in both years and hypothyroidism only in 2015. The KMO sampling adequacy index was 0.77 in 2011 and 0.74 in 2015 and a cumulative variance percentage was 47.0% in 2011 and 35.6% in 2015.

3.1.3. Women Aged 45–65 Years

Scree plot identified the same four factors of 2015, in the same order but, generally, factors identified in 2011 were more complex in terms of clinical conditions number (Table 4). Anxiety, depression, sleep, neurologic, and peripheral disorders were recorded during 2011, while only anxiety, depression, and sleep disorder remained in the 2015 factor. Related drugs were comparable, as opioids remained presents for both years. The second factor identified was respiratory due to the presence of asthma and allergic rhinitis, with the addition of acute lower respiratory tract infection during 2011. This factor was mostly made up of related drugs such as antibiotics, adrenergics, decongestants, and corticosteroids. The third cardiometabolic factor was composed of diabetes, hypertension, obesity, disorders of lipid metabolism equally for both years, but more conditions appeared in 2011, such as glaucoma. The last factor identified for both was the osteometabolic, which was similarly made up of osteoporosis and calcium. The KMO index was 0.86 in 2011 and 0.80 in 2015, while the cumulative variance percentage was 55.0% in 2011 and 31.3% in 2015.

3.1.4. Boys Aged 0–14 Years

This profile was similar to that observed for girls aged 0–14 years, both for 2011 and 2015 factors (Table 5). In fact, likewise, factors identified in 2015 in boys in this age group were generally already detected in 2011, but with the presence of an allergic/derma component. The same differences observed for girls in terms of conditions and factor were observed for boys. The KMO sampling adequacy index was 0.72 in 2011 and 0.74 in 2015, while the cumulative variance percentage was 34.0% in 2011 and 35.6% in 2015.

Table 5.

Patterns of chronic diseases (EDC codes) and drugs (ATC codes) and factor loading scores in men. Diseases are highlighted in bold.

Year 2011 Year 2015
0–14 years
FACTOR 1: ALLERGIC/DERMA Prev
(%)
Values FACTOR 1: RESPIRATORY/ACUTE INFECTION Prev
(%)
Values
J01C Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins 34.08 0.6579 H02A Corticosteroids for systemic use, pain 11.77 0.6877
M01A Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids 38.23 0.6372 RES02 Acute lower respiratory tract infection 13.69 0.6748
N02B Other analgesics and antipyretics 17.98 0.6097 R03A Adrenergics, inhalants 13.79 0.6683
R05C Expectorants, excl. combinations with cough suppressants 22.80 0.5800 J01C Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins 33.48 0.5854
R05D Cough suppressants, excl. combinations with expectorants 22.40 0.5611 R03B Other drugs for obstructive airway diseases, inhalants 4.05 0.5520
J01D Other beta-lactam antibacterials 4.75 0.4832 N02B Other analgesics and antipyretics 22.76 0.5332
S01A Anti-infectives 6.97 0.4410 J01F Macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins 8.83 0.5120
A07C Electrolytes with carbohydrates 3.12 0.4302 N05B Anxiolytics 3.49 0.4556
D07A Corticosteroids, plain 9.50 0.4195 S01A Anti-infective 9.79 0.4545
J01F Macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins 8.42 0.4027 D07A Corticosteroids, plain 9.67 0.4018
N05B Anxiolytics 3.56 0.4009 M01A Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids 34.58 0.3990
A03F Propulsives 1.91 0.3946 A07C Electrolytes with carbohydrates 4.48 0.3666
D06A Antibiotics for topical use 5.00 0.3710 D01A Antifungals for topical use 3.36 0.3452
H02A Corticosteroids for systemic use, plain 8.80 0.3262 D06A Antibiotics for topical use 5.64 0.3344
SKN02 Dermatitis and eczema 16.84 0.2812
FACTOR 2: RESPIRATORY/ASTHMA/ACUTE INFECTION Prev
(%)
Values FACTOR 2: RESPIRATORY/ASTHMA/
ALLERGIC
Prev
(%)
Values
R03A Adrenergics, inhalants 10.09 0.9215 R06A Antihistamines for systemic use 14.54 0.6159
R03B Other drugs for obstructive airway diseases, inhalants 3.59 0.8434 ALL03 Allergic rhinitis 5.34 0.7213
RES02 Acute lower respiratory tract infection 10.08 0.7459 S01G Decongestants and antiallergics 3.86 0.6773
ASMA Asthma 9.28 0.6818 R01A Decongestants and other nasal preparations for topical use 4.33 0.6734
ASMA Asthma 10.96 0.4222
FACTOR 3: ALLERGIC Prev
(%)
Values
R06A Antihistamines for systemic use 11.26 0.6047
ALL03 Allergic rhinitis 3.77 0.7499
R01A Decongestants and other nasal preparations for topical use 3.40 0.7494
S01G Decongestants and antiallergics 2.94 0.6728
FACTOR 4: MENTAL HEALTH Prev
(%)
Values FACTOR 3: MENTAL HEALTH Prev
(%)
Values
N06B Psychostimulants, agents used for ADHD and nootropics 2.46 0.9564 N06B Psychostimulants, agents used for ADHD and nootropics 2.18 0.7213
PSY05 Attention deficit disorder 1.97 0.8148 N03A Antiepileptics 0.39 0.6562
NUR19 Developmental disorder 2.10 0.3823 PSY05 Attention deficit disorder 1.92 0.5889
PSY14 Psychosocial disorders of childhood 5.70 0.3139 PSY14 Psychosocial disorders of childhood 8.59 0.3968
NUR19 Developmental disorder 3.89 0.3857
A02B Drugs for peptic ulcers and GERD 0.60 0.3324
15–44 years
FACTOR 1: MENTAL HEALTH/MECHANICAL PAIN Prev
(%)
Values FACTOR 1: MENTAL HEALTH Prev
(%)
Values
N03A Antiepileptics 1.67 0.7159 N06A Antidepressants 3.74 0.8979
N05C Hypnotics and sedatives 0.97 0.6100 N05C Hypnotics and sedatives 1.10 0.7614
N05B Anxiolytics 4.60 0.6036 N05A Antipsychotics 2.00 0.7482
N05A Antipsychotics 1.53 0.5564 N05B Anxiolytics 6.92 0.6522
A02B Drugs for peptic ulcer and GERD 7.94 0.5129 N03A Antiepileptics 2.45 0.6442
N02A Opioids 1.90 0.5024 PSY09 Depression 3.47 0.6005
M01A Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids 23.05 0.4126 PSY02 Substance use 2.79 0.4973
N02B Other analgesics and antipyretics 14.24 0.3849 PSY01 Anxiety neuroses 2.55 0.4801
PSY19 Sleep disorders of nonorganic origin 3.12 0.4604
FACTOR 2: MECHANICAL PAIN Prev
(%)
Values
M01A Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids 25.68 0.7741
N02B Other analgesics and antipyretics 17.05 0.6115
A02B Drugs for peptic ulcers and GERD 8.49 0.5996
J01C Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins 18.01 0.5105
N02A Opioids 2.92 0.4920
MUS14 Low back pain 4.18 0.4663
H02A Corticosteroids for systemic use, pain 2.58 0.4642
J01F Macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins 7.10 0.4037
B01A Antithrombotic agents 2.01 0.3980
FACTOR 2: RESPIRATORY Prev
(%)
Values FACTOR 3: RESPIRATORY Prev
(%)
Values
H02A Corticosteroids for systemic use, plain 1.65 0.3883 RES02 Acute lower respiratory tract infection 2.05 0.3838
R01A Decongestants and other nasal preparations for topical use 4.73 0.7461 R03A Adrenergics, inhalants 4.54 0.7900
R06A Antihistamines for systemic use 7.83 0.6764 R06A Antihistamines for systemic use 11.97 0.7005
R05C Expectorants, excl. combinations with cough suppressants 10.13 0.5909 ASMA Asthma 6.89 0.6227
ALL03 Allergic rhinitis 6.06 0.5124 R01A Decongestants and other nasal preparations for topical use 6.99 0.5562
J01F Macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins 5.22 0.4957 ALL03 Allergic rhinitis 12.12 0.4093
ASMA Asthma 3.53 0.4573
R05D Cough suppressants, excl. combinations with expectorants 5.99 0.4383
J01C Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins 15.47 0.3796
FACTOR 3: CARDIOMETABOLIC Prev
(%)
Values
HTA Hypertension 2.05 0.7494
NUT03 Obesity 2.62 0.5822
CAR11 Disorders of lipid metabolism 6.10 0.5101
B01A Antithrombotic agents 1.61 0.5063
FACTOR 4: DERMA Prev
(%)
Values
SKN02 Dermatitis and eczema 4.94 0.8586
D07A Corticosteroids, plain 3.62 0.6772
D01A Antifungals for topical use 3.15 0.4985
45–65 years
FACTOR 1: RESPIRATORY Prev
(%)
Values FACTOR 3: RESPIRATORY Prev
(%)
Values
R05C Expectorants, excl. combinations with cough suppressants 14.43 0.7394 N02B Other analgesics and antipyretics 22.35 0.3056
R06A Antihistamines for systemic use 8.06 0.6970 RES04 Emphysema, chronic bronchitis, COPD 3.64 0.3491
R01A Decongestants and other nasal preparations for topical use 5.05 0.6485 R03A Adrenergics, inhalants 5.88 0.8130
RES02 Acute lower respiratory tract infection 3.15 0.5805 R06A Antihistamines for systemic use 11.10 0.7063
J01F Macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins 5.57 0.5787 RES02 Acute lower respiratory tract infection 3.45 0.5897
R05D Cough suppressants, excl. combinations with expectorants 7.00 0.5409 R01A Decongestants and other nasal preparations for topical use 6.26 0.5803
J01C Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins 14.33 0.5140 ASMA Asthma 3.43 0.5666
N02B Other analgesics and antipyretics 21.11 0.5065 J01M Quinolone antibacterials 5.53 0.4548
M01A Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids 32.37 0.4865 J01F Macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins 6.91 0.4383
J01M Quinolone antibacterials 0.4676 J01C Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins 15.46 0.3981
ALL03 Allergic rhinitis 4.03 0.4222 ALL03 Allergic rhinitis 7.53 0.3589
ASMA Asthma 2.05 0.4190
D07A Corticosteroids, plain 32.37 0.3434
M02A Topical products for joint and muscular pain 6.25 0.3159
RES04 Emphysema, chronic bronchitis. COPD 2.69 0.2818
FACTOR 2: CARDIOMETABOLIC Prev
(%)
Values FACTOR 2: CARDIOMETABOLIC Prev
(%)
Values
A02B Drugs for peptic ulcer and GERD 24.46 0.3434 A02B Drugs for peptic ulcer and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (gord) 25.26 0.3952
HTA Hypertension 22.12 0.8007 B01A Antithrombotic agents 11.01 0.7832
B01A Antithrombotic agents 9.93 0.6619 HTA Hypertension 27.96 0.6610
DIAB Diabetes 8.73 0.6547 IHD Ischemic heart disease 4.07 0.6085
C09C Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), plain 6.49 0.6080 DIAB Diabetes 11.00 0.5750
IHD Ischemic heart disease 3.23 0.5763 C09C Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), plain 6.85 0.5396
NUT03 Obesity 6.73 0.5377 CAR16 Cardiovascular disorders, other 2.14 0.4854
CAR11 Disorders of lipid metabolism 26.32 0.4817 CAR09 Cardiac arrhythmia 2.50 0.4723
RHU02 Gout 2.88 0.3703 NUT03 Obesity 10.24 0.4283
CAR11 Disorders of lipid metabolism 39.37 0.3296
RHU02 Gout 4.17 0.3014
FACTOR 3: MENTAL HEALTH Prev
(%)
Values FACTOR 1: MENTAL HEALTH Prev
(%)
Values
N06A Antidepressants 6.04 0.9434 N06A Antidepressants 7.22 0.7887
PSY09 Depression 4.42 0.7844 N05B Anxiolytics 12.79 0.7326
N05B Anxiolytics 10.25 0.7607 N03A Antiepileptics 5.10 0.6613
PSY19 Sleep disorders of nonorganic origin 3.60 0.3751 PSY09 Depression 6.86 0.5530
PSY02 Substance use 2.61 0.3104 N02A Opioids 6.60 0.4891
PSY01 Anxiety, neuroses 3.04 0.4447
M01A Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids 31.42 0.4166
PSY19 Sleep disorders of nonorganic origin 6.66 0.3594
MUS14 Low back pain 6.13 0.3367
MUS13 Cervical pain syndromes 2.48 0.3161
NUR21 Neurologic disorders, other 3.69 0.2959

Abbreviations: ATC, anatomical therapeutic chemical classification; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EDC, expanded diagnostic clusters; GERD, gastro-esophageal reflux disease; Prev, Prevalence.

3.1.5. Men Aged 15–44 Years

Among men of this age group, the order and the composition of epidemiological patterns identified in 2015 were not maintained in 2011 (Table 5). In fact, during 2011, four factors were identified. The first one, recognized as mental health/mechanical pain, was comparable with the first two identified during 2015. Moreover, this factor appeared without condition but was only made up of drugs such as opioids, antiepileptics, anxiolytics, and NSAID. During 2015, mental health and mechanical pain were split into two factors containing, in the first case, depression, substance use, anxiety, and sleep disorders with related drugs, and, in the second case, low back pain. Respiratory factor observed during 2015 was already present in 2011 both for disease and drugs. The last two 2011 factors identified as cardiometabolic and derma were not present in 2015. The KMO sampling adequacy index was 0.85 in 2011 and 0.75 in 2015, while the cumulative variance percentage of 26.0% in 2011 and 37.0% in 2015.

3.1.6. Men Aged 45–65 Years

All three factors identified in 2015 were already present in 2011 but in a different order (Table 5). In this age group, respiratory factor was enriched with emphysema, chronic bronchitis, COPD for rather than other age groups, equally during 2015 and 2011. This factor appeared first during 2011 and last in 2015. The cardiometabolic factor seemed more complex in this age group for both years, due to the number of conditions that emerged such as hypertension, obesity, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and gout. Mental health factor appeared firstly during 2015 and has become more complex than in 2011. The KMO sampling adequacy index was 0.82 in 2011 and 0.63 in 2015, while the cumulative variance percentage was 40.0% in 2011 and 30.4% in 2015.

4. Discussion

This study found that baseline epidemiologic patterns of multimorbidity and polypharmacy identified in the young and adult Spanish population during 2015 were already present in 2011 but with the addition of an allergic/derma pattern, which is not maintained in 2015. Globally, our findings also revealed that patterns identified in 2011 were more complex in terms of both disease and drugs; this could be a sign of an improvement and greater accuracy over the years in the computerized medical records systems. Other reason for the decreasing in the number of drugs taken by all age groups between 2011 and 2015 can be explained by the fact that after 2011, some medication was no longer reimbursed by the Spanish NHS, so this cannot be translated into a decrease in their use. We found that the complexity of patterns in terms of diseases and drugs, identified in both sexes, increases with age, and this trend remains unchanged in 2015.

The first difference identified can be represented by the presence of dermatitis and eczema as a condition more often diagnosed during 2011. In young subjects, the respiratory pattern was the most prevalent, even after four years. During 2015, the respiratory allergic component was predominant in children. This aspect was recorded during 2011, but it seems that respiratory conditions were better registered during 2015, as shown from the more accurate patterns resulted. Corroborating with our results, the high frequency of allergic and asthmatic components in childhood was widely discussed in the literature [15,16,17,18]. Similar was the case of childhood mental disorders and illnesses, conditions also found in 2011, with the addition in 2015 of the drugs for peptic ulcers and GERD, highlighting an increase in their use over the years attributable to prescriptive inappropriateness [19,20]. Additionally, a register of developmental and psychosocial disorders in children associated with antiepileptic treatments and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatments were established in both 2011 and 2015. The same pattern of drugs appeared in both sexes, but the diagnosis in girls seemed less accurate than in boys [21]. This could be explained as, in general, the clinic is more evident in boys, and among girls the symptoms are less intense, and therefore, a more general descriptor is used. For these reasons, since 2011, pediatricians started to collaborate with psychiatrists in the follow-up and treatment of affected children [22].

Various changes have been highlighted over the years among the age group 15–44 years in both sexes. Drugs such as cough suppressants and propulsives were dispensed to both men and women in 2011, also in younger and older age groups, but not in 2015, but this can be explained by the fact that after 2011, they were no longer reimbursed by the Spanish NHS. Another considerable difference is related to the mental factor that has become more complex in 2015, differently for men and women. Hence, during 2015, the mental factor was more prevalent among women. The prevalence of depression increased from 4.5% in 2011 to 6.7% in 2015, and more neurological disorders were diagnosed. This could be partly explained by an increase in psychophysical stress caused by more accelerated life rhythms over the years [23]. Similarly, in 2015, men were diagnosed with more disorders not present in 2011, and there was also evidence of substance use disorder, not present in women [24]. Substance use in men, in this age group, could be the cause of the worsening of the diagnosis picture in 2015; in fact, it appears to be a mechanical pain factor that was not present at all in 2011.

It is likely that as polypharmacy increases, drug dependence also increases, which leads to the development of a phenomenon of drug tolerance that complicates the overall clinical framework [25]. In women, it is noteworthy that the mental factor appeared in some psychosocial disorders, such as psychosocial disorders of childhood, combined with a drug cluster in which opioids appeared only in 2015. Perhaps this could be related to the higher prescription of tramadol in 2011, as this molecule was associated with the mechanical pattern. To date, several observational studies are alerting health authorities due to the adverse effects of opioid drugs associated with gabapentin. In fact, in Canada and France, there has been a warning about the risk of combining gabapentin and opioids, both in clinical practice and for recreational use [26,27]. In Ireland, the Medical Council has urged doctors to reduce the prescription of sedative drugs, including gabapentin [28]. Additionally, a recently published study linked the use of these drugs, especially pregabalin, to an increased risk of suicidal behavior, involuntary overdoses, injuries, traffic accidents, and crime [29]. Furthermore, among women, mechanical pain was detected in 2011 but not in 2015; in this year, the neurologic disorders that produce pain as neurologic disorders and peripheral neuropathy are included in the mental health patterns. A significant difference is, in fact, evident with men in the same age group, for whom, as in 2011, the mechanical pain factor remained in 2015.

Our results showed that in 2011 a cardiometabolic factor appeared in men in the 15–44 age group, while during 2015, in the older age group. It could be that until 2011, the occurrence of an episode of hypertension was sufficient to be diagnosed; however, with the subsequent establishment of new guidelines, the diagnosis has to be more accurate and well confirmed [30].

Furthermore, our findings also revealed that in 2011, as for 2015, the association between age and epidemiological pattern complexity is confirmed, as already discussed in literature [31,32]. Therefore, both for 2011 and 2015, among adults until 65 years, all the patterns appeared more complex than other age groups. In fact, the most predominant factors maintained over time were respiratory, cardiometabolic, and mental factors. Respiratory factor generally appeared more complex in 2011 than 2015, because it has been widely studied and identified the systematic association between asthma and allergic rhinitis; this has allowed for making a more accurate diagnosis [33,34,35]. Cardiometabolic factor appears similar for men and women with the addition of gout in men. This is in line with other studies, reporting that a prevalence rate of 1–2% for adults, underlining that it represents the most common inflammatory arthritis in men [36,37]. Another difference between sex was that this pattern in men included consequences of metabolic syndrome such as cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, and cardiac arrhythmia, which is possibly due to increased cardiovascular risk in men, together with an increased incidence of ischemic heart and cerebrovascular diseases [38].

The mechanical pain in men aged 15–44 group in 2011 is included in the mental health pattern, while is separated in 2015. Contrarily, for women of the same age group, mechanical pain appeared only in 2011. The association of anxiety, depression, and somatic symptoms displayed in this pattern is well described, and somatic symptoms are mainly associated with emotional and brain functions, and they may reflect potential emotional conflicts that patients cannot face [39].

Finally, for the 45–56 age group, another gender difference can be highlighted, such as the presence of osteometabolic factor among women. This factor made up of osteoporosis and calcium, during 2011 also contained drugs affecting bone structure and mineralization that disappeared during 2015. The absence of these drugs in 2015 could be partly explained by the restrictions in use of bisphosphonates, recommended by the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices in 2011, due to their association with a higher risk of atypical fractures [40].

In various patterns, we revealed potential DDIs, which could increase the risk of adverse health outcomes. Among them, we could highlight the use of inhaled beta-adrenergic agonists and corticosteroids, which decreased potassium levels, thus increasing the risk of arrhythmia [41]; the use of macrolides with inhaled beta-adrenergic and antihistamines, producing a QT prolongation and thus increasing the risk of arrhythmia [42]; the combined use of benzodiazepines and opioids, which increases sedation and respiratory depression [41].

4.1. Comparison with Other Studies

Multiple studies have been published in the recent years describing the different multimorbidity patterns, such as a study conducted in patients over 14 years old that described the existence of mechanical obesity, metabolic, neurovascular, liver disease, psychiatric substance abuse, anxiety, and depression-related patterns [8]. In addition, others studies only described the polypharmacy patterns [35]. However, in 2019, a study on multimorbidity and polypharmacy patterns showed the existence of some unexpected systematic associations among chronic diseases and drugs, as well as potential DDIs and prescribing cascades described in multimorbid patients [11]. Other authors had identified patterns between drugs and chronic disease in populations with a specific disease. For example, Hanlon et al. in 2018 describe the pattern and extent of multimorbidity and polypharmacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [43]. Nevertheless, our study described the patterns that influence to all the population. Aoki et al. in 2018 developed a study similar to ours identifying the multimorbidity patterns in a Japanese population, determining the effects on polypharmacy and dosage frequency [44].

The present study could be considered more exhaustive, because it compared the evolution of multimorbidity and polypharmacy patterns between 4 years in the same population, although this time span is not enough to detect long-term changes.

4.2. Strengths and Limitations

To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale population study comparing the differences observed in 4 years in the systematic associations among chronic diseases and dispensed drugs. The large population size of the EpiChron Cohort, together with the quality of data, resulting in reliable and representative results compared to those based only on medical records or drug use surveys [11]. In order to compare the same population at two different times, in this study, we have considered the population as an open cohort and, thus, not a cohort composed of a fixed number of members, but a dynamic cohort in which over time some subjects became lost and others are involved in the study. A population residing in a geographical area is, by definition, an open (or dynamic) cohort made up of individuals who contribute their personal time to the cohort, as long as they meet the membership criteria, i.e., place of residence, age, and health status. Therefore, having analyzed the variations in terms of multimorbidity and polypharmacy patterns in the population of Aragon, the cohort observed in 2011 and 2015 was considered as dynamic.

During the last five years, valuable information has been published regarding the security profile of numerous drugs, as was the case of benzodiazepines and opioids, allowing us to discuss our findings from both 2011 and 2015 in a more comprehensive manner. One of the essential methodological limitations of this study concerns the impossibility of including some drugs in the analyses due to multicollinearity with specific diseases, thus leading to the absence of specific drugs that would be, a priori, expected in some patterns. The issue of multicollinearity was also responsible for excluding the population aged >65 years from the analysis, which limited the comprehensiveness of the study. Nevertheless, in the present study, we used the same methodological criteria as the reference study to compare two populations that are as homogeneous as possible [11]. Furthermore, we conducted this study in order to assess the variations in most common clinical profiles among real-world population over the years. The 4 years evaluated were from 2011 to 2015 due to the availability of such data; in the future, a further survey may be carried out over more recent years. Providing information based on real-world data [45,46,47,48,49,50,51] may be a useful way to explore the dynamics in real clinical practice and to improve single-patient care model.

5. Conclusions

This study investigated the nature and complexity of a population, investigating the presence of systematic associations between diseases and drugs at two different times. We found that most clinical profiles were maintained over time as in the case of mental, cardiometabolic, mechanical, endocrinological, and osteometabolic patterns. Our findings revealed that baseline multimorbidity and polypharmacy patterns are maintained over time, as the nature of patterns identified in 2011 was also confirmed in 2015. Furthermore, our results also confirmed the existing association between age and clinical complexity, confirming a correlation between multimorbidity and ageing. The present study, therefore, confirmed systematic associations between diseases and drugs in the patterns over time. This could help in the early identification of potential interactions in multimorbid patients with a high risk of adverse health outcomes due to polypharmacy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.M. and A.P.-T.; methodology, S.M., A.G.-M. and B.P.-P.; formal analysis, S.M. and A.G.-M.; data curation, B.P.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M. and A.G.-M.; writing—review and editing, J.C.-P., F.G.-R., I.I.-S., A.M.-J., V.O., M.A.-P.-S., E.M. and A.P.-T.; supervision, E.M. and A.P.-T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Gobierno de Aragón, grant number B01_20R, and from the Progetto Regionale AIFA “Analisi delle Prescrizioni Farmaceutiche in Regione Campania” (Pharmacovigilance grant).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used in this study cannot be publicly shared, because of restrictions imposed by the Aragon Health Sciences Institute (IACS) and asserted by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Aragon (CEICA, ceica@aragon.es). The authors who accessed the data belong to the EpiChron Research Group of IACS, and received permission from IACS to utilize the data for this specific study, thus implying its exclusive use by the researchers appearing in the project protocol approved by CEICA.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Sirois C., Domingues N.S., Laroche M.-L., Zongo A., Lunghi C., Guénette L., Kröger E., Émond V. Polypharmacy definitions for multimorbid older adults need stronger foundations to guide research, clinical practice and public health. Pharmacy. 2019;7:126. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7030126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bradley M.C., Motterlini N., Padmanabhan S., Cahir C., Williams T., Fahey T., Hughes C.M. Potentially inappropriate prescribing among older people in the United Kingdom. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wallace E., Stuart E., Vaughan N., Bennett K., Fahey T., Smith S.M. Risk prediction models to predict emergency hospital admission in community-dwelling adults. Med. Care. 2014;52:751–765. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Monegat M., Sermet C., Perronnin M., Rococo E. Polypharmacy: Definitions, Measurement and Stakes Involved. Review of the Literature and Measurement Tests. IRDES 2014. [(accessed on 5 April 2017)]; Available online: www.irdes.fr/english/issues-in-health-economics/204-polypharmacy-definitions-measurement-and-stakesinvolved.pdf.
  • 5.Chang T.I., Park H., Kim D.W., Jeon E.K., Rhee C.M., Kalantar-Zadeh K., Kang E.W., Kang S.-W., Han S.H. Polypharmacy, hospitalization, and mortality risk: A nationwide cohort study. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75888-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Prados-Torres D., Del Cura-González I., Prados-Torres A. Hacia un modelo de atención a la multimorbilidad en atención primaria. Atención Primaria. 2017;49:261–262. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2016.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Poblador-Plou B., Akker M.V.D., Vos R., Calderón-Larrañaga A., Metsemakers J., Prados-Torres A. Similar multimorbidity patterns in primary care patients from two european regions: Results of a factor analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e100375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Prados-Torres A., Calderón-Larrañaga A., Hancco-Saavedra J., Poblador-Plou B., Akker M.V.D. Multimorbidity patterns: A systematic review. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2014;67:254–266. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Staff T.P.O., Staff P.O. Correction: Multimorbidity patterns in a national representative sample of the spanish adult population. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0123037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Islam M.M., Valderas J.M., Yen L., Dawda P., Jowsey T., McRae I.S. Multimorbidity and comorbidity of chronic diseases among the senior Australians: Prevalence and patterns. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e83783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Menditto E., Miguel A.G., Juste A.M., Plou B.P., Pascual-Salcedo M.A., Orlando V., Rubio F.G., Torres A.P. Patterns of multimorbidity and polypharmacy in young and adult population: Systematic associations among chronic diseases and drugs using factor analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0210701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang I.-J., Tung T.-H., Tang C.-S., Zhao Z.-H. Allergens, air pollutants, and childhood allergic diseases. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2016;219:66–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pinart M., Keller T., Reich A., Fröhlich M., Cabieses B., Hohmann C., Postma D.S., Bousquet J., Antó J.M., Keil T. Sex-related allergic rhinitis prevalence switch from childhood to adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2017;172:224–235. doi: 10.1159/000464324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.World Health Organization Prevalence of Asthma and Allergies in Children. European Environment and Health Information System. FACT SHEET NO. 3.1 MAY 2007 CODE: RPG3_Air_E1. [(accessed on 1 February 2020)];2007 Available online: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/96996/3.1.pdf.
  • 15.Menditto E., Costa E., Midão L., Bosnic-Anticevich S., Novellino E., Bialek S., Briedis V., Mair A., Rajabian-Soderlund R., Arnavielhe S., et al. Adherence to treatment in allergic rhinitis using mobile technology. The MASK Study. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2018;49:442–460. doi: 10.1111/cea.13333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chia C.T.W., Lim W.P., Vu C.K.F. Inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors in a local setting. Singap. Med. J. 2014;55:363–366. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2014087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Molloy D., Molloy A., O’Loughlin C., Falconer M., Hennessy M. Inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2009;179:73–75. doi: 10.1007/s11845-009-0426-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tung I., Li J.J., Meza J.I., Jezior K.L., Kianmahd J.S., Hentschel P.G., O’Neil P.M., Lee S.S. Patterns of comorbidity among girls with ADHD: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2016;138:e20160430. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gobierno de Aragon Plan Integral de Infancia y Adolescencia de Aragón 2010–2014. [(accessed on 27 July 2020)]; Available online: https://www.aragon.es/documents/20127/674325/Plan_Integral_de_Infancia_y_Adolescencia._nov_2010.pdf/89b9de94-592c-c68c-fab3-66d0b15a1b16.
  • 20.Fowles E.R., Stang J., Bryant M., Kim S. Stress, Depression, social support, and eating habits reduce diet quality in the first trimester in low-income women: A Pilot Study. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2012;112:1619–1625. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Teixidó-Compañó E., Espelt A., Sordo L., Bravo M.J., Sarasa-Renedo A., Indave B.I., Bosque-Prous M., Brugal M.T. Differences between men and women in substance use: The role of educational level and employment status. Gac. Sanit. 2018;32:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Montamat S.C., Cusack B. Overcoming problems with polypharmacy and drug misuse in the elderly. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 1992;8:143–158. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0690(18)30503-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Governament of Canada Health Canada advises Canadians to Exercise Caution When Taking Gabapentin or Pregabalin with Opioids. [(accessed on 28 July 2020)];2019 Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada.html.
  • 24.Le Quotidien du Farmacien Prégabaline: Toujours plus de Mésusage. [(accessed on 28 July 2020)];2019 Available online: https://www.lequotidiendupharmacien.fr/actualite-pharmaceutique/article/2019/09/16/pregabaline-toujours-plus-de-mesusage_279763.
  • 25.The Irish Times Doctors Warned to Reduce Prescribing of Sedatives. [(accessed on 28 July 2020)]; Available online: news/doctors-warned-to-reduce-prescribing-of-sedatives-1.4022751.
  • 26.Molero Y., Larsson H., D’Onofrio B.M., Sharp D.J., Fazel S. Associations between gabapentinoids and suicidal behaviour, unintentional overdoses, injuries, road traffic incidents, and violent crime: Population based cohort study in Sweden. BMJ. 2019;365:l2147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Williams B., Mancia G., Spiering W., Rosei E.A., Azizi M., Burnier M., Clement D.L., Coca A., de Simone G., Dominiczak A.F., et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur. Heart J. 2018;39:3021–3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Illario M., Vollenbroek-Hutten M., Molloy D.W., Menditto E., Iaccarino G., Eklund P. Active and healthy ageing and independent living. J. Aging Res. 2015;2015:1–3. doi: 10.1155/2015/542183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Illario M., Vollenbroek-Hutten M.M.R., Molloy D.W., Menditto E., Iaccarino G., Eklund P. Active and healthy ageing and independent living 2016. J. Aging Res. 2016;2016:1–3. doi: 10.1155/2016/8062079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Khan D.A. Allergic rhinitis and asthma: Epidemiology and common pathophysiology. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2014;35:357–361. doi: 10.2500/aap.2014.35.3794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Morjaria J.B., Caruso M., Emma R., Russo C., Polosa R. Treatment of allergic rhinitis as a strategy for preventing asthma. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018;18:23. doi: 10.1007/s11882-018-0781-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.March M.E., Sleiman P.M.A., Hakonarson H. The genetics of asthma and allergic disorders. Discov. Med. 2011;11:35–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Robinson P.C. Gout—An update of aetiology, genetics, co-morbidities and management. Maturitas. 2018;118:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Richette P., Bardin T. Gout. Lancet. 2010;375:318–328. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60883-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Calderón-Larrañaga A., Gimeno-Feliu L.A., González-Rubio F., Poblador-Plou B., José M.L.-S., Abad-Díez J.M., Poncel-Falcó A., Prados-Torres A. Polypharmacy patterns: Unravelling systematic associations between prescribed medications. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e84967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zheng F., Duan Y., Li J., Lai L., Zhong Z., Hu M., Ding S. Somatic symptoms and their association with anxiety and depression in Chinese patients with cardiac neurosis. J. Int. Med. Res. 2019;47:4920–4928. doi: 10.1177/0300060519869711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios, AEMPS Bisfosfonatos y Riesgo de Fracturas Atípicas de Fémur. 15 de Abril de 2011. [(accessed on 1 June 2020)]; Available online: https://www.aemps.gob.es/informa/notasInformativas/medicamentosUsoHumano/seguridad/2011/docs/NI-MUH_04-2011.pdf?x57200.
  • 38.Madero A.D., Hernández C.R., Pollo D.R., González M.M., Martínez N.G., Arruz A.B. Interacciones farmacológicas en una unidad de cuidados paliativos. Med. Paliativa. 2012;19:17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.medipa.2010.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) European Medicines Agency—Find Medicine—European Public Assessment Reports. [(accessed on 20 March 2018)]; Available online: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/landing/epar_search.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058001d124.
  • 40.Prados-Torres A., Poblador-Plou B., Calderón-Larrañaga A., Gimeno-Feliu L.A., González-Rubio F., Poncel-Falcó A., Sicras-Mainar A., Alcalá-Nalvaiz J.T. Multimorbidity patterns in primary care: Interactions among chronic diseases using factor analysis. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e32190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Russo V., Monetti V.M., Guerriero F., Trama U., Guida A., Menditto E., Orlando V. Prevalence of antibiotic prescription in southern Italian outpatients: Real-world data analysis of socioeconomic and sociodemographic variables at a municipality level. Clin. Outcomes Res. 2018;ume 10:251–258. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S161299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Guerriero F., Orlando V., Monetti V.M., Russo V., Menditto E. Biological therapy utilization, switching, and cost among patients with psoriasis: Retrospective analysis of administrative databases in Southern Italy. Clin. Outcomes Res. 2017;9:741–748. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S147558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hanlon P., Nicholl B.I., Jani B.D., McQueenie R., Lee D., I Gallacher K., Mair F.S. Examining patterns of multimorbidity, polypharmacy and risk of adverse drug reactions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional UK Biobank study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e018404. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Aoki T., Yamamoto Y., Ikenoue T., Onishi Y., Fukuhara S. Multimorbidity patterns in relation to polypharmacy and dosage frequency: A nationwide, cross-sectional study in a Japanese population. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21917-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Orlando V.V., Menditto E., Coretti S., Putignano D., Fiorentino D., Ruggeri M. Doctors commitment and long-term effectiveness for cost containment policies: Lesson learned from biosimilar drugs. Clin. Outcomes Res. 2015;7:575–581. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S88531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Iolascon G., Gimigliano F., Orlando V., Capaldo A., Di Somma C., Menditto E. Osteoporosis drugs in real-world clinical practice: An analysis of persistence. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2013;25:137–141. doi: 10.1007/s40520-013-0127-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Malo S., Aguilar-Palacio I., Feja C., Lallana M.J., Rabanaque M.J., Armesto J., Menditto E. Different approaches to the assessment of adherence and persistence with cardiovascular-disease preventive medications. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2017;33:1329–1336. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1321534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cammarota S., Bruzzese D., Catapano A.L., Citarella A., De Luca L., Manzoli L., Masulli M., Menditto E., Mezzetti A., Riegler S., et al. Lower incidence of macrovascular complications inpatients on insulin glargine versus those on basal human insulins: A population-based cohort study in Italy. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2014;24:10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Casula M., Catapano A.L., Piccinelli R., Menditto E., Manzoli L., De Fendi L., Orlando V., Flacco M.E., Gambera M., Filippi A., et al. Assessment and potential determinants of compliance and persistence to antiosteoporosis therapy in Italy. Am. J. Manag. Care. 2014;20:138–145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Prados-Torres A., Poblador-Plou B., Gimeno-Miguel A., Calderón-Larrañaga A., Poncel-Falcó A., Gimeno-Feliú L.A., González-Rubio F., Laguna-Berna C., Marta-Moreno J., Clerencia-Sierra M., et al. Cohort profile: The epidemiology of chronic diseases and multimorbidity. The EpiChron Cohort Study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2018;47:382–384. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Salisbury C., Johnson L., Purdy S., Valderas J.M., Montgomery A.A. Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: A retrospective cohort study. Br. J. Gen. Pr. 2011;61:e12–e21. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X548929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used in this study cannot be publicly shared, because of restrictions imposed by the Aragon Health Sciences Institute (IACS) and asserted by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Aragon (CEICA, ceica@aragon.es). The authors who accessed the data belong to the EpiChron Research Group of IACS, and received permission from IACS to utilize the data for this specific study, thus implying its exclusive use by the researchers appearing in the project protocol approved by CEICA.


Articles from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES