Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Medicine logoLink to Journal of Clinical Medicine
. 2021 Apr 23;10(9):1844. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091844

Autoimmune Diseases and COVID-19 as Risk Factors for Poor Outcomes: Data on 13,940 Hospitalized Patients from the Spanish Nationwide SEMI-COVID-19 Registry

María del Mar Ayala Gutiérrez 1,*, Manuel Rubio-Rivas 2, Carlos Romero Gómez 1, Abelardo Montero Sáez 2, Iván Pérez de Pedro 1, Narcís Homs 2, Blanca Ayuso García 3, Carmen Cuenca Carvajal 4, Francisco Arnalich Fernández 5, José Luis Beato Pérez 6, Juan Antonio Vargas Núñez 7, Laura Letona Giménez 8, Carmen Suárez Fernández 9, Manuel Méndez Bailón 10, Carlota Tuñón de Almeida 11, Julio González Moraleja 12, Mayte de Guzmán García-Monge 13, Cristina Helguera Amezua 14, María del Pilar Fidalgo Montero 15, Vicente Giner Galvañ 16, Ricardo Gil Sánchez 17, Jorge Collado Sáenz 18, Ramon Boixeda 19, José Manuel Ramos Rincón 20, Ricardo Gómez Huelgas 1; on behalf of the SEMI-COVID-19 Network
Editor: Michela Sabbatucci
PMCID: PMC8123043  PMID: 33922777

Abstract

(1) Objectives: To describe the clinical characteristics and clinical course of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and autoimmune diseases (ADs) compared to the general population. (2) Methods: We used information available in the nationwide Spanish SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, which retrospectively compiles data from the first admission of adult patients with COVID-19. We selected all patients with ADs included in the registry and compared them to the remaining patients. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality during admission, readmission, and subsequent admissions, and secondary outcomes were a composite outcome including the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (MV), or death, as well as in-hospital complications. (3) Results: A total of 13,940 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were included, of which 362 (2.6%) had an AD. Patients with ADs were older, more likely to be female, and had greater comorbidity. On the multivariate logistic regression analysis, which involved the inverse propensity score weighting method, AD as a whole was not associated with an increased risk of any of the outcome variables. Habitual treatment with corticosteroids (CSs), age, Barthel Index score, and comorbidity were associated with poor outcomes. Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were associated with a decrease in mortality in patients with AD. (4) Conclusions: The analysis of the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry shows that ADs do not lead to a different prognosis, measured by mortality, complications, or the composite outcome. Considered individually, it seems that some diseases entail a different prognosis than that of the general population. Immunosuppressive/immunoregulatory treatments (IST) prior to admission had variable effects.

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, antirheumatic agents, biological therapy, glucocorticoids, immune system diseases, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2

1. Introduction

The novel coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) pandemic has spread throughout the world. Spain is one of the most affected countries in Europe, with more than 3,153,000 cumulative cases [1].

The infection has a more severe course in elderly men or those with comorbidities [2,3]. In the case of patients with autoimmune diseases (ADs), questions have been raised about the true susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and the course of the AD after infection. In general, the underlying dysfunction of their immune system and the immunosuppressive/immunoregulatory treatments (ISTs) they receive mean that some patients with ADs are at greater risk of infection [4,5]. Different studies have observed a frequency of COVID-19 in these patients that is higher than that of the general population [6,7,8], as well as a worse prognosis in terms of the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) or admission to intensive care units (ICUs) [9]. In others, however, the frequency of COVID-19 [10,11,12,13,14] and its prognosis were similar to patients without ADs [13,15,16,17,18,19]. It has been suggested that patients with ADs could have adopted stricter and earlier self-protection and social distancing measures than the general population [12,20].

On the other hand, antimalarials, which are common in the treatment of ADs, have in vitro antiviral effects [21], although no protective effect has been demonstrated [9,12,22,23]. In the inflammatory phase of COVID-19, ISTs could protect patients with ADs who usually receive them from the onset of a cytokine storm, which is associated with a poor prognosis [14,15,24]. Finally, some ADs have basal characteristics that could influence the course of COVID-19, both positively (overexpression of interferon alpha [25]) and negatively (lymphopenia [26] or epigenetic dysregulation [27]).

The Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) has created a registry of patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 in Spain. This registry makes it possible to compare the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and the clinical course of patients with and without ADs in order to establish whether differences exist between them.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Patients

We have used the information available in the Spanish nationwide SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, which retrospectively compiles data from the first admission of patients ≥ 18 years of age with COVID-19, confirmed microbiologically by a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test of a nasopharyngeal swab sample, sputum specimen, or bronchoalveolar lavage. This registry collects sociodemographic data, previous medical history, routine treatment (including CS, antimalarials, conventional or targeted disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cs/tsDMARDs), and bDMARDs), clinical presentation, clinical condition (including the degree of functional dependence, as evaluated by the Barthel Index [28], and the presence of comorbidities, as evaluated by the Charlson Comorbidity Index [29]), laboratory test results, radiological findings, clinical management, in-hospital complications, length of hospital stay, early readmissions, referral to long-term care or skilled nursing facilities, and deaths. Patients were treated at their attending physician’s discretion according to local protocols and their clinical judgment.

The SEMI-COVID-19 Registry was approved by the Provincial Research Ethics Committee of Málaga (Spain). Given that it is observational in nature, the registry poses no additional inconvenience to the patients included. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. When it was not possible to obtain it in writing for biosecurity reasons or because the patient had already been discharged, it was collected verbally and noted on the medical record. More in-depth information and preliminary results of the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry have recently been published [30].

We selected all of the patients with ADs included in the registry until 30 June 2020 (prior to the beginning of the vaccination campaign in Spain) and compared them with the remaining patients. The ADs were defined based on the information included in the medical record and the judgment of the physician in charge of entering the data into the registry, which was done using a standardized online data capture system. The primary outcome of the study was all-cause mortality during admission, readmission, and subsequent admissions. Secondary outcomes were a composite outcome, including the need for ICU admission, invasive and non-invasive MV, or death, as well as in-hospital complications. The latter included secondary bacterial pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), acute heart failure, arrhythmia, acute coronary syndrome, myocarditis, seizures, stroke, shock, sepsis, acute kidney failure, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), venous thromboembolism, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and acute limb ischemia.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were presented as a number (percentage), and continuous variables were reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests. Continuous variables were compared using an ANOVA test. The level of significance was established as a two-tailed p < 0.05. No corrections were made for multiple comparisons.

The different models of logistic regression were developed with the group of patients in the registry without ADs who had valid information in all of the predictor and result variables included in the corresponding analysis. For patients with ADs, the missing data were completed by multiple imputations [31]. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) when comparing outcomes, mortality, composite outcomes, and complications during hospitalization. The regression model included sociodemographic variables, comorbidities, and prior ISTs. For the predictor variable selection process, the Wald statistic, forward method, was used, with inclusion p < 0.05 and exclusion p < 0.10.

As it is an observational, non-randomized study, to reduce the number of model predictor variables, avoid selection biases, and better control the influence of their possible confounding effect, the different propensity scores (PSs) were independently calculated [32,33] for the binary variables of ADs, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), primary Sjögren syndrome (PSS), systemic sclerosis (SSc), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD)/overlap syndrome, inflammatory myopathies (IM), primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), spondyloarthropaties, vasculitis (systemic vasculitis, including giant cell arteritis), polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), and combined PMR/giant cell arteritis.

In the first step, in the logistic regression model that included the previously cited variables as dependents and variables on sociodemographic data, comorbidity, preadmission ISTs, and drugs received during the hospital stay as predictors, the estimated probability for each dependent variable was calculated as a PS using the enter method. In the next step, this PS was weighted by calculating its inverse (inverse propensity score weighting (IPSW) method) in patients with AD as 1/PS and in patients without AD as 1/(1-PS); the histogram of the weighted scores showed that the groups were comparable. Subsequently, an analysis of generalized estimation equations was carried out in the generalized linear models module of the SPSS statistical package in order to retrieve the original sample sizes and calculate the OR with their 95% CI. To assess the robustness of the results, sensitivity analyses were performed, comparing the results of the logistic regression analysis with those obtained through the IPSW method. All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp., US).

3. Results

3.1. Patients

As of 30 June 2020, a total of 13,940 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were included in the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, of which 362 (2.6%) had ADs, which were sub-classified into classic ADs, other ADs, and miscellaneous ADs (Table 1).

Table 1.

Classification of the autoimmune diseases (ADs).

Disease n (%) Total (%)
Without AD 13,578 (97.4) 13,578 (97.4)
Classical AD RA 113 (0.81) 207 (1.48)
SLE 23 (0.16)
PSS 19 (0.14)
SSc 13 (0.09)
Vasculitis: ANCA-vasculitis (8), isolated CNS vasculitis, Schönlein- Henoch purpura, urticarial hypocomplementemic vasculitis, erythema elevatum with vasculitis, antiMPO/antiGBM glomerulonephritis 13 (0.09)
Giant cell arteritis 9 (0.06)
MTCD/overlap 9 (0.06)
IM 4 (0.03)
APS 4 (0.03)
Other AD PMR 48 (0.34) 134 (0.96)
Spondyloarthropathy 33 (0.24)
Sarcoidosis 10 (0.07)
Inflammatory bowel disease 10 (0.07)
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 9 (0.06)
Primary biliary cirrhosis 6 (0.04)
Autoimmune cytopenia: immune thrombocytopenic purpura (3), autoimmune hemolytic anemia, autoimmune neutropenia 5 (0.04)
Autoimmune hepatitis 4 (0.03)
Myasthenia Gravis 4 (0.03)
Behçet’s disease 3 (0.02)
Multiple sclerosis 2 (0.01)
Miscellaneous AD Psoriasis 6 (0.04) 21 (0.15)
Cutaneous lupus 4 (0.03)
Seronegative polyarthritis 3 (0.02)
Seronegative arthritis 1 (0.01)
Arthralgia with antinuclear/citrullinatedpeptide antibody 1 (0.01)
Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy/orbital pseudotumor 1 (0.01)
Polyglandular autoimmune syndrome 1 (0.01)
Collagenous colitis 1 (0.01)
Erythema nodosum 1 (0.01)
HLAB27 uveitis 1 (0.01)
Palindromic rheumatism 1 (0.01)
Total 13,940 (100)

AD: autoimmune diseases; AntiGBM: anti-glomerular basement membrane antibodies; AntiMPO: myeloperoxidase antibodies; APS: primary antiphospholipid syndrome; CNS: central nervous system; IM: inflammatory myopathies; MTCD: mixed connective tissue disease; PMR: polymyalgia rheumatica; PSS: primary Sjögren syndrome; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; SSc: systemic sclerosis.

The average age of patients with ADs was somewhat higher, and female sex was more frequent than in the general population. They had greater comorbidity, with a Charlson Index > 2, especially in the group of patients with classic ADs (2.66 vs. 1.27 in the general population). The clinical manifestations, physical examination on admission, and radiological alterations of patients with ADs were similar to the general population (Table 2 and Table S1). Patients with ADs were being treated with ISTs more frequently (Table 2).

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics among groups.

Without AD Classical AD Other AD Miscellaneous AD p-Value
Sociodemographic data
Age, years (mean ± SD) 67.2 ± 16.3 69.6 ± 13.6 71.3 ± 14.3 66.4 ± 10.8 0.006
Sex (female) n (%) 5784 (42.6) 124 (59.9) 64 (47.8) 10 (47.6) <0.001
Race n (%) 0.040
  • -

    Caucasian

  • -

    Black

  • -

    Hispanic

  • -

    Asian

  • -

    Other

11,997 (89.7)
51 (0.4)
1145 (8.6)
60 (0.4)
118 (0.9)
193 (93.2)
3 (1.4)
10 (4.8)
0 (0.0)
1 (0.5)
129 (96.3)
0 (0.0)
3 (2.2)
0 (0.0)
2 (1.5)
21 (100)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
Degree of dependence (Barthel Index score) n (%) 0.081
  • -

    Absent/mild

  • -

    Moderate

  • -

    Severe

11,170 (83.5)
1249 (9.3)
962 (7.2)
166 (80.2)
28 (13.5)
13 (6.3)
105 (78.4)
13 (9.7)
16 (11.9)
20 (95.2)
1 (4.8)
0 (0.0)
Comorbidities
Charlson Comorbidity Index (mean ± SD) 1.27 ± 1.80 2.66 ± 2.09 2.36 ± 2.11 2.05 ± 1.66 <0.001
Smoking n (%) 0.068
  • -

    Non smoker

  • -

    Smoker

12,228 (94.6)
696 (5.4)
203 (98.1)
4 (1.9)
129 (96.3)
5 (3.7)
21 (100)
0 (0.0)
Alcohol use disorder n (%) 621 (4.7) 10 (4.8) 5 (3.7) 1 (4.8) 0.960
Hypertension n (%) 6849 (50.5) 118 (57.0) 76 (56.7) 12 (57.1) 0.122
Dyslipidemia n (%) 5352 (39.5) 88 (42.5) 63 (47.0) 9 (42.9) 0.263
Diabetes mellitus n (%) 2585 (19.0) 48 (23.2) 28 (20.9) 3 (14.3) 0.413
Obesity (BMI > 30) n (%) 2617 (21.2) 58 (28.0) 32 (23.9) 4 (19.0) 0.102
Anxiety n (%) 1045 (7.7) 19 (9.2) 11 (8.2) 3 (14.3) 0.594
Depression n (%) 1375 (10.2) 30 (14.5) 19 (14.2) 3 (14.3) 0.079
Neurodegenerative disorder n (%) 1237 (9.1) 21 (10.1) 16 (11.9) 1 (4.8) 0.573
Dementia n (%) 1358 (10.0) 25 (12.1) 14 (10.4) 1 (4.8) 0.653
Hemiplegia/paraplegia n (%) 221 (1.6) 6 (2.9) 4 (3.0) 0 (0.0) 0.281
Dialysis n (%) 154 (1.1) 5 (2.4) 4 (3.0) 0 (0.0) 0.145
Organ transplantation n (%) <0.001
  • -

    No transplant

  • -

    Kidney

  • -

    Liver

  • -

    Heart

  • -

    Lung

13,246 (98.8)
116 (0.8)
23 (0.2)
11 (0.1)
14 (0.1)
202 (97.6)
5 (2.4)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
131 (97.8)
2 (1.5)
1 (0.7)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
20 (95.2)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
1 (4.8)
Arteriosclerotic vascular disease n (%) 2359 (17.4) 48 (23.2) 29 (21.6) 1 (4.8) 0.033
Non-arteriosclerotic vascular disease n (%) 1995 (14.7) 46 (22.2) 28 (21.0) 4 (19.0) 0.004
Respiratory pathology n (%) 2682 (19.7) 70 (33.8) 38 (28.3) 7 (33.3) <0.001
HIV n (%) 96 (0.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.460
Chronic liver disease, moderate to severe n (%) 133 (1.0) 3 (1.4) 2 (1.5) 0 (0.0) 0.799
Chronic kidney failure moderate-severe n (%) 804 (5.9) 21 (10.1) 11 (8.2) 1 (4.8) 0.055
Cancer n (%) 1425 (10.5) 24 (11.6) 12 (8.9) 2 (9.5) 0.891
Gastroduodenal ulcer n (%) 340 (2.5) 9 (4.3) 6 (4.5) 0 (0.0) 0.148
Treatment before admission
Antimalarials n (%) 38 (0.3) 29 (14.0) 3 (2.2) 0 (0) <0.001
Corticosteroids n (%) 428 (3.1) 105 (50.7) 59 (44.0) 7 (33.3) <0.001
cs/tsDMARDs n (%) 360 (2.7) 97 (46.8) 28 (20.9) 8 (38.1) <0.001
bDMARDs n (%) 149 (1.1) 21 (10.1) 10 (7.5) 1 (4.8) <0.001

Data for patients with ADs were imputed for sociodemographic variables, comorbidity, and treatment before admission. Arteriosclerotic vascular disease (ischemic heart disease, cerebral vascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease). Non-arteriosclerotic vascular disease (heart failure and atrial fibrillation). Respiratory pathology (asthma, COPD, chronic bronchitis, sleep apnea syndrome). AD: autoimmune disease; bDMARDs: disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, original biological or similar; BMI: body mass index; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; cs/tsDMARDs: disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, synthetic, conventional, or targeted; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus.

During admission, patients with AD received ISTs more frequently than the general population, especially CS and immunoglobulins (IGIV), while the use of antimalarial drugs, which were part of the standard of care during a certain period of time in Spain, was similar in all groups (Table 3).

Table 3.

Immunosuppressors/immunomodulators during the admission.

Without AD Classical AD Other AD Miscellaneous AD p-Value
Hydroxychloroquine n (%) 11,581 (85.6) 172 (83.1) 106 (79.1) 19 (90.5) 0.113
Chloroquine n (%) 622 (4.6) 13 (6.3) 9 (6.7) 0 (0.0) 0.310
Tocilizumab n (%) 1136 (8.4) 19 (9.2) 9 (6.7) 3 (14.3) 0.661
Immunoglobulin n (%) 58 (0.4) 5 (2.4) 1 (0.7) 0 (0.0) 0.001
Anakinra n (%) 75 (0.6) 2 (1.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.685
Baricitinib n (%) 77 (0.6) 3 (1.4) 0 (0.0) 1 (4.8) 0.020
Corticosteroids n (%) 4656 (34.5) 102 (49.3) 49 (36.6) 11 (52.4) <0.001

AD: autoimmune diseases.

3.2. Prognosis in Patients with ADs

Although the duration of admission was similar in all groups, in the univariate analysis, patients with ADs had more complications (p = 0.008) and higher mortality (p < 0.001), and met the criteria of the composite outcome more often than the general population (p < 0.001), especially the group of classic ADs and other ADs (Table 4).

Table 4.

Outcomes.

Without AD Classical AD Other AD Miscellaneous AD p-Value
Length of stay (days) mean ± SD 11.2 ± 10.0 12.2 ± 10.7 11.4 ± 13.2 12.3 ± 8.0 0.502
NIMV n (%) 666 (4.9) 15 (7.4) 2 (1.5) 1 (4.8) 0.118
IMV n (%) 882 (6.5) 13 (6.4) 6 (4.5) 2 (9.5) 0.753
ICU admission n (%) 1108 (8.2) 23 (11.1) 7 (5.2) 2 (9.5) 0.264
Complications during admission n (%) 6246 (46.0) 118 (57.0) 70 (52.2) 10 (47.6) 0.008
 Bacterial pneumonia n (%) 1460 (10.8) 34 (16.4) 20 (14.9) 1 (4.8) 0.022
 ARDS n (%) 4414 (32.8) 84 (40.6) 48 (35.8) 7 (33.3) 0.019
 Heart failure n (%) 765 (5.7) 23 (11.1) 10 (7.5) 0 (0.0) 0.004
 Arrhythmia n (%) 523 (3.9) 18 (8.7) 7 (5.2) 1 (4.8) 0.005
 Myocardial infarction n (%) 108 (0.8) 3 (1.4) 2 (1.5) 0 (0.0) 0.572
 Myocarditis n (%) 118 (0.9) 4 (1.9) 2 (1.5) 0 (0.0) 0.346
 Seizures n (%) 80 (0.6) 3 (1.5) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.326
Stroke n (%)
  • -

    Ischemic

  • -

    Hemorrhagic

81 (0.6)
11 (0.1)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
3 (2.2)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0.267
 Shock n (%) 602 (4.5) 13 (6.3) 9 (6.7) 0 (0.0) 0.253
 Acute kidney failure n (%) 1872 (13.9) 42 (20.3) 20 (14.9) 5 (23.8) 0.032
 Sepsis n (%) 822 (6.1) 18 (8.7) 14 (10.4) 1 (4.8) 0.081
 DIC n (%) 148 (1.1) 4 (1.9) 2 (1.5) 0 (0.0) 0.636
Thromboembolic disease n (%)
  • -

    DVT

  • -

    PE

  • -

    DVT + PE

66 (0.5)
195 (1.4)
15 (0.1)
2 (1.0)
6 (2.9)
0 (0.0)
1 (0.7)
2 (1.5)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
1 (4.8)
0 (0.0)
<0.001
 Multiorgan failure n (%) 831 (6.2) 22 (10.6) 10 (7.5) 0 (0.0) 0.033
 Peripheral arteriopathy n (%) 72 (0.5) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.7) 0 (0.0) 0.718
Readmission n (%) 496 (3.8) 11 (5.5) 5 (3.8) 0 (0.0) 0.495
 Related to COVID-19 n (%) 205 (41.5) 7 (63.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.056
Death n (%) 2968 (22.2) 64 (30.9) 49 (36.6) 2 (9.5) <0.001
Composite outcome n (%) 3790 (27.9) 80 (38.6) 52 (38.8) 4 (19.0) <0.001

AD: autoimmune disease; ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; DIC: disseminated intravascular coagulopathy; DVT: deep venous thrombosis; ICU: intensive care unit; IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation; NIMV: non-invasive mechanical ventilation; PE: pulmonary embolism.

In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the ADs as a whole showed neutral effects on the outcome variables (mortality, composite outcome, and complications). Habitual treatment with CS was associated with a greater risk of these outcome variables, unlike the rest of the habitual ISTs, which had a neutral effect. Age, male sex, Hispanic ethnicity/race, Barthel Index score, and comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, respiratory pathology, non-arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and transplantation) were also poor prognostic factors (Table 5).

Table 5.

Measures of the effect, OR (95% CI), of the ADs, sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidity, and immunomodulatory treatments prior to admission and during hospital stay in relation to the outcome variables α.

Outcome Mortality Composite Outcome Complications
n (%) 2449 (21.7) 3176 (27.7) 5309 (46.4)
AUC AUC = 0.83
(95% CI 0.82–0.84)
AUC = 0.74
(95% CI 0.73–0.75)
AUC = 0.71
(95% CI 0.70–0.72)
Age, years 1.08 (1.08–1.09) 1.05 (1.04–1.05) 1.04 (1.03–1.04)
Sex (female) 0.58 (0.52–0.66) 0.60 (0.55–0.66) 0.60 (0.55–0.65)
Race
  • -

    Caucasian

  • -

    Black

  • -

    Hispanic

  • -

    Asian

  • -

    Others

NS 1
1.06 (0.49–2.27)
1.43 (1.18–1.74)
1.19 (0.55–2.57)
1.15 (0.68–1.96)
1
0.87 (0.46–1.63)
1.45 (1.24–1.69)
0.77 (0.40–1.47)
1.06 (0.68–1.63)
Degree of dependence (Barthel Index score)
  • -

    Absent/mild

  • -

    Moderate

  • -

    Severe

1
1.69 (1.45–1.98)
2.23 (1.87–2.66)
1
1.55 (1.34–1.79)
1.96 (1.66–2.31)
1
1.35 (1.16–1.57)
1.51 (1.27–1.79)
Hypertension 1.13 (1.01–1.27) 1.11 (1.01–1.23) 1.20 (1.10–1.32)
Dyslipidemia NS NS 1.09 (1.00–1.19)
Obesity (BMI > 30) 1.33 (1.17–1.51) 1.33 (1.19–1.48) 1.41 (1.28–1.55)
Respiratory pathology NS NS 1.14 (1.03–1.26)
Non-arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease NS 1.15 (1.02–1.30) 1.31 (1.16–1.48)
Habitual treatment with CS 1.81 (1.44–2.27) 1.54 (1.26–1.88) 1.39 (1.13–1.71)
Organ transplantation
  • -

    No transplant

  • -

    Kidney

  • -

    Liver

  • -

    Heart

  • -

    Lung

1
1.83 (1.14–2.94)
1.78 (0.68–4.68)
0.78 (0.09–7.07)
10.32 (3.00–35.51)
NS 1
1.63 (1.06–2.51)
1.14 (0.48–2.72)
1.57 (0.39–6.31)
6.42 (1.37–30.16)
Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.16 (1.13–1.19) 1.12 (1.09–1.15) 1.08 (1.05–1.11)
Autoimmune disease NS α,β NS α,β NS α,β

α Obtained in the logistic regression analysis (selection of variables: Wald statistician forward, with inclusion p < 0.05 and exclusion p < 0.10) in relation to the result variables: mortality, composite outcome (mortality, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission), and complications during hospitalization. Predictive variables included in the model: absent/present AD, age, sex, race, alcoholism, smoking, Barthel Index score, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, obesity, depression, neurodegenerative pathology, dementia, moderate to severe renal pathology, dialysis (absent/hemodialysis/peritoneal), organ transplantation, respiratory pathology (asthma, COPD, chronic bronchitis, sleep apnea syndrome), non-arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (heart failure or AF); arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (TIA, stroke, hemiplegia, angina, AMI, peripheral arterial disease), severe liver disease, any neoplasm, gastro-duodenal ulcer disease, AIDS, HIV infection, Charlson Comorbidity Index, in-hospital complications, pre-admission immunosuppressive therapy with CS, antimalarials, bDMARDs, and cs/tsDMARDs. In total, there were 31 exposure variables. β Statistical significance was not reached in the final model for the AD variable categorized into four groups (absent, classic AD, other AD, and miscellaneous), nor when the immunoregulatory treatments used during hospitalization were included in the model (HCQ, CQ, tocilizumab, IGIV, anakinra, baricitinib, CS). AD: autoimmune diseases; AF: atrial fibrillation; AIDS: acquired immune deficiency syndrome; AMI: acute myocardial infarction; AUC: area under the ROC curve; bDMARDs: disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, original, biological, or similar; BMI: body mass index; CQ: chloroquine; CS: corticosteroids; cs/tsDMARDs: disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, synthetic, conventional, or targeted; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; HCQ: hydroxychloroquine; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; ICU: intensive care unit; IVIG: intravenous immunoglobulins; NS: not significant; OSAS: obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; TIA: transient ischemic attack.

When we analyzed the effect of ADs as a whole and individually, as well as the habitual ISTs on the outcome variables by calculating the IPSW method, ADs as a whole were not associated with higher mortality, increased risk of the composite outcome, or more complications during admission (Table 6). Some Ads, such as RA, PMR, and vasculitis, were associated with higher mortality; spondyloarthropathies, vasculitis, and PMR were associated with a higher risk of the composite outcome, as well as RA, with higher risk of complications during hospitalization. SSc was associated with a lower risk of mortality, composite outcome, and complications during hospitalization. Similarly, PSS was associated with fewer complications during hospitalization (Supplementary Table S2). The effect of the habitual ISTs was very variable. BDMARDs were associated with a decrease in mortality in the set of Ads, and were especially beneficial in spondyloarthropathies, although contradictory results were observed in SLE, RA, and vasculitis. CS did not affect the overall ADs, but was detrimental in some diseases, such as PSS, SSc, MCTD/overlap, APS, IM, and vasculitis. Cs/tsDMARDs also did not affect the overall group, but were beneficial in some diseases, such as PMR/giant cell arteritis, SLE, and RA. Finally, antimalarials did not change the prognosis.

Table 6.

Measures of the effect, OR (95% CI) *, of ADs as a whole and of immunomodulatory treatments prior to hospital admission with their propensity scores on the outcome variables α.

Antimalarials Corticosteroids cs/tsDMARDs bDMARDs
Mortality 2.11
(0.56–7.58)
1.02
(0.29–3.58)
0.80
(0.26–2.49)
1.31
(0.60–2.90)
0.14
(0.03–0.78) *
Composite outcome 1.58
(0.44–5.63)
1.18
(0.38–3.68)
0.80
(0.28–2.33)
1.35
(0.65–2.80)
0.22
(0.04–1.14)
Complications 0.94
(0.25–3.44)
1.76
(0.56–5.55)
1.57
(0.47–5.30)
0.98
(0.47–2.02)
0.71
(0.09–5.91)

α Propensity scores were obtained with the inverse weighting method. Outcome variables were mortality, composite outcome (mortality, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission), and complications during the hospitalization. Predictor variables included in the logistic regression model to estimate the propensity score: age, sex, race, form of acquisition (common/nosocomial/residency), alcohol use disorder, smoking, Barthel Index score, comorbidity, Charlson Comorbidity Index, immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory treatments prior to admission (anti-malarial, glucocorticoids, cs/tsDMARDs, bDMARDs) and during hospitalization (antimalarials, tocilizumab, immunoglobulins, anakinra, baricitinib, corticosteroids), and the presence of a complication during hospitalization (38 exposure variables to calculate the propensity scores). A total of 11,174 patients hospitalized by COVID-19 were included. AD: autoimmune disease; bDMARDs: disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, original, biologic, or similar; cs/tsDMARDs: disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, synthetic, conventional, or targeted; ICU: intensive care unit.

4. Discussion

In this study, we analyzed data from one of the largest cohorts of hospitalized patients with ADs and COVID-19 published to date. In this registry, patients with ADs accounted for 2.6% of the total number of patients admitted to 150 hospitals in Spain for COVID-19. Other authors have described figures that range from ≤ 1% to 10% [34,35,36]. This variability could be influenced by the different prevalence of ADs according to the geographical area [37], as well as the selection and classification criteria of the ADs used. In the nationwide Spanish SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, several ADs were included based on the dysfunction of the underlying immune system, the possibility of receiving ISTs, and the judgment of the clinician in charge of data entry, which were gathered from the information contained in the medical record. The actual incidence of COVID-19 in patients with ADs is still unknown. Worldwide, in different epidemiological contexts and for different ADs, its incidence has been described as being both similar [10,12,13,14,38,39] and higher [6,7,40] than among the general population. In our case, the design of the registry does not allow for an approximation in this regard beyond what has been observed in hospitalized patients in our country.

In this registry, patients with ADs were more frequently female, older, more dependent, and with greater comorbidity than patients without ADs. In the univariate analysis, patients with ADs had higher mortality, met the criteria of the composite outcome more often, and had more complications during hospitalization. However, after controlling for the effect of possible known confounding factors using multivariate logistic regression and the IPSW method, the presence of an ADs did not entail a greater risk of these variables.

Two international registries of patients with ADs and a recent meta-analysis have shown the deleterious effect of age and comorbidity on the prognosis of COVID-19 [8,41,42,43]. These same factors may have acted as confounders of the higher mortality, composite outcome, and complications that we observed in the univariate analysis in patients with ADs. In the multivariate analysis, in which the effect of ADs on the prognosis of COVID-19 was estimated, taking into account these and other confounding factors (age, sex, ethnicity/race, comorbidities, alcohol and tobacco use, degree of dependency, and ISTs before and during admission), no relationship with the prognosis was observed. Age, male sex, and comorbidity behaved as poor prognostic factors in patients with ADs, as well as in the general population. Different studies published around the world support the idea that patients with ADs and COVID-19 have a similar clinical course to that of the general population [6,12,13,17,34,35,44,45]. Only two cohorts, both of which included only a small number of patients with ADs, found a higher frequency of respiratory failure [46] and need for MV or ICU admission [9] in patients with ADs compared to the general population, although there were no differences in the mortality rates in both cases.

Few studies have assessed the effect of different ADs on the prognosis of COVID-19. In our study, analyzed individually, worse progress was observed in patients with certain ADs, including RA, PMR, vasculitis, and spondyloarthropathies, and better progress in others, such as PSS and SSc (Table S2). Other authors have found a greater risk of severe COVID-19 in patients with systemic vasculitis, SLE, PSS, and APS, but they did not find differences between the control group and the group of patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis [47]. Although, in general, having an AD does not necessarily imply a worse prognosis, it cannot be ruled out that specific diseases with different pathogenic mechanisms and phenotypic characteristics would entail a different clinical course than the rest. Until now, the small number of patients with specific diseases that have been included in the publications, the absence of a control group, and the lack of control of biases and confounding factors have not allowed for the effects of these diseases to be fully characterized. Further analysis would be needed to evaluate the severity of specific conditions within the heterogeneous AD group.

Another concern during the pandemic has been the impact of basal ISTs (CS, antimalarials, and DMARDs) on the prognosis of COVID-19. The onset of hyper-inflammatory syndromes and even immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome associated with poor prognosis have been described in the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection [48]. Immunosuppressive therapies have been used for the treatment of this inflammatory phase of the disease [24,49], similar to other ADs associated with viral infections (such as cryoglobulinemia and hepatitis C virus or polyarteritis nodosa and hepatitis B virus [50]). In addition, ensuring that ADs remain in remission helps prevent infections in general [51] or the least poor progression of them [52]. In this context, various authors have suggested that basal ISTs would not result in a more severe clinical course [45], and could even have some protective effect [14,15,21,49]. In this study’s multivariate logistic regression analysis, the habitual treatment with CS was associated with higher mortality among patients with ADs. In the analysis, by calculating the PS, habitual CS did not influence the prognosis of ADs as a whole, although we did find a significant influence in a few diseases. Two large registries of patients with ADs and a recent meta-analysis have also shown the deleterious effect of CS on the prognosis of COVID-19 [8,41,42,43]. No information was collected in this registry on the dose or duration of pre-admission CS treatment or the activity of the underlying disease, which may have influenced these results.

Regular treatment with antimalarials did not have any protective effect, which is consistent with the results of other observational studies in patients with ADs [9,12,23,41]. However, in patients with PMR, antimalarials were associated with more complications, although the 95% CI was quite wide, and thus was too imprecise to be taken into consideration.

In our study, the regular use of DMARDs (bDMARDs or cs/tsDMARDs) tended to have a neutral or protective effect against the outcome variables in the whole of the ADs and in specific diseases. Other authors have also found a neutral [6,16,38,42,47,53] or protective [41] effect of bDMARDs and cs/tsDMARDs [41,47,53]. Better control of disease activity, as well as the attenuation or prevention of an excessive inflammatory response to COVID-19, could explain the protective or neutral effect of these drugs. In the case of SLE and RA, however, bDMARDs were shown to be harmful. A lack of information about other possible confounding factors, such as AD activity, may have influenced this result.

One of the main strengths of our study is the large number of patients included from the internal medicine departments of more than 150 hospitals. Furthermore, data were collected using a standardized, previously agreed upon protocol. Multiple imputations of the missing data, both randomized and biased, were performed on patients with ADs, which allowed all of them to be analyzed. To avoid selection biases and control for confounding factors in the estimation of the effect of ADs, a multivariate analysis was carried out, and the PS was estimated using the IPSW method. Finally, as a sensitivity analysis, the results obtained in the previous analyses were compared.

Our study has some limitations. In addition to being retrospective, the registry was not specifically designed to evaluate the effect of ADs, but rather was designed as a general registry of patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. This registry took advantage of the information available in electronic medical records, but the data were collected by a large number of researchers from different centers who were not necessarily specialized in ADs or in charge of patient care. This could have led to heterogeneity in the collection and validation of this information. Patients who were unable to provide informed consent at any time, either because of severe illness or mechanical ventilation, were excluded. However, they represent an extremely small proportion of patients, and thus have little impact on the results. The group of patients classified as having ADs included patients with various diseases. Their inclusion in this group was based on the baseline dysfunction of the immune system, the possibility of receiving immunosuppressive treatment, and the judgment of the physician in charge of entering the data, which reflects the habitual clinical practice and allowed us to increase the sample size. Since it was a very heterogeneous group, a subgroup analysis (classical, other, and miscellaneous) and analyses of specific entities were also performed. In the analysis, general population cases that were missing data for any of the variables of the different statistical analyses carried out were excluded from the control group, but, given the large sample size, the power of the statistical contrasts was not affected. On the other hand, the effect of the AD activity or the antiviral or antimicrobial drugs used during hospitalization were not evaluated, although some of the latter have not been proven effective in other studies [54]. In order to create the multivariate statistical contrast models, the admission date was not included. This may entail a selection bias, since, although little time has passed since the beginning of the pandemic, the management of patients may have changed in these months.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this analysis of the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry found that ADs do not entail a different prognosis, as measured by mortality, the composite outcome (mortality/ICU admission/need for MV), or complications, than that of the rest of patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 in Spain. Considered individually, it cannot be ruled out that some diseases entail a better or worse prognosis than the general patient population. The use of ISTs before admission had variable effects.

More studies are needed, including outpatient cohort studies, in order to determine the different aspects that affect COVID-19 prognosis in patients with ADs.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge all of the investigators who participated in the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry. We also thank the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry Coordinating Center, S&H Medical Science Service, for their quality control data, logistic, and administrative support. We greatly appreciate the help of doctor de Ramón Garrido in the statistical analysis.

List of the SEMI-COVID-19 Network members:

  • Coordinator of the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry: José Manuel Casas Rojo.

  • SEMI-COVID-19 Scientific Committee Members: José Manuel Casas Rojo, José Manuel Ramos Rincón, Carlos Lumbreras Bermejo, Jesús Millán Núñez-Cortés, Juan Miguel Antón Santos, Ricardo Gómez Huelgas.

  • SEMI-COVID-19 Registry Coordinating Center: S & H Medical Science Service.

  • Members of the SEMI-COVID-19 Group:

  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Madrid

  • Paloma Agudo de Blas, Coral Arévalo Cañas, Blanca Ayuso, José Bascuñana Morejón, Samara Campos Escudero, María Carnevali Frías, Santiago Cossio Tejido, Borja de Miguel Campo, Carmen Díaz Pedroche, Raquel Diaz Simon, Ana García Reyne, Lucia Jorge Huerta, Antonio Lalueza Blanco, Jaime Laureiro Gonzalo, Jaime Lora-Tamayo, Carlos Lumbreras Bermejo, Guillermo Maestro de la Calle, Barbara Otero Perpiña, Diana Paredes Ruiz, Marcos Sánchez Fernández, Javier Tejada Montes.

  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge. L’Hospitalet de Llobregat

  • Xavier Corbella, Narcís Homs, Abelardo Montero, Jose María Mora-Luján, Manuel Rubio Rivas.

  • H. U. Gregorio Marañón. Madrid

  • Laura Abarca Casas, Álvaro Alejandre de Oña, Rubén Alonso Beato, Leyre Alonso Gonzalo, Jaime Alonso Muñoz, Crhistian Mario Amodeo Oblitas, Cristina Ausín García, Marta Bacete Cebrián, Jesús Baltasar Corral, Maria Barrientos Guerrero, Alejandro Bendala Estrada, María Calderón Moreno, Paula Carrascosa Fernández, Raquel Carrillo, Sabela Castañeda Pérez, Eva Cervilla Muñoz, Agustín Diego Chacón Moreno, Maria Carmen Cuenca Carvajal, Sergio de Santos, Andrés Enríquez Gómez, Eduardo Fernández Carracedo, María Mercedes Ferreiro-Mazón Jenaro, Francisco Galeano Valle, Alejandra Garcia, Irene Garcia Fernandez-Bravo, María Eugenia García Leoni, Maria Gomez Antunez, Candela González San Narciso, Anthony Alexander Gurjian, Lorena Jiménez Ibáñez, Cristina Lavilla Olleros, Cristina Llamazares Mendo, Sara Luis García, Víctor Mato Jimeno, Clara Millán Nohales, Jesús Millán Núñez-Cortés, Sergio Moragón Ledesma, Antonio Muiño Miguez, Cecilia Muñoz Delgado, Lucía Ordieres Ortega, Susana Pardo Sánchez, Alejandro Parra Virto, María Teresa Pérez Sanz, Blanca Pinilla Llorente, Sandra Piqueras Ruiz, Guillermo Soria Fernández-Llamazares, María Toledano Macías, Neera Toledo Samaniego, Ana Torres do Rego, Maria Victoria Villalba Garcia, Gracia Villarreal, María Zurita Etayo.

  • H. U. La Paz-Cantoblanco-Carlos III. Madrid

  • Jorge Álvarez Troncoso, Francisco Arnalich Fernández, Francisco Blanco Quintana, Carmen Busca Arenzana, Sergio Carrasco Molina, Aranzazu Castellano Candalija, Germán Daroca Bengoa, Alejandro de Gea Grela, Alicia de Lorenzo Hernández, Alejandro Díez Vidal, Carmen Fernández Capitán, Maria Francisca García Iglesias, Borja González Muñoz, Carmen Rosario Herrero Gil, Juan María Herrero Martínez, Víctor Hontañón, Maria Jesús Jaras Hernández, Carlos Lahoz, Cristina Marcelo Calvo, Juan Carlos Martín Gutiérrez, Monica Martinez Prieto, Elena Martínez Robles, Araceli Menéndez Saldaña, Alberto Moreno Fernández, Jose Maria Mostaza Prieto, Ana Noblejas Mozo, Carlos Manuel Oñoro López, Esmeralda Palmier Peláez, Marina Palomar Pampyn, Maria Angustias Quesada Simón, Juan Carlos Ramos Ramos, Luis Ramos Ruperto, Aquilino Sánchez Purificación, Teresa Sancho Bueso, Raquel Sorriguieta Torre, Clara Itziar Soto Abanedes, Yeray Untoria Tabares, Marta Varas Mayoral, Julia Vásquez Manau.

  • C. H. U. de Albacete. Albacete

  • Jose Luis Beato Pérez, Maria Lourdes Sáez Méndez.

  • H. U. Puerta de Hierro. Majadahonda

  • María Álvarez Bello, Ane Andrés Eisenhofer, Ana Arias Milla, Isolina Baños Pérez, Laura Benítez Gutiérrez, Javier Bilbao Garay, Silvia Blanco Alonso, Jorge Calderón Parra, Alejandro Callejas Díaz, José María Camino Salvador, Mª Cruz Carreño Hernández, Valentín Cuervas-Mons Martínez, Sara de la Fuente Moral, Miguel del Pino Jimenez, Alberto Díaz de Santiago, Itziar Diego Yagüe, Ignacio Donate Velasco, Ana María Duca, Pedro Durán del Campo, Gabriela Escudero López, Esther Expósito Palomo, Ana Fernández Cruz, Esther Fiz Benito, Andrea Fraile López, Amy Galán Gómez, Sonia García Prieto, Claudia García Rodríguez-Maimón, Miguel Ángel García Viejo, Javier Gómez Irusta, Edith Vanessa Gutiérrez Abreu, Isabel Gutiérrez Martín, Ángela Gutiérrez Rojas, Andrea Gutiérrez Villanueva, Jesús Herráiz Jiménez, Pedro Laguna del Estal, Mª Carmen Máinez Sáiz, Cristina Martín Martín, María Martínez Urbistondo, Fernando Martínez Vera, Susana Mellor Pita, Patricia Mills Sánchez, Esther Montero Hernández, Alberto Mora Vargas, Cristina Moreno López, Alfonso Ángel-Moreno Maroto, Victor Moreno-Torres Concha, Ignacio Morrás De La Torre, Elena Múñez Rubio, Ana Muñoz Gómez, Rosa Muñoz de Benito, Alejandro Muñoz Serrano, Jose María Palau Fayós, Lina Marcela Parra Ramírez, Ilduara Pintos Pascual, Arturo José Ramos Martín-Vegue, Antonio Ramos Martínez, Isabel Redondo Cánovas del Castillo, Alberto Roldán Montaud, Lucía Romero Imaz, Yolanda Romero Pizarro, Mónica Sánchez Santiuste, David Sánchez Órtiz, Enrique Sánchez Chica, Patricia Serrano de la Fuente, Pablo Tutor de Ureta, Ángela Valencia Alijo, Mercedes Valentín-Pastrana Aguilar, Juan Antonio Vargas Núñez, Jose Manuel Vázquez Comendador, Gema Vázquez Contreras, Carmen Vizoso Gálvez.

  • H. Miguel Servet. Zaragoza

  • Gonzalo Acebes Repiso, Uxua Asín Samper, María Aranzazu Caudevilla Martínez, José Miguel García Bruñén, Rosa García Fenoll, Jesús Javier González Igual, Laura Letona Giménez, Mónica Llorente Barrio, Luis Sáez Comet.

  • H. U. La Princesa. Madrid

  • María Aguilera García, Ester Alonso Monge, Jesús Álvarez Rodríguez, Claudia Alvarez Varela, Miquel Berniz Gòdia, Marta Briega Molina, Marta Bustamante Vega, Jose Curbelo, Alicia de las Heras Moreno, Ignacio Descalzo Godoy, Alexia Constanza Espiño Alvarez, Ignacio Fernández Martín-Caro, Alejandra Franquet López-Mosteiro, Gonzalo Galvez Marquez, María J. García Blanco, Yaiza García del Álamo Hernández, Clara García-Rayo Encina, Noemí Gilabert González, Carolina Guillamo Rodríguez, Nicolás Labrador San Martín, Manuel Molina Báez, Carmen Muñoz Delgado, Pedro Parra Caballero, Javier Pérez Serrano, Laura Rabes Rodríguez, Pablo Rodríguez Cortés, Carlos Rodriguez Franco, Emilia Roy-Vallejo, Monica Rueda Vega, Aresio Sancha Lloret, Beatriz Sánchez Moreno, Marta Sanz Alba, Jorge Serrano Ballester, Alba Somovilla, Carmen Suarez Fernández, Macarena Vargas Tirado, Almudena Villa Marti.

  • H. Clínico San Carlos. Madrid

  • Inés Armenteros Yeguas, Javier Azaña Gómez, Julia Barrado Cuchillo, Irene Burruezo López, Noemí Cabello Clotet, Alberto E. Calvo Elías, Elpidio Calvo Manuel, Carmen María Cano de Luque, Cynthia Chocron Benbunan, Laura Dans Vilan, Ester Emilia Dubon Peralta, Vicente Estrada Pérez, Santiago Fernandez-Castelao, Marcos Oliver Fragiel Saavedra, José Luis García Klepzig, Maria del Rosario Iguarán Bermúdez, Esther Jaén Ferrer, Rubén Ángel Martín Sánchez, Manuel Méndez Bailón, Maria José Nuñez Orantos, Carolina Olmos Mata, Eva Orviz García, David Oteo Mata, Cristina Outon González, Juncal Perez-Somarriba, Pablo Pérez Mateos, Maria Esther Ramos Muñoz, Xabier Rivas Regaira, Iñigo Sagastagoitia Fornie, Alejandro Salinas Botrán, Miguel Suárez Robles, Maddalena Elena Urbano, Miguel Villar Martínez.

  • Hospital Royo Villanova. Zaragoza

  • Nicolás Alcalá Rivera, Anxela Crestelo Vieitez, Esther del Corral Beamonte, Jesús Díez Manglano, Isabel Fiteni Mera, Maria del Mar Garcia Andreu, Martin Gerico Aseguinolaza, Claudia Josa Laorden, Raul Martinez Murgui, Marta Teresa Matía Sanz.

  • H. U. de A Coruña. A Coruña

  • Alicia Alonso Álvarez, Olaya Alonso Juarros, Ariadna Arévalo López, Carmen Casariego Castiñeira, Ana Cerezales Calviño, Marta Contreras Sánchez, Ramón Fernández Varela, Santiago J. Freire Castro, Ana Padín Trigo, Rafael Prieto Jarel, Fátima Raad Varea, Ignacio Ramil Freán, Laura Ramos Alonso, Francisco Javier Sanmartín Pensado, David Vieito Porto.

  • H. Moisès Broggi. Sant Joan Despí

  • Judit Aranda Lobo, Jose Loureiro Amigo, Isabel Oriol Bermúdez, Melani Pestaña Fernández, Nicolas Rhyman, Nuria Vázquez Piqueras.

  • Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset. Valencia

  • Juan Alberto Aguilera Ayllón, Arturo Artero, María del Mar Carmona Martín, María José Fabiá Valls, Maria de Mar Fernández Garcés, Ana Belén Gómez Belda, Ian López Cruz, Manuel Madrazo López, Elisabet Mateo Sanchis, Jaume Micó Gandia, Laura Piles Roger, Adela Maria Pina Belmonte, Alba Viana García.

  • Hospital Clínico de Santiago. Santiago de Compostela

  • Maria del Carmen Beceiro Abad, Maria Aurora Freire Romero, Sonia Molinos Castro, Emilio Manuel Paez Guillan, María Pazo Nuñez, Paula Maria Pesqueira Fontan.

  • H. Nuestra Señora del Prado. Talavera de la Reina

  • Sonia Casallo Blanco, Jeffrey Oskar Magallanes Gamboa.

  • H. U. Ramón y Cajal. Madrid

  • Luis Fernando Abrego Vaca, Ana Andréu Arnanz, Octavio Arce García, Marta Bajo González, Pablo Borque Sanz, Alberto Cozar Llisto, Sonia de Pedro Baena, Beatriz Del Hoyo Cuenda, María Alejandra Gamboa Osorio, Isabel García Sánchez, Andrés González García, Oscar Alberto López Cisneros, Miguel Martínez Lacalzada, Borja Merino Ortiz, Jimena Rey-García, Elisa Riera González, Cristina Sánchez Díaz, Grisell Starita Fajardo, Cecilia Suárez Carantoña, Adrian Viteri Noel, Svetlana Zhilina Zhilina.

  • C. Asistencial de Zamora. Zamora

  • Carlos Aldasoro Frias, Luis Arribas Perez, María Esther Fraile Villarejo, Beatriz Garcia Lopez, Victor Madrid Romero, Emilia Martínez Velado, Victoria Palomar Calvo, Sara Pintos Otero, Carlota Tuñón de Almeida

  • H. Virgen de la Salud. Toledo

  • Ana Maria Alguacil Muñoz, Marta Blanco Fernández, Veronica Cano, Ricardo Crespo Moreno, Fernando Cuadra Garcia-Tenorio, Blanca Díaz-Tendero Nájera, Raquel Estévez González, María Paz García Butenegro, Alberto Gato Díez, Verónica Gómez Caverzaschi, Piedad María Gómez Pedraza, Julio González Moraleja, Raúl Hidalgo Carvajal, Patricia Jiménez Aranda, Raquel Labra González, Áxel Legua Caparachini, Pilar Lopez Castañeyra, Agustín Lozano Ancin, Jose Domingo Martin Garcia, Cristina Morata Romero, María Jesús Moya Saiz, Helena Moza Moríñigo, Gemma Muñiz Nicolás, Enriqueta Muñoz Platon, Filomena Oliveri, Elena Ortiz Ortiz, Raúl Perea Rafael, Pilar Redondo Galán, María Antonia Sepulveda Berrocal, Vicente Serrano Romero de Ávila, Pilar Toledano Sierra, Yamilex Urbano Aranda, Jesús Vázquez Clemente, Carmen Yera Bergua.

  • H. U. Infanta Cristina. Parla

  • Juan Miguel Antón Santos, Ana Belén Barbero Barrera, Coralia Bueno Muiño, Ruth Calderón Hernaiz, Irene Casado Lopez, José Manuel Casas Rojo, Andrés Cortés Troncoso, Mayte de Guzmán García-Monge, Francesco Deodati, Gonzalo García Casasola Sánchez, Elena Garcia Guijarro, Davide Luordo, María Mateos González, Jose A Melero Bermejo, Lorea Roteta García, Elena Sierra Gonzalo, Javier Villanueva Martínez.

  • H. de Cabueñes. Gijón

  • Ana María Álvarez Suárez, Carlos Delgado Vergés, Rosa Fernandez-Madera Martínez, Eva Fonseca Aizpuru, Alejandro Gómez Carrasco, Cristina Helguera Amezua, Juan Francisco López Caleya, María del Mar Martínez López, Aleida Martínez Zapico, Carmen Olabuenaga Iscar, María Luisa Taboada Martínez, Lara María Tamargo Chamorro.

  • Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga. Málaga

  • Mª Mar Ayala Gutiérrez, Rosa Bernal López, José Bueno Fonseca, Verónica Andrea Buonaiuto, Luis Francisco Caballero Martínez, Lidia Cobos Palacios, Clara Costo Muriel, Francis de Windt, Ana Teresa Fernandez-Truchaud Christophel, Paula García Ocaña, Ricardo Gómez Huelgas, Javier Gorospe García, Maria Dolores López Carmona, Pablo López Quirantes, Almudena López Sampalo, Elizabeth Lorenzo Hernández, Juan José Mancebo Sevilla, Jesica Martin Carmona, Luis Miguel Pérez-Belmonte, Araceli Pineda Cantero, Carlos Romero Gómez, Michele Ricci, Jaime Sanz Cánovas

  • H. U. San Juan de Alicante. San Juan de Alicante

  • Marisa Asensio Tomás, David Balaz, David Bonet Tur, Ruth Cañizares Navarro, Paloma Chazarra Pérez, Jesús Corbacho Redondo, Leticia Espinosa Del Barrio, Pedro Jesús Esteve Atiénzar, Carles García Cervera, David Francisco García Núñez, Vicente Giner Galvañ, Angie Gómez Uranga, Javier Guzmán Martínez, Isidro Hernández Isasi, Lourdes Lajara Villar, Juan Manuel Núñez Cruz, Sergio Palacios Fernández, Juan Jorge Peris García, Andrea Riaño Pérez, José Miguel Seguí Ripoll, Azucena Sempere Mira, Philip Wikman-Jorgensen.

  • H. del Henares. Coslada

  • Jesús Ballano Rodríguez-Solís, Luis Cabeza Osorio, María del Pilar Fidalgo Montero, Mª Isabel Fuentes Soriano, Erika Esperanza Lozano Rincon, Ana Martín Hermida, Jesus Martinez Carrilero, Jose Angel Pestaña Santiago, Manuel Sánchez Robledo, Patricia Sanz Rojas, Nahum Jacobo Torres Yebes, Vanessa Vento.

  • H. U. La Fe. Valencia

  • Dafne Cabañero, María Calabuig Ballester, Pascual Císcar Fernández, Ricardo Gil Sánchez, Marta Jiménez Escrig, Cristina Marín Amela, Laura Parra Gómez, Carlos Puig Navarro, José Antonio Todolí Parra.

  • H. San Pedro. Logroño

  • Diana Alegre González, Irene Ariño Pérez de Zabalza, Sergio Arnedo Hernández, Jorge Collado Sáenz, Beatriz Dendariena, Marta Gómez del Mazo, Iratxe Martínez de Narvajas Urra, Sara Martínez Hernández, Estela Menendez Fernández, Jose Luís Peña Somovilla, Elisa Rabadán Pejenaute.

  • H. de Mataró. Mataró

  • Raquel Aranega González, Ramon Boixeda, Javier Fernández Fernández, Carlos Lopera Mármol, Marta Parra Navarro, Ainhoa Rex Guzmán, Aleix Serrallonga Fustier.

  • H. U. Reina Sofía. Córdoba

  • Antonio Pablo Arenas de Larriva, Pilar Calero Espinal, Javier Delgado Lista, Francisco Fuentes-Jiménez, María Jesús Gómez Vázquez, Jose Jiménez Torres, José López-Miranda, Laura Martín Piedra, Javier Pascual Vinagre, Pablo Pérez-Martinez, María Elena Revelles Vílchez, Juan Luis Romero Cabrera, José David Torres Peña.

  • H. Juan Ramón Jiménez. Huelva

  • Francisco Javier Bejarano Luque, Francisco Javier Carrasco-Sánchez, Mercedes de Sousa Baena, Jaime Díaz Leal, Aurora Espinar Rubio, Maria Franco Huertas, Juan Antonio García Bravo, Andrés Gonzalez Macías, Encarnación Gutiérrez Jiménez, Alicia Hidalgo Jiménez, Constantino Lozano Quintero, Carmen Mancilla Reguera, Francisco Javier Martínez Marcos, Francisco Muñoz Beamud, Maria Perez Aguilera, Alícia Perez Jiménez, Virginia Rodríguez Castaño, Alvaro Sánchez de Alcazar del Río, Leire Toscano Ruiz.

  • Hospital Infanta Margarita. Cabra

  • María Esther Guisado Espartero, Lorena Montero Rivas, Maria de la Sierra Navas Alcántara, Raimundo Tirado-Miranda.

  • Hospital Alto Guadalquivir. Andújar

  • Begoña Cortés Rodríguez.

  • Hospital Costa del Sol. Marbella

  • Victoria Augustín Bandera, María Dolores Martín Escalante.

  • H. U. Virgen de las Nieves. Granada

  • Pablo Conde Baena, Joaquin Escobar Sevilla, Laura Gallo Padilla, Patricia Gómez Ronquillo, Pablo González Bustos, María Navío Botías, Jessica Ramírez Taboada, Mar Rivero Rodríguez.

  • C. H. U. de Ferrol. Ferrol

  • Hortensia Alvarez Diaz, Tamara Dalama Lopez, Estefania Martul Pego, Carmen Mella Pérez, Ana Pazos Ferro, Sabela Sánchez Trigo, Dolores Suarez Sambade, Maria Trigas Ferrin, Maria del Carmen Vázquez Friol, Laura Vilariño Maneiro.

  • Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León. León

  • Rosario Maria García Diez, Manuel Martin Regidor, Angel Luis Martínez Gonzalez, Alberto Muela Molinero, Raquel Rodríguez Díez, Beatriz Vicente Montes.

  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Ourense. Ourense

  • Raquel Fernández González, Amara Gonzalez Noya, Carlos Hernández Ceron, Isabel Izuzquiza Avanzini, Ana Latorre Diez, Pablo López Mato, Ana María Lorenzo Vizcaya, Daniel Peña Benítez, Milagros María Peña Zemsch, Lucía Pérez Expósito, Marta Pose Bar, Lara Rey González, Laura Rodrigo Lara

  • Hospital Marina Baixa. Villajoyosa

  • Javier Ena, Jose Enrique Gómez Segado.

  • Hospital Torrecárdenas. Almería

  • Luis Felipe Díez García, Iris El Attar Acedo, Bárbara Hernandez Sierra, Carmen Mar Sánchez Cano.

  • H. U. Severo Ochoa. Leganés

  • Yolanda Casillas Viera, Lucía Cayuela Rodríguez, Carmen de Juan Alvarez, Gema Flox Benitez, Laura García Escudero, Juan Martin Torres, Patricia Moreira Escriche, Susana Plaza Canteli, M Carmen Romero Pérez.

  • Hospital Platón. Barcelona

  • Ana Suarez Lombraña

  • Hospital Valle del Nalón. Riaño (Langreo)

  • Sara Fuente Cosío, César Manuel Gallo Álvaro, Julia Lobo García, Antía Pérez Piñeiro.

  • C. H. U. de Badajoz. Badajoz

  • Rafael Aragon Lara, Inmaculada Cimadevilla Fernandez, Juan Carlos Cira García, Gema Maria García García, Julia Gonzalez Granados, Beatriz Guerrero Sánchez, Francisco Javier Monreal Periáñez, Maria Josefa Pascual Perez.

  • H. Francesc de Borja. Gandia

  • Alba Camarena Molina, Simona Cioaia, Anna Ferrer Santolalia, José María Frutos Pérez, Eva Gil Tomás, Leyre Jorquer Vidal, Marina Llopis Sanchis, M Ángeles Martínez Pascual, Alvaro Navarro Batet, Mari Amparo Perea Ribis, Ricardo Peris Sanchez, José Manuel Querol Ribelles, Silvia Rodriguez Mercadal, Ana Ventura Esteve.

  • H. G. U. de Castellón. Castellón de la Plana

  • Jorge Andrés Soler, Marián Bennasar Remolar, Alejandro Cardenal Álvarez, Daniela Díaz Carlotti, María José Esteve Gimeno, Sergio Fabra Juana, Paula García López, María Teresa Guinot Soler, Daniela Palomo de la Sota, Guillem Pascual Castellanos, Ignacio Pérez Catalán, Celia Roig Martí, Paula Rubert Monzó, Javier Ruiz Padilla, Nuria Tornador Gaya, Jorge Usó Blasco.

  • C. A. U. de Salamanca. Salamanca

  • Gloria María Alonso Claudio, Víctor Barreales Rodríguez, Cristina Carbonell Muñoz, Adela Carpio Pérez, María Victoria Coral Orbes, Daniel Encinas Sánchez, Sandra Inés Revuelta, Miguel Marcos Martín, José Ignacio Martín González, José Ángel Martín Oterino, Leticia Moralejo Alonso, Sonia Peña Balbuena, María Luisa Pérez García, Ana Ramon Prados, Beatriz Rodríguez-Alonso, Ángela Romero Alegría, Maria Sanchez Ledesma, Rosa Juana Tejera Pérez.

  • H. General Defensa

  • Anyuli Gracia Gutiérrez, Leticia Esther Royo Trallero

  • H. U. Quironsalud Madrid. Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid)

  • Pablo Guisado Vasco, Ana Roda Santacruz, Ana Valverde Muñoz.

  • H. Parc Tauli. Sabadell

  • Francisco Epelde, Isabel Torrente

  • Hospital de Palamós. Palamós

  • Maricruz Almendros Rivas, Miquel Hortos Alsina, Anabel Martin-Urda Diez-Canseco.

  • H. Virgen de los Lirios. Alcoy (Alicante)

  • Mª José Esteban Giner.

  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid. Valladolid

  • Xjoylin Teresita Egües Torres, Sara Gutiérrez González, Cristina Novoa Fernández, Pablo Tellería Gómez.

  • Hospital Doctor José Molina Orosa. Arrecife (Lanzarote)

  • Virginia Herrero García, Berta Román Bernal.

  • Hospital do Salnes. Vilagarcía de Arousa

  • Vanesa Alende Castro, Ana María Baz Lomba, Ruth Brea Aparicio, Marta Fernández Morales, Jesus Manuel Fernandez Villar, Maria Teresa Lopez Monteagudo, Cristina Pérez García, Lorena María Rodríguez Ferreira, Diana Sande Llovo, Maria Begoña Valle Feijoo.

  • Hospital Público de Monforte de Lemos. Monforte de Lemos

  • José López Castro, Manuel Lorenzo López Reboiro.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm10091844/s1. Table S1. Baseline characteristics among groups; Table S2. Measures of the effect, OR (95% CI), of ADs individually and immunomodulatory treatments prior to hospital admission with their propensity scores as the outcome variables.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.d.M.A.G. and M.R.-R.; methodology, M.d.M.A.G. and M.R.-R.; software, M.d.M.A.G. and M.R.-R.; validation, C.R.G., A.M.S., I.P.d.P., and N.H.; formal analysis, M.d.M.A.G. and M.R.-R.; investigation, M.d.M.A.G., M.R.-R., C.R.G., A.M.S., I.P.d.P., and N.H.; resources, M.d.M.A.G., M.R.-R., C.R.G., A.M.S., I.P.d.P., N.H., J.M.R.R., and R.G.H.; data curation, M.d.M.A.G., M.R.-R., C.R.G., A.M.S., I.P.d.P., N.H., J.M.R.R., and R.G.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.d.M.A.G. and M.R.-R.; writing—review and editing, C.R.G., A.M.S., I.P.d.P., and N.H.; visualization, C.R.G., A.M.S., I.P.d.P., and N.H.; supervision, R.G.H.; project administration, J.M.R.R. and R.G.H.; funding acquisition, J.M.R.R. and R.G.H. All authors have contributed to the data collection. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Provincial Research Ethics Committee of Málaga (Spain). Ethics Committee code: SEMI-COVID-19 27-03-20.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data this study is based on are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Situation of COVID-19 in Spain. [(accessed on 22 February 2021)]; Available online: https://www.mscbs.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/ccayes/alertasActual/nCov/situacionActual.htm.
  • 2.Wu Z., McGoogan J.M. Characteristics of and Important Lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72,314 Cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323:1239–1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Richardson S., Hirsch J.S., Narasimhan M., Crawford J.M., McGinn T., Davidson K.W., The Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium. Barnaby D.P., Becker L.B., Chelico J.D., et al. Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020;323:2052–2059. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Doran M.F., Crowson C.S., Pond G.R., O’Fallon W.M., Gabriel S.E. Frequency of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with controls: A population-based study. Arthr. Rheum. 2002;46:2287–2293. doi: 10.1002/art.10524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li T.H., Lai C.C., Wang W.H., Chen W.S., Tsao Y.P., Tsai C.Y., Chang Y.S. Risk of severe herpes simplex virus infection in systemic lupus erythematosus: Analysis of epidemiology and risk factors analysis in Taiwan. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2019;78:941–946. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Damiani G., Pacifico A., Bragazzi N.L., Malagoli P. Biologics increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization, but not ICU admission and death: Real-life data from a large cohort during red-zone declaration. Dermatol. Ther. 2020;33:e13475. doi: 10.1111/dth.13475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pablos J.L., Abasolo L., Alvaro-Gracia J.M., Blanco F.J., Blanco R., Castrejón I., Fernandez-Fernandez D., Fernandez-Gutierrez B., Galindo-Izquierdo M., Gonzalez-Gay M.A., et al. RIER investigators group. Prevalence of hospital PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases in patients with chronic inflammatory and autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020;79:1170–1173. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Akiyama S., Hamdeh S., Micic D., Sakuraba A. Prevalence and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with autoimmune diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.D’Silva K.M., Serling-Boyd N., Wallwork R., Hsu T., Fu X., Gravallese E.M., Choi H.K., Sparks J.A., Wallace Z.S. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and rheumatic disease: A comparative cohort study from a US ‘hot spot’. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020;79:1156–1162. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Emmi G., Bettiol A., Mattioli I., Silvestri E., Di Scala G., Urban M.L., Vaglio A., Prisco D. SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2020;19:102575. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fan M., Qiu W., Bu B., Xu Y., Yang H., Huang D., Lau A.Y., Guo J., Zhang M.N., Zhang X., et al. Risk of COVID-19 infection in MS and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2020;7:e787. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Favalli E.G., Monti S., Ingegnoli F., Balduzzi S., Caporali R., Montecucco C. Incidence of COVID-19 in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with targeted immunosuppressive drugs: What can we learn from observational data? Arthr. Rheumatol. 2020;72:1600–1606. doi: 10.1002/art.41388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Allocca M., Fiorino G., Zallot C., Furfaro F., Gilardi D., Radice S., Danese S., Peyrin-Biroulet L. Incidence and patterns of COVID-19 among inflammatory bowel disease patients from the Nancy and Milan cohorts. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;8:2134–2135. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gubatan J., Levitte S., Balabanis T., Patel A., Sharma A., Habtezion A. SARS-CoV-2 Testing, Prevalence, and Predictors of COVID-19 in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Northern California. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:1141–1144. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gazzaruso C., Carlo Stella N., Mariani G., Tamburlini A., Garini P., Freddi E., Ravetto C., Coppola A., Gallotti P. Impact of anti-rheumatic drugs and steroids on clinical course and prognosis of COVID-19. Clin. Rheumatol. 2020;39:2475–2477. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05239-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Haberman R., Axelrad J., Chen A., Castillo R., Yan D., Izmirly P., Neimann A., Adhikari S., Hudesman D., Scher J.U. Covid-19 in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases—Case Series from New York. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:85–88. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2009567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moiseev S., Avdeev S., Brovko M., Yavorovskiy A., Novikov P.I., Umbetova K., Akulkina L., Tsareva N., Fomin V. Rheumatic diseases in intensive care unit patients with COVID-19. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2021;80:e16. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sanchez-Piedra C., Diaz-Torne C., Manero J., Pego-Reigosa J.M., Rúa-Figueroa Í., Gonzalez-Gay M.A., Gomez-Reino J., Alvaro-Gracia J.M., BIOBADASER Study Group Clinical features and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with biological and synthetic targeted therapies. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020;79:988–990. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tomelleri A., Sartorelli S., Campochiaro C., Baldissera E.M., Dagna L. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with large-vessel vasculitis in Italy: A monocentric survey. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020;79:1252–1253. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zen M., Fuzzi E., Astorri D., Saccon F., Padoan R., Ienna L., Cozzi G., Depascale R., Zanatta E., Gasparotto M., et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases in northeast Italy: A cross-sectional study on 916 patients. J. Autoimmun. 2020;112:102502. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yao X., Ye F., Zhang M., Cui C., Huang B., Niu P., Liu X., Zhao L., Dong E., Song C., et al. In Vitro Antiviral Activity and Projection of Optimized Dosing Design of Hydroxychloroquine for the Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;71:732–739. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mathian A., Mahevas M., Rohmer J., Roumier M., Cohen-Aubart F., Amador-Borrero B., Barrelet A., Chauvet C., Chazal T., Delahousse M., et al. Clinical course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a series of 17 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus under long-term treatment with hydroxychloroquine. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020;79:837–839. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Singer M.E., Kaelber D.C., Antonelli M.J. Hydroxychloroquine ineffective for COVID-19 prophylaxis in lupus and rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Del Papa N., Sambataro G., Minniti A., Pignataro F., Caporali R. Novel COronaVirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic: What are the risks for systemic sclerosis patients? Autoimmun. Rev. 2020;19:102558. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Niewold T.B. Interferon alpha as a primary pathogenic factor in human lupus. J. Interferon. Cytokine Res. 2011;31:887–892. doi: 10.1089/jir.2011.0071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lu Z., Li J., Ji J., Gu Z., Da Z. Mortality prediction in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with pulmonary infection. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2019;22:1077–1083. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sawalha A.H., Zhao M., Coit P., Lu Q. Epigenetic dysregulation of ACE2 and interferon-regulated genes might suggest increased COVID-19 susceptibility and severity in lupus patients. Clin. Immunol. 2020;215:108410. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mahoney F.I., Barthel D.W. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md. State Med. J. 1965;14:61–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Charlson M.E., Pompei P., Ales K.L., MacKenzie C.R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J. Chronic. Dis. 1987;40:373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Casas-Rojo J.M., Antón-Santos J.M., Millán-Núñez-Cortés J., Lumbreras-Bermejo C., Ramos-Rincón J.M., Roy-Vallejo E., Artero-Mora A., Arnalich-Fernández F., García-Bruñén J.M., Vargas-Núñez J.A., et al. SEMI-COVID-19 Network. Clinical characteristics of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Spain: Results from the SEMI-COVID-19 Network. Rev. Clin. Esp. 2020;220:480–494. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2020.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sterne J.A., White I.R., Carlin J.B., Spratt M., Royston P., Kenward M.G., Wood A.M., Carpenter J.R. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;338:b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Coscia Requena C., Muriel A., Peñuelas O. Analysis of causality from observational studies and its application in clinical research in Intensive Care Medicine. Med. Intensiva. 2018;42:292–300. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2018.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Deb S., Austin P.C., Tu J.V., Ko D.T., Mazer C.D., Kiss A., Fremes S.E. A review of propensity-score methods and their use in cardiovascular research. Can. J. Cardiol. 2016;32:259–265. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Huang Y., Chen Z., Wang Y., Han L., Qin K., Huang W., Huang Y., Wang H., Shen P., Ba X., et al. Clinical characteristics of 17 patients with COVID-19 and systemic autoimmune diseases: A retrospective study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020;79:1163–1169. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fredi M., Cavazzana I., Moschetti L., Andreoli L., Franceschini F., Brescia Rheumatology COVID-19 Study Group COVID-19 in patients with rheumatic diseases in northern Italy: A single-centre observational and case–control study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020;2:e549–e556. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30169-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Santos C.S., Morales C.M., Álvarez E.D., Castro C.Á., Robles A.L., Sandoval T.P. Determinants of COVID-19 disease severity in patients with underlying rheumatic disease. Clin. Rheumatol. 2020;39:2789–2796. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05301-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cooper G.S., Bynum M.L.K., Somers E.C. Recent insights in the epidemiology of autoimmune diseases: Improved prevalence estimates and understanding of clustering of diseases. J. Autoimmun. 2009;33:197–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2009.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Quartuccio L., Valent F., Pasut E., Tascini C., De Vita S. Prevalence of COVID-19 among patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases treated with biologic agents or small molecules: A population-based study in the first two months of COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. Joint Bone Spine. 2020;87:439–443. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Michelena X., Borrell H., López-Corbeto M., López-Lasanta M., Moreno E., Pascual-Pastor M., Erra A., Serrat M., Espartal E., Antón S., et al. Incidence of COVID-19 in a cohort of adult and paediatric patients with rheumatic diseases treated with targeted biologic and synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Semin. Arthr. Rheum. 2020;50:564–570. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bozzalla Cassione E., Zanframundo G., Biglia A., Codullo V., Montecucco C., Cavagna L. COVID-19 infection in a northern-Italian cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus assessed by telemedicine. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020;79:1382–1383. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gianfrancesco M.A., Hyrich K.L., Gossec L., Strangfeld A., Carmona L., Mateus E.F., Sufka P., Grainger R., Wallace Z., Bhana S., et al. Rheumatic disease and COVID-19: Initial data from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance provider registries. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020;2:e250–e253. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30095-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Strangfeld A., Schäfer M., Gianfrancesco M.A., Lawson-Tovey S., Liew J.W., Ljung L., Mateus E.F., Richez C., Santos M.J., Schmajuk G., et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death in people with rheumatic diseases: Results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician-reported registry. Ann. Rheum. Dis. :2021. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Brenner E.J., Ungaro R.C., Gearry R.B., Kaplan G.G., Kissous-Hunt M., Lewis J.D., Ng S.C., Rahier J.F., Reinisch W., Ruemmele F.M., et al. Corticosteroids, but not TNF antagonists, are associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: Results from an international registry. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:481–491. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gisondi P., Facheris P., Dapavo P., Piaserico S., Conti A., Naldi L., Cazzaniga S., Malagoli P., Costanzo A. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with chronic plaque psoriasis being treated with biologic therapy: The Northern Italy experience. Br. J. Dermatol. 2020;183:373–374. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Monti S., Balduzzi S., Delvino P., Bellis E., Quadrelli V.S., Montecucco C. Clinical course of COVID-19 in a series of patients with chronic arthritis treated with immunosuppressive targeted therapies. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020;79:667–668. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ye C., Cai S., Shen G., Guan H., Zhou L., Hu Y., Tu W., Chen Y., Yu Y., Wu X., et al. Clinical features of rheumatic patients infected with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020;79:1007–1013. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pablos J.L., Galindo M., Carmona L., Lledó A., Retuerto M., Blanco R., Gonzalez-Gay M.A., Martinez-Lopez D., Castrejón I., Alvaro-Gracia J.M., et al. Clinical outcomes of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and chronic inflammatory and autoimmune rheumatic diseases: A multicentric matched cohort study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020;79:1544–1549. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Winkler M.S., Korsten P., Binder C., Tampe B. Correspondence on ‘Interleukin-6 receptor blockade with subcutaneous tocilizumab in severe COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation: Case-control study’. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ferro F., Elefante E., Baldini C., Bartoloni E., Puxeddu I., Talarico R., Mosca M., Bombardieri S. COVID-19: The new challenge for rheumatologists. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2020;38:175–180. Epub 24 March 2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pelechas E., Drossou V., Voulgari P.V., Drosos A.A. Anti-Rheumatic Drugs for the Fight Against the Novel Coronavirus Infection (SARSCoV-2): What is the Evidence? Mediterr. J. Rheumatol. 2020;31:259–267. doi: 10.31138/mjr.31.3.259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Accortt N.A., Lesperance T., Liu M., Rebello S., Trivedi M., Li Y., Curtis J.R. Impact of sustained remission on the risk of serious infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthr. Care Res. 2018;70:679–684. doi: 10.1002/acr.23426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bezzio C., Saibeni S., Variola A., Allocca M., Massari A., Gerardi V., Casini V., Ricci C., Zingone F., Amato A., et al. Outcomes of COVID-19 in 79 patients with IBD in Italy: An IG-IBD study. Gut. 2020;69:1213–1217. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Salvarani C., Bajocchi G., Mancuso P., Galli E., Muratore F., Boiardi L., Catanoso M., Pipitone N., Cassone G., Girolimetto N., et al. Susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 in patients treated with bDMARDS and tsDMARDs: A population-based study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020;79:986–988. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cao B., Wang Y., Wen D., Liu W., Wang J., Fan G., Ruan L., Song B., Cai Y., Wei M., et al. A trial of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:1787–1799. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data this study is based on are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Journal of Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES