Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2021 May 13;9:e11446. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11446

Cannabinoids from inflorescences fractions of Trema orientalis (L.) Blume (Cannabaceae) against human pathogenic bacteria

Tiwtawat Napiroon 1,, Keerati Tanruean 2, Pisit Poolprasert 2, Markus Bacher 3, Henrik Balslev 4, Manop Poopath 5, Wichai Santimaleeworagun 6,
Editor: Jennifer Stearns
PMCID: PMC8126263  PMID: 34035994

Abstract

Background

Cannabinoids; tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabinol (CBN), might show antibacterial activity. Trema orientalis is a species in the Cannabaceae that is closely related to Cannabis through plastome phylogenetic evidence. This species is widely distributed throughout tropical Asia and is used as traditional medicine, particularly for the treatment of infectious diseases. However, no studies on the antibacterial activity of cannabinoid-containing inflorescences extracts are available. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine cannabinoid content and antibacterial activity of inflorescences fractions from T. orientalis native to Thailand.

Methods

We hypothesized that inflorescences from T. orientalis might display cannabinoids similar to Cannabis because of their close taxonomic relationship. We extracted the mature inflorescences and infructescence of T. orientalis in three disparate populations from different Thailand floristic regions. Extractions were subsequently partitioned into hydrophilic and lipophilic fractions using distilled water and chloroform. The lipophilic extracts were further fractionated by the column chromatography with gradient elution and analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Characterized cannabinoids were used in bioassays with multidrug-resistance bacteria.

Results

Lipophilic extracts and fractions of inflorescences from all Thailand floristic regions consistently displayed cannabinoids (THC, CBD and CBN) in various quantities. These extracts exhibited inhibitory activity for Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii strains with minimum inhibitory concentration values varying from 31.25 to 125 µg/mL.

Conclusion

Our study is the first to report cannabinoid detection in extracts from inflorescences of T. orientalis, a species in the Cannabaceae. These extracts and their fractions containing cannabinoids showed pronounced antibacterial activity. The use of analytic methods also demonstrated reproducible cannabinoid extraction.

Keywords: Infectious diseases, Cannabinoids, Botany, Chromatography, Cannabaceae

Introduction

Major cannabinoids, including tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabinol (CBN), are chemotaxonomic markers in inflorescences of the genus Cannabis (Cannabaceae). These natural products have been used for centuries to treat disease and alleviate pain (McPartland, 2018). Use of plant species in Cannabaceae as sources for antibacterial and antiviral agents in pulmonary or respiratory diseases has been reported (Caiaffa et al., 1994; Roth et al., 2004; Appendino et al., 2008). Naturally, cannabinoids in Cannabis might be from two ways including production by its own in plant or stimulated plant by environmental factors to initiate chemical isomerization. Typically, cannabinoids are analyzed by capillary gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) (Yotoriyama et al., 2005). Cannabinoid treatment for bacteria infection was reported from clinical trials using a combination of cannabidiol (CBD) and the antibiotic bacitracin (BAC). This combination effectively treated infections caused by Gram-positive resistant bacteria (Wassmann, Højrup & Klitgaard, 2020).

Trema orientalis is a species closely related to a sister group of Cannabis (Jin et al., 2018). The species is a common natural pioneer used in traditional medicine for the treatment of infections in tropical regions, particularly in continental Asia (Adinortey, Galyuon & Asamoah, 2013). This species is extensively used to reduce fevers and fight infection. Phytochemically, T. orientalis displays different major constituents in different plant parts—tremetol, simiarenol and simiarenone in leaves; tremetol, swertianin, scopoletin and several fatty acids and glycosides in stem bark; sterols and fatty acids in roots (Adinortey, Galyuon & Asamoah, 2013; Parvez et al., 2019). However, compounds from inflorescences have not been assessed in previous reports.

Trema orientalis is used for treatment of many ailments involving antibacterial and antiviral infection in the respiratory system (Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk, 1962). Treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistance bacteria (MDR), including Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii, is challenging, and newly emerged and extremely drug-resistant strains have posed serious problems in public health care (WHO, 2017). Antimicrobial agents from medicinal plants modify activity exhibited by MDR strains, yet medicinal plants are still underused as sources of antimicrobial agents. Antibacterial activity of inflorescence extracts from T. orientalis species is based on traditional uses in respiratory infection. This study thus investigates the content of cannabinoids as chemical markers of the Cannabis that might also be found in inflorescence extracts of T. orientalis. Also, we detail the activity of these extracts toward MDR bacteria that cause respiratory infection. We hypothesized that inflorescence extracts from T. orientalis might contain cannabinoids and might display antibacterial effects. We analyzed extracts and tested their antibacterial activity. Our study is the first to report cannabinoids from the inflorescence extracts of T. orientalis in the Cannabaceae.

Materials & Methods

Plant materials

Nine specimens of Trema orientalis were collected from three floristic regions in northern, southeastern and peninsular or southern Thailand. Locations were selected from distribution notes for herbarium specimens. All samples were identified by using comparative macro and micro-morphology using key characteristics in the Flora of Thailand and related documents. Voucher specimens were deposited in the BKF herbarium and indexed Index Herbariorum (Thiers, 2020). We selectively collected mature inflorescences flowers from November, 2019 to February, 2020 during the flowering period in agricultural and disturbed areas.

Extraction procedures

Mature inflorescences of T. orientalis were air-dried without sunlight. Dried materials (200 g) were powdered using a blender before phytochemical analysis. Powders were macerated in 500 mL of methanol for 10 days in the dark at room temperature. Extracts were filtered and concentrated under a vacuum in a heating bath at 45 °C and 218 mbar to acquire crude extracts. Extract was partitioned in 250 mL of distilled water (hydrophilic fraction) and chloroform (lipophilic fraction) in a separatory funnel flask of 500 mL. Finally, sediment was allowed to settle for 30 min in a fume, and the chloroform fraction was selectively collected and evaporated to dryness for further experiments.

Compound fractionation

The lipophilic extract contained 680 mg dry weight of inflorescences extract; 200 g was separated using column chromatography (glass column size: 1.7 × 80 cm) with 60 g of silica gel (0.04–0.063 mm, Merck) as the absorbent. The gradient solvent system was mixed 100 mL per fraction in three steps with increasing polarity: (1) hexane and diethyl ether mixed in 5 fractions (95:5, 90:10, 75:25, 50:50 and 0:100%v/v), (2) diethyl ether and methanol also mixed in 5 fractions (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75 and 10:90%v/v) and (3) One fraction of 100% methanol. All fractions from each gradient were collected in 25 mL sub-fractions then separated on TLC plates with hexane:ethyl acetate (8:2 v/v). These TLC plates were visualized under UV light (wavelengths 254 and 365 nm) and anisaldehyde sulfuric acid spray for terpenoid detection. HPLC chromatographic analysis for observed compounds completed and used to combine fractions into ten sub-fractions with similar characteristics. Sub-fractions were evaporated, collected in diethyl ether and stored at −20 C. Dry residues showed different physical characteristics.

Chromatography procedures (HPLC and GC-MS)

Subsequently, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis in each sub-fraction used a PerkinElmer (Flexar series) with a UV photodiode array detector at wavelengths of 230, 254 and 280 nm. A reverse-phase BDS hypersil™ C18 (thermo scientific™) column, (250 × 4.6 mm) was used for separation. The solvent system consisted of an aqueous buffer (A) containing (0.015 M ortho-phosphoric acid pH 3 and 0.0015 M tetrabutyl ammonium hydroxide) and methanol (B) (HPLC analytic grade, Merck). Sub-fractions were prepared at a concentration of 10 mg/mL in methal (analytic grade, Merck); 10 µL of solutions was injected for all analyses. Solvent flow rate was 1 ml min1 within 30 min for chromatogram recording. The mobile phase started at 60% B for 16 min and then increased to 90%–100% B within 6 min, with 100% B continuing for 6 min.

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) used an Agilent Technologies Model 6890N coupled with a 5973 inert mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, USA). Compounds were separated on an Agilent Technologies™ column DB5MS cross-linked poly 5% diphenyl 95% dimethylpolysiloxane (0.25 mm ×30 m ×0.25 µm film thickness). Column temperature was initially 45 °C was then increased to 100 °C for 1 min and was raised to 300 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min and held for 9 min. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of one mL/min. The injector, transfer line and ion-source temperatures were 250, 280, and 230 °C, respectively. MS detection was performed with electron ionization at 70 eV, operating in the full-scan acquisition mode in the range of 30–450 m/z and 150 °C MS quadrupole temperature (Ruppel & Kuffel, 2017). GC-MS results provided Total Ion Chromatogram (TIC) information including retention time, cannabinoid contents, limited of detection (LOD), percentage of maximum corrected area (% max.corr.) and percentage of total area (% total areas).

Analytical standards

Standard 1,000 µg/mL solutions for cannabinoids (THC, CBD and CBN, Merck™) were used to compare with sample results. GC-MS analytical processes in report no. TRCM63 was certified by Central Laboratory (Thailand) Co., Ltd. using the standard of ISO/IEC 17025. Each sub-fraction (990 µL) was mixed with 10 µL of three cannabinoid internal standards for calibration (modified from Ruppel & Kuffel, 2017). The results were reported as percent w/w of cannabinoids. The reproducibility was based on retention time and peak areas of standards, and sensitivity was determined by the LOD.

Antibacterial activity

Four MDR bacteria (superbugs) in the WHO list, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300 (methicillin-resistant), Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606, were obtained from the Department of Medical Science, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.

Disk diffusion assays were used for antibacterial testing of lipophilic sub-fractions. The MDR bacterial strains were inoculated into Muller-Hinton broth (MHB) (Oxoid™, Hamshire, UK). Bacterial cell suspensions equivalent in density to 0.5 McFarland (1.5 × 108 CFU/mL) were then inoculated with Muller-Hinton agar (MHA-Difco™, USA). For the compound loading, sub-fraction (200 µg) were purged with nitrogen dioxide (NO2), then dissolved with 20% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, USA) in distilled water (DW) at an amount of 100 µL. The paper disks (six mm diameter) were soaked in the sub-fraction and placed 30 mm apart on MHA containing the test bacteria. The MHA plate was then incubated at 37 °C for 18 h.

A broth microdilution assay was used to measure minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of various sub-fractions using serial dilutions in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Hybri-Max™, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), ranging from 1024 to 0.5 µg/mL, in 96-well microplates with the subsequent addition of a standard inoculum of test bacteria in Muller-Hinton™ broth (MHB). All samples were duplicated and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of extract that reduced the turbidity of cultures. The quality control followed the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2019) guidelines for standardized sensitivity tests. Bacteria were tested against several antibiotics as positive controls: PIP/TAZ (Piperacillin/Tazobactam 100/10 µg), AMK (Amikacin 30 µg), Ceftriaxone (30 µg), CTX (Cefotaxime 30 µg), Ceftazidime (30 ×), CIP (Ciprofloxacin 5 µg), Imipenem (10 µg), TMP/SMX (Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole 1.25/23.75 µg) and VAN (Vancomycin 30 µg). All bacterial strains were cultivated at 37 °C for 18 h. The resulting inhibition zones (diameter of clear zone; mm) were compared to those of standard antibiotics in the (CLSI, 2019) guideline (Table S3).

Results

Determination of cannabinoids in Trema orientalis inflorescence extracts

Fractions displaying similar TLC chromatograms were combined into sub-fractions for subsequent testing. Fractions 9 and 10 were combined into S1, fractions 11 and 12 into S2, fractions 13 to 18 into S3 and fractions 19 and 20 into S4. Terpenoids were detected on developed TLC plates using anisaldehyde sulfuric acid reagent. Only sub-fraction S3 showed two dominant violet spots at Rf values of 0.5 and 0.8, respectively.

TICs from GC-MS showed THC (B), CBD (C) and CBN (D) with precise retention times (RT) (Fig. 1). Cannabinoids identified in T. orientalis inflorescence sub-fraction (S3) showed the highest levels of CBN in all samples with lower concentrations of THC and CBD. The highest yields of cannabinoids were found in different regions, including the highest CBN (357.46 mg/kg, RT 19.24 min) and THC (89.96 mg/kg, RT 18.74 min) from the northern region and CBD (5.22 mg/kg, RT 17.92 min) from the southern region; THC and CBD were not present in samples from the southeastern region. However, some samples from all regions displayed some cannabinoids in similar inflorescence extracts (Table 1).

Figure 1. Total Ion Chromatogram (TIC) from GC-MS of cannabinoids compared with internal standard.

Figure 1

(A) Internal standard of cannabinoids; (B) Inflorescences fraction from Southern or Peninsular; (C) Inflorescences fraction from Northern; (D) Inflorescences fraction from Southeastern.

Table 1. Cannabinoids were compared with internal standards, and T. orientalis inflorescence fractions from plants collected from different regions in Thailand.

Region/Province Collector no. Habitats Cannabinoids detection (mg/kg)*
THC CBD CBN
Northern (N)
Uttaradit TN et al. 011 Agricultural areas 89.96 357.46
Phitsanulok TN et al. 009 Forest edges 70.17 324.05
Phetchabun TN et al. 012 Disturbed areas 188.49
Southeastern (SE)
Chanthaburi TN et al. 008 Beach forest 51.63
Rayong TN et al. 015 Beach forest 55.84
Trat TN et al. 010 Beach forest 50.06
Southern or Peninsula (PEN)
Chumphon TN et al. 007 Agricultural areas 38.13 5.22 132.18
Nakhon Si Thammarat TN et al. 014 Disturbed areas 175.69
Songkhla TN et al. 013 Disturbed areas 30.12 2.00 140.19

Notes.

*

An asterisk refers to cannabinoids in inflorescences fractions (10 mg/mL concentrations) dissolved with methanol and LOD was established as 0.5 with GC-MS.

Antibacterial activity of cannabinoids fraction

The inhibition zone diameters and MIC values of the inflorescence sub-fraction S3, which contained cannabinoids, are presented in Figs. 2 and 3. Sub-fraction S3 from plants collected from all regions showed antimicrobial activity against MDR bacteria, with zones of inhibition measuring 8 to 14 mm (Table S1). However, sub-fractions S1, S2 and S4 showed little or no growth inhibition (MIC > 1,024 µg/mL) and no clear zone of inhibition on MHA media. The S3 sample from the northern region displayed the lowest MIC concentration across all bacterial strains. Lowest MICs for S3 indicated significant antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300 (64.25 µg/mL), S. aureus ATCC 25923, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and A. baumannii ATCC 19606 (31.25 µg/mL). MDR strains of P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (AmpC β-lactamase producing strain) and A. baumannii ATCC 19606 were inhibited by S3 that contained cannabinoids in samples from each region.

Figure 2. Inhibition zone diameters (mm) of inflorescence fraction (S3).

Figure 2

Diameter > six mm indicates inhibition zone.

Figure 3. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, µg/mL) of inflorescence fraction (S3).

Figure 3

Trend of occurrence cannabinoids in the studied Trema orientalis

The occurrences of cannabinoids; THC, CBD and CBN in the inflorescence of T. orientalis collected from different regions are provided in Table 1 and inflorescence characters which found these compounds displayed in Fig. 4. Cannabinoids were qualitatively and quantitatively detected in all samples at varying concentrations in different regions. Hence, the presence of cannabinoids in inflorescence extracts may be a chemical marker for several members in the Cannabaceae. Variation in cannabinoid content across regions may be due to differences in natural biotic or abiotic factors that affect cannabinoid production, such as geographical habitats and unequal seasonal periods.

Figure 4. The inflorescence of Trema orientalis (A) and major cannabinoids structure; Tetrahydrocannabinol (B), Cannabidiol (C) and Cannabinol (D) were found in inflorescence fractions.

Figure 4

Discussion

Cannabinoids detection and botanical relationship

Our study is the first to report cannabinoids (THC, CBD and CBN) detection and antibacterial activity in extracts from inflorescences of T. orientalis, family Cannabaceae. Cannabinoids are widely distributed in the Cannabaceae, particularly in the genus Cannabis (Cannabis sativa and Cannabis indica) which is important in drug development for its anesthetic, antipsychotic properties and antibacterial activity against MDR bacterial strains (Kostic, Pejic & Skundric, 2008; Appendino et al., 2008; Marks et al., 2009). Cannabinoids are in the terpenoids group dominantly distributed in Cannabis. These compounds are concentrated on trichomes on flower surfaces of inflorescences (Backer et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2017). Cannabinoids have not been reported in other plant families, and show broad pharmacological properties (Thomas & Elsohly, 2016).

The major cannabinoids are tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) which is the main psychoactive compound, cannabidiol (CBD) as an anticonvulsant and anti-inflammatory drug in development, and cannabinol (CBN) that exhibits sedative and anticonvulsant properties (Paolino et al., 2016; Domingos et al., 2017; Borille et al., 2017). Total cannabinoid content of Cannabis inflorescences is 15.77%–20.37% of dry weight using modern drug analysis (Jin et al., 2020). occurrences of major cannabinoids in inflorescences of T. orientalis is first reported in this study. T. orientalis inflorescences have been used to treat bacterial bronchitis, pneumonia and pleurisy in children (Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk, 1962; Adinortey, Galyuon & Asamoah, 2013). However, inflorescences of T. orientalis lack of chemical investigation and GC-MS cannabinoid detection is not previously reported. Presence of these compounds in a species other than Cannabis will help interpret plant distribution and botanical relationships.

Most genera in the Cannabaceae have persistent tepals or perianth and stigmas in the mature flower at the end of the flowering season, including Cannabis, Humulus, Parasponia and Trema (Yang et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2018). Also, these genera show characteristic features, such as glandular and non-glandular trichomes. Trichomes are important for the accumulation of several terpenoids, including cannabinoids. These compounds are mostly produced in glandular trichomes, particularly in the genus Cannabis. However, trichomes are characteristics of flowers in the family. An update of Cannabaceae by Zhang et al. in 2018 based on plastome assembly showed strong bootstrap support (BP = 100) for a monophyletic group. The Trema and Parasponia clade and the Humulus and Cannabis clade are sister groups with strong bootstrap support (BS = 100). These close relationships led us to explore cannabinoids in the genus, Trema.

Current cannabinoid analytics allow rapid and precise detection. TLC is expected to meet the The Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (AOAC) needs for use in cannabinoid industries in the future (Sherma & Rabel, 2019). TLC was developed in the United States and worldwide, together with consensus methods by organizations including American Oil Chemist’s Society (AOCS), USP (United States Pharmacopeial Convention), and ASTM International (American Society for Testing and Materials) working with scientists and stakeholder communities (Audino, 2018). We used TLC for terpenoid screening with visualization by specific reagent spraying (anisaldehyde sulfuric acid). This approach allows positive testing for the presence of cannabinoids as odorless terpenoids. Preliminary phytochemical screening using TLC is important for detecting terpenoids in extracts. The approach allowed cannabinoid detection at a reduced cost. Our results on TLC screening are consistent with terpenoid and cannabinoid investigation reported by Sherma & Rabel (2019). These authors showed positive results for cannabinoids and terpenoids with TLC and a similar solvent system (hexane:ethyl acetate, 8:2 or 4:1 v/v) in a saturated chamber with specific reagent spraying and characteristic color patterns.

GC-MS was used for cannabinoids using internal standards under ISO/IEC 17025 laboratory certification in Thailand. GC-MS and its combination with other mass spectrometry allow separation and identification of cannabinoids from the National Institute of Standards and Technology Library (Mariotti et al., 2016; Calvi et al., 2018). Our acquired chromatogram peaks of cannabinoids in T. orientalis extracts are well defined, and the order of elution is similar to that reported in the Cannabis literature (Mariotti et al., 2016; Broséus, Anglada & Esseiva, 2010; Hazekamp et al., 2005). Similar retention time was found among internal cannabinoid standards and extracts in GC-MS analysis with a stationary phase, non-polar column (DB5 column, 5% diphenyl-95% dimethylpolysiloxane) (Santos et al., 2019). These column properties are similar the column used in the present study and internal standards provided different retention times (CBD =17.92 min, THC =18.74 min and CBN =19.24 min) (Fig. 2).

Antibacterial activities

Liquid from Trema orientalis inflorescence crushing has long been known to treat bronchitis, pneumonia and pleurisy symptoms in children (Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk, 1962). These symptoms are related to bacterial infection in the respiratory system. Important bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii, are often resistant to antimicrobials (WHO, 2017). Development of novel antibacterial agents against MDR strains is difficult due to the presence of decreased membrane permeability and multidrug efflux pumps (Morita, Tomida & Kawamura, 2014). We found cannabinoids in inflorescence extracts of T. orientalis, cannabinoids show antibacterial properties, inhibiting the growth of a variety of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains, which are clinically relevant strain (Appendino et al., 2008). Similarly, our inflorescence extracts inhibit pathogenic bacteria, particularly MDR strains (Appendino et al., 2008; Adinortey, Galyuon & Asamoah, 2013). Cannabinoids were developed as modulators of lipid affinity for the olivetol core of a poorly active antibacterial pharmacophore, supporting antibiotic development; major cannabinoids show potent activity against MDR bacteria (Appendino et al., 2008). The S3 fraction showed potent antibacterial activity, with the clear zone on disk diffusion assay in the range of 8 to 14 mm that is similar to the ranges of inhibition zones of 8 to 25 mm which cannabinoids contained in mouthwash products (Vasudevan & Stahl, 2020). For MIC values, the lowest concentration of extract in the range of 31.25 to 125 µg/mL, cannabinol (CBN) was found in all samples in our study. These results conform with antibacterial cannbinol (CBN) in Cannabis (Appendino et al., 2008) that shows promise in fighting MRSA bacteria with low MIC concentrations of less than or equal to specifically resistant antibiotics such as Amikacin (30 µg) and Piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 µg). Our observation suggests that cannabinoids in this study are the most likely antibacterial activity extension found in T. orientalis inflorescences preparation. Generally, CBN is less abundant in Cannabis than THC and CBD (Izzo et al., 2009), but in our study CBN was the major cannabinoid. CBN is reported in skin treatment for MRSA infection (Appendino et al., 2008), consistent with our results showing substantially high / and showed substantially high CBN content and significant antibacterial properties. Activities were notable for all four strains, particularly in S. aureus ATCC 25923, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and A. baumannii ATCC 19606 which show high resistance for β-lactams antibiotics. These findings are similar to a previous report of antibacterial properties of T. orientalis (Uddin, 2008). Efficacy against P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii, the major epidemic MDR strains occurring in Thailand and Southeast Asia hospitals, is noteworthy (Werarak et al., 2012).

Fractions that contained cannabinoids were mixtures of active compounds; synergistic effects for compounds could be more effective than any single constituent (Rasoanaivo et al., 2011). Synergistic effects of mixed compounds may act as antibacterial agents for resistance strains (Gilbert & Alves, 2003). Thus, fractions that contained cannabinoids of T. orientalis can be considered natural antibacterial agents for future antibiotic development for specific respiratory infections that conform with traditional use.

Conclusions

Our findings are the first to report cannabinoids contained in Trema orientalis, which is closely related to Cannabis. Inflorescence extracts of T. orientalis have the potential to be used as antibacterial agents, particularly for respiratory infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobactor baummanii. Analytical methods based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used for precise and sensitive cannabinoid detection. TLC and HPLC were used for qualitative screening to help with cost management and rapid investigation. Cannabinoid detection found cannabidiol (CBD), tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabinol (CBN) in inflorescences of T. orientalis. The occurrence of cannabinoids in T. orientalis shows the relationship between genera within the Cannabaceae. Therefore, continuing study in T. orientalis inflorescences is required to detect cannabinoids in other species in the genus Trema to identify chemotaxonomic characteristics for grouping within the cannabis family. Our work might also lead to the introduction of T. orientalis in agricultural areas as a model for inflorescence sources for supporting antibacterial agents in the future.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Inhibition zone (mm) of T. orientalis inflorescence fractions from plants collected from different regions in Thailand against bacterial strains.

Note: *Each sample was tested in duplicate: S1 = Sample 1 and S2 = Sample 2 **Abbreviation of bacterial strains: SA ATCC 43300 = Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300 (methicillin-resistant), SA ATCC 25923 = Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, PA ATCC 27853 = Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (AmpC β-lactamase producing strain) and AB ATCC 19606 = Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11446/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. The inhibition effects of standard antibiotics with control species by the CLSI (2019).

SA ATCC 25923: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300. SA ATCC 43300: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300. KP ATCC 700603: K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 and PA ATCC 27853: Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853. These strains were used as control species; the inhibition zone in each antibiotic was within the quality control ranges set by the CLSI (2019)*. NT abbreviation was refer to not tested.

*The quality control ranges set by the CLSI (2019): For K. pneumoniae strain ATCC 700603, the different clear zone diameter of antibiotics including ceftazidime (10–18 mm), cefotaxime (17–25 mm), and ceftriaxone (16–24 mm). For P. aeruginosa strain ATCC 27853, the different clear zone diameter of antibiotics including piperacillin/tazobactam (25–33 mm), amikacin (18–26 mm), and ciprofloxacin (25–33 mm).

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11446/supp-2
Supplemental Information 3. Inhibitory effects (MIC, µg/ml) of T. orientalis inflorescence fractions from plants collected from different regions in Thailand against bacterial strains.

Note: *Each sample was tested in duplicate: S1 = Sample 1 and S2 = Sample 2 **Abbreviation of bacterial strains: SA ATCC 43300 = Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300 (methicillin-resistant), SA ATCC 25923 = Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, PA ATCC 27853 = Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (AmpC β-lactamase producing strain) and AB ATCC 19606 = Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11446/supp-3

Funding Statement

This research was supported by The Agricultural Research Development Agency (Public Organization) Thailand, (ARDA) which provided research grants in 2020 of the Thai Medicinal Plants Cluster (No. CRP6305030040). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Tiwtawat Napiroon, Email: napiroont@staff.tu.ac.th, napiroont@gmail.com.

Wichai Santimaleeworagun, Email: SANTIMALEEWORAG_W@su.ac.th, swichai1234@gmail.com.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Tiwtawat Napiroon conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Keerati Tanruean and Wichai Santimaleeworagun conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Pisit Poolprasert and Manop Poopath conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Markus Bacher and Henrik Balslev analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements are available in the Supplementary Tables.

References

  • Adinortey, Galyuon & Asamoah (2013).Adinortey MB, Galyuon IK, Asamoah NO. Trema orientalis Linn. Blume: a potential for prospecting for drugs for various uses. Pharmacognocy Review. 2013;7(13):67–72. doi: 10.4103/0973-7847.112852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Appendino et al. (2008).Appendino G, Gibbons S, Giana A, Pagani A, Grassi G, Stavri M, Smith E, Rahman MM. Antibacterial cannabinoids from Cannabis sativa: a structure-activity study. Journal of Natural Products. 2008;71(8):1427–1430. doi: 10.1021/np8002673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Audino (2018).Audino S. Can analytical testing quality be assured in the Cannabis industry? Cannabis Science and Technology. 2018;1:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • Backer et al. (2012).Backer DB, Maebe K, Verstraete AG, Charlier C. Evolution of the content of THC and other major cannabinoids in drug type Cannabis cuttings and seedlings during growth of plants. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2012;57:918–922. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02068.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Borille et al. (2017).Borille BT, González M, Steffens L, Ortiz RS, Limberger RP. Cannabis sativa: a systematic review of plant analysis. Drug Analytical Research. 2017;1:1–23. [Google Scholar]
  • Broséus, Anglada & Esseiva (2010).Broséus J, Anglada F, Esseiva P. The differentiation of fibre- and drug type Cannabis seedlings by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and chemometric tools. Forensic Science International. 2010;15(200):87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Caiaffa et al. (1994).Caiaffa WT, Vlahov D, Graham NMH, Astemborski J, Solomon L, Nelson KE, Munoz A. Drug smoking, pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, and immunosuppression increase risk of bacterial pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive injection drug users. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 1994;150:1493–1498. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.6.7952605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Calvi et al. (2018).Calvi L, Pentimalli D, Panseri S, Giupponi L, Gelmini F, Beretta G, Vitali D, Bruno M, Zilio E, Pavlovic R, Giorgi A. Comprehensive quality evaluation of medical Cannabis sativa L. inflorescence and macerated oils based on HS-SPME coupled to GC–MS and LC-HRMS (q-exactive orbitrap®) approach. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2018;150:208–219. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.11.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • CLSI (2019).CLSI . Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 27th Edition CLSI supplement M100, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; Wayne: 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • Domingos et al. (2017).Domingos E, Carvalho TD, Pereira I, Vasconcelos GA, Thompson C, Augusti R, Rodrigues R, Tose LV, Santos H, Araujo JR, Vaz BG, Romão W. Paper spray ionization mass spectrometry applied to forensic chemistry—drugs of abuse, inks and questioned documents. Analytical Methods. 2017;9:4400–4409. doi: 10.1039/C7AY01091E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gilbert & Alves (2003).Gilbert B, Alves L. Synergy in plant medicines. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2003;10(1):13–20. doi: 10.2174/0929867033368583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hazekamp et al. (2005).Hazekamp A, Peltenburg A, Verpoorte R, Giroud C. Chromatographic and spectroscopic data of cannabinoids from Cannabis sativa L. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies. 2005;28:2361–2382. doi: 10.1080/10826070500187558. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Izzo et al. (2009).Izzo AA, Borrelli F, Capasso R, Di marzo V, Mechoulam R. Non-psychotropic plant cannabinoids: new therapeutic opportunities from an ancient herb. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2009;30(10):515–527. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jin et al. (2020).Jin D, Dai K, Xie Z, Chen J. Secondary metabolites profiled in Cannabis inflorescences, leaves, stem barks, and roots for medicinal purposes. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(3309):1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60172-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kostic, Pejic & Skundric (2008).Kostic M, Pejic B, Skundric P. Quality of chemically modified hemp fibres. Bioresource Technology. 2008;99(1):94–99. doi: 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2006.11.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mariotti et al. (2016).Mariotti KC, Marcelo MC, Ortiz RS, Borille BT, Dos RM, Fett MS, Ferrão MF, Limberger RP. Seized Cannabis seeds cultivated in greenhouse: a chemical study by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and chemometric analysis. Science & Justice. 2016;56(1):35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2015.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marks et al. (2009).Marks MD, Tian L, Wenger JP, Omburo SN, Soto-Fuentes W, He J, Gang DR, Weiblen GD, Dixon RA. Identification of candidate genes affecting γ9-tetrahydrocannabinol biosynthesis in Cannabis sativa. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2009;60(13):3715–3726. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McPartland (2018).McPartland JM. Cannabis systematics at the levels of family, genus, and species. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research. 2018;3(1):203–212. doi: 10.1089/can.2018.0039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Morita, Tomida & Kawamura (2014).Morita Y, Tomida J, Kawamura Y. Responses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to antimicrobials. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2014;4:1–8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Paolino et al. (2016).Paolino MC, Ferretti A, Papetti L, Villa MP, Parisi P. Cannabidiol as potential treatment in refractory pediatric epilepsy. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2016;16(1):17–21. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2016.1121098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Parvez et al. (2019).Parvez A, Azad MAK, Islam MZ, Munna MMR, Shaheen SM, Rahman MM, Azad AK. A phytochemical and pharmacological review on Trema orientalis: a potential medicinal plant. Pharmacology Online. 2019;3:103–119. [Google Scholar]
  • Rasoanaivo et al. (2011).Rasoanaivo P, Wright CW, Willcox ML, Gilbert B. Whole plant extracts versus single compounds for the treatment of malaria: synergy and positive interactions. Malaria Journal. 2011;10(Suppl 1):S4. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-S1-S4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Roth et al. (2004).Roth MD, Whittaker K, Salehi K, Tashkin DP, Baldwin GC. Mechanisms for impaired effector function in alveolar macrophages from marijuana and cocaine smokers. Journal of Neuroimmunology. 2004;147:82–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ruppel & Kuffel (2017).Ruppel TD, Kuffel N. PerkinElmer, Inc. Shelton, CT; USA: 2017. [31 July 2020]. Cannabis analysis: potency testing identification and quantification of THC and CBD by GC/FID and GC/MS. [Google Scholar]
  • Santos et al. (2019).Santos NAD, Tose LV, Silva, Samantha RCDS, Murgu M, Kuster RM, Ortiz RS, Camargo FAO, Vaz BG, Lacerda JV, Wanderson R. Analysis of isomeric cannabinoid standards and Cannabis products by UPLC-ESI-TWIM-MS: a comparison with GC-MS and GC × GC-QMS. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society. 2019;30(1):60–70. doi: 10.21577/0103-5053.20180152. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Sherma & Rabel (2019).Sherma J, Rabel F. Thin layer chromatography in the analysis of Cannabis and its components and synthetic cannabinoids. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies. 2019;42:613–628. doi: 10.1080/10826076.2019.1663529. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • The Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (AOAC) (2020).The AOAC (Association of Official Agricultural Chemists): Cannabis Analytical Science Program (CASP) 2020. https://cannabisindustryjournal.com/feature_article/spotlighton-aoac-new-leadership-new-initiatives-in-cannabis-food/ [24 June 2020]. https://cannabisindustryjournal.com/feature_article/spotlighton-aoac-new-leadership-new-initiatives-in-cannabis-food/
  • Thiers (2020).Thiers B. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium; 2020. [15 April 2020]. Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomas & Elsohly (2016).Thomas BF, Elsohly MA. The analytical Chemistry of Cannabis. Elsevier Inc.; Amsterdam: 2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Uddin (2008).Uddin SN. Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Trema orientalis Linn: an indigenous medicinal plant of Indian subcontinent. Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental Medicine. 2008;8(4):395–399. doi: 10.3742/OPEM.2008.8.4.395. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Vasudevan & Stahl (2020).Vasudevan K, Stahl V. Cannabinoids infused mouthwash products are as effective as chlorhexidine on inhibition of total-culturable bacterial content in dental plaque samples. Journal of Cannabis Research. 2020;2(20):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s42238-020-00027-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2017).Wang K, Abdala A, Hilal N, Khraisheh M. Mechanical characterization of membranes. Membrane Characterization. 2017;2017:259–306. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63776-5.00013-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Wassmann, Højrup & Klitgaard (2020).Wassmann CS, Højrup P, Klitgaard JK. Cannabidiol is an effective helper compound in combination with bacitracin to kill Gram-positive bacteria. Scientific Report. 2020;10(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60952-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk (1962).Watt JM, Breyer-Brandwijk MG. The medicinal and poisonous plants of Southern and Eastern Africa. 2nd edition Livingstone; London: 1962. [Google Scholar]
  • Werarak et al. (2012).Werarak P, Waiwarawut J, Tharavichitkul P, Pothirat C, Rungruanghiranya S, Geater SL, Chongthaleong A, Sittipunt C, Horsin P, Chalermskulrat W, Wiwatworapan T, Thummakul T, Mootsikapun P, Rungsrithong N, Supawita S, Chuchotthavorn C, Tongsai S, Thamlikitkul V. Acinetobacter baumannii Nosocomial Pneumonia in Tertiary Care Hospitals in Thailand. Journal of Medical Association of Thailand. 2012;95(2):23–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • WHO (2017).World Health Organization (WHO) WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. 2017. https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed. [27 July 2020]. https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed
  • Yang et al. (2013).Yang M, Van VR, Bakker F, Sattarian A, Li D, Yi T. Molecular phylogenetics and character evolution of Cannabaceae. Taxon. 2013;62(3):473–485. doi: 10.12705/623.9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Yotoriyama et al. (2005).Yotoriyama M, Ishiharajima E, Kato Y, Nagato A, Sekita S, Watanabe K, Yamamoto I. Identification and determination of cannabinoids in both commercially available and Cannabis oils stored long term. Journal of Health Science. 2005;51:483–487. doi: 10.1248/jhs.51.483. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2018).Zhang HL, Jin JJ, Moore MJ, Yi TS, Li DZ. Plastome characteristics of Cannabaceae. Plant Diversity. 2018;40:127–137. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2018.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Inhibition zone (mm) of T. orientalis inflorescence fractions from plants collected from different regions in Thailand against bacterial strains.

Note: *Each sample was tested in duplicate: S1 = Sample 1 and S2 = Sample 2 **Abbreviation of bacterial strains: SA ATCC 43300 = Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300 (methicillin-resistant), SA ATCC 25923 = Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, PA ATCC 27853 = Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (AmpC β-lactamase producing strain) and AB ATCC 19606 = Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11446/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. The inhibition effects of standard antibiotics with control species by the CLSI (2019).

SA ATCC 25923: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300. SA ATCC 43300: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300. KP ATCC 700603: K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 and PA ATCC 27853: Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853. These strains were used as control species; the inhibition zone in each antibiotic was within the quality control ranges set by the CLSI (2019)*. NT abbreviation was refer to not tested.

*The quality control ranges set by the CLSI (2019): For K. pneumoniae strain ATCC 700603, the different clear zone diameter of antibiotics including ceftazidime (10–18 mm), cefotaxime (17–25 mm), and ceftriaxone (16–24 mm). For P. aeruginosa strain ATCC 27853, the different clear zone diameter of antibiotics including piperacillin/tazobactam (25–33 mm), amikacin (18–26 mm), and ciprofloxacin (25–33 mm).

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11446/supp-2
Supplemental Information 3. Inhibitory effects (MIC, µg/ml) of T. orientalis inflorescence fractions from plants collected from different regions in Thailand against bacterial strains.

Note: *Each sample was tested in duplicate: S1 = Sample 1 and S2 = Sample 2 **Abbreviation of bacterial strains: SA ATCC 43300 = Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300 (methicillin-resistant), SA ATCC 25923 = Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, PA ATCC 27853 = Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (AmpC β-lactamase producing strain) and AB ATCC 19606 = Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11446/supp-3

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements are available in the Supplementary Tables.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES