Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 May 17;16(5):e0251279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251279

Generation of the short TRIM32 isoform is regulated by Lys 247 acetylation and a PEST sequence

Juncal Garcia-Garcia 1, Katrine Stange Overå 1, Waqas Khan 1, Eva Sjøttem 1,*
Editor: Michael Massiah2
PMCID: PMC8128265  PMID: 33999923

Abstract

TRIM32 is an E3 ligase implicated in diverse biological pathways and pathologies such as muscular dystrophy and cancer. TRIM32 are expressed both as full-length proteins, and as a truncated protein. The mechanisms for regulating these isoforms are poorly understood. Here we identify a PEST sequence in TRIM32 located in the unstructured region between the RING-BBox-CoiledCoil domains and the NHL repeats. The PEST sequence directs cleavage of TRIM32, generating a truncated protein similarly to the short isoform. We map three lysine residues that regulate PEST mediated cleavage and auto-ubiquitylation activity of TRIM32. Mimicking acetylation of lysine K247 completely inhibits TRIM32 cleavage, while the lysines K50 and K401 are implicated in auto-ubiquitylation activity. We show that the short isoform of TRIM32 is catalytic inactive, suggesting a dominant negative role. These findings uncover that TRIM32 is regulated by post-translational modifications of three lysine residues, and a conserved PEST sequence.

Introduction

Tripartite motif (TRIM) proteins have emerged as a large family of ubiquitin E3 ligases that are involved in a wide range of cellular processes such as development, differentiation, immunity and carcinogenesis [1]. As a member of the TRIM family, TRIM32 shows the common RBCC domain organization in its N-terminal, consisting of a “Really interesting New gene” (RING) domain, followed by one B-box domain, and a Coiled Coil (CC) region [2]. TRIM32 is characterized by six NHL repeats in its C-terminus. The RING domain is essential for the E3 ligase activity, while the B-box domain is necessary to modulate chain assembly rate of ubiquitin units. The CC domain assumes an α-helix structure that allows the formation of anti-parallel dimers [3]. To date, the NHL repeats are found to be involved in dimerization and cargo recognition [4]. TRIM32 oligomerization is a pre-requisite for its catalytic activity.

TRIM32 has multiple target proteins involved in innate immunity, carcinogenesis and muscle physiology [5]. TRIM32 is linked to two different genetic diseases [4]. Mutations in the NHL domains result in the muscle disorders Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy 2H (LGMD2H) and Sarcotubular myopathy (STM). These mutants display impaired oligomerization and auto-ubiquitylation activity, as well as reduced overall TRIM32 expression. A missense mutation in the B-box domain causes Bardet-Biedl Syndrome 11 (BBS11), which has a pleiotropic phenotype [6]. TRIM32 can be degraded both by the proteasome and by selective autophagy, and its auto-ubiquitylation activity is required for the autophagic degradation [7]. The autophagy receptor p62/SQSTM1 can direct ubiquitylated TRIM32 to autophagic degradation, but is at the same time a TRIM32 substrate, uncovering a role for TRIM32 in the regulation of selective autophagy.

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) such as phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitylation and SUMOylation are essential for the function and fate of most proteins. The attachment of these small molecules can modulate greatly the properties of a protein, affecting its stability, function, intracellular distribution and interaction with other proteins [8]. Acetylation is the most common PTM, playing important roles in cell signaling, and in the regulation of protein localization, stability and functionality. The addition of the acetyl group from an Acetyl coenzyme A (Ac-CoA) can occur in two different positions, in their Nα-termini of the amino acid or in the ε-amino group of a lysine amino acid. Lysine acetylation is a reversible modification that is tightly controlled by multiple acetyltransferases and deacetylases [9]. This repertoire of addition and removal of molecules allow the cell to control fast and efficiently the different changes in the environment.

Ubiquitylation of proteins is implicated as a regulatory mechanism of many cellular processes. The addition of ubiquitin moieties is a reversible process that occur on lysine residues. Ubiquitin itself contains seven lysine residues that can be ubiquitylated, forming ubiquitin chains. This allows multiple combinations, which adds a high degree of complexity to this cellular regulation mechanism [10]. As acetylation, ubiquitylation processes are controlled by a balance between ubiquitin E3 ligases and de-ubiquitin enzymes.

A PEST sequence is a region within a protein that is rich in proline (P), glutamic acid (E), serine (S) and threonine (T) residues. This sequence of amino acids often acts as a proteolytic signal to control the rapid turnover of the protein [11]. Originally PEST sequences were attributed to short-lived proteins, but later PEST sequences are also identified in some long-lived proteins. Moreover, alternative functions have been linked to PEST domains, hence their function is not limited to proteolytic signaling [12]. PEST regions are generally unstructured and flexible, and the 26S Proteasome and other proteases such as calpains are in charge of the degradation of PEST containing proteins. PEST sequences can lead to constitutive degradation of the protein, but they can also behave as conditional degradation signals depending on the cellular needs [13].

In this work we identify a PEST sequence in the unstructured region between the RBCC region and the NHL domains of the ubiquitin E3 ligase TRIM32. The PEST sequence directs cleavage of TRIM32, leading to a truncated TRIM32 protein lacking the C-terminal NHL-repeats, resembling isoform 3 of TRIM32. The existence of TRIM32 isoform 3 is experimental evidenced at protein level, but a corresponding transcript is not verified. We uncover that PEST mediated cleavage of TRIM32 is regulated by post-translational modifications of three lysine residues, K50, K247 and K401. Mimicking acetylation on K247 completely protects TRIM32 from PEST mediated cleavage. K50 and K401 were found to be important for TRIM32 auto-ubiquitylation activity, which is reported to be necessary for its tetramerization and cytoplasmic body formation. This is the first time that a PEST sequence has been described in a TRIM protein, as well as the regulation of a PEST sequence by acetylation of an adjacent lysine residue.

Results

PTMs of the lysine residues K50, K247 and K401 regulate TRIM32 cleavage

It is well recognized that TRIM32 has auto-ubiquitylation activity in addition to conventional ubiquitin-protein ligase activity [14,15]. Auto-ubiquitylation seems to regulate its expression level, E3 ligase activity and ability to form cytoplasmic bodies [7,1618]. We and others have shown that the missense mutation TRIM32D487N causing LGMD2H does not undergo auto-ubiquitylation [7,18]. Auto-ubiquitylated TRIM32 can be detected as a slower-migrating band on Western Blots, as indicated in Fig 1A where the slower migrating band is detected approximately 10 kDa above the band of the catalytic active EGFP-TRIM32WT and EGFP-TRIM32P130S [7]. The EGFP-TRIM32D487N mutant which do not contain auto-ubiquitylation activity [7], does not display this slow migrating band. Auto-ubiquitylation seems to be a prerequisite for the catalytic activity of TRIM32, as the LGMD2H mutant is unable to ubiquitylate the substrate protein p62/SQSTM1 [7]. Moreover, PKA mediated phosphorylation of TRIM32S651, which impairs its ability to undergo auto-ubiquitylation, leads to repression of its E3 ligase activity. The PKA phosphorylation was shown to be regulated by 14-3-3 protein binding to soluble TRIM32, trapping it in a soluble and functionally latent complex [17]. In an attempt to better understand the regulation of TRIM32, we started out to identify which lysine residues in TRIM32 are targeted by its auto-ubiquitylation activity. For this purpose we applied Mass Spectroscopy (MS) analyses of the catalytic inactive disease mutant myc-TRIM32D487N, and compared it to immunoprecipitated catalytic active myc-TRIM32WT and myc-TRIM32P130S. All proteins were stably expressed in the HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 knock out (KO) cells described previously [7]. No lysine residues of the catalytic inactive TRIM32LGMD2H disease mutant were detected as ubiquitylated, while peptides with K50 and K401 ubiquitylation were found in precipitates of the catalytic active enzymes myc-TRIM32WT and myc-TRIM32P130S (Fig 1B and 1C). However, peptides with acetylation of lysine K247 were identified in precipitates of the myc-TRIM32 disease mutants, but not in the TRIM32WT precipitates (Fig 1B and 1C). In order to determine if these lysine residues are targets for TRIM32 auto-ubiquitylation activity, the constructs EGFP-TRIM32K50R, EGFP-TRIM32K247R, and EGFP-TRIM32K401R were established by site-directed mutagenesis and transiently transfected into HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cells [7]. Western Blot analysis of the transfected proteins revealed that none of these single lysine to arginine mutations impaired auto-ubiquitylation activity of TRIM32 (S1A Fig). Next, we introduced double and triple K to R mutations in EGFP-TRIM32, generating EGFP-TRIM32K247R/K401R, EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R, EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K401R and EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R, respectively. These mutants along with EGFP-TRIM32WT, were transiently transfected into the TRIM32 KO cells and their auto-ubiquitylation activity investigated by Western blotting (Fig 1D). Surprisingly, introduction of the double mutation EGFP-TRIM32K247R/K401R resulted in a partially cleaved protein (Fig 1D and 1E, lane 3), while the triple EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R mutation resulted in a completely cleaved protein (Fig 1D and 1E, lane 6). Co-transfection of the broad specificity de-ubiquitinase USP2 verified that the slower-migrating band on the Western blots are due to ubiquitylated TRIM32 (Fig 1D and 1E and S1B Fig). Since mutations in TRIM32 is associated with muscular dystrophy, similar experiment was performed in the myoblast C2C12 cell line. Introduction of the K247R/K401R and K50/K247R/K401R mutations were exposed to cleavage also in this cell line (Fig 1E). Moreover, the polyclonal TRIM32 antibody displayed the same protein pattern on the Western blot as the GFP antibody, indicating that cleavage of EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R generates a stable N-terminal cleavage product of around 55 kDa. In contrast, any C-terminal cleavage products can not be detected in the gel, suggesting that this part of TRIM32 is exposed to further degradation.

Fig 1. PTMs of TRIM32K50, TRIM32K247 and TRIM32K401 regulate its cleavage.

Fig 1

(A) Western blot analysis of cell extracts from HEK293 FlpIn cells with tetracycline inducible expression of EGFP-TRIM32WT, the BBS11 associated mutant EGFP-TRIM32P130S, or the LGMD2H causing mutant EGFP-TRIM32D487N shows auto-ubiquitylation activity of TRIM32WT and TRIM32P130S, but not the LGMD2H mutant. (B) Sequence of the TRIM32 peptides identified by MS to display PTMs on lysine residues that differed between the TRIM32 proteins with auto-ubiquitylation activity (TRIM32WT and TRIM32P130S) and the LGMD2H disease variant lacking auto-ubiquitylation activity (TRIM32D487N). (C) Schematic of TRIM32 domain organization. The D487N mutation in the NHL repeats that is associated with LGMD2H and the P130S mutation in the B-box causing BBS11 are indicated above. The three lysine residues that are focused in this paper are indicated in red, while the PTMs of these residues identified by MS are indicated above. Ub: Ubiquitylation. Ac: Acetylation (D) Western Blot analysis of HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cells transiently transfected with expression plasmids for EGFP-TRIM32WT, the double mutants EGFP-TRIM32K247R/K401R, EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R, or EGFP-TRIM32K247R/K401R, or the triple mutant EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R. The last lane represents co-transfection of EGFP-TRIM32WT and mCherry-USP2 expression vectors. The bands representing EGFP-TRIM32, auto-ubiquitylated EGFP-TRIM32, and cleaved EGFP-TRIM32 are indicated to the right. PCNA represents the loading control. (E) Western blot analysis of a similar experiment as in (D), except that the myoblast C2C12 cell line is used instead of the HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cell line, and the antibody used is an anti-TRIM32 antibody instead of an anti-GFP antibody.

Acetylation of K247 is sufficient to inhibit cleavage of TRIM32

According to ENSEMBL genome browser (ensemble.org) and UniProt protein database (uniprot.org) there are two variants of the TRIM32 protein in humans. The main variant (Uniprot.org Q13049) is a 653 amino acid protein of 72 kDa. Additional, there is clear experimental evidence for the existence of a short 172 amino acid long variant of TRIM32 (Uniprot.org Q5JVY0) (Fig 2A). However, the existence of a transcript encoding the short protein variant is not validated, since a transcript with a 3’UTR is unrecognized so far (ensemble.org). The short isoform contains the N-terminal RBCC domains, but lack the NHL-repeats and the unstructured region between RBCC and the NHL-domain. The short isoform is around 20 kDa, and hence has a size very similar to the 55 kDa EGFP-TRIM32 N-terminal cleavage product that we observed above (20 kDa plus the EGFP-tag of 32.7 kDa). This prompted us to ask whether the short TRIM32 protein may be generated by proteolytic cleavage of the long form, and if this cleavage could be regulated by post-translational modifications of the lysine residues identified above (K50, K247, K401)(Fig 1C). De-ubiquitylation of TRIM32 by USP2 over-expression did not result in TRIM32 cleavage (Fig 1D and 1E). Therefore, we asked whether acetylation of the lysine residues K50, K247 and K401 would affect TRIM32 cleavage. Each of these lysine residues were replaced by the acetylation mimicking amino acid glutamine (Q) in the EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R construct. The constructs were transfected into the HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cell line, and their expression monitored by Western blotting (Fig 2B). Clearly, introduction of the acetylation mimicking mutant at position K247 completely inhibited cleavage of TRIM32 (Fig 2B, lane 5), while the K50Q and K401Q mutations did not (Fig 2B, lanes 4 and 6). This suggests that acetylation of K247 in TRIM32 is implicated in regulation of TRIM32 cleavage. The subcellular localization of the TRIM32 lysine mimicking mutants were examined by transient transfection of wild type EGFP-TRIM32 and the mutant constructs into HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cells. In line with previous reports, EGFP-TRIM32WT is enriched in small round cytoplasmic bodies in addition to diffuse cytoplasmic localization. Co-staining with the Golgi marker GM130 showed that many of the TRIM32 bodies localize close to the Golgi apparatus (Fig 2C). The EGFP-TRIM32 mutants that generate the cleaved TRIM32 product (TRIM32K50Q/k247R/K401R and TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401Q) formed mainly a few large bodies or aggregates localized in or close to the Golgi region. In contrast, the TRIM32K50R/K247Q/K401R mutant that inhibits TRIM32 cleavage, displays a subcellular localization very similar to the wild type protein (Fig 2C). Hence, the short TRIM32 protein seem to have a strong tendency to form large aggregates compared to full-length TRIM32 isoform.

Fig 2. K247 acetylation inhibits TRIM32 cleavage and facilitates its subcellular distribution.

Fig 2

(A) Schematic of the domain organization of TRIM32 isoform 1 and TRIM32 isoform 3. (B) Western Blot analysis of HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cells transiently transfected with expression plasmids for EGFP-TRIM32WT, EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R, EGFP-TRIM32K50Q/K247R/K401R, TRIM32K50R/K247Q/K401R or EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401Q. The bands representing EGFP-TRIM32 and cleaved EGFP-TRIM32 are indicated to the right. Ponceau staining of the membrane represents the loading control. (C) Confocal images of HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cells transiently transfected with expression plasmids for EGFP-TRIM32WT, EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R, EGFP-TRIM32K50Q/K247R/K401R, TRIM32K50R/K247Q/K401R or EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401Q, and immunostained with anti-GM130 antibodies, a Golgi marker. The cell nuclei are visualized by DAPI staining. Scale bars: 10 μM.

Autophagic degradation of TRIM32 is dependent on K50, K247 and K401 modifications

We have recently shown that TRIM32 is a substrate for selective autophagy [7]. Our next question was whether the short TRIM32 isoform is a target for selective autophagy. For this purpose, the double fluorescent tag mCherry-EYFP was cloned in front of the TRIM32 constructs TRIM32WT, TRIM32K247R/K401R, TRIM32K247Q, TRIM32K50R/K247Q/K401R, and TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R and transiently transfected into the HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cells. Since EYFP is unstable in acidic environments while mCherry is stable, double-tagged TRIM32 constructs targeted to the lysosome will be visualized as RedOnly dots in the fluorescence microscope, while TRIM32 bodies in the cytoplasm will occur as yellow. The mCherry-EYFP-TRIM32K247R/K401R and mCherry-EYFP-TRIM32K247Q constructs formed RedOnly dots, but to a lesser extent than mCherry-EYFP-TRIM32WT (Fig 3). However, when all three lysine residues were substituted with Arginine, giving rise to the cleaved TRIM32 product, or when K50 and K401 were substituted with arginine and K247 with glutamine, giving rise to a full length TRIM32 product, no red only dots was observed in the transfected cells (Fig 3). This suggests that PTMs on the lysine residues K50, K247 and K401 regulate autophagic degradation of TRIM32.

Fig 3. PTMs on TRIM32K50, TRIM32K247, TRIM32K401 regulate autophagic degradation of TRIM32.

Fig 3

(A) Confocal images of mCherry-EYFP-TRIM32WT, mCherry-EYFP-TRIM32K247R/K401R, mCherry-EYFP-TRIM32K247Q, mCherry-EYFP-TRIM32K50R/K247Q/K401R or mCherry-EYFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R transiently expressed in HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cells and exposed to normal or starved conditions. Scale bars: 10 μM. (B) The graphs represent the number of cells with RedOnly dots in the mCherry-EYFP-TRIM32 transfected cells shown with representative images in A. The graphs represent the average of three independent experiments with s.d. (n>20 cells). **P< 0.005; ***P<0.0005 (Student’s t-test).

TRIM32 cleavage is directed by a PEST sequence

The complete cleavage of the EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R construct prompted us to investigate whether TRIM32 encodes specific sequences that are exposed for proteolytic cleavage. Sequence analysis using the PEST prediction tool EMBOSS:epestfind (https://emboss.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/emboss/epestfind), identified a putative PEST sequence with PEST score 7.4 located from amino acid 248 to 270 (Fig 4A). The predicted PEST sequence is 100% conserved in mammals, and interestingly it is located adjacent to lysine K247 which acetylation inhibits TRIM32 cleavage. To examine if the predicted PEST sequence directs TRIM32 cleavage, specific glutamate and threonine residues within the PEST sequence were mutated to valine or isoleucine, respectively, in the EGFP-TRIM32WT construct. Additionally, a partial deletion of the PEST sequence was introduced in EGFP-TRIM32WT and EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R (Fig 4A). The PEST mutation and deletion constructs were transiently transfected into the HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cell line, and their expression monitored by Western blotting (Fig 4B). Clearly, partial deletion of the PEST sequence in the EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R construct completely inhibits TRIM32 cleavage (Fig 4B, lane 6). Partial deletion or mutation of the PEST sequence in wild type TRIM32 did not compromise TRIM32 expression (Fig 4B, lanes 3 and 4). This identifies the 248–270 region of TRIM32 to be a PEST sequence that directs cleavage of TRIM32 that is unable to be modified on K50, K247 and K401. Clearly, mimicking of acetylation on lysine K247, which is localized adjacent to the PEST sequence, completely protects TRIM32 from the PEST directed cleavage (Fig 4B, last lane).

Fig 4. Acetylation of K247 protects TRIM32 from cleavage directed by the adjacent PEST sequence.

Fig 4

(A) Schematic of TRIM32 domain organization with the three regulatory Lysine residues identified in this work indicated above, and the sequence of the mapped PEST sequence indicated below. MutPEST and ΔPEST display the modifications introduced to the predicted PEST sequence. (B) Western Blot analysis of cell extracts from HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cells transiently transfected with expression plasmids for EGFP-TRIM32WT, EGFP-TRIM32mutPEST, EGFP-TRIM32ΔPEST, EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R (3KR), TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R/ΔPEST (3KR ΔPEST) or EGFP-TRIM32K247Q. The bands representing EGFP-TRIM32 and cleaved EGFP-TRIM32 are indicated to the right. Tubulin represents the loading control. (C) Western Blot analysis of cell extracts from HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cells transiently transfected with expression plasmids for EGFP-TRIM32WT, EGFP-TRIM32WT and mCherry-USP2, EGFP-TRIM32ΔPEST, EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R (3KR), TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R/ΔPEST (3KR ΔPEST) or EGFP-TRIM32K50R/247Q/K401R or EGFP-TRIM32D487N. The bands representing ubiquitylated EGFP-TRIM32, EGFP-TRIM32 and cleaved EGFP-TRIM32 are indicated to the right. Actin represents the loading control.

The cleaved TRIM32 protein contains the RBCC domains, and hence may have the ability to undergo auto-ubiquitylation and thereby gain catalytic activity. To examine this, the auto-ubiquitylation activity of the triple mutant TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R was compared to the auto-ubiquitylation activity of TRIM32WT and TRIM32D487N, which is known to be catalytic inactive. Clearly, no auto-ubiquitylation activity was detected for the cleaved TRIM32 product (Fig 4C, lane 5). Auto-ubiquitylation activity of TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R with a partial deleted PEST sequence, and the acetylation mimicking mutant TRIM32K50R/K247Q/K401R were analyzed in parallel. Both these mutations inhibit cleavage of TRIM32 (Fig 4C, lanes 6,7). Notably, none of these mutant forms of TRIM32 displayed auto-ubiquitylation activity. In contrast, TRIM32WT with a partial deleted PEST sequence (Fig 4C, lane 4) and the TRIM32K247Q construct (Fig 4B, last lane) both display auto-ubiquitylation activity.

Together, these results show that the short isoform of TRIM32 can be generated by proteolytic cleavage directed by a PEST sequence located between the RBCC region and the NHL domains. Acetylation of K247 located adjacent to the PEST sequence, completely protects TRIM32 from PEST mediated cleavage. The short TRIM32 isoform and TRIM32 proteins containing K50, K247 and K401 mutations are catalytic inactive, showing the importance of these lysines for TRIM32 activity.

Discussion

In this study we aimed at gaining insight in how TRIM32 auto-ubiquitylation regulates its activity and stability. TRIM32 is implicated in diverse biological and physiological processes such as muscle physiology, neuronal differentiation, immunity and cancer [5]. TRIM32 is reported to act both as an oncogene and as tumor suppressor, depending on the specific organ and cellular context [5]. TRIM32 overexpression promotes cell proliferation, transforming activity, cell motility and prevents apoptosis [15,19], but it is also shown to promote asymmetric cell division of neuroblastoma cells and to enhance TNFα-induced apoptosis [20,21]. Abnormal expression of TRIM32 has been demonstrated in various human cancer cells [2226], and in the occipital lobe of Alzheimer’s disease patients [27]. Reduced TRIM32 expression in lung epithelial and tracheal cells increases their susceptibility to infection of influenza A virus [28]. Thus, regulating TRIM32 activity is of critical importance for healthy cell physiology.

Our data reveal that TRIM32 contains a conserved PEST sequence located in the unstructured region between the N-terminal RBCC domains and the C-terminal NHL-domains. This is the first time a PEST sequence is identified in a TRIM protein. Inhibition of PTMs of the K50, K247 and K401 residues by substitution of these lysine residues with arginine, resulted in exposure of the PEST to proteolytic enzymes, leading to TRIM32 cleavage. However, mimicking acetylation of K247 by glutamine substitution but keeping the K50R and K401R mutations, completely protected TRIM32 from proteolytic degradation. The acetylation also facilitated distribution of TRIM32 bodies throughout the cytoplasm, and protected it from autophagic degradation. Importantly, K247 is located immediately upstream of the PEST region. Thus, our data indicate that reversible acetylation of K247 regulates PEST mediated cleavage of TRIM32.

Research over the past decades have revealed that lysine acetylation is a common mechanism for regulation of protein stability, and can regulate both proteasome-dependent and lysosome-dependent protein degradation (recently reviewed [29]). Acetylation mediated stabilization of proteins can be due to direct competition between acetylation and ubiquitylation of the same lysine residue, such as described for SMAD7 [30] and TRIM50 [31]. However, acetylation is also reported to promote protein degradation by enhancing ubiquitylation leading to degradation in the proteasome [32,33] or the lysosome [34,35]. However, lysine acetylation regulating PEST mediated cleavage is to our knowledge not previously described, and hence presents a new mechanism for lysine acetylation mediating protein expression. Originally, PEST domains were identified in short living proteins [36], and later they are shown to function as an anchor site of E3 ubiquitin ligases required for ubiquitin dependent protein degradation [37,38]. TRIM32 degradation can be mediated both via proteasomal and lysosomal pathways [7]. Here we applied inhibitors of the proteasome, the lysosome and the calpain proteases (data not shown), but we were not able to pinpoint which pathway is implicated in the PEST mediated cleavage of TRIM32. We may speculate that the K247 acetylation inhibits binding of proteolytic enzymes, since acetylation of proteins is a well known mechanism for inhibiting (or promoting) protein-protein interactions [29].

TRIM32 activity is regulated by tetramerization via its coiled-coil domain [39]. Tetramerization leads to formation of RING domain dimers on each side of the two antiparallel TRIM32 dimers. RING domain dimerization is a common pre-requisite for E3 ligase activity of TRIM proteins [40,41]. TRIM32 tetramerization induces auto-ubiquitylation, which seems to be necessary for its conventional ubiquitin ligase activity and formation of cytoplasmic bodies. The scaffold 14-3-3 protein binds TRIM32 proteins phosphorylated at S651 in its very C-terminal end, and thereby inhibits TRIM32 tetramerization and cytoplasmic body formation [17]. HSP70, on the other hand, is reported to bind TRIM32 and promote formation of cytoplasmic bodies in an ATP-consuming process [42]. Apart from that, very little is known on how TRIM32 tetramerization and catalytic activity is regulated. The TRIM32LGMD2H disease mutants lack ubiquitylation activity and display a diffuse cytoplasmic localization [7,18]. This is in line with the MS analysis of PTMs on the TRIM32LGMD2H mutant in this study, where no lysine residues were found to be ubiquitylated. However, lysine K247 in the mutant protein was found to be acetylated, indicating that TRIM32 acetylation is not dependent on tetramerization. Mutation of the lysine residues K50, K247 and K401 to arginine, lead to cleavage of EGFP-TRIM32 generating an around 55 kDa protein containing the N-terminal RBCC domains. This cleavage product resemble the short TRIM32 isoform, suggesting that isoform 3 of TRIM32 is generated by proteolytic cleavage. This finding is supported by the lack of a transcript that corresponds to isoform 3 (ensembl.org). Mimicking acetylation of lysine K247, but keeping the K50R and K401R mutations, protected TRIM32 from cleavage but did not restore its auto-ubiquitylation activity. This was in line with our MS results showing that the catalytic inactive TRIM32LGMD2H mutant can undergo K247 acetylation. Mimicking acetylation of K50 or K401 did not protect TRIM32 from PEST mediated cleavage and our MS data indicated that these residues are targets for ubiquitylation and not acetylation. Our results indicate that these two lysine residues are important for auto-ubiquitylation activity, and hence the E3 ligase activity of TRIM32.

Our study uncover that TRIM32 isoform 3 may be generated by PEST mediated cleavage of full-length TRIM32 isoform1/2, and that acetylation of lysine K247 localized adjacent to the PEST sequence protects TRIM32 isoform 1/2 from cleavage. We show that the short TRIM32 isoform is catalytic inactive, and hence may function as a dominant negative mutant regulating TRIM32 E3 ligase activity. Moreover, we find that auto-ubiquitylation activity of full-length TRIM32 is dependent on the lysine residues K50 and K401. K50 is located in the RING domain, and hence may directly affect the formation of a functional catalytic unit. K401 is located in the NHL repeats. Various mutations in the NHL repeats cause LGMD2H, and we have previously shown that TRIM32LGMD2H mutants are catalytic inactive [7].

Identification of a functional PEST sequence in a TRIM family protein is a novel finding, and also that acetylation of a lysine residue adjacent to the PEST region regulates the exposure of the PEST. These findings may contribute to the understanding of cellular mechanisms leading to dysregulated TRIM32 expression observed in pathological conditions.

Materials and methods

Antibodies

The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit polyclonal antibody for TRIM32 (Proteintech, 10326-1-AP); rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP (Abcam, ab290); rabbit polyclonal anti-Actin (Sigma, A2066); mouse monoclonal anti-PCNA (DAKO, M0879); rabbit monoclonal anti-GM130 (Abcam, #52649). The following secondary antibodies were used: Horseradish-peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (BD 5 Biosciences, 554021); HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig (BD Biosciences, 554002); HRPconjugated anti-Biotin antibody (Cell Signalling, #7075), and Alexa FluorR 555-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Life Technologies, A-11008).

Cell culture and transfections

HEK293 FlpIn T-Rex (ThermoFisher, R714-07), HEK293 FlpIn T-Rex TRIM32 KO [7], C2C12 (ATCC® CRL-1772) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Sigma, D6046) with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% streptomycin-penicillin (Sigma, P4333). Sub-confluent cells in 6-well disheswere transfected using Metafectene Pro (Biontex, T040) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Plasmids

All plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Plasmids were made by conventional restriction enzyme based cloning or by use of the Gateway recombination system (ThermoFisher). Gateway LR reactions were performed as described in the instruction manual. Point mutations and deletion were carried out using the Site-directed-mutagenesis kit from STRATAGENE, using the primers described in Table 2. The oligonucleotides were ordered from ThermoFisher. All plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing (BigDye, Applied Biosystems, 4337455).

Table 1. Plasmids used in this study.

pDest EGFP-TRIM32 [7]
pDest EGFP-TRIM32D487N [7]
pDest EGFP-TRIM32P130S [7]
pDest EGFP-TRIM32K50R This study
pDest EGFP-TRIM32K247R This study
pDest EGFP-TRIM32K401R This study
pDest EGFP-TRIM32K247R/K401R This study
pDest EGFP TRIM32K50R/K247R This study
pDest EGFP-TRIM32K50Q/K401R This study
pDest EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R This study
pDest EGFP-TRIM32K50Q/K247R/K401R This study
pDest EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247Q/K401R This study
pDest EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401Q This study
pDest EGFP-TRIM32ΔPEST This study
pDest EGFP-TRIM32 K50R/K247R/K401R ΔPEST This study
pDest EGFP-TRIM32mutPEST This study
pDest EGFP-TRIM32K247Q This study
pDest mCherry-USP2 This study
pDest mCherry-EYFP-TRIM32 [7]
pDest mCherry-EYFP-TRIM32K247R/K401R This study
pDest mCherry-EYFP-TRIM32K247Q This study
PDest mCherry-EYFP-TRIM32K50R/K247Q/K401R This study
pDEST mCherry-EYFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R This study
pDest EGFP-C1 [43]
pDest mCherry-EYFP [44]

Table 2. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

TRIM32K50R 5’-TGCCGCCAGTGCCTGGAGCGCCTATTGGCCAGTAGCATC- 3’
TRIM32K247R 5’-TACTTCCTGGCCAAGATCCGCCAGGCAGATGTAGCACTA- 3’
TRIM32K401R 5’-ATACAAGTCTTTACCCGCCGCGGCTTTTTGAAGGAAATC- 3’
TRIM32K50Q 5’-TGCCGCCAGTGCCTGGAGCAGCTATTGGCCAGTAGCATC- 3’
TRIM32K247Q 5’-TACTTCCTGGCCAAGATCCAGCAGGCAGATGTAGCACTA- 3’
TRIM32K401Q 5’-ATACAAGTCTTTACCCGCCAAGGCTTTTTGAAGGAAATC- 3’
TRIM32ΔPEST 5’-AGGCAGATGTAGCACTACTGCTCACTGCCAGCTTGCCTCG- 3’
TRIM32mutPEST 5’- CACTACTGGTGGTGATAGCTGATGTGGTGGTGCCAGAGCT- 3’

Western blotting

Cells were seeded in 6-well dishes and transfected as indicated. One day post transfection the cells were lysed in 1xSDS buffer (50mM Tris pH 7.4; 2% SDS; 10% Glycerol) supplemented with 200mM dithiothreitol (Sigma, #D0632) and heated at 100°C for 10 minutes. The lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Sigma, GE10600003). The membrane was stained with Ponceau S (Sigma, P3504), blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk in 1% TBS-T (0.2M Tris pH 8; 1.5M NaCl and 0.05% Tween20 (Sigma, P9416)) and then incubated with indicated primary antibodies for 24h. The membrane was washed three times for 10 minutes each with PBS-T followed by incubation with secondary antibody for 1h. The membrane was washed three times for 10 minutes and analyzed by enhanced chemiluminescence using the ImageQuant LAS 4000 (GE Lifescience).

Immunostaining

Subconfluent cells were grown on coverslips (VWR, #631–0150) coated with Fibronectin (Sigma, F1141). They were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 20min at R.T., permeabilized with methanol at RT for 5min, blocked in 5% goat serum/PBS or 5% BSA/PBS and incubated at room temperature with a specific primary antibody followed by Alexa Fluor 555 conjugated secondary antibody and DAPI. Confocal images were obtained using a 63x/NA1.4 oil immersion objective on an LSM780 system and the ZEN software (Zeiss). Quantification of cells containing red only dots in the mCherry- EYFP-double tag assay was done manually in three independent experiments, each including at least 30 cells.

Statistics

All experiments were repeated at least three times, unless otherwise specified. Error bars represent the standard deviations. Two-sided unpaired, homoscedastic Student T-Tests were performed to assess significant differences between populations. Replicates were not pooled for statistical analyses.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Inhibition of proteolytic enzymes does not stabilize the TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R mutant or the TRIM32K247R/K401R mutant.

A. Western Blot analysis of HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cells transiently transfected with expression plasmids for EGFP-TRIM32WT, EGFP-TRIM32K50R, EGFP-TRIM32K247R, or TRIM32K401R. The bands representing EGFP-TRIM32 and auto-ubiquitylated EGFP-TRIM32 are indicated to the right. PCNA represents the loading control. B. Western Blot analysis of cell extracts from HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cells transiently transfected with expression plasmids for EGFP-TRIM32WT, EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K401R, EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R or EGFP-TRIM32K247R/K401R. Expression plasmid for mCherry-USP2 is co-transfected where indicated. The bands representing EGFP-TRIM32, auto-ubiquitylated EGFP-TRIM32 and cleaved EGFP-TRIM32 are indicated to the right Ponceau represents the loading control.

(PDF)

S1 Raw images

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Tromsø University Proteomics Platform for help with mass spectrometry analysis and the Advanced Microscopy Core Facility, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, for the use of instrumentation.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Hatakeyama S. TRIM Family Proteins: Roles in Autophagy, Immunity, and Carcinogenesis. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017;42(4):297–311. Epub 2017/01/26. 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.01.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Esposito D, Koliopoulos MG, Rittinger K. Structural determinants of TRIM protein function. Biochem Soc Trans. 2017;45(1):183–91. Epub 2017/02/17. 10.1042/BST20160325 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lazzari E, El-Halawany MS, De March M, Valentino F, Cantatore F, Migliore C, et al. Analysis of the Zn-Binding Domains of TRIM32, the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Mutated in Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy 2H. Cells. 2019;8(3). Epub 2019/03/20. 10.3390/cells8030254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tocchini C, Ciosk R. TRIM-NHL proteins in development and disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015;47–48:52–9. Epub 2015/10/31. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.10.017 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lazzari E, Meroni G. TRIM32 ubiquitin E3 ligase, one enzyme for several pathologies: From muscular dystrophy to tumours. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;79:469–77. Epub 2016/07/28. 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.07.023 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Servian-Morilla E, Cabrera-Serrano M, Rivas-Infante E, Carvajal A, Lamont PJ, Pelayo-Negro AL, et al. Altered myogenesis and premature senescence underlie human TRIM32-related myopathy. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019;7(1):30. Epub 2019/03/03. 10.1186/s40478-019-0683-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Overa KS, Garcia-Garcia J, Bhujabal Z, Jain A, Overvatn A, Larsen KB, et al. TRIM32, but not its muscular dystrophy-associated mutant, positively regulates and is targeted to autophagic degradation by p62/SQSTM1. J Cell Sci. 2019;132(23). Epub 2019/11/07. 10.1242/jcs.236596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Duan G, Walther D. The roles of post-translational modifications in the context of protein interaction networks. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11(2):e1004049. Epub 2015/02/19. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Drazic A, Myklebust LM, Ree R, Arnesen T. The world of protein acetylation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1864(10):1372–401. Epub 2016/06/15. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.06.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Swatek KN, Komander D. Ubiquitin modifications. Cell Res. 2016;26(4):399–422. Epub 2016/03/26. 10.1038/cr.2016.39 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rechsteiner M, Rogers SW. PEST sequences and regulation by proteolysis. Trends Biochem Sci. 1996;21(7):267–71. Epub 1996/07/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Qile M, Ji Y, Houtman MJC, Veldhuis M, Romunde F, Kok B, et al. Identification of a PEST Sequence in Vertebrate KIR2.1 That Modifies Rectification. Front Physiol. 2019;10:863. Epub 2019/07/25. 10.3389/fphys.2019.00863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Belizario JE, Alves J, Garay-Malpartida M, Occhiucci JM. Coupling caspase cleavage and proteasomal degradation of proteins carrying PEST motif. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2008;9(3):210–20. Epub 2008/06/10. 10.2174/138920308784534023 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kudryashova E, Kudryashov D, Kramerova I, Spencer MJ. Trim32 is a ubiquitin ligase mutated in limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2H that binds to skeletal muscle myosin and ubiquitinates actin. J Mol Biol. 2005;354(2):413–24. Epub 2005/10/26. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.09.068 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Albor A, El-Hizawi S, Horn EJ, Laederich M, Frosk P, Wrogemann K, et al. The interaction of Piasy with Trim32, an E3-ubiquitin ligase mutated in limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2H, promotes Piasy degradation and regulates UVB-induced keratinocyte apoptosis through NFkappaB. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(35):25850–66. Epub 2006/07/04. 10.1074/jbc.M601655200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kudryashova E, Struyk A, Mokhonova E, Cannon SC, Spencer MJ. The common missense mutation D489N in TRIM32 causing limb girdle muscular dystrophy 2H leads to loss of the mutated protein in knock-in mice resulting in a Trim32-null phenotype. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(20):3925–32. Epub 2011/07/22. 10.1093/hmg/ddr311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ichimura T, Taoka M, Shoji I, Kato H, Sato T, Hatakeyama S, et al. 14-3-3 proteins sequester a pool of soluble TRIM32 ubiquitin ligase to repress autoubiquitylation and cytoplasmic body formation. J Cell Sci. 2013;126(Pt 9):2014–26. Epub 2013/02/28. 10.1242/jcs.122069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Locke M, Tinsley CL, Benson MA, Blake DJ. TRIM32 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase for dysbindin. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(13):2344–58. Epub 2009/04/08. 10.1093/hmg/ddp167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kano S, Miyajima N, Fukuda S, Hatakeyama S. Tripartite motif protein 32 facilitates cell growth and migration via degradation of Abl-interactor 2. Cancer Res. 2008;68(14):5572–80. Epub 2008/07/18. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6231 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ryu YS, Lee Y, Lee KW, Hwang CY, Maeng JS, Kim JH, et al. TRIM32 protein sensitizes cells to tumor necrosis factor (TNFalpha)-induced apoptosis via its RING domain-dependent E3 ligase activity against X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP). J Biol Chem. 2011;286(29):25729–38. Epub 2011/06/02. 10.1074/jbc.M111.241893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Izumi H, Kaneko Y. Trim32 facilitates degradation of MYCN on spindle poles and induces asymmetric cell division in human neuroblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 2014;74(19):5620–30. Epub 2014/08/08. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0169 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhao TT, Jin F, Li JG, Xu YY, Dong HT, Liu Q, et al. TRIM32 promotes proliferation and confers chemoresistance to breast cancer cells through activation of the NF-kappaB pathway. J Cancer. 2018;9(8):1349–56. Epub 2018/05/04. 10.7150/jca.22390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ito M, Migita K, Matsumoto S, Wakatsuki K, Tanaka T, Kunishige T, et al. Overexpression of E3 ubiquitin ligase tripartite motif 32 correlates with a poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2017;13(5):3131–8. Epub 2017/05/20. 10.3892/ol.2017.5806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cui X, Lin Z, Chen Y, Mao X, Ni W, Liu J, et al. Upregulated TRIM32 correlates with enhanced cell proliferation and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cell Biochem. 2016;421(1–2):127–37. Epub 2016/08/31. 10.1007/s11010-016-2793-z . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yin H, Li Z, Chen J, Hu X. Expression and the potential functions of TRIM32 in lung cancer tumorigenesis. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(4):5232–43. Epub 2018/11/01. 10.1002/jcb.27798 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang M, Luo W, Zhang Y, Yang R, Li X, Guo Y, et al. Trim32 suppresses cerebellar development and tumorigenesis by degrading Gli1/sonic hedgehog signaling. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27(4):1286–99. Epub 2019/09/19. 10.1038/s41418-019-0415-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yokota T, Mishra M, Akatsu H, Tani Y, Miyauchi T, Yamamoto T, et al. Brain site-specific gene expression analysis in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Eur J Clin Invest. 2006;36(11):820–30. Epub 2006/10/13. 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2006.01722.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fu B, Wang L, Ding H, Schwamborn JC, Li S, Dorf ME. TRIM32 Senses and Restricts Influenza A Virus by Ubiquitination of PB1 Polymerase. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(6):e1004960. Epub 2015/06/10. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Narita T, Weinert BT, Choudhary C. Functions and mechanisms of non-histone protein acetylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(3):156–74. Epub 2018/11/24. 10.1038/s41580-018-0081-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gronroos E, Hellman U, Heldin CH, Ericsson J. Control of Smad7 stability by competition between acetylation and ubiquitination. Mol Cell. 2002;10(3):483–93. Epub 2002/11/01. 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00639-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fusco C, Micale L, Augello B, Mandriani B, Pellico MT, De Nittis P, et al. HDAC6 mediates the acetylation of TRIM50. Cell Signal. 2014;26(2):363–9. Epub 2013/12/07. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.11.036 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jiang W, Wang S, Xiao M, Lin Y, Zhou L, Lei Q, et al. Acetylation regulates gluconeogenesis by promoting PEPCK1 degradation via recruiting the UBR5 ubiquitin ligase. Mol Cell. 2011;43(1):33–44. Epub 2011/07/06. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.04.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Du Z, Song J, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Guda K, Yang S, et al. DNMT1 stability is regulated by proteins coordinating deubiquitination and acetylation-driven ubiquitination. Sci Signal. 2010;3(146):ra80. Epub 2010/11/04. 10.1126/scisignal.2001462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lv L, Li D, Zhao D, Lin R, Chu Y, Zhang H, et al. Acetylation targets the M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase for degradation through chaperone-mediated autophagy and promotes tumor growth. Mol Cell. 2011;42(6):719–30. Epub 2011/06/28. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.04.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhao D, Zou SW, Liu Y, Zhou X, Mo Y, Wang P, et al. Lysine-5 acetylation negatively regulates lactate dehydrogenase A and is decreased in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell. 2013;23(4):464–76. Epub 2013/03/26. 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.02.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rogers S, Wells R, Rechsteiner M. Amino acid sequences common to rapidly degraded proteins: the PEST hypothesis. Science. 1986;234(4774):364–8. Epub 1986/10/17. 10.1126/science.2876518 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xing H, Hong Y, Sarge KD. PEST sequences mediate heat shock factor 2 turnover by interacting with the Cul3 subunit of the Cul3-RING ubiquitin ligase. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2010;15(3):301–8. Epub 2009/09/22. 10.1007/s12192-009-0144-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Meyer RD, Srinivasan S, Singh AJ, Mahoney JE, Gharahassanlou KR, Rahimi N. PEST motif serine and tyrosine phosphorylation controls vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 stability and downregulation. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31(10):2010–25. Epub 2011/03/16. 10.1128/MCB.01006-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Koliopoulos MG, Esposito D, Christodoulou E, Taylor IA, Rittinger K. Functional role of TRIM E3 ligase oligomerization and regulation of catalytic activity. EMBO J. 2016;35(11):1204–18. Epub 2016/05/08. 10.15252/embj.201593741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Plechanovova A, Jaffray EG, Tatham MH, Naismith JH, Hay RT. Structure of a RING E3 ligase and ubiquitin-loaded E2 primed for catalysis. Nature. 2012;489(7414):115–20. Epub 2012/07/31. 10.1038/nature11376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Streich FC Jr., Ronchi VP, Connick JP, Haas AL. Tripartite motif ligases catalyze polyubiquitin chain formation through a cooperative allosteric mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(12):8209–21. Epub 2013/02/15. 10.1074/jbc.M113.451567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kawaguchi Y, Taoka M, Takekiyo T, Uekita T, Shoji I, Hachiya N, et al. TRIM32-Cytoplasmic-Body Formation Is an ATP-Consuming Process Stimulated by HSP70 in Cells. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169436. Epub 2017/01/05. 10.1371/journal.pone.0169436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lamark T, Perander M, Outzen H, Kristiansen K, Overvatn A, Michaelsen E, et al. Interaction codes within the family of mammalian Phox and Bem1p domain-containing proteins. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(36):34568–81. Epub 2003/06/19. 10.1074/jbc.M303221200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bhujabal Z, Birgisdottir AB, Sjottem E, Brenne HB, Overvatn A, Habisov S, et al. FKBP8 recruits LC3A to mediate Parkin-independent mitophagy. EMBO Rep. 2017;18(6):947–61. Epub 2017/04/07. 10.15252/embr.201643147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Michael Massiah

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

12 Feb 2021

PONE-D-21-00733

Generation of the short TRIM32 isoform is regulated by Lys 247 acetylation and a PEST sequence

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Sjøttem,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. This manuscript was reviewed by an external reviewer and myself (AE of PLOS One).  Our reviews are similar though that of mine is bit more optimistic. However we both address very similar concerns that should be addressed. One of our main concerns is that there are very strong conclusions that are not clearly supported by experiments or the figures. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 28 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Michael Massiah

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

Additional Editor Comments:

Review from AE

I have reviewed your manuscript. It worthy of publication however, there are a few comments that I have that should be straightforward to address.

  1. Can Fig 1A be bigger because as shown, the separation of the mono-Ub TRIM32 and TRIM32 seems too small to be the molecular weight of Ub?

  2. Am I to assume that TRIM32 is only capable of mono-ubiquitination?

  3. I am a bit confused that fig1 does not clearly show TRIM32 20K isoform or its 20K cleavage product. It appears that the band is at 40K. Also, it appears that TRIM32 (being 70k) is migrating at over 100K, can these be clarified?

  4. The statement (ln185) stating that acetylation of K247 is implicated in TRIM32 cleavage seems a bit strong because the structural implication of the K247 mutation is not clear.

  5. Lines 190-194 suggest that some of these mutant TRIM32 constructs form clump near the golgi? ER/Golgi produced proteins are usually destined for membrane association or extracellular. Is TRIM32 such a protein? Also the fact that these proteins form clumps suggests that the mutations may cause protein unfolding. Is there any validation that this is indeed the case or not?

  6. The conclusions of the PEST studies are based on fig 4b. The figure is too faint to make such conclusion, at least convincingly to this reader. In addition, the PEST sequence identified does not seem to have the signature P-S-T residues. Deletion of residues of this region could have structural implications. Can you clarify this some more.

Last, the manuscript would benefit from a careful read as there are a few minor grammar/typo issues

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript entitled "Generation of the short TRIM32 isoform is regulated by Lys 247 acetylation and a

PEST sequence" submitted by Sjottem et. all had concluded the following:

Authors suggest that three lysine residues regulates PEST mediating cleavage

and auto-ubiquitylation activity of TRIM32, Further authors also suggest that lysine K247 completely inhibits TRM32 cleavage. Lysines K50 and K401 regulate autoubiquitylation activity.

There are several lack of experimental proof before this manuscript can be considered for the publication.

There is no data showing the lack of autoubiquitination of TRIM32. Further the modification of Lysine (K) 247 is essential for cleavage. Authors have not shown any data if this mutation also effect its ubiquitination. Similairly no biochemical evidence had been provided for the Lysines K50 and K401 regulated autoubiquitylation activity.

Authors have not shown the rescue of the cleavage either inhibiting ubiquitin proteasome system or autophagy.

Does PEST sequence only important for the the cleavage or its modification effect its cleavage or functional autophagy.

Authors need to work further before it can be further considered for publication.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 May 17;16(5):e0251279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251279.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


17 Feb 2021

Dear Reviewers,

Please find enclosed the revised manuscript by Garcia-Garcia et al. entitled “Generation of the short TRIM32 isoform is regulated by Lys 247 acetylation and a PEST sequence”. We are grateful for the opportunity to submit a revised version of the manuscript, and thank the editor and the reviews for their useful comments to improve the paper. We have revised the manuscript according to reviews suggestions and criticisms as listed below.

The following is changed in the revised manuscript (MS):

1. The Figures are scaled to fit within maximum sizes according to the author guidelines

2. All changes in the text according to the reviews comments are marked by red letters.

3. We provide Supporting Information showing the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all Western blots results reported in Figures and Supplemental figures.

Below is our response to the comments made by the editor and the reviewers:

Review from AE

I have reviewed your manuscript. It worthy of publication however, there are a few comments that I have that should be straightforward to address.

1. Can Fig 1A be bigger because as shown, the separation of the mono-Ub TRIM32 and TRIM32 seems too small to be the molecular weight of Ub?

Answer: Fig. 1A is made bigger in the revised version. Moreover, we have clarified in the text that it is shown previously by us (Overå et al., 2019) and others (Locke et al., 2009) that the slower migrating band (migrates as an around 10 kDa larger protein) is due to auto-ubiquitylation (new text marked with red, page 4/5). It is also shown previously that TRIM32D487N is unable to undergo auto-ubiquitylation. In. Fig1A we clearly see that this mutant form of TRIM32 does not display a slower-migration band. We also show in Supplemental Fig. 1B, and and in the last lanes of Fig. 1D and 1E, that this slower migrating band disapperars when over-expression of the de-ubiquitinase USP2. This indicated that the slower-migrating band is due to mono-ubiquitylation. This is mentioned in the results section first part of page 6).

2. Am I to assume that TRIM32 is only capable of mono-ubiquitination?

Answer: TRIM32, as many other RING E3 ligases, is able both to mono and polyubiquitylate other proteins. This has been published for TRIM32 (see f.ex. Locke et al., 2009). However, the self – or – auto-ubiquitylation seems to be mainly mono-ubiquitylation. This mono-ubiquitylation activity comes from oligomerization of TRIM E3 ligases, which is e pre-requisite for their catalaytic activity (Koliopoulos et al., 2016). When TRIM32 is highly expressed, more slower migrating bands above the mon-Ub band can be detected, but they are much weaker than the mono-Ub band (see ex. Overå et al., 2019).

3. I am a bit confused that fig1 does not clearly show TRIM32 20K isoform or its 20K cleavage product. It appears that the band is at 40K. Also, it appears that TRIM32 (being 70k) is migrating at over 100K, can these be clarified?

Answer: We are sorry that we have not made this more clearly. In all experiments we have used HEK293 FlpIn cells which are knocked out for TRIM32 (see establishment of the cell line in Overå et al., 2019). TRIM32 WT and mutants have been introduced to this cell line as EGFP-fusion proteins. Hence, you have to add the size of EGFP (32.7 kDa) to the size of TRIM32 or the size of the cleavage product, to find the correct bands on the gel. Thus full length TRIM32 will run at around 100 kDa, while the cleaved product will be between 50 and 60 kDa. We have indicated above the WB gels that it is EGFP-TRIM32, and in the revised Figures we have marked to the right of each blot where the full length EGFP-TRIM32 and the cleaved EGFP-TRIM32 product are seen. We have also explained this better in the result section of the revised manuscript.

4. The statement (ln185) stating that acetylation of K247 is implicated in TRIM32 cleavage seems a bit strong because the structural implication of the K247 mutation is not clear.

Answer: We do show in Supplemental Figure 1A, that mutation of K247 to arginine (K247R) does not affect the migration or the auto-ubiquitylation of TRIM32, suggesting that the structure of the protein is not rigoursly affected. However, mimicking acetylation of K247 by the K to Q mutation may locally change the structure of the protein. This local change would be similar to the change that an acetylation of K247 leads to – and in our MS data we identified that this residue is able to be acetylated. Hence, we state that acetylation of this residue protects TRIM32 from cleavage. The protection can be mediated through structural changes that inhibits exposure of the adjacent PEST sequence, or through a local change in the electrostatical interaction with other proteins.

Lines 190-194 suggest that some of these mutant TRIM32 constructs form clump near the golgi? ER/Golgi produced proteins are usually destined for membrane association or extracellular. Is TRIM32 such a protein? Also the fact that these proteins form clumps suggests that the mutations may cause protein unfolding. Is there any validation that this is indeed the case or not?

Answer: TRIM32 is mainly not a membrane associated protein. It is diffuse in the cytoplasm, in addition to forming cytoplasmic bodies. This has been published by us and others previously (Locke et al., 2009; Overå et al., 2019). In Figure 2 we show that introduction of three lysine mutations, K50R, K247R and K401R, leads to mis-distribution of TRIM32 in the cytoplasm. This can be due to a more unstable folding of the short TRIM32 isoform, leading to more aggregation. We also show that mimicking acetylation on K247 rescue the distribution pattern of TRIM32.

5. The conclusions of the PEST studies are based on fig 4b. The figure is too faint to make such conclusion, at least convincingly to this reader. In addition, the PEST sequence identified does not seem to have the signature P-S-T residues. Deletion of residues of this region could have structural implications. Can you clarify this some more.

Answer: We have substituted the Western blot in Fig. 4B with a new blot showing stronger bands. Also Fig. 4C shows the cleavage of TRIM32 when the three lysine residus K50, K247 and K401 are mutated to arginine (lane 5), but when parts of the PEST sequence is deleted in this mutated TRIM32 protein, TRIM32 is not cleaved anymore and migrates as the wild-type protein. Lanes 4 of Fig. 4 B and C show that deletion of the PEST does not inhibit TRIM32 auto-ubiquitylation, suggesting that the structure of the protein is functional. The PEST sequence was predicted by the bioinformatics tool EMBOSS:epestfind. The link is included in the revised manuscript. A PEST sequence is rich in proline (P), glutamic acid (E), serine (S), and threonine (T) (Rogers et al., 1986) – and the TRIM32(248-270) region is rich in these amino-acids.

Last, the manuscript would benefit from a careful read as there are a few minor grammar/typo issues.

Answer: We have read carefully through the manuscript and corrected typo issues.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: The manuscript entitled "Generation of the short TRIM32 isoform is regulated by Lys 247 acetylation and a

PEST sequence" submitted by Sjottem et. all had concluded the following:

Authors suggest that three lysine residues regulates PEST mediating cleavage

and auto-ubiquitylation activity of TRIM32, Further authors also suggest that lysine K247 completely inhibits TRM32 cleavage. Lysines K50 and K401 regulate autoubiquitylation activity.

There are several lack of experimental proof before this manuscript can be considered for the publication.

There is no data showing the lack of autoubiquitination of TRIM32.

Answer: In Fig. 1A, last lane, we show the lack of auto-ubiquitylation of TRIM32 associated with the LGMD2H disease mutation. We also show in Fig. 1D and Fig. 1E, that over-expression of the de-ubiquitinase USP2 inhibits TRIM32 auto-ubiquitylation.

Further the modification of Lysine (K) 247 is essential for cleavage. Authors have not shown any data if this mutation also effect its ubiquitination.

Answer: In Supplemental Fig. 1A, we show that the K247R mutation do not affect auto-ubiquitylation of TRIM32. Also, in Fig. 4B, last lane, we see auto-ubiquitylation of the K247Q mutated TRIM32. Hence, mutation of K247 does not seem to inhibit auto-ubiquitylation. In the revised manuscript, we have pinpointed to specific lanes on the blots that show auto-ubiquitylation and cleavage.

Similairly no biochemical evidence had been provided for the Lysines K50 and K401 regulated autoubiquitylation activity.

Answer: In Fig. 4C, lane 7, we show that auto-ubiquitylation of TRIM32 is inhibited when the K49R and K40R mutations are introduced into the TRIM32 K247Q construct. In contrast, introduction of K247Q mutation into TRIM32 does not inhibit auto-ubiquitylation (last lane Fig. 4B). This suggests that K49 and K401 are important for auto-ubiquitylation activity.

To clarify this more for the reader, the result section page 10 is partial rewritten in the revised manuscript.

Authors have not shown the rescue of the cleavage either inhibiting ubiquitin proteasome system or autophagy.

Answer: As stated in the discussion (lines 316 – 318), we were not able to inhibit cleavage by adding the proteasome inhibitor MG132, or by adding the lysosomal inhibitor Bafilomycin A1, to the cells. Adding both inhibitors to the cells were very toxic for the cells, hence we did not get any conclusive results. In the autophagy assay (Figure 3) we show that mutation of the three lysine K49, K247 and K401 inhibits autophagic degradation.

Does PEST sequence only important for the the cleavage or its modification effect its cleavage or functional autophagy.

Answer: The focus of this work was to show that the PEST sequence is important for cleavage. Fig. 4 shows that TRIM32 with mutated or partial deleted PEST sequence contains auto-ubiquitylation activity. This suggest that the PEST is not important for the E3 ligase activity of TRIM32.

Decision Letter 1

Michael Massiah

23 Apr 2021

Generation of the short TRIM32 isoform is regulated by Lys 247 acetylation and a PEST sequence

PONE-D-21-00733R1

Dear Dr. Sjøttem,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Michael Massiah

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Michael Massiah

7 May 2021

PONE-D-21-00733R1

Generation of the short TRIM32 isoform is regulated by Lys 247 acetylation and a PEST sequence

Dear Dr. Sjøttem:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Michael Massiah

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Inhibition of proteolytic enzymes does not stabilize the TRIM32K50R/K247R/K401R mutant or the TRIM32K247R/K401R mutant.

    A. Western Blot analysis of HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cells transiently transfected with expression plasmids for EGFP-TRIM32WT, EGFP-TRIM32K50R, EGFP-TRIM32K247R, or TRIM32K401R. The bands representing EGFP-TRIM32 and auto-ubiquitylated EGFP-TRIM32 are indicated to the right. PCNA represents the loading control. B. Western Blot analysis of cell extracts from HEK293 FlpIn TRIM32 KO cells transiently transfected with expression plasmids for EGFP-TRIM32WT, EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K401R, EGFP-TRIM32K50R/K247R or EGFP-TRIM32K247R/K401R. Expression plasmid for mCherry-USP2 is co-transfected where indicated. The bands representing EGFP-TRIM32, auto-ubiquitylated EGFP-TRIM32 and cleaved EGFP-TRIM32 are indicated to the right Ponceau represents the loading control.

    (PDF)

    S1 Raw images

    (PDF)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES